Latest / Connor with Honor: AI, Real Estate and Real Life / Don't Replace People With AI. Here Is a Better Way.
Transcript
- 0:00SPEAKER_00: I uh I just have a comment why and trying to figure out why this is so difficult.
- 0:05SPEAKER_00: So difficult where they they have AI, artificial intelligence, they're talking about job loss and all these other things that's going to happen.
- 0:12SPEAKER_00: Maybe we've seen a little bit of a precursor, but what's the difficulty?
- 0:16SPEAKER_00: Understanding that if AI can replace one human job, what's the problem with keeping the human job?
- 0:22SPEAKER_00: Because AI is going to be able to work at least two times as much, 24 hours a day, three, eight-hour shifts.
- 0:29SPEAKER_00: You have AI that doesn't stop, doesn't shut down, doesn't go to lunch, doesn't take a sick day, doesn't do this.
- 0:35SPEAKER_00: Leave the human and slap the AI into that whole workflow, and then you still get, you know, at least two times the increase, and there's no problem.
- 0:45SPEAKER_00: And then the human doesn't get displaced.
- 0:47SPEAKER_00: So maybe there should be rules against getting rid of humans.
- 0:50SPEAKER_00: And I know if if you do this, they're going to find a loophole.
- 0:53SPEAKER_00: They're going to say, well, you know, this one really didn't get rid of the human because of AI, and that's going to be bullshit.
- 0:58SPEAKER_00: So we need to try to cinch this up.
- 1:00SPEAKER_00: But I mean, isn't that enough?
- 1:02SPEAKER_00: A two times return, a 200% increase?
- 1:06SPEAKER_00: And probably more if, in fact, the human being becomes worse than what AI can do.
- 1:12SPEAKER_00: Maybe AI gets even better at that human's job, and then you still leave the human, though, because maybe the human actually has to talk to a person.
- 1:18SPEAKER_00: Maybe to close that deal, the person on the other end doesn't want to talk to that human's avatar.
- 1:23SPEAKER_00: It's totally operated by AI.
- 1:25SPEAKER_00: Maybe they want to really talk to the human.
- 1:27SPEAKER_00: Because the human can kind of go maybe on a tangent that the other person will recognize as being purely human.
- 1:33SPEAKER_00: I'm sure AI will be able to do that as well.
- 1:36SPEAKER_00: But at least that way we don't have to worry about any job loss.
- 1:39SPEAKER_00: Just make that a rule.
- 1:41SPEAKER_00: Nobody's going to lose their job to AI.
- 1:43SPEAKER_00: That shouldn't be the way because you still have the business performance.
- 1:46SPEAKER_00: You still have the extra effects of having AI that's able to do all sorts of things beyond and above each human being, but don't get rid of them.
- 1:55SPEAKER_00: You keep them there.
- 1:57SPEAKER_00: You might even be able to bring on a couple more human beings because now you have triple the workflow.
- 2:02SPEAKER_00: And maybe that you can actually take people that were unemployed.
- 2:06SPEAKER_00: Now they have employment, they have health insurance, they have everything, and you're still able to level up and make more money.
- 2:11SPEAKER_00: I don't know.
- 2:12SPEAKER_00: It seems simple, but I think that uh the religions that want to take over the world should be simple as well to kind of deal with it and say, we're not going to have any of that because they exist.
- 2:22SPEAKER_00: And there's all sorts of other things that really seem simple.
- 2:24SPEAKER_00: But this one is right at the beginning.
- 2:26SPEAKER_00: Those religions have been around a long time.
- 2:28SPEAKER_00: Maybe we don't, you know, we can get rid of that or worry about that some other point.
- 2:32SPEAKER_00: But this is job loss.
- 2:33SPEAKER_00: This is now, this is people out of work, no health care, kids, foreclosures, whole nine yards.
- 2:38SPEAKER_00: I think they don't have to get rid of anybody.
- 2:40SPEAKER_00: Just think about it.
- 2:41SPEAKER_00: Anyway, all right, we'll see you in the next one.
- 2:43SPEAKER_00: Let me know.
- 2:43SPEAKER_00: Am I off?
- 2:44SPEAKER_00: Should we just get rid of the whole workforce and start over with AI?
- 2:48SPEAKER_00: Or is do they have to?