Latest / Selling Your Canadian Business / The Negotiating Secret Canadian Sellers Miss

Transcript

The Negotiating Secret Canadian Sellers Miss · Selling Your Canadian Business

• 0:30
  SPEAKER_01: You know, when you think about selling something incredibly valuable, like uh a business you've spent your entire life building, you really expect the whole process to be, I mean, purely about the numbers, right?
• 0:42
  SPEAKER_00: Oh, absolutely.
• 0:43
  SPEAKER_00: We all want it to be this clean mathematical equation.
• 0:46
  SPEAKER_00: You just assume capital markets are perfectly rational.
• 0:49
  SPEAKER_01: Yeah, exactly.
• 0:50
  SPEAKER_01: You sit down, you show the buyer your revenue, uh, you walk them through your profit margins, and then they just point to some spreadsheet to tell you the exact valuation.
• 0:58
  SPEAKER_01: And I want to say thank you so much to you, our listener, for taking the time to join us today for this deep dive.
• 1:04
  SPEAKER_00: Aaron Powell Yes, thank you for being here.
• 1:06
  SPEAKER_00: It's um it's such an important topic because that spreadsheet calculator you mentioned, in the reality of business acquisitions, it's completely broken.
• 1:15
  SPEAKER_01: Aaron Powell Totally broken.
• 1:16
  SPEAKER_01: Because uh we are actually looking at a negotiating dynamic that is, well, it's deeply structural and almost entirely psychological.
• 1:23
  SPEAKER_01: And most owners just walk right into that room completely unaware that the structural math has already been manipulated against them.
• 1:30
  SPEAKER_00: Aaron Powell They really do.
• 1:31
  SPEAKER_00: Yeah.
• 1:31
  SPEAKER_00: And they don't even realize it.
• 1:32
  SPEAKER_01: Right.
• 1:33
  SPEAKER_01: So our mission today in this deep dive is to uncover the single most important secret to negotiating the sale of a business.
• 1:40
  SPEAKER_01: We're digging into this really insightful article.
• 1:42
  SPEAKER_01: It's part of a series on Canadian sales by the Shaughnessy Group, and it basically all boils down to this one kind of strange sounding acronym, B A-TNA.
• 1:53
  SPEAKER_01: B-A-T-N-A.
• 1:54
  SPEAKER_00: It does sound like uh some piece of obscure legal jargon, doesn't it?
• 1:59
  SPEAKER_01: Yeah.
• 1:59
  SPEAKER_00: But it is literally the absolute foundation of negotiating leverage.
• 2:03
  SPEAKER_01: Aaron Powell It really is.
• 2:03
  SPEAKER_01: I mean, we usually assume leverage comes from having this flawless business or you know, hiring the most expensive, aggressive lawyers and terrorists.
• 2:10
  SPEAKER_01: Right.
• 2:10
  SPEAKER_00: Bulldogs.
• 2:11
  SPEAKER_01: Yeah, the bulldogs.
• 2:12
  SPEAKER_01: But stripped down to just plain everyday language, your B A T N A, which stands for best alternative to a negotiated agreement, it is simply your backup plan.
• 2:21
  SPEAKER_00: Aaron Powell That's it, just your backup plan.
• 2:23
  SPEAKER_01: Yeah, it's just a measure of how good your options are if the specific deal falls apart completely.
• 2:27
  SPEAKER_00: Aaron Powell And in this deep dive, we're gonna unpack why most business owners uh accidentally surrender this leverage before they even sit down at the negotiating table.
• 2:37
  SPEAKER_00: I mean, they just hand over their greatest structural advantage without even realizing the game has started.
• 2:42
  SPEAKER_01: Aaron Powell Okay, let's unpack this because starting with where this concept originates really explains why a simple backup plan dictates all the power dynamics in a room full of millionaires.
• 2:52
  SPEAKER_00: Yeah.
• 2:52
  SPEAKER_00: So the term was actually introduced to the world back in 1981.
• 2:55
  SPEAKER_00: It was Roger Fisher and William Urie in their landmark book, um, getting to Oh, right, from Harvard.
• 3:02
  SPEAKER_00: Exactly.
• 3:02
  SPEAKER_00: Out of Harvard's program on negotiation.
• 3:05
  SPEAKER_00: And they basically codified something fundamental about human behavior and economics.
• 3:10
  SPEAKER_00: Yeah.
• 3:10
  SPEAKER_00: Stated simply: the party with the weakest BATNA, meaning the worst backup plan, is, structurally speaking, the most desperate person in the room.
• 3:19
  SPEAKER_01: Aaron Powell Wow.
• 3:20
  SPEAKER_01: So desperation actually has a direct, tangible financial cost.
• 3:24
  SPEAKER_00: Aaron Powell A massive one.
• 3:25
  SPEAKER_00: I mean, for a business owner, their BATNA might be uh continuing to run the company for another five years, or maybe it's selling to a different buyer or doing an internal management buyout.
• 3:34
  SPEAKER_00: Right.
• 3:35
  SPEAKER_00: But the critical issue is the gap between what an owner assumes their backup plan is and what it actually is when it's tested in reality.
• 3:44
  SPEAKER_00: Trevor Burrus, Jr.
• 3:44
  SPEAKER_01: Yeah.
• 3:45
  SPEAKER_01: And that makes me think of like a really everyday analogy.
• 3:48
  SPEAKER_01: It is a lot like selling a used car.
• 3:51
  SPEAKER_00: Aaron Powell Oh, that's a good way to look at it.
• 3:52
  SPEAKER_01: Right.
• 3:53
  SPEAKER_01: Because like if you have a car parked in your driveway and you know you have three other people scheduled to come look at it this afternoon, you really do not care if the first buyer lowballs you.
• 4:02
  SPEAKER_00: Aaron Powell Not at all.
• 4:03
  SPEAKER_00: You just say no.
• 4:04
  SPEAKER_01: Exactly.
• 4:04
  SPEAKER_01: You just hand them back the keys and tell them to have a nice day.
• 4:07
  SPEAKER_01: But if that same car has been sitting on your front lawn for six months, you know, the battery is dying, the grass is growing around the tires, and one single buyer finally shows up.
• 4:17
  SPEAKER_00: You're sweating at that point.
• 4:18
  SPEAKER_01: You are highly motivated to make that deal work, even if the terms are just terrible.
• 4:22
  SPEAKER_00: What's fascinating here is that a strong BATNA doesn't just act as a safety net for when things go wrong, it actively alters the buyer's behavior during the negotiation itself.
• 4:35
  SPEAKER_00: It completely changes the reality of the room.
• 4:37
  SPEAKER_01: Wait, let's explore the mechanics of that.
• 4:39
  SPEAKER_01: Because if a beckon A is just, you know, a backup plan that lives in my head, why does it change the current conversation with the person sitting across from me?
• 4:48
  SPEAKER_00: Because professional buyers can sense it.
• 4:50
  SPEAKER_00: And honestly, they test for it constantly.
• 4:53
  SPEAKER_01: Like they're probing for weakness.
• 4:55
  SPEAKER_00: Exactly.
• 4:56
  SPEAKER_00: When you have a credible walkaway option, buyers adjust their risk models.
• 5:01
  SPEAKER_00: The research actually indicates they systematically improve their financial offers, they tighten up their due diligence timelines.
• 5:08
  SPEAKER_01: And stop dragging their feet?
• 5:09
  SPEAKER_00: Yes.
• 5:10
  SPEAKER_00: And they become far more flexible on the legal structure of the deal.
• 5:14
  SPEAKER_00: But conversely, when a buyer correctly perceives that you have no real alternative like that sad car sitting on the lawn, the leverage equation inverts entirely.
• 5:24
  SPEAKER_01: Man, that is intense.
• 5:25
  SPEAKER_01: And that brings us to the specific playground where this dynamic is happening right now.
• 5:29
  SPEAKER_01: The sources we are analyzing focus heavily on the Canadian lower middle market.
• 5:33
  SPEAKER_01: For you listening, we're talking about businesses that generate anywhere between$5 million and$50 million in annual revenue.
• 5:41
  SPEAKER_01: So, you know, this is not a massive corporate buyout where some tech giant absorbs a startup and everyone is just throwing unlimited money around.
• 5:49
  SPEAKER_00: No, not at all.
• 5:50
  SPEAKER_00: This is a very distinct, highly specialized ecosystem.
• 5:54
  SPEAKER_00: And in this market segment, the buyer pool is finite.
• 5:58
  SPEAKER_01: How finite?
• 5:59
  SPEAKER_00: Well, the realistic universe of qualified buyers, the ones who actually have the capital and the strategic interest to acquire a specific business, it might only be 15 to 40 parties, depending on the sector and geography.
• 6:11
  SPEAKER_01: Wait, 15 to 40 potential buyers globally?
• 6:13
  SPEAKER_00: Usually, yes.
• 6:14
  SPEAKER_00: It is not this deep, liquid market with hundreds of active bidders.
• 6:18
  SPEAKER_00: It's a small pool.
• 6:19
  SPEAKER_01: That is wild.
• 6:20
  SPEAKER_00: And this finite pool is currently colliding with a massive demographic shift.
• 6:23
  SPEAKER_00: The sources highlight what is referred to as the boomer wave.
• 6:26
  SPEAKER_01: Ah, right, the retirement wave.
• 6:28
  SPEAKER_00: Yeah.
• 6:28
  SPEAKER_00: An estimated 75% of Canadian small and medium-sized businesses are expected to change hands over the next 10 years as the baby boomer generation retires.
• 6:36
  SPEAKER_00: Aaron Powell Okay.
• 6:37
  SPEAKER_01: I have to pause and look at the logic there.
• 6:39
  SPEAKER_01: Because if 75% of businesses are hitting the market in the next decade, that is a massive wave of supply coming, right?
• 6:48
  SPEAKER_01: Right.
• 6:48
  SPEAKER_01: So wouldn't patient, well-capitalized buyers suddenly have their pick of the litter?
• 6:52
  SPEAKER_01: Like wouldn't they be clamoring for the good ones?
• 6:54
  SPEAKER_01: Why does that create a buyer's market that inherently weakens the seller's position from the start?
• 7:00
  SPEAKER_00: Well, that macroeconomic reality is definitely the first disadvantage.
• 7:04
  SPEAKER_00: There's just more supply.
• 7:05
  SPEAKER_00: Yeah.
• 7:06
  SPEAKER_00: But the second and arguably far more dangerous disadvantage is what Pepperdine University's private capital markets report defines as information asymmetry.
• 7:16
  SPEAKER_01: Aaron Powell Information Asymmetry.
• 7:17
  SPEAKER_01: So basically the experience gap between the two sides of the table.
• 7:20
  SPEAKER_00: Aaron Powell Exactly.
• 7:20
  SPEAKER_00: That experience gap operates as a massive BTNA advantage for the buyer.
• 7:24
  SPEAKER_00: Consider like a private equity firm, right?
• 7:26
  SPEAKER_01: Sure.
• 7:26
  SPEAKER_00: They employ teams of analysts whose only job, literally, their only job, is to negotiate dozens of acquisitions a year.
• 7:34
  SPEAKER_00: They know every financial trick, every legal pressure point, every stalling tactic.
• 7:38
  SPEAKER_00: And the owner.
• 7:39
  SPEAKER_00: The typical solo business owner negotiates the sale of a business perhaps once or twice in their entire lifetime.
• 7:46
  SPEAKER_00: Wow.
• 7:46
  SPEAKER_00: Plus, the buyer has multiple acquisition targets lined up.
• 7:50
  SPEAKER_00: Their alternative is to simply move to the next file on their desk.
• 7:53
  SPEAKER_00: The solo owner only has one business to sell.
• 7:56
  SPEAKER_00: That imbalance is just profound.
• 7:58
  SPEAKER_01: Right.
• 7:59
  SPEAKER_01: I mean, an owner who spent 20 years building a multimillion dollar company knows their daily operations better than anyone else on Earth.
• 8:06
  SPEAKER_01: But knowing how to run, say, a manufacturing plant and knowing how to architect a complex financial negotiation, those are two completely different skill sets.
• 8:15
  SPEAKER_00: They require entirely different mental muscles.
• 8:18
  SPEAKER_00: And this leads directly into the two biggest traps owners fall into when they attempt to negotiate directly on their own.
• 8:24
  SPEAKER_01: Oh, yeah, the traps.
• 8:26
  SPEAKER_00: The first one is what the Shaughnessy group sources call the single buyer trap.
• 8:29
  SPEAKER_01: Yes.
• 8:30
  SPEAKER_01: This really stood out in the notes for me because it almost always starts with a flattering, unsolicited offer, doesn't it?
• 8:36
  SPEAKER_00: Almost always.
• 8:37
  SPEAKER_01: Like a competitor or maybe a private equity firm that just bought a similar company in your sector, they reach out quietly, they take the owner to lunch, the conversation flows naturally, and they throw out this informal valuation that sounds highly attractive.
• 8:51
  SPEAKER_00: Oh, it completely strokes the owner's ego.
• 8:54
  SPEAKER_00: And it feels like they're skipping the difficult line of putting the business on the open market.
• 8:58
  SPEAKER_01: Right.
• 8:58
  SPEAKER_01: It feels like a shortcut.
• 9:00
  SPEAKER_00: Exactly.
• 9:01
  SPEAKER_00: But the moment they engage, their BATNA is compromised.
• 9:06
  SPEAKER_00: They are negotiating in a vacuum with just one buyer.
• 9:09
  SPEAKER_00: The buyer knows they are the only party in the room.
• 9:12
  SPEAKER_01: And the backup plan vanishes.
• 9:14
  SPEAKER_00: Yep.
• 9:14
  SPEAKER_00: The owner's alternative is to walk away and go back to working for another five years, but the buyer's alternative is to just go buy the owner's rival across town.
• 9:23
  SPEAKER_01: So what does this all mean?
• 9:24
  SPEAKER_01: I mean, if the owner realizes they are boxed in, why don't they just hit pause and call other buyers?
• 9:29
  SPEAKER_01: These are highly intelligent, highly successful founders.
• 9:32
  SPEAKER_01: How do they not see this happening?
• 9:34
  SPEAKER_00: Because by the time they realize they are boxed in, they're usually already caught in the second trap.
• 9:39
  SPEAKER_00: The emotional bay DNA problem.
• 9:41
  SPEAKER_00: This is rooted in some brilliant behavioral economics research by Deepak Malhotra and Max Baserman at Harvard Business School, which they detailed in their book, Negotiation Genius.
• 9:52
  SPEAKER_01: Okay.
• 9:53
  SPEAKER_00: When you negotiate directly, you go through months of grueling due diligence.
• 9:58
  SPEAKER_00: You open up your books, you share your management presentations, you start building these deep personal relationships with the acquiring team.
• 10:05
  SPEAKER_01: Oh, and the owner starts mentally spending the money, right?
• 10:08
  SPEAKER_01: They're picturing their retirement on a beach, they mentally check out of running the day-to-day company.
• 10:14
  SPEAKER_00: Exactly.
• 10:15
  SPEAKER_00: The psychological sunk cost becomes immense.
• 10:18
  SPEAKER_00: And professional buyers understand this cognitive bias perfectly.
• 10:22
  SPEAKER_00: The research actually shows that buyers deliberately use the passage of time as a weapon against the seller.
• 10:28
  SPEAKER_01: Wait, really?
• 10:29
  SPEAKER_01: Deliberately.
• 10:30
  SPEAKER_00: Oh, absolutely.
• 10:31
  SPEAKER_00: They will stretch out the due diligence process.
• 10:32
  SPEAKER_00: They'll take, you know, two weeks to respond to a simple term sheet.
• 10:35
  SPEAKER_00: They will make late stage, highly tedious requests for more historical data just to slow things down.
• 10:41
  SPEAKER_01: Wow.
• 10:42
  SPEAKER_01: So it is not administrative incompetence on the buyer's end.
• 10:45
  SPEAKER_01: They are intentionally dragging their feet to wear the seller out.
• 10:49
  SPEAKER_00: It is a calculated standard operating procedure.
• 10:53
  SPEAKER_00: Every single week that passes increases the owner's emotional investment in getting the deal across the finish line.
• 10:59
  SPEAKER_01: That makes so much sense.
• 11:01
  SPEAKER_00: So six months in, that same owner who originally sat at that lunch saying, Oh, I will only sell if the terms are perfect, is suddenly the party most desperate to close the transaction on whatever terms the buyer dictates.
• 11:12
  SPEAKER_01: Just to make the paint stop.
• 11:14
  SPEAKER_01: The harder the owner tries to push the deal forward, the deeper they sink into the buyer's terms.
• 11:19
  SPEAKER_01: They are systematically conceding their leverage just because their brain is exhausted.
• 11:23
  SPEAKER_00: Malhotra and Baseman's findings prove exactly that.
• 11:26
  SPEAKER_00: Negotiators with high emotional attachment make systematically worse financial decisions.
• 11:31
  SPEAKER_00: It is not a lack of intelligence at all.
• 11:34
  SPEAKER_00: It's just the structural reality they have trapped themselves in.
• 11:37
  SPEAKER_00: It eliminates their ability to make rational choices.
• 11:39
  SPEAKER_01: Okay, so we have established the traps, the single buyer scenario, and emotional exhaustion.
• 11:45
  SPEAKER_01: But the sources point to a very specific structural solution for this, which is bringing in a sell-side MA advisor to engineer a BTNA.
• 11:55
  SPEAKER_01: What does it actually mean to engineer leverage?
• 11:59
  SPEAKER_00: Well, it means actively manufacturing an environment where your alternatives are not just theoretical, but highly visible and genuinely threatening to the buyer.
• 12:08
  SPEAKER_01: Like creating a real auction.
• 12:09
  SPEAKER_00: Exactly.
• 12:10
  SPEAKER_00: An advisor creates competitive tension.
• 12:12
  SPEAKER_00: Instead of taking that one flattering lunch meeting, the advisor maps out the entire universe of those 15 to 40 qualified buyers we talked about.
• 12:20
  SPEAKER_00: They contact them simultaneously.
• 12:22
  SPEAKER_00: They completely control the flow of confidential information.
• 12:24
  SPEAKER_01: So the buyers all receive the same data at the exact same time, and they are forced to submit their indications of interest on a unified deadline.
• 12:32
  SPEAKER_01: Nobody gets special treatment.
• 12:33
  SPEAKER_00: Right.
• 12:33
  SPEAKER_00: And suddenly every buyer is aware they are in a competitive auction.
• 12:37
  SPEAKER_00: They know they might lose a prime asset to a direct rival.
• 12:40
  SPEAKER_00: And honestly, that awareness alone forces them to bypass the lowball offers and put their best foot forward.
• 12:46
  SPEAKER_01: Because they can't afford to play games.
• 12:47
  SPEAKER_00: Exactly.
• 12:48
  SPEAKER_00: But the advisor provides something even more crucial to the psychology of the room, the credible walk away.
• 12:54
  SPEAKER_01: Let's break that down.
• 12:55
  SPEAKER_01: Because if I am the solo owner and I tell a private equity firm, you know, hey, if you don't raise your price by$2 million, I am walking away.
• 13:05
  SPEAKER_01: The PE firm is probably looking at my exhausted face, knowing full well I do not want to start a six-month process over from scratch with a new buyer.
• 13:14
  SPEAKER_01: It just sounds like a bluff.
• 13:16
  SPEAKER_00: Yeah.
• 13:16
  SPEAKER_00: The buyer simply does not believe the threat.
• 13:18
  SPEAKER_00: They know you're tired.
• 13:20
  SPEAKER_00: But when a professional advisory firm says your revised offer does not meet the market clearing price, and we are prepared to move forward with the other bidders, the buyer actually believes it.
• 13:30
  SPEAKER_01: Because it's not emotional anymore.
• 13:32
  SPEAKER_00: Right.
• 13:32
  SPEAKER_00: They know the advisor is running a formal process.
• 13:34
  SPEAKER_00: They know the advisors have successfully walked away from bad deals before.
• 13:38
  SPEAKER_00: It removes the bluff entirely.
• 13:41
  SPEAKER_00: It becomes a statement of market reality.
• 13:43
  SPEAKER_01: Looking at the mechanics of this, it kind of reminds me of an insulating layer in a corporate strategy.
• 13:48
  SPEAKER_01: Like how a CEO will often use a CFO to deliver the really brutal financial news to Wall Street, keeping the CEO's relationship with the analysts clean.
• 14:00
  SPEAKER_01: In a business sale, the advisor is that insulating buffer.
• 14:03
  SPEAKER_00: That's a great analogy.
• 14:04
  SPEAKER_01: They're basically acting as a heat shield for a spacecraft upon re-entry.
• 14:08
  SPEAKER_01: They take all the burning friction of the price disputes, the arguments over working capital, the adversarial tension of due diligence.
• 14:16
  SPEAKER_01: So when the dust finally settles, the owner and the buyer can actually still sit in a boardroom and work together.
• 14:22
  SPEAKER_00: That is a highly accurate framework.
• 14:24
  SPEAKER_01: Uh-huh.
• 14:25
  SPEAKER_00: And this raises an important question financially.
• 14:27
  SPEAKER_00: In many mid-market deals, the owner has to stay on for a transition period, right?
• 14:31
  SPEAKER_01: Yeah, or they have an earnout structure.
• 14:33
  SPEAKER_00: Exactly.
• 14:34
  SPEAKER_00: Where a large portion of their payout is directly tied to the company's future performance under the new buyer.
• 14:39
  SPEAKER_01: Aaron Powell Right.
• 14:40
  SPEAKER_01: So if the buyer resents the owner because they fought bitterly over every single penny for six months, they are not going to be highly motivated to help that owner hit their future earnout targets.
• 14:49
  SPEAKER_01: Not at all.
• 14:50
  SPEAKER_01: The owner could lose millions on the back end simply because they wanted to act as their own aggressive negotiator on the front end.
• 14:57
  SPEAKER_00: Precisely.
• 14:58
  SPEAKER_00: The advisor absorbs that adversarial dynamic.
• 15:01
  SPEAKER_00: Specifically so the owner's post-close financial interests remain protected.
• 15:06
  SPEAKER_01: Okay, all of this logic holds up, but here's where it gets really interesting.
• 15:10
  SPEAKER_01: Want to push back on the underlying cost here.
• 15:12
  SPEAKER_01: Because a lot of owners listening know that an MA advisor charges a success fee, right?
• 15:17
  SPEAKER_01: Typically 3-6% of the total transaction value.
• 15:20
  SPEAKER_00: Yes, that's standard.
• 15:22
  SPEAKER_01: Let me just look at the math for a second.
• 15:24
  SPEAKER_01: A 6% fee on a$30 million business is$1.8 million.
• 15:29
  SPEAKER_01: I mean, nobody likes paying a 6% fee for anything.
• 15:32
  SPEAKER_01: That is a massive check to write.
• 15:34
  SPEAKER_01: Is an advisor actually generating$1.8 million worth of competitive tension, or are they just placing a tax on a deal that would have crossed the finish line anyway?
• 15:42
  SPEAKER_00: It is genuinely the most common and important question an owner can ask.
• 15:46
  SPEAKER_00: And first, we should fairly acknowledge the exceptions where a fee might not make sense.
• 15:50
  SPEAKER_01: Fair enough.
• 15:51
  SPEAKER_01: When does it not make sense?
• 15:52
  SPEAKER_00: The sources clearly outline that owner direct negotiation can work in specific circumstances.
• 15:58
  SPEAKER_00: If a business is valued under$5 million, features a very simple operational structure, and is being sold to a single, highly motivated strategic buyer who already knows the industry inside and out.
• 16:10
  SPEAKER_01: Then you don't need the whole song and dance.
• 16:12
  SPEAKER_00: Right.
• 16:13
  SPEAKER_00: The heavy cost of a full advisory process might not yield a positive return there.
• 16:17
  SPEAKER_01: Okay, so if it is a smaller, highly targeted transaction, you might not need the full auction infrastructure.
• 16:22
  SPEAKER_00: Exactly.
• 16:23
  SPEAKER_00: But for the vast majority of the Canadian lower middle market, that$5 million to$50 million space, the academic data provides a definitive answer to your question about the fee.
• 16:33
  SPEAKER_00: We can actually look at a major 2012 study by Goloboff, Petmazes, and Travlos that was published in the Journal of Finance.
• 16:40
  SPEAKER_01: Okay, how did they actually measure the value of the advisor, though?
• 16:43
  SPEAKER_00: They analyzed thousands of public and private MA transactions.
• 16:46
  SPEAKER_00: They isolated the variable of the advisor by controlling for target size, industry, macroeconomic factors, everything.
• 16:52
  SPEAKER_00: And what they found was a statistically significant advisory premium.
• 16:56
  SPEAKER_01: Meaning the buyers just paid more across the board.
• 16:59
  SPEAKER_00: Yes.
• 16:59
  SPEAKER_00: When an advisor was present, the competitive tension forced buyers to pay a premium over the expected market value that far exceeded the cost of the advisor's fee.
• 17:09
  SPEAKER_01: Aaron Powell So they mathematically proved that the presence of the advisor changed the final valuation.
• 17:14
  SPEAKER_01: You're saying the math actually proves that trying to save that fee is the most expensive mistake an owner can make.
• 17:44
  SPEAKER_01: Oh wow.
• 17:44
  SPEAKER_01: So in that scenario, paying a$1.8 million fee means the owner still nets$5.7 million more than they would have by going it alone.
• 17:52
  SPEAKER_01: The math of the premium just absorbs the fee entirely.
• 17:55
  SPEAKER_00: It completely absorbs it.
• 17:57
  SPEAKER_00: This aligns perfectly with foundational research by Galinsky and Musweiler at Columbia Business School, demonstrating that negotiators with strong, visible alternatives systematically achieve higher financial outcomes.
• 18:10
  SPEAKER_00: Right.
• 18:11
  SPEAKER_00: So to answer your pushback, it is not a sunk cost.
• 18:16
  SPEAKER_00: It is an investment with a mathematically proven ROI.
• 18:20
  SPEAKER_00: The question really is not whether you can afford the fee, it is whether you can afford the structural disadvantage of negotiating against a professional buyer without one.
• 18:29
  SPEAKER_01: That reframes the entire process.
• 18:31
  SPEAKER_01: I mean, it really does.
• 18:31
  SPEAKER_01: Let's distill this down for everyone listening.
• 18:33
  SPEAKER_01: Based on all the research and the sources we have covered today, if you take nothing else away from this deep dive, remember these three core insights.
• 18:41
  SPEAKER_01: Number one, never start a negotiation with a single buyer unless you fully accept that you are surrendering your leverage right out of the gate.
• 18:48
  SPEAKER_00: Absolutely.
• 18:48
  SPEAKER_01: Number two, build your BTNA before you need it.
• 18:51
  SPEAKER_01: Do not wait for a flattering, unsolicited offer to start figuring out your backup plan.
• 18:55
  SPEAKER_00: You build it early.
• 18:57
  SPEAKER_01: Exactly.
• 18:58
  SPEAKER_01: And number three, run the math, honestly.
• 19:02
  SPEAKER_01: Look at the data on professional representation because trying to save a fee on the front end might cost you your entire premium on the back end.
• 19:10
  SPEAKER_00: I think that's a perfect summary.
• 19:11
  SPEAKER_00: And I would leave you with one final thought to ponder as you look at your own business.
• 19:16
  SPEAKER_00: We have just explored how professional buyers deploy time, silence, and emotional fatigue against you as a standard default tactic.
• 19:24
  SPEAKER_01: Yeah, just as part of their playbook.
• 19:26
  SPEAKER_00: Right.
• 19:26
  SPEAKER_00: So if they are utilizing those psychological tools before you even realize the game has started, what other standard strategies are they running in the background that you don't even know exist?
• 19:36
  SPEAKER_01: Man, that is a phenomenal question to ask yourself before sitting down at any negotiating table.
• 19:40
  SPEAKER_01: It really makes you think.
• 19:41
  SPEAKER_01: We want to extend a massive thank you to you, our listener, for joining us on this deep dive today.
• 19:47
  SPEAKER_01: We really appreciate it.
• 19:48
  SPEAKER_00: Thank you so much for listening.
• 19:49
  SPEAKER_01: We also want to express our sincere gratitude to the Shaughnessy Group for providing these incredible data-backed insights into the Canadian market.
• 19:57
  SPEAKER_01: If you want to explore this topic further and arm yourself with more knowledge, you absolutely need to visit their website.
• 20:02
  SPEAKER_01: Visit shaughnessy.group, so that's www.shawhnessy.group for more resources.
• 20:08
  SPEAKER_00: It is essential reading for anyone considering an exit.
• 20:11
  SPEAKER_01: Without a doubt.
• 20:12
  SPEAKER_01: And for those who want to read the foundational theories we discussed today, you can check out the related book by clicking the Amazon link provided in our show notes, which is https.w.amazon.cad P B B E O F S W J V X Q.
• 20:28
  SPEAKER_01: It all comes back to that opening thought, you know?
• 20:30
  SPEAKER_01: We want a business sale to be a clean mathematical x-ray.
• 20:33
  SPEAKER_00: But it just isn't.
• 20:34
  SPEAKER_01: It isn't.
• 20:35
  SPEAKER_01: The reality is if you do not build your backup plan, if you do not engineer your B A T N A, you are just letting the buyer program the calculator.
• 20:42
  SPEAKER_01: Until next time, keep digging deeper.