Latest / Uphoff on Media Podcast / The Miss Isn’t the Failure. What You Do Next Is
Transcript
- 0:02SPEAKER_00: There are few questions that can cause more anxiety for a CEO than,
- 0:06SPEAKER_00: hey, how's the quarter shaping up?
- 0:09SPEAKER_00: From the first week in the quarter to the last,
- 0:11SPEAKER_00: C-level leaders regularly get asked how the numbers are looking.
- 0:15SPEAKER_00: From boards, employees, and partners, heck, even my wife would ask how the quarter was looking.
- 0:20SPEAKER_00: The reason the question can create so much agita is based on several factors.
- 0:25SPEAKER_00: Who's asking,
- 0:26SPEAKER_00: how the quarter actually is shaping up,
- 0:28SPEAKER_00: and what number they're actually asking about.
- 0:31SPEAKER_00: In 35 years of P&L responsibility,
- 0:34SPEAKER_00: I've found that boards to C-level to operating teams to employees is very easy
- 0:39SPEAKER_00: to get four key financial metrics confused and in turn miscommunicate or confuse how
- 0:45SPEAKER_00: the business is or isn't performing.
- 0:48SPEAKER_00: I have learned a ton about how to run a business to the numbers,
- 0:51SPEAKER_00: how to set them,
- 0:52SPEAKER_00: manage against them,
- 0:54SPEAKER_00: make appropriate plans and changes we're pacing ahead or behind,
- 0:58SPEAKER_00: and how to communicate about them to boards, executive teams, and employees.
- 1:02SPEAKER_00: In this episode in the related Substack Uphoff on Media post,
- 1:06SPEAKER_00: I share the frameworks and systems for managing a business to the numbers.
- 1:10SPEAKER_00: On Substack,
- 1:11SPEAKER_00: you can download and use the four frameworks referenced in this podcast
- 1:15SPEAKER_00: in your own business.
- 1:16SPEAKER_00: Okay, let's get to work.
- 1:18SPEAKER_00: This episode is called, The Miss Isn't the Failure, What You Do Next Is.
- 1:25SPEAKER_00: The board wants answers.
- 1:27SPEAKER_00: Your team is afraid to admit doubt.
- 1:29SPEAKER_00: What you do, what to do before you say anything to either one.
- 1:34SPEAKER_00: The board deck is due.
- 1:36SPEAKER_00: The forecast came in soft a week ago and everyone in the building already knows it.
- 1:41SPEAKER_00: Nobody has said so out loud because the first person
- 1:43SPEAKER_00: to say it risks sounding like they never believed in the plan.
- 1:47SPEAKER_00: That's the position every CEO eventually finds themselves in.
- 1:51SPEAKER_00: Above you a board and investors who signed off on a number and are anxious
- 1:54SPEAKER_00: to know how the business is performing.
- 1:56SPEAKER_00: Below you a management team that either doesn't know how bad it is yet
- 2:00SPEAKER_00: or is too nervous to bring it to you first.
- 2:02SPEAKER_00: Both conversations run through the same person, you.
- 2:06SPEAKER_00: And most days you're the only one standing there.
- 2:10SPEAKER_00: A recent Harvard Business Review piece on delivering bad earnings news got
- 2:14SPEAKER_00: the mechanics right Say it early,
- 2:16SPEAKER_00: quantify the shortfall in concrete terms,
- 2:19SPEAKER_00: kill the speculation before it starts, pair the bad news with a plan.
- 2:23SPEAKER_00: All very good advice.
- 2:24SPEAKER_00: It also assumes you already know two things that are actually the hard part.
- 2:28SPEAKER_00: What you told people to expect in the first place and what really happened
- 2:32SPEAKER_00: as opposed to the version you're telling yourself happened.
- 2:36SPEAKER_00: In five CEO roles, I've missed numbers and exceeded them.
- 2:40SPEAKER_00: Thankfully, while I was more often on the positive side, the misses taught me far more.
- 2:45SPEAKER_00: What follows are the systems those misses forced me to build,
- 2:49SPEAKER_00: how I manage a business against its budget,
- 2:51SPEAKER_00: how to diagnose the cause of a shortfall,
- 2:54SPEAKER_00: how to build a bridge plan,
- 2:55SPEAKER_00: and how to communicate about performance with the board and your operating team.
- 2:59SPEAKER_00: The charts and frameworks that come out of it are yours to download and use
- 3:04SPEAKER_00: in your own business.
- 3:07SPEAKER_00: Most misses get decided before the year starts.
- 3:11SPEAKER_00: Ask 10 CEOs whether their team can tell the difference between the budget,
- 3:15SPEAKER_00: the forecast, the pipeline, and the quota assignment.
- 3:18SPEAKER_00: In my experience, most can't.
- 3:21SPEAKER_00: Those are four different numbers doing four different jobs,
- 3:24SPEAKER_00: and most organizations flatten them into a single phrase, the number.
- 3:28SPEAKER_00: That flattening isn't harmless.
- 3:30SPEAKER_00: It creates confusion at the leadership table,
- 3:33SPEAKER_00: produces inaccurate numbers,
- 3:35SPEAKER_00: breeds anxiety that has nothing to do with actual performance,
- 3:38SPEAKER_00: and every so often sets up a mistake serious enough to be catastrophic.
- 3:42SPEAKER_00: The budget is what the board approves,
- 3:44SPEAKER_00: the number the business is actually run on,
- 3:46SPEAKER_00: the baseline every operating decision gets measured against all year.
- 3:50SPEAKER_00: The forecast is what you actually expect to deliver in the month,
- 3:54SPEAKER_00: quarter,
- 3:54SPEAKER_00: and year,
- 3:55SPEAKER_00: updated as real data comes in,
- 3:57SPEAKER_00: and it's usually the number the board cares most about,
- 4:00SPEAKER_00: even though budget is the one they signed off on.
- 4:03SPEAKER_00: Pipeline is the raw material underneath the forecast,
- 4:06SPEAKER_00: always larger than what will actually close, discounted by stage and probability.
- 4:11SPEAKER_00: The quota assignment is what you've asked the sales organization to carry often set
- 4:16SPEAKER_00: above the forecast on purpose as a stretch and it should never be confused with what
- 4:21SPEAKER_00: the company expects to report.
- 4:25SPEAKER_00: Confuse those four numbers and a casual comment turns into a real problem.
- 4:29SPEAKER_00: An executive tells a board member in the hallway that the team is running 10% ahead
- 4:34SPEAKER_00: of the number and everybody nods.
- 4:36SPEAKER_00: That's a good update if the number in question is budget.
- 4:39SPEAKER_00: If it's forecast and the forecast has been trending below budget for six weeks,
- 4:43SPEAKER_00: that same comment is wrong and by the time it gets corrected,
- 4:46SPEAKER_00: the board has already recalibrated around a number that was never real.
- 4:50SPEAKER_00: The discipline isn't more communication.
- 4:52SPEAKER_00: It's specifying which of the four numbers you're talking about every single time.
- 4:59SPEAKER_00: The tool I've used for 30 years to manage the forecast is a best case,
- 5:03SPEAKER_00: worst case,
- 5:04SPEAKER_00: realistic case model built specifically for quarterly and annual forecasting.
- 5:09SPEAKER_00: Not a single figure,
- 5:10SPEAKER_00: but a range with a 10 to 15% variance band that tracks actual
- 5:14SPEAKER_00: and projected performance against budget as the quarter unfolds,
- 5:17SPEAKER_00: not after it closes.
- 5:19SPEAKER_00: Run the business against that range every week and a shortfall shows up as
- 5:23SPEAKER_00: a trend line long before it shows up as a surprise,
- 5:26SPEAKER_00: which is what actually lets you act on it early.
- 5:29SPEAKER_00: The board benefit is real, but it's a byproduct.
- 5:31SPEAKER_00: A board that has already seen the worst case in writing doesn't treat a shortfall as a betrayal.
- 5:37SPEAKER_00: Here are some examples.
- 5:39SPEAKER_00: Information Week was a $15 million business and losing money,
- 5:43SPEAKER_00: and we took it to $175 million and $75 million in EBITDA in four years.
- 5:48SPEAKER_00: We built the plan on a series of key indicators,
- 5:50SPEAKER_00: not the year-end target,
- 5:52SPEAKER_00: qualified pipeline by vertical,
- 5:54SPEAKER_00: ad page growth against the prior year,
- 5:56SPEAKER_00: market share against six competitors, and market share by individual advertisers.
- 6:01SPEAKER_00: Every leader could recite them so nobody was surprised by the outcome.
- 6:05SPEAKER_00: But growth that fast creates its own pressure.
- 6:07SPEAKER_00: Systems built for a $15 million business buckled at $75 million.
- 6:12SPEAKER_00: The leader who gets a business from one tier to the next isn't always the leader
- 6:15SPEAKER_00: who gets it to the tier after that.
- 6:18SPEAKER_00: Scaling meant rebuilding systems,
- 6:19SPEAKER_00: changing out people who weren't scaling with us,
- 6:22SPEAKER_00: and resetting expectations upward every quarter because a board
- 6:25SPEAKER_00: that just watched you beat the number by 20% won't accept a repeat
- 6:29SPEAKER_00: of last year's target.
- 6:31SPEAKER_00: The Hollywood Reporter 30% growth in a single year against
- 6:35SPEAKER_00: a legacy print category everyone assumed was done growing.
- 6:39SPEAKER_00: The number came from a specific plan built around total reach
- 6:42SPEAKER_00: and early integrated print and digital offering, not a guess.
- 6:46SPEAKER_00: We passed variety and share of market for the first time and the board never had
- 6:50SPEAKER_00: to ask what was driving it because they'd seen the components every quarter.
- 6:54SPEAKER_00: Dramatic growth curves are the trickiest forecast of all.
- 6:58SPEAKER_00: No history to build a plan from.
- 7:00SPEAKER_00: The Game Developer Conference and the event Black Hat both grew more than 40% a year
- 7:06SPEAKER_00: on plans built from real registration and sponsorship data, not hope.
- 7:10SPEAKER_00: The pattern I've watched repeat,
- 7:12SPEAKER_00: the target got set to satisfy a board conversation,
- 7:16SPEAKER_00: not because anyone had evidence it was achievable.
- 7:20SPEAKER_00: A recent survey of more than 2,000 business leaders found 81%
- 7:25SPEAKER_00: of companies missed their sales forecast in at least one quarter over
- 7:28SPEAKER_00: a two-year stretch.
- 7:30SPEAKER_00: Most misses aren't a market surprise.
- 7:32SPEAKER_00: They're the plan finding out in public that it was never that precise to begin with.
- 7:38SPEAKER_00: Don't explain it before you understand it.
- 7:40SPEAKER_00: The moment the number turns negative, there are two instincts and both are wrong.
- 7:44SPEAKER_00: The first is to offend the plan.
- 7:46SPEAKER_00: The market's soft, the timing's off, give it another quarter.
- 7:50SPEAKER_00: The second is to overcorrect.
- 7:52SPEAKER_00: Blow up the strategy, replace the team, apologize your way through the next board meeting.
- 7:56SPEAKER_00: Both are a way of deciding what happened before you've actually found out.
- 8:00SPEAKER_00: I give myself and I tell any operator to give themselves roughly a week
- 8:04SPEAKER_00: before forming an opinion out loud.
- 8:07SPEAKER_00: Not a week of silence, a week of gathering the actual signal.
- 8:11SPEAKER_00: Pipeline conversion by stage, not just pipeline size.
- 8:14SPEAKER_00: Win-loss detail on the specific deals that slipped.
- 8:17SPEAKER_00: Not a summary someone else wrote for you.
- 8:19SPEAKER_00: What customers say when I get them on the phone myself.
- 8:22SPEAKER_00: Not the paraphrase in a deal review.
- 8:24SPEAKER_00: What's actually changed with competitors?
- 8:26SPEAKER_00: A price move, a new feature, a new entrant?
- 8:29SPEAKER_00: And whether they're seeing the same softness we are.
- 8:32SPEAKER_00: Whether customers are telling us directly that budgets are under pressure,
- 8:35SPEAKER_00: which is a market signal, not an excuse.
- 8:37SPEAKER_00: Whether the shortfall is brought across the business or concentrated in one product,
- 8:42SPEAKER_00: one region, or one team.
- 8:44SPEAKER_00: The diagnosis takes discipline precisely because the pressure to have
- 8:48SPEAKER_00: an answer arrives faster than the evidence does.
- 8:51SPEAKER_00: This is where most leadership teams skip a step.
- 8:54SPEAKER_00: They jump straight from we missed to here's the plan to fix it
- 8:58SPEAKER_00: without ever confirming what actually broke.
- 9:01SPEAKER_00: A recovery plan built on the wrong diagnosis doesn't just fail to fix the problem,
- 9:06SPEAKER_00: it burns the credibility you'll need the next time something goes wrong,
- 9:09SPEAKER_00: and there will be a next time.
- 9:13SPEAKER_00: Every miss traces back to one of four places.
- 9:16SPEAKER_00: After 35 years of this,
- 9:17SPEAKER_00: almost every miss I've seen sorts into one of four categories,
- 9:20SPEAKER_00: and the category determines nearly everything about what you do next.
- 9:26SPEAKER_00: Miscalculation.
- 9:28SPEAKER_00: That's ours.
- 9:29SPEAKER_00: It was wrong from the start.
- 9:30SPEAKER_00: The gap shows up in month one,
- 9:32SPEAKER_00: not month nine,
- 9:33SPEAKER_00: because the leading indicators were off before you ever went to market.
- 9:37SPEAKER_00: This is the most common cause behind a new launch that misses.
- 9:41SPEAKER_00: Not a market that turned, but a target nobody had real evidence for.
- 9:45SPEAKER_00: The fix is to rebuild the model instead of defending it.
- 9:47SPEAKER_00: Re-forecast off of real data, set the new number, and hold it.
- 9:52SPEAKER_00: Market dynamic.
- 9:53SPEAKER_00: The target was fair when you set it, but the market is contracted.
- 9:56SPEAKER_00: The whole category slows at once and peers are missing similar numbers.
- 10:01SPEAKER_00: This is what happened across most B2B print brands after the internet arrived faster
- 10:05SPEAKER_00: and cut deeper than any of us modeled.
- 10:07SPEAKER_00: The plan wasn't naive.
- 10:08SPEAKER_00: The ground underneath it moved.
- 10:11SPEAKER_00: The move here is to adjust the timeline, not the thesis.
- 10:14SPEAKER_00: Protect the plan's core assumptions and reset the pace against them.
- 10:19SPEAKER_00: Execution gap.
- 10:20SPEAKER_00: That's on us.
- 10:22SPEAKER_00: And the target was right.
- 10:23SPEAKER_00: Pipeline, hiring or launch date slipped against a plan nobody disputes.
- 10:27SPEAKER_00: The math still works.
- 10:28SPEAKER_00: This is the one that's hardest to admit because it's the one closest to home and
- 10:32SPEAKER_00: the fix is operating discipline.
- 10:34SPEAKER_00: Name what didn't get done, who owns it and the date it gets done by.
- 10:39SPEAKER_00: Competitive gap.
- 10:40SPEAKER_00: Our competitive position moved under us.
- 10:43SPEAKER_00: You're losing competitive deals you used to win.
- 10:45SPEAKER_00: Win rate is down against a market that isn't shrinking,
- 10:48SPEAKER_00: which is a different challenge than a market that is.
- 10:51SPEAKER_00: The fix is to fund the product gap directly.
- 10:54SPEAKER_00: No amount of sales effort outruns an uncompetitive offer.
- 10:58SPEAKER_00: The distinction matters because each of these four demands
- 11:01SPEAKER_00: a completely different conversation with the board and a completely different set
- 11:04SPEAKER_00: of actions with your executive team.
- 11:07SPEAKER_00: Mistake an execution gap for a market dynamic and you'll spend two quarters waiting
- 11:11SPEAKER_00: for a recovery the market was never gonna hand you.
- 11:13SPEAKER_00: Mistake a market dynamic for an execution gap and you'll fire people for a problem
- 11:18SPEAKER_00: that was never theirs to own.
- 11:21SPEAKER_00: A shortfall should never arrive without a plan attached.
- 11:25SPEAKER_00: Every company I've run, the rule was simple.
- 11:28SPEAKER_00: If you're forecasting a shortfall, you don't bring me the problem alone.
- 11:31SPEAKER_00: You bring a bridge plan,
- 11:33SPEAKER_00: a specific plan to close the gap and get back to or above budget within
- 11:37SPEAKER_00: the next two quarters with the specifics, the owner and the dates attached.
- 11:41SPEAKER_00: Not a general purpose to work harder,
- 11:43SPEAKER_00: an actual bridge from where the number is heading to where it needs to land.
- 11:47SPEAKER_00: This is two things.
- 11:48SPEAKER_00: A recovery conversation after the fact never can.
- 11:52SPEAKER_00: It surfaces the shortfall while it's still fixable months
- 11:55SPEAKER_00: before it would otherwise show up in a board deck and it forces the person closest
- 12:00SPEAKER_00: to the problem to do their own version of the diagnosis above miscalculation,
- 12:05SPEAKER_00: market,
- 12:06SPEAKER_00: execution,
- 12:07SPEAKER_00: or competitive before it ever reaches me because nobody can build a credible bridge
- 12:12SPEAKER_00: without knowing which one they're actually standing on.
- 12:17SPEAKER_00: The board and the team need two different conversations, not one memo.
- 12:21SPEAKER_00: The board wants the diagnosis,
- 12:23SPEAKER_00: the revised trajectory,
- 12:24SPEAKER_00: and the plan in that order delivered before they have to ask.
- 12:28SPEAKER_00: State the shortfall in dollars and percent against the number they approve,
- 12:32SPEAKER_00: not a description of how things feel.
- 12:34SPEAKER_00: Tell them which of the four categories you've landed on and why with the evidence,
- 12:38SPEAKER_00: not the instinct.
- 12:40SPEAKER_00: Give them a revised number with a date attached and be available for
- 12:43SPEAKER_00: the follow-up questions instead of hiding behind a deck.
- 12:46SPEAKER_00: What kills credibility with the board isn't the miss,
- 12:48SPEAKER_00: it's finding out later that you knew more than you said when you said it.
- 12:53SPEAKER_00: The team needs something different,
- 12:54SPEAKER_00: clarity about what's actually being asked of them now and honest signal about
- 12:59SPEAKER_00: whether this is about them or not.
- 13:02SPEAKER_00: If the diagnosis says market dynamic or miscalculation,
- 13:05SPEAKER_00: say so plainly and protect the team from carrying blame that isn't theirs.
- 13:09SPEAKER_00: If it's an execution gap,
- 13:10SPEAKER_00: say that plainly too,
- 13:12SPEAKER_00: with names,
- 13:12SPEAKER_00: owners and dates,
- 13:13SPEAKER_00: because a team that already knows something went wrong respects
- 13:17SPEAKER_00: a direct conversation far more than a vague one.
- 13:20SPEAKER_00: Silence in front of the team gets read as either panic or indifference.
- 13:23SPEAKER_00: Neither is true, and both are worse than whatever you're actually feeling.
- 13:29SPEAKER_00: What actually happens in the next 30 days?
- 13:32SPEAKER_00: Get the real numbers before you get an opinion.
- 13:34SPEAKER_00: A week of diagnosis before any external conversation, board included.
- 13:39SPEAKER_00: Diagnose before you communicate.
- 13:41SPEAKER_00: Know which of the four categories you're in before you draft a single sentence
- 13:44SPEAKER_00: to anyone outside the leadership team.
- 13:47SPEAKER_00: Ask whoever owns the shortfall for a bridge plan, not an explanation.
- 13:51SPEAKER_00: A specific plan to or above the number within two quarters with an owner and a date,
- 13:56SPEAKER_00: not a promise to try harder.
- 13:59SPEAKER_00: Tell the board first in writing before the meeting.
- 14:01SPEAKER_00: State this shortfall in dollars and percent against the number they approved,
- 14:05SPEAKER_00: not how things feel.
- 14:06SPEAKER_00: Match the message to the diagnosis, not to your mood.
- 14:09SPEAKER_00: A market dynamic gets a timeline reset.
- 14:11SPEAKER_00: An execution gap gets names, owners, and dates.
- 14:14SPEAKER_00: Don't apologize for a market you don't control and don't excuse the team that didn't do its job.
- 14:20SPEAKER_00: Tell the team the same week, not after the board reacts.
- 14:23SPEAKER_00: A delay reads as evidence you don't trust them with the truth,
- 14:26SPEAKER_00: which is a worse problem than the mist itself.
- 14:29SPEAKER_00: Put a recheck on the calendar before you leave the room.
- 14:31SPEAKER_00: 30, 60, 90 days out tied to the same leading indicators you should have flagged this
- 14:36SPEAKER_00: the first time.
- 14:38SPEAKER_00: If you don't have those indicators yet,
- 14:39SPEAKER_00: building them is the actual fix, not the recovery plan itself.
- 14:45SPEAKER_00: The number was never the hardest part.
- 14:47SPEAKER_00: Go back to the room I opened with.
- 14:48SPEAKER_00: The board deck is due, the number is soft, and nobody has said it out loud yet.
- 14:53SPEAKER_00: The instinct in that room is to treat silence as safety.
- 14:57SPEAKER_00: It isn't.
- 14:58SPEAKER_00: Every day that passes without confronting the truth and diagnosing the problem is
- 15:02SPEAKER_00: a day the board and the team are each writing their own version of what happened,
- 15:06SPEAKER_00: and neither version is likely to be generous.
- 15:09SPEAKER_00: I've missed numbers plenty of times across five CEO roles,
- 15:12SPEAKER_00: print brands that declined faster than the plan accounted for,
- 15:15SPEAKER_00: launches where the market taught us something the projections couldn't have.
- 15:19SPEAKER_00: None of those misses cost me what a bad diagnosis or a slow evasive conversation would have.
- 15:25SPEAKER_00: The number is never actually the hardest part of the job.
- 15:28SPEAKER_00: Deciding what it means and saying so before someone else decides it for you is.
- 15:36SPEAKER_00: Hey, that's it for this episode.
- 15:39SPEAKER_00: If you found this useful,
- 15:40SPEAKER_00: please do one thing,
- 15:41SPEAKER_00: follow the Uphoff on Media podcast on Apple or Spotify, and please leave a rating.
- 15:46SPEAKER_00: It's the single best way to help another operator find this.
- 15:49SPEAKER_00: I'm Tony Uphoff, back at it next week.