Latest / Global Voice Radio Network's tracks / Paul English Live 082726,,- Buried Law, Broken Government, and the Case for Recovering Our Inheritance

Transcript

Paul English Live 082726,,- Buried Law, Broken Government, and the Case for Recovering Our Inheritance · Global Voice Radio Network's tracks

• 0:16
  Unknown: Forward moving and focused on freedom.
• 0:19
  You're listening to the Global Voice Radio Network.
• 0:26
  This mirror stream is brought to you in part by
• 0:30
  mymitoboost.com
• 0:32
  for support of the mitochondria like never before.
• 0:35
  A body trying to function
• 0:37
  adequate mitochondrial
• 0:39
  function is kind of like running an engine without oil. It's not gonna work very well. It's also brought to you by snapfat.com.
• 0:47
  That is snap,phat,.com.
• 0:51
  It's also brought to you by the Prife International Terahertz frequency wand through iteroplanet.com.
• 0:59
  Thank you so much for joining us, and welcome to the program.
• 1:25
  Unknown: Welcome to the show.
• 1:52
  The knights drawing in where you are. They're they're drawn in a bit here near me. You remember last week, we had a thunderstorm this time last week, and it looks like it might do one any moment now, but it's not as exciting as last week. Not the start anyway, but the show is gonna be.
• 2:45
  No. I just I just poured water all over my t shirt. That's bit of a stupid start, isn't it? Hi, everyone. Welcome back to the show.
• 2:52
  It's Thursday, isn't it? Yeah. And,
• 2:55
  lots of fun, last few days. I had a technical trousers day from hell yesterday,
• 3:00
  which is probably a good sign, which means we're not gonna have one today.
• 3:04
  I've invoked the technical trouser hell gods. Not really, but just went out for my evening walk prior to the show. It's a regular thing now. I put my waistcoat on and got my pocket watch out, went for a little
• 3:15
  paseo. I think that's the Spanish word for your evening walk. And beautiful evening. It's a bit sort of dark and sort of all sort of you know come in a bit earlier but then it's very cloudy today
• 3:26
  but I can't believe how fast it's we've got to the back end of August. We've really got to the back end fast it's September next week isn't it? Obviously! Think I that's the month that comes after August.
• 3:37
  Anyway,
• 3:38
  we're here. We've got a guest. I'm gonna bring him on in about five or ten minutes time. Mike Burke is our guest tonight and, quite looking forward to this. You'll find out what the theme is. You can probably tell really from the image for today's show. I was just talking to Paul
• 3:50
  who's an American and he's always nosing around in our affairs around here which is, which is the right thing to do and, the the image is from,
• 3:59
  the Smithsonian Institute. I don't know why they've got it. They must have nicked it or or something. Actually, don't know who painted it. It might have been an American painter,
• 4:06
  but it's of the chancery division.
• 4:10
  And those of you that are familiar with Bleak House by Charles Dickens, by the way, this is only a tangential sort of link because we're not here to really talk about the chancery division or I don't know. But those
• 4:20
  of you that have read Bleak House will know that, Dickens goes on at great length
• 4:25
  about
• 4:26
  the court at chancery.
• 4:27
  It's a brilliant opening, sort of a few pages to Bleak House. Well, it's all about fog,
• 4:32
  It's all about the lord high chancellor,
• 4:34
  and it's all about this case, John Dice and John Dice, that goes on and on and on and on and on on.
• 4:41
  And, and barristers are born into it, live through it, and retire from it with piles of money, that kind of thing, and the defendants of course,
• 4:49
  come out destitute.
• 4:51
  So anyway, somebody who can also go on and on and on and on and on
• 4:56
  Unknown: is Eric von Essex. Eric, hello. Good evening and welcome to Good evening. Well, thank you very much, and it's nice to be here. We were talking beforehand about a great archaeological
• 5:07
  discovery round near where I live.
• 5:09
  So would you like me Really? To Oh. Yeah. Yeah. Okay.
• 5:13
  Unknown: All excited about it. Oh, exciting.
• 5:16
  Unknown: Well, there's
• 5:17
  on your
• 5:19
  telegram channel, plug, plug, plug, plug, plug, my telegram channel
• 5:23
  Yep. Somebody's been talking about dinosaurs.
• 5:25
  Did they exist?
• 5:27
  And I know that John Hamer,
• 5:29
  in his book, he believes they didn't exist.
• 5:32
  And most of the dinosaurs we have are
• 5:36
  sort of from other animals and things. But one's just been dug up around the corner of Fockham Hall, and
• 5:43
  it apparently,
• 5:44
  the archaeologist said that only
• 5:47
  porcupines,
• 5:48
  and it was called a Megasaurus.
• 5:50
  So there we go. So they do exist. Sorry. And
• 5:56
  Unknown: Everybody. If you haven't met Eric, you've met him now.
• 5:59
  It's
• 6:02
  very good. It's good. We're starting as we mean to God. Yes. Yes. It goes downhill from there on.
• 6:08
  I mean not that we want to talk about dinosaurs because we've got a few behind the microphone tonight, know me included, but I'm just thinking
• 6:15
  what do you think? Do you think they existed or not? I'm fiftyfifty
• 6:20
  Unknown: on it and leaning more towards them not existing because it sounds how comes that nothing was ever said about them,
• 6:27
  before the nineteenth century?
• 6:29
  Very little was said about them, and why didn't other,
• 6:32
  societies ever discover them or see them running like that? And I'm a little bit suspicious.
• 6:39
  But, again, I'll keep an open mind. Anybody it's a bit like flat earth. I'll keep an open mind. I don't know it's flat, round, square, or oblong. I don't know. But the fact is is that most of the stuff that's official
• 6:51
  that we're told turns out to be a pack of lies soon afterwards.
• 6:56
  Know? Landing
• 6:57
  noticed that, have you? Oh, what? Noticed that? Well, of course they landed on the moon
• 7:02
  and, things like that.
• 7:04
  And,
• 7:06
  Unknown: no. Mean, it's lots of I remember looking up, I think, at the moon that night or something. I couldn't see them. Could you see them? No. No. No. It's interesting.
• 7:14
  Unknown: Why do they have a peep when they spoke? You know? So I was, oh, okay. Beep.
• 7:18
  Right? Yep. Beep.
• 7:20
  Why? And, also, the other thing, which was absolutely amazing, they can make a phone call from the moon,
• 7:27
  and there was no delay in the sound.
• 7:30
  It was is immediate. That was that was really incredible, wasn't it? And especially when the operator came in and said, come on. You have to put 20 more in a in a in a box. So there we go. Yes. That's the sort of Internet connectivity that we want these days, isn't it? We want things as strikingly good as that. We really do. Yes. Do
• 7:48
  Unknown: you remember swinging it around to the focal
• 7:51
  point for the next couple of hours?
• 7:53
  Do you remember a couple of weeks ago we had
• 7:57
  Unknown: Michelle Jung and Maribel on the show? Yes, yes we did, that's right, and very very interesting and I hope they're okay.
• 8:04
  Unknown: Yeah I think they are. In fact I've alerted Maribel about tonight's show, she says she's probably going to be listening so you better be!
• 8:12
  No,
• 8:13
  So, I'm just practicing. I'm practicing my rude radio host manner. I've got to develop that. It's all too we're all too cheery and nice right Doing a James
• 8:22
  Unknown: Wow, you know? You will have your jabs and
• 8:25
  Unknown: that sort of stuff, know? Shocked him out. Although it's probably sort of a whale too far for me, have to say. I never found him much. I didn't have much of a whale of a time listening to him. No. But I
• 8:36
  Unknown: found him very, very irritating.
• 8:38
  Unknown: I I he went a bit bonkers in the end though, didn't he? So there we I suppose, but he was very ill and I you know whatever anyway all that kind of stuff but but yeah after the after that show a couple of weeks ago Maribel got in touch with me we talked about several other things and then she sent me,
• 8:53
  Mike Burke's contact details and,
• 8:56
  so we've had a couple of chats and we're gonna sort of I'm gonna bring Mike on now
• 9:01
  and Mike hello good evening and welcome to the show!
• 9:06
  Unknown: Good evening I hope you can hear me okay?
• 9:09
  Unknown: We can hear you loud and clear. How are you doing this fine lovely evening? Well it's not bad here anyway. How are you doing? Yeah same as you, overcast.
• 9:18
  Unknown: Yeah. Looks very thundery.
• 9:20
  Unknown: It does.
• 9:22
  Unknown: I've got to say I do concur with what Eric said about the dinosaurs, that's what
• 9:27
  I've come to,
• 9:29
  the conclusion I've now come to.
• 9:32
  Unknown: You don't
• 9:34
  think they existed either? No,
• 9:36
  Unknown: no. There's a lot of evidence for that particularly one of the things that I saw there was a woman who had an excellent channel, I can't think of it now, she talked about the
• 9:47
  studding mites and studding types. Remember going to Treter Gorge many years ago,
• 9:53
  a long time ago actually, and they said that stalagmites
• 9:56
  come down,
• 9:58
  stalagmites
• 9:59
  go down,
• 10:01
  Unknown: stalagmites go up. Oh I remember that. That that that sounds like my girlfriend's Stallektites go down. My ex girlfriend, Ryder. Yeah. Her Stallektites needs to come down. Terrible. She bought some smaller size. That's right. Well, we was led to believe that they grew about one inch every I think it was four thousand years.
• 10:24
  Unknown: Subsequently on this girl's channel
• 10:27
  she showed stellus prototypes forming on a garage, I think it was in America or somewhere,
• 10:32
  you know six foot high.
• 10:35
  How is that possible?
• 10:36
  And there was also a boot they found, a leather boot which they can trace manufacturers of, but the foot inside
• 10:44
  is petrified.
• 10:46
  But it could have been that old because the boot
• 10:49
  could be traced to the early twentieth century.
• 10:52
  How is that possible?
• 10:54
  So it makes you wonder what stuff we've been fed.
• 10:59
  On a lighter note to start it off,
• 11:02
  I'm reminded of a comment
• 11:04
  that I saw in Hansard
• 11:07
  about I think it was the Emperor of Russia
• 11:10
  visiting the House of Parliament. It was in the 1680s
• 11:13
  I believe,
• 11:15
  and when he got there he saw all these people scuttling up and down the stairs outside and he said to some guy there,
• 11:22
  who are all those people there?
• 11:24
  And the answer was they're all lawyers sir.
• 11:27
  And he said we've got but two in Russia and when I get back I'm minded to shoot one of them.
• 11:34
  Unknown: I
• 11:35
  like him already. Yes. I like him already. Mike, before we before we sort of jump in, I just I've just I've forgotten my manners with all the listeners. So just to do the old sort of station acknowledgment thing, I forgot to do that because I always get carried away at the beginning and not water all over me shirt, which is not so bad because it's very warm in here where I am tonight.
• 11:53
  Shout out to everybody on Rumble and YouTube that's tuning in and also over in the FFT radio chat.
• 12:01
  The more you use that chat, better it gets. It's getting livelier slowly but surely. So I'm looking at all three and if I can get my brains to work, might even read certain things out from time to time. That's great. We're going out of course on FFT radio at fftradio.com.
• 12:16
  We're also going out over WBN three twenty four
• 12:19
  And a quick shout out to WBN three twenty four for those of you that don't know. What happens with FFT is that around about 11:00 at night, in fact immediately after this show,
• 12:27
  we pick up, WBN for the overnight session, as I now call it, from 11:00 at night here through till 7AM in the morning
• 12:35
  with basically American talk radio shows primarily overnight. So for those of you that can't sleep at all, you can always tune into that kind of stuff. And then,
• 12:44
  07:00 in the mornings, currently what I've been doing cheekily, I think I might have mentioned this last week, we pick up the Mike Graham show off his YouTube channel and send that out, which is always lots of fun.
• 12:54
  I think I've covered everybody. Oh, there's Eurofolk Radio, there's Global Voice Network,
• 12:59
  maybe Holy Land Radio, I think as well. So we're going out over quite a few places. So however you're listening, hi and welcome to the show. Now Mike, I thought what might be useful for everybody because prior to Maribel
• 13:10
  sending me your details, of course I'd never heard of you and we've had two or three conversations now which I've really enjoyed and you've sent me lots of wonderful documents.
• 13:19
  But it's always nice for us to get some sort of lie of the land with you. What's your sort of
• 13:25
  history as it were in this space, your focal point? How did you get to this point? You know, ruining your Thursday night here on this
• 13:32
  show. How did you get to this point?
• 13:34
  Unknown: All
• 13:36
  went back to the
• 13:38
  Dunblane incident,
• 13:40
  That's right. In the 1966.
• 13:43
  Yes.
• 13:44
  Prior to that I
• 13:48
  I had everything rifles,
• 13:50
  shotguns, pistols, revolvers.
• 13:53
  It was made, it was all military stuff. It was
• 13:58
  were doing what we call combat shooting but essentially what it is it's target practice.
• 14:03
  Now there's a huge difference which I can get into at some other stage between target practice and target shooting,
• 14:09
  But essentially
• 14:12
  being a member of the being a affiliated member of the NRA and I think the child of the NRA was to train her in Madison's subjects
• 14:20
  in marksmanship for the defence of the realm.
• 14:23
  Unknown: Yeah.
• 14:25
  Unknown: But then
• 14:26
  prior, I was aware of the Hungerford incident back in '88.
• 14:31
  Unknown: Is that when that was? Is it that far away? Obviously, yeah, was before Dum Blain, wasn't it? That's right, we had the Hungerford
• 14:38
  Unknown: one. Now Yeah. We had a I'd be on a for my own pistol
• 14:44
  shooting
• 14:44
  club.
• 14:46
  I didn't like the way they were being controlled by the police.
• 14:49
  Particularly the
• 14:51
  secretaries
• 14:52
  and that sort of thing.
• 14:54
  So
• 14:56
  I formed my own club and
• 14:59
  I actually at some later stage I met up with a guy called John Hirsch who was
• 15:05
  met serving Met Policeman at the time.
• 15:07
  Right. And I I was aware of all the other stuff going on in America whether it whether it's Oklahoma one at night.
• 15:13
  Is it the crash run-in
• 15:15
  the background and what was going on out there?
• 15:18
  Then
• 15:20
  we had the Dunblane one
• 15:22
  and
• 15:24
  there was lots of questions came up
• 15:27
  after that
• 15:29
  which were never answered,
• 15:31
  But
• 15:32
  strangely enough, about two or three weeks after that, they had the Port Arthur massacre
• 15:38
  in
• 15:40
  Tasmania.
• 15:42
  Now that was an extremely interesting one because
• 15:46
  apparently the story is that there's very few police on the island.
• 15:51
  I mean, Pat, only a couple from what the article said and they had a phone call to say that there was some substance
• 15:59
  in a cave on the other side of the island. So the police was dispatched to investigate and I think they just found out it was flour
• 16:06
  or whatever sugar.
• 16:08
  They radioed back to say that they'd been there and there was nothing there.
• 16:13
  Don't forget I'm just going from what I can remember now because this was a long time ago and I've still got the articles on it and
• 16:20
  immediately
• 16:21
  after they radioed back to say that they were there and it was a false alarm,
• 16:26
  the shooting took place in the shopping mall.
• 16:29
  Now it was alleged that a guy who was a part year
• 16:34
  let's just say he was a bit slow.
• 16:36
  Er left handed.
• 16:38
  Really didn't know much about guns at all. In fact there was an incident where he took a gun with a knife round into it. He wasn't quite sure how to reject it or something stupid like that.
• 16:48
  Yep. But apparently, this is the same guy who apparently entered a shopping mall
• 16:53
  with a semi automatic rifle and I believe it was two magazines he had containing 15 rounds each
• 17:00
  And
• 17:01
  he opened started to open fire and
• 17:06
  he changed magazines
• 17:07
  on, you know, before the one was emptied.
• 17:10
  So, there was still one in the chamber and continue and apparently he shot and killed
• 17:17
  32 people with 29
• 17:20
  shots.
• 17:21
  That's an inverse cure ratio.
• 17:23
  How was that possible?
• 17:26
  That's one of the things.
• 17:28
  Right. This this same guy that apparently
• 17:31
  engaged
• 17:32
  in a a car which was moving at speed some distance away
• 17:37
  and hit the engine to put it out of action.
• 17:40
  And then he fled to somewhere called Seascape.
• 17:43
  I think it was something like his house or something. We were surrounded by the police
• 17:48
  but he never shot anything after that. Nothing.
• 17:51
  And then the house mysteriously caught fire.
• 17:55
  He eventually came crawling out of it. I don't know all
• 17:59
  the background behind it,
• 18:01
  but he was subsequently arrested.
• 18:04
  And you know what, as far as I can
• 18:07
  see up until very very recently, he's still in prison
• 18:11
  and he never went on trial.
• 18:15
  Unknown: And where is this is in The States is it? No this is in Tasmania.
• 18:22
  right,
• 18:24
  that that incident where he just went crazy up is that that supposedly young guy at the time who went nuts
• 18:31
  and killed a lot of people supposedly in a restaurant is that is it yeah
• 18:36
  I've
• 18:37
  got it now, I've got his face, I can't remember his name, but I've got his face flashed up. He was a light haired young man. I
• 18:45
  read all sorts of stuff around that because Mossad were in Tasmania at the same time, there's all sorts of setup and this all these sort of gun incidents happened round about the same time for them to invoke the restriction of carrying of firearms. Is that right?
• 18:58
  Unknown: Yes, essentially that's exactly what it was.
• 19:01
  Unknown: Yes, I remember that.
• 19:03
  Unknown: Another thing for thought.
• 19:05
  Mhmm. Is that
• 19:07
  I subsequently and I probably got a record that's unknown in PC.
• 19:13
  That the Tasmanian
• 19:15
  government
• 19:16
  or officials there had ordered a
• 19:19
  refrigerated
• 19:21
  undertaker's vehicle or something like a refrigerated vehicle
• 19:25
  which coincidentally
• 19:26
  could hold 32 bodies or something.
• 19:29
  Unknown: Right.
• 19:29
  Unknown: And
• 19:30
  then after the incident had happened, this is prior to the incident, and after the incident it was solved because I saw a picture of it.
• 19:39
  Now it makes you scratch your head,
• 19:42
  But
• 19:44
  going back to the dumb blame one, we knew that there was a lot of things wrong
• 19:49
  and I contacted the various shooting organisations
• 19:52
  and they just said no don't do anything, know, just
• 19:56
  maintain your respectful silence.
• 20:01
  But I didn't like that
• 20:02
  and I was talking to a disgruntled gun dealer, local one, and he said well I've got a couple he might be interested in. He's been
• 20:11
  doing some research. I met this guy John Hurst.
• 20:15
  He had a friend of his, Mike Jay, he was a senior pilot with British Airways at the time
• 20:20
  and
• 20:21
  he said you know we've got a Bill of Rights and that really started the whole constitutional journey because the consensus was, well, if I can't have him for
• 20:32
  target shooting or target practice, should I say, not shooting, then, I'll have him defensive purposes and in order to become proficient, you have to practice.
• 20:40
  Unknown: Yes.
• 20:41
  Unknown: So, that started our research journey.
• 20:45
  We did a lot of articles. We produced
• 20:47
  various documents bumbled
• 20:49
  brief safe briefing document.
• 20:52
  Yeah. It was called Safe, that's right.
• 20:55
  Safety and freedom for everyone because we went through the door. We was going through hand tidy plates. Everything we could find because don't forget it wasn't all computerized.
• 21:03
  Totally like you can now.
• 21:06
  We have to send off someone down to the you have to join law library, send someone down, they'd look for debates,
• 21:12
  photocopy
• 21:13
  them, post them down to me, I'd scan them up, word process them onto the computer.
• 21:18
  It's nothing like it is now. But we we got to we we put together quite an interesting document. It's about six or 70 pages.
• 21:27
  But the argonic part was it had a PO box and the PO box was befriend the pilot's
• 21:33
  place.
• 21:35
  Right. So the police picked up on it.
• 21:38
  And
• 21:39
  they then paid him a visit and revoked his firearm certificate. Not because he'd done anything wrong.
• 21:45
  But because he might use his lawfully owned firearms to protect himself.
• 21:52
  Unknown: So you've basically
• 21:54
  got something in common with Rupert Loh because I heard him talking a couple of months ago
• 21:59
  about this whole period around Dunblane and his father
• 22:03
  was,
• 22:04
  involved in target shooting wasn't he? He had a lot of guns and they took all his guns off him. I think it was around about that period.
• 22:11
  So did you know John Bingley before this or was it this event and the whole because I've I spoke to John Bingley probably he wouldn't remember. I had a few calls with him maybe ten or twelve years back,
• 22:22
  and I understand he makes
• 22:24
  ammunition.
• 22:25
  I think that's one of the things that he makes. He might make several other things, but I saw him give a speech,
• 22:31
  in some organization,
• 22:32
  the British
• 22:33
  constitution
• 22:34
  party or not party, not a political party, but something a group,
• 22:38
  and it was excellent all about the about the English constitution
• 22:42
  as I'm trying to avoid using the word British, Mike.
• 22:45
  Unknown: This is difficult, It isn't
• 22:47
  Unknown: is. Yeah. It is. It's like we've been brainwashed into every time I see it, I'm going, well, we're British, and it sounds so good to say, but I'm going, well, I'm I'm not actually.
• 22:55
  It's
• 22:56
  it's a bit confusing so we're not actually we're not British we're Britons I think we're Britons but we're not British.
• 23:02
  Anyway
• 23:03
  is that how you bumped into John Bingley around this sort of period or did you know him before that? Yes,
• 23:09
  Unknown: subsequent
• 23:11
  to that
• 23:13
  I'd
• 23:14
  formed other things apart from this safe one.
• 23:18
  I met up with a gun dealer up north
• 23:22
  and he
• 23:23
  had he he'd been
• 23:26
  getting together some information
• 23:28
  and they'd petition parliament
• 23:31
  about the RKBA
• 23:33
  business.
• 23:34
  Yeah. And I met up with him subsequent to that and we reunited
• 23:39
  and
• 23:40
  there was one was called Boris.
• 23:44
  Bit of Rights Appreciation Society.
• 23:47
  Unknown: Right. And
• 23:48
  Unknown: they petitioned parliament
• 23:51
  and in view of the huge
• 23:53
  amount of
• 23:56
  letters that parliament received,
• 23:58
  the House of Commons produced a research document. I think it's called ninety six one zero two. I've got a copy. I can always hold on.
• 24:05
  Okay. But ultimately they went through the history
• 24:08
  of firearms legislation.
• 24:10
  But ultimately they said it's for the courts to decide if it's put before if it's brought before them.
• 24:18
  So
• 24:20
  and I said to him that I, you know, I'm like a dog with a boat, you know.
• 24:25
  They took and weigh me guns.
• 24:29
  They don't trust me with guns. I don't trust them.
• 24:32
  So
• 24:33
  ultimately I put all the evidence together which we done
• 24:36
  with John Hurst and others.
• 24:38
  And we went to the high court. We done an application. There was a lot happening before that.
• 24:44
  Unknown: And you just don't realise how corrupt and rotten the system is until you start poking. Until it hits you. Yeah. Until it comes and starts nibbling around your ankles and biting your ankles. Yeah. It's a it's an unpleasant thing isn't it? So I guess prior to this Mike
• 24:58
  Unknown: you were a sound, solid, upstanding citizen or whatever. That's right. Yeah, no problem at all. We had a fantastic time. The guys we used to shoot with, we had black
• 25:08
  powder. We used to do shows
• 25:11
  at Chessington.
• 25:14
  The
• 25:15
  kids used to come here with all our cowboy stuff. They they had they called themselves the Arizona were outlaws.
• 25:19
  Oh. Just nice. The old golden coats. I've got an old in fact I looked at it fairly recently an old video where he was doing reenactments for a huge crowd locally on the Village green,
• 25:30
  you know, black
• 25:31
  powder shooting.
• 25:33
  Yeah, you tried doing that.
• 25:35
  Unknown: I've done nothing, know, I need to hang around firearms. We've got a shooting club up around the back here that I mean you can go up and do clays. In fact, my son was up there about four or five weeks back. Said, I need to take you up there. I said, yeah, because we we've driven past it for years and I'm I think I went actually, the last time I shot anything was probably about thirty years ago and that was clay pigeon shooting for an afternoon, which I really enjoyed.
• 25:56
  But it's just good to hang around places like that and just get familiar with firearms,
• 26:00
  know. Someone's asked by the way Mike in the chat or they said I thought we had the right to bear arms.
• 26:08
  Unknown: Yeah.
• 26:09
  Don't start me on that one!
• 26:11
  Unknown: I have done though, that's what this show is all about. We're gonna look at all these things that we've got the rights to do but everybody's forgotten about or we don't know how to apply it, whatever, but we do. This is
• 26:22
  Unknown: where it came back to basics after Dumblaying.
• 26:25
  We knew there was something funny and I think one of the nurses
• 26:28
  involved in that, I think it was a sirendra up here, I think she's still got a Facebook page actually, Dumblaying.
• 26:34
  Yeah, there's lots of unarchered things, lots and lots of strange things going on there, but I won't really get into that but again, freemotion really was involved and pedophilia and God knows what What? Freemotion,
• 26:46
  Mike? Yes.
• 26:49
  Unknown: I've seen a this is the done blind stuff yeah it's it's it's
• 26:53
  a sordid affair. I mean it really is. It's exhausting. Somebody actually asked in the chat earlier, is that the event that Andy Murray was involved with? Yeah, absolutely.
• 27:01
  And it's, and this is I'm not this is Oh yeah, he was one of the kids wasn't he? Yeah. He was. Yeah he was one that obviously did not lose his life
• 27:10
  and
• 27:12
  obviously many of the families were in shock and trauma. I think they got recompensed and that kind of propelled him to be able to cover the extremely high cost. I mean, look, I could be making this up. I did hear it from a coaching guy who was really pretty high up in in English tennis. I'm not gonna I nearly said British tennis. I don't know what to say in Scottish tennis.
• 27:31
  And, because he was a Scott and a good one, you know, and, yeah, that that gave them a lift up the ladder because it's, anybody that wants to take up tennis seriously, you're on a hiding to nothing, and it's
• 27:42
  it's a very tough path. But, yeah, so I'd read a lot of, you know, a lot of things came out. The Internet, of course, was picking up just after that. This is '96, I think, wasn't it, Dunblane? But by about eight or ten years later, a lot of information started to pile in. I remember reading a lot of that back at the time and going, oh, this is icky. And this was before, I guess, the whole of the world is run by psychopathic pedophiles
• 28:06
  sort of type thing had risen in strength, but there was certainly something
• 28:10
  very odd about it. You know, and the fact that isn't all the information from that blocked off for like a hundred years or something? There's a some kind of a court order. Yeah. Now wouldn't that be a fun one to have a look at? I think it was seventy years it's buried. Yeah. Now wouldn't that be a fun one? Are you planning on being around Mike to see it when they take out the envelope? Come on. Yeah, when Rupert gets in and that ain't gonna be as long as what people think, but that's another story.
• 28:37
  Unknown: Round about 2001
• 28:39
  there was a rally I think to Sports Association
• 28:41
  up in London,
• 28:43
  and I think it was Frank Fields,
• 28:45
  I can't remember what he's a minister or whatever,
• 28:47
  but he spoke to us at the rally
• 28:49
  and he said that at that time, don't forget since 2001,
• 28:54
  there were approximately 30,000
• 28:56
  Section five firearm holders in the country.
• 29:00
  Who are they?
• 29:02
  Unknown: Not us. What's Section five?
• 29:05
  Unknown: Is that a particular category of gun holder? What's Section five? Yeah, but again every time you ask me a question it opens a can of words. The Section five prohibits deception in the 68 firearms act.
• 29:17
  Unknown: Okay.
• 29:18
  Unknown: And these are the guns, these are the weapons that they think is so dangerous. You have to have the authority of the Secretary of State. Before that, it the it was the authority, the admiral gene in air marshals or something going back to 1920.
• 29:32
  But then we've got another can of worms.
• 29:35
  Because prior to 1920
• 29:36
  there was nothing.
• 29:38
  All you had was a pistol license.
• 29:41
  If you want to take it out a a gun out the curtains of your own house it was revenue raising. You had to get a license.
• 29:48
  After we ended up joining the, I'll do it briefly,
• 29:52
  the League of Nations
• 29:53
  in 1919.
• 29:55
  Yes. Which was drawn up by
• 29:58
  us
• 29:59
  Again, you'll see the same names have come up. The sword was assessed all the Crown Boards, the Bryce family, the Ross Charles here. Yeah. They're all in on it. Yeah. One
• 30:10
  of the aims of the legal nation was disarmament.
• 30:14
  And the firearms act was passed to honour our obligations
• 30:18
  at the
• 30:20
  the Treaty of Peace in Paris.
• 30:22
  Because that that that's where the League of Nations was created. That's the first attempt at one world government.
• 30:29
  And people might sneer at that and say here we go conspiracy.
• 30:33
  Well
• 30:34
  conspiracy
• 30:35
  no more. Read the Hansard debates it tells you.
• 30:38
  Mhmm. All my evidence comes from parliamentary debates in Hansard.
• 30:43
  There's no arguing.
• 30:44
  So they
• 30:47
  had emergency powers in place which I believe were mentioned finished on the 09/01/1920.
• 30:56
  And surprise surprise a fire alarm that was brought in just before the the end of August
• 31:02
  twenty twenty.
• 31:04
  And they there was a a prohibited section.
• 31:09
  And the idea of the prohibited section
• 31:11
  was to
• 31:12
  prohibit noxious substance and gases.
• 31:15
  Well it's got nothing to do with firearms, you could have had a noxious substance and gases act,
• 31:21
  but it was put into the firearms legislation. Oh by the way that's when dealers had to be registered as well for the first time. What gun dealers? Yes. That's right. They had to register them.
• 31:31
  And
• 31:32
  so we were with the 1928.
• 31:36
  Yeah so
• 31:39
  I just lost my train of thought on that one now. I've got so much fun. Sorry, because I butted in. No,
• 31:45
  it's one of our
• 31:47
  sorry we're talking about the prohibited section.
• 31:50
  Now
• 31:51
  subsequent to that
• 31:53
  they said that
• 31:55
  the prohibited section contained
• 31:57
  this section I don't know whether it might have been five in the 20 Act, I can't remember but it created a useful section.
• 32:05
  Now come 1937
• 32:07
  I think it was.
• 32:11
  It was Lord Strabowgli
• 32:13
  in the House of Lords who didn't go under the name previously because he was picked up off the street. He he supported our right to arms for defense and they didn't like what he said. I forget what his name was in the debates previously.
• 32:25
  Unknown: Strabowgli,
• 32:26
  that's a memorable name. Strabowgli.
• 32:29
  Okay, never heard of that one, Mike. Yeah, interesting. Anyway,
• 32:33
  Unknown: what happened is that he
• 32:35
  was talking about
• 32:37
  this ban because what they decided to do is to put fully automatic weapons into this prohibited category.
• 32:45
  So that was the first start and then you go forward again to
• 32:50
  was it '88 and the
• 32:53
  what's his name again? The one at Hungerford.
• 32:56
  Unknown: It's an automatic rifle. Michael Ryan was that?
• 33:01
  My brain's working, yep it popped up just then, just took a little while to come through. Michael Ryan, I remember that. Yeah and now that now they put all self loading rifles into that same category,
• 33:12
  Unknown: and they also cut the shotguns to three shot
• 33:17
  and you actually crimp them. The amount of dealers that try to crimp these shoes
• 33:21
  and it just fell off. I mean you can't it's almost impossible.
• 33:25
  But anyway that that was the legacy of that one and then we had the, I think next one is the Dumblaine one
• 33:33
  and it all
• 33:36
  guns above two-two calibre and then subsequently two-two calibre as well.
• 33:42
  So
• 33:44
  that was it. Now strangely enough
• 33:48
  they were put into a section five and we were told that they were banned,
• 33:53
  but they're not banned. You simply need the authority of the Secretary of State.
• 33:59
  Right.
• 34:00
  It's that simple.
• 34:02
  Now,
• 34:04
  target practice
• 34:06
  was a military term
• 34:07
  which you used
• 34:09
  and you'll find that in 1997
• 34:13
  a friend of mine was renewing his certificate
• 34:16
  and where he said
• 34:18
  reasons and he said for defence of the realm and target
• 34:21
  practice
• 34:23
  and it was returned to him as target shooting.
• 34:27
  Now that's a different ball game, that's going out enjoying a pastime,
• 34:32
  not just golf football etc,
• 34:34
  and that's not covered by the Bill of Rights. Target shooting is not covered by the Bill of Rights. That's right, Target practices
• 34:42
  and they changed that in the 1997
• 34:45
  amendment act. They didn't ban them, they simply moved into another category and I believe it wasn't even parliament that done it, I think it was an Act of the Executive by ordering council
• 34:55
  which raises another
• 34:57
  thing. But anyway going back to this right to arms,
• 35:01
  when I went to the High Court I got a judgment from Justice Popperwell
• 35:06
  which claimed that the Bill of Rights that you implied you'd be peeled by further legislation. This is article seven, the Bill of Rights.
• 35:14
  Etcetera and any
• 35:16
  other he refused my
• 35:18
  go to the court of appeal which said any other action I do would be doomed to failure.
• 35:23
  So I appealed his decision, ended up in the high court.
• 35:28
  And there were three jokers there. Was it Morrick Gibson and Henry?
• 35:34
  Now, Henry during the course of the discussion,
• 35:37
  he said that he sat on a law commission repealing common law.
• 35:42
  How on earth can a law commission repeal common law?
• 35:47
  This is some way through the trial so I intimated
• 35:50
  what he's talking about is doubling in something treasonable.
• 35:54
  Well it doesn't go down too well but ultimately
• 35:57
  what they said is that
• 36:00
  as allowed by law is a changing thing and parliament you know has decided to change the law now and you now need a section five authority. Mr Burke can't get around that provision.
• 36:12
  Well he can do because he's obliged to issue.
• 36:15
  And
• 36:18
  if you read very carefully the letters
• 36:21
  where I've written one of my documents to the
• 36:25
  Secretary of State on this subject.
• 36:28
  You'll
• 36:29
  note that he refused my application as a matter of policy,
• 36:34
  not law,
• 36:36
  and essentially that policy will stay in place unless government policy
• 36:41
  changes.
• 36:43
  Policy can't change the law,
• 36:46
  so therefore that right still exists.
• 36:50
  Unknown: He was just making a claim that he could or he's trying to imply that he could or he was trying to sort of basically brainwash everyone. I've said this sentence and therefore that's that.
• 37:01
  Unknown: But it's been the policy of previous governments to not
• 37:04
  allow the people of their ministry to protect themselves.
• 37:08
  Unknown: But
• 37:09
  Unknown: there's something come up and I suddenly remembered. I I wrote to him and he he he wrote a letter back so I put him in his place.
• 37:17
  And he said he said to me and I only read it a few minutes ago actually before the show started. Oh great. And he he he said
• 37:24
  I can't believe that I'm merely here as a rubber stamp for anyone that wants
• 37:28
  a gun for protection or a section five weapon.
• 37:31
  I can't believe it. That's his personal opinion. I can't believe it.
• 37:35
  Therefore, the Secretary of State, and here's the word, has a discretion.
• 37:42
  And I didn't pick it up.
• 37:44
  It's only the penny dropped today. We were in a discretionary jurisdiction.
• 37:49
  Unknown: That
• 37:50
  word this came up the other day you know, was doing something the other day this word discretion I had to look it up. Isn't discretion basically what I say goes?
• 37:59
  Unknown: Exactly and
• 38:01
  when I had
• 38:03
  was able to have a quick paper on a Rupert's applications
• 38:08
  or his refusal of the judgment from the High Court of Appeal Court. I think it was a high court. This is Rupert Lowe you're talking about now? Yes.
• 38:15
  Okay.
• 38:16
  Bear in mind I've never voted through my life.
• 38:20
  Unknown: Me neither, so we're in a good club. I like this, this is good, this sounds great, I've never done it. This is the only guy I could ever look to
• 38:27
  Unknown: throughout
• 38:28
  the history, you know throughout my time.
• 38:31
  Unknown: I'm the same, this is like an echo chamber around it, it's like that's it. I I banged on about this. It's not that I view, you know, we were discussing it, weren't we the other day? I don't view politics as the thing that's going to answer the situation,
• 38:42
  Unknown: but you've got to look at the the horses in the paddock and he's the only one recently that's talked like an adult for a start. That's right, but it's the politics that has to go and common law has to return because when you start talking about politics is what we are, we can talk in terms of us not being governed
• 38:59
  by a parliament, we're governed by the executive
• 39:02
  And the executive of the corporate side of the monarchy. But then that's another whole can of worms.
• 39:07
  Well we'll into that. Yeah if if we so if we're looking at the
• 39:12
  the the Bill of Rights. Er so going back to Rupert Lowe's judgement.
• 39:16
  You scan through it and then the
• 39:19
  judge says
• 39:20
  again, are they judges? That's another can of worms. He said I have a discretion.
• 39:25
  Well
• 39:26
  again I was looking at
• 39:29
  something I was researching the other day about this discretionary jurisdiction
• 39:34
  and essentially these ministers are all given a discretion.
• 39:38
  This includes all judges because they exercise the prerogative of the king. That's what the discretion is, they're in a discretionary jurisdiction. Now
• 39:46
  because you're in a discretionary jurisdiction,
• 39:49
  you can't
• 39:51
  be part of a system which has stare decisis, I. Things already decided,
• 39:57
  Because
• 39:58
  you can't be told
• 40:00
  what the judgements, what you have to do. You can't be fettered by
• 40:05
  previous judgements.
• 40:07
  And the reason you can't be fettered by previous judgements. And can you believe this? Is because you have a discretion
• 40:14
  and if you follow precedent
• 40:16
  then you're not exercising your discretion.
• 40:20
  Unknown: Say that again, say that again.
• 40:22
  Unknown: No way, can you? No way.
• 40:26
  Unknown: My
• 40:27
  brain just hit a gear, skin Yeah, scratch,
• 40:30
  Unknown: which goes back to exactly what I said to
• 40:34
  Keith Bottomley at the time, when I said you're fetic with an obligation.
• 40:38
  But of course you can't be fetic, but yes he is, but because Bea running is a corporation and therefore the common law, the Bill of Rights and that sort of thing don't apply because they've created their own system.
• 40:51
  It's all policy law. That's why it's got to stop. When you think about every time
• 40:56
  you worry about who's going to get in the next election
• 40:59
  and etc,
• 41:00
  know, who should be new Prime Minister.
• 41:03
  Well up until 1714,
• 41:05
  there was no Prime Minister. There was no whips. They didn't exist.
• 41:10
  You know, again, this this goes off a bit. This just shows you how big this can of worms is and how long they've been subverting our rights and liberties. But essentially, our right to carry weapons
• 41:21
  for our defence
• 41:23
  cannot
• 41:24
  be taken away.
• 41:26
  If they alleged that they had, then they'd have to re disarm the police
• 41:31
  because
• 41:34
  they could only carry a common law. Again that opens up another can of worms about the role of the police and all this as well.
• 41:41
  Right. So essentially
• 41:43
  yes you can have weapons for your defence. All you need to do because they put another hurdle instead of just a certificate.
• 41:49
  You now have to write a a five. It means just just section five from the Home Secretary
• 41:54
  and the chief chief of constable
• 41:57
  has to
• 41:58
  issue you with a certificate.
• 42:00
  The problem we have was firearms certificates and their certificate not licenses and I get fed up with people calling them licenses.
• 42:07
  We know it's a certificate because it's said on it license is a certificate, completely different things.
• 42:13
  But when you get a certificate
• 42:15
  you're told you have to sign it.
• 42:18
  Unknown: With your wedding signature,
• 42:19
  Unknown: you have to put your name on it, Right? That's right. And of course by signing it you agree to the you you agree to to the to the conditions.
• 42:28
  And that one of them. Yeah. To be used on approved ranges only.
• 42:31
  But if you actually look at the terms in the certificate itself
• 42:35
  it tells you when this gun's not being being used for cleaning, testing,
• 42:42
  or
• 42:43
  cleanly tested or something rather or
• 42:46
  some other
• 42:47
  purpose connected with its use, you should keep it in a safe. If you're not cleaning, testing and doing, I can't remember what the third one is, the only thing left you can do with the gun is is to have personal protection. So you're quite entitled to have it out the safe.
• 43:01
  But you've been we've been conditioned
• 43:04
  to
• 43:06
  believe that they can do well in fact there was another guy on the forum who said he suddenly turned up in his house one morning, know, can they do that to suddenly do a spot check?
• 43:16
  A friend of mine had that done many years ago.
• 43:19
  Him and his wife both could shoot other shooters.
• 43:22
  His
• 43:24
  guns were on
• 43:26
  her
• 43:26
  guns were on his certificate but his guns weren't on hers and they'd been shooting the day before, not you know it's been done slinging gun under the bed sometime, you can't be asked to clean it.
• 43:37
  And
• 43:38
  he got a visit from the old Bill
• 43:41
  and they said he would come to check your firearms.
• 43:44
  So they went back upstairs
• 43:46
  and his wife's sitting in the bedroom
• 43:49
  and
• 43:50
  you see the old Bill's mind working,
• 43:53
  go through all the paperwork, ah,
• 43:55
  his guns weren't on her certificate,
• 43:58
  therefore it should have been locked up but the gun was under the bed. We've got you!
• 44:05
  Unbelievable
• 44:06
  aren't they?
• 44:07
  Another
• 44:08
  guy who wrote to the police
• 44:11
  when we was doing Norris back in the late 90s and said
• 44:15
  you already had he said I I already have had a handgun but he said I I want
• 44:21
  done as per the bit of rights. And they said no. Check up the home office and you can't have a comfort defence etcetera.
• 44:28
  Obviously if you've got any more queries please don't hesitate to contact us. I've got the original documents.
• 44:34
  So he wrote back and said could you oh that's right, the police said it's been repealed by later legislation. So he wrote back and said could you actually show me where it's been repealed?
• 44:42
  That was it, got a visit in view of the continued correspondence between the police and us and you. We're revoking your certificate
• 44:51
  because he continued to ask questions. They invited him to ask the question for which his certificate was revoked.
• 44:58
  Unknown: Like oh like you're being insolent by actually taking us up on the offer that we've invited you to make to ask us questions. Because he did, oh you cheeky booger and they took it away.
• 45:08
  Kind of thing. So
• 45:10
  Unknown: we're talking about
• 45:12
  handguns and
• 45:14
  other
• 45:15
  various firearms,
• 45:17
  but of course we've also got things like friction lock buttons for example.
• 45:21
  Well what happened to those?
• 45:23
  They've been banned, prohibited. Well are they really? So go back and look at history. And this is the point. In order to find the answers,
• 45:32
  you can't just sort of scrap around here and there looking at bits of paper and try and put something together. It's taken me over thirty years to put it all together.
• 45:40
  Amazing. So I've it all.
• 45:42
  All of what's been going on with firearm legislation and the crooked deals they were doing,
• 45:48
  in fact one of the judges was involved in the debates about shotguns and
• 45:53
  they already conditioned on a certificate,
• 45:56
  but you
• 45:57
  can't see it. And the
• 45:59
  judge was told,
• 46:01
  he said no mention could be mentioned in this if a case comes to the High Court,
• 46:06
  know,
• 46:07
  we can't mention that you were involved in the debates on it etc etc.
• 46:11
  It's scandalous.
• 46:13
  Unknown: There's a question in here Mike or a little sort of pose up
• 46:18
  from
• 46:18
  Billy over in FFT chat. Hi Billy
• 46:22
  and several others. I'm scouring them and scanning them as you're talking. He says, so lawfully
• 46:27
  has anyone overturned
• 46:29
  the illegality
• 46:31
  of not carrying firearms
• 46:33
  as it's lawfully permitted in this country? Is it not? It's lawfully as you're explaining here right? It's lawfully permitted to do so. So
• 46:42
  are there processes that people undergo now
• 46:45
  to secure for themselves a firearm?
• 46:48
  Unknown: No
• 46:49
  because
• 46:50
  of the situation we're
• 46:52
  in with this corporate
• 46:54
  entity,
• 46:55
  the Crown Corporation running us.
• 46:59
  They they the executive,
• 47:01
  they control
• 47:04
  parliament. We know that. Look at all the ministers in there. But again to understand what that means you have to study the law because none of them should be there. They shouldn't be a prime minister. They shouldn't be the whips and that sort of thing.
• 47:16
  They're in total control but not only the executive in total control now. They've taken over the monarchy. They've taken over the prerogative of the king
• 47:24
  and which
• 47:26
  which they've created this discretion in jurisdiction.
• 47:30
  And there was another thing I'm just trying to I've got so much buzzing around me that I'm trying to think of the other part.
• 47:36
  Where were we on it?
• 47:40
  Oh that's what about getting it overturned.
• 47:42
  So
• 47:45
  the short answer is no because they have a blanket policy of refusing all such applications.
• 47:52
  Because it's policy not law.
• 47:55
  Er
• 47:55
  because the the Bill of Rights etcetera has been suspended.
• 48:01
  But again that that in itself
• 48:03
  the you can't can you how
• 48:05
  Unknown: do you suspend the yeah.
• 48:08
  Unknown: Yeah, because a Bill of Rights, even Blackstone confirmed in his commentaries, that the declaration
• 48:14
  and the Bill of Rights, you don't forget there's two, there's a Declaration of Rights
• 48:18
  which was read to William and Mary prior to the offering of the
• 48:22
  and that was incorporated
• 48:23
  into a Bill of Rights which eventually passed in December
• 48:27
  1689.
• 48:31
  Yeah the
• 48:33
  Bill of Rights, because some parts of the Bill of Rights were partly
• 48:37
  repealed
• 48:38
  in
• 48:39
  2005
• 48:40
  and 2013,
• 48:42
  I think.
• 48:43
  But
• 48:45
  when you look at the legislation that repealed it,
• 48:48
  again here we go again, the Queen couldn't pass it.
• 48:52
  Unknown: Because she would have been breaking her oath or her role as monarch?
• 48:57
  She would have invalidated herself if she'd passed it.
• 49:00
  Unknown: Yeah, well no she couldn't pass it because it handed over the power to the executive to govern us,
• 49:06
  and that the executive didn't exist before
• 49:10
  1714.
• 49:12
  So you see the problem, you've got to go right back and see just how crooked the whole system is and put the whole lot together.
• 49:20
  So if if we if we stroke forward again to buttons and that sort of thing for example because at the moment I personally if I had a daughter I'd be reluctant to get let her go anyway without it. These these rapes at Rupert's again he he's made aware of. It's horrendous.
• 49:37
  Absolutely horrendous. You can't tell me that there's women don't deserve to allow to carry you know, irritant sprays or in fact, handguns. I'm sure a lot of them are capable.
• 49:47
  Unknown: Yeah what were those small little pistols that the ladies had in
• 49:51
  the cowboy days? Know that little was it a derringer? Yeah
• 49:56
  Unknown: he gets nice little ones if they get once you know some. There you go ladies, we need to get to derringerisus.com
• 50:03
  Unknown: that's what we all you all need derringers. I've always fancied a beretta, I think that's the favourite, that's the tool of choice for James Bond isn't it? Doesn't he have a beretta? He does in some of the stories. Got the semi auto one but yes so I think that there should be a mass application because
• 50:19
  Unknown: ultimately,
• 50:23
  I in fact wrote to them back in for
• 50:26
  my son and my wife back in 2004,
• 50:29
  and I wrote to him for a section five,
• 50:32
  they declined it, I said okay, if I get Nick to carry on one,
• 50:36
  you as a responsible official will have to account for your neglected duty etc.
• 50:41
  But again you see you won't be able to prosecute them because they're all in it together, Not only is the executive taking over, but they also have a
• 50:49
  partnership with the judiciary would you believe? So the executive
• 50:53
  who should never have law making powers
• 50:56
  now have law making powers, and they partnered up with the judiciary. So there's no judicial independence.
• 51:03
  The judiciary
• 51:04
  are now exercising
• 51:06
  the prerogative of the monarch because
• 51:09
  the monarch has a discretionary jurisdiction,
• 51:11
  but the discretion can only be used for our benefit.
• 51:16
  Unknown: It can't be used you know for private gain or for advantage of a certain section. That's
• 51:21
  right, and there's a nickels Which is what they are doing when he says so he says this is a discretionary court, it's like I'm going to make some decisions that favor what I like and it's got nothing to do with you peasants out there, that kind of thing.
• 51:33
  Unknown: Yeah, I
• 51:36
  knew that I was in discretionary jurisdiction, had a recent bankruptcy bankruptcy hearing about a year ago
• 51:41
  and
• 51:42
  I got fed up with playing the shenanigans. I got screwed over.
• 51:46
  That's another long story about the police and the enforcement agents and the council
• 51:50
  and the crooked barrister in the county
• 51:53
  court and the fake evidence of the council
• 51:58
  official
• 51:59
  regarding
• 52:00
  liability order
• 52:01
  and the plea of the barrister to the judge, you know, you're the you're the judicial gatekeeper otherwise people, you know, the jury might be looking for first verdict. So,
• 52:11
  judge then took a matter of fact out the hand of the jury.
• 52:16
  And decided
• 52:17
  for herself that a document existed that no no one's ever seen it. And the council admitted
• 52:23
  that they had no record of it.
• 52:26
  And then the police said if you carry on your case we'll hit you for $70 costs,
• 52:32
  so eventually it was $15
• 52:34
  and
• 52:35
  then ultimately that ended up to bankruptcy proceedings.
• 52:39
  I got the fake document. It just shows you how crooked they all are, this so called liability order issued by Magistrates Court, what a lot of rubbish that is. It doesn't exist. It's a council printout,
• 52:50
  even the court wasn't the same. It was dated the day before the hearing.
• 52:54
  It was an indecipherable
• 52:55
  signature where it says Justice of There was no name, there's no address, there was no amount,
• 53:02
  there was no case number,
• 53:04
  and when you look very carefully underneath the word
• 53:08
  justice of the the peace,
• 53:10
  there were the two words or and a few lines of words and another or and another few lines of words.
• 53:17
  And when you look carefully examined it, some of the words have been crossed out. Now if you want to lead it you just put a line through the whole lot because it doesn't exist. Or you put scrub it through a wall or whatever.
• 53:29
  And but strangely enough I had that that
• 53:33
  that thing online.
• 53:35
  And there was another one which came with
• 53:39
  the same signature written slightly differently but it's obviously the same person who signed it.
• 53:45
  And different words had
• 53:48
  been deleted.
• 53:49
  Even the word magistrates had been taken off, and when you read it, liability orders, these counter liability orders don't emanate from the magistrates court, they're done by a
• 54:00
  designated
• 54:01
  officer at a designated
• 54:03
  court.
• 54:04
  It's a fraudulent instrument.
• 54:07
  Stick it in front of the judge and I said look there it is. I said it's a fraudulent instrument. I said it's
• 54:13
  and I
• 54:15
  said that the council made it up themselves. And I said not only that, the
• 54:19
  so called liability order was dated the day before the hearing.
• 54:27
  So
• 54:28
  the signature authorizing it was
• 54:32
  someone signed something and uploaded it into their computer system the day before the hearing about 11:00 at night or something. I can't remember what it was. So how is that possible? So has he been to court?
• 54:44
  Unknown: Yes.
• 54:45
  Unknown: Yeah, and this
• 54:47
  is a scam.
• 54:48
  And then instead
• 54:50
  of the judge throwing out the matter,
• 54:54
  he then
• 54:56
  adjourned it and wanted me to go back to the county court to try and get the previous order overturned.
• 55:05
  Really I've got cat nail shots of doing that.
• 55:07
  I spoke to some friends of mine because I've been process serving for many many years
• 55:12
  And most of the noise in the area and they said that's going to cost you mega bucks. Well the the judge in the county court was listening because it was a jury trial and the claim for damages I had against the police. So I should have come away with it about 70 to 100,000.
• 55:26
  Okay. Instead I'll come out owing them
• 55:29
  $15.
• 55:32
  So having looked it all he he he then adjourned it for me to go back. Well that was absolutely pointless.
• 55:38
  Mhmm. Because they're all in it together.
• 55:40
  Then they had the
• 55:43
  bankruptcy petition and then eventually I went back
• 55:47
  on the next hearing.
• 55:51
  I'm not corresponding with them at all,
• 55:53
  And I thought I've had enough of this. The system is so rotten that I'll just pay up
• 55:59
  because it's pointless trying to fight it. It's a waste of time.
• 56:03
  So I said to you again what I thought was a judge there. I said right, okay. I said I just want to pay it and clear it up. So I'd already offered the police solicitors. They need to pay it. They said no leave it to the chap which is a strange thing.
• 56:15
  So I said to the judge right term. I'll pay it. Give me wife a clean enough to keep going through this every time.
• 56:21
  And
• 56:22
  then she hit me with the
• 56:24
  well she says I've got a discretion.
• 56:27
  Here we go. She said I can either return it
• 56:31
  or I can go ahead with the bankruptcy.
• 56:34
  We all know what she's done.
• 56:37
  And
• 56:39
  since then,
• 56:41
  a year down the line, so it's almost the day now,
• 56:44
  and I've had no correspondence with them. All they've done was log something at the land registry and sent a couple of letters so I let them open and they're not to me.
• 56:53
  The
• 56:54
  bill has now crept up to £60,000
• 56:57
  in grade.
• 57:03
  Unknown: It's basically like a allegedly
• 57:06
  Unknown: it could be called a court mafia, couldn't it? Yeah, yeah, it's a star the star chambers, that's what they're they run by the executive.
• 57:14
  But the act abolishing the court Star Chamber, when was that 1641?
• 57:19
  They repealed
• 57:20
  that within Justice of the Peace Act 1968.
• 57:23
  Why did they repeat it? Because the act abolishing the court of Star Chamber where the executive controlled the courts,
• 57:29
  they reenacted it in the Justice of the Peace Act. Could you believe this stuff?
• 57:35
  Unknown: I guess to some degree Mike what it is is, and you know in the second hour this is what we can go into,
• 57:41
  've
• 57:42
  obviously looked at this in terms of specifics regarding firearms and the right to bear arms which still exists and then the complications that you have to go through to actually you know do that but looking at the way that the whole system has broken down ever since say Magna Carta or whenever you want to pick would be really useful to see this because obviously you've as you've said you've studied it and and you know people are not familiar really with Magna Carta Bill of Rights,
• 58:09
  and these other things that we generally don't talk about over here. I know in The States they do,
• 58:15
  and yet these documents,
• 58:18
  could, it seems to me, provide a great safeguard to us in some way if we find the right way of applying them and using them. So
• 58:25
  let's cover that in hour two. We're getting we're just getting to the end of hour one and at this stage we always play a little song. I've played this one a few times actually quite a long time ago really.
• 58:35
  We were talking a little bit earlier about Churchill
• 58:38
  because
• 58:39
  I've
• 58:40
  got him in the potty
• 58:42
  column of history.
• 58:43
  I'm not a fan and this is one of those politically
• 58:47
  incorrect songs that
• 58:49
  Charlie and his orchestra, the National Socialist swing band did back in the day. You've all heard it before. It's called the man with the big cigar.
• 58:57
  I haven't got any cigars today,
• 58:59
  but who knows? We might get some for Christmas. Anyway, we're gonna take a little short musical interlude with this, and we will be back on the other side after this song from Charlie and his Orchestra.
• 59:46
  Unknown: Who is that man
• 59:49
  with the big cigar
• 59:51
  whose greatest friend
• 59:54
  is the USSR?
• 59:57
  He's known around
• 59:59
  from near and far.
• 1:00:02
  That actor man
• 1:00:05
  with the big cigar,
• 1:00:08
  he pops away every night and day with a twinkle in his eye.
• 1:00:13
  And all the while behind that smile lurks many an untold eye. Don't bite always.
• 1:00:20
  You'll see his car.
• 1:00:24
  He's here. He's there. He's everywhere.
• 1:00:26
  The friend of The USSR.
• 1:00:31
  V stands for vanquished.
• 1:00:34
  It's the slogan of his land,
• 1:00:36
  and he'll fight until it's finished,
• 1:00:38
  and there's no one left to stand.
• 1:00:41
  He'll keep the red black lion,
• 1:00:44
  no hammered black and blue,
• 1:00:47
  for he's getting more than he bargained for, not fat friend of the Jews.
• 1:00:53
  So keep your chins up, one and all, and remember what I say.
• 1:00:58
  If Britons were to Britain through,
• 1:01:01
  they'd send that man away. Who is that man
• 1:01:05
  with the big cigar?
• 1:01:08
  He's here. He's there. He's everywhere.
• 1:01:11
  That man with the big cigar.
• 1:02:13
  Unknown: Charlie and his orchestra, the man with the big cigar.
• 1:02:16
  Did you quite like that Mike? It's quite a jolly little tune isn't it?
• 1:02:20
  Unknown: Interesting
• 1:02:21
  but the
• 1:02:22
  sound itself was absolute crap.
• 1:02:25
  Was it?
• 1:02:26
  Was. Is it not sat? Yeah, got in and out.
• 1:02:30
  Unknown: Really? Yeah.
• 1:02:31
  It sounded like it's underwater,
• 1:02:33
  it's underwater sound.
• 1:02:36
  Unknown: Please don't play it again.
• 1:02:40
  Please.
• 1:02:41
  Unknown: I I won't. I won't play it again. That's a bit strange. That's a technical thing. What's happened there? Hi, Paul. Yeah. Hi.
• 1:02:49
  Unknown: I've been I've been sending messages in the chat that your background noise reduction in StreamYard is turned on. It's making your music sound horrible.
• 1:03:01
  Why is turns itself on periodically.
• 1:03:03
  You gotta check those chat messages once in a while. I'm about to swear prolifically,
• 1:03:08
  Unknown: but I better not because this is a family show. So hang on just a minute. Let me I can't believe that. That's wrong. How did it oh, wait. Has it switched? Has
• 1:03:17
  Unknown: it? Has it? It's horribly, horribly wrong. It is. It's something StreamYard does.
• 1:03:22
  So
• 1:03:23
  Unknown: Hello,
• 1:03:24
  everybody. Can you hear me clearly now?
• 1:03:26
  Unknown: Good grief. Oh, we could hear you
• 1:03:30
  clearly all the time. It's just the music that
• 1:03:32
  it considers as background noise because it's constant.
• 1:03:36
  So
• 1:03:37
  Unknown: My apologies everybody.
• 1:03:39
  The the the technology
• 1:03:40
  thanks Paul for pointing it out. Sorry about that. So you couldn't even enjoy the song. I was just dancing around quite happily here with my glass of water. Sorry to put you through that everybody. It must have sounded crap on the other side. I have no idea why. So
• 1:03:53
  there we go so thanks Paul for pointing that out. Anyway technical there's always something isn't there over the whole thing I don't know it's just like a never ending battle against switches and crap
• 1:04:03
  I have no idea I hate this stuff at times really, always deciding it's gonna do what it wants to do.
• 1:04:10
  It's funny because I was using it earlier today and everything was fine. Anyway, never mind.
• 1:04:14
  So here we are, we're back in hour two.
• 1:04:17
  Got Eric's in the studio. Feel free Eric by the way to chip in at any point. Thank you. But we're we're here with Mike Burke and
• 1:04:24
  Mike just as I was saying there before that dreadful song, sorry for actually putting everybody through it, didn't realize it was so crap.
• 1:04:32
  We
• 1:04:33
  were just talking about the whole history, whole of sort of the long line that's got us to this point, is there sort of any particular
• 1:04:40
  place you think might be relevant to start off with all this kind of stuff?
• 1:04:44
  Unknown: Yeah, if
• 1:04:46
  we continue
• 1:04:47
  from
• 1:04:49
  you see people don't really most
• 1:04:51
  people still haven't heard about the Bill of Rights
• 1:04:54
  and less even less they know about the Declaration of Rights
• 1:04:59
  which preceded it.
• 1:05:01
  So they're two separate documents
• 1:05:03
  but as I said the terms of the declaration was incorporated
• 1:05:07
  into a Bill of Rights
• 1:05:09
  obviously with
• 1:05:11
  further words etc.
• 1:05:13
  Now
• 1:05:16
  it it was established or reestablished. It was going Christianity
• 1:05:19
  was going to be the mode of government.
• 1:05:22
  And that was permanent.
• 1:05:24
  Here hereafter
• 1:05:25
  forever.
• 1:05:27
  Christian Christian government, Christian legislator,
• 1:05:30
  Christian monarch.
• 1:05:31
  Unknown: Yeah.
• 1:05:34
  Unknown: Largely I have I can't go into the Jesuits and airing for it because like with the the gunpowder plot for example Guy Fawkes and we all think he's a hero. But in fact you'll find out that it was actually what the the gunplayer that plot was actually what they called the great Jesuit treason and
• 1:05:51
  papal papal
• 1:05:53
  suffering for other and it was a pope that they used to go around
• 1:05:56
  burning the effigy on.
• 1:05:59
  Unknown: Fact John Is that what they first did? What year is the gunpowder pot? '16?
• 1:06:04
  Unknown: 1605.
• 1:06:05
  Unknown: I had that in my head I was about to say it, seriously I was. 1605
• 1:06:09
  okay. Yeah of course Fawkes wasn't Fawkes jumped off the scaffold and broke his neck didn't he and and denied the
• 1:06:16
  the gory execution but they still went ahead with it anyway even though he was dead by then because he'd broken his neck.
• 1:06:22
  Unknown: Don't know what happened there but I can just remember because someone wrote an article covering all this which is very good and a lot of it confirmed what I'd already found out and it's the Jesuits involved in it. I mean the Jesuits have taken over the Vatican
• 1:06:36
  almost from early times. They're always in control of it.
• 1:06:40
  Yeah. And and
• 1:06:41
  so there's a lot happening
• 1:06:43
  prior to
• 1:06:44
  after the death of William and Mary
• 1:06:47
  and Queen Anne coming onto the throne. That's the late 1600s,
• 1:06:51
  Unknown: yeah? Early 1700s?
• 1:06:53
  Unknown: 1700s,
• 1:06:54
  yeah. Yeah. We had the act of Settlement which was a
• 1:06:58
  good piece of legislation,
• 1:07:00
  and then we had the union with Scotland.
• 1:07:05
  Now
• 1:07:06
  again that threw up a can of worms because
• 1:07:10
  we were to be governed as the Kingdom Of England.
• 1:07:13
  And now became Great Britain.
• 1:07:16
  But this was after she had sworn her right because she became come to the throne after death. I think it was Mary wasn't it? 1690 or something. I can't remember exactly now.
• 1:07:27
  But it it started off the the the joining of the
• 1:07:32
  Scotland in England.
• 1:07:34
  It started off whereas it is expedient which she's done something which is morally wrong. So she's obviously come under the influence of you know a a bad she's
• 1:07:43
  been given bad advice even
• 1:07:46
  counselling.
• 1:07:49
  Subsequent to her reign when she died in 2014
• 1:07:54
  the
• 1:07:56
  there used to be what they called an office of Lord High Treasurer and he's one of he he was in charge of the money if you like.
• 1:08:05
  Right. And he had a staff of office and a letter's patent for the treasury.
• 1:08:11
  And I thought it had been put into into commission and
• 1:08:16
  out of it emerged the very first Prime Minister who's the first Lord of the Treasury.
• 1:08:21
  Er I can't remember the second ones and the Whips who were junior lords of the Treasury.
• 1:08:27
  Now
• 1:08:28
  people I didn't really fully understand it but I had another friend also doing the same research.
• 1:08:33
  And what what it turned out to be
• 1:08:36
  is that
• 1:08:38
  George the first was a German king. He got no interest in running England. This is all this is relevant to what what's happened now.
• 1:08:46
  Right. Because this is what started the ship storm in the first place.
• 1:08:49
  Yes. It's very moment in time.
• 1:08:52
  So and the Lord High Treasurer because there was no the king was the chief executive.
• 1:08:59
  And the Lord High Treasurer reported
• 1:09:02
  to the to the king along with the Lord High Chancellor and someone else. There was no prime minister didn't exist.
• 1:09:09
  So by
• 1:09:10
  apparently it wasn't put into commission. It's been vacant since 1714
• 1:09:16
  because the office of Lord High Treasurer
• 1:09:19
  has to be concurrent with the staff of office and the letters pattern.
• 1:09:23
  Unknown: Yes.
• 1:09:24
  Unknown: But because
• 1:09:26
  they created
• 1:09:28
  because this is where the first prime minister appeared,
• 1:09:31
  because we now had an executive
• 1:09:35
  take a foothold into parliament because they now control the money.
• 1:09:39
  Unknown: What year is this Mike again roughly?
• 1:09:43
  Unknown: 1714.
• 1:09:45
  Unknown: Okay so that's what twenty years after the formation of the Bank of England in 1694
• 1:09:50
  right? So twenty years
• 1:09:52
  Unknown: Okay yeah yeah that follows, yep got that. And again if you look at the terms on that, that's it again there's a lot of funny things going on there. And by the way in about that same era, an act was passed by William and Mary to say that
• 1:10:06
  a parliament should be held at least once every three years.
• 1:10:13
  Because they weren't holding them that regularly back then, You don't because you don't need them, because it clearly goes on for another can of worms. What's parliament for?
• 1:10:23
  Parliament is there to redress your grievances.
• 1:10:27
  That's all they're there for.
• 1:10:29
  So if you've got a problem, you have a grievance, you know, we've we've got canal boats and you're trying to commit with this compete with the stagecoaches,
• 1:10:37
  you know, in the seventeen, eighteen hundreds or whatever.
• 1:10:40
  You petition parliament with a dress of grievance. The canals are all blocked up etcetera etcetera.
• 1:10:45
  So they would they would that petition would then be lying on the table to see if anyone else
• 1:10:51
  had the same problem,
• 1:10:53
  and the King did not receive any grant
• 1:10:57
  until all our grievances were redressed.
• 1:11:00
  That's how the system worked. That's what legislation should have been.
• 1:11:05
  Unknown: So until the grievance is redressed he didn't get the grant? He didn't get supplies.
• 1:11:11
  Yes.
• 1:11:12
  Unknown: But of course all that changed because we had Rothschilds getting, but that's another can of worms as well. So yes, so that was 1714,
• 1:11:20
  So they now controlled the finances.
• 1:11:23
  So of course then if people
• 1:11:25
  join them they would get pensions and that sort of thing, and once you get a minister what do they do? They create ministries.
• 1:11:32
  So from that one point in time
• 1:11:34
  the executive have now taken complete control of everything. They control, like I said to you before, they control part of the House of Lords, they control the House of Parliament,
• 1:11:44
  the House of Commons, they control the police, the judiciary,
• 1:11:49
  they've they've they've taken over the
• 1:11:53
  the Crown of England. We place it with a fictional Crown Corporation.
• 1:11:56
  But there's nothing you can do about it.
• 1:11:59
  Because they have all the power.
• 1:12:01
  What can you do? And in fact in 1927
• 1:12:05
  the Marquise of Baths remarked in the comment in Parliament
• 1:12:10
  regarding
• 1:12:11
  the corporate
• 1:12:13
  existence of that house and said how long do we plan to put up with the corporate existence
• 1:12:18
  of the House of Commons? And that goes back to the Parliament Act 1911 which is not in canon words.
• 1:12:24
  And he said the executive had complete control now, the police, you know, the military executive,
• 1:12:30
  there's no way we can fight back. This was 1927,
• 1:12:34
  almost a hundred years ago.
• 1:12:36
  That's how long it's been going on. It's drip feed.
• 1:12:40
  We now accept that all these rules and regulations be governed by them. Who makes them? Not your duly elected members of parliament. Who brings in the bills? The executive.
• 1:12:51
  And once a bill is passed what does it do? It gives power to the executive
• 1:12:56
  to make orders in council, regulations.
• 1:12:59
  Blackstone actually called it newfangled treason.
• 1:13:03
  Unknown: I like that, I like that, that is great because it's now old fangled treason isn't it? Because they've been doing for several hundred years but at the time when he said it. Yeah and
• 1:13:14
  Unknown: another anecdote
• 1:13:15
  in conjunction with that, it appeared not more than
• 1:13:18
  once in Han Sod,
• 1:13:21
  if I can remember the words Satan is now wiser than of yore, he tempts by making rich not poor.
• 1:13:31
  Unknown: Don't
• 1:13:33
  you think it's always this leaking in
• 1:13:36
  of
• 1:13:37
  currency purchasing power from the usual suspects that begins the slow but inevitable corruption of all these institutions.
• 1:13:45
  They they lose their way, do they not? The individuals themselves are tempted
• 1:13:49
  by something or other, and they just start to turn blind eyes and after doing that for fifty years everything's
• 1:13:56
  Unknown: like a toilet bowl, that's really what's going on. I mean it doesn't stop, mean that's where the executive first got the foothold,
• 1:14:04
  That was in 1714.
• 1:14:06
  Now since that date
• 1:14:09
  and up to, well including George the first,
• 1:14:14
  oaths that the monarchs swear at their coronation is set out set out in the Coronation Oath Act 1688.
• 1:14:21
  That
• 1:14:23
  oath has never been changed.
• 1:14:26
  If you look on legislation.gov,
• 1:14:29
  the coronation oath, you'll find that it's exactly the same form as it was in 1688.
• 1:14:34
  Unknown: This is the same year as the Bill of Rights, the whole thing is interlinked, is that right? Yeah it is, because
• 1:14:41
  Unknown: the ancient
• 1:14:42
  oath that King swore and the French raised it back from the 1300s
• 1:14:47
  was the same oath, but it had the word discretion.
• 1:14:53
  Unknown: Oh that word again
• 1:14:55
  Unknown: keeps cropping Justice up, isn't it?
• 1:14:57
  And discretion.
• 1:14:58
  They said that the previous oath approach was framed in doubtful words
• 1:15:04
  and therefore to make sure one uniform
• 1:15:07
  oath be taken in all times to come, and they laid it out
• 1:15:11
  the purpose of the oath. The whole point of the revolution was to free us from potpourri and arbitrary
• 1:15:18
  power which is exactly what we've got now.
• 1:15:22
  Unknown: I love that word, I've come across it a lot yeah.
• 1:15:26
  It was very common at the time wasn't it? Yeah to shake off potpourri.
• 1:15:30
  Unknown: Yeah now for potpourri in Islam
• 1:15:32
  anyway that's another story.
• 1:15:35
  So
• 1:15:36
  essentially that was it. Now
• 1:15:39
  no monarch has sworn the correct oath
• 1:15:42
  since the time of George the first.
• 1:15:45
  Unknown: Year was that then? Said 1714,
• 1:15:48
  Unknown: 1714.
• 1:15:49
  Unknown: Interesting. Two hundred years before the outbreak of World War one, 1714,
• 1:15:54
  every
• 1:15:55
  so called supposed monarch
• 1:15:57
  has not sworn the correct coronation oath and therefore
• 1:16:01
  were they ever the monarch even though I know Every they're referred
• 1:16:06
  Unknown: monarch since and
• 1:16:08
  all of them have held their positions de facto not de jure.
• 1:16:13
  Unknown: Right.
• 1:16:14
  Unknown: Because
• 1:16:17
  simply because they happen to be there. Now I actually got the an
• 1:16:22
  opinion. It was on one of these documents you get from Few Gardens about the coronation oath because I've done articles covering all of this. And the police and their oath and what a police officer is as opposed to a constable and all that stuff.
• 1:16:36
  But I went back I've got it back to
• 1:16:42
  I'm just trying to think what date it was.
• 1:16:47
  '17
• 1:16:50
  yeah that's right. 1931
• 1:16:52
  I think it was to do with the Statue Of Westminster.
• 1:16:55
  Okay. And they altered the oath and they took out certain words. They they keep on jiggling it around.
• 1:17:02
  Although the original oath is still shown in legislation.gov,
• 1:17:07
  no monarch has actually sworn it. Why is that? Because the executive
• 1:17:12
  and the executive appeared in 1714
• 1:17:15
  has taken control.
• 1:17:17
  They altered
• 1:17:18
  the terms
• 1:17:20
  and condition under which the monarch governed.
• 1:17:23
  In in actual fact they entered the third party interlopers
• 1:17:26
  interfered with the contract between the king and his people but the oath
• 1:17:31
  the the bill of rights and declaration of rights were to be the way that they going to be covered in the future and the coronation oath secured it altogether.
• 1:17:39
  And the team was now, the queen was now bound by the statute law.
• 1:17:43
  So
• 1:17:45
  they took out the word discretion, that's right, and then they also included the word statutes in parliament agreed on.
• 1:17:52
  This prevented the monarch from exercising the divine right of kings and running without parliament sector who James the second had done before
• 1:17:59
  before his demise.
• 1:18:01
  Yes.
• 1:18:02
  Because William and Mary were invited over here to to
• 1:18:05
  free us as I said before from poetry and arbitrary power. And if
• 1:18:10
  you look look at the the the bill of rights. When you look at the the full title it says it's an act declaring the rights rights and liberties of the subject and set in the succession of the crown.
• 1:18:21
  It simply declared
• 1:18:23
  pre existing rights we've had since time immemorial, the right to protect
• 1:18:28
  Unknown: yourself. So it was a re voicing, a re presentation,
• 1:18:31
  a re uttering of this ancient thing that's always existed. They've
• 1:18:36
  Unknown: simply declared the rights which we've had in the past and will continue in the future, and where they've been infringed
• 1:18:42
  they had a remedy like
• 1:18:45
  suspending
• 1:18:46
  the Bill of Rights and that sort of thing and dispensing with this, and the killer one was setting
• 1:18:52
  up commissions
• 1:18:54
  under the Great Seal.
• 1:18:56
  Now
• 1:18:58
  what they would do is set up a commission on the Great Seal and the classic one of that was bankruptcy laws.
• 1:19:04
  There are no judges
• 1:19:06
  ever sitting in bankruptcy hearings,
• 1:19:08
  they're simply administrators.
• 1:19:11
  And if you go back through the earliest bankruptcy laws you will find out the Lord Chance, I think it was, issued a commission under the Great Seal because people had petitioned him and complained because they erode money and they'd set up this tribunal.
• 1:19:24
  They weren't judges, they never were.
• 1:19:27
  And that they would decide the issues and it only related to
• 1:19:31
  merchants.
• 1:19:34
  It never ever applied
• 1:19:36
  to individuals.
• 1:19:38
  But of course as as history has a habit of showing they managed to
• 1:19:44
  drop the word
• 1:19:49
  not workers and business or something rather can't remember the exact word they had. Er and eventually got it to apply to everyone. And that is that is the case today.
• 1:19:58
  Unknown: Er did they get it to apply to everyone because they have morphed us into commerce?
• 1:20:04
  Unknown: Yes yes yeah they're with a fictional character yeah that's right yeah yeah so so they'll they forget us. I mean I've
• 1:20:12
  Unknown: done Graham Moore for a long time, he does some very good work. He does. He was on here a couple of months ago, Mike. He was on here a couple of months. We we we're on for an hour. I haven't spoken to him much since then, but he does some great work. Yeah. He does.
• 1:20:24
  Unknown: But I I suppose it
• 1:20:26
  go on.
• 1:20:28
  Unknown: Well, I have a quick question. Like, everything that you're talking about is, like, basically the background for
• 1:20:35
  why
• 1:20:36
  Charles is not considered a sovereign king. He's considered a manner lord.
• 1:20:41
  A manner lord is in the is in the public and under commerce, not
• 1:20:47
  in the private and under sovereign
• 1:20:50
  authority granted by god. Is is that kinda what you're getting at?
• 1:20:55
  Unknown: Feudal
• 1:20:57
  system.
• 1:20:58
  Unknown: There you go, feudalism.
• 1:21:00
  Okay.
• 1:21:02
  Unknown: Yeah. Yeah, there you go. And that brings me on to the thing because I can go back and give you a whole history and I can back everything up. I've got opinions for the
• 1:21:13
  there's an opinion from the I can't remember who it's from now. But essentially what they're saying is that the executive can alter the oath whenever they like. They've done it in the past and they can do it. That actually came up in a debate in 1953
• 1:21:27
  because someone questioned and said that the only people that could alter the oath
• 1:21:31
  is another act of parliament. And this is Winston Churchill,
• 1:21:35
  our friend Paul.
• 1:21:37
  And he
• 1:21:39
  actually said
• 1:21:40
  to
• 1:21:41
  question the validity of the oath, you know, where they haven't been altered by parliament,
• 1:21:46
  will be to question the validity of all oaths going back to the time of George the first.
• 1:21:52
  There we go,
• 1:21:54
  that's from Hansard.
• 1:21:57
  Unknown: Got it. I mean I have Charles Dan and we were talking to Robin Hood a couple of weeks back and I've got some documents, in fact I'm going to stick a link into some of the chats here, but he's as I understand it a liege lord,
• 1:22:09
  that's his actual official which is pretty close to what Paul was just saying a few moments ago. Okay yeah
• 1:22:14
  Unknown: different all right same thing same thing. Yep Now
• 1:22:21
  Unknown: let's get on to the crux of the matter where we stand today.
• 1:22:25
  So
• 1:22:26
  I've got an immense amount of information. John Bingley has done some terrific work on this because as you've got like you said earlier, he used to manufacture bullets, Bingley bullets. In effect Were those the names for them? He put isn't Bingley bullets sound great. I won't mind some of them. Yeah. Great. He's
• 1:22:42
  he used to do, I think, mainly sort of woodcutter
• 1:22:45
  and that's but I think he done a whole variety of stuff. I didn't rename that when I met him subsequently at sports dissociating meetings and so I kept on bidding up the bill of rights.
• 1:22:54
  You know in RKBA.
• 1:22:56
  Er but all these all these institutions get infiltrated
• 1:23:01
  as they do. Er but John was surprised I was John and Hearst and I which I mean we'd go for a meeting. We'd bring up the bit of rights and right to arms. And
• 1:23:11
  John thought well I'll get in on this.
• 1:23:13
  I'll start doing some research.
• 1:23:15
  And I I said to him a a senior wing commander who used to shoot with us. Lovely old chap.
• 1:23:20
  Used to fly B two bombers.
• 1:23:23
  And he
• 1:23:24
  just said unfortunately we seem to have dropped him on the wrong country.
• 1:23:28
  But I
• 1:23:29
  Unknown: think you'd get a lot of nods of agreement.
• 1:23:32
  Unknown: Yeah. But he he was
• 1:23:35
  he
• 1:23:36
  he was telling me about
• 1:23:38
  filling me in on various things. Unfortunately
• 1:23:42
  you know, I lost contact with him after the dumb brain thing. He sort of tend to lose a lose a lot of people after that.
• 1:23:49
  But he
• 1:23:50
  he was telling me about the
• 1:23:53
  because I gave him what I did actually
• 1:23:56
  store my documentation with him because I had a load of original documents. You know, you file them around everywhere, but it probably ends up in a chip. I mean,
• 1:24:05
  if I'd have needed him as backup, we could be dead out of the computer system like we are now. Yes. It it it it had been a different subject.
• 1:24:13
  But anyway,
• 1:24:15
  so
• 1:24:17
  this this sorry,
• 1:24:19
  I keep losing my train of thought because I've got so much
• 1:24:23
  Unknown: Yeah there's there's tons there's there's I'm losing your train of thought sometimes. Yeah. And not really not really Mike. No. I I'm sort of stitching it all together. I understand because it's it's there's a lot to it. A lot of unfolding chaps then this happened, then that, and then this goes back to this, and you're
• 1:24:40
  sort of cataloguing the decay,
• 1:24:43
  the mechanisms about how they brought about the decay, think. Yes, and every time something happens,
• 1:24:48
  Unknown: so if we could we would
• 1:24:51
  you ask me about what events in time? So, that was the catalyst which started it all off. Right. So, we now have the executive
• 1:24:58
  is is is taking it upon themselves to alter the oaths as
• 1:25:03
  as they like.
• 1:25:05
  Without any reference to the people. Because don't forget the oath is to the people.
• 1:25:09
  Not anyone else. And if it needs to be changed
• 1:25:12
  we have to be asked. Charles never asked us. In fact no monarchs ever asked us to to change it.
• 1:25:18
  And that's the only way it can be done by parliament. We're asked anything,
• 1:25:23
  Mike. No, that's right. So, now, here's the key to it all. So, on
• 1:25:28
  a lighter note, this is the situation where we are today
• 1:25:33
  is that we
• 1:25:35
  there was always a worry about the king professing the pope's religion.
• 1:25:39
  I've got my doubts about his wife
• 1:25:43
  because
• 1:25:45
  if she wasn't
• 1:25:48
  Roman Catholic,
• 1:25:50
  why did they see what to repeal the part relating to Roman Catholics from the Bill of Rights?
• 1:25:57
  Which brings me to another question actually. It might not necessarily be there. It might be more relating to
• 1:26:03
  Muslims now when you think about it, which I haven't really thought of before
• 1:26:08
  because we didn't have a problem with Muslims back in 1688
• 1:26:11
  Unknown: as far as I know. No I'm not aware of that apart from the fact that Barbary Corsairs nicked about 1,000,001 and a half million Europeans including many of the people from Cornwall and places like that, but that was those times but not in terms of them being ensconced on our land,
• 1:26:27
  Unknown: that didn't happen. So I've been through it all, I've been through this counterattack
• 1:26:33
  thing.
• 1:26:37
  System, I've been through their corrupt justice system, I ended up in prison
• 1:26:41
  for contempt of court,
• 1:26:43
  and that was a joke because we now it's a foreign jurisdiction and
• 1:26:48
  they they don't follow precedent.
• 1:26:50
  But when I got when I was able to view what I had been sent to prison for,
• 1:26:55
  it was contempt common law.
• 1:26:58
  So they're running two concurrent jurisdictions which begs a question.
• 1:27:01
  If there's a when
• 1:27:05
  it comes to the crunch,
• 1:27:07
  side which allegiance who's
• 1:27:10
  your primary allegiance to?
• 1:27:12
  Unknown: Well it's interesting you say that because that document I fired over to you the other day which we sometimes read through in fact it's probably going to be covered tomorrow night I think the last part of it which is this,
• 1:27:23
  colonial courts act from 1892
• 1:27:26
  basically within it it's it talks about them operating just about whatever jurisdiction they like. So you start off on one, the defendant starts off thinking that they're in one, but they inadvertently,
• 1:27:38
  for want of a better word, switch it to another one and keep just basically mucking about. I mean all of these things you know you were saying there that you're in contempt of court but isn't it the other way around?
• 1:27:50
  Are in
• 1:27:52
  contempt of the law?
• 1:27:54
  You're actually respecting the court from its true principles weren't you?
• 1:27:58
  Unknown: No,
• 1:28:00
  we're actually not quite actually because Alright. When
• 1:28:03
  came when I stood up, didn't like that. Because it's not in court,
• 1:28:08
  it's a tribune, he's got no authority whatsoever.
• 1:28:12
  And he didn't like it. He scuttled off out. He was told you know we we've gotta go. Leave the court. So we did. Was chatting around outside. Cut long story short. Got arrested. Shoveled into the custody suite. Then we had to go and purge our contempt.
• 1:28:27
  Well, big mistake.
• 1:28:28
  I got up there expecting me to say, please, no, I'm sorry, didn't mean to do it. I asked him what the hell he was doing running his private business sitting under a coat of arms.
• 1:28:36
  Unknown: And various other things, straight back in the shelves. And the second time I didn't go down too well with him then, Mike. That didn't go down too well with him. No.
• 1:28:44
  Unknown: Second
• 1:28:45
  time it was even worse, he said, Right, seven days for contempt
• 1:28:48
  and that was it. I ended up at the, I don't know, Woodford Prison, I don't know.
• 1:28:54
  So coming to the wrong side of me pension age and I've started my criminal career but that's how the system works. If you could you know if there's not enough criminals you manufacture them don't you?
• 1:29:02
  Unknown: Well I think there's a lot of truth in that yeah I think it's like that they operate both ends of the stick so that they've always a steady supply of cases that they can charge fees for. Yeah so a couple of things first of all the key to everything now is the coronation oath.
• 1:29:20
  Unknown: Even Charles,
• 1:29:22
  there was a lot of dubious goings on but part of his oath that he's
• 1:29:26
  well, it's not, he doesn't swear, you know, it's a test. He he's he's
• 1:29:31
  he's he's
• 1:29:34
  not interested it. I forget what the word is now.
• 1:29:37
  Er it's really up to him.
• 1:29:39
  And and he says you know I I will or whatever.
• 1:29:44
  Yep. And
• 1:29:46
  the
• 1:29:47
  one bit he agreed to was
• 1:29:50
  to maintain the laws of God.
• 1:29:54
  Unknown: And
• 1:29:55
  he said that did he recently when he just did it a few years back? Yes, that
• 1:30:01
  Unknown: one of the questions which he
• 1:30:04
  I can't think of the word.
• 1:30:07
  Unknown: But
• 1:30:09
  shouldn't it be it's the laws of God wouldn't that be natural law that is do no harm
• 1:30:16
  injury or loss to anybody?
• 1:30:18
  Unknown: I'm just trying to think of the word when they I'm sorry, I can't help you there. He doesn't swear an oath,
• 1:30:26
  oath is so
• 1:30:30
  it's read out to him and he answers.
• 1:30:34
  And
• 1:30:37
  he said that he promised to maintain the laws of God,
• 1:30:40
  and he also promised to cause law with justice and mercy to be executed in all his judgments.
• 1:30:47
  Now the key part in here is the king is a fountain of every species of justice and I've got a court
• 1:30:54
  decision of that, I think it's 1694
• 1:30:57
  Unknown: something rather. The king is the fountain of every species of What justice.
• 1:31:02
  A lovely sentence that is. Is that true though Mike? Yes, I'll read it out to you. This
• 1:31:09
  Unknown: is a killer forum.
• 1:31:10
  This is one they don't like and let me just quickly bring it up.
• 1:31:19
  Right the
• 1:31:20
  king is a fact. I'm just trying to think which one I've got it down on the
• 1:31:24
  coronation on the elected executive
• 1:31:27
  registering a vote. I think it might be on that one.
• 1:31:34
  Let's have a look.
• 1:31:35
  King's Bruce.
• 1:31:42
  I'm just letting all it settle in my head, so this is quite nice. Yeah. Yes. That that's right. So I've got a couple of good articles I wrote. One was about registering to vote to vote, which is another can of worms, but I just wanna open this other one. I've got so many articles I've written.
• 1:32:02
  That's right, the Crackdown on Free Speech, think that was the one, yeah.
• 1:32:08
  That's a good one.
• 1:32:12
  Now this is what I put
• 1:32:14
  put an
• 1:32:16
  article together, but I'll just read part of it. It says, The king's present in each and every court is an essential ingredient, and the king is bound by constitutional duty to fulfil the oath before God in the clear understanding the judges who represent him will dispense justice according to their judicial oath and required by their bearing true allegiance.
• 1:32:37
  Denying
• 1:32:38
  the presence of the king would not only place a king in a continuing state of perjury,
• 1:32:43
  as you would have failed to fulfil or breach the promises he made, but also the magistrates themselves, who were also custodians
• 1:32:50
  and guard of the king's oath.
• 1:32:52
  Without the king being represented, it cannot be a court of law because the king is the chief magistrate and the fountain of every species of justice.
• 1:33:01
  Any judgment, ruling, or order would be a nullity and void abomnisho.
• 1:33:06
  This is confirmed in case law in the king against Almond.
• 1:33:11
  Yeah. Hillary Hillary terms 1765.
• 1:33:14
  And this is a cracker. By our constitution,
• 1:33:17
  the king is a fountain of every species of justice which is administered in his kingdom.
• 1:33:23
  That's from Charles Cook's at Cook's Institute.
• 1:33:25
  The king is de jure to distribute justice to all his subjects,
• 1:33:30
  and because he cannot do it himself to all persons,
• 1:33:34
  he delegates his power to his judges who have the custody
• 1:33:38
  and guarded the king's oath and sit in the seat of the king concerning his justice.
• 1:33:44
  Every he's just every speech is a justice. But how can a king
• 1:33:49
  be represented
• 1:33:50
  in a court which they set up which is discretionary jurisdiction?
• 1:33:55
  The other thing how
• 1:33:56
  the hell can the judiciary uphold the rule of law
• 1:34:00
  when they're in a discretionary jurisdiction?
• 1:34:02
  It's a joke
• 1:34:04
  Unknown: it's At our expense of course, it's a joke at our expense.
• 1:34:09
  The so called judges,
• 1:34:11
  they are sitting there instead,
• 1:34:14
  two words, instead of the king. Yes? In
• 1:34:18
  Unknown: the stead, in other words in his place. Yes, that's Because the king can't be in every court.
• 1:34:23
  So the judges swear the judicial oath and the oath of allegiance to the king,
• 1:34:28
  and they sit as
• 1:34:30
  if they were the king in the court
• 1:34:33
  deciding the issue.
• 1:34:36
  No partisan thing etc. Now
• 1:34:40
  the point is when you go to court,
• 1:34:44
  we know that they've all been taken over and the judges don't sit
• 1:34:48
  judicially, they sit there as this star chamber proceedings
• 1:34:52
  and we know this because they're
• 1:34:54
  not represented in any of the courts. A friend of mine, a very respected member of the community, doing a case to deal with his child kidnappers in the high court a year or so ago
• 1:35:05
  and I got him to bring up this case and he got hold of the office there, the High Court Master's Office or something rather, and
• 1:35:14
  he wanted to know whether the king was present in court. Well, know, he was represented in court and they said no.
• 1:35:22
  So
• 1:35:23
  I think that pretty much tells you that they're
• 1:35:26
  exercising the prerogative to the king
• 1:35:29
  but the king's prohibited from setting up his own courts and in fact I've
• 1:35:34
  actually got a link for that to the royal's own website.
• 1:35:38
  Really? How
• 1:35:39
  stupid!
• 1:35:42
  Unknown: Yeah. So
• 1:35:43
  mean these things are we're using this word court,
• 1:35:46
  but if they're in breach of these things as
• 1:35:50
  I sense clearly from what you've just said they are, then they're not courts are they? No they're tribunals. In name only. Yes they're tribunals,
• 1:35:59
  Unknown: that's right, because they exercise a discretionary jurisdiction
• 1:36:02
  which goes back to a court case which I found in jury ashore in 1934,
• 1:36:07
  and it turned out it was a Canadian case,
• 1:36:11
  and they talked about this very thing, this discretionary jurisdiction which I mentioned to you earlier.
• 1:36:16
  So they've created this jurisdiction,
• 1:36:18
  this fake jurisdiction
• 1:36:21
  and using the birth certificate.
• 1:36:23
  Well,
• 1:36:24
  we've got all this, so cut to the chase. This is where we are. I had a whole list of things. I was going to bring up some important points.
• 1:36:32
  Unknown: We'll have you back, Mike, we're going to have you back so we don't need to plough through everything all in one day, but sorry. No, no, but the point is my list started turning into more the book.
• 1:36:42
  Well don't you think this is the challenge I drone on about this quite repeatedly is
• 1:36:47
  to get this
• 1:36:49
  absolute
• 1:36:50
  what I consider
• 1:36:52
  you are a keeper of the treasure, you're definitely one of those right because everything you say is the treasure left to us by our forefathers which we are unfamiliar with
• 1:37:01
  and and re familiarizing
• 1:37:03
  as a first step obviously is a key part of this to get the get the thing pared down. Mean it can't be we've to cover all these things but to get it in such a way that we can make it more easily digestible to a wider audience all the time. I mean it's a it is a considerable communications challenge it's not that we're short on the truth or the accuracy of the information that you're providing, it's how do we transmit it more effectively tomorrow than we did yesterday. It's that kind of thing you know and,
• 1:37:30
  it's
• 1:37:31
  a massive challenge because we're talking about hundreds of years
• 1:37:35
  of linguistic abuse of our system that everybody just says oh that's the way it is. Right, well I think that's the key. So what if
• 1:37:43
  Unknown: there was
• 1:37:44
  a solution?
• 1:37:46
  Unknown: Yes, what if there's a solution? A
• 1:37:49
  Unknown: cure.
• 1:37:50
  And what if that cure could become about quickly?
• 1:37:54
  Yes, I'm on I'm on for that. I don't need this list. I've got things like because I got under the electoral register because that's another can of worms and the army regulations bill and the foreign enlistment act and where they decide who the enemies are. These actually taking control. I've got the the these AI data centres.
• 1:38:14
  I can go on and go on, but what we want to know is we know what's going on, it's going on a daily basis,
• 1:38:22
  it's impacting everyone's lives. What
• 1:38:25
  in simple terms can we do about it?
• 1:38:29
  And that comes down to one thing.
• 1:38:32
  And would you believe
• 1:38:34
  the guys kindly helped us? The coronation oath and King Charles.
• 1:38:40
  You want to listen to some of the documentaries that Laura the insider and he's and the who's that guy
• 1:38:47
  she speaks to. I can't think the the bishop
• 1:38:51
  or something rather.
• 1:38:53
  Something rather.
• 1:38:54
  I can't think but anyway, got lots of videos because he's professed in the Muslim faith. He wants to be in
• 1:39:01
  fact, it
• 1:39:02
  was altered
• 1:39:03
  in some
• 1:39:05
  palace document
• 1:39:07
  about being a king of faith etc, but at the end of the day he's already
• 1:39:12
  broken
• 1:39:13
  his vow to God.
• 1:39:16
  Like it or not, it's happened. It happened in my court case.
• 1:39:22
  Promised to cause law with justice
• 1:39:25
  and mercy to be executed in all his judgment.
• 1:39:28
  But we don't, you get the opposite because we kicked God out of our lives, we're now getting ruled by wrong not right.
• 1:39:34
  Yes. Charles has to go, and fortunately he's hasting his demise.
• 1:39:39
  And what we need to do to cut to the chase, the throne of England has to be declared vacant.
• 1:39:46
  Unknown: Because it is vacant, isn't it? In actuality it is currently vacant. Has it been vacant then since 1714
• 1:39:53
  Unknown: since this died? Yes it would be, yeah. That's
• 1:39:55
  right. And now here we go and it says here,
• 1:40:01
  I'm just going to find
• 1:40:04
  that's what that oh no the huddlestone one it just shows you about that they're the partnership.
• 1:40:11
  The grievance by causing the next few to commission of the Great Seal for erecting a court called the Court of Commissioners for ecclesiastical
• 1:40:18
  cause is the remedy
• 1:40:19
  the Commission for Acting Great Court of Commissioners for Ecclesiastical
• 1:40:22
  Causes, and all other commissions
• 1:40:25
  and courts of the like nature are illegal and pernicious, which Oxford
• 1:40:30
  English Dictionary
• 1:40:31
  called destructive,
• 1:40:32
  ruinous and fatal.
• 1:40:35
  That
• 1:40:37
  all started with the
• 1:40:40
  courts up in 2003.
• 1:40:42
  What happened, there should be a commission of the peace,
• 1:40:45
  and then that's where they set up the new Supreme Court. Is it Faulkner
• 1:40:49
  and Blair?
• 1:40:50
  I
• 1:40:52
  Unknown: just fell ill when you said those names.
• 1:40:55
  Unknown: Then the Lord
• 1:40:57
  Lord Chancellor, Chancellor, being the keeper of the king's conscience or the queen's conscience,
• 1:41:01
  he advised the queen to hand her prerogatives to parliament
• 1:41:06
  to create this
• 1:41:07
  administrative system of law.
• 1:41:10
  The queen couldn't pass it
• 1:41:13
  because it was contrary to her oath, so she handed the prerogative to Parliament
• 1:41:17
  for them to deal with.
• 1:41:20
  But she still even though Parliament
• 1:41:22
  it was passed through the hot comments and the Lords,
• 1:41:25
  she still couldn't pass it. So they got her to sign a
• 1:41:29
  letter's pattern, authorize one of the councillors of state to pass it in her act, in her place. What is a letter's pattern? What is it? I've heard it the term many times. It's an open letter you know authorizing certain things to be done.
• 1:41:43
  But
• 1:41:45
  yeah so she just said you know it's greetings etc. I've actually got the one with Boris Johnson because someone was doing this research about the Oh you're bringing all the names up Mike. I
• 1:41:55
  Unknown: feel nauseous when you mention we're not feeling very good at this end. Because his
• 1:42:01
  Unknown: patent actually said that the office
• 1:42:05
  of Lord High Treasurer being vacant.
• 1:42:08
  So
• 1:42:10
  essentially, I suppose what I'm really saying at the end of the day
• 1:42:13
  is that
• 1:42:15
  no
• 1:42:16
  monarchy is sworn the correct oath, and that's the condition for holding the crown.
• 1:42:22
  And there's Barriss's opinion in that as well in 2017.
• 1:42:27
  He was trying to get away with some changes to the oath by saying he implied repeal.
• 1:42:31
  You can't imply that you repair the notice which the monarch has sworn to us. And if the monarch doesn't keep to that oath, we kick him up and we get a better one. But because the monarch has received evil counselling from the executive,
• 1:42:45
  which he's done, he's changed his oath, he's never asked us,
• 1:42:49
  we are now relieved from that contract.
• 1:42:53
  And there's the case law is,
• 1:42:56
  I'm just trying to see if it's here.
• 1:43:00
  I've got some articles
• 1:43:04
  here.
• 1:43:05
  Unknown: That a question from someone? A question? Yeah. That's that's Paul. Hang on. Eric.
• 1:43:10
  Unknown: Paul, was it Paul? Quick Yes, Paul. Okay. Quick question. Quick question. So in order to fix it, the the monarchy has to be declared vacant. However,
• 1:43:20
  Charles does have an error. Are they going to try and throw William in there to buy them time so they can continue the the de facto
• 1:43:28
  flubbery
• 1:43:29
  as it were?
• 1:43:30
  Unknown: Yeah. Now, that's that that's the that's the interesting part
• 1:43:34
  because
• 1:43:35
  at common law,
• 1:43:37
  on the demise of the king, because
• 1:43:42
  the crown isn't what we thought it was, you count crown as a king, now it's a crown corporation,
• 1:43:46
  but on their demise
• 1:43:49
  everyone,
• 1:43:50
  all those in office, went.
• 1:43:54
  All of them.
• 1:43:55
  But in 1901,
• 1:43:58
  don't forget we got the old Salisbury, remember the Salisbury from 1890,
• 1:44:02
  Halligo Land and the other one,
• 1:44:04
  all the abolition law stuff,
• 1:44:07
  1901,
• 1:44:10
  he was the
• 1:44:11
  Prime Minister
• 1:44:12
  and they passed the demise of the Crown Act, I think it was 1901,
• 1:44:17
  retrospective
• 1:44:18
  legislation
• 1:44:20
  to give themselves permanency,
• 1:44:23
  and the king actually said in his first speech,
• 1:44:27
  thank you for passing the act.
• 1:44:30
  Unknown: Passed it. Because he couldn't or he wouldn't? Well,
• 1:44:33
  Unknown: the executive passed it.
• 1:44:37
  Unknown: Gave him How a can they pass it really? It gets torturous doesn't it? They're not empowered to pass it are they? So this is all skullduggery and subterfusion,
• 1:44:45
  linguistic deception.
• 1:44:47
  Unknown: No monarchs
• 1:44:50
  passed legislations in the time of Victoria. I think it's about 1854
• 1:44:54
  or something.
• 1:44:55
  So he worked that one out. But of course they gave themselves a permanent position and then
• 1:45:01
  the roundabout there's a judgment in the Privy Calcure where they suggested that they also should be have permanent the
• 1:45:08
  private council judgement said the judges should have permanency as well. Well the ones who are running it all, the executive and the judiciary, they gave themselves permanent position.
• 1:45:17
  Well at common law,
• 1:45:19
  they go because they've given bad
• 1:45:21
  advice to the to the king. None of them can be trusted and the whole lot stand down but it gets better after that because then the governor generals all stand down. We've got Australia, New Zealand, Canada,
• 1:45:33
  and all the other 60 or 70 other countries.
• 1:45:36
  The whole system will be finished,
• 1:45:38
  and we can do that quite simply by declaring the throne of England vacant because the king has broken that original contract
• 1:45:46
  and the basis for that is
• 1:45:48
  to cheval judgement 1710.
• 1:45:51
  The nature of our our constitution
• 1:45:54
  is that of a limited monarchy
• 1:45:56
  wherein the supreme power is communicating divided between the queen, the Lords and the Commons, though the executive power and administration
• 1:46:05
  be wholly in the crown. In other words, just the king.
• 1:46:09
  Terms of 14 that is, the terms of such a constitution
• 1:46:13
  express an original contract between the Crown and the people.
• 1:46:17
  The consequences of such a frame of government are obvious.
• 1:46:21
  If the executive part endeavours the subversion and total destruction of the government, the original contract is thereby broke
• 1:46:29
  and the right of allegiance ceases.
• 1:46:31
  That part of the government that's fundamentally injured has the right to save or recover the constitution and you wish you had an original interest.
• 1:46:39
  They destroyed the commons, they destroyed the lords, they've taken over the judiciary,
• 1:46:44
  they've choked in power.
• 1:46:47
  Unknown: The timeline on this, I mean Mike, timeline on this would make a whole it would make a phenomenal sort of documentary series and teaching aid. It's like the whole steps through it as it builds up as you as you're talking, it's quite an amazing detailed thing that you've given us. It's brilliant. It's absolutely brilliant. If I if I just give you Blackstone's one because it it confirms the same thing.
• 1:47:09
  Unknown: This is supported in chapter seven of Black Stone's commentaries of the Lords of England entitled of the King's Prerogative.
• 1:47:16
  Mhmm. We now be
• 1:47:18
  allowed to lay down the law of redress against public oppression.
• 1:47:23
  I'm sorry. Stop there. Lay down the law of redress against public oppression.
• 1:47:27
  If therefore any future prince
• 1:47:30
  should endeavour to subvert the constitution
• 1:47:33
  by breaking the original contract between the king and the people
• 1:47:38
  should violate the fundamental laws and should withdraw himself out the kingdom, so there's three there,
• 1:47:45
  we are now authorized to declare that this conjunction of circumstances
• 1:47:49
  would amount to an abdication
• 1:47:50
  and thus to throw Medeibe vacant.
• 1:47:53
  But it is not for us to say that any one
• 1:47:56
  they don't say we all have to all three but any one or two or three
• 1:48:01
  so what they're not saying that any one or two of these ingredients would amount to such a situation,
• 1:48:07
  for other circumstances
• 1:48:08
  which affair to our imagination may furnish.
• 1:48:11
  Since both the law and history are silent,
• 1:48:14
  it becomes
• 1:48:16
  silent us to too,
• 1:48:18
  leaving it to future generations
• 1:48:20
  whenever necessity and the safety of the whole shall require it.
• 1:48:24
  The exercises of those inherent,
• 1:48:27
  though latent powers of society,
• 1:48:30
  which no climate,
• 1:48:32
  no time, no constitution,
• 1:48:34
  no contract can ever destroy or diminish.
• 1:48:39
  Unknown: Right.
• 1:48:41
  Unknown: There is. A revolution means to overthrow the political system. That's what it means. Political side of the king,
• 1:48:49
  you have a natural side and a body politic.
• 1:48:52
  And body politic has consumed the natural one.
• 1:48:55
  It has. And that's what they did with the statute of Westminster Australia. That's why they can all have their own you know King of Australia, King of New Zealand. Why? Because they were all
• 1:49:05
  corporations.
• 1:49:07
  And that happened
• 1:49:09
  after the League of Nations because they were set sail.
• 1:49:12
  Everyone that was an independent country and Canada, because they had to join the League of Nations,
• 1:49:17
  they had to be sovereign countries, but no one told the people.
• 1:49:22
  Unknown: This process as you're describing it is all roots back
• 1:49:26
  to the 1600s
• 1:49:27
  and this breach in things. There's a comment in here, I've got a couple of comments in worth reading out to you actually Mike. One's from Warren, it's just a statement he says, so I would say therefore the most recent English monarch of England
• 1:49:40
  English monarch of England is Elizabeth the first who died in sixteen o four because weren't all the other ones after that of German descent and then we got the Dutch people and all that. Is Elizabeth
• 1:49:50
  the first the actual last true English monarch that we've had?
• 1:49:55
  Because after 1714 we didn't have any right?
• 1:49:59
  Unknown: Quite possibly so.
• 1:50:01
  Yeah.
• 1:50:02
  Sorry.
• 1:50:03
  Unknown: No, it's okay. I'm
• 1:50:05
  Unknown: losing signal. I'll never listen. That's right, my wife was here, think she was trying to listen to Sam Incredible. Was like, hear this tapping noise, I wonder what the hell she's doing in the background. That's alright, it lends atmosphere to the broadcast, mate, this is fine.
• 1:50:16
  Yeah,
• 1:50:17
  that's
• 1:50:21
  where we're on. The fact that they created this jurisdiction
• 1:50:27
  and not telling us etc and then using our birth certificate,
• 1:50:31
  There is only one. There is only one cure. The throne of England has to be declared vacant.
• 1:50:37
  Then the whole they all go. I mean Chatham House again is another classic one. When we're when we're talking about defence policy.
• 1:50:45
  Someone can go and say we love Russians, we hate Ukrainians, at the moment we love Ukrainians and hate Russians,
• 1:50:52
  etc.
• 1:50:52
  This is policy, this is politics,
• 1:50:55
  this is not what we should be. We should be into under God's law, natural law. It's politics driven out of commerce, that's what it's Yes, about. And if we have the throne declared vacant,
• 1:51:07
  don't forget the king is elected because he faces his east, south, west and north, and then we're asked to accept him. So there's going to be a bit of a problem there because the next king that comes along is going to have to be bound by the original
• 1:51:21
  terms of the 1688
• 1:51:22
  Coronation Oath Act.
• 1:51:24
  Unknown: There's no getting away from it. Like I said Well I'm happy to declare the throne vacant Mike if you are,
• 1:51:31
  and I invite
• 1:51:32
  all the listeners to declare it even in your head.
• 1:51:35
  That's right. Yeah because you know this, the whole thing about their power,
• 1:51:41
  the the power that's in, you know, like breaking that down isn't a great part of it. It seems to me that the vast majority of us,
• 1:51:50
  and we are less stupid I would suggest probably than the layman currently because we're listening to things like this and we've got a lot of people that tunnel into these things, but the vast majority of people are literally unaware
• 1:52:00
  of
• 1:52:01
  probably anything that you've spoken about at all. I'm semi I'm more fully aware of it now and we touch upon this from time to time but they don't know and so their power exists
• 1:52:12
  in the
• 1:52:13
  confused state of mind that most of our people have been indoctrinated into.
• 1:52:19
  They're not familiar. I was never taught this at school. Were you taught this stuff at school? No. No. Never.
• 1:52:27
  No. You something else. No. They don't teach you about banking and law do they? And obviously the two are intertwined like two serpents throttling us all the time and shattering everything that we want and you don't get any history teachers saying now boys and girls I'm gonna take the next year we're gonna study the evolution of the English law and how it's been abused and why you currently don't have any and why the world is the way that it is.
• 1:52:52
  You know the peasant's declaration that the throne is vacant is something how do we do we just all start shouting it at 01:00 every Friday? I mean it might be a start. Mean it's That's
• 1:53:02
  Unknown: a key
• 1:53:03
  because
• 1:53:04
  it's not for Charles to abdicate and then we get the next in line and we're still back to square one.
• 1:53:11
  Unknown: Can't abdicate can he? Because he's not the king!
• 1:53:13
  Unknown: that's
• 1:53:15
  the other point, that's why we
• 1:53:17
  have to declare that he's abdicated,
• 1:53:20
  and the throne of England is vacant. Because don't forget William of Orange landed at Torbay in Devon on the 11/05/1688
• 1:53:26
  to start the revolution,
• 1:53:29
  Invited over here and that's not too far away. That's what's got to happen. We can't keep on going like this. It's no point for someone for contacting me for example saying, oh, I've got a show next March if you want to come on it. I would hope it it all be over long long before then because it it this system's got to come down. It's just it's destroying
• 1:53:47
  everything.
• 1:53:49
  Because we're governed by wrong not
• 1:53:51
  right in our corporate capacity.
• 1:53:54
  And even our ancestors in the debates
• 1:53:57
  when Rothschild got in, because that was the destruction of Christianity, that was his foothold in the door.
• 1:54:02
  Unknown: He said You're talking about what, when he went into Parliament in 1858
• 1:54:06
  Unknown: or whenever it was? That's right, yes, and the bloke actually said there, all we can do is record in these journals
• 1:54:13
  what led up to these events so that in future someone can look back and see what happened in order to correct it.
• 1:54:22
  And they said that in the journals of Parliament because that was the biggest thing. Rothschilds
• 1:54:27
  getting a foothold into Parliament
• 1:54:29
  and that was the
• 1:54:31
  beginning of the separation of church and state. And in 'sixty eight, was it 1868,
• 1:54:37
  the promissory oath sack or something, you could now attest or affirm etc. Instead of swearing to God.
• 1:54:44
  And in 1964
• 1:54:46
  they took out any reference to God,
• 1:54:49
  the oath, the the original constable's oath, replaced it with an attestation.
• 1:54:55
  So no constable swore an oath, it had been attested because they'd removed God,
• 1:55:00
  and they've removed it from the court system. You can't, you can no longer, I usually go into court regularly to swear an affidavit, Pick up the bible, swear by my mother, I'll listen to name and handwriting, comes into this affidavit, true and all that crap. Yeah. Don't do that anymore. You just have to sign a statement which if you if you lie on that statement, you commit contempt of court and now they're dealing with it.
• 1:55:20
  And if you do it through the high court, again, can't submit any, it's all electronic, it's all submitted,
• 1:55:27
  and it's just a statement,
• 1:55:29
  witness statements and that sort of thing. It's a joke.
• 1:55:31
  So people have to realise
• 1:55:33
  that
• 1:55:35
  the key element to this is God. They've taken God out.
• 1:55:39
  Charles is sworn to maintain the laws of God. None of the monarchs since 1714
• 1:55:45
  have done so,
• 1:55:46
  and
• 1:55:48
  the throne has to be declared vacant. One last comment from the this was the first time they started using orders in council,
• 1:55:56
  which is what they do now, in 1808.
• 1:55:59
  And what they actually said here,
• 1:56:01
  the power of making laws to bind the people of this realm is exclusively vested in his majesty
• 1:56:07
  by and with the advice and consent of the Lord's spiritual and temporal and commons of the realm in parliament assembled,
• 1:56:15
  and that every attempt to make, alter, suspend or repeal such laws by order of his majesty in his privy council
• 1:56:24
  or in any other manner than by his majesty in Parliament is unconstitutional
• 1:56:28
  and illegal.
• 1:56:31
  Unknown: So
• 1:56:32
  we've got a massive public awareness and informing campaign to get underway don't we?
• 1:56:37
  Unknown: Yes,
• 1:56:39
  they need to know the good bit first about declaring the throne of England vacant, and then there's blank spot you just got a fill in little gap as to why.
• 1:56:47
  Unknown: You if we go back to Anglo Saxon times and we're just coming up to the end of the
• 1:56:52
  this slot which has been fantastic Mike I've so enjoyed it's been brilliant but back in Anglo Saxon days they used to hold
• 1:56:58
  the the succession of the crown was did not necessarily go to the king's son or daughter. Was there a point in that? I mean
• 1:57:06
  I mean obviously that was what laid roots to the whole of the war of the roses and the whole of the Tudor you know scrapping all the time it's no I'm the rightful heir and this that and there. What would be the system of actually locating a king? How would you do it? I understood that the the elders you know in simpler times when you're in a village they'd sit around and go we got four guys here we think it's one of them let's have a chat it's you Bob you're gonna be the next guy in charge is that how it should work how would we actually make it work? Well it'd be the same William
• 1:57:36
  Unknown: of Orange they called the last the last
• 1:57:38
  parliament
• 1:57:40
  The last legitimate parliament. If we had to do that Christ, I don't know how far we'd go back. We'd probably go back to Magna Carta.
• 1:57:47
  Unknown: I'm on for it if you are.
• 1:57:50
  Unknown: But like I said, this is only a scratch of the information I've got, which is so much which is why
• 1:57:55
  I've got so much information that I can't get it all out and monthly when you mention something else it leads on to it, you forget your original thread.
• 1:58:04
  Unknown: So you know I can Well I'd like to after out of this show hour as well,
• 1:58:09
  I I'm gonna keep on having a chat with you because it's almost like like a copy briefing has got to be done like the the organization of to you know you go well here's a three page leaflet about it or here's a one page poster okay now there's the three page now this is 16 pages
• 1:58:26
  just some pathway into getting people I mean it's like a degree course in the history that you should have been taught but that you never were of course for obvious reasons. The documents I've sent
• 1:58:37
  Unknown: to you, they can be circulated because you find out about registering to vote and when you register to vote
• 1:58:43
  you automatically
• 1:58:48
  agree that you live in a democracy, but of course we don't live in a democracy, we live in a constitutional monarchy.
• 1:58:53
  You agree that you live in a democracy and will abide by the decisions.
• 1:58:57
  So you come off the voters list, but then you can't vote for the MP you want. So
• 1:59:03
  I don't know where we go from it on that one but anyway I've got it all chapter and verse. Some
• 1:59:09
  of the ones that I've done I've sent to you, mean you're free to circulate them.
• 1:59:13
  Unknown: I've just got to say a little word here Mike, we're just about to leave WBN three twenty four so we'll be back again same time next week that's all I'm gonna do. I'm not doing the song right now because we're just talking so much but
• 1:59:24
  it's just to say goodbye to everybody on WBN three twenty four. We're carrying on our FFT radio if you want to carry on listening go to paulenglishlive.com
• 1:59:32
  and you'll find all the listening links there.
• 1:59:34
  Unknown: Sorry about that Mike, please carry on. Yeah, yeah so no that was it, encompasses it. So I've got a load of other stuff but because
• 1:59:43
  the knowledge is so vast,
• 1:59:46
  I'm trying to
• 1:59:48
  explain to people is that there is a solution and it can be very, very quick and we haven't got an awful long time,
• 1:59:56
  We haven't got months and months and months. It's not just going on here, it's going on in Europe. They're all destroying their own countries
• 2:00:02
  with the money they're shipping out to Ukraine. They're destroying their own industries. It's self destruct because
• 2:00:08
  that's the nature of their business. They're evil and they're satanic
• 2:00:11
  and they've got to come down. You
• 2:00:14
  know, it's it's that simple. The whole system has got to come down.
• 2:00:17
  Unknown: What's your view, Mike, that Edward
• 2:00:20
  the seventh
• 2:00:21
  was aware of what was going on and he was done in? Do you know much about that?
• 2:00:27
  That
• 2:00:28
  was the one after Victoria,
• 2:00:30
  that was one that died in 1910.
• 2:00:33
  Unknown: I
• 2:00:35
  don't know much about him.
• 2:00:37
  Unknown: Well I
• 2:00:38
  think
• 2:00:39
  there's so many things that came through there's so many questions and other things I've made notes of them that we've not had time to cover which is not such a bad thing because an hour and fifty minutes on this stuff has it's been amazing Mike I mean I got a sense of what you knew from the phone calls that we'd had and a shout out to Maribel for setting this up I hope she's been listening because it's been,
• 2:01:00
  you've sort of given an overlay for all these key structural points about the decay.
• 2:01:05
  I mean you know I agree with you absolutely we are being destroyed from people who are purporting
• 2:01:11
  to be our government they're not they're masquerading
• 2:01:14
  as it is a complete masquerade and the power of the masquerade is held in place by the relentless bombardment into everybody's minds from when they first start going to school this has been going on for hundreds of years you know, to unpick all this stuff. So listen, I'd love to get you I'll speak to you after the show maybe tomorrow over the weekend, the next few days, and we'll book you in in a few weeks time if you're on for it. And
• 2:01:36
  I'm not gonna hold you to it because I know you're busy and all that kind of stuff, but this has just been
• 2:01:42
  exhausting but in the most wonderful way you know I mean it's been it's just been tremendous the amount of ground that you've covered
• 2:01:48
  there's enough to keep everybody going for several years I think with all the points that you've raised so
• 2:01:53
  I'd like to talk to you I've got these documents everybody so I'm gonna try and find a way to publish them we'll probably stick them in, the Paul English Telegram group and I'll also put them in the FFT radio group because there's a section in FFT radio on law and law so we'll start making those documents available there I'll get them up at some point during the course of tomorrow and people can start to read them and share them around Mike because it's it's great stuff and Alright thanks for inviting me on I appreciate it. It's been been wonderful absolutely wonderful.
• 2:02:20
  Unknown: Can I apply for the job of King please you know if it suits vacant I mean if you know you vote for No? I wanna be king.
• 2:02:28
  Oh, I wanna be king.
• 2:02:31
  Unknown: I said, your Thai treasure has already been taken because
• 2:02:35
  Rupert and Fine Nats is that would be a corker.
• 2:02:38
  Unknown: Yeah.
• 2:02:39
  If we can, you know, the the main thing I've
• 2:02:43
  I've banged on about here for for donkey's years is this overthrow of the Bank of England. It's that's the crown
• 2:02:49
  that's part of the crown empire and you know that it's just every single thing that we use is basically bogus It's all completely
• 2:02:58
  bogus.
• 2:02:59
  Unknown: Absolutely. It's got to come down. We run, you're right, by demonic criminals and the more I look into it the more demonic
• 2:03:05
  they appear to be because,
• 2:03:08
  my family
• 2:03:09
  were attacked
• 2:03:11
  demonically
• 2:03:12
  and what I experienced was a microcosm of the way
• 2:03:16
  governments react.
• 2:03:18
  They're
• 2:03:19
  exactly the same
• 2:03:20
  and
• 2:03:22
  you can understand their mindset once you experience that.
• 2:03:26
  Unknown: Can.
• 2:03:27
  Mike, we've got the I've got the next guest lined up and I'm gonna play a quick song to give everybody just a couple of minutes break, but I'll be in touch and we'll have you back. It's been brilliant today. Thank you very much for coming along. As I said, thanks to Maribel and I'll be in touch Mike absolutely wonderful show enjoyed it thank you thank
• 2:03:45
  you see you soon Mike bye for now bye bye we'll
• 2:03:49
  just go to a quick song and then we'll bring we'll
• 2:03:51
  bring Monica in
• 2:03:53
  because she's anyway, I played this a few weeks ago. This is that lovely little folk song. I don't know if I did it even. I don't think so. Anyway, here we go. We're gonna go to a folk song, and then we'll be back. And this should sound nice now because I'm not all buggered up.
• 2:04:19
  Unknown: Rode all alone
• 2:04:21
  until he met sweet, lovely, Joan.
• 2:04:28
  Good morning to you, my pretty young maid.
• 2:04:32
  And twice, good morning to you, sir, she said.
• 2:04:36
  He gave her a wing, but she rolled a dark eye. Says he to himself,
• 2:04:42
  I'll be there by and by.
• 2:04:48
  Oh, don't you think those boots are okay,
• 2:04:51
  but make a pretty place for us to play.
• 2:04:56
  So come with me, my pretty young thing,
• 2:05:00
  and I will give you my golden golden ring.
• 2:05:07
  He took off his ring, his ring, and your coat, and says my pretty young furnace, this he behold.
• 2:05:15
  I will give it freely
• 2:05:17
  for your maidenhead,
• 2:05:19
  and her cheeks, they blush like roses
• 2:05:22
  red.
• 2:05:26
  Come give that ring into
• 2:05:29
  my hand,
• 2:05:31
  and I
• 2:06:25
  Unknown: And that was the lovely Joan. And now we've got the lovely Monica. Lovely Monica, welcome to the show.
• 2:06:34
  Unknown: Thank you so much. Good day. Good evening, all of you. Nice to have you. Tuned in to the thank you. I tuned into the last twenty, twenty five minutes of your previous guest.
• 2:06:46
  That was very interesting. And,
• 2:06:49
  basically, what I got out of that part, the throne of England must be declared vacant.
• 2:06:54
  And maybe we should extend that to all seats of
• 2:06:59
  government currently
• 2:07:02
  in our nations,
• 2:07:04
  in our countries
• 2:07:05
  should be declared vacant because they are illegitimate
• 2:07:09
  and they are
• 2:07:10
  criminal,
• 2:07:11
  and there seems to be a hidden hand at force don't you think? Really?
• 2:07:16
  Unknown: No.
• 2:07:19
  I think
• 2:07:20
  you might be right Monica, I think there's a hidden hand although listening to Mike it's far less hidden.
• 2:07:26
  That was Mike Burke who was on and first time I've had him I only bumped into him a couple of weeks ago courtesy of another guest and he
• 2:07:35
  knows a lot of extremely relevant stuff. Thought he did a brilliant job really. Could understand these there's so many different sort of points to it, yes,
• 2:07:44
  we were talking the other day I think on last week's show about shouting
• 2:07:47
  and it's obviously the thing that we've got to shout is that the throne is effing vacant. Eric.
• 2:07:53
  Unknown: Oh yes yes I
• 2:07:54
  forgot all of And
• 2:07:56
  Unknown: I think you're right Monica, all of these people in power supposedly over us are bogus
• 2:08:02
  and yet of course the brainwashing goes on doesn't it? The conditioning,
• 2:08:06
  the compliance with it. Oh if we just vote another party and they'll put it right, well they can't.
• 2:08:12
  They can't put it right, they're part of the breach in the system itself, none of them can do that,
• 2:08:17
  until we actually saw, you know I've mentioned that here in this little island in this country we've got a lot of treasure and Mike is one of the keepers of that definitely.
• 2:08:26
  He just sort of was knocking
• 2:08:29
  the dust off of all this hidden treasure that we've got saying this is the root of the problem and it is. So you might know caught in the early part but we haven't had we haven't had a sitting monarch since 1714.
• 2:08:41
  We haven't had one.
• 2:08:42
  Unknown: I did hear him say that.
• 2:08:45
  That's incredible.
• 2:08:47
  And I I think I I lament that I didn't hear it, but I I could go back to the archives I'm sure to hear
• 2:08:54
  why and how that
• 2:08:56
  is the case, that none of them were
• 2:08:58
  actually legitimate,
• 2:08:59
  so the seat must be declared vacant.
• 2:09:03
  So yeah, that was very interesting. I have a question for you, Paul.
• 2:09:07
  How long is it's very, very serious question.
• 2:09:11
  It how long is it a donkey's year?
• 2:09:14
  Unknown: Oh, yeah. Donkey's years. You know? It's a very serious question, and Eric's going to answer it. Well, means a heck of a long time.
• 2:09:22
  Unknown: You know? Oh, that last for doggy's years. Yes. Or when the cows come home, that's another one.
• 2:09:28
  Unknown: Why have you Monica? You just got a donkey, Monica. Is that what's happened? No. No. I think you said it. That hasn't been a a legitimate
• 2:09:38
  think you were talking about the the throne Of England hasn't been legitimately
• 2:09:44
  occupied
• 2:09:44
  Unknown: in donkey's years. That's right. It hasn't.
• 2:09:48
  It it just means very, I don't know why. Do donkeys live a long time, Eric? Do they? I I don't know. But I know that a donkey in
• 2:09:56
  Unknown: Norfolk means something that you eat. And what it is, it's a big piece of bread that they hollow them inside out, and they put all bits of food in in there. And the farmers used to eat a donkey when they went farming. So it's a A strange folk in North Africa. I had no idea.
• 2:10:14
  Yeah. So they go, well, I've because I work with a fellow. He's always I've just had me donkey. Pardon?
• 2:10:18
  I've just had me donkey. What's he talking about? Means he just went and had his dinner. So there we go. But, Monica, are you up for a queen? What do you think? I'm I'm gonna put my name up for it. Oh. Why not? Right. I I did hear you all kind of competing for that position. I I might as well throw throw my hat into the You gotta practice the wave. You gotta wave with the back of your hand and talk down to people. I've been practicing that for years. Can't
• 2:10:43
  Unknown: support Eric. You've got to support me for king. Oh, bitch.
• 2:10:48
  No we've all got to fight. Bloody hell. There's probably not going to champion as well. Fight.
• 2:10:53
  Unknown: That's right.
• 2:10:55
  Actually
• 2:10:56
  Unknown: actually I would You're like to in the wrong part of the world. You're not gonna be king. Actually
• 2:11:02
  Unknown: I'm in I'm in Monica's part of the Commonwealth country, you know?
• 2:11:07
  I am in Monica's part of the world. So so I was I was all on board to either have Mike for king or Monica for Queen. Did you wanna get into something more serious? I mean Yes. That was Yes. That was very serious. Well,
• 2:11:22
  Unknown: somebody else before we go sorry. Didn't mean to call to talk across you there. Please just give me one minute. But
• 2:11:28
  I was gonna say, did you know that you living in Canada,
• 2:11:31
  you only officially own, I'm not sure if it's one or two feet under your feet, and below that,
• 2:11:38
  Unknown: the monarch of England owns it? Yes. I did know that. That's mineral rights. They talk about mineral rights. So we we I guess we have just soil rights, but we don't have mineral rights. Yeah.
• 2:11:50
  Unknown: I did know that. I'm not sure exactly what the depth is. I guess you you know it better than me. Two feet or something. If you've got a long a big apple tree, you could be eating what a king Charlie boy might because his roots might go below the the the footage that you're allowed.
• 2:12:04
  Unknown: So what comes there? Yeah. They might. They usually go outwards,
• 2:12:09
  Unknown: I think. Well, maybe there's a top root that goes down down. But but anyway Well And I think be the monarch, Monica. My last little sort of chirpy thing is, well, Monica the monarch sounds good, doesn't it? Don't you think? Of course. It's got a kind of ring to it. So you could be the queen, and then you could sort out those mineral rights, and you could have them. I'd be fine with that. You know, maybe the lord privy chancellor would be okay with it too. So I I I wouldn't mind. It'd be okay. Yeah. And, actually, speaking of those mineral rights or soil rights or whatever we do own or not, I mean, they're trying to make it so that we,
• 2:12:43
  Unknown: the people of European ancestry,
• 2:12:46
  we own nothing.
• 2:12:47
  But the natives own it all, even though they say that they never
• 2:12:52
  owned
• 2:12:53
  property. That was against their philosophy,
• 2:12:57
  against their way of thinking.
• 2:12:59
  They did not.
• 2:13:00
  No one person ownership
• 2:13:02
  over the land. They thought that was a bizarre concept, but now they own it all. I mean, that's what they're well on their way to trying to establish
• 2:13:12
  especially here in the province where I live, that recently
• 2:13:15
  a whole
• 2:13:16
  large amount of
• 2:13:18
  public lands,
• 2:13:20
  particularly in the provincial capital, were just handed over to them
• 2:13:26
  and they could potentially
• 2:13:27
  close those
• 2:13:29
  public lands to the public if they choose. It's unbelievable, but that wasn't even the topic that I was going to get into, although it would segue well from this vacant Yeah. I think it's a good segue. I suspect, Monica, on that score,
• 2:13:43
  Unknown: it the goal is not to give them,
• 2:13:46
  even though currently, maybe, the the current period is that they're being given ownership of this stuff. And the the main thing is to actually remove ownership from Uslot,
• 2:13:56
  and then once they've that's sorted out, then the people that think they own it, they'll find that they don't own it either. They'll lose out to something else. Bingle. Yeah. Bingle. It's just a domino effect. They'll just take it off them. Well, yeah, we know we know who's behind all this. It's the same same old same old.
• 2:14:12
  The Eskimos. Yeah.
• 2:14:14
  The Eskimos with the little hats. We stay say we stay safe around here, Monica. You know what we're like. We're pathetic.
• 2:14:21
  You're pathetic.
• 2:14:23
  Unknown: You're
• 2:14:23
  pathetic lot over there. Know, we we know who we're talking about. No.
• 2:14:28
  Anyway,
• 2:14:30
  but they are
• 2:14:31
  behind it, the UNDRIP, that's the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples.
• 2:14:40
  Apparently now there's
• 2:14:42
  a lot of wheeling and dealing going on between these Indigenous folks and the Chinese, for instance.
• 2:14:50
  Apparently, that's just fine according to UNDRIP.
• 2:14:54
  If they want to make their business deals, they can. If they want to do some development
• 2:15:00
  deals with the Chinese, they can.
• 2:15:02
  As
• 2:15:03
  you say, Paul, the idea here is to dispossess us
• 2:15:08
  of European
• 2:15:09
  heritage,
• 2:15:11
  the white folks, the people who founded and built this country,
• 2:15:16
  they want to dispossess us.
• 2:15:19
  And then,
• 2:15:20
  you know, are they really caring about these indigenous peoples and they really would like to
• 2:15:26
  have them, you know, roam and hunt and do their fishing and their berry picking unmolested
• 2:15:31
  from us evil, evil white people?
• 2:15:34
  Or is it about something else going on here? I mean, if they're
• 2:15:39
  willing and dealing with the Chinese
• 2:15:42
  to, let's say, do some pipelines
• 2:15:44
  or some
• 2:15:47
  gold mines or whatever it is that they're negotiating.
• 2:15:50
  And then they're going under the under where they don't have to go through the regular channels of
• 2:15:57
  whatever they
• 2:15:59
  getting permits from the government, which is a criminal organization
• 2:16:02
  anyway. But still, you know what I'm
• 2:16:06
  basically trying to say here? It is really about,
• 2:16:12
  first of all, dispossessing us, which I already said and you said it.
• 2:16:16
  And then it's the usual suspects
• 2:16:20
  basically running roughshod. I mean, everything
• 2:16:23
  they're telling us is is
• 2:16:25
  completely
• 2:16:28
  backwards, really, from reality.
• 2:16:31
  The meantime, they tell us that we're
• 2:16:33
  doing too much
• 2:16:35
  burning of fossil fuels, so climate change, climate change, climate change. Meanwhile, the AI centers are going up like mushrooms popping out of a wet forest That
• 2:16:45
  apparently uses a lot of energy and water, but that doesn't get mentioned in their equations of, Gee, we have to cut back on our usage of energy.
• 2:16:56
  On and on it goes. Anyway, I did have something else in mind that I it's just sort of fresh on my mind that I've been thinking
• 2:17:03
  Unknown: about. Or do you wanna stay on this topic maybe? No. No. Want it's yours. We like I wanna hear from you. So we you know, we've done the segue bit and
• 2:17:13
  go.
• 2:17:14
  Unknown: Yours. Alright. Alright.
• 2:17:16
  Okay. So
• 2:17:19
  this actually happened a few years ago in Canada
• 2:17:22
  and it did get some
• 2:17:23
  pushback and it did hit the
• 2:17:27
  media and the alternative media and people were talking about it and were outraged about it. Then it kind of went away and I'm kind of resurrecting this because I think that it is one of the most evil,
• 2:17:38
  diabolical,
• 2:17:39
  upside down, inverted, anti life pieces of legislation
• 2:17:44
  ever, ever, ever. And it's something called it it's an act bill c four in Canada, an act to amend the criminal code,
• 2:17:52
  and then in brackets it has conversion
• 2:17:56
  therapy.
• 2:17:57
  Do any of you have an idea what I am talking about when I say conversion therapy?
• 2:18:04
  Unknown: Is this when you decide to become a Muslim and you need help?
• 2:18:11
  Unknown: Try again. Anybody else?
• 2:18:13
  Unknown: When you have your gas changed from Nulsee gas to?
• 2:18:17
  Yeah. Yeah. That's it. Eric's right. That's it. North Sea. Because my my uncle, you see, he had a bushes shop, and a woman came in when they was converting gas over to North Sea. She said, oh, how long does this meat take to cook with North Sea gas? He said, depends on how high the tide is. He said, go go
• 2:18:35
  and phone go look to the gas board and ask them what the tide tables are. So if it's high tide, it'll
• 2:18:42
  be a little bit short of cooking. And she believed him.
• 2:18:47
  Unknown: Oh my goodness I didn't even know what you're talking about at first. No no I know that I I know. Anyway that's obviously not conversion therapy is it Monica? What is it? Oh my goodness. Maybe it's about going from Fahrenheit to Celsius or something. I don't know.
• 2:19:02
  I'm just foggy. No. No. Okay. This is and it's specifically
• 2:19:06
  directed at harming children.
• 2:19:09
  So conversion
• 2:19:10
  therapy
• 2:19:12
  is
• 2:19:14
  if you counsel
• 2:19:16
  a child
• 2:19:18
  or give them
• 2:19:21
  teaching or encouragement
• 2:19:24
  to
• 2:19:25
  stay
• 2:19:27
  with their
• 2:19:29
  assigned
• 2:19:30
  at birth,
• 2:19:31
  the sex that was assigned to them at birth?
• 2:19:34
  Unknown: If you to them. Alright.
• 2:19:36
  Unknown: Yeah. That's not they are either
• 2:19:39
  a girl or boy.
• 2:19:40
  Now if they have been
• 2:19:43
  indoctrinated
• 2:19:44
  and influenced by all the stuff
• 2:19:48
  around us and in school in particular, they get very, very influenced there with all the sexualization and the,
• 2:19:55
  you know, porno pushing, really, which they sometimes
• 2:19:58
  euphemistically
• 2:19:59
  call the family health class.
• 2:20:03
  Then they to some
• 2:20:06
  They want, Oh, I don't know if I feel more like a boy today or a girl, because that's what they get asked by their grade one teacher. Do you feel more like a girl today or a boy? Anyway, they get all this pressure and they get lots of attention if they suddenly say, oh, I think I'm in the wrong body.
• 2:20:21
  Then if somebody was to counsel them that, oh, no. No. No. No. No. Listen. You are just perfect the way you are and, you know, this is how you were born. This God made you this way. You you are a girl or you are a boy, like, whatever it is the case may be. That is
• 2:20:39
  conversion therapy, not the ones who are
• 2:20:43
  influencing them to change their gender. No. But that's what the word sounds like, doesn't it? Like, if you convert something, you're changing it from what it was or what it is to something different.
• 2:20:56
  No. Conversion therapy is if you let's say you take your child aside
• 2:21:01
  and say, hey. Listen. That that's nonsense.
• 2:21:04
  Don't you listen to that. That's you are just beautiful the way you are.
• 2:21:10
  Doesn't matter, little girl, that you love to climb trees. That is the most normal thing in the world, or it doesn't matter, little boy, that you like to maybe, you know,
• 2:21:19
  fix something by sewing with a thread and needle. You that's just f fine.
• 2:21:25
  Unknown: You know? Like, it just Yeah. I did. I used to have to mend my jeans with a sometimes if my mom wasn't around, I had to do that. Yeah. My brother Alfred did too. That's why I thought of that example. Know? Yes. Good one.
• 2:21:36
  Unknown: Pictures of him as a little boy he's sewing up his little stuffed animal.
• 2:21:41
  That's
• 2:21:43
  Unknown: not a euphemism for something is it? His little stuffed animal.
• 2:21:46
  Good grief. No. My goodness. Stop it.
• 2:21:51
  Sorry. We're getting out of hand here, aren't we? It was you, Monica. You're you're just trouble. Sorry. Yeah. Trouble trouble. So I I'm going to,
• 2:22:00
  Unknown: just read a little bit of this legislation. This is right out of the legislation.
• 2:22:04
  Conversion therapy is defined as a practice, a treatment, or a service designed
• 2:22:10
  to change a person's gender expression
• 2:22:14
  so that it conforms
• 2:22:15
  to the sex assigned to the person at birth
• 2:22:18
  or repress or reduce non heterosexual
• 2:22:22
  attraction or sexual behavior
• 2:22:24
  or repress a person's non cisgender
• 2:22:28
  identity
• 2:22:29
  or
• 2:22:30
  repress or reduce
• 2:22:32
  a person's gender expression that does not conform to the sex assigned to the person at birth.
• 2:22:38
  And then it goes on to say, the definition also provides for greater certainty.
• 2:22:43
  Like, here they wanna make it, you know, more clear exactly what they're saying because this is all very, very confusing, right? But for greater certainty,
• 2:22:51
  the definition also provides that
• 2:22:53
  conversion therapy does not
• 2:22:56
  include
• 2:22:57
  a practice, treatment, or service that relates to a person's gender transition.
• 2:23:03
  And that is not based on an assumption that a particular sexual orientation or a gender identity or a gender expression is to be preferred over another.
• 2:23:12
  Okay. That
• 2:23:13
  I just am over
• 2:23:16
  I am
• 2:23:17
  I don't know how to express my
• 2:23:19
  I am flipping Well done for reading it. Well done for reading it. Oh, thank you. I am just livid about this because,
• 2:23:27
  you see, this law
• 2:23:29
  like, you will not be criminalized
• 2:23:31
  if you take that child and you just pervert them and you confuse them and you cause them to doubt themselves and you cause them all kinds of turmoil and then you might cause them to become sterile because they might just go along with some of this stuff.
• 2:23:46
  No, that's not illegal. In fact, that's protected.
• 2:23:49
  They clearly say that here. But the person who tries to put sense into this child that's been
• 2:23:57
  influenced
• 2:23:58
  by these
• 2:23:59
  absolute
• 2:24:00
  perverts and this diabolical plan
• 2:24:03
  to ruin our children,
• 2:24:05
  the person who wants to, you know, remove them from that situation, the person that wants to
• 2:24:11
  convince them that what
• 2:24:13
  they are is what they are and this is all just good, that is explicitly a criminal act. And people can go to jail for that. In fact, they have gone to jail for that.
• 2:24:23
  So up to five years for
• 2:24:25
  this kind of thing. So anyway, that's what's on my mind right now.
• 2:24:30
  And this was passed in early twenty twenty two,
• 2:24:33
  I believe. I have to check that again. It
• 2:24:36
  was
• 2:24:38
  introduced in late twenty twenty one and then passed.
• 2:24:42
  This is law in Canada.
• 2:24:46
  Unknown: By who?
• 2:24:47
  I
• 2:24:49
  know this sounds like sort of sophistry or whatever but the fact is that the actual situation is that the people that are issuing these sentences out of their mouths that they say are laws,
• 2:25:00
  those people are in breach of the law.
• 2:25:02
  So,
• 2:25:03
  and I know this seemed maybe a moot point, but you know that's
• 2:25:08
  really the essence of it. Whenever I mean why are they issuing things like that? You know I've got that smell up my nostrils of the reek of cultural Marxist bullshit
• 2:25:17
  and,
• 2:25:18
  it's very effective isn't it? In the sense that it's gather it garners a lot of attention from people.
• 2:25:24
  People like yourself currently are getting outraged by it because of what you think it implies and I understand that as well. But there's an I think there's another stance that can be taken is that anybody you know
• 2:25:36
  instead of us defending ourselves against these things we have to assert our own interests and it's easier said than done but there is a root in here the more we keep which is basically,
• 2:25:46
  did you just say that right well we're gonna lock you up.
• 2:25:49
  What's the difference between us and them? They've got a lot of people
• 2:25:53
  enthralled to them literally and they are enthralled
• 2:25:57
  are they not? Know in the true sense of it they they get oh the government
• 2:26:02
  this thing said that, therefore I believe in government because obviously we've just got a bad one right now, but if we get a good one it'll be better.
• 2:26:10
  And so it's all these other people around you that actually lend lend their weight,
• 2:26:15
  they're sort of supine cowardice to the whole thing, and then you end up in this situation where you're the only person in the room whose light bulbs are on. Everybody else is basically a drone and so they go along with this stuff and it's not just this is it? But of course it is it's another attack on us. I see this as just another front
• 2:26:32
  to wipe us out.
• 2:26:34
  Unknown: That's what it's about. Yes. Of course it is. That's
• 2:26:38
  great.
• 2:26:39
  I like what you said Paul. The reality is that families have been split asunder on this.
• 2:26:46
  Marriages
• 2:26:47
  have been split up. Usually, it's the man who ends up being criminalized
• 2:26:52
  and goes to jail. There have been cases of people being jailed for trying to protect their young children from these harms.
• 2:27:01
  And so this this is I mean, the government, yeah, they're not legitimate,
• 2:27:06
  and that was
• 2:27:08
  like what we started out talking about because your previous guest was, you know, so eloquently talking about the throne of England must be declared vacant. And and I add that all these governments are illegitimate.
• 2:27:19
  Still, they do have the power of
• 2:27:23
  their
• 2:27:24
  They
• 2:27:25
  can come and arrest you. They can take you away in handcuffs. They have the power
• 2:27:31
  of the might, I guess. They have their swords, I guess you could say.
• 2:27:35
  So, yeah, we need to,
• 2:27:38
  for sure, push back, fight back. This is completely insane. It's diabolical.
• 2:27:44
  So upside down.
• 2:27:45
  I think it's
• 2:27:47
  an illustration
• 2:27:48
  of
• 2:27:49
  the
• 2:27:50
  most
• 2:27:52
  it's like a clear picture of how inverted everything is because this is just complete
• 2:27:58
  anti life
• 2:28:00
  to the point of reversing
• 2:28:02
  the sexes themselves.
• 2:28:04
  I mean, there cannot be anything more anti life than that when you negate
• 2:28:08
  the female and male, and that's essentially what this is about.
• 2:28:13
  You know.
• 2:28:14
  Unknown: It is. I mean I think it's also
• 2:28:18
  an aspect to this but this aspect I think applies to everything
• 2:28:22
  is
• 2:28:23
  this I know we use the word a lot but you have to use it the fact is that you are surrounded,
• 2:28:30
  the majority are brainwashed
• 2:28:32
  into complying with
• 2:28:34
  these people that have assumed authority.
• 2:28:37
  They're
• 2:28:38
  completely brainwashed into it. So they've developed a belief system haven't they in the authority of government? But the government
• 2:28:45
  is a bogus structure
• 2:28:47
  as we would cover in the last two hours and we mentioned it in different ways on other shows, but it's bogus. It's actually not an honorable or real or true thing. You know I think Mike was basically saying as well that you know we are governed by evil. I think that's pretty clear that we are. And now are you governed by evil? Well you're not to the degree that other people are because you're questioned. You have at least not lost sight of the question.
• 2:29:11
  You question these things, but we were surrounded by so many people that don't and I'm not saying you know I have no idea what I would do in that situation. Mean I,
• 2:29:20
  the idea is we've got to find a way of what's the scriptural thing come out of her. This entire system is wretched
• 2:29:28
  and it's repugnant
• 2:29:29
  and it's repugnant to God and we have to ally ourselves with God, whatever you might think that means, but really that is the only way through. We're not gonna do it without that because all these clever dicks step in and go we've you know that thing that you had to read out it's complete crap
• 2:29:45
  from yeah but somebody actually wrote that that's what some minion
• 2:29:50
  actually believed that I'm assuming and wrote it whereas if it was given to me in the department I go I'm off you're all complete you're crackers you're completely mad if you keep writing more of this stuff I'm gonna burn this house down with you in it. I mean it's that kind of response that I don't know you know but they've got such a hold over so many people that's the issue is is there a way to break that? There might not be I don't know but people this is what we said before you know the Covid thing's an example of it is this
• 2:30:17
  gross
• 2:30:18
  level of stupidity amongst people that they've been trained into. People are not naturally this stupid,
• 2:30:25
  this is unnatural they've been brought they've been inducted into it, into a satanic view of life, a godless that's what it means, godless way of life and if you you can't get any sense out of nothing without that, Nothing makes sense. It is a spell. It is a spell that we have put under, and and we have been dumbed down. Contrary to what we were taught in school,
• 2:30:45
  Unknown: we were given the clear impression that we are on
• 2:30:50
  the rise in every aspect in terms of our
• 2:30:54
  knowledge
• 2:30:56
  and our technological
• 2:30:58
  advancement and our morality
• 2:31:00
  is always going forward. We are rising. We are going up. And this was while we were being dumbed down
• 2:31:09
  by
• 2:31:10
  lies.
• 2:31:11
  Not only lies, but, you know,
• 2:31:14
  physical assaults and
• 2:31:17
  destruction
• 2:31:18
  of
• 2:31:19
  things in the past which kept us healthy.
• 2:31:22
  For example, I mean, is it seems like a completely
• 2:31:26
  different topic, it's something that I just recently
• 2:31:30
  was seeing some documentary videos on and that is the great bells.
• 2:31:35
  All the great bells
• 2:31:37
  that were in the towers
• 2:31:39
  and the churches and the
• 2:31:42
  big domes,
• 2:31:43
  big huge bells, some of them weighing tons
• 2:31:47
  that
• 2:31:49
  of them in existence for hundreds of years. And in 1917,
• 2:31:53
  there was the Great Bell Melt
• 2:31:55
  and it was in the name of the war effort. They needed to melt down the bells for ammunition and bullets, and nothing could be further from the truth. It was not
• 2:32:07
  for the war effort.
• 2:32:09
  The target itself was the bells
• 2:32:12
  to destroy them because these bells
• 2:32:14
  were finely crafted to create
• 2:32:18
  a frequency of vibration with many overtones
• 2:32:22
  that were very
• 2:32:24
  healing and soothing and beautiful.
• 2:32:29
  I can't really recount all this, but they were a source of
• 2:32:35
  well-being,
• 2:32:37
  not just to tell the time, not just to announce the beginning of a Mass or to announce that somebody's having a wedding now or something like that, which that was all good and beautiful, but they were actually a source of well-being.
• 2:32:52
  And I mean, the the people just mourned
• 2:32:55
  and wept when these bells were being knocked out of their towers and
• 2:32:59
  dropped unceremoniously
• 2:33:01
  to the streets below and then gathered up and taken to some big foundry and
• 2:33:06
  and destroyed.
• 2:33:08
  And that happened to thousands and thousands and thousands, I don't know, maybe tens of thousands of bells I think in
• 2:33:15
  Unknown: Yes.
• 2:33:16
  I can comment on that. So
• 2:33:18
  Unknown: how did I get onto that? I did say it was, like, a completely different subject. Oh, yes. Because you were talking about we're so stupid.
• 2:33:26
  Mhmm. And it it it is true. We've been put under a spell, and we have been dumbed down by the
• 2:33:32
  the false
• 2:33:34
  education.
• 2:33:36
  And we've been
• 2:33:40
  great has been stolen from us,
• 2:33:44
  such as this is one example, these bells. That's just one example.
• 2:33:50
  Know, nowadays,
• 2:33:52
  the poisons that were being fed through the air and through the water and deliberately,
• 2:33:57
  not just as a byproduct of industrial
• 2:34:01
  production of goods that we
• 2:34:04
  enjoy,
• 2:34:05
  but they are purposefully
• 2:34:07
  poisoning us. Then, of course, the bioweapons
• 2:34:09
  through the vaccination
• 2:34:11
  programs that have always been bad, which when I first started learning about harms of vaccines way, way backwell,
• 2:34:19
  I shouldn't say way, way back. Maybe
• 2:34:21
  a dozen years ago, I started to look into that. At first, thought, Well, maybe they started out good
• 2:34:26
  and then they just got usurped by
• 2:34:29
  somebody
• 2:34:30
  to make them bad. But no, they have been bad right from the get go. They have been a form of
• 2:34:36
  poisoning us. I mean, the whole allopathic medical system is bad.
• 2:34:41
  The only part that's really, really good in the medical system is when they deal with mechanical issues. They can put us back together again very, very well if we've been in an accident or
• 2:34:52
  organs. I know that they can do amazing
• 2:34:55
  things with heart
• 2:34:58
  issues and whatnot.
• 2:35:00
  But when it comes to disease and that kind of thing,
• 2:35:03
  the whole system is evil, actually. The allopathic medical system, it's very bad.
• 2:35:08
  And they destroyed all the other systems of healing,
• 2:35:12
  whether it was homeopathy or naturopathy.
• 2:35:16
  And then they suppressed
• 2:35:18
  Doctor.
• 2:35:19
  Reichi Hammer with his Germanische Heilkunder.
• 2:35:24
  They destroyed him.
• 2:35:27
  But it was just all very, very, very
• 2:35:30
  scientifically proven. He proved
• 2:35:33
  that cancer is not that which we are taught that it is.
• 2:35:37
  Was very successful with his patients in healing them
• 2:35:40
  using
• 2:35:42
  other
• 2:35:43
  ways of So thinking about
• 2:35:45
  we've been harmed and yes, we've been dumbed down so we can be very critical of our fellow
• 2:35:51
  men and women who have not yet opened their eyes and not yet seen the light. I was there just a few short years ago. I was in the same boat. I have a great understanding and a great empathy for
• 2:36:04
  our people who have not yet opened their eyes. I am always
• 2:36:09
  obsessed with how can we help these people to open their eyes because obviously we need
• 2:36:16
  more people to open their eyes. Then we can really declare
• 2:36:21
  the throne of England must be declared vacant and all our government representatives
• 2:36:25
  are in a system that is completely illegitimate. I mean,
• 2:36:29
  imagine if we were all our people or most of them, a really grand tipping point would need to be larger where
• 2:36:36
  we knew and understood and just laughed at them when they came with their next mandates. Six years or five years ago or whatever now, six
• 2:36:45
  years ago when they came and told us to wear masks, if everybody had just laughed at them
• 2:36:52
  Yeah. And not turned into
• 2:36:54
  not turned into little, you know, policing each other
• 2:36:58
  Unknown: because that's what happened. They turned us all into communists because all the people had to police each other. Anyway, I got We all became part of Astasi. A lot of people. And there's a certain personality type amongst us that loves that. It's the sort of traffic warden mentality. People who have never had any power, so they go, oh, I'm boss of all these people and I can intimidate them. They might not think of that consciously but they get a kick out of it. There's no two words about it, they do. TV and Paul is trying to talk I guess because he says can you guys hear me? I guess he's been trying to talk.
• 2:37:29
  Yeah well he he tries Yeah. Paul, it was a few minutes ago, but you were on a roll, Monica, and it was good. It was a good roll, by the way. Yeah. Not a bread roll. It was a good roll. Paul, yeah, you wanted to say something. Sorry.
• 2:37:40
  Unknown: Well, yeah, it's I can you guys hear me?
• 2:37:43
  Unknown: Yes. Yeah. We can hear you. Okay. Good. Oh, I can't. I
• 2:37:48
  Unknown: yeah. Okay.
• 2:37:49
  Unknown: Can't you hear him, Monica? No. He's not coming through at all. Not for me. So I don't know. You might be hearing him on a different platform.
• 2:37:57
  Unknown: I don't know. He's in the studio. That's really weird. This happened to someone the other day. How Kick me out and bring me back in. I can hear you, and I could hear Eric a moment ago when he said spot on, but I cannot hear Can you hear him, Eric? Yes. I can hear him. Yeah. Loud and clear. Kick me out and then bring me back in.
• 2:38:15
  Unknown: Kick me out and bring me back in. I've
• 2:38:17
  Unknown: always liked I've always wanted to kick someone out. I mean, I just have. Well, this is the don't hang up an audio bouncer. I'm gonna become an audio bouncer. So I'm just gonna
• 2:38:27
  I'm gonna kick you from the studio. Get ready to be kicked, Paul. Three, two, one, Alright.
• 2:38:32
  Unknown: Okay. Okay. So, yeah, he completely kicked me out. Alright. So now I've gotta reenter the studio. Let's see if we can do this.
• 2:38:41
  Get this taken care of.
• 2:38:44
  Honestly, I just had a couple of questions. Let's see if I can No, pop back in
• 2:38:51
  Unknown: I've turned you up a little bit. Don't worry, I've audio mixed it here. Think you're great. Everything sounds crystal clear to me. You sound really good. Thank you. So,
• 2:38:59
  yeah, where were we? Paul's about to come back with a question, so we're sat here with bated breath. Here we go. He's back. Hi
• 2:39:06
  Unknown: there. Okay. Can you hear me now? Yeah. Yes. Okay.
• 2:39:10
  Honestly,
• 2:39:11
  that is so weird. What
• 2:39:13
  they have done is it is
• 2:39:15
  basically
• 2:39:15
  destruction of
• 2:39:17
  a cross between the moral fabric of society and where societies in general and also the destruction of the family unit.
• 2:39:26
  Like
• 2:39:27
  the the whole thing with conversion therapy used to be used to have been sanctioned by the church and everything,
• 2:39:34
  and conversion therapy was what they did to homosexuals
• 2:39:38
  trying to fix them with respect to God and the way things were supposed to be. But then they've also been tearing at the moral fabric of the family and society in general because during COVID, when everybody was locked down and only
• 2:39:54
  essential workers were enabled, were allowed to leave their houses,
• 2:39:59
  there was an absolute
• 2:40:01
  explosion
• 2:40:02
  of incest porn.
• 2:40:05
  And it
• 2:40:06
  absolutely
• 2:40:07
  it would I believe it was by design to destroy the moral fabric
• 2:40:12
  and the the moral conscience
• 2:40:15
  of people in general. And one of the ways they did that was locking up mothers with fathers, brothers with sisters,
• 2:40:24
  and families in general,
• 2:40:27
  knowing that eventually nature would take its course. And it took them months to accomplish that, and I think they did.
• 2:40:33
  These are absolutely horrible people.
• 2:40:36
  Unknown: Horrible. Well if they are people,
• 2:40:39
  Unknown: they you know, point. Just
• 2:40:42
  for one moment my brain went on a different track and where did this happen? Were they locked up the mothers
• 2:40:49
  with daughters and their fathers with their sons?
• 2:40:52
  Unknown: When and where is that going on? It was the whole lockdown. The whole lockdown in America. Oh, the lockdown thing.
• 2:40:59
  Unknown: Yes. Yes. Yes.
• 2:41:01
  Unknown: Whole the whole COVID lockdown thing.
• 2:41:03
  Unknown: The whole COVID lockdown thing. Sorry. I was thought you're talking about some past event.
• 2:41:08
  Unknown: This is I firmly yes. I firmly believe that that was
• 2:41:13
  to to hack away at the the moral fabric of people in general.
• 2:41:22
  Unknown: Yes. I agree with you. I think you're right.
• 2:41:25
  Unknown: Oh,
• 2:41:26
  despicable despicable.
• 2:41:27
  Unknown: Well, it's every single thing. Every single aspect of life,
• 2:41:32
  everything is weaponized. The food supply system, the media, the government, the banking,
• 2:41:38
  everything. Everything that you look to in a supposedly well organized society,
• 2:41:44
  which it used to be, is gone. I think you know the thing about the bells of course I think it touches on something else that if you you know and we talk about buildings here but it's in the same sort of channel.
• 2:41:56
  The absence of beauty, the growing absence of beauty in all things, the design of things and stuff you know. I mean the only thing that they spend time designing now is the latest smartphone which looks like every other thing, but actual stuff
• 2:42:10
  there is no value added
• 2:42:12
  because there aren't any they've created a system that has removed the artisan from our world.
• 2:42:19
  The artisans are few and far between aren't they? And because no one can make a living doing that sort of stuff unless you've got a rich patron
• 2:42:26
  and maybe it was always like that to some degree, you look back at the things you know you know those sorts of stories that you're attracted to. I mean the idea of the prince and the princess and the the knights and all this stuff and castles. I mean I know I'm being silly but they've got a beauty to them. There's something about the scenes and the settings
• 2:42:46
  it's real, it's truthful, it feels honorable and direct. Everything now
• 2:42:51
  courtesy of this veil that has been thrown over as you know courtesy of the mainstream media amongst many other things has put everybody in a kind of state of suspended,
• 2:43:01
  I don't know, animation. It's just odd. It is very odd. You've got to fight every day. I think fight is probably the right word to retain your consciousness and your sanity. I I do think the best way to do it is you continually question everything. I mean I don't know what your days like Monica,
• 2:43:17
  Eric and Paul, I suspect it's similar to this. From the moment I wake to the moment I go to sleep, I never stop thinking about all this stuff. I just don't.
• 2:43:26
  It's just nonsense, it's seven days a week, it's been like this for years because and you get get a bit frustrated going I haven't seen the key yet.
• 2:43:35
  Know maybe that's a delusion that there is one simple key I don't know but I do think
• 2:43:40
  that without us standing, know we want to combat these things but we we need to really address our own foundation.
• 2:43:48
  I tend to think,
• 2:43:51
  because the more we get in touch with and live out of our own genuine foundation of life, which is you
• 2:43:59
  need to know who we are as a race,
• 2:44:01
  what we've done, what we can do,
• 2:44:04
  and to live
• 2:44:05
  in that space more than we live in the fear porn world, we've got that's the first one hurdle to overcome because we're just bombarded with puke 20 fourseven.
• 2:44:15
  You know, and I like to listen to other radio guys and guys that and gals that are out there in the closer to the mainstream media thing, but I tend to the view and look I'm still learning on this kind of front as well, that they're you most of us are using the wrong sentences. We're not actually focused in the right way. There's that clever dick phrase but it's kind of true. To some degree we've all ingested the command structure of the enemy.
• 2:44:39
  You know their language, their terms, we use the words that they keep creating,
• 2:44:43
  and because they're able to publish them in such huge powerful ways through into your head twenty four seven. You know the whole of the newscasting system what's the point of it? It's mad. Mean it's just complete fiction. When you say using their words are you talking about their
• 2:45:00
  Unknown: you know for example they describe
• 2:45:03
  cameras as flock cameras and I think we should call them outdoor prison
• 2:45:08
  cameras.
• 2:45:09
  Unknown: Yeah. Well maybe but I mean I'm just thinking about what you read out.
• 2:45:12
  You know that type of language the way that stuff is written?
• 2:45:16
  If you look at the way that court legalese is written it's crap. I'd fire these people for writing sentences like that and I mean it. It comes right down to the words, if if a teenager
• 2:45:27
  of average intelligence cannot comprehend it, it's not that he or she is thick, it's that you sir can't write madam, you can't write. You've got to be read to be understood and comprehended and they don't write like that. Write intentionally to confuse and then shame you for being a thicko in the class. You know,
• 2:45:46
  it's that it's gotta be reversed.
• 2:45:48
  Unknown: These things that are written in laws, it's actually got a name for it's it's in another language, and this language is called legalese.
• 2:45:57
  Yes. Legalese.
• 2:45:59
  And then that's a big reason why
• 2:46:01
  they say you all have to have a lawyer. You don't have to have a lawyer when you go to court if you're charged
• 2:46:07
  with whatever. You don't have to have a lawyer. You can go and speak for yourself, speak on your own behalf.
• 2:46:13
  However, they strongly discourage people to do that. They strongly encourage you to have a lawyer. A lot of it is because of this language, this legalese.
• 2:46:23
  However,
• 2:46:24
  if you do go and speak on your own behalf, if you have the unfortunate
• 2:46:30
  fate of being in
• 2:46:32
  of their
• 2:46:33
  court
• 2:46:34
  system,
• 2:46:36
  if you are on your own there, the judge has the moral or not just the moral obligation but has the obligation
• 2:46:44
  to explain the legalese, to translate,
• 2:46:47
  turn it into a language you could understand.
• 2:46:52
  Unknown: You imagine? Well the mere fact that you need an interpreter I. E. A lawyer means that you can't be stood in the face of the law. I mean there that you know they say
• 2:47:01
  ignorance or ignorance
• 2:47:03
  is no defense and this is actually true
• 2:47:06
  because ignorance more than implies what it's stating is you knew about this thing and you chose not to give it any conscious attention
• 2:47:14
  and therefore,
• 2:47:16
  because you knew it and didn't do anything once this is the thing about acquiring stuff you're actually honor bound or duty bound to act on it.
• 2:47:24
  If it's repugnant to you that's the whole thing and of course I think in the past our people did used to do that more readily easily and quickly often with their fists and axes and things like this right? That was the times I'm not calling to go back to that but by the same token we've become soft
• 2:47:41
  sort of in our
• 2:47:42
  will
• 2:47:43
  our willpower and people have lost it they don't assert themselves because there's penalty There are penalties for speaking your mind and all this kind of stuff. Why?
• 2:47:52
  Why? Well because
• 2:47:54
  we are cattle to be controlled. So you know this is this is the form that it's currently in. I don't think this means there's not a way out, think there absolutely is. I think the pressure is building up in here considerably with every passing day, but it requires
• 2:48:06
  permanent and consistent effort and to find like we have here and in the listeners good companions along the way. Very very important, vital in fact, Vital that you have good companions. You're you're right that it can't the the
• 2:48:23
  Unknown: overthrow of this, the it it cannot be stopped. And I'll just quote my brother some of his excellent
• 2:48:29
  little metaphors that he uses. It's like if you
• 2:48:33
  you might have drank the finest wine
• 2:48:36
  in the world, but you overdid it and you had way too much. Well,
• 2:48:40
  your body is not gonna pay attention to the fact that this was very, very expensive wine. If you needed to get rid of it, you will vomit and it will just come out and you cannot stop it.
• 2:48:55
  This is like a volcano
• 2:48:56
  about to erupt
• 2:48:58
  that when
• 2:49:02
  We can't go down much further here and this is going to erupt. I think that our opponents
• 2:49:09
  are very afraid. They are very, very afraid because they know that when this erupts, boy oh boy, they are gonna be hiding and running.
• 2:49:17
  And the other metaphor he says is it's like trying to stop a hurricane
• 2:49:23
  by farting into the wind.
• 2:49:27
  Unknown: I think you're right in some regards but also if we look at
• 2:49:31
  how they have behaved
• 2:49:33
  and their acolytes and the helpers that they have from our own race, the ones that have fallen lower than you could possibly go,
• 2:49:41
  their capacity for vicious behavior appears to be almost unlimited.
• 2:49:46
  I mean we're talking
• 2:49:48
  about their control of food which is a biggie.
• 2:49:51
  I heard a farmer on another show this morning, was on the Mike Graham show which is this morning radio gig that goes out on YouTube and it's it's it's not mainstream,
• 2:50:00
  he used to be mainstream, he's moving more and more in this direction.
• 2:50:03
  The farmer came on and it was,
• 2:50:06
  quietly it was very well put but seriously alarming a guy from Wales and he was just talking about the crop yields and all this stuff and he said people need to get organized and I'm not trying to sort of fear monger but it's just a matter of exercising some responsibility with this. It won't hurt to actually start to build up some kind of a store. Whether that would be enough I don't know these things are a bit like facing a tidal wave you know it would be maybe
• 2:50:30
  we've said it before if I informed everybody there's a tidal wave coming in about five hours you go what do I do? There's nothing we can't it's too late it's over right it's finished. We can't do anything in five hours, it doesn't matter even if you could get 50 miles away or 100 miles,
• 2:50:44
  everybody else is gonna be trying to do that and it'll be just mayhem and sorry so just sit down have a pint you know write your last letters and put them in a bottle or something they might get found. I don't know what to say, but I think if you look at their behavior historically
• 2:50:57
  it's not good toward us.
• 2:51:00
  Unknown: That's putting it mildly, I'm using English understatement as far as I can use it. More people are being killed by their own governments than all the wars put together.
• 2:51:09
  Yeah. Governments are dangerous,
• 2:51:11
  and I question whether we need them. But the trouble is if you did away with government tomorrow,
• 2:51:17
  it would be chaos, and it's actually education of the masses to be self supporting
• 2:51:23
  and self reliant. That's the thing. Take care of our own lives.
• 2:51:28
  We don't need these complete strangers and psychos
• 2:51:31
  in government telling you what to do.
• 2:51:35
  But I've got a feeling something that we will least expect will happen that will work in our favor.
• 2:51:41
  And at the moment, people are too comfortable. They won't do anything once they're comfortable.
• 2:51:45
  Once the supermarket shelves are empty, then they'll do something, but not until. And the government aware of that, so you'll be able to get ahold of high carbohydrate
• 2:51:55
  junk food and sweet stuff. Yes. But you won't be able to get ahold of quality food.
• 2:52:01
  And I think Mhmm. That's what they want to do. They don't want you to have meat.
• 2:52:05
  Why?
• 2:52:06
  Because humans
• 2:52:08
  naturally eat meat.
• 2:52:10
  We are meat eaters, and if we don't eat meat,
• 2:52:14
  Unknown: we get very angry. That's to go to Brazil, Eric. They've got 237,000,000
• 2:52:19
  head of cattle.
• 2:52:21
  That's where we need to go if you want me.
• 2:52:24
  Yes I mean I hate the I can't consider the idea of going somewhere else, I don't know what it's like for you Monica, I just I can't.
• 2:52:32
  It's just don't see. Look we're all we've all got to go sometime,
• 2:52:35
  Everybody dies but not everybody lives. I would suggest to you that at least we are giving it a good shake of the dice here doing our best to live live onwardly.
• 2:52:46
  Unknown: I like that what you just said everybody dies but not everybody lives. That's really good, profound.
• 2:52:52
  Unknown: Well, mate, it's it's kinda true, isn't it? You know? It is. This is why you get frustrated with dopey people around you. You sorta, like, wanna shake them up and slap them and go, look. Do you know what you're being given? You got life. Why don't you use it? Right why do you start shouting oh no this is gonna I can't I can't abide it I mean it literally makes my skin crawl and I have to go away because I'm gonna throw up you know people it's only when they start shouting as well. Know we were talking about last week and it seems like a joke. We were yeah. When you start to make a noise and you get in touch with that stuff, and it's not far away from me all the time but I like to talk normally, but it's not far off right? You find out you've got colossal
• 2:53:32
  access to energy,
• 2:53:34
  it's off the charts. There are huge forces going on in people but they're scared of them, they're almost like scared of them oh I can't behave like that. You can and you need to but people won't approve
• 2:53:46
  forget them.
• 2:53:48
  You might inspire another couple of lunatics to stand up and go enough
• 2:53:53
  and this is where we're at this is we're at the enough point we're just looking for methodologies where we I guess all of us including myself don't want to get killed in the process. This is true,
• 2:54:03
  this is absolutely true. Unfortunately if you look at history many good people did,
• 2:54:07
  because they you hit a point you go this is not life, I'm not living, it doesn't matter now if I die I'm just gonna fight you, Yeah, you're gonna lose. I don't care, I'm still fighting you.
• 2:54:16
  Unknown: Don't care about that.
• 2:54:18
  Don't want to go down on your knees, you want to go down fighting.
• 2:54:23
  Yeah. You know,
• 2:54:25
  and and then, you know, I want to just bring it back to something you said earlier about
• 2:54:29
  beauty in
• 2:54:30
  objects around us and in our I think of it as functional art when people
• 2:54:37
  build things or make things that are not just of
• 2:54:41
  utilitarian nature, but also they are a work of art. Like if you build a
• 2:54:47
  piece of furniture, a chair or a table, and it's
• 2:54:51
  got beautifully carved
• 2:54:53
  legs
• 2:54:54
  and
• 2:54:55
  ornaments
• 2:54:56
  or or just the you know, on your fence outside, it's a beautiful ornamental
• 2:55:02
  object of beauty as well as functional.
• 2:55:05
  And it used to be so common
• 2:55:08
  that buildings were like that. Sorry to veer the subject, I just want to bring it back to that because in our everyday lives, yes, we can
• 2:55:18
  do whatever we can, and everybody's going to have different things that they can do. Everybody has different talents.
• 2:55:24
  And we can, you know, scream and shout. We can try to wake people up. We can do things.
• 2:55:31
  But also every day,
• 2:55:33
  we should be
• 2:55:34
  consciously
• 2:55:36
  having
• 2:55:37
  activities
• 2:55:39
  in our lives that
• 2:55:41
  are joyful, that we are living with joy,
• 2:55:44
  that maybe it does consist of, you know, that you're building something and it has beauty in it, not just utilitarian,
• 2:55:51
  you know, this kind of thing.
• 2:55:53
  Or that you play music or you walk in in the woods
• 2:55:57
  Unknown: and Mhmm. Just
• 2:56:00
  Unknown: doing something that is enjoyable and beautiful.
• 2:56:04
  Yes. Hopefully, you share laughter with people.
• 2:56:07
  But at the same time, daily, everybody can do something in this war that we are in. And at some point,
• 2:56:16
  we are just gonna it's it's gonna be enough. Like you said this earlier, enough. It's enough.
• 2:56:21
  Unknown: It's time. Like What's that phrase, Eric? Had enough yet?
• 2:56:25
  Unknown: Yes.
• 2:56:26
  Yes. Yep. So enough yet?
• 2:56:30
  Unknown: Minute shooting session. That was a fast hour, Monica.
• 2:56:33
  Unknown: Oh my goodness. Is it done music. It's done already.
• 2:56:37
  Unknown: Oh my
• 2:56:38
  know it's
• 2:56:40
  it's unbelievable. Most
• 2:56:41
  enjoyable I always it was it always is with you Monica I love it. Did
• 2:56:46
  you know I didn't even send you did you see I didn't even send you a message I was that confident you were gonna rock up today.
• 2:56:51
  Unknown: I'm glad you confirmed that because then I was worried that maybe my system of communication doesn't work.
• 2:56:57
  Unknown: No we're getting on telepathic levels now I just I thought Monica's gonna be there because she's just solid as a rock and it's just fantastic Monica it's been it's been lovely having you back again. It really is. And now
• 2:57:09
  that you're here, it seems a long time since the last one. But when when I thought about you coming on this week, thought, wasn't she just here last week? But it it wasn't.
• 2:57:17
  Unknown: That's right.
• 2:57:18
  Unknown: Monica Schafer for Queen mum.
• 2:57:21
  Schafer for Queen mum.
• 2:57:24
  Unknown: Anyway everyone we're gonna we'll be back I got twenty seconds this is just right we're gonna be back next week of course usual time Monica will be back in next month. Thanks very much for being with us this evening, and, thanks also to Mike Burke who, made the first two hours brilliant. We'll see you next week everybody. Bye for now. Bye bye.
• 2:57:48
  Unknown: Blasting the Voice of Freedom Worldwide, you're listening to the Global Voice Radio Network.
• 2:57:54
  Unknown: Bye bye, boys. Have fun storming the castle.