Latest / The Augarius Williams Show / The Truth Shall Set You Free | Episode 16

Transcript

The Truth Shall Set You Free | Episode 16 · The Augarius Williams Show

0:01
Speaker 1: Thanks so much for listening to The Igirius Williams Show.
0:04
You can cast new episodes every week on the iHeartRadio app,
0:08
Apple Podcasts, the wheref you enjoy listening to your favorite podcast.
0:24
Speaker 2: What's going on?
0:25
Speaker 1: Everybody, Welcome in to the latest edition of The Agirius
0:29
Williams Show. I'm Your Man, Agarius Williams. Thanking you all
0:32
once again for listening, however and wherever you may be listening.
0:35
For those of you that are returning, welcome back. For
0:38
those of you that are checking us out for the
0:39
first time, Welcome aboard. We do this every single week
0:43
where we come together to break down the biggest stories
0:46
from around the world of politics, and we'd love for
0:48
you guys to become a part of what we do here.
0:50
All that you have to do is follow us on
0:52
your favorite podcast platform, then leave us a rating and review,
0:56
and last, but certainly not least, please go out and
0:59
tell family members and friends about the great things that
1:01
we do here on the show, so that way they,
1:04
like you, can become a part of what we strive
1:06
to do here, which is the break down the biggest
1:08
political stories in our own unique, unapologetic and sometimes we
1:11
just got to do it in our own controversial way.
1:14
So if you guys go out and take care of
1:16
those few things for us, we greatly appreciate it. Have
1:18
a great show planned for you today, so just sit
1:20
back and enjoy yourself. For those of you that are new,
1:24
I like to issue this disclaimer at the very beginning
1:28
of each and every episode of the Igarius William Show.
1:32
I'm not a Democrat, I'm not a Republican. I am
1:35
someone that has grown tired over the course of his
1:38
lifetime of the political system here in this country. So
1:41
if you're someone that's like minded like myself, and you've
1:44
grown tired of the political system in this country, I
1:47
think you're gonna enjoy what you're about to hear. So
1:50
once again, just sit back and enjoy yourself. Episode sixteen.
1:55
What's the title of it? You may be wondering. That's
1:58
a pretty interesting question, because by the time you guys
2:01
hear this episode, you will have already known what the
2:04
episode title was going to be. I went with a
2:07
couple of different options before sitting down to record this
2:10
for you guys, but the option that I settled on
2:14
was simply this, The truth shall set you free.
2:17
Speaker 2: We live in a time now where.
2:19
Speaker 1: The truth almost seems like it's locked up somewhere and
2:23
only a handful of people seem to.
2:25
Speaker 2: Have the key to it. Everybody is always.
2:27
Speaker 1: Telling you that they're the ones that's giving you the
2:30
truth straight no Chaser, they're the ones that's not misleading you.
2:33
But every time you turn around, it always feels like
2:36
we the masses, are being misled by those who claim
2:40
that their job is to tell us the truth straight
2:42
no Chaser. Prime example of this, there's this big fuss
2:47
here lately about the mainstream media and how so many
2:51
people have decided, you know what, I no longer believe
2:54
that the mainstream media serves my interest. On one hand,
2:58
you have networks like seeing in NBCABCCBS, MS NOW News Nation,
3:05
where it seems like the majority of the time they
3:08
lean democratic. And then you have other networks on the
3:11
other side like Fox One, American News, Newsmax, Bright Bart,
3:16
so on and so forth, and you can tell that
3:18
they have a very strong Republican leaning, and both networks
3:21
accuse the other of doing the thing that they claim
3:24
that they're not doing. For an example, CNN is always
3:27
trying to tell you and I that they believe in
3:30
reporting right down the middle. They have no biases whatsoever.
3:34
But if you tune into any CNN programming, more times
3:38
than not, it is going to lean very heavily into
3:41
the Democratic column. If you go and turn on any
3:44
Fox News program, it's going to lean mostly into the
3:47
Republican column.
3:48
Speaker 2: So all of these.
3:49
Speaker 1: Networks are trying to get you and I to buy
3:52
into this notion that they're giving us the truth, when
3:54
in all actuality, they're only giving us the truth of
3:57
the side that they like. And that's the reason why
4:00
I also have such a hard problem or hard time
4:03
with the President of the United States when he routinely
4:06
comes out and calls out networks like CNN, CBS, ABC.
4:10
Speaker 2: For reporting on him unfairly.
4:12
Speaker 1: And I think to myself, well, you have networks whose
4:15
sole job it is to report on you positively, So
4:18
why are you so obsessed with the networks that don't
4:21
report on you positively. If I'm the kind of person
4:25
that was, in Donald Trump's position, the most powerful man
4:28
on the face of the earth right now, I wouldn't
4:31
concern myself with the opinions of people who don't like me.
4:34
Because when you walk into a job like president of
4:38
the United States, you understand almost immediately that the vast
4:42
majority of the country is not going to like you,
4:44
because it's gonna be something that you're gonna do that's
4:46
gonna piss him off. And it seems like from the
4:49
very beginning when Donald Trump first announced that he was
4:52
running for president back in twenty fifteen, most Americans had
4:55
already made up their minds that they were never going
4:57
to support him because of the very viow things that
5:01
he said the day that he announced, and some of
5:03
the other things that came up in his past when
5:05
he ran for president the first time. So people have
5:08
already had this preconceived notion that, hey, it doesn't matter
5:11
what this guy does, I will never be able to
5:14
support him because he's not my cup of teeth. The
5:16
same could be said about Barack Obama, Joe Biden, George
5:19
w Bush, Bill Clinton. You go all the way back
5:22
to the first president, George Washington, and I guarantee you
5:25
there was somebody out there that had something to say
5:27
negatively about him. So we have to get out of
5:31
this mind warp of believing that these networks are in
5:36
the sole business of telling you and ere the truth.
5:38
We have to get out of his mind warp of
5:40
believing that politicians have our best interests at heart.
5:43
Speaker 2: You have so many Americans.
5:44
Speaker 1: Who are thoroughly convinced that their representatives are telling them
5:49
the truth. Here in Mississippi, for an example, you have
5:52
a vast majority of Mississippi Republicans who will sit idly
5:56
by and tell you that they believe every single thing
6:00
that Michael Guests tells them, that they believe every single
6:02
thing that Benny Thompson tells them, that they believe every
6:05
single thing that Cindy Hyge Smith and Roger Wicker tells them.
6:09
I have adopted the principle that, hey, everything a politician
6:12
says needs to be put under a microscope to see
6:15
if it's really the truth or is it the truth
6:17
just spun in a way that they like. So don't
6:22
be the person that's blindly out here trusting these politicians
6:26
when you know all the while that they're not giving
6:28
you the unadultraded truth. The truth is at a premium,
6:33
and it doesn't matter if you're someone who watches mainstream
6:37
news or if you're someone who watches independent news or
6:41
independent media. Is what you choose to consume. It doesn't
6:43
matter even the independent people are not really telling you
6:47
all that there is to know because some of them
6:51
are bought and paid for by the very people who
6:55
they claim are misleading. You think of all of these
6:58
quote unquote political influences, the Bennett Johnson's, the Hassan Pikers,
7:04
the Tucker Carlson's, Megan Kelly, Candace Owens, Officer Tatum. Just
7:10
go down the list of the political influencers and ask yourself.
7:14
Speaker 2: Are they really giving me what I really need to know?
7:19
Speaker 1: Or are they thoroughly compromised by the people that they
7:22
tell me that they're not compromised by. I brought this
7:27
up in an earlier episode, and I'm gonna use it
7:29
again here right now. Megan Kelly's tagline for her show
7:34
is no BS, no agenda, No fear. But it seems
7:38
like her show has a very strong Republican leaning, and
7:42
I would have no problem with that if she came
7:44
out and said, you know what, my show leans.
7:46
Speaker 2: More conservative than liberal.
7:49
Speaker 1: And I know what someone out there may be saying, well,
7:51
you should have already known that her show was going
7:53
to be mostly conservative because she spent the better part
7:56
of her media career at Fox News.
7:58
Speaker 2: And I would say true, but she said in her book,
8:03
and she.
8:03
Speaker 1: Said numerous times in interviews that she's not a conservative,
8:08
she's not a liberal. She's someone that identifies as an independent.
8:12
But it's hard to tell sometimes when you watch her
8:14
show or you listen to her show, and you hear
8:17
the things that she says about the conservatives, and then
8:19
you turn around and you hear the things that she
8:21
says about the liberals. The truth shall set you free.
8:28
And the minute that you realize that the people who
8:30
continue to peddle this notion that they're the ones that's
8:32
operating in truth, the minute that you're able to walk
8:36
away from that and say, you know what, I no
8:38
longer believe you guys are serving my best interests, then
8:41
you get the true freedom that you need to go
8:44
and do your own independent research.
8:48
Speaker 2: I've never told you guys.
8:52
Speaker 1: Since I started this podcast, to never go and research
9:01
what I say. If I say something on here and
9:05
you want to go do your own independent investigation into
9:08
what I've said, by all means, do it. And if
9:11
I'm wrong about something, I would greatly appreciate it if
9:14
you chose to let me know. I'm not gonna be
9:17
the person that's gonna scold my audience. If I say something,
9:20
you guys, go and prove that what I said was incorrect.
9:23
You come back and tell me that it's incorrect, and
9:25
I'll call you guys a bunch of foods for not
9:27
believing what I said. I'm not gonna do that, because
9:30
the best kind of criticism that you can ever receive
9:32
is constructive criticism, because constructive criticism keeps you honest with
9:37
yourself from people who have a vested interest in what
9:42
it is that you're trying to do. Most people are
9:45
not trying to lead you astray in your personal life.
9:48
But those politicians and those influences, they're the ones that
9:51
are trying to lead you astray. They're the ones that
9:55
are having you believe that our soul fight should be
9:59
Democrat versus Republican, red state versus blue state.
10:05
Speaker 2: That's not our fight.
10:07
Speaker 1: And the more and more people that wake up and realize, hey,
10:10
that's not our fight, the better off we would be
10:13
in terms of trying to go and save this country.
10:16
I did an episode not too long ago called preserving
10:19
our Future, and that's basically what we should be doing
10:22
right now. We should be doing everything in our power
10:25
to preserve our future, because right now our future is
10:30
not looking very spectacular. And a lot of that has
10:35
to do with people's continue dependence on politicians who will
10:38
look out for their own best interest while throwing you
10:41
under the bus and serving you up to their donors,
10:45
serving you up to the people that are trying to
10:48
destroy your way of life. It's always politicians telling you
10:52
that they're fighting for your freedoms while they go to Washington,
10:56
DC and do everything they can to strip you up
10:58
said freedoms. It's always the politicians telling you that, hey,
11:05
if you vote for me, you're Republican. I'm gonna go
11:08
to DC. I'm gonna stand up to the swamp, gonna
11:10
stand up to the Democrats. Meanwhile, they're working behind the
11:14
scenes with the Democrats to destroy whatever credibility that they
11:18
had when they first went there. The fight is not
11:26
with each other, or it shouldn't be with each other.
11:30
The fight should be with those in positions of power
11:32
who continue to tell you and I that our fight
11:34
should be with each other. The worst piece of advice
11:39
anybody can give, hey, fight with your neighbor because they
11:42
got a different campaign sign in their yard. Fight with
11:45
your neighbor because they believe that congressional map should.
11:50
Speaker 2: Be drawn differently.
11:52
Speaker 1: Fight with your neighbor because they believe that you're using
11:55
too much water and you should be conserving water so
11:57
that way we can save the planet. The truth shall
12:03
set you free. And it's so great to see so
12:07
many people wake up and say, you know what, instead
12:10
of fighting with my neighbor, how about it be in
12:14
our best interest to get along with each other so
12:16
that way we can see different viewpoints. I've made it
12:21
abundantly clear in previous episodes that I would have no
12:23
problem being friends with anybody of any political elk as
12:29
long as they're willing to say, you know what, I
12:31
want to hear you out. I don't want to come
12:35
to the table with all my Democratic beliefs and force
12:39
you to believe in. I don't want to come to
12:41
the table with all my Republican beliefs and force you
12:44
to believe in. I'm willing to hear you out on things,
12:47
and I'm willing to open my mind up to different
12:50
avenues of thinking that I've never thought about, that I've
12:54
never considered. That's the reason why they don't want us unified.
13:02
That's the reason why they want us always fighting each
13:05
other because it keeps us distracted from what we need
13:08
to be focusing on. That's the reason why they fought
13:12
so hard to keep TikTok from being banned, because they
13:16
know that there is a large contingent group of Americans
13:21
that would go crazy without their TikTok, would go crazy
13:26
without their Instagram, would go crazy without their Facebook, their YouTube, Twitch, Netflix, Amazon, Prime,
13:36
Paramount plus Peacock, all these different things. If they keep
13:41
your attention focused on those things, you won't be able
13:44
to focus enough attention on the things that matter. Some
13:51
people may listen to this and they may say, you're
13:53
a conspiracy theorist, you're a nutcase. But it seems like
13:58
here lately, those of us that would be considered to
14:01
be netcases have been getting a lot of things right.
14:06
For an example, doctor Fauci and his testimony last week
14:13
to the Senate, or to the Senate, to one of
14:16
the Senate committees, would be a better way of paraphrasing
14:18
that gets up there and please the fifth one hundred
14:23
and eleven times. And instead of most mainstream liberals saying, hey,
14:29
you know what, what Fauci did was disgraceful. We can't
14:34
defend that what they chose to do was sit back
14:38
and say, hey, how dare you guys criticize Faucia for
14:42
having a diary number one and number two? How dare
14:45
you guys criticize Fauci for getting up there and not
14:49
wanting to answer questions for that dog and pony show
14:51
that the Republicans set up. Now, I will agree with
14:54
the Liberals on that point. Anybody with enough sense could
14:59
easily sit back and say, hey, more than likely you
15:04
know that Fauci understands what it is that you guys
15:08
are trying to do. So he's gonna get up there
15:10
and he's not gonna answer any of your questions because
15:12
he knows that any question that he answers is just
15:15
gonna open a trap door to another question that becomes
15:17
another trap, than another trap, and another trap. When I
15:22
first heard that Fauci was gonna be on Capitol Hill,
15:26
test to find I was not one of those people
15:28
that was jumping up for Joyce saying they're gonna get him,
15:30
They're gonna nail that bastard, Because why would I say
15:34
such a thing if I already knew that Fauci was
15:37
gonna go up there and basically not offer any information
15:40
or any apologies to those people that he hurt while
15:43
he led the country's COVID nineteen response team. Fauci has
15:49
a lot of blood on his hands, the same way
15:52
that a lot of politicians in twenty twenty have blood
15:55
on their hands for some of the actions that they
15:57
chose to take.
15:59
Speaker 2: For those who.
16:00
Speaker 1: Over and over and over again pushed the vaccine, hey
16:05
take the shot and you won't be able to transmit COVID.
16:08
Speaker 2: Take the shot and everything would go right back to normal.
16:12
Speaker 1: And as I stated in the previous episode, for those
16:16
of you out there that wants to throw all the
16:21
blame at the feet of Joe Biden, best believe had
16:25
Donald Trump won the twenty twenty election, he would have
16:28
done probably the exact same thing that Biden did mandate
16:31
in the vaccine, because in Trump's eyes, he wanted to
16:34
reopen the greatest economy in the history of our country,
16:37
and the longer that stay closed, the harder it would
16:40
be for the economy to rebuild itself coming out of
16:43
the pandemic, which we're still continuing to see six years later,
16:49
and there are signs out there that this economy will
16:52
never get back to where it was pre COVID, but
16:55
I think most of us have come to that realization
16:58
by now. So Fuci went from being the doctor that
17:06
people listen to to better understand COVID to being the
17:10
doctor that people look at.
17:12
Speaker 2: And say, wait a minute.
17:14
Speaker 1: This guy funded the gang of function research at the
17:17
Wuhan Lab in China. And this is the same guy
17:20
who had no problem with his celebrity status. He went
17:25
from being a doctor who cared about science to being
17:28
a doctor who cared about how many celebrities he could see,
17:31
how many text messages he was getting, how many phone
17:33
calls he was getting. This is a guy who never
17:36
cared about the well being of the American people the
17:39
same way politicians don't. And it seems like is distraction
17:44
after distraction after distraction to keep our eyes peeled away.
17:49
Speaker 2: From what we really need to be focusing on. Now.
17:53
Speaker 1: Am I the kind of person that would love to
17:55
see Fauci be held accountable one day for his actions, Absolutely,
17:59
but he may never be held accountable in this life.
18:03
And those of you that are believers know exactly where
18:05
I'm about to go with this. There's a mighty, a
18:09
mightier power that sits up high and looks down low,
18:14
and he sees everything that we do, all the secrets
18:18
we keep, all the lies we tell, all our thoughts,
18:24
And there's gonna come this point in time where we're
18:27
all gonna have to stand in front of this judge.
18:32
There's not gonna be twelve people in a box that
18:35
have to go and deliberate and then come back and
18:37
give him the verdict, because he's already gonna have the verdict.
18:42
Speaker 2: But this judge is gonna ask.
18:44
Speaker 1: What we did with the time that he gave us,
18:49
and it's gonna be solely up to him to decide
18:52
if we're worthy of eternal bliss or eternal damnation. So
19:03
even if Fauci is never held to account here on earth,
19:10
he'll be held to account when it's time to stand
19:12
in front of the big judge for the ultimate verdict.
19:18
And some of those same politicians that sat up there
19:22
and wanted Fauci to answer those questions, their hands are
19:25
not clean. A lot of those senators' hands are not clean.
19:33
Even if they weren't senators in twenty twenty or twenty
19:36
twenty one, their hands still aren't clean. But this whole
19:43
thing is a circus. It's a charade, and the more
19:47
and more people start to wake up to the fact
19:49
that that's what this is, the more.
19:51
Speaker 2: That these hearings don't seem the matter.
19:56
Speaker 1: I was reading yesterday when I was trying to find
19:58
things that I wanted to talk to you guys about today,
20:01
that the Senate, I think it's the Judiciary Committee of
20:04
my memory sirst correct has invited Jack Smith to testify
20:09
in front of them next month, and I was thinking
20:11
to myself, Yeah, here we go again, another charade. Bring
20:16
Jack Smith in there, knowing damn well that he's not
20:19
going to answer any questions that you guys really want
20:22
him to answer, and who knows, he may get in
20:24
there and plead the fifth one hundred and eleven times.
20:31
It's crazy what they'll have us focused on to keep
20:34
our attention away from the bigger things. Speaking of keeping
20:40
our attention focused on something else, in five states today,
20:47
primary elections are being held Michigan, Missouri, Virginia, and Washington
20:55
Force states. Pardon, I don't know where I got fired from.
20:57
Four states we'll be holding primaries today, and one of
21:02
the most talked about races is the one for the
21:05
Democratic Senate nomination in Michigan.
21:09
Speaker 2: You have Abdul Osayed, the.
21:12
Speaker 1: Democratic socialist candidate, taking on the more moderate candidate in
21:16
Haley Stevens. This race is going to, in a lot
21:21
of people's mind, put the final nail in the coffin
21:27
as it pertains to where the Democratic Party is going
21:29
to go heading into the future. A lot of people
21:33
believe that with the influence that Bernie Sanders and Zoramumdani
21:38
and Alexandro Casio Cortez have over the party, that the
21:42
Democratic Party is going to have to, in so many
21:45
instances embrace many aspects of democratic socialism that many moderate
21:51
Democrats may not be prepared to embrace. And that's the
21:54
problem that you find yourself having to deal with if
21:57
you're someone like a Chuck Schumer, if you're someone like
21:59
a high King Jeffers, if it's someone like a Kamala
22:03
Harris who's trying to be the Democratic nominee again for president.
22:09
She can say all she wants, but anybody knows that
22:11
she's plotting to run again in twenty twenty eight. It'd
22:15
be a harder road for but I believe that's what
22:18
she's plotting to do. I, for one, am not bought
22:23
into this idea that democratic socialism is the best path
22:29
forward for this country. But I can understand why so
22:33
many people feel like that's the next plausible idea to
22:39
believe it, because you have people that sit back and
22:43
they say, you know what, this capitalism thing isn't what
22:49
it's all cracked up to be. If this isn't capitalism
22:54
that we're living on, we're living under a system where
22:57
only a few benefit fit and everybody else sufferers.
23:05
Speaker 2: I talked about this in the previous episode.
23:09
Speaker 1: There are some people that can look at this economy
23:13
that we're in and they can say that everything's fine,
23:18
while others look at this economy and say, damn, when
23:21
will things get better? And you have people who a
23:25
couple of years ago didn't have to work two jobs
23:28
now having to work two jobs just to keep float
23:31
keep afloat. I mean, you have people that are getting
23:34
out of college that can't even find jobs, but yet
23:38
they've spent all of this money and gotten into all
23:40
this student loan debt to get the degree that was
23:43
promised to them to get them a higher paying job.
23:50
I mean, you have people that can't afford rent, can't
23:53
afford groceries, can't afford gas, can't afford a mortgage, can't
23:56
afford any basic thing, And they're looking at socialism, democratic socialism,
24:02
and they're saying, man, you know, medicare for all.
24:08
Speaker 2: Government run stores and doing all these other things. Hey,
24:14
it may not be so bad, but if you read.
24:17
Speaker 1: The fine print of this democratic socialism movement, it's not
24:22
all peaches and cream. Because what happens when the government
24:27
ran grocery stores start rationing out food. What happens when
24:32
they decide, hey, let's get rid of all these prisons
24:34
and you get all these violent people back onto the street.
24:37
What happens when Medicare for all doesn't really pan out
24:42
the way you want it to. All of these things
24:47
could happen, and it would cause this democratic socialism movement
24:52
to fall squarely on his face because his face value
24:56
would have lost value. And that's a conversation that many
25:00
of them are not ready for. The big problem that
25:05
I have with this entire conversation is that because democratic
25:11
socialism is so bad, it's causing Republicans to sit back
25:16
and say, we don't really have to address any of
25:19
the problems that the people have, because all we can
25:23
go out and say is man, socialism is terrible, and
25:27
then it'll get people to come to our calls.
25:31
Speaker 2: We don't have.
25:32
Speaker 1: To defend the president and his record. What we can
25:36
say is, would you rather have what we have now?
25:39
Would you rather have the boogeyman that happens to be socialism?
25:46
But this should be a wake up call for the Republicans.
25:53
You guys aren't cooking with hot grease. You guys aren't
25:58
bad in a thousand within American people, because the vast
26:04
majority of Americans have sat back and they've watched what's
26:07
happened over the course of the first two years of
26:09
Trump's second term and they've said, you know what is
26:12
not what it was advertised to be, and it's causing
26:16
a lot of people to say, maybe let's go in
26:19
another direction.
26:21
Speaker 2: Now.
26:21
Speaker 1: The main problem that most Republicans have with the socialists,
26:29
it's not their platform, not the candidates. The main problem
26:34
that they have is that if those politicians get elected
26:37
in November and if the Republican if the Republicans lose
26:41
control the House and the Senate, Number one, Donald Trump
26:44
would become a lamed up president, which basically, for those
26:48
of you that don't keep up with politics as much
26:50
as I do, it would basically mean that Donald Trump
26:54
would just be a figurehead possibly wouldn't get any major
26:57
legislation passed, because you know, why would.
27:01
Speaker 2: There be a need to.
27:03
Speaker 1: Let's make him look bad on the way out the door,
27:05
and let's make whomever the presumptive Republican nominee in twenty
27:08
twenty eight look bad out the gate, because we're going
27:13
to hold their party and their agenda hostage to where
27:15
they can't get anything done. The second thing, if Democrats
27:20
take control of both chambers of Congress, Donald Trump will
27:24
be investigated to the high heavens, and a lot of
27:28
people are hoping for that singular reason for the Democrats
27:32
to retake control of the House and the Senate, or
27:35
just the House.
27:39
Speaker 2: So Donald Trump.
27:40
Speaker 1: Can be investigated, impeached, And if the Republicans keep control
27:46
of the Senate, of course, he'll be found not guilty
27:49
in a Senate trial. It's political theater at its finest.
27:58
So what's at stake today in these four stakes, with
28:02
these primaries, what's at stake is the same thing that's
28:09
been at stake for the longest period in time. Who
28:14
is going to be allowed to take their Circus Act
28:19
to Washington, DC? That's basically what's at stake. The Republicans
28:28
are gonna have to reason with the contingent possibility that
28:34
the Socialists are going to get more and more popular,
28:37
And if you're the Democrats, you're gonna have to deal
28:40
with the fact that the Socialists are getting more popular.
28:43
And whomever the nominee is going to be in twenty
28:46
twenty eight, if there's someone that's not a socialist, they're
28:50
gonna have to make a hell of a lot of
28:52
overtures to the socialist wing of their party to get
28:55
them to buy into whatever it is that they're trying
28:58
to sell. But all in all, we're still in a
29:08
pretty pretty sad pickle politically.
29:13
Speaker 2: It's not gonna get better with this election. It's not
29:15
gonna get better with the next election. It's not gonna
29:18
get better with the next one.
29:21
Speaker 1: And that's something that a lot of people throughout this
29:25
country are starting to realize not gonna get better because
29:31
they all promise the same thing and never delivered. So,
29:38
speaking of the Democrats, they are in a very interesting
29:45
position right now on two fronts. The first front is
29:49
the one we just got finished talking about the Democratic
29:52
Socialists gaining ground in the Party. The second front is
29:58
how are they going to possibly dig themselves out of debt.
30:03
We all remember in twenty twenty four that Kamala Harris
30:07
had over ninety days to run for the highest office
30:11
in the land. She went through a billion dollars in
30:15
that time, and by the time she gave her concession speech,
30:23
her and her campaign.
30:24
Speaker 2: Were in debt.
30:26
Speaker 1: The Democratic National Committee is in debt so much so
30:32
to where there are now calls being made for DNC
30:36
chair Ken Martin to lose his chairmanship. Republicans they see
30:41
this and they get all gidded.
30:44
Speaker 2: Yes, we got them.
30:45
Speaker 1: But the crazy part that I'm having a hard time
30:47
understanding Republicans is the Democrats are in debt. We know that,
30:53
I think they're in debt to the tune of eighteen
30:55
million dollars at last check. But yet you have so
30:59
many Democratocratic candidates that are leading in the polls in
31:03
states that Republicans are supposed to have locked up.
31:05
Speaker 2: For an example, in Texas, James Talafrico.
31:09
Speaker 1: Or Rico, whichever one you want to call them, holds
31:12
a lead over Ken Paxton. A lot of that has
31:16
to do with the fact that Ken Paxton is a
31:19
very politically vulnerable candidate. There are certain transgressions that he's
31:25
been through recently that's caused people to look at him
31:27
and say, maybe he's not the ideal candidate to take
31:30
the seat.
31:31
Speaker 2: From John Cornyan, even though he beat John Cornyn in
31:33
the primary.
31:35
Speaker 1: James Tallerco, on the other hand, is in the same vote.
31:38
He's not the most desirable candidate.
31:41
Speaker 2: I mean.
31:42
Speaker 1: So it's like in Texas, similar to what I said
31:45
during the twenty twenty four election, You're essentially voting for
31:49
the lesser of two evils, whom do you believe will
31:53
be less evil than the other. Do you believe that's
31:56
gonna be Paxton or do you believe that's gonna be
31:58
tall Rico. So that's one race where Republicans are needing
32:08
to gain ground. The other race is in Florida where
32:12
Byron Donalds, who in all likelihood is going to go
32:14
on to win the Republican nomination for governor, is in
32:17
a hole against the Democratic candidate.
32:20
Speaker 2: For the seat.
32:21
Speaker 1: And a lot of people are looking at that and
32:23
they're saying, well, how is this a state that Donald
32:26
Trump won three times and yet Byron Donalds is lagging?
32:31
And that can be answered with one simple answer. Donald
32:36
Trump is more popular in the state of Florida than
32:38
Byron Donalds. Ron de Santas is more popular in Florida
32:42
than Byron Donalds. And let's just go ahead and call
32:47
in as and As in a spade a spade. A
32:49
lot of white voters felt comfortable voting for Donald Trump.
32:52
They felt comfortable voting for Rhonda Santas. They don't necessarily
32:55
feel comfortable voting for Byron Donalds, even considering the fact
32:59
that he's married to a white woman.
33:03
Speaker 2: Let's just tell the truth.
33:04
Speaker 1: In Shane the Devil, a lot of white voters will
33:07
not feel comfortable voting for Byron Donald's. The same way
33:11
in Ohio, a lot of white voters will not feel
33:13
comfortable voting for vivet Ramaswami, even though he is the
33:16
Republican nominee.
33:17
Speaker 2: The saint can be said for If JD.
33:19
Speaker 1: Vance wins the nomination in twenty twenty eight, a lot
33:22
of white racist voters will not feel comfortable voting for
33:25
him because of the fact that he's married to an Indian,
33:33
the same problem that Osai ed has. In Michigan, a
33:35
lot of black voters are not going to vote for him.
33:37
Because they don't like the fact that he criticized Michelle
33:40
Obama and her school lunch program when.
33:43
Speaker 2: She was first Lady.
33:45
Speaker 1: And he's been trying to do all that he can
33:47
to try to swoon the black voters in Michigan, going
33:51
to their churches, going to their cookouts, going to their barbershops.
33:58
And even though you have James Clyburn's saying that, hey,
34:00
if you're black, Hailey Stevens is your candidate, not Al Saed.
34:05
We'll see how that plays out tonight. So what needs
34:10
to happen for the Democratic Party to dig themselves out
34:15
of the hole that they find themselves in. Well, first,
34:20
they need to admit that it's time to completely overhaul
34:23
the way they think about elections. The Democrats will never
34:27
be able to win the presidency or reclaim the House
34:30
or the Senate again if they don't get to the whiteboard,
34:35
erase everything they thought they knew about themselves, and start
34:38
from scratch. That's the best way going forward that they
34:41
can ensure that they can start winning some of these
34:44
more highly competitive races. Number Two, I am in agreement
34:48
that it's time for Ken Martin to be removed from leadership.
34:50
Ken Martin has shown that he does not have a
34:53
particular keen eye for running the operations of the Democratic Party.
35:00
Number three, this party's gonna have to decide what their
35:05
identity is gonna be. Are you gonna be a party
35:08
that's gonna be a big tent party that's gonna welcome everybody,
35:12
or are you going to be a party that's gonna
35:14
be welcoming of everybody but cater to more of the
35:19
socialist wing. And if you do that, are you gonna
35:22
run off more of your moderate Democrats? Case in point,
35:25
John Fetterman has made it abundantly clear that if things
35:28
continue to go south for the Democrats, he will switch
35:31
his party affiliation. And of course you have a lot
35:34
of Pennsylvania Democrats saying we didn't like the guy to
35:38
begin with. When he was running against doctor Odze. You
35:41
guys seem to like him. When he ran for lieutenant governor,
35:44
you guys.
35:44
Speaker 2: Seem to like him.
35:46
Speaker 1: But now that he's not toring the line one hundred
35:48
percent with the Democratic Party, you don't like him. Republicans,
35:51
you're the same way. So don't don't be cheering if
35:55
somebody doesn't tow the line all the way with you.
35:58
Speaker 2: Guys, you ask them.
36:00
Speaker 1: That's the reason why so many of you guys won't
36:02
John Thune removed the Senate Majority leader. That's the reason
36:04
why so many of you guys turned against Marjora Tayler
36:07
Green turned against even though he's not a politician, Tucker Carlson,
36:11
because the minute that they dare to speak out against
36:14
the party line, they were banished, the same way that
36:18
the Democrats are trying to banish John Fetterman. They're gonna
36:21
make sure that he gets primaried the next time around,
36:25
because they do not like that he's basically turned into
36:28
a turncoat, and they're gonna make sure that he's held
36:32
quote unquote accountable for his betrayal in his next election.
36:42
I mean, if you're the Democratic Party, if you want
36:47
to win the presidency, you're gonna have to do a
36:54
lot of things to.
36:57
Speaker 2: Change the perception.
37:00
Speaker 1: Around how people view you, because if you don't change
37:04
the perception, the perception will then become the reality. And
37:08
in a lot of people's minds, the perception has already
37:11
become the reality. This is a party that doesn't stand
37:14
for the things that they used to stand for. Somebody
37:19
here locally in Mississippi brought up a good point not
37:21
too long ago on the radio. This is a party
37:24
that John F. Kennedy would not be welcomed in today.
37:27
This is a party that Bill Clinton would not be
37:29
welcome in today because the views that they e spound
37:33
during their time as president are not necessarily welcomed in
37:39
today's Democratic Party.
37:46
Speaker 2: And you have so many Democrats that are okay with that. Hey,
37:49
it doesn't matter.
37:50
Speaker 1: We need to win over the socialist Look at what
37:54
Zoramom Donnie was able to do in New York. Look
37:58
at what Bernie Sanders been able to do all those
38:00
years in Vermont. Look at what AOC is doing in
38:03
New York. What are they doing necessary? Like, these people
38:07
come out and they preach to you and I about
38:10
why we need to do things differently, and yet they're
38:12
the ones doing the opposite of what they tell you
38:14
and I to do. Bernie Sanders wants you to believe
38:18
that he is this champion of the people, but yet
38:20
he still flies private. Alexandri Alexandria A Casio Cortez wants
38:26
you to believe that she's a fighter for families, and
38:28
yet she doesn't even have a family of her own.
38:34
Speaker 2: Zora Mumdani wants you to believe.
38:36
Speaker 1: That New York is welcoming of all New Yorkers, and
38:40
we see that he's at odds with the vast majority
38:43
of the Jewish population in the city. I'm gonna have
38:50
to go here with this example, and I know it's
38:52
gonna piss some people off, but I gotta say it.
38:54
Speaker 2: It's almost like how.
38:59
Speaker 1: Kamala Harris won't you to believe that she feels the
39:03
pulse of the black community, but Kamala Harris lives in
39:07
a neighborhood that has little to know black people in it.
39:13
It's always the black leaders who want to tell the
39:15
black community that they feel what we're going through, but
39:17
yet when they go home, they live in neighborhoods that
39:21
have little to know black people living in them. I
39:26
guarantee you Ben Crump does not live around a bunch
39:28
of black people. Al Sharpton does not live around a
39:31
bunch of black people. But they want you and I
39:34
to believe that they feel where we're coming from when
39:38
we expound our issues.
39:41
Speaker 2: Is a bunch of bs.
39:48
Speaker 1: So this is going to be the reckoning that the
39:53
Democrats need to face. A similar reckoning is going to
39:58
come for the Republicans in twenty twenty because they're going
40:02
to have to decide where the party goes, because Donald
40:05
Trump is gonna be on his way out the door
40:08
if he doesn't try to figure out some kind of
40:10
way to stay.
40:11
Speaker 2: In there and run again in twenty twenty eight.
40:15
Speaker 1: But if Donald Trump abides by the Constitution, and if
40:19
he decides, you know what, twenty twenty eight, I gotta
40:22
step aside, make room for somebody else. If you're the
40:24
Republican Party, you have to ask yourself the question, what
40:28
direction do we want to go in?
40:31
Speaker 2: Do we want to.
40:31
Speaker 1: Stay in the direction of MAGA or do we want
40:35
to go back to traditional Republican principles and policies. Now,
40:42
you run the risk of alienating either side if you
40:46
choose to go with one or the other. If you
40:49
choose to stay with MAGA, you alienate the traditional Republicans
40:52
who see twenty twenty eight as an opportunity to wrangle
40:55
back control of the party to their side. But if
40:58
you choose to go in the traditional route, you're gonna
41:01
alienate those MAGA Republicans who feels.
41:05
Speaker 2: That this was the plan all along.
41:08
Speaker 1: Let Trump do his thing and then come and do
41:11
a coup to get control of the party back. So
41:17
all I can say to both sides is buckle up,
41:21
because twenty twenty eight is going to be a hell
41:24
of a political year. People are looking at twenty twenty
41:27
six saying that it's a juicy political year. I don't
41:31
think twenty twenty six is gonna have anything on twenty
41:34
twenty eight, as both parties try to figure out what
41:40
their identity is gonna be. For the Republicans to keep
41:44
control of what they already have and for the Democrats
41:46
to gain control of what they currently do not have,
41:52
very very interesting political times that were going to be
41:54
going through in the next couple of years. Speaking of
42:01
the Maga wing of the Republican Party, there's a rift
42:07
going on in the Trump administration, and I would be
42:12
remiss if I did not talk about it, because we
42:17
all know that Donald Trump does not like it when
42:24
somebody defies him, when somebody dares to grow a set
42:31
of balls. Let him hang and say, I don't believe
42:37
what you're saying. It's true, I don't believe the conclusion
42:41
that you came to is the right conclusion. And if
42:45
you're U as attorney for the District of Columbia, Janine Piro,
42:49
you find yourself in that position right now. What am
42:53
I referring to for those of you that live your
42:56
life and you're not consumed with what's going on in politics.
43:01
Late last week on Friday, to be matter of fact,
43:06
Janine Piro announced that the District of Columbia US court
43:16
had dropped the charges against David Hearn. David Hearn is
43:21
the former Olympic canoeist who was accused of vandalizing the
43:29
reflecting pool. Now, Donald Trump went and got a company
43:34
through the Secretary of Interior to redo the reflecting pool,
43:39
and for a time it looks good until it became
43:43
clear to anybody in any common sense that the job
43:46
wasn't done right and the after effect showed. So what
43:52
happened was back on the thirteenth, on the nineteenth Pardon
43:59
me of June, David Hearn told the AP that he
44:03
was riding his bike when he stopped to inspect a
44:10
piece of the reflecting pool that had come apart, and
44:14
instantly he was arrested for vandalists and had he been
44:17
found guilty, he would have served up to ten years
44:21
in prison for destruction to federal property.
44:26
Speaker 2: Now, let that sink in for a second.
44:28
Speaker 1: This guy was riding his bike, stopped to take a
44:32
look at what was in the water, and was arrested
44:35
for vandalism. Instead of the president of this country saying,
44:42
you know what, I'm gonna bite the bullet on this
44:45
one and I'm gonna say that the job wasn't done
44:49
up to my standards, what I'm gonna do is continue
44:53
to blame vandals for something.
44:55
Speaker 2: That they didn't even do.
44:58
Speaker 1: And I'm gonna get my us a tur Nie who
45:01
I handpicked from Fox.
45:05
Speaker 2: To have my back on this.
45:09
Speaker 1: Janeine Piro looked at everything and she said, you know what,
45:12
I can't go along with this because that's not what happened.
45:16
Janeine Piro got so bold to where she even threw
45:19
the Interior Department under the bus, saying that they're the
45:22
ones that caused the damage to the reflecting pool. It
45:26
wasn't a job done by vandals. It was an anept,
45:30
poorly done job by the contractor who won the no
45:34
bid from the Interior Department, and of course the Interior
45:39
Secretary of Doug Bergham, who's gonna kiss Donald Trump's ass
45:41
at every opportunity came out and said, wait a minute,
45:44
wasn't us. How are you gonna blame us? We don't
45:49
agree with your assessment. We did everything right. You guys
45:52
are the one that dropped the ball on this. You
45:54
guys are the ones that efft this up. I'm paraphrasing,
45:57
but it went along those lines. So now you have
46:02
this very interesting tango affair going on at the White House.
46:08
It was reported on yesterday that Janine Piro went to
46:13
the White House where she was excoriated by Donald Trump for,
46:18
in his words, quote unquote, folding like an umbrella. He
46:24
said he didn't understand why she chose to do what
46:27
she did, and she basically went to the White House
46:30
to tell him that it wasn't me.
46:31
Speaker 2: It was my.
46:32
Speaker 1: Attorneys who work under me, who thought that it would
46:35
be in this department's best interest to drop the charges
46:39
because there wasn't enough to take to a grand jury
46:42
and eventually to try That's the conclusion that her and
46:49
her attorneys came to. But that wasn't good enough for
46:53
the President, who made it abundantly clear in public as
46:57
well as on his true social platform that he was
47:00
not happy and still isn't happy with Janine Piro.
47:07
Speaker 2: This guy is so thin skinned.
47:12
Speaker 1: To where anytime that he gets rebuked, he can't stand
47:17
the heat of the cook. But we were always told
47:20
that if you can't stand the heat of the cook,
47:21
you gotta stay out the kitchen. And that seems to
47:24
be a lesson that Donald Trump has failed to grasp.
47:27
If you can't stand the heat of the cook, you
47:29
got to stay out the kitchen, because if you don't,
47:33
you'll find yourself getting burnt. And he's gotten burnt quite
47:37
a few times believing stuff that's not to be believed.
47:43
Out of all the things this guy could have been
47:45
doing that particular day, why would he decide to take
47:48
time to go to Washington, d c. To go by
47:51
the reflecting pool and just vandalize the thing. Why would
47:57
he waste his time doing that. Why wouldn't you just
48:02
come out and say, you know what, we dropped the
48:05
ball on this. We spent fourteen million tax pair of
48:09
dollars on this project and it didn't live up to
48:12
my expectations.
48:14
Speaker 2: We dropped the ball.
48:17
Speaker 1: If anybody should be getting lambasted by the President, it
48:20
should be Doug Bergham, the Secretary of the Interior. He
48:23
should be the one on the chopping block, not Janeine Piro.
48:31
But when you work for a guy who cares more
48:34
about protecting his ego than protecting the truth, this is
48:37
what you get. When you work for a guy who
48:42
would rather be told what he wants to hear as
48:44
opposed to what he needs to know, this is the
48:47
outcome that you get. I mean, this is the same
48:52
guy who's the President of the United States, who's given
48:56
a run twenty three thousand chances to negotiate, and every
49:04
time that they failed to agree to his terms, we
49:08
go right back into this war, a war that we
49:15
were told we were never going to get into, a
49:19
war that most of us thought was over with Operation
49:21
Epic Fury, A war that continues every single time you
49:26
hear about it, the gold poster being moved further and
49:30
further and further back.
49:34
Speaker 2: Oh no, we haven't achieved all our objectives yet.
49:36
Speaker 1: But I thought you guys told us last year that
49:39
Iran's nuclear program had been obliterated. I thought you guys
49:44
told us last year that Iran's economy was crippled. I
49:47
thought you guys told us last year that the power
49:52
center of the Iranian government was desecrated. Oh yeah, we
49:59
may have told you guys that, but we got some
50:02
new intelligence that points us in another direction. It's the
50:09
same cock and bull story, just given on a different day.
50:14
This administration does not have this Iran war figured out,
50:19
because it seems like they're doing a lot of playing
50:21
this by ear, which is very dangerous when you start
50:26
affecting the lives of American servicemen and women. And we've
50:31
already lost American servicemen and women due to this monstrosity,
50:40
and at the rate we're going, we could lose a
50:42
lot more. Like this war doesn't seem to have an
50:47
end goal. Well, it does, but the end goal is
50:52
what we thought was obtained last year. The complete obliteration
50:56
of the Iranian nuclear program is the end goal for
50:59
this war. But it doesn't seem like this administration understands
51:03
how to get to that objective. Russia and China have
51:09
already agreed to help Iran as much as they can,
51:14
So you've gotten Jijuin Ping in Beijing and Vladimir Putin
51:18
in Moscow telling Tyron that.
51:21
Speaker 2: We'll give you guys what you need. Don't worry about it,
51:23
we got it.
51:29
Speaker 1: It would be a different story if we went into
51:32
this thing and it seemed like we knew at least
51:35
halfway what we were doing, it doesn't even seem like
51:38
we halfway know what we're doing. And every time you
51:43
look around, hey, you know, we're gonna get this thing
51:46
ended quickly. And then next thing, you know, well, we
51:48
got to stop it for a while because Iran they
51:50
now claim that they want to talk. And then the
51:53
Iranians they come out and they say, we're not negotiating
51:55
with the United States. We're talking to a mom or
51:58
we're not talking to them. So that means either they're
52:00
lying in Tehran or they're lying in Washington. But somebody's
52:03
lying when it comes to this quote unquote negotiation effort.
52:09
Somebody's not being straight up. And I think I know
52:16
which side it is. So this is our commander in chief,
52:27
the same one who's fixating on Iran, the same one
52:32
who's at odds with his US attorney for the District
52:34
of Columbia, the same one that's doing everything in his
52:41
power to squeeze the balls of the Republican Senators to
52:47
get them to pass everything he wants passed before he
52:50
loses his grip on power. That's basically what this is.
52:54
That's the reason why there is such this big push
52:57
to get to save back past, because before we lose
53:01
our grip on power, we got to make sure we get.
53:03
Speaker 2: Some things done.
53:07
Speaker 1: And like I told you guys in the previous episode,
53:09
it doesn't matter if the Save Act pass because as
53:14
long as you have a vast majority of Americans standing
53:17
up saying it doesn't matter how security elections are. If
53:20
the politicians are not going to be honest, then what's
53:22
the point. As long as that continues to be the sentiment,
53:26
it doesn't matter how secure you make the elections, you'll
53:30
still have people saying we don't trust them as much
53:32
as we should. But I, for one, bringing this whole
53:40
thing back home, I for one, am on the side
53:44
of Janine Pirou. Drop the charges, move on to fight
53:48
another fight, at least the fight that you have the
53:51
evidence to go and win. All right, friends, one last
53:59
thing that I want to talk to you guys about
54:01
before I let you guys go. I'm gonna be completely
54:07
honest with you as I've been throughout the entirety of
54:10
this show, because I want you guys to understand where
54:14
I'm coming from. As it pertains to this particular topic.
54:22
I am not a fan of this particular league. I
54:29
don't watch games from this particular league, but it always
54:34
seems like no matter how far you try to get
54:36
yourself away from this particular league, this particular league will
54:39
do everything in its power to wrangle you back in
54:43
and force you to consume it in some kind of
54:45
a way. And of course, the league that I'm referring
54:50
to is the WNBA. I've been on this earth nearly
54:57
twenty six years, and in my twenty six years of life,
55:02
I've never been.
55:06
Speaker 2: A WNBA connoisseur.
55:11
Speaker 1: For anybody who knows me personally, they'll be able to
55:15
tell you that basketball is not one of my favorite sports.
55:18
I'm a sports fanatic to the ump team degree. But
55:23
if you gave me a choice of what to watch,
55:27
I'll watch football, I'll watch baseball, I'll watch hockey, I'll
55:32
watch tennis, I'll watch golf.
55:33
Speaker 2: I'll watch NASCAR before I watch.
55:36
Speaker 1: Basketball, especially the WNBA. Even when the whole Caitlyn Clark
55:43
boom was happening, you still couldn't get me to consume
55:46
the product, because it didn't matter how good Caitlin Clark
55:53
would be in the WNBA, you'd still have people saying,
55:59
like I was saying, it's still not a tangibly good product.
56:04
It's almost like when a store is having a hard
56:08
time getting rid of an item, they try to mark
56:10
it down as cheap as they can, and it still
56:13
sits there because people just aren't interested in buying it
56:15
because it's just not that good of a product. And
56:18
that's the WNBA here. Recently, they've been trending in an
56:24
upward direction. They've now moved from smaller arenas to playing
56:30
in the arenas where the NBA teams play their games.
56:35
They're now on TV more than they've been in the past.
56:38
You know, players are now receiving bigger contracts than they've
56:41
ever received in the past. So the WNBA and a
56:43
lot of people's eyes are moving in the right direction.
56:47
But for most of us, even if it is moving
56:50
in the right direction, it's still something that we just
56:53
don't want to consume. And one of the reasons why
56:57
I don't consume the WNBA is because this league is
57:05
the very personification of what it means to spite your nose,
57:09
to spite your face, or cut off your nose to
57:13
spite your face. This league epitomizes that expression cut off
57:21
his nose to spite his face. What do I mean
57:25
when I say that you would think with the WNBA
57:31
being for women to chase their dream of playing professional basketball,
57:39
they would be doing everything in their power to make
57:42
sure that the league is for women and women only.
57:46
I think it's even in their bylaws that only women
57:50
can play in the WNBA.
57:52
Speaker 2: Now you have this thing where.
57:55
Speaker 1: A lot of WNBA players and coaches are coming out saying, look,
58:00
if there is somebody out there that's transgender that wants
58:03
to play in women's sports, they should be welcoming or
58:07
people should be welcoming of them playing in that sport.
58:12
And that is what has caused people to focus a
58:16
little extra attention on the WNBA because of one Sophie Cuttingham.
58:21
Sophie Cuttingham plays for the Indiana Fever, the same team
58:24
that Caitlyn Clark happens to play for, and Sophie Cuttingham
58:28
has been getting a lot of attention because she's made
58:30
her mission to stand up for protecting the sanctity and
58:35
the sanity of women's sports, and a lot of people
58:38
have looked at her and they've said, we need to
58:42
be more inclusive. How can we be more inclusive if
58:45
we're turning around trans athletes once again, cutting off your
58:53
nose to spite your face. The WNBA should be for
58:59
natural born women. There should be no men who transition
59:06
to women playing in the WNBA. That's the way it
59:11
should be, just like there should be no woman who
59:14
transitions to being a man playing in the NBA. I
59:21
don't think that men should be in women's sports, because
59:28
women's sports should be for women. Men's sports should be
59:32
for men. There should be no blurring of that line.
59:41
And yet you have so many people who seem to
59:44
make it their business to blur that line on the
59:47
accounts of being inclusive, on account of being transparent, on
59:54
the count of making trans people feel that they belong
59:57
in sports. Shell Reeve, the head coach of the Minnesota Link.
1:00:01
The other day when they were playing the Fever, she
1:00:03
wore a shirt that said trans.
1:00:05
Speaker 2: I think you said trans kids belong to something to
1:00:08
that effect.
1:00:09
Speaker 1: They belong, but not in sports where the sport that
1:00:15
they're trying to play is not the sport is not
1:00:18
the sport of their asside birth. And yet the WNBA
1:00:29
wonders why so many people turn away from it as
1:00:32
opposed to embrace it. Because of stuff like this, every
1:00:39
WNBA player should be speaking up supporting Sophie, cutting him saying, yeah,
1:00:47
we understand the need to be more inclusive, but we
1:00:49
also understand the need to protect our league from those
1:00:53
that shouldn't be playing it. That's the way it should be.
1:01:00
But you have so many of them that are willing
1:01:02
to toe the line because in their mind it's the
1:01:06
best thing to do to avoid any controversy. Let me
1:01:11
not step on any toes. And yet they continue to
1:01:20
wonder why their league flounders, why the NBA has to
1:01:25
build them out over and over and over again, because
1:01:30
too many times they put themselves in the position where
1:01:34
they're cutting off their nose to spite their face. And
1:01:39
that's something, honestly, that they should stop doing if they
1:01:42
ever want to be even semi respected going forward as
1:01:47
a league. And with that being said, ladies and gentlemen,
1:01:50
that'll wrap up today's edition of the Igarius Williams Show.
1:01:53
Want to thank you guys once again. Is always for listening,
1:01:56
however and wherever you may be listening. Until next time
1:01:59
you guys, continue to enjoy your day's Stay safe, take care,
1:02:01
God bless. We are out peace.