Latest / Becker’s Healthcare Podcast / Challenging the Health Insurance System and Rethinking Healthcare Costs with Dr. J. Benjamin Proctor
Transcript
- 0:02- The strategic agenda facing hospital and health system
- 0:04- leaders right now is not a short list.
- 0:07- Growth in a consolidating market, sustainable margins in
- 0:09- a reimbursement environment that rarely moves in your
- 0:12- favor,
- 0:12- a tech investment cycle that demands both urgency
- 0:15- and discipline,
- 0:16- and a workforce story that is still being
- 0:19- written.
- 0:20- Eker's fourteenth annual CEO CFO roundtable brings together
- 0:23- more than 1,500 executive level attendees and nearly
- 0:27- 400 speakers across four days of sessions that
- 0:30- are designed to help c suite leaders benchmark,
- 0:32- pressure test, and sharpen their priorities.
- 0:35- Not in the abstract, but against the real
- 0:37- decisions they'll face heading into the next year.
- 0:39- It's the kind of event you leave with
- 0:40- a clear sense of where you stand and
- 0:42- what comes next.
- 0:44- So join us November second through the fifth
- 0:46- at the Hyatt Regency in Chicago,
- 0:48- and come ready to do the hard thinking.
- 0:50- Register on our events page at beckershospitalreview.com
- 0:54- by clicking on the events tab in the
- 0:56- upper right.
- 0:57- This is Scott Becker with the Becker's Healthcare
- 1:00- Podcast.
- 1:01- Thrilled today to be joined by a brilliant
- 1:03- physician, author,
- 1:06- internal medicine physician,
- 1:08- doctor Ben
- 1:09- Benjamin Proctor. He practices in Iberia, Louisiana.
- 1:13- He's written a book, Inefficient on Purpose. I
- 1:16- think you'll really enjoy the discussion with doctor
- 1:18- Proctor. I did tremendously,
- 1:20- and and thank you for listening. Doctor Proctor,
- 1:22- can you take a moment and introduce yourself?
- 1:25- Yeah. So, I do work for, Iberia Medical
- 1:28- Center. It's a, relatively rural hospital in Southern
- 1:32- Louisiana in Iberia. I'm not the founder. I'm
- 1:35- just one of the members. I am the
- 1:37- medical director of our wound care center, the
- 1:40- advanced wound Wound Care Center at IMC.
- 1:43- Yeah. And I'm board certified. I've been practicing
- 1:45- for going on about twelve years now, in
- 1:48- Louisiana.
- 1:49- And I started writing this book about three
- 1:51- years ago, because I had some things that
- 1:54- I saw in my time in health care
- 1:55- that I wanted to improve on.
- 1:58- Well well, fantastic. And tell us a little
- 1:59- bit about the book and about what you're
- 2:01- watching in health care most closely currently.
- 2:04- I mean, the thing that interests me the
- 2:06- most is
- 2:07- the Medicare for all, really. That's what it
- 2:09- comes down to.
- 2:11- The way our current system set up is
- 2:14- very profit focused,
- 2:15- with our, for profit health insurers.
- 2:19- And that leads to, some inefficiency,
- 2:21- in our health care system. And that is
- 2:23- where I got the title of the book,
- 2:26- Inefficient on Purpose. That's not to say that
- 2:28- medicine is inefficient or hospitals are inefficient.
- 2:31- That's the the system itself
- 2:33- that,
- 2:34- relies on,
- 2:35- profits,
- 2:37- in health care, leads to the inefficiency
- 2:40- and the increased cost per capita.
- 2:44- America spends over 13,000
- 2:46- per person,
- 2:48- every year, you know, where other developed countries
- 2:50- will spend somewhere in the 5 to $7,000
- 2:53- per capita on their health care.
- 2:55- And yet despite spending the most, we have
- 2:58- some of the worst outcomes,
- 3:00- where,
- 3:02- our life expectancy
- 3:04- is by far the worst of the developed
- 3:06- 38,
- 3:07- OPEC countries. We,
- 3:10- we're,
- 3:11- you know, around the eighty to a hundred
- 3:13- in infant and maternal mortality rates.
- 3:17- And yeah. And I kinda go into detail
- 3:19- on why I think all of those
- 3:21- happen in today's health care in America. And
- 3:24- and let me ask you a question. The
- 3:25- payment system is horribly inefficient.
- 3:28- You got four major payers, you You got
- 3:30- 50 different Medicaid payers. You've got Medicare. You
- 3:33- got the Veterans Administration.
- 3:35- I mean... And then you've got lots of
- 3:36- a couple 100 other smaller payers. And so
- 3:39- running a practice today, running a house today
- 3:41- is is incredibly
- 3:42- ridiculous
- 3:43- in terms of efficiency because you have to
- 3:45- deal with so many different payment systems.
- 3:47- We spend as an ace about 250,000,000,000
- 3:49- a year in revenue cycle.
- 3:51- And and and so the theory that we
- 3:52- get to Medicare for all or coverage for
- 3:54- all in a simpler payment system,
- 3:57- obviously, is very attractive.
- 3:58- But but how do you deal with the
- 4:00- fact that even we get to a better
- 4:02- payment system,
- 4:03- we end up with still tremendous supply and
- 4:05- demand imbalances
- 4:07- where it's harder and harder,
- 4:09- almost impossible in one place to get primary
- 4:10- care doctor,
- 4:12- many places impossible to get the right specialist
- 4:14- for the right cancer,
- 4:15- horrendous shortages of oncologists. How do you deal
- 4:18- with that other side of the equation? Because
- 4:19- it seems to me, I don't disagree with
- 4:21- you on coverage for all. I'm totally on
- 4:23- board with coverage for all. Whether Medicare for
- 4:25- all is the right way to get there.
- 4:26- I don't know for sure. But, certainly, the
- 4:28- payment system is horribly inefficient.
- 4:30- But how do we deal with the supply
- 4:32- demand challenge
- 4:33- of, you know, not having enough OB GYNs
- 4:36- to staff more rural areas,
- 4:38- not enough oncologists to staff all of us,
- 4:40- and some specialties being so short. How do
- 4:43- you deal with a lot of those things
- 4:44- when you get past the payment system?
- 4:47- Yeah. So we are definitely,
- 4:49- in a physician shortage,
- 4:52- in a bunch of areas. You mentioned OB.
- 4:55- Family practice is in a shortage. Definitely not
- 4:57- enough oncologists, rheumatologists,
- 4:59- neurologists.
- 5:00- We can go on.
- 5:02- The... I I think some of that, I
- 5:05- do kinda touch on in the book. It
- 5:08- has to do with how, health care dollars
- 5:11- are getting, allocated. Too much of the money,
- 5:14- in hospitals or getting put on, what we
- 5:17- call BIR or billing insurance, related areas. They
- 5:20- are the people who have to negotiate with
- 5:23- those 100 different insurances that you just mentioned
- 5:27- to get billed,
- 5:29- to order tests, for the doctors, you know,
- 5:31- that the doctors deemed necessary to get surgeries
- 5:33- approved,
- 5:34- and paid for. You know, so The US
- 5:37- spends a excess of $500,000,000,000
- 5:40- a year on BIR
- 5:42- compared to other,
- 5:44- developed nations. So, you know, that's just one
- 5:46- way that, Medicare for all could
- 5:49- decrease some of that spending.
- 5:50- Then maybe we could,
- 5:53- improve,
- 5:54- physician salaries to attract more doctors. I think
- 5:58- also, a couple decades ago, we stopped,
- 6:01- opening new residencies
- 6:03- for doctors. You know, of course, we need
- 6:04- to get rid of that and start training
- 6:06- the future generation of doctors.
- 6:08- So so there's definitely... Medicare referral is just
- 6:12- one aspect.
- 6:14- I think it would improve health outcomes
- 6:17- by
- 6:18- not having to negotiate
- 6:21- a... With a for profit health insurance, where
- 6:23- on one side, they're trying to balance their
- 6:25- premium and their expenses
- 6:27- to still generate a profit for their shareholders
- 6:30- versus me who just sees the patient, who's
- 6:32- just trying to give you the test,
- 6:35- you know, that you need, give you the
- 6:37- medicine that you need. But a 100%. And
- 6:39- and there's so many not for profit insurers
- 6:41- too. But either way, we've got a bastardized
- 6:44- health payment system
- 6:46- that has led to hundreds of, you know,
- 6:49- stats, whether it's billing insurance payments, it's 250
- 6:53- or 500,000,000,000
- 6:54- out of a $5,400,000,000,000
- 6:56- amount that we're spending. It's a huge amount
- 6:58- and, obviously, a lot of waste there.
- 7:00- How do you deal with the fact that
- 7:02- there are so many shortages, different physicians, and
- 7:04- different specialties,
- 7:06- and yet so many of the physician societies
- 7:09- don't seem so excited about having us develop
- 7:11- more doctors that they almost viewed as competition.
- 7:14- So we end up with the supply demand
- 7:15- imbalance. Let me ask you about that question.
- 7:18- The next question is, what I hear from
- 7:19- some of the physicians is,
- 7:21- if we go to Medicare for all, it
- 7:23- will lead to a regression of payment
- 7:26- that they'll be getting less on average per
- 7:28- patient,
- 7:29- and part of the subsidy they still get
- 7:31- or cross subsidy comes from the commercial insurers,
- 7:33- albeit that's getting smaller and smaller. But How
- 7:36- do you deal with the two issues that
- 7:37- the specialty societies
- 7:39- don't seem so interested, actually, in developing more
- 7:41- doctors?
- 7:42- And the education system is also totally...
- 7:45- Creates great doctors, but it way too lengthy
- 7:47- a process.
- 7:49- And then third, the issue that, you know,
- 7:51- if we move to Medicare for all, part
- 7:53- of the way that physicians do okay, some
- 7:55- of the commercial insurers. How do you how
- 7:57- do you deal with some of those issues?
- 7:59- Yeah. Well, so the first thing is... So
- 8:02- so... Yeah. The the
- 8:04- the governing bodies in medicine...
- 8:06- So pretty much whenever you're a doctor, I
- 8:07- mean, you're essentially competing for the, quote, good
- 8:10- insurances.
- 8:11- Right?
- 8:12- So when you look at any one
- 8:15- test, you know, when somebody comes in my
- 8:17- office, and I see them for a outpatient
- 8:19- clinic visit or I do a surgery and
- 8:21- wound care,
- 8:23- doing that,
- 8:24- you get paid different amounts based on
- 8:28- what that person's insurance is. So, you know,
- 8:30- it's usually a 100%.
- 8:33- It will be a, you know, a Blue
- 8:35- Cross or other,
- 8:37- for profit. Medicare will pay roughly 90%
- 8:40- of that.
- 8:41- And then Medicaid,
- 8:43- you know, pays something five, 10%. I mean,
- 8:45- it's a incredibly small amount.
- 8:47- And then,
- 8:48- obviously, there's too many of our citizens are,
- 8:51- you know, don't have health insurance. And of
- 8:53- course, those people you're trying to, you know,
- 8:55- just get them to pay cash. So, yes,
- 8:57- what you're trying to do is you're trying
- 8:58- to divvy up that pie.
- 9:00- So, of course, if you have a current
- 9:03- load of positions and we're trying to compete
- 9:05- for that small portion of pie that is
- 9:07- just the private insurance and the Medicare,
- 9:10- and then you expand our doctor amount dramatically,
- 9:13- then, again, we're competing for that same small
- 9:16- pool. But by changing the pool to all
- 9:19- Americans
- 9:20- and then they're all treated equally,
- 9:22- Right? So each citizen's insurance, you know, is
- 9:26- Medicare now. It all pays the same amount.
- 9:28- But now we're gonna have all those Medicaid,
- 9:30- and instead of paying five or 10%, they're
- 9:32- paying the full amount. All those people who
- 9:34- used to not have insurance are now under
- 9:37- Medicare. They're also gonna be paying us the
- 9:39- full amount. So so I think that would
- 9:41- be the the big expansion. It's just the
- 9:43- total number of users who can access and
- 9:46- effectively utilize health care.
- 9:48- I think your point is well taken and
- 9:50- it... And I love the fact that you
- 9:51- don't sort of argue with the fact that
- 9:53- the physician specialty societies aren't so excited about
- 9:55- adding more doctors. And the point being, there's
- 9:57- lots of competition with the limited dollars that
- 9:59- are out there for physicians. I think your
- 10:01- point is so well taken. And obviously, the
- 10:02- Medicaid system works 50 different Medicaid plans, all
- 10:05- paying different amounts.
- 10:06- Some states okay, some states, like you said,
- 10:08- just awful in terms of reimbursement.
- 10:11- How do you also look at sort of
- 10:14- this this concept of, you know, we talked
- 10:17- a little bit about
- 10:18- some physicians view...
- 10:20- I I hear a lot of physicians that
- 10:23- are pro Medicare for all, but very concerned
- 10:26- in their... In very many physicians that are
- 10:28- pro, we want coverage for all. One of
- 10:30- the great benefits of the Affordable Care Act
- 10:32- was bringing down the amount of people that
- 10:34- are noncovered to ten percent. Now that's going
- 10:35- back up a little bit.
- 10:37- But but how do you deal with the
- 10:39- concept of
- 10:40- some physicians saying that a lot of our
- 10:43- reimbursement or what makes us money is those
- 10:45- commercial payers. So we get rid of commercial
- 10:47- payers, then we're all stuck with the Medicare
- 10:49- system. Obviously, the Medicare system
- 10:51- is proving to be far better than the
- 10:53- Medicare Advantage system. The Medicare Advantage system so
- 10:55- far has been a debacle. It cost more
- 10:58- per capita.
- 10:59- It's just a disaster, and it's really turning
- 11:01- over Medicare to those commercial payers that you're
- 11:03- talking about. And that's just been a disaster,
- 11:05- at least as far as I can tell.
- 11:07- Yeah. It... It's it's been the worst from
- 11:10- both a patient side and a doctor side,
- 11:12- you know, because
- 11:13- anytime I see a Medicare
- 11:15- person,
- 11:16- a person with Medicare insurance, now I have
- 11:18- to do all of these prior authorizations and
- 11:21- denials
- 11:22- and out of network providers that I didn't
- 11:24- have to deal with when they were just
- 11:26- a regular Medicare.
- 11:28- So so that's been a a huge issue.
- 11:30- The Affordable Care Act did try to
- 11:33- increase,
- 11:34- the number of people on insurance,
- 11:37- but, of course, as a result,
- 11:39- it dramatically increased the price that the average
- 11:41- person has to pay, you know, because again,
- 11:44- the the... Those insurance are still trying to
- 11:45- make their profit and then the Affordable Care
- 11:48- Act made it to where they have to
- 11:49- keep their profit margin at a certain amount.
- 11:52- So then what do they do? They have
- 11:53- to find ways to
- 11:56- convince people or to deny tests so that
- 11:58- they can still keep their profit margin.
- 12:01- I think the point you're making, doctor Proctor,
- 12:03- is, you know, under Medicare Advantage,
- 12:05- peers try to get their medical loss ratio
- 12:07- in a certain spot. It couldn't be too
- 12:08- low. It couldn't be too high. This has
- 12:10- led to all sorts of gaming of authorizations,
- 12:13- preauthorizations, denials, everything else. So... But your point
- 12:15- is well taken. From both the physician and
- 12:17- patient perspective,
- 12:19- sooner or later, everybody send... Tends to hate
- 12:21- Medicare Advantage. At start, they seem to like
- 12:23- it for some of the additional benefits, then
- 12:25- the patients tend to hate it too. The
- 12:27- physicians hate it, and certainly health systems are
- 12:29- showing that they hate it as well. So
- 12:30- I think that's exactly right. So so... Home
- 12:33- health, so my local home health won't take
- 12:36- Humana right now to to name one example,
- 12:38- because they just are,
- 12:40- anytime you need a home health, you know,
- 12:41- you wanna send somebody home to do physical
- 12:43- therapy or give them IV antibiotics,
- 12:45- they are,
- 12:47- denying payments. They are trying to recoup some
- 12:50- of the patients once they pay out. Instead
- 12:52- of giving somebody 10 visits, the Humana will
- 12:54- only authorize
- 12:55- four visits.
- 12:57- So, a lot of the home healths in
- 12:59- my local community are just flat out denying
- 13:01- anyone with Humana... Medicare Advantage,
- 13:04- and that's been a really big issue over
- 13:05- the last couple of months. No. Thank you.
- 13:07- And one of my worst experience with the
- 13:08- physical therapist was that physical therapist
- 13:11- deciding how much care I needed based on
- 13:13- how much my insurance would pay
- 13:15- as opposed to how much care I needed,
- 13:17- which are two very two very different things.
- 13:20- Amen. I mean, that's that's that's my whole
- 13:22- book is
- 13:24- why why is it that these
- 13:27- insurers who've never met you or I are
- 13:30- now
- 13:31- dictating how much care you need, what tests
- 13:33- you need, what medicine you need. It's... The
- 13:36- whole system is is is crazy, you know.
- 13:40- It... It's... It should be... It... It's our
- 13:42- job to, of course, still be good stewards
- 13:44- of the health care dollars,
- 13:46- but to to provide the best care that
- 13:49- we can. And I feel like based on
- 13:52- what insurance you come in, it's okay. This
- 13:54- is the best medicine for you. This is
- 13:56- the second best medicine for you. This is
- 13:57- the medicine your insurance is gonna pay for
- 13:59- this condition.
- 14:01- And and that is just something that I've
- 14:03- always struggled with as a doctor.
- 14:05- Well, I I think you just said it
- 14:06- so right though. There's there's the best medicine
- 14:08- for you, and there's the best medicine that
- 14:10- your insurance will pay for. And often, the
- 14:13- truth is somewhere in between, but the insurance
- 14:15- won't pay for the the upper limit of
- 14:17- that, which is what a patient often needs.
- 14:19- And at the same time, like, when Congress
- 14:21- yells at the big insurance companies, as they
- 14:23- did in hearings a few months ago,
- 14:25- it it seems to me so
- 14:27- hypocritical
- 14:28- because
- 14:29- so many of those insurers are doing exactly
- 14:32- what Congress asked them to do in managing
- 14:34- Medicare Advantage on the state level, managing Medicaid
- 14:37- plans
- 14:38- was literally... I mean, there wasn't really any
- 14:41- great belief,
- 14:42- at least unless you're really a theorist, that
- 14:45- the insurers are gonna provide better
- 14:47- care or navigate care better, manage care better.
- 14:50- It was really about
- 14:52- they're gonna do stuff the government doesn't like
- 14:54- to do, which is deny,
- 14:55- pre authorize,
- 14:57- etcetera,
- 14:58- and that's what the insurers are doing. So
- 14:59- when I see Congress yelling at the insurance
- 15:01- CEOs, CEOs yelling back at Congress, I think
- 15:03- they're all in, you know, in this... In
- 15:06- cahoots together. It seems like they're all playing
- 15:07- the same game together. I mean, the money
- 15:10- was turned over to these insurance to do
- 15:12- exactly what they're doing.
- 15:15- Yeah. So they
- 15:17- they they pretty much got what they asked
- 15:18- for. You know, of course, everyone tries to
- 15:21- talk about how America is a free market
- 15:23- system,
- 15:24- you know, to divide
- 15:26- unevenly
- 15:27- the resources,
- 15:28- you know, based on how hard you work
- 15:30- or how high this degree is and how
- 15:32- much you get paid at your job and
- 15:33- you may get more money or less money,
- 15:36- based on that. But I don't feel like
- 15:38- health care should fit under that umbrella. You
- 15:40- know, it's not, oh, you get a really
- 15:42- nice TV versus you get a really basic
- 15:44- TV. You know, everyone
- 15:46- deserves
- 15:47- good health care.
- 15:48- My favorite example that I use in the
- 15:50- book is is,
- 15:52- for profit firefighting.
- 15:54- So, you know, in ancient Rome,
- 15:56- before the government decided to tax and start
- 15:59- a
- 16:01- government funded
- 16:02- firefighting service, you used to have
- 16:05- for profit firefighters.
- 16:07- And there would be a fire outbreak in
- 16:09- Rome,
- 16:10- and they would show up and they would
- 16:12- just look at the owner and be like,
- 16:13- are you gonna pay me for my service?
- 16:16- Or do you have firefighting insurance? If they
- 16:19- said no,
- 16:20- those firefighters just sit there and watch the
- 16:22- building burn out. And I feel like that's
- 16:24- how I feel a lot of times in
- 16:26- medicine.
- 16:27- I feel like I I know what the
- 16:29- best treatment is. I know what tests you
- 16:31- need. I I I know...
- 16:33- But there's this barrier
- 16:35- between us on you getting what you need.
- 16:38- I I think the government
- 16:40- should take over that payment just like they
- 16:43- take over the payment and providing the service
- 16:45- of firefighting.
- 16:47- And let me ask you this question. Because
- 16:48- one of the points you're getting against Medicare
- 16:50- for all
- 16:51- is that in countries that have national health
- 16:54- systems,
- 16:55- you often end up with... I mean, the
- 16:57- hope is you end up with Medicare for
- 16:59- all and we get out of this concept
- 17:01- of so many different tiers of care, like
- 17:04- Mhmm. Based on how much money you have.
- 17:06- But but... And certainly in this country where
- 17:08- there's such a shortage supply,
- 17:10- you see with concierge care... And I don't
- 17:12- blame the physicians one bit for this. This
- 17:14- is their way to make a living in
- 17:15- many places.
- 17:16- But you see concierge care certainly driving a
- 17:19- different tier of care where, you know,
- 17:22- not enough primary care physicians.
- 17:24- So in many, many states, you can't get
- 17:26- a primary care physician without paying a concierge
- 17:29- fee.
- 17:29- And the idea
- 17:31- of, you
- 17:32- know, Medicare for all or coverage for all
- 17:34- is that we get out of that.
- 17:36- But but the flip side is, in so
- 17:38- many countries that have a socialized health system
- 17:40- or nationalized health system,
- 17:42- they've ended up with exactly the problem we
- 17:44- have
- 17:45- in that
- 17:47- the physicians
- 17:48- end up out of the system,
- 17:50- getting paid by the well off of the
- 17:51- politically connected
- 17:53- to provide care in private hospitals, private systems,
- 17:55- private other stuff.
- 17:57- And so rather than improving the supply demand
- 18:00- in a lot of those countries, the weights
- 18:01- are horrible unless you're wealthy, then the weights
- 18:04- are short. So how do you... Right. Yeah.
- 18:06- How do you deal with those problems like
- 18:08- the modernist problems?
- 18:09- Yeah. So look, there's always gonna be, even
- 18:12- with for profit firefighting. Right? So I don't
- 18:14- know if you remember when they had those
- 18:16- fires in California a year or two ago,
- 18:19- and people were literally paying
- 18:21- firefighters
- 18:22- from other states to, like, come in and
- 18:24- protect their house. But But the wealthy are
- 18:26- always gonna use their resources
- 18:28- to get the best of whatever it is.
- 18:31- So I I don't think that that's gonna
- 18:33- be any different if there is a Medicare
- 18:35- for Evol.
- 18:36- What I'm trying to do is I'm trying
- 18:37- to make health care better for the average
- 18:39- person. You know, I still think that there's
- 18:41- gonna be some person who wants better care.
- 18:44- The example I always use is the professional
- 18:46- athlete.
- 18:47- So even if we have Medicare for all,
- 18:49- there's still gonna be that one baseball player
- 18:53- who tears his
- 18:54- elbow ligament,
- 18:56- who gets a MRI that night,
- 18:58- who gets flown out to wherever doctor James
- 19:01- Andrews is and gets surgery the next morning
- 19:03- without a weight, has the best physical therapy.
- 19:06- But there's always gonna be that case. But
- 19:09- but I think your point
- 19:10- that's what I'm gonna wanna fix.
- 19:12- Yeah. Your point that I've that I've heard,
- 19:15- the the best stated by yourself and a
- 19:17- couple others is, look, we're not trying to
- 19:19- change everything. We wanna make sure that every
- 19:22- American gets a baseline of care
- 19:24- that's above the constant fight with the insurance
- 19:27- companies
- 19:28- about what they'll pay for. That everybody gets
- 19:30- a baseline of care, and then, you know,
- 19:32- what I love about your discussion is
- 19:34- you're not saying that it's a fix for
- 19:36- everything.
- 19:37- You're saying it gets us to at least
- 19:38- a a point of spot where everybody gets
- 19:41- care. The average American get cares.
- 19:43- And sure, we're not trying to demonize the
- 19:45- rich and say that they can't buy doctor
- 19:47- Andrews when they wanted to buy doctor Andrews
- 19:49- or doctor Joe, who is still alive. I
- 19:50- know he is not. But but the point
- 19:52- being that it it it... It's imperfect, but
- 19:57- the point is it gets us a spot
- 19:58- where hopefully we're getting a baseline kind of
- 20:00- coverage for everybody.
- 20:02- Yes. And... Yeah. And and especially the current
- 20:04- system where it's Medicare and Medicaid. Right? So
- 20:06- the only government funded systems that we have
- 20:08- right now or for the the people 65
- 20:11- are the very poor,
- 20:12- but they get dramatically different
- 20:15- coverage. So earlier, you said that how
- 20:18- does
- 20:19- someone get different care or have to travel
- 20:21- a long way for a, a specialist. The
- 20:23- only people who have to travel for a
- 20:25- specialist right now are people with Medicaid. Right?
- 20:27- So I have so many Medicaid patients
- 20:29- who need their back surgery, who need their
- 20:31- cancer treatment, and they have to go to
- 20:32- those tertiary centers. Right? So I live in
- 20:34- New Iberia. The closest tertiary center is New
- 20:36- Orleans or Shreveport.
- 20:38- Those are both roughly three hour drives away
- 20:40- from where I live. So those Medicaid patients,
- 20:43- I have to call and get them set
- 20:45- up at one of those tertiary
- 20:47- big,
- 20:48- you know, not for profit systems that usually
- 20:51- have attached med schools and all those sort
- 20:52- of things. Where a Medicare
- 20:55- patient, right, so a person 65,
- 20:57- yeah, we have back surgeons and
- 21:00- oncologists and all those sort of specialists within
- 21:02- our community that will see and take care
- 21:04- of those patients and accept their Medicare.
- 21:07- And that has to do again with, unfortunately,
- 21:09- payments. Right? So like we talked about, especially
- 21:11- with Louisiana Medicaid, which really does not pay,
- 21:14- comparable rates. But a Medicare pays 90% on
- 21:17- the dollar where a Medicaid will pay that
- 21:20- five or 10%.
- 21:21- So a lot of those doctors just can't
- 21:23- see a whole bunch of those Medicaid patients.
- 21:26- Oh, a 100%. They they end up having
- 21:28- limited spots, a few spots a week, a
- 21:30- couple spots a week, whatever it is because
- 21:31- they just can't do it. If you're getting
- 21:33- paid five, 10%,
- 21:34- the patient might as well be an indigent
- 21:35- patient. But... Because by the time you get
- 21:37- covered by the government, Medicaid pays you, it's
- 21:40- almost not even worth bothering to bill. You're
- 21:42- just really doing it. It's almost become philanthropic
- 21:45- work by the doctor here in the clinic
- 21:47- itself.
- 21:48- Right. Yeah. Absolutely. And then the other thing
- 21:50- you mentioned was, the wait periods.
- 21:53- So so I have a solution for that
- 21:54- or at least I have a proposed solution
- 21:56- for that. So... Yeah. So in
- 21:58- Canada is the biggest complaint a lot of
- 22:00- Americans have. So they always hear about in
- 22:03- Canada that whenever they decide it's time to,
- 22:05- like, have a surgery, right, especially a non
- 22:08- emergent surgery. Right? So they wanna get a
- 22:09- knee replacement or a hip replacement is the
- 22:11- common one.
- 22:12- If you do that in America, you know,
- 22:14- you can go to a surgeon and you
- 22:15- can get your knee replaced next week if
- 22:17- your your knee is in terrible shape.
- 22:19- In Canada, you're gonna get put on a
- 22:21- list and you're not gonna have to get
- 22:23- your knee replaced,
- 22:24- you know, in four months. So I think
- 22:26- was the average in the study.
- 22:28- So
- 22:30- the thing with Canada is Canada doesn't
- 22:33- get paid. The doctors and the hospitals don't
- 22:35- get paid by the test or by the
- 22:38- treatment or by the surgery.
- 22:40- They get lump sums. Right? So every hospital
- 22:44- says, oh, you take care of a 100,000
- 22:45- people, you get x number of dollars, and
- 22:48- you're gonna use that money to take care
- 22:50- of everybody for a year.
- 22:53- So a doctor in that system gets their
- 22:56- salary and they're not incentivized
- 22:58- to see five surgeries versus seven surgeries. You
- 23:01- kinda see what I'm getting at? Yep. Yeah.
- 23:03- 100%. So you would maintain... But instead of
- 23:05- the...... Service,
- 23:06- it would still be free for service.... Service.
- 23:08- Yeah. Which which I think is exactly right
- 23:11- because when you get these capsulated payments and
- 23:13- the insurance companies,
- 23:15- you know, people complain about fee for service
- 23:17- and doctor doing too much, under managed care
- 23:20- or capitated payment. It's exactly the opposite. People
- 23:23- try and deny care and don't do care.
- 23:25- I mean, there's there's challenges on both sides
- 23:27- of it, but
- 23:28- this concept of everybody becoming sort of, like,
- 23:32- you know, not working that hard because they're
- 23:34- just getting paid, like, a lump sum amount
- 23:36- and there's no incentive to do work, I
- 23:38- think, is is a... No incentive to stay
- 23:40- extra. Yeah. So so... Yeah. By but by
- 23:42- keeping that, right, again, with the current Medicare
- 23:44- system,
- 23:45- if you see... If you do four Medicare
- 23:47- knee surgeries, you make four knee surgery fees.
- 23:51- But if you do eight knee surgeries, you
- 23:53- get eight feet. You know what I mean?
- 23:54- So... Yeah. So you do that Medicare for
- 23:56- all you do better.
- 23:57- You make more money. Right? So then that
- 23:59- would still incentivize and I think that would
- 24:00- alleviate a lot of that
- 24:02- backlog stuff that they have in some of
- 24:04- those systems,
- 24:06- without,
- 24:07- you know, changing,
- 24:09- the the way we do medicine. Right? Still
- 24:11- keeping some aspects,
- 24:13- you know, in a quote free market.
- 24:15- No. And I and I... At least where
- 24:16- you get paid for productivity. Not, you know,
- 24:18- I I I love that. And and doctor
- 24:20- Proctor, let me ask you one more time.
- 24:22- Tell us the name of the book where
- 24:23- people can get the book so so people
- 24:26- hear that again if you don't mind, doctor
- 24:27- Proctor.
- 24:28- Yeah. So the book is called Inefficient on
- 24:30- Purpose,
- 24:31- Challenging the Insurance Industrial Complex.
- 24:34- It's available on Amazon.
- 24:36- You can get a paperback, hard copy, or
- 24:39- an ebook.
- 24:40- Fantastic. And when can we get you to
- 24:42- write a book on the educational industrial complex,
- 24:44- which seems to be us all, where the
- 24:46- incentives seem to be totally messed up as
- 24:48- well?
- 24:49- It... I I I know that that one
- 24:52- needs one. I absolutely agree. And then somebody
- 24:54- was actually talking about how our, food system
- 24:57- and diet also,
- 24:59- could be totally revamped and how obesity and
- 25:01- just our our diet in general. And I
- 25:03- was like, man, I'm really not ready to
- 25:04- write another book right now. But, if if
- 25:07- I ever decide to write another one, I
- 25:08- know a couple areas that would be right
- 25:10- for,
- 25:10- some disruption.
- 25:12- I love that. And people do know or
- 25:14- people that have written books now exhausting a
- 25:16- process is they actually get a book
- 25:18- written, rewritten, edited,
- 25:20- get it to where you want it to
- 25:21- be, and then get it published, work on
- 25:23- distribution, everything else. So I I hear you
- 25:25- on the exhaustion factor. Doctor Proctor, what a
- 25:27- complete pleasure to visit with you. Thank you
- 25:29- so much for joining us. Thank you so
- 25:31- much. Yeah. Absolutely. Thanks, Scott.