Latest / Man in America Podcast / The DISTURBING Connection Between Mass Shootings & Microwaves — Dr. Reiner Fuellmich Interview

Transcript

The DISTURBING Connection Between Mass Shootings & Microwaves — Dr. Reiner Fuellmich Interview · Man in America Podcast

• 0:01
  Seth Holehouse: Ladies and gentlemen, welcome to Man in America. I'm your host, Seth Holehouse. So there's a lot of different vectors that are coming after us. If you look at them, we've got the vaccine, we have the BLM riots, we have the food shortages, there's a whole host of things that seem like they're all going awry. But there's one part, there's one aspect of that that doesn't get a whole lot of attention, and that is the five g, the the microwaving.
• 0:29
  And the question really is is is it safe? Is it something that is a threat to us? Of course, the big telecom companies say it has no problem for you. It's it's safe and effective. We've heard that before.
• 0:42
  But joining us today is doctor Reiner Fulmich, someone who has been working not only to expose the criminals and creating what he hopes to be something soon where he can take them to trial. Right? He really is working hard on bringing justice to the people that are behind the COVID vaccine agenda. But he's also is consistently interviewing a lot of people and piecing together a narrative to understand where we're at. Doctor Fulmich, it is such an honor to have you on the show.
• 1:11
  Thank you very much for joining us today.
• 1:14
  Speaker 2: Well, thank you very much for having me. It's a pleasure. I'm looking forward to this interview.
• 1:19
  Seth Holehouse: Yeah. Well, there's a lot to get to dive into. There's a lot of this crazy stuff happening. I know that you've been involved with the, I think, ICIC, and you've got a lot of different projects you're working on. But it was what really caught my eye recently when I saw an interview that you had done with Maria Zee, who's a fantastic journalist and, you know, great show.
• 1:38
  And you were talking about this interview that you did with Barry Trower, which I've watched segments of it, but I wanna I wanna watch the whole thing after this. And so what you discussed, though, was basically actually, I'll quote what you said. You're talking about radiation. And what you told Maria Z was you said let me pull this up here. You said, microwave radiation is much more dangerous for the entire planet than the so called vaccines are, and that it can be used to create any symptom, you know, cause geoengineering, turn perfectly peaceful people into serial killers, etc.
• 2:13
  And this was really shocking to me because I've, similar to you, been really working hard to expose the vaccine agenda and, you you know, what's really behind that and bring the true evidence out about that. But I also believe, and I have interviewed Doctor. Robert Young, where I learned a lot about the real threat of the microwave, you know, three g, four g, five g. And it seems like that is like and how he said, he said, look, this technology makes the atom bomb obsolete. And that was a very strong statement.
• 2:42
  So I'd love to dive into this topic with you and understand better, you know, based upon your interview and your own research. Can you tell us about this microwave technology we're seeing pop up all over the place?
• 2:57
  Speaker 2: Well, I think we still don't know enough about it, but the one person who knows everything about it is Barry Trauer. He's a former intelligence officer with both MI5 and MI6. I keep saying to people when they ask me about Barry, that he's the real life James Bond. I mean, he's 79 years old now, but he was a Navy diver, and he debriefed Russian spies during the Cold War. So he knows the ins and out of the intelligence business, but he also knows everything about microwave radiation because he first got in contact with this topic when I think at the age of 15 or 16 or 17, he became a Navy diver.
• 3:42
  And he was instructed for defusing mines, for example, he was instructed to not worry so much about snipers who were trying to kill him when he's trying to defuse mines, but to worry about microwave radiation, because that is what they used in order to, I guess, mix up your mind and confuse you, but it goes far beyond that. That's what started him to think more seriously about microwave radiation. He's a very serious scientist. He has a degree in mathematics and physics, I believe, and also knows a lot, I don't think he has a degree in medicine, but he knows a lot about how microwave radiation affects human biology. And just as you said, this is what he explained in this two part interview, microwave radiation is probably much more dangerous than the so called shots or the so called vaccines rather, because it affects everyone, not just the vaccinated.
• 4:48
  Now there is certainly, this is probably what Doctor. Young told you, there's certainly an interaction between whatever is in the vials and is then injected into the body with microwave technology with five gs. We don't really know how far this goes. But the thing is you don't even need anything to be injected into the human body in order to affect the human body with five gs or microwave radiation in general, because he says that all of this, three gs, four gs, it's all highly dangerous And it's been known to be highly dangerous. It's a weapon.
• 5:29
  It's been used as a weapon since the 1930s, the Russians and the East Germans are the farthest or were the farthest ahead in this. And just as you said, he explained to me how you can turn people who are perfectly normal people into serial killers. And he believes that some of the so called mass shootings, and there weren't any mass shootings before, was it Columbine in 1999? There weren't any mass shootings. And he thinks that this microwave radiation was used in order to make people, to turn people into serial killers who were otherwise perfectly normal.
• 6:09
  Now, I'm not sure about that, because I don't know the backgrounds of the people who went on a rampage and killed others, but I find it very plausible. And he told us about how you can use microwave radiation five gs in particular, I suppose, for geoengineering. Again, I don't know how far this goes, because there's something else that needs to be taken into consideration, I believe. And this is what I learned from a recent interview that I did with Doctor. Mike Yeaden and Meredith Miller and Professor Joseph Molotores.
• 6:47
  Mike Yeaden of course is the former vice president of Pfizer. Meredith always refuses to be called a psychologist, but she's one of the most brilliant psychologists I know. And Professor Joseph Molotores is professor of, he's retired, but he's a professor of philosophy. And in this interview, connects with a presentation that was given by a biologist by the name of Jay Cui from Pittsburgh. This presentation was given on the weekly conference that is conducted by the CHD people.
• 7:23
  It's still called the PCR test group. In this interview and in an article which Mike wrote a couple of weeks ago, and in this presentation, here's what we learned. It may very well be that there was never a novel coronavirus, nothing. Now, this doesn't have anything to do with the question of whether or not there are viruses at all, or whether this allegedly novel coronavirus has ever been properly isolated, which it probably hasn't, they just used computer models. But that doesn't have anything to do with that.
• 8:00
  It's only the question whether there was a novel coronavirus, or if there was only the threat of a novel coronavirus. And to make a long story short, all of us came to the conclusion that of course they didn't release a novel coronavirus because that dangerous one at that because that would have been far too dangerous even for those who are behind us for as Mr. As Catherine Austin Fitz calls him Mr. Global. But the same effect, of course, can be generated by getting people to believe that there's a novel coronavirus out there, which is really, really dangerous.
• 8:43
  And some of the aspects that need to be taken into consideration is one, none of the politicians were afraid of the virus. He mentioned the exam or well, some of them wore the mask for a while. And then as soon as the photo op was over, they took them down again. And he mentioned the example of Boris Johnson in Great Britain who had to step down because of party gate, because he was having parties and totally unprotected parties, singing, dancing, and having fun. Also, the flu seems to have disappeared when the coronavirus appeared.
• 9:20
  How can that be? Also, there was never any access mortality until the start of the so called vaccination campaign. So if you take all this together, it does make sense. Well, there's these spikes of mortality in Bergamo and New York, but we know in the meantime that this was caused by the panic mongering. A lot of people went into the hospitals who otherwise would have stayed at home, waited for a few days and then gone back to work.
• 9:50
  Because as we now believe, I believe, Mike believes, and I think Jay Couey believes too, this is just the regular flu virus, which they blew all out of proportion, as most flus and most common colds or serious colds contain one of the four endemic coronaviruses. So if you set the test to only test for the coronavirus, you're guaranteed to find it, especially if you misuse it the way that it has been misused by this now infamous professor Doctor. Drosten of Charite University in Berlin, who did this at the behest of the WHO, which as we now know is a totally corrupt organization. So if this is true, and there's one other aspect, which of course people worry about. What about the gain of function experiments?
• 10:42
  Well, maybe they did conduct gain of function experiments, maybe they didn't, we don't know. Maybe those who are involved don't even know what happened there, but we believe that the only reason the discussion about whether or not there were gain of function experiments and who was involved in it, the only reason this all of a sudden popped up in the mainstream media, which is otherwise totally under the control of these five large corporations. The only reason is to make people believe that this is a dangerous virus because it's escaped from a lab, or maybe it was leaked from a lab. So in reality, we believe there was never a novel coronavirus. They're just trying to make us believe that there was a novel coronavirus so that people would ultimately, first you create the problem, then you offer the solution that ultimately the people would agree to getting the shots.
• 11:38
  Everything else in between didn't really play a role, the mask mandates, the social distancing, I mean, they didn't need the virus or rather the declaration of a public health emergency
• 11:57
  rather
• 11:53
  Seth Holehouse: international concern for mask mandates and social distancing, they needed it because their ultimate
• 11:58
  Speaker 2: goal was to get people to accept the injections. Now, if that is true, if it is true that these people used the fear which they created by way of their politicians, who are their politicians, not ours, most of them who are now in positions of power are creatures of the young global leaders program of the World Economic Forum. And of course, the mainstream media, if this is true, if by way of using the politicians and the mainstream media, they just created fear in order to get us to do what they want us to do, get the injections. Well, there are automatically more questions arising because these same people are telling us about global warming, climate change, food shortages, energy shortages. We know for a fact from having interviewed, I've interviewed four fifty experts from all walks of science.
• 13:00
  One of them is Doctor. Patrick Moore, the founder of Greenpeace, who also holds a degree in biology. We know for a fact that there is no climate change. This is cycles. These cycles, in fact, we may even be moving into a mild ice age.
• 13:16
  But I'm saying this because when you talk about five gs and microwave radiation, and is not leaked by accident, the discussion about how dangerous this is, is not leaked by accident. I think they want us to believe that they're much more powerful than they really are. Yes, they do have all these technologies at their disposal, which we paid for, Catherine Austin Fitts says in the late 1980s or so, 21,000,000,000,000, not billion US dollars disappeared from the federal budget, probably went to the DOD who is behind the so called vaccinations, not the FDA, not the CDC. We know this from a great interview that is based on the whistleblower, Catherine Brooke Jackson's testimony interview that Robert F. Kennedy Jr.
• 14:17
  Very recently did with Sasha Latipova. So, but if most of what we're seeing is an illusion, because as Franklin D. Roosevelt said, fear is the only thing that we need to fear. Then we have to be careful not to allow others to sensationalize true facts so that they're overblown and make each and every one of us afraid. I think the problem, yes, the problem is there, but it's not as grave as they try and make it out to be, they're not half, maybe not one tenth as powerful as they try to make us believe.
• 15:01
  Seth Holehouse: Folks, the world is going through a process that experts are calling dedollarization, and China and Russia are leading the charge. So what's this mean? You see, the US dollar is a fiat currency, meaning it isn't backed by anything of value. The only thing that gives our dollar value is its demand around the world, which is primarily because of its petrodollar status, meaning that nations are forced to buy and sell oil in USD. But now, the world is losing faith in the dollar and it's very close to losing its status as the petrodollar and world reserve currency, especially now that the oil producing nations are abandoning The US for China, Russia, and other BRICS nations.
• 15:40
  But what happens if the dollar loses that sacred status? Well, the value of our dollars, our life savings, IRAs, four zero one k, stocks, bank accounts could literally be wiped out in a matter of months, weeks, or even overnight. And to make things worse, Biden and the Fed are currently working on a secret project Hamilton, a new form of digital currency that'll obliterate your freedom and privacy. Now look, folks. I'm not a financial adviser, so please do your own research.
• 16:08
  But I believe that now more than ever, it's a good time to consider transferring at least a portion of your wealth into physical gold and silver, real world assets that have survived every currency collapse and every empire collapse in history. But I wanna be really clear with you. You don't buy gold and silver to get rich. You do it to protect and preserve your wealth and freedom. Look.
• 16:31
  There's a reason why nations like Russia are backing their currency with gold and why the elites and banks are buying up physical gold and silver like we've never seen before, but they don't want you to know that. They want you to lose everything when the dollar crashes and be forced into their digital currency slave system. So now's the time to protect your financial future. And for this, I'm confident recommending Doctor. Kirk Elliott.
• 16:54
  Kirk has two PhDs and is an incredible Christian patriot who's dedicated to helping protect your financial future. Look, Kirk is who I use. He's who my friends and my family use. I trust him. You can buy gold and silver directly, or you can transfer your IRA into physical gold and silver with zero taxes or penalties.
• 17:13
  So to learn more about this, open up a new tab right now and go to goldwithseth.com, or you can call (720) 605-3900 to speak to someone right now. Again, that's (720) 605-3900 or goldwithseth.com. The phone number and the link are also in the show description.
• 17:37
  Speaker 2: Many of the people who you see on television, the politicians, other media people, many of them, including our leading politicians in Germany, and I hate to say it, but it also includes the leading American politicians seem to be really, really not the most, well, let's put it this way, not the brightest candle on the chandelier. So they're using people who may or may not know that they're being used in my view in order to create fear. And once we understand that, we should be able to take a more rational approach to what's going on and find the right solution to make the right choices. So the most important thing is to keep exposing everything that we believe is important for the people to understand how to react to this and to keep calm. Because panic is never a good advisor.
• 18:39
  It always leads us astray. I mean, it's okay to be afraid sometimes, but panic is not a good, it never gives you good guidance. So that said, five gs is definitely dangerous. Microwave radiation is definitely dangerous. And this is not just because of what Barry Trauer told us, but also we interviewed one of the most experienced experts in microwave radiation half a year before he died.
• 19:16
  His name is Professor Carl Hecht, H E C H T from East Germany, that's where he was born. And he died at the end of last year, think at the age of 98 or 99, but up until the very end, he was totally focused, he knew exactly what he was talking about. Now, this guy had collected a thousand studies on the dangers of microwave radiation, not just five gs, but all the others as well. And they all disappeared. He still has copies of them, I don't know who has them now, but they disappeared when Deutsche Telekom, which is like AT and T or Verizon, but it's one of the more powerful telecommunications providers in Germany and in the world, T Mobile in The US for example, when they asked him in the early 2000s, if he could provide them with these studies and he did, and then they were lost.
• 20:23
  But in 1992 or 1994, at the beginning of cell phones being introduced to the general population, there was a lot of panic about how dangerous this might be. A lot of people in particular in Germany were very worried. And then all of a sudden, this whole discussion died down. That has to do with the government, or in this case, Deutsche Telekom, trying to calm people down so that they would continue to buy the new technology, the new cell phones, get into Wi Fi, etcetera, etcetera. Another thing which was meant to, I guess, make us believe this is safe and good for us is microwave ovens, of course.
• 21:05
  Everyone believes, oh, this is great, I can have a microwave dinner tonight, I don't really know, I don't really have to know how to cook, I'll just put my microwave dinner in there and everything's cool. But that's how they got us used to or got us to believe this is safe and effective basically when in reality is extremely dangerous. And I believe that it is extremely dangerous and I also believe that for example, the people, the pictures of the people who keeled over in Wuhan in December of twenty nineteen or so at the beginning of the so called now pandemic, I don't think they died of a virus because that's not how you die of a virus. And Barry says, this is probably when they first tested five gs and killed these people by now this is speaking in layman's terms, there's probably correct technical terms with, but through the application of five gs, you can literally suck all of the energy out of a person's body out of all the cells of the person, and then they die and they're dead before they hit the ground. So that's I think what we saw.
• 22:14
  But this is based on I'm not a scientist, I'm just a lawyer who is trying to understand what's going on in order to file a brief, which explains all of this to a judge who doesn't know anything about it. That's based on Barry Trauer's testimony. I think he will be an important witness.
• 22:33
  Seth Holehouse: Well, there's a lot to unpack there. But one thing I want to comment on is just what you said about being able to expose this and yet not be controlled by fear. And that's the hard part because I find there's a spectrum. On one side, you have people that just wanna put their head in the sand. They don't wanna hear about anything negative.
• 22:49
  They wanna pretend that life will go back to how it was before the the pandemic. On the other side of the spectrum, you have the people that are pounding the table and, like, you know, the globalists are gonna kill us all, and it really does cause lot of fear. And I find that it's hard for me to find the right balance because I think that knowledge is power, and this is an information warfare that, you know, this is what we're in. And so educating people about these things is really, really important. But being able to do it in a way that doesn't send everyone running for the hills or thinking that, gosh, there's three g, four g, five g everywhere.
• 23:21
  So, like, I'm gonna die as soon as they want me to die. Like, had to figure out how to, you know, be be rational and find the balance. But so when I hear the overall kind of train of thinking and how you've explained things, I take a step back, and I try to break this down. It's like, okay, we now know that the pandemic was planned. Right?
• 23:41
  You know, you know, event two zero one and much earlier than that, you know, lockstep, etcetera. So we knew that was planned. We know that the the media worked in coordination with the politicians, with the nonprofits, with the, you know, Gavi, etcetera. They all worked together to create the fear and then bring the solution, right, to to implement their their vaccine solution for that. So we know that that was all coordinated to, you know, to get people to vaccinate.
• 24:07
  And I agree with you in terms of the the masks and social distancing. Like, I think that those were just part of the psychological operation. Like, get people used to wearing a mask. And once they're they're used to being subservient to wear a mask, then they'll line up for their third booster. Right?
• 24:21
  So I think that that's I I think that that's just part of the overall operation for people. I think it had nothing to do with masks or social distancing. It was it was really, you know, can we go to a prison yard? It's okay, make all the prisoners spin around in a circle for ten minutes. You know I mean?
• 24:34
  It's just to get them used to following commands. And so but if you look at like because I love taking a big picture view of this information. And it's always great talking to people like you that have interviewed a lot of different people because I find that that's the only way to arrive at a picture of what's really happening because we could we could specialize in one silo of this and spend the next ten years understanding it, but you're really see the forest through the trees. And so if we're looking at the the bigger picture that there's this plan to get as much of the world vaccinated as possible, if there was a depopulation agenda, like we've talked to, you know, heard about that they want to kill ninety percent, well, not that many are actually dying. Right?
• 25:15
  Yeah. There's a large population that are dying from the vaccine, but not, you know, not two, three, you know, not two thirds of the of the, you know, the human race. But there's a question I had this what came out with through the interview with Robert Young is that was that operation really about just getting this substance inside of enough people as possible that can then be controlled with their microwave technology? Right? Like, is it was it about depositing something?
• 25:42
  But also, you look at the skies, you look at the chemtrails, you look at the food that we're being we're we're you know, it feels like we're being poisoned, but I also ask myself, is it poison they're putting us into us just to kind of kill us off, or is it nanotechnology? You know, are they dumping some sort of nanotechnology into the skies, in the clouds so it rains, we're bringing it in there, and does that nanotechnology make us more susceptible to being controlled by the frequencies? Right? So and there's there's a lot of anyway, I'm just kind of there's there's so much to kinda unpack with this. But, I mean, do you think that the end goal of this operation is this kind of total technocracy where a small group of people have control over everybody, and technology is how they do it through microwave, through being able to control our behavior, and that a lot of these different isolated events actually all make sense when you realize that's the fundamental goal.
• 26:41
  Speaker 2: Yes, I believe that. That's very plausible. We spoke with so many people about this, geopoliticians, historians, Holocaust survivors, but also with Catherine Austin Fitts, the former Assistant Secretary of Housing and Urban Development. And she agrees, everyone agrees that this is their end goal, total control. It's like I keep saying it's like a dystopian James Bond movie, only this time they're trying to make this real.
• 27:14
  They're not gonna get away with it because they, first of all, as I said, none of them are particularly bright, maybe some of them know something, but they don't see the whole picture. They don't understand how to deal with us, the resistance, which is probably far bigger than they ever expected, because they don't understand about emotions, about creativity and intuition. Now, when you've mentioned that it's a fine line that we have to walk on the one hand, we don't wanna panic, on the other hand, we need to know, we need to understand what's going on. And some of the bits and pieces of information that we're getting are really scary. Well, you have to trust your intuition.
• 28:05
  And I believe having interviewed all these people, I truly believe that they are evil, they are dangerous, but they will not get away with it. It may very well happen that when they realize that the next big scare cannot be another virus because people just, you know, they just shrug their shoulders, monkeypox, that was a nonstarter, you know, but I'm afraid that they're probably gonna push the Ukraine war into Germany and Western Europe, because that is their testing ground. That's their first attempt at a one world government under the EU. The EU is, I believe now not Europe, it's a huge bureaucracy. It has nothing to do with Europe.
• 28:59
  Most Europeans hate it. But the EU, we believe now is a creation of what people consider the deep state, just like the World Economic Forum was not invented just by Klaus Schwab, but he did it at the behest he was in the 1960s, he went to Harvard and that's where he met Henry Kissinger, then he introduced him to a CIA funded program, And then he founded the World Economic Forum in 1971. So that is basically a creation of the deep state, I believe. And the same is then true for the young global leaders program, which they started in 1992. '2 of the first graduates are Angela Merkel and Bill Gates.
• 29:47
  And we know that half or more of today's leaders are all creatures of this or produced by the Young Global Leaders program. Same is true for Ursula von der Leyen, one of the most corrupt leaders of this world. She's the president of the EU Commission. So ultimately, that's their goal. They want full control.
• 30:09
  Full control means to kill off as many as they think they need to kill off so that they'll have all the resources for themselves. And the rest of us should be under their full control. That's why they're talking about technocracy and transhumanism and all that. It can't work, it can't work. We're gonna talk to some of the experts in this field, transhumanism, technocracy in order to show the people that yes, it's dangerous, but it can't work.
• 30:38
  So don't panic, just stand up, wait for the right moment, and then rise up and push back. Simply just say no, as they said in that old commercial, I think it's Nike, just say no and that'll be it. And it really, that's the core of the matter. We all of us have to understand and this is especially difficult for Germans to understand because they've been used to simply following orders. That's why people used to think, oh, this is a very orderly country.
• 31:08
  They're a punctual German engineering, all that. It didn't start with Hitler. It started with Bismarck in eighteen something, in the 1850s or later Bismarck in the 1870s, German Prussian discipline, that's when it all started. So it's especially hard for Germans to understand, not so much for Americans. And then the Japanese are sort of in between, that we each and every one of us has their own individual sovereignty.
• 31:39
  We know we have a built in compass and an innate ability to see what's right and what's wrong, what's good and what's evil. We don't really need any complicated laws or even more complicated legalese to know this, we know that and if we wanna do something that makes sense to us, no one can tell us not to do it, unless of course it interferes with someone else's freedoms. But if it weren't for all of these complicated judiciaries, let's put it that way, and the German one is one of the most complicated. I think 75% of the world's output in tax law articles and books comes from Germany. So if it weren't for all this complicated bullshit, that's what I call it, because you learn nothing at a German law school other than bullshit, it has nothing to do with the reality of life, you don't learn how to get to the point, to the heart of the matter, how to find the truth, the true facts.
• 32:49
  You only understand about the application of the law, how to do a legal analysis, but how do you do a legal analysis if you don't know the facts first? You don't learn anything about that. But we all of us have this built in compass to understand what's right and wrong and good and evil. So we all of us, each and every one of us knows what to do without getting any orders from anyone. And if we then connect with like minded people, for example, if in a small community, we find a 100 people or 200 people who believe, oh yeah, this is the kind of system of education which we think makes sense for us.
• 33:31
  And who's going to keep us from doing that? Or this the kind of, this is how we want to produce energy. We don't need these global behemoths. We don't need these global corporation to feed us. We don't need the Walmarts, the Costco's and all the others.
• 33:46
  We can do it ourselves and at a much better price. And it's going to be much healthier because we're not going to have any genetically modified food or stuff and we're not gonna spray anything on them. So that's where it all starts out. If people understand that each and every one of us has their sovereign, their own sovereignty, then that's real democracy. It's bottom up and not top down.
• 34:13
  And the next step will then be to disconnect from all of these global corporations and global NGOs, they're all of them criminal, I have come to realize, not just through my work as an attorney, because my firm and I, we used to represent only consumers and small and medium sized businesses against large global corporations such as Deutsche Bank, VW and the world's largest shipping company, which is totally corrupt. Kuna Nagel is its name, most people probably don't know it. But that's the only way to go. You cannot, they have had so much time to infiltrate the system with their people. It is so utterly, thoroughly corrupt, you cannot save it.
• 34:59
  There's no way you can fix it from the inside. You can only disconnect, set up your own system of education, of economic system of healthcare, which leads us back to Doctor. Young and Doctor. Love and all the others, which doesn't mean that the pharmaceutical industry as a whole is bad, but 99% is probably bad, we don't need it. And it doesn't mean that allopathy as a whole is bad, but 99% we don't need.
• 35:33
  We can all of us take care of ourselves. It's very simple, eat the right thing, exercise, and all of a sudden, there's no need to go to see a doctor unless maybe you break a leg or something. And if you look at what happened before in 1913, I believe the usual suspects, the Rockefellers and others introduced us to the pharmaceutical industry, because they hired thousands of professors and teachers to stand things on its head to teach at the universities and at school that natural medicine, which is what used to be, which has worked and had worked up until then for hundreds and hundreds of years, they're all quacks. The new way to go is the pharmaceutical industry. This is how it all happened.
• 36:30
  These are the kinds of information that people need to understand in order to make the right choices, and then they'll know life is so much easier and can be so much simpler than what these global corporations and global NGOs are trying to make us believe. We can do it ourselves. And the way to stop this is not by waiting for someone or some entity to save us. This time, we are the cavalry. We're gonna save ourselves.
• 36:59
  Seth Holehouse: And so something I take from what you just laid out there is that, a, you strongly believe that their plan to enslave the entire world will fail. And I tend I actually agree with every cell of my being. I agree. But if you look at kind of, like, breaking out, like, the why is that? I think it's a very fundamental thing that I've come to to understand that is that the these these evil people, they you know, if you listen to, you know, Harari, listen to Klaus Schwab, they believe that we're hackable animals.
• 37:30
  They believe that we don't have a soul, that we are just these these hackable bodies of cells that are no different than a computer. Once they understand it, they can hack us. But I believe that we have a soul. I believe in a higher power. Right?
• 37:44
  They don't believe that. Right? So for them, they don't believe in God. They don't believe in the divine. They don't believe in the creator.
• 37:52
  And so their whole plan is is based upon a lack of belief in God. Mhmm. And so but, like, we talk about how all of us have this conscience. We have this this gut feeling, which I believe is our soul that connects us to God and to and into, you know, the more divine realms that they they they don't they don't have a way to overcome that. So they they probably think that we can we can use our five g.
• 38:17
  We can use the programming of the television. We can use the alternative tuning for the music, all these different things to scramble people and turn them into these mindless zombies, but they can't turn us into soulless zombies. Right? Because those those souls are there, and they'll emerge at a certain point. That's when they're trying so hard to cover it up.
• 38:35
  And so I think that if we if we collectively can start to tap into that again, I I think that's the secret weapon. It's to realize that, you know what? God made me and he gave me sovereignty over my own over my own body. I have free will. And it's like, it's not that like, I'm gonna try to play your game and lose.
• 38:54
  It's just I'm just not gonna not gonna play your game. Like we win by just saying, well, we don't need you, and we're gonna do our own thing over here.
• 39:01
  Speaker 2: Yeah, absolutely. I agree 100%. I keep trying to explain to people, especially now right after Easter or Passover, that I'm not a religious person. I was born and raised as a Christian, as a Lutheran, but when I realized that there's no separation between in Germany between the church and the state, the state collects taxes for the church. And when I realized that some of the things that the churches had done over the centuries, not good things like the crusades or the conquistadors, which were really serial killers and lots of other stuff, you know, child abuse.
• 39:43
  I decided this is, I don't need any organized religion in order to believe that there's a higher power out there. Our value system, the Christian value system and mine, for example, it's almost the same. There's a few variations that don't really matter in the end. So that is exactly what I agree with you on. There is a higher power out there and this is an our spirituality which each and every one of us has inside themselves is what connects us and can't believe I'm saying this, I'm a rational lawyer.
• 40:23
  I've been a lawyer for the I've been a trial lawyer for thirty years, but this is how it is. There is a higher power out there and it will come to our aid once we rise up and we will rise up at the right time. And I think that's going to be soon. And brings us back to where we started five gs and microwave radiation frequencies. We are electric beings, we emit electricity, we need that for our brains to work, for example.
• 40:58
  And here's another thing about microwave radiation. I think the other side has been using this covertly using this in order to influence our frequencies, which should be in sync with the universe's frequencies. Again, there's smarter people than I who I'm going to interview in order to learn more about it. Physicists and others, people like Barry Trauer. But I truly believe that that is true.
• 41:28
  If we're in sync, our frequencies are in sync with those that surround us, and there's no question about it that there are these frequencies that surround the entire planet Earth, but also go through the entire universe, then we're probably going to be healthy. Of course, we're still going to have to eat the right food and exercise. But that is a very basic component, I believe, of our spiritual health, not just the physical health, but our spiritual health. And spirituality is something they don't understand. They know it's there, but they can't deal with it.
• 42:10
  I keep saying they don't we know how to, you know, sing and dance and love and have fun. They don't. Have, have you ever noticed they have no sense of humor? They don't know how to laugh at things. Sometimes they pretend, but it's usually very awkward.
• 42:26
  They don't know how to do it, but we do. And they
• 42:30
  Seth Holehouse: can't
• 42:30
  Speaker 2: deal with that. There's no way they can deal with it. They are destined to fail. They're destined to fail because they're thinking in digital currency, so to speak, one zero, one zero, one zero. But there's a lot of things that is in between this one zero one zero, creativity, intuition, we have it, they don't.
• 42:53
  Seth Holehouse: I couldn't agree more with that. One thing that I do want to ask you about a little further, going back to the the five g and the microwaving, is so in America, you can see, I I think within the past couple of weeks, there's been multiple mass shootings. Now, this is something that I've looked into before. And I don't really dig into it much publicly, because it's not one of those areas where you can really come out and and question it without getting attacked extensively. So I won't go into some other things that I might believe.
• 43:21
  But one thing that I have seen consistently is that the the perpetrators, the people that walk in with these guns and do this, almost always are on heavy psychiatric meds. There's been a lot of instances they've talked about hearing voices. They've talked about hearing, you know, voices in their head instructing them to do these kinds of things. I mean, it's not it's not normal. Right?
• 43:43
  And so if you look at again, if you look at the going back to the bigger picture of these very evil people that want to take over the world, they understand that America is really the it's it's the Holy Grail. If if they can't take America, they can't take the rest of the world, right, because it's just that it's you know, we're the beacon of freedom. Now one of the things that they do need to overcome though is the second amendment because they you know, if you look at if you look at any, you know, know, totalitarian regime that's come in, you know, whether it was Nazi Germany or the, you know, Soviet Russia or the CCP, it was always an unarmed population. There's never been an instance where a government was able to able to overthrow a well armed population. There's even examples that I think it was in Afghanistan during I think it was World War two that the Soviets couldn't even come close to overtaking Afghanistan because they were all armed.
• 44:37
  They knew how to so that they they couldn't even touch it because behind every door was probably an AK 47 or some sort of rifle. And so if you look at this and you think that, okay, these people have this kind of control that they we know they do. They control the media, the pharmaceutical companies. It's my is it I think perhaps it's speculative to think that perhaps there's something in the pharmaceutical drugs that goes inside of a person that allows that person to be easily manipulated through some sort of external thing. Right?
• 45:08
  Such as a radiation or etc. And if you kind of piece it all together, it almost makes too much sense that if they can create a pandemic through creating these symptoms through this radiation and basically giving people radiation poisoning and then thinking, oh, I better go get vaccinated for this, right, or wear my mask when it's actually perhaps radiation poisoning, that they would also use that same technology to create false flag events. And not to say that these people in these schools or churches aren't being killed. Don't wanna take away from that. But to me, it's looking at, well, who's really behind it?
• 45:45
  Who's orchestrating it?
• 45:46
  Speaker 2: I agree with that too. It's a very plausible explanation because it's very obvious that what we think our government is trying to do. They're trying to disarm the American people. And I agree with you, the war, not just the battles, but the war will be won in The United States. And probably, in large part due to the fact that the American people are well armed, and many of them are well trained as well.
• 46:20
  And that is why I also believe and others do too. It doesn't come out of nowhere that some of these shootings, I'm not saying they didn't happen, but some of these shootings obviously have been staged. Some of these terrorist attacks have been staged in order to make people believe that there's too many guns out there. That's why we need to get rid of the second amendment. Now I used to be very skeptical of the second amendment, but not anymore, not after these past three years and all these interviews that I've done.
• 46:59
  I now believe that the second amendment, they included it into the constitution in order to be able to defend themselves, the framers of the constitution, to defend themselves against their own government if it ever needed to be done, because that's where they all came from. They all came from European countries, The UK, for example, Great Britain, where they were either persecuted for religious or political reasons, They have to run away from their own government. And in case it ever got to that point again, that's why the Second Amendment was included in the American constitution. Now all of a sudden, makes perfect sense, not just to me, but to many others as well.
• 47:44
  Seth Holehouse: Yeah, it really does. I mean, similar to you when I was younger, I didn't understand it. And I thought, you know, why do you need a gun with, you know, 30 rounds to hunt deer? And that's the argument they oftentimes make. Well, now I'm realizing that it's not just it's not about hunting, actually.
• 48:00
  The second it has almost nothing to do with hunting. It's really about protecting yourself from tyranny, whether it's the own government or, you know, go go go watch Red Dawn where the the communists, you know, are parachuting in. You know, there's been a lot of talk of of wars of different sorts and whether China invades or Russia invades or who knows what or even the UN soldiers, who knows what, I think that, you know, the population having the ability to defend itself is really critical. So, anyway, I just want before we sign off, I want to ask, is there any place that people can find you or follow your work that you'd like to direct people to?
• 48:38
  Speaker 2: Yes. Our website is ICIC.law. ICIC stands for International Crimes Investigative Committee and then .law. That's where you'll find all of the interviews. Yes, we're in the process of setting up a new website because there's gonna be what we call the big bang.
• 48:59
  And that is due to this, the three missions of what we're about ICIC is one, exposing all of the information that is crucial for the people for them to make the right choices. Two, offer solutions. How do we create our own energy at no cost? How can a new economy, what can a new economy look like? But the third mission, that's why it's called the International Crimes Investigative Committee is to use all the facts that we learn from interviewing all these people as evidence in a court of law, because these are not just simple facts.
• 49:44
  These facts come from people from renowned professors of renowned universities like Professor Lutte Montagnier, we interviewed him shortly before he died. And I can't even begin to list them all, but I have personally interviewed them and some of them have become really good friends, Mike Eadon is one of them, And I have absolutely no reason to believe that any of them had lied to me. Now, I don't say this lightly because I've been a trial lawyer for almost thirty years now and I have interviewed over a thousand witnesses. And usually after about twenty seconds, I know this guy or this woman is lying to me or not. But with these people, it's totally different.
• 50:38
  They're risking, some of them are risking everything. They're not in it for the money. They're doing it because they believe we have to put an end to this and we must make sure that it never happens again. So the third mission is to put these people on trial, to put those people who are responsible and the entities are the corporations, Pfizer, the financial corporations through which they funnel their money to where they wanted to go, BlackRock and others, we're gonna put them on trial. I think we're gonna need to take down these corporations because the only reason why they're so powerful and rich is because they've stolen all of what they have, they've stolen it from us.
• 51:19
  And some of the people will have to go behind bars, some of them will have to pay damages. My friend Martin Schwab, not related to the evil Schwab, but he's a professor of law in Germany. He says, he's a Christian, of course, and he says, Rainer, we don't have to worry about the death penalty, the boss, he will take care of that. Maybe, but we're gonna to pick up the pieces and whatever is left after the higher power or the boss steps in, we're going to have to make sure that this is not going to ever happen again. There's a movie, I think, or maybe it's a series of movies that was made by Vera Sharif, who's a Holocaust survivor.
• 52:03
  And I think it's called Never Again Is Now, because that's what they said after World War II, this shall never happen again. And all of a sudden, things look eerily familiar, at least to those who have lived through the Third Reich and she's one of them. So we're gonna at this time, I think there's going to be a real great reckoning. We have had the facts that are necessary to stop this for a long time. We're learning more details, but we don't really need any more details.
• 52:37
  We know there's never been a pandemic, there was never a novel coronavirus. BioNTech Pfizer filed for a patent for their so called vaccine in November of twenty nineteen. Now, how can that be? And in this filing, they included all the adverse effects, myocarditis, blood clotting, everything was in there, they knew everything. So we're gonna have to do something about that.
• 53:07
  And that means we're gonna have to put them on trial. But the only thing that was lacking was a judiciary or a court of law that would give us a fair hearing. Filed for some of my clients, small and medium sized businesses in Germany, filed complaints against this aforementioned Dresden guy, who invented the PCR test at the behest or misused rather the PCR test, because the PCR test itself is a great tool, scientific tool. It's a great tool. That's why Kerry Mollis, one of the most intelligent and witty people I've ever seen.
• 53:43
  I only saw him in his videos, course, but that's why he got a Nobel Prize for it. But this guy and the WHO misused it in order to create cases that didn't exist. So all of these people have to go on trial, but where is the judiciary that will give us a fair hearing? In Germany, you will not find it because in Germany, the one judge who stood up and did something about it and stopped a school from torturing the children there based on the expert testimony he got from three professors from renowned universities. His house, his car and his office were searched three weeks after the ruling.
• 54:23
  His cell phone, his computer were seized. Same thing happened to the three experts. Same thing happened to the lawyer who represented the interests of the children, etcetera, etcetera. In the meantime, he's lost his job and he's on trial. They charged them with a crime, which doesn't even exist.
• 54:40
  But that's the way it is. And so our group of international attorneys who we conducted this model grand jury with, but that was a model proceeding. It was not the real thing. So many people would probably have accused us of conducting a kangaroo type thing, kangaroo court type thing. This group of international attorneys is still there.
• 55:06
  And we've been talking to a, let's say, totally, absolutely 1000% independent judiciary, which has been around for hundreds of years and which will give us a fair hearing. So as soon as that is cut and dried, we're gonna we're gonna make this public. And I think it'll give a lot of people a lot of hope.
• 55:27
  Seth Holehouse: Oh, that's great. It certainly has given me hope just hearing about it. So that's that's wonderful. Well, thank you so much for what you're doing and for putting your your career and your safety on the line to do this because we, I mean, there's really no option if you see the truth, you have to fight against what's happening. And thank you again for joining us today and for giving us this time.
• 55:50
  It's it's great to to speak with you. I really appreciate you coming on.
• 55:54
  Speaker 2: Thank you very much. Like I said, it's it's a real pleasure. It was fun talking to you.
• 55:58
  Seth Holehouse: Thank you. Alright, folks. I hope you enjoyed that interview. I've now got a quick economic update with Doctor. Kirk Elliott.
• 56:08
  So Kirk, as usual, it's so great to have you back on the show.
• 56:13
  Speaker 3: It's great to be with you and banks we've been talking about banks failing since they started failing here. Mean, it's been and it's been a wild ride, and and it started small. And it wasn't all really all that small. Silicon Valley Bank wasn't that small. But in the grand scheme of things, hundred and 73,000,000,000 in assets, in checking deposits.
• 56:37
  It's not small, but it's not large. It's not one of the big players, right? But it caused a contagion that's spreading, that's spreading across the world. So was one of the big problems with that is how are you going to fund a bank collapse? Or is there enough government money to do it?
• 56:57
  Right? Because FDIC is so underinsured. It's like 1.3% 1.38% of all deposits are that's all that FDIC has. But that's just what covers from zero to 250,000. Right?
• 57:10
  What about the accounts that are 250,000 or greater? Those are the uninsured deposits that that banks have. Right? Those are the things that if you lose that, you're toast. Right?
• 57:23
  Because there is no insurance to cover that. Well, this is where what I believe is coming next is as banks continue to fail. Because once you start to get a bigger bank, well now we've got huge problems. Because look at what a smallish bank like Silicon Valley Bank did, 173,000,000,000. That's not small in the grand scheme, but it is.
• 57:45
  When you've got a list of banks where the report just came out of how much uninsured deposits are out there. So yeah, look at this article on zero hedge. So if you look through this article, Silicon Valley Bank, obviously number one on that list. It's that first red line.
• 58:08
  Seth Holehouse: So this infographic basically, that's what they're saying is they're saying that today there is at least 7,000,000,000,000 in uninsured bank deposits in America. Right? So I think this is this is the reality that's settling in for people that a lot of these banks are close to being insolvent and actually that a lot of their deposits are uninsured. Meaning, so say people that have money sitting in the local bank, they had this illusion. It's almost like you think your house is insured for hurricanes, and a hurricane comes, you find out, actually, no, your house wasn't insured.
• 58:41
  It's like, oh, so people are realizing it. So this infographic I'll I'll hand it back over to you to explain this. This infographic is showing the top US banks by uninsured deposits. So can you walk us through this?
• 58:57
  Speaker 3: Yeah. So all of these are the deposits greater than 250,000. Right? So Silicon Valley Bank went under. 93 plus percent of their deposits were uninsured.
• 59:09
  If you look at number four on that list, Signature Bank, eighty nine percent of their deposits were uninsured. So what does it tell you that these banks that are failing are the ones where their uninsured amounts are too large and they fail because people start to get squirrely and say, I'm I'm pulling my money out. I'm I'm only I'm gonna have less than the FDIC limit in there. And so they start pulling out. Well, and the banks since summer of twenty twenty have 0% by by regulation that they have to keep back.
• 59:40
  Well, they're ripe for a run on the banks. Right, Seth? And so so look at the second bank on there. That's a big one. BNY Mellon Bank, 90 two percent.
• 59:50
  State Street Bank, absolutely massive, 91.2% uninsured. But look at this next one, Northern Trust. To me, this is one of the biggest ones on list because nobody really knows about what Northern Trust does, but they manage the custodial accounts for JPMorgan Chase. They're huge, absolutely huge. So they go under, okay, so does JPMorgan Chase.
• 1:00:14
  But then you look at the next one down, Citibank. Oh my word, 73% of all deposits. Now we're not talking about $173,000,000,000 in checking accounts.
• 1:00:26
  Seth Holehouse: So it's not trillion. What is that?
• 1:00:28
  Speaker 3: We're talking 17,000,000,000,000. Really? Oh gosh.
• 1:00:32
  Seth Holehouse: It's it's crazy because if I were to look at this, you know, say, okay, these are the uninsured banks. There's some part of maybe it's just a it's a confirmation bias or normalcy bias. Probably normalcy bias that thinks that, well, these are gonna be the banks like Silicon Valley Bank. They're in the riskier, you know, the tech stuff. But seeing Citibank on there, right, with 73% uninsured, and that's $17,000,000,000,000.
• 1:01:00
  But then scrolling down a little more, you've got JPMorgan with $32,000,000,000,000 and more than half of that is completely uninsured. I mean, I mean, and look, I don't wanna cause bank runs, but it's this information when people see this that makes them think maybe I shouldn't be keeping my money in the bank if this much of it is uninsured. And look, again, and you and I have talked about this, this is just calculating what's insured up to $250,000. But we know that of all the deposits up to up to $250,000 that the FDIC can only insure a fraction of those. So it's kinda like there's this illusion that, oh, well, half of the deposits are insured at JPMorgan.
• 1:01:51
  It's like, well, no. It's probably closer to, like, a few percentage. Is that I mean, am I right in my understanding?
• 1:01:57
  Speaker 3: Well, it's only 1.38% on average of all of these is actually I mean, they have so FDIC has 125,000,000,000. K? That's and and 21,000,000,000 of that was taken Silicon Valley Bank alone. That means they have 100,000,000,000 left. Well, look at look at some of these banks.
• 1:02:21
  How much How much of the $32,000,000,000,000 how much do you think JPMorgan Chase has in insured amounts? I don't know. I don't know. But this amount is absolutely massive because if you have a bank that fails and there's a lot of incestuous relationships in here because like I said, Northern Trust is very tied in with JPMorgan Chase. Well, they're they're number five on that list.
• 1:02:46
  Right? So if they go down, then people's deposits at JPMorgan are gonna go under. People are gonna get scared, pull their money out of JPMorgan. Now all of sudden, you've got 32,000,000,000,000 that wants to leave the system. And if JPMorgan goes down, everybody at Citibank is gonna say, what?
• 1:03:02
  The largest bank in the country just went under? What about us? And so you've got bank after bank after bank, where this is where that contagion can spread really quick. This is the exact reason why UBS had to buy Credit Suisse. Because if Credit Suisse would have gone under, they're not even on this list because they're not a North American bank, right?
• 1:03:26
  But Credit Suisse has $39,000,000,000,000 worth of derivatives exposure. They have upwards of $1,300,000,000,000 in checking accounts. So it's a lot. So then if they would have gone under, it would have spread to Deutsche Bank, it would have spread to UBS, and they had to do what they did to bail out the European banking system as well. This is how fragile this banking system is right now where one big bank going under upsets the whole apple cart.
• 1:04:03
  Right? They think that they got through the Silicon Valley Bank situation. No, they didn't. They just bought a little bit of time. Because if it's a big bank that goes under, you won't be able to stop the contagion from spreading.
• 1:04:16
  You just won't.
• 1:04:18
  Seth Holehouse: And that must be why we've got this article. This is from Rubini who they call the doctor Doom. I'd say he's probably pretty accurate where he's saying that most US banks are technically near insolvency, and hundreds are already fully insolvent. I mean, that this is major. It's like, look.
• 1:04:36
  Okay. If if someone told me that, say, most car manufacturers in America are close to insolvency, like, oh, that sucks. You know what I mean? But I've already got my car and, you know, there's other there's, you know, the Japanese cars and get those ones. And if Ford collapses, maybe there's gonna be some job losses.
• 1:04:54
  It wouldn't affect me very much. Right? But if these banks are insolvent if if my bank goes under and the FDIC says, sorry, we can't afford to to bail you out because these other ones went under? This is significant. I mean, is almost like, say you're on some sort of life, you know, kind of saving medication, and you find out that the company that makes it is insolvent.
• 1:05:18
  Like, you'd be like, okay. I gotta figure out how to find this medication somewhere else because this just can't work. I mean, this is this is really not a good situation, is it?
• 1:05:31
  Speaker 3: It's the end of a system as we know it, is really the ultimate ramifications. But here again, we've talked about this before in previous shows and on other shows that we've done, this is right where they want us. And by they, I'm talking about the globalists and the people who are bringing in the new system. Because if they can destroy the old system, their new system comes in really easily. And we have to always realize and never forget the same people bringing in the new one are the same ones that had the old one.
• 1:06:04
  They don't lose either way. In fact, they gain more because they gain the freedom that you once had. It goes to them. The ability to buy or sell when you want to. The ability to have private transactions, that goes the way of the dodo bird.
• 1:06:21
  And that's what they gain. This whole system that we're seeing, you know what, Seth? When when we've talked before about about the change of the world's reserve currency. You can't get that without complete implosion of a system because it's too big. It's like the reserve currency of the world that all international settlements are transacted in.
• 1:06:44
  Well, get rid of the petrodollar to decimate The US economy, and then erode people's faith and confidence in the banking system. Now you've got them exactly where they want them, and that's what I believe is happening right here is if you lose faith and confidence in the dollar and you've lost faith and confidence in your own bank, what's left? I mean, what should be left is your faith in God, right, that He's got this all under control. But yet this will erode people's faith, and it will extinguish their hope. But we know that there's hope.
• 1:07:22
  We do know there's
• 1:07:23
  Seth Holehouse: And that's the question, you know, that really kinda comes to mind. It's like, okay. If we've lost faith in the banking system, and fundamentally, we lose faith in the dollar, it's like, well, don't move your money from your savings to the stock market, which is still tied to the dollar. I know that that's one of the questions that people have is, okay, where do you move those funds? And, you know, to me, it's it's tangible assets.
• 1:07:46
  Right? Like, a pound of rice in America is still valuable in China. Right? It's still valuable in, you know, across the border in Mexico because it it's a tangible asset. It's not a fiat asset.
• 1:07:59
  You know, the the value of rice isn't because some board of rice producers says that rice is worth this much. Right? It's it's valuable because
• 1:08:06
  Speaker 3: it
• 1:08:07
  Seth Holehouse: feeds people. Right? So land, food, ammunition, brass. Right? These are all tangible assets, but then you have gold and silver, which is the reason why Russia has backed their currency with gold.
• 1:08:20
  Because even if, say, there's the US dollar that completely plummets and implodes in America, say you converted that dollar into a piece of silver, well, that silver still has value in the rest of the world. Therefore, it still keeps its value. Right? Is that the correct understanding? I mean, is that what do you think about that?
• 1:08:41
  Speaker 3: Correct. That's absolutely correct. And you look back throughout time when currencies collapsed, you go through inflation. Just the erosion that we've seen in our own currency back in the 1920s, so one hundred years ago, one ounce of gold was equal to $20 right? And what would it buy you though?
• 1:09:05
  And we've talked about this before, but it's a really good analogy for what we're talking about is the loss of purchasing power that comes from the erosion of inflation is extreme, and it's intensifying. See, but one ounce of gold used to buy you a finely tailored men's suit, a shirt, a tie, belt, and shoes. $20 today, it doesn't even get you a pair of nice socks. Right? So but one ounce of gold at a couple thousand dollars an ounce still gets you a finely tailored men's suit or shirt, tie belt, and shoes.
• 1:09:33
  Right? It's the insurance policy against a collapsing currency. It's maintained that purchasing power over time, and that's why we allocate into it, not just because of the amazing growth that we're seeing right now, but it's our freedom from a collapsing currency. It's our insurance policy to maintain our purchasing power over time. That's exactly what it does.
• 1:09:58
  Seth Holehouse: I I couldn't agree more. So for folks that are watching, listening, if you want to talk to Kirk or his team, set up a free consultation, just open up a new tab, head on over to goldwithseth.com. So goldwithseth.com or call (720) 605-3900. On the website, you scroll down, there's a little form you fill out. It's a free consultation to learn more about this.
• 1:10:22
  And look, folks, if you already have your own people that you trust for gold and silver, great. Right? Like, think that every patriot that values their freedom, again, I'm not a financial advisor, so please do your own research. But in my opinion, you can't go wrong with this, especially if you're concerned about what's happening in the markets, concerned what's happening with the dollar, the banks, etc. So goldwithseth.com.
• 1:10:45
  Doctor. Kirk Elliott, thank you so much for joining us as usual. It's it's great to have these updates because I feel like it changes every single day.
• 1:10:52
  Speaker 3: You're right. It's my pleasure. We'll talk to you again soon.
• 1:10:55
  Seth Holehouse: Alright. Take care.