Latest / UK Column Radio / Irrefutable Evidence With John Beaudoin—Part 2

Transcript

Irrefutable Evidence With John Beaudoin—Part 2 · UK Column Radio

• 0:07
  Hello, I'm Debbie Evans. Welcome to another UK column interview. Now this
• 0:15
  is part two of a very special interview that if you haven't seen part one,
• 0:21
  please go and look at part one because we're going to be meeting again
• 0:25
  John Bodwin today. Irrefutable evidence. What do you do when you get one
• 0:32
  and a half million unredacted death certificates through your door? Well that's what happened
• 0:40
  to John. And in part one we were talking about how that happened,
• 0:46
  why that happened, and the results of what he found out. And today
• 0:52
  we're going to be talking a bit about John's life before COVID, and I'm
• 0:57
  going to be joined by my great friend and Cheryl Granger, who is an
• 1:02
  independent pharmaceutical consultant trainer, and we're going to be not just exploring a bit
• 1:07
  about John's life, but also about what to go going forward and some of
• 1:14
  the data that he's uncovered. What can we do in the UK as a
• 1:19
  result of his findings in the USA. So let me start by first introducing
• 1:26
  John. John Bodwin, thank you so much. You're connecting via Massachusetts to
• 1:32
  the UK. Thank you so much for agreeing to talk to us yet again,
• 1:36
  because Part one, quite frankly, was fascinating. Welcome and it's always
• 1:42
  a pleasure to talk to you guys. It's been the last time was good,
• 1:46
  so I'm looking forward to this. Well, we've got tons of questions
• 1:49
  hence part two because it was fascinating and of course joining me Cheryl. Thank
• 1:53
  you so much for giving your time again and I know you're as excited as
• 1:57
  I am, so welcome back to another UK column interview. Thanks Debbie,
• 2:02
  Hello John. This should be just as fascinating hopefully. I mean, just
• 2:08
  remind you last time we talked about obtaining the death certificates or one point four
• 2:14
  million of them, and the errors and omissions and the false coding of all
• 2:20
  that day that the authorities had brought to us, and then they talk went
• 2:27
  around seasonality of the results and the age influence on the results of the reactions
• 2:34
  to the vaccinations, and then the symptoms the actual clear in John's analysis,
• 2:43
  and obviously the difference is then between twenty twenty and twenty one when the vaccines
• 2:47
  were then rolled out at the beginning of twenty one. And we also talked
• 2:51
  about some treatments which we might go on and talk about some more, but
• 2:54
  I'd like to go back to the beginning, and obviously was in Massachusetts,
• 3:00
  which is quite handy because that's where the death certificates first came from. And
• 3:07
  I think it would be interesting to hear a little bit more about your career
• 3:09
  prior to changing it to be a data analyst, and if you'd fill us
• 3:15
  in on your background and what makes you perfect for having this information come over
• 3:21
  your desk. Well, there's a lot there. I'll say a few things
• 3:24
  I haven't really said to the world yet, the one hundred and fifty podcasts
• 3:30
  or whatever I've done. I feel guilty in my career. You know,
• 3:37
  it was easy for me. I worked sometimes fifteen or twenty hours a week.
• 3:43
  That's all I needed to do. Was I was bored with everything else.
• 3:46
  And there's a lot of dinners. I won trips through the projects and
• 3:52
  contracts that I worked on, So there were large contracts for semiconductive research and
• 3:57
  development. Before that, it was a lot of board design and chip design.
• 4:01
  I didn't do the designs. I get to talk to engineers about their
• 4:03
  designs. So I would go visit a company and say what are you doing?
• 4:08
  They would tell me, and I'd say, oh, well, you
• 4:10
  know, if you change your architecture a little bit, you could use this
• 4:13
  chip and save board space, power time and deliver some type of value.
• 4:16
  If you deliver value to them, they're willing to pay you a portion of
• 4:19
  that value. That's really what sales should be about, instead of trying to
• 4:25
  jam a product down somebody's throat. So, yeah, I was. I
• 4:30
  was well trained. They put like forty thousand dollars a training it to me
• 4:33
  for public speaking, presentation, giving strategic planning. And that's where that's where
• 4:42
  everything I do comes from, its strategic planning. And although you know I
• 4:46
  would make fun of the training, I was kind of like the class clown
• 4:49
  in a lot of the trainings where I would not take it seriously. They
• 4:54
  thought I wasn't taking it seriously. But then I would use it and appreciate
• 4:58
  it, and it was just it's just a strange career I had. I
• 5:05
  I like, I think you heard me say on another podcast. I would
• 5:10
  get a private tour of the Vatican with the group I was with because the
• 5:13
  company paid a million dollars or so for that private tour and say, oh,
• 5:17
  here's the Sistine Chapel. Stay as long as you want you know,
• 5:20
  most people get ushered in and ushered out and groups sell jam together, and
• 5:25
  the Japanese contingent and our company pull out the cameras and start taking all the
• 5:29
  flash pictures, and all the signs say no flash pictures. They can't read
• 5:31
  English. So it was kind of funny. We had up to I think
• 5:36
  two hundred people that would go on these trips. So Monte Carlo dinner in
• 5:43
  the Princess Private Auto Museum. It's got some really cool cars going way back
• 5:46
  to the beginning of cars, and then all the Monte Carlo cars as well
• 5:50
  as you know, the original Ford Model T and stuff like that. So
• 5:55
  private tour of the Vatican, the Monty Carlo trip his time, Bolt was
• 5:59
  a good trip. The funny trip for me was New York City. All
• 6:02
  the guys from around the world are like, oh, we're going to New
• 6:04
  York City and I'm like, going to New York City. I have to
• 6:08
  jump on a train and take two hour trip down to New York City.
• 6:13
  At the Waldorf Historia, It's like, yeah, it's a little hotel room
• 6:15
  in a big city. To me, New York City was nothing right.
• 6:19
  It'd be like, you guys going to London and saying, Wow, we're
• 6:21
  going to London. It wasn't a big deal. But back to the important
• 6:27
  stuff. That's where I learned people, and that's what it comes down to,
• 6:32
  is understanding people. Whether it's reading psychology books and I think you mentioned
• 6:39
  ash conformity tests, there's the Milgrim experiments and all that stuff we learned in
• 6:44
  school actually applies. It really works when you evaluate people. How can I
• 6:48
  manipulate I say manipulate, it's not a very nice word. How can I
• 6:53
  get the guy on the other side of the table to sign the contract?
• 6:57
  What can I say to entice him? Either at the beginning of a two
• 7:01
  or three year program, and I planned things out for years, and what
• 7:06
  I'm doing with COVID data it's a strategic, multi year plan. I've been
• 7:12
  watching your podcasts, John, and I know that you know the lifestyle and
• 7:18
  the companies that you've worked for, and the amount of money that you've managed
• 7:25
  is immense, and then all of a sudden, you've gone from that to
• 7:31
  literally holding yourself up in an office pretty much twenty four to seven, three,
• 7:36
  six five analyzing all of this data. I mean that it's an extraordinary
• 7:44
  parallel universe that you're now living. And I just wanted our viewers and listeners
• 7:49
  to know really of the involvement that you had with these massive, great,
• 7:54
  big companies with huge budgets. I mean, how does it feel now to
• 7:58
  be so looking at all of that from where you where you are now,
• 8:03
  with what you found out. It's really weird, you know. I'm just
• 8:07
  I'm just a guy. I did a job. I was really good at
• 8:11
  it. Everybody in that business thinks they're the best in the business, but
• 8:16
  I really was. When I evaluate people, you know, it's almost not
• 8:24
  nice to psychologically try to figure somebody out, right, But in a job
• 8:31
  where you multi millions of dollars tens of millions of dollars without cost of good
• 8:35
  soul for your audience to understand, if I sell two hundred and fifty million
• 8:41
  dollars of computers, right, that's if I were to sell software, it's
• 8:45
  like twenty million. Why because the computers have a cost associated with them.
• 8:50
  When you're selling software, intellectual property, design services, things like that,
• 8:54
  well, the services do have a cost because you have to pay your guys
• 8:56
  to do the design. But with software, when you're doing very large deals,
• 9:03
  since there's no cost of good soul. It's all profit when you do
• 9:05
  the deal, when you're done at the end, and so it's equivalent to
• 9:09
  like two hundred and fifty million dollar deals that I was doing, and I'm
• 9:13
  nobody. I don't I'm not rich, I don't have a lot of money,
• 9:16
  really nothing left anymore. But how did I do that and then end
• 9:22
  up here? It's kind of weird. As I one thing we used to
• 9:26
  say in the business is there's no point in doing something somebody else is very
• 9:33
  good at unless you believe you can win through fragmentation or flanking or strategies that
• 9:43
  are not frontal. If you're going to go frontal, you have to have
• 9:45
  an overwhelming advantage. Your product has to be ten times better, it has
• 9:48
  to be much faster, it has to be much cheaper. It's if you
• 9:52
  don't have that frontal attack advantage, that overwhelming advantage. Sorry, if you
• 9:58
  don't have the overwhelming advantage, you can't go front them. You have to
• 10:01
  come in through. Hey, you know we're already doing business over here.
• 10:03
  Why don't you give me this little other side contract you try to fragment the
• 10:07
  company. The way I looked at this, the ideas the marketplace of ideas
• 10:13
  with covid is, I just assumed everybody was lying because when I saw Fauci,
• 10:18
  I knew immediately the guy was lying. It's just in my business.
• 10:22
  You just have to read people. And there are there are mechanics and electricians
• 10:26
  and hairdressers who can also discern somebody is lying to them. So it's nothing
• 10:33
  to do with that. There's training involved, and there's being intelligent, but
• 10:37
  that that social intelligence and being able to interact with somebody and read them.
• 10:43
  It's almost not trainable. Some of it is. You can teach somebody little
• 10:46
  cues to look for, but they'll make mistakes like I'm I have a skin
• 10:52
  allergy, so I touched my face a lot, and say, oh,
• 10:54
  you're lying because you touched your face. That's not always the case. Like
• 10:58
  there was a got an MBA late in life, fifty one through fifty four
• 11:03
  years old, and in one of the first classes, the professor said is
• 11:09
  talking to the class, it was organizational behavior. Well, you see,
• 11:13
  I can tell like John here in the front row, he has no respect
• 11:16
  for me because he's leaning to one side and he's not paying attention. And
• 11:22
  she said a bunch of stuff about me she didn't like me, obviously to
• 11:24
  the class full of much younger people. And then she said she asked me
• 11:28
  a question. I said, well, I got in a mountain biking accident
• 11:33
  three days ago, and you see I rolled up my sleeve as all these
• 11:37
  bloody scratches on my arm. I said, I also have a titanium plate
• 11:41
  in my neck with three vertebrae fused. And when I went over the handlebars
• 11:43
  of the bike three days ago, I not only fractured two vertebrae in my
• 11:48
  back, I also herniated the disc four C five, which is above the
• 11:52
  C five six seven fusion. And so I'm leaning to one side because I'm
• 11:56
  not taking painkillers so I can pay attention in class, and I'm in a
• 12:00
  lot of pain. Has got nothing to do with an attitude toward you,
• 12:03
  And she looked like an idiot in front of the class. So her assessment
• 12:07
  of me is of the I learned in a textbook. When somebody has this
• 12:11
  body language, then they must be this right. But she was completely wrong,
• 12:16
  and she doesn't have the ability to discern between an actual physical ailment.
• 12:20
  And I really wasn't paying attention. I was paying attention. I was taking
• 12:24
  notes so that ability to go beyond the textbooks and in the moment read somebody
• 12:33
  I picked up right away with Fauci and I thought, wow, they're going
• 12:37
  to kill a lot of people. As soon as they started all the social
• 12:41
  lockdowns and everything else. My immediate concern was husbands and wives that could be
• 12:50
  together for forty to fifty sixty years, all of a sudden they're going to
• 12:54
  have a problem. Why well, they're locked in a house for twenty four
• 12:56
  hours a day. That's never happened before. The guy has gone to work,
• 13:00
  he's out of the house for ten hours a day, and they can
• 13:03
  do that for ten twenty thirty years, but they can't do that for two
• 13:05
  weeks. If it's twenty four hours a day in a house. And if
• 13:11
  you go a little bit younger, right with parents with younger kids, you
• 13:15
  have abuses of the children, both sexually and physical abuse, where you're changing
• 13:20
  the social dynamics down to the very house level. Right. This all went
• 13:26
  through my head within minutes. I said, you're going to create negative externalities
• 13:31
  of pathologies in people where you're going to lose. You're gonna have people beaten
• 13:37
  and sometimes killed. You're gonna have drug addicts returned to doing drugs, and
• 13:41
  I was right about won't get into George Floyd. I did a whole show
• 13:46
  on him that was about being locked down. He was getting clean, and
• 13:52
  he went back and did drugs because he was told, Oh, by the
• 13:54
  way, your two jobs, you're fired from both of them. Stay in
• 13:58
  your house, surrounded by these low income in the low income housing that you're
• 14:03
  in, Stay there and be surrounded by drug dealers trying to stay clean from
• 14:07
  drugs. Like of course he did Fentendal and then we all went through the
• 14:11
  Bolm stuff. All that stuff went through my head immediately, and it's all
• 14:16
  played out exactly as I thought it would. But to understand the various aspects
• 14:22
  of externalities, and I use that word because it's an economics term. There's
• 14:26
  psychological, sociological, moral, philosophical, and then you get the biology,
• 14:31
  biology, and the physician doctor you guys call them gps over there. That's
• 14:37
  that's a tiny little piece of all this. The CARES Act is a behavior
• 14:41
  modification. When you look at what they've done, it's exactly what I would
• 14:46
  do in my career, putting a strategic plan together. And I'm going on
• 14:52
  past the you know how what happened in my career, but that's what I
• 14:56
  did in my career, and that's why I only worked ten to fifty hours
• 15:00
  a week, because I would look at something and figure it out and then
• 15:03
  come up with a plan. I was working probably sixteen hours a day for
• 15:09
  two months in compression time down to the end of the contract, making sure
• 15:13
  all my engineers were talking to their engineers and messaging messaging, messaging, saying
• 15:18
  the same thing over and over as part of the plan. But in the
• 15:22
  two and a half to three years it takes to develop the whole plan and
• 15:26
  contract, yeah, I wasn't working ten to fifteen hours a week, but
• 15:31
  then all the stress and compression. It sounds great, Oh, you make
• 15:35
  a lot of money you do a contract, but it's almost like psychological torture.
• 15:39
  I'm in the shower thinking about what I'm going to say to a guy
• 15:43
  and how I'm going to change his mind or manipulate him toward a contract term
• 15:48
  that's adverse to our position. And how do I get him to change that
• 15:52
  contract term. What am I going to trade him in return to get him
• 15:56
  to yield on that so that we can get something else, And what's a
• 16:00
  win win for both sides. I'm in the shower, I'm sleeping, I'm
• 16:04
  dreaming about it. I mean, it's a lot of stress for a couple
• 16:07
  of months as you come down to the end of that contract negotiation and negotiations
• 16:12
  planning. So it's really hard, it's really stressful. It's the kind of
• 16:15
  thing that creates heart attacks. But then for the next two years, it's
• 16:22
  not working hard, just making sure everybody on the team is doing their thing
• 16:25
  around the world in various engineering organizations. So, you know, that's my
• 16:30
  career. And because I have a very strange career of understanding the various purviews
• 16:37
  of you know, morality, psychology, sociology, economics, finance, accounting.
• 16:42
  I can just see the CARES Act for what it is as a behavior
• 16:45
  modification device. I can see the PREP Act. Well, I went to
• 16:51
  law school. That kind of rounded me out quite a bit. Three years
• 16:53
  ago. I went for a year before they kicked me out for not getting
• 16:56
  the vaccine and that kind of you know, I've been I've been academically lazy
• 17:03
  my whole life because I can get away with not working hard and using my
• 17:07
  brain. I made decent amount of money by doing so. And I've put
• 17:14
  all my time into raising my sons. I coached fifty teams of what you
• 17:18
  guys call football in America, we call it soccer. Fifty teams, a
• 17:22
  thousand games, five hundred excuse me, five hundred games, a thousand trainings
• 17:26
  or practices, a lot of time put in. And that's because family meant
• 17:32
  more to me than anything. And I had a difficult situation being a single
• 17:36
  father of three young boys, and you know, it really helped to not
• 17:41
  have to work hard and to use my brain to make a decent amount of
• 17:45
  money so I could spend more time with my sons and coaching them because it
• 17:48
  was important to me. That's that's how I came to be in this position.
• 17:53
  And when COVID hit, I looked at what was happening and I did
• 17:57
  something that they can't mess with. All cause deaths everything else. They're lying
• 18:03
  about cases. People were following cases, like why are people following cases?
• 18:07
  They're lying about all what's the point? And even looking at the data,
• 18:11
  you won't find me talking about cases in the last four and a half years.
• 18:15
  It's a waste of time because all the cases were predicated on that pcr
• 18:18
  BS. Right, You guys know what BS is over there, right,
• 18:25
  Okay, So I never looked at cases. The only thing they couldn't mess
• 18:30
  with is all caused death. And what I said back then, I said
• 18:33
  it out loud, is the only way they can mess with all cause death
• 18:37
  is to actually murder people. And there's no way they're doing that. That's
• 18:41
  how I felt. That's what I said, There's no way they're doing that,
• 18:45
  and I was wrong. But in the context of that time, I
• 18:51
  noticed that some bigger name guys were picking up all cause mortality, and I
• 18:55
  thought, well, if they're doing it, why should I do it?
• 18:56
  Because they're smarter, they have PhDs. I'm done with all CAUs and I
• 19:02
  moved on to the law school and then I started looking at when the vaccine
• 19:06
  came out in early twenty one, I thought, okay, let's compare COVID
• 19:11
  death rates in places where the vaccine is and look at vaccine uptake rates.
• 19:17
  And I looked at Trinidad and Tobago. They didn't have any COVID deaths for
• 19:21
  a year, and then they started vaccinating. In two weeks after they started
• 19:25
  vaccinating, they started getting COVID deaths. And Vietnam excuse me, yeah,
• 19:30
  Vietnam, but I think it was Taiwan. I looked at and then I
• 19:33
  looked at I threw in an eastern European country, just to make sure I
• 19:37
  had somewhat of a seasonal northern climate, because Trinidad and Tobago's in the Caribbean,
• 19:42
  and Taiwan's pretty hot and the same temperature all year round pretty much.
• 19:48
  So I always looked at seasons. I figured out seasonality way back, and
• 19:52
  I looked at the one confusing place was Bolivia, and I couldn't figure out
• 19:57
  Bolivia did not fit my model, and it was driving me crazy until I
• 20:02
  looked at a satellite photo of Bolivia and I saw a bunch of brown like
• 20:06
  I thought it was like South American junglely and I looked. I'm like,
• 20:10
  oh, the most populous city is ten thousand feet ten thousand feet high.
• 20:15
  It doesn't get hot there, it's cool. So it didn't fit the model.
• 20:19
  I had the wrong seasonality. And then I looked at the second most
• 20:22
  populous city. It's in the jungle, and I started looking at city by
• 20:26
  city and like, oh, it does fit the model. The seasonality and
• 20:29
  temperature variations do work. Deaths rise when you get to cooler temperatures, obviously,
• 20:37
  and so I looked at things that were different from most people. And
• 20:41
  when the bigger name started looking at something, I walked away from it.
• 20:45
  But then when I got the database, I tried to give it to PhDs.
• 20:49
  They did some analyses nothing. The only guy that did so, Joel
• 20:55
  Smalley in the UK, did a really good job with the first article with
• 21:00
  regard to our cause in the database, but then having given it to professors
• 21:06
  at universities like three of them, nothing came of it. So I guess
• 21:11
  I got to do it myself. And the more I looked at it,
• 21:14
  the more I realize that I'm doing things that nobody else has done. And
• 21:18
  why doesn't epidemialogy look at the most obvious data signals? And that's kind of
• 21:23
  how I got into all this. So that's a long winded version. Thank
• 21:27
  you so much for that, John, And I think I'm going to come
• 21:32
  on later in the interview to talk to you about something that you've just said
• 21:36
  you're very passionate about, which is family and youngsters, and I think that
• 21:40
  everybody watching will completely identify with that. And what I'm going to say is
• 21:45
  there's going to be a very important message for youngsters during this video, during
• 21:51
  this interview, so please stay with us. But for now, I'm going
• 21:56
  to throw back to our good friend Cheryl because she wants to ask you about
• 22:00
  Massachusetts and why was the Massachusetts data so important? So Cheryl over to you.
• 22:07
  Yeah, John, I mean I can understand completely what you're saying with
• 22:11
  vouching what have you, because every night we had three students talk to us
• 22:17
  about figures, and they constantly told how many people had died. Didn't tell
• 22:22
  me that that's of COVID. They didn't tell anybody at about how many people
• 22:26
  normally died in a normal day. You know, it was all taken out
• 22:29
  of context, and to me, the whole thing is illogical and unscientific.
• 22:33
  I didn't understand it at all. And of course, the National Health Service
• 22:37
  became the National COVID Service because you weren't allowed to go there unless you were
• 22:41
  stopping breathing and suffering from COVID that a PR or other had told you You've
• 22:48
  got. So I can completely understand what you've just been saying. So I
• 22:52
  want to take you back to Massachusetts and why the Massachusetts data was so important,
• 22:57
  And I can put a slide up some information that I pinched from some
• 23:03
  of your chats, and basically this is talking about the number of people I
• 23:11
  presume with COVID in twenty twenty of our debt. But it also links into
• 23:18
  all the other things around the Massachusetts area that makes it an ideal test place
• 23:23
  for the launch of all this. Yeah, thank you. I've given this
• 23:29
  part so many times. I'll whip through it pretty quickly. The issue of
• 23:33
  why Massachusetts is so important, It's not just that I live here. Massachusetts
• 23:37
  has about six hundred pharma companies in the ecosystem of pharma. They sell to
• 23:44
  pharma like materials to produce things. Forty seven billion dollars in venture capital financing
• 23:49
  is behind new pharma companies that start in Massachusetts. There are fifty companies over
• 23:55
  one hundred million dollars a year in revenue in farma in Massachusetts and ten companies
• 24:00
  over a billion dollars a year in revenue in pharma in Massachusetts. Maderna's headquarters
• 24:04
  in R and D is in Massachusetts. Pfiser's divisional headquarters for their mRNA injection
• 24:10
  is in Massachusetts. The CDC director during COVID was Rochelle Wallanski. She's one
• 24:17
  of them, Robert after Robert Redfield, and she's from Massachusetts. My congressman
• 24:22
  is Jake Auchincloss. His father was Fauci's number two for many years, Hugh
• 24:30
  Auchincloss. So Massachusetts is central to all of this pharmasty. They are the
• 24:36
  number one state in the entire United States for NIH National Institutes of Health funding
• 24:41
  from the federal government. And it's kind of interesting that if you if you
• 24:48
  were to look at that slide I had up that said July twenty seven,
• 24:52
  that's a snapshot of in time where I tracked for the first year and a
• 24:57
  half, year and a half, less than a year and a half.
• 25:00
  I think it was up until June twenty twenty one that I tracked every month
• 25:06
  on the twenty seventh of every month, what are the purported number of COVID
• 25:10
  deaths for every sovereign? And a sovereign in my case, I define it
• 25:15
  as any nation or United States state that has three million or more people.
• 25:22
  So if a state had three million or more people, I would it would
• 25:26
  be on the list. And any nation that had three million or more people.
• 25:30
  And in the entire world, the sovereigns with the highest purported COVID deaths
• 25:37
  per population, or New Jersey, New York, Massachusetts so so much that
• 25:44
  they ran away from the world in purporting claiming that there were so many COVID
• 25:48
  deaths that Belgium was a distant fourth. In fact, Massachusetts was fifty percent
• 25:53
  more than Belgium. And a lot of people say Belgium is the most corrupt
• 25:57
  country in in Europe, and I don't know, I'm not from there,
• 26:02
  but I'll believe. And it's of course there's no way to measure it,
• 26:07
  but yeah, there's a lot of stuff going on in Belgium from the whole
• 26:11
  EU perspective, and I would say, yeah, where you get power,
• 26:15
  you get corruption. And so if Belgium is the number one, there in
• 26:18
  Massachusetts is fifty percent more. And then you look at the context of the
• 26:23
  situation again, where a virus starts halfway around the world in China, but
• 26:29
  the three places New York, New Jersey, and Massachusetts with the most to
• 26:33
  gain reported the most deaths. What a coincidence. So yeah, having the
• 26:40
  Massachusetts data is not just because I live here, It's because it is the
• 26:44
  center of all this pharma stuff that's explained brilliantly. I'd like to put the
• 26:48
  next side up back on Stephanie, which would allow just to summarize all these
• 26:55
  main points, some stunning points that we made in part one. My picture
• 27:02
  is blocking out the first two. So it said they weren't, Oh,
• 27:04
  they weren't given antibiotics. Yeah, how did they drive the numbers up?
• 27:08
  And why do I say it was basically murdered? It wasn't. The all
• 27:14
  cause increases actually were murder. Here I am three years later refuting myself from
• 27:19
  twenty twenty, where I thought they would never do that. The individuals who
• 27:22
  did it didn't know they were doing it. It was a consequence of the
• 27:26
  behavior modification of the policies and laws that were put in place, and the
• 27:32
  people who did it centrally, like at the NIH who came up with the
• 27:36
  COVID treatment protocols, the COVID treatment recommendations, and you can google that right
• 27:41
  now, NIH Space COVID DASH nineteen Space Treatment Space Recommendations that'll come up with
• 27:52
  a page if you do a search for that, and in that page it'll
• 27:55
  still say rembes vere now and it did. On April twenty. First,
• 28:00
  they came up with a protocol and they haven't changed it four and a half
• 28:03
  years, as if they haven't learned anything. And in that protocol they put
• 28:10
  in ventilators and stuff like that, and they knew within months. Doctors knew
• 28:15
  within months the ventilators were killing people, but they did it anyway, so
• 28:21
  they caused bacterial infections. They said, oh, there's no point in giving
• 28:26
  antibiotics for a virus, you'll create antibiotic resistance in the patient. Well,
• 28:34
  if somebody's dead, then they're not very well antibiotic resistant, are they or
• 28:37
  are they? It doesn't matter. No, it doesn't matter. You killed
• 28:41
  them because you withheld the life saving antibiotics that they needed at the time.
• 28:47
  And that did happen. So they drove through many avenues. It was antibiotics
• 28:52
  through coercion from the American Board of Internal Medicine, Family Medicine, the Federation
• 29:00
  of State Medical Boards, the state licensing boards, the protocols from the NIH,
• 29:06
  FDA, CDC, those all combined in various ways to modify the behaviors
• 29:11
  of the doctors who thought they were prescribing what was going to save the patient
• 29:15
  because the NIH said it would. And they've all become robots that just follow
• 29:19
  what the NIH says to do. Let's see hospital protocol murders. You know,
• 29:27
  somebody at the top knew what they were doing. Like I said,
• 29:30
  if you get central authority, then they can get people downstream to do a
• 29:33
  lot of crazy stuff and not even know that they're killing people. More than
• 29:37
  half a million people died from the COVID vaccine, but another half million,
• 29:42
  and this is the United States numbers. I'm talking about another half million from
• 29:47
  the hospital protocols recently. I'm just gonna instead of reviewing this right here,
• 29:53
  I'm going to say something brand new, which is and we're going to come
• 29:57
  out with a press release next week. I went down to Connecticut because I
• 30:02
  now have their records and I have Minnesota too, so I have three states
• 30:06
  now, three major states. Vermont is very small, but we have that,
• 30:08
  so we have four states. Aaron Hertzberg and New York got that.
• 30:14
  So Connecticut I went down and I handed them the Attorney General's office, the
• 30:21
  Governor's office, and the Public Health Commissioner's office. I handed them a brief.
• 30:26
  And in that brief, it's twenty two pages, but it's double space.
• 30:30
  It's not a lot of it's just kind of fluffy stuff I have to
• 30:33
  write. But when it comes to the grass, a cute renal failure alone.
• 30:37
  If you look at a cute renal failure excess deaths in the context of
• 30:42
  history, it's the worst thing in one hundred years. Say, how can
• 30:47
  that be? Nobody's talking about it, nobody knows about it. Like,
• 30:49
  no, it really is. One hundred and fifty five thousand excess acute rental
• 30:55
  failure involved deaths in the last four years. And it's not COVID. Didn't
• 31:00
  happen in the first wave. This is really important. I would like to
• 31:06
  know, and I have somebody looking into it. Did it happen in Europe?
• 31:10
  Did end one seven acute renal failure go up in Europe? If you
• 31:12
  have different things happening in terms of the human body from the same disease,
• 31:17
  well it can't very well be the disease. It's the treatment. They killed
• 31:22
  half a million people here, one hundred and fifty five thousand of which died
• 31:26
  with acute renal failure on their death records. To put that in perspective,
• 31:30
  it's more than polio and small box and everything. This happened in the last
• 31:33
  hundred years because the Spanish flu was one hundred and four or five six years
• 31:40
  ago, one hundred and six years ago, So in the last hundred years,
• 31:45
  there's nothing else that comes close to the thing that they're not even looking
• 31:49
  at, not even looking at it where they have a legal duty to look
• 31:52
  at that. And that's the message I delivered to the officials in Connecticut last
• 31:56
  week. There's more coming, There's more vaccine, there's more on cancers.
• 32:01
  As I roll out these studies all summer long about Connecticut, I'm going to
• 32:07
  wrap in Massachusetts and Minnesota, and the world will see what people are dying
• 32:10
  from. The system I put together is better than any public health analysis system
• 32:16
  that we've seen from any of the governments in the United States. And I
• 32:20
  use the plural word because every state has its own government and is sovereign.
• 32:24
  So every state public health department and every federal agency like FDA, CDC,
• 32:30
  and NIH they have like two hundred and fifty thousand people in all those agencies,
• 32:34
  and one guy in a basement with a computer who has an engineering degree
• 32:37
  put together a bed, a better early morning system and historical investigational tool to
• 32:43
  look at what is killing people, who is dying, when are they dying.
• 32:46
  The whole thing that I wrote in my book about seasonality profile, age,
• 32:51
  age spectrum profile, cause or symptom spectrum profile. So that's what I
• 32:57
  did last week, went down to Connecticut and out agains the analysis of Connecticut.
• 33:01
  Next week you'll see more work. Ed Dowd is also coming out with
• 33:06
  something the exact same time next week, and that is with regard to acute
• 33:12
  renal failure as well. They came up with a number of one hundred and
• 33:15
  fifty three thousand access I came up with one hundred and fifty five thousand.
• 33:17
  So you have two different groups, two different methodologies, using two different databases,
• 33:22
  came up with roughly the same number. It's real, and it goes
• 33:24
  down to twenty five years old, not eighty one year old COVID deaths,
• 33:30
  up to ninety eight year old COVID deaths. This is real. They're really
• 33:34
  killing people and they die in the hospital. And you know, if it's
• 33:38
  not the protocols, it's not real desevere, if it's not the vaccine,
• 33:44
  If they say everything they're doing is right, then what is it. Why
• 33:47
  are they avoiding study of the most prolific killer in the last one hundred years
• 33:53
  in the United States. Why won't they do their jobs to investigate? Because
• 33:59
  how easy is it to investigate? It would take one man week for an
• 34:02
  astute person to look through certain records. You find anybody twenty five to forty
• 34:07
  four is about you know, say there's one hundred or two hundred of them.
• 34:12
  You can look through the medical files and do searches. What were their
• 34:15
  vital signs after they got rumed sverre and you have them hourly in the hospital.
• 34:21
  What were their blood labs and you've got them like once or twice a
• 34:23
  day. And from the blood labs and imaging and vital signs and the times
• 34:30
  at which they were administered medications and looking at the liver enzymes and looking at
• 34:35
  the creatinine levels, you can figure out what caused their kidneys to fail that
• 34:40
  killed them. It's that easy. But they these two hundred and fifty thousand
• 34:45
  people who work for governments across the United States, none of them are looking
• 34:50
  at this. Nobody's talking about this. It's the biggest killer in one hundred
• 34:52
  years. And if people say, oh, COVID, say no, Acute
• 34:57
  renal failure is bigger. If you look at the life years lost because life
• 35:00
  years last, you have to multiply by the number of years that they otherwise
• 35:04
  would have lived. And when compared to COVID a few renal failure is worse
• 35:08
  and it affects more people in society, being that if somebody forty years old
• 35:14
  dies, right with a ten year old, a twelve year old and a
• 35:16
  sixteen year old kid, then you're affecting them those people too for the rest
• 35:22
  of their lives. This is what seems to happen here with our MHR.
• 35:25
  They're picking up on small signals that they might want to mention. And I
• 35:30
  know you said that only my courdiitist is talked about as limited handout to play.
• 35:36
  It's the small things that they're looking at, not the major things.
• 35:39
  So we have had reports in our press about vaccine due from pacitic thrombcytepenia,
• 35:46
  which had I think for four hundred and forty five cases reported eighty one deaths
• 35:53
  about but compared with you know, sudden adult sudden death syndrome and what have
• 36:01
  you, there's a lot of death reports that are being ignored. They're not
• 36:07
  taking any of the major areas. Like you've just said, with your working
• 36:12
  failure. They're not taking and looking at those things. They're just looking at
• 36:15
  something so that they can say there's some side effect, but it's not.
• 36:20
  Something comes to this point of making every side effect mentioned into extremely rare andresumably
• 36:30
  telling us that's the same in the States. Yes, yeah, when they
• 36:35
  talk about if they can elevate the reach and voice of an individual who only
• 36:40
  talks about milcarditis, I say they being say whether it's military intelligence, the
• 36:46
  CIA, or a consortium of social media who conspire to send messages out to
• 36:52
  the people, but if they can get us all talking about one thing that's
• 36:55
  rare instead of the thing that's killing people at two orders magnitude greater, one
• 37:00
  hundred times more deaths are occurring from X versus Y, and they're only talking
• 37:06
  about why. It allows them to say it's rare. On the other side,
• 37:08
  right, our opponents, our adversaries, that is what's happening now,
• 37:13
  trauma You mentioned trauma, side openia. Those numbers are very well, it's
• 37:16
  happening a hell of a lot more than that. But the question is why
• 37:21
  is it happening? And people would say, well, it can't be causing
• 37:25
  all of these ailments. It can't be causing all of this stuff. Well,
• 37:29
  yeah, it can, because it's really only one thing. The blood
• 37:32
  is dysregulated blood and blood formation at the cellular level where you have the three
• 37:38
  major cell types like traumocytes are platelets, right, erythrocytes, red cells,
• 37:45
  and then in white cells, you have a whole bunch of different white cells,
• 37:49
  so many different white cells, and the dysregulation of the immune system has
• 37:53
  to do it. That's blood formation right along with the red cells and the
• 37:58
  platelets. Traumacyte openia is a low platelet cant so you can't clock. Your
• 38:04
  intracranial hemorrhages are in the setting of traumacyde openia, Your gastrointestinal hemorrhages are in
• 38:09
  the setting of tramacyde openia. And when you add up all these hemorrhages around
• 38:14
  your body, be they a large one or or like carpet bombing with with
• 38:19
  a bunch of little ones like leaky brain early on set dementia due to you
• 38:24
  know, leakage of capillarias in your brain. And I'll say from March year
• 38:30
  a dough you should have him on to talk because he he has a lot
• 38:35
  of really good information of transfection T cell attack where it strips the end of
• 38:39
  thelia, ligning of your inside, lining of your blood vessels, and then
• 38:44
  he can explain why a lot of things are happening. We don't agree that
• 38:49
  it's everything. He thinks it's it's ever everything has to do with that,
• 38:52
  and you know, we can we can agree on ninety percent, disagree on
• 38:55
  ten percent. But for what we agree on, I believe if he's absolutely
• 39:00
  right, and it manifests in traumacytepenia and other like clotting, like low plate
• 39:07
  account is traumacytepenia, Well, how is that happening in the same context of
• 39:12
  clotting. How can you have low plate account and clotting. I'm not a
• 39:17
  biologist or a doctor, and I don't like to get into this, but
• 39:21
  there are certain white cells that if disregulated macrophages will and what they're part of
• 39:27
  their job is to clean up old traumocytes. Traumacytes last like ten to twelve
• 39:31
  days. If you start killing them at one to two days, then you're
• 39:37
  going to have a low plate account instead of letting them live to do their
• 39:42
  job. Right, So, even though you're creating plenty of traumacytes, plenty
• 39:45
  of platelets. You have a low plate account because they're all being eaten up
• 39:50
  and killed by these disregulated macrophages who are going beyond their mission and killing good
• 39:55
  platelets instead of dying platelets. Just wanted to comment on trauma sites. Yeah,
• 40:02
  John, that was great. What the other thing that people seem to
• 40:07
  fall back on a lot that gets reported by mainstream media is how many houses
• 40:14
  have been saved, whereas I believe it's the reverse of that. Have you
• 40:17
  got any idea what figure you've put on to that access you to treatment?
• 40:23
  Yeah, those are impossible numbers to actually figure out. But you know,
• 40:30
  my opinion, having looked through all the data is they haven't saved anybody.
• 40:32
  They killed a lot more people than they saved, and that manifests across the
• 40:37
  age strata. So let's look at Massachusetts, and Massachusetts is different. They
• 40:43
  killed a lot of people up front and the pandemic through the policies, and
• 40:47
  then later on Minnesota caught on nine months later and started enacting those policies and
• 40:52
  killing people. But in Massachusetts, the really old people were wiped out in
• 40:59
  nine weeks, eighty eight hundred people in mid March to mid June, and
• 41:05
  then nothing really happened with regard to COVID deaths over the summer, and they
• 41:08
  started up again in November, and when they started up in November, going
• 41:13
  into the new year, they started vaccinating. What happened was there was there
• 41:17
  was a shift where there was a deficit in the old people that they're really
• 41:22
  eighty five plus. So the eighty five pluses, the ones who would die
• 41:28
  die, they're not around to die a second time, and so the rest
• 41:31
  that were left were super healthy, and so there was a deficit of deaths
• 41:37
  fewer than normal from February to June July of twenty twenty one. Now that
• 41:44
  deficit canceled out the excess deaths that started in January for the sixty five to
• 41:52
  eighty four group, so sixty five. If you look at sixty five plus,
• 41:57
  you have what's called the Simpsons paradox, where negative one and plus one
• 42:01
  you add them and at zero so there appears to be no signal. But
• 42:05
  if you separate them like I did, you find that the deficit in one
• 42:09
  cancels the excess in the other, where they say there is no excess and
• 42:14
  they say, oh, we're saving people because the deaths are going down it's
• 42:17
  like the deaths are down because the deficit in the eighty five year olds.
• 42:22
  It should be down even more. Though, if you were actually saving the
• 42:25
  people sixty five to eighty four, and if you were actually saving the eighty
• 42:30
  five plus people, then there should be a deficit in the aggregate, which
• 42:36
  there wasn't. It looked normal based on twenty fifteen through twenty nineteen, but
• 42:42
  how do you account for the fact that a bunch of people are dead already
• 42:45
  and can't die twice. There should be a deficit less than normal. And
• 42:50
  when you look at all these signals and combine them, you realize there was
• 42:53
  excess death in sixty five to eighty four beginning in early twenty one when they
• 43:01
  started vaccinating people. So it wasn't a live saved, it was a lives
• 43:06
  taken. They were taking lives with those vaccines. There's no other way you
• 43:10
  can figure it out. The lockdowns were done. The society was we weren't
• 43:15
  normal, But you know, the bigger excess would have occurred from COVID in
• 43:20
  that age range. And then you start going down even younger and you find
• 43:24
  that let's take a look at pneumonia, COVID and all casts. The graphs
• 43:29
  all look exactly the same. Where you had the first wave that didn't really
• 43:34
  affect that the younger people in the mid March to mid June, and then
• 43:38
  you start with your November second wave that went through February didn't really affect them
• 43:45
  either then, and then you go into the third wave another year later,
• 43:50
  and all of a sudden, you have far more people dying of pneumonia after
• 43:52
  being vaccinated too, sometimes three times. Some people had three shots by then
• 44:00
  the third wave. How do you have far more people dying of pneumonia after
• 44:06
  getting their vaccines having survived two full waves of COVID with the killer variants.
• 44:10
  If you believe in the variant talk right, it makes absolutely no sense.
• 44:15
  So as far as life's saved, they didn't save anybody. Those vaccines saved
• 44:22
  nobody. There's no signal in the data. The curves were already going down
• 44:29
  when a lot of people were being vaccinated. If you go down through the
• 44:31
  age groups, they started with the really old people in January February. They
• 44:35
  had the second shots by the end of February, sometimes March in the nursing
• 44:38
  homes and stuff like that, And then you get into the Okay, now
• 44:42
  the sixty five plus can get it, and that was like April, and
• 44:45
  then May was like maybe forty five plus. But there's a whole schedule where
• 44:50
  in age groups they rolled it out from January to May, and it's like,
• 44:54
  oh, I can't wait to get my COVID shot. My age group
• 44:58
  is coming up. They're gonna save me. It's like, no, they
• 45:01
  killed a bunch of people. Yeah, no, that's that's interesting. I
• 45:06
  mean, one of the things that I've been talking about the ascument analysis is
• 45:10
  the latest reports have been defined in these vaccines as therapy gene therapy. And
• 45:21
  does that make a difference in your mind to what's going to happen with the
• 45:25
  care Is Act. Oh, the Cares Act. Well, you know,
• 45:30
  CARES Act is a rat's nest of calling other laws. So you got the
• 45:36
  PREP Act, the Cares Act, and you have the CMS dot gov in
• 45:40
  the n c TAP program and the payouts, it's really difficult to trace the
• 45:45
  accounting. Even the hospitals they are getting paid, they know where to submit
• 45:50
  their claim to get paid, they don't know all the law that it takes
• 45:54
  to that enables that payment. But getting to the law and the policies the
• 46:08
  CARES Act, like I said, as a behavior modification. It's it was
• 46:14
  never intended to save anybody. Nothing in there has anything to save anybody or
• 46:21
  to give money to the states so that the states could save anybody. Everything
• 46:24
  in there is a modification of behavior of hospital administrators to kill people for money,
• 46:30
  to use ventilators, to prescribe from do severe, to make sure that
• 46:37
  what it was at ivermectin and hydroxychloric whin or not you So, yeah,
• 46:43
  the laws that are put in place were never intended to save anybody. In
• 46:47
  fact, the Cares Act was written in twenty eighteen, twenty eighteen, they
• 46:52
  changed a few variables, it was finalized in twenty nineteen, and when COVID
• 46:57
  hit, they changed a few variables in March of twenty So the intent was
• 47:01
  never disave a lot of people. But the PREP Act would be demnifying the
• 47:10
  use of vaccines, wouldn't it. So we're talking here now about a genetic
• 47:15
  product and therefore it doesn't go into the same banner. So can you see
• 47:21
  that that would change it? Yeah, I'm glad you said that, because
• 47:23
  I forgot to address the most important part of your question. What is a
• 47:28
  vaccine. Yeah, it's they have to change the definition of vaccine, so
• 47:34
  legally, now you know, from from this point on, maybe they can
• 47:37
  call it a vaccine. You have to define something before you debate or argue
• 47:40
  about it. No, it was never a vaccine. It's gene drug therapy.
• 47:45
  I'm not a biologist, really not qualified to talk about it, except
• 47:47
  to say I'm a human being and I can discern, I can read right
• 47:52
  and very simply it did not meet the definition of vaccine before COVID period.
• 47:58
  Nobody can refuse that they had to change the definition in order to call it
• 48:02
  vaccine. Why. Because vaccine is an accepted word within society. People mostly
• 48:07
  associate vaccines with something good. People wouldn't take. Oh, try this new
• 48:14
  gene drug therapy that just came out that hasn't been tested. Nobody's going to
• 48:17
  sign up for that, but they'll sign up for Oh, this is a
• 48:22
  new vaccine. Oh vaccine. Oh, vaccines have been around for hundreds of
• 48:25
  years. I'll take a vaccine. So the word play is again it's they're
• 48:31
  marketing it to you and they're manipulating you with words. They also changed the
• 48:36
  word anti vaxer. People don't realize that there actually was a definition. It
• 48:40
  used to be that it's anybody who's against all vaccines. They changed the definition
• 48:45
  to mean not only anybody who's against just one vaccine, but it's also anybody
• 48:51
  who's against any government edicts, law, or mandate with regard to vaccines.
• 48:55
  So if you don't agree with the government in any way, you're now called
• 48:59
  an antibaxer, whereas the old definition was you're against all vaccines. Very different
• 49:05
  definition. And then the use of the word anecdote. They relegated the most
• 49:09
  important evidence, which is case case history, case studies, to be called
• 49:15
  anecdotal evidence. You even hear doctors programmed to call a case study anecdotal evidence.
• 49:23
  When I say, they've relegated it to the trashyt that is now the
• 49:28
  lowest form of evidence, where the highest form is a peer reviewed, randomized
• 49:31
  controlled trial research paper from halfway around the world with a different water supply,
• 49:36
  genetics, and food supply than the patient standing in front of you. So
• 49:39
  you read the paper and you go, as a doctor, you do what
• 49:43
  the paper says, instead of the patient right in front of you, who
• 49:46
  might be completely different than the body of people that the paper was written about.
• 49:52
  It's crazy. So, yeah, vaccines is different. The gene drug
• 49:55
  therapies are not vaccines. They've conned the world through wordplay and manipulation, and
• 50:04
  they've gotten the masses to accept something using a previously accepted word that really had
• 50:09
  nothing to do with the gene drug therapy. They were trying to shove down
• 50:14
  your throats. And actually you brought me onto a subject that I wanted to
• 50:17
  discuss with you as well, because you're a gentleman with many hats, and
• 50:23
  the law is also you were studying the law, right, can you?
• 50:29
  I have got a little video because what I love so much about many of
• 50:32
  your channels, and we're going to ask you where where we can find you
• 50:36
  in a minute. But before I do show the video, can I just
• 50:39
  ask you to give a little bit of background as to your involvement with the
• 50:45
  law and did you was it true you got kicked off your course because you
• 50:49
  actually wouldn't take the injection. Yeah. So in twenty twenty, when I
• 50:53
  realized that there are a bunch of smarter people are doing the alkahs, I
• 50:58
  actually had a sign from God. I talked about it in a few videos.
• 51:01
  It takes a little bit of time so I won't get into it now.
• 51:05
  But basically, I had sued the governor over the mask mandate, and
• 51:08
  I didn't know what I was doing because I'm not a lawyer. I just
• 51:12
  copied a lawsuit somebody else did and changed a few laws and changed my reason
• 51:16
  pursuing, and he changed the order for the entire state to get around my
• 51:22
  lawsuit. So I must have had an impact. But I went to law
• 51:28
  school on a whim in two weeks. They didn't require a standardized test to
• 51:35
  get in because it's a not very good law school. It's cheap. I
• 51:39
  spent twenty eight thousand dollars that first year to go to that law school.
• 51:44
  And before I went a day to that law school, I wrote to the
• 51:47
  director of admissions and I said, it says here, I have to take
• 51:52
  the COVID VAC scene when it's available. I'm not going to do that.
• 51:55
  I'm definitely one ear. Do you have any I'm definitely one ear from a
• 51:59
  shot I got when I was four years old of zero hearing in my right
• 52:01
  ear since four years old, And I asked him, do you have an
• 52:06
  exemption process? And he wrote back to me three things, three majored things.
• 52:10
  Were in the email reply, don't worry you're over thirty, you don't
• 52:15
  have to get vaccinated. Number two was nobody from this school is going to
• 52:21
  ask you if you're vaccinated. And number three was nobody from this school is
• 52:24
  going to be first in line for that vaccine. And so based upon that
• 52:30
  inducement, which I mean I knew, I knew certain things about contracts,
• 52:35
  having put together many contracts and done battle with lawyers to take terms out,
• 52:39
  and it's like you're being overly you're overly constraining this contract such that neither party
• 52:45
  will sign it, and would we would do battle with the legal representation from
• 52:49
  the corporations to try to get them to agree on the terms. They're all
• 52:54
  trying to protect the company right each each side. And I knew that you
• 53:00
  can't make side letters, you can't make promises outside the contract, because that's
• 53:05
  very bad. It can be fraudulent inducement. And a lot of guys did
• 53:08
  that. I know guys that got fired, They got sacked from their jobs
• 53:13
  because they made a promise outside the contract, say well, if you sign
• 53:16
  it, i'll give you this on the side. And then when they were
• 53:20
  caught giving the comfortability from the customer something on the side that would be bad.
• 53:25
  But sometimes the customer said, you owe me this. You said you
• 53:29
  would do it, and the guys like, well, yeah, I know,
• 53:30
  but the company won't let me do it. Well, then why did
• 53:34
  you promise you would do it? And so the law school made a promise
• 53:37
  to me, and it turns out it was a fraudulent inducement, meant to
• 53:40
  get me to sign on the dotted line, pay the twenty eight thousand dollars
• 53:44
  and matriculate it their school, which I did, and then nine months later
• 53:49
  they say you have to get a vaccine. I said, okay, where's
• 53:52
  I'll do an exemption. Where's your exemption thing? I had to filled out
• 53:54
  the religious exemption which they held out to me. We have exemptions here.
• 54:00
  Here was the religious exemption form. I did it. They never replied.
• 54:05
  I kept calling out, saying, hey, when are you going to rule
• 54:07
  on this? The next year law school Year two was about to begin,
• 54:15
  and they just ignored me. And then I get a letter in the mail.
• 54:19
  You've been unenrolled. You have to pay your twenty eight thousand dollars loan.
• 54:22
  They just unenrolled me, and so I sued them in the court said,
• 54:25
  Oh, you don't have any standing because when the judge the judge basically
• 54:31
  when she found out it was about vaccines, she just ruled against me.
• 54:37
  I didn't get to a substitute of argument or discussion whether or not it was
• 54:39
  a contract violation, which it obviously is, which I obviously have standing.
• 54:45
  But she just did what she did because she wants everybody to get the vaccine,
• 54:51
  and she was clearly rude to my attorney. I had an attorney at
• 54:55
  that time representing me in an oral argument. So what do I know about
• 55:01
  the law. I only went to law school for a year. I learned
• 55:06
  civil procedure and I got an A in contracts. I did really well in
• 55:08
  contracts. I did pretty good in tourts. I don't know a lot of
• 55:14
  administrative law. I didn't do constitutional law. I didn't do evidence. I
• 55:16
  hadn't taken the evidence class. But I know things and it allowed me to
• 55:22
  understand law from an economic and moral perspective. And I have a different perspective
• 55:28
  on law than most lawyers in the United States at the intersection of law and
• 55:31
  economics, and Chicago School of Law and Economics is really good at this,
• 55:36
  but they haven't put themselves out there because it's mostly a liberal place and they
• 55:39
  don't want to go against the Democrat Party and all the COVID stuff going on,
• 55:45
  they stayed out of it. You know how universities are, the schools
• 55:47
  are, but at the intersection of law and economics. They've dismissed many cases
• 55:52
  in the United States on standing doctrine. And that's I could probably teach a
• 55:59
  course and standing doctrine right now. Even lawyers say, oh, John,
• 56:02
  you don't understand standing, and then they try to explain it. They can't
• 56:06
  explain it. It's inexplicable. All it is is it's an excuse for a
• 56:12
  judge to kick any case out anytime he wants to violate a person's right to
• 56:16
  petition the government for redress of grievances, the right to go to court.
• 56:21
  Is say you're harming me, Please stop harming me. No, you don't
• 56:24
  have standing. They won't even hear the case, so I won't get into
• 56:29
  all the details of that. And I'm not sure I answered your question,
• 56:32
  but yeah, I'm kind of into law now. Yeah, And you know,
• 56:37
  John, I've been watching loads of your videos and I really would suggest
• 56:40
  we're going to ask you where all these are going to be in a minute.
• 56:44
  But I just want to show our viewers and listeners a very short video
• 56:49
  that you've put out for youngsters. And this is what I want to talk
• 56:52
  to you about the division between our generation and youngsters and what do youngsters have
• 56:59
  to look out for? And this little video is called civil disobedience. Let's
• 57:05
  have a look, hi, kids. Here's the short version. The poison
• 57:07
  needle is a ten x greater risk of harm than COVID itself, including heart
• 57:12
  damage. The mask only works to make you compliant to government orders like a
• 57:15
  slave. Civil disobedience is not unlawful, so what is it. Civil relates
• 57:20
  to private rights and remedies sought by action or lawsuit, like the action of
• 57:23
  Vietnam War protests or the lawsuit by a governor preserving the rights of his people.
• 57:28
  Remedy is the legal means, under natural law, not man made law,
• 57:31
  to recover a right or prevent the wrong. You have a legal right
• 57:36
  to refuse unjust laws. Disobedience is refusal to follow commands together. Civil disobedience
• 57:40
  means the legal means to recover a right or prevent the wrong by refusing to
• 57:45
  follow commands your intent must be to recover a right or prevent a wrong,
• 57:49
  and your act of refusing commands must be by legal means. Defiance of law
• 57:53
  without intent to remedy is not civil disobedience. Each cause and act must be
• 57:59
  civil. You need both pieces of the puzzle. Know what you're doing,
• 58:01
  why you're doing it, and what your objective is. The dictionary now says
• 58:05
  civil disobedience involves forcing concessions from the government. This is exactly backwards. Government
• 58:10
  is the one doing the forcing, and government is the one demanding we concede
• 58:14
  rights and freedoms like bodily autonomy. It is backwards on purpose. To shape
• 58:17
  culture around words, remember two things. Make sure you're attempting to recover a
• 58:22
  right or prevent a wrong to yourself or others, and do not comply.
• 58:25
  Government rarely receives a law on their own. It takes heroes of civil disobedience
• 58:30
  to stand up to them to get the laws changed. God bless you John.
• 58:35
  We know youngsters like messages short, and that was short and it was
• 58:40
  extremely informative. I worry about the youngsters as I don't think they see what
• 58:49
  we see. What's your message to them? And what's your message to our
• 58:52
  viewers and listeners that have got younger children and grandchildren that they want to pass
• 58:59
  the message onto. Well, it's time to step up and realize that we
• 59:05
  used to deem people adults at thirteen years old, going way back in human
• 59:08
  history. You have to protect yourselves. The government means to kill you,
• 59:15
  and if you just are going to comply, you'll find one day that you
• 59:17
  won't be able to have children because for some reason you're sterile. How did
• 59:22
  that happen? What did they inject you with? You'll find that some of
• 59:27
  your friends are chronically sick, some of them have cancers and die at a
• 59:31
  far greater rate than any time in human history. They mean to kill you
• 59:37
  and the ideas behind And that was one of five videos for civil disobedience.
• 59:44
  I think it was the second or third one. It's a series. I
• 59:46
  get into the psychology of civil disobedience and how you can prepare yourself for an
• 59:51
  engagement, Know what's going to happen, if you're going to be arrested,
• 59:55
  understanding your rights, and it's not complicated. It doesn't have to be complicated.
• 1:00:00
  You can carry on a business card your rights. You don't have to
• 1:00:04
  memorize them, you can just read them to the officer. And if you're
• 1:00:07
  not giving a chance to read them to the officer, then you can have
• 1:00:09
  just a couple of things to say. And if you're going to be arrested,
• 1:00:13
  you're going to be arrested. It's better than dying. It's better than
• 1:00:15
  being forced into compliance something injected past your skin into your body, which is
• 1:00:22
  a medical battery. We talk about informed consent, but the ideas behind that
• 1:00:28
  short two minute video, there's a lot in there. Lexi Houston on esthetics,
• 1:00:35
  Saint Augustine, Saint Thomas Aquinas. These are ideas that formed from Aristotalian
• 1:00:40
  philosophy and Christian doctrine married together. It's not religion, it's it's natural rights
• 1:00:47
  as a human being. If you believe in liberty or not. If you
• 1:00:52
  don't believe in individual liberty, then you believe in slavery. You believe people
• 1:00:57
  can be enslaved and it's just your just chattel to be sold and bought and
• 1:01:00
  used by corporations, oligarchies, oligarchists, oligarchs, and all the philosophy around
• 1:01:12
  that and how we come to aggregate as human beings in villages and towns and
• 1:01:17
  you know, we gather together for Safety's that's mostly and some people like the
• 1:01:24
  companionship, but it's really for safety and for utility. It's easier for everybody
• 1:01:32
  with a with an expertise to to more efficiently do what they do as an
• 1:01:37
  expert, whether it's shoeing a horse or growing, you know, taking care
• 1:01:44
  of farm animals. You become an expert at what you do, and therefore
• 1:01:47
  your little society can benefit from it, and everybody has to work less because
• 1:01:52
  you have the more efficient people at each job doing that job. All these
• 1:01:57
  philosophies and these economic studies of efficiency culminate down into little short messages that young
• 1:02:05
  people can understand like that, and one of them is the psychology of civil
• 1:02:08
  disobedience, preparing yourself to to engage with the police, to engage with your
• 1:02:14
  school principal or your school master. The introduction, kind of the introduction gets
• 1:02:21
  into they want you to eat bugs instead of meat. They're trying to destroy
• 1:02:25
  the meat production in the United States right now. Oh h five, one
• 1:02:30
  H five N one. I think there was a question asked early in this
• 1:02:34
  in this segment we did where or maybe it was before we started recording,
• 1:02:39
  what will people fall for it again. No, people won't fall for H
• 1:02:45
  five N one like they did with COVID. But how many people will it
• 1:02:47
  take to actually make a difference. I don't think it's going to be enough,
• 1:02:52
  and I don't think H five n one is even about getting people to
• 1:02:54
  take a vaccine for H five on one at all. It's going out after
• 1:03:00
  the food supply. It's leaving an excuse. Oh, a couple of chickens
• 1:03:05
  died. Oh, now we have to kill a million chickens, a million
• 1:03:09
  because a few tested positive for H five and one and one of them actually
• 1:03:14
  die. These are the excuses they're using to wreck the food supply and then
• 1:03:21
  distribution. They're going to have to make sure the cities get enough food otherwise
• 1:03:24
  the cities will riot. These are things that are being done on purpose by
• 1:03:30
  government, and the kids need to understand when they see signs. When you
• 1:03:34
  see a news story about, oh, this cow had H five and one,
• 1:03:37
  so we had to kill a half a million cows, it's like,
• 1:03:39
  whoa wait a minute, they're messing with our food supply. If I'm a
• 1:03:44
  young person, I'm like, something's really wrong here. Imagine if they don't
• 1:03:50
  understand it if you don't have food, then people riot and kill each other.
• 1:03:53
  You're talking food, and many of our audience now will be saying yeah.
• 1:04:00
  And Debbie's talking about water, because I bet that's for maybe a whole
• 1:04:04
  another interview. I can see so many rolling up because we've got so many
• 1:04:10
  questions to ask you, and I know that we are caught short a little
• 1:04:15
  bit on time. And before I bring Cheryl back to maybe give a last
• 1:04:18
  question or her final thoughts before we go to you for your last word,
• 1:04:24
  I'm going to ask you a question with regards to harms and the law,
• 1:04:30
  so hopefully it'll span both of your specialist subjects. But do you think it
• 1:04:36
  would be helpful because I do personally, and even law or to be made
• 1:04:43
  law that if a doctor or a medical professional or a nurse receives a report
• 1:04:50
  of a suspected harm associated with a vaccine or medicine, that that report should
• 1:04:58
  be made public. We can all see how many reports and it should be
• 1:05:03
  a legal requirement for medical professionals to make that report public, and then we
• 1:05:09
  could see how many reports are being submitted. Because I'm just wondering how we
• 1:05:15
  ever get to the bottom of all of this unless we have some form of
• 1:05:19
  transparency from medical professionals who, at the end of the day, are there
• 1:05:25
  to prevent harm. Right, So I just wondered what your thoughts were on
• 1:05:30
  that. Yeah, we already have those loss one aspect, it's a legal
• 1:05:36
  duty to act. Okay, you and I don't have Well I don't know
• 1:05:41
  about your training, but I don't have a legal duty to act to save
• 1:05:45
  somebody from a certain thing that's not in my purview. You know, I'm
• 1:05:49
  an engineer. I'm not a doctor. I wasn't trained as a doctor.
• 1:05:53
  Lifeguards have a legal duty to act if somebody is drowning. Close family members
• 1:05:59
  have a legal duty to act to save their children. Let's say I use
• 1:06:03
  this example all the time. They actually teach it in hospital. If a
• 1:06:06
  boy is drowning, you know, six seven years old, and he says,
• 1:06:11
  toss me the life preserver, and you look down at your feet and
• 1:06:14
  you get the life preserver there. You just have to throw at ten feet
• 1:06:16
  to save the kid. No, I don't feel like it. I'd rather
• 1:06:19
  just watch you drown and see what it looks like to watch a boy drown.
• 1:06:24
  You don't have a legal duty to act unless if you're a close family
• 1:06:28
  member, then it's murdered because you do have that legal duty to act.
• 1:06:30
  If you're a lifeguard, if you've had lifeguard training even thirty years ago,
• 1:06:34
  you have a legal duty to act. If you're a paramedic, if you're
• 1:06:39
  a policeman, if you're a fireman. The reason this is important is because
• 1:06:42
  doctors and nurses have certain legal duties, as do politicians, and when they
• 1:06:47
  have notice and knowledge, if they've been given knowledge through some type of notice,
• 1:06:54
  that the people are in imminent danger of harm, and it's in the
• 1:06:58
  purview of what they do right their job. They took the job to save
• 1:07:01
  people, and they are basically preventing other people from getting that job because they
• 1:07:06
  took that job. Not only are they not doing the job, they're hiding
• 1:07:11
  information that would otherwise see this is murder. I mean, these are common
• 1:07:16
  law things that have been around for hundreds of years that just need enforcement.
• 1:07:25
  So it's not about making a new law, it's about enforcing the laws that
• 1:07:28
  exist, and for society to recognize the immorality of the inaction by the NHS,
• 1:07:35
  by any individual doctor who knows and is afraid to come forward because of
• 1:07:41
  the coercion from the government. If they come forward, they'll lose their job.
• 1:07:46
  So the government is committing murder against the people by not only not doing
• 1:07:50
  their duty to investigate the potential deaths, because they have that legal duty to
• 1:07:58
  act. They took that job in the government, in the NHS, in
• 1:08:01
  the FDA and CDC and NIH and the public health departments of every state.
• 1:08:06
  The information is sitting right there, and they're refusing to look at it.
• 1:08:10
  One man week will end this for the entire world, no more debate.
• 1:08:14
  They have all the information on their servers, but they're not looking at it
• 1:08:17
  on purpose. So with regard to law, it's there. We have enough
• 1:08:25
  laws. Making new laws just kind of I'm not a big fan of new
• 1:08:30
  law because the existing laws are not being upheld and enforced, and that's what
• 1:08:35
  it takes to change everything. But the people who would otherwise do the enforcement
• 1:08:41
  are not inclined to enforce because who's taking them to task. It really comes
• 1:08:45
  down to the people. Public opinion needs to swell big enough that these people
• 1:08:51
  fear righteous retribution, and when they fear righteous response to them killing the people,
• 1:09:02
  then maybe they'll do their jobs. Until then, we're kind of stuck,
• 1:09:08
  but we have people like you, so here and listen to who has
• 1:09:13
  the irrefutable evidence? John? Where can we find you? That will be
• 1:09:17
  links in the little article that will appear beneath this interview, But where are
• 1:09:21
  the best places for people to find your latest information? And also tell us
• 1:09:27
  just a little bit about your book, and I know Cheryl will will show
• 1:09:30
  us the book in a minute, so I can be found. I do
• 1:09:33
  write a substack, which is articles. I haven't written a lot lately,
• 1:09:38
  but there's going to be morecoming and that's this right here, calcandish On.
• 1:09:43
  So if you do co O q U I N D E C h I
• 1:09:45
  E N dot substack s U B s t A c k dot com,
• 1:09:50
  you'll find articles. And if people want to catch up, you can go
• 1:09:55
  back more than two years to my first article and start reading and you will
• 1:09:59
  probably you learn a lot of information you've never heard before, and yet I've
• 1:10:02
  had it out there over two years, a lot of factual information. The
• 1:10:06
  first thing I do is I context the situation around morality. So the first
• 1:10:12
  one is how can people do this to each other? Everybody talks about Matias
• 1:10:16
  Stesma and the five things required for mass formation. I am not a PhD.
• 1:10:23
  I just think the way a normal person would discern information. He has
• 1:10:29
  so fear of impending war or crop growth, prolonged cool temperatures, charismatic leaders.
• 1:10:35
  These are things that and I do. Oh that's in my video actually
• 1:10:40
  one of my civil disobedience videos. Those are things that can show somebody how
• 1:10:45
  this can happen, how society can be so crazy. And then the next
• 1:10:49
  one is about morality. I establish a moral foundation about death lottery. You
• 1:10:55
  can't compel somebody to enter a death lottery, but that's what mandates do they
• 1:10:59
  know some people are going to die, whether it's one in a million or
• 1:11:01
  one in two. It's immoral. And Suma Logica l l C. That's
• 1:11:11
  s U M M A l O g I C A l l C dot
• 1:11:15
  com is where I'm moving most of my activity for posting my lawsuits and uh
• 1:11:24
  presentations that I do graphs, A lot of graphs will be posted at Zuma
• 1:11:29
  Logic at ll C. Right now, there are just a few press releases
• 1:11:31
  talking about the formation of Zumologica ll C. The the older one I'm moving
• 1:11:36
  away from is Via Vira Vita v I A v E r A v I
• 1:11:41
  t A dot com that still has the lawsuits and graphs old graphs and stuff,
• 1:11:46
  and what am I missing? Twitter at John Bodwin Senior j O H
• 1:11:51
  N b e A U d O I N s R. I'm also on
• 1:11:55
  Facebook John Paul Bodwin Senior. And I think John Paul Bodwin Senr. And
• 1:12:00
  oh, where can you find my book? Can't forget that one? The
• 1:12:04
  real c d C dot com t H E R e A l C d
• 1:12:09
  C dot com. I'm moving away from the cocana. That's the initials here.
• 1:12:14
  See the D is lowercase, and my book says the real c d
• 1:12:17
  C with the D lowercase that's what it means. It means bad dog or
• 1:12:21
  naughty dog in French. I'm kind of moving away from that because people can't
• 1:12:25
  pronounce it, can't spell it. So I'll just call myself the real CDC,
• 1:12:30
  like you know my shirt right where is it right here? That I'm
• 1:12:33
  kind of going with the real CDC. So the real CDC dot com to
• 1:12:36
  buy my books. I'll I'll have press announcements there as well. I think
• 1:12:40
  that covers everything. Yeah, here's the book, okay, so it is
• 1:12:45
  possible to get hold of the book from the UK and there's the evidence.
• 1:12:51
  Hopefully you'll buy that through it's a very interesting read. Thank you very much,
• 1:12:57
  John for everything you've told us today. Obviously, it seems to me
• 1:13:01
  that everything that's happening in the States is happening here too. It's happening all
• 1:13:06
  over the world. It's a global problem. The evidence that we're collecting is
• 1:13:14
  enormous in terms of everything that's gone wrong with the treatments that have been used
• 1:13:19
  since twenty one and prior to that, during the COVID the rollout of the
• 1:13:27
  infection in twenty twenty. I'm still trying to get hold of information, particularly
• 1:13:32
  on pregnancy, and that is something that is being hidden at the moment,
• 1:13:41
  which I think is unforgivable. But public interest is growing and hopefully will continue
• 1:13:47
  with your work and everybody else's work around the world to expose more and more.
• 1:13:53
  And all I can say is keep up the good work and come and
• 1:13:57
  talk to us again. It's been very interesting having this chat this afternoon.
• 1:14:01
  Thank you very much for your time. It is good having this chat this
• 1:14:04
  morning. Thanks. I appreciate the time and the forum and the platform to
• 1:14:09
  address people in the UK. As well as the United States. It's not
• 1:14:13
  often that I get to address people outside the US. Well, I for
• 1:14:16
  one, am very grateful to you because it's really important that the United Kingdom.
• 1:14:23
  Here's what you've found out, because it applies to us as well.
• 1:14:30
  I don't know what other to say than thank you, and I know that
• 1:14:32
  we'll meet again very soon. If that sounds a bit cliche, I apologize,
• 1:14:36
  but we always give our guests the last word, and this for you
• 1:14:43
  is your last word with our love, grateful, thanks and God bless thank
• 1:14:47
  you. Over to you. Humans have been on the planet ten thousand years,
• 1:14:53
  maybe longer. I don't know, it's really not that long in the
• 1:14:55
  history of the planet and the universe and everything, right, ten thousand years,
• 1:15:00
  So for ten thousand years, humans thrived to where we were, say,
• 1:15:04
  fifty years ago, and we did that through our own discernment of what
• 1:15:10
  is good for us, what is bad for us. Somebody eat something and
• 1:15:13
  they die, We're not going to eat that. They drink from a pond,
• 1:15:17
  We're not going to drink from that pond. They got sick, they're
• 1:15:19
  throwing up these obvious things that we discerned for ten thousand years that got us
• 1:15:27
  as a species to where we are. It seems to have been thrown out
• 1:15:30
  the window in the last fifty years or so. And what I say that
• 1:15:35
  because people have abdicated their ability to discern the facts and evidence around them.
• 1:15:42
  They've abdicated that to somebody in a white coat. If somebody who paints fingernails
• 1:15:49
  for a living, what's on a white coat. People will listen to her
• 1:15:55
  as if she's an authority on something because she has a white coat on it.
• 1:16:00
  Really kind of it's difficult to explain that. It seems that many humans
• 1:16:05
  have abdicated their ability to discern to authority figures. And I'm not knocking doctors
• 1:16:13
  and biologists that people come to them and ask them questions. They want answers.
• 1:16:18
  They want them to tell me what to do, Tell me what this
• 1:16:23
  disease is, Tell me about the vaccine. They've abdicated their thinking. They
• 1:16:28
  have the boy down the street died, that her niece died, somebody's uncle
• 1:16:33
  died, like all of a sudden, they were perfectly healthy. Well it
• 1:16:36
  happens, Oh, it happens, it happened, No, it doesn't happen
• 1:16:40
  this month. People need to use their own brains use their own eyes see
• 1:16:45
  what's happening. Everybody knows some kid who got either myocarditis or had some pulmonary
• 1:16:51
  embolism or a deep bane trombosis in their leg. Everybody knows somebody who's been
• 1:16:58
  affected by the US vaccine. That's not a vaccine, this gene drug therapy.
• 1:17:04
  And if they can't see that, they're almost beyond help. But remind
• 1:17:11
  them think about how it was ten years ago. Did you see this?
• 1:17:16
  And if they can't use their own discernment like we did for ten thousand years
• 1:17:21
  as a human species, move on and find somebody else who will listen.
• 1:17:26
  We need to bring public opinion around. So I mean the closing comment is
• 1:17:30
  basically humans got to where we are over ten thousand years, and we're all
• 1:17:35
  messed up in the last couple of decades where we addocate our own discernment to
• 1:17:41
  somebody in a white coat and the practice of allopathic medicine. It's crazy,
• 1:17:45
  And it's not the doctors or scientist's fault for basically putting us through four and
• 1:17:51
  a half years without answers. It's the people. The people need to look
• 1:17:57
  at the evidence in the real CDC and the s see memorandum, my two
• 1:18:00
  publications. That's enough evidence to destroy the whole COVID narrative. And it's irrefutable.
• 1:18:08
  It's not p values, confidence intervals and research papers with randomized controlled trial
• 1:18:13
  with sixteen percent greater ABC than x y z, and so there's a propensity
• 1:18:18
  for this to kill you by myocarditis or something else. No, it's my
• 1:18:23
  evidence is this guy died of pulmonary amblysm that he got two days after he
• 1:18:28
  got vaccinated. Oh and here's five more. There's five more people that reacted
• 1:18:31
  within hours, died within days from a stroke. And it's all the same
• 1:18:36
  thing. It's irrefutable. You don't need a doctor. The evidence is right
• 1:18:42
  there in front of you. So that's the message. It's rely on your
• 1:18:45
  own discernment. Try to convince people through factual based evidence. And that's conclusive
• 1:18:53
  evidence, not persuasive evidence that would otherwise come from a doctor or a biologist.
• 1:18:58
  I appreciate all they do is absolutely necessary to have them and I and
• 1:19:03
  I. It's persuasive evidence that will be on top of the conclusive evidence.
• 1:19:09
  The conclusive evidence is right in front of you. Pay attention. That's it.
• 1:19:14
  Thank you very much for having me