Latest / UK Column Radio / Richard Gage on Building 7 and the Twin Towers | Jerm Warfare

Transcript

Richard Gage on Building 7 and the Twin Towers | Jerm Warfare · UK Column Radio

• 0:30
  Speaker 1: My name is Jim.
• 0:31
  Speaker 2: This is gilm Warfare the Battle of ideas A member
• 0:35
  Speaker 2: of the American Institute of Architects and founder and former
• 0:38
  Speaker 2: CEO of Architects and Engineers for nine to eleven Truth,
• 0:41
  Speaker 2: now leading the charge for New World Trade send Investigation
• 0:44
  Speaker 2: along with his wife Gail at Richard Gage nine eleven
• 0:47
  Speaker 2: dot org.
• 0:48
  Speaker 1: Richard Gage, thank you for joining me in the trenches.
• 0:51
  Speaker 3: Thank you, Jeram. Great to be here with you.
• 0:54
  Speaker 2: What is this Bay Area thing? Why do Americans say that?
• 0:57
  Speaker 2: Is it the area that's around a bay?
• 1:00
  Speaker 1: Talk like that? Yeah, well, there's this huge bay.
• 1:03
  Speaker 3: San Francisco is only a small part of it, and
• 1:06
  Speaker 3: it includes dozens of cities, pretty large cities like Oakland,
• 1:11
  Speaker 3: It's Berkeley, et cetera. So it's a huge metropolitan area.
• 1:17
  Speaker 1: So when you say Bay area, is that is that
• 1:19
  Speaker 1: like more specific?
• 1:21
  Speaker 3: It's less specific. It's less specific than San Francisco, where
• 1:25
  Speaker 3: I'm not from, thankfully, and more inclusive of a metropolitan
• 1:33
  Speaker 3: area that's larger than the Los Angeles metropolitan area.
• 1:37
  Speaker 2: I apologize for my for my lack of American knowledge,
• 1:41
  Speaker 2: but doing something every day.
• 1:43
  Speaker 1: By the way, let me turn it around. Have you
• 1:45
  Speaker 1: been to my side? Of the pond.
• 1:47
  Speaker 3: I've never been to Africa. If that's what you mean,
• 1:50
  Speaker 3: I've certainly.
• 1:51
  Speaker 1: You need to change that.
• 1:54
  Speaker 3: Yeah, well, I hear all kinds of things about South
• 1:57
  Speaker 3: Africa that concerned me. Farmers been urdered.
• 2:01
  Speaker 2: Since a lot of it is just propaganda. Look, it's
• 2:05
  Speaker 2: not it's not. You know, this isn't the world's safest country,
• 2:08
  Speaker 2: but it's not. It's not a war zone.
• 2:12
  Speaker 3: Okay, then maybe I'll come.
• 2:14
  Speaker 2: Why are you a former CEO of Architects and Engineers.
• 2:23
  Speaker 3: Well, twenty years ago I started the Architects and Engineers
• 2:26
  Speaker 3: for nine to eleven Truth, with fourteen of them signed
• 2:30
  Speaker 3: on to the petition demanding a new investigation into the
• 2:33
  Speaker 3: destruction of all three World Right Center skyscrapers on nine
• 2:38
  Speaker 3: to eleven. And we've grown that to thirty six hundred
• 2:41
  Speaker 3: architects and engineers. And about four or five years ago
• 2:45
  Speaker 3: we had differences of opinion. I wanted to branch off
• 2:49
  Speaker 3: and talk about COVID and the parallels between nine to eleven,
• 2:53
  Speaker 3: and well, you know, these thirty six hundred architects and
• 2:58
  Speaker 3: engineers did sign a petition not for COVID investigation, but
• 3:03
  Speaker 3: for nine to eleven. And so this was a discussion,
• 3:07
  Speaker 3: you know, do we branch out or do we not?
• 3:10
  Speaker 3: And I wanted to and they didn't. So I went
• 3:12
  Speaker 3: off on my own started Richard Gage nine one one
• 3:16
  Speaker 3: dot org and we've with along with my wife Gail,
• 3:22
  Speaker 3: we have been at it ever since and doing eighty
• 3:26
  Speaker 3: five podcasts, more than a dozen speaking engagements in one
• 3:30
  Speaker 3: thousand radio interviews altogether.
• 3:33
  Speaker 2: Now when you say and you will trade center investigation,
• 3:38
  Speaker 2: what do you mean?
• 3:40
  Speaker 3: Well, the nine to eleven commission didn't even mention the
• 3:44
  Speaker 3: third worst structural failure in modern history that happened on
• 3:49
  Speaker 3: nine to eleven, forty seven story Building seven, which we're
• 3:53
  Speaker 3: going to talk about, and I'll show you It came
• 3:56
  Speaker 3: down rapidly, symmetrically after witnesses explosions into its own footprint.
• 4:03
  Speaker 3: And that's a significant event because no plane hit that building. Right,
• 4:08
  Speaker 3: So this investigation has to include Building seven, and the
• 4:15
  Speaker 3: twin towers are very explosive investigation, I mean destruction as well.
• 4:20
  Speaker 2: But yes, the thing that blows my mind. If I
• 4:22
  Speaker 2: talked to just about anybody about ninety eleven, we'll talk
• 4:26
  Speaker 2: about the towers and the bents are gone. Nobody knows
• 4:29
  Speaker 2: about Building seven.
• 4:32
  Speaker 3: Yeah, most architecture engineers don't even know it's been hidden
• 4:37
  Speaker 3: from us. The Board of Directors of the American Institute
• 4:42
  Speaker 3: of Architects ninety thousand members of which I'm one, they
• 4:46
  Speaker 3: didn't even issue one bulletin on this major catastrophe. Again,
• 4:52
  Speaker 3: no plane hit the building, so why did it go down? Well,
• 4:56
  Speaker 3: this came along, as you'll see, and blamed fires.
• 5:02
  Speaker 1: Has that anywhere else?
• 5:04
  Speaker 3: I got to show you. I got to show you
• 5:06
  Speaker 3: the evidence. No, it's never. Fires have never brought down
• 5:10
  Speaker 3: a steel frame fire protected building and history. Ever, the
• 5:14
  Speaker 3: Securities and Exchange Commission lost thousands of files related to
• 5:17
  Speaker 3: hundreds of cases that they were actively pursuing against Wall
• 5:21
  Speaker 3: Street companies like Enron and WorldCom. This is your major
• 5:30
  Speaker 3: destruction of evidence. It takes courage to look at this information,
• 5:34
  Speaker 3: and it took me a lot of courage to just
• 5:38
  Speaker 3: turn my world upside down when I found out about
• 5:42
  Speaker 3: the explosive destruction of these buildings. I mean, the whole
• 5:45
  Speaker 3: world has been scammed, right, this has to be false.
• 5:50
  Speaker 3: I have to prove it wrong, and I tried and
• 5:52
  Speaker 3: I couldn't. David ray Griffin was giving a presentation the
• 5:56
  Speaker 3: next day after I heard him on the radio on
• 5:58
  Speaker 3: KPFA's Guns and Butter program, and boy, I went and man,
• 6:05
  Speaker 3: I'm going, this is either the biggest scam in history
• 6:10
  Speaker 3: or this I mean, I mean nine to eleven, or
• 6:17
  Speaker 3: this gentleman's lying. And it turns out everything that I
• 6:21
  Speaker 3: found out was true. In fact, he told me about
• 6:24
  Speaker 3: Building seven, which most people don't even know anything about. Again,
• 6:28
  Speaker 3: not hit by a plane, football field and length away
• 6:33
  Speaker 3: from the North Tower. It suffered some damage during the
• 6:39
  Speaker 3: collapse of the North tower, but this damage, according to NIST,
• 6:44
  Speaker 3: was not a significant factor in the building's collapse. Well,
• 6:47
  Speaker 3: let's look at that collapse. Here's Building seven at five
• 6:50
  Speaker 3: point twenty in the afternoon. The east penthouse comes down
• 6:53
  Speaker 3: first in an isolated event. Six seconds later, the entire
• 6:58
  Speaker 3: building does this, straight down uniformly, symmetrically into its own footprint,
• 7:05
  Speaker 3: after witnesses heard explosions. Again was the official narrative, GERM.
• 7:10
  Speaker 3: It was what we found?
• 7:12
  Speaker 1: Was it uncontrolled? Building fires caused an extraordinary event.
• 7:17
  Speaker 2: The collapse of World Trade Center seven was primarily due
• 7:20
  Speaker 2: to fire.
• 7:21
  Speaker 3: I suppose we should look at those fires. These are
• 7:25
  Speaker 3: the worst fires that we have photographic or video evidence
• 7:28
  Speaker 3: of in the building. There are few, they are relatively small,
• 7:32
  Speaker 3: and they are scattered throughout the building. And NIST claims
• 7:38
  Speaker 3: that that these fires brought the building down. We're going
• 7:42
  Speaker 3: to look at that in some detail. But these fires
• 7:45
  Speaker 3: were out over an hour before this building comes down
• 7:49
  Speaker 3: on the floor of the initiation of collapse, which NIST
• 7:54
  Speaker 3: relies on those fires burning. In fact, they show those
• 7:58
  Speaker 3: fires burning well after four pm in their simulation. So
• 8:04
  Speaker 3: their simulation of the fires in their computer model shows
• 8:09
  Speaker 3: them burning very hot along this whole ledge. And yet
• 8:14
  Speaker 3: the photographs show that they've burned out, and their initiation
• 8:19
  Speaker 3: of collapse theory requires the fires to be burning at
• 8:22
  Speaker 3: the time of the collapse, which is an hour and
• 8:24
  Speaker 3: twenty minutes later. And they because it's an initiation of
• 8:31
  Speaker 3: it's the thermal expansion of long span beams in this area.
• 8:37
  Speaker 3: These oops, these long span beams here pushing this girder
• 8:45
  Speaker 3: off of its seat on this column seventy nine have
• 8:47
  Speaker 3: this whole elaborate theory, none of which can be true.
• 8:52
  Speaker 3: In fact, fires have never brought down a steel frame
• 8:56
  Speaker 3: fire protected structure, as I mentioned.
• 8:58
  Speaker 1: Ever, not that those are way woose.
• 9:02
  Speaker 3: These are much larger, hotter, and longer lasting fires especially
• 9:07
  Speaker 3: in these buildings. You recognize one of these, at least
• 9:12
  Speaker 3: in Grenville. I keep thinking of your by your accent,
• 9:15
  Speaker 3: that you're in England. You're not in England.
• 9:17
  Speaker 1: No, I'm not in the UK.
• 9:19
  Speaker 3: But you have high rise buildings in South Africa. And
• 9:24
  Speaker 3: I don't know if they've done this, but if they did,
• 9:26
  Speaker 3: they wouldn't fall. None of these buildings have fallen just quickly.
• 9:30
  Speaker 2: Richard, Before you go on, if you don't mind interjecting
• 9:34
  Speaker 2: from time to time, just as a matter of curiosity,
• 9:37
  Speaker 2: can you remember what you were doing on this day.
• 9:41
  Speaker 3: On nine to eleven, I was getting ready for my
• 9:46
  Speaker 3: getting going to work with my wife. At the time,
• 9:49
  Speaker 3: we were looking at the TV and going, WHOA that
• 9:55
  Speaker 3: that building, that second building was hit by a plane.
• 9:58
  Speaker 3: That is uh clear not an accident, right, So at
• 10:03
  Speaker 3: that point I realized we're under attack. Then I saw
• 10:05
  Speaker 3: the towers come down. Not Building seven. They didn't show that,
• 10:10
  Speaker 3: but the towers they did show quite a number of times,
• 10:13
  Speaker 3: and boy didn't look like a collapse to me. But
• 10:15
  Speaker 3: it took me five years to realize that something was fishy.
• 10:20
  Speaker 3: Only when I heard David Ray Griffin, who's now written
• 10:23
  Speaker 3: fourteen books on the subject of nine to eleven? Did
• 10:28
  Speaker 3: I start to rethink nine to eleven? And you can
• 10:33
  Speaker 3: see why longer than that? Yeah, most people. And then
• 10:39
  Speaker 3: when you see it, of course, you can't unsee it.
• 10:41
  Speaker 3: Like this, here's Building seven on the right, a series
• 10:44
  Speaker 3: of known controlled demolitions on the left. Is there any similarity?
• 10:49
  Speaker 3: Is there enough? Yeah? Enough similarity to warrant and investigation
• 10:54
  Speaker 3: into the possible use of explosives, especially sans fire.
• 10:59
  Speaker 1: Yeah, into the on footprint yep.
• 11:02
  Speaker 3: And and they're all dropping at a certain speed, and
• 11:06
  Speaker 3: and that speed actually does vary a little bit. But
• 11:09
  Speaker 3: we're going to look at the typical features of controlled
• 11:12
  Speaker 3: demolition and compare those features to Buildings seven and see
• 11:16
  Speaker 3: if it has any of those features. Let's begin with
• 11:20
  Speaker 3: a sudden onset of destruction. The first feature of controlled demolition.
• 11:26
  Speaker 3: Is there that. Let's listen to Dan red here.
• 11:29
  Speaker 4: We're going to show you a videotape of the collapse
• 11:31
  Speaker 4: of itself described that.
• 11:33
  Speaker 5: Now we go to the video chape the collapse of
• 11:34
  Speaker 5: this building.
• 11:42
  Speaker 4: It's amazing, amazing, incredible, sick you word for the third
• 11:48
  Speaker 4: time today. It's reminiscent of those pictures we've all seen
• 11:52
  Speaker 4: too much on television before when a building was deliberately
• 11:55
  Speaker 4: disturbed and destroyed by workplaced dynamite to knock it down?
• 12:00
  Speaker 3: What who is that?
• 12:02
  Speaker 4: Dan?
• 12:02
  Speaker 3: Deliberately destroyed by well placed right and knock it down.
• 12:07
  Speaker 3: He's uh, those are pretty pretty important words. He's never
• 12:12
  Speaker 3: repeated them on nine on mainstream television ever. In fact,
• 12:17
  Speaker 3: without the exception of two times, Germ, we've never seen
• 12:21
  Speaker 3: this building collapse on TV. It should have been the
• 12:27
  Speaker 3: most studied structural failure ever by engineers and arctics, and
• 12:30
  Speaker 3: it's not. They just have swept it under the rug.
• 12:37
  Speaker 3: So let's see if feature number two is apparent. Is
• 12:41
  Speaker 3: there a straight down symmetrical collapse? As we look from
• 12:44
  Speaker 3: West Street, we can say, oh, that's pretty straight down,
• 12:47
  Speaker 3: pretty symmetrical. How do you do that? Germ. You've got
• 12:51
  Speaker 3: to remove all the core columns at once within a
• 12:55
  Speaker 3: fraction of a second of each other, followed about a
• 12:58
  Speaker 3: second later by the perimeter columns. Any deviation from that
• 13:04
  Speaker 3: pattern and you have a real problem. Can these fires
• 13:09
  Speaker 3: create that level of precision? Obviously not right. Here's what happens.
• 13:17
  Speaker 3: Go ahead, look at this. This is you get charges
• 13:22
  Speaker 3: that don't go off, you get really strange things in
• 13:25
  Speaker 3: controlled demolitions. If it's not exactly perfect like that.
• 13:30
  Speaker 1: I was gonna ask you.
• 13:31
  Speaker 2: You an architect, so you understand how a structure like
• 13:35
  Speaker 2: this needs to be built and broken apart in order
• 13:38
  Speaker 2: for it to fall like that.
• 13:41
  Speaker 3: Yeah, you have to take out all the core columns
• 13:44
  Speaker 3: and then followed about a second later, all the perimeter
• 13:48
  Speaker 3: columns at once. So it hasn't been repeat every floor.
• 13:52
  Speaker 3: Oh yeah, every floor synchronistically timed all the way down
• 13:56
  Speaker 3: the up the building. Typically they start low in the building,
• 14:00
  Speaker 3: which allows gravity to do that work. Fires, especially these
• 14:04
  Speaker 3: fires are not going to accomplish that.
• 14:08
  Speaker 2: But now, I mean, so some people argue that fires
• 14:12
  Speaker 2: can do that, they can weaken the beams.
• 14:15
  Speaker 3: Well, these fires can weaken beams, but look at the asymmetry.
• 14:20
  Speaker 3: If those fires did weaken the beams and they were
• 14:23
  Speaker 3: burned out an hour over an hour before this building collapsed,
• 14:28
  Speaker 3: so they couldn't have expanded those beams pushing that girder
• 14:32
  Speaker 3: off of its seat. But if it did, don't you
• 14:35
  Speaker 3: think the building would fall over to the left the
• 14:38
  Speaker 3: northeast corner. Now, I mean, you have damage a building
• 14:43
  Speaker 3: in the northeast corner, and yes, it would fall over
• 14:46
  Speaker 3: to that corner. But no, it falls straight and down
• 14:50
  Speaker 3: as you saw. The official narrative says these beams were expanded,
• 14:55
  Speaker 3: pushing this girder off of its seat on this column
• 14:59
  Speaker 3: seventy nine, causing this floor thirteen to fall on twelve twelve,
• 15:04
  Speaker 3: and eleven, eleven on ten, and so on for nine floors.
• 15:08
  Speaker 3: And then this instability travels laterally across this football field's
• 15:12
  Speaker 3: length building and in somehow in just six seconds, and
• 15:20
  Speaker 3: the whole thing falls down. Now, if a building is
• 15:23
  Speaker 3: damaged on one side, you'd expect it to fall to
• 15:26
  Speaker 3: that side. If you get kicked in the knee, you
• 15:29
  Speaker 3: fall over to that side, you don't fall to the
• 15:33
  Speaker 3: other side. So and you're not going to fall. If
• 15:38
  Speaker 3: you do fall, the other steel members in the structure
• 15:44
  Speaker 3: are going to slow down that fall. But this building
• 15:48
  Speaker 3: fell at freefall. This is documented by physicists. Free falls
• 15:53
  Speaker 3: as fast as a bowling ball falling out of the sky,
• 15:57
  Speaker 3: gaining velocity every second. In fact, that's the definition of freefall.
• 16:05
  Speaker 3: No resistance. This building had like forty thousand tons of
• 16:11
  Speaker 3: structural steels supporting it. Where did all that steel go
• 16:16
  Speaker 3: so that this building could fall at freefall as acknowledged.
• 16:22
  Speaker 3: Finally by this after denying it for six years, they acknowledged. Okay, yeah,
• 16:28
  Speaker 3: you're right, this building did come down at freefall. Well,
• 16:33
  Speaker 3: what happened to all the columns that were supporting the building?
• 16:37
  Speaker 3: That means not one of these eighty columns gave any
• 16:42
  Speaker 3: resistance to this building's collapse. Did these fires take all
• 16:48
  Speaker 3: of those columns out? No, they don't think so. So
• 16:52
  Speaker 3: we look at the next feature, the total dismemberment of
• 16:55
  Speaker 3: the structural steel frame. Yeah, it falls like a house
• 16:59
  Speaker 3: of car yards. The out exterior walls on top of
• 17:03
  Speaker 3: the interior walls, every column from every beam almost separated
• 17:08
  Speaker 3: from each other, so that a forty seven story moment
• 17:13
  Speaker 3: resisting welded steel framed building came down to compress to
• 17:21
  Speaker 3: four to six stories tall. Fascinating. How does that happen
• 17:26
  Speaker 3: by fire? In a building that is a natural collapse
• 17:31
  Speaker 3: like these buildings due to earthquakes. The building falls over,
• 17:37
  Speaker 3: the columns and memes are not severed one from another.
• 17:41
  Speaker 3: The building is recognizable as a building as opposed to
• 17:45
  Speaker 3: a house of cards. So could these fires do the
• 17:51
  Speaker 3: damage that was done? We don't think so. So what
• 17:55
  Speaker 3: could is the question, germ, maybe explosions could well explosions
• 18:01
  Speaker 3: leave signs, right, NIST says there's no witnesses of explosions. Well,
• 18:07
  Speaker 3: what about this one.
• 18:09
  Speaker 6: We were watching the building actual because it was on fire,
• 18:11
  Speaker 6: the bottom floors of the iron building off.
• 18:14
  Speaker 3: Fire, and you know, we heard.
• 18:16
  Speaker 7: This one found a kind of like a clap of thunder.
• 18:19
  Speaker 1: Turned around, we were shocked to see that.
• 18:21
  Speaker 5: The building was well.
• 18:23
  Speaker 1: It looked like there was a shock waves.
• 18:25
  Speaker 8: Ripping to the building and the windows all pumpted out.
• 18:29
  Speaker 1: And you know, it was horrifying.
• 18:31
  Speaker 3: And then you know, about a second later, the boss
• 18:34
  Speaker 3: pool came out and the building followed after that, and
• 18:39
  Speaker 3: the building followed after that, after a sound of a
• 18:42
  Speaker 3: clap of thunder, after a shockwave ripping through the building.
• 18:46
  Speaker 3: How about Kevin mcpatten, former Air Force medic, who was
• 18:51
  Speaker 3: on hand to see this destruction.
• 18:54
  Speaker 6: You heard explosions like woo, It's like at this sound,
• 19:00
  Speaker 6: it's not like when the compression like.
• 19:02
  Speaker 3: Boom boom, boom, boom boom.
• 19:04
  Speaker 1: Like floors that were dropping and collapsing.
• 19:07
  Speaker 2: This was boom like you felt a rumble in the ground,
• 19:11
  Speaker 2: like almost like you wanted to grab onto something.
• 19:14
  Speaker 1: To me, I knew that was an explosion. There was
• 19:17
  Speaker 1: no doubt in my mind.
• 19:19
  Speaker 3: Okay. And what did Bill Rizzotti see?
• 19:21
  Speaker 8: I was standing like two blocks away, and all of
• 19:23
  Speaker 8: a sudden, I just seen a big flash.
• 19:25
  Speaker 3: And then I seen the building coming down, and I
• 19:27
  Speaker 3: just seen people just running everywhere, chaotic like big flash.
• 19:31
  Speaker 3: How about first responder Captain Richard Patterson from the FDNY
• 19:36
  Speaker 3: Fire Department in New.
• 19:37
  Speaker 7: York One seven like as well, and was a series
• 19:41
  Speaker 7: of concussive.
• 19:45
  Speaker 3: Explosion, okay, And first responder Patrick Dillon.
• 19:49
  Speaker 9: I remember feeling that like it was like like freight
• 19:53
  Speaker 9: trains underneath the earth shaking, the earth even shaking me.
• 19:57
  Speaker 9: That's when we all saw Building seven crumple in the
• 20:02
  Speaker 9: middle like way up at the top. It buckled, It
• 20:06
  Speaker 9: buckled and then dropped.
• 20:09
  Speaker 3: And the deputy director of New York's Emergency Management Office,
• 20:13
  Speaker 3: Richard Rotan's, then.
• 20:15
  Speaker 8: He had to go into that building to assess it.
• 20:18
  Speaker 7: You could hear the building freak above us, I could
• 20:22
  Speaker 7: hear things fall, you could hear.
• 20:23
  Speaker 1: The fire burning.
• 20:25
  Speaker 9: You can see columns hanging from the epper floors, gaping
• 20:29
  Speaker 9: holes in the floors.
• 20:30
  Speaker 1: Above us.
• 20:31
  Speaker 3: There was an elevated car that was blown out of
• 20:33
  Speaker 3: his shift that was down the hall. An elevator car
• 20:37
  Speaker 3: blown out of its shaft that was down the hall.
• 20:39
  Speaker 3: How did an elevator car get forty feet down the
• 20:43
  Speaker 3: hall from its hoistway leaving a huge hole in the
• 20:47
  Speaker 3: hoist way. That's pretty extraordinary. This is not due to
• 20:53
  Speaker 3: damage which Niss says was done in the lower in
• 20:57
  Speaker 3: the southwest corner of this building by when the north
• 21:03
  Speaker 3: tower went down, which, by the way, that damage, if
• 21:07
  Speaker 3: that was the cause of this building's collapse, Whichness says
• 21:10
  Speaker 3: it was not, it would have fallen to the southwest corner,
• 21:15
  Speaker 3: to the lower left in this case. So it doesn't
• 21:18
  Speaker 3: do that either. So we know we have massive explosions.
• 21:23
  Speaker 3: Witnessed also by Barry Jennings and Michael Hess who had
• 21:27
  Speaker 3: been called to a meeting that morning and they were
• 21:32
  Speaker 3: late and the building had penn evacuated. But this is
• 21:36
  Speaker 3: their experience trying to get into the building after the
• 21:42
  Speaker 3: planes had hit the towers, but well before the towers
• 21:47
  Speaker 3: came down nearby. This is their experience.
• 21:51
  Speaker 10: Well, we got to the eight flour I started walking
• 21:54
  Speaker 10: to one side of the building.
• 21:57
  Speaker 5: Sounds that it was gone.
• 21:58
  Speaker 1: The first supposon I heard when I was on the stage.
• 22:00
  Speaker 5: Were landing.
• 22:02
  Speaker 1: When we made it down to the sixth floor. Then
• 22:04
  Speaker 1: we made it back to the eight floor.
• 22:05
  Speaker 10: I heard some more explosions, Michael Boom, like an exposure,
• 22:13
  Speaker 10: more than one. Yes, we started walking down the side.
• 22:16
  Speaker 10: You made to the eighth floor. Big explosion when was
• 22:19
  Speaker 10: back into the eighth floor.
• 22:21
  Speaker 4: When we get outside, police officer comes to me and says,
• 22:23
  Speaker 4: you have to run.
• 22:25
  Speaker 10: We have more information of bombs.
• 22:26
  Speaker 3: So you have to run information of bombs. Bombs like
• 22:30
  Speaker 3: this heard in the late morning of nine to eleven
• 22:33
  Speaker 3: nearby in the vicinity of building seven. Yeah, here's one
• 22:35
  Speaker 3: of the guys.
• 22:36
  Speaker 8: You can tell you. I'm okay, all right, Yeah, I
• 22:39
  Speaker 8: want to call you.
• 22:39
  Speaker 1: You want to call your mother? A fright.
• 22:44
  Speaker 3: Get this says there's no witnesses of explosions, and yet
• 22:51
  Speaker 3: we just heard more than half a dozen. So why
• 22:54
  Speaker 3: are they lying about explosions relative to Building seven. There
• 22:59
  Speaker 3: are a dozen other witnesses of explosions in our longer presentations.
• 23:05
  Speaker 3: But somebody brought a laptop to this expert in controlled
• 23:10
  Speaker 3: demolition and showed him the Building seven because he didn't
• 23:15
  Speaker 3: know about it. Well after nine to eleven and Danny
• 23:19
  Speaker 3: Juenko is the top European controlled demolition expert.
• 23:25
  Speaker 10: Danny Joenko is the expert on this in Europe.
• 23:29
  Speaker 1: What did he say?
• 23:30
  Speaker 10: It is controlled emolitionctoracurvator. There's not a score, there's there's
• 23:40
  Speaker 10: a team for the o expass.
• 23:42
  Speaker 3: Team of experts. Well, he's not alone in that assessment.
• 23:45
  Speaker 3: To three dozen structural engineers are among the thirty six
• 23:49
  Speaker 3: hundred architect and engineers demanding a new investigation, like Kamal Obeyed,
• 23:54
  Speaker 3: who says a localized failure in a steel frame building
• 23:56
  Speaker 3: like World Trace Enter seven cannot cause a catastrophic collapse
• 24:00
  Speaker 3: like a house of cards without a simultaneous and patterned
• 24:04
  Speaker 3: loss of several of its columns at key locations within
• 24:08
  Speaker 3: the building. Well, this caught the attention of Professor Lee
• 24:12
  Speaker 3: Roy Holsey from the University of Alaska, one of the
• 24:14
  Speaker 3: top forensic structural engineers in the country, who proceeded to
• 24:18
  Speaker 3: do a four year study of this building, concluding through
• 24:24
  Speaker 3: several competing software programs to confirm each other results, which
• 24:31
  Speaker 3: they did that if the building was damaged in the
• 24:34
  Speaker 3: northeast corner, it would have tipped to the northeast corner. Okay,
• 24:38
  Speaker 3: they confirmed that, But what do they have to do
• 24:41
  Speaker 3: to get it to fall like the video? They had
• 24:43
  Speaker 3: to take all the core columns out within a fraction
• 24:47
  Speaker 3: of a second of each other. Followed on the left
• 24:50
  Speaker 3: is their computer model, followed about a second later by
• 24:55
  Speaker 3: the perimeter columns. That's how it looks like the video
• 24:59
  Speaker 3: in a see. Whereas the computer model on the right
• 25:03
  Speaker 3: was produced by NIST, which doesn't even match the collapse
• 25:07
  Speaker 3: very well at all. With the exception of the penthouse,
• 25:10
  Speaker 3: you have four hundred structural steel connections failing every second,
• 25:14
  Speaker 3: and the left side of their computer model, but it
• 25:17
  Speaker 3: actually stops. They don't. Even after four years of trying
• 25:23
  Speaker 3: to get this computer model back engineered to mimic the
• 25:29
  Speaker 3: behavior of the video, they can't do that. It begins
• 25:31
  Speaker 3: to tip over, and so they stop at two seconds
• 25:34
  Speaker 3: into the global collapse. So they've failed utterly to prove
• 25:39
  Speaker 3: their case. In fact, it disproves their case. What was
• 25:43
  Speaker 3: the conclusions of the University of Alaska. Fire didn't cause
• 25:47
  Speaker 3: a collapse of this building. Temperatures are not high enough,
• 25:50
  Speaker 3: not high enough to cause the weakening of the steel framing.
• 25:54
  Speaker 3: Thermal expansion did not result in a loss of support
• 25:58
  Speaker 3: for the beams and the girders. The collapse of this
• 26:01
  Speaker 3: building was a global failure involving what the near simultaneous
• 26:06
  Speaker 3: failure of all the columns in the building, not a
• 26:11
  Speaker 3: progressive collapse as claimed by NIST. So that has gone everywhere,
• 26:16
  Speaker 3: including to every member of Congress in the United States.
• 26:20
  Speaker 3: So what could have brought this building down? What kind
• 26:24
  Speaker 3: of explosives are there? Well, we have a clue. We
• 26:27
  Speaker 3: can look at the evidence of extreme heat provided by
• 26:30
  Speaker 3: who FEMA in this case in their Building Performance Assessment
• 26:35
  Speaker 3: Team report came out in May of two thousand and two.
• 26:38
  Speaker 3: A metallurgical examination of the steel that few pieces that
• 26:44
  Speaker 3: they managed to save. They find never before observed. You
• 26:49
  Speaker 3: tectical reactions intragranular melting capable of turning a solid steel
• 26:54
  Speaker 3: girder into Swiss cheese like you see here. Fire doesn't
• 26:59
  Speaker 3: do this to steal fires three thousand degrees excuse me,
• 27:05
  Speaker 3: It takes three thousand degrees to melt steel. The fires
• 27:08
  Speaker 3: are typically less than a quarter of those temperatures. So
• 27:14
  Speaker 3: what's melting this steel in the Twin Towers as well?
• 27:18
  Speaker 3: This piece is from World Trade Center Building seven. This
• 27:21
  Speaker 3: piece from the Twin Towers thinned to razor sharpness. The web,
• 27:27
  Speaker 3: the centerpiece of the ibeam is thinned from five eighths
• 27:32
  Speaker 3: inches to razor sharpness. What do they document? Rapid oxidation? Sulfidation?
• 27:38
  Speaker 3: Fire doesn't do that liquid iron. That's melted iron. That's
• 27:42
  Speaker 3: three thousand degrees fahir nheit about half that celsius, so
• 27:48
  Speaker 3: sulfur formed during this hot corrosion attack on the steel.
• 27:55
  Speaker 3: That's as far as this investigation went. What are they
• 27:58
  Speaker 3: talking about? The New York Times calls us the deepest
• 28:00
  Speaker 3: mystery and covered in the investigation, but it's omitted in
• 28:04
  Speaker 3: the this report. They completely omit it. When they take
• 28:08
  Speaker 3: over the investigation two years later, they throw this part out.
• 28:12
  Speaker 3: But the fire or protection engineer Jonathan Barnett of the
• 28:16
  Speaker 3: VIEMA team says steel members in the debris pile appear
• 28:19
  Speaker 3: to have been partly evaporated in extraordinarily high temperatures. He's
• 28:25
  Speaker 3: not talking about fire here, He's talking about something else,
• 28:29
  Speaker 3: because it takes four thousand degrees fahrenheit about two thousand
• 28:33
  Speaker 3: celsius to evaporate steel. Well, we can tell the temperature
• 28:39
  Speaker 3: of molten steel or iron pouring out of the crab.
• 28:43
  Speaker 3: Colaw excavator here. We can tell it because it's color.
• 28:47
  Speaker 3: That's the physics of molten materials. We're talking twenty five
• 28:51
  Speaker 3: hundred degrees fahrenheit here, twice as hot as office fires
• 28:56
  Speaker 3: get typically maybe three times and even four times most
• 29:00
  Speaker 3: office fires. This is about thirteen seventy one celsius. Well,
• 29:06
  Speaker 3: this is a problem. The hottest office fires. The most
• 29:11
  Speaker 3: conservative mathematically based experimental worst case data eighteen hundred and
• 29:16
  Speaker 3: thirty degrees is what they used just to be safe.
• 29:19
  Speaker 3: Very conservative, eighteen hundred and thirty. But we're talking temperatures
• 29:25
  Speaker 3: exceeding twice this, as you'll see. So can jetfield do that? No?
• 29:32
  Speaker 3: Jetviel burns at about six hundred degrees fahrenheit. According to
• 29:37
  Speaker 3: this petroleum engineer in open air, jetfield only burns us hot.
• 29:42
  Speaker 3: What burns hotter? Maybe thermite does, germ. Let's find out
• 29:47
  Speaker 3: what is thermine?
• 29:48
  Speaker 8: Fendi are used by the military. Thermite is a compound
• 29:52
  Speaker 8: of iron oxide and aluminum, which, when ignited, sustains an
• 29:56
  Speaker 8: extreme heat reaction, creating molten iron in just two seconds.
• 30:03
  Speaker 8: Thermite can reach temperatures over forty five hundred degrees fahrenheit,
• 30:08
  Speaker 8: quite enough to liquefy steel. We know that open air
• 30:12
  Speaker 8: fires cannot burn hot enough to melt steel, but metal
• 30:16
  Speaker 8: had melted at the base of the towers. Appendix CEA
• 30:22
  Speaker 8: of the FEMA report described sulfur residues on the World
• 30:25
  Speaker 8: Trade Center steel. The New York Times called this the
• 30:30
  Speaker 8: deepest mystery of all. Sulfur slightly lowers the melting point
• 30:34
  Speaker 8: of iron and iron oxide and iron sulfide had formed
• 30:39
  Speaker 8: on the surface of the structural steel. Sulfur used with
• 30:43
  Speaker 8: thermite is called thermite, producing even faster results.
• 30:49
  Speaker 3: Maybe we're getting here, getting somewhere here, because if thermite
• 30:55
  Speaker 3: were used, it would explain the extreme temperatures four and
• 30:59
  Speaker 3: five thousand degrees that fire can't and jetfield can't explain.
• 31:03
  Speaker 3: It would explain the presence of sulfur, which is added
• 31:07
  Speaker 3: to thermite to become thermite much more effective at cutting
• 31:11
  Speaker 3: through steel. Would also explain the presence of other ignited
• 31:16
  Speaker 3: incendiary evidence that was found by the US Geological Survey
• 31:22
  Speaker 3: in their two thousand and five particle atlas of the
• 31:26
  Speaker 3: World Trade Center dust. What do they find millions billions
• 31:32
  Speaker 3: of previously molten iron microspheres iron. We haven't used iron
• 31:41
  Speaker 3: in our skyscrapers for one hundred years. Where's this iron
• 31:44
  Speaker 3: coming from? Iron? Molten iron is the byproduct of thermite.
• 31:50
  Speaker 3: How does it get spherical? Well, when you spray, aerosolized
• 31:56
  Speaker 3: liquids form themselves into spheres, even aerosolized molten iron liquids
• 32:02
  Speaker 3: by the pressure of explosions. That's just what the physics
• 32:06
  Speaker 3: of it is. That's what rain drops are. They're spherical. Well,
• 32:10
  Speaker 3: there's so many of these that the EPA even used
• 32:14
  Speaker 3: them as a signature component of the World Trade Center dust.
• 32:18
  Speaker 3: In other words, it's not even World Trade Center dust
• 32:20
  Speaker 3: unless it has all these previously molten iron microspheres, which
• 32:25
  Speaker 3: they don't even know and didn't bother to speculate where
• 32:30
  Speaker 3: they might come from. But they're found in all the
• 32:33
  Speaker 3: dust samples. Up to six percent of these dust samples,
• 32:38
  Speaker 3: some of them contain previously molten iron microspheres. Talking about
• 32:42
  Speaker 3: four tons of this material extrapolating, so our Jle group
• 32:51
  Speaker 3: independently finds and documents them. They say, in fact, they're
• 32:56
  Speaker 3: formed during the event, not before by the iron works
• 33:00
  Speaker 3: welding the building together the towers, not afterward by the
• 33:08
  Speaker 3: workers cutting the building apart, but during the event itself. Well,
• 33:13
  Speaker 3: how are they formed we could do an experiment. Experiment
• 33:17
  Speaker 3: is the arbiter of competing hypotheses. Let's do one. Let's
• 33:23
  Speaker 3: light some thermites. See what happens. It looks like thousands
• 33:30
  Speaker 3: of sparks, but they cool and they fall into the
• 33:34
  Speaker 3: pan as previously molten iron microspheres. That's all evidence of
• 33:42
  Speaker 3: ignited thermite. Is there any evidence of unignited thermite found
• 33:48
  Speaker 3: in the World Trade Center dust? Seems so we have
• 33:52
  Speaker 3: Nil's Harritt and Stephen Jones leading a team of eight
• 33:56
  Speaker 3: international scientists and they study this dust chemically. He's a
• 34:01
  Speaker 3: nuclear engineer, nanotechnical engineer, professor. They team up and they
• 34:08
  Speaker 3: find all of these red gray chips red on one
• 34:12
  Speaker 3: side gray and the other. They're curious because they thought
• 34:17
  Speaker 3: they were paint, but they don't act like paint. The
• 34:20
  Speaker 3: largest is about a sixteenth of an inch, very small chips,
• 34:25
  Speaker 3: but they attracted to a magnet, so they have a
• 34:28
  Speaker 3: high iron content. And they get real interesting because they
• 34:33
  Speaker 3: want to rule out paint. So they examine the red
• 34:37
  Speaker 3: layer and they rule out paint. Very high aluminum peaks.
• 34:43
  Speaker 3: Very they have iron and silica and manganese, which is
• 34:49
  Speaker 3: not used in paint. And which is these is the
• 34:55
  Speaker 3: signature of thermite? What's that doing? And all the paint,
• 34:58
  Speaker 3: Well they zoom in fifty thousand times with an electron
• 35:01
  Speaker 3: microscope and they find these nanoparticles inside these little red
• 35:10
  Speaker 3: grade chips of iron oxide crystals and aluminum plateless at
• 35:15
  Speaker 3: the nanoscale a thousand times smaller than the diameter of
• 35:20
  Speaker 3: a human air. So they find this is super thermite.
• 35:26
  Speaker 3: They do research. They say, well where do we what
• 35:30
  Speaker 3: is this stuff? Well, it's explosive composites based on thermite reactions.
• 35:35
  Speaker 3: The fuel and oxidizer constituents are intimately mixed at the
• 35:38
  Speaker 3: nanometer sized scale. This is developed by Lawrence Livermore Lab.
• 35:42
  Speaker 3: Before nine to eleven, two thousand and one. When you
• 35:47
  Speaker 3: get these particles so small at the nanoscale, the magic
• 35:53
  Speaker 3: of it is that the surface volume increases exponentially, and
• 35:58
  Speaker 3: when it's intimately mixed, you have an instant chemical reaction.
• 36:03
  Speaker 3: You've engineered an incendiary which works by means of heat
• 36:07
  Speaker 3: to become more explosive. In fact, at about four hundred
• 36:12
  Speaker 3: and thirty degrees celsius, they ignite interestingly, And that's exactly
• 36:19
  Speaker 3: in this published a data by Lawrence Livermore Lab. That's
• 36:22
  Speaker 3: what you find. What they found. The international scientists studying
• 36:28
  Speaker 3: the World Trade Center dust found that all of their
• 36:31
  Speaker 3: samples did the same thing. They ignite at that temperature
• 36:38
  Speaker 3: about eight hundred and fifty fair Knight. That is not paint.
• 36:44
  Speaker 3: Paint doesn't have these exotic properties. They've ruled out paint.
• 36:49
  Speaker 3: That's not a question among scientists who who've looked at
• 36:55
  Speaker 3: this data and responded to it. And then what happens
• 37:00
  Speaker 3: though when they ignite, what do they produce? Previously molten
• 37:06
  Speaker 3: iron microspheres, Well, they produce molten iron microspheres which cool
• 37:13
  Speaker 3: and very interesting, with the same chemical signature as the
• 37:19
  Speaker 3: molten iron microspheres found in all the World Trade Center
• 37:23
  Speaker 3: dust samples by the US Geological Survey and RJ. Lee.
• 37:29
  Speaker 3: So we know exactly where those molten iron microspheres came from.
• 37:34
  Speaker 3: They came from these red gray chips. As if we
• 37:37
  Speaker 3: didn't know, they're found attached to partially ignited red grade chips.
• 37:43
  Speaker 3: As you see here and here. This is very sophisticated technology,
• 37:50
  Speaker 3: not made in a cave in Afghanistan. This is made
• 37:54
  Speaker 3: only in the most advanced defense contracting laboratories.
• 38:00
  Speaker 1: Richard are you are you telling me that.
• 38:03
  Speaker 2: A gray a gray bearded Muslim man in a cave
• 38:07
  Speaker 2: in the Middle East with a Nokia at thirty three
• 38:09
  Speaker 2: to ten couldn't have pulled us off.
• 38:11
  Speaker 3: Not likely, very unlikely. This stuff is highly controlled. They
• 38:19
  Speaker 3: don't add it to every Muslim terrorist who comes along. Well,
• 38:23
  Speaker 3: maybe they did it as possible that but if you
• 38:28
  Speaker 3: look at the security in the World Trade Center in
• 38:30
  Speaker 3: Building seven, it's three of the most highly secure buildings
• 38:35
  Speaker 3: outside the Pentagon, unlikely to be penetrated by outside terror.
• 38:43
  Speaker 3: But this study is pure reviewed in the Bentham Open
• 38:48
  Speaker 3: Chemical Physics Journal in two thousand and nine. They've concluded
• 38:51
  Speaker 3: that the red layer is active unreacted their medic material
• 38:55
  Speaker 3: incorporating nanotechnology. It's highly energetic or pyrotechnic, explode of material
• 39:01
  Speaker 3: or explosive. This cross is the boundary of incendiaries versus explosives.
• 39:07
  Speaker 3: So we know that it was used to bring down
• 39:10
  Speaker 3: the towers. There may have been other devices other methodologies.
• 39:14
  Speaker 3: This we know though, along with high energy explosives due
• 39:19
  Speaker 3: to the behavior of the twin towers, which we're going
• 39:21
  Speaker 3: to look at in a second. But with regard to
• 39:24
  Speaker 3: Building seven, we have all the key characteristic and some
• 39:27
  Speaker 3: very uncharacteristic features of controlled demolition. This is direct evidence
• 39:32
  Speaker 3: of destruction withincendiaries in the case of Building seven, and
• 39:37
  Speaker 3: not characteristic of destruction by fire. With additional circumstantial evidence
• 39:44
  Speaker 3: and cooperative testimony that we've looked, some of which we've
• 39:49
  Speaker 3: looked at. This is proof beyond a doubt of controlled demolition.
• 39:53
  Speaker 3: The body of proof that's convinced three thousand architects and
• 39:57
  Speaker 3: engineers to sign on to the petition demanding a new
• 39:59
  Speaker 3: investm mistigation, many of which appear in our ongoing film
• 40:04
  Speaker 3: series nine to eleven Crime Scene to Courtroom, which I
• 40:10
  Speaker 3: would like to show you the trailer of Here goes.
• 40:17
  Speaker 7: No matter how improbable the conclusion may appear, and you've
• 40:22
  Speaker 7: eliminated the impossible one, whatever remains, however improbable, must be
• 40:28
  Speaker 7: the truth.
• 40:32
  Speaker 3: We're bringing alive in the film.
• 40:34
  Speaker 11: The sixty exhibits of the nine to eleven WTC evidence
• 40:37
  Speaker 11: contained in the Lawyer's Committee Grand Jury petition that have
• 40:41
  Speaker 11: already been submitted to the US Attorney in Manhattan to
• 40:45
  Speaker 11: present to a Special Criminal Sure.
• 40:48
  Speaker 12: This historic investigation is ongoing and there's a role for
• 40:52
  Speaker 12: you in it. Yes, you can help us bring the
• 40:55
  Speaker 12: real perpetrators to justice through this film series bring together
• 41:01
  Speaker 12: two dozen experts in their fields.
• 41:02
  Speaker 3: They ignored any scenario involving in the SENDI areas demolition work.
• 41:07
  Speaker 3: You're going to set charges on each four.
• 41:10
  Speaker 12: The building could not have been brought down.
• 41:13
  Speaker 6: By offer spires.
• 41:14
  Speaker 7: In other words, all of the emptior columns over eight
• 41:17
  Speaker 7: stories came down were basically lost.
• 41:21
  Speaker 9: At once, I could make out what looked like from
• 41:26
  Speaker 9: a science fiction movie most.
• 41:28
  Speaker 7: In lava okay, And he paused and said, got to
• 41:34
  Speaker 7: be coming down around five o'clock. We'll be filming these
• 41:37
  Speaker 7: evidence presentations, not only more filings with the grand jury,
• 41:42
  Speaker 7: also presentations to each of you.
• 41:44
  Speaker 6: We're inviting you to serve as virtual grand jury during
• 41:48
  Speaker 6: each episode.
• 41:57
  Speaker 3: And yes, we're encouraging everybody to look at this film series.
• 42:02
  Speaker 3: We produced six episodes, five episodes so far. The six
• 42:05
  Speaker 3: one's coming out in a few couple of weeks and
• 42:09
  Speaker 3: you can see them at nine to one one C
• 42:11
  Speaker 3: two CE dot org letter CE number two letter ce
• 42:16
  Speaker 3: dot org. And encourage everybody to take part in this
• 42:20
  Speaker 3: series because it's co produced by you, our viewers. We
• 42:27
  Speaker 3: can't do it alone. We need your help. Five hundred
• 42:29
  Speaker 3: dollars donation will get you into the credits as an
• 42:33
  Speaker 3: executive producer, and so we encourage you to donate at
• 42:37
  Speaker 3: any level. And because you've got to ask yourself a question, right, jerem,
• 42:44
  Speaker 3: we're talking about clear evidence of Building seven. Well, then
• 42:48
  Speaker 3: if that's true and that was a controlled demolition, which
• 42:52
  Speaker 3: involves a deep conspiracy all by itself, shouldn't we at
• 42:56
  Speaker 3: least look at the evidence in the twin towers to
• 43:00
  Speaker 3: see if there's destruction by explosives there as well. Well,
• 43:07
  Speaker 3: we can in two seconds figure that out pretty clearly.
• 43:11
  Speaker 3: We have upward outward arching streamers in this destruction of
• 43:17
  Speaker 3: each of these towers, the north and the south, simultaneously
• 43:20
  Speaker 3: shown here for clarity. In comparison, we have four and
• 43:26
  Speaker 3: eight tons structural steel sections ejected laterally at over eighty
• 43:30
  Speaker 3: miles an hour, clocked by physicists landing up to six
• 43:34
  Speaker 3: hundred feet in every direction, trailed by what thick white
• 43:41
  Speaker 3: smoke clouds? Why are thick white smoke clouds trailing these
• 43:47
  Speaker 3: structural steel sections. They're not flammable, structural steels not flammable
• 43:52
  Speaker 3: in office fire or jet fuel conditions. What are these
• 43:57
  Speaker 3: thick white smoke clouds when we burn some thermite, and
• 44:01
  Speaker 3: we can see thick white smoke clouds of what aluminum
• 44:06
  Speaker 3: oxide ash, the byproduct, the other byproduct of thermite, in
• 44:11
  Speaker 3: addition to the molten iron. So we'll look at those
• 44:15
  Speaker 3: in some detail as we compare the features of the
• 44:19
  Speaker 3: destruction of the twin towers to control demolition, which we'll
• 44:25
  Speaker 3: start with, is there a sudden onset of destruction? Looking
• 44:29
  Speaker 3: at the North tower, it's at rest and all of
• 44:33
  Speaker 3: a sudden, it's in uniform downward motion. It's a sudden onset.
• 44:38
  Speaker 3: There's no slowing down of this when it meets the cold,
• 44:45
  Speaker 3: hard steel below. Same with the South tower. It's at rest,
• 44:48
  Speaker 3: and all of a sudden, it's in uniform, almost free
• 44:52
  Speaker 3: fall downward motion. You'd expect the steel below to slow
• 44:57
  Speaker 3: it down. We'll look at that. But the official narrative
• 45:00
  Speaker 3: tells us that the upper part destroyed the lower part
• 45:06
  Speaker 3: and then destroyed itself magically. Well, this violates Newton's third law.
• 45:12
  Speaker 3: This was given to us by Zidentic Bazon of Northwestern
• 45:16
  Speaker 3: University in Chicago, in this extremely complex piece of mathematical wizardry,
• 45:22
  Speaker 3: which became the key theoretical basis for NIST's column failure
• 45:27
  Speaker 3: theory of the Twin Towers, And this paper was submitted
• 45:31
  Speaker 3: just two days after nine to eleven. The rest of
• 45:35
  Speaker 3: us are freaked out, who's doing this to us? When's
• 45:37
  Speaker 3: the next attack coming? But not this gentleman, structural engineer,
• 45:44
  Speaker 3: mathematical genius. He is in his den providing the key
• 45:51
  Speaker 3: theoretical basis for NIST. And sure enough it gets published,
• 45:58
  Speaker 3: and it's full of problems, like, for instance, the violation
• 46:02
  Speaker 3: of Newton's third law of motion. There's an equal and
• 46:05
  Speaker 3: opposite destructive force when two bodies collide. Take a mac
• 46:09
  Speaker 3: truck the lorry and run it into a Volkswagen. Who wins? Right?
• 46:13
  Speaker 3: The lory doesn't matter if we drop the Volkswagen on it. No,
• 46:17
  Speaker 3: the lightest part of a structure cannot possibly destroy the
• 46:24
  Speaker 3: cold steel that gets heavier and heavier. It's a virtual pyramid.
• 46:28
  Speaker 3: Take a look at the lightest columns are at the top.
• 46:31
  Speaker 3: Then they get heavier and heavier as they assume more
• 46:35
  Speaker 3: loads from gravity and from wind, and they get heavier
• 46:40
  Speaker 3: and heavier. These core columns are fifty two inches by
• 46:43
  Speaker 3: twenty two inches at the bottom, almost solid steel. Well,
• 46:49
  Speaker 3: let's look and see what's happening to the upper part.
• 46:52
  Speaker 3: Is it crushing the lower part. Let's make it easier,
• 46:57
  Speaker 3: take a look at the lower red line at the
• 46:59
  Speaker 3: plane impacts. Is that block driving the rest of the
• 47:04
  Speaker 3: building down or is it telescoping in on itself destroying itself?
• 47:12
  Speaker 3: And what's destroying it will come to that. But if
• 47:16
  Speaker 3: it were driving the rest of the building down to
• 47:18
  Speaker 3: the ground, we would see it. But none of the photos,
• 47:20
  Speaker 3: none of the videos show such an upper block destroying
• 47:24
  Speaker 3: the lower block. It's been destroyed, as you saw in
• 47:27
  Speaker 3: the first three seconds. After that, it's in pieces. If
• 47:34
  Speaker 3: it were there, it would have yeah.
• 47:36
  Speaker 2: Yeah, sorry, Richard. This video clip here breaks my brain.
• 47:41
  Speaker 2: They look at that steel beam, it looks like it's vanishing.
• 47:46
  Speaker 3: Well, what's happening is you can see, well, this steel column,
• 47:50
  Speaker 3: the set of steel columns from the inner core of
• 47:53
  Speaker 3: the World Trade Center would have been crushed by that
• 47:56
  Speaker 3: upper block. So what this video proves is that an
• 47:59
  Speaker 3: upper block block did not destroy the rest of the structure.
• 48:04
  Speaker 3: And now six seconds twelve seconds later, what we see
• 48:08
  Speaker 3: is not it vanishing, but descending. Frame by frame, you
• 48:13
  Speaker 3: can see the top of this steel column descending through
• 48:17
  Speaker 3: the smoke that it has been that's emanating off of
• 48:23
  Speaker 3: it due to these explosives. You can see the top
• 48:25
  Speaker 3: of it. It's going down, it's not vanishing, and that's smoke,
• 48:29
  Speaker 3: that's not dust. Some of the proponents of the directed
• 48:33
  Speaker 3: energy weapons theory, you say this turning to steel, The
• 48:36
  Speaker 3: steel is turning to dust.
• 48:38
  Speaker 2: That's kind of what I'm alluding to, because I've had
• 48:40
  Speaker 2: a couple of those discussions before. By the way, just
• 48:43
  Speaker 2: quickly while just if you don't mind, what is your
• 48:46
  Speaker 2: view on that.
• 48:47
  Speaker 3: Well, if there's there's no steel dust found by any
• 48:55
  Speaker 3: of the numerous agencies studying the dust, none of them
• 48:59
  Speaker 3: fine steel dust in the dust. They find previously molten
• 49:03
  Speaker 3: iron microspheres, they find red gray chips of nanothermite. They
• 49:09
  Speaker 3: don't find any steel dust. So if ninety thousand tons
• 49:13
  Speaker 3: of structural steel in each tower was turned to dust,
• 49:16
  Speaker 3: I think you'd see some of that dust in the dust,
• 49:19
  Speaker 3: but you don't. And so no, the proponents of that
• 49:25
  Speaker 3: theory deny the evidence that we're showing you evidence of
• 49:29
  Speaker 3: explosive destruction. I mean, just take a look at it
• 49:33
  Speaker 3: on the left versus a volcanic eruption on the right,
• 49:36
  Speaker 3: upward outward arching streamers, a geometry of fireworks freely flying
• 49:42
  Speaker 3: solid molten objects. That's not part of the directed energy
• 49:48
  Speaker 3: weapons theory. Trailed.
• 49:50
  Speaker 2: The thing, yeah, Richard Soifer jumping in is that if
• 49:52
  Speaker 2: you look at buildings that have fallen in the past,
• 49:57
  Speaker 2: this was obviously very very aggressive. I mean, look at that.
• 50:02
  Speaker 2: I mean just look what that looks like. I mean,
• 50:04
  Speaker 2: I've never seen a building look like that when it
• 50:07
  Speaker 2: when it when it collapses.
• 50:09
  Speaker 3: No, this is very unique. The Twin towers are very
• 50:12
  Speaker 3: explosive event with thermite that the the producing the aluminium
• 50:20
  Speaker 3: oxide ash trailing the four and eight ton structural steel sections.
• 50:25
  Speaker 3: So yes, it looks more like a volcanic eruption. Uh
• 50:29
  Speaker 3: and and and that's why high energy explosives incendiaries. That's
• 50:34
  Speaker 3: what we're talking about here. It's not a crushed down,
• 50:38
  Speaker 3: crush up theory. Because of that central piece. We have
• 50:44
  Speaker 3: proven that theory to be alive. The upper part didn't
• 50:47
  Speaker 3: destroy the lower part.
• 50:49
  Speaker 2: So that's so what what so what are you saying?
• 50:51
  Speaker 2: So they were so it wasn't pancaking. There were explosives
• 50:56
  Speaker 2: all the way down, is that?
• 50:57
  Speaker 3: Yes, So that's what that's what we see in the first,
• 51:00
  Speaker 3: actually in the first three seconds, we see a controlled
• 51:03
  Speaker 3: demolition like Building seven. After that it turns into a
• 51:06
  Speaker 3: different phase, a very explosive phase where the structure is
• 51:10
  Speaker 3: blown out, not down, not down, but out and down
• 51:15
  Speaker 3: and then leaving intact the spine standing nine hundred feet
• 51:21
  Speaker 3: in the air for a dozen seconds so and then
• 51:24
  Speaker 3: it falls vertically through the smoke as we saw. So
• 51:30
  Speaker 3: that's what we're looking at. And we see the evidence
• 51:32
  Speaker 3: of explosions in the witnesses, one hundred and fifty six
• 51:36
  Speaker 3: of them in fact first responders declaring in testimony orally recorded,
• 51:42
  Speaker 3: producing twelve thousand pages of testimony read by Professor Graham McQueen.
• 51:48
  Speaker 3: Let's look at a couple of them. We felt the
• 51:50
  Speaker 3: ground shake, you could see the towers way, and then
• 51:54
  Speaker 3: it just came down. So we're talking about explosions. All
• 51:58
  Speaker 3: of a sudden, the ground just started shaking, felt like
• 51:59
  Speaker 3: a train running under my feet. The next thing we know,
• 52:02
  Speaker 3: we look up on the towers collapsing again, and again
• 52:05
  Speaker 3: you can hear a very specific order of events here.
• 52:08
  Speaker 3: They're hearing, they're feeling, they're seeing explosions before the towers
• 52:15
  Speaker 3: come down. This also completely pulls the rug out from
• 52:18
  Speaker 3: underneath the director and energy weapons theory shook my bones.
• 52:22
  Speaker 3: Shortly before the first tower came down. I remember feeling
• 52:26
  Speaker 3: the ground shaking, heard a terrible noise, and then debris
• 52:30
  Speaker 3: just started flying everywhere. None of these witnesses are acknowledged,
• 52:34
  Speaker 3: by the way, by NIST, who was paid twenty million
• 52:38
  Speaker 3: dollars to study these collapses and came up with yet
• 52:41
  Speaker 3: another fire collapse theory. I saw a flash flash flash
• 52:45
  Speaker 3: at the lower level of the building, you know, like
• 52:48
  Speaker 3: when they demolish a building. Saw a number of brief
• 52:52
  Speaker 3: light sources being emitted from inside the building between floors
• 52:54
  Speaker 3: ten and fifteen. He saw about six of these brief
• 52:57
  Speaker 3: flashes accompanied by a crackling sound before the tower collapsed.
• 53:05
  Speaker 3: I saw low level flashes, a self flash, slash, slash,
• 53:07
  Speaker 3: and then it looked like the building came down. An
• 53:12
  Speaker 3: explosion appeared at the very top simultaneously from all four
• 53:15
  Speaker 3: sized materials shot out horizontally, and then there seemed to
• 53:19
  Speaker 3: be momentary delay before you could see the beginning of
• 53:26
  Speaker 3: the collapse. How specific does this expert witness this fire
• 53:30
  Speaker 3: chief need to be? This completely pulls the rug out
• 53:36
  Speaker 3: from underneath the directed energy weapons theory all by itself.
• 53:40
  Speaker 3: There was an explosion in the South tower, one floor
• 53:43
  Speaker 3: under another. When it hit about the fifth floor, I
• 53:45
  Speaker 3: fear there was a bomb because it looked like a synchronized,
• 53:48
  Speaker 3: deliberate kind of thing. Well, let's look at feature number three.
• 53:54
  Speaker 3: Is there a straight down symmetrical collapse. Well, the building
• 53:57
  Speaker 3: actually begins to tilt to the left. The south tower,
• 54:00
  Speaker 3: the first one to come down, is tilting, in fact
• 54:03
  Speaker 3: at twenty degrees, and so there's asymmetrical loading on the
• 54:08
  Speaker 3: structure below by its tilt. There's asymmetrical damage from the fires,
• 54:14
  Speaker 3: there's asymmetrical damage from the built the plane that hit it.
• 54:18
  Speaker 3: How in the world, then do we get complete symmetrical
• 54:25
  Speaker 3: destruction all the way around, like the firefighter said, all
• 54:28
  Speaker 3: four sides of the building. It makes no sense given
• 54:33
  Speaker 3: what's going on up above. Well, what does make sense?
• 54:38
  Speaker 3: We can find out if we zoom into the leading
• 54:40
  Speaker 3: corner of these explosions. I see in this looped video
• 54:47
  Speaker 3: about a dozen independent explosions, including what we call at
• 54:54
  Speaker 3: the bottom a squib isolated explosive ejection.
• 55:00
  Speaker 1: Yeah, you can see them there.
• 55:01
  Speaker 3: Yep. This is not a directed energy weapon doing this.
• 55:04
  Speaker 3: These are obviously pre placed explosions in the exterior structure
• 55:09
  Speaker 3: of the building. It's also not a nuclear weapon going off.
• 55:13
  Speaker 3: These are synchronized explosions.
• 55:17
  Speaker 1: Which I've heard that many nuke theory also.
• 55:22
  Speaker 3: Uh huh, Well does this look like a nuclear weapon?
• 55:26
  Speaker 1: No, I don't think so.
• 55:29
  Speaker 3: Below maybe about a thousand of them, real tiny, iitty
• 55:33
  Speaker 3: bitty ones. But why would you do that when you
• 55:35
  Speaker 3: can just place explosives and nuclear weapons leave massive radiation
• 55:40
  Speaker 3: and bright bright light, bright, many many times brighter than
• 55:45
  Speaker 3: the sun. Let's look at feature number four. There's more
• 55:48
  Speaker 3: evidence here isolated explosive ejections called squibs in the controlled
• 55:53
  Speaker 3: demolition industry. These are found forty stories down below the destruction,
• 56:01
  Speaker 3: even as far down as sixty stories. What's producing these
• 56:06
  Speaker 3: a directed energy weapon way down there? No, we're talking
• 56:10
  Speaker 3: about mistimed explosions in all likelihood, and in this case
• 56:15
  Speaker 3: probably correctly timed explosions. In the south tower, before it
• 56:20
  Speaker 3: begins to lean to the right, we see about a
• 56:24
  Speaker 3: dozen isolated explosive ejections destroying the rigidity of the structure,
• 56:30
  Speaker 3: which is why it doesn't maintain its angular momentum and
• 56:33
  Speaker 3: fall off the rigid structure below onto the ground in
• 56:40
  Speaker 3: one piece. It's been dismantled, disintegrated essentially. How fast is
• 56:47
  Speaker 3: it coming down? Well, physicists have also measured this speed
• 56:51
  Speaker 3: of acceleration, not deceleration. It's not slowing down as it
• 56:57
  Speaker 3: meets the cold, hard steel below, it's speeding up. It's
• 57:01
  Speaker 3: sixty four percent or two thirds of freefall acceleration. That's
• 57:05
  Speaker 3: almost as fast as dropping a bowling ball out of
• 57:09
  Speaker 3: the sky, but that has to meet resistance. There's two
• 57:13
  Speaker 3: hundred and eighty seven massive core columns in this building,
• 57:16
  Speaker 3: fifty two inches by twenty two inches, almost solid steel
• 57:20
  Speaker 3: at the bottom forty seven of them. They're not providing
• 57:27
  Speaker 3: all their strength. Ninety percent of their strength has been
• 57:30
  Speaker 3: removed to achieve sixty four percent of freefall. And we're
• 57:35
  Speaker 3: talking also two hundred and forty steel perimeter columns all
• 57:41
  Speaker 3: the way around the building marching and there's more steel
• 57:46
  Speaker 3: than glass on the exterior of this building. It could
• 57:51
  Speaker 3: hold twenty times the gravity loads because of this orthogonal
• 57:58
  Speaker 3: Veri and deal trust that's designed to resist wind loads
• 58:03
  Speaker 3: makes it very very strong to resist gravity loads. So
• 58:07
  Speaker 3: no way could this come down at freefall or near
• 58:13
  Speaker 3: free fall. So we look at more evidence. And that's
• 58:17
  Speaker 3: the lateral ejection of those steel exterior perimeter sections eight
• 58:24
  Speaker 3: and four ton structural steel sections ejected it laterally at
• 58:28
  Speaker 3: eighty miles an hour, clocked by physicists impaling themselves into
• 58:33
  Speaker 3: the skyscrapers all around the structure, the two towers destroying
• 58:38
  Speaker 3: the winter gardens six hundred feet away, destroying the Deutsche
• 58:44
  Speaker 3: Bank building across the street. It had to be dismantled.
• 58:48
  Speaker 3: These are those sections. Look at that gentleman crawling on them.
• 58:52
  Speaker 3: They are bolted together, one on top of the other,
• 58:57
  Speaker 3: with four to six bolts, depending on their location. All
• 59:04
  Speaker 3: the plane had to do was to impact with its
• 59:09
  Speaker 3: massive tonnage, including the jet fuel, and push these exterior
• 59:15
  Speaker 3: sections inward, shearing those four bolts in the case of
• 59:21
  Speaker 3: this section, so it didn't have to slice the bill.
• 59:27
  Speaker 3: And yes, aluminum is softer than steel. But it punctured
• 59:32
  Speaker 3: the exterior by pushing these sections in, shearing off those bolts.
• 59:38
  Speaker 3: And why are they trailing all They're freely flying, by
• 59:43
  Speaker 3: the way, which this proves that the it's not like
• 59:45
  Speaker 3: a banana peeling off the building. Why are they trailing
• 59:48
  Speaker 3: thick white smoke clouds? Look at this one back to
• 59:52
  Speaker 3: forward to back to It starts out horizontal. How does
• 59:59
  Speaker 3: gravity work down? What's going on here? Out? This is
• 1:00:04
  Speaker 3: an explosive force pushing this four tons structural steel section out.
• 1:00:10
  Speaker 3: This alone also destroys the directed energy weapons theory. And
• 1:00:15
  Speaker 3: what's trailing it thick white smoke clouds. We found that
• 1:00:19
  Speaker 3: that is the other byproduct of thermite aluminum oxide ash.
• 1:00:26
  Speaker 3: There's enough energy here to hurl a two hundred pound
• 1:00:29
  Speaker 3: cannonball three miles. Where's that energy coming from? High energy explosives?
• 1:00:36
  Speaker 3: And we're talking about a twelve hundred foot diameter around
• 1:00:40
  Speaker 3: each of the towers, impacting even Building seven that far away.
• 1:00:48
  Speaker 3: And by the way, if that's true, Jeram, we have
• 1:00:53
  Speaker 3: to figure out if one hundred thousand tons of steel
• 1:00:56
  Speaker 3: in each of these buildings I said ninety thousand earlier,
• 1:01:00
  Speaker 3: one hundred thousand, it's distributed outside the footprint, what's crushing
• 1:01:06
  Speaker 3: the building? The steel can't crush the building if it's
• 1:01:12
  Speaker 3: been ejected laterally outside of it from the top down,
• 1:01:20
  Speaker 3: can it? No? Maybe it was a concrete there's a
• 1:01:22
  Speaker 3: lot of concrete in this building. Through one hundred and
• 1:01:24
  Speaker 3: ten floors of concrete, each of them an acre in size.
• 1:01:27
  Speaker 3: But we're looking for them. We can't find them. There
• 1:01:31
  Speaker 3: were four and eight inch thick concrete slabs poured on
• 1:01:35
  Speaker 3: metal deckings supported by lightweight steel trusses. We're looking for
• 1:01:40
  Speaker 3: one hundred and ten of these acre size floors. We
• 1:01:44
  Speaker 3: don't find in the base. Fifty of those floors, we
• 1:01:51
  Speaker 3: don't find, twenty of them. We don't find one acre
• 1:01:54
  Speaker 3: size floor. We don't find a half acre, a quarter acre,
• 1:01:58
  Speaker 3: sixteenth of an acre size floor. In a real gravitational collapse,
• 1:02:04
  Speaker 3: we find pancakes like this earthquake damaged building in Mexico.
• 1:02:11
  Speaker 3: We find pancakes like this earthquake damaged building in Bangkok.
• 1:02:16
  Speaker 3: By the way, this was a thirty three story building
• 1:02:19
  Speaker 3: that pancaked. How tall was its pile? Its pile was
• 1:02:27
  Speaker 3: ten times the height of a man. We're talking eight
• 1:02:32
  Speaker 3: stories tall of pancakes. How many pancakes, stories of pancakes
• 1:02:38
  Speaker 3: should we have expected in one hundred and ten floor
• 1:02:42
  Speaker 3: building three times the size of this Banquok, Bangkok earthquake.
• 1:02:48
  Speaker 3: We should have found a thirty story building pile, thirty
• 1:02:54
  Speaker 3: stories size pile, but we don't. This is a three
• 1:02:57
  Speaker 3: or four five story building pile. Miscellaneous metal no concrete. No,
• 1:03:06
  Speaker 3: we're talking about a real problem in comparison here. So
• 1:03:13
  Speaker 3: where's the concrete? Oh? There, it is pulverized in mid air.
• 1:03:21
  Speaker 3: This is not steel dust that the dew people suggest.
• 1:03:26
  Speaker 3: This is pulverized concrete by high energy explosives or extreme heat.
• 1:03:33
  Speaker 3: What can pulverize concrete? Well, fifteen hundred degrees fahrenheit about
• 1:03:38
  Speaker 3: half that celsius can produce? What white powdered decomposed hydration products? Wow,
• 1:03:49
  Speaker 3: according to a STMC eight five six, we're talking about
• 1:03:56
  Speaker 3: high heat. Now, thermite we found is four and five
• 1:04:00
  Speaker 3: thousand degrees fahrenheit three times these temperatures. So this is
• 1:04:08
  Speaker 3: documented by the Fire Safety Journal as well. Twenty two
• 1:04:10
  Speaker 3: hundred degrees fahrenheit. Concrete specimens subjected to this temperature were
• 1:04:14
  Speaker 3: completely decomposed. So heat can do it, high energy explosives
• 1:04:21
  Speaker 3: can do it. But it was done, and this is
• 1:04:24
  Speaker 3: the proof right here and here, and it was distributed
• 1:04:27
  Speaker 3: where throughout Lower Manhattan, ninety thousand tons of concrete pulvarized
• 1:04:35
  Speaker 3: one hundred micron particles distributed in a blanket three inches
• 1:04:38
  Speaker 3: thick across Lower Manhattan. Wait a minute, that presents another problem.
• 1:04:46
  Speaker 3: If ninety thousand tons of concretes pulvariz has spread over
• 1:04:50
  Speaker 3: three square miles. Is it crushing the building? No, it
• 1:04:58
  Speaker 3: can't crush the building either, Right, it's distributed and a
• 1:05:02
  Speaker 3: three square mile area around the building from the top
• 1:05:08
  Speaker 3: down it was pulverized. So what's crushing this building? That zendenic.
• 1:05:13
  Speaker 3: Byzant spent two days creating the key theoretical basis for
• 1:05:19
  Speaker 3: this column failure theory, submitting to a major university claiming
• 1:05:26
  Speaker 3: that the top part destroyed the lower part. Well, there's
• 1:05:30
  Speaker 3: some errors in it. Took to engineers ten years to
• 1:05:32
  Speaker 3: decode it. They found that he fraudulently doubled the mass
• 1:05:38
  Speaker 3: up above the point of plane impacts. He decreased the
• 1:05:42
  Speaker 3: column strength below by a factor of three. It's completely
• 1:05:46
  Speaker 3: rigged fraudulently in favor of a collapse, and that fraud
• 1:05:53
  Speaker 3: was exposed by engineers who submitted this to the same
• 1:05:56
  Speaker 3: paper that Byzant submitted his to the American Society Civil
• 1:06:02
  Speaker 3: engineers won't publish it. Why, they said, Oh, it's out
• 1:06:06
  Speaker 3: of scope. What how's that out of scope to publish
• 1:06:11
  Speaker 3: a paper challenging a previously published paper in that journal
• 1:06:16
  Speaker 3: Journal of Engineering mechanics, it's not out of scope. That's
• 1:06:19
  Speaker 3: what we do in peer reviewed science. So there's lawsuits
• 1:06:24
  Speaker 3: going on about that. Still, well, how would they have
• 1:06:28
  Speaker 3: had access in the building to plant explosives and incendiaries. Well,
• 1:06:35
  Speaker 3: they might have done it during the fireproofing upgrades that
• 1:06:39
  Speaker 3: happened in the months and years prior to nine to eleven,
• 1:06:43
  Speaker 3: because we should note coincidentally, many of those floors were
• 1:06:48
  Speaker 3: coincident with the floors that the planes hit. So maybe
• 1:06:53
  Speaker 3: those planes were supposed to hit those floors which weren't
• 1:06:57
  Speaker 3: upgraded with fireproofing. But perhaps liquid applied nanothermite and a
• 1:07:04
  Speaker 3: deceptive inter mescent paint fireproofing upgrade. Its possibility needs more research.
• 1:07:11
  Speaker 3: Kevin Ryan gave us this research. You can find it
• 1:07:15
  Speaker 3: at dig within dot net. How else might they have
• 1:07:20
  Speaker 3: gotten in, Well, if you had access to the core
• 1:07:22
  Speaker 3: columns to the elevators in the building, you'd have access
• 1:07:25
  Speaker 3: to the core columns that surround those elevator shafts. Well,
• 1:07:31
  Speaker 3: did we have an elevator modernization, Yeah, we sure did.
• 1:07:37
  Speaker 3: But you'd have to go through two inches of gypsum
• 1:07:40
  Speaker 3: board to access those columns outside these elevator shafts. If
• 1:07:49
  Speaker 3: you could descend through the elevator shafts and try to
• 1:07:55
  Speaker 3: obtain that access. It created quite a dusty mess mess.
• 1:07:58
  Speaker 3: If any of you have ever done gypsum board work,
• 1:08:02
  Speaker 3: you find us quite a mess. Well, listen to what
• 1:08:05
  Speaker 3: Scott Forbes testifies to he's the senior database administrator at
• 1:08:09
  Speaker 3: Fiduciary Trust, one of the world trade centers.
• 1:08:12
  Speaker 5: Was probably the week cleaning up to nine eleven. Every
• 1:08:15
  Speaker 5: morning had coming around seven am, and the dust was incredible.
• 1:08:19
  Speaker 5: It was selfy. It was like the cleaners were cleaning
• 1:08:22
  Speaker 5: right where the windows where there was a sill which
• 1:08:25
  Speaker 5: inclosed radiators. I was sick to death of the dust
• 1:08:30
  Speaker 5: which were appearing on the window sill. It was dirty,
• 1:08:34
  Speaker 5: gray and very very noticeable in that week cleaning up
• 1:08:37
  Speaker 5: to nine eleven.
• 1:08:40
  Speaker 3: Very interesting given the largest elevator modernization in the world
• 1:08:45
  Speaker 3: documented in March of two thousand and one before nine
• 1:08:49
  Speaker 3: to eleven, where a elevator had the contract that got
• 1:08:54
  Speaker 3: it from Otis Elevator, who had installed in have been
• 1:08:57
  Speaker 3: maintaining these elevators up to the point of this contract.
• 1:09:01
  Speaker 3: These elevators, the elevator employees of which they had eighty
• 1:09:05
  Speaker 3: five by some accounts, in the building. They're all safe
• 1:09:11
  Speaker 3: and accounted for. They fled, they didn't help the first
• 1:09:14
  Speaker 3: responders rescue these victims. Is it possible that explosives could
• 1:09:22
  Speaker 3: have been planted in the guise of this elevator modernization.
• 1:09:25
  Speaker 3: We think so, and we have also the destruction of
• 1:09:33
  Speaker 3: evidence and easily the largest and most perplexing structural failures
• 1:09:37
  Speaker 3: in history, four hundred truckloads a day carting this evidence
• 1:09:43
  Speaker 3: to China on these barges for recycling before investigators could
• 1:09:49
  Speaker 3: get their hands on it and do a proper investigation.
• 1:09:52
  Speaker 3: This is the illegal destruction of evidence in a crime scene,
• 1:09:57
  Speaker 3: prompting Bill Manning, editor in chief of Fire Engineering Magazine,
• 1:10:00
  Speaker 3: to cry out, crucial evidence that can answer many questions
• 1:10:05
  Speaker 3: is on the slow boat to China, showing an astounding
• 1:10:08
  Speaker 3: ignorance of government officials to the value of a thorough
• 1:10:12
  Speaker 3: scientific investigation. The destruction and removal of evidence must stop immediately.
• 1:10:19
  Speaker 3: But it didn't. And now we have to look back
• 1:10:24
  Speaker 3: with the evidence that we do have and realize that
• 1:10:27
  Speaker 3: we have all the key components characteristics of controlled demolition.
• 1:10:32
  Speaker 3: Fire doesn't create any one of these, let alone all
• 1:10:35
  Speaker 3: ten of them. With additional circumstantial evidence of corroberative testimony
• 1:10:40
  Speaker 3: that becomes proof, a body of proof convincing. Thirty six
• 1:10:44
  Speaker 3: hundred architects and engineers sign on publicly to a petition
• 1:10:48
  Speaker 3: demanding a new investigation, and they do appear in our
• 1:10:53
  Speaker 3: film series nine to eleven Crime Scene to Courtroom, and
• 1:10:57
  Speaker 3: we do have all of this documented. Forty high rise
• 1:11:00
  Speaker 3: architect structural engineers, Meddle are just chemists, physicists, controlled demolished experts.
• 1:11:06
  Speaker 3: In our landmark documentary came out twenty thirteen, nine to eleven,
• 1:11:12
  Speaker 3: explosive evidence experts speak out. The fifteen minute documentary made
• 1:11:17
  Speaker 3: for PBS narrated by actor Ed Asner, just on Building seven.
• 1:11:22
  Speaker 3: Fifteen minutes. That's the one to show everybody as the
• 1:11:26
  Speaker 3: first step and then the deeper look into the forensic study,
• 1:11:32
  Speaker 3: the dynamic analysis by the University of Alaska on Building
• 1:11:37
  Speaker 3: seven in the engineers that helped all this is documented
• 1:11:42
  Speaker 3: outlined for you in our brochure which you can hand
• 1:11:45
  Speaker 3: to every architect and engineer. You can find everybody else
• 1:11:48
  Speaker 3: that you know. Because the proof of Building seven in
• 1:11:53
  Speaker 3: the Twin Towers destruction is a dark one. We've got
• 1:11:57
  Speaker 3: to get on it. After twenty five years now we
• 1:12:06
  Speaker 3: are putting together the twenty fifth anniversary conference in New York,
• 1:12:11
  Speaker 3: and we're inviting everybody to come to New York on
• 1:12:14
  Speaker 3: September eleventh, and the tenth, and the twelfth, and the thirteenth.
• 1:12:19
  Speaker 3: That will be announcing that in a week. And you're
• 1:12:23
  Speaker 3: going to need that information and that camaraderie and to
• 1:12:27
  Speaker 3: gird up your own courage, because you're going to have
• 1:12:29
  Speaker 3: to draw a line in the sand at some point
• 1:12:32
  Speaker 3: say thus far and no farther. I am not going
• 1:12:37
  Speaker 3: to stand by and allow this scam on the world,
• 1:12:42
  Speaker 3: which caused the invasion of two countries, Afghanistan and Iraq,
• 1:12:46
  Speaker 3: which two million people have perished, the destruction of our
• 1:12:51
  Speaker 3: civil liberties in America and around the world through the
• 1:12:54
  Speaker 3: Patriot Act, the Military Commissions Act, the National Defense Authorization
• 1:12:58
  Speaker 3: Act of twenty twelve, where each of us, any of us,
• 1:13:03
  Speaker 3: can be arrested without a right to a lawyer, a trial,
• 1:13:06
  Speaker 3: a jury. We could be tortured, even assassinated legally under
• 1:13:11
  Speaker 3: these emergency conditions created by this scam, this hoax, this
• 1:13:16
  Speaker 3: false flag operation known as nine to eleven. So don't
• 1:13:21
  Speaker 3: stick your head in the sand after hearing this information,
• 1:13:26
  Speaker 3: though those of you who share this with others, make
• 1:13:29
  Speaker 3: sure they don't either. Germs audience is different than most.
• 1:13:39
  Speaker 3: They're educated, They're taught to critically think and do their
• 1:13:44
  Speaker 3: own research. And I hope all of you will not
• 1:13:47
  Speaker 3: only do that, but have your friend's family relatives speak
• 1:13:51
  Speaker 3: the truth. It's time. It's not too late, is it, Germ.
• 1:13:56
  Speaker 2: Well, it's almost too late looking at the time. But
• 1:13:58
  Speaker 2: I have to throw in a question that I have
• 1:14:01
  Speaker 2: a feeding you're not going to want to answer, and
• 1:14:03
  Speaker 2: I compete, gonna stand, but everybody wants to know who.
• 1:14:10
  Speaker 3: Well, who had access to the Twin Towers and Building seven,
• 1:14:18
  Speaker 3: three of the most highly secure buildings outside the Pentagon.
• 1:14:23
  Speaker 3: We'll get to the Pentagon in a second. Who had
• 1:14:26
  Speaker 3: access to these buildings? You know, al Qada probably didn't
• 1:14:31
  Speaker 3: to set explosives on every floor. Unlikely. The security company
• 1:14:38
  Speaker 3: certainly needs an investigation. Secure coom STRATASEC at the time.
• 1:14:42
  Speaker 3: Who's on the board of those directors? Two Bush family members,
• 1:14:46
  Speaker 3: Weert Walker, the third Marvin Bush Cheney has his own
• 1:14:52
  Speaker 3: tentacles throughout nine to eleven. Who who had the capability
• 1:14:57
  Speaker 3: to cause the air defenses to stand down with air
• 1:15:03
  Speaker 3: defense drills? Confusing the nord radar texts, So they didn't
• 1:15:08
  Speaker 3: know what was real world on nine to eleven and
• 1:15:12
  Speaker 3: what wasn't. Who created forty three separate in events, most
• 1:15:20
  Speaker 3: of them hijacking exercise, many of them running those planes
• 1:15:23
  Speaker 3: into the building, and many of them on nine to eleven.
• 1:15:28
  Speaker 3: You know, we begin to get a picture that this
• 1:15:31
  Speaker 3: is not al Kaeda, right, This is elements, rogue elements
• 1:15:35
  Speaker 3: within our government and industry who had the capability to
• 1:15:41
  Speaker 3: cover up nine to eleven. The Attorney General, for instance,
• 1:15:45
  Speaker 3: Dick Chertoff sending home the dancing Israelis who were proven
• 1:15:50
  Speaker 3: Masad agents after brief captivity in the US, being apprehended
• 1:15:59
  Speaker 3: by the FBI because of a very suspicious behaviors and
• 1:16:06
  Speaker 3: ties to the Masad. So, yeah, we can begin to
• 1:16:10
  Speaker 3: form a picture. It's and it's important that we do.
• 1:16:15
  Speaker 3: Who had the capability to run this operation and the
• 1:16:20
  Speaker 3: guise of reacting to it. You mentioned Dick Cheney in
• 1:16:24
  Speaker 3: the Bunker. There's all kinds of major questions that David
• 1:16:29
  Speaker 3: ray Griffin has exposed in his book The New Pearl
• 1:16:32
  Speaker 3: Harbor and New Pearl Harbor Revisited.
• 1:16:35
  Speaker 1: One Lost Time. How can I follow your work?
• 1:16:40
  Speaker 3: Well, certainly the website, Richard Gage nine to eleven dot
• 1:16:45
  Speaker 3: org will give you all the evidence that you need
• 1:16:50
  Speaker 3: to get a real investigation if you have the not
• 1:16:54
  Speaker 3: only the courage, but the stamina and the time and
• 1:16:59
  Speaker 3: the reach and connect with other powerful people, those of
• 1:17:03
  Speaker 3: you who can and do. We're relying on you to
• 1:17:08
  Speaker 3: take this evidence and send this podcast with Germ Warfare
• 1:17:15
  Speaker 3: and the UK column to every architect and engineer you
• 1:17:19
  Speaker 3: can find, everybody else that you know, and the media,
• 1:17:23
  Speaker 3: other media, the media, the lamestream media who will not
• 1:17:29
  Speaker 3: who has been censoring the truth, will not speak the
• 1:17:31
  Speaker 3: truth about these events. They're part of the problem, the
• 1:17:35
  Speaker 3: deep state that we must come down if we're to
• 1:17:39
  Speaker 3: survive our governments mutual governments in South Africa and the
• 1:17:42
  Speaker 3: United States and elsewhere.
• 1:17:45
  Speaker 1: Richard Gage, thank you for joining me in the Strangers.
• 1:17:48
  Speaker 3: Thanks jerm