Latest / Honey Badger Radio / Honey Badger Radio targeted by Homeland Security | Rantzerker 194

Transcript

Honey Badger Radio targeted by Homeland Security | Rantzerker 194 · Honey Badger Radio

• 0:00
  Coming to you live from deep within a slushy and rainy and unseasonably warm radioactive
• 0:08
  wasteland. We are the survivors of the all Right Keck Apocalypse. The few,
• 0:12
  the brave, the bitchy, once more wading into battle against the glowy
• 0:19
  zombie hordes with rant Zirker number one nine four Honey Badger Radio targeted by Homeland
• 0:28
  Security question mark. Yeah, well actually mostly mostly Karen, but also us
• 0:34
  as well, the glowey FEDERALI Hordes, the federal glowy FEDERALI Hordes now ran
• 0:41
  Zirker. So I just want to do a big shout out to b X
• 0:46
  that is at b X underscore on underscore x at Twitter, who initiated this
• 0:53
  or created this Twitter thread or and did a lot of the research to find
• 0:57
  this out. This seems to be shades of didn't even remember all of those
• 1:02
  little NGOs that were going after the alt right or alleged alt right years ago
• 1:08
  to try to dbank them. Oh yeah no, and it's it's like and
• 1:12
  it hasn't stopped, right, you have you have the NGO's well, I
• 1:18
  mean, like the Twitter files. Anyone who was following that. Matt I
• 1:23
  was just watching that Matt speak at congressional hearing. Congressional hearing. Yeah,
• 1:34
  yeah, him and Mike Schellenberger and uh and him and Barry Weiss. I
• 1:38
  think she quit at New York Times and went independent. But these are all
• 1:45
  independent journalists. And when Elon Musk took over Twitter, he handed them a
• 1:49
  whole ton of internal documents and he managed to save some of those documents because
• 1:57
  one of his directors went on a deleting spree. That director and all,
• 2:05
  yeah, that director or it was an executive, he was like he was
• 2:10
  like a deputy chief executive or something like that. Right, Well, that
• 2:19
  guy, James Baker used to be the general counsel for the FBI, okay,
• 2:29
  and he went on an internal document deletion spree that Elon Musk caught him
• 2:35
  in the act and fired him, right, And then he handed over all
• 2:39
  these internal memos and emails and communications and slack chats and all of this other
• 2:45
  stuff over to Tyebe and Schellenberger and Barry Weiss and I think there were a
• 2:52
  couple of others and got them to go through it. And basically, particularly
• 2:58
  since the Biden administration, I mean, was there was always some communication red
• 3:05
  flagging of accounts and stuff by the federal government, various agencies and departments,
• 3:12
  basically saying, well, we think this is a you know, we think
• 3:15
  this count needs to be reviewed. Right, And it's basically like pushing the
• 3:20
  report button, only you get instant service, you get an instant immediate review.
• 3:27
  Right. But since the Biden administration took took office, it's it's been
• 3:36
  like really heavy handed they have. There was one email exchange where the White
• 3:46
  House Communications assistant Communications director or whatever was complaining about an account and and and
• 3:57
  he was complaining about the back channel, right, the form, the special
• 4:00
  form that the government has right to get them moved to the front of the
• 4:05
  line for any kind of report like this, I complaint complaining that it wasn't
• 4:14
  working and he had to refresh at a bunch of times and refill it out
• 4:16
  and whatever. And he was really pissed. And then Twitter responded within like
• 4:21
  five minutes and said, you know, we'll get on this, we'll review
• 4:25
  it and take action if necessary. Right, And then the guy says,
• 4:30
  you know, basically said well go ahead and be non compliant. See what
• 4:35
  happens, right, And the worst thing, and this is coming right out
• 4:42
  of the White House. This isn't just coming out of like the FBI or
• 4:45
  the DHS or whatever or the CIA. This is like coming out of the
• 4:49
  White House, the Biden administration, the staff, White House staff right now.
• 4:55
  Trump had one instance where one of his communications directors asked that a tweet
• 5:01
  be taken down, be deleted. It was when who's that that? Christy
• 5:11
  Chrissy Teagan Chrissy Tigan said something rude about Trump's penism and uh, And the
• 5:18
  White House asked if that tweet could be taken down and they said, no,
• 5:23
  it doesn't violate our terms of service. So and that that was like
• 5:28
  that was the one. See, Trump is just as bad as the rest
• 5:31
  of them. He's trying to control qualified. Like if that was about Hillary's
• 5:38
  coach, wouldn't Twitter be like, oh no, we can't have that.
• 5:42
  Yeah, that's harassment, that's sexual. It's a little bit different than I
• 5:46
  mean, what does anybody's coach or peter have to do with their politics?
• 5:51
  Yeah, why would you feel like, you know, like a fair game,
• 5:56
  you know, parody whatever. But also like but the problem is the
• 6:00
  double standard, Like you do that to a female politician and suddenly the world
• 6:05
  the sky is falling. Well, what they found, what what these journalists
• 6:10
  found, was that that the government was requiring or getting Twitter, compelling pressuring
• 6:20
  Twitter to basically censor a whole bunch of distinguished individuals, right like Harvard Stanford
• 6:30
  trained professors of epidemiology, right, Harvard immunologists, right, like you know,
• 6:38
  if they if they and they actually found three categories of information that the
• 6:44
  government was requiring them to censor. And it was like misinformation, which is
• 6:49
  just being mistake and just being wrong because you made a mistake, right,
• 6:54
  disinformation which is lying, and what they call the new the new category malinformation,
• 7:01
  which is true information that subverts or counter counters public policy. Right.
• 7:14
  So Biden wants everyone to get the vaccines. So when people started posting their
• 7:20
  actual vaccine injuries, these are actual true stories with their actual doctor's diagnosis of
• 7:28
  vaccine injury, right, those people were being censored, They were being throttled.
• 7:33
  Sometimes their accounts were being deleted. Right. And so I'm just sitting
• 7:39
  here and I'm watching this and my jaw is dropping. And of course the
• 7:42
  Democrats in these congressional hearings, because this the last one was like I think
• 7:45
  it was the third one where Schellenberger and Tayibi came and testified, right,
• 7:50
  and and you know the first one. I'm watching it and I'm like Jesus
• 7:56
  Christ, and the Democrats are all just defending it. They're like, well,
• 7:59
  they weren't or sink Twitter to do it. Yeah. No, they're
• 8:01
  just threatening them with being broken up, all these big tech companies being broken
• 8:07
  up with antitrust laws if they don't comply. Yeah, it's uh. And
• 8:13
  now we are seeing this, which is that the Homeland Security is blowing seven
• 8:20
  hundred thousand dollars to to like put a spotlight on Alison in butt fock Saskatchewan
• 8:28
  and me sitting on my fucking couch with my sidewalk half shoveled, because we're
• 8:35
  like, because I'm not even I'm not even capable of organizing a trip to
• 8:41
  the toilet if there's more than two people involved. Okay, maybe terror really,
• 8:50
  maybe they're afraid of my organizational capabilities as they are. And I'm so
• 8:54
  fucking lazy i couldn't even finish my goddamn sidewalk. I'm like, just like,
• 9:00
  the city, come do it. I'll pay the three hundred and fifty
• 9:01
  dollars. Fine. M Jesus. Should I read it the tweets that started
• 9:07
  it? Yeah, the tweet that started it. So that started it all.
• 9:13
  There was a tweet thread that starts by someone named BX with a blue
• 9:18
  check at BX on x and this was very recent, like like what yesterday,
• 9:28
  I think when we learned about it, and they write this. So
• 9:30
  I'm gonna read it out for you guys, And I'm sorry for my voice,
• 9:33
  but I have I've had like a sore throat for the last couple of
• 9:37
  days, and I mean it'll sleep very well. Oh you cod Yeah.
• 9:41
  Basically, well, I'm one of those dirty, filthy unvaccinated people. So
• 9:48
  you mean too Yeah, I think Allison is too. Okay, let's not
• 9:54
  go there because we don't want to get pulled, all right, all right,
• 9:58
  So anyway, they right massive, the US Department of Homeland Security paid
• 10:05
  nearly seven hundred thousand dollars to Accounter Terrorism NGO to quote intercept and divert and
• 10:11
  quote Twitter slash x traffic away from specific individuals in the manisphere, and they
• 10:20
  tagged at Rational Mail, which is Rollo, Cobra, Tate, which I
• 10:24
  think is Andrew Tait, and Fresh and Fit Pod, which is fresh and
• 10:28
  Fit, among others, were specifically named as targets. The DHS TVTP grant
• 10:33
  funding was given to Arizona State University, home of the McCain Institute. The
• 10:39
  purpose of the giant I'm Sorry. The purpose of the grant was to design
• 10:43
  a native tool to be used on Twitter to effectively suppress individuals in the Manisphere
• 10:48
  by diverting their audiences away from their content towards counter messaging content, which is
• 10:54
  websites, podcasts, and creators created are curated by the McCain Institute to counter
• 11:00
  hate speech and misinformation. The US government has named the Manisphere as one of
• 11:05
  the biggest terror threats facing the US. They claim this broad network is the
• 11:11
  main cause of extremely isolated acts of in cell related violence. The conflation of
• 11:18
  in cells with the broader Manisphere as a justification for targeted counter terrorism opts,
• 11:22
  which can include aggressive surveillance and censorship, is part of a disturbing trend.
• 11:28
  The ever broadening definitions of terrorism and extremism put forth by the US government poses
• 11:35
  a very real threat to the constitutional rights of law abiding citizens. Even worse,
• 11:41
  the grant application in resulting reports suggests a large scale collaboration of tech giants,
• 11:46
  NGOs, and US government agencies to design and implement tools to counter hate
• 11:52
  and disinformation by diverting web traffic away from specific individuals and communities deemed harmful.
• 11:58
  What is harmful content? According to the US government, white supremacy, anti
• 12:03
  government views, so libertarianism. Foreign terror organizations like ISIS and the Manisphere are
• 12:13
  the top four terror threats according to the McCain Institute. The Manisphere, the
• 12:20
  Manisphere, and in your face THEACE isis jeez, in your face alt right,
• 12:30
  Uh Trumpists. I guess, I guess we don't technically qualify as the
• 12:37
  Manosphere. But since anyway, we're not mega Republicans, we have no no
• 12:46
  we we we count. It doesn't matter if we're not. We're basically like
• 12:50
  here. I'll just go to the screenshot about where they talk about the Karen
• 12:54
  thing. Here. This is part of the document. One of our one
• 13:00
  of our Twitter followers shared a screenshut of this. And of course they get
• 13:03
  they get the facts wrong, but that's not important, he says, well,
• 13:07
  it's not. I mean, they get some of the stuff wrong,
• 13:09
  but I think the point is is that we are not immune. So it
• 13:16
  does Karen's channel hosts two hundred thousand plus followers. That's Karen's personal channel,
• 13:20
  and her video archive is expansive, dating from twenty thirteen to twenty twenty two.
• 13:26
  While Strawn's content seems less explicitly incendiary, there is overlap between her typical
• 13:31
  men's rights discourse and other Manisphere related topics and hosting well known misogynists on her
• 13:37
  podcast Honey Badger Radio or by interviewing PUA affiliated figures. Her channel permits the
• 13:43
  propagation of messietys fought. We're all Karen. It's like, I'm Karen,
• 13:50
  Your Karen, Karen is Karen, Joe is Karen. You are merely a
• 13:56
  pseudo ponds. I am the Amba and you are the extensions of my protoplasm.
• 14:05
  This this is just showing that they don't really like do deep research.
• 14:09
  They just do enough. No I guarantee. Oh yeah, what what Allison?
• 14:16
  You said? You said that they got on my ass for like interviewing
• 14:20
  Sasha day Game. Sasha day Game the most freaking purple pick up artist out
• 14:26
  there right, Like he's he's like, you know, I think the nightclub
• 14:30
  scene is skeezy and there's a lot of like questionable consent sex going on there.
• 14:35
  Oh man, I don't I don't like it. I think it's I
• 14:37
  think it's a little dirty. Let me just do a little bit of directing
• 14:41
  before we continue with this. If you go to the actual report, go
• 14:46
  back to the actual report, Brian, and then just scroll down one to
• 14:50
  Yeah, I could just go almost to the end, almost to the end,
• 14:54
  because they talk about women in the manosphere. Oh, it looks like
• 14:58
  it has to load up. It's loading, it's loading. Oh wow,
• 15:03
  they got pearl, and yeah they got pearl after pearl, because he got
• 15:07
  a lot on pearl. They got pages and pages on pages on pearl.
• 15:11
  Pearl is okay, go back up? Oh no, wait wait, yeah,
• 15:13
  down, I think it's YouTube. But yeah, a little bit further,
• 15:16
  a little bit further, you'll see the Karen. You'll see Karen's there.
• 15:20
  You go there, there's Karen. There's Sasha day Game. Oh very
• 15:24
  purple pilled. Oh yeah, yeah, Sasha day Game. Yeah. No.
• 15:28
  He he was like, I was like Jesus Christ, you gotta like
• 15:31
  grow a spine there, dude, right, but you're giving me win too
• 15:37
  much credit and and you know, but it's like okay, okay, like
• 15:41
  I I interview all kinds. I talked to anybody, right, and they
• 15:46
  didn't even put it. We talk to rush V did interview when Chris Carantwell
• 15:50
  was the big one. Chris can't well. Chris Cantwell, who was at
• 15:54
  the Unite the Right, He wasn't just at the rally during the day,
• 15:56
  he was at the one Batiki torch the night before. Okay, why Sasha
• 16:03
  game Like why? Okay? I have lots of thoughts on this one.
• 16:10
  What we're seeing is that Homeland Security and presumably probably the FBI is involved in
• 16:15
  this somewhere. Regard men who have UH who want to have a relationship with
• 16:25
  women and want to pursue the skills in order to interest women in relationships with
• 16:30
  them, they're terrorists. Men who don't have relationships with women do not possess
• 16:37
  the skills and maybe never will. And men who do not want relationships with
• 16:41
  men women at all are terrorists. Men who are currently regretting the legal ramifications
• 16:48
  of relationships with women are terrorists. Like, yeah, absurd, it's all
• 16:56
  it's all ends against all men. It's like it's like, if if you
• 17:02
  like women, you're a misogynist. You don't like it. If you don't
• 17:06
  want anything to do with women. You're a misogynist if you if you wish
• 17:08
  you had a relationship with women, but you can't figure out how to get
• 17:12
  one, you're a misogynist. If you if you do want a relationship with
• 17:17
  women and you do know how to get one, you're also a misogynist.
• 17:21
  It's like, it's like, I mean, they are literally a MiG tell
• 17:26
  terrorists in cells, terrorists, MRA's terrorists, right, pick up artists,
• 17:33
  terrorists, right, Like any kind of way that a man expresses himself or
• 17:41
  his masculinity that has any kind of criticism or any kind of understanding of female
• 17:48
  nature terrorists. Yeah. Oh, I think I think Karen's mouth is moving
• 17:56
  when I talk too well, because the sound is just going out of the
• 18:00
  communications audio. Oh damn it. Well we are all Karen. Now,
• 18:07
  well that's true, that's true you guys, Honey, Badger radio is all
• 18:12
  me, it's all mine. I expect you to switch over ownership a sap
• 18:18
  Ah. No, I don't want I don't honestly anything. I think it's
• 18:23
  probably better that they think that you own it, because then it just confuses
• 18:26
  them. I mean, well, well, I mean it basically, you're
• 18:30
  probably not going to get audited anytime soon. So uh yeah, famous line
• 18:37
  if they think I owe it, do you have do you have wood?
• 18:40
  Knock on wood, let's knock all Oh solid wood coffee table. I don't
• 18:45
  have wood Mode Modern from nineteen sixty five. Okay, all right, So
• 18:51
  I just wanted to point that out, like they're they're defining men who have
• 18:55
  an opinion about their relationships with women as terroristic. That's insane and this is
• 19:02
  this is the powers that be. So when feminists start talking about how,
• 19:06
  oh we're the under no they're not. They are absolutely one embedded in the
• 19:11
  entire structure. They marginalize every aspect of men and men's lives and men's opinions
• 19:18
  about themselves. It's pervasive and disturbing. Yeah. Do you remember do you
• 19:22
  remember when I think it was when Weiss did that thing about ICM I fourteen,
• 19:30
  Uh huh yeah, and then uh someone asked a feminist about it or
• 19:36
  something. She was like, oh, I only wish feminists had that kind
• 19:40
  of power. And it's like yeah, because every time, every time something
• 19:44
  happens for women and people think it's great, right, and the public thinks,
• 19:48
  you know, the overwhelmingly approves. It's like feminism did that because we're
• 19:53
  that powerful, right, But then anytime the public is just like, actually
• 20:00
  that doesn't seem quite fair and we don't like it, they're like, well,
• 20:04
  we didn't have anything to do with it, because we don't have that
• 20:07
  kind of power, Like fuck this shit. You have power of defining the
• 20:14
  narrative and defining how you're seen. Like yes, particularly at this point,
• 20:18
  there's no denying it. We don't even know how far this goes, how
• 20:22
  many institutions are completely in their pocket. Although in this instance, I think
• 20:26
  that considering the shoddy nature of the resource, this is probably an NGO just
• 20:32
  making a cash grab. To be honestly, I think the only reason but
• 20:36
  the DHS wouldn't the DHS wouldn't be paying for it, and wouldn't be listing
• 20:41
  the Manisphere as in the top four. If they didn't think that the Manisphere
• 20:45
  was in the top four. What the hell are they doing? Oh,
• 20:49
  they think Alec Manassian and Elliott Roger are like a trend or something, give
• 20:56
  it, well, they're very First of all, Elliott Roger existed before the
• 21:00
  whole insull thing. I mean, this is ridiculous. This is the behavior
• 21:07
  of an institution that's completely lost the plot over what it's actually protecting the fact
• 21:12
  that they diverting funds from saving Americans by foiling actual terrorist acts to classifying men's
• 21:22
  opinions on things in their life as terrorism. I mean, well, for
• 21:26
  we have a government that classifies men having an opinion on their relationships with women
• 21:33
  are lack thereof as terrorism. That the DHS is in charge of the borders,
• 21:40
  right, Okay, And the moment Biden took off as he opened the
• 21:45
  southern border, right, and his idea of funding the border and securing the
• 21:49
  border is just when people cross illegally, we process them faster and release them
• 21:56
  into the interior faster. Right. If we can get funds for that,
• 21:59
  then we won't have this big crisis at the border. Right. So,
• 22:03
  there have been six million people who've crossed that border illegally since twenty twenty one,
• 22:08
  since Biden took office. Six million people and hundreds of people on the
• 22:17
  terror watch list have been apprehended at the border, but there have been one
• 22:21
  point five million known god aways. Those are people who cross the border away
• 22:27
  from a point of entry, were caught on camera, but nobody actually caught
• 22:32
  them, right, and we don't know who they are. So I'm like,
• 22:40
  and then we don't even know how many unknown got aways there were who
• 22:44
  crossed over where there were no cameras. So I don't look, can I
• 22:52
  worried about the Manisphere? All right, Brian say something, Yeah, this
• 23:00
  evidence. I don't think this is ludicrosy. I think this is entirely purpose
• 23:04
  and yeah, it's absolutely deliberate. And the manisphere or what they call the
• 23:11
  manisphere, is really just anyone that wants to discuss the issues that men face
• 23:18
  outside of feminist oversight. That's all it is. That it's basically like we
• 23:23
  are off because look, I live paycheck to paycheck in a small apartment in
• 23:29
  Virginia. I'm not I'm not making massive waves. I'm not collecting you know,
• 23:34
  big giant government grants. I'm I'm just talking about issues without feminist oversight,
• 23:42
  and I'm critical of the way that things are and I think that these
• 23:49
  people. So sometimes this becomes a discussion about people like, you know,
• 23:56
  election fraud. We talk about things like election fraud on the border and the
• 24:00
  war in Israel and the war in Ukraine. It's all connected. It's all
• 24:04
  connected, and it starts with men, and they know that, they know
• 24:08
  that that's where everything else comes from, and so they can't let us like
• 24:15
  say anything that's gonna help men, because a society with strong, independent men
• 24:23
  is a society that does not need the state. And they know that and
• 24:27
  they're terrified of it, and that's why they're doing this. It's on purpose,
• 24:30
  one hundred percent. They're not stupid. I know it doesn't make sense
• 24:34
  when you look at it, but if you know that they have absolutely no
• 24:38
  intention of helping men, absolutely no intention of helping women, absolutely no intention
• 24:45
  of helping anyone except themselves, then it becomes really obvious. I mean,
• 24:51
  like, look at you think it's not connected, but look at how well
• 24:59
  I can't do this because it would take too long. But there are these
• 25:02
  there's this old document that Planned Parenthood put out where they were like, we
• 25:08
  have to reduce the population and then and it's not just through abortion, because
• 25:14
  they weren't just doing that. They had a whole plan because they wanted they
• 25:18
  just they hate people and they want to make up people fewer, and so
• 25:22
  they break up families, they separate men and women, They promote abortions,
• 25:26
  they promote homosexuality, promote all this other stuff and it actually has those consequences.
• 25:32
  They are getting what they want. This is absolutely on purpose. This
• 25:36
  is not stupid, This is not misled, This is not absurd. This
• 25:40
  is just evil and they're doing it and they know it, and we should
• 25:42
  stop intending like they're just misled because it's not true. I know, I'm
• 25:48
  not doing it. They're misled. Yeah, yeah, no, but okay,
• 25:52
  So there are a few people, including the vek Ramaswami at the debate
• 25:56
  last night, yes last night, who talked about how the eight gray replacement
• 26:06
  ray eerie, they is not a conspiracy theory. Nope. And and I'm
• 26:15
  looking at like these the footage of these people all waiting on the one side
• 26:19
  of the wall, the border wall, to go in and get checked in
• 26:23
  and be released into the interior of the US. Right, they're all fighting
• 26:29
  age men. And either's like maybe one out of twenty is a woman,
• 26:34
  one out of thirty is a woman with a child, right, the rest
• 26:38
  of them are fighting age men. And then you got Senator Dick Durbin standing
• 26:45
  on the floor of the Senate giving a speech saying, well, you know,
• 26:48
  recruitments way down since we brought in all this woke stuff and started suggesting
• 26:53
  our soldiers cut their dicks off, right, So and started talking about white
• 27:02
  rage and the military and you know how in sixteen nineteen and all of that
• 27:07
  crap. Right, So, we can't get the recruits that we need.
• 27:10
  So how about this, how about we take these illegals and if they serve
• 27:18
  them in the military, we can make them citizens. Yeah, that's that's
• 27:23
  sort of like a late stage empire's tactic. Oh yeah, no, didn't
• 27:27
  the Romans do that? Yeah? Well here's the thing though, all right,
• 27:30
  this is this is, this is what sort of maybe a little bit
• 27:33
  of a white pill. Yes, the Romans did that, and the western
• 27:38
  half of the empire collapsed. However, the eastern half of the empire survived
• 27:45
  into modernity. And it's because I think that that the Roman culture was very
• 27:48
  adaptive and it adapted in certain ways that we could get into, Like I
• 27:53
  could talk about it, but I won't because this is going to get take
• 27:56
  us way off topic. But I wanted to say something to what Brian was
• 28:00
  talking about about how and also Karen, because what she's bringing up is they're
• 28:06
  importing illegals of fighting age because they know that there's no way, they have
• 28:11
  no incentive for men, naturalized men to fight for this society, the society
• 28:18
  that literally pays takes their money, to put a scope up their ass,
• 28:26
  these men's ass about their opinions on women and their opinions on their relationships with
• 28:30
  women. You believe that, like they know this, They know that this
• 28:34
  is rotten to the core. They know that this is this is part of
• 28:37
  what's driving the recruitment failure. So they're importing men in to fill up the
• 28:45
  army so that we could defend ourselves like they did in the late Roman Empire.
• 28:48
  Yeah, and they're dangling the caarative citizenship. And because they have absolutely
• 28:53
  nothing to give men in our society at this time, they can't even give
• 28:59
  them a kind word. All they have is a proborum censorship. And apparently
• 29:03
  being classified as a terrorist for having an opinion on the woman or the women
• 29:07
  or lack of women in your life. Yeah, that's that's absurd. That'd
• 29:11
  be like all of the women, the fat women. You're terrorists because you
• 29:17
  consider well you you women. Men don't find you as attractive as than women.
• 29:22
  You're a terrorist now because you have an opinion on men's opinion of you
• 29:26
  like the hell, yeah, no, it's and that's you live in And
• 29:32
  this whole time, I'm thinking, Jesus Christ, they should hear my husband
• 29:34
  talk to me. You know. It's like my husband talk to me.
• 29:41
  Oh yeah, right, I'll tell them something. I'll make fun of him
• 29:45
  or whatever, and he'll be like, I will punch you in the tit.
• 29:48
  I got a super I got a super chat. I want to read
• 29:52
  it really quick so it doesn't disappear from TV Dinner Master Chef who us US
• 29:59
  five pounds and says, doesn't homeland security have better things to do, including
• 30:02
  too much money and not enough actual work to do funds for pamphlets and similar
• 30:06
  terror devices, Well, I would. They would probably say that they could
• 30:10
  walk in chew gum. At the same time, they're obviously not protecting the
• 30:14
  border, so that's one job that they don't have to do. But yeah,
• 30:18
  no, it's all about it's all about control. They no, no,
• 30:21
  no, no, Brian, Brian, Brian no. Every time I
• 30:23
  see Alejandromiorkis in front of Congress, he assures everyone that the border is secure.
• 30:30
  Oh right, well, and as he inherited a broken immigration system from
• 30:34
  Trump, Yeah, the border was broken under Trump. You know, I
• 30:41
  just, okay, I want to get too far into immigration, because there
• 30:44
  was something I wanted to talk about with I'm just. I'm just. We've
• 30:47
  abused and beaten and demoralized our men to the point where we have to we
• 30:55
  have to import psychologically at least healthy masculinity, right like, or at least
• 31:03
  men with a healthy sense of themselves as men. We have to import them
• 31:10
  to be able to fill up slots in not just the military, but in
• 31:14
  the police force. Yeah, they're hiring illegals, undocumented immigrants to be police.
• 31:22
  Well, eventually, that's the society we're part of. It is.
• 31:30
  We are in a death spiral attacking masculinity. And I hate to tell everyone,
• 31:36
  but there's a reason why men evolved. And there is no successful society
• 31:41
  that doesn't integrate masculine instincts into its perpetuation and maintenance. It just doesn't.
• 31:52
  It doesn't exist, all right. And when you make this gigantic war on
• 31:59
  the half of your population, and the half of your population that incidentally is
• 32:04
  keyed for whatever reason, to sacrifice everything for their social group, everything,
• 32:08
  men have an instinct to step between danger and their social group. And you
• 32:15
  have decided you're not interested in having that. Well, guess what. Guess
• 32:20
  what you lose when you decide to marginalize the half of the population that's willing
• 32:24
  to sacrifice everything for their social group, for their nation, for their religion,
• 32:30
  for their tribe, for their clan, for their family. Guess what
• 32:31
  you lose. You lose your ability to protect yourself well, and this is
• 32:37
  your ability to build a future. This is an instinct too, right,
• 32:43
  So it takes a lot of counter pressure to squash that, to like completely
• 32:49
  obliterate it, right, to make it so that men are completely apathetic,
• 32:52
  that they no longer will act on an apathetic Did you read that recent Okay,
• 32:58
  so there's an there's an article, and I know exactly what you're saying,
• 33:01
  Karen. It takes a frick ton takes generations of pressure and marginalization.
• 33:07
  Recently, there was an article that came across my Twitter desk and it was
• 33:12
  talking about or either either there it was shared in the discord. It's talking
• 33:16
  about how they've did this study on about five thousand I think split evenly between
• 33:22
  German and U came in and they found that men who have a negative opinion
• 33:29
  of masculinity have worse mental health outcomes. I mean, duh, but you
• 33:34
  know they need they need to know this stuff because they can't use common sense
• 33:37
  like we need. Yeah, no, they need they need to actually verify
• 33:39
  it, you know. Through When you tell men that their masculinity is shit,
• 33:46
  they feel bad and they have worse mental health outcomes. But here's yeah,
• 33:51
  they have like a negative self concept when you tell them they're bad.
• 33:54
  It's like very strange. Here's the kicker. After the many generations of feminists
• 34:00
  telling men that masculinity is associated with violence against women, we now have a
• 34:07
  generation of young men who think that masculinity is violence against women, and the
• 34:13
  older generations associate masculinity with protecting women. The younger generations associated with being violent
• 34:21
  towards women and shift in the attitude. It's not that they are violent towards
• 34:25
  women, it's a shift in the attitude of believing the relationship between masculinity and
• 34:31
  women. So the older general, my sons don't buy into that. Okay,
• 34:35
  that's they're twenty one and twenty nine. They do not buy into any
• 34:39
  of that crap right about. You know, how masculinity is bad and it's
• 34:45
  the equivalent of violence against women, but they're not interested in dating and they're
• 34:52
  not interested in putting themselves in harm's way for women at all. Honestly,
• 35:01
  I don't blame men, Like there's this guy on Twitter who's like, well,
• 35:05
  I just I don't have any interest. I don't have any interest in
• 35:07
  protecting or being violent to women. I just want to ignore them. I'm
• 35:09
  like, understandable, have a nice day, just like I can understand that
• 35:15
  at this point. I can understand the men who are just checking out at
• 35:17
  this monstrosity that we've constructed. But my point is that feminism has constructed this
• 35:22
  link between these young men sense of themselves as men and the most horrible crime
• 35:29
  you can imagine, which is violence against women. Don't get me, don't
• 35:31
  don't bullshit me on this. Everybody thinks violence against women is the worst,
• 35:36
  everybody the everybody pous thing you can do. And you have constructed this this
• 35:42
  You've conflated the most heinous, sinful act with men when masculinity. That's what
• 35:49
  feminists have done, and it's led to unbelievable toll in men's mental health.
• 35:53
  And even those guys you were saying some men are apathetic, good for them,
• 35:58
  those are the men that have actually survived with something intact. Most guys
• 36:02
  are not apathetic, they're actively self loathing. Good luck constructing men protect men
• 36:10
  who are willing to go out and protect women from guys who are mentally shut
• 36:15
  down by the messaging that feminists give them. Good good, good job,
• 36:20
  good job destroying your civilization. Everyone take a bow. Yeah, grief.
• 36:25
  And the thing is that people are they don't see this, they don't see
• 36:31
  the connection between all of this. No, it's it's it's infuriating too,
• 36:37
  right, because like when even the conservatives don't yeah, no, and and
• 36:42
  you get the whole discussion on fatherlessness and it's like, well, girls suffer
• 36:46
  from fatherlessness too. Yeah, except for girls. Okay, they're probably going
• 36:52
  to grow up in daycares populated by adult women, in elementary schools populated by
• 36:59
  adult women, and with a mother in the home, maybe aunts and a
• 37:02
  grandmother around them. Right, Okay, so they got plenty of same sex
• 37:07
  adult role models who are responsible and and all of that to basically give themselves
• 37:15
  a positive view of women in the world. Right, what did boys have?
• 37:21
  It's like Tommy Sodomayor said, you know, like you never insult somebody's
• 37:24
  mama on the playground, right, your mom ain't shit? Yeah you talk?
• 37:29
  Hey, you freaking fisticuffs right, Okay, even if your mom's a
• 37:35
  crackhor you got a defender. And then yeah, but then somebody says your
• 37:42
  daddy ain't Your daddy ain't shit, And the first thing you say is you
• 37:45
  know my daddy like, because that's what they've been hearing from their mom their
• 37:52
  whole fucking life. Your daddy ain't shit. I don't need no man,
• 37:58
  Well you don't. I got a super chat and a super chow. I'm
• 38:01
  gonna go ahead and read those. So Superchat from said Joel Jed seventy seven
• 38:09
  for two pounds, and he says they hope the bashing would be a challenge
• 38:14
  to men. Thank you, Jed, Well, it certainly is. And
• 38:20
  then I got a really big superchow. Thank you so much for the superchow.
• 38:25
  So and this is from af ass thrown because it's five dollars and he
• 38:31
  says this pisses me off so much. We have feminists talking about the pink
• 38:36
  tax. Actually male products are more expensive now and claim how oppressed they are.
• 38:39
  Meanwhile, a group of men and women discussing how men can find meaning
• 38:44
  to better themselves and how are labeled as biggest threat to society? What the
• 38:50
  actual fuck? At the same time, we have Ukrainian women complaining why the
• 38:53
  men don't want to fight? Your videos and those of Bane six sixty six
• 38:58
  AU or even just a Carr have become even more relevant. What do you
• 39:01
  badgers think? Will it be up to men again to fix these feminist mess
• 39:06
  and still get blamed for it? Well, I will say real quick,
• 39:09
  we actually are a threat to them, to their power because a well,
• 39:17
  look, a man who has a purpose and does not hate himself is the
• 39:24
  most dangerous thing to people like these elites. This is why they're doing it.
• 39:30
  We are a threat to their power. That's what I think, all
• 39:35
  right. I just want to I want to put my slot in here.
• 39:39
  I think that it's a threat in a difference. It is a threat,
• 39:45
  yes, but not in a gross and physical way. It has nothing to
• 39:50
  do with an actual violent threat, because I don't think we pose a violent
• 39:54
  threat in the slightest. I don't think any of us here are violent people,
• 40:00
  just not in our nature. We are very kind and very compassionate people.
• 40:06
  That's why we talk about the group of people that that you get the
• 40:09
  most blowback for extending any kind of compassion for like, look at all of
• 40:15
  the crap that we've dealt with year after year after year at Honey Badger Radio,
• 40:20
  and part of it looks like it is literally the government is in some
• 40:23
  ways got us in our site, in our in their sights, Like now
• 40:29
  we have to I have to ask, well, why was I turned away
• 40:31
  from the American Why why was I turned away from the US border during the
• 40:37
  Ice Age twenty eight twenty nineteen, Like what was it? Was it?
• 40:42
  Really? I mean, I know other Canadians were also being turned away for
• 40:45
  similar reasons. But on the other hand, like was it? They knew
• 40:51
  just that? And they they knew it, They knew who they knew who
• 40:54
  I was, They knew that I was part of Honey Badger Radio. In
• 40:58
  fact, they also spoke like when when Mike doctor Randamcamp went to see Lauren,
• 41:05
  so he has he's in a relationship with Lauren, as I think you
• 41:07
  guys know, and he periodically comes to the US. The lat before Kouf,
• 41:13
  he came to the US to see Lauren, and he was questioned about
• 41:17
  his relationship to me and Honey Badger Radio at the border. Yes, yes,
• 41:25
  So now I have to wonder why exactly was I turned away and banned
• 41:30
  for five years from the US, not just turned away, not just lo
• 41:34
  hey, stupid naive Canadian, you just can't apply for a B A B
• 41:37
  two visa right now because whatever we're we're really getting hinky about immigration. No,
• 41:44
  I was banned for five years, you know, And now I have
• 41:47
  to wonder about all of that, like how deep is that does that network
• 41:52
  of how deep does that file go on? Me and Honey Badger Radio and
• 41:57
  Karen and the rest of us. So we are literally dealing potentially well looks
• 42:01
  like actually now with a system that's out to get us. And I know
• 42:07
  how paranoid that sounds, but it's staring us right there. Yeah, I
• 42:13
  know, like Mel Gibson. Yeah, and you know in that movie.
• 42:20
  And then also the deal with the court case and losing the court case,
• 42:23
  not just on the stuff that might have been a little bit more of a
• 42:27
  stretch, but the stuff that was right there in black and white. They
• 42:30
  can't that a contract that they had is not it's not actually legal based on
• 42:38
  Canadian consumer protection. And they didn't even rule, like the judge didn't even
• 42:43
  rule in my favor and say hey, okay, pay here seven hundred and
• 42:45
  fifty bucks and let's move on with our lives. Gee, they didn't even
• 42:49
  do that. This was over seven hundred and fifty bucks. And the judge
• 42:52
  broke Canadian law, gave a judgment that wasn't even a judgment because it didn't
• 42:59
  even reference any law because he couldn't reference any law with his judgment because it
• 43:04
  was completely divorced from the law. Yep, and you have the facts wrong
• 43:08
  too, Yeah, and what happened there? How did that happen? And
• 43:14
  it's like all every step of the way, how much we have dealt with
• 43:17
  with the system, how much we have tried to keep going despite all the
• 43:22
  crap that we were facing, And the only thing that motivates us is the
• 43:29
  fact that we care about people, and we care about a group of people
• 43:32
  that nobody else is willing to and not just because you know, nobody gives
• 43:37
  a fuck about men, why would you really? Because men are there to
• 43:39
  be thrown into the pit in order to build the bridge that everybody else walks
• 43:45
  across for society, right, nobody gives a fuck about them. That's why
• 43:50
  we can send them to build the the the tunnel under the Thames, and
• 43:54
  you know five, you know, a couple dozen men die for every foot
• 43:59
  of tunnel, right, that's why we can send them into war to solve
• 44:01
  our political disputes, which is the real most ridiculous monstrosity I've ever heard of.
• 44:07
  But anyway, you know, so we have this inclination not to care
• 44:10
  about men, but we do, like the people here do. We're doing
• 44:15
  this because we care well, and we're not just doing it because we're not
• 44:20
  doing it just because we care for men. Right, It's not like we
• 44:22
  solely care for men. Like I care about my daughter. I want her
• 44:25
  to have like a lance at a reasonable life. Oh yeah, well you
• 44:31
  know, and at I had this horrible nightmare right the other night where you
• 44:38
  know, my older two because they're only about fifteen months apart, they were
• 44:45
  sitting and talking and they were joking about about they made some wise cracks about
• 44:55
  culture and misogyny and like, they made some sexist and then they fist bumped,
• 45:01
  right, and then there was this man who was sitting in front of
• 45:06
  them saying, why are you fist bumping over that? That was really rude,
• 45:09
  right, And and then my daughter started crying and he says, well,
• 45:16
  what's with this? And she says, everyone's either took or done.
• 45:22
  Everyone's either took or done. And I'm like, oh, fuck, you
• 45:28
  know, because she's twenty eight right, no kids yet, she's got a
• 45:34
  boyfriend, no kids yet, and she you know, and it's like every
• 45:37
  time's running out and everyone is either taken or done. Yeah, done with
• 45:43
  the shit. But my point is that we do this and I care about
• 45:50
  women. In fact, it really pisses me off when I see the full
• 45:52
  extent in part. You know, you go towards men for the same reason
• 45:55
  that it's someone like Justin Trotcia does because nobody does. Nobody's care taking care
• 46:00
  of men, nobody's looking out for men. So you look, this is
• 46:02
  what you decide to do, right, It's not because you don't care about
• 46:07
  women. And in fact, it infuriates me when I realized that feminists don't
• 46:09
  care about women. They're just a payday. They don't care about women,
• 46:15
  they're just victim farming. And that really pissed me off because I thought,
• 46:19
  at the very least feminists cared about women, and then I find out they
• 46:22
  don't. They don't care about anyone. They care about their freaking bottom line
• 46:25
  and their political clout. But anyway, my point is that none of us
• 46:30
  are aggressive people. We're driven by compassion. Oh I don't know about that,
• 46:35
  Alison, But except for Karen, Okay, Karen, Karen is their
• 46:37
  own par But we are driven by compassion. We are create very disagreeable,
• 46:44
  which is why we can keep going forward despite all of the crap that's thrown
• 46:47
  at us socially, Like I don't give a fuck you called me a Pigmy,
• 46:52
  I want to live with myself at the end of the day, and
• 46:53
  if I turn away, i've if I turn away from something that is important
• 47:00
  to me because I believe that it is the compassionate thing to do. Because
• 47:05
  I was bullied by a bunch of reprobates, I can't live with myself with
• 47:08
  that. And then we have to deal with the institutional stuff. But my
• 47:14
  overall point is we are so driven by compassion that that we are willing to
• 47:21
  walk into a hal of social, political, and legal bullshit in order to
• 47:25
  keep advocating for men right. And we are willing to do this on a
• 47:30
  shoe string budget. Like I looked at the financials and there was one feminist
• 47:37
  NGO one head of a feminist NGO. Her salary is the entire budget for
• 47:46
  all of HBr combined, just her salary for a year, and all she
• 47:50
  does is put out a pamphlet and do a monthly one and a half hour
• 47:55
  seminar. That's it. That's her entire productivity. Yeah, no, it's
• 48:00
  It's like, so we work on a shaw of shoestring budget, you know,
• 48:07
  and I feel bad about that. We work on a shoe string budget.
• 48:10
  We are constantly dealing with shit like the Homeland Security just declaring us and
• 48:16
  I know they are gonna lump us with the Manisphere as one of the four
• 48:21
  biggest terroristic threats even though none of us are in any way violent, and
• 48:25
  then dealing with all the legal ramifications like this is a hard row to hoe.
• 48:31
  This is really fucking hard. It's really hard, and yet we still
• 48:37
  do it. And I'm just saying that that says something about our natures as
• 48:40
  being compassionate and how much we're driven by compassion. That's all I was saying.
• 48:45
  So, I don't know we are a threat on a moral level.
• 48:51
  Yeah. The reason why I'm gonna say that is I don't think they're afraid
• 48:55
  necessarily of men becoming violent. They're afraid of men walking away and building something
• 49:01
  else, because when men walk away and they build something else, Roma happens,
• 49:08
  and Rome is unstoppable. I'm just gonna say that until it gets stopped,
• 49:14
  because they started a devaluation and then it goes into the East. And
• 49:16
  the thing is that when you look at the politics of Europe and the Eastern
• 49:22
  Rome, we are living in the shadow of the politics of the breakup of
• 49:27
  the West. Like all of the countries, you know, their borders are
• 49:32
  almost exactly the same as the Roman provinces they used to be a lot of
• 49:37
  their politics and their cultural attitudes are inherited from when they were Roman. Like
• 49:45
  what happened is you got that centralization falling and then building itself back up again
• 49:51
  locally. So it's like our civilization is in the shadow of that one,
• 49:58
  reclaiming it and still still working off of how to describe this, still working
• 50:05
  off of the operating system developed in that little town with the Seven Hills,
• 50:09
  off the code you know in Italy, we're still operating off of that.
• 50:15
  And if we actually look at that and we actually consciously understand ourselves, we
• 50:22
  can build something that is a foundation for a future that the homeland security,
• 50:29
  all of this stuff is not going to be part of. That's what men
• 50:31
  have in them and women. When men and women work together and actually care
• 50:37
  about each other and actually build something together, we can build something that they
• 50:42
  have absolutely that they're not going to be part of, and they must know
• 50:45
  that. Okay, Well, you know, I wanted to I just wanted
• 50:51
  to say I'm not motivated primarily by compassion, not for men, not for
• 50:57
  women, not prolong on the internet. Well there is. That'd probably be
• 51:04
  about twenty percent of my motivation, but it really is because I do have
• 51:09
  skin in the game in the form of three children, and I'd really like
• 51:15
  them to have some kind of future. And like that's that's kind of what
• 51:21
  keeps me motivated on a number of fronts, not just on the men's right
• 51:25
  It's front, but on certain other topics that are highly controversial as well.
• 51:34
  But it's basically I look at it and I think, you know, like,
• 51:38
  we all want a functional society, right, we all want to retain
• 51:45
  at least retain the standard of living that we have now. Where I flip
• 51:51
  a switch, the lights come on, right, where I turn a tap,
• 51:54
  the water comes out and it's not poisoned. It's not full of lead,
• 51:59
  it not full of contaminants. Right, it's not full of beaver fever.
• 52:04
  Okay, you know we all at least want that. My husband works
• 52:07
  in critical infrastructure, right, and and everybody wants the toilet to flush and
• 52:15
  for the waste to be carried away, like everybody needs that. Everybody wants
• 52:20
  that. Everybody absolutely has to have that, right, Otherwise they would be
• 52:25
  like, have you ever lived, Allison? Have you ever lived in a
• 52:29
  house with a completely clogged sewer line? She's not there, Brian, have
• 52:37
  you ever No? But but have you ever been in a house, been
• 52:42
  in a house where it was thirty six hours before you could flush a toilet
• 52:46
  or use your kitchen sink? No, in the middle of winter when it's
• 52:52
  twenty below out. No, No, you're looking. You're looking. Yeah,
• 52:59
  No, And I'm just like, I'm just like, Okay, So,
• 53:01
  what do we have to do to maintain this? What do we have
• 53:05
  to do to retain this? What do we have to do so that the
• 53:08
  next generation has things at least as good as we do, Right? And
• 53:15
  that informs me on things like the waste of fucking time and money that colleges
• 53:23
  for most people, it informs me on you know, governments, maybe they
• 53:30
  should be balancing their budgets and not going into debt because that's not how households
• 53:37
  are supposed to operate. Why does the government operate like that? Right,
• 53:40
  maybe we should be promoting the most productive people, right, and encouraging people
• 53:50
  in their particular fields of greatest productivity. Like, maybe that's what we should
• 53:57
  be doing, right, And it's like, well, don't take your most
• 54:00
  economically productive people, not just economically productive, but in terms of units of
• 54:07
  work produced per year, units of benefit produced. You know, the number
• 54:13
  of times I flip that switch and the lights come on, it's like just
• 54:15
  amazing. It's like almost every time. You want to keep those people happy,
• 54:22
  functional, healthy, right, and motivated. Right, that's what you
• 54:28
  want to do. And it's like, so like, from a purely pragmatic
• 54:32
  utilitarian standpoint, we are destroying our entire society, right, and not only
• 54:42
  are we destroying the future for our kids. We've basically like I saw a
• 54:47
  meme the other day, right, you know, welcome to a newborn,
• 54:52
  Right, welcome to the world. Here's your seventy eight thousand dollars in debt.
• 55:00
  I was actually I could actually hear you, guys. I was just
• 55:02
  all right, I got I got a super I got a super check.
• 55:07
  And before we before we go into that can, I just did you just
• 55:12
  say you had to see a man about a horse. I don't know what
• 55:15
  that means, but yes, okay, did you need to shake the weasel?
• 55:20
  Though? No, I had to shutter the clam Okay, oh okay,
• 55:25
  good? All right, So anyway I did, I did hear you,
• 55:30
  And yes I have lived in a house without plumbing and it was not
• 55:34
  pleasant. Yeah, yeah, get get good, you good good. Use
• 55:37
  out of those big paint buckets, all right. And also, I just
• 55:43
  want to remind everybody who's listening, if you do want to send us a
• 55:45
  message, the best way to do so is feed the badger dot com slash
• 55:49
  just the tip. We get the full benefit of the funds and you get
• 55:51
  the full benefit of avoiding YouTube's comment enhancement system. That's feed the badger dot
• 55:57
  com slash just the tip. Okay, go ahead, Brian, I just
• 55:59
  want to to say that because I haven't said it yet. It's fine.
• 56:01
  So I got a super chat and a super chow or a rumble rant.
• 56:06
  Actually it's a rumble rant. So I got a rumble rant from Blade Kaiser
• 56:09
  and he says, five dollars, thank you, blave. Just sitting here
• 56:14
  at work, and all of a sudden, a wild rant zerker appears.
• 56:17
  What the deuce? Yes, we have been the juice. What the deuce?
• 56:22
  We've been spotted by the Well it's I think we've been on the radar
• 56:29
  for a while, so I guess I would. It wouldn't be fair to
• 56:30
  say we've been spotted, but yes, we are under them, the radar
• 56:35
  of the Department of Homeland Security. We haven't even got into what they're actually
• 56:40
  doing, right, I know, I know, i'd like to. Okay,
• 56:45
  sorry, I'm like sucking on a Ricola lozenge because my throat, So
• 56:51
  yeah, don't take offense to that. Sick Fox gives it's ten dollars as
• 56:55
  a as a super chow and says, if talking about men's issues creates a
• 57:04
  threat to the state, then that tells you what you need to know about
• 57:07
  the state. Well, yeah, that's what I'm saying. That's what I
• 57:10
  meant when I said it's a threat. I don't mean a physical threat.
• 57:13
  I don't mean a threat of violence or harm. I mean that when you
• 57:17
  have a man, when you have men that know what their worth is,
• 57:22
  that have the appropriate amount of support, your governments, influence in power,
• 57:28
  and all of the other institutions, all these feminist organizations, they diminish and
• 57:32
  they know that, and that's why they're doing that. And actually they're not
• 57:37
  as necessary anymore, and so like they just go away. Specifically before we
• 57:45
  continue. Specifically, they're worried about women talking about men's issues. Oh yeah,
• 57:51
  well more than men talking about men's issues, because men have been doing
• 57:54
  that forever and they haven't responded this way. Yeah, and they Okay,
• 58:00
  so we can go through that section that I showed you. Yeah, yeah,
• 58:07
  let's talk a little bit about it. Yeah, just go up and
• 58:09
  we'll Because they have a specific section on women who talk about men's issues,
• 58:15
  you have to go up a bit further, uh to this YouTube, but
• 58:19
  primally, nope, keep going. It's a it's a specific section. We
• 58:22
  should take a look at that. So incidentally, what this all is is,
• 58:25
  yes, we're on Homeland securities radar, but they're also we're also finding
• 58:30
  out, yes, female support its misogyny. We're also finding out that we
• 58:37
  are being targeted by either these groups to have attention, clicks, likes,
• 58:44
  whatever diverted away from us. And in particular that I've noticed that these groups
• 58:49
  really are worried about women who talk about men's issues. Oh, women in
• 58:53
  the service of male supremacy. Yes that I am not part of the women's
• 59:01
  auxiliary. I am the deputy Grand Wizard of the Men's rights movement. I
• 59:10
  believe that it is still a position below Anthony Johnson, who is the president
• 59:15
  and CEO of the Manisphere. But it's still still a worthwhile title. Okay.
• 59:22
  But anyway, so they're really concerned about women who talk about these issues.
• 59:27
  They are this is, this is I'm pretty sure that this is one
• 59:30
  of the big targets. And uh, I mean there are pages and pages
• 59:35
  and pages and pages on Pearl. Of course, I don't understand how talking
• 59:38
  about how men are victims of society and women is male supremacy. But you
• 59:45
  know, good, square that circle in your head. No no, no,
• 59:52
  no, no, no, no, Okay, here's the thing.
• 59:54
  Here's the thing. Else. Men are supposed to do what they're told,
• 1:00:00
  even if what they're told changes on the hour, okay, and uh,
• 1:00:06
  and they're supposed to shut the fuck up and uh and pay, That's exactly
• 1:00:15
  it. And honestly, this is not This is not new. A society
• 1:00:20
  investing in a narrative that explains why it's justified throwing men into the meat grinder,
• 1:00:25
  that's not new. We needed that in World War One, we needed
• 1:00:30
  that. Throughout all of our history of violence towards each other, we've needed
• 1:00:32
  these justifications for why men are expendable. And feminism is just another one,
• 1:00:37
  just another one in a long line of them. And if we're going to
• 1:00:40
  challenge this, we're challenging something very fundamental. But yeah, well, and
• 1:00:45
  you know, at one of the things too write that drives me crazy is
• 1:00:51
  feminism, Like they're they're really great stealers of valor. Right, So it's
• 1:00:57
  like, now on, remember and stay in Canada, November eleventh, Right,
• 1:01:01
  we have to honor the brave women and men who gave their lives for
• 1:01:08
  our freedoms. Right, And it's like, yeah, but I'm pretty sure
• 1:01:15
  it was like ninety seven percent men. Yeah, And I'm pretty sure every
• 1:01:22
  single woman who gave her life, every single female military person right who gave
• 1:01:30
  her life for her country, was did so voluntarily because she volunteered for military
• 1:01:37
  service, not because she was drafted. And also the military would have done
• 1:01:43
  considerably more to prevent her death than the men's death and women's death. And
• 1:01:46
  the military still isn't proportionate to their participation in the military. Oh god,
• 1:01:52
  yeah, no, it's still like ninety eight percent men's deaths, even those
• 1:01:54
  seventeen percent of the military as women. Yeah, it's just like and oh,
• 1:02:00
  and feminists fought and fought and fought, and they got it right for
• 1:02:04
  the right of women to be promoted in the military all the way up to
• 1:02:10
  the very top levels, even though they'd never served in combat, because that
• 1:02:15
  that is, basically that was kind of the standard right you had to have
• 1:02:22
  at least served in combat before you got promoted to general, right, And
• 1:02:29
  no women can be promoted to be generals despite the fact that they're not allowed
• 1:02:36
  to serve in or not qualified to serve in combat, even though they have
• 1:02:39
  never served in combat. Combat, they're they're allowed to now, but nobody's
• 1:02:45
  ever qualified. Good lord, all right, so let's let's let's walk.
• 1:02:50
  Let's take a look at this, all right, so more read just want
• 1:02:58
  me to read this, sure, women in the service of male supremacy exploring
• 1:03:05
  females support extreme misogyny on mainstream social media platforms by Clara Boukhart and Leela mcclintlock.
• 1:03:14
  The current online misogynists land so this women that wrote this. The current
• 1:03:19
  online misogynist landscape is a patchwork of various communities sorry with distinct discursive oh do
• 1:03:25
  you want me to read it? And cultural practices. Popular communities include Men
• 1:03:31
  going their Own Way, a movement combating against what they consider a ginocentric society
• 1:03:37
  by withdrawing from women completely and in cells involuntary celibates, a community of mostly
• 1:03:44
  young men unable to have sexual and or romantic relationships with women, which is
• 1:03:49
  expressed in hostility and animosity towards them in their forums. In recent years,
• 1:03:54
  with the rise of the man of sphere, you may have encountered some content
• 1:03:58
  from this part of the Internet. Unexpectedly, the algorithm algorithm curated recommendation discovery
• 1:04:04
  feeds of any social media app may have served you up a tweet from the
• 1:04:09
  notorious Manisphere influencer Andrew Tait lamenting the purported abominable state of masculinity in the West,
• 1:04:15
  or a video from the Whatever podcast mocking the body count that is the
• 1:04:19
  number of sexual partners someone has had of the unforgivably emancipated modern woman females,
• 1:04:27
  supportive massa terrorism. This is this is what they define as terrorism. It's
• 1:04:31
  not just terrorism. It is the top one of the top four, right
• 1:04:35
  up there with ISIS and libertarians. This is just you know, like,
• 1:04:41
  instead of looking at it and saying, wow, aren't these really insane rankings,
• 1:04:45
  maybe we should be like, yeah, it looks like they Why why
• 1:04:48
  do they have a problem with people supporting men? And why do they have
• 1:04:51
  a problem with libertarians? Huh huh? I mean ISIS is kind of a
• 1:04:57
  no brainer. Okay, I can get with that, but what is it
• 1:05:00
  with the other two? Why are those right up there with it? Like
• 1:05:03
  like literally, you can be in the you can be in the in the
• 1:05:06
  chat or watching this later, and you can be like, I'm not a
• 1:05:10
  NMRA, I don't give a fuck about men's issues, right, but I'm
• 1:05:13
  an a CAP or I'm a libertarian. Well guess what, buddy, you're
• 1:05:16
  with us now? And you know what, it makes perfect sense. It
• 1:05:19
  makes perfect sense because again, these are authoritarian, fucking crazy people that want
• 1:05:27
  to control your life. They this is how much they want to control your
• 1:05:30
  life. They don't like that. Migtao just don't just want to be left
• 1:05:33
  alone. That's literally like they be like men that don't want anything to do
• 1:05:36
  with women are dangerous to women somehow, in cells men who have no chance
• 1:05:42
  with women also very dangerous to women. Like, if anything, you should
• 1:05:46
  be telling in cels, you should be convincing them to live a migtile lifestyle
• 1:05:50
  so that they'll at least be content and alone if they can. Right.
• 1:05:55
  But no, it's not because they genuinely fear any of these people. It's
• 1:06:00
  because they hate the fact that these people want to be like they want to
• 1:06:05
  be left alone, without interference, without control. This is why they lump
• 1:06:10
  MRAs in with libertarians. You may not think it makes sense, but if
• 1:06:14
  you look at it from from the perspective of a totalitarian dictator, it makes
• 1:06:19
  perfect sense. Well let me let me put it in another way. They
• 1:06:25
  see something that you don't libertarians and caps conservatives, women, hippie women with
• 1:06:33
  their crystals who want to use homeopathy to cure the koof and I, you
• 1:06:39
  know what, I feel like you should have every right to do that.
• 1:06:41
  Don't get me wrong, I'm being a little bit chungu in cheek. But
• 1:06:44
  you know what I mean. All of you don't understand why you're being lumped
• 1:06:47
  in with the manisphere and the far right and men, but all of you
• 1:06:53
  are expressions of some form of masculine virtue, and they know it. They
• 1:06:58
  will point this out and they will say that wanting to retain your bodily autonomy
• 1:07:04
  and make decisions about your own body is a masculine virtue. Somehow, wanting
• 1:07:12
  to not act out of fear and retain your freedom to make choices is a
• 1:07:15
  masculine virtue. They the people who are a masculine characteristic, a masculine device,
• 1:07:23
  a masculine advice. The people who are promoting that when I've seen when
• 1:07:28
  they talked about, let's say the medical authoritarianism, they were saying that submitting
• 1:07:36
  to certain social expectations was a feminine virtue. So submitting your freedom over your
• 1:07:46
  choices of what to do with your body was a feminine virtue for the benefit
• 1:07:51
  for the safety of all was a feminine virtue. And they would say that
• 1:07:58
  they think that, well, they know that they're promoting this feminine submission,
• 1:08:05
  this feminine belief that freedom is not freedom to do what you want, but
• 1:08:10
  freedom from fear. As Brian's wife Lindsay pointed out, they are promoting all
• 1:08:15
  of that. That's why you're in their sights because they see you as masculine.
• 1:08:21
  They see you as men. You may call yourself conservatives, you may
• 1:08:26
  call yourself libertarians, you may cause yourself and caps, but they see you
• 1:08:30
  as expressions of masculinity. And they're right because you are. That desire for
• 1:08:35
  freedom over safety that is masculine, That desire for autonomy over service to suppose,
• 1:08:44
  you know, supposedly others, that kind of piety, that's masculine.
• 1:08:47
  Okay. All of these things are masculine expressions. The desire for meritocracy,
• 1:08:54
  the desire to have our entire society run by a meritocracy, that's masculine,
• 1:09:00
  okay. The desire for people to get what they earn rather than what they
• 1:09:03
  need, that is masculine. They see you as men, they see you
• 1:09:09
  as pursuing a masculine end. You think that you're just doing a political thing
• 1:09:14
  that's divorced from men and women, but you're not. You're actually you've actually
• 1:09:18
  attached to some aspect of what I would call masculine virtues and of course they
• 1:09:24
  would call masculine vices either freedom, meritocracy, autonomy, freedom of speech.
• 1:09:31
  You've attached to that, and you think that this is a gender neutral political
• 1:09:35
  concept, it's not. It is an expression of masculinity. And they're gunning
• 1:09:42
  after you because they believe and they know that you are. You are professing,
• 1:09:48
  and you're putting your weight behind something that they perceive which is wrong,
• 1:09:53
  which is an expression of masculinity. It's why they'll call white supremacy. And
• 1:09:59
  you look at so what they're talking about when they say white supremacy, and
• 1:10:01
  it's like, well, that's masculinity, all right. They're tying whatever they
• 1:10:06
  can to what they hate or what they want to get rid of, which
• 1:10:11
  is masculinity. It's like a feminine nosis. They want to remove it from
• 1:10:15
  society. And they really don't want women to be masculine, because if you
• 1:10:19
  think about how they're portraying women, they're not portraying women as protective towards men,
• 1:10:25
  as honorable towards men, as respectful and loyal, which is what we
• 1:10:30
  traditionally regard as masculine and the masculine relationship towards women. They're not doing that.
• 1:10:36
  They define the masculine is criminal and then say, well, women should
• 1:10:40
  be criminal too, women should be aggressive and sociopathic too, because that's how
• 1:10:45
  we've defined masculinity, in complete defiance of how it was defined traditionally. And
• 1:10:50
  yeah, there should be no there should be no restrictions on women's behavior,
• 1:10:58
  including those restrictions that you know, we regired this person as being an unhinged
• 1:11:01
  sociopath if they were a man directing their behavior at women. Okay, so
• 1:11:06
  it's like they are gunning, and they will say it. They will say
• 1:11:13
  the future's female, a world defined and ruled by women's virtues, what they
• 1:11:18
  perceive to be women's virtues, which is putting safety before freedom, which is
• 1:11:23
  putting need before merit, which is which is putting fear before autonomy. Okay,
• 1:11:31
  they courage before courage. They will say that world is a better world,
• 1:11:36
  and that's what they're driving towards. So you think you're gender neutral,
• 1:11:40
  you're not. You are actually advancing some aspect of masculine virtue and a society
• 1:11:45
  that is dead set on eradicating it. And how else what other conclusion can
• 1:11:51
  you come to when you see an institution that is putting the entire apparatus,
• 1:11:57
  the entire anti terrorist apparatus against people who are simply saying that men have a
• 1:12:01
  right to have an opinion like this is. This is how deep it goes.
• 1:12:11
  They have a right to an opinion, as long as it's the right
• 1:12:14
  opinion. Well, we can look at the where they're redirecting people. So
• 1:12:18
  you guys get the yeah, we finished the paragraph, then okay. Female
• 1:12:28
  supported misogyny on mainstream platforms has largely been contained to anti feminist content by far
• 1:12:35
  right and tradwife subcommunities online, often mixing the aesthetics of traditional gender roles with
• 1:12:42
  captions condemning the idea of gender equality. A specific characteristic of this content online
• 1:12:47
  is the veneration of the traditional female gender roles. However, a new niche
• 1:12:51
  of female supported misogyny online seems to have emerged. Rather than romanticizing and promoting
• 1:12:58
  a patriarchal society, these women condemn any female dissidents this niche of female influencers
• 1:13:03
  and content creator What this okay? What okay? Clara and Leela, You
• 1:13:15
  are getting a grant from the US government for your nonsense, and you are
• 1:13:21
  saying that we are condemning feminist female dissidents. You're the ones, this is
• 1:13:28
  like complete projection. You are the ones condemning female dissidents. Okay, continue,
• 1:13:33
  Brian, I just wanted to point that out, all right, this
• 1:13:38
  niche of female influencers and content creators primarily followed and supported by men, use
• 1:13:44
  the same humiliating and denigrating language to talk about women as is typical in much
• 1:13:48
  of the manisphere. Uh okay, and it's all about feeling insulted. Yeah
• 1:13:54
  yeah. And men are pigs okay, yeah, And men are pigs and
• 1:13:58
  are blamed for any criminal sick Yeah yeah, no, men men are all
• 1:14:02
  men are pigs and uh, all men are rapists and that is all they
• 1:14:09
  are. That was the the epitome of feminist thought in the nineteen sev from
• 1:14:15
  people like Catherine McKinnon. So you know, like, don't give me this
• 1:14:19
  crap, but we're using denigrating language against Like, honestly, did anybody see
• 1:14:27
  Chris Christie simping for fucking Nikki Hayley during that debate, right because Vivek challenged
• 1:14:33
  her. He's like, she wants to send our children, our troops to
• 1:14:39
  Ukraine, to Ukraine, for Ukraine, name the three provinces, right,
• 1:14:48
  that Russia wants that Ukraine doesn't want to give up. Name them, Nikki,
• 1:14:53
  name them? You can't and you know you can't. And then it's
• 1:14:57
  like Chris Christie comes to her rescue captain and say, oh, oh,
• 1:15:00
  well, you know he insulted her intelligence and that's not okay. I know
• 1:15:05
  who which provinces in Ukraine that are under dispute right out of the region,
• 1:15:13
  the don Bass Crimea, right, then the Neetsk and Luhansk. You know,
• 1:15:19
  like it's like it's like, no, but what I'm saying is I
• 1:15:24
  know this. Nikki Hayley doesn't know this. She's all in for this war.
• 1:15:28
  She's like two hundred billion dollars in counting, and you know, why
• 1:15:31
  not send our boys over there? Right, She's like, because we have
• 1:15:35
  to do it. And she's completely she can't even name she can't even name
• 1:15:40
  the provinces she's defended. So the point is that she is ignorant over the
• 1:15:45
  opinion that she's holding. Yeah, and then you got then you got Chris
• 1:15:47
  Krispy Kreme Okay, standing there defending her because she's like completely silenced. She
• 1:15:55
  She's like she's got this look on her face, like, oh fuck,
• 1:15:58
  I didn't study, right, and I wasn't expecting that question. And and
• 1:16:04
  and he's like, oh not, I know what they are, those provinces
• 1:16:10
  are, and she knows what they are, and here they are and I'll
• 1:16:13
  name them right. No, She's just like, you're not allowed to insult
• 1:16:16
  the woman's intelligence. Oh yeah, good lord, Yes, it was so
• 1:16:23
  freaking like so I'm looking at like black conservative perspective his take on it,
• 1:16:28
  and he's like, oh god, he was simping so hard for her,
• 1:16:30
  right, And I'm like yeah, And like, how can we have a
• 1:16:38
  Nikki Haley as president of the United States, as the leader of the fucking
• 1:16:44
  free world when when the moment you criticized her on something legitimate, Right,
• 1:16:51
  she's got a dozen captain save a hose coming to a rescue saying you can't
• 1:16:57
  question her because she's female. Yeah, because vagina? Yeah, Like what
• 1:17:02
  the fuck? And honestly, like, when you are in the headspace where
• 1:17:10
  it is actually really disgusting to know that what you do as an individual will
• 1:17:16
  never be more important than your sliced salami between your legs, like, never
• 1:17:25
  be more important, Like you'll never rise as an individual. As an individual
• 1:17:29
  woman, your choices will never rise above the fact that you are a woman.
• 1:17:33
  That will always be the most salient, the most important, the most
• 1:17:39
  gravitational thing about you is that you're a woman. Nothing that you can do
• 1:17:43
  as an individual will ever be seen outside of being a woman. That to
• 1:17:47
  me is misogyny. Oh yeah, like that to me is a combination of
• 1:17:54
  being gagged and hog tied. And then, yeah, what the fuck's the
• 1:17:59
  point of my life? What's the point? What's the point of my individual
• 1:18:02
  choices? What's the point of anything that I do? If the only thing
• 1:18:06
  I will ever be is a woman? Like and what I mean by that
• 1:18:12
  is, there will nothing that I can do as an individual will never eclipse
• 1:18:16
  the importance as a woman. It's so difficult to explain this. No,
• 1:18:23
  no, no, it's it's not difficult at all. It's like, it's
• 1:18:26
  basically, I want to be defined by my actions and my words, am
• 1:18:30
  not my gender. And you know, like, isn't that supposed to be
• 1:18:35
  the entire feminist project? Apparently not. Sorry, I I I why I
• 1:18:43
  sold it, and I was sold that and over the years that I engaged
• 1:18:50
  with it, I saw that that is not what is being offered. I'm
• 1:18:55
  sorry if you keep going to a deli and you're like, could I have
• 1:19:00
  could I have some, you know, spicy meatballs? And they keep serving
• 1:19:03
  you deer shit. Eventually you're like, you know, I don't think that
• 1:19:08
  you're really about the spicy meatballs. I think you're about the deer shit,
• 1:19:12
  okay, And that's where I'm coming from. I feel a deep sense of
• 1:19:15
  betrayal because I realized that feminism isn't about recognizing women as individual moral actions and
• 1:19:26
  the importance of their decisions in the greater world. It's about consistently deflecting back
• 1:19:33
  onto being female and saying, oh, no, no, no, the
• 1:19:36
  really important thing is that she's a woman always unless she's of course. And
• 1:19:43
  you know what's really funny is they're like, well, well, it will
• 1:19:45
  insult the women who are not part bitch. Oh yeah, we recognized as
• 1:19:51
  an individual actor by you outside of your your weird fuzzy thoughts. Fhere,
• 1:20:00
  then be in your weird fuzzy thought spirit. So bring it on, Bring
• 1:20:03
  the insults on. At least there are consequence to my actions. At least
• 1:20:06
  you're recognizing my individuality. Yeah, yeah, no, And it's it's like,
• 1:20:12
  it's like the whole Sarah Palin thing right, Well, you're not allowed
• 1:20:15
  to criticize Kamala Harris because she's a woman. But you know, we we
• 1:20:23
  can literally skin Sarah Palin alive and parade her around the town square, right
• 1:20:30
  because she's not she's not our kind of woman. Yo, yep. And
• 1:20:35
  I'll tell you how that particular how the feminists and all of the rest on
• 1:20:43
  that particular side whatever, how they treat the women who disagree with them,
• 1:20:48
  is how they really feel about women. And I don't mean like women who
• 1:20:53
  are doing something bad, behaving bad, just women who have a different opinion
• 1:20:57
  about economics, immigration, health. You know that that's that's their real opinion.
• 1:21:03
  Now, it actually, really, it really struck me. Okay,
• 1:21:06
  actually I shouldn't get into it. I won't get it. We are the
• 1:21:10
  female face of male supremacy, Allison, so we should not be listened to
• 1:21:15
  what strangely we are listened to. But the problems are the handmaidens of the
• 1:21:23
  patriarchy. Okay, well I'm not here to be a handmaiden. I'm here
• 1:21:27
  to have my individual choices and actions respected and offered their consequences, if that
• 1:21:35
  makes sense, Like, yeah, I was yours because because the men men's
• 1:21:41
  rights movement recognizes me as an individual and not just as a fucking genital mass
• 1:21:48
  Okay, all right, let's keep going. You want to read more of
• 1:21:53
  this article? Yes, you sound so delighted unless you want me to.
• 1:21:58
  It's kind of long, but got no I can do it. Female extreme
• 1:22:01
  massages content creators like Pearl Davis have a mask the following across social media platforms
• 1:22:06
  for denigrating women for not meeting her prescribed behavioral standards. Okay. In addition,
• 1:22:14
  go ahead, I think that I know a lot of Pearls. Pearl's
• 1:22:17
  messages stop being cuns. And you know what, I think that I don't
• 1:22:23
  understand why everybody. I'll be honest, Okay, if you're a woman,
• 1:22:29
  it doesn't matter what you look like. If you're a woman who genuinely wants
• 1:22:32
  a companion in a man, and that and not a paycheck, not not
• 1:22:38
  a you know, like an alpha male who's going to solve all your problems,
• 1:22:43
  but an actual companion. I don't think it matters what you look like.
• 1:22:45
  You're gonna find one. And I think ultimately it doesn't even matter,
• 1:22:49
  Like it doesn't matter what Pearl is saying about body count and looks and youth
• 1:22:53
  and all this shit. If you're a woman who wants a companion, you
• 1:22:58
  know you're You're fine. It's not even that isn't even your world. What
• 1:23:01
  she's calling out women who offer nothing and want everything. Yeah, okay,
• 1:23:10
  and that that to me, at least from what I've seen. You know,
• 1:23:14
  I don't agree with everything she says. I think she she definitely seems
• 1:23:17
  to enjoy kicking the hornet's nest, and I think maybe she's over focused on
• 1:23:23
  looks and body count and other stuff rather than looking at the moral fiber of
• 1:23:28
  women. Yeah. No, but the issue too, I think that she's
• 1:23:31
  speaking the language that women will listen to. Though Allison, Yeah, thing
• 1:23:34
  she talked about virtue and all that women wouldn't pay attention. But she goes
• 1:23:40
  there hitting the hold to a high value and says that actually isn't very high
• 1:23:45
  value. And I'm going to point out why, and ultimately she's allowed to
• 1:23:48
  have her opinion. It could be absolutely insane. It doesn't matter. Remember,
• 1:23:53
  girl's not passing any laws. She's not looking to get people banned off
• 1:23:57
  of social media, she's not looking to redirect shit. She's not getting grants
• 1:24:00
  from the government. She is not doing any of those things. She is
• 1:24:03
  a woman on the internet with an opinion that doesn't match up with the opinion
• 1:24:08
  of these people. That's the only thing she's guilty of. Well, and
• 1:24:13
  you have to realize too, Allison, because we're both kind of middle aged,
• 1:24:16
  right that, you know, the women these days, right like that
• 1:24:21
  there. I keep going back to that video and this woman she she actually
• 1:24:26
  was the one recording it and she uploaded it. But she she was like
• 1:24:31
  this, she's a little chubby, and but she she dulled herself up and
• 1:24:36
  she's, you know, in the passenger seat of this really nice car being
• 1:24:42
  driven to a first date by a relatively you know, better than average attractive
• 1:24:48
  guy. Right, and then he pulls up to the cheesecake factory. Yeah,
• 1:24:54
  after she had been late. And that's why he lost his reservation too.
• 1:24:59
  Yeah, he was going to take her to someplace nicer, but he
• 1:25:02
  lost the reservation because she took an hour and a half longer than you know,
• 1:25:06
  and she wouldn't even let him come up and sit in her living room.
• 1:25:11
  She made him sit in the lobby of the apartment building waiting for her,
• 1:25:15
  right, And so he's like, okay, we're going to the cheesecake
• 1:25:16
  factory, and she's like, I'm not getting out of the car. And
• 1:25:20
  so then she's like, yeah, we gon't talk about this, and she
• 1:25:25
  records the whole thing. She's live streaming it. He's like, are you
• 1:25:28
  recording me? Like what the hell? And and so they talk about it
• 1:25:32
  and he's like, yeah, cheesecake factory is nice. I was going to
• 1:25:35
  take you to this other place, but you know, I lost my reservation
• 1:25:40
  because you were late. She's like, well, but I didn't get off
• 1:25:43
  work until he's like, well, you know that's fine. That's why we're
• 1:25:45
  going to the cheesecake factory, right, And then she's like, no,
• 1:25:48
  I'm not going. I'm not going to be seen in the cheesecake factory.
• 1:25:51
  And he's like, okay, I'll drive you home, and then she starts
• 1:25:55
  crying like she she well, she wasn't. She wasn't crying theatrically, she
• 1:26:04
  was trying to not cry. Yeah. She's like, but but yeah,
• 1:26:09
  yeah, you fucking douche, Like what do you expect? Yeah, like
• 1:26:15
  this the this is not okay. This is not the behavior of somebody wants
• 1:26:19
  a relationship. It is the behavior of someone who's looking at the world in
• 1:26:23
  terms of her vanity and what she can get out of it, Like although
• 1:26:28
  you know, a four hundred dollars dinner at some nice place or a two
• 1:26:31
  hundred dollars dinner at the cheesecake factory, two hundred dollars really got that expensive?
• 1:26:36
  Well, but I don't know like appetizers, entrees, drinks, dessert.
• 1:26:43
  Okay, yeah, all right, but what is it that you were
• 1:26:45
  going to say overall about uh me? When when you look at these women,
• 1:26:50
  right, Okay, she wasn't even that attractive in terms of like,
• 1:26:56
  she wasn't a ten, right, she was mid She was because she was
• 1:27:00
  a little pudgy, right, she had nice cleavage and she was showing it
• 1:27:03
  off, you know when she had really nice braids, she did her makeup
• 1:27:08
  nice, but like she was nothing special, right, And it's like,
• 1:27:12
  okay, so you're nothing special. Okay, what can you do with nothing
• 1:27:16
  special? Right? Okay? You can do the best you can with what
• 1:27:23
  you've got physically, And you know what, if that's what men care about?
• 1:27:29
  If if men care about a woman who has a nice waist to hip
• 1:27:33
  ratio, even if she's a little overweight, right, who has a pretty
• 1:27:38
  face, who keeps herself looking nice, who dresses nice, right, has
• 1:27:42
  a nice personality, right, has something to bring to the table, right,
• 1:27:46
  all of those things, right, then then you're gonna be able to
• 1:27:49
  find somebody, even if you're a little overweight. But like, you can't
• 1:27:54
  be Lizzo without the money and fame and demand a top tier man. You
• 1:28:03
  can't do that, Like, what the fuck are you thinking? Right?
• 1:28:06
  And the whole idea of saying, well, fuck you, I landed a
• 1:28:12
  man. Now he's stuck with me, So I'm gonna off with the makeup,
• 1:28:16
  on with the pounds, right, How is that respectful? He didn't
• 1:28:21
  marry some three hundred pound fricking bitch who like wears sweatpants all day. Yeah,
• 1:28:29
  And I mean it's bait and switch, right, Like it's I'm just
• 1:28:32
  like, I'm I'm I'm literally, I'm just what. The fact that men
• 1:28:41
  have desires, and one of their desires is a woman who is in decent
• 1:28:46
  physical shape, not top notch physical shape. She doesn't need to be a
• 1:28:53
  fucking victorious secret model pre fat body positivity movement, right, she doesn't need
• 1:29:00
  to be that. She just needs to be presentable, right. And the
• 1:29:03
  fact that men have a preference. That's not okay, yeah, no,
• 1:29:08
  I'm That's not what I'm getting at. But what I'm getting at is that
• 1:29:12
  these women are demanding. They're they're they're demanding something that they don't like,
• 1:29:18
  they can't afford, or they can't It's what I'm trying to get at is
• 1:29:24
  if you're trying, they're trying to buy a cart and a cigarettes with buttons
• 1:29:28
  and a smile. Okay, if you're a woman and you genuinely want a
• 1:29:32
  companion, you don't want a meal ticket, you don't want somebody who's going
• 1:29:38
  to fix your life. You genuinely want somebody to grow old with, to
• 1:29:42
  explore the world with, to enjoy your life with, to have those memories
• 1:29:45
  with. You're gonna find someone. And it doesn't matter what you look like.
• 1:29:51
  I mean to a degree. I mean if you're like three hundred pounds,
• 1:29:54
  maybe it does matter. But I mean I've even seen three hundred pounds
• 1:29:58
  women find someone, right if you have that attitude. But ultimately, what
• 1:30:03
  she's calling out is women who expect mister big Christian gray and they look like
• 1:30:11
  Lizo, right, and you know, like with no fame, no wealth
• 1:30:15
  or nothing, they're not bringing anything else to the table. She's calling out
• 1:30:18
  those women. She's not calling out the women who genuinely say, like,
• 1:30:24
  how many generations now have feminists say well, now women can mate for companionship,
• 1:30:30
  there are money anymore. That hasn't fallen out, Like that's another thing,
• 1:30:33
  you know, deer turds instead of meat, spicy meat balls. That
• 1:30:38
  hasn't fallen out for anyone. Have women actually done the work to overcome that
• 1:30:44
  desire for a man who's going to fix everything in their life and pay for
• 1:30:47
  them, because it still seems to be there. It's still women still want
• 1:30:53
  to be financially dependent on a man. It's just that the the amount that
• 1:30:58
  a man has to earn is higher now. They still want that dynamic,
• 1:31:02
  but it's now far fewer men actually meet it. So that attitude that women
• 1:31:10
  had in the fifties, that you know, I want a man who makes
• 1:31:14
  money and can take care of me, that hasn't changed. Is now we
• 1:31:17
  have gone from like ninety percent of men can actually fulfill the desires of women
• 1:31:23
  to ten percent of men. That's the difference because the actual desire women have
• 1:31:28
  never done the work to change it. They've never done the work to start
• 1:31:31
  wanting companionship versus a meal ticket. And that doesn't mean that if your husband
• 1:31:36
  is the one who earns the money that you know that falls into that,
• 1:31:42
  that's different. You know, if it's something you've decided upon, if it
• 1:31:45
  works for you, that's fine. But if you bring that attitude to your
• 1:31:48
  relationship and you don't actually look like a woman a man in the top ten
• 1:31:56
  percent wants, I think that's what Pearl is calling out, calling out the
• 1:32:00
  vanity, yep, and the perception. But if again, if you're a
• 1:32:05
  woman who's like, I just want a companion in my life, I don't
• 1:32:09
  want the top ten percent. I just want a dude because I like men,
• 1:32:13
  and I like the way that men approach life, and I think it
• 1:32:15
  brings something to my life to have a man. That's not the person that
• 1:32:20
  Pearl's talking about. She's talking about the women and not just the women who
• 1:32:24
  are like, oh, I expect a top tier man, but I expect
• 1:32:28
  a top tier man who's top tier and what he wants his companionship. He
• 1:32:32
  doesn't want anything for me. And it's like it's such a duplicitous way to
• 1:32:38
  approach it, and most women haven't done the work to resolve that desire for
• 1:32:44
  a meal ticket or a man who fixes their life. They haven't done that
• 1:32:47
  work, and she's pointing that out. If you haven't done that work and
• 1:32:53
  you're asking for and you aren't the top tier woman, you want a top
• 1:32:58
  tier man, it just doesn't work that way. Like I said, so,
• 1:33:02
  my opinion is there is a sort of a hidden other side to what
• 1:33:06
  she's saying. And maybe I'm reading into it quite a bit, but you
• 1:33:11
  can get off the vanity carousel by simply sitting yourself down and saying, what
• 1:33:18
  is it I actually want in my life? What is it? What is
• 1:33:23
  the kind of person that I want to spend a life with I want to
• 1:33:26
  grow old with. I'm not I'm going to set aside the meal ticket.
• 1:33:30
  I can be my own meal ticket. Now, who do I want to
• 1:33:32
  grow old with? What are his characteristics? I mean? Who do I
• 1:33:39
  want to wake up with when I'm seventy? Yeah. But the problem is,
• 1:33:44
  Allison, is that the higher up the socioeconomic ladder a single woman goes,
• 1:33:50
  the higher her standards for who she's willing to settle for. Yeah,
• 1:33:57
  hypergamy actually increases as women become more capable of looking after themselves. Yes,
• 1:34:04
  right, like women women at the bottom wrong of the socioeconomics settle for a
• 1:34:10
  man who earns less. Yeah, but that's the thing. They haven't.
• 1:34:15
  They haven't. They haven't. They haven't got because wanting compon it. Haven't.
• 1:34:20
  It may be instinctive. A lot of things are instinctive, wanting in
• 1:34:26
  the Bronze Age, wanting a man who can protect you, instinctive that we
• 1:34:31
  we actually overcame because right now I guarantee, like you know, fifty years
• 1:34:35
  ago, women weren't matching up with men who were Bronze Age warlords. Okay,
• 1:34:41
  they were matching up with post Christian men who had a good job.
• 1:34:45
  So we can get over these instincts, or at least we can moderate them.
• 1:34:48
  So we can moderate this or transpose them on other aspects. Of other
• 1:34:55
  aspects. Women can sit down and look at the world in terms of who
• 1:35:00
  do I want as a companion, not who do I want as a meal
• 1:35:01
  ticket? And they haven't done the work, right, they haven't done the
• 1:35:05
  work. Too well, they won't do the work because nobody's going to actually
• 1:35:09
  make them do the work. Because traditionalists think that men should provide for women,
• 1:35:14
  and feminists basically aren't going to admit that anything is wrong with women is
• 1:35:20
  instinctive. So what I'm saying is feminist is feminists promised men that when they
• 1:35:27
  lost their role as bread winners, which is really what happened, They got
• 1:35:30
  their role yoinked from them, that women would evolve into wanting them as companions.
• 1:35:35
  And that hasn't happened. Yeah, no, and that's the problem.
• 1:35:41
  Yeah, okay, And what we need is we can't have the traditionalists who
• 1:35:44
  are like, wow, men should be bread. No, you're not solving
• 1:35:46
  this issue. We have this issue, this manifest issue, right now,
• 1:35:49
  and it is bigger than the West now, it's everywhere, and it's part
• 1:35:54
  of an advanced industrial system. When we are a wash in material goods,
• 1:36:00
  women still want a provider, but their standards for what is a provider gets
• 1:36:08
  so high that no man or very few men can reach them. And we
• 1:36:12
  don't want those. We don't want the average man. I'm sorry, conservatives.
• 1:36:15
  We don't want the average man to be able to live up to the
• 1:36:18
  material standards of the of the average woman now because we need another two earths.
• 1:36:24
  And once they do that, we'd need another ten earths because it's then
• 1:36:27
  it's the next ten percent. This is this is a spiral that causes our
• 1:36:30
  resources, really causes our resources to be completely depleted. So women need to
• 1:36:35
  get a handle on this. They need to learn to look at the world
• 1:36:41
  in terms of who do I want to grow with as a person, as
• 1:36:45
  an individual? What man out there is going to respect my individuality and to
• 1:36:51
  help me develop it as a person that is a companion? Okay, it's
• 1:36:57
  not a pro Oh sorry, I accidentally hit mute. I said women need
• 1:37:11
  to do the work that feminism said they would when they took away men's role
• 1:37:15
  as breadwinner. Okay, men wouldn't have problems now, Like, no man
• 1:37:19
  is going to have a problem with a woman who wants him as a companion.
• 1:37:21
  In fact, many men do want a woman who wants him as a
• 1:37:26
  companion. I think that's actually a pretty standard desire for most men. They
• 1:37:31
  don't want a woman who just wants a meal ticket anymore. They want a
• 1:37:35
  companion and women are not providing that. And we can talk about body counts,
• 1:37:41
  we can talk about youth, we can talk about purity, but I
• 1:37:44
  think it comes down to that women have done the work to become companions,
• 1:37:49
  and that's what men want, really want if you really ask them, and
• 1:37:55
  women haven't done the work. So they are still in that mentality of I
• 1:38:00
  need I need a top tier, I need bronze age warlord. They're still
• 1:38:03
  in that mentality at the same time as the people who took away men's ability
• 1:38:10
  to fulfill that for women did so while saying, well, while women will
• 1:38:15
  want you his companions. Guys, what a fucking lie. Men haven't been
• 1:38:18
  right to be pissed. You took away what made them attractive to women and
• 1:38:25
  said, well, women will find your soul attractive and women didn't. Yeah.
• 1:38:30
  Well, you know what what frustrates me is because do you remember the
• 1:38:32
  Monk debates years ago where they had Camille Paulia and Caitlin morn And and a
• 1:38:45
  couple of they had basically had four feminist women right arguing whether men were obsolete.
• 1:38:51
  Oh, it's poochy and and you know, and I did a speech
• 1:39:00
  basically jojo okay, jojo, fuck off, I'm talking. I did a
• 1:39:10
  speech on that debate, right, because it's like, our men obsolete.
• 1:39:15
  Well, what do you do with things that are obsolete? You take them
• 1:39:16
  out to the curb, right, Okay, Like we're not talking about our
• 1:39:21
  men heirlooms. We're not talking about our men unnecessary, because there's a lot
• 1:39:27
  of things that are unnecessary that we want to have that we value, like
• 1:39:33
  vacations and nice cars and you know, and twenty eight hundred square foot homes
• 1:39:42
  and things like that, Like nobody needs that, right but you know,
• 1:39:45
  like there are plenty of unnecessary So it's not a matter of our men unnecessary.
• 1:39:50
  It's a matter of our men obsolete. If men are obsolete, what
• 1:39:54
  do you do with your obsolete stuff? You take it to the fucking dump,
• 1:39:59
  right rowed away. And the very fact that they could ask this question
• 1:40:04
  in a nationwide debate aired on CBC right that, and they didn't have a
• 1:40:14
  single man in that debate. It was not just for women, four feminist
• 1:40:21
  women, okay, arguing whether men were obsolete or not. And the thing
• 1:40:30
  that really infuriated me was that the audience went in and the majority because at
• 1:40:39
  the Monk debates they vote on the resolution before and after the debate, right
• 1:40:45
  to see whether their minds were changed, and something like sixty percent of the
• 1:40:48
  people in the audience before the debate voted that no, men are not obsolete,
• 1:40:54
  and then they changed their minds and sixty percent by the end of it
• 1:41:01
  decided that yes, men were obsolete. And I was like, Camille Pallia
• 1:41:06
  did her best, right, she really did her best. She was she
• 1:41:12
  did everything other than say, if civilization had been left in women's hands,
• 1:41:15
  we'd all still be living with in grass huts. Right, Okay. She
• 1:41:20
  was just like, men do everything that's necessary for the proper functioning of society.
• 1:41:26
  It's almost all men, right, Men are not obsolete, and we
• 1:41:31
  consider them so at our peril. Right. She was very convincing, but
• 1:41:38
  somehow she didn't convince an audience full of fucking Torontonians. I think it was
• 1:41:43
  Toronto that it was hosted at. And yeah, no, And I was
• 1:41:48
  just I was just fucking blown away. How do you basically say fifty,
• 1:41:55
  Like, how do you even dare to ask the quote question in the first
• 1:42:00
  place? Right, Because things that are obsolete are to be discarded, right,
• 1:42:11
  Caitlin Moran said. I think she said something along the lines of,
• 1:42:15
  well, you know, you're not necessary anymore, but you're kind of like
• 1:42:19
  ice cream will keep you around. And I'm like, what the fuck kind
• 1:42:25
  of condescending cunt is this? You'll keep them around. Yeah, when your
• 1:42:30
  fucking sewer line needs unclogging, bitch. Well that's uh, that's kind of
• 1:42:38
  She's a good example of the approved sort of uh you know, uh men's
• 1:42:44
  issues resources, right, Like, can I can I really quick look at
• 1:42:47
  this diverting thing? Where where is this image? Oh yeah, so just
• 1:42:51
  give people an understanding. They the proposal in this particular document. I know
• 1:42:56
  we've gone all over the place the proposal in this particular document. And as
• 1:43:00
  the original tweet said, this is just a tip of the iceberg. So
• 1:43:04
  we don't know how many initiatives that this the homeland security and tech sites.
• 1:43:11
  I'm sure this is also on all the other social media plaf Yes, this
• 1:43:15
  is what we're learning about this because Elon Musk is dragging it out in the
• 1:43:19
  open on Twitter. But this goes probably several times fold more for YouTube,
• 1:43:25
  for example, than than Twitter. So but what they were proposing in this
• 1:43:30
  initiative or this grant, and this is just one, was to divert attention
• 1:43:36
  on Twitter away from US to approved of men's men's manipulation groups basically manipulating or
• 1:43:53
  not really men's resources, but resources to ensure mail compliance basically, and and
• 1:44:00
  so these are the resources that they were diverting attention that would would have organically
• 1:44:04
  gone to us to something else that they approved of. And I just want
• 1:44:10
  to point out, like a couple I think a month ago, there are
• 1:44:13
  people talking about why aren't you millions? I mean, if they were talking
• 1:44:16
  about how when I say that this stuff is difficult, I'm like, oh,
• 1:44:21
  this is just too high q i Q. That's why we have a
• 1:44:25
  small audience. Like, Okay, first of all, this stuff is difficult.
• 1:44:29
  It isn't difficult because it's difficult to conceptualize. It's difficult because it runs
• 1:44:33
  counter to how we see ourselves as people, right it It's it's questioning some
• 1:44:40
  very deep and fundamental aspects of our identities. That's where we're what we do.
• 1:44:45
  And it's also blaming women, which nobody likes to do. That's like
• 1:44:47
  the verboten in our society. But also apparently we are, we are jogging
• 1:44:54
  uphill. So not only are these concepts difficult in like a in terms of
• 1:44:59
  question fundamental aspects of our identities as men and women, they're also being pushed
• 1:45:04
  against on a fundamental level, like just in behind the scenes in terms of
• 1:45:10
  the FBI and the homeland security. And I have also seen other groups that
• 1:45:15
  talk directly with YouTube about censoring content like ours right, and we are also
• 1:45:20
  women who talk about these issues. So almost every angle we are facing headwinds.
• 1:45:30
  So please give you know, us a bit of a break. Maybe
• 1:45:32
  not Karen because she got quite big, but you know, give me a
• 1:45:35
  bit of a break on this issue of how big we are. I'm trying,
• 1:45:40
  you know. I would love to be huge, well maybe not really
• 1:45:43
  huge, but reasonably huge, you know. And I would love to see
• 1:45:47
  have lots of people understand these ideas and integrate with them and think about them
• 1:45:53
  and see them. But there's a lot of stuff, you know, being
• 1:45:57
  thrown in our faces that's preventing them. And it's not just in competence on
• 1:46:00
  my part. Okay, I'm trying my best, and I know that I'm
• 1:46:04
  not the greatest YouTube er or social media presence. I'm not really that great
• 1:46:11
  at the kind of stuff. But there's also stuff that we're dealing with beyond
• 1:46:15
  my personal incompetence, and that is we got these big institutions that are out
• 1:46:20
  for us that are influencing YouTube, and we're influencing Twitter to reduce the kind
• 1:46:27
  of organic attention that we get right. So, yes, I'm incompetent,
• 1:46:31
  but it's not just that. That's all I'm gonna say. All right,
• 1:46:36
  the initiatives we're being, the organic attention that would have gone to us,
• 1:46:43
  they're sending too. I got another super chow from Ashthrun ash Throun, who
• 1:46:49
  gives us five dollars. Thank you, Ashman, and says Chris Williamson in
• 1:46:55
  a show with Louise Perry, kept perpetuating the idea that women, before they
• 1:46:59
  can to earn their own money, were not really in love. They were
• 1:47:01
  suffering from Stockholm syndrome, not that men were working in the minds while she
• 1:47:06
  was at home with the kids. And now he questions if men are still
• 1:47:11
  necessary. This document even shows that men talking about meaning of life are a
• 1:47:16
  threat to society. Some theories are no longer theories. Well, you know
• 1:47:25
  this is I think. I think, honestly, Chris Williamson either does not
• 1:47:30
  have the courage to face the truth or he knows where his bread is buttered
• 1:47:32
  and he's not going to say anything risky, And it's probably more likely the
• 1:47:36
  latter. Well, I'm sure that I'm sure that women often felt trapped in
• 1:47:43
  the house. I mean, like my mom, she stayed at home with
• 1:47:45
  her. Yeah, yeah, my mom. She stayed at home with us
• 1:47:51
  when until I was ten, right, you know, she worked while my
• 1:47:57
  oldest sister was small because they were living with my grandparents. But then you
• 1:48:04
  know, once they got their own house, she basically was like, Okay,
• 1:48:10
  I'll do books for a couple of small businesses, you know, from
• 1:48:15
  home, work from home, and then she like babysat and she cooked lunch
• 1:48:18
  for the neighborhood kids and stuff, and you know, made money that way
• 1:48:23
  and stuff. So she was always bringing in a little money. But she
• 1:48:27
  you know, like there were days when she greeted my dad at the door
• 1:48:30
  when he came home from work, holding a screaming kid and saying, take
• 1:48:34
  this child before I kill it, because I've had it. Like it's it's
• 1:48:40
  enough, right, Like it's enough. You're feeding eight neighborhood kids lunch every
• 1:48:45
  day, you're babysitting two more, and you got three of your own.
• 1:48:48
  It's like, no, that's a lot. That's a lot. And you're
• 1:48:54
  also, you know, operating a household without a dishwasher or a mic wave.
• 1:49:00
  I didn't even taste store bought bread until I was ten years old,
• 1:49:05
  right, So, you know, you're she like she kept a vegetable garden.
• 1:49:12
  I mean like she was a busy, busy, freaking woman, and
• 1:49:15
  she had all these kids around her all the time, and so, you
• 1:49:18
  know, and I'm sure she felt like she was stuck right well, you
• 1:49:23
  know, and then there's my dad, you know, up in Swan Hills.
• 1:49:29
  It's a couple hundred kilometers away in a pouring fucking rainstorm, on his
• 1:49:33
  back underneath a freaking big truck, right, realizing that, oh, the
• 1:49:41
  reason why the brakes aren't working and why I was called all the way out
• 1:49:45
  here is because this fucking idiot driver has been driving for the last five hundred
• 1:49:49
  kilometers with the emergency brakes on leg sticking out into traffic on the side of
• 1:49:58
  the fucking highway. Right. So I'm pretty sure, I'm pretty sure they
• 1:50:02
  both had their trials and tribulations, they both had their annoyances, they both
• 1:50:08
  had their areas of dissatisfaction. Right. But every Friday night, we'd sit
• 1:50:15
  after after dinner and after Mash was over, because it played at six point
• 1:50:19
  thirty every night, and we'd all sit and watch Mash. And then Mom
• 1:50:25
  and Dad would turn off the TV and they would balance their checkbook together,
• 1:50:30
  compare their receipts, you know, go through the visa slips, all of
• 1:50:35
  that, you know, write everything down because they were very meticulous that way.
• 1:50:41
  And it was like, oh, it's like dim lighting and it's very
• 1:50:45
  warm and cozy, and you know, maybe the middle of winter, and
• 1:50:48
  here they are just working as a team, just working as a team,
• 1:50:54
  building towards some right, And that was the example that I grew up withal
• 1:51:00
  take this child before I kill it, right, but the whole Yeah,
• 1:51:06
  we're all working together. And it wasn't just them, you know, like
• 1:51:10
  they recruited us too, right, So we did a lot of projects with
• 1:51:15
  them when we were old enough to wield a paintbrush or a shovel or a
• 1:51:19
  pair of scissors because there were no weed whackers back then, so Mom would
• 1:51:25
  send us out with scissors to trim the verge. Right, Okay, but
• 1:51:31
  like, no, that is how it's supposed to work, right, And
• 1:51:36
  you have your you have your moments of dissatisfaction, you have your moments of
• 1:51:40
  resentment, you have your moments of frustration where you want to tear your own
• 1:51:45
  hair out, right, Okay, so do men, so do men,
• 1:51:50
  and it's like, I'm sorry, that's just life. That's life, and
• 1:51:57
  you get over it and you move on and you get back to work and
• 1:52:00
  you build something. Mm hmm. Yeah. Well, I mean there's this
• 1:52:05
  perception that if if you're a woman, in your every waking moment isn't a
• 1:52:13
  perfect you're you're a little far from your mind and I can't hear you.
• 1:52:16
  Oh okay. There's a perception that if you're a woman, if you're a
• 1:52:20
  woman in your every waking moment, isn't like you remember Barbie, that that
• 1:52:25
  became yeah, yeah, yeah, no, you know what, it is
• 1:52:28
  perfect? I have my friend and it's like, that's not life, no
• 1:52:33
  difficult. And your contentment is in that you've built something, You've done something
• 1:52:39
  through your own actions. Brian, you should google the far Side. Wendel,
• 1:52:44
  I am not content. Yeah, and then post post that car,
• 1:52:49
  post that comic. All right, let's get what wind what Wendell. I
• 1:52:55
  am not content. Wendell, I am not content, And then we will
• 1:53:03
  go to the what they're trying to divert organic attention that we get too.
• 1:53:10
  And I think that they had like they had a recommendation for Twitter, which
• 1:53:14
  I don't think was picked up so that they would under our content they would
• 1:53:19
  show something or maybe it was maybe they do do it. Wendell, I'm
• 1:53:25
  not content. Like, look at her. She's like in jewelry with a
• 1:53:30
  martini, you know, like in this nice place and he's just like sitting
• 1:53:35
  there having a beer after work and she's like, Wendel, I am not
• 1:53:40
  content. Well you got like a plate of food there, you know,
• 1:53:45
  and and she's just like, yeah, no bracelets and stuff, right,
• 1:53:51
  and it's just like, yeah, no, that's women. That's women these
• 1:53:55
  days. Wendell, I am not content. Okay, so let us look
• 1:54:00
  at the people that should our attention to us should be diverted to. So
• 1:54:05
  this is actually something that people should be aware of and men should be aware
• 1:54:09
  of. These are these are groups you probably should avoid. At this point,
• 1:54:16
  we're going to go through this. So yes, because this is just
• 1:54:20
  a screenshot from the document, but it says our methodology using digital advertising,
• 1:54:27
  in depth research and partnership building nepotism. Our goal is to create healthier outlets
• 1:54:32
  to divert people. They mean men in sell and intel adjacent, so basically
• 1:54:39
  just men away from misogynist online we're in cell adjacent. Like basically, when
• 1:54:46
  they specifically talking about men, they don't really know what to do with you.
• 1:54:51
  You see, you have in cells, and then you have men who
• 1:54:56
  could be in cells, so that basically you could just say in cell,
• 1:55:00
  well, instill Jason just is the entire group men. Yeah, it says,
• 1:55:04
  through strategic messaging, we mitigate the proliferation of hateful behavior online in order
• 1:55:12
  to enhance safety for all people. And so they aim to target the manisphere.
• 1:55:17
  And I can't see it because it's kind of like low res, but
• 1:55:21
  I'm pretty sure it's like Andrew Tate, Rollo, Tamasi, Pearl Date maybe
• 1:55:26
  Pearl, I don't know, and some other people. It doesn't matter.
• 1:55:29
  It doesn't really matter. Honestly, this could be like any like Migtau creator,
• 1:55:33
  could be Paul Elim, it could be Warren Ferrell. It doesn't matter.
• 1:55:36
  And then it says by surfacing positive male influences, so essentially they have
• 1:55:42
  approved men's resources. They want to use Twitter's tools through strategic messaging to redirect
• 1:55:51
  people that might find themselves, you know, looking at Answer State or or
• 1:55:58
  basically any unapproved person. I don't want to get anything. What was that
• 1:56:02
  it's any unapproved that included a person like, because the thing is, if
• 1:56:06
  I name a name, you guys might get like in the weeds about whether
• 1:56:10
  or not that person specifically is a good or bad. Example, it doesn't
• 1:56:14
  matter. It's basically they have their people, and you have to go to
• 1:56:16
  their people, period. It doesn't matter who it is. So they exactly
• 1:56:20
  they have man men alive, man enough every man, the Mankind Project,
• 1:56:28
  which we know about the Mankind Project right visible Man, the Men's circle,
• 1:56:32
  men living there. I want to make a clarification. There are two mankinds.
• 1:56:38
  There's uh Mankind UK, which is a legitimate resource for men going through
• 1:56:45
  domestic violence, and then there's the Mankind Project, yeah, which is basically
• 1:56:53
  the Mankind Project isn't the good Man Project. The good Man Project is cancer,
• 1:56:58
  but the man Mankind Project is a bit sus. They're they're kind of
• 1:57:01
  like, at best, you're gonna be like in the woods, you know,
• 1:57:04
  beating on bongo drums, smoking weed like that at best, but it's
• 1:57:09
  not really gonna It's that you saw what you wasn't Mankind the project the one
• 1:57:16
  you went to Chicago. Yes, it was Tim Golditch and he's a part
• 1:57:20
  of that, but he's also part of NCFM, and I think, you
• 1:57:24
  know, Tim Gold is kind of he's trying to like he's trying to like
• 1:57:30
  make all of this. You know, he's very modern in this, a
• 1:57:32
  little bit of an old school hippie. Yeah, he's a very old school
• 1:57:35
  hippie type guy. And I went to a couple of mankind project things and
• 1:57:41
  I was like, yeah, this is all fine and dandy for like,
• 1:57:45
  for what it is, but it's it's so harmless. But it's also not
• 1:57:47
  going to fix anything. Like these guys, you know, they're mad because
• 1:57:50
  they don't have access to their kids, they're losing a bunch of money and
• 1:57:54
  property and their divorces all this other stuff Like these this going out into the
• 1:57:59
  woods and beating bongo drums. It's just not going to fix the laws.
• 1:58:02
  It's putting the honest back on men to you know, you punch a man
• 1:58:10
  in the face, and instead of the man saying, hey, don't punch
• 1:58:12
  me in the face, he's like, well, how do I hit my
• 1:58:15
  bongo drums to get rid of the bruise on my face? Like? How
• 1:58:18
  do I take responsibility for how the system has harmed me as a man,
• 1:58:23
  How do I take responsibility and deal with the emotions of being marginalized as a
• 1:58:29
  man, of being discriminated against in law? How do I take responsibility for
• 1:58:33
  those effects and and and just live with them? So essentially, it's like,
• 1:58:39
  instead of challenging, challenging all of the discrimination, challenging the negative messaging,
• 1:58:45
  challenging all of this like societal crap, the people, the men in
• 1:58:49
  the Mankind Problem Project are saying, how do we become strong enough, allegedly
• 1:58:56
  to endure all of this, to swallow it and just live with it?
• 1:59:01
  Well, I think, I think, well the Mankind Project, Okay,
• 1:59:06
  so there is something to be said for first aid, right, Like,
• 1:59:11
  it's not it's not going to I don't think that's necessarily first aid. I
• 1:59:16
  think that, yeah, no, But it's basically people dealing an organization dealing
• 1:59:21
  with men in crisis. Talking them down from a farty requires recognizing that they're
• 1:59:27
  second aid and third aid, not but that you're just getting something somebody to
• 1:59:32
  the point of being able to do deeper healing. That's not what this is
• 1:59:38
  about. This is about men taking responsibility for how something is being the things
• 1:59:44
  that are being inflicted on them. So there's no. I don't I don't
• 1:59:47
  know whether that's the case with the Mankind Project. I think that it's mostly
• 1:59:51
  a support group, and I'm fine with support groups. But at the same
• 1:59:59
  time, that's just first aid. That's just a band aid. That's just
• 2:00:04
  the bandage you put on the wounded soldier. What you need to do is
• 2:00:08
  end the war. Yes, you need to stop blaming the soldier for being
• 2:00:15
  injured, Yeah, or for being in the war when he was drafted.
• 2:00:19
  Yeah. I was going to say that that there's nothing wrong with the Mankind
• 2:00:24
  Project, like the good part, Like I think there is a good to
• 2:00:27
  it. However, when you have, you know, people that are really
• 2:00:30
  trying to address legislative, legal, and political issues that are directly impacting the
• 2:00:38
  lives of men and boys, and you try to talk about them and instead
• 2:00:42
  they redirect you to bongos in the woods, it's not going to solve the
• 2:00:45
  problem. It's like a step backwards, you know. Like it's fine if
• 2:00:49
  you're trying to like get some connection with other men, but what's going to
• 2:00:53
  happen if you direct these guys to to bongos in the woods. They're going
• 2:00:57
  to be like with their buddies like, well, you know, at least
• 2:01:00
  I'm not going to commit suicide this week because you guys are here, But
• 2:01:04
  would be really nice if like somebody could like help me see my kids.
• 2:01:09
  Oh no, no, no, we're not going to fix those things.
• 2:01:12
  We're not going to fix that. You you just hear smoking. Here token
• 2:01:15
  another bit of this weed, and we'll eat some cupcakes and we'll talk about
• 2:01:20
  our feelings. And I'm sure that you'll forget. But it's the thing is
• 2:01:26
  is that it doesn't fix anything. It's still like this, let's just talk
• 2:01:30
  about it a very female. It's a very female approach. It is.
• 2:01:33
  It's like it's not about the nail, except the man is the one with
• 2:01:39
  a nail in his forehead. You must have seen that. That's my way.
• 2:01:45
  Yeah, we've talked about it many times. That's my that's my only
• 2:01:48
  like I see what they're doing. Is what I'm saying is that even if
• 2:01:51
  some of these groups, like there's like fishing the good fight. I don't
• 2:01:56
  know what that means, they're basically like can get together and go do something
• 2:02:02
  together, some activity hiking. But you know that's that's fine. Like men
• 2:02:12
  should have their spaces in this document. It should be suss at this point.
• 2:02:17
  It is, I'm saying it is, but but it's also a it's
• 2:02:21
  like if it's like it's supposed to tie. Yeah, it's supposed to tide
• 2:02:29
  you over so you don't do anything crazy, but it doesn't actually address your
• 2:02:33
  problems. Sassi fire. You know, Okay, yes, yes we can
• 2:02:40
  look at support groups. That's fine. But if you're part of a group
• 2:02:45
  that insists that men are the problem they don't have problems, that's a big
• 2:02:50
  is that's a big issue, and I think that's the demarcation. These individuals
• 2:02:58
  want to direct men to groups that remind men that they are the problem and
• 2:03:01
  that they don't have problems. They are the problem, and if they have
• 2:03:04
  problems, it's because they are the problem. And I think that's that's the
• 2:03:10
  line. I don't think men of the problem. I think they're almost always
• 2:03:14
  the solution, and I fact, in fact, I think framing men is
• 2:03:18
  being the problem is forcing them to be a solution in a way that ultimately
• 2:03:25
  is self destructive. But go ahead, Karen, I was just gonna say,
• 2:03:30
  like, I I'm very unnerved that my lips are moving when you're speaking,
• 2:03:34
  Allison. I know, maybe do you want me to turn or do
• 2:03:39
  you want Brian to turn that off? Maybe? No, No, it's
• 2:03:42
  fine, it's it's okay. I can. If I can, If I
• 2:03:45
  can put all my F bombs and C bombs on you because uh my icon
• 2:03:51
  spoke while you were also speaking, then uh then maybe the Department of Homeland
• 2:03:58
  Security won't come down so hard on rule. Well, as we know,
• 2:04:01
  we're all Karen, so this works. Yeah, well, you know this
• 2:04:06
  must be why they think we're all Karen. Like I'm Karen, and Brian's
• 2:04:10
  Karen, and Hannah's Karen, and Laurence Karen and Mike's Karen and we're all
• 2:04:15
  just Karen here. Yeah. Well and we're all angry white women who want
• 2:04:19
  to talk to the manager. Yeah we do. All right, So what
• 2:04:25
  did you want to go into any Oh that you want to look at the
• 2:04:28
  person behind me? Oh? I don't know what is next. I guess
• 2:04:31
  you said that there was because I don't know how long much longer we can
• 2:04:34
  do this. We've gone for like two hours. Okay, we can do
• 2:04:38
  this until Karen needs to leave, but well I should probably go in about
• 2:04:43
  fifteen minutes. All right, Well, I have this, I have this
• 2:04:45
  thing you just gave me this document? Is it okay for us to go
• 2:04:48
  through this? So this was given to us by b X, the person
• 2:04:51
  who initially gave us the info on this thread. I think that maybe you
• 2:04:56
  should wait until because I've talked to her and she might be willing to come
• 2:05:00
  on the show and talk. I think that would be great if we can
• 2:05:03
  have one go back to looking at what they there. Let's do Let's go
• 2:05:09
  back to looking at Yeah that, so we're still okay. So this is
• 2:05:15
  still the women in the service of male supremacy exploring female supporting femalsogyny on mainstream
• 2:05:20
  social media platforms. Okay. Scoping the phenomenon. The trend of conservative female
• 2:05:28
  content creators sermonizing on topics such as having families younger or submitting to the men
• 2:05:32
  and the family is not a new one. Different variations of these trad wife
• 2:05:38
  influencers exist, and their content, often aestheticizing domestic existence, have steadily entered
• 2:05:44
  the mainstream. However, the recent I just want to point out that all
• 2:05:48
  the male negative content on TikTok it doesn't ray to mention at all. So
• 2:05:53
  it's it's fine for women to go out and do all this crap like this
• 2:05:58
  negative trash action. Yeah, hawk Shigen, But men that's fine. But
• 2:06:01
  you know, women who support men, they're terrorists. That really shows you
• 2:06:09
  what our society's value system is is, doesn't it. Well okay, yep.
• 2:06:17
  However, the recent rise in females supported extreme misogyny counts only a handful
• 2:06:23
  of content creators with substantial following. Ideologically, they promote the red pill,
• 2:06:29
  which they put underline a term that from The Matrix nineteen ninety nine. Oh,
• 2:06:33
  thanks for the thanks for the the source there, coz. Yeah,
• 2:06:40
  the citation co opted by the manisphere to refer to having woken up to the
• 2:06:45
  reality of feminist society and it's damaging treatment of men. While data show is
• 2:06:50
  a very real set of issues and challenges facing young men, the red pill
• 2:06:55
  traces all of these issues back to modern women. Well actually no, no,
• 2:07:00
  no, no, no, no, no no no, Well but
• 2:07:04
  not modern women. Yes, but that's right. Modern women are the product
• 2:07:12
  of feminism, and so it's like it it all inevitably goes. All roads
• 2:07:17
  go back to feminism and cultural Marxism and the oppressor oppressed narrative and and and
• 2:07:25
  so on. Yeah, well, the Marxist lens right where where you just
• 2:07:30
  you just take mind comp and you replace or no, you take the communist
• 2:07:34
  manifesto and you replace uh bourgeoisie with men, and proletariat with women, and
• 2:07:43
  capitalism with patriarchy, and and then then there you go. You're all set,
• 2:07:47
  right, you know, and you only wasteds and you only you only
• 2:07:55
  wasted four years in university to learn how to copy paste replace. They're saying
• 2:08:01
  that men face there are issues and challenges facing young men. No, really,
• 2:08:07
  I didn't. Yeah, it's unavoidable to recognize this. And they're calling
• 2:08:11
  out the people who say we need to deal with this, because we call
• 2:08:16
  out the people who increasingly prevent these issues to be dealt with, like,
• 2:08:22
  yeah, no, and we need to deal with it in a systemic way,
• 2:08:26
  not in an on the individual level, right, the level of Okay,
• 2:08:31
  so I found a support group and I won't commit suicide this week,
• 2:08:39
  maybe next, but not this week, right, Like, no, we
• 2:08:43
  need to actually look at the entirety of all of the institutions that are inflicting
• 2:08:52
  these conditions on men and say, well, we need to actually make institutional
• 2:08:58
  changes in those areas. And you know, like, and they don't want
• 2:09:05
  to do that they just want to have the stop gap of the freaking drum
• 2:09:09
  circle in the woods with apparently copious weed. Hmm, okay, because because
• 2:09:22
  because you know, weed doesn't damage people's brains or anything. Okay, I
• 2:09:28
  think here's another thing they would They would marginalize and regard as terrorists any group
• 2:09:37
  that recognizes the issues and challenging challenges facing young men without blaming young men,
• 2:09:43
  and while without reframing it as something that young men need to take responsibility for
• 2:09:48
  overcoming their the the effects. So you know, you should be emotionally strong
• 2:09:56
  enough to go through an abusive relationship, lose your children, lose your house,
• 2:10:01
  and at the end, you should just have the emotional skills as a
• 2:10:05
  man to just suck it up without being well never mind, you know,
• 2:10:09
  yeah, well never mind. Right, that's their attitude. Like, look
• 2:10:13
  at who they're declaring terrorists. Anybody who has sympathy for men? Yeah,
• 2:10:22
  Like, is there anyone? And yes, sure, I guess there are
• 2:10:24
  some some places where support groups. But when I look at these support groups,
• 2:10:31
  inevitably I find that you all have the same framework. Men must blame
• 2:10:35
  themselves for their problems. Men cannot put any blame on the legal system,
• 2:10:43
  the social system, the financial system, the corporate system, the government system.
• 2:10:46
  They cannot put any blame on any ideology. They cannot put any blame
• 2:10:52
  on the women in their lives who've done this to them, or the ideologies
• 2:10:56
  that facilitate the women in their lives to do this to them. They must
• 2:11:00
  blame themselves. They must regard society's failure of them to be their failure of
• 2:11:07
  society. That is the thing. That is the difference. If you tell
• 2:11:13
  young men, if I was a person telling young men right now that your
• 2:11:18
  problems in your life are you failing society, not society failing you. If
• 2:11:24
  I were to say that, I would be in the good books of Homeland
• 2:11:28
  Security and the FBI and the Canadian government if I were to say that.
• 2:11:33
  But because I say no, actually, these problems are out of young men's
• 2:11:39
  hands. And if we continue to blame them and expect them to suck it
• 2:11:43
  up, these problems are going to become our problems because I say that I
• 2:11:48
  am a terrorist. That's it. That's the difference. All right, Let's
• 2:11:56
  uh, and you know, all the rest of this is pretty much irrelevant.
• 2:12:00
  They're just viewing some shit about justice raff and it basically explains female supportive
• 2:12:07
  misogyny looks like so number one, it says conservative anti feminists, and then
• 2:12:13
  it defines them. They reject feminist theory, believe biological differences should lead to
• 2:12:16
  traditional gender roles, women belong to the private sphere. And then you have
• 2:12:22
  all right women, idealized gender norms, white supremacist thought, interlacement of anti
• 2:12:31
  feminism and national purity. Uh. Then you have tradwives, occupation of traditional
• 2:12:35
  generals, prioritizing family values, commitment to Christianity. Oh my god. And
• 2:12:50
  then we got fem cells involuntarily celibate, sarcastic, self depreciating online content,
• 2:12:56
  extreme messaging to illicit shock and republic outrage, going to buy MANI spere for
• 2:13:01
  not being real in cells, I think themsells is basically just pick me.
• 2:13:05
  But that's that's what that is that they're Okay, let's let's skip because the
• 2:13:09
  rest of this is just basically you know, I'm talking about Pearl Davis for
• 2:13:13
  like, skip to the headline as speculating on why, Okay, speculating on
• 2:13:20
  the why. Now, Undoubtedly, as you have been reading this piece,
• 2:13:24
  your mind wandered to the question that prompted us to write this piece in the
• 2:13:26
  first place. Why do women decide to build an entire online persona on their
• 2:13:31
  dislike of women that do not fit into the prescribed standards of misogynists. The
• 2:13:35
  following scenarios outline potential motivations for the aforementioned Okay, let's read your mind,
• 2:13:41
  seboons, think of us? Yeah? Scenario one, anti women female influencers
• 2:13:52
  are merely opportunistic patriarchal bargains and competition. Do you want me to read this
• 2:13:58
  whole thing? You know what? Let me read it. Let me read
• 2:14:03
  it. Okay. In Denis's Candyotes Bargaining with Patriarchy nineteen eighty eight, she
• 2:14:09
  lays out the different, culturally diffiated, differentiated ways women strategize to gain security,
• 2:14:15
  safety, and authority within patriarchal society. In a quid pro quo that
• 2:14:18
  leaves sex based oppression in text, the woman receives a desired position in exchange
• 2:14:24
  for any type of submission to a man. Having bargained with the patriarchy,
• 2:14:28
  the woman has carved out and optimized favorable place in the hierarchy for herself,
• 2:14:33
  while leaving the system intact. Within the context of a reappreciation of traditional gender
• 2:14:39
  roles, a condrowing contempt for women's sexual liberation, and an increased exposure to
• 2:14:43
  misogynists content for the manisphere. Some of these female influencers may be engaging in
• 2:14:48
  patriarchal bargaining while humiliating modern women and arguing for a rollback of civil liberties or
• 2:14:52
  women. They're carving out a privileged role in a patriarchal hierarchy and hope to
• 2:14:56
  be respected and desired by men entirely def finding themselves in opposition to other modern
• 2:15:01
  girls. Okay, lady, can I point something out? There's only one
• 2:15:07
  of us or or one of this particular group that's on this list of terrorists.
• 2:15:13
  Okay, there's Okay, you have society and then you have the people
• 2:15:18
  that that society declares terroristic. Right, we are apparently on that list.
• 2:15:26
  We are the anti feminist women. You are getting a grant from the US
• 2:15:35
  government. Who do you think is engaging in a patriarchal bargain here from She's
• 2:15:43
  getting a grant from mostly the male taxpayer. Yeah, but you're getting a
• 2:15:48
  grant from the US the Homeland Security. You are getting a grant from the
• 2:15:54
  institution, and we are being labeled terrorists and we're one's engaging in the patriarchal
• 2:16:01
  bargaining with you, like you're bargaining with the goddamn US government. Who the
• 2:16:07
  fuck are we bargaining with? What institution do we appeal to? Like?
• 2:16:16
  Literally, this is absurd? Okay, Like, do I need to reiterate
• 2:16:20
  again? All right? Kicked out of a freaking convention? Where was my
• 2:16:26
  patriarchal bargain then? Or was the patriarchal bargain the feminist that got me kicked
• 2:16:31
  out? Bargaining with the patriarchs controlling the convention because they didn't like me.
• 2:16:37
  Okay, tried to sue to get my seven hundred and fifty bucks back,
• 2:16:43
  oh, blocked there? So where was the patriarchal bargain? Where was my
• 2:16:48
  patriarchal bargain? Huh? Okay tried to put on a convention, got kicked
• 2:16:54
  out of the US for five years? Where's my patriarchal bargain? Can I
• 2:16:58
  get use this patriarch bargain to get off this list of fucking potential terrorism?
• 2:17:03
  Like? Where what the hell of the two of us? What's your name
• 2:17:09
  again? Of the two of us, are three of us? Four of
• 2:17:15
  us? Car Clara, Leela, Me and Karen. Which do you think
• 2:17:18
  is actually getting a patriarchal bargain? Yeah, once you are on the terrorist
• 2:17:24
  list of the ones you are getting money like this is ridiculous. You are
• 2:17:30
  the institution. And incidentally, what you're bargaining is your own individuality. You're
• 2:17:37
  cutting off and destroying your sense of self in order to get this fricking grant.
• 2:17:46
  That's your patriarchal barb Turn it, big mirror, it's you, Karla
• 2:17:52
  and Leela, You're the ones making the patriarchal bargain. Okay, let's okay,
• 2:17:58
  I'll keep going. Uh so the anti women patriarchal bargain. Uh,
• 2:18:05
  where's the rest of this? This? This is really poorly Uh, this
• 2:18:09
  is really poorly laid out. Oh. I also want to point out they're
• 2:18:16
  saying that Pearl's content becoming more polished as she gets more money to polish.
• 2:18:20
  It is evidence of some sinister uh misogynists. Ploy The form of this misogynist
• 2:18:28
  content has transformed and evolved. Professional audio studios for podcasts are set up by
• 2:18:33
  these influencers. High quality videos are shot and edited, and behind seemingly natural
• 2:18:37
  street activism hides careful planning and manipulation of footage to align with ideological intent.
• 2:18:43
  It is this increasing sophistication of seemingly simple content that may provide especially prove especially
• 2:18:48
  effective in swaying people in favor of misogynist content. Good lord, So essentially,
• 2:18:54
  what's happened is Pearl is is uh is improved upon us and is creating
• 2:19:01
  a sinister, misogynist whatever empire through a patriarchal bargain. I don't know who
• 2:19:07
  she's bargaining with. I mean YouTube that's demonetized, her TikTok that's kicked her
• 2:19:11
  off the platform. Like, where's the bargain? Well, she's just entertaining.
• 2:19:18
  Her producer is male, so yeah, but she employs him. He's
• 2:19:22
  bargaining with her. Ladies, Like, what what institution is Pearl barn with
• 2:19:30
  what the men who are interested in their content? They're not an institution.
• 2:19:33
  They're just a bunch of individuals. Goddamn. Wait wait wait, wait wait
• 2:19:37
  a minute. Look at this scenario two. This is another examp another explanation
• 2:19:41
  anti women. Female influencers are committed to gaining political power and often practice feminism
• 2:19:48
  in the process. Please, anti feminist women are trying to get political power.
• 2:20:00
  How is that not projection? Like these women already have tremendous political power
• 2:20:05
  and they're just trying to keep it. I've had people, actually, right
• 2:20:11
  from the moment that I put up my first several videos, right, you
• 2:20:16
  know, like first six months I was active on YouTube saying I should run
• 2:20:18
  for office, and I've always said no, I don't want political power.
• 2:20:22
  Like that's sounds like a lot of work, right, Like I'm just like
• 2:20:31
  no, I want to do what interests me. Oh and also i'd have
• 2:20:35
  to clean up my language because like, fuck that shit, and cultivating a
• 2:20:39
  counter culture the attention economy. It pays to be a successful content creator online,
• 2:20:45
  even with the frequent crackdowns by social media and video sharing platforms on Oh
• 2:20:50
  really, I had a da charchal bargain there. I demonetized my entire channel
• 2:20:56
  right the moment that they brought in this fucking, screwy, fucking rule right
• 2:21:01
  where it's like, well, you have to guess whether your video is suitable
• 2:21:07
  for advertisers, and if you say it was and we decide it wasn't,
• 2:21:13
  then you get a strike. I was like, fuck, demonetize everything,
• 2:21:16
  right, I can't afford this shit, right, Like I can't afford for
• 2:21:22
  my entire body of work to go down in flames, right because I guessed
• 2:21:28
  wrong on what was advertiser friendly. So I was just like, yeah,
• 2:21:35
  no, I set my entire channel to eighteen and over and I set my
• 2:21:39
  entire channel to demonetized. Right. Yeah, I earn nothing except for the
• 2:21:43
  few tips that trickle in through PayPal and the little bit that people leave on
• 2:21:48
  Honey Badger Radio's website for me, designated for me, And that's it,
• 2:21:54
  and it's it's in the few hundred dollars every three months. That's it.
• 2:22:01
  That's what I earn. And yeah, I've we managed to eke out a
• 2:22:05
  living doing this. Yeah, and thank you to everybody who supports us.
• 2:22:11
  And I'm not complaining either, because I do this out of passion, right,
• 2:22:16
  Yeah. I like doing it. I enjoy doing it. It's what
• 2:22:20
  I want to do. That's why I transition from the YouTube channel to talk
• 2:22:26
  radio spots is because virgin bums on virgin seats are worth a lot more to
• 2:22:33
  me, to my soul, right than cash in my pocket to preach to
• 2:22:39
  an already converted choir. Okay, So like I just basically said, you
• 2:22:43
  know, if I can reach people on the freeway during drive time in the
• 2:22:50
  morning in Pennsylvania, right, and I have to get up at five am
• 2:22:54
  to do it. I'm going to do it. Okay, I'm going to
• 2:22:56
  do it. I'm going to introduce them to some new thought, new ideas,
• 2:23:01
  right and I'm gonna spread awareness that way. And that's the best possible
• 2:23:05
  way that I can actually be useful, Okay, be useful in this endeavor.
• 2:23:15
  Right. So, I was just like, but I abandoned my channel
• 2:23:22
  as a money making venture years ago, years ago, like the moment my
• 2:23:26
  husband earned enough that I didn't have to worry about putting anything of that I
• 2:23:35
  earned towards our bills, right, I was just like, yeah, fuck,
• 2:23:39
  yeah, no, I'm I'm done worrying about the money right now.
• 2:23:43
  I'm just back into this as a passion project. That's all it is.
• 2:23:50
  That's what it is. I don't earn any money, and or hardly any
• 2:23:56
  money. And you know, the money that I do get, what little
• 2:24:01
  I do get, is really nice and I appreciate it and thank you everybody
• 2:24:05
  who's but this is not this is not a career that pays my bills at
• 2:24:13
  all. And yet this is a career for me that pays my bills however,
• 2:24:18
  just barely. Yeah, and also you're you're not You're not you're not
• 2:24:24
  buying any mansions, You're not like b l M. No, we're actually
• 2:24:28
  just doing work. Like it's pretty one to one. You know, you
• 2:24:33
  pay us, we do work. I manage it. I manage a community
• 2:24:37
  and uh, you know, and that's it. Like it's it's pretty transparent.
• 2:24:43
  But it's it's like a paycheck to paycheck thing. It's like Brian said,
• 2:24:46
  it's paycheck to paycheck. Nobody has Like none of us are living the
• 2:24:50
  extravagant life, none of us a purlous But she's creating content that people enjoy.
• 2:24:58
  Yeah, and maybe she is motivating money, but she's not making a
• 2:25:03
  whole lot of money now because she's been completely demarchized. Currently didn't work very
• 2:25:09
  well for her. Yeah, no, it okay, a patriarchal bargain requires
• 2:25:13
  an institution to bargain with. There is none, like every single institution is
• 2:25:18
  trying to get rid of or look at this, like this is a grant
• 2:25:22
  from the US government nine hundred thousand dollars I could use from our our channels,
• 2:25:31
  Like where is the patriarchal, who are we bargaining with? Good lord,
• 2:25:35
  it is more like you are trying to destroy women and remove their livelihood
• 2:25:41
  based on your bargain with Homeland Security. Yeah, no, it's it's I'm
• 2:25:46
  I'm just like, I'm just like, you made seven hundred thousand dollars to
• 2:25:50
  produce this work product, right, and I'm just like, I'm blown fucking
• 2:25:58
  away. I'm blown away because it's just like, what the fuck did you
• 2:26:01
  do for that money? Nothing? Nothing. They probably you sat on Twitter
• 2:26:07
  and you you you found the few accounts right that you wanted to target,
• 2:26:13
  and then you like targeted some you made some uh some soft puppet accounts or
• 2:26:20
  whatever, and you targeted some ooh look into the Mankind project and that's what
• 2:26:26
  you got paid seven hundred fucking thousand dollars for. Well, I could do
• 2:26:30
  that, and they don't. They don't get it right at all. Nobody's
• 2:26:35
  gonna do this for paycheck or for attention or for social clout. I mean,
• 2:26:39
  maybe Pearl Is, maybe Roma Is, they've got huge and they've they've
• 2:26:43
  really figured out that. But here's the thing. I mean, we're we're
• 2:26:48
  lumped in with the same with the same people like, regardless of what you
• 2:26:52
  dislike, there are people in our audience who dislike Pearl's content. You may
• 2:26:56
  dislike their content her content, but we are lumped in with her content.
• 2:27:03
  And Okay, So I think if if Pearl was only in it for the
• 2:27:11
  money, she'd be doing feminism. I mean, I think that she legitimately
• 2:27:16
  cares about this stuff, and it just so happens that being a young lady
• 2:27:20
  is helpful to blowing up your channel. This, I think is why Roma
• 2:27:24
  and Pearl are big, because what they say isn't like as deep, but
• 2:27:30
  they are saying the stuff young women is very helpful. But I don't think
• 2:27:37
  they don't care because and I would even say this about Roma as well,
• 2:27:41
  because if they were just in it for the money, they'd be feminists because
• 2:27:45
  that's easy money. You don't even have to think to do that ship.
• 2:27:48
  Oh man. That that that guy who did the audit of like all the
• 2:27:52
  women's shelters in Alberta and found that on average, the director of Women's a
• 2:27:58
  batter women's shelter in Alberta earns over one hundred and twenty five thousand dollars a
• 2:28:05
  year. And this was like ten years ago. Yeah, that's nice,
• 2:28:11
  and I'm just like, wow, nice work if you can get it,
• 2:28:15
  I guess right. But and that's all. That's a director of a women's
• 2:28:20
  shelter. If you get into the NGOs that do fucking all, you're getting
• 2:28:26
  like a millions of dollars a year. If you're a board member, you
• 2:28:28
  just collect a few forty thousand dollars paychecks from each board you're on. You
• 2:28:33
  do an hour of work a week if that, and then you're making millions
• 2:28:37
  for fucking off for doing the lattes with your friends every couple of weeks.
• 2:28:41
  Yeah. No, it's an unbelievably lucrative field because the instant you say,
• 2:28:48
  ah, I need to be saved because I'm a woman, a bunch like
• 2:28:54
  a herd of daddy big Bucks come over and start shoving quads of cash down
• 2:28:58
  your throat. Oh I'm s week invulnerable. I need a big man to
• 2:29:05
  save me. Well, it's like, okay, cashbucks, more more funds
• 2:29:09
  getting thrown at you. I'm gonna I'm gonna give some props to Anna Kasparian
• 2:29:13
  here because she went on the Patrick bet David podcast Okay, and she was
• 2:29:20
  talking about homelessness in California and she said, okay, so all they do
• 2:29:26
  is throw billions of dollars at this. Okay, but where does that money
• 2:29:31
  go. It goes to NGOs, and then the NGOs pay their freaking directors
• 2:29:37
  two hundred and fifty thousand dollars a year to fucking do nothing, to do
• 2:29:41
  nothing. That it's almost like the state is actually not interested in helping people
• 2:29:48
  help people all. And I'm just like, okay, props to her,
• 2:29:56
  right, Like she actually has been coming around a little bit over the last
• 2:30:01
  year or so in terms of like things are getting too woke, things are
• 2:30:05
  getting too fucked right, and the Democrat Party is not necessarily anybody's friend.
• 2:30:11
  And but she's you know, like she's stood up and said, you know,
• 2:30:16
  like I don't like the term Karen. I don't like the fact that
• 2:30:22
  because I'm a straight white woman, I'm vilified. Well, welcome to the
• 2:30:26
  fucking club Anna Casparian, right, okay, because before it was you,
• 2:30:33
  it was straight white men. So like, but it's like, okay,
• 2:30:41
  Bill Maher's waking up right, not enough, and I don't forgive him.
• 2:30:46
  I don't forgive Anna Casparian yet either, But you know, it's it's like
• 2:30:50
  they are actually starting to open their eyes and go like, what the fuck
• 2:30:54
  were we promoting? Like we were we thought we were promoting this thing and
• 2:31:03
  it turned out to be all this other shit, right, and it's no
• 2:31:07
  good and you know, like every time. And this is one of the
• 2:31:13
  differences between I think between feminists and anti feminists, is you even saw it
• 2:31:22
  with that, or even between the right and the left at this point,
• 2:31:26
  right, is you find that people on the one side of the issue,
• 2:31:31
  on our side of the issues, were like, well, you acknowledged you
• 2:31:39
  were mistaken or you were wrong, or you went too far or whatever.
• 2:31:45
  Welcome to we have cookies. Welcome to to where we are now, we
• 2:31:52
  have cookies. Have a cookie, right, And you know, feminists do
• 2:31:56
  not do that. Once you've gone to the other side, you are persona
• 2:32:03
  non grata forever. That's right. Sorry, you're smart motherfucker. That's right.
• 2:32:13
  Okay, So we okay, you have to go or I have to
• 2:32:20
  go. I have to go. I just got a text from my son,
• 2:32:22
  well because we just got to the park about you. Yeah, well
• 2:32:26
  it's gonna have to wait. We'll have to do yeah, we'll have to
• 2:32:30
  do more later. I mean, yeah, sorry, but but yeah,
• 2:32:37
  no, I'm not that interested in myself, my son. We can you
• 2:32:41
  know what we can blaze through this, Brian, because it's it's basically the
• 2:32:45
  next section. Oh well I okay, yeah, talk about me behind my
• 2:32:50
  back all you want? All right? Fine, well, okay, sorry,
• 2:32:52
  we're gonna We're gonna devote another episode to this. Yeah, why do
• 2:32:56
  we do that? Okay? So essentially what we will cover in that episode
• 2:33:01
  will be the final conclusions of their looking at why women do it, why
• 2:33:09
  women create quote unquote misogynist content. And again I would remind you I have
• 2:33:13
  a different definition of misogyny. My definition of misogyny is believing that a woman's
• 2:33:20
  individual actions and choices will never rise above in importance the fact, or overshadow,
• 2:33:26
  or ever eclipse in importance to the fact that she's a woman. So
• 2:33:30
  a woman as an individual is always inferior to a woman simply as a genital
• 2:33:35
  mass. Okay, that's my definition of misogyny. And go ahead. Well,
• 2:33:43
  I am on my way out the door, so I will leave you
• 2:33:48
  two to say, we'll just explain what we're gonna do, and I you
• 2:33:54
  know, I'll see you next time when the topic is me apparently, so
• 2:34:01
  all right, all right, so we'll cover the section that the concluding section
• 2:34:05
  on why anti feminist women do what they do. Then we'll look into YouTube's
• 2:34:13
  a preliminary exploration of Manisphere content, in which we discover that it is misogynist
• 2:34:20
  to want to develop the skills to attract women, and it's also a misogynist
• 2:34:26
  to feel like you can't develop the skills to attract women. And it's also
• 2:34:28
  a misogynist do just not bother with the skills to attract women. It's misogyny
• 2:34:35
  all the way down, folks, surprise and then uh, and then we
• 2:34:39
  will we'll go over their conclusions. So it may be a little bit of
• 2:34:43
  a shorter show, but hopefully it'll be an entertaining one. Well, there's
• 2:34:48
  there's other stuff we might look at as well, So yeah, there there.
• 2:34:52
  I think I think this is a it's a big event, and I
• 2:34:58
  think it's an ongoing issue. You okay, whatever you want to see.
• 2:35:01
  Somebody says that they want to use they want to avoid misogyny as like a
• 2:35:05
  word, Well, whatever word you want to use for that, because I
• 2:35:09
  don't there's got to be some way to define it, like, uh,
• 2:35:15
  I don't know it really bugs me this idea that no matter what you do
• 2:35:20
  or say as a woman, it'll never be more important than the fact that
• 2:35:22
  you are a woman. And feminist feed into that constantly, and they don't
• 2:35:28
  call it a patriarchal bargain, despite the fact that it's probably the closest thing
• 2:35:31
  to being a patriarchal bargain anyway. So I just want to remind everyone after
• 2:35:35
  the show is over, if you enjoyed this content, you want to send
• 2:35:39
  us a tip and say, hey, you're doing great work. Feed the
• 2:35:41
  Badger dot com slash just the tip and uh, just just a final statement
• 2:35:46
  on my incompetence. I am not a media personality. I never thought I
• 2:35:52
  was going to be a media personality. I didn't do any education related to
• 2:35:56
  media personality, dumb or anything like that. I never really worked on the
• 2:36:01
  skills necessary for social media. I am just somebody who reads a lot and
• 2:36:07
  thinks very deeply on things, and I had an interest in gender dynamics,
• 2:36:11
  So that's my background. I apologize if my work isn't really great at bringing
• 2:36:18
  attention to these issues like Roma and Pearl do. But on the other hand,
• 2:36:22
  I don't know if I wanted to embrace dumbing down everything that we talk
• 2:36:28
  about in order to make it as accessible as possible, which is the thing
• 2:36:33
  I think they both do, and they both do it well. They are
• 2:36:35
  entertaining personalities. They bring a certain depth that people relate to to these issues,
• 2:36:43
  and that's why they've gotten bigger. I am somebody who likes to go
• 2:36:48
  deep. I like to look at the underlying patterns and the underlying forces.
• 2:36:54
  And that doesn't appeal to everyone. You know. They don't want to go
• 2:36:58
  seven layers deep. They don't want to start doing a tour of the mantle,
• 2:37:01
  you know. So that's the focus that I bring. If it's what
• 2:37:07
  you like, stay with us, listen to us. You may find that
• 2:37:11
  we predict a lot of stuff that happens going forward and that might be of
• 2:37:16
  interest to you. If you don't like spoilers, then go watch Roma and
• 2:37:20
  Pearl. I guess anyway, If you enjoy this content, feed the Badger
• 2:37:24
  dot com slash just the tip to send us a tip and send us a
• 2:37:26
  comment after the show is done. We will endeavor to read those comments comments
• 2:37:31
  at the next available show, and it is the best way to send us
• 2:37:35
  any kind of funds and tell us that we're not screaming into the abyss with
• 2:37:37
  our crazy little channel here. And yeah, so once again feed Thebadger dot
• 2:37:41
  com slash just the tip and back to you, Brian. Okay, so,
• 2:37:48
  if you guys liked this video, please hit like, subscribe. If
• 2:37:50
  you're not already subscribed, hit the bellf and notifications, leave us a comment,
• 2:37:54
  let us know what you guys think about what we discussed on the show
• 2:37:58
  today. And again, like Allison said, uh, you know, go
• 2:38:03
  to feedbadge dot com for SLA's just a tip to send us a super chow.
• 2:38:07
  And if you're on Rumble, please subscribe and if you are over here
• 2:38:13
  on YouTube give us a like, hit that thumbs up button. So thank
• 2:38:20
  you guys so much for coming on the show. Please share this video and
• 2:38:22
  we will talk to you all in the next one.