Latest / Reformed Thinking / From Crown to Captivity to Christ (Matthew 1:6–11)

Transcript

From Crown to Captivity to Christ (Matthew 1:6–11) · Reformed Thinking

0:00
Welcome to Reform thinking it's good to be back.
0:02
Today we're doing one of our deep dives, looking closely at a
0:04
part of Matthews Gospel that honestly, many of us tend to
0:08
skim over. The genealogy, specifically in
0:11
Matthew chapter 1 versus 6 through 11.
0:13
That middle section, David, down to the deportation to Babylon.
0:18
And far from being just a list of names, this section is, well,
0:21
it's packed with theology. Matthew's building an argument
0:24
here architecturally. An argument?
0:26
How so? He's using the structure, the
0:28
names, even specific phrases to show the failure, the systemic
0:32
failure of human kingship. Setting the stage for why Christ
0:37
had to come as the only truly righteous king.
0:39
Exactly. It establishes the theological
0:41
necessity of Jesus. OK, so our mission for this deep
0:44
dive is to untack that. We'll look at how Matthew uses
0:47
things like titles, how he brings up moral issues, and this
0:51
keyword for exile. Mitoikija.
0:54
Mitoikija. Yeah, We'll see how it all
0:56
points to the royal line left on its own, heading for ruin,
1:00
creating this vacuum that only Christ can fill.
1:03
Sounds fascinating. Let's get started.
1:05
All right, so Matthew starts this second block of names
1:09
verses 6 to 11, right after the first block culminates in David,
1:13
and he gives David a unique label here.
1:15
He does Verse six starts David the king though a day of
1:19
bustless. And nobody else in the whole
1:21
list gets that title right. Not Solomon.
1:24
Not Josiah. No one.
1:25
It's specific to David, and that's intentional.
1:27
It's like Matthew puts a spotlight right there.
1:29
So what's the significance? Why the king just for David?
1:34
Well, it's not just identifying him, it's anchoring everything
1:37
that follows in the idea of kingship, specifically the
1:40
kingship God promised through David.
1:43
The Davidic covenant. Exactly that title the king it
1:46
gathers up all the weight of that promise from Tekken Samuel
1:49
7 Psalm 89 the whole thing the. Promise of an enduring throne, a
1:53
dynasty, a. House that God would establish
1:56
forever. Matthew's reminding us right at
1:58
the start, God made an oath. That oath stands even if the
2:01
kings fail. And given that verse one,
2:03
introduce Jesus as the son of David.
2:05
Right. This title for David in verse 6
2:08
immediately ramps up the messianic expectation.
2:11
It sets David as the standard, the, you know, the high
2:14
watermark. OK, so every king that follows
2:17
is going to be measured against this standard.
2:19
Precisely. And Matthew knows and expects us
2:22
to know from the Old Testament record that they're going to
2:24
fall short. It sets up the contrast,
2:26
highlighting their insufficiency right from the beginning.
2:29
The promise is solid. That the human bearers of the
2:32
promise, well, that's another story.
2:34
It's interesting though. Massey sets this high standard
2:36
with David the King, but then immediately he complicates it
2:40
doesn't. He he does in the very same
2:42
breath, David the king begat Solomon by the wife of Uriah.
2:46
Yeah, not just by Bashi, but he uses that specific
2:50
circumlocation. And it's incredibly pointed.
2:53
Matthew forces us to remember the scandal, the sin, right
2:56
alongside the royal title. Why that phrasing?
2:58
Why the wife of Uriah? It focuses our attention not on
3:02
the a royal romance, but on the core of David's crime.
3:05
It points directly back to Telly Samuel 11:00 and 12:00.
3:08
Uriah the Hittite, a Gentile soldier in David's army.
3:12
Yes, so the phrase instantly brings up David's abuse of
3:16
power, his adultery, his deception, and ultimately his
3:19
murder of a loyal soldier to cover it all up.
3:22
So it's theft and murder. That's what Matthew wants us to
3:24
remember. He installs that moral memory
3:26
right at the head of this royal section.
3:28
It's like saying here's the great King, the archetype, and
3:31
here's the blood stained right next to his crown.
3:33
But wait, if the point of the genealogy is to establish Jesus
3:36
credentials, why lead? This section was such a stark
3:40
reminder of sin it seems almost counterintuitive.
3:43
But it serves A vital theological purpose right away.
3:46
It demonstrates the the bankruptcy of merely human rule.
3:51
Even the best of them. Even the best if David, the man
3:54
after God's own heart, the standard bearer, could fall this
3:56
hard. It proves that no human king, no
3:59
matter how gifted or initially faithful, is sufficient in
4:01
himself. Even the ideal monarch needed
4:04
mercy, needed grace. It pulls the rug out from it.
4:07
Or any idea that salvation could come just through a good human
4:10
lineage or pedigree? Absolutely.
4:12
And you notice Matthew consistently includes women in
4:14
the genealogy who have, let's say, complicated stories or
4:19
Gentile backgrounds. Tamar, Rahab, Ruth, and now the
4:22
wife of Uriah. Yeah, that's always struck.
4:25
Me by highlighting David's sin linked to Uriah, a Gentile right
4:29
here, Matthew is showing us something crucial.
4:33
The covenant moves forward by grace, not by perfect pedigree.
4:37
So God's faithfulness carries the line forward despite the
4:41
sins of the kings. Precisely.
4:42
The line needs redemption from the very start.
4:45
It's preservation isn't due to the virtue of the kings, but to
4:48
God's unwavering commitment to His own promise.
4:51
That sets a really important tone for the rest of the list,
4:54
doesn't it? We're not looking for a hero in
4:56
the line itself. We're seeing a line that
4:57
desperately needs a savior from outside itself.
5:00
David's failure casts a long shadow.
5:02
We carry that knowledge as we read the names that follow.
5:05
OK, so after establishing David as the standard but immediately
5:09
highlighting the moral fracture, Matthew then proceeds through
5:12
the list of subsequent kings. And there's a distinctive rhythm
5:15
here. Yes, there is.
5:17
He uses the verb agonosen fathered or begat over and over
5:21
again. Solomon begat Rihabom.
5:23
Rihabom be the baija. Baija begat ASA.
5:26
It creates the steady, almost hypnotic cadence, like a
5:30
genealogical drum beat, keeping time down through the
5:33
generations. And when you hear that constant
5:35
rhythm, that repetition, you start to expect something right,
5:38
like it's building towards. Towards a climax, towards
5:41
stability, or maybe a golden age, a king who finally gets it
5:44
right. The rhythm itself creates a
5:46
sense of narrative momentum, of inertia.
5:48
But. You're saying Matthew is using
5:50
that expectation against us in a way?
5:52
He is because the repetition teaches a crucial, maybe even
5:55
negative theological lesson before we get to the end of this
5:57
section, that that human begetting can keep the line
6:01
going physically, but it cannot redeem the people it.
6:03
Perpetuates the line, but doesn't purify it.
6:05
Exactly. The steady drum beat proves that
6:08
flesh just begets flesh. The sin problem, the moral
6:12
fracture we saw with David, gets passed down.
6:14
Left to itself, the line just keeps inheriting and frankly,
6:17
compounding the guilt. So continuity isn't the same as
6:20
righteousness. Not at all.
6:21
It's continuity towards judgment unless something changes.
6:25
This really sounds like Matthew's laying out a
6:26
historical case for, well, what Reformed theology calls total
6:30
depravity, the inherent inability of human nature, even
6:33
within the covenant line, to achieve righteousness.
6:36
I think that's a fair reading. He's using Israel's own history
6:39
as Exhibit A. Look, God gave this line
6:42
everything the law, the temple, the prophets, the specific
6:46
Davidic promise, and yet, what's the result?
6:48
Generation after generation. Failure, idolatry, Injustice
6:53
leading to collapse. It shows the problem wasn't just
6:55
a few bad apples, a few bad kings.
6:58
The problem was deeper, internal to the lion itself, internal to
7:02
human nature. They couldn't fix themselves.
7:05
Which brings us squarely to the insufficiency of the human
7:08
kings. We need to look at some of these
7:10
names between David and the exile.
7:12
It's not just a blur. There are specific stories here
7:15
that illustrate this failure. Right.
7:16
Take Riho Bohm, Solomon's son, the first one after the Kingdom
7:20
splits. He's the one who listened to his
7:22
young, arrogant friends instead of the older advisors.
7:25
Yes, and his harsh response directly caused the 10 northern
7:28
tribes to break away. So the unity of David's Kingdom
7:32
shattered almost immediately. A massive failure right at the
7:35
start of this section. OK, so unity is lost early on,
7:38
but what about the kings who were remembered more positively?
7:41
The good kings? The reformers like ASA or
7:44
Jehoshaphat. Well, ASA starts off well.
7:46
He clears out idols, relies on God against a huge Kushaid army
7:50
in Two Chronicles 14 seems promising.
7:53
But later, when facing bash off Israel, he completely bypasses
7:57
God. He makes a political deal with
7:59
Syria, even raids the temple treasury to pay for it.
8:02
And when the prophet Hanani confronts him, ASA throws him in
8:05
prison. He ends his life relying on
8:08
physicians, not the Lord, for a disease in his feet.
8:11
So a good start, but a decay into self-reliance and rejecting
8:14
prophetic correction. So even the good ones were
8:16
flawed, inconsistent. What about Jehoshaphat?
8:18
He's generally seen as pious. He was, but his major flaw was
8:22
compromised through alliances. He repeatedly allied himself
8:26
with the wicked kings of Israel, the House of Ahab.
8:28
Marrying his son Jehoram to Athalia, Ahab's daughter.
8:32
That didn't end well. It was disastrous.
8:34
It brought bowel worship and incredible violence right into
8:37
Judah through Afelli's influence.
8:39
Later on, Joshua Fat's personal piety couldn't protect the
8:43
Kingdom when his political alliances compromised its
8:46
covenant faithfulness. These examples show that even
8:49
well-intentioned efforts could be undermined by personal
8:52
failings or bad policy. Indian kings who were just bad.
8:57
Manasseh comes to mind. Manasseh represents the absolute
9:00
nadir. He wasn't just flawed, he
9:02
actively, systematically reverse the reforms of his godly father
9:06
Hezekiah. He rebuilt the high places,
9:09
brought back Bell worship, astrology, child sacrifice.
9:11
Put idols inside the temple itself. 2 Kings tells us he
9:14
filled Jerusalem with innocent blood.
9:17
His sin was so egregious, so pervasive, that the biblical
9:20
writers identify his reign as the tipping point, the reason
9:22
judgement became unavoidable. Even though he apparently
9:25
repented later in exile. Even so, the damage was done.
9:27
Done. The spiritual debt was too
9:29
massive. His actions sealed Judah's fate.
9:31
And this points back to Hezekiah too, doesn't it?
9:33
Hezekiah the father, the great reformer who faced down
9:36
Sennacherib. But even he had a moment of
9:39
pride that contributed the downfall.
9:41
That's right, after God miraculously saved Jerusalem,
9:44
Hezekiah got sick. God healed him.
9:46
And then the Babylonian envoys came.
9:49
And he showed them everything, all the treasures, the Armory.
9:52
A foolish display of national pride and self-reliance.
9:55
And Isaiah? The prophet immediately called
9:58
him out on it, predicting that everything he'd shown off would
10:01
one day be carried to Babylon. Wow.
10:03
So Hezekiah the reformer kind of plants the seeds for the future
10:07
exile through his own pride. It shows how fragile things
10:10
were. Even the bright spots often
10:12
contained the seeds of future failure.
10:14
They managed, at best, episodic reform without inner renewal.
10:18
They could change external practices for a time, but they
10:20
couldn't change the people's hearts or even consistently
10:24
govern their own. This leads us to Josiah may be
10:26
the last great hope before the end.
10:29
Josiah was incredibly zealous, found the Book of the Law,
10:32
purged idolatry, held a massive Passover.
10:35
A genuine revival, it seems. But it wasn't enough.
10:38
It was too late. Scripture is clear.
10:41
Like in 2 Kings 23.26. Even after Josiah's reforms,
10:45
God's wrath still burned against Judah because of the accumulated
10:48
sins, especially Manassas. Josiah could cleanse the land,
10:52
but he couldn't undo the past or more importantly, regenerate the
10:56
nation's heart. Generational guilt was too deep.
10:59
So the historical record, as Matthew assumes his readers know
11:02
it, points to a structural problem.
11:04
It wasn't just bad luck or occasional failures.
11:07
It was systemic, the line itself.
11:09
The human monarchy, was incapable of producing the
11:12
lasting righteousness the Covenant required.
11:15
The historical verdict, summed up in Two Chronicles 36, is
11:18
stark. God sent warnings, but they
11:20
mocked the messengers, despised his words, scoffed at his
11:23
prophets until. Until the wrath of the Lord rose
11:26
against his people, till there was no remedy.
11:28
No remedy. That's the key.
11:29
The human system was broken beyond human repair.
11:32
This whole section, this drum beat of Againison, has been
11:35
documenting the inevitable March towards that verdict.
11:37
Matthew is building an irrefutable case based on
11:40
Israel's own sacred history. The human lion can only produce
11:43
heirs to exile. Which creates that theological
11:46
vacuum, that desperate need for something, someone else.
11:49
And now the rhythm is about to break.
11:52
Right. That's steady beat of big gap,
11:54
big gap. Big gap has carried us through
11:56
10 generations from Solomon. We're expecting it to continue,
11:59
but instead crash. Exactly.
12:01
The momentum hits a wall, and that wall has a name.
12:05
Metoikeisha. Deportation.
12:08
Exile. How does Matthew signal this
12:10
shift? It happens right after Josiah
12:13
with Jek and. I The structure changes
12:14
abruptly. Look at verse 11.
12:16
It's not just Josiah begat Jek and I and his brothers.
12:19
It's Josiah begat Jek and I and his brothers at the time of the
12:21
deportation to Babylon. That qualifying phrase at the
12:24
time of the deportation, it breaks the pattern.
12:27
It slams on the brakes. Linguistically, it halts the
12:30
rhythm. Theologically, it reframes
12:31
everything. It functions as you said
12:33
earlier, like a crash symbol. Precisely.
12:35
It shatters the hypnotic continuity that crash announces
12:39
the end of the line's trajectory, the end of its human
12:42
pretensions. It's the arrival of divine
12:44
judgment. The story isn't building to
12:46
glory. It's collapsed into captivity.
12:48
And you mentioned Matthew emphasizes this word mento
12:50
akeesia. It's rare.
12:52
Quite rare in the New Testament, but Matthew uses it three times
12:55
in quick succession here in verse 11, then in verse 12 after
12:58
the deportation, and again in his summary in verse 17.
13:01
From David to the deportation. From the deportation to the
13:05
Christ. So he's really hammering at
13:07
home. Why this repetition?
13:09
He's making exile the structural pivot, the theological hinge of
13:13
the whole chapter. It divides the history cleanly.
13:16
Problem David to exile and resolution exile to Christ.
13:20
Everything now revolves around understanding and overcoming
13:23
this reality of methokesia. OK.
13:25
So it's the hinge. What does exile signify
13:28
theologically for Matthew? It's more than just being forced
13:31
to move to Babylon, isn't? It oh much more.
13:33
It's first and foremost a covenantal lawsuit reaching its
13:35
verdict, meaning it's the direct fulfillment of the curses
13:38
threatened way back in the Torah.
13:40
Leviticus 26, Deuteronomy 28 to 30.
13:42
God warned Israel. If you persistently break the
13:45
covenant, disobey my commands, pursue idolatry, the land itself
13:49
will vomit you out. So the exile wasn't just a
13:52
political or military defeat, it was God executing the terms of
13:56
his own covenant agreement. Yes, it validates the Law and
13:59
the prophets who have warned about this for centuries.
14:01
It confirms God's justice. Wrath fell, as Chronicles said,
14:05
till there was no remedy within the old system.
14:08
And that phrase in verse 11 at the time of the deportation,
14:11
Yeah. What does that imply about Jack
14:13
and I and the generations born after the exile began?
14:16
The grammar there, Epito's metoy, suggests that Jeconiah
14:20
and his descendants, She'll Teals, Aruba Ball, were born
14:23
under the condition of exile. Their very existence is now
14:27
situated within a regime of judgement.
14:29
The line continues, yes, but it continues under divine sentence.
14:33
So even when they physically return from Babylon later,
14:36
Zerubbabel leading them back, they're still in a sense under
14:40
this judgement. That's the implication.
14:42
They return to the land, they rebuild a temple.
14:44
But the glorious, independent Davidic kingship, it's not
14:47
restored. They remain under foreign
14:49
domination. Persian, Greek, Roman.
14:51
Geographically, they might be back, but covenantally,
14:53
politically, the Exile hasn't fully ended.
14:56
Which points to something deeper.
14:58
If the return to the land wasn't the full solution, then the
15:01
problem wasn't just geography. Exactly this leads us to the
15:04
deeper exile, moral and spiritual estrangement.
15:08
OK, what is this deeper exile? It's the root cause behind the
15:11
physical deportation. It's the estrangement from God
15:14
caused by sin. That moral fracture we saw
15:17
starting with David? It metastasized through the
15:20
generations, creating a separation between Israel and
15:23
their holy God. Babylon's chains were just the
15:26
external symptom of this internal spiritual reality.
15:29
So the real tragedy of exile wasn't just losing land or
15:32
sovereignty. The deepest ache, the core loss,
15:35
was the departure of God's presence.
15:38
Remember Ezekiel's vision, the kavod, the glory of the Lord
15:42
physically leaving the temple before its destruction.
15:44
Exile at its heart means being cut off from fellowship with
15:47
God, cast out from his presence because of sin.
15:50
Wow, so the entire history Matthew has just traced the
15:53
initial sin, the drum beat of failure, the crash into Matoya
15:56
Keisha. It all demonstrates this
15:58
profound separation and the lines utter inability to fix it.
16:01
Absolutely, the line has proven it can only be get errors to
16:05
exile both physical and spiritual.
16:07
It's run itself into a dead end. Which creates, as you called it,
16:11
a theological vacuum. Yes, the need for rescue is now
16:15
undeniable, but that rescues cannot come from within the
16:19
established pattern. It can't be another againison.
16:22
If the line is to reach its promised fulfillment in a
16:24
righteous king, it requires A radical break, a divine
16:28
intervention. The stage is perfectly set for
16:30
something entirely new. The necessity for God himself to
16:34
act is now unavoidable. So the genealogy has crashed
16:37
into the wall of exile mid to Akisha.
16:39
The human line has failed. How does Matthew show the
16:43
resolution? How does he get us to Jesus
16:44
without just continuing the failed pattern?
16:46
He does it with a stunning grammatical shift right in verse
16:49
16. It's the resolution interrupting
16:50
the failed cadence. OK, walk us through verse 16.
16:53
What changes? For 17 generations, running back
16:55
to Abraham, we've had the active voice.
16:57
Abraham begat Isaac, David begat Solomon, Jacob begat Joseph A
17:01
Guinison. But when we get to Jesus, the
17:04
pattern breaks completely. It says Jacob fathered Joseph,
17:08
the husband of Mary, of whom Jesus was born.
17:11
The verb shifts to the passive was born.
17:14
And crucially, the relative pronoun of whom X has is
17:18
feminine, singular, referring back to Mary, not Joseph.
17:22
So Joseph doesn't bigot Jesus in the same way the previous
17:26
fathers bigot their sons. The chain of human aginison is
17:29
broken. It's the ultimate anti aginison.
17:32
This deliberate grammatical break signals that Jesus's
17:35
origin isn't from the potency of the human line, which we've just
17:38
seen fail so spectacularly. His origin is from divine
17:42
initiative. And Matthew immediately
17:44
clarifies this. Yes, the Angel explains to
17:46
Joseph shortly after the child conceived in Mary is from the
17:50
Holy Spirit supernatural conception.
17:52
Why is this detail, the virgin conception, so theologically
17:56
vital at this exact point in the genealogy?
17:58
Because of everything we've just discussed, the entire line
18:00
descended from David, while carrying the promise, also
18:03
carried the stain of sin, the Adamic inheritance that led
18:06
inevitably to medication. If Jesus were simply Joseph's
18:09
natural son. He would inherit that same
18:11
fallen nature, that same connection into the lion's guilt
18:14
and failure. He'd be just another son of
18:17
David, unable to truly save. So the conception by the Spirit
18:20
ensures Jesus stands outside Adam's guilt.
18:23
He possesses a true unfallen human nature.
18:25
Exactly. It guarantees His intrinsic
18:28
holiness. Only a sinless king, one not
18:31
implicated in the very sin he came to overcome, can actually
18:34
fulfill the office and redeem the people.
18:37
This fits perfectly with Reformed understanding of
18:39
Christ's person, truly human, yet without sin.
18:43
The genealogy demonstrates why that sinlessness was absolutely
18:46
necessary. OK, so he has the divine
18:49
qualification, holiness, but he still needs the legal right to
18:52
David's throne to fulfill the covenant promise.
18:55
This brings us to Jesus's dual claim to kingship, legal right
18:58
and divine qualification. How is the legal part secured if
19:02
Joseph isn't the biological father?
19:04
Matthew handles this very carefully.
19:06
He traces the royal lineage through Solomon all the way down
19:08
to Joseph. Joseph is explicitly named the
19:11
husband of Mary. So Joseph provides the
19:12
connection to the royal wine. He provides the legal connection
19:16
in Jewish law and custom adoption, particularly through
19:20
the act of naming, conferred legal status and inheritance
19:23
rights. Joseph, by marrying Mary and
19:26
then formally naming the child Jesus as the Angel commanded him
19:29
in 1.21 and as he does in 1.25, legally accepts Jesus as his
19:34
son. So Jesus inherits the legal
19:37
claim to the Davidic throne through Joseph, his adoptive
19:40
father. Correct.
19:41
He gets the title, the lineage rights through Joseph.
19:43
But wait. There's that tricky issue we
19:46
touched on earlier, the Jikaniah curse.
19:49
Jekaniah, also called Konaya or Jehoi Chin is in Joseph's line,
19:52
right? Yeah, and Jeremiah cursed him.
19:54
Yes, Jeremiah 22.30 It's a significant hurdle.
19:58
God declared through Jeremiah that none of Jekoniah's physical
20:01
offspring would ever prosper sitting on David's throne.
20:03
It was a divine judgement, a legal disqualification for his
20:06
natural descendants. So if Joseph is a descendant of
20:08
Jekoniah, and Jesus gets his legal claim through Joseph, how
20:12
does Jesus avoid inheriting that curse?
20:14
This seems like a major problem. It would be except for the
20:17
virgin conception. This is where Matthew's
20:18
structure is so brilliant. How?
20:19
Does it solve it? Jesus receives the legal title
20:22
to the throne through Joseph's line, the line that includes the
20:25
cursed Jeconiah. But because he is conceived by
20:28
the Holy Spirit, he is not Jeconiah's physical seed.
20:31
He doesn't share his biology. So the curse applies to the
20:34
natural offspring, the seed. But Jesus isn't naturally
20:37
descended from Jeconiah. Precisely, he inherits the legal
20:40
right without inheriting the biological curse.
20:43
Some also point to Luke's genealogy, tracing Mary's line
20:46
back to David through Nathan, not Solomon and Jeconiah,
20:50
suggesting his physical Davidic descent comes through a
20:52
different uncursed branch, while the legal throne right comes via
20:56
Joseph. That's incredibly precise.
20:58
Matthew uses Joseph's line for the legal claim, and the spirits
21:01
work for the necessary holiness and avoidance of the curse.
21:05
It makes Jesus, the uncontested, rested, uncursed air, the divine
21:08
promise. The Davidic covenant finds a way
21:11
to overcome the divine judgement, the Jeconiah curse,
21:14
through the unique person of the Mediator.
21:16
He is both the lawful Son of David and the Holy Son of God.
21:19
He solves all the problems the agundus and rhythm created.
21:22
Wow. OK, so we have the King legally
21:24
installed, divinely qualified. What is his mission?
21:28
Matthew tells us immediately. This is about defining Jesus's
21:31
mission, the end of the deeper exile.
21:34
Yes, the angel's message to Joseph isn't just she will have
21:38
a son. It's you shall call his name
21:40
Jesus, for he will save his people from their sins.
21:43
Matthew 121. Save his people from their sins,
21:47
not save his people from the Romans, or restore the political
21:50
Kingdom immediately. Exactly.
21:52
His primary mission is defined in soteriological saving terms.
21:56
He targets the root cause of the middle Acacia, the deeper exile
21:59
sin. This confirms that the ultimate
22:01
exile, the real problem, was moral and spiritual estrangement
22:05
from God. And salvation comes through his
22:07
work, through atonement, not through policy changes like the
22:10
old kings tried. Right.
22:11
He deals with the sin that caused the separation and think
22:14
back to the core pain of exile, the loss of God's presence.
22:17
Which connects to his other name.
22:18
Emanuel quoted by Matthew right after the virgin birth.
22:21
Explanation 1.23 Behold, the Virgin shall conceive and bear
22:25
Son, and they shall call his name Emmanuel, which means.
22:28
God with us. The perfect direct antidote to
22:31
exile if exile, separation from God.
22:34
Emmanuel is God dwelling with his people in the person of
22:37
Jesus. He bridges the gap caused by
22:40
sin. He reverses the departure of
22:42
God's glory. He is the end of the deeper
22:45
exile. With the whole structure of the
22:46
genealogy. David's High standard and
22:49
immediate failure. The relentless drum beat of
22:51
insufficient kings, the crash into judgement in exile, it all
22:56
serves to demonstrate the absolute necessity of this king.
22:58
He is the divinely scripted climax to Israel's whole
23:01
history. He's the fulfillment they
23:03
couldn't achieve themselves. He's the righteous king who
23:06
doesn't just reform, but saves. And his kingship isn't temporary
23:09
or fragile like theirs, no. It culminates as Matthew shows
23:12
us at the very end of his gospel with the risen Christ declaring
23:15
all authority in heaven and on earth has been given to me,
23:18
Matthew 28.18. It's an eternal, righteous,
23:21
all-encompassing kingship that truly fulfills the Davidic
23:24
promise and establishes God's reign perfectly.
23:26
Hashtag #outdro. Wow.
23:28
OK, so looking back at this section, Matthew 1.6 to 11, it's
23:32
clear this isn't just a list, it's a powerful theological
23:34
argument told through names and structure.
23:36
It really is. You see that steady beat of a
23:39
Guinness in human generation, driving relentlessly forward.
23:43
Only to smash into the wall of Matoikeesia, the exile, the
23:47
judgement. Yeah, forcing this theological
23:49
reckoning. Matthew's architecture is just
23:51
brilliant. It teaches about God's
23:53
Providence, how He governs history, even incorporating
23:56
human failure and judgement into His plan.
23:59
And it highlights the covenant of grace, doesn't it?
24:01
God's promise to David wasn't ultimately dependent on the
24:04
King's performance. It finds its fulfillment in the
24:07
mediator, Jesus. Absolutely.
24:10
The whole structure pushes us away from trusting in any human
24:14
lineage or effort, even the best of them, and forces us to
24:17
transfer all our hope to the perfect son of David.
24:20
The one who wasn't just begotten in the old way, but was
24:22
conceived by the Holy Spirit. Right.
24:24
God himself had to intervene, had to initiate to bigot
24:27
salvation, because the human line could only bigot heirs to
24:30
exile. That brings us to a final
24:32
thought for you, the listener. Consider this.
24:35
If Israel's best kings, guys like Hezekiah or Josiah with all
24:39
their reforms and policies, couldn't actually regenerate the
24:42
hearts of the people or solve the deep problem of sin, where
24:46
does true regeneration come from?
24:48
Where does real forgiveness, real release from that deeper
24:51
exile of the soul, actually reside?
24:54
It's not in human systems or self improvement.
24:56
Matthew's genealogy points us relentlessly to the one king who
24:59
came to save his people from their sins.
25:02
The king who ends the physical exile also ends the spiritual
25:05
captivity. He's Emmanuel, God with us.