Latest / The Financial Exchange Show / Will Trump stand by while RFK Jr goes after fast food?
Transcript
- 0:00Speaker 1: The Financial Exchange is produced by Money Matters Radio and
- 0:03Speaker 1: is hosted by employees of the Armstrong Advisory Group, a
- 0:05Speaker 1: registered investment advisor. All opinions expressed are solely those of
- 0:09Speaker 1: the hosts. Do not reflect the opinions of Armstrong Advisory
- 0:11Speaker 1: or anyone else. Investments can lose money. This program does
- 0:14Speaker 1: not offer any specific financial or investment advice. Please consult
- 0:17Speaker 1: your own financial, tax, and estate planning advisors before making
- 0:20Speaker 1: any investment decisions. Armstrong Advisory and the advertisers heard on
- 0:23Speaker 1: this program do not endorse each other or their services.
- 0:26Speaker 1: Armstrong and Money Matters Radio do not compensate each other
- 0:28Speaker 1: for referrals and are not affiliated. This is the Financial
- 0:34Speaker 1: Exchange with Mike Armstrong and Mark Vandetti. Your exclusive look
- 0:40Speaker 1: at business and financial news affecting your day, your city,
- 0:43Speaker 1: your world. Stay informed and up to date about economic
- 0:47Speaker 1: and market trends, plus breaking business news every day. The
- 0:51Speaker 1: Financial Exchange is a proud partner of the Disabled American
- 0:54Speaker 1: Veterans Department of Massachusetts. Help us support our great American
- 0:58Speaker 1: heroes by visiting dav five K dot Boston and making
- 1:02Speaker 1: a donation today. Face is the Financial Exchange with Mike
- 1:06Speaker 1: Armstrong and Mark Vandetti.
- 1:09Speaker 2: Good morning, and welcome back to the Financial Exchange. It
- 1:13Speaker 2: is Mike Armstrong, Mark and bet Mark Vandetti. I've got
- 1:16Speaker 2: my last name, but not your last name. Sorry about that.
- 1:19Speaker 2: And notice kitchen on the board this morning the Financial Exchange.
- 1:24Speaker 2: It's not spelled like the kitchen that you and I know.
- 1:26Speaker 2: It's a little different than that. Markets are mixed at
- 1:29Speaker 2: the moment. Dow positive sixteen points, just basically flat S
- 1:33Speaker 2: and P down two points, or again basically flat NASDAK
- 1:37Speaker 2: down thirty points, a little bit more than a tenth
- 1:39Speaker 2: of a percent, Rustle two thousand off about a third
- 1:41Speaker 2: of eight percent. In bond markets, we've got yields moving
- 1:45Speaker 2: slightly higher, as Jerome Powell is addressing Congress. At the moment,
- 1:49Speaker 2: we've got the yield and the ten year Treasury sitting
- 1:52Speaker 2: around four point five four percent. Leads me over to
- 1:57Speaker 2: mortgage markets, where you've got the thirty year fixed rate
- 2:00Speaker 2: mortgage sitting at seven point zero one percent. For those
- 2:04Speaker 2: in the Boston area housing market where basically just about
- 2:07Speaker 2: everything is a jumbo, you're sitting at seven point three
- 2:10Speaker 2: percent on the thirty year jumbo rates. Price of a
- 2:13Speaker 2: barrel of oil moving up slightly today on potential tariff news,
- 2:19Speaker 2: or though maybe it's just moving up because it's moving
- 2:22Speaker 2: up a percentage point up to seventy three dollars and
- 2:24Speaker 2: six cents a barrel to one percent daily move. The
- 2:27Speaker 2: price of a gallon of gas now nationally sitting at
- 2:31Speaker 2: three dollars and fourteen cents. Anything else catching your rise
- 2:35Speaker 2: market wise? Mark. We did have some earnings reports earlier today.
- 2:38Speaker 2: Coca Cola beat on earnings in spite of some currency
- 2:42Speaker 2: problems that they're having. By problems, I just mean they
- 2:45Speaker 2: do a whole bunch of sales overseason. You've got to
- 2:47Speaker 2: translate that back to dollars. Their stocks up three point
- 2:50Speaker 2: four percent this morning. And then last major earnings report
- 2:53Speaker 2: will come from in Vidia, and that is coming out
- 2:56Speaker 2: not next week but the following if I'm not mistaken.
- 3:00Speaker 3: Now, yields are up on longer term developed economy government
- 3:04Speaker 3: bonds all over the world. Always hard to tell if
- 3:07Speaker 3: it's US rates driving rates up elsewhere or if they're
- 3:12Speaker 3: all responding to some common factor. I can't find a
- 3:16Speaker 3: common factor other than the potential threat of tariffs and
- 3:19Speaker 3: the inflationary impact of tariffs. Both here and abroad, if
- 3:22Speaker 3: our trading partners retaliate. The other obvious culprit, potentially obvious
- 3:28Speaker 3: culprit is Powell not suggesting that rates are likely to
- 3:32Speaker 3: come down, at least not markedly in the near term.
- 3:35Speaker 3: That might put upward pressure on longer term rates, though
- 3:37Speaker 3: you could also see it doing exactly the opposite. A
- 3:40Speaker 3: more restrictive FED might mean lower growth and lower inflation,
- 3:44Speaker 3: which could propel treasury prices higher. So I don't know,
- 3:48Speaker 3: and maybe it's just noise. Maybe there's something deeper going on.
- 3:51Speaker 2: And ultimately, like we said, in spite of all that,
- 3:55Speaker 2: you know, fury around all sorts of stuff with tariffs.
- 3:58Speaker 2: Markets are barely this morning, so they're all either not
- 4:02Speaker 2: taking the trade war threat seriously and sniffing out some
- 4:06Speaker 2: deals to be made, or a bit of whistling past
- 4:09Speaker 2: the graveyard still because let's be clear, a trade war
- 4:12Speaker 2: would be bad for capital. Why this week's inflation report
- 4:16Speaker 2: is especially important. We will get a CPI report tomorrow
- 4:20Speaker 2: at eight thirty am, and I'm not sure I'm buying
- 4:24Speaker 2: that this week's inflation report we have this conversation is
- 4:26Speaker 2: month especially important.
- 4:27Speaker 3: I swear we've we've had this conversation at least a
- 4:29Speaker 3: few times in the past few years.
- 4:31Speaker 2: I was gonna ask, so you know, inflation peaked back
- 4:34Speaker 2: in the summer of twenty twenty two, so you know,
- 4:37Speaker 2: we're like, we have a good three years thirty six
- 4:40Speaker 2: separate CPI reports that have been printed since that point
- 4:43Speaker 2: in time. Does this even make the top ten percent?
- 4:46Speaker 2: To you? It doesn't It a.
- 4:49Speaker 3: Result is extreme. It will we want really no deal
- 4:51Speaker 3: after the fact.
- 4:52Speaker 2: But sitting here the day before the inflation report comes out,
- 4:55Speaker 2: I'm not all that concerned about a spikeation for that.
- 5:00Speaker 3: Why is it who's saying that this will bet.
- 5:03Speaker 2: Nick tim Ross from the Wall Street Journal is saying
- 5:05Speaker 2: that it is going to be an especially important inflation report.
- 5:09Speaker 2: Here's his argument. For the last two years, you saw
- 5:13Speaker 2: somewhat of a cyclical bounce and inflation in the first
- 5:15Speaker 2: quarter of the year because of some seasonal adjustments and
- 5:19Speaker 2: changes that they make at the beginning of the year,
- 5:21Speaker 2: and so might we see that tick off here in January?
- 5:25Speaker 2: And again, I just don't think that makes it a
- 5:27Speaker 2: particularly important inflation report. Those we're going to tune in,
- 5:30Speaker 2: we're going to report on it. We'll tell you all
- 5:31Speaker 2: the details yeah, but I can't sit here the day
- 5:34Speaker 2: before this inflation report comes out saying Wow, if this
- 5:38Speaker 2: print's a tenth of a percentage point higher or lower,
- 5:40Speaker 2: we're going to have a real distinct shift in policy here,
- 5:43Speaker 2: can you.
- 5:45Speaker 3: Well, I have no idea obviously exactly how they're waiting
- 5:48Speaker 3: these things, but generally speaking, as you guys like to
- 5:51Speaker 3: say a lot on this show, one print does not
- 5:55Speaker 3: constitute a trend. You need really several months, and ideally
- 5:58Speaker 3: you want to conclusion to be borne out by several
- 6:01Speaker 3: different measures, and thank goodness, there are many different measures
- 6:04Speaker 3: of inflation out there.
- 6:05Speaker 2: Yeah, I don't know, just you know, compared to early
- 6:08Speaker 2: twenty twenty two, when inflation was really starting to kick
- 6:11Speaker 2: in and I was really fascinated by what was going
- 6:13Speaker 2: to come out in the next report, compared to say,
- 6:17Speaker 2: late twenty twenty three, when we were thinking that inflation
- 6:20Speaker 2: was defeated, but oh will it have a comeback? I
- 6:22Speaker 2: was much more interested in the reports that were gonna
- 6:24Speaker 2: come out. So day, I'm I'm just not convinced that
- 6:27Speaker 2: this is important.
- 6:27Speaker 3: Headline last month, which reflects activity in the month before.
- 6:31Speaker 3: The headline number reported last month was I think four
- 6:33Speaker 3: tenths of a percent month over a month that was elevated.
- 6:36Speaker 3: I think it was. I think energy prices were the culper,
- 6:38Speaker 3: But if not, it was something Obviously that's the larger point.
- 6:41Speaker 3: There's always something pulling them, pulling headline up or down.
- 6:45Speaker 3: So another print, I guess to use the financial press
- 6:49Speaker 3: jargon for release of data, another very high print might
- 6:53Speaker 3: get people's attention and get them wondering if the luck
- 6:57Speaker 3: of special factors which is pulled, which you have helped
- 7:01Speaker 3: to pull inflation down over the past couple of years,
- 7:03Speaker 3: maybe that maybe our luck there is run out. I
- 7:07Speaker 3: don't know, Mike.
- 7:07Speaker 2: Yeah, So as of the last report back in December,
- 7:10Speaker 2: you're over your inflation was running just shy of three percent.
- 7:13Speaker 2: That's expected to dip a little bit tomorrow. If you
- 7:16Speaker 2: strip out food and energy, which have actually been dragging
- 7:18Speaker 2: down inflation, especially the energy side of the equation, then
- 7:22Speaker 2: inflation has been running three point two percent over the
- 7:24Speaker 2: course of the last year. One item in particular that
- 7:27Speaker 2: I've been focused on over the last couple of years
- 7:29Speaker 2: and just curious about, has to do with shelter costs.
- 7:32Speaker 2: I know we've all seen housing prices in some parts
- 7:35Speaker 2: of the country double, But most recently the trend has
- 7:38Speaker 2: been towards actually lower costs for shelter, and that's been
- 7:42Speaker 2: borne out by a few different surveys that say realtor,
- 7:44Speaker 2: dot com and others have been doing on the rental
- 7:47Speaker 2: market in particular, and especially in some areas of the
- 7:50Speaker 2: country where more building has occurred. According to CPI, the
- 7:54Speaker 2: shelter costs in the United States we're up another four
- 7:56Speaker 2: point six percent over the last course of the last year.
- 7:59Speaker 2: And I'm just interested to see if we will see
- 8:01Speaker 2: that dip at all, because that does account for I
- 8:04Speaker 2: think about a third of the total component of CPI.
- 8:07Speaker 2: I don't think it'll be a I don't think you
- 8:08Speaker 2: can use it to say it'll drive things one direction
- 8:11Speaker 2: or another. But I'm just curious to see does this
- 8:13Speaker 2: bear out in any way over the course.
- 8:15Speaker 3: Of This is why it's good to look at different
- 8:17Speaker 3: measures of inflation, particularly those that filter out the inevitable
- 8:22Speaker 3: big swings and relative prices. Whether it's food or energy,
- 8:26Speaker 3: or insurance premiums or cell phone bills, all of those
- 8:29Speaker 3: four categories I just cited have at one time or
- 8:31Speaker 3: another been responsible for big swings in inflation, positive or negative,
- 8:38Speaker 3: so things like the media in which we talk about
- 8:40Speaker 3: a lot and other outlier trimming methods. Trimmed mean is another,
- 8:47Speaker 3: and there are measures that exclude some things categorically core
- 8:51Speaker 3: and supercore and super duper core. The last one I
- 8:54Speaker 3: don't think really exists, but there are lots of them
- 8:56Speaker 3: out there, so you do have to look at them all.
- 8:58Speaker 3: And thankfully there are a lot of great research who
- 9:00Speaker 3: routinely post updates almost immediately after we get official inflation
- 9:04Speaker 3: reads like we will get tomorrow morning, on these on
- 9:08Speaker 3: these more holistic if you like, measures of inflation which
- 9:12Speaker 3: may better reflect the underlying trend in inflation, which is
- 9:16Speaker 3: something that FED can control through its control of the
- 9:18Speaker 3: money supply.
- 9:19Speaker 2: Let's take a quick break when we come back and
- 9:21Speaker 2: have some trivia for you. Next on the Financial Exchange,
- 9:23Speaker 2: and then we're talking Maha. What is it? And what
- 9:27Speaker 2: might it do to McDonald's. That's next on the Financial Exchange.
- 9:31Speaker 1: Miss any of the show. The Financial Exchange Show podcast
- 9:34Speaker 1: is available on Apple, Spotify, and iHeartRadio. Hit the subscribe
- 9:38Speaker 1: button and leave us a five star review. This is
- 9:41Speaker 1: the Financial Exchange Radio Network. Find daily interviews and full
- 9:46Speaker 1: shows of the Financial Exchange on our YouTube page. Like
- 9:49Speaker 1: us on YouTube and get caught up on anything and
- 9:52Speaker 1: everything you might have missed. This is the Financial Exchange
- 9:55Speaker 1: Radio Network.
- 10:02Speaker 4: Time now for some trivia here on the Financial Exchange.
- 10:06Speaker 4: On this day in nineteen ninety three, President Clinton made
- 10:09Speaker 4: his selection for US Attorney General. The selection was historic
- 10:13Speaker 4: because he picked the first female US Attorney general in
- 10:17Speaker 4: history of the question today is who was the first
- 10:19Speaker 4: female US Attorney general? Who was the first female US
- 10:25Speaker 4: Attorney general? Be the third person who texts us at
- 10:28Speaker 4: six one seven three six two one three eighty five
- 10:31Speaker 4: with the correct answer, and you'll win a Financial Exchange
- 10:33Speaker 4: Show t shirt. The third correct response will be our winner.
- 10:36Speaker 4: See the complete contest rules at Financial Exchange Show dot com.
- 10:40Speaker 2: Bloomberg has a piece today why fast food could be
- 10:43Speaker 2: MAHA's next targets. So, first of all, we have to
- 10:46Speaker 2: explain what Maha was, because I kind of forgot. It's
- 10:49Speaker 2: the following behind RFK Junior that he's kind of sparked
- 10:52Speaker 2: in terms of make America healthy again. And I have
- 10:57Speaker 2: to say, I just am not even remotely concerned about
- 11:00Speaker 2: this affecting fast food companies. I don't know why you
- 11:03Speaker 2: would be. But here's the idea, I don't. That's my
- 11:08Speaker 2: exact subject to.
- 11:09Speaker 3: The same regulations as everybody.
- 11:11Speaker 2: My exact point is, what exactly are you going to
- 11:14Speaker 2: do to change America's behavior in a way that makes
- 11:20Speaker 2: them eat less fast food? Like, I don't think the
- 11:23Speaker 2: Trump administration is going to embark on a public education
- 11:27Speaker 2: campaign about the harms of fast food.
- 11:29Speaker 3: Mike, We're going to need the calories to fight off
- 11:31Speaker 3: the measles and the rubella. We're all going to contract
- 11:33Speaker 3: when this guy's actually run at HHS. So I just
- 11:37Speaker 3: stuck up.
- 11:38Speaker 2: I'm surprised by anyone who is actually concerned about this. Obviously,
- 11:42Speaker 2: Donald Trump himself has spoken at length about how big
- 11:45Speaker 2: a fan he is of companies of the food from McDonald's.
- 11:50Speaker 2: And do you think about the other areas of this,
- 11:53Speaker 2: Like might there be a push from RFK to focus
- 11:56Speaker 2: on health and maybe like improving school lunches. I could
- 12:00Speaker 2: see that, But at the same time, you're arguing for
- 12:03Speaker 2: bigger government then, and so I just don't see where
- 12:06Speaker 2: this is going to be a play in the incoming
- 12:08Speaker 2: Trump administration. And I certainly wouldn't be concerned about it
- 12:12Speaker 2: from an investor perspective when it comes to fast food companies.
- 12:14Speaker 2: I don't know if you have any different conclusions.
- 12:16Speaker 3: I just think you cannot just regulate companies called McDonald's
- 12:22Speaker 3: or Burger King or.
- 12:28Speaker 2: Phone's ringing.
- 12:29Speaker 3: Yeah, I was wondering if I should help them get
- 12:31Speaker 3: it on the line. Yeah.
- 12:33Speaker 2: Really frustrated with this right now. Yeah, I just don't know.
- 12:37Speaker 3: What do you do? What do you outlaw make? What nuggets?
- 12:40Speaker 3: Chicken nuggets?
- 12:41Speaker 2: And if you actually wanted to really continue to cut
- 12:43Speaker 2: down this in the best way possible, the best method
- 12:45Speaker 2: that I can think of is continuing with all of
- 12:48Speaker 2: these weight loss drugs that have been actually changing people's
- 12:51Speaker 2: diet preferences, with some fact based evidence that it's actually
- 12:53Speaker 2: been working over the course of the last few years.
- 12:55Speaker 3: Evidence such an elitist, such a Massachusetts uist.
- 13:00Speaker 2: C net reports six tax mistakes that could get you
- 13:03Speaker 2: audited by the IRS. Let's be clear first, when they
- 13:06Speaker 2: had a staff, Let's be clear first and foremost, in
- 13:09Speaker 2: twenty twenty four, of the roughly one hundred and sixty
- 13:12Speaker 2: five million tax returns that the IRS received, Sorry, this
- 13:16Speaker 2: was actually twenty twenty two, one hundred and sixty five
- 13:18Speaker 2: million tax returns received by the IRS. Six hundred and
- 13:22Speaker 2: twenty four one thousand of those were audited. That's less
- 13:24Speaker 2: than zero point four percent. So to be clear, your
- 13:27Speaker 2: chances of be an auditor are pretty low to begin with.
- 13:30Speaker 2: But don't make stupid mistakes and you won't catch the
- 13:32Speaker 2: eyes of the IRS, I think.
- 13:33Speaker 3: Is the point of this.
- 13:35Speaker 2: Don't add incorrectly, Okay. To that end, probably don't file
- 13:41Speaker 2: a tax return by hand. And yes, they do check
- 13:44Speaker 2: your math if you return. If you file a return
- 13:48Speaker 2: that's incomplete, meaning you forgot to add a W two
- 13:52Speaker 2: to it, or maybe a ten ninety nine if you're
- 13:55Speaker 2: not familiar. When you go to file your tax return,
- 13:58Speaker 2: the IRS pretty much knows how much taxes you owe
- 14:01Speaker 2: unless you unless you own your own business where they
- 14:04Speaker 2: don't see some of the transactions. Let's just assume for
- 14:06Speaker 2: a moment that you are a W two employee of
- 14:09Speaker 2: a company or retired individual with income sources coming from
- 14:14Speaker 2: Social Security or an employer and investment accounts such as
- 14:18Speaker 2: iras and brokerage accounts. In that case, the IRS knows
- 14:24Speaker 2: every source of income and taxable possibilities that you have,
- 14:29Speaker 2: and so if you file a tax return and it's
- 14:31Speaker 2: missing some of those items, then yes, you are likely
- 14:33Speaker 2: to get flagged in their system. And it's not even
- 14:35Speaker 2: usually an audit. It's just, hey, you missed this tax return.
- 14:37Speaker 2: Do you miss this tax item on your return and
- 14:39Speaker 2: you owe an extra three thousand dollars, Not like the
- 14:41Speaker 2: old days.
- 14:42Speaker 3: When they didn't share ten ninety nines with the IRL.
- 14:44Speaker 2: Correct, Yeah they do. I don't know when that started precisely,
- 14:48Speaker 2: but yeah, yeah, for quite some time now, they report
- 14:53Speaker 2: all of that stuff directly to the IRS, and so
- 14:55Speaker 2: they know, you know, and if you screw up, then
- 14:58Speaker 2: everybody knows. Likewise, it used to be that capital gains
- 15:03Speaker 2: didn't get reported to the IRS basically all Let's say
- 15:07Speaker 2: you made an investment in a stock prior to what
- 15:11Speaker 2: was it twenty ten where they started tracking reporting.
- 15:13Speaker 3: On this, It sounds about right on.
- 15:16Speaker 2: I think it was twenty ten. Cost basis reporting, it
- 15:18Speaker 2: was basically just hey, you self report whatever you say
- 15:22Speaker 2: to the IRS. We're not going to tell them anything.
- 15:24Speaker 2: Beginning in twenty ten and then twenty eleven, I think
- 15:26Speaker 2: for mutual funds, every custodian out there, whether it's Schwab, Fidelity,
- 15:30Speaker 2: Robinhood and the likes were required to tell you as
- 15:34Speaker 2: well as the IRS what you paid for securities along
- 15:36Speaker 2: the way. So my main message here is everyone's terrified
- 15:40Speaker 2: of the IRS for some reason. And the fact of
- 15:43Speaker 2: the matter is they audit very few tax returns, and
- 15:47Speaker 2: if you're not cheating the system, you have absolutely nothing
- 15:50Speaker 2: to be worried about. Like I get these frantic calls
- 15:52Speaker 2: from people like, oh god, I missed this check or
- 15:57Speaker 2: this letter from the IRS. I'm going to jail, and
- 15:59Speaker 2: it's like, no, you're not. You missed a letter from
- 16:03Speaker 2: the IRS. One you didn't even miss the do date.
- 16:05Speaker 2: But even if you did, the worst case scenario you're
- 16:07Speaker 2: going to have is a day's worth of interest penalties.
- 16:10Speaker 3: Unmust there's something they're not telling you.
- 16:11Speaker 2: Yeah, I mean maybe they are.
- 16:14Speaker 3: They used to say home office is a red flag.
- 16:17Speaker 2: Yeah, home office was a red flag at one point.
- 16:20Speaker 2: You know, very sizable charitable contributions in a single year
- 16:24Speaker 2: can be a bit of a red flag because again,
- 16:27Speaker 2: those would be areas that they don't get reporting on, right.
- 16:29Speaker 2: They have no idea if you donated a bunch of
- 16:31Speaker 2: cash to a charity, for example, if you're self employed
- 16:36Speaker 2: and you have a lot of deductions, again self employment,
- 16:39Speaker 2: they don't have any read on this from the IRS.
- 16:41Speaker 2: They don't know what your deductions are. They don't know
- 16:43Speaker 2: what you're spending money on, what you're spending on money
- 16:45Speaker 2: personally versus tax deductible. So if you have a lot
- 16:49Speaker 2: of deductions on your business, yeah, that's going to increase
- 16:51Speaker 2: your risk of being audited. Again, I'm not a CPA,
- 16:54Speaker 2: so talk to a CPA about this stuff. But according
- 16:58Speaker 2: to the article, yeah, claiming too many business expenses or
- 17:01Speaker 2: significant losses on a business year after year, that's that's
- 17:04Speaker 2: going to be a red flag eventually for them to
- 17:06Speaker 2: take a look at. But you know, funny enough, because
- 17:10Speaker 2: of the tax rules these days, it can actually make
- 17:13Speaker 2: a lot of sense to lump all your charitable deductions
- 17:16Speaker 2: into one year. And so while that can increase your
- 17:19Speaker 2: risk of audit, it's also a pretty sensible thing to
- 17:22Speaker 2: do from a tax planning perspective because of the standard
- 17:25Speaker 2: deduction now and how that all had all that all
- 17:28Speaker 2: kind of works for you and also sometimes against you.
- 17:31Speaker 2: So again it was a great tip. My main message,
- 17:34Speaker 2: don't be afraid of the IRS unless you are genuinely
- 17:37Speaker 2: defrauding the American government, which you know, don't do that.
- 17:43Speaker 2: Then you don't really have anything to fear.
- 17:45Speaker 3: Our pardons are coming fast and furious. I think you
- 17:47Speaker 3: just need to write a letter and buy some Trump
- 17:50Speaker 3: mean coin, mean coin.
- 17:51Speaker 1: Hot.
- 17:54Speaker 2: I don't want to talk about this story. I want
- 17:55Speaker 2: to talk about this story instead. China is unveiling so
- 18:00Speaker 2: for trains. These are for aging tourists and the goal
- 18:03Speaker 2: is to keep the economy on track. They're gonna be
- 18:06Speaker 2: outfitted with all sorts of healthcare on the train, allowing
- 18:10Speaker 2: easy travel.
- 18:11Speaker 3: When the Communist Party tells you, hey, get on this train,
- 18:13Speaker 3: it'll be fun. Where's it going, it's a surprise.
- 18:16Speaker 2: I would be very suspicious about hopping aboard a state
- 18:20Speaker 2: sponsored old person train.
- 18:22Speaker 3: Yeah, in a country with big demographic problems that, like,
- 18:26Speaker 3: does that not sound concerning to everybody else that's listening
- 18:29Speaker 3: right now?
- 18:30Speaker 2: Like that's immediately where my mind went. And God, shame
- 18:34Speaker 2: on me for being so negative and assuming the absolute
- 18:38Speaker 2: worst out of this country. But why shouldn't I tell
- 18:42Speaker 2: me why I shouldn't be extraordinarily pessimistic about the Chinese
- 18:46Speaker 2: government sponsoring old person trains to quote take you on
- 18:51Speaker 2: the vacation of a lifetime across the country.
- 18:54Speaker 3: And right into the Pacific.
- 18:59Speaker 2: Yeah, it just it just is not a problem solved.
- 19:03Speaker 3: As we talked about earlier, totalitarian governments can pretty much
- 19:07Speaker 3: wave a wand and affect whatever solution they love they can.
- 19:11Speaker 2: So I mean, again, I'm being a bit dramatic here,
- 19:14Speaker 2: but wow, this really just played into all of my negative.
- 19:19Speaker 3: As you get older, it harder to keep your balance.
- 19:22Speaker 3: These people are partying on moving trains.
- 19:27Speaker 2: Cruise ships. Train trains move a lot.
- 19:29Speaker 3: Trains are a little tougher.
- 19:30Speaker 2: To trivia winners next, and then baby boomers in the
- 19:34Speaker 2: United States and their housing trends are next.
- 19:41Speaker 1: Bringing the latest financial news straight to your radio. Every day,
- 19:46Speaker 1: It's the Financial Exchange on the Financial Exchange Radio Network.
- 19:52Speaker 1: The Financial Exchange streams live on YouTube. Like our page
- 19:56Speaker 1: and stay up to date on breaking business news all
- 19:58Speaker 1: morning long. BA is the Financial Exchange Radio Network.
- 20:06Speaker 4: All right. Our trivia question today was who was the
- 20:09Speaker 4: first female US Attorney General? That answer would be Janet
- 20:13Speaker 4: Reno and our winner today is Stephen from Hope, Rhode Island.
- 20:19Speaker 4: Stephen has won a Financial Exchange Show t shirt. We
- 20:21Speaker 4: play trivia every day here on the Financial Exchange. See
- 20:24Speaker 4: complete contest rules at Financial Exchange Show dot com.
- 20:29Speaker 2: Aging Boomers about to rekindle the senior housing markets. So
- 20:32Speaker 2: what we've seen going on here in senior housing, assisted
- 20:35Speaker 2: living facilities, independent living facilities, nursing homes is some pretty
- 20:40Speaker 2: severe financial strain. Now, the nursing home piece is explainable
- 20:44Speaker 2: because a large portion of the folks in nursing homes
- 20:47Speaker 2: end up on Medicaid, which has a much lower reimbursement
- 20:52Speaker 2: pay rate on nursing homes than say a private pay
- 20:55Speaker 2: nursing home, and so that to me makes a fair
- 20:58Speaker 2: bit of sense. But it's been fascinating to me that
- 21:00Speaker 2: these independent and assisted living facilities, especially during COVID, had
- 21:05Speaker 2: a real serious financial issue where one boomers just did
- 21:10Speaker 2: not want to move into these types of facilities. Generally,
- 21:14Speaker 2: combine that with COVID and the reporting of you know,
- 21:18Speaker 2: a lot of deaths in some of these facilities, and
- 21:20Speaker 2: you had a lot of people moving out or just
- 21:23Speaker 2: a lack of demand for them. Wall Street Journal pointing
- 21:26Speaker 2: out here, look with the trend in population that we
- 21:29Speaker 2: are about to see here, which you know, you can
- 21:32Speaker 2: take a look at the chart yourself, but the portion
- 21:34Speaker 2: of Americans who are going to be over the age
- 21:37Speaker 2: of eighty and just the raw numbers of Americans who
- 21:39Speaker 2: are soon to be over the age of eighty. It's
- 21:42Speaker 2: going to be a kind of exponential growth rate in
- 21:45Speaker 2: terms of what we are about to see. And the
- 21:47Speaker 2: question is are we actually built up enough if these
- 21:52Speaker 2: people start moving into these types of places, And the
- 21:56Speaker 2: answer seems to be no. But I also see no
- 21:59Speaker 2: evidence that that's actual what's going to happen? You know,
- 22:02Speaker 2: I keep seeing trends where instead baby boomers are saying
- 22:07Speaker 2: I don't want to move into one of these places
- 22:09Speaker 2: like my parents did, and I am instead going to
- 22:11Speaker 2: go and they find some help in other ways. And
- 22:15Speaker 2: that's that's kind of defined the housing trend as we've
- 22:17Speaker 2: seen it last Yeah, it has been this growing trend.
- 22:21Speaker 2: Now the question is can that exist forever? Right? Like
- 22:25Speaker 2: many generations before, you know, a lot was written, for instance,
- 22:29Speaker 2: about how millennials just weren't going to buy houses anymore,
- 22:32Speaker 2: and I counted with, well, no, they might just buy
- 22:35Speaker 2: houses later, and we saw that they instead, you know,
- 22:38Speaker 2: by there by the time they turned like thirty five,
- 22:40Speaker 2: the home ownership rate was about where it was for
- 22:43Speaker 2: Baby boomers. It just got there later.
- 22:46Speaker 3: At some point you need full time help.
- 22:48Speaker 2: But in many cases.
- 22:50Speaker 3: You're That was a very insightful point you made about
- 22:52Speaker 3: boomers who are now on the cusp of eighty the
- 22:55Speaker 3: oldest part of that cohort. They saw their parents, They
- 23:01Speaker 3: saw the lifestyle that they were subjected to, for lack
- 23:04Speaker 3: of a better yea in assisted living facilities, and it's
- 23:08Speaker 3: not always the most dignified, just by necessity, not because
- 23:11Speaker 3: they don't try to do great work there. They saw
- 23:14Speaker 3: what that experience is like, and they don't want to
- 23:16Speaker 3: subject themselves to it until they absolutely have to. Would
- 23:18Speaker 3: be I haven't spoken anybody about this, but I did
- 23:22Speaker 3: witness it, like a lot of people did, sure, and
- 23:23Speaker 3: I could see why you would want an age in
- 23:25Speaker 3: place for as long as possible, but at some point
- 23:28Speaker 3: you can't.
- 23:28Speaker 2: Yeah. The challenging thing about all that, too, is for
- 23:31Speaker 2: a lot of these places, in fact, the majority of
- 23:33Speaker 2: these places, they don't how do I put this nicely,
- 23:37Speaker 2: They don't want really unhealthy people.
- 23:39Speaker 3: No, that's fair.
- 23:41Speaker 2: Because if you're going to be really unhealthy, they want
- 23:44Speaker 2: to put you into a nursing home instead. And so
- 23:47Speaker 2: what I wasn't really previously aware of but makes all
- 23:50Speaker 2: the sense in the world. I'll use my grandfather as
- 23:53Speaker 2: an example, he lives in an independent independent living facility
- 23:57Speaker 2: apartment within one of these communities, and it's got all
- 23:59Speaker 2: stage of care right up through nursing care. And what
- 24:02Speaker 2: he told me is, you actually cannot move into this
- 24:07Speaker 2: independent living facility without being able to pass both a
- 24:11Speaker 2: pretty thorough cognitive and physical test. And I just kind
- 24:16Speaker 2: of hadn't thought about that. But his point was like,
- 24:18Speaker 2: they're not going to take somebody into this facility, which
- 24:21Speaker 2: guarantees your care for life by the way, you know,
- 24:24Speaker 2: they take a buy in and then they say, even
- 24:25Speaker 2: if you run out of money, we're not going to
- 24:27Speaker 2: boot you out of this place. You know, eventually you
- 24:29Speaker 2: might qualify for Medicaid, but no matter what, you'll have
- 24:31Speaker 2: a place in this facility. They're not interested in somebody
- 24:34Speaker 2: who's eighty two years old and already cognitively declining. In
- 24:37Speaker 2: that case, they're going to tell you to go straight
- 24:39Speaker 2: to a nursing home. And that's a piece that I
- 24:41Speaker 2: see people misjudging frequently when it comes to their long
- 24:44Speaker 2: term plans, is oh, well, if it all goes to hell,
- 24:47Speaker 2: you know, I've looked at this place, Well, will this
- 24:50Speaker 2: place actually have you by the time you are ready
- 24:53Speaker 2: to go into it, I think is one of the
- 24:54Speaker 2: other concerns that I see. So yeah, neither. I don't
- 25:00Speaker 2: you know which direction this goes in. But if it
- 25:03Speaker 2: does result in a lot of people suddenly moving towards
- 25:06Speaker 2: that type of facility down the road, which I would
- 25:08Speaker 2: be surprised by. But if it does, we are severely
- 25:11Speaker 2: underbuilt for that type of place and severely undersupplied with
- 25:15Speaker 2: the care givers that would be needed to supply that
- 25:18Speaker 2: sort of thing as well.
- 25:20Speaker 3: Good a labor force to service that is an issue,
- 25:24Speaker 3: particularly crack down on lower skilled labor.
- 25:26Speaker 2: Yep, yep. Folks. Want to talk to you about the
- 25:30Speaker 2: brand new guide from the Armstrong Advisory Group which actually
- 25:33Speaker 2: ties into this a little bit. It's a guide all
- 25:35Speaker 2: about Medicare and if you're not thoroughly familiar with the program. Obviously,
- 25:41Speaker 2: if you've already over the age of sixty five and
- 25:43Speaker 2: have been on the program for a few years, you've
- 25:45Speaker 2: got a much better understanding of it. But put yourself
- 25:48Speaker 2: back in the shoes of yourself at age sixty two,
- 25:50Speaker 2: for example, and just the number of questions you had
- 25:52Speaker 2: about what's part A, how does it work, how is
- 25:55Speaker 2: it going to work with a metagap plan or some
- 25:58Speaker 2: other type of health insurance. What if I'm retiring before
- 26:01Speaker 2: age sixty five, what exactly does Medicare cover and what
- 26:04Speaker 2: doesn't it cover. I think there's a general appreciation and
- 26:09Speaker 2: knowledge that, hey, most people on Medicare really find it
- 26:11Speaker 2: to be a great insurance program. But how it's going
- 26:14Speaker 2: to work with your spouse's insurance if they're still in
- 26:17Speaker 2: the labor market, how your income is going to affect
- 26:19Speaker 2: your premium payments. All of these things are again a
- 26:25Speaker 2: big learning curve for folks that are heading towards that
- 26:27Speaker 2: Medicare age. If you are in that cohort, is still
- 26:31Speaker 2: learning about Medicare, your options that are available to you,
- 26:34Speaker 2: and how it's all going to work with your specific lifestyle.
- 26:37Speaker 2: Give the folks at Armstrong Advisor Group a call. We've
- 26:39Speaker 2: got a brand new guide out this month all about Medicare.
- 26:42Speaker 2: It can be your complete guide on how to look
- 26:45Speaker 2: through all this stuff prior to engaging with somebody who
- 26:48Speaker 2: actually sells insurance plans. The phone number for the Armstrong
- 26:52Speaker 2: Advisory Group to request your brand new copy of our
- 26:54Speaker 2: brand new guide on Medicare is eight hundred three nine
- 26:58Speaker 2: to three four zero zero one. Again, it's the Armstrong
- 27:01Speaker 2: Advisory Groups February Guide all about Medicare. You can get
- 27:05Speaker 2: your copy by calling us at eight hundred three nine
- 27:08Speaker 2: three four zero zero one.
- 27:11Speaker 1: The proceeding was paid for by Armstrong Advisory Group, a
- 27:13Speaker 1: registered investment advisor. Nothing in the ad or in any
- 27:16Speaker 1: Armstrong Guide a specific financial, legal, or tax advice. Consult
- 27:19Speaker 1: your own financial tax into state planning advisors before making
- 27:22Speaker 1: any investment decisions. Armstrong may contact you to offer investment
- 27:25Speaker 1: advisory services.
- 27:28Speaker 2: Dear God, I don't think I had realized how bad
- 27:30Speaker 2: the egg problem had gotten in the United States. The
- 27:33Speaker 2: On Friday, the average wholesale price for large white shell
- 27:37Speaker 2: eggs reached eight dollars a dozen. That is the wholesale price,
- 27:42Speaker 2: that is not the retail price that all of us
- 27:44Speaker 2: are facing at grocery stores. I'm a little bit confused
- 27:47Speaker 2: by this because I'm on Amazon's website right now, and
- 27:49Speaker 2: I can get Amazon Fresh cage free large white eggs
- 27:53Speaker 2: a dozen of them for five dollars and forty nine
- 27:55Speaker 2: cents delivered to me between four and six pm today,
- 27:58Speaker 2: So I'm not sure how this is actually affecting market prices,
- 28:01Speaker 2: but just for some general sense of how high that
- 28:06Speaker 2: wholesale price level is. The last time we got anywhere
- 28:10Speaker 2: near this level was back in December twenty twenty two,
- 28:14Speaker 2: heading into Christmas time. Then I think I remember everyone
- 28:17Speaker 2: talking about egg prices and the shortages. Then the wholesale
- 28:20Speaker 2: price back in December of twenty two only reached five
- 28:22Speaker 2: dollars and forty six cents per dozen. So when you
- 28:26Speaker 2: go to Trader Joe's and you see the limit of
- 28:29Speaker 2: one dozen per customer, or Costco or any of these places,
- 28:32Speaker 2: this is what we're seeing. And I mean a price
- 28:35Speaker 2: level here that is a full three dollars a dozen
- 28:39Speaker 2: higher than the previous all time highs is concerning it is.
- 28:42Speaker 3: It will feed into inflation in the short term.
- 28:45Speaker 2: It's yeah, it's not concerning from a gross economic standpoint.
- 28:48Speaker 2: I don't think.
- 28:49Speaker 3: I don't think so. Unless it shocking it makes its
- 28:51Speaker 3: way into inflation. Yeah, well, that can make its way
- 28:53Speaker 3: into inflation expectations. Yeah, that was part of the reason
- 28:55Speaker 3: why expectations where it was, according to the Mission surveys
- 28:58Speaker 3: we reported lately last week, because it is shocking. So
- 29:02Speaker 3: the FED obviously can't induce more egg production, but the
- 29:06Speaker 3: FED does have to think about expectations.
- 29:08Speaker 2: And I'll just say this one thing because I remember
- 29:11Speaker 2: back in December twenty twenty two, everybody blaming Joe Biden
- 29:15Speaker 2: for egg prices. The president doesn't control egg prices, sure
- 29:19Speaker 2: that they're Donald Donald Trump can't control egg prices. He
- 29:22Speaker 2: can't bring him down. Joe Biden couldn't at the time.
- 29:25Speaker 2: It's outside economic forces. And anybody claiming that, hey, let's
- 29:29Speaker 2: solve this with price fixing and grocery stores doesn't know
- 29:33Speaker 2: what they are talking about.
- 29:34Speaker 3: It looks at least politicians aren't because that was silly.
- 29:38Speaker 3: Allegations of price gouging and imposing price sealing statutorily, that
- 29:42Speaker 3: was all silly. At least we're not hearing that this time.
- 29:45Speaker 3: At the same time, though the president owns what's happening
- 29:47Speaker 3: on his or a watch, and they do have to
- 29:50Speaker 3: be at some point perceived to be doing something. It's
- 29:52Speaker 3: probably only a matter of time before if it persists,
- 29:57Speaker 3: policymakers do speak.
- 29:59Speaker 2: Up egg alternatives, we're all going to have beyond eggs.
- 30:06Speaker 2: I have never had beyond eggs before. I don't even
- 30:09Speaker 2: know if that they're a real product, but I'm guessing
- 30:12Speaker 2: they do not taste very good. Let's take a quick
- 30:14Speaker 2: break when we come back, bit a stack roulette Here
- 30:17Speaker 2: on the Financial Exchange.
- 30:18Speaker 1: This is your home for the most comprehensive coverage of
- 30:21Speaker 1: the economy and the trends on Wall Street Face. He's
- 30:25Speaker 1: the Financial Exchange Radio Network. The Financial Exchange Show podcast
- 30:29Speaker 1: drops every day on Apple, Spotify, and iHeartRadio. Hit that
- 30:33Speaker 1: subscribe button and leave us a five star review. You're
- 30:36Speaker 1: listening to the Financial Exchange Radio Network.
- 30:42Speaker 4: The Financial Exchange is a proud partner of the Disabled
- 30:44Speaker 4: American Veterans Department in Massachusetts. By making a donation, you
- 30:48Speaker 4: can support the Veteran Envancement Program, which offers permanent and
- 30:52Speaker 4: transitional affordable housing to veterans and their dependents. The DAV
- 30:56Speaker 4: of Massachusetts is the only DAV department in the country
- 30:59Speaker 4: to lead a veterans housing initiative for single vets and
- 31:02Speaker 4: those with families. Visit DAV five k dot Boston to
- 31:06Speaker 4: make it donation today and make a note for this
- 31:08Speaker 4: year's five K to be held on Saturday, November eighth.
- 31:13Speaker 4: That's DAV five k dot Boston.
- 31:15Speaker 2: Time for a bit of stacker Lett. What do you
- 31:17Speaker 2: have for us? Mark? You're grinning over at me. So
- 31:19Speaker 2: I'm assuming you got something.
- 31:20Speaker 3: I finally, I don't want to say prepared, because it's
- 31:23Speaker 3: not like I don't. But I've got a story that
- 31:25Speaker 3: ties into something we did earlier. Good short, I should
- 31:30Speaker 3: probably just get to it.
- 31:31Speaker 2: Yeah, Okay, Now let's tease it for another minute and
- 31:33Speaker 2: a half or two and just really really drag this
- 31:35Speaker 2: out if we can.
- 31:38Speaker 3: We talked earlier about knock on effects of tariffs. There
- 31:41Speaker 3: is our first order effects steal and aluminum get more expensive.
- 31:45Speaker 3: There are second order effects, as people that use steal
- 31:49Speaker 3: and aluminum to make stuff like automakers face constrained supply.
- 31:54Speaker 3: I have to raise prices, so Ford executive. Bloomberg reports
- 31:57Speaker 3: Jim Farley travels to Washington tomorrow to and I'm just
- 32:01Speaker 3: reading here verbatim warn members of Congress that twenty five
- 32:04Speaker 3: percent tariffs, those of the magnitude that the administration is proposing,
- 32:09Speaker 3: would blow a hole in the auto industry, which was
- 32:12Speaker 3: I think surprisingly at least to my.
- 32:15Speaker 2: Sight of what it's worth.
- 32:16Speaker 3: Yeah. Direct, Yeah, and maybe a little bit alarmist. You
- 32:24Speaker 3: don't think I'm not suggesting alarmist is the wrong word.
- 32:27Speaker 3: Maybe just direct?
- 32:28Speaker 2: Yeah, No, I guess alarmists can be legitimate if it's
- 32:32Speaker 2: if it's genuinely alarming, right, And it's not that we
- 32:36Speaker 2: can't make cars exclusively here in the United States. It's
- 32:41Speaker 2: that the rule of law in the United States for
- 32:43Speaker 2: the last many how many years have we been manufacturing
- 32:47Speaker 2: cars in North America, like one hundred, has been that
- 32:51Speaker 2: you can manufacture different parts in North America, and our
- 32:54Speaker 2: closest allies, Canada and Mexico play a key role in that.
- 32:57Speaker 2: And so again, could we shift all of that manufacturing
- 33:01Speaker 2: to the United States and have a completely self contained system.
- 33:05Speaker 2: Not entirely, because we would still need parts from all
- 33:07Speaker 2: across the world to make these things, but yes, we could.
- 33:11Speaker 2: The problem is you would have to rebuild factories all
- 33:14Speaker 2: across the United States and find a whole bunch of
- 33:17Speaker 2: labor that doesn't currently it currently exists solely in the
- 33:20Speaker 2: United States to do it. So would it blow a
- 33:21Speaker 2: hole in Ford and Tesla and Stilantis and GM's businesses. Yeah,
- 33:27Speaker 2: I don't think that's an overstatement. We talked about how
- 33:29Speaker 2: significant the price increases would be if this went into play.
- 33:31Speaker 3: In the same story, it reports, Bloomberg reports that Brookings,
- 33:35Speaker 3: which is a think tank estimates nearly two hundred thousand
- 33:38Speaker 3: job losses from folks like Ford who you steal an
- 33:43Speaker 3: aluminum as inputs as a result of these tariffs US
- 33:47Speaker 3: ex Sports. Bloomberg goes on to say a motor vehicles
- 33:49Speaker 3: would fall by twenty five percent of Canada and twenty
- 33:52Speaker 3: three percent of Mexico if the tariffs were imposed. So
- 33:55Speaker 3: it's these second and later stage knock on effects that
- 33:59Speaker 3: often not and are easy to well, They're not easy
- 34:02Speaker 3: to overlook in this case because because of the clarion
- 34:06Speaker 3: clear warning from Jim Farley, CEO Ford.
- 34:10Speaker 2: Going back to Sunday's game, the I think most surprising
- 34:17Speaker 2: advertising themed thing that we can talk about today was
- 34:19Speaker 2: the fact that Jeep was the only advertiser, only automaker
- 34:24Speaker 2: advertiser during the entire Super Bowl? Anybody else find like,
- 34:28Speaker 2: I didn't really think about that until I read this piece,
- 34:31Speaker 2: But yeah, the Harrison Ford ad with Jeep was the
- 34:35Speaker 2: only actual automaker advertisement during the Super Bowl, And I
- 34:41Speaker 2: wonder when the last time you had neither Ford nor
- 34:44Speaker 2: General Motors advertising anything during that, you know, king of
- 34:50Speaker 2: all advertising opportunities. I find that really really interesting. I
- 34:54Speaker 2: know that these companies have been struggling Ford in particular
- 34:57Speaker 2: with this transition to and then away from electric vehicles,
- 35:00Speaker 2: and GM maybe less so, but still has their own problems.
- 35:04Speaker 2: But I cannot remember watching a Super Bowl without so
- 35:08Speaker 2: many car advertisements plastered all over the place. I found
- 35:12Speaker 2: it very, very surprising, And I also think that it
- 35:15Speaker 2: comes at a time when they could actually spend dollars
- 35:18Speaker 2: on smart advertising right now, Like what GM and Dodge
- 35:22Speaker 2: and these other companies are talking about doing on the
- 35:26Speaker 2: hybrid side is really cool technology that's not really widely
- 35:31Speaker 2: accepted anywhere. I keep getting, you know, stuck on these
- 35:35Speaker 2: electric vehicles with the with the gas generator, but even
- 35:39Speaker 2: just these straight hybrid vehicles coming out of the likes
- 35:41Speaker 2: of Toyota that can get you like eight hundred miles
- 35:44Speaker 2: per fill up. That's fascinating stuff that I'm just surprised
- 35:47Speaker 2: they're not advertising. And I don't really understand why Stillantis
- 35:51Speaker 2: was the only one to go out there. I mean Stillantis.
- 35:55Speaker 2: I think they felt that they had to recommit to
- 35:57Speaker 2: the American market, and maybe they felt that their Jeep
- 35:59Speaker 2: brand had been cheapened a little bit by the kind
- 36:02Speaker 2: of successive failures over at the Lantis of the class
- 36:04Speaker 2: of the last few years. So maybe they were forced
- 36:06Speaker 2: into a corner here. But I don't know any takeaways
- 36:09Speaker 2: on Ford and GM's absence.
- 36:10Speaker 3: My story was better than yours, and that never happens, Mike,
- 36:13Speaker 3: I don't think it's ever happened in three years.
- 36:14Speaker 2: The only thing he's focused.
- 36:15Speaker 3: No, I'm just sort of I'm very pleased with my
- 36:18Speaker 3: with my calling of the Okay, so let's dig into this.
- 36:20Speaker 3: Did they make a conscious decision not to advertise? I
- 36:23Speaker 3: think so obviously?
- 36:24Speaker 2: Yeah, I mean obviously if you've advertised in like every
- 36:26Speaker 2: super Bowl in history and then suddenly decide not to,
- 36:30Speaker 2: that seems pretty compelling. I mean, I bet there are
- 36:31Speaker 2: a few years around the Great Financial Crisis where they
- 36:34Speaker 2: didn't advertise.
- 36:35Speaker 3: Stupid question on my part, I apologize. I mean, do
- 36:37Speaker 3: they they have the similar rationales for not advertising? Has anyone?
- 36:42Speaker 3: Has anyone done any actual journalism on this? Do we
- 36:45Speaker 3: know why? Both? I do not know.
- 36:47Speaker 2: I don't think they've put out any public statements about
- 36:49Speaker 2: why they didn't advertise. I don't know, uh what led
- 36:53Speaker 2: them to make the decision, but clearly deciding that the
- 36:58Speaker 2: whatever it costs, what did it cost this year? Been
- 37:00Speaker 2: for a thirty seconds, seven eight and a half million
- 37:02Speaker 2: something like that.
- 37:03Speaker 4: I think it was seven point eight million.
- 37:04Speaker 2: Actually, okay, well yeah it's pretty big. All right, I'm
- 37:07Speaker 2: gonna go back.
- 37:07Speaker 3: You would agree that my story was No, I would not.
- 37:11Speaker 4: No, I absolutely would not.
- 37:13Speaker 2: He can't disagree just because he employed, because Mike employees.
- 37:16Speaker 3: Come on, doesn't employee?
- 37:17Speaker 2: That's true. I wait, I've made it. I've made a
- 37:23Speaker 2: habit of teasing towns and cities that vote down multi
- 37:27Speaker 2: family housing by saying, like, you know, you're telling me
- 37:30Speaker 2: that you want affordable housing in one breath, but then
- 37:33Speaker 2: not voting for it in the second. I'm gonna applaud
- 37:37Speaker 2: Cambridge here. The city of Cambridge, Massachusetts, became the first
- 37:40Speaker 2: city in Massachusetts to eliminate single family zoning. What that
- 37:45Speaker 2: means is anywhere in the city you can build a
- 37:49Speaker 2: multifamily if you want to. There is no area of
- 37:52Speaker 2: Cambridge now that is reserved just for single family. Anywhere
- 37:55Speaker 2: there can build multi family if they so choose to.
- 37:58Speaker 2: Nobody's forcing them to do it. It is just about
- 38:00Speaker 2: free markets, which I can kind of appreciate. That is
- 38:04Speaker 2: all the time we have for today's financial exchange markets
- 38:07Speaker 2: are basically flat. We'll have a full update tomorrow and
- 38:11Speaker 2: a new read on CPI, so tune in. Have a
- 38:13Speaker 2: great rest of your day, folks,