Latest / Cultural Wars | America Out Loud News / Strike three on Trump’s life!

Transcript

Strike three on Trump’s life! · Cultural Wars | America Out Loud News

• 0:11
  Helping to secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity.
• 0:15
  This is the Constitution Study on the America Out Loud Network with your host, Paul Engel.
• 0:31
  As you well know, there was a third attempt on Donald Trump's life this past weekend.
• 0:36
  If only this were a game, then we could call strike three.
• 0:40
  You're out.
• 0:41
  Hello there, everyday Americans, Paul Englehero, the Constitution Study, where we read instead of the Constitution, teacher I can generate be freak.
• 0:48
  Glad you could join me today.
• 0:49
  I've been traveling lately, so I really didn't have a chance to dig into this story.
• 0:54
  I didn't even hear about it until um late Sunday.
• 0:58
  So um I'm a little late to the game, but to me that's a good thing because it gives people a chance to ponder and it gives me a chance to look at what people are saying and try and get some more details behind it.
• 1:10
  No, there's not just the the instant what happened.
• 1:14
  Um here's what I know so far.
• 1:18
  Uh an armed, I guess I'm still calling him a suspect, uh, charged the one of the security checkpoints at the White House correspondents dinner, which is held, I think it's a Washington Hilton hotel.
• 1:32
  It's not on White House grounds, it's in a hotel.
• 1:34
  Uh, he had a shotgun, handgun knives, and uh it is believed, at least at this point, that he was a lone wolf, that he acted alone.
• 1:44
  Uh one Secret Service officer was struck by a round, but it was caught by his his bullet resistant vests, and and he is was fairly quickly released uh from the hospital.
• 1:58
  Now, of course, this led to a ruckus and and the event was shut down, and you know, people were were literally dragged, officials and VIPs were dragged from the location for their own security and for for good reason.
• 2:09
  But of course, that quickly brought up questions, such as well, how did the gunman get so close to the ballroom?
• 2:19
  And uh I've heard some stories about that.
• 2:21
  I'll get into that as we're going along.
• 2:23
  Um apparently he had registered to stay at the hotel.
• 2:27
  He was a guest at the hotel.
• 2:29
  And um uh, well, let's just also say he he did a little bit of of writing.
• 2:36
  Uh he he's people said they were they were um concerned after the fact, um, about the security.
• 2:46
  Um apparently one point uh he the the gunman wrote that he was he expected security cameras around every bed and bend, bugged hotel rooms, armed agents everywhere, metal detectors, but he didn't see it.
• 3:02
  Now, he he did have some, as I said, some writings, uh, what some people are referring to as a a manifesto, uh, which showed him to be, well, um, uh definitely a Trump hater.
• 3:15
  Uh, apparently uh a hater of Christians as well, and uh he said his agenda was to kill as many people as he could.
• 3:23
  Um part of uh one of the quotes I saw was that uh the gunman said, uh, I'm no longer willing to permit a pedophile rapist and traitor to cope my hands with his crimes.
• 3:36
  Uh okay, I again I'm seeing uh uh a lot of bad information, but I'm not seeing a lot of evidence to support what this person is saying.
• 3:45
  And that that's gonna become important as we we go through this.
• 3:49
  So uh uh, because this has kicked off a lot of questions, all right.
• 3:55
  What about security in the ballroom?
• 3:59
  Well, uh I'm I'm no Secret Service agent, and I don't have any inside information, but I imagine that there are rings of security around the president.
• 4:07
  There are rings of security around the ballroom.
• 4:10
  One of those rings stopped this gunman.
• 4:13
  So it does rather sound like security worked in this case, right?
• 4:18
  He didn't get into the ballroom.
• 4:20
  He didn't get uh uh to the the what you might call the the security charges, the president and the other other officials.
• 4:28
  Um it worked.
• 4:31
  The fact that he got into the hotel, you have to remember security is always a balance.
• 4:36
  The most secure ballroom would allow no one in it, right?
• 4:42
  You'd have the president talking to unmanned cameras.
• 4:45
  That's the but that's not what we want.
• 4:48
  On the other hand, this is part of this is in a hotel, meaning people have to be able to either have to shut down the hotel, or you have to allow people staying at the hotel to get into and out of a hotel.
• 4:59
  So, you know, I it seems to me that that security are there lessons that could be learned?
• 5:06
  Probably.
• 5:08
  But all these people going, oh my god, you know, the the security it doesn't sound like to me.
• 5:13
  Now again, I wasn't there.
• 5:15
  Uh I've heard some scattering reporting from people who were there, and I do have some questions that came out that I'm going to talk about as we go along.
• 5:23
  But um the good news is, right?
• 5:26
  You had a a person who, well, while not um identifying uh so much with any particular party, did apparently make a donation through Act Blue to the Kamala Harris presidential campaign, a whole $25.
• 5:41
  So uh I wouldn't call him an ardent Democrat, but I I do note that this is now the third attempt on the life of a president who happens to be a member of the Republican Party.
• 5:54
  Um was the last time there was an attempt on a president's life who is a member of the Democratic Party.
• 6:01
  I don't know off the top of my head.
• 6:04
  Now, I'm also hearing people talking, well, there were all sorts of red flags.
• 6:07
  You know, the the the brother of the uh alleged gunman um alerted police when he received the so-called manifesto manifesto.
• 6:17
  Some people are saying, again, very thin from what I've seen, a lot of stuff being said um without a lot of supporting information.
• 6:25
  But um again, red flags are almost always hindsight, right?
• 6:31
  Hindsight's 2020.
• 6:33
  Things you see, did he contact the police?
• 6:36
  Okay, how many people write crazy things about the president each and every day, right?
• 6:41
  It it's it's you know, it's not so much finding a needle in a haystack, it's more like finding a needle in a pile of needles.
• 6:48
  So this has been the craziness that's been talked about the the beginning of this week.
• 6:53
  And again, this wasn't simply an attack on Trump, but he, according to his quote-unquote manifesto, he wanted to go after all the administration officials from the highest ranking to the lowest, which would really put Trump at the beginning of the list.
• 7:00
  So he wanted to go after all the administration officials from the highest ranking to the lowest, which would really put Trump at the beginning of the list, but hey, I'm sure he would have taken whoever he would have he could have gotten.
• 7:07
  But hey, I'm sure he would have taken whoever he would have he could have gotten.
• 7:13
  Now, surprise, surprise, Donald Trump had a bunch of comments about this uh attempt on not just his life, but the life of other members of uh his administration.
• 7:13
  Now, surprise, surprise, Donald Trump had a bunch of comments about this uh attempt on not just his life, but the lives of other members of uh his administration.
• 7:25
  Um he described the suspect as a very troubled guy, as um.
• 7:25
  Um he described the suspect as a very troubled guy, as um someone who wrote a manifesto, including uh expressing anti-Christian views.
• 7:36
  Uh in one quote, he says, this guy is a sick guy.
• 7:39
  When you read his manifesto, he hates Christians.
• 7:42
  I think his sister or brother actually was complaining about it.
• 7:45
  You know, they were even complaining to law enforcement.
• 7:49
  Uh, during an interview with 60 minutes, he said that he was a Christian believer, and then he became anti-Christian and he had a lot of change.
• 7:57
  He said he's been going through a lot based on what he wrote.
• 8:01
  Now, again, not really a surprise.
• 8:04
  The 60 minutes interview looked at the allegations of pedophilia and and rape.
• 8:09
  And Trump's response, again, was really good.
• 8:11
  He says, Well, I was waiting for you to read that because I knew you would.
• 8:15
  Yeah, he did write that.
• 8:17
  I'm not a rapist.
• 8:18
  I didn't rape anybody.
• 8:20
  He says, I'm not a pedophile.
• 8:22
  You can read that crap from sick from a sick person.
• 8:24
  I got associated with all that stuff that has nothing to do with me.
• 8:28
  I was totally exonerated.
• 8:30
  And this goes to show why, and I'm going to spin this into spin.
• 8:34
  I'm gonna I want to look at how important critical thinking is, and the fact that it's not really taught in our schools anymore.
• 8:41
  There are a lot of allegations, right?
• 8:44
  But if those allegations aren't based in facts and data, they're merely someone's opinion.
• 8:49
  But here you have a disturbed person.
• 8:52
  Apparently, I would say anybody that's that figures the solution to a political issue is violence, I'd say is disturbed.
• 9:02
  Right.
• 9:02
  That's my starting point.
• 9:04
  And when he hears a litany of drama about, oh, you know, Trump did this and he's a rapist and he's a pedophile, and and you know, he was associated with Jeffrey Epstein, and well, we're speculating that the reason that they haven't released all the data is Trump's name's on it, and all of this speculation leads to people going, well, that must be true.
• 9:26
  See, apparently this gunman read or heard or saw these reports, assumed they were true or that the allegations were true, and use that as a basis to believe that this person that Donald Trump and his is just not worth uh not worth being allowed to live.
• 9:47
  Now, in more proof that Trump is becoming a fairly uh skilled politician, he took this as an opportunity to promote his new ballroom.
• 9:59
  He he said the Washington Hilton were these things again, one of the more secure buildings in in DC, but not a not a government building.
• 10:08
  He described it as not particularly secure building.
• 10:12
  Says today we need levels of security, probably not as has seen before.
• 10:17
  Uh again, he was attacked in Butler, Pennsylvania.
• 10:20
  He was he got his ear shot.
• 10:22
  There was a second assassination attempt on a on a golf course.
• 10:26
  I'm sure from his standpoint, yeah, we we need more security.
• 10:30
  Having a ballroom on the White House grounds with the additional security that is the White House, right?
• 10:38
  Would be a better place to hold these events because you could provide more security without disturbing the public that may be wanting to use the Washington Hilton.
• 10:49
  Um I haven't thought this all the way through.
• 10:52
  I'm not entirely sure whether that makes sense.
• 10:55
  I see some logic to that.
• 10:57
  I I'm not sure how I would fall on that stem, but because then again, I never had an issue with the ballroom to begin with.
• 11:04
  Um in no small part because, well, the um it was being paid for in large part by private donations.
• 11:13
  Uh, and I know from what I'd never been to the White House.
• 11:16
  I've never taken a tour.
• 11:17
  Um as I got as I drove near it once.
• 11:21
  But uh, you know, if the White House is as small and constricted as I've been led to believe, then maybe it makes sense.
• 11:31
  And again, this is perfect opportunity to say, hey, um, you know, we've we've got this, we can we can turn this into a reason to promote the ballroom.
• 11:39
  Because remember, we all had all the the he's already had some of the legal issues with the ballroom.
• 11:43
  So uh that's not a surprise.
• 11:45
  And of course, there have been a lot of reactions in the media from the administration, but also from others, like uh former President Barack Obama.
• 11:55
  Now, I will grant him that he uh um was making this statement uh I think it was during the Sunday shows, but uh again, I I'm reminded of a saying from the Wizard of Oz.
• 12:10
  Pay no attention to that man behind the curtain.
• 12:14
  Look, wait him off has spoken.
• 12:18
  Um maybe that should be the great and powerful Obama has spoken.
• 12:24
  Uh he said, although we don't have all the details about the motives behind the last night shooting at the White House correspondence dinner, it's incumbent upon us all to reject the idea that violence has any place in our democracy.
• 12:35
  Um, okay, um, I don't know.
• 12:39
  Maybe he didn't know about the manifesto that called Trump also in there.
• 12:44
  His history of anti-Trump rhetoric.
• 12:46
  I should that the anti-Trump rhetoric in the manifesto.
• 12:50
  Um, you know, maybe he didn't, maybe he didn't know.
• 12:53
  Um, it's funny, he says that that violence has no place um in in our democracy.
• 13:02
  Well, well, that's just not true.
• 13:05
  Violence is everywhere.
• 13:06
  And for first of all, we're not a democracy, we're a republic.
• 13:09
  You know, but violence is everywhere.
• 13:13
  Remember, not only was it violence that this gunman used to try and get at his attacker or his targets, it was violence that was used to stop him.
• 13:26
  Right?
• 13:27
  It's not that the violence on this event was not one-sided.
• 13:31
  The legitimacy of the violence was one-sided, but the violence, there was violence on both sides.
• 13:36
  This guy charged a security checkpoint with guns, and they he was he was dealt with violently.
• 13:44
  So this pablum of well, violence has no place.
• 13:48
  I'm sorry, but as one of the leaders of the Democratic Party who've been uh uh a vilifying Trump, coming up with all sorts of of evil um without evidence, calling them names, um, you know you may not be committing actual violence, but you're not exactly walking around with clean hands here.
• 14:10
  I'm not saying that this rhetoric against Trump has is at fault.
• 14:10
  I'm not saying that this rhetoric against Trump has is at fault.
• 14:16
  But I'm sorry if you're looking at this saying, you know, uh uh that you know we spent uh two years calling him Hitler and a Nazi and uh blaming him for you know everything from from
• 14:16
  But I'm sorry if you're looking at this saying, you know, uh that you know we spent uh two years calling him Hitler and a Nazi and uh blaming him for you know everything from from uh we're just gonna have an upcoming nuclear war to the common cold.
• 14:36
  Well, somebody's gonna take that and figure it's worth acting violently to stop it.
• 14:42
  So, you know, I I kind of look at at Obama and say, well, it has no place.
• 14:46
  Oh, it has lots of places.
• 14:48
  And I look at other members of the Democratic Party that have fomented generally lower levels of violence, but violence nonetheless.
• 14:56
  Um who was the leader who was one of the the in the house who was telling in a press conference to not let members of the administration eat peacefully in restaurants.
• 15:08
  There's a a history of calling for disturbance and low-level violence.
• 15:15
  Uh, they they weren't, I don't say they were calling for Trump's assassination, but they certainly were uh fomenting the idea of violence.
• 15:23
  Doesn't mean it's their fault.
• 15:24
  They're entitled to their own opinion, but um, yeah, when when Obama says there's no place, well, that's belied by the fact that yeah, um, there is a place, and in fact, uh there was a place for the Secret Service to use violence to uh protect the their charges in the ballroom.
• 15:45
  There was a place for uh um you know the the there are calls for like I said, lower levels of violence, but you know, violence nonetheless.
• 15:55
  So uh yeah, and and that's not the only example issue.
• 15:59
  There's there's plenty more, but I I have a break coming up.
• 16:02
  Before I go, you know, I like I said, I was traveling recently, and generally when I travel, I have a hard time falling asleep, right?
• 16:09
  Yeah, I'm in a strange room, uh, I got strange noises, I need some help falling asleep.
• 16:14
  Now I know a lot of people they reach for hormones like melatonin, or they reach for pharmaceuticals, and I used to as well.
• 16:22
  That is until I found restful sleep from the wellness company.
• 16:26
  A set of natural ingredients designed to calm the mind to reduce stress to get a better, more restful night's sleep without worrying about hormones that would that can you become dependent on or can disrupt your sleep wake cycle.
• 16:39
  Give it a try, go to AmericaOutloud.shop and well, click on the restful sleep panel and then do your own research, see what's included, look at the testimonials, decide if it's something worth trying.
• 16:50
  I think it is.
• 16:52
  When you decide to try it, well, use the code out loud at checkout, and you'll get 20% off of your order.
• 16:58
  Now, again, I'm not a doctor, but this has been backed by documented research.
• 17:02
  It's been vetted by the chief medical board of the wellness company.
• 17:06
  And it works for me.
• 17:08
  It's what I use when I need that little extra help falling asleep.
• 17:12
  So go to AmericaOut Loud.shop, check out the restful sleep panel, do your own research, right?
• 17:17
  I want you to be an informed consumer.
• 17:20
  And then when you're ready to check out, don't forget to use the code out loud to get 20% off of your order, get a good and restful night's sleep, and help live a healthier lifestyle.
• 17:39
  Your heart is the most crucial muscle in your body.
• 17:42
  Are you doing enough to keep it strong?
• 17:44
  Introducing the wellness company's breakthrough healthy heart formula, designed by Dr.
• 17:48
  Peter McCullough, now upgraded with taurine.
• 17:51
  This stately supplement supports cardiovascular health and works to protect cells against oxidative stress, packed with D-ribose to boost heart function, taurine to help maintain heart and muscular health, coenzyme Q10 and selenium citrate to help reduce risk of cardiac disease and a vitamin B complex with L-carnitine for energy and muscle support.
• 18:11
  Endorsed by the wellness company's chief medical board, this formula is your ally for heart health.
• 18:16
  Reclaim your health now at TWC.health forward slash out loud and use code out loud for 20% off your first order plus free shipping.
• 18:26
  Have you been looking for a healthy snack for on the go?
• 18:29
  Well, not all energy bars are soft and sugary.
• 18:33
  Bear bars or a crunchy savory bar made from just six simple natural ingredients.
• 18:40
  Bear bars or plant-based, organic gluten-free, contain six grams of protein and are low temperature dried for unique crunch.
• 18:49
  Most energy bars are based on chocolate or fruit and are held together with syrups or sweeteners.
• 18:56
  To learn more, just visit barebar.com slash out loud.
• 19:01
  Oral hygiene hasn't changed in 50 years, but our diet and the way we eat has creating an environment in your mouth for bacteria to wreck havoc on your teeth and gums for better oral health.
• 19:13
  Get spray dental defense, an oral care line designed to combat acid-creating bacteria.
• 19:19
  The toothpaste, mouthwash, mints, and gum all contain xylitol and natural ingredients shown to dramatically improve oral health.
• 19:27
  Sprite can be found online and at all fine natural retailers.
• 19:36
  Is upon us.
• 19:55
  Is that place to awaken your heart, soul, and mind to the outlook.
• 20:12
  They've been talking about the assassination attempt this past weekend at the White House correspondence dinner.
• 20:17
  And I'm not so much focusing on the attempt, but I want to focus on a lot of the discussion we've had around that.
• 20:25
  I spent some time in the beginning, what I know, what I've found out so far.
• 20:29
  But I what I find most interesting is how much of the how many of the talking heads are obviously talking without any knowledge.
• 20:39
  All right.
• 20:43
  And even the the uh uh the shooter making assumptions.
• 20:47
  For example, everyone's talking about how uh um how weak the uh uh the security was at the the Hilton.
• 20:55
  And as I pointed out at the beginning, you know, there's a balance between uh security flexibility and rigidness.
• 21:00
  Flexibility and rigidness.
• 21:01
  You know, you're dealing with a privately owned building that has its own business that they're trying to run.
• 21:01
  You know, you're dealing with a a privately owned building that has its own business that they're trying to run.
• 21:09
  It would be put it this way.
• 21:09
  It would be put it this way.
• 21:12
  I'm sure it would be in the news if the Secret Service shut down the Washington Hilton for a week so they could go through and scan every room and sweep through the entire place and make sure nobody got in beforehand.
• 21:12
  I'm sure it would be in the news if the Secret Service shut down the Washington Hilton for a week so they could go through and scan every room and and sweep through the entire place and make sure nobody got in beforehand and uh I think that'd be going too far.
• 21:23
  And I think that'd be going too far.
• 21:27
  But the other thing is is people are talking about the secret.
• 21:27
  But the other thing is people are talking about the seen and unseen security.
• 21:32
  Well, that's just it.
• 21:34
  Not all security is visible.
• 21:36
  Some of the best security are the things you don't see.
• 21:40
  And no one seems to be talking about the stuff that they don't see.
• 21:42
  And while, yeah, I'm sure there are lessons that can be learned.
• 21:47
  Um you have to wonder you know, how much of this, you know, again, first of all, the gunman did not get to his his targets.
• 21:57
  He was stopped by the Secret Service.
• 21:59
  Um, you know, the maybe they'll learn some things that they may want to do different next time.
• 22:05
  That's the nature of life.
• 22:07
  But um, I just find it interesting.
• 22:09
  A number of people who are are not, and again, I'm not a security expert.
• 22:13
  The closest thing I've got is I'm the head of security at our church.
• 22:17
  Which means I've spent time thinking about things like this.
• 22:21
  So I don't, you know, and and and again, I'm not saying the Secret Service was perfect.
• 22:26
  I'm not saying there are things, but I'm saying there are a lot of people who don't have the full story that are talking as if they do.
• 22:34
  And you know, to me, that's just as arrogant as as anything else we've seen.
• 22:40
  But of course, if we're talking about reactions to the to the the the attempted assassination, well, are you really surprised that the the uh the Marxists and the media are walking in in lockstep to um spin this?
• 22:57
  Mr.
• 22:58
  Acting Attorney General, the security breach does come uh amid reporting in the Atlantic that FBI director Cash Patel has alarmed some of his colleagues with episodes of what the Atlantic describes as excessive drinking, unexplained absences.
• 23:13
  Does President Trump still have confidence in Cash Patel to lead the FBI at this critical moment?
• 23:22
  That article was full of unnamed sources and should be completely discounted.
• 23:28
  Now, the interviewer was the good person I asked the question was Christine Walwel from uh it was the Meet the Press program.
• 23:35
  And and notice the the the spin starts in the security breach.
• 23:40
  I I'm sorry, what I've heard described so far, the security was not breached.
• 23:45
  They didn't get the guy didn't get into the ballroom.
• 23:48
  The hard security perimeter was attacked, but not breached.
• 23:52
  And she immediately goes into a another media attack on FBI director Cash Patel, which I find interesting because the FBI, to my knowledge, doesn't deal with presidential security, it's the Secret Service.
• 24:06
  And as uh uh acting uh attorney General Blanchett said, it was full of unnamed sources.
• 24:12
  There was no, there's no why would I believe this if I got nothing but anonymous unnamed sources?
• 24:17
  How do I know what they're saying is true?
• 24:19
  How do they know if they even said that if I can't ask them if they said this?
• 24:24
  And this is both the the um the the you know, look at this the spin and the agenda of the corporate media, along with uh a serious lack of critical thinking, not just by the Atlantic, but by uh NBC, by Ms.
• 24:41
  Welker to say, you know, what does this have to do with um with the the security breach?
• 24:49
  Again, you're taking people who have who are not security experts, they weren't involved, they weren't involved, they had no special knowledge of the security precautions made, and I keep pointing out the hard security perimeter.
• 25:01
  You got a soft perimeter outside, the hard security perimeter was not breached.
• 25:06
  Yes, he got into the hotel.
• 25:08
  That was a working functioning hotel.
• 25:10
  Well, then why wasn't there security outside the hotel?
• 25:12
  Because it's a working functioning hotel.
• 25:16
  Should they could they have had more at the entrance they were using for possibly, but we don't know the security plan.
• 25:23
  We don't know the layers in depth.
• 25:25
  We don't know the circles of security.
• 25:27
  We just don't know, at least nobody I've heard talking about this actually knows.
• 25:32
  But again, the media, um they're playing their spin on this.
• 25:38
  Now, I referenced the 60 minutes interview Trump did uh Sunday, and let me play part of it for you to see what I'm talking about.
• 25:45
  The so-called manifesto is a stunning thing to read, Mr.
• 25:49
  President.
• 25:49
  He appears to reference a motive in it.
• 25:53
  He writes this quote, administration officials, they are targets.
• 25:57
  And he also wrote this.
• 25:59
  I'm no longer willing to permit a pedophile rapist and traitor to coat my hands with his crimes.
• 26:05
  What's your reaction to that?
• 26:06
  Well, I was waiting for you to read that because I knew you would because you're you're you're horrible people, horrible people.
• 26:12
  All right, let me jump in for a second.
• 26:14
  Because notice he says, just I was waiting for you to read that.
• 26:16
  I knew you were going to read that.
• 26:18
  I knew you're gonna because in his words, you're horrible people.
• 26:22
  Uh, but what's interesting is as the the that part of the interview goes on, you can you can see the uh the the Trump taking control of the narrative here.
• 26:34
  Yeah, he did write that.
• 26:36
  Uh I'm I'm not a rapist.
• 26:38
  I didn't rape anybody.
• 26:39
  Uh oh, you think you think he was referring to you.
• 26:42
  Excuse me.
• 26:43
  What one thought spa.
• 26:45
  He had said, I'm not going to let that person, individual, the head of the administration.
• 26:51
  You don't think he was talking about Trump?
• 26:53
  What is she smoking?
• 26:55
  This is this is ridiculous.
• 26:56
  And of course, again, Trump says, no, uh, don't interrupt me.
• 27:00
  I'm not done yet.
• 27:01
  And he goes on.
• 27:02
  You read that crap from some sick person.
• 27:05
  Uh I got associated with stuff that has nothing to do with me.
• 27:11
  I was totally exonerated.
• 27:13
  Your friends on the other side of uh the plate are the ones that were involved with, let's say, Epstein or other things.
• 27:22
  But I said to myself, you know, I'll do this interview, and they'll probably I read the manifesto, you know, as a sick person.
• 27:29
  But you should be ashamed of yourself reading that because I'm not any of those things.
• 27:35
  Mr.
• 27:35
  President, these are the things that never excuse me.
• 27:38
  You shouldn't be reading that on 60 minutes.
• 27:41
  You're a disgrace, but go ahead, let's finish the interview.
• 27:44
  Now I find it interesting.
• 27:45
  Well, well, these aren't my words, Mr.
• 27:47
  President.
• 27:47
  These are the manifesto that you're giving air time to on 60 minutes.
• 27:53
  You know, you're not talking about the the podunk uh express.
• 27:58
  You're talking about 60 minutes.
• 28:00
  And you won't even admit that this is talking about the president.
• 28:00
  And you won't even admit that this is a talking about the president.
• 28:04
  I mean, this is, yeah.
• 28:04
  I mean, this is yeah, um, you know, uh I there's a reason why I haven't used the gunsman's name.
• 28:06
  Um, you know, I there's a reason why I haven't used the gunsman's name.
• 28:11
  I don't think he deserves the the recognition.
• 28:11
  I don't think he deserves the the recognition.
• 28:13
  Uh, you know, and again, this is the constitution study.
• 28:13
  Uh, you know, and again, this is the constitution study.
• 28:16
  This is not 60 minutes.
• 28:16
  This is not 60 minutes.
• 28:18
  And uh, you know, so it's it's is it it's exactly what I expected.
• 28:18
  And uh, you know, so it's it's it's exactly what I expected.
• 28:24
  And I, you know, Trump says it's exactly what I expected, right?
• 28:24
  And I, you know, Trump says it's exactly what I expected, right?
• 28:27
  You're gonna bring this up, you're gonna promote these ideas.
• 28:27
  You're gonna bring this up, you're gonna promote these ideas, stuff that I was exonerated for.
• 28:32
  Stuff that evidence shows when you talk about the other side of the plate.
• 28:34
  I'm assuming he's talking about Democrats, although we've had both Democrats and Republicans recently resign from Congress because of uh uh accusations of uh, well, we'll just call them sexual deviancy.
• 28:48
  Um yeah, it's kind of what it's one of the reasons why I don't watch corporate media, because they've shown themselves to be um not only one side, not only biased, but uh, you know, oh, oh me, no, no, this is these aren't I I'm just saying what what he he said, what does that have to do?
• 29:07
  You're repeating the words of a crazy person.
• 29:09
  What does it have to do with what we're doing here?
• 29:13
  He says, You're horrible people, but let's continue the interview.
• 29:15
  And he did.
• 29:17
  But I love the fact that he he kept control, he didn't lose his temper.
• 29:21
  He says, No, no, no, wait, look, I'm not done yet.
• 29:23
  You're gonna give me my time, and I'll let you continue the interview, even though what you're saying is just outrageous, and uh or that you're quoting a madman um and using that as to why should I respond to the ravings of a madman?
• 29:37
  I thought it was it was one of his better uh uh media appearances.
• 29:42
  In another example, so uh Dana Bash from CNN State of the Union um was interviewing Representative Jamie Raskin and asked him if the now third attempt on Trump's life would um get him to think twice about the rhetoric that he uses.
• 30:00
  Yeah, and and you have uh and as many of your fellow democrats have used some heated rhetoric against the president.
• 30:08
  And do you think twice about that when something like this happens?
• 30:11
  Well, what rhetoric do you have in mind?
• 30:13
  Just talking about uh some of the the fact that he you know is terrible for this country and so on and so forth.
• 30:20
  I understand that that's your democratic right, but overall, yeah, do you have a response?
• 30:26
  No problem with Donald Trump at all.
• 30:28
  I mean, I talked about the policies of this administration, the authoritarianism like we saw on display in Minneapolis, where two of our citizens were gunned down in the streets simply for exercising their first amendment rights, Renee Good, Alex Predi.
• 30:42
  Um I had nothing personal against Donald Trump, but you know, when we start to start attacking our people for exercise, except uh what was it uh Ms.
• 30:51
  Good was using her car to get away, was running trying to run over in an attempt to get away.
• 30:57
  Um, a Secret Service agent, I'm sorry, nice agent.
• 31:01
  Um Mr.
• 31:02
  Peretti was uh dear uh was memory serves was resisting in an arrest when when uh he was so in other words, I have nothing personal, but the people what he's doing, uh listen, I don't know, I don't have examples of Mr.
• 31:16
  Asking going directly.
• 31:17
  But the interesting thing, what caught my attention was not so much the interaction between uh Ms.
• 31:22
  Bash and Mr.
• 31:23
  and Representative Raskin.
• 31:25
  What I found interesting was the reaction.
• 31:28
  So there's an ex-group called Call to Activism that posted CNN's Dana Bash humiliates herself on live TV, insinuating to Jimmy Raskins that Democrats are to blame for political viral violence for heated rhetoric, like saying Trump is terrible for this country, completely delusional, embarrassing.
• 31:46
  I'm less concerned about saying he's bad for this Trump.
• 31:48
  I'm talking about the fact that repeated by both politicians and media pundits, media faces alike, that he's Hitler, he's a fascist, uh, he's a dictator, he's a king, um, all without any evidence.
• 32:02
  And then you see the 60 minutes.
• 32:03
  Well, you know, that's what he was saying.
• 32:05
  Yeah, and you're repeating it and you're spreading it.
• 32:09
  Uh, you know, because you didn't, you know, yes, it was it was the manifesto.
• 32:12
  It's a madman.
• 32:13
  So, you know, when if you it is it really surprising that somebody um who may be a little less than stable hears this rhetoric and um says, yeah, Donald Trump is a is a rapist and a pedophile because well, I saw some report about him being in the Epstein and people claiming that the the reason wasn't wasn't because he's on the he's his name is on the list.
• 32:38
  And he was exonerated, but doesn't really matter.
• 32:42
  Now, I'm not saying they have responsibility for the actions of the gunman.
• 32:46
  The actions of the gunmen are his responsibility.
• 32:48
  But what she was asking was, listen, when these things happen, do you ask yourself, you know, am I inflaming the situation with the rhetoric?
• 32:57
  Or can I find a way to tamp down the uh the rhetoric with what I'm saying?
• 33:03
  Do you ask yourself that?
• 33:05
  And the very fact that she was asking somebody, hey, do you think about that?
• 33:10
  Got a heated reaction from this group called to activism.
• 33:16
  And I wonder how many more.
• 33:20
  Are we dealing with the media that says, oh, by the way, you you even you question us where we oh my God, this is this is this is crazy.
• 33:27
  You're you've humiliated yourself for even saying, hey, what about the rhetoric?
• 33:32
  Don't they ask the Republicans about rhetoric when bad things happen?
• 33:38
  Why is it wrong to ask?
• 33:40
  Don't they demand that Republicans repudiate some what some whack job says that isn't even a member of the Republican Party necessarily, but don't they demand they repudiate that?
• 33:51
  All she asks was, hey, does this make you think about that?
• 33:55
  That kind of shows the the craziness.
• 33:58
  And what's interesting is you have uh, you know, the very idea, hey, maybe the rhetoric isn't helping.
• 34:06
  How dare you consider that?
• 34:07
  Oh, but yeah, we're free to call uh Trump Hitler and a fascist and a Nazi and and all these things.
• 34:14
  But you and you question, does that rhetoric make things worse?
• 34:17
  How dare you?
• 34:19
  And it only seems to happen on one side of the political aisle.
• 34:24
  I don't know about you, but to me, that's a clue.
• 34:28
  And I don't know about you, but for me, this is strike three.
• 34:33
  And in a baseball game, strike three means you're out.
• 34:37
  Then again, I haven't paid attention to the media, corporate media for oh, more than a decade now, simply because they've shown them see themselves to be untrustworthy.
• 34:47
  But it keeps bringing back to the need to learn critical thinking to distinguish rhetoric from facts and data.
• 34:55
  Or as I like to say on one of my conference calls, um, you have to detach the narrative.
• 35:00
  You have to detach the narrative.
• 35:01
  You have to understand the narrative is a story.
• 35:01
  You have to understand the narrative is a story.
• 35:04
  Facts and data are not.
• 35:04
  Facts and data are not.
• 35:06
  So when people are promoting a narrative, they're telling a story.
• 35:06
  So when people are promoting a narrative, they're telling a story.
• 35:12
  And we need the critical thinking, once again, to look and say, well, that's a story.
• 35:12
  And we need the critical thinking, once again, to look and say, well, that's a story where the facts and evidence to make it a nonfiction, as opposed to a fiction.
• 35:17
  We're the facts and evidence to make it a nonfiction as opposed to a fiction.
• 35:23
  Now, I'm I'm gonna I've talked enough about the this.
• 35:23
  Now, I'm I'm gonna I've talked enough about the the this.
• 35:26
  I'm gonna change to some other topics, but before I do that.
• 35:26
  I'm gonna change to some other topics, but before I do that, I have to take another break, another break.
• 35:32
  Um, but I want to remind you, you know, we talk about the rights being under attack, and we often forget that it's frequently these these not for profits, these lobbying organizations, these uh activist organizations that are pushing for these infringements, and they're often funded by corporate America that we're doing business with.
• 35:55
  Why do we do business with companies that are trying to destroy our rights?
• 35:59
  Patriot Mobile is America's only Christian conservative wireless provider.
• 36:03
  And they they share my values.
• 36:05
  Yes, they've got great 4G and 5G coverage all over the nation.
• 36:08
  Yes, they've got 100% U.S.
• 36:10
  based customer support.
• 36:12
  But what I really like them is they take a portion of every dollar they earn to support organizations like First Liberty, Turning Point USA.
• 36:18
  Yes, now even the Constitution study, so that we can help defend people's rights.
• 36:24
  So please, the time is now.
• 36:26
  Stop supporting companies that are attacking our rights, support companies and that are supporting organizations that are defending your rights using your cell phone to stand against those that want to make America uh, well, a Marxist dystopia.
• 36:39
  Go to patriot mobile.comslash constitution, find a plan that works for you, see if you're eligible for a discount.
• 36:46
  Everyone from veterans and first responders to families with multiple lines can get discounts.
• 36:51
  And then use the code constitution to checkout to get free activation.
• 36:55
  Join me at Patriot Mobile.
• 36:57
  Use your cell phone to defend your rights by going to Patriot Mobile.comslash constitution.
• 37:01
  Don't forget, use that code constitution at checkout to get your activate new line activated absolutely free.
• 37:07
  I also hope you'll join me at America Out Loud.news.
• 37:10
  Now I go there each and every day for news and information.
• 37:13
  Why?
• 37:14
  Well, because it tells me the stories of corporate media doesn't want me to know.
• 37:17
  And it's important that we share those stories.
• 37:20
  You'd be surprised how many times you'll encounter somebody who hears a story and say, I didn't know that was happening.
• 37:24
  I didn't hear about that.
• 37:25
  That's right, because corporate media didn't want them to.
• 37:28
  So do me a favor, read the stories and articles, then share them.
• 37:32
  Listen to a podcast, watch a video, share it.
• 37:35
  It's the sharing of this news and information that the Marxists, the government actors don't want others to hear to help secure the blessings of liberty for all of us.
• 37:49
  During COVID, we got educated on the power of natural virus protection and immune boosting using vitamins A, C, D, zinc, and Quircetin.
• 37:59
  The problem?
• 38:00
  Getting them at the right dosage from truly natural sources that doesn't cost an arm and a leg.
• 38:05
  Enter the daily V stack.
• 38:07
  Using breakthrough cellular absorption technology, we put those vitamins together and supercharge them with a complete multi-mineral complex.
• 38:15
  The daily VStack is basically an oral IV of six products all in one at an affordable price.
• 38:22
  Go to chemicalfree body.com forward slash out loud today.
• 38:26
  Get the daily V stack, protect yourself, boost your immune system, and save 20% on your first order.
• 38:34
  The smartest food on the planet doesn't come from a lab or in a package.
• 38:38
  It grows in a glass jar.
• 38:41
  I'm Doug Evans, author of the national bestseller, The Spout Book.
• 38:45
  Sprouts deliver up to a hundred times the antioxidants of mature vegetables.
• 38:51
  They grow in just three to five days for under a dollar serving.
• 38:55
  Get your sprouting kit at the spouting company.com slash out loud.
• 39:01
  Use the code out loud for an exclusive offer.
• 39:04
  Grow smarter.
• 39:05
  Are you struggling with thinning hair?
• 39:06
  Try roots from the wellness company.
• 39:08
  The stuck here formulated non-oily hydrogel uses seven powerful peptides and key nutrients to nourish your scalp and support visibly thicker, healthier hair.
• 39:17
  Visit TWC.health forward slash outloud and use code out loud for 20% off your first order.
• 39:24
  That is TWC.
• 39:33
  Welcome back, everyday American Jeffrey joined the Constitution study.
• 39:37
  We've been talking about the third assassination attempt on Donald Trump and members of his cabinet.
• 39:42
  And uh one thing that came up there before I walk away from this was a lot of people pointed out you didn't need an ID to get into the hotel.
• 39:50
  Now I don't know if you needed an ID to get through the ballroom security, but all you had to do is have a ticket.
• 39:56
  And nobody even verified the ticket.
• 39:58
  That's what I've been told.
• 39:59
  But again, that's to get into the hotel, the outer security per the soft security perimeter.
• 40:05
  Now, this came to my attention because California, again, run by Democrats who have been heartily opposed to voter ID laws.
• 40:16
  Well, the people of California will now have an opportunity to vote on whether or not to require a photo ID when they people go to the polling place.
• 40:25
  See the California Secretary of State, Shirley Weber announced last week that the proposed constitutional amendment had met the threshold to be on the general ballot in on November 3rd, meaning the people of California will get the chance to weigh in on what they think.
• 40:44
  This would add a new section of the California Constitution requiring voters to show a government-issued ID when voting in person, or to give the last four digits of a unique government-issued identifying number when voting by mail.
• 41:00
  It also would require the state to provide a voter ID card at no cost upon requests.
• 41:07
  Now, as I've said, you know, we'll have to talk about the Save Act and the requirement for a voter ID.
• 41:13
  That only works for elections for House and Senate, because they're the only federal elections people actually vote in.
• 41:20
  But this would add to the California Constitution the requirement for some for a government issued ID, a photo ID if in person or the last four digits.
• 41:29
  When they say government issued ID, I'm assuming like social security number, driver's license, voter ID card, something like that.
• 41:35
  By the way, this would join Article 2, Section 2 of the California Constitution that says a United States citizen 18 years of age and resident in this state may vote.
• 41:52
  Which means to register to vote, you'd have to be a United States citizen.
• 41:55
  I don't know if they have a requirement to produce a voter ID.
• 41:58
  I'm sorry, a proof of citizenship when they register.
• 42:00
  When they register, that would make sense.
• 42:01
  That would make sense.
• 42:02
  But this is the state of California.
• 42:02
  But this is the state of California.
• 42:04
  The people have the opportunity to add this requirement to the election process.
• 42:04
  The people have the opportunity to add this requirement to the election process.
• 42:11
  The question is will the people of California do this?
• 42:11
  The question is, will the people of California do this?
• 42:15
  Right?
• 42:15
  Right?
• 42:16
  It's it's it's in your hands, Californians.
• 42:16
  It's in your hands, Californians.
• 42:18
  When you go to vote, uh whatever this this uh uh where this ends up on the ballot, this uh uh proposition.
• 42:18
  When you go to vote, uh, whatever this uh uh where this ends up on the ballot, this uh uh proposition.
• 42:28
  Do you want to require a
• 42:28
  Do you want to require an ID to vote or not?
• 42:32
  Because again, everybody was complaining we didn't need an ID to get into the to the hotel.
• 42:37
  Well, yeah, because you don't need an ID, you need to you generally need an ID to register to to, I should say, to get a room in a hotel.
• 42:44
  Uh, but you don't need uh an ID, a photo ID to simply enter the hotel.
• 42:50
  Uh but shouldn't we require, I mean, you need a uh a photo ID to get a uh an airplane ticket to get on an airplane.
• 42:59
  Uh, shouldn't we need it for one of the most important civic duties of a United States citizen?
• 43:06
  Makes sense to me.
• 43:07
  We'll see if it makes sense to California this November.
• 43:10
  Uh let's head back to home state of Tennessee.
• 43:14
  There are there's been a bit of conundrum lately.
• 43:18
  Um Tennessee is considering new legislation.
• 43:22
  Now, I let me back up for a second, because in every state of the union, in order to legally use lethal force, you have to be uh uh there must be an imminent threat of death or serious bodily injury to you or an innocent bystander, right?
• 43:40
  In other words, unless you've initiated violence, and this is unless it's your fault, to you you're not allowed to use um uh force, lethal force to defend property only life.
• 43:55
  Now, the notable exception to this has been the state of Texas, where you can use lethal force to stop the imminent commission of arson, burglary, robbery, aggravated robbery, threat theft during the nighttime, or criminal mischief during the nighttime.
• 44:13
  And you can also use uh deadly force to stop someone from fleeing who has committed you can sure prove has committed this.
• 44:21
  In other words, you've you're a witness to it, is it would be what I expect.
• 44:24
  And again, Texas, for a long time, this has been the outlier.
• 44:27
  But Tennessee is considering legislation that would add the defense of property to the use of deadly force.
• 44:38
  Now, as I understand it, the original intent of the legislation was to allow the use of lethal force when someone's life is not directly threatened.
• 44:48
  All right.
• 44:49
  Uh but it's it's being hotly debated to allow the use of deadly force again to prevent arson, burglary, robbery, aggravated cruelty to animals, and grave sexual abuse.
• 45:02
  Now, this led to some, well, what's described as raucous debate on the House floor.
• 45:08
  Now, I admit I have some divided thoughts about this.
• 45:14
  Because on the one hand, for the most part, property is replaceable.
• 45:18
  All right.
• 45:20
  If someone is threatening property, right, they're they're they're they're trying to rob my house or burgle or or whatnot.
• 45:27
  Um, am I really willing to take someone's life for that?
• 45:32
  Now that's important because I may threaten, but will I actually take deadly force, right?
• 45:37
  If someone comes in and tries to rob my home, they're likely to get greeted at the door with me armed.
• 45:44
  All right.
• 45:45
  The question is, would I actually point a gun and pull a trigger at them?
• 45:48
  And again, I have no way of knowing if burglar or robbery could escalate into something else.
• 45:54
  Arson, again, arson may involve the death of others.
• 45:57
  If someone is in that building, that's that's terrible.
• 46:00
  What I and again, grave sexual abuse, man.
• 46:03
  If I see someone raping a lady, guess what?
• 46:07
  I'm pulling my side arm, and if I think that's the only way, and uh that's the only way I can stop them, they're gonna have a really bad day.
• 46:16
  And if I'm seeing that, especially a child or something like that, yeah, I could understand the blood boils.
• 46:21
  Cruelty to animals.
• 46:24
  I know that makes me really, really mad.
• 46:26
  Would I be willing to use lethal force for that?
• 46:29
  I guess it depends on the circumstance, which again, this is raucous debate.
• 46:33
  It's not it's not even finished yet.
• 46:35
  The last I knew.
• 46:37
  Um, but it's it's a question of of you know, at what point does something be so heinous as to warrant a potentially lethal response?
• 46:50
  Right?
• 46:51
  Whether it's your intent to kill them or not is one question, a potentially lethal.
• 46:56
  These to me are important questions.
• 46:59
  They're questions that need to be debated.
• 47:01
  They should be at least a, if not raucous, at least a full-throated debate.
• 47:08
  What are we willing to defend and how far are we willing to go to defend them?
• 47:12
  You know what?
• 47:13
  If I see somebody attacking my family, they're in trouble.
• 47:18
  I see someone trying to rape my wife or my daughter, I'm not asking any questions.
• 47:22
  I don't care what the law says.
• 47:24
  Justice says I'm stopping them now.
• 47:28
  And whether it's a it's a firearm or a baseball bat upside the head, both of which can be lethal.
• 47:34
  The question is, will the with a government, will the state say, well, you didn't have a right to do that.
• 47:39
  That was that was excessive force.
• 47:41
  Tell that to my daughter.
• 47:43
  Tell that to my wife.
• 47:44
  You know, I I'm I I haven't read the legislation yet.
• 47:49
  And I'm in fact, I'm trying to track it down because I really want to look some look into some details of this, because that to me is again the devil's in the details.
• 47:59
  That's where uh I want to look at this and get it in and there may be some details I haven't thought of.
• 48:05
  But I want you to think about that.
• 48:08
  Is you know, when does something that may not lead to death warrant that level of response?
• 48:17
  And I think that's something we should all consider.
• 48:20
  What no matter what the law says in our state, how far will we go in the defense of people or stuff?
• 48:29
  Is that back to that proper preparation prevents poor form?
• 48:32
  If we think about this ahead of time, then maybe we'll be more prepared.
• 48:37
  God forbid, it should happen somewhere where we can do something about it.
• 48:42
  Now, I got one more thing, and this this caught my attention.
• 48:45
  This is a European issue.
• 48:48
  But the more and more I hear people talk say that we should be more and more like Europe, the more and more I look at Europe and say, do I really want to be like that?
• 48:56
  See, there's a Dutch company called Interrail that has a they call they've got a it's called Euro Rail.
• 49:00
  That has a they call they've got a it's called Eurorail, all right.
• 49:03
  All right, so it has a product called Eurorail.
• 49:03
  So it has a product called Eurorail.
• 49:05
  And the whole idea is uh it allows people to use a lot by young people to travel by train across 33 different European countries.
• 49:05
  And the whole idea is uh it allows people to use a lot by young people to travel by train across 33 different European countries, all right.
• 49:14
  All right, so you buy a pass, and you know, it's like a like a city bus pass, but it's all across Europe.
• 49:14
  So you buy a pass, and you know it's like a like a city bus pass, but it's all across Europe.
• 49:21
  And again, young people use this a lot when they're doing it if they want to do a European tour, it's an a cost-effective way of doing this, but some information has come.
• 49:21
  And again, young people use this a lot when they're doing it if they want to do a European tour, it's an a cost effective way of doing this, but some information has come out.
• 49:31
  See, in order to get the the this Euro rail pass, they wanted the person's passport number.
• 49:39
  Now, again, you're traveling across countries.
• 49:42
  So you would think you need a passport, but I believe this is all within the European Union, meaning you don't need a passport to actually cross national borders.
• 49:52
  Now, the problem is so they the Eurorail has these passport numbers, and there's apparently uh there's a stolen data set according to uh reports on Telegram, that there are over 300,000 people whose personal data, including their passport number, is now for sale on the dark web.
• 50:17
  A spokesperson said we can confirm that data copied during the security incident has been offered for sale on the dark web and a sample data set has been published on Telegram.
• 50:28
  Customers whose personal data was included in the data set are being informed directly where contact details are available to us.
• 50:35
  Now, why do I bring this up?
• 50:37
  Because Eurowale doesn't work in the United States.
• 50:40
  Why do I bring this up?
• 50:42
  It shows the importance of uh what are called threat vectors, right?
• 50:47
  When you give up data for convenience, that data can be attacked.
• 50:53
  For example, in the United States, Congress has illegally demanded that uh uh if you want to go to certain places, you need to have either a passport or what's called a real ID.
• 51:09
  This real ID requires you to provide um uh proof of citizenship, uh and biometrics.
• 51:18
  All right, so you're giving over personal data, social security number, uh uh, you know, personal, a lot of this data.
• 51:24
  Now, this is given over to the state, but in order to get the states to implement this, what the federal government says we'll give you money to help implement real ID, but only if you take that data, including all that personal data, all the biometric data, and you put it in an interstate database, meaning you get a real ID in Tennessee, well, it can be searched in New York, including my biometric data or California or Alaska or Florida or anywhere else.
• 51:55
  That to me is bad enough because that's that's exposure of my data.
• 52:00
  But there's more because as the uh as your rail has found out, they were target of a security breach where this data was stolen as now being sold.
• 52:13
  Meaning if this interstate database would be a similar target for hackers, right?
• 52:21
  And let's face it, governments are not exactly known for their best cybersecurity.
• 52:27
  If that data gets breached and it gets stolen, and now all this information, including your biometric data, is now available on the dark web for sale because of the security breach, all to get an ID to fly.
• 52:42
  So I recently took a trip.
• 52:43
  I went up to New York, uh, deal with some family business, and I flew up to New York.
• 52:48
  I don't have a real ID.
• 52:49
  I had to bring my passport simply to travel across interstate borders.
• 52:55
  I I thought, or at least to fly by to go by air across interstate borders, which to me, isn't that the requirement of papers that we tried to get away from?
• 53:06
  The idea that you need papers to travel to certain places within the country, isn't that what we wanted to get away from?
• 53:16
  Apparently, we're bringing it back.
• 53:18
  As Benjamin Franklin said, he would give up essential liberty for the promise of temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety.
• 53:26
  People have been giving up their most personal and private information for the promise of safe travel, which by the way, the it shows TSA ain't doing the job.
• 53:38
  And in doing so, they've the right to holding information private, their passport number, their bank account, others, all this other data.
• 53:49
  And every time we turn around and say, Well, we need these digital wallets and these digital IDs, we need to put this in a database to make our lives easier or to keep us safe.
• 54:01
  What are we giving up for this luxury?
• 54:05
  Is it really worth it?
• 54:08
  Okay, before I head call a day, I want to remind you if you live in Florida.
• 54:12
  I'm going to be speaking at the Lake County uh Constitution.
• 54:16
  Is it's a conservative constitution party's constitution creation day banquet, May 16th, in uh Eustace at the USIS Women's Club in Eustace, Florida from 5 to 9 p.m.
• 54:28
  Find out more, go to constitutionstudy.com slash events, click on the link.
• 54:31
  And uh, if you join me, I'd love to meet you, love to shake your hand, love to talk with you.
• 54:35
  I have a I think it's a pretty interesting speech to give.
• 54:39
  And uh again, hopefully see you there if you're in the area.
• 54:43
  Uh I'll also put a link to the event uh in the show notes if you want to sign up there.
• 54:49
  The point is if you're there, I I hope you'll join us.
• 54:51
  Uh, like I said, I have a pretty good story, a big good speech lined up.
• 54:56
  Uh, we'll be having dinner and it'll be a great time to sit and discuss, maybe ask some questions, maybe get involved.
• 55:03
  I've got some questions.
• 55:04
  I've actually had a couple questions rolling in, which is to be really good.
• 55:07
  So I also hope you'll head to constitutionstudy.com slash questions, ask a question or two.
• 55:12
  Let us know what's on your mind.
• 55:13
  What are you thinking?
• 55:14
  What ideas do you want?
• 55:16
  What questions do you have?
• 55:18
  And uh again, all I ask is that you uh you give me your name and email address because I'm going to reply directly via email with um with an answer.
• 55:26
  But if you'd also like me to play it here on the radio, there's a checkbox.
• 55:29
  This is please uh answer on America at loud talk radio.
• 55:32
  I will do both.
• 55:33
  So please uh check it out.
• 55:35
  Constitutionstudy.com slash questions to ask questions, constitution study.com slash events to find all the events that I'm speaking at.
• 55:42
  I've got a couple, I haven't put them all on the website yet, but that's the best place to keep track of where I will be and where I'll be speaking.
• 55:50
  Now, I also hope you'll come back and join us here for the constitution study on America at loud talk radio, heard on the iHeart Radio Network every weekday, 4 p.m.
• 55:59
  Eastern time.
• 56:00
  Time.
• 56:00
  You can listen on our media player.
• 56:00
  You can listen on our media player.
• 56:02
  We've got apps for Apple, Android, and Alexa.
• 56:02
  We've got apps for Apple, Android, and Alexa.
• 56:05
  Now, all my shows also go to a podcast.
• 56:05
  Now, all my shows also go to a podcast.
• 56:08
  It takes a couple days to go from talk radio to podcast, but you get to listen in your favorite podcast app.
• 56:08
  It takes a couple days to go from talk radio to podcast, but you get to listen in your favorite podcast app.
• 56:15
  Uh, do me a favor though, subscribe to the show, leave us a rating, especially an Apple Podcast.
• 56:15
  Do me a favor though, subscribe to the show.
• 56:18
  Leave us a rating, especially an Apple Podcast.
• 56:20
  It helps the algorithm show us to more people who are more likely to click the links and join us here for the constitution study.
• 56:20
  It helps the algorithm show us to more people who are more likely to click the links and join us here for the Constitution Study.
• 56:27
  Speaking of links, you can find all the links you need at the
• 56:27
  Speaking of links, you can find all the links you need at the homepage at AmericaOutloud.news.
• 56:32
  But as with everything else, please share those links.
• 56:35
  Let other people know what's going on.
• 56:37
  It's the sharing of the links, the sharing of this information, but also help share the blessings of liberty to everyone who calls this great nation home.