Latest / Trumponomics / Is Kamala Harris Better for American Business?

Transcript

Is Kamala Harris Better for American Business? · Trumponomics

0:03
Speaker 1: Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news.
0:14
Speaker 2: This would probably be controversial among my friends in the
0:18
Speaker 2: Biden administration, but I think that there's a general perception
0:24
Speaker 2: that Vice President Harris will be a bit more business friendly.
0:32
Speaker 1: Welcome back to voter Nomics, where politics and markets collide.
0:36
Speaker 1: This year, voters around the world have the ability to
0:39
Speaker 1: affect markets, countries, and economies like never before, so we've
0:43
Speaker 1: created this series to help you make sense of it all.
0:46
Speaker 3: I'm Allegra Stratton, I'm Adrian Wooldridge, and I'm Stephanie Flanders.
0:50
Speaker 1: So look, we are seven minutes out.
0:52
Speaker 3: From the seven minutes.
0:58
Speaker 1: Obviously fail in the first ten seconds. We are seven
1:03
Speaker 1: weeks out from the US election, and although the outcome
1:06
Speaker 1: is no clearer, the end is coming into sites. So
1:09
Speaker 1: we're going to continue to unpick what the candidate's financial
1:12
Speaker 1: and regulatory policies could mean for American businesses.
1:16
Speaker 3: And one of the things we're going to get into later,
1:17
Speaker 3: Adrian and I spoke with one of Wall Street's higher
1:20
Speaker 3: profile Democrats and ever Core Chairman emeritus, Ralph sch Losty,
1:25
Speaker 3: one of its founders, just to get an idea of
1:28
Speaker 3: what the potential ideas could mean for business. You know,
1:31
Speaker 3: he's sitting in Wall Street, or certainly was sitting in
1:35
Speaker 3: Wall Street, and has a particular perspective that you might
1:38
Speaker 3: say was a kind of traditional approach to thinking about
1:40
Speaker 3: business and campaigns. You know, how much money are they
1:43
Speaker 3: give it putting in what impact of the candidates policies
1:46
Speaker 3: going to have? But Adrian and I don't know about you,
1:48
Speaker 3: but I've just been struck. You know, Donald Trump progressively
1:52
Speaker 3: has so scrambled the way we think about business and
1:56
Speaker 3: politics and brought them closer and closer together. And we've
1:59
Speaker 3: seen that particularly in an increasingly close relationship between him
2:03
Speaker 3: and Elon Musk, where Elon Musk is not just giving
2:05
Speaker 3: him a huge amount of money, but giving him a
2:07
Speaker 3: platform actively supporting him on Twitter.
2:10
Speaker 4: Absolutely, there used to be a sort of hands off
2:13
Speaker 4: relationship between the donor on the one hand and the
2:17
Speaker 4: candidate on the other. The donor would give some money,
2:19
Speaker 4: it would go through a lot of intermediaries and there'd
2:22
Speaker 4: be some sort of space between the two. Now you're
2:24
Speaker 4: getting a direct intermingling between business on the one hand
2:29
Speaker 4: and the candidates on the other. Trump obviously did this,
2:31
Speaker 4: and it's most flagrant with his hotel in Washington that
2:35
Speaker 4: he encouraged people to go into. But now we're saying
2:38
Speaker 4: with Musk, Musk is running this business which is ex Twitter.
2:42
Speaker 4: That part of the business model seems to be outrage
2:45
Speaker 4: people to put Trump on there to encourage sort of
2:50
Speaker 4: active engagement with Twitter through saying Trump Trump leaning things.
2:54
Speaker 4: So it's an extraordinary sort of commingling, I think.
2:58
Speaker 1: And also there's a kickback because if Trump's selective, Musk
3:01
Speaker 1: is going to be given this role looking at So
3:03
Speaker 1: there's and I do try not to be too parochial
3:05
Speaker 1: and bring it back to the UK. But in the
3:07
Speaker 1: UK right now we're having every day on the front page,
3:09
Speaker 1: we've got the Prime Minister and his wife being accused
3:12
Speaker 1: for taking clothes and money off of Well, money is
3:15
Speaker 1: not the problem, but clothes and other benefits that they
3:17
Speaker 1: haven't declared off a donor on the one hand. But
3:20
Speaker 1: then in America you've got it on a mega mega,
3:22
Speaker 1: mega scale and it doesn't not mega but a mega scale,
3:25
Speaker 1: And it doesn't seem to there doesn't seem to be
3:28
Speaker 1: anybody saying, hold on a second, it's not allowed.
3:31
Speaker 3: Well except I mean, there's plenty of people amazed at
3:33
Speaker 3: the kind of conflict of interest that would represent. I mean, remember,
3:36
Speaker 3: it's not just that it's payback for support in the campaign.
3:41
Speaker 3: It would be an ongoing and massive conflict of interest
3:43
Speaker 3: for Elon Musk to be reinventing government or thinking about
3:47
Speaker 3: how to reduce government at a time when his own
3:50
Speaker 3: company is receiving billions of dollars in government contracts. So
3:56
Speaker 3: the idea that there are no guardrails against that, I
3:59
Speaker 3: think is surprise to people in America, where we always
4:03
Speaker 3: taught that, you know, there is this written constitution that
4:06
Speaker 3: provides checks and balances. They're increasingly getting faded.
4:10
Speaker 1: If you read the biography of Musk, it's clear that
4:13
Speaker 1: about eighteen months ago, two years ago, Musk thought Trump
4:15
Speaker 1: was a loser.
4:17
Speaker 3: And maybe that's the direct quote. Well, not very long ago,
4:21
Speaker 3: Donald Trump thought crypto currencies were a scam, and we
4:24
Speaker 3: now know that he's going to get his own.
4:35
Speaker 1: Okay, So to talk about that change of heart that
4:38
Speaker 1: Stephanie just mentioned and how crypto is playing in the
4:41
Speaker 1: US election, we have in the podcast studio right now
4:44
Speaker 1: Emily Nicole, who is Bloomberg's crypto reporter. Hi, Emily, Hi,
4:49
Speaker 1: just explain for us what was launched by Donald Trump
4:53
Speaker 1: and family this week launched.
4:56
Speaker 5: Maybe a bit of a generous term, actually more like
4:59
Speaker 5: a veiled to a certain extent. So earlier this week,
5:02
Speaker 5: Donald Trump went on an X spaces I guess you'd
5:05
Speaker 5: call it now, where he spoke for about two hours
5:08
Speaker 5: along with other members of the Trump family about the
5:11
Speaker 5: project that they intend to launch called World Liberty Financial.
5:15
Speaker 5: We still don't really know what it is, except for
5:18
Speaker 5: the fact that it's going to be in the world
5:19
Speaker 5: of decentralized finance, which means that there will be some
5:23
Speaker 5: loose form of governance by the people and the community
5:26
Speaker 5: that are buying into it rather than by the people
5:29
Speaker 5: running it, and that there will be a token attached
5:31
Speaker 5: to it for that purpose which people can buy to
5:34
Speaker 5: use to vote on proposals on how it's run, but
5:36
Speaker 5: also probably speculate with as well.
5:39
Speaker 1: So for an expert like yourself, does it look promising
5:42
Speaker 1: or does it look a bit odd?
5:44
Speaker 3: It looks light on details. I think it's probably not
5:48
Speaker 3: the first crypto enterprise that's been a bit light onto.
5:52
Speaker 5: Yeah, exactly, but it's probably the most high profile one
5:55
Speaker 5: that we've had so far. I mean, for a respective
6:00
Speaker 5: of president to be launching something like this. It definitely
6:04
Speaker 5: is in that gray area of we don't know exactly
6:07
Speaker 5: where it sits between business interests, financial interests, how much
6:11
Speaker 5: he might stand to profit from it or benefit from it.
6:13
Speaker 5: There is a disclaimer on the project that says Trump
6:16
Speaker 5: or his family members, none of them will benefit financially
6:19
Speaker 5: from it. But you know, that's assuming that the token
6:22
Speaker 5: itself isn't going to be something that can appreciate in value.
6:25
Speaker 5: Obviously it will, so whether or not that actually bears
6:29
Speaker 5: out to be the case is something to be.
6:31
Speaker 1: Seen, Adrian, I mean, before we get onto talking to
6:34
Speaker 1: Emily about the crypto in the election, just sort of
6:37
Speaker 1: on the principle of a presidential candidate launching or unveiling,
6:41
Speaker 1: to use Emily's phrase, unveiling something like this.
6:44
Speaker 3: Would we see that in the UK though.
6:46
Speaker 4: I can't conceivably imagine it. It's not just that there
6:49
Speaker 4: that he's unveiling this. This thing is a presidential candidate.
6:52
Speaker 4: He's doing it seven weeks before the election on a
6:56
Speaker 4: platform provided by one of his biggest backers, Elon m
7:00
Speaker 4: It's quite extraordinary, and.
7:01
Speaker 3: It's also the intermingling with the family. The family are
7:04
Speaker 3: ever presently and the business interests continue with the family.
7:08
Speaker 3: And I noticed even in our story that the white
7:13
Speaker 3: paper for well, it sounds like white paper is also
7:16
Speaker 3: a sort of a generous phrase. But the World Liberty
7:18
Speaker 3: Financial reviewed by Bloomberg News and that listed Donald Trump
7:22
Speaker 3: as chief Crypto Advocate, Eric and Donald Junior each as
7:26
Speaker 3: Web three ambassadors, and eighteen year old Baron Trump as
7:30
Speaker 3: Chief DEFY Visionary. I guess we should. I mean DeFi
7:36
Speaker 3: is a sort of particular bit of the crypto universe
7:41
Speaker 3: which is even considered a little bit fringe even by
7:44
Speaker 3: some of the crypto people. Is that right Somewhat? Yes?
7:47
Speaker 5: I mean, if you're kind of the yeah, who would
7:50
Speaker 5: buy bitcoin or ether because you think it might be
7:53
Speaker 5: a bit of an investment, than Defy is certainly fringe
7:55
Speaker 5: to you the crypto traders. Though It's kind of the
7:58
Speaker 5: bread and butter of how things work, because it's often
8:00
Speaker 5: the way that you get to experiment with new tokens,
8:03
Speaker 5: new projects and things before they can get vetted properly
8:06
Speaker 5: to be on the big exchanges like Finance or coinbase.
8:09
Speaker 5: For Trump, and in this project, the purpose of it
8:14
Speaker 5: being in DeFi is quite important because it means that
8:16
Speaker 5: they can have this claim to not really have any
8:19
Speaker 5: control or say over how it operates. Defy itself as
8:22
Speaker 5: a construct is imagine a project that's basically just a
8:26
Speaker 5: whole run of code and smart contracts that kind of
8:29
Speaker 5: execute when certain conditions are met, and nobody can intervene
8:32
Speaker 5: once they're written. So the idea is that people who
8:35
Speaker 5: hold this token that's touched the project can use that
8:38
Speaker 5: bit of token that they own to say, Okay, well
8:40
Speaker 5: I vote this way, and somebody with more tokens can
8:42
Speaker 5: vote another way, and in that way, the Trump family
8:46
Speaker 5: themselves can say, well, really, I don't have any say
8:48
Speaker 5: about how this goes because all the token holders are
8:50
Speaker 5: voting whichever way. That doesn't necessarily mean they don't benefit
8:54
Speaker 5: financially from it, though, especially if token does trade in
8:56
Speaker 5: open markets, which it should do in time.
8:58
Speaker 3: I mean, there is this a bit of the sort
9:03
Speaker 3: of demographic that Trump is really going for, which is
9:06
Speaker 3: the sort of countercultural younger skeptical of government. And this
9:12
Speaker 3: is right. Even if they don't make any money on this,
9:14
Speaker 3: it does sort of send that message that I'm all
9:17
Speaker 3: about sort of somewhat, you know, it's getting away from
9:20
Speaker 3: the mainstream financial system. Libertarianism, I mean, that's part of
9:25
Speaker 3: the messaging.
9:26
Speaker 5: Yeah, all of those things are kind of at the
9:28
Speaker 5: heart of crypto, and so a lot of the traders
9:31
Speaker 5: who sit within crypto are at least you know, hardcore,
9:33
Speaker 5: day to day, live and breathe it very much sit
9:36
Speaker 5: on that side. But then you have to wonder if
9:39
Speaker 5: that they would have been Trump voters anyway to a
9:41
Speaker 5: certain extent. And so Trump has made repeated over to
9:44
Speaker 5: the crypto industry this year to say that he wants
9:47
Speaker 5: to be part of it, he wants to create rules
9:49
Speaker 5: for it, he wants to get rid of sec chair
9:52
Speaker 5: Gary Guns are on day one because Gary Guns that
9:54
Speaker 5: has been launching several enforcement actions against scripto companies over
9:57
Speaker 5: the last few years that the industry is seeves as
10:00
Speaker 5: overly harsh. But you know, saying all of that was
10:04
Speaker 5: probably enough because by comparison, his competitor Kamala Harris hasn't
10:09
Speaker 5: really said anything on crypto.
10:10
Speaker 3: I mean, when it comes to the sort of directly
10:14
Speaker 3: benefiting financially from the campaign, we had that you know,
10:17
Speaker 3: Trump Media ipo. In April Origin it was valued at
10:23
Speaker 3: nine billion. I think it's now less than half that
10:25
Speaker 3: he could still potentially make two billion and people are
10:27
Speaker 3: literally trading him and it's been going down pretty steadily,
10:30
Speaker 3: certainly since Biden got out of the race. If people
10:32
Speaker 3: end up trading on this platform, which is very much
10:34
Speaker 3: associated with him, if they're speculating on Trump media stocks
10:39
Speaker 3: based on whether or not they think he's going to win,
10:41
Speaker 3: and then they end up losing a lot of money,
10:43
Speaker 3: I mean, it isn't done that back fire on him
10:45
Speaker 3: in the end, or does it not matter because he's lost?
10:46
Speaker 5: And it depends how much he can distance himself from it.
10:49
Speaker 5: I mean the ability to be able to say, well,
10:51
Speaker 5: you know, we don't earn any money from this, I'm
10:53
Speaker 5: just an advisor, or I sit on the periphery. I'm
10:56
Speaker 5: just promoting it, but my family are really more involved
10:58
Speaker 5: these kind of things. There's always a way from to
11:00
Speaker 5: distance himself. That said, we did do a story my
11:03
Speaker 5: colleagues Zeker Fox and Miashen early this month about the
11:08
Speaker 5: people behind the project who are building it. And they've
11:11
Speaker 5: previously built projects that have been subject to hacks, They've
11:16
Speaker 5: done get rich quick schemes, they've sold colon cleanses online.
11:19
Speaker 5: You know, it's not necessarily the kind of business business
11:22
Speaker 5: that you think would be solid footing, so looking ahead
11:26
Speaker 5: to what world liberty might look like. I mean, there's
11:29
Speaker 5: always a chance, for example, that they don't launch this
11:31
Speaker 5: before the election happens, and so he's able to kind
11:34
Speaker 5: of say that, well, you know, nothing infringed upon the
11:37
Speaker 5: voting process in a certain sense, but once it goes live,
11:41
Speaker 5: there's nothing to say. I guess that he couldn't still
11:43
Speaker 5: sit on those edges without having all his fingers in.
11:46
Speaker 3: I guess this is all part of why it must
11:47
Speaker 3: be interesting day to day to be a Bloomberg crypto reporter.
11:51
Speaker 3: Thank you very much, Sheery, Thank you my top fact.
11:54
Speaker 3: I was looking up while we were talking that Trump
11:56
Speaker 3: Media's revenue is equivalent and I have to admit this
11:59
Speaker 3: is according to Roy, but it is equivalent to two
12:01
Speaker 3: Starbucks coffee shops, and strategists say it's three point six
12:05
Speaker 3: billion stock market value is detached from its day to
12:07
Speaker 3: day business, since it lost just UNDERD nine hundred thousand
12:10
Speaker 3: dollars in its most reported quarter. I love that it's
12:13
Speaker 3: worth several billion dollars and its revenue is the same
12:15
Speaker 3: as two star coffee shops. We have our guest this week, Adrian,
12:28
Speaker 3: and I spoke with one of Wall Street's higher profile Democrats.
12:31
Speaker 3: A few days ago, Ralph schlostein chairman emeritus at Evercourt,
12:35
Speaker 3: which is a global investment banking advisory business, and I
12:39
Speaker 3: started by asking him, at this late stage in the campaign,
12:42
Speaker 3: was it really going to come down to who had
12:44
Speaker 3: the most money?
12:47
Speaker 2: I think the answer to that is how much does
12:50
Speaker 2: the relative net worth of Bill Gates and Warren Buffett? Matter?
12:55
Speaker 2: Both of them have more money than they need.
12:57
Speaker 3: They don't have instant access to massive social media.
13:00
Speaker 2: Platform and I would say both campaigns have more than
13:07
Speaker 2: enough money to promote their candidate, and the differential in money,
13:17
Speaker 2: which at least at the current moment, seems to favor
13:20
Speaker 2: Vice President Harris, is not going to be the determining
13:24
Speaker 2: factor in this election.
13:26
Speaker 4: Can you give us a general sense of how corporate
13:29
Speaker 4: America business America is seeing and splitting over this debate.
13:34
Speaker 4: Are there any clear lines of difference between different business
13:37
Speaker 4: groupings and is it changing? Is that as the election evolves.
13:42
Speaker 2: This would probably be controversial among my friends in the
13:45
Speaker 2: Biden administration, but I think that there's a general perception
13:51
Speaker 2: that Vice President Harris will be a bit more business friendly.
13:57
Speaker 2: Large technology and corporate business friendly, and I think some
14:02
Speaker 2: of that is a function of her background and where
14:06
Speaker 2: she comes from. She's represented in the Senate many of
14:10
Speaker 2: these large technology companies, obviously Silicon Valley is in California,
14:16
Speaker 2: and she's got a long history of interacting with them,
14:20
Speaker 2: being supported by them, and having i think some empathy
14:24
Speaker 2: to the issues that might be of interest to them.
14:28
Speaker 2: And that's not to say that President Biden has been
14:31
Speaker 2: hostile toward business, but he's just he's got less of
14:35
Speaker 2: a background and an empathy toward that, and he's got
14:39
Speaker 2: a very strong background in foreign policy and that's been
14:42
Speaker 2: a big focus of his I think her agenda is
14:48
Speaker 2: very focused on two things. Growth for the overall economy,
14:53
Speaker 2: which I think is really important, as there is something
14:57
Speaker 2: to be said for this long around quote of the
15:02
Speaker 2: rising tide lifting all ships. And then she's also i
15:06
Speaker 2: think very focused on moving a little bit more of
15:10
Speaker 2: the benefits of public policy to the middle class. Her
15:14
Speaker 2: housing plan, her childcare plan, her child credit, tax credit,
15:22
Speaker 2: capping drug prices, and the fact, you know there's going
15:26
Speaker 2: to be a massive discussion next year about what do
15:30
Speaker 2: we do with the Trump tax cuts. They all expire
15:33
Speaker 2: at the end of twenty twenty five, and there's a
15:37
Speaker 2: probably the biggest difference between the two candidates, which neither
15:40
Speaker 2: of them talks particularly a lot about, is what their
15:44
Speaker 2: view is of what should happen to that next year.
15:47
Speaker 4: Against that, I just want to say that surely we're
15:50
Speaker 4: seeing business fleeing from California as a significant rate, and
15:54
Speaker 4: middle class people fleeing from California as a significant rate,
15:58
Speaker 4: because it's hard for middle class people to make ends meet,
16:01
Speaker 4: and businesses feel that the burden of regulation is an
16:04
Speaker 4: intrusiveness of regulation is very high. If I was looking
16:07
Speaker 4: at California, I wouldn't say that that's the sort of
16:09
Speaker 4: place I wanted to do business these days.
16:12
Speaker 2: Oh, it has a lot of things going for it too.
16:14
Speaker 2: It has an incredibly educated labor force, and it's been,
16:19
Speaker 2: you know, until relatively recently, a you know, an engine
16:24
Speaker 2: of demographic growth for the United States. So you know,
16:29
Speaker 2: there certainly are highly publicized, occasionally controversial figures like Elon
16:36
Speaker 2: Musk who make very strong statements about the friendliness of
16:41
Speaker 2: the California business climate. And I do think as a
16:46
Speaker 2: general matter, the Democratic Party has been a little bit
16:53
Speaker 2: excessive in its regulatory exuberance, and that's true at the
16:59
Speaker 2: national level, and it's certainly true in the states that
17:03
Speaker 2: where you have one party rule, one of which I
17:07
Speaker 2: live in.
17:09
Speaker 3: I'm interested. There's been quite a lot of talk. You
17:12
Speaker 3: actually just mentioned it. There about three quite unpopular characters
17:16
Speaker 3: in large parts of the business community that are currently
17:19
Speaker 3: in the administration, Lena Khan and Gary Gainsler, the head
17:23
Speaker 3: of the leader Khan being a Federal Trade Commission head,
17:26
Speaker 3: and the Security and Exchange Commission head Gary against Leni
17:29
Speaker 3: Khan in particular has distinguished herself for a sort of
17:35
Speaker 3: pro competitive, quite aggressive approach to at least a starting
17:40
Speaker 3: to regulate big tech companies and others. Then more generally,
17:43
Speaker 3: I would say, there's a sort of interesting dividing line
17:46
Speaker 3: between right and left in large parts of the world now,
17:51
Speaker 3: where it's actually the left of the progressive side that
17:55
Speaker 3: is talking more. I don't know if they've done a
17:57
Speaker 3: lot more, but talking a lot more about competition and
18:01
Speaker 3: worried about concentration of corporate power. I Nikan is a
18:05
Speaker 3: sort of symbolic figure for many people and the more
18:08
Speaker 3: progressive side of Democrats, because she has been considered to
18:11
Speaker 3: be quite radical. Kamala Harras worry about that whether or
18:15
Speaker 3: not she gets reappointed, is that going to be a
18:17
Speaker 3: key issue.
18:18
Speaker 2: A very high quality news organization, Bloomberg that wrote a
18:23
Speaker 2: story about how donors and supporters of Kamala Harris were
18:29
Speaker 2: suggesting that their support or donations should be conditioned upon
18:35
Speaker 2: the removal of her, and I wasn't quoted in that story,
18:38
Speaker 2: but I was called about it, and I said that
18:41
Speaker 2: I thought that was highly premature and ridiculous. Other than that,
18:47
Speaker 2: completely true and the reason I do believe that, first
18:53
Speaker 2: of all, you had anti trust policy and competition policy.
18:58
Speaker 2: There hasn't been a single change in law since probably
19:03
Speaker 2: two thousand or earlier. I said in twenty seventeen that
19:08
Speaker 2: I thought one of the most difficult professional jobs in
19:12
Speaker 2: America under President Trump was to be an anti trust lawyer,
19:17
Speaker 2: because the law didn't really matter. It was whether he
19:21
Speaker 2: liked you or not. So he went after the Time
19:25
Speaker 2: Warner Att merger because he hated CNN, and of course
19:30
Speaker 2: they got thrown out in court. We had an experience
19:33
Speaker 2: where we had a merger held at Evercore held up
19:38
Speaker 2: under Syphius, which was, by the way, a merger of
19:42
Speaker 2: two US companies had nothing to do with Syphius.
19:45
Speaker 3: Syphius is the American law that is used just to
19:49
Speaker 3: prevent foreign companies from taking big stakes of US company.
19:53
Speaker 2: Yes, buying US companies. So this was two American companies
19:56
Speaker 2: and it was held up for a long time, and
19:59
Speaker 2: then one of the companies decided to redomicile one of
20:04
Speaker 2: their headquarters back into the United States and lo and
20:08
Speaker 2: behold a week later the merger got approved. Nothing to
20:12
Speaker 2: do with law, I think the current group and Lena
20:16
Speaker 2: Khan is the tip of the spear there, but the
20:20
Speaker 2: Assistant Attorney General for Anti Trust is certainly part of
20:24
Speaker 2: that as well Kaplan. They've been definitely more aggressive in
20:29
Speaker 2: their interpretation of the law. They've gone to court a
20:33
Speaker 2: number of times and lost, they've won a couple And
20:37
Speaker 2: so we spend a lot of time at Evercore with
20:40
Speaker 2: companies talking about mergers, and this is always a part
20:43
Speaker 2: of the discussion. And I would say the prevailing view
20:46
Speaker 2: among larger companies today is if we believe the laws
20:52
Speaker 2: on our side, we may be challenged, but we'll go
20:54
Speaker 2: to court and we'll win. I do think my guess
20:58
Speaker 2: would be that there would be a somewhat moderated view
21:03
Speaker 2: of that particular of the FTC and the assistant Attorney
21:07
Speaker 2: General for Andy Trust under Vice President Harris, with her
21:11
Speaker 2: legal background and sensitivity to some of the issues that
21:16
Speaker 2: business cares about, might care a little bit more about
21:20
Speaker 2: how those particular roles are executed.
21:24
Speaker 3: There are some who say that it potentially more influential
21:30
Speaker 3: than you would think. Point of disagreement between Trump and
21:34
Speaker 3: Harris as asked you to crypto because it is gaining
21:38
Speaker 3: so many Ficinado's, particularly in kind of demographics that Kamala
21:43
Speaker 3: Harris is trying to attract. And Trump has changed his
21:46
Speaker 3: view on crypto but has now been pretty positive about it.
21:50
Speaker 3: We think that's partly why Elon Mosque is so supportive
21:52
Speaker 3: of him, whereas Gary Goesler stands for a much more
21:55
Speaker 3: circumspect and potentially negative approach. Do you think that is
21:59
Speaker 3: we are underestimating how much that masses.
22:02
Speaker 2: I would say it to me, it's a fringe issue,
22:06
Speaker 2: not a central issue. I think the change on President
22:12
Speaker 2: Trump's part has been definitely linked in a pretty material
22:17
Speaker 2: way to the contributions that have been made. There's an
22:23
Speaker 2: interest group out there that has a pack that is
22:25
Speaker 2: giving tens of millions of not hundreds of millions of
22:29
Speaker 2: dollars in this election cycle to crypto friendly candidates, including
22:37
Speaker 2: former President Trump.
22:39
Speaker 3: But you're sitting in a mainstream Wall Street maybe you'd
22:42
Speaker 3: always say.
22:43
Speaker 2: That I must say, I'm in the world that things
22:46
Speaker 2: are not probably a complete paleoanthic erea troglodite. I have
22:53
Speaker 2: said in the past that to me, the valuation of
22:56
Speaker 2: bitcoin reminded me of the beanie baby create But I
23:01
Speaker 2: think that's turned out to be and not necessarily correct view.
23:06
Speaker 2: And I think it remains to be seen whether there
23:10
Speaker 2: are any mainstream uses of these electronic monetary vehicles other
23:18
Speaker 2: than a store of value and speculation.
23:21
Speaker 4: I want you to ask about something else, which is
23:23
Speaker 4: what might be briefly called woke capital, or the passion
23:27
Speaker 4: for micro intervention in the way that businesses run themselves
23:31
Speaker 4: THROUGHDI and ESD and the rest of it. Is Vice
23:37
Speaker 4: President Harris an advocate of that, and if she is,
23:40
Speaker 4: is that a problem for business?
23:42
Speaker 2: I think the I'm very passionate about the objectives of
23:48
Speaker 2: some of that. I think they're really good business reasons
23:51
Speaker 2: to have a diverse workforce, and I can articulate those
23:55
Speaker 2: for you if you want. But I do think the
24:00
Speaker 2: prescriptive nature of this, which has been broadly thrown into
24:04
Speaker 2: the pejorative term woke capitalism, is not necessary? Is overdone?
24:10
Speaker 2: I really do And I stepped down as a CEO
24:14
Speaker 2: of Evercore about two and a half years ago, and
24:17
Speaker 2: one of the things I've said privately more than once
24:21
Speaker 2: is that being the CEO of a public company today
24:26
Speaker 2: is just a lot more challenging and less clear as
24:33
Speaker 2: to what you're really trying to accomplish. Evercore is a
24:37
Speaker 2: independent investment banking firm. We don't have any balance sheet,
24:41
Speaker 2: we have offices, and the idea that we would be
24:44
Speaker 2: required to file a lengthy environmental statement about whether our
24:51
Speaker 2: buildings are eco friendly or not is in my view,
24:56
Speaker 2: complete nonsense. Obviously, if you're a chemical company be focused
25:00
Speaker 2: on that. If you're an energy company, should be focused
25:04
Speaker 2: on the environmental aspects of your business. But this has
25:08
Speaker 2: gone It has gone way too far. The goals that
25:12
Speaker 2: they're trying to achieve are laudable. What's gone way overboard
25:16
Speaker 2: is the prescriptive exuberance with which they pursue them.
25:20
Speaker 3: From the sort of everical perspective, Should anyone be trading
25:24
Speaker 3: this election? How does one trade this election?
25:26
Speaker 2: I'm not sure how to trade even without an election,
25:29
Speaker 2: so with an election it becomes harder. I'm just not
25:32
Speaker 2: I think the only thing that I do think is
25:36
Speaker 2: truly market effecting is I do believe that if Trump
25:43
Speaker 2: were to pursue the tariff policies that he's discussed in
25:49
Speaker 2: the campaign, and it's not clear to me that he
25:51
Speaker 2: would pursue them, but if he were to pursue those,
25:55
Speaker 2: which would be very high tariffs across the board and
26:00
Speaker 2: much using that as the principal source of new revenue
26:03
Speaker 2: for the finance the government, I think that will have
26:07
Speaker 2: a very chilling effect on the markets, and because it
26:12
Speaker 2: will be widely perceived to be anti trade and inflationary,
26:17
Speaker 2: and I think neither of those things are good for
26:20
Speaker 2: equity markets.
26:21
Speaker 3: It's interesting you say that there is a Wall Street
26:23
Speaker 3: view that I would say is quite common, which is
26:25
Speaker 3: that longer term, the macroeconomic mix under Donald Trump would
26:30
Speaker 3: undoubtedly be less sustainable, more risky band for the US,
26:35
Speaker 3: band for the world, higher inflation, as you say, reduced
26:39
Speaker 3: trade connections, and an enormous deficit. It's going to be
26:43
Speaker 3: pretty large under either administration, but under a completely out
26:47
Speaker 3: of control deficit. But I've seen plenty of notes coming
26:52
Speaker 3: through my email saying it will be bullish for risk
26:56
Speaker 3: assets in the first year or so. Because you would
26:59
Speaker 3: have this text, you would have a feeling that business
27:04
Speaker 3: was not going to be constrained by regulations, by the
27:07
Speaker 3: long arm of the state. All these things that have
27:09
Speaker 3: been you even just talked about just now.
27:11
Speaker 2: I think it's interesting. I remember that in twenty sixteen
27:15
Speaker 2: the election. I happened to be in Paris at the time,
27:20
Speaker 2: and my phone rang at five in the morning and
27:23
Speaker 2: it was Ed Hyman, who was the founder of ISI
27:27
Speaker 2: and now the chairman of Evercore ISI, and the noted
27:31
Speaker 2: I think he's won number one in institutional investor research
27:36
Speaker 2: for over forty years as economist. And he said he
27:39
Speaker 2: was in Tokyo and he was about to speak to
27:41
Speaker 2: a bunch of institutional investors and at that point it
27:45
Speaker 2: was clear that Trump was going to be elected, and
27:49
Speaker 2: the S and P was down a thousand points futures
27:52
Speaker 2: not the market, and he said, what should I say?
27:55
Speaker 2: And I said, if you want to be controversial or provocative,
28:00
Speaker 2: and I said, I really believe this, by the way,
28:02
Speaker 2: I think you should say that notwithstanding the fact that
28:05
Speaker 2: the S and P is down a thousand points. Futures
28:08
Speaker 2: are down a thousand points right now. By the time
28:10
Speaker 2: the market closes at four o'clock in New York, the
28:13
Speaker 2: market will be up. And he said, why do you
28:16
Speaker 2: say that? And I said, Donald Trump is going to
28:18
Speaker 2: be for lower corporate taxes, He's going to be for
28:21
Speaker 2: a stimulative fiscal policy, he's going to be for infrastructure investment.
28:26
Speaker 2: And that's very bullish for the equity markets, and people
28:28
Speaker 2: will realize that. And so he got up and said that,
28:30
Speaker 2: and it turned out to me, I'm only telling you
28:32
Speaker 2: this story because for once I was right, and I
28:35
Speaker 2: do think that the initial effect. Let's take the corporate
28:39
Speaker 2: tax rate, for example, which is a twenty one percent
28:42
Speaker 2: right now, leaving a side state and local taxes, which
28:47
Speaker 2: are won't be changing much. If it's a twenty one percent,
28:51
Speaker 2: for every dollar a company makes, seventy nine cents of
28:56
Speaker 2: it will go to its shareholders and twenty one cents
28:59
Speaker 2: to the US government. If it's at twenty eight percent,
29:03
Speaker 2: as Vice President Harris has suggested, and I'm not sure
29:06
Speaker 2: it'll ever get that high again, but that's a seven
29:10
Speaker 2: percentage point off of seventy nine, which is like a
29:13
Speaker 2: ten percent decline in corporate earnings. Ultimately, that filters through
29:19
Speaker 2: to the valuation of stocks. If it's at fifteen percent,
29:23
Speaker 2: that's six points on. It's a seven and a half
29:27
Speaker 2: percent increase in what shareholders will get. The math's pretty simple.
29:33
Speaker 2: I think that point alone will provide if Trump is elected,
29:38
Speaker 2: will provide a little bit of following wind to the
29:42
Speaker 2: stock market.
29:43
Speaker 3: But one thing we have in the UK is some
29:46
Speaker 3: quite a lot of concern in the City of London
29:49
Speaker 3: and elsewhere. That's the moves that the government, that the
29:53
Speaker 3: new labor government might make to increase the amount of
29:56
Speaker 3: money coming from the richest and from wealth already encouraging
30:01
Speaker 3: people to leave for Italy or leave for America. Quite
30:04
Speaker 3: a lot of concern about capital flight. Do you think
30:07
Speaker 3: there's any issue around that if Kamala Harris stays in
30:10
Speaker 3: just as a sort of attractiveness of the US versus
30:14
Speaker 3: other places, as a wealthy person for wealthy people. I
30:18
Speaker 3: may not referring to you specifically as a wealthy person,
30:20
Speaker 3: but I bet you hang out with a few.
30:24
Speaker 2: I'll tell you my personal view on this first. My
30:26
Speaker 2: personal view on this is my parents were both immigrants.
30:30
Speaker 2: My father was a bartender and I've managed to do
30:35
Speaker 2: reasonably well in my life. I have an enormous amount
30:38
Speaker 2: of gratitude and appreciation both for the United States and
30:43
Speaker 2: the opportunities it provides and for New York City. I'm
30:47
Speaker 2: not one of these people who's gonna abandon ship because
30:51
Speaker 2: I can save a little money on or a lot
30:53
Speaker 2: of money on taxes. I think you have to look
30:56
Speaker 2: at for the broader question. It's pretty donning what has
31:01
Speaker 2: happened in the world in terms of the US economy
31:06
Speaker 2: and the US markets relative to the Europe's and relative
31:10
Speaker 2: to the Japan's. And if you look at in two
31:14
Speaker 2: thousand and eight, the GDP of Europe including the UK,
31:19
Speaker 2: and the US were roughly equal. By twenty and sixteen,
31:24
Speaker 2: the US was about fifty percent higher, and today it's
31:27
Speaker 2: almost double. Taxes are about gee, what do you get
31:33
Speaker 2: to keep of what you've made? The opportunities to make
31:38
Speaker 2: are so great in the US relative to other places
31:42
Speaker 2: in the world. Even with Lena Khan sitting in the
31:45
Speaker 2: seat that she sits in and Gary Gensler sitting in
31:48
Speaker 2: the seat that he sits in, I think people should
31:52
Speaker 2: maybe people who are sitting on a lot of money
31:54
Speaker 2: are going to attract it the places like Monaco and Litgenstein,
31:58
Speaker 2: in places like that. But the last time I went
32:01
Speaker 2: to the opera, I wasn't overwhelmed with the quality of
32:05
Speaker 2: the performance.
32:07
Speaker 4: Why hasn't that extraordinary economic growth in the US translated
32:12
Speaker 4: into more optimistic sentiments. Why is an incumbent struggling to
32:16
Speaker 4: be re elected after this incredible economic boom?
32:20
Speaker 2: It is shocking. Actually, I think it's a really good question,
32:25
Speaker 2: and I think the reason for it is the widespread
32:31
Speaker 2: and pernicious effect on people's psyches of inflation. I was
32:38
Speaker 2: working in the White House in between nineteen seventy seven
32:41
Speaker 2: and nineteen early eighty one under President Carter, when we
32:45
Speaker 2: had the greatest inflation in the history of the United States.
32:49
Speaker 2: And I have said a number of times to people
32:52
Speaker 2: who worked in the Biden administration that you have to
32:57
Speaker 2: recognize that is something that touches every single person in
33:04
Speaker 2: the country in a negative way. And when you when
33:09
Speaker 2: your wages go up, but you're spending You go into
33:12
Speaker 2: the grocery store every week and you're spending twenty percent,
33:15
Speaker 2: thirty percent, forty percent more for eggs and milk and
33:19
Speaker 2: things that you buy every week. It's or for gasoline.
33:23
Speaker 2: It's in your face, and it's it's really discouraging and
33:30
Speaker 2: off putting. And I think, to me, unemployment's horrible, but
33:35
Speaker 2: it touches if unemployment's high, it's six percent or seven percent,
33:39
Speaker 2: it touches a relatively small portion of the economy of
33:43
Speaker 2: the voter population and their families and friends and such.
33:46
Speaker 2: It's certainly a big issue, and its effect obviously on
33:50
Speaker 2: those people is huge. Is more dramatic than inflation, But
33:54
Speaker 2: inflation touches everybody, and it's a in my view, it's
33:57
Speaker 2: a cloud over the confidence that people have about the economy.
34:03
Speaker 3: So Ralph Rap, you've given us a lot of time.
34:05
Speaker 3: We're going to let you go. In a second. I
34:06
Speaker 3: can't help ask you, if you were in Paris on
34:09
Speaker 3: the night of the twenty sixteen, where are you're planning
34:13
Speaker 3: to be for this for this election, and maybe cast
34:16
Speaker 3: some light on whether what you think.
34:18
Speaker 2: I'm going to be in New York. I'm going to
34:20
Speaker 2: be with my two children and a bunch of friends
34:23
Speaker 2: that I'm an election party somewhere, and gosh, I have
34:28
Speaker 2: no better insight into who's going to win than I
34:31
Speaker 2: do into what the markets are going to do. Between
34:34
Speaker 2: now and the end of the year, I hope it's
34:37
Speaker 2: Vice President Harris. I actually think she's better for the country.
34:43
Speaker 2: I think she's younger, she brings us. I think to me,
34:46
Speaker 2: one of the great issues in our country and globally
34:51
Speaker 2: is the widening gap of wealth between the one percent
34:57
Speaker 2: and then the other ninety nine percent, and particularly the
35:00
Speaker 2: eighty percent that is the middle class and those who
35:05
Speaker 2: have less means than the middle class. And I think
35:07
Speaker 2: she's really attentive to that, and I believe that issue, unattended,
35:14
Speaker 2: will ultimately corrode support for capitalism and free democratic institutions.
35:21
Speaker 3: Ralph last, thank you very much for joining us.
35:25
Speaker 1: Thanks for listening to this week's Votonomics from Bloomberg. This
35:29
Speaker 1: episode was hosted by me alegra Stratton with Stephanie Flanders
35:32
Speaker 1: and Adrian Wooldridge. It was produced by Somersadi, production support
35:37
Speaker 1: from Chris Martlu and Isabella Ward. Sound designed by Blake Maples.
35:41
Speaker 1: Brendan Francis Newnham is our executive producer. Sage Bauman is
35:46
Speaker 1: head of Podcasts and special Thanks to Ralph Schlosstein and
35:50
Speaker 1: Emilie Nicole. Please subscribe, rate, and review wherever you listen
35:54
Speaker 1: to podcasts