Latest / The Alex Marlow Show / Stock Bloodbath Explained, Socialists Take L.A., Lawfare Ramping Up Against MAGA

Transcript

Stock Bloodbath Explained, Socialists Take L.A., Lawfare Ramping Up Against MAGA · The Alex Marlow Show

0:00
Speaker 1: It's the Alex Marlowe Show. The Alex Marlowe Show. I'm
0:03
Speaker 1: glad you're here. We're still processing the bloodbath election for Republicans.
0:09
Speaker 1: I've got some silver linings to point out today. I've
0:12
Speaker 1: got also a lot of bad signs, and we're starting
0:15
Speaker 1: to see some of the fallout from the elections, plus
0:18
Speaker 1: still results are trickling in. The biggest one, I would
0:21
Speaker 1: say from overnight, is that Nithya Raman looks poised to
0:25
Speaker 1: become the next mayor of LA, and I think that
0:28
Speaker 1: is a wild thing that we would have all of
0:31
Speaker 1: a sudden a person who is a socialist in LA
0:34
Speaker 1: because of the fact that LA was not socialist enough,
0:37
Speaker 1: I guess. The solution is going to be more socialist.
0:40
Speaker 1: And I'm okay with it for a couple of things.
0:43
Speaker 1: One of the reasons is because Karen Bass, who is
0:46
Speaker 1: a retarded person who is currently our mayor, she let
0:49
Speaker 1: the city burn down. And I do think that that
0:52
Speaker 1: does count. So that counts for me. And I feel
0:55
Speaker 1: like there are some things beyond ideology and politics. And
0:58
Speaker 1: it's Karen Bass who literally was a communist. She was
1:01
Speaker 1: a communist. She studied under communists. She was a person
1:05
Speaker 1: who was an acolyte at Castro's. So it's not like
1:08
Speaker 1: she's some sort of a moderate. But that person, if
1:10
Speaker 1: you're in charge and you go to Africa while the
1:13
Speaker 1: city burns down, then you should not be elected to
1:15
Speaker 1: anything ever again. There should be a basic threshold for
1:18
Speaker 1: competence in our country, which we don't have. And I
1:21
Speaker 1: don't know why we don't have it, but we should.
1:24
Speaker 1: And I think that there are certain things that cross
1:26
Speaker 1: the threshold of you are too incompetent to serve in
1:30
Speaker 1: public office. So I think she fell beneath that threshold,
1:34
Speaker 1: and I, of course, would have rather seen Spencer Pratt
1:36
Speaker 1: be the mayor. I don't have a full say, though,
1:39
Speaker 1: as I've noted on the show many times. I live
1:41
Speaker 1: in L.A. County but not L.A. City, so I don't
1:43
Speaker 1: get the vote for the mayor's race. But I probably
1:46
Speaker 1: would have abstained if I voted in general, but I
1:48
Speaker 1: certainly wouldn't have voted for Bass. I mean, she would
1:51
Speaker 1: never have gotten my vote. It's sort of a similar
1:53
Speaker 1: thing for when I endorse Zohar Mamdani over Andrew Cuomo,
1:58
Speaker 1: partially because of the accelerationism and there's a trolliness to
2:01
Speaker 1: it a little bit. But Cuomo also, to me, he
2:05
Speaker 1: had hit that threshold of incompetence that you're no longer
2:09
Speaker 1: allowed to serve in public office because of his nursing
2:11
Speaker 1: home policy during the pandemic, where he was forcing sick
2:15
Speaker 1: people into confined spaces with the elderly was just shy
2:20
Speaker 1: of murderous. And the fact that he did that, I
2:23
Speaker 1: think that you're no longer allowed to hold public office.
2:26
Speaker 1: You can run a sports bar or you can podcast
2:28
Speaker 1: or you can blog or you can paint houses. But
2:33
Speaker 1: you can't have anything where you're elected to stuff. You
2:36
Speaker 1: no longer get to be elected to things once you
2:40
Speaker 1: have a policy that you support publicly. that leads to
2:42
Speaker 1: mass death. Okay. So that's just one of those things
2:44
Speaker 1: I got. So we'll see the person who was in
2:48
Speaker 1: charge of LA's homelessness now in charge of the whole city.
2:53
Speaker 1: Now imagine that what a strange place we're in. If
2:55
Speaker 1: you want to talk about something discouraging is that we
2:58
Speaker 1: keep promoting people who are completely incapable of doing medium
3:04
Speaker 1: sized jobs. We keep promoting them to bigger jobs. So
3:09
Speaker 1: Nithya Raman chaired the Los Angeles City Council's Housing and
3:13
Speaker 1: Homelessness Committee from 2023 to 2026. So you can blame
3:19
Speaker 1: Bass too for some of the homelessness, but imagine thinking
3:22
Speaker 1: Bass is not good enough. So let's get the person
3:24
Speaker 1: who is in charge of homelessness, the thing that embarrasses
3:29
Speaker 1: our city throughout the world. LA is known for our
3:32
Speaker 1: homelessness and the fact that so many public monuments, so
3:35
Speaker 1: many places for gathering for families have now been completely
3:39
Speaker 1: overrun by vagrants. Let's put the person who's in charge
3:43
Speaker 1: of dealing with that and doing a terrible job, let's
3:47
Speaker 1: put her in charge of everything, especially when she's an
3:49
Speaker 1: open socialist and does all sorts of radical things. I mean,
3:52
Speaker 1: just her whole stance on policing is she is explicitly
3:57
Speaker 1: called for defunding the police. The city has gotten incredibly unsafe.
4:02
Speaker 1: where everyone has either been a victim of a crime
4:06
Speaker 1: or knows someone firsthand who's been a victim of a crime.
4:10
Speaker 1: It is when you're in the city of LA, there
4:12
Speaker 1: is noticeable apprehension that you're going to get mugged, you're
4:16
Speaker 1: going to get robbed, people are going to break into
4:17
Speaker 1: your cars, and it's been going on for a long time.
4:20
Speaker 1: And Rahman has been explicitly a defund the police person.
4:25
Speaker 1: And she has said that she wants to transform the
4:29
Speaker 1: LAPD into a much smaller specialized force. And she wants
4:35
Speaker 1: to shift resources to social services. Because that's been known
4:40
Speaker 1: to deter violent crime. It's just also fascinating how we
4:45
Speaker 1: won't learn lessons collectively as a society. Look at D.C.,
4:50
Speaker 1: for example, which also elected a socialist, and you had
4:53
Speaker 1: Donald Trump come in, and because he lives there and
4:55
Speaker 1: he thinks D.C. could be a fantastic capital and said
4:58
Speaker 1: it's sort of an embarrassment in a lot of ways,
5:00
Speaker 1: he took over with the home rule stuff. He took
5:03
Speaker 1: over law enforcement, and now D.C. is completely secure. You
5:06
Speaker 1: could walk home with a buzz on throughout D.C., having
5:10
Speaker 1: a great time, your headphones in, and feel pretty comfortable.
5:14
Speaker 1: And that's all because of Donald Trump because there's cops everywhere.
5:16
Speaker 1: You walk around. It is– you feel like this would
5:20
Speaker 1: be a bad spot to commit any crimes because there's
5:22
Speaker 1: a cop every two, three blocks. And the plan now
5:26
Speaker 1: in LA, which has had a huge crime problem, is
5:29
Speaker 1: to defund the police or shrink the LAPD. And what's
5:32
Speaker 1: going to happen when she doesn't do it? What's going
5:34
Speaker 1: to happen when she doesn't really do it because she
5:35
Speaker 1: realizes it's pretty dumb to do it? So she's got the–
5:41
Speaker 1: all these homeless encampments. She's been a proponent of– expanding the,
5:48
Speaker 1: these ordinances of the, she's been one of the reasons
5:54
Speaker 1: why we have so many of these camps. And what's
5:58
Speaker 1: created here is a environment where these, these become drug
6:04
Speaker 1: dens and crime dens and rape dens and very comfortable
6:08
Speaker 1: with all this stuff. So we'll see what happens here,
6:11
Speaker 1: but she's also a big DSA person, a, she's someone
6:15
Speaker 1: who is really invested in the genocide that Israel is
6:19
Speaker 1: committing on Palestine, which is obviously not a thing. But
6:23
Speaker 1: she calls what Israel does in Gaza genocide. She's the
6:29
Speaker 1: mayor of LA. This is one where I don't get
6:34
Speaker 1: why mayors are asked about this stuff at all. I
6:36
Speaker 1: shouldn't know her opinion. I don't want to know her
6:39
Speaker 1: opinion on Gaza. She's the mayor of LA.
6:42
Speaker 2: I don't.
6:42
Speaker 1: And there's a huge Jewish population in L.A., and this
6:44
Speaker 1: is who you're going to get. You're going to get
6:46
Speaker 1: a person who thinks that the one Jewish state on
6:48
Speaker 1: Earth of 8, 9 million people, they're terrorizing the whole
6:52
Speaker 1: planet when they're surrounded by a sea of Islamic dictatorships
6:56
Speaker 1: and military– I'm sorry, militant Islamist governments. The one Jewish
7:02
Speaker 1: state on Earth, they're just terrorizing the whole region. And
7:05
Speaker 1: how does that affect the city of L.A., which has
7:07
Speaker 1: become unaffordable and crime-ridden and homeless everywhere? It's just Let's
7:13
Speaker 1: just see what happens. She's also a big tenant protection person,
7:16
Speaker 1: which means that it's really hard to evict people. She
7:20
Speaker 1: wants to strengthen rent stabilization, which means she wants rent
7:23
Speaker 1: control as much as she can and all sorts of
7:27
Speaker 1: gender DEI stuff. Let's just see how it goes. Let's
7:30
Speaker 1: see how it goes. Other news that's breaking. We're keeping
7:37
Speaker 1: an eye on the Mississippi Senate race. We're not getting
7:39
Speaker 1: answers right away, but the Democrat ahead by about 1,500
7:42
Speaker 1: votes in that one. So another one where I've been
7:44
Speaker 1: told that Cindy Hyde-Smith, who's out there, the Republican, not
7:47
Speaker 1: taking a race seriously. And the real Dan Sullivan seems
7:50
Speaker 1: convinced he's going to win in Alaska. I don't know
7:53
Speaker 1: if I believe it, but he thinks that it's going
7:56
Speaker 1: to go to rank choice because no one will have
7:58
Speaker 1: gotten 50% of the vote. And so the way the
7:59
Speaker 1: rank choice votes is that the people who did not
8:03
Speaker 1: get in the– were not the top did not select
8:07
Speaker 1: the top vote-getter first. They're going to get their second
8:11
Speaker 1: choice and so on. And Dan Sullivan, the real Dan Sullivan,
8:14
Speaker 1: thinks he is going to get a bump from that,
8:18
Speaker 1: which is interesting because ranked choice voting has traditionally favored
8:22
Speaker 1: more liberal Democrats. So we'll see in this case if
8:25
Speaker 1: he's right. So hopefully that's the case. But we're just
8:29
Speaker 1: starting to get an agenda that from the Democrats with
8:33
Speaker 1: their top priorities are. And I'm going to spend quite
8:35
Speaker 1: a bit of the show going through that, plus some
8:37
Speaker 1: more reflections that I've had on the election and what
8:40
Speaker 1: it means. But I'm going to go through some of
8:41
Speaker 1: the polling, some of the exit polls to show you
8:44
Speaker 1: how we really lost and some of the messages that
8:46
Speaker 1: were missing. But we're going to see a real interesting
8:49
Speaker 1: civil war between the Democrats who are going to have
8:52
Speaker 1: a choice between whether or not they're going to want
8:55
Speaker 1: to do retributive stuff, lawfare, prosecuting people who are associated
8:59
Speaker 1: with the Trump campaign. They're going to do some of that.
9:00
Speaker 1: Maybe they'll do a lot. trying to punish businesses that
9:03
Speaker 1: have donated to the Trump campaign. All that's going to happen.
9:06
Speaker 1: Or are they going to try to take a more
9:08
Speaker 1: mature approach and try to just create legislation that maybe
9:11
Speaker 1: has economic populism in it and try to send it
9:14
Speaker 1: to Trump and see if he'll sign it? And then
9:15
Speaker 1: if he doesn't, then you get the moral high ground.
9:18
Speaker 1: We'll see what they do, but I think I've got
9:20
Speaker 1: some insight into what it's going to be, and I'll
9:23
Speaker 1: share some of that after the break. But first, I
9:24
Speaker 1: want to tell you about medical-grade red light therapy. You
9:27
Speaker 1: can use it for your pain, And if the cost
9:29
Speaker 1: has been holding you back, well, it shouldn't anymore because
9:32
Speaker 1: at SunPowerLED, you can now use eligible HSA and FSA
9:37
Speaker 1: funds towards any device. I've been using the SuperPOM 1050.
9:40
Speaker 1: It's a handheld. I use it at home for my
9:42
Speaker 1: knee and my back, and I really do feel the difference.
9:45
Speaker 1: And there's also a helmet that I got, and I've
9:48
Speaker 1: tried it, and I have a friend using it right now.
9:50
Speaker 1: There's incredible science behind it. It's called photobiomodulation or PBM.
9:54
Speaker 1: And according to the PBM Foundation, there's more than 100
9:56
Speaker 1: million patient treatments that have been performed without any... side effects.
10:00
Speaker 1: And that's something that is, to me, pure maha. Medical
10:03
Speaker 1: grade SuperPOM 1050 has got a patent-pended cooling system. It
10:07
Speaker 1: creates a wall of light. That's what the technology is called.
10:10
Speaker 1: Spreads light evenly across a wider treatment area, making it
10:13
Speaker 1: more effective than any of the alternative technologies available. My
10:16
Speaker 1: friend Tom Kerber has been making this affordable, those HSA
10:19
Speaker 1: and FSA funds. Plus, if you use code MARLO, you
10:23
Speaker 1: get 10% off. So sunpowerled.com, HSA plus FSA, code MARLO
10:27
Speaker 1: for 10% off. There's no excuse now. Try it. Give
10:30
Speaker 1: it a shot, sunpowerled.com. Who answers America's call for more energy?
10:40
Speaker 1: People do. Chevron is helping fuel national energy security. Their U.S.
10:45
Speaker 1: production has increased by nearly 60% in the past three years.
10:48
Speaker 1: And with plans to invest over $ 10 billion in U.S.
10:51
Speaker 1: energy projects in 2026, they're helping boost economies, create better jobs,
10:57
Speaker 1: and build an America powered by America's own energy. Learn
11:01
Speaker 1: more about what Chevron's people do at Chevron.com slash America.
11:06
Speaker 1: Let me ask you, when the next healthcare skit When
11:09
Speaker 1: the next health scare hits the headlines, are you ready
11:13
Speaker 1: or are you just going to feel helpless again? Back
11:16
Speaker 1: in 2020, the late Zev Zelenko watched his own patients
11:19
Speaker 1: feel the same helplessness and he decided to do something
11:22
Speaker 1: about it. He was a frontline physician. He interviewed everywhere,
11:25
Speaker 1: consulted with the White House during the pandemic. President Trump
11:28
Speaker 1: even mentioned him in a press conference. And he formulated
11:31
Speaker 1: his Z-Stack so people could fight back with their own
11:34
Speaker 1: immune system and And the exact doses, he formulated this
11:37
Speaker 1: perfectly so you have everything you need for a healthy
11:40
Speaker 1: immune system. He was attacked for it. He was deplatformed.
11:44
Speaker 1: But he was proven right. And today, his original formula
11:46
Speaker 1: carries on his legacy. So you don't have to wait
11:49
Speaker 1: for the next health care. You can take control of
11:51
Speaker 1: your immune system today. Give your body what it needs
11:54
Speaker 1: to fight. They're offering the biggest discount ever right now,
11:57
Speaker 1: $ 4. 95 plus shipping and handling. And you get quite a deal,
12:01
Speaker 1: quite a good amount of product for that, I will
12:04
Speaker 1: tell you. $ 4. 95 plus shipping and handling, ZStackLife.com slash Alex.
12:08
Speaker 1: That's the website, ZStackLife.com slash Alex. All right, other breaking
12:13
Speaker 1: news that we're looking at right now is that Harmeet
12:16
Speaker 1: Dhillon has apparently resigned as DOJ's Assistant Attorney General. It's
12:20
Speaker 1: interesting to see if we're going to get any quick
12:22
Speaker 1: turnaround from some of this stuff. Harmeet's done a good
12:25
Speaker 1: job in that role. She's been very aggressive. She's very proactive.
12:28
Speaker 1: She doesn't wait around to start doing stuff, tries to
12:31
Speaker 1: get stuff done. So, I'm very interested to see what's
12:35
Speaker 1: going to happen there, uh, with, in terms of any
12:39
Speaker 1: sort of, uh, turnover. There's talk of, will Marco Rubio resign?
12:45
Speaker 1: And the trick is that if you resign, then in
12:49
Speaker 1: the lame duck, then we could get people approved in
12:51
Speaker 1: the Senate very quickly. Um, I don't know if that's true.
12:54
Speaker 1: In fact, I talked to White House source yesterday who
12:56
Speaker 1: said he had not heard anything about that, but you
12:59
Speaker 1: never know. Um, Is Pete Hegseth on the chopping block?
13:02
Speaker 1: That's another one that I've heard, and that one does
13:04
Speaker 1: sound more credible. It sounds more credible that Trump is
13:06
Speaker 1: considering whether or not– there's one specific failing in the
13:10
Speaker 1: Iran war, which is that I don't think there was
13:13
Speaker 1: enough calculation that was done to see if Iran muddies
13:18
Speaker 1: up the strait, how much of a downstream effect that's
13:20
Speaker 1: going to have on the economy and how hard that
13:23
Speaker 1: was going to be to navigate. That may have been
13:25
Speaker 1: an oversight that Trump might be looking to pin the
13:27
Speaker 1: blame on someone, and Hegseth as Secretary of War could
13:30
Speaker 1: be a good candidate for that. I don't know if
13:32
Speaker 1: that's entirely justified, but that is the chatter, and I
13:34
Speaker 1: do think that there is a path forward that could
13:38
Speaker 1: see Hegseth getting moved out, and I don't know who
13:40
Speaker 1: would come in. Ron DeSantis is a name that's been
13:44
Speaker 1: thrown out, probably could get Senate confirmation. Even with a
13:50
Speaker 1: Democrat Senate, there's a chance he could get through. because
13:54
Speaker 1: he's got impeccable credentials. DeSantis' resume is unbelievable. And again,
13:59
Speaker 1: he was a great governor of Florida, very bad presidential
14:01
Speaker 1: candidate in 2020, but he does kind of have a
14:04
Speaker 1: perfect resume. And so any job he wants, he could
14:08
Speaker 1: get it, but he's going to run for president. And
14:11
Speaker 1: will he want to just take this job for what
14:14
Speaker 1: would it be a year? And then he'd have to
14:15
Speaker 1: probably resign then to run for office. So All that
14:19
Speaker 1: is intriguing, and I will give you, to the best
14:22
Speaker 1: of my knowledge, what's going on there as best I can.
14:26
Speaker 1: I've got a cut of DeSantis who was cooking on
14:28
Speaker 1: Laura Ingraham's show yesterday. Let me play cut 25 for
14:31
Speaker 1: you guys.
14:34
Speaker 3: If you're going to do huge conservative things that are
14:38
Speaker 3: going to reorient the country for a generation, fine. But
14:41
Speaker 3: I saw no indication that the current group of Republican
14:45
Speaker 3: senators were interested in doing that type of bold conservative change.
14:50
Speaker 3: I mean, why haven't we done immigration? Shut off H-1B visas.
14:55
Speaker 3: Why haven't we codified Trump's immigration executive orders? There's so...
14:59
Speaker 3: Why haven't we... Strip jurisdiction from the federal courts over
15:04
Speaker 3: deportation cases. There's so many things that could have been done.
15:08
Speaker 3: They didn't even attempt it, Laura. They would say, oh,
15:10
Speaker 3: if only we needed 50 votes, we would have done it.
15:12
Speaker 3: You don't have 50 votes for doing conservative things. You've
15:15
Speaker 3: never shown that you'll do conservative things even with 50 votes.
15:21
Speaker 1: This is exactly right. And I said this specifically on
15:26
Speaker 1: the show yesterday. I kind of was almost yelling it
15:28
Speaker 1: on the show is that the Republican Senate and House
15:30
Speaker 1: does nothing. And there will be a lot of finger
15:32
Speaker 1: pointing at Trump. There'll be a lot of blaming of Trump.
15:34
Speaker 1: There'll be a lot of blaming of the Iran war.
15:36
Speaker 1: And I'm not saying none of that counts. Of course,
15:39
Speaker 1: it counts. And I do think there's a significant thing
15:41
Speaker 1: that happened that a lot of people signed up for
15:43
Speaker 1: MAGA because of economic populism. And then we find ourselves
15:47
Speaker 1: in the Iran war and it's driving prices up. And
15:49
Speaker 1: so the economic populism wasn't delivered at the level we thought.
15:53
Speaker 1: And people are disappointed. So they punish Republicans and Trump
15:56
Speaker 1: and MAGA. All that's obvious. I understand that happened. But
16:01
Speaker 1: it is underrated how little the both Republican Congresses, the
16:06
Speaker 1: Senate and the House, how little they got done. And
16:09
Speaker 1: the fact that they do it in such a way
16:10
Speaker 1: that they even lack charm, they lack charisma. MAGA Mike
16:14
Speaker 1: Johnson's already backing out. It's going to be Steve Scalise
16:17
Speaker 1: versus Jim Jordan for the minority leadership role. I'm pulling
16:21
Speaker 1: for Jordan. Both of them work nicely with us at Breitbart,
16:23
Speaker 1: but Jordan more aggressive and has been a supporter of
16:27
Speaker 1: mine personally. He's always nice to catch up with. So
16:29
Speaker 1: that would be a better scenario. John Thune apparently is
16:32
Speaker 1: hanging in there. He wants to be the minority leader.
16:35
Speaker 4: Why?
16:36
Speaker 1: What's in it for him? It sounds like a crap job.
16:38
Speaker 1: It really does. It really does not sound like a
16:39
Speaker 1: fun job. But Now we also will, and I'll comment
16:43
Speaker 1: on this after the break, who are going to be
16:45
Speaker 1: the leadership of the Democrat Party considering the new guard
16:48
Speaker 1: does not want Chuck Schumer? More on that when we
16:50
Speaker 1: come back.
16:50
Speaker 5: All right.
16:56
Speaker 1: I want to spend some time here breaking down. What's
17:00
Speaker 1: going on in the election? And the one other breaking
17:02
Speaker 1: news item that I feel compelled to mention on the
17:05
Speaker 1: show before I do that is Russell Brand found guilty
17:09
Speaker 1: of a count of rape and three counts of sexual
17:10
Speaker 1: assault in the UK. And Russell Brand is a comedian,
17:15
Speaker 1: actor and performer and is someone who should be familiar
17:18
Speaker 1: to almost all of you. And he's got some funny
17:20
Speaker 1: stuff and some good movies. But he's recently become a
17:23
Speaker 1: part of the manosphere and almost conservative podcast culture. It's
17:28
Speaker 1: just noteworthy because of his conviction. As I've said many
17:33
Speaker 1: times before on the show, it's always the people you
17:35
Speaker 1: most expect. This is a guy who's spoken openly about
17:38
Speaker 1: how he tried to bed 5,000 women, and that just
17:41
Speaker 1: makes you a creep. It's just too many. That's too many.
17:44
Speaker 1: That's too many. I'm not trying to be a prude here,
17:47
Speaker 1: but I'm saying that that's too many, and we need
17:50
Speaker 1: better leaders, and we need better influences on young males,
17:53
Speaker 1: and that this guy was developing a big following amongst
17:56
Speaker 1: conservative Christian young men, and then this is his past,
18:01
Speaker 1: and then now he's been convicted. He's a criminal. He's
18:03
Speaker 1: going to go to jail. We need better leaders. We do.
18:07
Speaker 1: We need better influences on young men. And I think
18:10
Speaker 1: we've talked about this as a movement, that young men
18:13
Speaker 1: are being abandoned, and they don't have good role models.
18:16
Speaker 1: And this is a terrible role model, a guy like this.
18:18
Speaker 1: But also, we don't have great role models apparently for
18:22
Speaker 1: young women as well because looking at the breakdown of
18:25
Speaker 1: the races from the swing states– and I do a
18:28
Speaker 1: little deeper dive than I'll go now on over the
18:31
Speaker 1: weekend with Emma Jo Morris. I just recorded a podcast
18:33
Speaker 1: with her, which will come out. We talk about this stuff.
18:36
Speaker 1: But women, particularly younger women, voting overwhelmingly for Democrats, women
18:41
Speaker 1: voting double digits for Democrats in all of those major
18:45
Speaker 1: swing states that saw– Seats flip, double digits on all
18:48
Speaker 1: of them, whereas men still tending to vote Republican in
18:52
Speaker 1: most of these states aside from North Carolina where everyone
18:55
Speaker 1: seemed to vote Democrat in that race. And then if
18:57
Speaker 1: you go under 44, if you go under– what was that, Sean?
19:02
Speaker 1: If you go under– okay, if you go under 44,
19:05
Speaker 1: age 44, 18 to 44, women voting overwhelmingly– for Democrats,
19:13
Speaker 1: including females with no kids voting four to one or
19:17
Speaker 1: even five to one for Democrats. And this is really
19:21
Speaker 1: dark stuff because when men and women are not in
19:25
Speaker 1: alignment on values, then they're less likely to get married
19:28
Speaker 1: and get this stat. Republicans with children, I'm sorry, 18
19:34
Speaker 1: to 44 males with children are voting Republican. 18 to
19:39
Speaker 1: 44 males with no children are voting overwhelmingly for Democrats,
19:43
Speaker 1: though still at a much lower rate than women with
19:47
Speaker 1: no children are voting for Democrats. But there's becoming a
19:50
Speaker 1: huge divide amongst the sexes politically. And we've talked quite
19:55
Speaker 1: a bit in recent years, particularly thanks to people like
19:59
Speaker 1: my late friend Charlie Kirk, trying to reach male voters.
20:04
Speaker 1: But one thing we are not doing is we're not
20:06
Speaker 1: reaching female voters at all. And how does that messaging change?
20:11
Speaker 1: And single female voters were offering literally nothing that they're liking.
20:16
Speaker 1: And this is something I've not heard this discussed, but
20:18
Speaker 1: this is what's evident in the polls, is that we've
20:21
Speaker 1: moved so many demographic groups towards conservative movement. Latinos come
20:26
Speaker 1: to mind in particular. Young men come to mind, though
20:29
Speaker 1: we did way worse with young men this election cycle.
20:32
Speaker 1: But young females, we are completely striking out, and really
20:35
Speaker 1: important to note that. So we've got to provide some
20:39
Speaker 1: real solutions here. And one of them, which I'm happy
20:41
Speaker 1: to say, is that economic populism remains popular. This is
20:46
Speaker 1: one of the main silver linings from the election, is
20:48
Speaker 1: that economic populism won in this election. I've got a
20:52
Speaker 1: big article on this at Breitbart News from John Binder.
20:55
Speaker 1: But basically, where there are tax cuts, where there are
20:59
Speaker 1: anti-big tech measures, where there are voter ID, so many
21:05
Speaker 1: top-level issues... in this election for people that should align
21:11
Speaker 1: with MAGA values, those all won. Those won when they
21:17
Speaker 1: were on parts of ballot initiatives. So economic populism, power
21:23
Speaker 1: belonging to the people, Democrats won big running on these
21:28
Speaker 1: issues and down ballot where there were where there were
21:33
Speaker 1: causes like voter ID, like things like crackdowns on law enforcement,
21:40
Speaker 1: whether there are things that are taking on the major corporations,
21:43
Speaker 1: these are all things that continue to succeed. So a
21:45
Speaker 1: lot of the stuff that we campaigned on and ran
21:47
Speaker 1: on in prior elections are still popular amongst the voters.
21:52
Speaker 1: It's just MAGA did not access those voters. And so
21:56
Speaker 1: now the Democrats are going to have their hands full
21:58
Speaker 1: because they have to square the circle of that they
22:01
Speaker 1: want to have lax immigration enforcement and they want to
22:05
Speaker 1: have economic populism, and you can't have that. So this
22:09
Speaker 1: is a key. I've said this in the past. You
22:11
Speaker 1: cannot have an open border in a huge welfare state.
22:13
Speaker 1: You also cannot have economic populism and also want to
22:16
Speaker 1: import a bunch of people from all over the world.
22:18
Speaker 1: That doesn't work. There's no math to it because that
22:22
Speaker 1: harms American workers and American workers' wages. So there's another
22:25
Speaker 1: civil war that we're going to see amongst the Democrats
22:27
Speaker 1: is whether or not they get very aggressive– on the
22:30
Speaker 1: retributive stuff against Trump and people aligned with Trump and
22:33
Speaker 1: going after Musk and going after Trump's donors, or whether
22:36
Speaker 1: or not they actually try to legislate. And they're going
22:38
Speaker 1: to have a really hard time actually trying to send stuff,
22:41
Speaker 1: bills to President Trump because there's going to be huge
22:44
Speaker 1: pressure amongst their activist base who may have campaigned on
22:47
Speaker 1: economic populism, but they don't really believe it. That's not
22:50
Speaker 1: really why they're here. They really are here to abolish
22:53
Speaker 1: ICE and to give Trump a hard time and to
22:56
Speaker 1: investigate Stephen Miller and investigate Elon Musk. And that's really
22:59
Speaker 1: what they want to do. So them working this out.
23:04
Speaker 1: So I heard James Tallarico in an interview talking about
23:07
Speaker 1: how he wants to get legislation done. And then you
23:11
Speaker 1: hear him out there saying stuff like this, cut 14.
23:15
Speaker 6: I heard from Latino voters, from Hispanic Texans, many of
23:20
Speaker 6: them under the age of 30, who are worried that
23:24
Speaker 6: their parents aren't going to come home at the end
23:26
Speaker 6: of the day. that these masked men in unmarked vehicles
23:31
Speaker 6: are going to kidnap members of their family or are
23:34
Speaker 6: going to kill hardworking members of our community, which is
23:37
Speaker 6: exactly what happened to Lorenzo Salgado in Houston, Texas. And
23:42
Speaker 6: so we have to take on this secret police force
23:46
Speaker 6: that is hurting our neighbors.
23:50
Speaker 1: So what he's saying is that ICE is abducting citizens.
23:56
Speaker 1: This is the implication. and stealing them from their family.
24:01
Speaker 1: So ICE is not doing that. And I do think
24:03
Speaker 1: that the messaging on ICE could be way better in retrospect,
24:06
Speaker 1: hindsight being 50-50, as they say. The messaging could have
24:10
Speaker 1: been a lot better on the ICE raids, totally. But overall,
24:15
Speaker 1: that's not really what ICE is doing is rounding up
24:17
Speaker 1: American citizens. They're trying to get illegals to self-deport. They're
24:20
Speaker 1: trying to compel illegals to self-deport. So in pandering to
24:24
Speaker 1: people who have no right to be here, is not
24:27
Speaker 1: something that squares with economic populism. So when him talking
24:31
Speaker 1: this way, it doesn't suggest that he's going to be
24:33
Speaker 1: working with Trump on stuff. The ICE talking points are
24:37
Speaker 1: out in full force. Here's Javier Becerra, the incoming governor
24:39
Speaker 1: of California, cut 24.
24:40
Speaker 4: Freedom to walk the streets without fear of gun violence
24:45
Speaker 4: or ICE mercenaries. And freedom tonight to hold a free election. Yeah!
25:01
Speaker 4: Brothers and sisters, this is California, where no problem is
25:05
Speaker 4: too big to solve, and no person is too small
25:08
Speaker 4: to matter. The California dream is universal, it's non-negotiable, and yes,
25:16
Speaker 4: it is undeportable.
25:19
Speaker 1: Sanctuary State, California, this is what killed the state. What's
25:22
Speaker 1: killed the state is illegal immigration. I've been saying this
25:24
Speaker 1: for as long as I've had a microphone, and I
25:26
Speaker 1: say it in polite tones because it's so old news
25:29
Speaker 1: to me. who witnessed this my entire childhood growing up
25:33
Speaker 1: through my adulthood. The more illegal immigrants we imported to
25:36
Speaker 1: the state, the harder it became to run the state.
25:38
Speaker 1: It became completely unmanageable. And yet there's not a single
25:41
Speaker 1: major politician in the state that is able to get
25:43
Speaker 1: that message to the voters and get it through. And
25:47
Speaker 1: so that's what they're talking about. ICE is our mercenaries
25:49
Speaker 1: and we're not going to deport anyone. And let's see
25:52
Speaker 1: how that goes. We know how it's going to go.
25:55
Speaker 1: Abdul Rahman Mohammed El-Sayed, cut 18, please. So what about ICE?
26:03
Speaker 5: I mean, you don't have to investigate the shooting of
26:06
Speaker 5: Alex Petty, right, or the murder of Renee Good.
26:09
Speaker 3: Apparently they don't want to.
26:11
Speaker 1: Can we find out, though, who shot them?
26:14
Speaker 3: Can we find out who's behind the masks?
26:17
Speaker 1: Can the Senate do that? I hope we do.
26:21
Speaker 5: And, you know, it is my intent, as I've always said,
26:23
Speaker 5: that I don't think, I said this in 2018, ICE
26:25
Speaker 5: is not about immigration. ICE is about normalizing paramilitary force
26:29
Speaker 5: on our streets.
26:29
Speaker 1: Right.
26:29
Speaker 2: Yeah.
26:30
Speaker 5: And I don't think we need an ICE.
26:33
Speaker 1: Unreal. Yeah, the guys are commenting on the iambic pentameter
26:39
Speaker 1: of Javier Becerra, that last clip. Yeah, it does sound like,
26:43
Speaker 1: talking like a nursery rhyme. He has to be scripted
26:45
Speaker 1: because he's an idiot. Like, he's very dumb. They're not
26:47
Speaker 1: all dumb. Syed's not dumb. But it's the– some of
26:50
Speaker 1: them are dumb, but Sarah is a dumb guy. Yeah,
26:53
Speaker 1: so we're going to investigate and abolish ICE. That's what he–
26:56
Speaker 1: I thought it was like economic populism. No, it's not
26:59
Speaker 1: just economic populism. And so we got to think about
27:02
Speaker 1: can we message better on this stuff? Are the ICE masks–
27:04
Speaker 1: I understand it, but it doesn't– it looks really bad
27:07
Speaker 1: in the photos, the ICE wearing the masks in the photos.
27:10
Speaker 1: I get people get doxxed. I've been doxxed, and I'll
27:12
Speaker 1: be doxxed again, and I'll be doxxed again, and I'll
27:14
Speaker 1: be doxxed. That's part of the world we're living in.
27:15
Speaker 5: It's horrible.
27:16
Speaker 1: It's horrible. It's bad. But overall, the masks are definitely
27:19
Speaker 1: not helping with the messaging. I'll tell you that. So
27:22
Speaker 1: worth considering. Can we make adjustments? But that's what– are
27:24
Speaker 1: they doing economic populism or are we doing– we're going
27:27
Speaker 1: to make sure we don't enforce any of our immigration laws?
27:31
Speaker 1: So what's so fascinating to me is where the retribution
27:36
Speaker 1: is going to be aimed. This is the great Jamie Raskin,
27:40
Speaker 1: the craziest hair in all of Congress. Here is what
27:43
Speaker 1: he's planning to do, cut 26th.
27:46
Speaker 2: We will not hesitate to go after the private corporations
27:50
Speaker 2: that are collaborating in all of the lawlessness with Donald Trump.
27:54
Speaker 2: And we've done it before and we will absolutely do
27:57
Speaker 2: it again.
27:59
Speaker 1: So he's going to go after the corporations associated with Trump.
28:02
Speaker 1: They're going to go after law firms that would even
28:04
Speaker 1: support Trump and to give counsel to Trump. And they're
28:07
Speaker 1: very bitter over the fact that Trump was able to
28:10
Speaker 1: convince all of these white shoe law firms, which were
28:14
Speaker 1: the the best law firms around to work with him
28:17
Speaker 1: on stuff that they would mutually agree on. Things like
28:21
Speaker 1: anti-Semitism legislation, hate crime stuff against Jewish people. Trump did this,
28:27
Speaker 1: and I document this in Breaking the Law. Guys, I
28:29
Speaker 1: don't write these books for my health. I write books
28:31
Speaker 1: when I feel like I'm onto something that is the
28:32
Speaker 1: biggest thing going. And Breaking the Law is going to
28:35
Speaker 1: feel like child's play compared to what we've got coming
28:38
Speaker 1: from these people. And they've taken all these notes down
28:41
Speaker 1: of all these firms that Trump reached out to, And said,
28:44
Speaker 1: I'm cutting your security clearance unless we figure out a
28:46
Speaker 1: way to work together because these firms are farm systems
28:49
Speaker 1: for the lawfare superstructure that was used to harass him,
28:52
Speaker 1: his family, and his allies. And Jamie Raskin doesn't forget that.
28:56
Speaker 1: He's going to go after all these firms. They're going
28:58
Speaker 1: to go after all the Republican donors, even though they're
29:01
Speaker 1: the ones who try to buy Senate races with guys
29:03
Speaker 1: like Reid Hoffman. And the AI stuff, which I should
29:06
Speaker 1: comment on a lot more. The fact that we lost
29:08
Speaker 1: the messaging on AI when the whole AI industry are
29:11
Speaker 1: left-wing people. And somehow the left was able to seize
29:14
Speaker 1: the narrative on that. That was a colossal blunder and
29:17
Speaker 1: one that we cannot let people forget about that. All right,
29:21
Speaker 1: I want to talk to you guys about pre-born. This
29:23
Speaker 1: is something that is a great use of your charitable dollars.
29:27
Speaker 1: And I know that $ 28 may not sound like a
29:29
Speaker 1: lot of money, but it provides an ultrasound to a
29:33
Speaker 1: scared mother who could be considering abortion, but might be
29:36
Speaker 1: willing to give that baby a shot at life. This
29:40
Speaker 1: provides something incredibly important, a real opportunity to pause, to
29:44
Speaker 1: see her baby, to meet her baby for the first time.
29:47
Speaker 1: And that woman who's facing an unexpected pregnancy can reach
29:49
Speaker 1: for a phone. She can search for abortion pills. She
29:52
Speaker 1: can get the telehealth visits. The pills get delivered to
29:55
Speaker 1: her home. This is why abortions are actually going up
29:58
Speaker 1: despite Roe v. Wade being overturned. And she can move
30:02
Speaker 1: from the fear about what she's going to go through
30:06
Speaker 1: towards comfort, towards safety, and it's with pre-born. So she
30:10
Speaker 1: could act on that fear quickly and get the abortion,
30:13
Speaker 1: or she could act on that fear, go to pre-born,
30:16
Speaker 1: get the free ultrasound at a pre-born network clinic, and
30:19
Speaker 1: see her baby, receive compassionate support. Here, be listened to.
30:23
Speaker 1: $ 28 is an ultrasound. $ 280 is 10. Do the math.
30:28
Speaker 1: And right now there's a dollar for dollar match. So
30:30
Speaker 1: your gift gets doubled. Perfect time to give. 833-850-BABY.
30:37
Speaker 5: 833-850-2229.
30:38
Speaker 1: When a woman sees her baby, she's 80% to choose life.
30:41
Speaker 1: Go to preborn.com slash Marlo. You guys got to donate
30:44
Speaker 1: to this great group. All right, so... Massive tech stock
30:55
Speaker 1: sell-off right now. Just absolutely stunning numbers. I'm looking at
31:00
Speaker 1: the tickers. And those of you catching up on the show,
31:05
Speaker 1: it's pretty bleak right now. Dow's down 1,500 points. It's
31:08
Speaker 1: about 3%. S & P down 4%. NASDAQ down 5%.
31:12
Speaker 1: We are talking about $ 2. 5 trillion wiped out the American
31:16
Speaker 1: economy all in a moment. Nvidia, the biggest loser at
31:20
Speaker 1: the moment, is down 7%, Microsoft 2.5%, Google 2%, Amazon 3%,
31:22
Speaker 1: SpaceX 8.6%, Tesla 10%, massive, massive sell-off. Why is this?
31:24
Speaker 1: Why would SpaceX and Tesla be the worst? Well, it's
31:38
Speaker 1: because of what I just played. Play the Raskin clip
31:40
Speaker 1: one more time, please, guys. Cut 26.
31:41
Speaker 2: We will not hesitate to go after the private corporations
31:45
Speaker 2: that are collaborating in all of the lawlessness with Donald Trump.
31:50
Speaker 2: And we've done it before and we will absolutely do
31:53
Speaker 2: it again.
31:55
Speaker 1: They're going to punish any of these businesses that tried
31:57
Speaker 1: to do better with Trump. And that's the whole tech sector.
32:00
Speaker 1: So the whole tech sector. I was going through this,
32:04
Speaker 1: and there was about 40 or so anti-AI measures on
32:08
Speaker 1: the ballot, and every single one of them passed. People
32:11
Speaker 1: just completely hate AI, and the Trump administration messaged terribly
32:15
Speaker 1: on this. I think part of this is that J.D.
32:18
Speaker 1: Vance is perceived as part of the tech industry because
32:20
Speaker 1: of his relationship with Peter Thiel. I have no idea
32:23
Speaker 1: if Vance is a part of the tech industry to
32:25
Speaker 1: any sort of meaningful degree, but I think that's a
32:28
Speaker 1: perception that's real. And then I think that the messaging
32:31
Speaker 1: coming out of the executive branch was that we need superintelligence.
32:37
Speaker 1: This is superintelligence. And all the data centers are a
32:41
Speaker 1: necessary thing that is going to provide the greatest economic
32:44
Speaker 1: boom ever. And if you're against it, you're falling for
32:48
Speaker 1: a Chinese psyop. That was clearly horrific messaging. I said
32:51
Speaker 1: so at the time over and over again. And the
32:53
Speaker 1: Democrats seized on that. They see the anti-AI wave as
32:57
Speaker 1: a way to solidify huge voter bases and they're totally right.
33:02
Speaker 1: And the Republicans, Matt did a terrible job on this.
33:05
Speaker 1: And what's wild to think is that the biggest AI
33:09
Speaker 1: earners are going to be people who are voting Democrat
33:12
Speaker 1: and donate to Democrats anyway. So even the fact that
33:16
Speaker 1: you were, you were just, here's what I want to say.
33:20
Speaker 1: Here's what I want to say. This is, this is
33:22
Speaker 1: what's important here. Think about Facebook and meta and Instagram.
33:28
Speaker 1: And now TikTok as well. But particularly Facebook, where so
33:32
Speaker 1: much talk over the past several years is how people
33:35
Speaker 1: were becoming incredibly depressed, suicidal, having huge mental health issues
33:40
Speaker 1: because of these platforms. And that was tolerable to Democrats
33:45
Speaker 1: and the left. They were okay with it. They'd say,
33:47
Speaker 1: maybe you slap a lawsuit on them. Maybe you do
33:50
Speaker 1: a puff piece in the New York Times about a
33:52
Speaker 1: whistleblower who's saying how bad Facebook is. But they get
33:55
Speaker 1: a little fine, and then they move on. They make
33:57
Speaker 1: some adjustments, maybe not enough, but we all move on.
34:01
Speaker 1: But you dare support Donald Trump? You dare support the
34:05
Speaker 1: Republican administration? Now, all of a sudden, we've got to
34:07
Speaker 1: come after you, even if that means our own voters
34:11
Speaker 1: are going to lose a ton of money that they
34:12
Speaker 1: have in the stock market. So this is the thing
34:16
Speaker 1: when I point out how the left hates our country
34:18
Speaker 1: and how they really don't like American values. They don't
34:20
Speaker 1: like the American people. They certainly don't like our government
34:25
Speaker 1: in its current form. And all they want to do
34:28
Speaker 1: is figure out who they can attack and blame and damage.
34:32
Speaker 1: And they're at war. They're at complete war with a
34:34
Speaker 1: lot of the foundational beliefs of this country. And this
34:37
Speaker 1: is a perfect example of this. They feel it as
34:41
Speaker 1: a necessary evil to make Americans lose tons of money
34:44
Speaker 1: for our economy to suffer because they feel it necessary
34:48
Speaker 1: to investigate corporations that who just work politely with President Trump.
34:53
Speaker 1: Corporations in this country are not right-wing entities. They tend
34:59
Speaker 1: to prefer the status quo. They tend to prefer things
35:02
Speaker 1: to be simple for there to not be too much turmoil.
35:05
Speaker 1: And when you see Trump wins and then Trump wins again,
35:09
Speaker 1: and he seemed to get more popular from the first
35:11
Speaker 1: term to the second term, then it makes a lot
35:13
Speaker 1: of sense for your business to try to at least
35:14
Speaker 1: be able to cooperate with President Trump and his administration
35:17
Speaker 1: because MAGA is going to be here for a while.
35:20
Speaker 1: But just that slight, that small slight is enough to
35:23
Speaker 1: get all these Democrats worked up. They're ready to investigate.
35:26
Speaker 1: They're ready for people to lawyer up. They're ready to subpoena.
35:29
Speaker 1: And all these companies, particularly the fact that the world's
35:31
Speaker 1: richest man is a Trump ally, they're all going to
35:35
Speaker 1: be investigated, even if that costs their own voters and
35:37
Speaker 1: even themselves tons and tons and tons of money. That's
35:39
Speaker 1: how much they hate MAGA. And they hate most of you.
35:43
Speaker 1: Most of you in the audience. Unreal. So is woke
35:47
Speaker 1: coming back? I think it will. Is lawfare coming back?
35:50
Speaker 1: I think it's going to be something that we've never
35:51
Speaker 1: seen before. And you're going to see some lip service
35:54
Speaker 1: played that we're not going to lawyer up stuff. The
35:56
Speaker 1: DNC chair is saying that we're going to focus on prices. Well,
36:00
Speaker 1: what kind of a start is this? The start is
36:03
Speaker 1: that Americans are losing a ton of money, and it's
36:05
Speaker 1: all because they believe the Democrats are going to make
36:08
Speaker 1: life very difficult for the tech companies that are largely
36:13
Speaker 1: Democrat voters and donors. Isn't that something? But they're not
36:17
Speaker 1: sufficiently far enough to the left. That's the lesson. Go
36:21
Speaker 1: peace and love and serve the Lord. See you tomorrow.