Latest / Talk to Prince Show - Solving World's Problems / Prince Israel Zaar on: Yet Again, The War is Coming. You Mustn't Go to War to be Victorious

Transcript

Prince Israel Zaar on: Yet Again, The War is Coming. You Mustn't Go to War to be Victorious · Talk to Prince Show - Solving World's Problems

• 0:02
  Speaker 1: Uh, the the war with Iran will start again. The
• 0:16
  Speaker 1: war with Iran will start again. Now war we'll start again?
• 0:32
  Speaker 1: For what good? For what purpose? For what significant preparation?
• 0:44
  Speaker 1: What significant difference? What new strategy? H what new tactic?
• 0:59
  Speaker 1: What new intelligence? What new engineering? What new gadgets? What
• 1:18
  Speaker 1: news support? What new cohesion or readiness or proactiveness or preemptiveness?
• 1:42
  Speaker 1: What new discovery? What new breakthrough? What is it that
• 1:54
  Speaker 1: will make a significant difference for this war to continue?
• 2:03
  Speaker 1: What is it that will change the tide, that would
• 2:09
  Speaker 1: change the news cycle? Sustainably? Our bring stability and pace,
• 2:24
  Speaker 1: Our bring tranquility and sustainability. In the business commissioner or
• 2:32
  Speaker 1: administrative of geopolitical wild is it a new strategy I
• 2:45
  Speaker 1: was not there before? Under extormation or over extimation, over
• 2:58
  Speaker 1: promise and under and on that, on that deliver. Is
• 3:05
  Speaker 1: it seven phase or seven grace? Is it giving a
• 3:13
  Speaker 1: deadly blot on enemy? Is it looking for a strategic
• 3:21
  Speaker 1: exit or win? What is it? Why must this war continue?
• 3:40
  Speaker 1: With all the devastation, the destruction, the gas crisis, the
• 3:47
  Speaker 1: affordability crisis, the petal chemicals crisis, the fertilizers crisis, in
• 3:59
  Speaker 1: the hostrial material crisis, the AI mineral crisis, the silicon crisis,
• 4:10
  Speaker 1: the financial market crisis, the stock exchange market crisis, the
• 4:21
  Speaker 1: strategic defeat crisis. What is it this time? And we
• 4:31
  Speaker 1: have planned so well, we have crossed our t's and
• 4:36
  Speaker 1: dot our eyes, that we're not doing by Hebrews arrogance
• 4:42
  Speaker 1: or adamancy, adamancy the inability to not listen. The world
• 5:00
  Speaker 1: is watching just as we are preparing, the enemy is preparing.
• 5:10
  Speaker 1: We have we given away all our cards? Have we
• 5:14
  Speaker 1: telegraphed our carriers and everything we're doing around the world?
• 5:21
  Speaker 1: Does the enemy sit and watch us come closer to
• 5:24
  Speaker 1: them on the high seas, under water, in the air
• 5:31
  Speaker 1: and the satellites. Do they have the data, the connectivity there,
• 5:42
  Speaker 1: the plain view and plain inside that I don't give
• 5:46
  Speaker 1: to them? What is it this time that we're gonna
• 5:57
  Speaker 1: do to decapitate the enemy as we promise, or to
• 6:01
  Speaker 1: bring the enemies to his knee, or to beg the
• 6:05
  Speaker 1: enemy to cry uncle? What is it? Have we talked
• 6:15
  Speaker 1: through again this time? Have we see misunderstood the enemy again?
• 6:26
  Speaker 1: This time? A we stee underestimating the enemy? Is tine?
• 6:37
  Speaker 1: I were still underestimating the capabilities of the enemy this tine?
• 6:46
  Speaker 1: Are we still down playing the unknowns of the our
• 6:48
  Speaker 1: nouns this time? Do we think that we have what
• 6:54
  Speaker 1: the enemy doesn't have? The intelligence, the human power, the logistics,
• 7:03
  Speaker 1: the assets for the long long the missiles, the drones,
• 7:12
  Speaker 1: the German systems, the satellite navigations, the weaponry necessary to
• 7:19
  Speaker 1: give that blow we want. Do we have it in
• 7:24
  Speaker 1: the long run? Shall we continue it to do? What?
• 7:30
  Speaker 1: Kill more people? Disturb my infrastructure? This tray? My civilian infrastructure?
• 7:38
  Speaker 1: Do you have the weapons to go sixteen story building
• 7:42
  Speaker 1: beneath the earth under water? Do we have those bombs necessary?
• 7:49
  Speaker 1: Is there anything else in our assenter something else didn't
• 7:53
  Speaker 1: use before? And the question can somebody explain why we
• 7:57
  Speaker 1: didn't use it before that we are going to use
• 7:59
  Speaker 1: it now? Is it playing with time or playing with victory,
• 8:09
  Speaker 1: or playing with the lives of our great soldiers, or
• 8:14
  Speaker 1: playing with the lives of bystanders and innocent children and women,
• 8:19
  Speaker 1: on playing with the lives and well being of those
• 8:24
  Speaker 1: who have nothing to do with the war. If we
• 8:29
  Speaker 1: reconsider what will happen to the Gold allies? Do they
• 8:36
  Speaker 1: have the protectives, shield those interceptors and the necessary weaponry
• 8:50
  Speaker 1: necessary to defend themselves. For in the case in case
• 8:56
  Speaker 1: of an escalation arritories strikes, didn't the enemy telegraph? For
• 9:06
  Speaker 1: the telegraph? What the over there and the place is
• 9:10
  Speaker 1: there going to destroy? The golf and the pain that
• 9:14
  Speaker 1: will cause to the state of Homos and the threats
• 9:19
  Speaker 1: of their satellites. Groups whoties has Boller and those in
• 9:28
  Speaker 1: Iran and those still silent in Caza. Are we sure
• 9:38
  Speaker 1: this time thou have what it takes to do the
• 9:44
  Speaker 1: job and give us the dignity that you so wish?
• 9:53
  Speaker 1: Is it about that dignity? Is it the dignity of
• 9:56
  Speaker 1: the country, of an administration, or of a person or
• 10:05
  Speaker 1: an ally. It's that dignity for America, for the citizens
• 10:13
  Speaker 1: or the people of America. It's that dignity of victory?
• 10:18
  Speaker 1: Is it for the constitution, the rule of law, the
• 10:22
  Speaker 1: loss of war, the respect of international law and the
• 10:29
  Speaker 1: international descencing and dignity of all persons who have nothing
• 10:34
  Speaker 1: to do with their conflict? Shall we again go to
• 10:39
  Speaker 1: war and kill in using kids, aing thosing children and
• 10:41
  Speaker 1: women and bystanders, Or we are going for the enemy
• 10:48
  Speaker 1: now we know where they are. And if we do
• 10:52
  Speaker 1: decapitate the enemy, that we did before. What we change
• 10:59
  Speaker 1: isn't the enemy at this centralized system of power, that's
• 11:06
  Speaker 1: one that once we decapitate, they just replace decomputation and
• 11:10
  Speaker 1: replacement and continuation. Isn't not what it ta is decomputation, replacement, continuation.
• 11:22
  Speaker 1: Are we going to change this chain of command? Yeah?
• 11:33
  Speaker 1: Do we have some information from the inside, inside, inside
• 11:45
  Speaker 1: the country, inside the administration, inside that technology helps h
• 11:57
  Speaker 1: Are we ready? H Do we know the quantity of
• 12:06
  Speaker 1: the enemy's weapons they are stock piles? How much they
• 12:18
  Speaker 1: have in stock that we don't now? Do we consider
• 12:26
  Speaker 1: they're using knew on discovered weapons? It says a weapon
• 12:33
  Speaker 1: they're hiding from us? Is that something we do not
• 12:37
  Speaker 1: now that they might surprise us with? What about Russia
• 12:46
  Speaker 1: and China their support and the secret meetings not spoken,
• 13:00
  Speaker 1: and the transfers of technology not now the openness to
• 13:08
  Speaker 1: share data. Do we fully grasp the magnitude of what
• 13:18
  Speaker 1: we are in, what were guarding and what we are
• 13:24
  Speaker 1: getting our safe into Again, a repercussion the global economy,
• 13:32
  Speaker 1: the repercussion on our standing in the world, the effects
• 13:38
  Speaker 1: it has on speeding multiplarity, multilateralism. Are we conscious that
• 13:52
  Speaker 1: it is not going to affect pet Petro dollar our
• 13:57
  Speaker 1: investments in the Gulf countries with the UEA be involved
• 14:04
  Speaker 1: this time fully involved. If the U is to be
• 14:09
  Speaker 1: fully involved and they're ready, do they have what it tags?
• 14:16
  Speaker 1: To anger? Translate to weapons? The weapons translate to targets
• 14:26
  Speaker 1: to targets, transfer to strategy, the strategy H transfer to
• 14:36
  Speaker 1: preemptiveness and productiveness and the long run? Or is vector
• 14:45
  Speaker 1: quick and decisive, quick, anticapitating, slow and strategic H? What
• 15:01
  Speaker 1: will be a victory for the animy to surrender and
• 15:07
  Speaker 1: raise their arms and kneel and bow and come to
• 15:12
  Speaker 1: the table and beg for uncle? What is it destruction
• 15:24
  Speaker 1: of their nuclass dog pies iernoum enrichment to be so precise,
• 15:29
  Speaker 1: the center of figures that were once destroyed and stock underground?
• 15:43
  Speaker 1: Is it to continue failed missions that enemy already knows?
• 15:51
  Speaker 1: Are we driven by passion, by emotions, by sentiments, or
• 15:57
  Speaker 1: by intelligence and strategy, a long term thinking and the
• 16:03
  Speaker 1: effects of the negative causality of that which we had
• 16:08
  Speaker 1: to embark ourselves on again? Is it for a person
• 16:21
  Speaker 1: an ally, a country, a region, or for the new order?
• 16:36
  Speaker 1: Isn't the new order already here? A China, Russia and
• 16:44
  Speaker 1: Iran and the bricks cannot be discarded anymore. Isn't it
• 16:51
  Speaker 1: true of the realignment reshaping of the global order that
• 16:59
  Speaker 1: we are supposed to be the major player and supposed
• 17:04
  Speaker 1: to be the country that everybody gravitates to. Must it
• 17:10
  Speaker 1: be true? War or self power or diploma say, or
• 17:20
  Speaker 1: partnership or consensus, spirit or mutuality or this approxitor or
• 17:31
  Speaker 1: with dignity and respect? Are we trying to bend the will?
• 17:43
  Speaker 1: I was trying to change the tides. I were trying
• 17:48
  Speaker 1: to prevent the sun from shining, or the rain from falling,
• 17:56
  Speaker 1: or the seasons from coming and going. Is it a
• 18:03
  Speaker 1: war of resistant change that is ine vitible? Or is
• 18:12
  Speaker 1: it a war for a dimension a messianic proposition that
• 18:24
  Speaker 1: must be fulfilled? Is it is the war driven by
• 18:32
  Speaker 1: religion and mythology or by pragmatism, by science, the scientific method, facts,
• 18:51
  Speaker 1: facts on the ground, the facts from data from intelligence.
• 19:02
  Speaker 1: But this is not the time Rush makes waste. Rush
• 19:13
  Speaker 1: makes waste. He must not do it because you have
• 19:20
  Speaker 1: to do it. It must do it because he's right.
• 19:27
  Speaker 1: Why fight a losing battle? Some counties win without fighting.
• 19:37
  Speaker 1: Why must we blade to call it? Even I can
• 19:44
  Speaker 1: win without fighting without pointing her finger. Be careful, listen
• 20:02
  Speaker 1: to the experts. The Germans did not listen to the
• 20:14
  Speaker 1: expert when they got into Moscow because he was winter.
• 20:22
  Speaker 1: Napoleon did not listen to the experts when he got
• 20:29
  Speaker 1: into Mouscre, when he got into the war where Russia
• 20:34
  Speaker 1: and Muscre because it was winter. Summer is coming. Summer
• 20:44
  Speaker 1: is not friendly to the Middle Asian countries. If their
• 20:49
  Speaker 1: infrastructure is destroyed, their desalination plants, and their petroleum sector
• 20:58
  Speaker 1: is damaged, things will go terribly raw around this Arabic country.
• 21:11
  Speaker 1: It got borders with many countries. It's a country that
• 21:16
  Speaker 1: can be self sufficient because of the science and geography,
• 21:22
  Speaker 1: and they got weapons and the threat of a nuclear weapon.
• 21:30
  Speaker 1: Don't provoke the bear. Don't push somebody to the corner.
• 21:38
  Speaker 1: That only choice they have is a worse bad option.
• 21:48
  Speaker 1: Once you make a human being to fight for their
• 21:53
  Speaker 1: survivor and to see the enemy has an existential threat,
• 22:05
  Speaker 1: terrible things can happen for humanity. Sometimes the resolve the
• 22:11
  Speaker 1: results we expect can be attainable, but the consequences of
• 22:18
  Speaker 1: attending our result who made their resolved the resolve unresolved
• 22:28
  Speaker 1: and unnecessary. Civilizational states are not democratic states. Never forget
• 22:39
  Speaker 1: that the pretend to be democratic states. Civilizational states are
• 22:51
  Speaker 1: not democratic states. The pretend to be democratic states. The
• 22:56
  Speaker 1: structure of governance is different. You have their supreme leader,
• 23:02
  Speaker 1: or that their leader. You have the leader that stays
• 23:07
  Speaker 1: in office as long as they want. In which war
• 23:12
  Speaker 1: with those countries, you gather a nice pectutism, even though
• 23:19
  Speaker 1: they are suffering, united people to their flag, even though
• 23:24
  Speaker 1: their leader might be a tyran retyrant or leadership and
• 23:29
  Speaker 1: be crushing or hurting the people. In the name of
• 23:36
  Speaker 1: the counter and the flag. It's difficult for countries not
• 23:42
  Speaker 1: to come together to fight where they describe the common enemy.
• 23:48
  Speaker 1: I will fighting the world because it's our legacy, our time,
• 23:53
  Speaker 1: or it because it's the course of time, the course
• 23:58
  Speaker 1: of event. The sun rises because it's the right time,
• 24:07
  Speaker 1: The seasons come and go because the right time. The
• 24:13
  Speaker 1: fruit right ripens in nature because it's the right time.
• 24:21
  Speaker 1: Is it the right time if the first time was
• 24:25
  Speaker 1: not the right time, what makes this time to ripe?
• 24:30
  Speaker 1: Some analysis on experts, some corrupt representatives, some deceptive data,
• 24:42
  Speaker 1: some false promises and false flags operations, some dilusion of reality,
• 24:53
  Speaker 1: some delusion and dystopia. Some fantasy theorem they dreamed to
• 25:06
  Speaker 1: be to be seen I remembered as a legacy project.
• 25:18
  Speaker 1: What is it that everything got it right the first time,
• 25:25
  Speaker 1: we're gonna get right the second time? What has changed
• 25:29
  Speaker 1: so much? Our military gadget gadget? Did we replace the depletion?
• 25:43
  Speaker 1: Did we pluck the holes in our intelligence? We have
• 25:49
  Speaker 1: some new software updates, some new super AI too, something
• 25:57
  Speaker 1: that will make a difference. Or we are planning to
• 26:04
  Speaker 1: go do the same thing and wish for lack or
• 26:10
  Speaker 1: just more of the sign. Will the enemy this time
• 26:18
  Speaker 1: accept a cease fire? That we go in and ask
• 26:24
  Speaker 1: for a ceasefire and they refused and they want to continue.
• 26:31
  Speaker 1: Have you calculated this? Have you calculated the fallouts to
• 26:39
  Speaker 1: some diplomacy or diplomatic relationship overseas, or to travel to
• 26:45
  Speaker 1: a country that might be disrupted, or to nego show
• 26:49
  Speaker 1: some countries that they might pull out the negotiations, or
• 26:55
  Speaker 1: to do something so devastating that a country give justification
• 27:03
  Speaker 1: to develop a nuclear weapon. I think doubt, ask questions, projection, perception, perspective, measurement,
• 27:28
  Speaker 1: proportionality and balance, common sense, common humanity, human descence, respectful
• 27:44
  Speaker 1: allowed the life of the child, and women, and by
• 27:47
  Speaker 1: standard respect for not depleting civilian infrastructure to call it victory.
• 27:59
  Speaker 1: If we must find deified of which we shouldn't, let
• 28:11
  Speaker 1: there'll be a breakthrough reason. Please, a superior to war.
• 28:27
  Speaker 1: Agreement is superior to disagreement. It's always a positive thing
• 28:41
  Speaker 1: to say peace with all sincerity and strategy. You must
• 28:52
  Speaker 1: not go to war to make a point. You've been there,
• 28:58
  Speaker 1: We've been there. If war makes points, why do go
• 29:05
  Speaker 1: to war again? It doesn't animosity, ammity and hatred. It
• 29:14
  Speaker 1: should not be the catalyst of war. We should go
• 29:21
  Speaker 1: to war when it's legitimate, that can be packed by
• 29:27
  Speaker 1: the people, by the constitution, by the law, and by
• 29:32
  Speaker 1: alike nations or supporters or partners. A war of dignity,
• 29:40
  Speaker 1: a war of decency, a war of respect, a war
• 29:47
  Speaker 1: of sovereignty. Now will fight to defend our sovereignty. They
• 29:52
  Speaker 1: did not be that will go to war for misguided reasons.
• 30:01
  Speaker 1: Let it not be that we go to war not
• 30:03
  Speaker 1: for not for our great nation, but to do another
• 30:07
  Speaker 1: person's being sacrifice, not of our great troops and great
• 30:13
  Speaker 1: capital for somebody else is betting for some unpatriotic reasons.
• 30:28
  Speaker 1: The war. It's ready again for the continuation of the war.
• 30:40
  Speaker 1: We wish we could stop it. We wish we can't
• 30:44
  Speaker 1: stop it. But those who want war, we get their war,
• 30:53
  Speaker 1: and citizens and civilians pick up the pieces. It's not
• 30:59
  Speaker 1: supposed to be that. Why don't abuse the power given today,
• 31:07
  Speaker 1: use it to profit and benefit the nation for the
• 31:12
  Speaker 1: good of every citizen. Don't take power given today to
• 31:18
  Speaker 1: do what you like. I hurts the nation and people,
• 31:23
  Speaker 1: a reputation of that, reputation of that nation and people,
• 31:28
  Speaker 1: and standing of that nation and people. The first punch
• 31:36
  Speaker 1: punch my heart. If you keep punching, the enemy might
• 31:44
  Speaker 1: become resistant to it and just choose to lose everything
• 31:53
  Speaker 1: to expose our vulnerabilities. Don't give the enemy an opportunity
• 32:03
  Speaker 1: to expose our vulnerabilities. Dick says the clock, tik tak,
• 32:11
  Speaker 1: what you have to do do quick, philosopher, Prince. Our
• 32:23
  Speaker 1: intelligence is philosopher princes reserved from the gasity of Las
• 32:27
  Speaker 1: Vegas A prayer thirty eight, twenty twenty six. TikTok says
• 32:36
  Speaker 1: the clock, what you have to do do quick, and
• 32:41
  Speaker 1: that which he was supposed to do should be sicking, peace,
• 32:47
  Speaker 1: seeking understanding and the consolation, bringing parties to the table
• 32:51
  Speaker 1: ironed our differences, striking a deal, the deal of the century.
• 32:59
  Speaker 1: War it's a weakness. War exposes weakness. As as I
• 33:06
  Speaker 1: said again, nobody gets the war. And declare Wayne po
• 33:16
  Speaker 1: Pot declare wings are strategy to get out of the war.
• 33:20
  Speaker 1: There is no Victorian war. Victory is subjective and relative.
• 33:28
  Speaker 1: When you go to war for subjectivity and relativity and
• 33:33
  Speaker 1: destroying resources, infrastructure, killing us and children, women and loose
• 33:42
  Speaker 1: brave soldiers unnecessarily just to get what we want. It's
• 33:51
  Speaker 1: your war. It's your war. Think it through. Thank you,