Latest / UK Column Radio / UK Column ‘On Location’ in Cheltenham: Brian Gerrish

Transcript

UK Column ‘On Location’ in Cheltenham: Brian Gerrish · UK Column Radio

0:14
Thank you very much. Now some of you may have
0:17
realised that in my more mature years, I've become a bit croaky
0:21
of voice and this is not helped by there are so many of you want
0:26
to talk to me. So I've I've got to preserve a
0:30
little bit of my audio capacity. So I'm I'm just going to talk
0:34
quite quietly. If you can't hear, put a hand
0:36
up, but otherwise I just want to talk to you in a quiet way so
0:41
that I have voice to talk to the rest of you for the rest of
0:44
today. OK, brilliant.
0:47
Thank you all for coming. It's fantastic.
0:50
We are going to do more events. There'll be another event in the
0:52
autumn. Next year is the 20th
0:55
anniversary of the UK column and we are going to do a special
0:59
event. We want to do a weekend event
1:01
and early commitment will make a big difference to us doing that.
1:06
So if today goes well for you and you think it'd be fantastic
1:11
to be away for a weekend with normal people and we're working
1:20
on it now, I've really got to watch the time because I I've
1:24
got a lot of information. Gemma talks about the UK column
1:28
Information Cascade, and I'm going to give you one of those.
1:32
You might have to wait till the video comes out to go back
1:36
through it, to pause it because I'm going to talk through some
1:38
of the slides. But I want to be sure that
1:41
basically information and research that we've done as the
1:44
column appears on the screen. You had a brilliant personal
1:49
testimony to start off. You knew Roger was telling the
1:54
truth from personal experience. And for me, I've got to put some
1:59
evidence up on the screen and I've got some videos.
2:01
But first I have to tell you off.
2:04
Some of you have been very casual with your code books.
2:08
This, this book has got to stay with you.
2:11
Don't share it because you'll regret it, OK?
2:14
So don't leave it under your chair.
2:17
Keep it with you. You'll find out why right before
2:23
I get started. Many people do not know that the
2:28
UK column used to publish a newspaper.
2:31
This is 2010. And what does it say?
2:35
Three parties, one police state. With respect, Sir, there is no
2:39
Labour Party. There's only one party, the UNI
2:42
Party. This was the UK column in 2012
2:46
pointing out that an Asian man had tried to protect white
2:50
children. And that newspaper went to every
2:53
mosque in the country. We didn't send it there, the
2:57
communities did. This was this warning what Brown
3:01
was doing? Brown's treason.
3:04
I believe that what we are talking about today is treason.
3:08
And here was a mix of by Mike, of David Cameron and Nick Clegg,
3:14
half and half for the face quizzlings, Quizzlings for
3:19
change, collaborators in treason.
3:24
We've been there. We've told people about this.
3:26
But we printed nearly 1,000,000 newspapers.
3:31
And there's a lady called Kate here who was part of the
3:33
original UK column team that helped us mail out those
3:38
newspapers. So if you get a chance to meet
3:41
Kate, she'll tell you what it was like in the early days.
3:45
Let's start. So I chose not to have the
3:49
doughnut because I thought this was a nicer picture and we
3:53
needed something to lighten it up.
3:54
So where is this? Alex?
3:57
This is. Yeah.
3:59
Bude Cornwall. Anyway, listening to keep us
4:05
safe. Who believes that?
4:08
OK, It's a shame the girl's not here, isn't it?
4:12
So this is what they tell us. Trust us.
4:15
You're safe in our hands. But the key thing is who is the
4:19
deep state, really? This is part of the problem.
4:22
Can you see it? Can you touch it?
4:23
Do you know what it does? Well, what we can do is we can
4:27
play a bit of video. Let's.
6:11
I'm intrigued because there should have been some commentary
6:14
on that video maker that what you like.
6:16
However, this is how they sell themselves, the soft sell.
6:20
Trust us, we're nice people. I'm sure many of them are, but
6:24
we've got to be a lot more discerning about who we allow to
6:28
control us and monitor us. And I don't have any confidence
6:34
in the doughnut down the road, whichever direction it is, and
6:39
I'm going to try and explain why.
6:41
But if we think that there's something wrong in society.
6:44
We've just heard about the massive abuse of children, but
6:48
apparently our intelligence services and our security
6:51
services don't know this is going on.
6:54
They're monitoring millions of conversations, but they don't
6:58
know the child abuse is going on.
7:00
That's remarkable, isn't it? It's only a coincidence.
7:04
What should society be like? Well, Ben Rubin was kind enough
7:09
to record a little bit of video for me.
7:12
Let's see what he has to say. A healthy society, the market
7:47
and the state. The state is concerned with
7:53
power, the market concerned with money, and the church is
8:01
concerned with spirit. And the trick is to achieve an
8:06
even balance between the three. If you have too much market,
8:13
things become unequal very quickly.
8:17
Too much state, things become rigid and inflexible and
8:21
inhumane. Too much church and nothing ever
8:26
gets done. And today we live in a
8:31
completely unbalanced society because we're governed by what's
8:37
known as a public private partnership, A conspiracy if you
8:41
will, between the markets and the state, what I call an unholy
8:47
alliance between money and power.
8:49
We have a state that issues diktats and a market that
8:55
profits from enforcing them without any kind of democratic
9:01
scrutiny or oversight. That is the deep state in
9:06
effect. And this system, this public
9:09
private partnership, has delivered levels of inequality
9:12
that are unprecedented in human history in a manner that is very
9:18
reasonably described as anti human.
9:22
Citizens pay for it through our taxes and by being subjugated to
9:27
the public private partnership and the church.
9:31
The third pillar is nowhere to be seen.
9:38
So that that was Ben's version of society.
9:41
And I think it's a very interesting one.
9:43
We have to have it in balance for it to be working properly.
9:46
And clearly it's not in balance. And what what we call a deep
9:50
state, this was one definition. A deep state is a type of
9:54
government made-up of potential unauthorized secret networks of
9:58
power operating independently of a state's political leadership
10:02
in pursuit of their own agenda and goals.
10:05
I think we'll cross out potential because it's reality.
10:09
But I I thought that this was quite a good definition.
10:12
Now, what are we talking about in the really deep part of the
10:16
state? Well, this is an overview of how
10:18
things are linked together. You've got the doughnut, it's
10:21
got listening stations. We've seen those.
10:24
BBC monitoring is part of it. Yes, the BBC is part of the
10:28
state's spying apparatus. We've got a political charity
10:32
called Common Purpose, which I'll come on to.
10:34
And then we've got the overseas links with the National Security
10:38
Agency, CIA, et cetera, et cetera.
10:41
But the point I was making on this slide originally was we had
10:44
a British politician, Brooks Newmark, reported in the Daily
10:49
Mail as going overseas on the border with Syria in order to
10:53
talk to people who were connected to terrorists.
10:56
And we asked on what basis he went and where the minutes of
10:59
the meeting were. And that was never revealed to
11:02
us. But there was other stuff going
11:04
on. And we're going back in time
11:07
here. What are we looking at?
11:08
Well, we're looking at Malcolm Rifkin.
11:11
And a statement in the Guardian for the chair of the
11:14
Intelligence and Security committee to discuss working for
11:18
a bogus Chinese company is very odd indeed, to be frank.
11:23
I can't believe that the ISC members are allowed outside
11:27
interests. They are.
11:28
They see more sensitive information than most government
11:32
ministers. Now the point being made here is
11:35
the people with oversight and regulation and control of the
11:40
security services not doing their job.
11:44
And if I expand that a bit, this is another problem going on at
11:49
the moment. And this is showing the links
11:52
between the security services and Israel right now.
11:57
What we've got to ask ourselves here is, well, hang on a minute,
12:00
if if all our data or data is being shared with Israel, who's
12:05
actually in control? Who is in control?
12:09
It doesn't matter that it's Israel, because if it was Italy
12:12
or Germany, I'd still be making the same statement.
12:15
But this was never discussed with the public.
12:18
It was just something that was set up and now we know that the
12:21
state spies on us as individuals.
12:24
We have to be very sure where this data is going.
12:27
But of course nothing works without money.
12:31
And this is going back to June 2013 where the Bilderberg Group
12:37
met in Watford, in the Grove Hotel in Watford.
12:41
And I produced this slide at the time to just show you some of
12:45
the bankers who were there. We've no idea what was discussed
12:48
with government ministers, secret meetings, but here were
12:54
the faces. And then on the bottom left
12:56
you've got Peter Sutherland, no longer with us past as they say.
13:02
He was the man that thought mass migration was great to breakdown
13:07
the homogeneity of the nation state.
13:10
So a man who believed in using mass migration as a political
13:14
weapon, sitting down behind closed doors with a mass of
13:17
bankers and ministers, No minutes.
13:23
This is outrageous. And basically the whole country
13:28
should be up in arms about that. Or put inverted commas around
13:31
that. But here, here is the reality of
13:35
how this state controls itself. And this is a little bit of a a
13:41
just an overview. It's a slide from about 2000
13:45
where somebody produced an excellent little graphic that
13:48
was essentially saying, well just be careful of who controls
13:52
the media because Disney, Time Warner and another 4 big outfit
13:58
outfits are basically taking the whole of the media under
14:02
control. So these are global corporations
14:06
controlling right down to your local newspaper.
14:09
In fact, if you try and find a local Independent newspaper now
14:14
in this country, it's very difficult because they've all
14:16
been snapped up by by the big global companies.
14:22
And this means, of course, that if those global companies are in
14:25
bed with the government and as Ben Rubin said in the public
14:30
private partnership arrangement, then what you have got is total
14:36
state globalist control of the media.
14:39
And that means we are not going to get the truth.
14:42
We're not going to see what's really happening in the country
14:45
now. We the UK column warned and
14:49
warned what was happening when we saw the initial setup for
14:54
control of the press. And here this slide is
14:58
indicative of the setup for the Leveson inquiry where all of a
15:02
sudden we couldn't trust the existing press.
15:04
They'd been naughty boys, they hacked people's phones.
15:09
And So what was happening was a mix of political interests and
15:14
private interests in order to set up an inquiry to control
15:19
press and media. That means free speech.
15:22
We're back in sort of 2015, I think it was here was was being
15:28
grabbed and taken away from us. Now, Roger mentioned the sort of
15:32
layers, so I'm going to call it the networks.
15:35
If you want to understand the deep state, you've got to be
15:37
able to think in terms that it operates as a sort of big BLOB.
15:42
But there's layers, there's networks, and the only way we
15:46
could deal with this was by starting to break it apart in
15:50
order to show these networks. So I'll talk over this slide as
15:54
it animates. But this shows you how complex
15:58
the state's arrangements were to grab control of the press.
16:02
And what you're seeing here is from the bottom left hand corner
16:06
where a political charity called Common Purpose started a work
16:11
with an organization called Hacked Off and then Brian
16:14
Leveson was all part of that mix.
16:16
They eventually started down the route of state control of the
16:20
media, something Mike Robinson has been warning and warning and
16:24
warning about in recent UK column news programmes.
16:29
So Max Moseley there, you might be surprised, but he was a
16:32
naughty boy at one stage and did something a little bit
16:35
embarrassing, which I can possibly talk about, but he
16:38
ended up thinking he was the right man to help fund this
16:42
embryonic growth in state control of the media.
16:47
And have a look at this, this man here, this is Leveson what
16:52
the initial opening video of the SIS system, the intelligence
16:57
system. I was expecting a narrative for
16:59
some reason it wasn't there. But of course they talk about
17:03
our views and values. Trust us because our values are
17:08
good, but this man was involved in the network to take control
17:14
of the press. And then when we go into who
17:17
regulates the intelligence services and the police, well
17:21
what a surprise because the same old faces keep popping up.
17:25
Now there may be nothing in this, but it is rather a
17:29
coincidence that everywhere you see the control coming in, you
17:33
often see the same faces. Now children have been mentioned
17:37
and why are children part of the mix?
17:41
I believe for two main reasons. One is destruction of the family
17:46
unit. That is an objective.
17:49
They want the children and how do you get the children and how
17:53
do you get vulnerable children? You destroy the protective
17:57
family unit of mum and dad. That's one reason this is going
18:01
on. The other reason is that if they
18:03
can get the children away from a protective mother and father,
18:07
those children can be trafficked and abused and sold.
18:11
They become money, big money. It's a billions, multi billion
18:16
pound industry. Child trafficking in this
18:19
country, not external in this country.
18:23
And you may, sorry, you may remember a while back that there
18:28
was a big so-called Westminster VIP paedophile ring.
18:33
And most of this is is to the left.
18:35
It was to do with a guest house called Elm Guest House.
18:39
It all went into the long grass. But it was revealed at the time
18:43
that the men going to that guest guest house to abuse young boys
18:47
came from a variety of interesting places.
18:50
There was politicians, there were police, an MI five person,
18:54
that's interesting. And military people were
18:58
involved. A whole heap of people were
19:01
coming in in order to engage in the abuse of children.
19:05
Now I'm going to put a label over this.
19:07
I know you're not going to be able to read all of that, but if
19:10
you watch the video later, you can freeze it and see the
19:12
detail. This is under the surface at the
19:16
moment. Although it happened years ago,
19:19
the implications of who in the state was involved in the abuse
19:23
of children has never gone away. And I'm going to tell you today
19:27
there's a powder keg sitting under the surface to do with the
19:31
politicians, the security, sorry, the national security
19:35
people and the police, senior police officers who were abusing
19:42
children. The government made a big effort
19:44
to cover this up. This is another slide of recover
19:49
up of abuse, but this one isn't about Elm Guest House.
19:52
This is about Dolphin Square in London where politicians in
19:58
particular were abusing young boys, right.
20:02
This is also sitting under the surface and the moment some
20:08
very, very brave people have said no, we're not going to let
20:11
this go. We are going to get this
20:13
information out. The people who are denying the
20:18
evidence which they hold in their possession of the police.
20:22
And when we get to the point where it's not the police are
20:25
incompetent or corrupt, when they are actually protecting
20:30
people who abuse children, the police service as a whole is
20:34
nearly gone. And this is the reality of UK in
20:38
2025. Now, a bit of Five Eyes.
20:42
And I'm going to say a big thank you to Matt Erett.
20:45
This was part of a very interesting little documentary.
20:49
I'm really going to play a clip of it.
20:51
Go to Rumble and you can see the full Five Eyes.
20:55
See what it's On March 6th, 1946, the UKUSA Signals
21:01
Agreement established what became known as the Five Eyes.
21:05
That soon involved the global dragnet of intelligence
21:08
agencies, led by Britain's GCHQ into MI 6.
21:13
Soon other Anglo-Saxon spy agencies such as Canada's
21:17
Communications Security Establishment and RCMP joined
21:21
into the alliance, along with partner agencies in Australia
21:24
and New Zealand. It is no coincidence that March
21:29
6th, 1946 was also the same day that Winston Churchill delivered
21:34
his infamous Iron Curtain speech in Fulton, MO, setting into
21:38
motion the framework of the Cold War.
21:41
In the Baltic to Trieste, in the Adriatic, an Iron Curtain has
21:47
descended across the continent. Behind that line lie all the
21:52
capitals of the ancient states of Central and Eastern Europe.
21:58
Under this new order ushered in by President Truman and
22:01
Churchill, America's OSS was disbanded and President Franklin
22:06
Roosevelt's dream of AUS, Russia, China Alliance to shape
22:10
the post war world was destroyed.
22:13
In this new scheme for a new world order, America's closest
22:16
allies that fought by her side to prevent the success of the
22:19
Nazi war machine were now rebranded as America's enemies,
22:24
while America's enemies became her closest allies.
22:32
So I'm going to say that is a really excellent documentary,
22:35
but you've got the twist there right at the end.
22:37
Suddenly the bad people became the good people and the good
22:40
people became the bad people. Absolutely on the button.
22:43
Let's have a look at the doughnut you.
22:48
Now know more about how the three agencies listen to or read
22:51
communications in order to guard.
22:54
But who guards the guards? In the UK, Parliament makes the
22:58
laws the agencies should abide by.
23:00
The newly empowered Intelligence and Security Committee then
23:04
tries to ensure they do just that.
23:07
The former head of GCHQ says today's historic hearings are a
23:11
test. In a curious way, the committee
23:13
itself is as much on trial as the three witnesses because they
23:20
have to demonstrate to the public that they are capable of
23:24
oversight of this very difficult, delicate area.
23:29
And if they can't, then public anxiety following the
23:33
revelations will undoubtedly grow.
23:35
I'm confident they can. The details revealed by the
23:38
former CIA contract worker Edward Snowden about the
23:41
capacity of the UK to Hoover up vast quantities of electronic
23:45
data has caused concern. Are the agencies going beyond
23:48
the letter of the law? So David says no, but that staff
23:52
need to be constantly reminded about the law and ethics.
23:57
The two are complementary. The legal oversight comes from
24:00
very senior judges who can descend on and do descend on the
24:04
agencies who not only look at the papers but go and interview
24:08
individual analysts. Ask them why you intercepting
24:11
that target. Prove to me that it's a
24:14
proportionate and necessary in the light of the task you've
24:16
been given. So very clever little response
24:25
to camera there because he said, well, the basically the problem
24:28
isn't the security services themselves, it's whether the
24:31
political system is competent enough to evaluate our delicate
24:35
work. I'm going to say never seen that
24:38
clip before myself until a couple of days ago and I thought
24:41
what a devious, dangerous man. Because we need oversight of
24:47
what is actually happening. Now there is apparently some
24:51
oversight through Parliament, but of course where most
24:53
politicians go is to the House Commons library because they're
24:57
lazy, they don't want to research on their own.
25:00
So briefing documents like this are what the average MP accepts
25:05
as truth. And this is This is why the
25:08
average MP at the moment is absolutely failing because they
25:11
don't know anything. They only believe what the
25:13
government and their their national offices tell them.
25:17
So that document for me indicative, but if you get into
25:21
the panel here, the Intelligence and Security Committee, this is
25:25
the the front page of a report. These are the people supposedly,
25:29
supposedly keeping oversight of the intelligence and security
25:33
services. If you read this particular
25:36
report that I've got on screen, excuse me, they are talking
25:40
about their inability to do the job because people are keeping
25:44
information from them. So we are talking breakdown of
25:48
the full system. The security services at the
25:51
moment are playing fast and loose because the politicians
25:54
either won't do their job or don't know how to do it.
25:57
What's the result? This is just a table of how much
26:00
money GCHQ sucks up and that's not the important bit with this
26:05
report. The committee talked about this.
26:09
You can't read that text, but I assure you what's here is
26:12
diversity training, getting in young people to break up the
26:17
homogeneity of GCHQ, bringing more diverse people.
26:22
What does that do? Well, I'll give you a
26:23
demonstration, but you need the Telegraph from a couple of days
26:27
ago, because at the bottom of the front page was this tiny
26:30
article. Top Secret GCHQ files taken away
26:35
by intern when you got inside. This is the main article and it
26:42
tells how this person had come in on one of these special
26:45
schemes and suddenly started to help himself to top secret data.
26:50
But down at the bottom in one tiny parent and one tiny
26:54
sentence was this, that there was also a connection with
27:00
indecent images of children. But inside GCHQ, Meanwhile, what
27:06
does GCHQ do to the public? They send out this nonsense.
27:11
Get your children. Can your children crack the the
27:14
GCH code puzzle? This is something designed by
27:20
children, but it's very dangerous because it's trying to
27:23
make out that what they do is just nothing.
27:25
It's all a bit of a gain. So, you know, here we are.
27:30
GCHQGCHQ can entertain our children, but it's unable to
27:35
protect the country from subversion.
27:37
Whereas we've heard with the opening speaker thousands of our
27:42
children are being abused and yet the listening station down
27:45
the road says it's no idea what's going on.
27:49
Well, what about this as an organization?
27:53
An organization believes in these things.
27:56
It's setting up useful idiots. It's using two or three
28:00
determined 5th columnists on the inside, expert idiots, building
28:06
coalitions and conspiring. And if you challenge them, they
28:12
say run over them, undermine them, go round them, discredit
28:17
them. That's exactly what Roger was
28:20
talking about. Do you think UK should support
28:24
an organization that believes in those things?
28:27
Because I don't what? What am I talking about?
28:30
Well, I'm talking about the doctrine book from the political
28:34
charity Common Purpose, Right? And this organization got all
28:40
over the country and we warned and warned and warned what was
28:44
going on, but they got somewhere else.
28:47
So let's bring GCHQ back on screen, because we showed many,
28:52
many years ago that that organization seeking to conspire
28:57
and overturn and produce 1/5 column had penetrated GCHQ
29:03
itself. And these are not idle
29:05
positions. They had got hold of the Policy
29:08
and Coordination and Development Programmes individual from GCHQ
29:13
and they'd also got hold of the head of software engineering.
29:21
This can't be right. This is an organization which is
29:23
says it's there to break things down, to conspire.
29:27
And yet they got into GCHQ. Now we warned what was going on.
29:33
We even showed the extent of this political charity across
29:37
the country. And so a red dot, if you can
29:40
just make it out on the map that that is a, that is a group of
29:44
individuals trained by this totally unaccountable
29:48
organization. Now, one of the things they were
29:51
doing was breaking apart silos. And what they meant by that is
29:56
if you have an organization that's working perfectly well
29:58
and happily, they are going to get in and destabilize it.
30:03
Why do you need to do that? Because if you want to take over
30:07
or control the direction of a big organization, you have to
30:12
shake it, you have to destabilize it, and then you can
30:15
manoeuvre that big organization. You can't change the NHS
30:20
overnight. They had to destabilize it,
30:23
break it down, make it all unstable so that they could then
30:28
bring it to where it was going to go.
30:31
I put out many years ago a video of a man talking about
30:35
disruption. Let's hear what he has to say.
30:40
Edited by Mike Robinson so nothing is taken out of context,
30:45
but there is a little bit of editing.
30:50
Hi I'm. Going to do that very uncool Ted
30:53
thing of saying this is really exciting for me to do this.
30:57
You don't often hear that at the beginning of Ted videos, but I
30:59
think you should a bit more. So I'm going to talk to you
31:03
about some of the work that we do.
31:05
My name is Dominic Campbell. I run a small phone called
31:08
Future Gov and I'm lucky enough to work with a small gang of
31:12
cool people who are really interested in how we can use
31:16
technology in the web to transform government and
31:18
politics. This is my personal story.
31:21
This is where I started nine years ago.
31:24
Very, very classic local government story.
31:26
That's Barnett Town Hall in North London, doesn't look like
31:31
the hotbed of innovation and disruption.
31:34
So this is also me. The other side of my life is my
31:37
web obsession and in particular Twitter.
31:39
And those two, the last two slides have really the
31:43
foundation of my career and the foundation of future government
31:46
and also me being lucky enough to be part of this movement
31:50
that's now often called Gov 2O Government 2 point O building on
31:54
how do you, how do you transform the web government using Web 2
31:59
point O technology? So Twitter has been pretty
32:02
fundamental to why I'm here tonight in so many ways, which I
32:05
can't really go into because there's so many of them.
32:08
But it's, it's fascinating just from a personal journey, how
32:11
disruptive to my life this this disruptive technology has been.
32:16
To actually Take Me Out of being in the back office of the town
32:19
hall in North London to suddenly being here three years later is
32:23
phenomenal. What is the kind of culture that
32:25
we're all striving for? What is the new world that we're
32:28
pushing for? So I think that we're at a point
32:30
now where you're either with us or you're against or are we
32:33
actually going to transform government into something
32:35
entirely different, so. If you don't understand
32:42
breakdown in the NHS, breakdown in government, holes in the
32:46
road, it's because the whole system in this country
32:49
deliberately targeted by disruptors, that's what they
32:53
call themselves in order to destroy what is in place.
32:58
And of course, if you disrupt in a hospital, people get hurt.
33:01
Now somebody saw this video, his name's Alex Thompson.
33:05
This was many years ago. And Alex said to me was later to
33:09
say to me, I'll watch the video and, and my jaw just about hit
33:14
the floor. And when Alex speaks in a
33:17
minute, I hope he's going to tell you why his jaw nearly hit
33:20
the floor when he watched that man speaking on that video clip.
33:25
But let's do a little bit more in the short time we got left
33:29
because of course, the big thing these organisations keep telling
33:34
us is they keep us safe. We're not allowed to know what
33:38
they do, but they can tell us they keep us safe.
33:42
We've foiled 1000 attacks. Where's the proof?
33:44
Oh, we can't tell you. I mean, it's a good business,
33:48
isn't it, when you think of it. All right, so let's hear one of
33:52
the previous operatives talking. I spent.
33:56
My entire life working against covert threats to this country,
34:07
and we are well equipped to do that.
34:09
And we have powerful agencies across government and powerful
34:12
friends and allies. Most importantly, we have our
34:15
values, which we cannot relinquish under any
34:18
circumstances. But we need to give ourselves
34:21
the best modern chance for dealing with these issues.
34:25
And a frustration for me, I'll be honest with you as I dealt
34:28
with this stuff, was the ambiguity, the ambiguity that
34:37
existed legally around all of these issues, particularly as
34:41
time went on, they were manifest in the digital space and the
34:46
people were exploiting our open society to plot and carry out
34:52
acts of aggression and harm against citizens.
34:55
And of course, there's a few vivid examples of that that you
34:58
have seen. Moments after the attack in
35:03
Salisbury. They remain in a critical.
35:05
Condition after being exposed to the substance Novichok.
35:08
The three suspects are believed to be in Russia.
35:11
The attack by the Russian military intelligence service in
35:14
Salisbury against British citizens, one of whom died as a
35:18
result, I think tells you all you need to know both about the
35:22
nature of the adversaries that we're up against and the fact
35:25
that this is going on. I.
35:29
Sensed you enjoyed that, right? But he said something very
35:34
telling. Did you pick up open society
35:38
right? This is straight out of George
35:40
Soros World Economic Forum book. And what he's telling you is
35:44
that his job is protecting open society.
35:48
That's not our society. It's something different.
35:50
Before I get a bit more detail on that, let's just remind
35:55
ourselves about the whole of the scribble poisoning affair.
35:58
The UK column did quite a lot because apparently, and I say
36:02
this as an ex military man that went through the nuclear,
36:05
biological and chemical warfare training where we knew how
36:10
dangerous some of these products were, you were dead in seconds.
36:14
But apparently for script all the script all case, you could
36:18
use baby wipes to just clean off the handles, right.
36:21
So this excellent article from the Grey Zone encourage you to
36:25
read it because in it he's got some really phenomenal
36:29
information which is showing that the official narrative was
36:33
complete rubbish. But if you've heard open Society
36:37
from one man, this is Richard Moore.
36:39
So the latest incumbent, the 17th C.
36:43
If you look at the bottom of the small print, you can't read.
36:46
But don't worry, I'm going to tell you what it is.
36:48
He says that they're there to help preserve the rules based
36:51
international system. That's nothing about you, me,
36:57
our families, It's nothing about UK.
37:00
He's telling you that these powerful security agencies are
37:03
there to protect the international globalist system,
37:10
right? We're paying the billions for
37:13
these people to operate at the moment.
37:15
And the other thing on their particular page, it's right down
37:19
at the bottom, so it's very small, but it says this.
37:22
We are #secretively like you. This is nudging.
37:27
This is applied behavioural psychology to get the reader to
37:31
believe that they can trust these individuals.
37:34
Why shouldn't we trust them? Well come back to Alex Thompson
37:38
because many years ago he sent me a book which was a bit of an
37:41
eye opener when I opened it because it was called A Secret
37:44
History of Torture. I recommend you buy a copy.
37:47
It's not quite what you think it is.
37:50
This is about Britain's involved in evolvement, in torture around
37:56
the world, and it opens with the fact that immediately at the end
38:00
of the Second World War, our intelligence services took over
38:04
Gestapo facilities and tortured people.
38:10
Evidence is there. And so as he says, and yet the
38:13
evidence is irrefutable. When faced with potential
38:16
threats to their that's the word he used to their national
38:21
security. The gloves always come off.
38:25
That book full of footnotes full of the evidential reports
38:30
describing the most disgusting things that our government and
38:35
the intelligence agencies carried out, apparently to keep
38:39
us safe. It's disgusting.
38:42
Now I've mentioned interaction with other countries, but this
38:47
was Francis Moore to gayly announced to the to the to the
38:50
UK and the world that our intelligence forces had now been
38:55
LinkedIn with other elements of of Israeli intelligence
38:59
gathering, including linking British and and Israeli
39:04
universities in order to share data.
39:08
Who voted for this? Did any of you vote for This Was
39:12
Just done? And why were we interested in
39:15
Francis Maude? Well, Francis Maude was helping
39:18
to promote that charity Common Purpose, right?
39:23
It's coincidence, just a coincidence.
39:26
But what was he also doing? He unleashed applied behavioural
39:30
psychology and I've talked about this many times because we were
39:35
warning and warning back in 2013 the government said it could
39:40
change people's minds and behaviours and they wouldn't
39:43
know about it. This is the document, it's
39:46
online as APDF. If you haven't read it, get
39:49
online and read it because it's truly astounding.
39:52
They are using applied psychology everywhere, including
39:58
on civil servants and politicians.
40:01
And when you hear strange phrases coming out of the mouths
40:05
of politicians, it's because you're dealing with a reframed
40:08
person. This technology.
40:12
Technology is real. And the British government said
40:15
we are leading the world on the ability to change the way people
40:19
think. UK column did a huge amount of
40:22
work showing the layers, the networks.
40:25
So this is the top with Francis Maude and the top civil servants
40:31
at the time. But we also highlighted that.
40:34
Let's bring it on down. That was Bob Kerslake came in to
40:38
replace the head man at the top. But we also showed that in the
40:43
background there was dialogues going on with French behavioural
40:47
change experts, never declared to the public, but it was
40:51
declared to another charity called the Franco British
40:54
Council. Never put in the press, never
40:58
talked about and the man on screen, Olivier Williere, if
41:04
I've pronounced that correctly, was a neuro man.
41:07
He wasn't just a psychologist or a psychiatrist, he was neuro and
41:12
they were talking about UK and the French working together to
41:15
change the way people think and behave.
41:19
And if we take it through, this was the Behavioural Insights
41:23
team that was set up in this country under David Halpern in
41:27
order to run the agenda in UK. And if I follow it through, very
41:31
quickly it took us to David Cameron's Big Society.
41:36
But if you want to see the Frenchman, here he is.
41:38
This is the article on the UK column.
41:41
British Cabinet Office collaborates with French
41:44
brainwashing guru to change the way we think.
41:48
This is a phenomenal book. Talking about this is very
41:52
expensive now because it seems to have sort of been retracted,
41:55
but it's written by PhD university people.
41:59
They've got tables of how this pernicious behavioural change
42:05
penetrated all parts of of the civil service.
42:09
Now the worst thing is that very often the attack on society has
42:14
been in our faces. So this was a quote from Nicola,
42:17
the Nicholas Bowles MP back in 2013.
42:21
And he said the Prime Minister and his deputy, Nick Clegg want
42:25
their people power revolution to unleash chaotic effects across
42:30
local communities. I don't know where Roger is now,
42:33
but he's been in the middle of those chaotic effects.
42:36
Chaos or chaotic, therefore, in our vocabulary, is a good thing.
42:40
And I'll bring up another one, Danny Kruger.
42:43
The Conservatives plan to introduce a period of creative
42:47
destruction. This is this is sedition, this
42:52
is treason, we were told. What were the security services
42:57
doing? Where were they?
42:59
I think they were complicit. Let's have a look at this man
43:02
Michael Gove, a revolutionary communist could lead Ofsted.
43:10
So if the right candidate for any public appointment happens
43:13
to be a member of the Revolutionary Communist Party or
43:16
someone who's been generous enough to support a political
43:19
party with their hard earned cash, think about what Roger was
43:23
telling you. If they're the right person, he
43:26
or she will be appointed. I ask who checked him and I will
43:32
end on this one, which is Eric Pickles.
43:42
So what was his message? Well, I mean it.
43:44
It was just everything. We are going to shake up the
43:47
balance of power in this country.
43:49
We are going to change the nature of the Constitution, be
43:53
in no doubt about our commitment to localism.
43:56
I know I look like an unlikely revolutionary, but the
44:00
revolution starts here. Isn't this sedition right?
44:07
You wonder why the country's falling apart.
44:09
They told you they were going to destroy the country and you've
44:13
had a glimpse of how how that was done.
44:16
I've got to finish, but I just want to end on this.
44:20
The Tories, big society, people think it was a sort of busted
44:24
flush and it disappeared. Oh no, it didn't.
44:26
You're living big society now. And this was a model based on
44:31
another provocateur, Saul Alinsky.
44:37
I'm not making this up. This is in the Conservative.
44:40
This was in the Conservative home blogspot.
44:42
They admitted it. And once again, the UK column
44:46
warns what was going on here. The dissent, Interstate media
44:51
control. And last bit, I'm sorry for the
44:54
Labour Party is if you think this was only being carried out
44:59
through the Labour, through the Conservative Party.
45:01
No, because exactly the same Solinsky policy was being
45:06
unleashed through the through Labour.
45:10
And I'll end with this, this slide, which is just to say, are
45:16
we really to believe that our security services with billions
45:21
of pounds of surveillance and monitoring couldn't work out
45:25
that this country was being destroyed by subversion and
45:29
sedition from inside the country?
45:32
So as they say, I put it to you that this is this cannot
45:36
possibly be the case. And if it's if it's the case
45:39
that the Security Service is new, then they are complicit in
45:44
the subversion and what we have called the treason against this
45:49
country. I'll end there.
45:50
Thank you.