Latest / Gil I Am / Harmeet Dhillon and Tucker Carlson Shocking Story of Kamala Harris and the Crimes She’s Committed! PART 2

Transcript

Harmeet Dhillon and Tucker Carlson Shocking Story of Kamala Harris and the Crimes She’s Committed! PART 2 · Gil I Am

0:00
Speaker 1: Okay, So what's up everybody. This is this guil Thanks
0:03
Speaker 1: for listening, and now I give to you part two
0:07
Speaker 1: of Kamala Harris's crimes that she's committed and all of
0:11
Speaker 1: the undertakings that she's done to get to where she is.
0:14
Speaker 1: So this is Parmeet Dilon, who's being interviewed by tuber Carlson.
0:20
Speaker 1: I hope you like it. Please enjoy, talk to you later.
0:29
Speaker 2: So in San Francisco, like many of our liberal cities
0:31
Speaker 2: in California, there's there's campaign finance matching funds that are available,
0:37
Speaker 2: but there's also a benefit that you get if you
0:39
Speaker 2: agree to voluntarily cap you're raising and spending. At the time,
0:44
Speaker 2: for mayor, I think it was a little bit higher,
0:46
Speaker 2: but for district attorney and mayor it might have been
0:48
Speaker 2: the same. It was two hundred and eleven thousand dollars.
0:51
Speaker 2: So if you agreed to CAP, you're raising and spending
0:53
Speaker 2: at two hundred and eleven thousand dollars. In two thousand
0:56
Speaker 2: and three, you got a statement published in the Voter
1:00
Speaker 2: Guide that's mailed to all the almost half a million
1:03
Speaker 2: voters in San Francisco registered voters saying that you had
1:06
Speaker 2: voluntarily agreed to confine yourself to that spending cap. So
1:10
Speaker 2: it's like a level playing field and it's a little
1:12
Speaker 2: bit of a gold star that you're agreeing not to
1:15
Speaker 2: engage in corruption, wasteful spending, cronyism by raising money from
1:19
Speaker 2: all kinds of unknown sources. So she agreed to that.
1:23
Speaker 2: She filed a piece of paper. She signed it under
1:25
Speaker 2: penalty of perjury, saying, I Kamala Harris agreed to this
1:28
Speaker 2: voluntary spending limit. The other most of the other candidates
1:32
Speaker 2: in the race and candidates for mayor during that race,
1:35
Speaker 2: they also agreed to that spending limit. Okay, so most
1:38
Speaker 2: of the candidates running for office in California, San Francisco
1:41
Speaker 2: rather agreed to that spending limit. Well, it turns out
1:45
Speaker 2: that Kamala Harris, who by the way, started out in
1:48
Speaker 2: this campaign third behind her boss, Terrence Hallanan, who was
1:52
Speaker 2: in the lead, and then a guy named Vic Fozio
1:56
Speaker 2: who was a former prosecutor then defense attorney who was
2:01
Speaker 2: going to be the hard on crime guy. He was
2:03
Speaker 2: eventually endorsed by the Republicans in San Francisco. So she
2:06
Speaker 2: was third, She was the underdog, and so she quickly
2:09
Speaker 2: was she was getting no traction at first, so she
2:11
Speaker 2: realized she was going to have to really supercharge her spending.
2:14
Speaker 2: Willie Brown helped her with this. Willi Brown also helped
2:17
Speaker 2: raise money for independent expenditures to support her as well.
2:21
Speaker 2: So it's a funny story, but you know, one of
2:26
Speaker 2: her one of her campaign themes was that she was
2:30
Speaker 2: going to be tough on drugs, tough on marijuana. Back
2:32
Speaker 2: in two thousand and three, marijuana wasn't the recreational use
2:37
Speaker 2: of marijuana was not legal in California, and so she
2:40
Speaker 2: was going to be tough on pot. So apparently some
2:43
Speaker 2: pot activists who didn't like this, you know, they were
2:48
Speaker 2: pouring over the campaign finance records and it's a pot
2:51
Speaker 2: activist to realize that Kamala Harris had raised over three
2:54
Speaker 2: hundred thousand dollars and had spent over three hundred thousand dollars.
2:57
Speaker 2: So this person went and let the their campaigns know.
3:01
Speaker 2: They filed an ethics complaint against her, and at the
3:06
Speaker 2: end of the election, she had spent over six hundred
3:09
Speaker 2: thousand dollars, so triple the amount that she was allowed.
3:13
Speaker 2: But thanks to hiring a good lawyer and making the
3:16
Speaker 2: excuse that oh, the form changed I didn't really understand
3:19
Speaker 2: the meaning of this, so please lift the cap. She
3:23
Speaker 2: got the San Francisco Ethics Commission, and by the way,
3:26
Speaker 2: many of those people on the Ethics Commission owed their
3:28
Speaker 2: positions to Willie Brown. She got them to look the
3:32
Speaker 2: other way on this gross violation. It's a crime. By
3:35
Speaker 2: the way, it could be. She could have been prosecuted
3:37
Speaker 2: for a misdemeanor had she been properly held accountable for
3:42
Speaker 2: this significant campaign finance violation, and anybody else would have.
3:48
Speaker 2: But the Ethics Commission simply lifted the cap, which is
3:51
Speaker 2: not in the statute. So instead of disqualifying her, which
3:55
Speaker 2: would have been the normal punishment, and prosecuting her, she
3:59
Speaker 2: simply got away with it. So in her first race
4:03
Speaker 2: for elected office, she ignored the camping finance limits. She
4:09
Speaker 2: used corrupt patronage from her former lover to raise the
4:14
Speaker 2: money necessary to do the glossy ads. I've got several
4:17
Speaker 2: examples here. She did more mailers and all of the
4:19
Speaker 2: other candidates. She had independent expenditures on her behalf, and
4:23
Speaker 2: she simply was able to outspend and blow through these limits.
4:27
Speaker 3: And so I got an ad from her.
4:30
Speaker 2: I have a lot of this material here from two
4:33
Speaker 2: thousand and two thousand and three, and so this is
4:37
Speaker 2: all the people who endorsed her, and this is all
4:39
Speaker 2: the main political machine there in San Francisco. Now, one
4:43
Speaker 2: of those guys in jail for he's a former state
4:46
Speaker 2: Senator Leland Yee.
4:48
Speaker 4: He was later indicted for Williams, Reverend Cecil Williams, and
4:54
Speaker 4: he was involved with Jim Jones. But maybe I'm misremembering.
4:58
Speaker 2: There's a lot of blasts from the past over there.
5:03
Speaker 2: Because she raised so much money, she was able to
5:06
Speaker 2: send multiple of these, you know, big glossy mailers.
5:11
Speaker 3: She's today's voice for justice.
5:14
Speaker 2: Yeah, today's voice for justice. Kamala Harris, Registrict Attorney. You know,
5:18
Speaker 2: Aaron Peskin, Fiona Ma you know, some of the shadiest
5:22
Speaker 2: politicians in California are here on her endorsement list. Of course,
5:27
Speaker 2: Willie Brown, she was you know, she checked all the
5:31
Speaker 2: boxes to get the gay community on board, the Asian
5:34
Speaker 2: community on board. You know, she really put the coalition
5:37
Speaker 2: together thanks to the mentorship she enjoyed. Here is Assembly Men, Marcoleno.
5:42
Speaker 2: No one is better prepared to lead our District Attorney's
5:45
Speaker 2: office in this new era than Kamala Harris. Well, they're
5:48
Speaker 2: actually almost every prosecutor in that office was better prepared.
5:53
Speaker 2: Terrence Hallanan was better prepared, vic Fozia was better prepared.
5:56
Speaker 2: So by simply out spending and violent the campaign finance
6:01
Speaker 2: cap she was able to win this election. She got
6:06
Speaker 2: it into the runoff, and then she was able to
6:09
Speaker 2: win in the runoff against her boss. So it was
6:12
Speaker 2: a pretty incredible upset. This is another one of her
6:16
Speaker 2: glossy mayors, glossy mailers. So she's a veteran prosecutor with
6:23
Speaker 2: thirteen years of courtroom experience in a ninety percent conviction rate.
6:27
Speaker 2: She actually had only been a prosecutor for ten years,
6:30
Speaker 2: and her conviction rate, I mean, you can manipulate any
6:35
Speaker 2: statistic you want by simply changing the numerator and the denominator,
6:41
Speaker 2: and so you know, it's pretty incredible that the birth
6:45
Speaker 2: of this meteoric career comes out of multiple campaign finance violations.
6:54
Speaker 3: So she won, she won that race.
6:57
Speaker 2: I mean, one of the mailers from the other side
7:02
Speaker 2: is a mailer from the from the Tenants Union, which
7:06
Speaker 2: was supporting Kamala Harris, sorry sorry, supporting Terrence Halenan, and
7:11
Speaker 2: they pointed out that she had committed another violation, and
7:14
Speaker 2: that is soliciting money from landlords who she was supposed
7:19
Speaker 2: to be regulating in her job at the City Attorney's office.
7:22
Speaker 2: So one of her jobs in the City Attorney's office involved,
7:25
Speaker 2: you know, sort of the welfare of people who were
7:29
Speaker 2: on public assistance, and that included people in the SRO
7:34
Speaker 2: single residence housing and Section eight housing. I mean, it's
7:38
Speaker 2: it's a lot of our residents are on public assistance
7:41
Speaker 2: and live in this kind of housing. And so she
7:44
Speaker 2: happily took tens of thousands of dollars from slum lords
7:48
Speaker 2: who she was supposed to be regulating in this campaign
7:52
Speaker 2: and the tenants union, there's a there's a mailer in
7:55
Speaker 2: here I have somewhere that talks about her taking money
7:58
Speaker 2: from the roach motels and and you know, they were
8:01
Speaker 2: able to put that one mailer out, but it ended
8:03
Speaker 2: up not not convincing.
8:05
Speaker 4: San Francisco has more roach motels in any city in
8:07
Speaker 4: the I think per square foot it's probably number one.
8:10
Speaker 3: So we're getting pretty close to the presidential election. That
8:12
Speaker 3: probably has you thinking about the future and possibly feeling
8:15
Speaker 3: a little anxious about it. So what can you do
8:20
Speaker 3: to secure your future? Well, probably a lot of things,
8:25
Speaker 3: but maybe one of the first, and this is not glamorous,
8:28
Speaker 3: but get some life insurance. According to the annual Insurance
8:32
Speaker 3: Barometer study, forty one percent of people don't have the
8:35
Speaker 3: coverage they need should something unexpected happen to them, and
8:39
Speaker 3: unexpected things happen, in fact, it's going to happen to
8:42
Speaker 3: all of us. Not to be morbid. You don't want
8:45
Speaker 3: to leave a mess behind. You've got people who love
8:47
Speaker 3: you and depend on you. They have mortgage payments or
8:50
Speaker 3: credit card debt. They need money, and you don't want
8:53
Speaker 3: to leave them in the lurch. And that has happened
8:55
Speaker 3: probably to people you know. And that's why we're proud
8:58
Speaker 3: to partner with policy Genius, very straightforward tool that helps
9:02
Speaker 3: you find the right life insurance policy at the best
9:05
Speaker 3: price so you can have some peace of mind. Policy
9:08
Speaker 3: Genius it is easy. You can find life insurance policies
9:10
Speaker 3: that start at just two hundred to ninety two dollars
9:13
Speaker 3: per year for a million dollars of coverage. Some options
9:16
Speaker 3: are one hundred percent online and lets you avoid unnecessary
9:19
Speaker 3: medical exams. And if you're in the business of avoiding
9:23
Speaker 3: unnecessary medical exams, that's good news. Policy Genius combines the
9:28
Speaker 3: best of a fast and easy to use digital tool
9:31
Speaker 3: with the expertise of real licensed agents. You compare quotes
9:35
Speaker 3: from America's top insurance side by side for free, so
9:39
Speaker 3: it's not confusing and you don't suspect that you're getting
9:42
Speaker 3: shafted because you're not. Go to policygenius dot com slash
9:46
Speaker 3: Tucker to get your free life insurance quotes and see
9:49
Speaker 3: how it works and how much you could save. That's
9:51
Speaker 3: policygenius dot com slash Tucker.
9:54
Speaker 2: So Tucker, I mentioned to you that she blew through
9:58
Speaker 2: those campaign finance limits. Yeah, and she was given a
10:03
Speaker 2: pass if she issued corrective apology and disclosure to the public.
10:08
Speaker 2: So how she did that was she had a door hanger.
10:13
Speaker 2: And those of us who were involved in politics, you know,
10:15
Speaker 2: you go walk doors, you knock on the doors, and
10:17
Speaker 2: you hang a doorhanger with your materials. So she replaced
10:20
Speaker 2: her door hanger with this Kamala Harris folded door hanger
10:26
Speaker 2: and then in the tiniest possible print, would you like, yeah,
10:31
Speaker 2: I'll put mine on. Let me show you. I mean,
10:37
Speaker 2: due to an error by the Kamala Harris campaign, the
10:39
Speaker 2: voter information pamphlet indicates that the campaign has agreed to
10:43
Speaker 2: voluntary limit campaign spending. This is incorrect. We take responsibility
10:47
Speaker 2: for this error. Now this is printed on the top
10:49
Speaker 2: of this hangar, so you hang it on the door.
10:53
Speaker 3: And no way the normal.
10:55
Speaker 2: Wage slave coming home from their actual job where they worked,
10:58
Speaker 2: you know, a full day on like Kamala Harris, would go.
11:02
Speaker 3: And let people who are not getting Willie.
11:03
Speaker 2: Brown, you may people those of us taxpayers who have
11:07
Speaker 2: private sector jobs. You come home and the first thing
11:09
Speaker 2: you do with this annoying piece of crap is tear
11:12
Speaker 2: it off, right, So this is the part that would
11:14
Speaker 2: follow to the ground when you tear it off, and
11:15
Speaker 2: maybe clutch your mail and take it. And nobody read
11:18
Speaker 2: this like three point disclosure on this thing. And so
11:22
Speaker 2: because her patronage boyfriend had fixed it for her, she
11:27
Speaker 2: got away with this. Nobody else would be able to
11:30
Speaker 2: get away with this today, I can guarantee you and
11:33
Speaker 2: so no shame. And that's how she got her start
11:36
Speaker 2: in politics by breaking the rules. And so I mentioned
11:41
Speaker 2: to you these no show jobs as well. She had
11:44
Speaker 2: the lowest attendance record of any of the attendees of
11:47
Speaker 2: these two commissions either. So on top of having a job,
11:49
Speaker 2: or she got paid hundreds of thousands of dollars to
11:52
Speaker 2: do very little. She didn't even show up and do that.
11:55
Speaker 2: But there's one more fact about this. You know, in
11:58
Speaker 2: the City Attorney's office, they had to keep time sheets.
12:01
Speaker 2: Now you know a lot of lawyers. You've gotten bills
12:04
Speaker 2: from lawyers. We yes, I have we bill by the hour,
12:09
Speaker 2: supposed to record our time in tenths of an hour. Okay,
12:13
Speaker 2: So in the City Attorney's office you recorded your time
12:18
Speaker 2: that way. And so someone in one of these various
12:20
Speaker 2: campaigns she's been in over the years, did a Public
12:23
Speaker 2: Records Act request for these hours. And her predecessor in
12:27
Speaker 2: her job at the City Attorney's Office was a now
12:32
Speaker 2: i think retired or semi retired judge, Catherine Feinstein, the
12:36
Speaker 2: daughter of Dianne Feinstein, the former United States Senator. So
12:40
Speaker 2: Feinstein had the job and then Kamala Harris had the job.
12:43
Speaker 2: So if you compare their hours, you see that Kamala
12:46
Speaker 2: Harris I think, worked one day over eight hours, and
12:48
Speaker 2: all the three years that she worked there, Diane Feinstein's
12:51
Speaker 2: daughter regularly worked.
12:53
Speaker 3: Long, normal lawyer hours one day over eight hours in
12:57
Speaker 3: how long three years. Ye As she's just lazy.
13:01
Speaker 2: Yeah, And there were a number of days where she
13:03
Speaker 2: had block eight hours, phone calls, research something eight hours.
13:09
Speaker 2: So she didn't work full days in that job. That's
13:12
Speaker 2: that's what any supervisor, I'm a supervisor about twenty five lawyers,
13:16
Speaker 2: if I saw timesheets like that, I would call that
13:18
Speaker 2: person and to put them on probation because they clearly
13:21
Speaker 2: aren't working a full days worth the work. They're block billing,
13:24
Speaker 2: they're putting down time, they're doing a lot of admin time,
13:27
Speaker 2: days and days of admin time, meaning I didn't work
13:30
Speaker 2: that day. I read the newspaper, I did continuing legal education,
13:35
Speaker 2: I did some you know, background research. She did not
13:38
Speaker 2: work those full days. That's what any supervising lawyer, being honest,
13:43
Speaker 2: would tell you. So that's pretty striking because as it is,
13:47
Speaker 2: you're you know, only expected to work, you know, sort
13:50
Speaker 2: of nine to five on like those of us who
13:52
Speaker 2: are you know, working in the private sector, working much
13:55
Speaker 2: harder to make a living and keep our jobs. There's
13:58
Speaker 2: no such accountability in in the jobs that she's held.
14:02
Speaker 2: And so when she ran for DA she claimed, I've
14:05
Speaker 2: tried hundreds and hundreds of serious felony cases, and she
14:08
Speaker 2: got busted by the tenants union saying, actually, you've tried
14:11
Speaker 2: ten cases. And then she had to sort of over
14:15
Speaker 2: the years own that maybe she was affiliated with hundreds
14:20
Speaker 2: of cases, she didn't actually try them. And look, as
14:24
Speaker 2: you get more senior as a lawyer, you don't try
14:27
Speaker 2: every case. I get it, But in those early years
14:29
Speaker 2: of your career, if you're billing yourself as a top
14:32
Speaker 2: cop and a top prosecutor, normally people do. But that
14:37
Speaker 2: is not Kamala Harris.
14:39
Speaker 3: You have an excellent memory, well in general, but for
14:44
Speaker 3: this period twenty years ago, and you were around Kamala Harris,
14:49
Speaker 3: living in that world matter all that. When you see
14:52
Speaker 3: Kamala Harris now, does she seem like the same person
14:55
Speaker 3: to you?
14:56
Speaker 2: So this is interesting, Tucker. I got the impression from
14:58
Speaker 2: the first time I met Kamala Harris, when she strode
15:01
Speaker 2: into my friend's apartment in that small fundraiser of an
15:07
Speaker 2: extremely confident, competent, articulate person.
15:11
Speaker 1: Now.
15:12
Speaker 2: I don't think she's a great lawyer, and I think
15:14
Speaker 2: she's hardly had much courtroom experience, but she exuded competence
15:19
Speaker 2: and confidence. And the Kamala Harris you saw as vice
15:25
Speaker 2: president of the United States. Seems to be a completely
15:28
Speaker 2: different person, inarticulate, lacking confidence, almost like dazed or medicated
15:38
Speaker 2: in some way. And I don't know that, of course.
15:40
Speaker 2: I'm just telling you that the impression of somebody extremely
15:44
Speaker 2: competent and confident and able to talk about their record,
15:48
Speaker 2: their recent record, even falsely, with a degree of confidence
15:53
Speaker 2: in bravado. There's a couple of dynamics there. First of all,
15:58
Speaker 2: I think the record that she's been running on is
16:01
Speaker 2: way in the past, and so it's become part of
16:03
Speaker 2: her own personal hagiography that she's, you know, this brilliant, accomplished,
16:09
Speaker 2: stunning you know, top cop who criminals quake in their
16:13
Speaker 2: boots to see her. That's not true, but you know
16:17
Speaker 2: she's adopted it. But it's also way in the past.
16:19
Speaker 2: But secondly, it feels like she's not able to articulate herself.
16:24
Speaker 2: There seems to be a veil of inability to string
16:29
Speaker 2: together complete and coherent sentences.
16:32
Speaker 3: She seems afraid. To me. You saw it in the
16:34
Speaker 3: opening moments of her debate with Trump, where I thought
16:37
Speaker 3: she did well. As the debate continued, but in the
16:41
Speaker 3: opening moments, it's worth looking at the tape again. You
16:44
Speaker 3: see her eyes. This woman's terrified.
16:47
Speaker 2: Maybe it's imposter syndrome. I don't know what it is,
16:50
Speaker 2: but well, imposter syndrome as somebody who is successful, has
16:54
Speaker 2: reached certain levels of at least outward appearance as a success,
17:00
Speaker 2: yet it is plagued by self doubt that maybe I
17:03
Speaker 2: don't belong here? What am I doing here?
17:05
Speaker 3: I feel like I'm an impostor how did I.
17:06
Speaker 2: Find myself here? Like a bad dream, like those dreams
17:10
Speaker 2: we all have before the exam that you know, you
17:13
Speaker 2: go in and you haven't studied, and it's the fighter,
17:15
Speaker 2: that's the giant mare. You're in your pajamas or whatever
17:19
Speaker 2: and so, but it isn't one. It can happen to
17:22
Speaker 2: any of us, and we all free sometimes in tense situations.
17:25
Speaker 2: What we've all seen her on the national and international
17:28
Speaker 2: stage doing increasingly incoherent word salad statements. We've just seen
17:34
Speaker 2: the incident with sixty minutes substituting a completely incoherent answer
17:41
Speaker 2: that she gave to a question with something else that
17:44
Speaker 2: she did in another part of the interview, or maybe
17:46
Speaker 2: even taped afterwards. Who knows. I have no idea how
17:49
Speaker 2: sixty minutes came up with that.
17:50
Speaker 3: But sixty Minutes got caught lying about the Internet.
17:52
Speaker 2: Sixty Minutes has been caught blatantly fixing her incoherence for her,
17:57
Speaker 2: and you know that has been the case with the
17:59
Speaker 2: mainstream media. I think this is a theme throughout her career,
18:02
Speaker 2: dating back to that two thousand, two thousand and three.
18:06
Speaker 2: Is she gotten her leg up in life by shortcuts,
18:11
Speaker 2: not by meritocracy, and then she finds herself in a
18:16
Speaker 2: position that is beyond her capabilities, and then she has
18:19
Speaker 2: to lie and exaggerate to maintain that position and get
18:23
Speaker 2: to the next level. But with the assistance of the
18:25
Speaker 2: Democratic machine in California. And to be fair to her,
18:29
Speaker 2: she's not the only person. I mean, Gavin Newsom is
18:31
Speaker 2: another example of somebody who has faked his way to
18:35
Speaker 2: the top. Jaby erbisera who's in the cabinet today, is
18:39
Speaker 2: a guy who had basically one year of legal experience
18:42
Speaker 2: before he became the Attorney General of California. And so
18:46
Speaker 2: California's machine has produced a number of underqualified and over
18:52
Speaker 2: confident duds. But this person is seeking the top job
18:55
Speaker 2: of the United States with an exaggerated record, with a
19:00
Speaker 2: tattered history of sordid ways that she got to where
19:04
Speaker 2: she is, of numerous legal violations that could have resulted
19:08
Speaker 2: in criminal prosecution, just the campaign finance violations alone. And
19:13
Speaker 2: so you know, I can understand why somebody might have
19:15
Speaker 2: an imposter syndrome. And that's their history.
19:19
Speaker 1: Now.
19:19
Speaker 3: Sad thing is, California used to be famous for producing
19:22
Speaker 3: things from the world's best aag to aerospace to great movies.
19:25
Speaker 3: And now it's like failed light rail projects in Kamala
19:29
Speaker 3: Harris and Kevin Newsome.
19:31
Speaker 2: And gas lighting, gas lighting the voters on so many levels.
19:34
Speaker 2: So I mean, Kamala Harris promised to San Francisco voters
19:38
Speaker 2: to get elected that she was going to be tough
19:40
Speaker 2: on crime. The murder rate skyrocketed during her years as
19:45
Speaker 2: a district attorney. And why did that happen? Well, gangs
19:49
Speaker 2: in the whole Bay area, they do talk to each other.
19:50
Speaker 2: I was talking to a prosecutor in her office a
19:52
Speaker 2: couple of days ago in preparation for our interview, and
19:57
Speaker 2: this prosecutor said, harmeet these criminals. You may think, oh,
20:00
Speaker 2: they're like you know, criminals are on the margins of society,
20:02
Speaker 2: they're subhuman. No, they're very smart. They communicate with each other.
20:06
Speaker 2: They know that if you are doing certain crimes in
20:11
Speaker 2: San Francisco, you're going to get a pass. If you're
20:14
Speaker 2: doing drunk driving in San Francisco, you were going to
20:16
Speaker 2: get a past. During Kamala Harris's tenure, if you did
20:19
Speaker 2: it in Alameda County, San Mateo County, Murrin County, you
20:22
Speaker 2: would get prosecuted. So guess what. The criminals came to
20:25
Speaker 2: San Francisco to do their drug dealing, to do their
20:29
Speaker 2: break ins, their hot prow burglaries, their low level offenses.
20:33
Speaker 2: Kamala Harris was notorious for being hard on gun possession
20:37
Speaker 2: by legal taxpayers, but extremely lenient to the point of
20:43
Speaker 2: multiple criminals who possess guns committing murders after she let
20:49
Speaker 2: them off with a slap on the wrist or no
20:50
Speaker 2: punishment at all. So there was a double standard there
20:53
Speaker 2: in her prosecution.
20:55
Speaker 3: And that's a theme throughout the state where you know
20:59
Speaker 3: they've legalized stealing, can steal from stores and nothing, no
21:03
Speaker 3: one can do anything about it. But any store owner
21:06
Speaker 3: who tries to defend himself against violence, or homeowner who
21:09
Speaker 3: tries the same will be prosecuted.
21:11
Speaker 2: That's right.
21:11
Speaker 3: Why what is that impulse that anarcotyranny. Where does that
21:16
Speaker 3: come from?
21:17
Speaker 2: Well, there's two aspects of it. First of all, it's
21:19
Speaker 2: treating the successful people in society as criminals and putting
21:24
Speaker 2: them in a box. I mean, I'm a legal gun
21:26
Speaker 2: owner and you know the scrutiny you have to jump
21:30
Speaker 2: through to get a gun legally, and California is incredible.
21:35
Speaker 2: But if you are an illegal alien, you get a
21:38
Speaker 2: free pass. We're a sanctuary we're a sanctuary city before
21:41
Speaker 2: we were a sanctuary state. So Kamala Harris has long
21:44
Speaker 2: been in the camp of protecting those folks by simply
21:47
Speaker 2: looking the other.
21:48
Speaker 3: Way, breaking federal law, in other words, breaking federal law.
21:52
Speaker 3: And how is that the not insurrection? By the way, I.
21:55
Speaker 2: Mean, I think it's look, you know, the criminals have
21:58
Speaker 2: guns and they get away with it.
22:00
Speaker 3: But how is it not? I mean, she's always running
22:02
Speaker 3: around calling all the j six, all the diabetic grandmother's
22:05
Speaker 3: languishing in prison insurrectionists. But how was it not insurrection
22:08
Speaker 3: against the United States of America to allow foreigners in
22:13
Speaker 3: your state against federal law.
22:15
Speaker 2: Well, I completely agree. I mean, it's even worse than that.
22:18
Speaker 2: There was an interesting situation where a criminal committed a
22:23
Speaker 2: crime in San Francisco while she was the district attorney,
22:26
Speaker 2: and that criminal was free to commit that crime because
22:30
Speaker 2: she had pushed for that criminal to be part of
22:33
Speaker 2: a program of rehabilitation. So there was a rehabilitation program
22:37
Speaker 2: where if you did some job training as someone arrested
22:40
Speaker 2: for a serious crime, you could avoid prison time. Well,
22:45
Speaker 2: an illegal alien is not entitled to hold a job.
22:49
Speaker 2: So San Francisco taxpayers, California taxpayers under Kamala Harris's leadership,
22:55
Speaker 2: were paying for jobs training for illegal alien criminals to
23:00
Speaker 2: get out of their criminal sentences, and then they weren't
23:03
Speaker 2: even eligible to go on to hold those jobs. So
23:07
Speaker 2: one of those people committed a serious violent crime shattering
23:10
Speaker 2: the skull of a taxpayer in San Francisco, and he
23:13
Speaker 2: was able to do that because Kamala Harris signed him
23:17
Speaker 2: up for jobs training when he isn't illegally allowed under United.
23:19
Speaker 3: Why would you want that? I mean, you clearly are
23:21
Speaker 3: trying to overthrow the society.
23:24
Speaker 2: You know, you're pandering to a particular element of society.
23:27
Speaker 2: I think eventually Democrats have wanted to legalize all of
23:30
Speaker 2: the illegal aliens in the country. That's not a secret. Now,
23:32
Speaker 2: they tried to lie about it in the past, but
23:34
Speaker 2: today that's a campaign promise of hers that she wants
23:37
Speaker 2: to legalize all of these illegal aliens in the country
23:41
Speaker 2: and get their votes. So it's a long term vote
23:44
Speaker 2: recruitment program by these folks. But look, you can't forget
23:49
Speaker 2: the detail.
23:50
Speaker 3: She's the insurrections throw the United States government and system
23:56
Speaker 3: and destroyed democracy and invalidate our founding documents are core freedoms.
24:02
Speaker 3: I mean, that's all Those are all species of insurrection
24:04
Speaker 3: that would seem to me. She sounds like a criminal.
24:07
Speaker 2: Well, she's broken a lot of laws over the years,
24:10
Speaker 2: just in the white collar laws, but she's enabled hundreds,
24:14
Speaker 2: if not thousands of criminals to go on to commit
24:17
Speaker 2: violent crimes and even fatalities. And they're police officers in
24:22
Speaker 2: San Francisco who lost their lives because Kamala Harris was
24:26
Speaker 2: soft on the criminals who went on to kill them
24:29
Speaker 2: as one of their dozens of offenses. There's a long
24:33
Speaker 2: trail of victims in San Francisco and now California who
24:39
Speaker 2: have suffered because of Kamala Harris's soft on crime policies.
24:42
Speaker 2: And she's lied about it and gotten away with it.
24:45
Speaker 2: And it's kind of incredible that someone who failed, who
24:48
Speaker 2: increased the murder rate by many percentage points, who prosecuted
24:53
Speaker 2: almost no violent crimes in San Francisco during the many
24:56
Speaker 2: years she was a district attorney, she failed, up to
25:00
Speaker 2: becoming the Attorney General, where she went on to violate
25:04
Speaker 2: the rights of criminal defendants on a much more massive scale.
25:08
Speaker 2: But even before that, Tucker, one of the interesting incidents
25:12
Speaker 2: is in the last two years of her race, of
25:16
Speaker 2: her tenure as district attorney, she was embrold in a
25:19
Speaker 2: major scandal involving the systematic violation of criminal defendants' rights.
25:24
Speaker 2: And in San Francisco, in the drug lab, there was
25:28
Speaker 2: a drug technician who was supposed to test the drugs,
25:31
Speaker 2: and this person was sampling the drugs, taking them home
25:36
Speaker 2: and sampling them and also making numerous errors. This was
25:39
Speaker 2: an open secret in the District Attorney's office. So after
25:43
Speaker 2: you know, people mentioned it on numerous occasions, judges chastise
25:46
Speaker 2: the District Attorney's office. Eventually, a top manager in the
25:51
Speaker 2: office CENTI cover your ass email to Kamala Harris saying, Hey,
25:55
Speaker 2: by the way, I think the head of this drug
25:58
Speaker 2: lab section is actually taking drugs and regularly violating protocols
26:04
Speaker 2: and handling evidence. Kamala Harris, instead of doing her immediate
26:08
Speaker 2: duty as a district attorney to inform all defense counsel
26:12
Speaker 2: in all the cases in which this lab technician had
26:15
Speaker 2: handled the drugs for testing, she sat on it for
26:19
Speaker 2: a period of three months and it only came out
26:23
Speaker 2: not through Kamala Harris disclosing it, and so the judge
26:26
Speaker 2: in that case, Christine Mizzulo, excoriated the district attorney's office.
26:30
Speaker 2: Now by this time, Kamala Harris had been the district
26:33
Speaker 2: attorney for six years. In the six years she was
26:35
Speaker 2: a district attorney, she created no protocol for disclosing to
26:40
Speaker 2: defense counsel. This what's called a Brady violation, a violation
26:44
Speaker 2: which is so massive that you have to disclose to
26:46
Speaker 2: the other side that there's been a potential due process
26:48
Speaker 2: violation that could be exculpatory. So she got in trouble
26:52
Speaker 2: for that. She went on after that two years later
26:55
Speaker 2: to become the Attorney General of California. So there's literally
26:58
Speaker 2: no accountability for by some accounts, fourteen hundred cases, either
27:04
Speaker 2: convictions or pending cases, had to be dismissed in San Francisco.
27:09
Speaker 2: Because of this due process violation of the rights of
27:13
Speaker 2: the accused, I personally litigated a case against Kamala Harris
27:17
Speaker 2: myself and I saw the same pattern. So I had
27:21
Speaker 2: an important civil rights case involving a sick applicant for
27:24
Speaker 2: a prison guard job in the prison department in Sacramento County.
27:30
Speaker 2: Kamala Harris was the attorney general when this case went
27:32
Speaker 2: to trial, was getting prepared for trial, and I had
27:36
Speaker 2: won this case at the administrative level, so I was
27:38
Speaker 2: able to prove it an administrative hearing for state employees
27:41
Speaker 2: that the civil rights of my client had been violated
27:44
Speaker 2: because he was denied a job with the prison department
27:47
Speaker 2: because of his articles of faith. He had a beer,
27:49
Speaker 2: and he had a turbine, and under a federal equal
27:53
Speaker 2: employment law and state law as well, you're in you know,
27:56
Speaker 2: the state has to accommodate that. They had to offer
27:59
Speaker 2: him the opportunity to take a different gas mask test
28:01
Speaker 2: and prove that he could do the job. Well. I
28:04
Speaker 2: won that case at the administrative level, which should have
28:07
Speaker 2: been a slam dunk for the state to agree that
28:09
Speaker 2: he should have this job.
28:10
Speaker 1: Well.
28:10
Speaker 2: Kamala Harris fought that decision all the way to eve
28:15
Speaker 2: of trial, and I remember getting the United States Department
28:19
Speaker 2: of Justice involved in this case. And it was only
28:21
Speaker 2: after the United States Department of Justice opened up a
28:24
Speaker 2: civil rights investigation from the Office of Civil Rights into
28:27
Speaker 2: the State Corrections Department and how the state was handling
28:31
Speaker 2: this particular case, and after I got a national coalition
28:35
Speaker 2: of civil rights organizations ranging all the way from the
28:38
Speaker 2: American Civil Liberties Union to the Beckett Fund, a conservative organization,
28:43
Speaker 2: so a whole panoply of almost thirty civil rights organizations.
28:47
Speaker 2: Only when I had a massive press conference on this issue,
28:50
Speaker 2: did Kamala Harris, four years into this case, finally agree
28:53
Speaker 2: to settle the case. So you know, and why would
28:56
Speaker 2: she do that? Well, the Prison Guards Union, it turns out,
29:00
Speaker 2: only wanted accommodations for certain people but not others, and
29:03
Speaker 2: they didn't want this newcomer coming into their ranks. So
29:07
Speaker 2: you know, there was a blatant violation of my client
29:09
Speaker 2: civil rights. But I finally want but only after exerting
29:12
Speaker 2: outside pressure. And this has been her pattern. Typically, she's
29:16
Speaker 2: only willing to back down not because she's wrong, but
29:19
Speaker 2: because she's embarrassed or confronted publicly, and even then she's
29:24
Speaker 2: had such an entire career of faking her way to
29:28
Speaker 2: the top that there's just no shame there. And you
29:32
Speaker 2: know she's willing to continue to lie until.
29:34
Speaker 3: She got she gets to be Attorney General of the
29:37
Speaker 3: state of California after failing as a prosecutor for San
29:41
Speaker 3: Frusco County.
29:41
Speaker 2: Well, again, it's the machine politics of California. You mentioned
29:45
Speaker 2: Gavin Newsom. You know, at the same time, there was
29:47
Speaker 2: a consideration of whether Kamala Harris might run for a governor,
29:50
Speaker 2: and basically in the upper echelons of Democrat politics in California,
29:56
Speaker 2: these things are all worked out in advance. You know,
29:57
Speaker 2: multiple people might want the job, and I can guarantee
29:59
Speaker 2: you that's happening right now. In the case of Nancy Pelosi,
30:02
Speaker 2: who's you know, reaching the end of her career. At
30:05
Speaker 2: some point of her you know, it'll naturally expire, But
30:09
Speaker 2: there's a lot of jockeying like that. You know, which
30:11
Speaker 2: constituency is it going to be gay, Is it going
30:14
Speaker 2: to be Asian, Is it going to be black? Who's
30:15
Speaker 2: going to get the prize? So it's kind of like that.
30:17
Speaker 3: So that's all that matters.
30:19
Speaker 2: All that matters is identity politics. So you know, at
30:22
Speaker 2: that point in time, she was a district attorney and
30:26
Speaker 2: she could have run for multiple different offices. Senate wasn't
30:29
Speaker 2: open at the time, so she ran for the Attorney
30:32
Speaker 2: general position. And so despite this massive and I could
30:36
Speaker 2: go on for hours, I have a dossier of horrific
30:41
Speaker 2: instances of gross civil rights and human rights violations that
30:45
Speaker 2: occurred on her watch. She had the resume, and she
30:50
Speaker 2: had the powerful backing, and she checked the boxes of
30:54
Speaker 2: identity politics. First woman, first African American, first Indian American.
31:01
Speaker 2: So she checked those boxes. She ran. Now she ran
31:03
Speaker 2: against a highly competent, seasoned district attorney of Los Angeles County,
31:09
Speaker 2: Steve Cooley, who I consider a friend and who's been
31:11
Speaker 2: a fellow warrior in the pro life movement with me.
31:16
Speaker 1: Okay, So that ends part two of this interview, and
31:20
Speaker 1: it gives you a little more of an idea of
31:23
Speaker 1: exactly who this woman is. There's been rumors that she
31:27
Speaker 1: slipt the way to the top. She's given the receipts.
31:30
Speaker 1: Let you know exactly who she is. This woman is
31:33
Speaker 1: not substantial at all. There is nothing that she says
31:36
Speaker 1: or does that makes any damn sense, her interviews are incoherent.
31:41
Speaker 1: She's just a goddamn retard. And as far as Trump
31:44
Speaker 1: goes off the hinge and says what he says, he's
31:47
Speaker 1: an intelligent person. The biggest thing that we know about
31:50
Speaker 1: Donald Trump is that the four years he's proven that
31:53
Speaker 1: he can run this country, keep us out of trouble,
31:56
Speaker 1: and he can have a blistering economy that helps the people. Donold.
32:00
Speaker 1: That's the only way to do this. Kamala Harris is garbage.
32:03
Speaker 1: So this ends Part two. My name is Gil. Thanks
32:05
Speaker 1: for listening. Please like, subscribe, share and comment. Let me
32:09
Speaker 1: know what you think and I'll talk to you later
32:11
Speaker 1: with Part three later