Latest / Honey Badger Radio / Down, Down, to Grifter Town | HBR Talk 342

Transcript

Down, Down, to Grifter Town | HBR Talk 342 · Honey Badger Radio

• 0:00
  Speaker 1: Welcome to HBr Talk three forty two. Down down to
• 0:04
  Speaker 1: grifter Town. We've been looking into this hole, this deep, dark, nasty, dank,
• 0:12
  Speaker 1: disgusting hole of government spending, and I've been thinking about this.
• 0:21
  Speaker 1: I mean, yeah, rabbit holes go deep and they and
• 0:24
  Speaker 1: they wander a little bit and you find yourself in
• 0:26
  Speaker 1: odd places and so on. But rabbits are cute and fluffy,
• 0:31
  Speaker 1: and even if you don't have any sympathy, you know,
• 0:36
  Speaker 1: for a little rodents that look cuter than other little rodents,
• 0:43
  Speaker 1: you can eat rabbits. You know, they have some benefit
• 0:47
  Speaker 1: in the world at least. Right there's nothing good about
• 0:50
  Speaker 1: this what we're looking into. There's there's nothing good about this.
• 0:55
  Speaker 1: It could be good if they would take the feminism
• 0:58
  Speaker 1: out of it, but it's it's not comparable to a
• 1:02
  Speaker 1: rabbit hole. So the only thing I could think of
• 1:04
  Speaker 1: was goblins.
• 1:08
  Speaker 2: Do goblins have holes? Is that howlins?
• 1:11
  Speaker 3: Well, I mean I realized that Jews have tunnels.
• 1:17
  Speaker 1: They live in a big hole in the mountain. You know.
• 1:22
  Speaker 1: That's that's where the title comes from. Don dough to
• 1:25
  Speaker 1: Grifter tone. I can't sing that deep. It's one feminine
• 1:30
  Speaker 1: thing about me. I'm i can't get lower than tenor.
• 1:36
  Speaker 1: But and yes, I am showing my age, and no,
• 1:39
  Speaker 1: I do not care. Actually is a male, yeah, Alto's
• 1:48
  Speaker 1: a lot of altos can get down into the tenor ring.
• 1:50
  Speaker 2: Do you get a soprano?
• 1:52
  Speaker 1: Yeah, no, a lot of there's there's notes that some
• 1:55
  Speaker 1: altos can't get low enough to. But some altos can
• 2:00
  Speaker 1: get into the tenor range, and I'm one of them.
• 2:02
  Speaker 2: But I have no idea what I am.
• 2:05
  Speaker 3: People have asked me what I am, and I think
• 2:07
  Speaker 3: the technical term is baritone. But I'm just like comedy.
• 2:11
  Speaker 3: I can only sing comedy songs. I've tried singing sterious songs.
• 2:15
  Speaker 3: I just I don't sing like a singer. I sing
• 2:18
  Speaker 3: like a comedian.
• 2:19
  Speaker 2: Yeah, that's all I know.
• 2:22
  Speaker 1: What's funny is my my brother is also a tenor,
• 2:25
  Speaker 1: like but he's actually a tenor. I'm an alto that
• 2:27
  Speaker 1: can hit tenor. So I have little bit no idea.
• 2:32
  Speaker 4: What I am.
• 2:33
  Speaker 5: I have no idea what I am.
• 2:34
  Speaker 4: I think I think I was told I was a soprano, but.
• 2:38
  Speaker 1: I I hard.
• 2:41
  Speaker 4: A hard time hitting like the higher ranges. But you
• 2:44
  Speaker 4: know I do my bad be honest.
• 2:45
  Speaker 3: This is not another one of those points of identity politics.
• 2:48
  Speaker 2: I don't think, Matt.
• 2:50
  Speaker 1: Well, it does if you're trying to sing a piece
• 2:53
  Speaker 1: that has notes that are out of your range, because
• 2:55
  Speaker 1: that can get painful. But yeah, in any case, So
• 3:00
  Speaker 1: here we go. I'm your host, Hannah Wallen, here with
• 3:04
  Speaker 1: nonsense annihilator Lauren Brooks and the personification of perceptivity Mike Stevenson.
• 3:08
  Speaker 1: And yeah, this hole we're exploring is deep, dark and
• 3:13
  Speaker 1: filled with the stench of goblin or feminists, the stench
• 3:19
  Speaker 1: of feminists. They seem to have found a magic weapon
• 3:22
  Speaker 1: disguised as an innocent piece of human nature that, when utilized,
• 3:27
  Speaker 1: causes establishment entities to throw money at them. So there
• 3:33
  Speaker 1: we go. But before we get into it, we probably
• 3:39
  Speaker 1: should glove up before we get into it. But besides that,
• 3:42
  Speaker 1: we gotta do what we gotta do. As always, Honey
• 3:44
  Speaker 1: Badgery Radio dishes out a smorgasboard of thought provoking discussions,
• 3:49
  Speaker 1: and as experiences both recent and long past have demonstrated,
• 3:53
  Speaker 1: the provoked thoughts are fighting back. They've made it clear
• 3:56
  Speaker 1: that for people like us, relying on third party payment
• 3:59
  Speaker 1: platforms like Patreon to fund our work is treading on
• 4:01
  Speaker 1: thin ice or building our house in the path of
• 4:04
  Speaker 1: a rapidly growing wildfire. In light of this, we strongly
• 4:09
  Speaker 1: encourage our supporters to switch at least their support for
• 4:12
  Speaker 1: us to Feed the Badger dot com the most stable
• 4:15
  Speaker 1: way to help us out. And if you want to
• 4:18
  Speaker 1: tip us directly instead of relying on any social media platforms,
• 4:21
  Speaker 1: tip jar. The link for that is feed the Badger
• 4:23
  Speaker 1: dot com slash just a tip And as always, the
• 4:28
  Speaker 1: same risk applies to our social media platforms, which is
• 4:31
  Speaker 1: why you should further provoke the thought police by tracking
• 4:34
  Speaker 1: our thought provoking discussions on Honey Badger Brigade dot com,
• 4:38
  Speaker 1: where you can find your way to all of our content,
• 4:40
  Speaker 1: as well as a link to feed the Badger dot
• 4:42
  Speaker 1: com in the drop down menu at the top of
• 4:44
  Speaker 1: the page. And if you want to see if you
• 4:50
  Speaker 1: want to listen, I should say to this because there's
• 4:52
  Speaker 1: not really a uh I guess there is a feed
• 4:56
  Speaker 1: for a couple of other platforms besides YouTube, but a
• 5:02
  Speaker 1: lot of the platforms we use is just sound. So
• 5:06
  Speaker 1: in any case, if you want to look at some
• 5:08
  Speaker 1: of the other platforms that this is playing on and
• 5:11
  Speaker 1: you're used to watching it on YouTube, Honeybatcher Brigade dot
• 5:14
  Speaker 1: com is a place to look. So this, this particular
• 5:23
  Speaker 1: branch of the whole, is the best way I can
• 5:27
  Speaker 1: put it, because this really is a whole. I actually
• 5:31
  Speaker 1: went back and looked, you know, we were looking at
• 5:35
  Speaker 1: examples that I found searching the word feminist last time.
• 5:43
  Speaker 1: I thought, we just go right out right into it
• 5:45
  Speaker 1: and search the word feminist, and we did find a
• 5:49
  Speaker 1: bunch of stuff, and there is still more to go
• 5:51
  Speaker 1: over from that hole. But I just got curious because
• 5:55
  Speaker 1: you know, there's other things that you can look at
• 5:59
  Speaker 1: that feminism uses a lot of coded language and stuff,
• 6:02
  Speaker 1: and one of those is we we we kind of
• 6:06
  Speaker 1: highlighted last week gender based. Right now, if I just
• 6:13
  Speaker 1: put the word based in there, anything that had the
• 6:18
  Speaker 1: word based in it would come up, not just gender based,
• 6:22
  Speaker 1: but if I just put the word gender in there,
• 6:24
  Speaker 1: of course, anything that has gender as part of its
• 6:28
  Speaker 1: description comes up.
• 6:30
  Speaker 3: And that now that the idea of gender based seems
• 6:36
  Speaker 3: like something of a contradiction in terms yeah, when you
• 6:39
  Speaker 3: think of it in terms of modern day memes and such,
• 6:45
  Speaker 3: But yeah, how are you supposed to weed this out
• 6:48
  Speaker 3: when there's so many things called gender based? I mean,
• 6:51
  Speaker 3: gender gender is cringe, and based is well based, but
• 6:56
  Speaker 3: gender based.
• 6:58
  Speaker 2: How do you how do you pull that out of
• 7:01
  Speaker 2: the weeds?
• 7:02
  Speaker 1: M Well, the thing I noticed last week is, you know,
• 7:06
  Speaker 1: when we first started talking about these issues, we were
• 7:12
  Speaker 1: still seeing what we currently talk about as intimate partner
• 7:19
  Speaker 1: violence on a regular basis. That was referred to as
• 7:23
  Speaker 1: domestic violence, and it was for decades actually referred to
• 7:29
  Speaker 1: as domestic violence. And when feminists wanted to sort of
• 7:38
  Speaker 1: take over the idea and the treatment of domestic violence,
• 7:45
  Speaker 1: they started calling it intimate partner violence because that way
• 7:49
  Speaker 1: they could expand it from violence that is ignored by
• 7:53
  Speaker 1: the police because it's taking place within a family inside
• 7:57
  Speaker 1: a home, to violence and other forms of aggression that
• 8:05
  Speaker 1: take place within a partnership that doesn't necessarily involve living together.
• 8:11
  Speaker 1: So if a woman accuses her boyfriend who doesn't live
• 8:16
  Speaker 1: with her of stalking and harassing her after they break up,
• 8:22
  Speaker 1: you know, now he's her ex boyfriend calls her on
• 8:24
  Speaker 1: the phone once for something, you know, I would like
• 8:27
  Speaker 1: my socks back, you know, some dumb thing like that,
• 8:30
  Speaker 1: and the next thing you know, there's a restraining order.
• 8:32
  Speaker 1: He's stalking me, and that's you know not I know,
• 8:37
  Speaker 1: it's not everything like there are instances of actual stalking,
• 8:40
  Speaker 1: There are instances of actual harassment, but they call it
• 8:45
  Speaker 1: gender based violence. Now they were calling it intimate partner violence.
• 8:51
  Speaker 1: And there's a specific reason for the change. Right, intimate
• 8:55
  Speaker 1: partner violence, you can discuss that in genderless terms. So
• 9:00
  Speaker 1: this happens between couples that are heterosexual, and it can
• 9:05
  Speaker 1: go either way. It happens between couples that are homosexual,
• 9:12
  Speaker 1: and it happens to people who are bisexual. So everybody
• 9:17
  Speaker 1: can experience this, and not only can everybody experience this,
• 9:22
  Speaker 1: but perpetrators can be either sex. Right, if it's intimate
• 9:25
  Speaker 1: partner violence, as soon as it's gender based violence, we
• 9:28
  Speaker 1: get right back to the Deluthe model, which views all
• 9:33
  Speaker 1: of this type of violence as a behavior that is
• 9:40
  Speaker 1: caused by patriarchy. That represents men trying to dominate women,
• 9:46
  Speaker 1: Men as a population trying to dominate women as a
• 9:49
  Speaker 1: population and control women. And that changes everything, right, because
• 9:55
  Speaker 1: as soon as it's the male population trying to control
• 9:58
  Speaker 1: the female population, then suddenly it doesn't have to matter
• 10:05
  Speaker 1: if it happens to a male victim. It only happens
• 10:11
  Speaker 1: has to matter if it's done by a male perpetrator.
• 10:17
  Speaker 1: And so when they've changed it to gender based violence.
• 10:21
  Speaker 1: That's their territorial pissing on the idea again, so that
• 10:28
  Speaker 1: we're not talking about it in terms that allow for
• 10:34
  Speaker 1: female perpetrators to be taken seriously, possibly prosecuted, possibly to
• 10:43
  Speaker 1: go to the same kind of programs that male perpetrators
• 10:46
  Speaker 1: go to, where they admit that they're what they're doing
• 10:50
  Speaker 1: is wrong and harmful and that they maybe have a
• 10:54
  Speaker 1: temper problem and need to change the way they think
• 10:58
  Speaker 1: about interpersonal conflict and that kind of thing. So with
• 11:05
  Speaker 1: that in mind, I went through in search gender and
• 11:09
  Speaker 1: I found some interesting things, and we'll start with I
• 11:14
  Speaker 1: might actually start with the end here what I was
• 11:17
  Speaker 1: going to look at last, So there is a concept
• 11:21
  Speaker 1: called feminist jurisprudence that I learned about this early on
• 11:28
  Speaker 1: in my Reddit days, so this would have been something
• 11:30
  Speaker 1: that I've been hearing probably for about ten to twelve years.
• 11:39
  Speaker 1: This term feminist jurisprudence is basically feminism in law is
• 11:46
  Speaker 1: this whole long paragraph a philosophy of law based on
• 11:49
  Speaker 1: the political blah blah blah of feminism when it began
• 11:54
  Speaker 1: which the sixties, the second wave of feminism started with
• 11:58
  Speaker 1: this feminist juris prudence thing, and it's here's the important part.
• 12:07
  Speaker 1: Now holds a significant place in US law and legal thought,
• 12:12
  Speaker 1: influences many debates on this whole set of issues here
• 12:16
  Speaker 1: that we discuss through various approaches. Feminists have identified gendered components,
• 12:24
  Speaker 1: engendered implications of seemingly neutral laws and practices. So this
• 12:29
  Speaker 1: is how feminists inform law and policy in a way that,
• 12:37
  Speaker 1: in their beliefs, justifies discrimination. And of course it doesn't.
• 12:45
  Speaker 1: But they can convince legislators, they can convince judges, they
• 12:51
  Speaker 1: can convince police forces, prosecutors, and parts of the general
• 12:58
  Speaker 1: public that they should be able to trample your rights.
• 13:04
  Speaker 3: I'm glad Trump is going ahead with this executive order
• 13:07
  Speaker 3: about there is only two genders. Yeah, and you know
• 13:13
  Speaker 3: something is better than nothing. But he he is clipping
• 13:16
  Speaker 3: at the leaves of the of this.
• 13:20
  Speaker 2: Of this Cathuley plant.
• 13:23
  Speaker 3: If he were really to address the seeds, this is
• 13:27
  Speaker 3: what he would do. I mean, the idea that men
• 13:30
  Speaker 3: and women can change their gender is it seems radical,
• 13:34
  Speaker 3: and yes it is, But those are just the latest
• 13:38
  Speaker 3: flowerings of the deadly.
• 13:41
  Speaker 6: Plant that that was planted by uh feminism.
• 13:48
  Speaker 3: And if you if you don't pull this poisonous plant
• 13:54
  Speaker 3: out by the root, then you're just going to keep
• 13:58
  Speaker 3: getting it germinating over the world. This is people clipping
• 14:05
  Speaker 3: up at the leaves. But if the if the seed
• 14:09
  Speaker 3: is still planting itself all over the world, then you're
• 14:13
  Speaker 3: gonna keep getting these same things. We could say, yeah,
• 14:16
  Speaker 3: we don't believe men should play in women's sports, and yeah,
• 14:21
  Speaker 3: but if you're still if you're still subsidizing this, uh,
• 14:27
  Speaker 3: this Hawker Maimie theory that men oppress women everywhere and
• 14:32
  Speaker 3: always have, then you're gonna keep getting these eruptions of
• 14:38
  Speaker 3: men should become women and then they'll be less pressive.
• 14:41
  Speaker 3: And it's yeah, it's I I want an executive order
• 14:47
  Speaker 3: that doesn't just say there are only two genders. I
• 14:50
  Speaker 3: want an executive order saying men do not oppress women everywhere.
• 14:55
  Speaker 2: And always have. I know.
• 14:58
  Speaker 3: I Yeah, that's that's not gonna happen anytime soon because
• 15:03
  Speaker 3: Trump doesn't understand that, Musk doesn't understand that if they've
• 15:07
  Speaker 3: only recently got on board with the with the with
• 15:11
  Speaker 3: the outer limits of this contagion.
• 15:15
  Speaker 1: Yeah, it's gonna take a while. Yeah, And it's the
• 15:21
  Speaker 1: hard thing is this, And there's a There's a guy
• 15:24
  Speaker 1: that I follow on on X that had a great
• 15:28
  Speaker 1: metaphor for this. He goes by the name of shadow
• 15:31
  Speaker 1: Claw at shadow Claw eighty seven, and he said to me,
• 15:36
  Speaker 1: I just thought of a metaphor for feminism. And and
• 15:40
  Speaker 1: he he'd said that we were talking about these, you
• 15:42
  Speaker 1: and Mike were talking about this. I hope I'm pronouncing
• 15:45
  Speaker 1: this right, by the way, I believe it's pronounced kuzu
• 15:48
  Speaker 1: k u d z u. It's an invasive vine that
• 15:52
  Speaker 1: grows in the US with beautiful purple flowers that destroys
• 15:56
  Speaker 1: and tears down entire forest. You have to find and
• 15:59
  Speaker 1: kill the root. And I started watching there was a
• 16:03
  Speaker 1: video he posted on it on how to kill it,
• 16:06
  Speaker 1: and it's it's interesting that it's a vine and it
• 16:11
  Speaker 1: grows from an original like little plant that's maybe the
• 16:17
  Speaker 1: size of a potted violet, and that little plant has
• 16:24
  Speaker 1: a ball of roots that goes down into the ground
• 16:27
  Speaker 1: and a little bit of it sticks up and it
• 16:30
  Speaker 1: shoots off a vine, and after a little bit, a
• 16:34
  Speaker 1: couple of feet maybe another crown like that forms in
• 16:40
  Speaker 1: the ground, and then that one shoots off a vine
• 16:43
  Speaker 1: and it goes and it continues and it grows really fast,
• 16:48
  Speaker 1: and it takes over entire forests, and it weighs down
• 16:53
  Speaker 1: the trees. It covers up everything so that nothing can
• 16:58
  Speaker 1: get sunlight. It sucks all the nutrients out of the soil,
• 17:02
  Speaker 1: It kills all the other plants. Basically, it just sucks
• 17:07
  Speaker 1: the life out of everything. It is a leech plant.
• 17:11
  Speaker 1: So it is a perfect metaphor for what feminism does.
• 17:15
  Speaker 1: And in this instance, do you look at this this
• 17:19
  Speaker 1: concept of feminist jurisprudence, right, And this is from Cornell
• 17:25
  Speaker 1: Law School, so this isn't just some rando website. This
• 17:30
  Speaker 1: is what the establishment thinks feminists in terms of feminist jurisprudence.
• 17:37
  Speaker 1: And as it says here, this is targeting laws impacting employment.
• 17:45
  Speaker 1: It's like the first thing listed right, employment, divorce, reproductive rights, abortion, rape,
• 17:51
  Speaker 1: domestic violence, and sexual harassment. They've all quote benefited from
• 17:59
  Speaker 1: the analysis an insight of feminist jurisprudence. And it goes
• 18:04
  Speaker 1: on to say it describes patriarchy theory. Basically, feminists believe
• 18:09
  Speaker 1: that history was written from a Western cis male point
• 18:12
  Speaker 1: of view and does not reflect anyone else's role in
• 18:15
  Speaker 1: making history and structuring society. This male written history has
• 18:19
  Speaker 1: created a bias in the concept of human nature, gender
• 18:23
  Speaker 1: political or gender potential and social arrangements. The language, logic,
• 18:30
  Speaker 1: and structure of the law are male created and reinforced
• 18:33
  Speaker 1: Western male values and powered dynamics. Creating a binary of
• 18:38
  Speaker 1: male and female also creates an implied hierarchy, so it
• 18:42
  Speaker 1: actually does get into the gender mafia ideology as well. There.
• 18:47
  Speaker 1: And the problem obviously with feminist jurisprudence is that you
• 18:53
  Speaker 1: take a law that says, let's say they have a
• 18:58
  Speaker 1: law that says, don't spit on this sidewalk. You cannot
• 19:01
  Speaker 1: spit on the sidewalk. Spitting on a sidewalk puts other
• 19:05
  Speaker 1: people at risk, especially in the wintertime. And Ohio has
• 19:08
  Speaker 1: a lot of communities that actually still have laws on
• 19:11
  Speaker 1: the books don't spit on the sidewalk. And it's from
• 19:13
  Speaker 1: back in the day when there used to be a
• 19:16
  Speaker 1: spittoon outside of every bar for men that were chewing tobacco.
• 19:21
  Speaker 1: Chewing tobacco wasn't something that women did a lot, but
• 19:24
  Speaker 1: some women did, and you know, you'd spit your tobacco
• 19:29
  Speaker 1: spit in there. And if men were sitting around talking
• 19:34
  Speaker 1: and everything, they might aim from a distance and miss
• 19:38
  Speaker 1: the spittoon, and then you end up with this slimy
• 19:41
  Speaker 1: mess on the sidewalk. And if it freezes, you now
• 19:46
  Speaker 1: have an ice patch. And if somebody's walking along and
• 19:50
  Speaker 1: they don't see it, you now have somebody on the sidewalk. Right.
• 19:54
  Speaker 1: The other thing is sidewalks used to not be I mean,
• 19:57
  Speaker 1: some men didn't always exist, So sidewalks used to be wooden,
• 20:01
  Speaker 1: and that shit is acid and it will eat through
• 20:04
  Speaker 1: the wood. They probably damages concrete too. But since it's
• 20:08
  Speaker 1: not a common thing anymore, right, so you have this law,
• 20:11
  Speaker 1: you can't spit on the sidewalk. Okay, spitting on the
• 20:14
  Speaker 1: sidewalk is illegal. Feminists come along. Oh wait, now, spitting
• 20:18
  Speaker 1: on the sidewalk is something men do to intimidate women.
• 20:22
  Speaker 1: It's a gender based crime, right men. Men have low
• 20:28
  Speaker 1: heeled boots and they can see their feet everywhere they go.
• 20:34
  Speaker 1: But women wear these big puffy skirts everywhere they go,
• 20:37
  Speaker 1: and they have these high heeled boots and they're not
• 20:39
  Speaker 1: made for work and they're not made for traction. So obviously,
• 20:43
  Speaker 1: spitting on the sidewalk is a gender based crime. And
• 20:47
  Speaker 1: the next thing, you know, spitting on the sidewalk is illegal.
• 20:50
  Speaker 1: When men do it, but not when women do it.
• 20:53
  Speaker 1: And if a woman falls on you know, a pile
• 20:59
  Speaker 1: of spit or a patch of ice from spit on
• 21:04
  Speaker 1: the sidewalk, well, obviously that was a gender based assault.
• 21:09
  Speaker 1: And instead of a small fine, now you're going to jail.
• 21:14
  Speaker 1: That's how feminist jurisprudence works. A feminist jurisprudence says that
• 21:20
  Speaker 1: children are better off during their tender years with only
• 21:25
  Speaker 1: their mothers, instead of being shuffled back and forth to
• 21:32
  Speaker 1: mothers and father's houses after a divorce. And no reason
• 21:39
  Speaker 1: except God said so. Right, that was the logic behind
• 21:43
  Speaker 1: the tender years doctrine, because God said so. How do
• 21:46
  Speaker 1: we know God said so? A woman told.
• 21:48
  Speaker 4: Us a God shaped hole.
• 21:55
  Speaker 1: Yep, a God shaped hole. And so that's what we're
• 22:00
  Speaker 1: looking at in terms of every place we see uh,
• 22:05
  Speaker 1: in the in the law and policy, every place that
• 22:07
  Speaker 1: we see gender, the word gender. I just remember what
• 22:13
  Speaker 1: feminist jurisprudence is.
• 22:17
  Speaker 5: And uh.
• 22:17
  Speaker 1: And if you think it's you know, well, you know
• 22:20
  Speaker 1: they did all the teaching on this back in the
• 22:22
  Speaker 1: sixties and now it's not so much being promoted. Right
• 22:27
  Speaker 1: here is UVA law, This is Virginia University of Virginia. Right,
• 22:35
  Speaker 1: this is a Spring of twenty four, so this past
• 22:38
  Speaker 1: spring Feminist Jurisprudence Schedule information. This was a what level
• 22:46
  Speaker 1: course was this? I don't know if it says they
• 22:51
  Speaker 1: may not be doing that anymore. Where it's one oh one, two, one,
• 22:56
  Speaker 1: three oh one and all that, and tell telling you
• 22:59
  Speaker 1: what what usually you what a year or how many
• 23:02
  Speaker 1: semesters you have to have been in before you're really
• 23:05
  Speaker 1: eligible to take this class. Feminist jurisprudence is a field
• 23:09
  Speaker 1: in which scholarly activity is rooted in a set of
• 23:12
  Speaker 1: practice is designed to excavate and revise the myriad of
• 23:18
  Speaker 1: ways in which law conditions the lived experiences of women, men,
• 23:22
  Speaker 1: and children. They put women first, feminists, and so they're
• 23:29
  Speaker 1: studying what are understood to be the distinct schools of
• 23:33
  Speaker 1: feminist jurisprudence. There are now multiple schools of feminist jurisprudence
• 23:38
  Speaker 1: and the forms of practice that each supports. And now
• 23:43
  Speaker 1: they have this whole course work studying the history critical race, feminism,
• 23:51
  Speaker 1: queer legal theory, like all of the all of the
• 23:54
  Speaker 1: feminist things, all of the intersectional things. And this is
• 24:00
  Speaker 1: a course that and it's a it's available to any
• 24:05
  Speaker 1: students in family law, law, philosophy, and the humanities. So
• 24:11
  Speaker 1: there's a huge area there that anybody can take this course.
• 24:17
  Speaker 1: And so this is this is not old, it's not
• 24:22
  Speaker 1: I mean, it's been around a long time, but it's
• 24:24
  Speaker 1: not something that isn't being done anymore. It's not so
• 24:30
  Speaker 1: entrenched that they're not having to continue to teach it.
• 24:34
  Speaker 1: It's it's so entrenched that it's part of their system
• 24:40
  Speaker 1: of education. Like you, if you go to a lawyer
• 24:45
  Speaker 1: for anything, your lawyer has probably studied this. When you
• 24:52
  Speaker 1: have to deal with police, if you have to report
• 24:56
  Speaker 1: a crime, or if you're a witnessed to a crime,
• 24:59
  Speaker 1: or if you're accused of a crime, they've had that
• 25:03
  Speaker 1: as part of their education. The prosecutor has had that
• 25:07
  Speaker 1: as part of his education. The judge in any case
• 25:11
  Speaker 1: that you're involved in, has had that as part of
• 25:13
  Speaker 1: his education. And you know, the laws that have been
• 25:19
  Speaker 1: passed the legislators have actually been inundated with commentary from
• 25:27
  Speaker 1: people input during the legislative process. From that standpoint, so
• 25:36
  Speaker 1: it's it really is like that kudoo plant. It's it's everywhere.
• 25:43
  Speaker 1: It grows rapidly. It's ten drolls go in all different directions,
• 25:48
  Speaker 1: and once it puts down its rootball in one place,
• 25:53
  Speaker 1: it expands into the next, and the next and the next.
• 25:57
  Speaker 1: So yeah, that's basically what we're dealing with, and it's
• 26:03
  Speaker 1: what we're looking at today in this this particular segment
• 26:09
  Speaker 1: of the rabbit hole, the goblin hole, a feminist hole
• 26:15
  Speaker 1: that sounds even grosser. We'll go back to goblin hole.
• 26:18
  Speaker 3: And not just for being told that the do O
• 26:22
  Speaker 3: S means Department of State. D o S means discoperating system,
• 26:28
  Speaker 3: and it always will to those to those of us
• 26:31
  Speaker 3: of a certain generation, we will never forget. The do
• 26:35
  Speaker 3: OS was the glory days before Windows existed. You don't
• 26:39
  Speaker 3: you don't get that, Let's destroy the Department of State.
• 26:47
  Speaker 3: I would rather remember Doss Microsoft Dots. As much as
• 26:50
  Speaker 3: I hate Microsoft.
• 26:52
  Speaker 1: You can still go into DOS.
• 26:54
  Speaker 5: It's just.
• 26:56
  Speaker 3: I do I have a do every everyone should have
• 26:59
  Speaker 3: a box that allows you to play old old Doss games.
• 27:04
  Speaker 6: Oh man, I'm having I'm having a nostalgia trip.
• 27:08
  Speaker 1: Yeah, there's there's other stuff you can do. But in
• 27:11
  Speaker 1: any case, yeah, the Department of State kind of at
• 27:16
  Speaker 1: this point sucks. But hopefully that will change in any
• 27:21
  Speaker 1: case at this At this point, I would say this,
• 27:28
  Speaker 1: this indicator here would make it the Department of Scams.
• 27:33
  Speaker 1: So this is financial assistance. We're still in USA spending
• 27:39
  Speaker 1: dot gov. This is an award profile from a I
• 27:46
  Speaker 1: think I actually closed the tab I had all the
• 27:54
  Speaker 1: gender stuff on. I can find it again. It's all
• 27:56
  Speaker 1: you gotta do is go through and search and it'll
• 27:58
  Speaker 1: come back up again. But this is the United Nations
• 28:04
  Speaker 1: Office on Drugs and Crime. If you really want to
• 28:07
  Speaker 1: be shocked, you know, go to this website and look
• 28:14
  Speaker 1: up United Nations. There will be a ton the United Nations.
• 28:21
  Speaker 1: The amount of funding the United Nations has gotten from
• 28:24
  Speaker 1: the United States, Like, we pay a fee to the
• 28:26
  Speaker 1: United Nations that's like a membership fee, and people think
• 28:31
  Speaker 1: of that as the only money the UN gets from US,
• 28:35
  Speaker 1: But actually we spend a huge amount of money funding
• 28:42
  Speaker 1: United Nations programs, in United Nations offices, United Nations departments.
• 28:49
  Speaker 1: You and women would not exist without US money. So
• 28:59
  Speaker 1: a lot of this stuff, it's bullshit to think that
• 29:02
  Speaker 1: we could just, oh, we're going to stop paying our
• 29:04
  Speaker 1: membership fees and that will solve the problem with the UN. No,
• 29:10
  Speaker 1: every dollar the US is sending to the UN needs
• 29:15
  Speaker 1: to be cut off, and every dollar they want in
• 29:20
  Speaker 1: the future needs to be justified and voted on by
• 29:26
  Speaker 1: the American people. So this Department of State program to
• 29:36
  Speaker 1: the United Nations Office on Drug and Crime, We're going
• 29:39
  Speaker 1: to scroll down here after much ado in sure police
• 29:44
  Speaker 1: officers effectively respond to gender based violence related crimes based
• 29:49
  Speaker 1: on a gender sensitive curriculum for police academies in priority states.
• 29:57
  Speaker 1: So you remember when we got a que used to
• 30:00
  Speaker 1: being conspiracy theorists, paranoid conspiracy theorists for claiming that there
• 30:06
  Speaker 1: was funding from the Violence Against Women Act that paid
• 30:11
  Speaker 1: for training for police officers. Right here, police officers to
• 30:22
  Speaker 1: to use the Duluthe model to use feminist models to
• 30:25
  Speaker 1: address domestic violence.
• 30:27
  Speaker 6: It's still happening in the UK. It's gone, It's gone
• 30:30
  Speaker 6: way beyond men and women in the UK.
• 30:33
  Speaker 3: Is that the is at the point where the police
• 30:36
  Speaker 3: will arrest you for misgendering someone on Twitter. And you
• 30:40
  Speaker 3: know what that means, calling someone by the correct generation
• 30:44
  Speaker 3: gender gender the pointless word.
• 30:47
  Speaker 1: But you know what I mean, Well, it's funny too
• 30:49
  Speaker 1: because they'll do that if you misgender someone who is
• 30:53
  Speaker 1: trans right, but not a few misgender female m r A.
• 30:59
  Speaker 3: Again, how has been misgendered more than anyone I've ever
• 31:03
  Speaker 3: known on the Yeah.
• 31:05
  Speaker 1: The difference between me and trans woman, though, is I
• 31:09
  Speaker 1: think it's funny when it happens to me, But.
• 31:14
  Speaker 2: People don't understand that. Hannah, it's a it's a girl's name.
• 31:19
  Speaker 3: So many people see the name Hannah and they think
• 31:21
  Speaker 3: it must be some freaking Scottish guy.
• 31:25
  Speaker 1: Yeah, nope, it's.
• 31:27
  Speaker 2: It's a common name over here.
• 31:28
  Speaker 3: I've met I've met several Hannah's, but apparently it's quite
• 31:31
  Speaker 3: rare in the Americans.
• 31:33
  Speaker 1: Yeah, if I pronounce it slightly differently, instead of being
• 31:36
  Speaker 1: an English name for a girl, it's an Arabic name
• 31:40
  Speaker 1: for a girl. In English, it's Hannah. In Arabic it's Hannah.
• 31:49
  Speaker 1: Also Jewish name for a girl, but it really stems
• 31:53
  Speaker 1: from Arabic, so it's it's interesting people will see that.
• 31:59
  Speaker 2: And my name is Hebrew as well.
• 32:01
  Speaker 1: Yeah, a lot of English names are actually.
• 32:06
  Speaker 5: Not all though.
• 32:07
  Speaker 1: But but yeah, it's uh, But I don't think they
• 32:11
  Speaker 1: look at my name. They just get mad at something
• 32:13
  Speaker 1: I said. And if they don't like something I said,
• 32:16
  Speaker 1: that I must be a dude. Can't possibly not like
• 32:19
  Speaker 1: something a woman said.
• 32:21
  Speaker 4: Yeah, and you know, it's easy enough to just use
• 32:24
  Speaker 4: a fake name. You know, I think that's probably a
• 32:26
  Speaker 4: good percentage of the other people who just do that.
• 32:30
  Speaker 4: You know, it's lazy and it's just ridiculous. But that's
• 32:36
  Speaker 4: that's how people are, you know, especially when you're saying
• 32:39
  Speaker 4: things that they don't like.
• 32:41
  Speaker 1: Yeah, you know, it would be pointless for me to
• 32:45
  Speaker 1: use a fake name. I've been doxed, like I was
• 32:49
  Speaker 1: like years ago. So but yeah, So this is this
• 32:53
  Speaker 1: is one of the first things I wanted to talk about.
• 32:56
  Speaker 1: This is the United States federal government. Now, remindy to
• 33:01
  Speaker 1: remind you this. This is the Department of State, all right,
• 33:05
  Speaker 1: the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime. So this
• 33:09
  Speaker 1: isn't just in the United States that they're doing this.
• 33:14
  Speaker 1: This funding goes to pay it for this training to
• 33:21
  Speaker 1: be exported to other countries. Right, They're exporting it to
• 33:28
  Speaker 1: other countries after they did it here first. They're exporting
• 33:35
  Speaker 1: it to all kinds of places all over the world.
• 33:39
  Speaker 1: And what we've got coming up will show you some
• 33:42
  Speaker 1: of what's going on there. But I wanted to establish
• 33:45
  Speaker 1: this first because again, this is a we told you
• 33:49
  Speaker 1: so moment. From the men's rights movement to everybody who
• 33:52
  Speaker 1: called US conspiracy theorists and paranoid for saying that this
• 33:56
  Speaker 1: was happening in the United States.
• 33:58
  Speaker 3: What's been uncovered over the last few weeks by Doge
• 34:03
  Speaker 3: regard regarding USA, d usaid, is how much the US
• 34:11
  Speaker 3: government has been pushing a certain ideology on the rest
• 34:15
  Speaker 3: of the world. And for most of my lifetime, this
• 34:19
  Speaker 3: has been what the quote unquote liberal left leading media
• 34:24
  Speaker 3: has been pushing against. Like they don't want the American
• 34:28
  Speaker 3: government to be pushing their ideology onto the rest of
• 34:31
  Speaker 3: the world, or indeed the European government, the various governments
• 34:36
  Speaker 3: to be pushing their ideology on the rest of the world.
• 34:40
  Speaker 3: We don't want any of this military industrial complex. But
• 34:45
  Speaker 3: if we're spending millions of dollars trying to turn everyone
• 34:49
  Speaker 3: gay across the world.
• 34:50
  Speaker 2: Oh yeah, we're fine with that.
• 34:52
  Speaker 3: Yeah, you know, we're fine with trying to turn serbians gay.
• 34:56
  Speaker 3: We're fine with trying trying to turn banglades. She's gay,
• 35:00
  Speaker 3: with fighting with trying to turn the whole world gay.
• 35:03
  Speaker 2: You know, the vast majority of.
• 35:06
  Speaker 3: The world doesn't want to be turned gay, especially not
• 35:08
  Speaker 3: by the American government. They don't trust the American government.
• 35:12
  Speaker 1: It's because the American government is gay.
• 35:16
  Speaker 3: It is, and it's gay's trying to turn the whole
• 35:19
  Speaker 3: world gay. But but this is just this blind spot,
• 35:24
  Speaker 3: especially when it comes to the mass media of of
• 35:27
  Speaker 3: the West. They're like, oh, yeah, we we we hate
• 35:31
  Speaker 3: the colonialism of the West likes to.
• 35:36
  Speaker 2: Try to turn everyone gay.
• 35:38
  Speaker 3: And then you know, you're a bigger if you don't
• 35:40
  Speaker 3: want to turn the whole world gay and democratic.
• 35:43
  Speaker 2: Yeah, that's that's that's how far it goes back.
• 35:46
  Speaker 3: For one hundred years of the West has been trying
• 35:48
  Speaker 3: to turn the rest of the world democratic, and we've
• 35:52
  Speaker 3: just been like, well, of course you have to be democratic.
• 35:55
  Speaker 3: There's no other there's no other possibility.
• 35:57
  Speaker 2: You can't.
• 35:59
  Speaker 6: You have to be democrats to go, we'll shoot you,
• 36:01
  Speaker 6: to quote Alan Watts all those years ago, and and
• 36:07
  Speaker 6: and and yeah.
• 36:08
  Speaker 2: It's it's not like.
• 36:11
  Speaker 3: The American right wing is trying to dominate the world
• 36:16
  Speaker 3: with its ideology. It seems the American right wing is
• 36:21
  Speaker 3: putting America first. Most people just saying yeah, no, just
• 36:26
  Speaker 3: we want to be left to ourselves, and we want
• 36:28
  Speaker 3: to leave you to yourselves, and and and yeah. Within
• 36:33
  Speaker 3: that paradigm. We can trade valuable goods with each other.
• 36:38
  Speaker 3: But there's this faction of people that.
• 36:40
  Speaker 2: Want to use the vast treasuries.
• 36:45
  Speaker 3: Of of of the of the American government as confiscated
• 36:50
  Speaker 3: from the American taxpayers to turn the whole world gay.
• 36:55
  Speaker 3: And I'm like this, this is why the whole world
• 36:58
  Speaker 3: hates America. This is why the whole world hates Europe.
• 37:01
  Speaker 3: It's not because of a spice trade from one hundred
• 37:05
  Speaker 3: years ago. It's because they're trying to turn the whole
• 37:08
  Speaker 3: world gay.
• 37:09
  Speaker 4: In the whole world, spicy trade doesn't want to become gay.
• 37:16
  Speaker 1: I had to.
• 37:20
  Speaker 5: The spicy trade.
• 37:25
  Speaker 1: Uh shit, But you know, you're right. It's we're in
• 37:29
  Speaker 1: a situation now where we're being told that multiculturalism is
• 37:34
  Speaker 1: a great and fabulous and wonderful thing as long as
• 37:39
  Speaker 1: when it comes to Western culture, it only includes the
• 37:42
  Speaker 1: aspects that don't necessarily contribute in any way, shape or
• 37:46
  Speaker 1: form to the success of Western culture. Right, So, no, no,
• 37:53
  Speaker 1: no capitalism, no uh innovation, no industrialism, no hard work,
• 38:01
  Speaker 1: no you know, none of that. No rewarding merit over
• 38:09
  Speaker 1: other aspects of your character and stuff like that. But
• 38:12
  Speaker 1: definitely the idea of focusing on demographic over and above character.
• 38:20
  Speaker 1: Definitely the idea of messing around with people's sexuality and
• 38:25
  Speaker 1: focusing on sexuality because apparently, in a world where there
• 38:30
  Speaker 1: is still food insecurity, who you fuck is way way
• 38:34
  Speaker 1: more important than where your next meal is coming from
• 38:37
  Speaker 1: for some reason, like it's just the dumbest thing, and
• 38:43
  Speaker 1: it is being deliberately exported by the people who tell
• 38:48
  Speaker 1: us that they're trying to help the world. So the
• 38:53
  Speaker 1: United States has been paying to teach police in India,
• 38:59
  Speaker 1: in Africa, all over every country that that is affected
• 39:04
  Speaker 1: by US funding, uh In in the Far East, in
• 39:10
  Speaker 1: the Middle East, and in all over South America and
• 39:15
  Speaker 1: parts of Europe, that if there is a situation of
• 39:22
  Speaker 1: domestic violence or intimate partner violence, so to speak, then
• 39:29
  Speaker 1: it's probably the man beating the woman to keep her subdued,
• 39:35
  Speaker 1: to keep her keep control over her. That if there's
• 39:40
  Speaker 1: a drug crime or other such non gendered crime taking
• 39:48
  Speaker 1: place and the partners involved happened to be a couple,
• 39:53
  Speaker 1: well he made her do it. He's the one that's
• 39:56
  Speaker 1: at fault. Right, Those are the kind of things that
• 39:59
  Speaker 1: they're paying. They're paying to spread that all over the
• 40:01
  Speaker 1: world instead of having police just investigate and get to
• 40:06
  Speaker 1: the bottom of all, right, what happened, who committed the crime,
• 40:11
  Speaker 1: and how long have they been committing this crime and
• 40:15
  Speaker 1: what can we do about it. It's all about blaming
• 40:20
  Speaker 1: men and excusing or elevating women. So that's the first
• 40:26
  Speaker 1: one we have. The next one, let's see, we've got
• 40:33
  Speaker 1: to go back up here before so we know who
• 40:35
  Speaker 1: this is. This is the Department of State again, so
• 40:38
  Speaker 1: the State Department does a lot of this. That's the
• 40:40
  Speaker 1: other thing. Like we we were looking at this last
• 40:43
  Speaker 1: week and we've been hearing a lot about USAID, right, USAID,
• 40:49
  Speaker 1: which isn't very it's they should have added an assety
• 40:52
  Speaker 1: end of that.
• 40:53
  Speaker 5: Yes, I was in my mind. I always say, you
• 40:56
  Speaker 5: know the second asset silent.
• 40:57
  Speaker 1: Yeah, yeah, But this isn't USA I D. This is
• 41:02
  Speaker 1: a state department. And we looked at some things last time,
• 41:07
  Speaker 1: I think with the Justice Department was one of them.
• 41:10
  Speaker 1: Health and Human Services is another one, and we've seen
• 41:13
  Speaker 1: some military stuff in the Patriot Only after show. We
• 41:18
  Speaker 1: have been looking at some maybe not necessarily feminist spending,
• 41:23
  Speaker 1: but Uncle Sam's social media addiction. Because Uncle Sam does
• 41:29
  Speaker 1: have quite a heavily funded social media addiction, and you know,
• 41:36
  Speaker 1: there's there's a few interesting things that we've located there.
• 41:41
  Speaker 1: But in any case, this is this is the state
• 41:44
  Speaker 1: department funding you in f p A. So you want
• 41:50
  Speaker 1: to know what you in f p A is? Yeah,
• 41:56
  Speaker 1: it is. Let's see if I've got it right here here. Yeah,
• 42:00
  Speaker 1: the United States New United Nations Population Fund. And I
• 42:04
  Speaker 1: don't know why there's an F in the middle of it,
• 42:07
  Speaker 1: but just to show you, here's my Google search. It
• 42:09
  Speaker 1: does not come up United States, like, I don't know,
• 42:14
  Speaker 1: the United States fucking Population Fund, Like, I don't know
• 42:19
  Speaker 1: why is there an F in here? I guess they
• 42:22
  Speaker 1: put the F in population next, but this is not.
• 42:30
  Speaker 6: Germans like to put p's and f's together.
• 42:33
  Speaker 1: I don't know. But whatever it is, well, but then
• 42:41
  Speaker 1: it would be pronounced population fund. I think.
• 42:46
  Speaker 5: I think maybe it's just a four.
• 42:48
  Speaker 4: But even still, why would you need to shove that
• 42:52
  Speaker 4: F in there?
• 42:55
  Speaker 1: That's because it's the government, and the government is especially
• 42:58
  Speaker 1: good at at shoving that F in there. You shove
• 43:01
  Speaker 1: that F in there all that they shove it up
• 43:03
  Speaker 1: as far as it can go. Unfunck all you guys.
• 43:12
  Speaker 1: So we're looking at two hundred and forty two point
• 43:15
  Speaker 1: eight million from sixty one transactions to this recipient total here, right,
• 43:22
  Speaker 1: But the one that we're looking at specifically, this is
• 43:28
  Speaker 1: UH scrolling back down provision of Integrated Sexual and Reproductive healthcare,
• 43:38
  Speaker 1: maternal health, mobile health, and gender based violence Prevention and Response.
• 43:42
  Speaker 1: So again we're seeing this gender based violence. So this
• 43:47
  Speaker 1: is what you know, we want to pay attention because
• 43:50
  Speaker 1: this is this is a terminology terminology change from the
• 43:54
  Speaker 1: last ten years from what they used to say, which
• 43:59
  Speaker 1: was intimate partner violence. And there's a reason when they
• 44:05
  Speaker 1: make these changes. Right, Intimate partner violence specifically implies some
• 44:10
  Speaker 1: form of relationship or some form of intention to have
• 44:16
  Speaker 1: a relationship at least on one party. So it's intimate
• 44:20
  Speaker 1: partner violence as somebody stalks you and harasses you, even
• 44:23
  Speaker 1: if you were never intimate partners. That person that is
• 44:27
  Speaker 1: stalking you is trying to impose an intimate partner relationship
• 44:32
  Speaker 1: that you don't want, you know, or somebody harassing you
• 44:36
  Speaker 1: trying to impose an intimate partner relationship that you don't want.
• 44:40
  Speaker 1: That's that that was always considered to be either intimate
• 44:44
  Speaker 1: partner violence or sexual violence. So when they lumped intimate
• 44:50
  Speaker 1: partner and sexual violence in together and started calling it
• 44:55
  Speaker 1: ipn SV. That was a first step because it it
• 45:00
  Speaker 1: sort of sexualizes in a partner violence and it domesticates
• 45:05
  Speaker 1: sexual violence, makes it all sort of one big attack,
• 45:11
  Speaker 1: and it lends itself to that idea that it's all
• 45:15
  Speaker 1: related and it's all this effort at patriarchal oppression of
• 45:19
  Speaker 1: women and blah blah blah. So now anytime there is
• 45:24
  Speaker 1: a violent conflict that has a man on one side
• 45:27
  Speaker 1: or a male on one side and a female on
• 45:29
  Speaker 1: the other side, it can now be called gender based violence.
• 45:33
  Speaker 1: If you are on the street and you see a
• 45:39
  Speaker 1: purse snatching where somebody runs up to a woman, grabs
• 45:43
  Speaker 1: her purse and then runs off with it. One of
• 45:47
  Speaker 1: the reasons I don't carry a purse, by the way,
• 45:51
  Speaker 1: that is now that's gender based violence, because it's usually
• 45:56
  Speaker 1: men that take that kind of risk that they're going
• 45:58
  Speaker 1: to get their ass kicked by the person their ste
• 46:00
  Speaker 1: feeling from, or that they're going to get caught and
• 46:02
  Speaker 1: arrested and jailed. It's not usually women don't usually do that.
• 46:06
  Speaker 1: They can, and there are times when women will steal
• 46:09
  Speaker 1: from each other, especially in the bathroom, like you have,
• 46:12
  Speaker 1: there's a hook on the inside of like bathroom stalls
• 46:18
  Speaker 1: to hang your coat. And if you have, if you're female,
• 46:24
  Speaker 1: and you have any female friends that care at all
• 46:26
  Speaker 1: about you, at least one of them has told you
• 46:28
  Speaker 1: at some point never hang your purse on that hook,
• 46:32
  Speaker 1: because there are women who will go in and reach
• 46:34
  Speaker 1: over the top, grab it and run.
• 46:37
  Speaker 5: Oh shit, Yeah, I never thought about that, because I do.
• 46:41
  Speaker 4: That all the time, like especially like you know, at
• 46:43
  Speaker 4: the airport, you know, because I'm just never putting anything
• 46:48
  Speaker 4: on the on the ground like that.
• 46:50
  Speaker 1: Yeah, if the ground is fucking filthy, there is. There
• 46:53
  Speaker 1: is not enough of any type of chemical in the
• 46:56
  Speaker 1: world to make me want to put things on the
• 46:59
  Speaker 1: floor in any public bathroom, right, And there are women
• 47:03
  Speaker 1: who will do that. You won't. You don't want to
• 47:04
  Speaker 1: put it on the floor either, because then they can
• 47:06
  Speaker 1: see it, reach under and grab it. And this is
• 47:10
  Speaker 1: the other reason why I don't carry carry a purse.
• 47:13
  Speaker 2: Right.
• 47:14
  Speaker 1: You set that down somewhere on the floor in a bathroom,
• 47:18
  Speaker 1: on the counter. The counters are dirty. Right. You go
• 47:23
  Speaker 1: someplace public, like a bus station, and you said it
• 47:25
  Speaker 1: on the seat. You don't know what else was sitting there.
• 47:27
  Speaker 1: You don't know who else was sitting there. You don't
• 47:28
  Speaker 1: know if it's got RSV on it or you know anything.
• 47:33
  Speaker 1: And uh and by the time you get to the
• 47:35
  Speaker 1: end of the day, you're just just one day. Your
• 47:39
  Speaker 1: purse is covered in germs. Nasty. It's like the.
• 47:46
  Speaker 4: I've watched a police body cam video where they this guy.
• 47:52
  Speaker 4: He was obviously homeless, but you know, a very large man,
• 47:57
  Speaker 4: a man of size, and.
• 48:00
  Speaker 5: He was sitting on the bench.
• 48:01
  Speaker 4: It's one of those benches where it's not like it's
• 48:03
  Speaker 4: not like a solid surface, it's it's like got the
• 48:07
  Speaker 4: great you know, it's just the rails and they're you know,
• 48:10
  Speaker 4: and and you know, the spread probably about maybe an
• 48:16
  Speaker 4: inch or two apart or whatever. But he was sitting
• 48:19
  Speaker 4: on the bench, and he took a crap while he
• 48:22
  Speaker 4: was sitting on the bench.
• 48:24
  Speaker 5: And I mean, just.
• 48:28
  Speaker 4: Thinking about that if they hadn't if no one had
• 48:32
  Speaker 4: caught him, and no one had come to clean it up.
• 48:34
  Speaker 4: I mean, besides obviously smelling, you know what was going
• 48:39
  Speaker 4: on underneath. But you know, if nobody cleans that, the
• 48:43
  Speaker 4: bench itself off right, like the the.
• 48:46
  Speaker 5: Material can go through and hit the floor.
• 48:49
  Speaker 2: Yes, but it also san Francisco.
• 48:53
  Speaker 7: Well, yes, you know, but it also scrapes along the side,
• 48:58
  Speaker 7: and if you're just unto expecting, if they just pick
• 49:01
  Speaker 7: up what's on the ground.
• 49:04
  Speaker 4: You could still be sitting in someone else's pooh. And
• 49:09
  Speaker 4: that's just I can't, I can't do it.
• 49:12
  Speaker 5: It makes me never want to leave the house.
• 49:14
  Speaker 7: Yeah, like you people are just nasty and weird, and
• 49:21
  Speaker 7: you know, like I feel bad.
• 49:23
  Speaker 4: For people who are in that situation, you know, when
• 49:26
  Speaker 4: you're homeless and there's nowhere to go, but good what
• 49:30
  Speaker 4: we need to do better by our homeless people. And
• 49:37
  Speaker 4: you know, as we're reading and learning about all the
• 49:41
  Speaker 4: ways that our money is being wasted.
• 49:44
  Speaker 5: Yeah, it just it just makes you weep for humanity.
• 49:51
  Speaker 1: Right now, dedicated to mental health programs that would help
• 49:55
  Speaker 1: people get back on their feet, or house them if
• 49:59
  Speaker 1: they were not capable of getting back on their feet,
• 50:02
  Speaker 1: or you know, anything like that, and you would have
• 50:05
  Speaker 1: money instead of.
• 50:06
  Speaker 3: Just giving that money to well legal aliens, yeah, terrorize
• 50:11
  Speaker 3: your neighborhood.
• 50:12
  Speaker 1: You could provide a lifetime of treatment for every person
• 50:16
  Speaker 1: in the United States whose reason for being homeless is
• 50:19
  Speaker 1: that they have a mental health condition that's preventing them
• 50:22
  Speaker 1: from doing the things that they need to do to
• 50:25
  Speaker 1: get out of that situation, and that includes people whose
• 50:28
  Speaker 1: mental health condition is drug addiction or alcohol addiction or
• 50:32
  Speaker 1: something else along those lines. You could fund that all
• 50:36
  Speaker 1: the way and basically eliminate that problem in terms of
• 50:45
  Speaker 1: the people that are in the situation right now, at
• 50:50
  Speaker 1: least under the assumption that everybody that receives treatment will
• 50:54
  Speaker 1: put effort into recovery, because that's not always the case.
• 50:58
  Speaker 1: But you could do that, and you would have so
• 51:02
  Speaker 1: much money left over that it will it would appear
• 51:06
  Speaker 1: you could do it for the whole world with the
• 51:10
  Speaker 1: money that the United States spends promoting gender based violence
• 51:15
  Speaker 1: as a concept and feminist jurisprudence and you know, deciding
• 51:24
  Speaker 1: like feminist jurisprudence is one of the reasons why when
• 51:27
  Speaker 1: a country creates a set of laws that formulate a
• 51:32
  Speaker 1: welfare system, that country then has stipulations within the welfare
• 51:39
  Speaker 1: system that the woman of the house has to pick
• 51:42
  Speaker 1: up the free food and she gets to distribute it
• 51:46
  Speaker 1: as she sees fit, you know, stuff like that. But yeah,
• 51:52
  Speaker 1: so that's where we are with this one. And we
• 51:55
  Speaker 1: will look really quickly here. This is like I said,
• 51:58
  Speaker 1: two and forty two point eight million awarded to this
• 52:03
  Speaker 1: organization over time. And let's see if I can find it.
• 52:07
  Speaker 1: This goes back. The earliest year that's showing in this
• 52:11
  Speaker 1: chart is two thousand and eight. So in two thousand
• 52:13
  Speaker 1: and eight they got nothing. But they've gotten different awards
• 52:18
  Speaker 1: different years, for different things, in different amounts. And you
• 52:24
  Speaker 1: can see that as it got more recent here, they've
• 52:30
  Speaker 1: had much suddenly, these much larger amounts. So the bulk
• 52:37
  Speaker 1: of what they've had came through last year and the
• 52:40
  Speaker 1: year before. Between those last two years, that's almost the
• 52:45
  Speaker 1: entirety of everything they've ever received from the federal government.
• 52:51
  Speaker 1: You know, we look at who they are. This is
• 52:56
  Speaker 1: the most eye sort like I don't know who designed
• 52:58
  Speaker 1: this website, but fuck them because my eyes hurt now, Like.
• 53:05
  Speaker 3: I'm looking at an optical illusion. Yeah, that's something something
• 53:11
  Speaker 3: should be skewing into diagonal lines right now.
• 53:15
  Speaker 1: Yeah, So remember last week we found an organization that
• 53:20
  Speaker 1: was promoting a couple of organizations actually that were promoting
• 53:23
  Speaker 1: male genital mutilation in in Africa. So we have this
• 53:30
  Speaker 1: one patterns of hope inside the movement to end female
• 53:36
  Speaker 1: genital mutilation. Right, So I thought, okay, you know these
• 53:41
  Speaker 1: guys are clearly anti genital cutting, right, there is.
• 53:47
  Speaker 2: One too many words in that sentence.
• 53:49
  Speaker 1: Yeah, one too many words. They didn't female, right, and
• 53:55
  Speaker 1: and so you know, is it is it gendered on
• 53:59
  Speaker 1: their part? So I start looking and yeah, they're oh yes,
• 54:05
  Speaker 1: all uh, all of their funding they say is voluntary.
• 54:09
  Speaker 1: They're counting funding that's from our tax dollars that's confiscated
• 54:14
  Speaker 1: and sent to them. That that's that's voluntary. Guys, you
• 54:20
  Speaker 1: voluntarily sent them money. You didn't know you were sending them.
• 54:25
  Speaker 1: But yeah, there we go back up to the top here.
• 54:33
  Speaker 4: Well, you know, just just like a fucking I don't
• 54:37
  Speaker 4: want to say feminists because this is really more of
• 54:40
  Speaker 4: a woman thing. When when they when they sleep with
• 54:43
  Speaker 4: a guy and then they regretted afterwards and claim that
• 54:46
  Speaker 4: it was rape. Well, I'm being financially raped. I didn't
• 54:49
  Speaker 4: voluntarily give anybody ship. I want my money back.
• 54:54
  Speaker 1: Mm hmm. Correct. So they have this program, Uh, don't
• 55:00
  Speaker 1: you dare. I don't know if you guys can see
• 55:03
  Speaker 1: my cursor or not. And it's only on that page.
• 55:08
  Speaker 1: So it is Google, Google's mad stop that seriously, Ah,
• 55:19
  Speaker 1: there we go, Okay, joint program on the elimination of
• 55:24
  Speaker 1: female genital mutilation. And in case you don't know that,
• 55:27
  Speaker 1: if you want to read the rest of the page,
• 55:29
  Speaker 1: you have to scroll down. There's this stupid animated thing
• 55:32
  Speaker 1: over here. That is probably the reason my computer FROs.
• 55:36
  Speaker 1: But they have publications, annual reports, they have partnerships and funding.
• 55:42
  Speaker 1: They're active in multiple countries. Here you notice they're target
• 55:51
  Speaker 1: areas eighteen eighteen different countries or where this is common,
• 55:54
  Speaker 1: and it's done a lot for religious reasons. Uh so
• 55:59
  Speaker 1: religious is not an excuse when it's girls.
• 56:02
  Speaker 6: Right.
• 56:04
  Speaker 1: It's been going on since two thousand and eight. Coincidentally,
• 56:09
  Speaker 1: that's when the United States started giving them money, and they.
• 56:16
  Speaker 3: Have people people talk about voter ide like it affects
• 56:20
  Speaker 3: mostly black people. People even talked about fucking COVID.
• 56:28
  Speaker 1: I'm just going to say, we say it now in.
• 56:33
  Speaker 3: Ways it's bad because it affects black people more than
• 56:37
  Speaker 3: it affects white people. And they come up with all
• 56:41
  Speaker 3: kinds of these things like if you if you crack
• 56:44
  Speaker 3: down on crime, it affects black people more than it
• 56:50
  Speaker 3: affects white people. And I'm just trying to remember what
• 56:56
  Speaker 3: it was that Wait, what's the subject again?
• 57:00
  Speaker 1: Because of female genital mutilation. So in other words, one,
• 57:04
  Speaker 1: you know, yes, only when it happens to girls, not
• 57:08
  Speaker 1: when it happens to boys. That's what their focus is.
• 57:13
  Speaker 3: Yeah, and if they if they were to really approach
• 57:17
  Speaker 3: the subject of circumcision, which is a euphemism for male
• 57:24
  Speaker 3: genital mutilation, if they were really to approach the subject
• 57:28
  Speaker 3: of infant genital mutilation, it would affect the USA a
• 57:38
  Speaker 3: lot because like fifty of them yep quote unquote circum size.
• 57:45
  Speaker 3: But in Africa it's even worse, especially northern Africa and
• 57:49
  Speaker 3: especially areas just to the south of.
• 57:55
  Speaker 2: The Sahara.
• 57:57
  Speaker 3: So and yet then when when you try to speak
• 58:01
  Speaker 3: out against circumcision, they never say that's racist, because most
• 58:06
  Speaker 3: of the circumcisions in the world are in fact in
• 58:08
  Speaker 3: Africa in the Middle East. They don't care, they don't
• 58:12
  Speaker 3: they don't even care that it affects American males a lot.
• 58:19
  Speaker 3: They just keep finding ways to skew it in the
• 58:23
  Speaker 3: in the direction of women are the victims of everything.
• 58:27
  Speaker 1: You have a fact they've actually protested against it affecting
• 58:30
  Speaker 1: American men less now than it used to.
• 58:34
  Speaker 3: F GM is extremely rare in the world. And yeah,
• 58:37
  Speaker 3: there's there's there's you know, the lot of countries in
• 58:39
  Speaker 3: North Africa and the Middle East where it's practiced, but
• 58:44
  Speaker 3: it's nothing compared with how many countries in the world
• 58:49
  Speaker 3: practice male genital nisulation, which is always should ever call
• 58:53
  Speaker 3: it it's it's in North Africa, it's in the Middle East,
• 58:57
  Speaker 3: it's in America, it's in Europe to a lesser extent
• 59:01
  Speaker 3: depending on the country, but it's a problem here as well.
• 59:05
  Speaker 2: It still goes on.
• 59:07
  Speaker 3: It should be illegal in many countries, it is illegal,
• 59:10
  Speaker 3: but it is still practiced. There are there are things
• 59:15
  Speaker 3: we can do to prevent male genital mutilation in all
• 59:20
  Speaker 3: of these countries, but it's not done. There are things
• 59:23
  Speaker 3: we can do to prevent female genital mutilation in Europe
• 59:28
  Speaker 3: and America, and.
• 59:29
  Speaker 6: It's get rid of the fuss.
• 59:32
  Speaker 2: But we're not going to do that either.
• 59:34
  Speaker 3: We're just going to concentrate on all the countries where
• 59:38
  Speaker 3: it's nothing but Muslims or nothing but whatever believor of
• 59:45
  Speaker 3: ideology that allows you to mutilate the genitals of children
• 59:50
  Speaker 3: and get away with it. But yeah, it's it's it's
• 59:54
  Speaker 3: never to do with protecting the children. It's never to
• 59:57
  Speaker 3: do with preserving the mental health of the children.
• 1:00:01
  Speaker 2: It's it's it's.
• 1:00:04
  Speaker 3: It kind of seems to be about expanding these Western
• 1:00:10
  Speaker 3: ideas of protect the women and attack the men all
• 1:00:14
  Speaker 3: over the place. And it's again, it's the same thing
• 1:00:16
  Speaker 3: with the US aid like, as long as we can
• 1:00:23
  Speaker 3: be seen to be protecting the women and butchering the
• 1:00:29
  Speaker 3: genitals of the men, it's all fine, it's all fine,
• 1:00:33
  Speaker 3: and we just we just need to we just need
• 1:00:36
  Speaker 3: to wring the throats of these of these foreign countries
• 1:00:39
  Speaker 3: and say stop abusing women, please do continue abusing men.
• 1:00:45
  Speaker 5: Yeah, so did you do either of you?
• 1:00:48
  Speaker 4: See on X that Elon when he changed his name
• 1:00:53
  Speaker 4: to Harry Balls, he also changed his bio to say
• 1:00:57
  Speaker 4: circumcisions and you know, not not to say that he's
• 1:01:03
  Speaker 4: gonna step in and fix everything, you know what I mean,
• 1:01:06
  Speaker 4: He's he the Glord knows that he's got enough on
• 1:01:10
  Speaker 4: his plate. But it makes me wonder if he's even
• 1:01:14
  Speaker 4: aware of the conversation that's being had around male genital mutilation,
• 1:01:21
  Speaker 4: because that's what it is. I hate calling it circumcision.
• 1:01:25
  Speaker 1: He might be because that's a pun.
• 1:01:30
  Speaker 2: It was obviously a joke.
• 1:01:32
  Speaker 1: Yeah, like he's and it's what he's doing is he's
• 1:01:34
  Speaker 1: making fun of the procedure of doing the procedure, like, oh, yeah,
• 1:01:39
  Speaker 1: as you're doing this terrible thing, we could do it
• 1:01:41
  Speaker 1: better fifty off.
• 1:01:44
  Speaker 4: Yeah, I mean that he comes from South Africa. I
• 1:01:48
  Speaker 4: would I would guess my best guess would be to
• 1:01:52
  Speaker 4: say that he is not.
• 1:01:55
  Speaker 5: Mutilated in that way.
• 1:01:57
  Speaker 1: But he is probably aware of the scam the US
• 1:02:00
  Speaker 1: has been running there for the longest time.
• 1:02:03
  Speaker 3: Yes, No, he's aware of, like I said, the creeping
• 1:02:10
  Speaker 3: ivy of the scam, but I don't think he's yet
• 1:02:13
  Speaker 3: aware of the seeds.
• 1:02:14
  Speaker 1: Of this scam, the details on all the leaves. What's
• 1:02:17
  Speaker 1: interesting is, you know, like you see this right, and
• 1:02:21
  Speaker 1: we see this from all kinds of organizations, and they
• 1:02:23
  Speaker 1: have all these this type of statement, every single one
• 1:02:26
  Speaker 1: of them is this program is so great. We've been
• 1:02:29
  Speaker 1: doing this for this many years. These many people are involved,
• 1:02:33
  Speaker 1: right in partnership with governments, NGOs and the private sector,
• 1:02:36
  Speaker 1: blah blah blah. And they give their reasons. Female genital mutilation,
• 1:02:43
  Speaker 1: they say, is a violation of human rights and is
• 1:02:45
  Speaker 1: never safe, with immediate health risks that can span a lifetime,
• 1:02:49
  Speaker 1: including chronic payment sections, increased risks of childbirth, complications and
• 1:02:54
  Speaker 1: psychological trauma, and then there's like this whole page of stuff.
• 1:03:01
  Speaker 1: Wait there's more, right, So I like, well, what are
• 1:03:04
  Speaker 1: these people doing in regard to like, they have this
• 1:03:06
  Speaker 1: thing on female genital mutilation? What is their stance on
• 1:03:11
  Speaker 1: male genital mutilation? So I googled them because I couldn't
• 1:03:15
  Speaker 1: find it on their website.
• 1:03:17
  Speaker 4: Women like the way cut penises look, so that's all
• 1:03:20
  Speaker 4: they need to know.
• 1:03:21
  Speaker 1: Uh yeah, So my I went with male circumcision because
• 1:03:26
  Speaker 1: I knew it wouldn't come up as male genital mutilation, right.
• 1:03:29
  Speaker 1: United Nations Population Fund quote male circumcision in the Google search,
• 1:03:34
  Speaker 1: and the AI overview is based on the available information
• 1:03:40
  Speaker 1: that is found. It like combines it all into this
• 1:03:44
  Speaker 1: statement of this is what the documentation online or the
• 1:03:49
  Speaker 1: articles online say. So it'll have looked at ye unfpah,
• 1:03:55
  Speaker 1: it'll have looked at their website and found it where
• 1:03:58
  Speaker 1: I couldn't find it, and then also any news reports
• 1:04:03
  Speaker 1: on from the web about what they've been doing and everything.
• 1:04:07
  Speaker 1: The United Nations Population Fund has supported voluntary medical male
• 1:04:13
  Speaker 1: circumcision and they refer to it as VMMC. So we
• 1:04:17
  Speaker 1: have female genital mutilation which they are fighting but when
• 1:04:21
  Speaker 1: you cut the skin off of a baby boy, then
• 1:04:26
  Speaker 1: it's voluntary voluntary medical male circumcision. And they're promoting the
• 1:04:34
  Speaker 1: canard that it reduces HIV transmission.
• 1:04:38
  Speaker 4: Oh my god.
• 1:04:41
  Speaker 1: It then they say they promote a human rights based
• 1:04:48
  Speaker 1: approach to VMMC. So I just want to remind you,
• 1:04:52
  Speaker 1: right they said down here, FGM is a violation of
• 1:05:00
  Speaker 1: human rights. Now, feminist fight female circumcision, female genital mutilation
• 1:05:09
  Speaker 1: to the degree that if a woman decides that she
• 1:05:13
  Speaker 1: wants to have a procedure done, you know, and it
• 1:05:17
  Speaker 1: doesn't matter whether it's the most dramatic or the least dramatic,
• 1:05:22
  Speaker 1: or even there's a thing they do now where it's
• 1:05:24
  Speaker 1: a symbolic circumcision, but they don't actually do a circumcision.
• 1:05:29
  Speaker 1: They just take a pin and they draw a drop
• 1:05:32
  Speaker 1: of blood. That's it. In comparison to circumcision, it's pretty tame.
• 1:05:39
  Speaker 1: I still wouldn't want that done to my child, Like
• 1:05:42
  Speaker 1: you keep your your pins and needles away from my kid.
• 1:05:45
  Speaker 1: If my kid doesn't need a medication that has to
• 1:05:48
  Speaker 1: be injected, you know, you can fuck write the hell
• 1:05:51
  Speaker 1: off with that shit, all right, But I say this,
• 1:05:55
  Speaker 1: like I still got little kids. My kids are all
• 1:05:58
  Speaker 1: old enough to drink, old enough to get married, old
• 1:06:03
  Speaker 1: enough to I'm my grandma, So there you go.
• 1:06:08
  Speaker 3: But to have had twelve thousand falskins removed from their body,
• 1:06:16
  Speaker 3: and I'm going to work out the math eight days old,
• 1:06:20
  Speaker 3: eighteen years old, how many falscans are they legally allowed
• 1:06:24
  Speaker 3: to move from their body at that point?
• 1:06:27
  Speaker 1: Yeah.
• 1:06:27
  Speaker 4: You know what really really ticked me off when you
• 1:06:31
  Speaker 4: were reading what you were reading before is the fact
• 1:06:35
  Speaker 4: that they can realize that there's even to the point
• 1:06:38
  Speaker 4: of psychological trauma when it's done to females. Why can't think,
• 1:06:46
  Speaker 4: why is that not something that you can admit that
• 1:06:49
  Speaker 4: will happen to a boy when you do it to him,
• 1:06:52
  Speaker 4: Because it absolutely does have psychological trauma.
• 1:06:55
  Speaker 5: It leaves a psychological.
• 1:06:58
  Speaker 4: Physical right right, But no, they use they use uses
• 1:07:04
  Speaker 4: in the book. Oh he's a baby.
• 1:07:05
  Speaker 5: Oh he'll forget it. Oh you don't have any memories
• 1:07:08
  Speaker 5: when you're that young. Fuck you, yeah you do. You
• 1:07:13
  Speaker 5: can absolutely do, you know. And it's just so.
• 1:07:20
  Speaker 1: We can't even measure if they don't remember it. You
• 1:07:22
  Speaker 1: don't have to remember a traumatic experience for it to
• 1:07:25
  Speaker 1: be traumatic for the rest of your life. But this
• 1:07:28
  Speaker 1: is the interesting thing, right, So they the thing is
• 1:07:31
  Speaker 1: that they cited as reasons that it's a human rights
• 1:07:34
  Speaker 1: violation for women, right, they call them barriers to voluntary
• 1:07:40
  Speaker 1: male medical circumcision. Pain is a barrier right. Complications can
• 1:07:48
  Speaker 1: include what's this list they had here, Uh, immediate health
• 1:07:54
  Speaker 1: risks that can span a lifetime, including chronic pain, infections,
• 1:07:58
  Speaker 1: increased risk obviously not childbirth complications, but sexual complications for men,
• 1:08:04
  Speaker 1: and psychological trauma. Those are complications. So when you're doing
• 1:08:11
  Speaker 1: it to little girls, it's a human rights violation. When
• 1:08:15
  Speaker 1: you do it to little boys, it's complications.
• 1:08:17
  Speaker 4: It's a complication, Oh my god.
• 1:08:20
  Speaker 1: And they're promoting this with our money, and there's no
• 1:08:28
  Speaker 1: excuse to not know that it's wrong, because when you
• 1:08:32
  Speaker 1: do it to a girl, they damn well know that
• 1:08:34
  Speaker 1: it's wrong.
• 1:08:35
  Speaker 4: Mm hmm.
• 1:08:36
  Speaker 1: Right. They are gathering a lot of money to fight
• 1:08:39
  Speaker 1: it when it's done to girls, and then they're promoting
• 1:08:42
  Speaker 1: it when it's done to boys. I just, I.
• 1:08:54
  Speaker 4: Yeah, it's it's it really. I can't like, I can't
• 1:09:01
  Speaker 4: deal with it. I can't deal with the anger, the
• 1:09:05
  Speaker 4: level of anger that it invokes in me. I just
• 1:09:09
  Speaker 4: it really pisses.
• 1:09:11
  Speaker 5: Me off, you know what I mean?
• 1:09:13
  Speaker 4: And I don't understand how anyone, anyone could think that,
• 1:09:20
  Speaker 4: especially a mother like you just gave birth to this
• 1:09:25
  Speaker 4: child that you love more than anything in the world.
• 1:09:29
  Speaker 4: Oh yeah, let's just go take a knife scalpel to
• 1:09:33
  Speaker 4: the most sensitive part of this child that I just
• 1:09:36
  Speaker 4: gave birth to. You know, there's a chance that he
• 1:09:40
  Speaker 4: may not survive the procedure, on top of the fact
• 1:09:44
  Speaker 4: that you have to pay thousands.
• 1:09:47
  Speaker 5: Of dollars to have it done all, but.
• 1:09:50
  Speaker 4: I want him to look like his father.
• 1:09:53
  Speaker 5: Yeah, women, women, women, you like it better? Who gives up?
• 1:09:58
  Speaker 5: Fuck with women life?
• 1:09:59
  Speaker 4: Do you I think that women are not going to
• 1:10:02
  Speaker 4: fuck a dick if it's if it's not.
• 1:10:05
  Speaker 5: Circumcised, of course not, you know what I mean.
• 1:10:08
  Speaker 4: Do you think any woman who is that hungry, like
• 1:10:11
  Speaker 4: if she wants to have a trial, she's just you.
• 1:10:14
  Speaker 5: Get that thing a week. No, No, it's.
• 1:10:17
  Speaker 1: Actually a good litmus test. If a woman won't have
• 1:10:19
  Speaker 1: anything to do with you because you have not been
• 1:10:22
  Speaker 1: scarred for life down there, then she's probably not a
• 1:10:26
  Speaker 1: good match for you, and it isn't good wife material.
• 1:10:30
  Speaker 1: Like that's that's a good way to eliminate a prospect
• 1:10:35
  Speaker 1: right there. But uh, and of course if she thinks
• 1:10:39
  Speaker 1: it's okay to do it to you, to you, she'll
• 1:10:42
  Speaker 1: think it's okay to do it to your son.
• 1:10:45
  Speaker 4: Mm hmm.
• 1:10:46
  Speaker 1: You know when I when I found out that, uh,
• 1:10:51
  Speaker 1: you know, my son was going to be a son,
• 1:10:54
  Speaker 1: and I had to start looking into this because you know,
• 1:10:59
  Speaker 1: obviously you wouldn't have to consider it in the United
• 1:11:03
  Speaker 1: States if you were having a girl, because we don't
• 1:11:08
  Speaker 1: have that here. Although there was a judge in Michigan
• 1:11:13
  Speaker 1: that ruled that since male circumcision is okay, it's discrimination
• 1:11:19
  Speaker 1: to punish someone for performing a female circumcision. So that
• 1:11:23
  Speaker 1: was interesting. But the first thought that I had with
• 1:11:29
  Speaker 1: regard to this and was like, all right, at that time,
• 1:11:37
  Speaker 1: I had not heard the myth that it prevents HIV transmission.
• 1:11:45
  Speaker 1: So I had heard nothing that provides any idea for
• 1:11:49
  Speaker 1: a benefit to this, and I'm reading about it and
• 1:11:54
  Speaker 1: I'm like, you're telling me the immune system has not
• 1:11:59
  Speaker 1: formed during the first few days of a after birth, right,
• 1:12:04
  Speaker 1: so the child does not have any defense if germs
• 1:12:07
  Speaker 1: are introduced. In fact, the child's immune system partly relies
• 1:12:13
  Speaker 1: on antibodies that go through mother's milk, so nursing instead
• 1:12:22
  Speaker 1: of using formula, for instance, it's not always an option.
• 1:12:26
  Speaker 1: Once in a while a woman can't can't nurse, but
• 1:12:32
  Speaker 1: you know, it's very important if you can that you
• 1:12:35
  Speaker 1: do so that your baby gets that initial boost to
• 1:12:40
  Speaker 1: an immune system. But during the first couple of days,
• 1:12:43
  Speaker 1: if some kind of bacteria or virus is introduced, your
• 1:12:49
  Speaker 1: child has little to no defenses against that. It's incredibly dangerous.
• 1:12:55
  Speaker 1: Unbelievably babies die from that in the first few days
• 1:12:59
  Speaker 1: after birth. And I remembered learning growing up that the
• 1:13:06
  Speaker 1: largest organ in your immune system, also the largest organ
• 1:13:11
  Speaker 1: in your body is your skin, and it's it's the
• 1:13:15
  Speaker 1: first line of defense against contact exposure, physical contact exposure
• 1:13:21
  Speaker 1: to bacteria and viruses. Right, So obviously inside a baby's
• 1:13:30
  Speaker 1: diaper there's going to be urine in feces.
• 1:13:34
  Speaker 5: On a regular basis. That's what the diaper's for.
• 1:13:38
  Speaker 1: And it's it gets everywhere. It doesn't just it's not stationary.
• 1:13:41
  Speaker 5: Right baby, No, it's not.
• 1:13:44
  Speaker 4: It's not like a log.
• 1:13:46
  Speaker 1: Yeah, you know, you don't get a log. You get
• 1:13:48
  Speaker 1: gray poupon and it goes everywhere. And if it's like
• 1:13:56
  Speaker 1: if your kid gets sick. It goes up out the
• 1:14:00
  Speaker 1: back of the diaper and everything, so like its it's
• 1:14:06
  Speaker 1: it's some sick kid sometimes gets three or four baths
• 1:14:09
  Speaker 1: a day, you know. But in any case, so it's
• 1:14:16
  Speaker 1: going to have feces on it. You know, if you
• 1:14:19
  Speaker 1: have a circumcision done, the open wound is going to
• 1:14:25
  Speaker 1: have feces on it. And even if you bandone it
• 1:14:28
  Speaker 1: to prevent that, it's going to have urine on it
• 1:14:31
  Speaker 1: because urine is coming out of the tip when the
• 1:14:33
  Speaker 1: child peas MM. So there is no like, there is
• 1:14:40
  Speaker 1: no safe circumcision. And right there, I was just like,
• 1:14:45
  Speaker 1: I don't, I don't. I don't want to do this,
• 1:14:48
  Speaker 1: you know. And the more I looked into it, the
• 1:14:51
  Speaker 1: more I realize there is no justification for doing this
• 1:14:55
  Speaker 1: at an age where it takes away his decision making
• 1:14:58
  Speaker 1: process on it, Like you can't you can't put it
• 1:15:02
  Speaker 1: back later, you know, if he gets to be older
• 1:15:05
  Speaker 1: and he's like, I wish that you hadn't done that,
• 1:15:07
  Speaker 1: there would be nothing I could do, right. And so
• 1:15:11
  Speaker 1: I brought all this to my husband and like, this
• 1:15:13
  Speaker 1: is what I have learned, and you know, we talked
• 1:15:16
  Speaker 1: about it and he's looking into information and you know,
• 1:15:20
  Speaker 1: we basically were like, this is bullshit. We're not you know,
• 1:15:24
  Speaker 1: we're not doing this. He can decide that when he
• 1:15:27
  Speaker 1: gets older if he wants to. And that's that was
• 1:15:29
  Speaker 1: pretty much. It was all a common sense process that
• 1:15:32
  Speaker 1: was all all about what's safe, what's should be his choice,
• 1:15:43
  Speaker 1: and you know what, what's completely not justified to do.
• 1:15:48
  Speaker 1: And I don't understand anybody taking a different thought process
• 1:15:53
  Speaker 1: when I started reading the first thing I thought when
• 1:15:56
  Speaker 1: I started reading that, you know there's special HIV receipts
• 1:16:00
  Speaker 1: cells in the foreskin, I thought, what kind of magic
• 1:16:04
  Speaker 1: bullshit mumbo jumbo is this crap? Because you know, that
• 1:16:08
  Speaker 1: would have been a couple of years after he was born,
• 1:16:12
  Speaker 1: like toddler age. And I read it in some parenting
• 1:16:16
  Speaker 1: magazine and I'm like, where the fuck is this coming from? Like,
• 1:16:20
  Speaker 1: what the hell is a special AIDS receptor cell?
• 1:16:24
  Speaker 6: Uh?
• 1:16:24
  Speaker 1: And so I start reading into it and everything, and
• 1:16:26
  Speaker 1: there was not any evidence to back that up, that
• 1:16:31
  Speaker 1: back that claim up anywhere. It was a theory that
• 1:16:36
  Speaker 1: was postulated by individuals who basically decided that since the
• 1:16:43
  Speaker 1: foreskin is folded up and covered you know, over, and
• 1:16:50
  Speaker 1: like when when the penis contracts. It's all bunched up.
• 1:16:53
  Speaker 1: You know, that germs could hide in the little folds
• 1:16:59
  Speaker 1: and those would be the special AIDS receptor cells. And
• 1:17:05
  Speaker 1: I was like, well, nobody's gonna fall for that, right,
• 1:17:08
  Speaker 1: nobody's gonna fall for that bullshit. It didn't occur to
• 1:17:10
  Speaker 1: me that there would be US federal government funded organizations
• 1:17:19
  Speaker 1: promoting it in third world countries where people are not
• 1:17:22
  Speaker 1: as well educated, so that they could harvest foreskins for
• 1:17:29
  Speaker 1: the cosmetic industry. Here.
• 1:17:34
  Speaker 5: It's it's just it's mind blowing.
• 1:17:36
  Speaker 8: And you know, like you, you wouldn't even need funding,
• 1:17:47
  Speaker 8: you wouldn't even need a grant.
• 1:17:48
  Speaker 4: Try to try to pull this over on the American population.
• 1:17:52
  Speaker 4: I mean, you know most of us. I would like
• 1:17:55
  Speaker 4: to think that most of us, Yeah, would look at
• 1:17:59
  Speaker 4: that and say, well this two plus two is not
• 1:18:02
  Speaker 4: equaling five. That's that's that doesn't make sense, you know.
• 1:18:09
  Speaker 4: But we are we have we have bred a society
• 1:18:14
  Speaker 4: that is only focused on their basic desires, right they
• 1:18:21
  Speaker 4: they all they think about is food and sex, right,
• 1:18:25
  Speaker 4: the things that make them feel good.
• 1:18:28
  Speaker 1: Ye.
• 1:18:29
  Speaker 4: And then what happens they they they have obviously they
• 1:18:33
  Speaker 4: have kids and they're not equipped, right, They don't have
• 1:18:38
  Speaker 4: the education, they're not equipped with that education. They're not
• 1:18:42
  Speaker 4: going to teach their children any goddamn thing because all
• 1:18:47
  Speaker 4: it is is just put the good things in your
• 1:18:50
  Speaker 4: mouth and stick this thing in that thing because it
• 1:18:55
  Speaker 4: makes me feel good. You know. That's that's that's the level,
• 1:19:01
  Speaker 4: right that that They don't think any further than that,
• 1:19:06
  Speaker 4: you know, So why why would they even bother to
• 1:19:12
  Speaker 4: question anything about being told? Oh, well, you know, circumcision
• 1:19:16
  Speaker 4: prevents aids. Right, you don't even have to do that.
• 1:19:23
  Speaker 4: Sigh off on these people because they're so stupid they
• 1:19:25
  Speaker 4: would just believe it.
• 1:19:28
  Speaker 1: Yes, in order to do the magic thing, you have
• 1:19:30
  Speaker 1: to cut the tip off the magic wand yeah, and
• 1:19:35
  Speaker 1: I guess wave it around and ship too, But first
• 1:19:38
  Speaker 1: you have to cut off definitely have to cut off
• 1:19:40
  Speaker 1: the tip of the magic wand to make the magic work.
• 1:19:44
  Speaker 4: Yeah, but I mean we we we can't even get
• 1:19:47
  Speaker 4: to the the uh, you know, the details of things
• 1:19:52
  Speaker 4: like that.
• 1:19:52
  Speaker 5: It's like it's.
• 1:19:54
  Speaker 4: It begins and ends that well like it the way
• 1:19:59
  Speaker 4: of books.
• 1:20:00
  Speaker 5: They don't like the way of human penis looks.
• 1:20:06
  Speaker 1: They don't like it. It's the ultimate iteration of chicks
• 1:20:10
  Speaker 1: dig scars.
• 1:20:12
  Speaker 5: Yes, my god.
• 1:20:15
  Speaker 4: Yes.
• 1:20:17
  Speaker 1: The thing that really gets me about this, though, is
• 1:20:20
  Speaker 1: the blatant federal promotion, international promotion of guynes centrism, because
• 1:20:30
  Speaker 1: that's basically.
• 1:20:31
  Speaker 5: What this is.
• 1:20:31
  Speaker 1: Right, you have this organization, and these are not the
• 1:20:34
  Speaker 1: only things that this organization does. There, they have things
• 1:20:39
  Speaker 1: that could be considered good things, right. They promote they
• 1:20:45
  Speaker 1: promote medical facilities in various places where it is hard
• 1:20:51
  Speaker 1: for people to get health care. But then when you
• 1:20:56
  Speaker 1: look into it, there's that guynescent attitude. Again, well this
• 1:21:02
  Speaker 1: is for women. Well, parent biology, there's they have bodies
• 1:21:07
  Speaker 1: and their bodies get injured or sick. Mm hmm, right,
• 1:21:11
  Speaker 1: they age, they have reproductive health, they can get STIs.
• 1:21:18
  Speaker 1: But somehow public health, mobile health, and most of all
• 1:21:25
  Speaker 1: reproductive health are deemed for women.
• 1:21:31
  Speaker 4: Right right, I mean shit, Planned parenthood does breast cancer screening.
• 1:21:36
  Speaker 4: But they also the major thing that they do is
• 1:21:39
  Speaker 4: kill babies.
• 1:21:40
  Speaker 5: Right, So.
• 1:21:43
  Speaker 4: Like it doesn't it doesn't matter if they do one
• 1:21:46
  Speaker 4: good thing, if what they spend the rest of their
• 1:21:49
  Speaker 4: goddamn existence doing is.
• 1:21:52
  Speaker 1: Murder, well, and then the other thing is even if
• 1:21:57
  Speaker 1: that was not the case, even if they were not
• 1:21:59
  Speaker 1: from voting abortion, which they are, this organization, by the way,
• 1:22:05
  Speaker 1: because they have it mentioned among the things that they
• 1:22:09
  Speaker 1: had mentioned there. But even if they weren't doing that,
• 1:22:13
  Speaker 1: even if they weren't promoting male genital mutilation despite knowing
• 1:22:21
  Speaker 1: that it is a human rights violation, it would be
• 1:22:25
  Speaker 1: bad enough that in their promotion of healthcare, in their
• 1:22:33
  Speaker 1: funding of health care facilities and treatments, doctors, nurses, and
• 1:22:40
  Speaker 1: so on, they're focusing strictly on women. They're promoting the
• 1:22:47
  Speaker 1: idea that women have needs and men just have obligations.
• 1:22:55
  Speaker 1: So the US is paying through this organization to promoteocentrism.
• 1:23:01
  Speaker 1: And it isn't child centrism, right, It's not passing on
• 1:23:07
  Speaker 1: your DNA, it's not survival of the species. It's straight
• 1:23:13
  Speaker 1: up completely dysfunctional, no point other than to elevate women
• 1:23:20
  Speaker 1: above men. Gynocentrism mm hmm, and go monkey Go says,
• 1:23:30
  Speaker 1: it's not gaynocentrism, it's Judaism and Zionism. Here's the problem.
• 1:23:36
  Speaker 1: It's not all being promoted by Jews, right. It is
• 1:23:41
  Speaker 1: to the point now where there is an entire industry
• 1:23:47
  Speaker 1: that capitalizes on this. So if you look up online
• 1:23:52
  Speaker 1: the cost the price of something called neonatal foreskin fibroblasts.
• 1:24:00
  Speaker 1: You'll find that the companies that sell them also sell
• 1:24:04
  Speaker 1: other skin samples and sell samples and stuff. But there's
• 1:24:09
  Speaker 1: a disproportionate profit from neonatal foreskin Jews and Muslims.
• 1:24:16
  Speaker 2: It needs to be said Muslims.
• 1:24:19
  Speaker 5: And it's Christian and.
• 1:24:24
  Speaker 1: Secular. This is the thing people don't realize. Secular promotion
• 1:24:29
  Speaker 1: of circumcision is a result of the ability to sell
• 1:24:36
  Speaker 1: foreskin fiber blasts, right, right, two industries that and there
• 1:24:41
  Speaker 1: are some things they use them for that you know,
• 1:24:45
  Speaker 1: people will be well, at least they're they're using them
• 1:24:47
  Speaker 1: for something that that benefits humanity because they use them
• 1:24:50
  Speaker 1: to treat burns. But you can use fish skin for that.
• 1:24:55
  Speaker 1: You don't have to use In fact, you know, my
• 1:24:59
  Speaker 1: dad had a third degree burn that fish skin was
• 1:25:04
  Speaker 1: used to treat. So they don't need for skin fiber
• 1:25:07
  Speaker 1: blasts for that. So what if it does get used
• 1:25:11
  Speaker 1: for that, it's not not because they need it. But yeah,
• 1:25:15
  Speaker 1: it gets used for facials, it gets used for hair treatments,
• 1:25:18
  Speaker 1: that it gets used in cosmetics. And women are putting this.
• 1:25:24
  Speaker 1: Most of the women you know are dick faces, right.
• 1:25:29
  Speaker 1: Their makeup has something in it that was originally on
• 1:25:37
  Speaker 1: a baby's dick.
• 1:25:40
  Speaker 2: Yeah, it's not.
• 1:25:40
  Speaker 3: It's not just Jews, it's not just Muslims, it's not
• 1:25:44
  Speaker 3: just Christians, it's not just atheists.
• 1:25:47
  Speaker 2: All of these.
• 1:25:47
  Speaker 3: Groups have fallen to this idea that you can just
• 1:25:55
  Speaker 3: mutilate the genitals of male babies and it's fine, and
• 1:26:02
  Speaker 3: if you make an ordinate amount of money from the
• 1:26:08
  Speaker 3: resources that you have cut away from male babies dicks.
• 1:26:15
  Speaker 3: It's like it's practically universal at this point, certainly among
• 1:26:21
  Speaker 3: the Abrahamic religions and the atheistic offshoots from.
• 1:26:26
  Speaker 2: Those Abrahamic religions.
• 1:26:28
  Speaker 3: Like, it's not it's not just religions, it's feminism. And
• 1:26:32
  Speaker 3: that's only if feminism doesn't count as a religion.
• 1:26:36
  Speaker 1: I think it counts more as a cult.
• 1:26:39
  Speaker 3: Yeah and yeah, and it's it's no coincidence that the
• 1:26:49
  Speaker 3: cults that turned into religions have landed at the same
• 1:26:53
  Speaker 3: place as the cults that have not yet turned into religions.
• 1:26:58
  Speaker 2: Yes, like anyone, anyone can.
• 1:27:02
  Speaker 3: Remove this the skin of a bit of a male
• 1:27:07
  Speaker 3: baby sentitals and just be like.
• 1:27:10
  Speaker 2: Okay with it.
• 1:27:11
  Speaker 3: Evidently it's nothing to do with the religion. Evidently it's
• 1:27:16
  Speaker 3: nothing to do with your culture.
• 1:27:20
  Speaker 2: Yeah, it can it that this.
• 1:27:25
  Speaker 3: Abhorrence of nature can happen to any culture as long
• 1:27:33
  Speaker 3: as you just don't give up flying fuck about the.
• 1:27:36
  Speaker 6: Well being of male human beings.
• 1:27:39
  Speaker 2: That's what it is.
• 1:27:41
  Speaker 3: And this is this is, this is why we keep
• 1:27:44
  Speaker 3: banging on this drum because it doesn't matter what what
• 1:27:51
  Speaker 3: name you give to the creator of the universe, like
• 1:27:57
  Speaker 3: it really shouldn't and but apparently it does, as long
• 1:28:02
  Speaker 3: as it results in you being able to mutilate the
• 1:28:06
  Speaker 3: genitals of male babies, like Atheists do it, Muslims, the Christians, jeez,
• 1:28:14
  Speaker 3: everyone does it.
• 1:28:16
  Speaker 2: Should that not?
• 1:28:18
  Speaker 5: English?
• 1:28:19
  Speaker 2: Should not?
• 1:28:20
  Speaker 3: Should that not tell you something that the fundamental problem
• 1:28:25
  Speaker 3: is not with any given religion. The fundamental problem is
• 1:28:31
  Speaker 3: whatever fucking ideology it is you have that allows you
• 1:28:36
  Speaker 3: to mutilate male genitals and just feel perfectly fine about it,
• 1:28:43
  Speaker 3: Like this, This is not a religious war we're waging.
• 1:28:47
  Speaker 3: It's it's it's a war between two fashions. One faction
• 1:28:53
  Speaker 3: that thinks you can do whatever the fuck you like
• 1:28:57
  Speaker 3: to men and it's okay, and.
• 1:29:00
  Speaker 2: And this other.
• 1:29:02
  Speaker 3: Somewhat marginalized dare I say ideology that says, no, you
• 1:29:10
  Speaker 3: actually you can't do whatever you like to men, and
• 1:29:13
  Speaker 3: it's fine, it's actually I know it sounds weird, but no,
• 1:29:20
  Speaker 3: you can't just do whatever you like to men in
• 1:29:25
  Speaker 3: the name of fucking progress or war or whatever.
• 1:29:31
  Speaker 1: It's not fun.
• 1:29:33
  Speaker 4: And see, the thing is that, you know, if it
• 1:29:38
  Speaker 4: if mutilating their genitals gave men more pleasure, they wouldn't
• 1:29:44
  Speaker 4: be they wouldn't be into No one would be okay
• 1:29:46
  Speaker 4: with it, right, it wouldn't even be a.
• 1:29:50
  Speaker 5: Fucking thing right, irrespective of religion.
• 1:29:54
  Speaker 4: What what what really blows my mind, you know, is
• 1:29:58
  Speaker 4: when it comes to the Christians and they they they
• 1:30:04
  Speaker 4: use the Bible as the justification for cutting up male children.
• 1:30:13
  Speaker 4: And I mean, I'm sorry, but isn't your God supposed
• 1:30:18
  Speaker 4: to be omnipresent, omnipotent and all knowing, all powerful ally,
• 1:30:23
  Speaker 4: why do you think that your God made a mistake?
• 1:30:27
  Speaker 5: You know? And I'm not sure because I'm not I'm
• 1:30:29
  Speaker 5: not religious.
• 1:30:30
  Speaker 4: I don't know what it is in the Bible that
• 1:30:33
  Speaker 4: it says that God says you have to do this
• 1:30:37
  Speaker 4: thing right, Like I don't know what the chapter and verses.
• 1:30:42
  Speaker 5: But how how in the world can you be how
• 1:30:55
  Speaker 5: is this your religion?
• 1:30:56
  Speaker 4: Right?
• 1:30:56
  Speaker 1: Like?
• 1:30:56
  Speaker 4: How do you love this God. This is your God.
• 1:31:00
  Speaker 4: Your God is all knowing, all powerful, perfect, this is
• 1:31:03
  Speaker 4: this is the way, and God is my Jesus is
• 1:31:07
  Speaker 4: all that shit right. But God is so stupid that
• 1:31:11
  Speaker 4: he screwed up your baby and now you have to
• 1:31:16
  Speaker 4: go and fix God's work.
• 1:31:20
  Speaker 5: Make that make sense? That makes sense.
• 1:31:23
  Speaker 1: It's not the theory behind Jewish circumcision. That's supposed to
• 1:31:27
  Speaker 1: be considered a sacrifice. Yes, and so it's like, I
• 1:31:33
  Speaker 1: understand where that's coming from and everything, but obviously I
• 1:31:38
  Speaker 1: don't agree with imposing it on children. And it didn't
• 1:31:42
  Speaker 1: used to be done on the level that it is now.
• 1:31:46
  Speaker 1: It didn't used to be, for lack of a better description,
• 1:31:51
  Speaker 1: high and tight. That used to be much more minor
• 1:31:58
  Speaker 1: in terms of the in terms of the cut. Not
• 1:32:03
  Speaker 1: that that necessarily fixes the problem, but the point of
• 1:32:07
  Speaker 1: it essentially was to differentiate them from everybody else and
• 1:32:12
  Speaker 1: to make a statement of obedience that you're you're creating
• 1:32:17
  Speaker 1: a sacrifice in order to prove that you are that
• 1:32:24
  Speaker 1: loyal to your God, that you're giving up something valuable
• 1:32:29
  Speaker 1: and you know a part of your person that you'll
• 1:32:33
  Speaker 1: have a reminder for the rest of your life. And
• 1:32:36
  Speaker 1: there's other other religions that practice ritual scarification. And you know,
• 1:32:44
  Speaker 1: like my my thinking on it is, you know, I
• 1:32:47
  Speaker 1: don't like any of it. It doesn't it's not better
• 1:32:53
  Speaker 1: if it's some other part of the body, and it's not.
• 1:32:55
  Speaker 1: But if it's that part of the body, well you
• 1:32:58
  Speaker 1: can choose it done to children against their will exact
• 1:33:03
  Speaker 1: old enough to make that decision themselves exactly.
• 1:33:06
  Speaker 4: But you know, the these my body, my choice motherfuckers. Somehow,
• 1:33:11
  Speaker 4: for some reason, they can't wrap that around their fucking
• 1:33:15
  Speaker 4: heads when it comes to I don't know, an infant. Huh, Jesus,
• 1:33:25
  Speaker 4: I'm sorry, this is it makes me just it's like
• 1:33:31
  Speaker 4: unbelievably angry, and I just.
• 1:33:39
  Speaker 5: I need to not talk about this anymore because.
• 1:33:41
  Speaker 1: And I will. I will say the thing about the
• 1:33:45
  Speaker 1: so called receptor cells and everything. One of the things
• 1:33:48
  Speaker 1: that I will point out is this being circumcised actually
• 1:33:53
  Speaker 1: makes a guy less likely to be comfortable using a condom.
• 1:33:59
  Speaker 1: Nothing comes in contact with those cells if you've got
• 1:34:01
  Speaker 1: a condom on. So it's a moot point. But that
• 1:34:11
  Speaker 1: twenty fourteen study was pretty well debunked later on. It
• 1:34:18
  Speaker 1: was it was demonstrated that the the individuals who did
• 1:34:24
  Speaker 1: the study engaged in a whole bunch of ethics violations
• 1:34:28
  Speaker 1: in the course of the study. And they also just
• 1:34:33
  Speaker 1: blatantly attribute the effects of condom use to circumcision without
• 1:34:38
  Speaker 1: any evidence at all.
• 1:34:40
  Speaker 5: Just so stupid. And our tax payer money is going
• 1:34:45
  Speaker 5: to fund the the.
• 1:34:49
  Speaker 1: This thing, and it went to fund that study too, yep.
• 1:34:56
  Speaker 5: So yeah, just I don't get it. I don't get it,
• 1:35:00
  Speaker 5: you know, I mean, I can.
• 1:35:02
  Speaker 1: You can talk about this all night. We have one
• 1:35:05
  Speaker 1: more to look at though, So I'm gonna I'm gonna
• 1:35:06
  Speaker 1: move on from the cut here. And and like I
• 1:35:10
  Speaker 1: said it, this taints everything this organization does. And it's
• 1:35:15
  Speaker 1: not just the circumcision aspect that that taints it. It's
• 1:35:18
  Speaker 1: the guynes centrisom. You know, when you say, well, we're
• 1:35:21
  Speaker 1: gonna provide healthcare, but we're gonna we're gonna make it
• 1:35:26
  Speaker 1: female centric, and uh, we're going to make the bulk
• 1:35:31
  Speaker 1: of the resources available to women only. You're not providing healthcare,
• 1:35:36
  Speaker 1: you're providing a resource for women, and you should just
• 1:35:39
  Speaker 1: admit that it's gendered. So the next one that we
• 1:35:44
  Speaker 1: have here, again the Department of State. State State Department
• 1:35:49
  Speaker 1: was pretty busy with this ship, right we now have.
• 1:35:52
  Speaker 1: This is the Pan American Development Foundation Incorporated, and we
• 1:36:00
  Speaker 1: will look here. They had their funding was not as
• 1:36:03
  Speaker 1: high as the previous organization, but they're a million. Theirs
• 1:36:09
  Speaker 1: was conduct an assessment of prior This is international programming
• 1:36:17
  Speaker 1: on gender based violence in Latin America to provide recommendations
• 1:36:20
  Speaker 1: for future programming objectives. Institutionalize rule of law by developing
• 1:36:28
  Speaker 1: and expanding criminal justice systems, to strengthen partner country law
• 1:36:34
  Speaker 1: enforcement and judicial effectiveness, foster corporation or cooperation and legal affairs.
• 1:36:40
  Speaker 1: And advance respect for human rights. And by human rights,
• 1:36:45
  Speaker 1: they mean women's rights. They don't mean human rights. And
• 1:36:49
  Speaker 1: so they're looking at again, gender based violence. They're promoting
• 1:36:53
  Speaker 1: this in Latin America. So I'm like, all right, who
• 1:36:56
  Speaker 1: are these guys? And again I just searched their name
• 1:37:01
  Speaker 1: and their website came up and this is the this
• 1:37:06
  Speaker 1: is what I for. One of the first things I
• 1:37:09
  Speaker 1: saw participatory meeting of women's organizations from Latin America and
• 1:37:17
  Speaker 1: the Caribbean. So the Pan American Development Foundation partnered with Equality.
• 1:37:28
  Speaker 1: Now we've seen them before, but just as a reminder,
• 1:37:33
  Speaker 1: we'll look here. Equality.
• 1:37:34
  Speaker 6: Now, I wonder what Pan American means.
• 1:37:38
  Speaker 1: Pan American means across the continents.
• 1:37:42
  Speaker 4: Yeah, like like Pan African, but.
• 1:37:47
  Speaker 2: They hoped to pan the entire world.
• 1:37:52
  Speaker 1: Yes, pretty much. So this Equity Now Partner organization there
• 1:37:58
  Speaker 1: with IS is basically a feminist jurisprudence jurisprudence promoting organization organization.
• 1:38:05
  Speaker 1: They they actually go into other countries and manipulate the
• 1:38:11
  Speaker 1: laws in those other countries. They here's where it says,
• 1:38:14
  Speaker 1: uh International Network of Lawyers, activists and supporters. Uh so
• 1:38:23
  Speaker 1: you know, basically activists, some of which know how to
• 1:38:28
  Speaker 1: manipulate the law. Yeah. Popping Hulla Balloon's points out that
• 1:38:42
  Speaker 1: was in Karen's Nefault video. Feminism disregards men's humanity, so
• 1:38:47
  Speaker 1: when they say human rights, they only have to mean
• 1:38:49
  Speaker 1: women because they don't think of men as human m
• 1:38:53
  Speaker 1: mm hmmm. They have changed laws, they have expanded here
• 1:39:06
  Speaker 1: we go, feminist legal expertise, that's feminist JURISPROOFRAC seventy six
• 1:39:12
  Speaker 1: trainings and workshops. Uh, three thirty nine million women and
• 1:39:18
  Speaker 1: girls worldwide, they've said, and they call it improving access
• 1:39:21
  Speaker 1: to justice, but it basically means too legal power.
• 1:39:26
  Speaker 4: And you can donate as if your fucking tax payer
• 1:39:30
  Speaker 4: money isn't enough.
• 1:39:32
  Speaker 5: Yeah, it's all over the place.
• 1:39:34
  Speaker 1: There's three donation buttons, right, fuck these people Jesus yep,
• 1:39:43
  Speaker 1: And they're looking at So if you look at trafficking,
• 1:39:46
  Speaker 1: for instance, human trafficking that happens to both sexes, including
• 1:39:50
  Speaker 1: sexual human trafficking. One of the things that people don't
• 1:39:54
  Speaker 1: know is that among traffickers who exploit women, there is
• 1:40:02
  Speaker 1: a large contingent that are women. Mm hm women traffic women,
• 1:40:12
  Speaker 1: but yeah, sexual.
• 1:40:15
  Speaker 4: Yea.
• 1:40:17
  Speaker 1: Then there then we have, you know, the stuff that
• 1:40:19
  Speaker 1: most people would be like, oh, yes, rape is bad.
• 1:40:22
  Speaker 1: We're we're definitely going to support this because they're opposing
• 1:40:24
  Speaker 1: rape and we oppose rape. Therefore, you know, and and
• 1:40:27
  Speaker 1: wife beating is bad, and they oppose wife beating, we
• 1:40:30
  Speaker 1: oppose what Then we get to this part right here.
• 1:40:33
  Speaker 1: In harmful practices, the term harmful practices, this is not
• 1:40:38
  Speaker 1: letting me show this. This this stupid header is hiding
• 1:40:46
  Speaker 1: the text. I'll just read it. But it's right behind Lauren.
• 1:40:51
  Speaker 1: In harmful practices, the term harmful practices geez, the donation
• 1:40:56
  Speaker 1: buttons covering it up. Covers forms of violence or ritual
• 1:41:01
  Speaker 1: discrimination primarily committed against girls and women that have become
• 1:41:06
  Speaker 1: culturally normalized. So at first you think, oh, you know,
• 1:41:13
  Speaker 1: I'm a posed to targeting women. But there is no
• 1:41:18
  Speaker 1: form of violence or ritual discrimination that is unique to women.
• 1:41:24
  Speaker 1: And I say this even though there are cultures with guardianship,
• 1:41:29
  Speaker 1: which is similar to coverture. And the reason I say
• 1:41:33
  Speaker 1: that is because every type of discrimination that feminists call
• 1:41:40
  Speaker 1: anti women discrimination goes both ways. In some way or another.
• 1:41:45
  Speaker 1: Women for every not allowed women have, men have an
• 1:41:49
  Speaker 1: obligation that if a woman is allowed to do the
• 1:41:53
  Speaker 1: thing they're not allowed to do, they may interfere with
• 1:41:57
  Speaker 1: the man meeting that obligation. One of one of Karen's
• 1:42:02
  Speaker 1: favorite examples is if a man is obligated to pay
• 1:42:07
  Speaker 1: all of the household taxes, then he should have the
• 1:42:10
  Speaker 1: right to decide whether people whose taxes he would be
• 1:42:15
  Speaker 1: responsible for are allowed to earn money that he has
• 1:42:19
  Speaker 1: to pay taxes on but can't touch. So in countries
• 1:42:26
  Speaker 1: with guardianship, if a woman, if a man allows his
• 1:42:30
  Speaker 1: wife to get a job, she gets the job, she
• 1:42:34
  Speaker 1: earns a paycheck. He's not allowed to take her money,
• 1:42:37
  Speaker 1: but he has to pay taxes on it. So if
• 1:42:40
  Speaker 1: his say he's I don't know, he does roadwork works
• 1:42:46
  Speaker 1: for construction crew. And let's say he makes the equivalent
• 1:42:51
  Speaker 1: of forty thousand American dollars a year, and that's probably
• 1:42:58
  Speaker 1: way low bulling it for a lot of construction work,
• 1:43:01
  Speaker 1: because that's dangerous work and so there would be hazard pay.
• 1:43:04
  Speaker 1: But let's say forty thousand, and let's say she goes
• 1:43:07
  Speaker 1: into some cushy human resources thing. She has a degree,
• 1:43:13
  Speaker 1: and she works in an office with sexist air conditioning
• 1:43:17
  Speaker 1: and shit, and maybe she gets paid eighty thousand American
• 1:43:22
  Speaker 1: dollars equivalent per year, and maybe she decides that she's
• 1:43:27
  Speaker 1: not going to hand over any of it for taxes.
• 1:43:31
  Speaker 1: So now he's paying taxes on his forty thousand, plus
• 1:43:35
  Speaker 1: he's paying more taxes on her eighty thousand, and he's
• 1:43:38
  Speaker 1: still obligated to support her. And she doesn't have to
• 1:43:43
  Speaker 1: spend any of that money on the family. She can
• 1:43:47
  Speaker 1: just keep it all for herself if she wants to, right,
• 1:43:51
  Speaker 1: So it's fair under that circumstance, because of his obligations
• 1:43:58
  Speaker 1: to say if she wants to get a job, she
• 1:44:01
  Speaker 1: has to get his permission. Feminists would call that discrimination
• 1:44:06
  Speaker 1: against women in my opinion, and I think Karen's expressed
• 1:44:11
  Speaker 1: pretty much the same thing. Allison's expressed pretty much the
• 1:44:13
  Speaker 1: same that's discrimination against both sexes. Right, it'd be fair
• 1:44:18
  Speaker 1: if the obligations were removed from his end. He doesn't
• 1:44:23
  Speaker 1: have to pay her taxes, and any obligation to support
• 1:44:28
  Speaker 1: the family falls equally on both the husband and the wife. Well, then, okay,
• 1:44:34
  Speaker 1: she can get a job without his permission. That would
• 1:44:38
  Speaker 1: be an end to a harmful practice. But these feminists
• 1:44:41
  Speaker 1: what they do. They don't go in and say, well,
• 1:44:45
  Speaker 1: let's get rid of all these stipulations and simplify things. Yes,
• 1:44:49
  Speaker 1: she can get a job. She has to pay her
• 1:44:51
  Speaker 1: own taxes, and if she has income, she is as
• 1:44:56
  Speaker 1: responsible with her income as he is with him his
• 1:45:00
  Speaker 1: for supporting their family. Their family has to come first,
• 1:45:04
  Speaker 1: you know. Or or maybe we don't tell people how
• 1:45:07
  Speaker 1: to spend their money, but they don't do that. It's well,
• 1:45:12
  Speaker 1: we want to keep those obligations in place. A man
• 1:45:15
  Speaker 1: should have to support his wife, and women have less
• 1:45:19
  Speaker 1: freedom in this country, so it's only fair that he
• 1:45:24
  Speaker 1: has to pay her taxes and support her. But she
• 1:45:27
  Speaker 1: should be able to get a job without his permission.
• 1:45:29
  Speaker 1: She should. It's discrimination if she gets told no, right,
• 1:45:33
  Speaker 1: and that's what these types of organizations promote. So that's
• 1:45:38
  Speaker 1: what the organization that we were just looking at is
• 1:45:44
  Speaker 1: partnered with. So we go back to this, Yeah, there
• 1:45:55
  Speaker 1: it is. So this participatory meeting, this was from twenty
• 1:45:59
  Speaker 1: twenty three. The Pan American Development Foundation organized a bunch
• 1:46:09
  Speaker 1: of different feminist organizations into this meeting, an Organization of
• 1:46:15
  Speaker 1: American States General Assembly. And then when they say American States,
• 1:46:20
  Speaker 1: they don't mean the fifty states of the United States.
• 1:46:22
  Speaker 1: They mean Brazil, in Mexico and the United States, Canada,
• 1:46:30
  Speaker 1: everything in between, Guatemala, you know, Al Salvador, every place
• 1:46:35
  Speaker 1: that had any feminist organizations could send representatives to this meeting.
• 1:46:45
  Speaker 1: And so what the first thing the meeting aimed to,
• 1:46:48
  Speaker 1: and this is all coded language again, increase access to
• 1:46:51
  Speaker 1: resources and advocacy strategies for women's rights organizations right, build
• 1:46:58
  Speaker 1: relationships between women rights organizations from Latin America and the
• 1:47:02
  Speaker 1: Caribbean and the Caribbean and key US based organizations and institutions.
• 1:47:09
  Speaker 1: So what does that mean, Well, the first one means
• 1:47:13
  Speaker 1: they had a meeting to figure out how to increase
• 1:47:18
  Speaker 1: their grift. They did a meeting to figure out how
• 1:47:21
  Speaker 1: to extort more money from establishment governments and establishment organizations, businesses,
• 1:47:30
  Speaker 1: charities like the Ford Foundation and the Carnegie Foundation, and like,
• 1:47:36
  Speaker 1: how to get George Soros money right then? And that
• 1:47:40
  Speaker 1: was the first topic of their meeting, how do we
• 1:47:42
  Speaker 1: get more money? And the second topic was how do
• 1:47:49
  Speaker 1: we network? How do we conspire? That's we paid for that.
• 1:47:59
  Speaker 1: We paid for a feminist meeting on how to get
• 1:48:04
  Speaker 1: more money out of us and how to conspire with
• 1:48:10
  Speaker 1: each other as a network in order to more effectively
• 1:48:14
  Speaker 1: grift on our dime. You guys are both muted. I
• 1:48:24
  Speaker 1: was going to give you a chance.
• 1:48:27
  Speaker 4: I can't even I'm spent. I hate I hate them,
• 1:48:32
  Speaker 4: and I hate using that word. I really don't like
• 1:48:35
  Speaker 4: using that word because the opposite of love is not hate,
• 1:48:39
  Speaker 4: it is indifference.
• 1:48:40
  Speaker 5: Yeah, I despise these people. I despise what they do.
• 1:48:46
  Speaker 5: I think it is just beyond the pale.
• 1:48:50
  Speaker 4: And as far as I'm concerned, you know, people are
• 1:48:56
  Speaker 4: questioning whether or not Elon Must deserves to be in there,
• 1:49:00
  Speaker 4: and what is he doing and what are his intentions.
• 1:49:03
  Speaker 5: I don't give off, but I don't care.
• 1:49:06
  Speaker 4: Who can have all of my information If you go
• 1:49:09
  Speaker 4: after these bastards and you pull their money. I'll be
• 1:49:15
  Speaker 4: happy with that. Fine, I'm fine. You know, this is
• 1:49:20
  Speaker 4: absolutely ridiculous.
• 1:49:22
  Speaker 3: It begs the question if Elon isn't allowed to be there,
• 1:49:27
  Speaker 3: then why any of these niggas are allowed to be there.
• 1:49:30
  Speaker 3: I mean, you all in America are just beginning to
• 1:49:33
  Speaker 3: scratch the surface of the corruption in your government, and
• 1:49:38
  Speaker 3: I'm sat here, I'm having to return to my European
• 1:49:43
  Speaker 3: government in two days or so, thinking, well, these niggas are.
• 1:49:50
  Speaker 5: Still doing all the same shit, and it's getting worse.
• 1:49:54
  Speaker 5: It's getting worse.
• 1:49:56
  Speaker 3: But you know, even Persia didn't do it. Yeah, like like, well,
• 1:50:05
  Speaker 3: Trump was getting elected to his first term, Britain was
• 1:50:09
  Speaker 3: getting its breadit and we we thought that this would
• 1:50:12
  Speaker 3: have comparable effects on the bureaucracy of of of our
• 1:50:21
  Speaker 3: respective continents. But evidently it wasn't. I mean, in neither case,
• 1:50:28
  Speaker 3: because Trump's four years didn't really achieve much. But but
• 1:50:33
  Speaker 3: but now that you're getting dark Trump, you you're finally
• 1:50:40
  Speaker 3: you're finally getting some ship changing. But back here in Europe,
• 1:50:44
  Speaker 3: I say back here, I'm I'm still in the US
• 1:50:48
  Speaker 3: A thankfully for for the next two days, but.
• 1:50:52
  Speaker 2: Sooner we'll have to go back. And yeah, in Europe.
• 1:50:55
  Speaker 2: We we we're.
• 1:50:57
  Speaker 3: Not even getting initial Trump, let alone dark Trump. The
• 1:51:05
  Speaker 3: problem is still persistent.
• 1:51:08
  Speaker 4: Yeah, now you guys are like quadrupling down on the
• 1:51:12
  Speaker 4: problem despite Brexit.
• 1:51:15
  Speaker 3: The whole whole point of Brexit was to prevent this
• 1:51:18
  Speaker 3: ship from happening. Unfortunately, we even though we exited from
• 1:51:24
  Speaker 3: the bureaucracy of the EU, we still have the bureaucracy
• 1:51:29
  Speaker 3: of the.
• 1:51:31
  Speaker 5: To tier care.
• 1:51:33
  Speaker 3: Yes, that's sort of thing. And it wasn't just Kid,
• 1:51:36
  Speaker 3: it was Boris to raise it. It was fucking David Cameron,
• 1:51:41
  Speaker 3: it was fucking Tony Blair and all that. This has
• 1:51:44
  Speaker 3: been going on for thirty years. Wait, yeah, yeah, about
• 1:51:49
  Speaker 3: thirty years.
• 1:51:51
  Speaker 1: You might possibly have your own kuzu plant.
• 1:51:55
  Speaker 2: Yes, yeah. And I.
• 1:51:58
  Speaker 3: Hold out hope that that we that we can get
• 1:52:02
  Speaker 3: the same treatment that you're getting, like much like Germany
• 1:52:05
  Speaker 3: holds out hope that they can get the a f
• 1:52:07
  Speaker 3: D in the next election, much like all kinds of
• 1:52:10
  Speaker 3: European countries hope that they can get anything resembling the
• 1:52:17
  Speaker 3: blessings that that you all getting in the Americas. And
• 1:52:21
  Speaker 3: I've not just been Trump, I mean I mean by
• 1:52:24
  Speaker 3: Kareley in in in Alavado or indeed malay in in.
• 1:52:34
  Speaker 3: We all want our version of alfuera. It's America is
• 1:52:40
  Speaker 3: only just getting I mean, the USA is only just
• 1:52:44
  Speaker 3: getting its version of alua. We all want our version
• 1:52:48
  Speaker 3: of afuera, like the whole world, except China. China doesn't want.
• 1:52:55
  Speaker 3: China wants I don't know how you translate this. China
• 1:52:58
  Speaker 3: wants everything of the state and in the state. You
• 1:53:05
  Speaker 3: might call it fascism. I mean, the East is going
• 1:53:09
  Speaker 3: exactly what these bastards might call fascism, whereas Europe and
• 1:53:16
  Speaker 3: America are only just pulling themselves out of anything that
• 1:53:21
  Speaker 3: could be called fascism. It's just so ironic that the
• 1:53:26
  Speaker 3: fascism we're dealing with in the twenty first century is
• 1:53:29
  Speaker 3: left wing fascism. Wait what that doesn't make any sense, Mike,
• 1:53:34
  Speaker 3: How could there be such a thing as left wing fascism.
• 1:53:37
  Speaker 6: Well, yeah, that's what happens.
• 1:53:41
  Speaker 3: That's what happens when you block yourself off from the
• 1:53:45
  Speaker 3: existence of the idea of left wing fascism. Everything within
• 1:53:51
  Speaker 3: the state and of the state.
• 1:53:54
  Speaker 2: How could that be leftism?
• 1:53:55
  Speaker 3: Yeah, that's what leftism is. That's what leftism has been
• 1:54:02
  Speaker 3: for the last thirty years. Everything within the state, everything
• 1:54:06
  Speaker 3: of the state, but that how could that be fascist?
• 1:54:10
  Speaker 3: There's no such thing as left wing fascism.
• 1:54:13
  Speaker 2: No, there is.
• 1:54:15
  Speaker 3: There is. What's been happening for like fifty years. Left
• 1:54:20
  Speaker 3: wing fascism everything within the state and of the state.
• 1:54:26
  Speaker 2: It hating.
• 1:54:30
  Speaker 3: The population, that's that's supposed to be served by the state.
• 1:54:36
  Speaker 2: That's what's happening.
• 1:54:38
  Speaker 3: It's it's it's just so hard for boomers to understand it.
• 1:54:43
  Speaker 3: It's even hard for gen x's to understand. How could
• 1:54:47
  Speaker 3: the TV be lying to us this much? How could
• 1:54:50
  Speaker 3: the newspapers be lying to us this much? Surely no
• 1:54:55
  Speaker 3: one could possibly lie to us this much. I mean,
• 1:55:00
  Speaker 3: I totally don't trust the government, right, but the government
• 1:55:05
  Speaker 3: wouldn't lie to us this much.
• 1:55:07
  Speaker 2: Yeah, no, they would. They always have.
• 1:55:09
  Speaker 4: And the kicker, the kick in the ass, is that
• 1:55:12
  Speaker 4: they owe their very existence to us. And yet what
• 1:55:18
  Speaker 4: are they doing. They are turning around and putting the
• 1:55:20
  Speaker 4: knife right in our backs and expecting a bigger tip.
• 1:55:27
  Speaker 1: Well, they're running a scam. Yeah. The fact is that
• 1:55:31
  Speaker 1: everything that needs a fuida, everything that needs to be
• 1:55:36
  Speaker 1: cast out exercised, so to speak. Feminism guynes centrism is
• 1:55:45
  Speaker 1: the wedge that has been used to pry open the
• 1:55:51
  Speaker 1: otherwise secure airtight attitudes we would have about individuality and
• 1:55:59
  Speaker 1: freedom and uh civil rights and so on. To shove
• 1:56:04
  Speaker 1: that ship down our throats mm hmm. Price sh it
• 1:56:09
  Speaker 1: open and in it goes. And now our country is
• 1:56:14
  Speaker 1: having to vomit all this stuff out and it's going
• 1:56:17
  Speaker 1: to continue, and it's gonna it's going to have moments
• 1:56:21
  Speaker 1: where people are gonna be like, well, this is painful.
• 1:56:24
  Speaker 1: I don't know if I sign up for this much pain.
• 1:56:27
  Speaker 1: But if you don't go through it, well, it's just
• 1:56:31
  Speaker 1: like dealing with a physical addiction. This country is going
• 1:56:36
  Speaker 1: to go through safety net withdrawal. It's going to go
• 1:56:40
  Speaker 1: through economic security, false economic security by the way, withdrawal.
• 1:56:47
  Speaker 1: It's gonna go withdrawal. M It's going to go through
• 1:56:53
  Speaker 1: uh babysitter government babysitter withdrawal, and people are going to
• 1:57:02
  Speaker 1: There will be people that are gonna feel like they
• 1:57:05
  Speaker 1: regret this. But if you hold the lid, be me
• 1:57:10
  Speaker 1: and stuck with it. On the other side of that
• 1:57:14
  Speaker 1: is a much stronger and much more secure existence.
• 1:57:19
  Speaker 5: Mm hmm.
• 1:57:21
  Speaker 1: I about have to rely on somebody else to take
• 1:57:23
  Speaker 1: care of you, because you can take care of yourself
• 1:57:26
  Speaker 1: then somebody else can't let you down.
• 1:57:29
  Speaker 4: Absolutely, And you know what I love about this term,
• 1:57:34
  Speaker 4: Trump's second term now is that you know, we know
• 1:57:38
  Speaker 4: that he won't be back in office again, right right.
• 1:57:43
  Speaker 5: Even if I don't think any of.
• 1:57:46
  Speaker 4: His children are really poised to take the position, I
• 1:57:51
  Speaker 4: just don't see any of that happening, right, But Barrun
• 1:57:56
  Speaker 4: I would love to see that happen.
• 1:57:58
  Speaker 5: I absolutely would love to see that happen.
• 1:58:01
  Speaker 4: There's gonna be major pushback, but again, I don't think
• 1:58:03
  Speaker 4: the Democrats will be ready and have a candidate that
• 1:58:09
  Speaker 4: a viable candidate within this amount of time, because they
• 1:58:14
  Speaker 4: are knocking our.
• 1:58:15
  Speaker 5: Front teeth out right. They are just.
• 1:58:18
  Speaker 4: Absolutely balls to the wall, exposing everything, And I think
• 1:58:24
  Speaker 4: that is part of Trump's plan, right because this you know,
• 1:58:28
  Speaker 4: and again I hated the twenty twenty election.
• 1:58:33
  Speaker 5: I hated the results of that.
• 1:58:35
  Speaker 4: But if that never happened, we would not be in
• 1:58:39
  Speaker 4: this position right now. Trump would have been just way
• 1:58:43
  Speaker 4: more complacent, you know, just trying to see out the
• 1:58:47
  Speaker 4: rest of his term. But now there's a fire in
• 1:58:50
  Speaker 4: his belly that is just you can't buy this, right,
• 1:58:57
  Speaker 4: This is just.
• 1:58:59
  Speaker 5: It's the perfect fucking storm.
• 1:59:01
  Speaker 4: I think he had the past four years to sit
• 1:59:05
  Speaker 4: back and really understand what he's doing. Right, this whole
• 1:59:10
  Speaker 4: doge thing, like the the the that four chan meme
• 1:59:14
  Speaker 4: that I posted about the USDES that's absolutely true.
• 1:59:18
  Speaker 5: Okay, this system was in place.
• 1:59:21
  Speaker 4: Trump just came in, took it over, refined it, renamed it.
• 1:59:27
  Speaker 4: And these Democrats can't do a fucking thing. They are
• 1:59:32
  Speaker 4: toothless against this this I don't want to say regime,
• 1:59:37
  Speaker 4: this administration.
• 1:59:38
  Speaker 5: They are absolutely toothless against it.
• 1:59:41
  Speaker 4: They can't do anything but boohoo, whine and cry about
• 1:59:45
  Speaker 4: whatever Trump is doing.
• 1:59:46
  Speaker 5: And that's perfect.
• 1:59:47
  Speaker 4: You know, I think he is using this as his
• 1:59:50
  Speaker 4: his I think he understands, you know that they're after
• 1:59:55
  Speaker 4: this four years. It's a toss up because as much
• 1:59:59
  Speaker 4: as we would like to see jd.
• 2:00:00
  Speaker 5: Vance go in there, it's not a guarantee.
• 2:00:04
  Speaker 4: But what he's doing is opening everyone's eyes to the disruption,
• 2:00:11
  Speaker 4: right to the the absolute just.
• 2:00:17
  Speaker 5: Greed and and and.
• 2:00:23
  Speaker 4: It's yeah, yeah, and they are the Democrats are defenseless
• 2:00:30
  Speaker 4: against it.
• 2:00:30
  Speaker 5: And it's beautiful.
• 2:00:31
  Speaker 4: It's beautiful because even they are waking them, not all
• 2:00:35
  Speaker 4: of them.
• 2:00:36
  Speaker 5: You know, you still have the.
• 2:00:37
  Speaker 4: The Aana Presley's and all these black Democrats.
• 2:00:42
  Speaker 5: You know, the Maxine Water.
• 2:00:47
  Speaker 1: Had the same fart held inside of her nostrils.
• 2:00:51
  Speaker 4: Yes, you know, they are so feebly trying to clawing
• 2:00:58
  Speaker 4: and trying to do any thing that they can. I mean,
• 2:01:02
  Speaker 4: I saw a video they were and these people are.
• 2:01:08
  Speaker 5: They were talking about Elon in the Oval office, right
• 2:01:11
  Speaker 5: that that pressure that they did.
• 2:01:13
  Speaker 4: Oh well, Elon got to say three thousand, four hundred
• 2:01:17
  Speaker 4: and sixty seven words and Trump only said two thousand,
• 2:01:21
  Speaker 4: five hundred and twenty five words.
• 2:01:23
  Speaker 5: Oh my god. Jd Vance couldn't even get that all.
• 2:01:26
  Speaker 5: But like, like, are you serious?
• 2:01:29
  Speaker 1: This is the levels this is people don't understand about JD. Vance.
• 2:01:35
  Speaker 1: He doesn't need.
• 2:01:37
  Speaker 5: To be or he does.
• 2:01:39
  Speaker 1: Yeah, he doesn't point across very concisely, yeestly and poignantly
• 2:01:46
  Speaker 1: and yeah, and he doesn't. He doesn't meant words, he
• 2:01:48
  Speaker 1: doesn't waste.
• 2:01:49
  Speaker 5: He does not.
• 2:01:50
  Speaker 4: He does not, he does not. And so that's why
• 2:01:54
  Speaker 4: I'm very hopeful for him.
• 2:01:56
  Speaker 5: And if he does decide.
• 2:01:58
  Speaker 4: To move forward, and I think they are building a
• 2:02:03
  Speaker 4: great team behind him, I think that it could only
• 2:02:09
  Speaker 4: go in that direction. But you know, listen, you saw
• 2:02:14
  Speaker 4: what happened to Obama, right, Like Obama in two.
• 2:02:17
  Speaker 5: Thousand and eight look completely different.
• 2:02:20
  Speaker 1: Oh my gosh.
• 2:02:20
  Speaker 5: Yeah, at the end of his present president.
• 2:02:23
  Speaker 1: Right like like twenty years.
• 2:02:25
  Speaker 5: Oh my god, yes, he did.
• 2:02:28
  Speaker 4: You know. So there's a lot of stress that comes
• 2:02:30
  Speaker 4: along with the responsibilities, understandably, so so, you know, and
• 2:02:37
  Speaker 4: Dance has young children, you know.
• 2:02:41
  Speaker 5: But I don't know.
• 2:02:43
  Speaker 4: I don't know if I believe that he has the
• 2:02:48
  Speaker 4: metal to do it. I believe that he is built
• 2:02:51
  Speaker 4: of sterner stuff. I think that he will want to
• 2:02:54
  Speaker 4: because he also sees the value in what the Trump
• 2:02:59
  Speaker 4: administration is doing.
• 2:03:01
  Speaker 5: So, you know, I would love to see it happen.
• 2:03:04
  Speaker 4: And I think that this whole thing would doge and
• 2:03:09
  Speaker 4: exposing all of this government wasteful spending is just going
• 2:03:16
  Speaker 4: to change the It's just going to change the polarity
• 2:03:20
  Speaker 4: of everything.
• 2:03:22
  Speaker 1: Yeah, right too. And people are starting to realize, especially
• 2:03:26
  Speaker 1: like young men are starting to realize, you know, this
• 2:03:28
  Speaker 1: is our future being mortgaged. This is the effect of
• 2:03:32
  Speaker 1: this on you know, this is a situation men most affected.
• 2:03:36
  Speaker 1: The effect of this on women is not anywhere near
• 2:03:38
  Speaker 1: the same because most of these taxes are going to
• 2:03:42
  Speaker 1: pay for benefits for women. They're paying for women's safety, nets,
• 2:03:47
  Speaker 1: and they're paying for, like we're seeing here, promotion of
• 2:03:51
  Speaker 1: feminist philosophies that are designed to for the most part,
• 2:03:57
  Speaker 1: they're designed to persuade establishment entities to reserve resources for
• 2:04:03
  Speaker 1: women over and above for men. So yeahny, taxes that
• 2:04:08
  Speaker 1: women pay one way or another, they're getting something back
• 2:04:12
  Speaker 1: out of it, whereas taxes that men pay are mostly
• 2:04:18
  Speaker 1: going to benefit women and women's organizations.
• 2:04:22
  Speaker 4: Yeah, we just have to hope that there are that
• 2:04:26
  Speaker 4: the majority of the young men are not going to
• 2:04:30
  Speaker 4: be persuaded by what the little women's want and you
• 2:04:35
  Speaker 4: know what they need.
• 2:04:36
  Speaker 5: Oh my god's taking away and regular No he's not, No,
• 2:04:41
  Speaker 5: he's not. He's not doing any of that.
• 2:04:44
  Speaker 1: You can't take away something right that isn't a right.
• 2:04:47
  Speaker 1: And you start with that, Okay, it's not right. I'm
• 2:04:51
  Speaker 1: never going to call it a right. I think no bullshit.
• 2:04:55
  Speaker 1: And and as far as access to the procedure, h
• 2:05:00
  Speaker 1: it's it's women's fault that this is happening. Prior to
• 2:05:05
  Speaker 1: Roe v. Wade, there was already legalized abortion in most states.
• 2:05:13
  Speaker 1: Women simply had to demonstrate a medical need mm hmm.
• 2:05:19
  Speaker 1: Or in a lot of states, they just had to
• 2:05:22
  Speaker 1: demonstrate that it was an adverse situation for them. So
• 2:05:28
  Speaker 1: a medical need could include mental health. If she was
• 2:05:32
  Speaker 1: depressed about being pregnant, she could have an abortion. She
• 2:05:38
  Speaker 1: didn't even have to threaten suicide. She just had to
• 2:05:40
  Speaker 1: be depressed upset.
• 2:05:42
  Speaker 5: That's just disresgusting, and that's disgusting.
• 2:05:47
  Speaker 1: It is, but it is what the law was in the.
• 2:05:51
  Speaker 4: Majority of I'm sad because there were consequences to my decisions.
• 2:05:56
  Speaker 1: So I got here. When we hear that historically women
• 2:06:02
  Speaker 1: couldn't have abortions, that that's bullshit. When it was a
• 2:06:05
  Speaker 1: medical procedure, When it became a medical procedure and not
• 2:06:08
  Speaker 1: something that women did out of desperation in their own home,
• 2:06:12
  Speaker 1: and it became part of a medical practice in America,
• 2:06:17
  Speaker 1: there weren't very many years in between when that happened
• 2:06:23
  Speaker 1: and when it became a fairly common practice. There were
• 2:06:28
  Speaker 1: like two hundred thousand abortions done the year before Roe v. Wade,
• 2:06:35
  Speaker 1: and there were like three hundred thousand done the next year,
• 2:06:38
  Speaker 1: and it continued to go up, and it was going up.
• 2:06:42
  Speaker 1: It was like one hundred thousand the year before and
• 2:06:46
  Speaker 1: seventy thousand before that. It was real close. I have
• 2:06:49
  Speaker 1: a video about it, where I did a review of
• 2:06:54
  Speaker 1: the trailer for Call Jane. Still haven't watched the movie.
• 2:06:58
  Speaker 1: I don't know if I can stomach it, but the
• 2:07:01
  Speaker 1: trailer gave a bunch of impressions, and what I basically
• 2:07:06
  Speaker 1: did was I went through and fact checked those impressions,
• 2:07:12
  Speaker 1: and of course they were bullshit. It was all bullshit,
• 2:07:18
  Speaker 1: which is pretty common from feminism. Feminism is pretty much
• 2:07:21
  Speaker 1: all bullshit. Yeah, but yeah, I once again, women had
• 2:07:30
  Speaker 1: access then before rovi versus wide, and it was only
• 2:07:36
  Speaker 1: feminists trying to expand the practice, to make it more
• 2:07:41
  Speaker 1: common to be done in later terms and expanded the
• 2:07:46
  Speaker 1: profitability of planned parenthood. Really that pushed people to the
• 2:07:53
  Speaker 1: point of wanting it outlawed again, and pushed people to
• 2:07:57
  Speaker 1: the point of wanting it defunded and wanting it stopped.
• 2:08:02
  Speaker 1: If they had just left well enough alone, access would
• 2:08:07
  Speaker 1: have continued to be available and they wouldn't have had
• 2:08:10
  Speaker 1: anything to complain about.
• 2:08:12
  Speaker 2: Mm hm.
• 2:08:14
  Speaker 1: But back to this organization. So here's one of their
• 2:08:17
  Speaker 1: statements of philosophy here, and this is under women. They
• 2:08:23
  Speaker 1: had this lovely image of a bunch of women putting
• 2:08:27
  Speaker 1: their fists together to form a big Oh, I guess
• 2:08:29
  Speaker 1: they were very happy in that moment. We believe that
• 2:08:35
  Speaker 1: structural and cultural changes are needed to ensure women's and
• 2:08:39
  Speaker 1: girls human rights. We support the work and partner with
• 2:08:42
  Speaker 1: women's organizations who have been at the forefront of the
• 2:08:45
  Speaker 1: struggle for women's rights. And then they go on. We
• 2:08:49
  Speaker 1: work in Latin America and the Caribbean to facilitate meaningful
• 2:08:53
  Speaker 1: exchanges among organizations and governments to expand women's opportunities and
• 2:08:59
  Speaker 1: access to services. We also equip young men and women
• 2:09:02
  Speaker 1: with the tools needed to challenge sexist norms.
• 2:09:06
  Speaker 5: And oh look they mentioned men.
• 2:09:09
  Speaker 4: Yeah, this is this is an obligation, right, yeah, of course,
• 2:09:15
  Speaker 4: of course.
• 2:09:16
  Speaker 5: But this is all just fucking word salad. What does
• 2:09:18
  Speaker 5: that even mean?
• 2:09:20
  Speaker 4: Can you actually articulate what it means without all the flowery, fluffy,
• 2:09:25
  Speaker 4: fluffy fucking language.
• 2:09:27
  Speaker 5: They mean?
• 2:09:29
  Speaker 1: This is America funding of feminist conspiracy in South America
• 2:09:38
  Speaker 1: to inform changes in law and policy to manipulate legislators.
• 2:09:44
  Speaker 1: That is what. That is, plain and simple language. It's
• 2:09:47
  Speaker 1: a feminist conspiracy in South America to manipulate legislators using
• 2:09:54
  Speaker 1: US tax dollars. Crazy, Yeah, it's a it's the United
• 2:10:02
  Speaker 1: States exporting feminism. Yep. So then we have one last one.
• 2:10:18
  Speaker 1: I'll be as brief as I can with this, also
• 2:10:21
  Speaker 1: State Department. So again none of these are USAID, none
• 2:10:28
  Speaker 1: of it all, Right, So the State Department paid the
• 2:10:34
  Speaker 1: International Development Law Organization also known as IDLO I low.
• 2:10:39
  Speaker 1: I guess they paid eight hundred and fifty thousand dollars
• 2:10:47
  Speaker 1: to enhance the promotion of gender equality and address root
• 2:10:51
  Speaker 1: causes and consequences of gender based violence. And uh, here
• 2:11:00
  Speaker 1: they're talking about institutionalizing rule of law by developing and
• 2:11:04
  Speaker 1: expanding criminal justice systems to strengthen partner country law enforcement
• 2:11:08
  Speaker 1: and judicial effectiveness, foster cooperation and legal affairs in advanced
• 2:11:12
  Speaker 1: respect for human rights. So what they're talking about here
• 2:11:16
  Speaker 1: is again an international feminist conspiracy to change law and
• 2:11:23
  Speaker 1: policy to gender partner violence law and sexual violence law.
• 2:11:31
  Speaker 1: But the Administrative Agency, Bureau of International Narcotics and Law
• 2:11:36
  Speaker 1: Enforcement Affairs.
• 2:11:38
  Speaker 5: It all just sounds like the same fucking thing.
• 2:11:43
  Speaker 4: It's like one one organization, right, But they're using these
• 2:11:49
  Speaker 4: shadow shell corporations to get more money, right, like these
• 2:11:54
  Speaker 4: are I don't know if it actually he says who's
• 2:12:01
  Speaker 4: involved here, but it sounds like it's one corporation with
• 2:12:06
  Speaker 4: like three or four or five different people, and they're
• 2:12:08
  Speaker 4: all they all have their hands out and they're all
• 2:12:11
  Speaker 4: collecting checks to do the same exact fucking thing.
• 2:12:14
  Speaker 1: Yep, and their funding goes back in this chart two
• 2:12:20
  Speaker 1: thousand and eight. They got two point nine million in
• 2:12:22
  Speaker 1: two thousand and eight, and there's this this is what
• 2:12:25
  Speaker 1: two point nine million looks like. Right, there's the five
• 2:12:29
  Speaker 1: million dollar line, all right, and then then we get
• 2:12:33
  Speaker 1: to twenty seventeen. Oh they quick shit, yep. And then
• 2:12:39
  Speaker 1: you know, we have this little roller coaster here, and
• 2:12:42
  Speaker 1: we got twenty point five million in twenty twenty two.
• 2:12:45
  Speaker 1: So they're averaging somewhere in between five and ten million,
• 2:12:50
  Speaker 1: you know, between the beginning and the end. But what's
• 2:12:53
  Speaker 1: really going on here is that in the last ten years,
• 2:12:58
  Speaker 1: quite a bit of spending has taken place.
• 2:13:02
  Speaker 5: And it doesn't make getty.
• 2:13:03
  Speaker 1: Taken twenty nineteen, but the rest of the time it
• 2:13:05
  Speaker 1: sure did.
• 2:13:07
  Speaker 4: It just doesn't make sense, like, where is this money
• 2:13:10
  Speaker 4: going to?
• 2:13:11
  Speaker 5: If all you're doing is trying to change the hearts and.
• 2:13:13
  Speaker 4: The minds of the people, couldn't you just write like
• 2:13:18
  Speaker 4: a letter, you know what I mean?
• 2:13:19
  Speaker 1: Why why does it take a thousand dollars letter written
• 2:13:22
  Speaker 1: on twenty thousand dollars stationary ten thousand dollars ink pen by.
• 2:13:27
  Speaker 5: You know what I mean?
• 2:13:28
  Speaker 1: By expert?
• 2:13:32
  Speaker 4: Even that could I could, I wouldn't like it, but
• 2:13:37
  Speaker 4: I would say, okay, all right, you gotta pay one
• 2:13:40
  Speaker 4: person to do this thing. Why does it take twenty
• 2:13:45
  Speaker 4: million anything to do something? And how fucking how how
• 2:13:52
  Speaker 4: long have they been getting this money? How many years?
• 2:13:56
  Speaker 4: You mean you couldn't accomplish this within your first all,
• 2:13:59
  Speaker 4: I don't know, three to five years, and now it's
• 2:14:02
  Speaker 4: still gotta go on to this day because what happened
• 2:14:06
  Speaker 4: your your influence was that fucking shit or that it
• 2:14:10
  Speaker 4: didn't work.
• 2:14:12
  Speaker 5: And you just need more money? You just I just
• 2:14:15
  Speaker 5: need more money.
• 2:14:16
  Speaker 4: So I can just convince these people, what.
• 2:14:21
  Speaker 5: What is the money going to? I know what it is.
• 2:14:23
  Speaker 5: You're paying people off.
• 2:14:26
  Speaker 1: You want to know something else about this organization. They're
• 2:14:29
  Speaker 1: not paying people off. By the way. It's one of
• 2:14:33
  Speaker 1: the things that we have noticed with feminist organizations is
• 2:14:38
  Speaker 1: that there's always somebody at a CEO level in the
• 2:14:41
  Speaker 1: organization that is making hundreds of thousands of dollars a
• 2:14:45
  Speaker 1: year into like six meetings a year right, seriously, But
• 2:14:51
  Speaker 1: uh so they this this organization you know they're in
• 2:14:55
  Speaker 1: They're what we do page they talk about basically the
• 2:14:59
  Speaker 1: same thing as last one, that they they essentially go
• 2:15:05
  Speaker 1: into the areas where they're working and influence changes in
• 2:15:10
  Speaker 1: law and policy. And they have this gender strategy. And
• 2:15:13
  Speaker 1: we have this page that explains a little bit about
• 2:15:17
  Speaker 1: their gender strategy. But I believe this is the page
• 2:15:25
  Speaker 1: where I saw.
• 2:15:30
  Speaker 5: And what they do they do? What buy what? Buying
• 2:15:33
  Speaker 5: them all fucking rolexes? What the fuck?
• 2:15:37
  Speaker 1: No pressure campaigns, but partners and donors a right. So
• 2:15:42
  Speaker 1: they need all this money from the United States because
• 2:15:45
  Speaker 1: without us they wouldn't be able to function. Except wait,
• 2:15:48
  Speaker 1: they're getting money from China, Denmark, in Germany, Italy, the Netherlands, Sweden,
• 2:15:54
  Speaker 1: and the United Kingdom in addition to US. And then
• 2:15:58
  Speaker 1: also this is the top one, guys. I'm not putting
• 2:16:01
  Speaker 1: them for o my Linda Gates Foundation, British Council East
• 2:16:08
  Speaker 1: Europe Foundation, European Bank for Reconstruction and Development, European Union,
• 2:16:15
  Speaker 1: European Commission Food and Agriculture, Organization of the United Nations.
• 2:16:21
  Speaker 1: So we give the United Nations money and then we
• 2:16:25
  Speaker 1: give United Nations sub organizations money that's that that do
• 2:16:30
  Speaker 1: these type of things, and then we give this organization money,
• 2:16:33
  Speaker 1: and then the United Nations takes some of the money
• 2:16:35
  Speaker 1: that we gave them and gives them to this organization too. Disgusting, Right,
• 2:16:41
  Speaker 1: Ford Foundation, Yo, Search for Common Ground, the Ford Foundation.
• 2:16:49
  Speaker 5: Those were the motherfuckers that that what was her name?
• 2:16:53
  Speaker 4: Mm hmmm, that feminist that we were just fucking talking
• 2:16:56
  Speaker 4: about a few weeks ago, that the one, Oh my god.
• 2:17:00
  Speaker 1: Yeah, the four Foundation is the organization is the organization
• 2:17:03
  Speaker 1: that funded the first gender studies course in the United States.
• 2:17:08
  Speaker 1: Mm hmm. And it goes on right, uh, Swede Bio,
• 2:17:15
  Speaker 1: Stockholm Resilience Center, the Netherlands Institute of International Relations. Then
• 2:17:20
  Speaker 1: we have three separate United Nations organizations Convention on Biological Diversity,
• 2:17:28
  Speaker 1: Program on HIV SLASH, AIDS Development Program U n d P,
• 2:17:33
  Speaker 1: and then VIV Healthcare. So they have all these different
• 2:17:38
  Speaker 1: This funding going into this organization is huge from all
• 2:17:41
  Speaker 1: of these different So feminists when they when they talk
• 2:17:47
  Speaker 1: like they're just they're just individual chicks on the street
• 2:17:51
  Speaker 1: advocating for for gender equality, how can you get so upset? Right,
• 2:17:58
  Speaker 1: It's because they're not. They do have power and influence.
• 2:18:03
  Speaker 1: They have a shitload of power and influence. They have
• 2:18:07
  Speaker 1: an international network of funding and refunding, like they regift
• 2:18:15
  Speaker 1: funds between each other to each other, just pass this
• 2:18:19
  Speaker 1: money around like like at three dollars hore at a friend,
• 2:18:27
  Speaker 1: And and we're supposed to feel sorry for them, these
• 2:18:32
  Speaker 1: poor underdogs that have had such a hard time fighting
• 2:18:37
  Speaker 1: in the world gender women.
• 2:18:40
  Speaker 4: They're so oppressed by this mountain of cash that's lying
• 2:18:44
  Speaker 4: on top of them. Oh my god, how are we
• 2:18:49
  Speaker 4: gonna get up from under all this fucking money.
• 2:18:51
  Speaker 5: It is just too much.
• 2:18:56
  Speaker 1: Goes to promote this, this gender strategy, and they have
• 2:19:03
  Speaker 1: this philosophy. Idlo's gender strategy, achieving gender equality and justice
• 2:19:08
  Speaker 1: for women through the rule of Law, aims to ensure
• 2:19:12
  Speaker 1: that gender is well integrated into idlo's work and that
• 2:19:17
  Speaker 1: IDLO programs, research, and advocacy effectively contribute to gender equality.
• 2:19:23
  Speaker 1: Women's empowerment, which is separate from gender equality guys. Women's
• 2:19:29
  Speaker 1: empowerment is a whole separate thing, which indicates that women's
• 2:19:34
  Speaker 1: empowerment is not about equality. Nope, an achievement of fair
• 2:19:42
  Speaker 1: justice outcomes for women and girls, which again separate from
• 2:19:46
  Speaker 1: equality therefore, it is not about equality. It is informed
• 2:19:53
  Speaker 1: by internationally recognized human rights standards, empirical research, and global
• 2:19:58
  Speaker 1: commitments on gender equality. They're still using the word equality
• 2:20:03
  Speaker 1: at least, But so how do they do this? IDLO
• 2:20:11
  Speaker 1: is the only inter governmental organization exclusively devoted to promoting
• 2:20:17
  Speaker 1: the rule of law, meaning it is involved between governments,
• 2:20:23
  Speaker 1: between different countries. So they consult with Italy, they consult
• 2:20:27
  Speaker 1: with Brazil, they consult with India, they consult with the
• 2:20:32
  Speaker 1: United States. They then they'll go back and forth. They're
• 2:20:36
  Speaker 1: the organization, or at least one of the organizations, that
• 2:20:42
  Speaker 1: is promoting the idea that there needs to be a unified,
• 2:20:47
  Speaker 1: for instance, domestic violence law around the world that should
• 2:20:52
  Speaker 1: be based on the same beliefs about domestic violence, the
• 2:20:56
  Speaker 1: Duluthe model, and should respect on the same way, fund
• 2:21:01
  Speaker 1: the same responses, fund the same research, and basically make
• 2:21:06
  Speaker 1: the same stipulations, so that no matter what country you're in,
• 2:21:12
  Speaker 1: if a wife beats her husband or pours a kettle
• 2:21:16
  Speaker 1: of hot water on him while he's sleeping, he doesn't
• 2:21:20
  Speaker 1: have the same recourse as as she would have if
• 2:21:23
  Speaker 1: he just yells at her.
• 2:21:26
  Speaker 4: You know, I'm sure there's a fair amount of these
• 2:21:28
  Speaker 4: people that actually believe that they are justified and doing
• 2:21:34
  Speaker 4: a good thing. But I really really want to know
• 2:21:37
  Speaker 4: how many of them actually just know that this is
• 2:21:41
  Speaker 4: a money grab.
• 2:21:42
  Speaker 1: I think most of them.
• 2:21:44
  Speaker 5: I would think so too. I would think so too.
• 2:21:47
  Speaker 5: But you know it's.
• 2:21:51
  Speaker 1: You now. For them, it is just a money grab.
• 2:21:55
  Speaker 1: But what they're doing still has real world implications. And yeah,
• 2:21:59
  Speaker 1: here's the one an important paragraph explaining exactly when they
• 2:22:04
  Speaker 1: go back and forth between these countries what they do.
• 2:22:08
  Speaker 1: Idlo's strategic Plans specifically states that IDLO is committed to
• 2:22:13
  Speaker 1: promoting gender equality through non discriminatory, gender responsive laws and institutions,
• 2:22:19
  Speaker 1: enhancing women's access to justice, and increasing their legal empowerment
• 2:22:23
  Speaker 1: to achieve sustainable development. So to take that out of legalies,
• 2:22:28
  Speaker 1: what that says there is that IDLO goes to these
• 2:22:32
  Speaker 1: partner countries that they're working with and looks through their
• 2:22:37
  Speaker 1: law and policy and says, you need to change this
• 2:22:40
  Speaker 1: to be more feminist friendly. Here's where the problem is.
• 2:22:44
  Speaker 1: Here's what we want you to do, and they get
• 2:22:47
  Speaker 1: what they want. So when you see feminists in London
• 2:23:00
  Speaker 1: fighting to eliminate women's prisons and have all women's criminal
• 2:23:06
  Speaker 1: activity treated as a mental health issue that needs to
• 2:23:12
  Speaker 1: involve going to a mental health institution instead of being
• 2:23:15
  Speaker 1: imprisoned for violent behavior and stuff like that. It starts
• 2:23:20
  Speaker 1: with an organization like this, and it is funded by
• 2:23:25
  Speaker 1: US taxpayer dollars. And when you see feminists in India
• 2:23:32
  Speaker 1: fighting for a law that allows woman to make a
• 2:23:36
  Speaker 1: domestic violence allegation against her husband and then have his
• 2:23:40
  Speaker 1: whole family put in jail, including his infant nephew, that
• 2:23:47
  Speaker 1: was that was funded funded by an organization like this,
• 2:23:51
  Speaker 1: promoted by an organization like this, probably this one, right,
• 2:23:58
  Speaker 1: and it's it's that way throughout the world. So we
• 2:24:03
  Speaker 1: go back to feminist jurisprudence. And remember what we said
• 2:24:07
  Speaker 1: at the beginning of the show. Feminists believe history was
• 2:24:11
  Speaker 1: written from a Western cis male point of view and
• 2:24:14
  Speaker 1: does not reflect anyone else's role in making history and
• 2:24:17
  Speaker 1: structuring society. And this part right here, the language, logic,
• 2:24:24
  Speaker 1: and structure of the law male created to reinforce Western
• 2:24:27
  Speaker 1: male values and power dynamics. Creating a binary of male
• 2:24:34
  Speaker 1: and female also creates an implied hierarchy. So that's what
• 2:24:37
  Speaker 1: they're trying to erase. What the fucks right. Their philosophy
• 2:24:44
  Speaker 1: is to essentially gender bias every law and every policy
• 2:24:53
  Speaker 1: they can get their hands on in order to erase
• 2:24:57
  Speaker 1: Western male values and power dynamics that they believe rule
• 2:25:01
  Speaker 1: the world.
• 2:25:05
  Speaker 5: Yet they have no problem living in westernized countries. Ah,
• 2:25:11
  Speaker 5: these fucking people.
• 2:25:15
  Speaker 1: Yep, I can't. And with that, I think we have
• 2:25:18
  Speaker 1: covered this particular set. There will be more. Next week
• 2:25:24
  Speaker 1: We're going to look into a few more. I may
• 2:25:26
  Speaker 1: not go through everything I find because a lot of
• 2:25:29
  Speaker 1: it is the same, Like this tonight had a theme,
• 2:25:35
  Speaker 1: and I can do other nights like that where it's
• 2:25:37
  Speaker 1: similar theme. We could do a whole night if I
• 2:25:40
  Speaker 1: go through and search it. We could do a whole
• 2:25:43
  Speaker 1: night on the American federal government exporting circumcision.
• 2:25:48
  Speaker 5: But yeah, it's that.
• 2:25:53
  Speaker 1: It would be one of those nights where you definitely
• 2:25:56
  Speaker 1: would if you you need to take ask him before
• 2:26:00
  Speaker 1: the show to keep your blood pressure down.
• 2:26:02
  Speaker 5: I mean, it just it makes me. It makes me.
• 2:26:06
  Speaker 4: I don't even want to say irrationally, because I think
• 2:26:09
  Speaker 4: it's completely rational that level of anger that it pushes
• 2:26:13
  Speaker 4: me to, and I think it should I think more
• 2:26:16
  Speaker 4: people should be this angry about it.
• 2:26:19
  Speaker 1: Yeah, you know, I agree I agree.
• 2:26:22
  Speaker 4: It just it furiates me because it almost feels like
• 2:26:26
  Speaker 4: there's really nothing that I can do but talk about it.
• 2:26:29
  Speaker 5: So I'm happy to do that.
• 2:26:31
  Speaker 4: But it's just so fucking wrong what we do to
• 2:26:38
  Speaker 4: men in this country and to watch them sit back
• 2:26:41
  Speaker 4: and say, oh, well, I'm fine with it.
• 2:26:43
  Speaker 5: Oh, I'm glad that my parents did it.
• 2:26:45
  Speaker 4: No, you just really don't understand the full implications of
• 2:26:49
  Speaker 4: what happened to you, and that's part of that psychological trauma.
• 2:26:54
  Speaker 1: Yeah, yep. It'd be like saying that goes to a
• 2:27:01
  Speaker 1: party and she gets completely plowed out of her gourd
• 2:27:06
  Speaker 1: and passes out and then somebody rapes her while she's
• 2:27:09
  Speaker 1: passed out on the couch, that she shouldn't be traumatized
• 2:27:12
  Speaker 1: because I mean, she doesn't remember it, right, Like, nobody
• 2:27:16
  Speaker 1: would accept that. Nobody, Nope, but they'll accept that when
• 2:27:21
  Speaker 1: you say it about a little boy who was conscious
• 2:27:25
  Speaker 1: when he was cut and felt everything, everything, everything during
• 2:27:33
  Speaker 1: the part of his life where his experience of time
• 2:27:36
  Speaker 1: was so short that every minute, every second is an eternity.
• 2:27:43
  Speaker 5: Mm hmm.
• 2:27:45
  Speaker 1: So yeah, before we go, we have a couple of
• 2:27:51
  Speaker 1: super Oh no, we have a couple of super chows,
• 2:27:54
  Speaker 1: not super chats. Meredith g gave us five dollars and said,
• 2:27:58
  Speaker 1: HBr talked three forty two honey for the badgers, and
• 2:28:01
  Speaker 1: XERX gave us five dollars and said. The etymology of fascism.
• 2:28:08
  Speaker 1: The word fascism originates from the Italian term fascismo, which
• 2:28:13
  Speaker 1: is derived from the word fascio, meaning bundle of sticks.
• 2:28:19
  Speaker 1: So it's faggotry because a bundle of sticks, if you're
• 2:28:25
  Speaker 1: going to use them to start a fire, is a
• 2:28:30
  Speaker 1: faggot anyway, a faggot of wood. So that's so funny.
• 2:28:41
  Speaker 1: I know, that's great bundle of sticks. This term, in turn,
• 2:28:49
  Speaker 1: is derived from the Latin word fascis. Not to be
• 2:28:53
  Speaker 1: confused with fecies. It's pretty easy to confuse those two things,
• 2:28:58
  Speaker 1: which refers to a bundle of rods bound around and
• 2:29:02
  Speaker 1: acts an ancient Roman symbol of authority carried by lictors
• 2:29:06
  Speaker 1: before magistrates, so basically lawyers used to carry this symbol.
• 2:29:14
  Speaker 1: The symbolism of the fascis suggests strength through unity, as
• 2:29:20
  Speaker 1: a single rod is easily broken, but a bundle is
• 2:29:23
  Speaker 1: difficult to break. By the same principle, Guys, if you
• 2:29:28
  Speaker 1: ever want to impress somebody by tearing a phone book
• 2:29:30
  Speaker 1: in half. You bend it so that you just get
• 2:29:34
  Speaker 1: the very tip of the pages, and you're only tearing
• 2:29:40
  Speaker 1: a couple of pages to start with, and once you
• 2:29:43
  Speaker 1: get it started, you might actually be able to tear
• 2:29:47
  Speaker 1: the entire phone book. For gen Z, a phone book
• 2:29:52
  Speaker 1: is like a catalog of phone numbers that we used
• 2:29:57
  Speaker 1: to get. Every year we'd get new one, and it
• 2:30:01
  Speaker 1: would be about an inch to two inches stick, depending
• 2:30:04
  Speaker 1: on the area that you lived in, and everybody was
• 2:30:08
  Speaker 1: listed in it unless they paid extra to not be listed,
• 2:30:13
  Speaker 1: and so it would have your name in alphabetical order,
• 2:30:16
  Speaker 1: and that was the white pages, and then you had
• 2:30:18
  Speaker 1: the yellow pages that had all the businesses, and you
• 2:30:20
  Speaker 1: had to pay to be in the yellow pages. So
• 2:30:22
  Speaker 1: this is a book that's between an inch and two inches,
• 2:30:25
  Speaker 1: maybe three inches if you're in a very big area,
• 2:30:28
  Speaker 1: a very populated area, thick, and people would impress others
• 2:30:34
  Speaker 1: by ripping it in half, because you know, you're really
• 2:30:37
  Speaker 1: strong if you can do that. But if you if
• 2:30:39
  Speaker 1: you actually start by bending it so that the pages
• 2:30:44
  Speaker 1: aren't all flat up against each other, you can actually
• 2:30:50
  Speaker 1: do it very easily. Anyway, So he goes on So
• 2:30:54
  Speaker 1: this is how fascism is leftist or left wing. And
• 2:30:57
  Speaker 1: it's also why some of us consider the GOP being
• 2:31:00
  Speaker 1: left wing as well, because they are pretty authoritarian just
• 2:31:03
  Speaker 1: to the right of the left. So and that's fitting.
• 2:31:10
  Speaker 1: But yeah, you separating things out does make them easier
• 2:31:16
  Speaker 1: to break. And that, by the way, is why back
• 2:31:20
  Speaker 1: during the Cold War, Russia worked so hard to destroy
• 2:31:25
  Speaker 1: the unity of the American people because a bundle is
• 2:31:30
  Speaker 1: difficult to break, but individuals can be broken very easily.
• 2:31:36
  Speaker 1: It's also why family is so important. Family and community
• 2:31:43
  Speaker 1: actually so, but those are our super chows and we
• 2:31:49
  Speaker 1: do not have any super chats and we do not
• 2:31:53
  Speaker 1: have any rumble rants. So I will thank everybody for
• 2:31:59
  Speaker 1: listening to our crazy rant about feminism and government this stuff.
• 2:32:09
  Speaker 1: You guys have to know that this is I'm doing
• 2:32:14
  Speaker 1: this partly because it's a big I told you so,
• 2:32:18
  Speaker 1: and I do love getting to say I told you
• 2:32:20
  Speaker 1: so so, But it's also everybody needs to know this.
• 2:32:25
  Speaker 1: You need to realize just how interwoven feminist funding really
• 2:32:30
  Speaker 1: is within our government. I think personally, and I'm not
• 2:32:35
  Speaker 1: going to claim that I have evidence of this, but
• 2:32:37
  Speaker 1: I think if you went through every aspect of the
• 2:32:44
  Speaker 1: American federal budget, you would find that probably eighty percent
• 2:32:48
  Speaker 1: of it is attached to some form of feminist spending
• 2:32:51
  Speaker 1: or another directly, not even indirectly attached, but directly attached.
• 2:33:01
  Speaker 1: And I think if we eliminated feminism from the US
• 2:33:03
  Speaker 1: government entirely, we wouldn't need income taxes at all. Yep,
• 2:33:12
  Speaker 1: maybe not even property taxes.
• 2:33:15
  Speaker 5: Hopefully this is coming soon. I'm holding out.
• 2:33:20
  Speaker 4: Then, my President Trump, please, if you are listening to
• 2:33:26
  Speaker 4: the sound of my voice, let's get rid of this
• 2:33:29
  Speaker 4: income tax. And I think what's happening is he's trying
• 2:33:33
  Speaker 4: to cut back on all of the extraneous spending, yes,
• 2:33:38
  Speaker 4: so that he can make that a possibility, right because right.
• 2:33:43
  Speaker 5: Now it's that's how you run a budget exactly exactly.
• 2:33:52
  Speaker 5: So you know, good luck, godspeed right there with you.
• 2:33:57
  Speaker 4: Let's go.
• 2:33:58
  Speaker 5: I am so not tired of winning.
• 2:34:01
  Speaker 1: There we go. We will leave you all with the
• 2:34:04
  Speaker 1: wise words of mister three h three, who says anger
• 2:34:07
  Speaker 1: is a justified emotion in the face of injustice, and
• 2:34:11
  Speaker 1: he is absolutely right about that.
• 2:34:13
  Speaker 2: You know it isn't this. This is racist and textist
• 2:34:18
  Speaker 2: and transphobic.
• 2:34:20
  Speaker 4: Why you better shut up before I come and mutilate
• 2:34:24
  Speaker 4: your genitals.
• 2:34:25
  Speaker 1: Oh no, you are not in honor here, dude. I know,
• 2:34:30
  Speaker 1: I said next to you. Thanks everybody for listening. Thanks
• 2:34:37
  Speaker 1: to my two co hosts for sticking out this long
• 2:34:40
  Speaker 1: sausage with me. More to come. Thanks everybody who works
• 2:34:44
  Speaker 1: in the background and make HBr talk happen. Good night all,
• 2:34:48
  Speaker 1: and we good night, y'all. We'll see you next Thursday.
• 2:34:52
  Speaker 5: Yeah, activists, our machine.
• 2:34:56
  Speaker 2: Okay,