Latest / The Quark Side - Quantum Physics Podcast / Dark Photons: Hidden Signals from Earth
Transcript
- 0:01Speaker 1: Welcome to the quart Side Quantum Physics Podcast, an exploration
- 0:05Speaker 1: of the fundamental structure of reality, where quantum laws govern matter, energy,
- 0:11Speaker 1: and information. Here, uncertainty is a feature, not a flaw,
- 0:16Speaker 1: and understanding begins the smallest scales.
- 0:28Speaker 2: I want you to take a second and just like,
- 0:29Speaker 2: imagine something for me. Think about the ground beneath your
- 0:33Speaker 2: feet right now, the actual planet you're standing on, right.
- 0:36Speaker 3: Because we usually just think of Earth as a giant
- 0:39Speaker 3: rock floating through the void of space, just a.
- 0:41Speaker 2: Habitat yeah, exactly, a place with oceans and mountains and
- 0:44Speaker 2: well us. But I really want you to look at
- 0:47Speaker 2: it differently today. Imagine that this planet isn't just a rock.
- 0:51Speaker 2: I mean, imagine that it's actually this massive, incredibly sensitive
- 0:55Speaker 2: scientific instrument.
- 0:56Speaker 3: Oh absolutely, a planetary scale machine just like humming with energy.
- 1:01Speaker 2: And after decades of staring out into the dark, scientists
- 1:04Speaker 2: have finally figured out how to turn it on.
- 1:07Speaker 3: It completely alters our perspective on how we do science. Really.
- 1:10Speaker 3: I mean, we're so used to the idea of building
- 1:13Speaker 3: these massive machines to study the universe, right like.
- 1:16Speaker 2: Those giant metal tubes underground.
- 1:19Speaker 3: Or cooling superconducting magnets down to absolute zero. Yeah, we
- 1:23Speaker 3: try to isolate everything in these pristine, highly artificial lab environments.
- 1:27Speaker 3: But what we're looking at today it just flips traditional
- 1:30Speaker 3: laboratory science entirely on its head.
- 1:32Speaker 2: Because the machine we needed to understand the cosmos was, well,
- 1:36Speaker 2: it was already built.
- 1:36Speaker 3: Exactly, we're living on it, and.
- 1:38Speaker 2: We need a machine this big. I mean a machine
- 1:41Speaker 2: literally the size of a planet, because the mystery we're
- 1:43Speaker 2: trying to solve is arguably, anyway the biggest mystery in
- 1:47Speaker 2: the entire universe, the hunt for dark matter. Right, we're
- 1:50Speaker 2: going to explore this brilliant, very recent breakthrough in physics
- 1:55Speaker 2: where researchers are actually using the Earth's own magnetic field
- 1:59Speaker 2: to track down two mind bogglingly tiny hypothetical.
- 2:03Speaker 3: Particles ultra light axions and dark photons.
- 2:06Speaker 2: Yes, which is just like an incredibly ambitious undertaking using
- 2:10Speaker 2: the Earth itself to find the invisible backbone of the cosmos.
- 2:14Speaker 3: It perfectly illustrates how sometimes you know, when you hit
- 2:17Speaker 3: a wall in experimental physics, the answer isn't to just
- 2:20Speaker 3: look closer or build a more expensive laboratory.
- 2:24Speaker 2: Right, You don't just throw more money at it, Exactly.
- 2:27Speaker 3: Sometimes the answer is to step back, look at the
- 2:29Speaker 3: biggest picture possible, and actually use the natural physics of
- 2:32Speaker 3: the world to your advantage.
- 2:34Speaker 2: Okay, let's unpack this, because before we can really appreciate
- 2:38Speaker 2: how you'd even use an entire planet as a dark
- 2:41Speaker 2: matter detector, we have to understand the sheer scale of
- 2:43Speaker 2: the problem we're up against, right we do.
- 2:46Speaker 3: We need to set the stage with the core dark
- 2:48Speaker 3: matter problem itself.
- 2:49Speaker 2: So what are we actually looking for and why has
- 2:52Speaker 2: it been so like impossible to find?
- 2:55Speaker 3: Well, when astronomers look at the universe, they observe how
- 2:58Speaker 3: galaxies spin and how light bends around massive galaxy clusters. Yeah,
- 3:03Speaker 3: and simply put, the math just doesn't add up based
- 3:06Speaker 3: on the stuff we can actually.
- 3:07Speaker 2: See, right, the normal matter, Yeah.
- 3:09Speaker 3: The stars, the planets, the gas clouds, you and me.
- 3:12Speaker 3: It all only accounts for this tiny, tiny fraction of
- 3:14Speaker 3: what's actually out there.
- 3:16Speaker 2: It's like the classic spinning plate problem, right, Like, if
- 3:19Speaker 2: you spin a plate with say, pennies on it too fast,
- 3:21Speaker 2: the pennies.
- 3:22Speaker 3: Just fly off right centrifugal force.
- 3:24Speaker 2: Yeah, and galaxies are spinning so fast that the stars
- 3:27Speaker 2: should literally be flung out into deep space, but they aren't.
- 3:31Speaker 3: They hold together. Yeah, and the current consensus is that
- 3:34Speaker 3: there is this invisible glue holding it all together, dark matter.
- 3:38Speaker 2: Which makes up what roughly twenty five percent of the
- 3:40Speaker 2: universe's total energy content.
- 3:43Speaker 3: Roughly, Yeah, it has this massive, undeniable gravitational footprint. I mean,
- 3:48Speaker 3: it's existence is almost certain based on those gravitational effects alone.
- 3:52Speaker 2: Yet we have no idea what it actually is.
- 3:56Speaker 3: It's true identity has completely eluded scientists for nearly a
- 4:01Speaker 3: century now.
- 4:02Speaker 2: It's sort of like watching a cuppet show, you know,
- 4:04Speaker 2: where you can see the wooden puppets dancing perfectly in
- 4:06Speaker 2: sync doing these incredibly complex routines, but the strings are
- 4:11Speaker 2: completely invisible.
- 4:12Speaker 3: That's a great way to put it.
- 4:13Speaker 2: We know the strings are pulling the puppets, but we
- 4:15Speaker 2: can't catch them. We can't touch them, which brings us
- 4:19Speaker 2: to our prime suspects. I guess if dark matter isn't
- 4:22Speaker 2: made of normal atoms, what is it?
- 4:25Speaker 3: Well, the two leading candidates right now are those hypothetical
- 4:28Speaker 3: particles we mentioned earlier, ultralight axions and dark photons.
- 4:33Speaker 2: Right, And we really need to emphasize the word ultralight here,
- 4:36Speaker 2: don't we.
- 4:36Speaker 3: We absolutely do. When physicists talk about these specific particles
- 4:40Speaker 3: in this particular range. Their mass is almost incomprehensible to
- 4:44Speaker 3: the human mind.
- 4:45Speaker 2: Because they're estimated to be what nineteen to twenty one
- 4:48Speaker 2: orders of magnitude lighter than an electron.
- 4:51Speaker 3: Exactly, nineteen to twenty one orders of magnitude.
- 4:53Speaker 2: See numbers like that, just they just slide right off
- 4:56Speaker 2: the brain. I mean, an electron is already a fundamental
- 4:59Speaker 2: building block so smart we can barely fathom it in
- 5:01Speaker 2: our daily lives.
- 5:03Speaker 3: Right, and we are talking about something that is a
- 5:05Speaker 3: billion trillion times lighter than that.
- 5:08Speaker 2: It's practically nothing, So how do you even begin to
- 5:11Speaker 2: look for something that infinitely small?
- 5:15Speaker 3: Traditionally, the method for hunting axions relies on strong magnetism.
- 5:19Speaker 3: The prevailing theory suggests that if an axion passes through
- 5:23Speaker 3: a sufficiently intense magnetic.
- 5:24Speaker 2: Field, it does something weird, right, Yeah.
- 5:26Speaker 3: It has a very small probability of spontaneously converting into
- 5:30Speaker 3: a photon.
- 5:31Speaker 2: Oh wow, So it literally turns into light exactly, you
- 5:34Speaker 2: would turn into a tiny flash of light that our
- 5:36Speaker 2: sensors could actually detect.
- 5:38Speaker 3: So conventional searches build these highly controlled experiments where they
- 5:41Speaker 3: fire up incredibly strong superconducting magnets inside a laboratory.
- 5:45Speaker 2: Just hoping that an axion flies through the room, hits
- 5:48Speaker 2: the field, and pops out as a detectable photon.
- 5:50Speaker 3: That's the idea. Yeah, but this is where the traditional
- 5:53Speaker 3: method hits a massive physical bottleneck.
- 5:56Speaker 2: I mean, think about it. Logically, we're looking for something
- 5:58Speaker 2: twenty orders of magnetude lighter than an electron. Trying to
- 6:02Speaker 2: find these particles using a standard lab magnet, It's like
- 6:06Speaker 2: trying to catch a microscopic, completely invisible ghost, right right.
- 6:10Speaker 2: And you're using like a standard butterfly net, but you're
- 6:13Speaker 2: swinging it while standing inside a dark, cramped closet.
- 6:16Speaker 3: That is a perfect way to visualize the limitation.
- 6:19Speaker 2: I mean, you might have a really really nice, incredibly
- 6:22Speaker 2: expensive butterfly net, but the area you're swinging it in
- 6:25Speaker 2: is just way too small.
- 6:26Speaker 3: Yeah, Because it's not just about the absolute strength of
- 6:29Speaker 3: the magnet you're powering up. It is about the volume,
- 6:32Speaker 3: the sheer amount of fifical three dimensional space that your
- 6:36Speaker 3: magnetic field can cover. Right, real estate, Exactly, a laboratory magnet,
- 6:41Speaker 3: no matter how powerful human engineering can make it, is
- 6:44Speaker 3: inherently limited by the walls of the room.
- 6:46Speaker 2: It sits in which just isn't big enough, not even close.
- 6:50Speaker 3: When the particles you're hunting are this infinitesimally small and
- 6:54Speaker 3: their interactions are so staggeringly rare, volume becomes your most
- 6:58Speaker 3: critical asset. Need a much much larger net to have
- 7:02Speaker 3: any statistical hope of catching one.
- 7:04Speaker 2: Okay, So, if the problem with lab magnets is purely
- 7:07Speaker 2: a lack of real estate, the obvious solution is to
- 7:10Speaker 2: find a bigger room. But I mean, where do you
- 7:13Speaker 2: find a magnet bigger than a building?
- 7:14Speaker 3: Well, you step outside, right. This is the brilliance of
- 7:17Speaker 3: a recent collaborative effort by researchers from Kyoto University, Hiroshima University,
- 7:22Speaker 3: and Nihi University. They realize that Earth's own natural magnetic
- 7:26Speaker 3: field spans a scale that no human made laboratory could
- 7:29Speaker 3: ever possibly.
- 7:30Speaker 2: Match, because our planet is quite literally a giant magnet
- 7:34Speaker 2: spinning through a hypothetical ocean of dark matter.
- 7:36Speaker 3: Precisely, why build a magnet when you can just live
- 7:39Speaker 3: on one?
- 7:39Speaker 2: It completely redefines our tool set, doesn't it.
- 7:42Speaker 3: It really does. At Sushi Turiya, who is one of
- 7:45Speaker 3: the key figures driving this research, pointed out this beautifully
- 7:49Speaker 3: elegant mechanism that our planet naturally provides. He noted that
- 7:53Speaker 3: the earth ionosphere cavity acts as a natural resonator.
- 7:56Speaker 2: Okay, let me stop you there. So what does this
- 7:58Speaker 2: all mean? The Earth ionosphere cavity. I'm like trying to
- 8:02Speaker 2: picture this in my head. Is it sort of like
- 8:05Speaker 2: the body of an acoustic guitar?
- 8:07Speaker 3: Oh, that's an interesting way to think about it.
- 8:08Speaker 2: How so, Well, if you just take a guitar string,
- 8:11Speaker 2: pull it tight in the open air, and pluck it,
- 8:13Speaker 2: it hardly makes any sound at all.
- 8:15Speaker 3: Right, right, it's very quiet.
- 8:16Speaker 2: The string vibrates, sure, but it's the hollow, wooden cavity
- 8:19Speaker 2: of the guitar's body catching those vibrations, bouncing them around
- 8:23Speaker 2: and actually amplifying the sound so we can hear it.
- 8:26Speaker 2: Is the Earth doing something like that?
- 8:28Speaker 3: What's fascinating here is that your acoustic guitar analogy is
- 8:32Speaker 3: physically exactly what is happening, just with electromagnetism instead of
- 8:36Speaker 3: acoustic sound.
- 8:37Speaker 2: Wow, okay, yeah.
- 8:39Speaker 3: To visualize the cavity, imagine the solid surface of the Earth. Now,
- 8:43Speaker 3: look up high up in our atmosphere. There's a layer
- 8:46Speaker 3: called the ionosphere.
- 8:47Speaker 2: Right where the air gets really thin.
- 8:49Speaker 3: It's actually a shell of atmosphereic gas that has been
- 8:52Speaker 3: baked by solar radiation until his particles become electrically charged.
- 8:56Speaker 3: The space between the solid ground and that charged onosphere
- 9:00Speaker 3: is a massive spherical gap.
- 9:03Speaker 2: And that gap is the hollow body of our planetary guitar.
- 9:06Speaker 3: Yes, exactly, when electromagnetic waves, like the tiny tiny ones
- 9:11Speaker 3: that would be produced by an axion or a dark
- 9:13Speaker 3: photon interacting with Earth's magnetic field, when they bounce around
- 9:17Speaker 3: inside this massive spherical gap, the planetary cavity naturally amplifies them.
- 9:22Speaker 3: That is wild, and it just so happens that this
- 9:25Speaker 3: planetary guitar body naturally amplifies electromagnetic waves right around the
- 9:30Speaker 3: specific mass range of the ultra light axions and dark photons.
- 9:34Speaker 3: The team wanted to probe.
- 9:36Speaker 2: Okay, but I mean, the acoustic guitar analogy is beautiful
- 9:39Speaker 2: in theory, but detecting dark matter can't be as simple
- 9:41Speaker 2: as just holding a really big microphone up to the sky.
- 9:44Speaker 2: There had to be a catch. The math wasn't quite.
- 9:46Speaker 3: There yet, right, No, it wasn't. It was a significant
- 9:49Speaker 3: theoretical roadblock for a long time before this team's work.
- 9:53Speaker 3: The existing mathematical models used to understand this cavity could
- 9:56Speaker 3: only accurately handle frequencies below one.
- 9:59Speaker 2: Hurtz so cycle per second, which.
- 10:01Speaker 3: Means if the dark matter signal is coming in higher
- 10:03Speaker 3: than one hurts, the old math basically renders us completely
- 10:08Speaker 3: deaf to it. So how do you fix a math
- 10:10Speaker 3: model that just goes blind at higher frequencies?
- 10:13Speaker 2: You have to rethink the fundamental assumptions of your model.
- 10:17Speaker 2: The breakthrough came when the research team built an entirely
- 10:19Speaker 2: new theoretical framework that accounted for the electrical conductivity of
- 10:23Speaker 2: the Earth's lower atmosphere.
- 10:25Speaker 3: Wait, I thought the lower atmosphere was just like regular air.
- 10:28Speaker 2: Well, Previously models treated the air in the cavity almost
- 10:31Speaker 2: like a perfect vacuum. But the atmosphere isn't entirely empty.
- 10:35Speaker 2: It has a slight electrical charge, a very faint conductivity, and.
- 10:38Speaker 3: I'm guessing that charge messes with the signal exactly.
- 10:41Speaker 2: It creates a drag as an electromagnetic wave pushes through
- 10:45Speaker 2: the atmosphere, that slight conductivity pulls on it, altering how
- 10:48Speaker 2: it behaves. If your math ignores that drag, your predictions
- 10:52Speaker 2: completely fall apart.
- 10:53Speaker 3: At higher frequencies, so they factored the drag in.
- 10:56Speaker 2: Yes, by factoring in how the atmosphere itself conducts electricity,
- 11:00Speaker 2: they were finally able to extend these reliable predictions all
- 11:03Speaker 2: the way up to about thirty hertz, which is the
- 11:05Speaker 2: key that unlocks the whole planetary machine, because by expanding
- 11:09Speaker 2: the math up to thirty hertz, they found the sweet spot,
- 11:12Speaker 2: didn't they?
- 11:13Speaker 3: They did. This new framework specifically showed that the earth
- 11:16Speaker 3: dionosphere cavity acts as a massive amplifier for signals right
- 11:21Speaker 3: near eight herts.
- 11:22Speaker 2: That's amazing.
- 11:23Speaker 3: They finally had the mathematical blueprint to understand what the
- 11:27Speaker 3: planet's resonance should actually look like if dark matter was
- 11:29Speaker 3: interacting with it.
- 11:30Speaker 2: Okay, so the team has the math, they've effectively tuned
- 11:34Speaker 2: their theoretical instruments to listen to the Earth's cavity. But
- 11:37Speaker 2: a theoretical framework is still just you know, chalk on
- 11:40Speaker 2: a blackboard until you test it against the real world.
- 11:43Speaker 3: Right. You need actual data?
- 11:45Speaker 2: Yeah, they needed planetary data to actually hunt for these suspects.
- 11:48Speaker 2: Where do you even get that kind of data?
- 11:50Speaker 3: You need a very specific, highly pristine data set. You
- 11:54Speaker 3: can't just take a quick snapshot. You need a long,
- 11:57Speaker 3: continuous recording of the Earth's magnetic feel to search for
- 12:01Speaker 3: an incredibly faint, steady hum.
- 12:03Speaker 2: So where did they look?
- 12:04Speaker 3: The utilized data from the British Geological Surveys Eskdale Mure Observatory.
- 12:10Speaker 3: It's this very quiet station in Scotland, far away from
- 12:13Speaker 3: major city interference, and they analyzed a massive decade long
- 12:18Speaker 3: data set spanning from twenty twelve to twenty.
- 12:20Speaker 2: Twenty two, ten years of continuous planetary data. I cannot
- 12:24Speaker 2: even fathom the sheer volume of noise in a data
- 12:27Speaker 2: set like that.
- 12:28Speaker 3: Oh, it's intense. Think about the monumental task of sifting
- 12:32Speaker 3: through ten years of the Earth's electromagnetic history second by second.
- 12:36Speaker 3: The Earth's magnetic field is incredibly chaotic.
- 12:39Speaker 2: Yeah, I mean, you have solar storms blasting the upper atmosphere.
- 12:43Speaker 3: We have global lightning strikes constantly going on.
- 12:45Speaker 2: We had artificial noise right like power grids and subway.
- 12:47Speaker 3: Systems exactly all of these things create massive electromagnetic spikes.
- 12:52Speaker 3: The team had to meticulously clean the data set, applying
- 12:55Speaker 3: rigorous mathematical filters to scrub away all of that artificial
- 12:58Speaker 3: and natural noise.
- 12:59Speaker 2: Because what they were looking for. Wasn't a sudden spike, right,
- 13:02Speaker 2: it was a whisper. They were hunting for this steady,
- 13:05Speaker 2: narrow frequency signal, something that just hums constantly over incredibly
- 13:10Speaker 2: long time scales, which is the exact footprint a background
- 13:14Speaker 2: field of dark matter would leave.
- 13:16Speaker 3: And here's where the detective work gets really sophisticated, because
- 13:20Speaker 3: they aren't just looking for one suspect, They are hunting
- 13:23Speaker 3: for two distinct particles, axions and dark photons.
- 13:27Speaker 2: Oh right, both of them.
- 13:29Speaker 3: And their new theoretical framework actually provided a way to
- 13:32Speaker 3: tell the difference between the two based on where the
- 13:35Speaker 3: signal appeared on the planet.
- 13:36Speaker 2: Okay, I definitely want to hear how they tell them apart,
- 13:38Speaker 2: it all.
- 13:38Speaker 3: Comes down to geographic variation. The framework predicted that if
- 13:42Speaker 3: the signal was originating from axions, it wouldn't look the
- 13:45Speaker 3: same everywhere on Earth. Why not, because the strength of
- 13:48Speaker 3: an axion signal depends on the specific geometry and angle
- 13:51Speaker 3: of Earth's magnetic field as the planet moves through the
- 13:54Speaker 3: dark matter background. Because of this geometry, the math pointed
- 13:59Speaker 3: to southeast Age as the specific location where axion signals
- 14:02Speaker 3: would be the absolute strongest.
- 14:04Speaker 2: So axions have like a geographic hot.
- 14:06Speaker 3: Spot, they have a geographic footprint. Yes. Dark photons, however,
- 14:11Speaker 3: are a completely different story.
- 14:12Speaker 2: Wait a second, let me push back on this logically
- 14:14Speaker 2: for a minute. The whole premise of this planetary detector
- 14:17Speaker 2: is that we are using the Earth's magnetic field to
- 14:21Speaker 2: trigger these particles. Correct, But the physics of dark photons
- 14:25Speaker 2: states that they generate electromagnetic waves on their own, even
- 14:28Speaker 2: without a magnetic field present, right, that's right. So if
- 14:31Speaker 2: a dark photon doesn't even need the magnetic field to
- 14:34Speaker 2: make its wave, why are we bothering to use this
- 14:36Speaker 2: geomagnetic data set to look for them.
- 14:38Speaker 3: That hits the absolute core of the issue, and it
- 14:42Speaker 3: highlights a really subtle but vital distinction in the physics here.
- 14:46Speaker 3: You are entirely correct that dark photons do not need
- 14:49Speaker 3: a magnetic field to generate an electromagnetic wave. They do
- 14:52Speaker 3: that intrinsically. But and this is the critical distinction, that
- 14:57Speaker 3: initial way generated by a dark photon is un fathomably weak.
- 15:02Speaker 3: If that wave just happened out in the vacuum of
- 15:04Speaker 3: space or even in our atmosphere without an amplifier, we
- 15:08Speaker 3: would never detect it. Our sensors just aren't sensitive enough. Oh,
- 15:12Speaker 3: I see, we desperately need the earth ionosphere cavity to
- 15:15Speaker 3: act as our resonator.
- 15:17Speaker 2: So it all goes back to the acoustic guitar.
- 15:19Speaker 3: It does. The dark photon might be plucking its own string,
- 15:23Speaker 3: completely ignoring the Earth's magnetic field, but we still need
- 15:26Speaker 3: the massive resonant hollow body of the planetary cavity to
- 15:30Speaker 3: catch that tiny vibration.
- 15:32Speaker 2: To bounce it around and actually amplify it into a
- 15:35Speaker 2: signal we can read.
- 15:36Speaker 3: Exactly at places like the s dale Mere Observatory. And
- 15:39Speaker 3: because dark photons do not rely on the specific geometry
- 15:43Speaker 3: of the magnetic field to create their wave, the framework
- 15:46Speaker 3: predicted their signal should look nearly identical everywhere on.
- 15:50Speaker 2: Earth without a hotspot in Southeast Asia. Precisely, that makes
- 15:53Speaker 2: perfect sense. The planet is still the amplifier, even if
- 15:56Speaker 2: the particle brought its own guitar string. Okay, So if
- 16:00Speaker 2: they apply this decade of meticulously cleaned up data from
- 16:03Speaker 2: the Scottish observatory to their brand new thirty hertz mathematical framework,
- 16:08Speaker 2: what did they actually find? Did the planetary machine work?
- 16:11Speaker 3: The results they achieved didn't just prove the concept works,
- 16:14Speaker 3: It completely blew the doors off the previous limits of
- 16:17Speaker 3: dark matter research by treating the entire planet as a detector.
- 16:21Speaker 3: The constraints this team set on how strongly axions couple
- 16:25Speaker 3: to light are now roughly one hundred times tighter than
- 16:29Speaker 3: the previous best limits from any ground based laboratory experiment.
- 16:33Speaker 2: Hold on, before we celebrate that, define couple to light
- 16:35Speaker 2: for me, what does that actually mean in plain English?
- 16:38Speaker 3: Sure, think of coupling as a probability rate. It is
- 16:42Speaker 3: simply a measurement of how likely it is that an
- 16:45Speaker 3: axion will actually transform into a photon, a particle of
- 16:49Speaker 3: light when it hits a magnetic field.
- 16:50Speaker 2: Okay, I follow you.
- 16:51Speaker 3: So by setting tighter limits, the researchers are basically saying
- 16:54Speaker 3: we have narrowed down the hiding spots. If axions exist,
- 16:58Speaker 3: their probability of interacting with light must be lower than
- 17:01Speaker 3: this new threshold, because if it was higher, our planetary
- 17:04Speaker 3: contector definitely would have seen them.
- 17:06Speaker 2: Ah. So they drew a much smaller, much more precise
- 17:09Speaker 2: boundary box for where these particles can hide, and they
- 17:11Speaker 2: did it by a factor of one hundred. That is
- 17:14Speaker 2: a massive leap in precision.
- 17:16Speaker 3: It is astronomical. In fact, these new limits derived from
- 17:20Speaker 3: essentially looking at the ground. They're so good that they
- 17:23Speaker 3: rival the constraints set by major multi billion dollar astrophysical
- 17:28Speaker 3: space observatories like Chandra and NuStar.
- 17:31Speaker 2: I just need to pause and marvel at that for
- 17:33Speaker 2: a second. Right, we're talking about launching multi billion dollar
- 17:36Speaker 2: rockets into space, putting X ray observatories in orbit to
- 17:41Speaker 2: stare into the deep cosmos yea. And this team rivaled
- 17:45Speaker 2: that precision by downloading public geological data from a quiet
- 17:48Speaker 2: sheep field in Scotland and just applying better math to it.
- 17:51Speaker 2: That is the ultimate scientific flex.
- 17:53Speaker 3: It really is. And it's worth noting that those space
- 17:56Speaker 3: observatories rely on a whole different set of theoretical assumptions
- 17:59Speaker 3: about extream chaotic environments deep in space. This terrestrial approach
- 18:03Speaker 3: cuts through a lot of that cosmic uncertainty. Wow, but
- 18:06Speaker 3: their analysis didn't stop at just setting limits and ruling
- 18:08Speaker 3: things out.
- 18:09Speaker 2: Here's where it gets really interesting.
- 18:11Speaker 3: Yes, this raises an important question about what we're actually
- 18:13Speaker 3: seeing in the data, because mysteriously, when they ran the
- 18:18Speaker 3: analysis looking for dark photons, they didn't just draw a blank.
- 18:21Speaker 2: Wait, they actually found something.
- 18:23Speaker 3: They turned up several signal candidates real distinct signals in
- 18:28Speaker 3: the data that match their frequency profile of what could
- 18:32Speaker 3: potentially originate from dark matter.
- 18:34Speaker 2: They found breadcrumbs. Now to be absolutely clear for everyone listening,
- 18:38Speaker 2: their true nature is unconfirmed. Right. We are not saying
- 18:42Speaker 2: this team definitively discovered dark matter today.
- 18:44Speaker 3: No, no, we're not saying that.
- 18:46Speaker 2: But the signatures are there, sitting right in that narrow
- 18:49Speaker 2: frequency ban behaving the exact way a dark photon is
- 18:53Speaker 2: theoretically supposed to behave when amplified by the Earth. I mean,
- 18:57Speaker 2: it's the exact type of anomaly you would hope to
- 18:59Speaker 2: see if we are finally looking in the right place exactly.
- 19:03Speaker 3: This is why this research, which was published in the
- 19:05Speaker 3: Progress of Theoretical and Experimental Physics, is being viewed as
- 19:09Speaker 3: the foundation for a completely.
- 19:11Speaker 2: New era, a whole new way of doing things.
- 19:14Speaker 3: It's expected to underpin a new phase of dark matter searches.
- 19:17Speaker 3: They've built the mathematical framework, they have proven the Earth
- 19:20Speaker 3: works as a reliable amplifier, and they've already found anomalies
- 19:24Speaker 3: that demand immediate for their investigation.
- 19:26Speaker 2: It really is a triumph of thinking outside the box,
- 19:30Speaker 2: or I guess outside the laboratory.
- 19:31Speaker 3: If we connect this to the bigger picture. For you
- 19:33Speaker 3: listening right now, it profoundly changes how you should perceive
- 19:38Speaker 3: your immediate environment. How so well the device you're listening
- 19:42Speaker 3: to this on, the room, you're sitting in the air,
- 19:45Speaker 3: you are breathing. It is all currently bathing in this
- 19:48Speaker 3: continuous planetary resonance. We are constantly enveloped by the earth
- 19:52Speaker 3: onosphere cavity, humming and vibrating with invisible electromagnetic waves.
- 19:58Speaker 2: It completely changes our relationship with the planet, doesn't it.
- 20:00Speaker 2: It's not just our home or our ecosystem. It's a
- 20:03Speaker 2: highly tuned lens that we can use to view the deepest,
- 20:07Speaker 2: most invisible secrets of the cosmos.
- 20:09Speaker 3: It proves it's sometimes the most advanced technology we possess
- 20:13Speaker 3: is the natural physics of the world itself, provided we
- 20:16Speaker 3: are clever enough to decipher the math to listen to it.
- 20:19Speaker 2: So, just to recap this incredible journey, for decades, scientists
- 20:22Speaker 2: have known that roughly twenty five percent of the universe
- 20:25Speaker 2: is missing. The spinning plates of galaxies told us the
- 20:28Speaker 2: invisible strings of dark matter are there, but despite its
- 20:31Speaker 2: massive gravitational footprint, we couldn't find its particles. These unimaginably
- 20:36Speaker 2: tiny axions and dark photons using traditional lab magnets. The
- 20:41Speaker 2: closet was just too small for the butterflynet way too small,
- 20:45Speaker 2: So a team of researchers mathematically unlock the Earth's atmosphere,
- 20:48Speaker 2: factoring in electrical drag to prove that the gap between
- 20:51Speaker 2: the ground and the ionosphere acts as a giant acoustic
- 20:54Speaker 2: guitar body for electromagnetism YEP. By meticulously cleaning ten years
- 20:59Speaker 2: of noisy geomagnetic data from a quiet Scottish village, they
- 21:03Speaker 2: set limits one hundred times tighter than ever before, rivaling
- 21:06Speaker 2: our best space telescopes, and most exciting of all, they
- 21:10Speaker 2: uncovered mysterious new signal candidates that just might be the
- 21:13Speaker 2: dark photons we've been hunting for.
- 21:15Speaker 3: It is a phenomenal leak forward, yeah, and it leads
- 21:17Speaker 3: us standing on the threshold of something incredibly exciting. We
- 21:20Speaker 3: have finally turned the planet on as a scientific.
- 21:22Speaker 2: Instrument, which leaves you with something pretty wild to think
- 21:25Speaker 2: about the next time you step outside and look up
- 21:27Speaker 2: at the sky. If our own atmosphere and magnetic field
- 21:30Speaker 2: are naturally humming and amplifying the faint signals of the
- 21:32Speaker 2: universe's most elusive invisible particles. What other invisible cosmic conversations?
- 21:38Speaker 2: Is the Earth constantly translating right beneath our feet, just
- 21:41Speaker 2: waiting for us to figure out the right mathematical frequency
- 21:44Speaker 2: to listen to