Latest / Best of: Features / How big grocers have been limiting food access in California
Transcript
- 0:05How big grocers have been limiting food access in California. Written by
- 0:10Angelica Cenabria. This article is being read by an automated voice generated
- 0:15by Everlett. We often hear that corporate food chains are enormous because
- 0:21it makes them more efficiency?
- 0:22How true is this? In an age where Americans increasingly buy groceries
- 0:26with pay later plans, food chain workers barely make ends meet, and
- 0:30executives get richer, where is the efficiency? In California, Albertson's Companies maintains
- 0:36nearly six hundred stores across the state, over one hundred more stores
- 0:40than Costco and Walmart combined, making it the top dog. If the
- 0:44idea of Albertson's dominance is foreign to you, be aware that grocery
- 0:48chains like Safeway, Vaughns Pavilions, and more than a dozen others are
- 0:51all owned by Albertson's companies. As Albertsons has gotten larger and more
- 0:56powerful, its growth has backfired on California communities. Corporate consolidation has steadily
- 1:03increased over the past forty years, pushing small independent businesses into the
- 1:07minority and consolidated grocers into dominance. As Albertsons protects its profits and
- 1:12gears up to close a handful of California locations, which would lower
- 1:16its operating costs, communities might not get a chance to see these
- 1:20grocery store replaced. In addition to lease squatting, uncovered by S. F.
- 1:26Gates investigation on zombie stores, companies like Albertsons can maintain their power
- 1:31by blocking competitors through the use of grocer. Restrictive covenants, stipulations written
- 1:36into deed and lease agreements that limits or completely prohibit the operation
- 1:40of a grocery store on a piece of property. As they sell
- 1:44a property, they write the restriction into the deed, so the next
- 1:47owner is unable to lease the space to a grocer. This practice
- 1:51effectively obstructs a community's access to food and limits its autonomy. However,
- 1:56finding out whether a piece of land is impacted by a grocery
- 1:59restrictive covenant is tricky. Restrictive covenants on retail properties are often not
- 2:04publicly accessible in California. Once communities realize what is happening, they're furious
- 2:10and often organized to fight back. The Shame on Safeway campaign, launched
- 2:15by the Food Empowerment Project protested a restrictive covenant than Safeway placed
- 2:20on one of its prior locations in Valayo, effectively banning a competitor
- 2:24grocer from operating in that building for fifteen years. Entire childhoods went
- 2:29by without families having a nearby grocery store. After sending several letters
- 2:34to its parent company Albertsons, about how the restrictive covenant was harming
- 2:38the community, the Food Empowerment Project received nothing substantial in response, other
- 2:43than this practice is sometimes necessary. Different town, different year, and the
- 2:49same playbook is being used. David Renkert, a brewery owner and the
- 2:53lead organizer of Friends of Tahoe City, was looking to buy an
- 2:56old Safeway building in Tahoe City. During negotiations he was asked by
- 3:00Albertsons, which you'll recall is the parent company of Safeway, if he
- 3:04would agree to a grocery restrictive covenant on the property. Rankert did
- 3:08the math. The building had the freezers, fridges, and piping required for
- 3:13a grocery store. Blocking another grocer from operating in a grocery building
- 3:17would severely lower the economic opportunity of the space, diminishing the property's
- 3:22value. He ultimately did not purchase they building, and Albertson ceased communications
- 3:27with him. After learning of Albertson's similar behavior in towns like Bishop
- 3:32and Bellingham, Washington, Rankert began organizing his community through Friends of Tahoe
- 3:38City, which allowed him to push back against what he saw as
- 3:40Albertson's obstruction of food access. Due to the town's remaining safeway being
- 3:46constantly running out of fresh produce and other food, he told me
- 3:49he saw residents have to drive out of town, sometimes an hour
- 3:53to get what they need. Why does a company like Albertsons write
- 3:57these grocery restrictive covenants? Only a business with extensive market power benefits
- 4:02from these kinds of restrictions. By close airstorms strategically funneling consumers to
- 4:07other branches, giant grocers can hike up prices, serve low quality foods,
- 4:12block competitors from operating at prior locations, and pay their workers lower
- 4:16wages. Blocking and maintaining control over competition gives large grocers more price
- 4:22setting power. This power is taken from the consumer, limiting their choice
- 4:26of where to shop. It's not just Tahoe City and Valayo that
- 4:30have been dealing with this. Towns like Chula Vista and Eureka have
- 4:34also stood at the mercy of Albertson's power, but legislators have taken
- 4:38note. While current federal antitrust law falls short in meeting the needs
- 4:42of our current and evolving economy, here in California, Assembly Bill eighteen
- 4:47fifty seven, authored by Assemblymember Cecilia Aguilar Curry, aims to prohibit and
- 4:52nullify grocery restrictions that create food deserts. Assembly Bill seventeen seventy six,
- 4:58or the Compete Act, would also begin to address Albertson's power over
- 5:02communities by updating California law to include single firms as unlawful actors
- 5:07when engaging in manipulative and anti competitive behavior. Lawmakers passed both of
- 5:12these bills this session, and the bills await their fate in the
- 5:15Governor's Office. The frontline fight for dignified food access is alive and
- 5:20well, but it's not over until we reckon with the true role
- 5:23that corporate grocers play in food access. Angelica Sanabria is the Narrative
- 5:28and Network Coordinator at the California Food and Farming Network.