Latest / Honey Badger Radio / Supreme Court Destroys "Equality", Florida Ends Permanent Alimony, Dog Canceled | HBR News 412

Transcript

Supreme Court Destroys "Equality", Florida Ends Permanent Alimony, Dog Canceled | HBR News 412 · Honey Badger Radio

• 0:01
  This is HBr News Number four twelve. Supreme Court destroys equality, Florida ends
• 0:08
  permanent alimony, dog Cancel, where we talk about the stories of the week
• 0:12
  and give it the Badger treatment. Hello everyone, Happy fourth of July,
• 0:20
  Independence Day or whatever equivalent day you might have going on in your respective country.
• 0:25
  Um, and welcome to Honey Badger Radio. My name is Brian.
• 0:28
  I'm here with the Badger team of Mike and Mike, Ja and Hannah Wallen,
• 0:34
  and we are going to be discussing the news of the week. It's
• 0:37
  going to be a lot of fun. Oh and I think Lauren is here
• 0:39
  too, like kind of on the same discord as Mike, so you might
• 0:43
  hear her voice like chime in every so often. And that's totally fine.
• 0:47
  Yes day Treason Day, we've been going back. I said, happy,
• 0:57
  Sorry, sorry, we had bigger balls than you exactly is it going?
• 1:03
  Okay? Hey, hey listen, you're you're one step away from France right
• 1:08
  now? Okay, I wouldn't talking day ship Happy let us come together against
• 1:15
  Communism day? How about that? I have a I have a Fourth of
• 1:19
  July joke, Well, an America joke for you. Why do they spell
• 1:25
  the word canceled with two l's in England and one L in America. Do
• 1:34
  you say, yeah? So in in in the UK, canceled is spelled
• 1:38
  with two l's, but in the United States its spelled with one. Do
• 1:41
  you know why? It might be the French influence. I know it's something
• 1:46
  funny. Well, I mean it's because we gave you that L in seventeen
• 1:51
  seventy six. Okay, at that statue. Yeah, sometimes I hate that
• 2:04
  statue. So it's like a it's like a blight on our country. I
• 2:07
  know it sounds weird, but um, anyway, so I was back when
• 2:13
  they knew what it meant. Well, yeah, but knew what it meant.
• 2:15
  Yeah, but people know what it means. The leadership seems to forget.
• 2:17
  Oh no, they think the plancard on the statue is some kind of
• 2:22
  official fucking document. That's why they let like all kinds of immigrants come in.
• 2:25
  Oh what about bring us your poor and you're tired, And it's like,
• 2:29
  dude, they put that on the statue. That's not in our fucking
• 2:31
  laws. So anyway, um, but we're gonna be talking about some great
• 2:36
  stories today, some good news on this one. And I hope that you
• 2:39
  guys are here of your own free will and not because you have nothing else
• 2:45
  going on on the fourth of July. So um, please stick around.
• 2:49
  It's gonna be a good time, and be sure to join us afterwards for
• 2:51
  the patron only show. I will tell talk a little bit about what that
• 2:54
  is shortly, but first let's get into a summary of what we're going to
• 2:59
  be talking about today. So we're gonna be talking about the Supreme Court ruling.
• 3:01
  I know there were there were multiple Supreme Court rulings, but we're gonna
• 3:06
  drill down on one in particular that is the most relevant to our interests as
• 3:12
  um, you know, men's issues advocates, and that is the ruling against
• 3:15
  affirmative action. Governor Ronda Santis signed a bill ending permanent alimony the Royal Air
• 3:20
  Force. That's the British Air Force that was embroiled in a discrimination scandal.
• 3:25
  And more so, stick around, it's gonna be a good time, and
• 3:29
  but sure to join us afterwards for the patient only show. This one's gonna
• 3:31
  take a little bit of time to set up, but I want to show
• 3:34
  you guys, So Jojo, go to your bed. Why are you laying
• 3:37
  on the floor. I got him a bed for nothing. He just lays
• 3:39
  on the floor. Anyway. JoJo's in the shot. You guys can see
• 3:42
  him, but he's kind of like only partly there. He'll probably move at
• 3:45
  some point. So like and your cat toys for Christmas, because you know,
• 3:49
  he's just going to play with the box. Yeah, exactly, It's
• 3:53
  exactly. It's like, why why bother? He's gonna play with the thing
• 3:57
  that you don't want to play with. So JoJo's laying on the carpet.
• 4:00
  This is what I love about. This is what a lot about humans.
• 4:02
  They understand your traditions and they don't shit on any furniture. Yeah, in
• 4:09
  circumstances. So um, so you might this is kind of a weird after
• 4:16
  show topic, but I am gonna. I think it would be very interesting
• 4:20
  because there's some stuff that got left out by the people, the parties involved.
• 4:24
  So m seven years ago, I believe it was seven years ago.
• 4:28
  You might remember a mass shooter named Gavin Long who killed four police officers.
• 4:33
  I think it was in Baton Rouge. Um, but it was it wasn't
• 4:36
  the South of the United States, and he didn't Yeah, Louisiana, right,
• 4:42
  Louisiana, and um, the Young Turks was a was who this person
• 4:48
  watched but also responded to. And of course the Young Turks had that story
• 4:54
  buried. They didn't. They never addressed it, They never addressed that they
• 4:58
  were kind of egging this on. Again. I'm not one of these like
• 5:01
  words as violence people, but I do think that if you propaganda is hard
• 5:05
  enough, you might get some unexpected outcomes from troubled people. And this wasn't
• 5:11
  even a words as violent situation. This was literally this guy was quite literally
• 5:16
  word for word, reciting what they were saying, reginstitating what they were saying,
• 5:21
  and in some instances when he's making his little response videos, you can
• 5:26
  see the reflection in his glasses. And he has the Young Turks videos up.
• 5:30
  Yes, and I think it's worth looking at for a couple of reasons.
• 5:33
  One of course, you guys know that groups like the Young Turks accused
• 5:38
  people like us of like you know, inspiring mass shootings like Elliott Roger,
• 5:43
  like Alec Manassian, despite the fact that you know there's so much evidence against
• 5:47
  that, not only that you know that we didn't have anything to do with
• 5:51
  it, or people in our sort of like circles have nothing to do with
• 5:55
  it. But also that you know that in the Alec Menasty case, it
• 5:59
  might not even be the reasons that a lot of these types of people would
• 6:02
  put out there. So there is this video, we're gonna go through it,
• 6:06
  um and there's something that that this is an atheism is unstoppable video.
• 6:11
  You guys remember might remember him. He's not really on YouTube, but there
• 6:14
  is a small channel called The Pouch where little clips of his videos go up
• 6:17
  and then you you have to go to UM. I think it's um there's
• 6:23
  like a channel where you can get all this sort of you know, band
• 6:26
  stuff. It's like band up video or something like that. And also Sean
• 6:30
  Fitzgerald who's also pictured here, he has a channel called Actual Justice Warrior.
• 6:33
  UM. I like the content he goes through to you know, these sort
• 6:39
  of criminal cases and he breaks everything down. UM and I you know,
• 6:44
  so it's it's also very useful, but one they do kind of miss on
• 6:47
  them the sort of like you know, men's issues angle on this, which
• 6:54
  we will go into in the Patrons Show. So if you want to join
• 6:57
  us on the Patrons Show, you have to become a badger by going into
• 7:00
  being the Badger dot com. Five bucks a month will get you into the
• 7:01
  discord and you'll be able to watch all the additional content. If you give
• 7:04
  it higher levels, you'll be able to contribute in the actual discussions. There
• 7:09
  are different levels depending on the show, but in general, it's you know,
• 7:13
  I think it's it's totally worth it if you can, and we hope
• 7:16
  to see you there. So that's feed the Badger dot com. Set up
• 7:19
  a monthly subscription and join us. And also, if you want to make
• 7:23
  sure that if we get heated from the internet, which could be at anytime
• 7:27
  completely unexpected, go to Badger feed dot com or Honey Badger Radio dot com.
• 7:31
  That is where the content lives and you'll be able to continue to follow
• 7:35
  us. And also Rumble Gang. Shout out to Rumble Gang anybody that's on
• 7:42
  Rumble that's watching, because we are also you know, we are also there
• 7:48
  as well, and hopefully I'm making sure that like you can actually see the
• 7:53
  video. I don't know what's going on here, but I'm just checking to
• 7:56
  make sure Rumble's working. So oh yeah, yeah, we're up. Okay,
• 8:00
  good, I didn't see the live chat. There goes hi, mister
• 8:03
  row three or three be bad sad and OI can woee, but didn't butcher
• 8:09
  that um welcome, So all right with I think that's everything. So without
• 8:13
  out of the way, let's get into today's stories. Let's talk first about
• 8:18
  the Supreme Court, and I'm going to hand it off to Mike j oh
• 8:24
  Right so ye. Last week, in a six to three decision, the
• 8:30
  Supreme Court of the United States declared it unconstitutional for race to be a factor
• 8:37
  in college admissions and as to let the let the rulings speak for itself.
• 8:45
  As part of the majority opinion, Justice Roberts wrote, quote for the reasons
• 8:50
  provided above, the Harvard and a UNC admissions programs cannot be reconciled with the
• 8:58
  guarantees of the equal textion clause. Both programs lack sufficiently focused and measurable objectives
• 9:05
  warranting the use of race unavoidedly or unavoidably employ race in a negative manner,
• 9:15
  involve racial stereotyping, and lack meaningful endpoints. We have never permitted admissions programs
• 9:22
  to work in that way, and we will not do so today. The
• 9:26
  student must be treated based on his or her experiences as an individual, not
• 9:31
  on the basis of race. Many universities have for too long done just the
• 9:39
  opposite, and in doing so, they have concluded wrongly that the touchstone of
• 9:43
  an individual's identity is not challenges bested, skills built, or lessons learned,
• 9:52
  but the color of their skin. Our constitutional history does not tolerate that choice.
• 10:00
  I just want to chime in before you talk. I thought that this
• 10:03
  also included gender. Am I wrong about that? I do not believe.
• 10:07
  So, okay, okay, so it doesn't matter. Yeah, all right,
• 10:13
  my go ahead. Yeah. Is there anyone on earth who doesn't,
• 10:20
  in some language, in some dialect or other, understand the concept of a
• 10:24
  spoiled child? I mean that that term we use in English is wonderfully poetic
• 10:31
  in the way it invokes negative imagery on something that is ostensibly compassionate and biostensibly
• 10:39
  I mean, it's supposed to be compassionate, but it isn't. It creates
• 10:43
  more problems than it solves. When you expose a culture to certain conditions,
• 10:48
  and by culture in this case, I mean bacterial culture. A stable warm
• 10:54
  temperature, just the right amount of water and sugars and nutrients, etc.
• 11:00
  You can allow life to thrive at an optimum rate. Unfortunately, you also
• 11:03
  invite every other bacterial neighbors to thrive in the same environment. That's why a
• 11:11
  spoiled child is like spoiled food. You didn't freeze it, you didn't refrigerate
• 11:18
  it, you didn't even preserve it. You left it out in the open
• 11:22
  on the kitchen counters smeared all over every door knob in the vicinity, so
• 11:28
  it could spread its ethereal scent over the environment, and then the environment,
• 11:33
  in response, spreads its various intoxicants into the spoiled food in question. Affirmative
• 11:39
  action is and always has been a method for spoiling children. Whatever, however
• 11:48
  you extend your definition of children to be eighteen year old or twenty one year
• 11:50
  old, or a subsidized and government sanctioned method for dissolving certain boundaries in certain
• 12:00
  children, namely that boundary where you understand your strength and weaknesses on an individual
• 12:05
  basis. I'm dancing around this concept we call the privilege. Those who have
• 12:13
  it often don't know they have it, and it makes them deluded. It
• 12:18
  makes them so deluded that they will deflect and protect the very idea of privilege
• 12:24
  onto the people who evidently don't have it. And let's face it. The
• 12:28
  most pathetic individuals on the face of this planet are the most privileged, such
• 12:33
  as the offspring of world leaders, especially dictators, or want to be dictators
• 12:41
  as privileged as Hunter Biden obviously is. I wouldn't want to be him,
• 12:48
  would anyone listening want to be? It must be hell on earth to be
• 12:54
  able to drift through life drastically affecting the lives of millions of people and just
• 13:01
  never being held accountable for anything. It's the absolute definition of a first world
• 13:07
  problem. But it's the kind of concentrated essence of first world problem. The
• 13:13
  ordinary people can never fully understand it. When you could be a gigantic piece
• 13:20
  of shit to everyone around you and you never face any consequences that can and
• 13:26
  will absolutely ruin someone's characters on his personality until they're absolutely reliant on safety nets,
• 13:35
  giant safety nets held up by a division of giants just to keep them
• 13:41
  feeling normal. I mean it must be awful. Well, yeah, the
• 13:46
  Princess Jasmine obviously wasn't as trapped as a Laddin, but she was still trapped,
• 13:56
  not in the same way. But you know, in this and we're
• 14:00
  being an A list celebrity who can't go out in public without an entourage of
• 14:05
  security personnel in a way that is genuinely trapped, or be in a very
• 14:11
  different way to oppose who are trapped by just being poor. And and that's
• 14:16
  essentially what affirmative action is imposing on the people it purports to be helping.
• 14:22
  Privilege is a double edged salt. It gives you food until you forget how
• 14:28
  to find food for yourself. It gives you opportunities until you forget how to
• 14:35
  find opportunities for yourself. It gives you power, and it stands to reason
• 14:39
  power that is given to you. It's not real power. It's delegated power,
• 14:46
  delegated to you by someone with more power, and therefore all the power.
• 14:50
  You're just working for a machine that has all the real power. And
• 14:56
  I don't know how often we need to remind you of this. That machine
• 15:00
  does not give a shit about you. You are not the programmer of the
• 15:05
  machine. You are the fuel of the machine. Socialists don't really give a
• 15:11
  shit about the workers. National socialists don't really give a shit about the nation
• 15:16
  or the area and race within it. Feminists don't really give a shit about
• 15:20
  women, and yes, masculinists don't really give a shit about men. Oh
• 15:26
  wait, there's no such staining. It's masculine. But there's just men's rights
• 15:31
  advocates and we don't want free handouts. We just don't want to be forced
• 15:37
  to give them out. If if only every other kind of marginalized group could
• 15:48
  get on board with that idea. HM. The tough thing about this is
• 15:54
  that you know that the universities are going to find a way around it,
• 15:58
  and it it's something that wasn't necessary. It's like, um, it's like
• 16:04
  Title nine. Title nine was outdated when it passed. Like by the time
• 16:08
  it passed, the universities were starting to figure out you know, actually,
• 16:11
  now women are doing the jobs that they're going to university for. Uh,
• 16:17
  the whole purpose is being served if they if they get their degree, Um,
• 16:22
  we might as well start admitting them into these programs. And then a
• 16:26
  law gets passed it says they have to well, now, now you got
• 16:30
  to you gotta figure out a way to make that law continue to be necessary.
• 16:34
  And the administration that that is set up to enforce that law. So
• 16:41
  they came up with, well, Title nine is to um to make sure
• 16:47
  that women are treated equally in sports, and of course that uh that got
• 16:53
  parlayed into Title nine is set up to make sure that women don't face sexual
• 17:00
  harassment on on university campuses. And now it's now it's set up to say
• 17:07
  that men, you know, men, men can get into women's sports as
• 17:15
  long as they claim to be trans. They don't actually have to demonstrate fully
• 17:19
  that they are trans. They just have to say it, maybe put on
• 17:25
  some pigtails and stuff. Right, So it morphs and it continues to live
• 17:32
  despite the fact that really, um all it's ever been used for was historically
• 17:41
  to attack men's areas on university campuses. They didn't increase women's participation in sports.
• 17:49
  They got rid of Olympic um gymnastics programs for men and Olympic wrestling programs
• 17:57
  for men, and and then called it even because now no more men were
• 18:02
  participating in sports than women on that campus. And then as soon as there
• 18:08
  wasn't a way to use that against men anymore, they went into, well,
• 18:15
  now we want to be able to accuse men and deny them due process,
• 18:19
  and that was given and even when the courts have said, nope,
• 18:26
  you have to provide due process if you're going to do this, if you're
• 18:29
  gonna have this type of hearing if you're going to behave this way. Universities
• 18:34
  have continued to allow false allegations to take away men's right to equal treatment on
• 18:44
  campus and men's access to their education right. So when it comes to affirmative
• 18:52
  action, the court gave some stipulations as to what the problems were with these
• 18:56
  policies, what the universities are going to do. They're not going to eliminate
• 19:02
  these policies. They're not going to get rid of these policies. They're going
• 19:04
  to find a way to claim, Okay, well, we're going to change
• 19:10
  the policies so that they no longer unavoidably employee race in a negative manner or
• 19:18
  involve stereotyping. You know, we're going to add meaningful endpoints, and they'll
• 19:26
  claim that they are not stereotyping even when they are, and then we'll have
• 19:33
  to be further lawsuits. There will have to be further actions in order to
• 19:40
  make this ruling have an impact on campuses, because that's what that's what these
• 19:45
  people do. It's what bureaucrats do. Okay, well, you don't like
• 19:48
  the policies, say the policy is invalid, will revamp the policy so that
• 19:53
  we can continue doing the same thing, but the words are different now,
• 19:59
  so it's not the same policy and you can't criticize it anymore. That's that's
• 20:03
  what they're gonna try. I predict that's their next move. Yeah, I
• 20:07
  agree, believe me. Would would you believe Hannah that you're already correct?
• 20:14
  Yeah? Because are they already doing it? Harvard has already announced that as
• 20:18
  part of the admissions process, applicants are going to be asked for an essay,
• 20:26
  of course, that describes how their race has affected their life. Wow,
• 20:32
  what if you're right? What if you're Oriental, if you're from India?
• 20:36
  Yeah, I mean, are you gonna have to exaggerate? But Lauren,
• 20:38
  did you want to say something before I give my two cents? Yeah?
• 20:42
  I was just gonna say because you know, because in the interim,
• 20:45
  you know what's gonna happen every Laquandria Lsandria Devant. I sorry. Just the
• 20:55
  names that these black women give their kids that make them fucking stand out.
• 21:03
  Okay, don't forget that they name them after brands and like types of alcohol,
• 21:07
  like like like you know, they name their kids the names of cars
• 21:15
  they have never driven in countries they have never been to my naming name Paris,
• 21:22
  Paris, My my naming Mercedes. But you drive a Kia. What
• 21:29
  do you want talking about? Yeah? But anyway, but the stereotype still
• 21:34
  exists, right because of our black women name their goddamn kids and it's just
• 21:41
  what they do. So on a college application, if you're looking at a
• 21:45
  fourteen letter or fourteen syllable name, yeah, right, it's kind of easy
• 21:55
  to to categorize which group fall into and you can't. But that's the thing
• 22:02
  you can't. You can never eliminate the person's um automatic, their their own
• 22:10
  buy its right, their own how they view the world. Oh well,
• 22:15
  you know, if you put someone in there who is familiar with black names,
• 22:19
  then they will obviously more readily recognize names that would sound like they belong
• 22:27
  to a black person. It's just it's just it, you know, And
• 22:32
  it's not a racist thing to say. So, no, you're not the
• 22:36
  one that's put you know, like that's prioritizing and organizing people based on skin
• 22:41
  color. They are, I mean right, they're literally doing that. I
• 22:45
  mean, um, so I just want to say, um something about this.
• 22:49
  Well, let me tell you, so, I think that this is
• 22:56
  good news overall, and I but I agree with and I think you guys
• 23:00
  agree that this is overall a good thing. But I also agree that of
• 23:03
  course universities are going to find ways to work around it. Of course they're
• 23:07
  going to try to oppose this, but since it has been ruled unconstitutional,
• 23:12
  I think that will set a precedent. And students that are you know,
• 23:18
  of a group that gets excluded by the way, I think that the real
• 23:23
  issue the response was more to um like Oriental students, like Asian students,
• 23:29
  Indian students that didn't that were like put on the lower priority. I don't
• 23:33
  think the white students were the ones that people are respond to, even though
• 23:37
  it shouldn't matter and it should just purely be based in merit. But but
• 23:42
  having said that, I think that that if if a white or if a
• 23:47
  person that would normally not get you know, like the help they need or
• 23:52
  not get accepted, and they get passed over despite like having really good scores
• 23:56
  or whatever, and they want to take this to core, and I think
• 24:00
  that you should if if you're going to if you really want to go to
• 24:03
  Harvard or Yale or whatever school it is, this is going to be good
• 24:08
  for you. In that fight because the Supreme Court set precedent, and the
• 24:12
  truth is this should apply across the board and hopefully the same thing, because
• 24:18
  I thought that maybe this was also about gender, but if it isn't,
• 24:21
  then it should be obviously, and maybe people will keep fighting because like right
• 24:26
  now, I think that the most educated demographic in the United States is a
• 24:32
  black female. And that's that's all. I mean. I'm not saying that
• 24:36
  they can't do it, but I'm saying that a lot of it has to
• 24:38
  do with affirmative action because the black men aren't even doing as well. So
• 24:42
  maybe there's maybe the gap in the gender support is bigger than the race gap,
• 24:48
  and I bet it is. That's what I would guess. So first
• 24:53
  of all, that's that. So yeah, overall, I think it's a
• 24:55
  good thing. But um, you know, uh there, it's gonna set
• 24:59
  president fully, they'll be more fighting going forward. But then like on the
• 25:03
  other side, is this other thing. Okay? Um, so activists like
• 25:08
  race activists, race hustlers are really upset, Okay, really upset. I
• 25:14
  saw, um, oh what's her name? This is black anchor person on
• 25:19
  MSNBC, I think, and she was Joy Reid. Yes, yes,
• 25:26
  and she said I was the product of affirmative action, and she thought,
• 25:30
  I mean, I was like, so you're not qualified to do your job.
• 25:36
  You didn't say that's a weird self report, but she said it has
• 25:38
  some weird opinions and says some weird things and has been um basically caught lying
• 25:47
  more than once. It's she says she was a product of affirmative action.
• 25:52
  That doesn't actually make affirmative action look good. No, well, it just
• 25:59
  kind of myself. It's a self report for one, but exactly nothing.
• 26:03
  Nothing really does. Okay, I'm sorry. I would never stand up and
• 26:10
  say, oh, yes, I got this because of the color of my
• 26:12
  skin, and they you know what I mean. I wants to know that
• 26:17
  I earned this position, that I earned this spot on my merit because I'm
• 26:22
  smart enough, because I'm intuitive enough, because I'm skilled. Exactly, I
• 26:27
  did the work. I don't want to be seen as someone who needs you.
• 26:32
  You just need a helping hand. No, fuck you, you want
• 26:36
  to help? You want to help me pay these bills? Bitch? How
• 26:37
  about that? That's it, that's it. Give me intuition. But outside
• 26:42
  of that, don't, don't, don't, don't, don't do it.
• 26:47
  Based on the color of my skin, because that's just and oh my god,
• 26:52
  it's like you couldn't do it. Yeah, you couldn't. You couldn't
• 26:56
  do it without us. Well, and the thing is made these things cheaper.
• 27:00
  I know. The thing is too, is that there are probably some
• 27:04
  people from minority groups that did qualify, but they'll always wonder if they did
• 27:10
  it on their own merit, or if like you know, they were getting
• 27:12
  like these people looking up for them, um, sorry, or or or
• 27:18
  if they already filled their quota of people that they need to help, so
• 27:22
  that you just weren't I'm sorry, you weren't unprivileged enough. We had,
• 27:29
  we had some darkies that we had to get off the roster. It's like,
• 27:34
  oh so so anyway, But going back to what I was saying,
• 27:38
  so, yeah, I do. I do think this is good. It's
• 27:40
  that's a good precedent. Hopefully we can. Um people should start. They
• 27:44
  have to fight, because you know, these universities are going to find a
• 27:48
  work around, absolutely, but they should. They got to be helped.
• 27:49
  Their feet have to be held to the fire on this if they discriminate.
• 27:52
  So and if you you know, I hate to play the race card,
• 27:56
  but if you're like Asian or or whatever and you get like discriminated against,
• 28:02
  because I know that they do, then you should definitely make a stink about
• 28:06
  it and bring this up because these people they're gonna do what they want.
• 28:10
  They don't care about the law, right, they don't care about that.
• 28:12
  But but having said that, though, I will also add that university educations
• 28:18
  suck, so it's not like you know mostly what it does. And this
• 28:22
  is kind of like how they screw over people who would normally not have gotten
• 28:26
  in to college because maybe their grades weren't high enough or whatever, and you
• 28:30
  could that you know, we're looking this like, talking about this at this
• 28:36
  level, at this stage of a young person's growth and development is kind of
• 28:41
  putting the cart before the horse, because if they like, we need to
• 28:45
  prepare them for um, you know, they're adult years, whether they go
• 28:49
  to college or not, from the moment they are born. And a lot
• 28:53
  of that gets you know, you have obviously I beat the drum on this
• 28:57
  all the time, but you have single parent homes, usually there's no father
• 29:02
  around. The child is abused, you know, by the mother because she's
• 29:06
  stressed. She beats her kids. Whatever. They go to shitty ass public
• 29:08
  schools where they're not taught anything useful. If you look at like the scores
• 29:14
  of the reading abilities and the mathematic abilities of young people in school these days,
• 29:22
  especially in urban areas that are on the public school I know that,
• 29:26
  Like you know, some of these activists will say it's because of redlining and
• 29:29
  the white supremacy. Now everyone's doing badly if they're in if they're in an
• 29:33
  urban area, public schools suckballs, period. Okay, so they're not preparing
• 29:40
  you for the real world. I saw that unfolded real time when I was
• 29:42
  going to school and there, So the education sucks. And then you get
• 29:49
  into a university because of affirmative action, even though you're not really supposed to
• 29:53
  you know good enough, you get a shitty education and gender studies or queer
• 29:57
  theory or something else you can't use, and then you're eighty grand one hundred
• 30:00
  grand in debt for the rest of your life and you can't pay it off
• 30:03
  because you work at Starbucks. So it's almost like people really shouldn't even be
• 30:10
  worried about not getting to go to college. It's not a mark of status.
• 30:15
  It doesn't help you get a really good job unless you're going into a
• 30:18
  very specific field where that training is necessary. But in most cases it's not.
• 30:23
  Because a lot of people go to college they don't know what they want
• 30:26
  to do yet. They're just sort of like, you know, playing around.
• 30:29
  They're having fun. They're they're on campus, they join a fraternity or
• 30:33
  a sorority, they go to parties, they get drunk all the time,
• 30:37
  they have you know, sex with random people, and they do a little
• 30:40
  bit of class on the side. They learn about bullshit like gender studies things,
• 30:45
  and then they get out with their with their you know, they get
• 30:48
  their bachelors and they can't use it anywhere because they didn't do anything practical,
• 30:52
  and we're not preparing these people for this. So it's almost like, I
• 30:56
  think it's a blessing for minorities that would normally get into college if they follow
• 31:00
  through on it, because they could avoid a whole bunch of headache and a
• 31:04
  whole whole bunch of debt by just like going into a trade starting a business.
• 31:11
  You can learn a lot of skills on the internet. You you don't
• 31:14
  even have to go to school like you could, like I learn more just
• 31:17
  watching YouTube videos and reading articles and stuff like that than I ever did going
• 31:22
  to school, like absolutely, but bar none. I learned more online.
• 31:26
  And lastly, if you there was well, actually two more things. One,
• 31:32
  there was complaints about this kind of what they call it like legacy admissions.
• 31:38
  So like you know, if you if your father went to this college,
• 31:41
  then you're more likely to get into this college, and they want to
• 31:45
  end that. I mean, yeah, I guess. I mean it's it
• 31:47
  makes up a very small percentage of people who end up going to university,
• 31:49
  though it's a very small percentage. And on top of that, it doesn't
• 31:53
  again, it doesn't guarantee success. They're just they're gonna end up in a
• 31:56
  bunch of debt anyway, and they might not be able to use any of
• 32:00
  their skills regardless. But it'd be nice to end it. But I would
• 32:02
  also add this too, Um, if if we have been doing affirmative action
• 32:08
  for a couple of generations, then there are likely people who belong to minority
• 32:14
  groups and I put that in quotes, um who basically succeeded through that and
• 32:20
  they are then getting their kids into college. So this legacy thing is not
• 32:24
  just a white thing. I mean I don't think it is period. And
• 32:29
  plus it's a it's a tiny, tiny percentage, it's like six percent or
• 32:32
  something of the college admissions are you know, because of that, So I
• 32:37
  wouldn't I wouldn't sweat that. I don't think that's a big deal. And
• 32:40
  frankly, I don't even think it's racial anymore because a couple of generations have
• 32:45
  passed, and so there are plenty of Blacks, latinos Asians, Indians you
• 32:49
  know, that are getting natives that are getting their kids into college through like
• 32:52
  they're you know, they're sort of like previous because there they were, um
• 32:58
  what do you call it, on their previous alma mater. And the last
• 33:01
  thing I would say is just today I saw and I know it was in
• 33:06
  response to this, but somebody put up a cool video. I can't remember
• 33:09
  the name of it, but just look up Thomas soul. He writes about
• 33:13
  this stuff, and he wrote about affirmative action and all of the problems he
• 33:16
  has with it, especially when it's based on race, because and I think
• 33:20
  that based on gender, it's it's a lot more cut and dry, obviously,
• 33:23
  But of course, if you wanted to benefit from your gender, you
• 33:25
  could just not be a man and you'll get the benefit, So they're gonna
• 33:30
  have to address that at some point. But in terms of race, he
• 33:35
  talked about how in the sixties, I think they or yeah, in the
• 33:39
  sixties, in about ten years, the number of Natives or you know,
• 33:45
  like American Indians that were attending college, like it went up like eight times
• 33:52
  in the seventies compared to the sixties, so like in ten years. And
• 33:55
  the reason for this is not that they suddenly had like that many more college
• 34:00
  attendees because they were they were actually pulling the same group of people after ten
• 34:05
  years. The reason is because when affirmative action came out, everyone who had
• 34:09
  some Native Black Latino in the in their heritage, if they had it in
• 34:15
  their history, even if they were mostly white, even if they had blonde
• 34:19
  hair and blue eyes, if they could claim, oh yeah, I got
• 34:22
  Cherokee, then they would get the benefit. So all it is is just
• 34:25
  like, I want to be in this category because they get the benefit.
• 34:29
  So the category should just be eliminated anyway, because most Americans are pretty mixed
• 34:35
  regardless, right, So this is another thing that has to go. So
• 34:37
  I would look up the Thomasoul thing, and again, just for the record,
• 34:42
  I hope that this does extend to gender. I think it's a good
• 34:45
  step in the right direction, along with a bunch of other things. But
• 34:49
  these these are all kind of top down, and at the end of the
• 34:52
  day, we have to work bottom up if we want like long lasting change.
• 34:57
  So that's basically my thoughts on that. You know, when I went
• 35:01
  to I went to college for a few years, and I went to the
• 35:06
  college that my parents met at because it was at the time I was I
• 35:10
  was wanting to be a school teacher, and that was a college that was
• 35:16
  a good place for teacher education. It was known as a good place for
• 35:21
  teacher education. And you know, one of the first things they said during
• 35:25
  the admissions process because they asked, you know, well, why do you
• 35:29
  want to go to school here? And I gave that as my first reason,
• 35:31
  and then I said, now, also my parents met here, and
• 35:35
  they said, well, we don't do legacy admissions. That's how I learned
• 35:38
  what a legacy admission was. I'd never heard of that when I was growing
• 35:44
  up, that some people get to go to specific universities because their parents went
• 35:49
  there, And it seems to me that it would be a thing that would
• 35:52
  set somebody up for failure because you would you would never know if you were
• 35:59
  cut out out to get through the rigors of university, if you if you
• 36:06
  just got in because of a detail like that, and it would be the
• 36:10
  same with affirmative action. Um you get there and you don't you're not prepared,
• 36:17
  or you don't have the discipline, or you don't have the IQ,
• 36:22
  which you know, that's that's a that's the thing that happens, and you
• 36:27
  maybe maybe shoved somebody out that did you know that that could have succeeded.
• 36:35
  You end up frustrated, You end up with debt that you're never going to
• 36:37
  be able to pay off because you don't finish school. You end up dropping
• 36:40
  out um or or worse, you end up with a degree that doesn't doesn't
• 36:47
  mean anything, and when you get into the workplace for that degree, you
• 36:52
  discover that you really didn't learn anything that's going to teach you how to do
• 36:55
  your job. And then at the same time, somebody that may have gone
• 37:02
  through and gotten the education they needed to do a different job doesn't. And
• 37:07
  it's not necessarily just people pushing out people of different races. If if having
• 37:16
  merit doesn't doesn't doesn't comprise the majority of what gets you into a university.
• 37:24
  The students with merit don't push themselves to compete, and so they don't rise
• 37:31
  to the top because everybody's going to get a trophy, right, So why
• 37:37
  would you compete and why would you rise to the top. Why would you
• 37:40
  stand out during a time in your life when standing out gets you bullied?
• 37:46
  Right, So then those kids get dragged down and they maybe decide university isn't
• 37:53
  for them. They maybe decide that they're not any better than anybody else.
• 38:00
  They're not going to uh, they're not going to become a nurse or a
• 38:04
  doctor or a scientist or you know, a politician or whatever. And and
• 38:10
  so they they just you know, go into some family owned business or they
• 38:16
  go work for somebody outside their family or whatever, and uh, and they
• 38:22
  don't they don't succeed, and then society doesn't get the benefit of this person's
• 38:28
  greatness because they never achieve it. So like between legacy admissions and affirmative action,
• 38:37
  um, i'd say legacy admissions are affirmative action for rich people, people
• 38:43
  that could affords in their kids to school. It's really not any better.
• 38:46
  And the people that are complaining are the ones that are mad that affirmative action
• 38:50
  was taken down. Well, it's like, uh, you know, I'm
• 38:53
  sorry, but your terms are acceptable. Let's let's eliminate both, I mean
• 38:58
  programs. I'm okay with it, but I mean, like I said,
• 39:00
  it's games. The scale is completely different though, I mean, but I
• 39:06
  mean in principle. Yeah, sure, that's matter of it. You know,
• 39:08
  like in my it's just one of those things where they think that's a
• 39:13
  trump card. Right. Oh, well, if you're going to eliminate this,
• 39:15
  well let's eliminate that too. No, your terms are acceptable. It's
• 39:19
  a whole shit. Yeah, but they don't. But they don't have an
• 39:22
  a little shit. They don't really want to eliminate both. They just want
• 39:24
  to keep their thing, so they're not they'll they'll say that that's the whole
• 39:30
  point if your terms are acceptable. Yeah yeah, yeah, sure, um
• 39:34
  right, the whole point of your terms are acceptable is you thought this was
• 39:37
  going to be a trump card. You really didn't care about getting rid of
• 39:38
  it. Well, we don't care about keeping it, so okay, we'll
• 39:43
  agree. Uh, you know, and now and now you're now your trump
• 39:47
  card is gone. Yeah, now what are you gonna do? Yeah?
• 39:51
  Now for sure, but again they'll work around it either way. And I
• 39:53
  think that in fact, more colleges are more likely to reject legacy enrolled people
• 40:00
  or whatever, then they will a more affirmative action. Hire is because they're
• 40:05
  all true believers in there, so they're gonna do it. But nonetheless,
• 40:07
  I think it I think it sets a good precedent. I think people should
• 40:10
  follow through. This is sort of like seeing that the dragon has a little
• 40:15
  scale missing. But that's not the same as striking it right. It's like
• 40:19
  revealing the weakness. So we got to drill down um and you know,
• 40:23
  fight that so and then the same goes for title nine that you know,
• 40:28
  it's the same, it's the same business. Hopefully that we will see some
• 40:30
  developments in that department too, because the Supreme Court has been on a roll.
• 40:36
  So all right, anybody else have any thoughts on this? Okay,
• 40:39
  before we move on to the next story, then, thank you for everybody's
• 40:43
  contributions. I'm going to read your super chows because I got some of those,
• 40:46
  so thank you for that. M Plain Dainge gives us five dollars and
• 40:52
  says you have to salt it properly. Too much and you end up picking
• 40:54
  pickling too little and it spoils. You need the right amount of salt to
• 40:58
  ferment to develop up depth of flavor, different notes and umami, that's a
• 41:02
  type of flavor. We have to stop worrying if it makes people salty.
• 41:07
  I offended. We need the salt to preserve the good microbes and eliminate the
• 41:12
  bad ones. It's controlled rot. I love chart chart, koutree. I
• 41:17
  love sausage. I love lamp. Do you really love lamp? I love
• 41:22
  lamp? Or you just saying that because the lamp is in the room.
• 41:24
  Um side note. Masculinists are slash word thing. I remember them being on
• 41:29
  Facebook in twenty ten, but they were weird and didn't really talk about male
• 41:34
  issues. They're kind of like Migtao, but really weird. Kobe Bryant was
• 41:37
  named after Kobe Beef. Well just about the masculinist. Yeah, yeah,
• 41:44
  it was a parody of feminism, that's all. It wasn't real. I
• 41:46
  mean I remember the Twitter account. It's the same thing. But thank you
• 41:51
  playing Dane for the five dollars. Meredith ge gives us five dollars and says
• 41:54
  HBr News for twelve honey for the Badgers, there was a time when you
• 41:59
  didn't need a college degree to enter into many professions. College is a scam
• 42:02
  that we taxpayers are subsidizing with all the federal grants that are awarded to them.
• 42:07
  Absolutely correct. It is a scam, and I bought into it.
• 42:10
  I think a lot of people in my generation brought into it, and they
• 42:14
  shouldn't. You know it, don't let don't let people pressure you into college
• 42:17
  because it's just indoctrination, the next level of adoctrination. I mean that basically
• 42:22
  starts in fucking daycare and grammar school and kindergarten. But if you can prevent
• 42:28
  it, you know, don't go to college. I don't think it's worth
• 42:30
  it, Thank you, Meredith. Then we got teaching styles must match the
• 42:35
  learning style for five dollars, and they say, I think the teaching styles
• 42:38
  at these universities that are harder to get in might not be best suited for
• 42:43
  students that get accepted through affirmative action. For example, Californian U sees higher
• 42:47
  professors whose main job responsibility is to research. I suspect their teaching material is
• 42:52
  more abstract, which is harder to understand and digest. From the perspective of
• 42:57
  most students California State universities. On the other hand, higher teachers whose main
• 43:00
  job is a focus on teaching, I think their material is much less abstract
• 43:05
  and thus much more understandable to many more people. Well, you know,
• 43:08
  honestly, a big part of the problem is the teaching style at the lower
• 43:12
  levels. And I'll give you an example. My dad had students that got
• 43:17
  to his eighth grade, seventh and eighth grade English classes without knowing how to
• 43:24
  use a dictionary to look up how to spell a word. And they would
• 43:29
  ask him, how the heck do I look it up in the dictionary if
• 43:30
  I don't know how to spell it? Well, you know what the first
• 43:34
  letter is, right, and you can sort of sound out what the second
• 43:37
  letter might be and what the first vowel might be, and so you start
• 43:42
  looking back and forth in the areas where those words would would be if they
• 43:45
  were spelled that way, and until you find it and then you know how
• 43:52
  to spell it, you know. And that was like people would would not
• 43:58
  know how to look up xylophone because it's not spelled with a Z, and
• 44:01
  you know, he had to go through and teach that. So he started
• 44:05
  having open book spelling tests, but you couldn't use your spelling book. You
• 44:08
  had to use the dictionary. You could memorize the rule, you could memorize
• 44:13
  the spelling words. A lot of us did. But there were students that
• 44:17
  during the spelling test would have a word or two where they would look them
• 44:22
  up in the dictionary, and so they would practice doing that and they would
• 44:27
  get it down. This is something that's important for students back then to learn
• 44:30
  because like back then, you know, you couldn't just type a word into
• 44:34
  your computer and Google would spell it for you. There was no Google,
• 44:38
  right, there was no Internet because per se like there was. You could
• 44:44
  you could use a modem to direct dial somebody's server if you knew what you
• 44:49
  were looking for, but but you didn't have the stuff that you have today.
• 44:55
  That's like automatic. And I'll bet kits today don't learn that in school.
• 45:00
  I bet they don't learn how to use the dictionary to figure out how
• 45:02
  to spell a word. They might not even use a paper dictionary to learn
• 45:07
  how to find out the meaning of a word. Everything is a Google search
• 45:13
  now. Everything is on some search engine or another, most likely Google.
• 45:20
  But in any case like that, in a nutshell, is why students get
• 45:27
  to university unable to handle professors with more abstract teaching methods because they don't know
• 45:34
  how to learn in that manner. They've never found out how to learn things
• 45:39
  by looking them up, reading about them, and then trying them out right.
• 45:45
  Well, I mean again, that's why they you know, this is
• 45:49
  talking about university is put in the car before the horse because child's development starts
• 45:53
  a lot earlier. But but I got to move on. Thank you for
• 45:57
  the supercows, and I am hoping to get a teacher on our show for
• 46:01
  a fireside chat in September, so be on the lookout for that. I
• 46:06
  think she's pretty great. She's trying to change the way that you know,
• 46:10
  the people teach basically. So we're gonna move on nextorry, let us know
• 46:15
  when you guys think about this one in the comments, and let us move
• 46:17
  on to the next one. All right, So changes are coming to those
• 46:23
  that receive permanent alimony payments. The approval drew outcry from members of the quote
• 46:30
  First Wives Advocacy Group end quote. This is de Santis signing the bill that
• 46:35
  ended permanent alimony. Yes, he went ahead and signed it. They said
• 46:38
  that quote on behalf of the thousands of women who are group represents. We
• 46:43
  are very disappointed in the governor's decision to sign the alimony reform bill. We
• 46:47
  believe by signing it, he has put older women in a situation which will
• 46:52
  cause financial devastation. The so called Party of Family Values has just contributed to
• 46:58
  erosion of the institution of marriage in Florida and quote many of those who were
• 47:02
  required to continue making payments had to work long past normal retirement age in order
• 47:07
  to keep up with their payments. Florida. That's men. By the way,
• 47:12
  Florida Family Fairness, of group that advocated for changes in alimony or to
• 47:16
  alimony in Florida, praised the bill. Their chairman, Michael Bueller, said
• 47:22
  that quote Florida Family Fairness is pleased that the Florida Legislature and government Governor de
• 47:27
  Santis have passed a bill that ends permanent alimony and codifies in statute the right
• 47:32
  to retire for existing alimony payers and quote. Along with eliminating permanent alimony,
• 47:37
  the measure will set up a process for expouses who make alimony payments to seek
• 47:43
  modifications to alimony agreements when they want to retire. This bill now allows judges
• 47:49
  to reduce or terminate alimony upon considering numerous factors such as the age and health
• 47:54
  of the individual making payments, customary retirement age of the person's profession, the
• 48:00
  economic impact a reduction in alimony would have on the recipient of the payments,
• 48:06
  and the motivation for retirement and likelihood of returning to work for the person making
• 48:10
  the payments. Those with current alimony payment step set up permanently and who entered
• 48:16
  a non modifiable alimony structure will be struck or stuck sorry, But those entering
• 48:23
  into new alimony payments will have new rules and guidelines. Joe Gruder's the set
• 48:29
  at bill sponsor said that quote, so what you can do right now under
• 48:32
  case law, we now codify all those laws and make that the rule of
• 48:37
  law. So we basically just solidify that. So from a retroactivity standpoint,
• 48:42
  no, because if anything could be modifiable before, it's still modifiable. If
• 48:46
  it's non modifiable agreement, you can still modify that agreement. End quote.
• 48:52
  So I'm gonna sound off as a woman here because what they basically said,
• 48:57
  because I saw the complaints from women in this and some idiot said something about
• 49:01
  it being a death sentence for her, and I will I will go deep
• 49:06
  here. All right, I'm gonna I'm gonna start right off the high dive.
• 49:10
  If you are young enough to be alive today, you are of baby
• 49:16
  boomerage or younger. You are of the age of feminism, right you.
• 49:23
  You grew up during the era when women were in the workplace, when women
• 49:30
  could bring home the bacon, fry it up in the pan and never let
• 49:34
  their husband forget he was a man. You grew up in the area era
• 49:37
  where women could do anything, be anything. He worked completely equal to men.
• 49:45
  You know what a man does when he loses his income, when his
• 49:49
  job just disappears. Uh, he's been working at this place for twenty years
• 49:53
  and suddenly it closes down. It's gone. There is no job anym more.
• 50:00
  You know what he does. He gets another job, even if he
• 50:04
  doesn't have any training in anything around him that will get him another job.
• 50:09
  And nobody treats him like he's a victim of anything in that situation. Nobody
• 50:17
  has sympathy and compassion for his loss of income. They treat him like a
• 50:23
  bum if he doesn't go out and get another job. They treat him like
• 50:27
  a bum. If he goes out and gets another job and it doesn't pay
• 50:30
  as much. In many cases, his wife will leave him. In many
• 50:35
  cases, if he's divorced and this happens to him and he's paying alimony or
• 50:39
  child support, a judge will tell him that it is his fault that he
• 50:43
  can't find the same income someplace, even if it's in the middle of a
• 50:49
  recession, even if it's in the middle of a situation where jobs are closing
• 50:54
  left and right, even if he's been injured and he's disabled. Right,
• 51:00
  if a man loses his job because he's injured and disabled, that doesn't necessarily
• 51:06
  reduce his child support. It doesn't reduce his responsibilities, doesn't make his kids
• 51:09
  any less hungry, doesn't make his house any less expensive. So shape the
• 51:15
  fuck up. Man up, women, I don't have any sympathy. I
• 51:22
  have been working since I was fifteen years old because I was raised to believe
• 51:29
  that it is my job to support myself. It isn't somebody else's responsibility to
• 51:34
  support me. Isn't somebody else's responsibility to pay my bills just because I'm a
• 51:38
  woman. And if you are alive today, however old you are, whether
• 51:45
  you're working, age, retirement age, somewhere in between, you know the
• 51:51
  beginning or the end, and your main source of income is alimony from a
• 51:57
  divorce, you should be a shamed If you're not fully disabled and haven't been
• 52:05
  fully disabled all your life, and your main source of income comes from something
• 52:09
  other than your work, you should be ashamed that you are not pulling your
• 52:15
  weight. Not complaining that somebody else isn't going to pay your way anymore.
• 52:23
  Get off your ass and do something for fuck's sake. If you raised kids,
• 52:30
  if you're claim to fame is that you raised kids, write a children's
• 52:37
  book. You can use AI to illustrate it now. So I don't want
• 52:42
  to hear it. I don't want to hear the complaints. If I can
• 52:45
  do it and I do have a disability, I have three disabilities, and
• 52:52
  I have worked more than full time for most of my life, my whole
• 52:57
  adult life and part of my teenage life. I don't want to hear that
• 53:01
  being a woman is a handicap, right, I have three disabilities, not
• 53:07
  four. So all of you that are complaining about the end of alimony can
• 53:15
  fuck write the hell off with that, because it is bullshit. It is
• 53:19
  bullshit to say that it's a death sentence for you when you can't work a
• 53:24
  man to death to pay your bills. Yeah, I got a disability.
• 53:30
  I got a disability to pay you for the rest of your fucking life for
• 53:34
  your lifestyle. Okay, just because we used to be married, they know,
• 53:40
  mother? Wait all lee shit? Who I have never in my life
• 53:50
  understood the idea behind alimony, okay? And I understand that there's some women
• 53:55
  that claim, oh, well, you know, I supported his boys,
• 54:00
  so I couldn't further my own education. So now I can't. I can't
• 54:05
  support myself and my family. I can only make whatever. Okay, well,
• 54:09
  boot let me a fucking river. I'm sorry if anyone in today's day
• 54:16
  and age goes into a marriage and doesn't understand what can happen on both sides,
• 54:24
  good or bad. Right you. You may marry someone who is financially
• 54:30
  successful in yanayaa, and then a year later down the road he becomes disabled
• 54:37
  and now, oops, what's gonna happen if he can't then provide that income
• 54:44
  that you were so accustomed to, and you're sitting on your ass. No,
• 54:49
  you have to step up. I really don't. It bothers me so
• 54:58
  much I should not have to pay you for any amount of time just because
• 55:05
  we were together. Okay, I'm sorry this listen, especially if you don't
• 55:12
  have children. I mean, I know in a lot of cases people have
• 55:15
  children that that's typically what happens. You know, then you're but you're paying
• 55:22
  child support on top of Alimoni drives me up the freaking wall, Okay,
• 55:31
  because in a lot of these cases we know that well, the child support
• 55:37
  if if it's a substantial amount of child support, right, some women don't
• 55:42
  really get enough to really support themselves from the father because he's not a substantial
• 55:47
  provider. But in the cases where they do, then these mothers are living
• 55:54
  off of that money. It's not going towards the child, you know.
• 56:00
  And good god, if you don't look at every every famous person who gets
• 56:08
  there was somebody else that was just in news and now they want um,
• 56:14
  um two hundred thousand dollars something like two and a half two hundred and fifty
• 56:20
  thousand dollars a month a month in child's support. Child And what does this
• 56:27
  kid do that he needs two hundred and fifty thousand dollars because his daddy rich,
• 56:36
  because his daddy had it at one point. This is disgusting. It
• 56:39
  is so beyond what the actual needs of the child are, right, all
• 56:45
  right, that's child's word. We're off in the weees. We're talking about
• 56:49
  the moony mooney bitch. If you don't get up off your knees and go
• 56:55
  find a motherfucking job, I am so I'm sick of this. You can't
• 57:00
  live off of your past relationships forever just because they might have inconvenienced you.
• 57:09
  You gotta put you know how to take your pennies off. You gotta put
• 57:14
  your big girl pennies right the fuck back on and learn how to live and
• 57:19
  deal with life. It's moments like this where I find myself appreciating, counterintuitively
• 57:30
  appreciating the sort of emergent, intercessional fashion of the feminist movement, namely the
• 57:36
  people who are determined to steal your children and mutilate the genitals of your children,
• 57:42
  because they're providing a target, a worthwhile target for the righteously indignated,
• 57:49
  perpetually outraged mothers and wives of America and the Great and Western world. The
• 57:55
  Karens, shall we say, Some of them are conservatives, them are liberal,
• 58:00
  but they all represent this force of authoritarian nature that exists only to forsibly
• 58:07
  complain about shit until ship changes. They need something, They need something to
• 58:13
  get up in arms about and complain to the manager about. And you can
• 58:16
  bet your bottom dollar they would all be up in arms about this alimony business
• 58:22
  in Florida. But at this point in time, most of them are far
• 58:28
  more concerned with the idea that the government, that the government can convince your
• 58:31
  children to get generatively mutilated, and then they can kidnap your children for the
• 58:37
  purposes of having them generally mutilated. And yet would you believe this concerns the
• 58:45
  concerned mothers of America and the Great and West of the world more than the
• 58:51
  idea that their husbands get to keep a little bit more of their money than
• 58:54
  they might in the event of a separation. Yes, there are a great
• 59:00
  deal of completely insane women out there whose primary consent or only concern is making
• 59:07
  sure they get to generally mutilate their children, so that they only response they
• 59:14
  ever receive is oh my god, you're so brave, you're so progressive to
• 59:17
  have had a butcher take a scalpel to your infant child. But thankfully,
• 59:22
  at this point in history, they are still in the minority at least.
• 59:25
  But now for the foreseeable future, I hope this continues. I hope enough
• 59:32
  women can continue to get their priorities in order and realize that their greatest enemy,
• 59:39
  the greatest threat to their man their way of life, is not men,
• 59:44
  especially not the men who love them or even once loved them. Their
• 59:49
  greatest enemy is the state, the very state threatening to kidnap their children,
• 59:53
  the very state that is in charge of stealing their ex husband's money. Many
• 1:00:00
  sooner or later, they'll put two and two together and notice that the state
• 1:00:07
  in question is lying to them in each and every instance, and it's only
• 1:00:12
  applying so called oppression on one side and so called privilege on the other.
• 1:00:20
  A number multiplied by a negative number is a negative number, the state being
• 1:00:28
  the multiplier. Reproduction is also a multiplier, but it's curtailed by nature.
• 1:00:35
  Cultural multiple multipliers are not. They're only curtailed by the likes of us us
• 1:00:45
  here, honey, by the radio and the like. That's why you've never
• 1:00:47
  heard of us who even who even said that? Hey, woo and so
• 1:00:54
  and so far? All right, anybody else have any far on this one?
• 1:01:01
  Okay? You know the famous statement well behave. Women rarely make history.
• 1:01:10
  Yeah. Women who rely on other people for everything, including their own
• 1:01:19
  support, don't make history. Yeah. Women who do things make history,
• 1:01:25
  even if they don't do as much as men, Even if it's for doing
• 1:01:30
  something that men have been doing for years, they still had to do something
• 1:01:36
  right. Women who sit on their asses and collect from an ex husband fade
• 1:01:42
  into nothing and when they die, they're only remembered as deadweight. Yeah.
• 1:01:53
  Good news. Hopefully again, this is something that will we will see in
• 1:01:59
  other parts of the country Florida. I think Florida in particular has an aging
• 1:02:05
  population. A lot of people retire there, so it would make sense that
• 1:02:07
  that might be where it starts in sort of like the impetus for it.
• 1:02:10
  But hopefully again we will see more of this, you know, just for
• 1:02:15
  fairness sake, in other parts of the country. And maybe this will also
• 1:02:20
  set some kind of precedent. I mean, you know, I see it
• 1:02:23
  all as positive stuff. Maybe I'm maybe I'm an optimist. Maybe it's a
• 1:02:28
  unrealistic or naive of me, but I think we should take whatever. You
• 1:02:31
  know, Joys come our way when they come. So it means men will
• 1:02:37
  get some relief and more women will start doing something with their lives. Yeah,
• 1:02:40
  yeah, I think it could only I mean, assuming people respond to
• 1:02:45
  it maturely, it could only mean good things for both men and women.
• 1:02:49
  So let us know when you guys think about this in the comments. I'm
• 1:02:52
  just looking to see if I missed any super chows or rumble rants know nothing
• 1:02:57
  yet, let us know, you know, send us a super chat through
• 1:03:00
  YouTube or rumble ran through rumble, or you can set a super chat by
• 1:03:04
  going to feed the badget dot com force last just the tip and leave us
• 1:03:07
  a message. We get more of the money, you know. Rumble takes
• 1:03:10
  a little bit, YouTube takes like half, So if you don't want those
• 1:03:15
  people getting your money, just go to just the Tip. We get the
• 1:03:17
  most of it that way. So anyway, moving on to the next story,
• 1:03:21
  we're gonna go across the pond to a significantly less free country and learn
• 1:03:27
  about what's going on with well, I guess you could say affirmative action in
• 1:03:31
  a way, but it's related. So Mike J I'm gonna hand it off
• 1:03:36
  to you. Thank you. Brian. So, the UK's Royal Air Force
• 1:03:43
  usually abbreviated as the r a F, launched an inquiry into a recruitment drive
• 1:03:49
  done in at twenty at twenty and twenty one, and they uncovered some impropriety.
• 1:03:57
  Over one hundred and sixty female or non white TO candidates were placed into
• 1:04:00
  training positions ahead of candidates who were white and mail, which constituted, as
• 1:04:08
  they call on the report, positive discrimination. The report states quote we found
• 1:04:15
  that concerns were raised at the time by r and ASS recruitment and selection staff,
• 1:04:21
  but those who led the initiatives believed they were pushing the boundaries of positive
• 1:04:27
  action rather than acting unlawfully. We found that the chain of commands reaction to
• 1:04:31
  the former A Group Captain Ras was overly defensive and not properly considered whether she
• 1:04:40
  might have been justified in what she said regarding previous acts of positive discrimination,
• 1:04:45
  or the legality of what she was asked to do, and that insufficient effort
• 1:04:53
  had been made to determine the facts. Quote. Air Chief Marshal Sir Rich
• 1:04:59
  Knights responded to the report, stating quote the belief at the time, based
• 1:05:04
  on the understanding of the recruiting process an interpretation of the legal advice, was
• 1:05:11
  that this practice demonstrated acceptable positive action. We now know that it did not,
• 1:05:17
  and I apologize unreservedly to all those affected. We accept that some men
• 1:05:23
  were discriminated against. This included a group of thirty one individuals who likely missed
• 1:05:29
  the opportunity to qualify for a five thousand euro joining bonus. We've identified those
• 1:05:34
  people in our retrospectively offering to award them any financial payment they missed out on
• 1:05:42
  a quote. A popular question people often pose, but just for fun,
• 1:05:49
  is if you can invite anyone alive or dead for a dinner party, who
• 1:05:55
  would you invite? And honestly, whatever the limit to the number of is,
• 1:06:00
  my first two choices would be Karl Marx and Vladimir Lenin, And if
• 1:06:04
  I had any extra seats at the table, they would be reserved for the
• 1:06:09
  team of video editors I have employed to present the series of clips which I
• 1:06:15
  will summarily play to the audience of the aforementioned pioneers of communism. I want
• 1:06:20
  to know if this is what they had in mind, if this what's going
• 1:06:26
  on right now at this point in the twenty first century is what they had
• 1:06:30
  in mind a hundred years ago in the twentieth century, Because I have a
• 1:06:32
  strong suspicion that it is not. This is why it's so difficult to draw
• 1:06:39
  the line between the communism of a hundred years ago to the fractally extracted results
• 1:06:46
  that we've got to at the end of the past century. Back then,
• 1:06:50
  it was all about the workers, the people who work, and that's what
• 1:06:55
  Lenin was hoping to export the rest of the world. Maybe that's what the
• 1:07:00
  KGB, in their long con guerrilla operation, we're hoping to spread to the
• 1:07:05
  rest of the world. But that's not what happened because the West, as
• 1:07:10
  it happens, had not been operating with the upper class as the proposed BOURGEOISI.
• 1:07:19
  As far as the West is concerned, according to the cultural zeitgeist,
• 1:07:25
  men are the bourgeois and if you let them run with it for long enough,
• 1:07:30
  white people are the bourgeois. Straight people are the BOURGEOISI says, people
• 1:07:34
  are the bourgeoisie. Weirdly enough, it's anything but the upper class. It
• 1:07:42
  just so happens that in the West the working class are the most sexist,
• 1:07:45
  racist, transphobic people out there, right, And so the ruling class can
• 1:07:50
  adopt communism among those lines, and hey press though they find themselves able to
• 1:07:56
  oppress the working class and continue to privilege the ruling class, which, hey,
• 1:08:02
  it turns out to be the exact opposite of what Marks and LENNI we're
• 1:08:06
  trying to implement. Or is it. No, it's not. It's the
• 1:08:11
  same shit. You take what is popular and you pretend it is unpopular.
• 1:08:16
  That's all it is. You You've built a conduit to divert all the underdog
• 1:08:24
  energy from the actual underdog to the erroneously proposed overdog. All the wealth and
• 1:08:31
  property gets trickled up from the part to the rich. Then the rich escape
• 1:08:40
  to another country, while the part gets eaten alive by whichever barbarians happen to
• 1:08:45
  remain. If only people could actually remember that this keeps happening, it'll be
• 1:08:51
  great. We really need to get get rid of that grid of mainstream media
• 1:08:58
  liars who tracks to tell us it's not happening. That will be even greater.
• 1:09:03
  But we'll all be dead by that. Whatever. I'll drink to that.
• 1:09:09
  God bless America, Happy July fall, anybody else, Okay, we're
• 1:09:16
  gonna well, I mean, yeah, it's messed up. I don't know
• 1:09:20
  what to say, but I'm glad that it was caught. Hopefully something will
• 1:09:25
  be something corrective. Action will be taken. We'll see. Let us know
• 1:09:29
  what you guys think about this one in the comments. We're kind of doing
• 1:09:31
  well, okay, so one more to go. Um, let me just
• 1:09:35
  make sure I'm not missing any super chows or super chats. No, okay,
• 1:09:42
  so we're gonna get into the final story here. I couldn't help myself
• 1:09:48
  because you know, it is the July July the fourth, it is Independence
• 1:09:54
  Day, is America's birthday. And also Jojoe is as an American foxhound,
• 1:10:00
  or at least in most of his breed makeup is that. So it got
• 1:10:05
  me thinking about dogs, and I saw this story which I could not pass
• 1:10:10
  up. So dog canceled by Pride. Jonathan Miller was a writer for The
• 1:10:15
  Spectator, had his dog canceled by Pride, Austrian company Tractive manufacturers GPS trackers
• 1:10:24
  for dogs which you clipped to their collars. I was actually looking into getting
• 1:10:27
  it because I like to walk around with Jojoe off leash, because he's pretty
• 1:10:30
  good about staying close by. But in the you know, in the off
• 1:10:33
  chance that he might pick up the scent of a deer or a rabbit,
• 1:10:38
  he might run off and then it be it could be a bit of trouble
• 1:10:41
  getting him back, So we were thinking about doing it, and this guy
• 1:10:45
  apparently had one for a number of years. They had participated in corporate pride
• 1:10:51
  fury. Last month, of course, right esg scores and all that.
• 1:10:55
  Miller, who has had a subscription to Tractive for years, received this email
• 1:11:00
  last month. Quote this is the email ready for your dog's pride look taking
• 1:11:03
  your pup with you for pride events. Use live mode to always know where
• 1:11:09
  they are. See how active they got at the parade with wellness monitoring.
• 1:11:13
  End quote, and then it continues quote for a mere four seventy nine that's
• 1:11:17
  four pounds seventy nine pence, I think reduced from five ninety nine pounds,
• 1:11:23
  Tractive would simply supply a plastic rainbow flag cover to fit over the tracker so
• 1:11:29
  that all might see her allegiance to LGBTQ. End quote. As Miller explains,
• 1:11:35
  his dog Bella pictured here, has kept her views on pride to herself
• 1:11:41
  because she is a dog on her behalf. He wrote to Tractive, saying,
• 1:11:45
  quote perhaps a little bad tempered, suggesting to quote stick their business tracking
• 1:11:49
  pets and stick to their business of tracking pets and spare us the obnoxious virtue
• 1:11:56
  signaling end quote. Miller's subscription was and canceled without him asking, with a
• 1:12:02
  reply from attractive customer service agent named Bonnie, whose signature was adorned with three
• 1:12:08
  rainbows, wishing him a wonderful day. So she said, your account has
• 1:12:14
  been canceled, Have a wonderful day, okay, with like you know,
• 1:12:17
  passive aggressive female way. Miller says he did not want his subscription canceled.
• 1:12:21
  He merely objected to the unnecessary insertion of pride ideology. He concluded, quote
• 1:12:28
  Apparently I don't share the values subtractive for which obsce escence to pride is more
• 1:12:32
  important than the welfare of my dog. Shame end quote. This really sounds
• 1:12:38
  like something out of a Douglass Adam's novel. Yeah right, It really sounds
• 1:12:44
  like something that would happen in The Hitchhiker's Guide. But it's jeez. How
• 1:12:49
  a company tells you they don't want your money. This is like reverse capitalism
• 1:12:56
  where these companies that they have decided they wanted to increase their esg score,
• 1:13:04
  uh, decide that they don't actually need customers to survive. And and now
• 1:13:10
  this this company is going to be known for his Like, I never heard
• 1:13:13
  of of tractive before. I know that people in the UNS get chipped it
• 1:13:20
  on Amazon, but I'm not gonna yeah. And I know there's other organizations
• 1:13:26
  that do this, but now that organization, that's the only thing they're going
• 1:13:31
  to be known for outside of their own customer base. Their own existing customer
• 1:13:38
  base, people who never heard of them before. That's the first thing that
• 1:13:41
  they've ever heard of this company is that they canceled a dog because the owner
• 1:13:46
  didn't want to have UM and a bunch of emails pushing a political perspective to
• 1:13:56
  him because he cared about the welfare and location of his dog. Like that's
• 1:14:01
  it. I would be so embarrassed if I owned a company and the only
• 1:14:06
  thing that the majority of people that heard of my company knew about me was
• 1:14:12
  that I tried to push a political perspective that had nothing to do with the
• 1:14:15
  service I provide on a customer, and when he got annoyed about it,
• 1:14:19
  I canceled this service, so I don't need you as a customer. Like
• 1:14:25
  that would be humiliating to have that being what I was known for. These
• 1:14:30
  people don't seem to mind. That should tell you a lot. I wouldn't
• 1:14:34
  use this company if I had a thousand pets at this point, because obviously
• 1:14:40
  they don't really care about their business relationship with their customers. If they did,
• 1:14:46
  they wouldn't pull that shit. Somebody said, there's a follow up.
• 1:14:53
  The guy did get an apology and his service was restored. But still the
• 1:14:57
  person who did that, there was a a kind there's a kind of self
• 1:15:00
  righteousness, right, like she assumed, Well, if you don't agree with
• 1:15:04
  this thing, then like you you should be unpersoned, and your dog too,
• 1:15:09
  and your little dog too. Um. And the thing is the company
• 1:15:15
  hired that person, Yeah, exactly that that person made it through their their
• 1:15:20
  whole HR department rigamarole process for hiring. This is, you know, all
• 1:15:26
  of the vetting and all of the questions you have to ask and answer and
• 1:15:30
  all of the you know, if I were if I were a customer,
• 1:15:35
  what would you say to me? And all that kind all that they made
• 1:15:39
  it through all that only to do this, which means their vetting process doesn't
• 1:15:45
  weed out this kind of person, it promotes them. M You don't have
• 1:15:49
  to decide eventually if this juice is worth the squeeze, right if you know,
• 1:15:57
  you're you're pandering to oh look at us, look at look at the
• 1:16:00
  diverse type of people we hire. That the type of people that would do
• 1:16:02
  this at a heartbeat, If that's going to be worth the bad press.
• 1:16:08
  Yeah, and I suppose if you're a huge enough company like Amazon, you
• 1:16:12
  know, and you shut down an entire man's house, well, not not
• 1:16:16
  entirely, but just aboding to the story that Lewis Rossman spoke about. Yeah,
• 1:16:24
  yeah, you could probably eat the cost. You can probably bury this
• 1:16:28
  story. You can probably just move on like nothing happened and probably be fine.
• 1:16:33
  But I imagine the smaller fish are gonna have a hard time doing it.
• 1:16:41
  Yeah. Yeah, well they're they're they're gonna have to They're gonna have
• 1:16:44
  to be the first two sort of like correct course correct, because otherwise they're
• 1:16:48
  there. I think that the general tolerance for all of this woke shit,
• 1:16:55
  not just the pride stuff, although this is the you know, this was
• 1:16:58
  the pride is over. We're now it's white. It's a what did what
• 1:17:00
  did Jesse Lee Peterson call it a white History month? Jokingly, he calls
• 1:17:04
  it July It just feels white. But um, but yeah, we're we're
• 1:17:11
  fortunately, uh, you know, I think people are really really getting sick
• 1:17:15
  of it. I think every year they get more and more like aggressive with
• 1:17:19
  this stuff, and I think people are just, you know, they're at
• 1:17:23
  their wits end. And I think I mean, they took a lot of
• 1:17:26
  they took a lot of L's this year. Man. Yeah, I think
• 1:17:29
  I think that the exactly. I think that. Did you see the new
• 1:17:31
  ad they did for bud Light as an as an aside where they just like,
• 1:17:36
  these people are so incredibly out of touch. So first they knew the
• 1:17:40
  dill Mulva anything does not go over well. Nobody wants to hear about it.
• 1:17:44
  It's they're not transphobic, they just don't want the ship pushed in their
• 1:17:46
  face. You know. Um, that's it. They just don't want it
• 1:17:50
  there. They don't want to represent it with a beer. It's this is
• 1:17:54
  ridiculous. And then they tried to course correct with the fucking Clydesdale's and the
• 1:17:59
  you know, the guy with the smoky voice talking about America, and it
• 1:18:03
  just seems so cringe and forced. It was like, we don't need you
• 1:18:08
  to pant it to us, because we're not the people. You tried to
• 1:18:10
  pant it the first time. You can pat it to the woke, because
• 1:18:13
  they're they're insecure narcissists. They need to hear about how awesome they are all
• 1:18:16
  the time. We don't just sell us the beer just you know, go
• 1:18:19
  back to doing the old like funny commercials. Remember those, remember you know,
• 1:18:24
  less filling tastes great, remember that, like go, you know,
• 1:18:27
  go and do those do the do the frogs, you know, a bud
• 1:18:30
  wise or like do that, like don't don't do don't go over the top
• 1:18:33
  with the miraca bullshit. And then after that they did, um well,
• 1:18:39
  I think there might have been another thing they did. Oh they they they
• 1:18:43
  doubled down on the whole support of the trans is. They went ahead,
• 1:18:46
  they sponsored uh you know obese. Oh that was the video game strippers or
• 1:18:54
  oh yeah yeah, yeah, yeah, right right yeah. And now they
• 1:18:56
  just came out with another ad that's just men like grunting like that. That's
• 1:19:01
  the whole ad. It's like fifteen twenty seconds and it's just men grunting at
• 1:19:05
  each other with beer. And I'm like this, so this is what you
• 1:19:09
  think about your customer base. Of course it's men like because men are not
• 1:19:14
  likely to complain. But again this is like absolutely wrong like that. You
• 1:19:18
  know, they the people in the marketing for Budweiser and the people who are
• 1:19:23
  Anheuser, Bush or whatever, the people in like positions of authority in those
• 1:19:29
  they hate the product they're selling. It's just like everywhere else. The people
• 1:19:32
  that work at Disney, they hate Disney movies, they hate them, they
• 1:19:36
  hate the properties, they hate comics, they hate video games, they hate
• 1:19:41
  it all. And so they just invert because they can't actually make something that
• 1:19:45
  people want, because they don't want to do what people want, because they
• 1:19:49
  don't want people to be happy. So instead they do the reverse because the
• 1:19:53
  only thing you can do is invert reality and try to present something that is
• 1:19:57
  the opposite of true, and in the per epise of it is to get
• 1:20:00
  people talking about it, and they think that that sells products, and it's
• 1:20:03
  just not reflected in the numbers. Yes, people are complaining, but they
• 1:20:09
  are also losing a lot of money. So I'm you know the same thing
• 1:20:13
  with this dog thing. You know what, go ahead and do that.
• 1:20:15
  Somebody. Other people have made GPS trackers for dogs that I'm sure are not
• 1:20:19
  going to try and force me to put a rainbow on Jojo because my dog
• 1:20:23
  is not gay. He's just dominant. Um anyway, he's a dog.
• 1:20:30
  He doesn't Yeah, I know, I know, he doesn't care. He's
• 1:20:32
  been he's he's he's been neutered since like since he was eight months old,
• 1:20:36
  so he doesn't have sex drive really, although he really does get along well
• 1:20:42
  with girl dogs. I don't know if that's kind of like a faghag thing
• 1:20:44
  or what, but um, no, Joe is not gay. He's just
• 1:20:46
  a dog, so we don't need to make this a thing. So um
• 1:20:51
  anyway, does anyone else have any thoughts on the canceled dog? I mean,
• 1:21:00
  they're not These companies aren't pandering to the masses at all, not to
• 1:21:06
  the woke, not to the unwoke, Nantennue. They're pandering to the banks.
• 1:21:12
  And when they do this shit, what the consumer should understand is it's
• 1:21:19
  not about appealing to a set of consumers. It's about appealing to a set
• 1:21:28
  of financiers. You're not important to them, and the best way they can
• 1:21:32
  tell you that you're not important to them is by trying to improve their ESG
• 1:21:40
  score. That's them telling you that Goldman Sacks and Chase Bank and all of
• 1:21:48
  the other big wigs out there. Um that that the the whole shebang of
• 1:22:00
  elitists that have come up with this, right uh swab You know those guys,
• 1:22:06
  those are who's important to them. Black Rock is important to them.
• 1:22:11
  They might be owned by it, they're not. They're not. They don't
• 1:22:15
  give a rat's ass about you. So if you're going to do something like
• 1:22:19
  this where you're going to track your dog, research how this is done,
• 1:22:28
  look into it. Maybe find a small company locally that does something like this,
• 1:22:34
  or figure out a way to create something yourself that will that will help
• 1:22:41
  you track your dog, or maybe maybe don't get too um technical minded with
• 1:22:48
  your pet. Yes, I mean anybody that can track your dog can track
• 1:22:58
  you, right, Yeah, that's true. I mean, like you know,
• 1:23:01
  I don't even throw away your phone. That are you going to throw
• 1:23:03
  away your dog? No? I, Um, I think that it can
• 1:23:09
  be super handy, but I wouldn't want to be on some kind of network.
• 1:23:12
  I'd like to link just be from my phone to the dog. And
• 1:23:15
  even then I don't have to worry too much about Jojo because he's you know,
• 1:23:18
  he's good about staying close. Uh. And we you know there are
• 1:23:23
  leash laws here, although there are counties like neighboring counties that have no leash
• 1:23:27
  law, and I want to go there and just walk with him because he
• 1:23:30
  would be very good. He's very good at about staying with me. I
• 1:23:34
  mean, he can't even leave the room because nobody's here. If Lindsay was
• 1:23:38
  here, Jojo wouldn't be on his bed right now. So anyway, Um,
• 1:23:45
  but uh yeah, happy scared the crap out of your dog day.
• 1:23:47
  By the way, although although Jojo doesn't mind fire fireworks, so that means
• 1:23:53
  he's not a trader. He doesn't mind fireworks, but Leslie my last talk,
• 1:24:00
  she was terrified of them like she would have like panic attacks. So
• 1:24:04
  anyway, Um, does anyone else have any final thoughts on this or any
• 1:24:09
  of the other things we covered? All right, so we're gonna wrap it
• 1:24:11
  up then, all right, So, um, thank you so much for
• 1:24:15
  everybody who came on the show today. I want to thank Lauren in particular
• 1:24:18
  for adding her commentary. It's fine. I don't mind you know, more
• 1:24:21
  voices. It's always good. And thank thank you guys for joining us on
• 1:24:28
  the show today. I look forward to senior comments on the stories and I
• 1:24:31
  hope you have a really great rest of your day, whether it is fourth
• 1:24:35
  of July for you or not. I mean, it's the fourth July for
• 1:24:39
  everybody unless you're like way in the future, but I mean like Independence Day.
• 1:24:43
  You know, I'll just shut up now. So anyway, if you
• 1:24:45
  guys liked this video, please hit like, subscribe if you're already. If
• 1:24:48
  you're not already subscribe, hit the bell for notifications you know when our streams
• 1:24:51
  go live. Leave us a comment, let us how what you guys think
• 1:24:55
  about what we discussed on the show today, and please please please share this
• 1:24:58
  video because sharing is care. Thank you guys so much for coming on today's
• 1:25:00
  episode of HBr News. Stick around because there is a little bit of a
• 1:25:03
  treat at the end here, and we'll talk to you all in the next video.