Latest / UK Column Radio / UK Column ‘On Location’ in Cheltenham: UK Column Team Panel Discussion

Transcript

UK Column ‘On Location’ in Cheltenham: UK Column Team Panel Discussion · UK Column Radio

0:11
Speaker 1: If anyone is sort of within ear short of the
0:13
Speaker 1: door and does happen to see Brian, can you remind
0:15
Speaker 1: him as the UK column event on today and that
0:19
Speaker 1: we might need him. Okay, So what we'll do because
0:24
Speaker 1: as I said, we were a bit pushed for time
0:27
Speaker 1: with Brian and Alex. Obviously Brian's eliminated himself from the
0:30
Speaker 1: race at this stage. But we will start with a
0:34
Speaker 1: question for Alex, and I think it is worth coming
0:37
Speaker 1: back to, and the question is why would Alex not
0:40
Speaker 1: work for King Charles?
0:44
Speaker 2: Because it was clear even then that he wouldn't take
0:47
Speaker 2: his oath. Seriously, you've got the distinguished form from substance.
0:53
Speaker 2: I remember my mum lived long enough to see the coronation.
0:57
Speaker 2: She knew it wasn't going to be like the Last Rain,
0:59
Speaker 2: but she was, you know, like many of her generation,
1:02
Speaker 2: too much persuaded by the sincere face that he pulled
1:07
Speaker 2: and the classic wording he gave, which was better than
1:10
Speaker 2: the wording that Prince Philip made Queen Elizabeth swear. You know,
1:14
Speaker 2: there was the full wording about laws and customs, but
1:17
Speaker 2: it was clear from how he was brought up and
1:19
Speaker 2: the opinions he'd express publicly and privately that he didn't
1:22
Speaker 2: regard his job as obeying the people and following their customs.
1:26
Speaker 2: So in as simple as that, And it was also
1:28
Speaker 2: it's important to throw down red lines for yourself, isn't it.
1:31
Speaker 2: It's important to say this, you know, psychologically, for yourself
1:34
Speaker 2: and for the vetting officer or whatever else you face
1:37
Speaker 2: in life. There are certain bridges I won't cross, and
1:40
Speaker 2: you know, in my experience that doesn't lead to people
1:42
Speaker 2: saying we won't work with you, at least to them
1:44
Speaker 2: respecting you more. Actually, thank.
1:53
Speaker 1: Alex, thank you very much. Now there's one which I
1:55
Speaker 1: can on to quite briefly, which is what does the
1:57
Speaker 1: T shirt slogan? I wasn't the only one listening mean,
2:01
Speaker 1: and I do apologize for not spelling it out, But
2:09
Speaker 1: there's a there's a big building down the road that's
2:11
Speaker 1: sort of shaped a bit like this, and it's just
2:14
Speaker 1: possible that they might be tuned into what's going on today.
2:18
Speaker 1: So that's what that meant.
2:19
Speaker 3: But thank you, thank.
2:20
Speaker 1: You very much for asking, because that will boost sales
2:22
Speaker 1: five hundredfold. So that's that's terrific. Now let's see, Okay
2:29
Speaker 1: to the whole panel. Given our judicial system only functions
2:34
Speaker 1: to support the Deep States objectives. What steps can we
2:38
Speaker 1: take to set up a people's judicial system? That is
2:43
Speaker 1: a very good question, I think. But I'm unsure as
2:47
Speaker 1: to who should lead on because we've just heard from
2:49
Speaker 1: alex But I but I okay, like there we go.
2:55
Speaker 1: Come on, somebody's got to be up for it. I think, yeah,
3:00
Speaker 1: come on, Alexis, we have it.
3:01
Speaker 2: It's the jury in a word. You know, you can
3:03
Speaker 2: go into a lot more detail than that. And I
3:04
Speaker 2: don't apologize for going on about jurists. They're being attacked
3:07
Speaker 2: for an obvious reason.
3:09
Speaker 4: Right.
3:10
Speaker 2: Catherine Gunn knew in her legal team that the precedent
3:14
Speaker 2: that had been set was Clive Ponting. I remember the
3:17
Speaker 2: General General Belgrano affair, and that's why the National Security
3:21
Speaker 2: Act removed the public interest defense. Somebody asked me about
3:24
Speaker 2: that at the end of lunch break. You can claim
3:26
Speaker 2: anything in statute. You can say henceforth, we are a tyranny.
3:30
Speaker 2: You know, but the only people who will ever to
3:33
Speaker 2: use the technical term casseate, negate, overturn, defy, nullify. You
3:37
Speaker 2: can use all of these terms. The only people who'll
3:39
Speaker 2: ever do that is the people. I have an American
3:43
Speaker 2: standing on my right, they still have the English invention
3:45
Speaker 2: of the grand jury. We got rid of it allegedly
3:49
Speaker 2: in the nineteen thirties. Perhaps say something about grand juries.
3:58
Speaker 5: I'll say something about grand juries, because we've been talking
4:01
Speaker 5: a lot in the last lot of weeks about what
4:06
Speaker 5: are they called people's assemblies and these kinds of things.
4:09
Speaker 5: And on the face of it, for many people, these
4:12
Speaker 5: these types of citizens assemblies seem like grand juries. But
4:16
Speaker 5: there's a significant difference, and that is that the grand
4:18
Speaker 5: juries are set up with the on on the basis
4:21
Speaker 5: that they have investigatory parts themselves. They are responsible for
4:26
Speaker 5: running their own investigations and deciding who they're who the
4:29
Speaker 5: experts are that they're going to speak to, or where
4:31
Speaker 5: they're going to gather the reverence evidence from or whatnot,
4:33
Speaker 5: whereas citizens assemblies tend to be run by vested interests
4:38
Speaker 5: who provide the experts to the people that are taking
4:42
Speaker 5: part in what, on the face of it seems like
4:44
Speaker 5: a grand jury. And there's there's the fundamental differences that
4:48
Speaker 5: they choose who the experts are, and that makes it
4:52
Speaker 5: totally devalues the whole exercise. It makes it basically null
4:56
Speaker 5: and void. And you know, we saw this, Brian and
5:00
Speaker 5: I saw this, and when was Occupy Band twenty eleven,
5:04
Speaker 5: twenty twelve, something like that at Saint Paul's and we
5:08
Speaker 5: saw the types that we saw people moving into the
5:11
Speaker 5: occupy movement and using Delphi technique to try to steer
5:18
Speaker 5: the outcome of what we're effectively embryonic people's assemblies at
5:21
Speaker 5: that At that event, it was quite spectacular to watch
5:25
Speaker 5: Common Purpose.
5:26
Speaker 3: Yeah, yeah, Common Purpose graduates doing that Climate Camp action.
5:33
Speaker 3: It turned legitimate protest about the bankers into climate. Everything's climate.
5:39
Speaker 4: Now, you know.
5:43
Speaker 3: There you go.
5:46
Speaker 6: Without without sounding to Robespiary and I do have a
5:52
Speaker 6: lot of appreciation for the French style of direct democracy.
5:56
Speaker 6: Sometimes I think we can learn something from from the.
5:58
Speaker 1: French excellent right, rather unusual characteristics of not being too
6:11
Speaker 1: much well or being rather backward and coming forward, which
6:14
Speaker 1: is strange given how people are on screen, let's say.
6:20
Speaker 1: But anyway, let's get into something I think should we
6:23
Speaker 1: direct this at Ben to start with? You have delved
6:26
Speaker 1: into the past, which has been insightful, and I understand
6:29
Speaker 1: the relevance, but we'd like to hear more about what
6:31
Speaker 1: the future holds, and in particular what power we hold. Ben,
6:36
Speaker 1: would you like to start with anyone else who'd like
6:38
Speaker 1: to jump in? But I think Ben might have what
6:40
Speaker 1: power we all hold.
6:41
Speaker 3: I mean it's routed in what we've just been talking about.
6:43
Speaker 3: To be honest with you, it's can't hear me? Okay,
6:52
Speaker 3: can you hear me?
6:52
Speaker 4: Now?
6:53
Speaker 3: I normally get told off of speaking too loudly into
6:56
Speaker 3: the microphone, So trying to find the balance. We already
7:02
Speaker 3: have the power. We have natural law, we have the
7:06
Speaker 3: magna carta, we have jury trial, and these things are
7:10
Speaker 3: being eroded consistently, and that's been going on for centuries.
7:16
Speaker 3: And we need to get back to the fundamental principles
7:19
Speaker 3: of what this country is about. And if we can
7:22
Speaker 3: do that, we can go back to go forward, then
7:25
Speaker 3: we've got a viable future. If we don't, then we're
7:28
Speaker 3: in big trouble. And that's about us ultimately coming together
7:36
Speaker 3: as a nation, re establishing basic fundamental human principles, and
7:45
Speaker 3: rebuilding a society that works for everybody. You know, and
7:48
Speaker 3: we have that capacity within us. You know, we can
7:52
Speaker 3: everything about this nation. Everything that's good about this nation
7:55
Speaker 3: was built by the people of this nation.
7:56
Speaker 4: You know.
7:57
Speaker 3: It sounds like a kind of trite thing to say,
7:58
Speaker 3: but it's quite important. And the people that run the
8:01
Speaker 3: country right now, and the people that run this global
8:04
Speaker 3: system that they're trying to bring in to replace the
8:07
Speaker 3: ancient system that i'm referring to, have never built anything
8:12
Speaker 3: of note. Actually they've stolen everything. You know, it's a
8:15
Speaker 3: scam what they're running. And the creatives, the creative force,
8:23
Speaker 3: is the people of this country. And we've got to die.
8:25
Speaker 3: We've got to reawaken to that fact. And we've got
8:28
Speaker 3: to understand what it is that we need and want
8:32
Speaker 3: in a successful, high quality, twenty first century civilization, which
8:38
Speaker 3: is what I think we should be aspiring to be.
8:41
Speaker 3: And we've got to act, and we've got to build,
8:44
Speaker 3: and we've got to coordinate with each other in an
8:46
Speaker 3: open and a transparent and an honest fashion. And you'd
8:52
Speaker 3: be very surprised how quickly things can get better once
8:56
Speaker 3: we start to do that. Actually, you know, I'm thinking
9:00
Speaker 3: three to five years, not fifty, you know, but there's
9:04
Speaker 3: quite a lot of fire that we're going to have
9:06
Speaker 3: to deal with fairly immediately actually, you know, but the
9:11
Speaker 3: next few years is not going to be easy. But
9:15
Speaker 3: you know, trying to fight the existing system as we
9:19
Speaker 3: do on a daily basis is important, but just as important,
9:24
Speaker 3: and it will become increasingly important, I think, is what
9:27
Speaker 3: we build into next. And again that's ultimately down to us.
9:31
Speaker 7: So if I can ask the members, how many do
9:34
Speaker 7: you remember going back into my lecture remote here, how
9:37
Speaker 7: many do you remember my Christmas message from twenty twenty four?
9:42
Speaker 7: Anyone remember it?
9:45
Speaker 4: Good?
9:46
Speaker 7: Okay? Everyone fails?
9:48
Speaker 3: Go home? All right?
9:49
Speaker 7: No, My message was to fight global act local. Remember
9:56
Speaker 7: that now, So everyone finds some little thing that you
9:59
Speaker 7: can do. It doesn't have to be massive. You don't
10:02
Speaker 7: have to necessarily climb up the polls and take down
10:04
Speaker 7: Yula's cameras. But whatever you can do locally in your community,
10:07
Speaker 7: that is using your efforts and your benefits and your talents,
10:10
Speaker 7: that's you're only were going to do this, and it's
10:12
Speaker 7: strength and numbers the more of us that do it
10:14
Speaker 7: in what little ways we can, whether it's anonymous, whether
10:16
Speaker 7: you go on UK column news and tell the world
10:18
Speaker 7: what you think, find something you can do yourselves, And
10:21
Speaker 7: I guarantee once you do it and you identify it
10:24
Speaker 7: and you follow through, you will feel better and you
10:25
Speaker 7: won't be quite so depressed as you are by two
10:27
Speaker 7: po every Monday.
10:36
Speaker 4: I think would have a little bit.
10:39
Speaker 8: Yeah. Well, absolutely what Diane said is completely true, and
10:43
Speaker 8: I eco exactly what she says. I mean, I didn't
10:47
Speaker 8: start my journey until the early two thousands when a
10:52
Speaker 8: lady called Rosa Chori in the United States talked about
10:55
Speaker 8: how the United Nations was bringing the agenda from global
10:59
Speaker 8: to local and how it was actually put into via
11:03
Speaker 8: the Into Governmental Panel and Climate Change into every town
11:07
Speaker 8: council in our country to subvert our town councils into
11:13
Speaker 8: this globalist agenda. And her advice always was sadly, she's
11:17
Speaker 8: not with us anymore. It was really exactly what Diane said,
11:22
Speaker 8: you have to really counteract this globally locally because globally
11:28
Speaker 8: is it's a big agenda, and they brought it in
11:31
Speaker 8: to subvert all our town councils very successfully. And the
11:35
Speaker 8: only way we can counteract it is in our locality
11:39
Speaker 8: and to be able to set up our own groups
11:41
Speaker 8: to challenge our counsels and challenge and then a lot
11:45
Speaker 8: of the councils, my counsel are finally waking up. They
11:47
Speaker 8: were Green XR Council, they are now waking up, so
11:52
Speaker 8: it can be done just an MPs when we did
11:58
Speaker 8: a thing of talk in what was the played Sheddington
12:02
Speaker 8: Sheddington a few weeks ago, and there were MP's there
12:05
Speaker 8: who were beginning to wake up. We need to really
12:08
Speaker 8: there's good people doing bad things and they're not they're
12:11
Speaker 8: not ultimately bad, but they don't understand. And it's our job.
12:16
Speaker 8: We know, it's our job to help spread the word
12:19
Speaker 8: and wake them up, particularly people in power like MPs.
12:23
Speaker 4: Thank you excellent.
12:30
Speaker 1: We're just going to cross the Atlantic for a bit
12:32
Speaker 1: and I think Patrick, perhaps you can start on this.
12:36
Speaker 1: Can you tell us your sense of r f K
12:39
Speaker 1: and whether we consider whether we consider there is any
12:46
Speaker 1: any sort of breakthrough or whether it's pure compromise. We
12:51
Speaker 1: haven't got that long, Patrick.
12:52
Speaker 6: So I would have I would have supported him, I
13:08
Speaker 6: really would have.
13:09
Speaker 4: I was there.
13:10
Speaker 6: I was just on the edge. I was on the
13:12
Speaker 6: cusp of throwing my support behind. At the time, he
13:16
Speaker 6: was a Democrat, so I thought, Okay, this is gonna
13:20
Speaker 6: be a little bit tricky, but I'm ready to do
13:22
Speaker 6: it because I liked what he was saying about all
13:24
Speaker 6: this anti war message and Ukraine and this and that,
13:30
Speaker 6: and then he kind of took a very very strange turn.
13:34
Speaker 6: And then I started seeing him with America's Rabbi Schmooley
13:40
Speaker 6: doing photo photo shoots, photo bombing, and all of a sudden,
13:44
Speaker 6: he just got very strange. And then you started hearing oh,
13:48
Speaker 6: he was on Epstein's plane twice and and everything starting
13:51
Speaker 6: falling apart. But I still thought, Okay, I'm not going
13:54
Speaker 6: to support him, and here he's being shortlisted for a
13:57
Speaker 6: cabinet position HHS. It's a harmless position. I mean, can
14:01
Speaker 6: anybody name an HSS secretary before RFK Junior?
14:05
Speaker 4: Anyone hands.
14:07
Speaker 6: That's where you want to send people when you want
14:09
Speaker 6: their political careers to die, You send them to the
14:12
Speaker 6: head of a government agency, which is what Trump has
14:15
Speaker 6: done very strategically. He's eliminated all potential challengers for twenty
14:20
Speaker 6: twenty eight, stuffed them into dead end cabinet positions where
14:23
Speaker 6: they'll be mired and scandal. That said, I really was
14:27
Speaker 6: disappointed when he got in front of the Senate confirmation
14:31
Speaker 6: hearings and they said, what do you think about the
14:33
Speaker 6: childhood vaccine schedule?
14:35
Speaker 4: And I was like, this is your moment.
14:37
Speaker 6: You know, this is actually what you've been fighting at
14:40
Speaker 6: Children's Health Defense for the last seven years, and of
14:43
Speaker 6: course he folded like a cheap deck chair in a
14:50
Speaker 6: three star hotel in Marbella or something like that.
14:53
Speaker 4: It was very bad.
14:54
Speaker 6: And then I thought to myself, Okay, so you're not
14:56
Speaker 6: going to defend that. But wait a minute, she's about
14:58
Speaker 6: to ask you about bird flu vaccine. I thought, Okay,
15:01
Speaker 6: this is his chance. He can really make amends here.
15:04
Speaker 6: And of course she challenged him directly. And this is
15:07
Speaker 6: a guy who said, why do we need a vaccine?
15:09
Speaker 6: Said this three years earlier, why do we need a
15:11
Speaker 6: vaccine for something that doesn't exist?
15:14
Speaker 4: And he said, I support a bird flu vaccine. And
15:17
Speaker 4: then I was just like no, please. So that was it.
15:20
Speaker 6: That's I really think. And everyone says, oh, he just
15:24
Speaker 6: needs to get in. I love this cope. Oh we
15:27
Speaker 6: just need to get in say the right things, and
15:29
Speaker 6: you can change it from the inside. Let me tell
15:32
Speaker 6: you something, if you studied Washington long enough, you'll know
15:36
Speaker 6: that that swamp will mold you.
15:38
Speaker 4: You don't mold the swamp.
15:39
Speaker 6: And he either come in there all guns blazing, start
15:42
Speaker 6: shooting and taking names, and then go out in a
15:45
Speaker 6: blaze of glory, and that then you become a change agent.
15:48
Speaker 6: You become a real influencer at that point, or you
15:51
Speaker 6: go in and try to make the system happy, and
15:54
Speaker 6: the system will then mold you.
15:56
Speaker 4: And that's a test.
15:57
Speaker 6: When you go in front of the Congress, they're testing
15:59
Speaker 6: you to see if you will comply. They'll see if
16:02
Speaker 6: you comply. And he complied, so he got the job.
16:05
Speaker 6: If he pushed back on any of those points, he
16:07
Speaker 6: probably he might have got destroyed in the press. It
16:10
Speaker 6: might have been a disaster. So that's the test, actually,
16:14
Speaker 6: and that's a bit of an initiation into that world,
16:19
Speaker 6: is how how much you will comply or not. And
16:22
Speaker 6: so he didn't. In my opinion, he did more on
16:25
Speaker 6: the outside than he'll ever do on the inside. That's
16:27
Speaker 6: just my personal opinion. I hope I'm wrong.
16:35
Speaker 1: Good, good question. Patrick's obviously undecided. No, neither Brian is
16:47
Speaker 1: with us. Happily this for him. I think, how do
16:51
Speaker 1: you keep family as the biggest influence on children's values
16:56
Speaker 1: given the concerted and multiple assaults on family bonds.
17:03
Speaker 9: That's a pretty easy question, isn't it, Because it requires
17:05
Speaker 9: mums and dads to do their job. And I'll just say,
17:15
Speaker 9: and I see this from the life experience of a
17:20
Speaker 9: father excuse me grandfather as well. But basically, looking back,
17:27
Speaker 9: you know, my children were educated via the school system,
17:30
Speaker 9: and there were some poor things emerged later on that
17:34
Speaker 9: were I was not very happy with. Would I school
17:39
Speaker 9: educate my children again? No, So I have huge respect
17:48
Speaker 9: for the families that have decided that, you know, mum
17:51
Speaker 9: and dad are going to educate their children. I think
17:54
Speaker 9: this is a very proper and brave statement. And this,
17:59
Speaker 9: to me is where the change starts. Because schooling, as
18:03
Speaker 9: in a school of fish, is all about taking the
18:05
Speaker 9: minds of young children and instilling in them the views
18:09
Speaker 9: and values not of the family, but of the state.
18:12
Speaker 9: And it's just obvious that this is happening at the moment,
18:16
Speaker 9: and I've got to be careful, you know what to say,
18:19
Speaker 9: because you talk families, it starts getting personal work. But
18:22
Speaker 9: I'll say within my wider family unit, I've heard people
18:25
Speaker 9: sort of just casually talking, well, you know what happens
18:28
Speaker 9: if little Joey wants to be a girl. So this
18:32
Speaker 9: agenda is now seek right into the hearts of families.
18:36
Speaker 9: And if you get parents who don't have the strength
18:40
Speaker 9: of character to stand up and say no, this filth
18:44
Speaker 9: is not coming into my family. Then you're losing. So
18:48
Speaker 9: it requires parents to stand up and be counted. And
18:51
Speaker 9: the other thing I'd like to say, and maybe there'll
18:53
Speaker 9: be a bit of pushback in the room, is it's
18:55
Speaker 9: certainly time for fathers to stand up to be counted,
19:04
Speaker 9: because you know, some of the other communities in UK,
19:10
Speaker 9: when you talk to them, they find it astonishing that
19:14
Speaker 9: somebody'd come along and grab your children and you wouldn't
19:17
Speaker 9: fight for those children. I mean fight, but here everybody's
19:22
Speaker 9: become a pussy basically in this area, so I'm looking
19:27
Speaker 9: at the dads. I've run a series for a while
19:30
Speaker 9: called Gutsy Women, and I felt obliged to do that
19:34
Speaker 9: because a lot of the people coming to speak to
19:36
Speaker 9: me about the loss of children to the state were women,
19:40
Speaker 9: and they were very gutsy women, and some of the
19:42
Speaker 9: things that they'd been through and done, I was amazed.
19:45
Speaker 9: And then you start to say, well, okay, where are
19:47
Speaker 9: the blokes And the reality is that a lot of
19:51
Speaker 9: blokes have been emasculated by the reframing agenda of the state,
19:59
Speaker 9: and you've got to we've got to what's the word,
20:02
Speaker 9: get the balls back all right, because this this lot
20:07
Speaker 9: of running all over us in the moment. And the
20:09
Speaker 9: main reason is because people are not saying no in
20:12
Speaker 9: the first instance, no not in my name, and then
20:15
Speaker 9: they're not standing up in a measured You've got to
20:19
Speaker 9: be measured because if you go in too hard, of course,
20:22
Speaker 9: the police, you know, they just need that as the excuse.
20:25
Speaker 9: So you've got to be calculating what you do. But
20:27
Speaker 9: you can still be very forceful by saying no, it's
20:32
Speaker 9: not happening. And so we've got to change the family unit.
20:36
Speaker 9: But the you know, we want the future, we've got
20:39
Speaker 9: to get controlled of the children. It's really simple.
20:43
Speaker 5: What's the question again?
20:48
Speaker 9: That is.
20:50
Speaker 1: The question specifically was how do you keep family as
20:54
Speaker 1: the biggest influence on children's values?
20:57
Speaker 4: Right?
20:57
Speaker 5: Given the concerned, don't put a phone in their hands
21:00
Speaker 5: the age of.
21:00
Speaker 1: Three or at any age, I might venture Mike, actually
21:13
Speaker 1: quick now that you've got microphone. How does UK column
21:16
Speaker 1: see its future because of the implications of the Online
21:18
Speaker 1: Safety Act slash offcompowers? Does it feel that its existence
21:22
Speaker 1: is threatened? And how would you deal with that threat?
21:26
Speaker 5: Is our existence threatened? Yes, as everybody that wants to
21:29
Speaker 5: speak out that is not mainstream media threatened?
21:33
Speaker 7: Yes?
21:34
Speaker 5: What are we going to do about it. We're going
21:36
Speaker 5: to start with YouTube and we're going to take them
21:38
Speaker 5: to court.
21:51
Speaker 1: Excellent, very very good question and of course a terrific answer,
21:57
Speaker 1: something we will look forward to talking to you more about,
21:59
Speaker 1: because that is a obviously a very very big, serious issue.
22:02
Speaker 1: Now I'm just fiddling through you to a question for Alex.
22:05
Speaker 1: Alex in your experience, how does dark Accult work through
22:10
Speaker 1: agencies like GCHQ and intelligence to control the nation.
22:17
Speaker 2: I got the shivers from some seniors. They're often the
22:21
Speaker 2: number two of an agency or an organization, the direct
22:26
Speaker 2: boss of Chris Steele, for example, when Steele was running
22:30
Speaker 2: the Russia effort at six, shall I out of courtesy? Yeah,
22:35
Speaker 2: I shall name him Nigel Inkster.
22:38
Speaker 3: So often the.
22:39
Speaker 2: Scott isn't it alas? But he was in the running
22:42
Speaker 2: to be the next see the next head of six
22:44
Speaker 2: in two thousand and nine, got passed over for the
22:47
Speaker 2: job and went into the private sector and started lobbying
22:49
Speaker 2: for wars to start. At a UK column event at
22:52
Speaker 2: Telford a decade ago, a distressed squad, he came up
22:56
Speaker 2: to Brian and me and said Inkster is a satan
22:59
Speaker 2: it and his job is to start Wars and gave
23:02
Speaker 2: me enough detail to persuade me that he was telling
23:04
Speaker 2: the truth. That Inkster had brought a bunch of British
23:08
Speaker 2: snipers no longer in regular service, to the front line
23:11
Speaker 2: in South Ossetia to lure the Georgians into a war
23:14
Speaker 2: with the Russians by starting the shooting for them. That
23:17
Speaker 2: was President Sakashvili brought to power by the Rose Revolution
23:19
Speaker 2: that I mentioned, which happened under our noses, and no
23:22
Speaker 2: one in the agencies knew anything about it, nor did
23:23
Speaker 2: the Americans know anything about it happening. It wasn't us
23:25
Speaker 2: playing the Americans off against each other. It's just these
23:28
Speaker 2: things happened. Yes, And there've been rumblings through the years
23:33
Speaker 2: about you know what secret societies have senior spooks on
23:37
Speaker 2: the list. You'll get them in every walk of life.
23:40
Speaker 2: I think that the main purpose they have is to
23:43
Speaker 2: funnel through information they have and then present it outside
23:47
Speaker 2: the service and after their service to others. So I
23:49
Speaker 2: mean during Trump one pat will recall, well, there were
23:52
Speaker 2: a number of claims and I could not say they
23:54
Speaker 2: were nonsense. That the contract, as I referred to in
23:57
Speaker 2: the part of the first part of my speech, like Boo,
23:59
Speaker 2: Adam Hamilton and many others who store nssay's data that
24:04
Speaker 2: the claim is that's the real goodies. And it got
24:06
Speaker 2: very heated during Trump one, with the Christeele Brigade saying
24:09
Speaker 2: these people are a national security threat and the opponents saying, no, no,
24:12
Speaker 2: it's just that we want to recapture American government from
24:15
Speaker 2: a largely British clique, as they would see it. But
24:17
Speaker 2: the claim there was that people with dark allegiances senior
24:22
Speaker 2: officers in the intelligence agencies, and I repeat again, they
24:25
Speaker 2: haven't sworn an oath unlike the American equivalent, were apparently
24:30
Speaker 2: colluding but possible. You know, the contractors are darker, I think,
24:35
Speaker 2: and the off sites also feel darker than the headquarters.
24:38
Speaker 2: I went to Men with Hill once, and you know
24:40
Speaker 2: that's a triple deception, that is because it's called RAF
24:44
Speaker 2: Men with Hill. The Royal Air Force, as far as
24:46
Speaker 2: I could see on my visit doesn't come into the
24:48
Speaker 2: main operations building at all. It's just there for the
24:50
Speaker 2: name the US Air Force. Likewise, NSA have more stay
24:55
Speaker 2: than GCHQ there. And when you go into the main
24:57
Speaker 2: operations room there's a daist at the end where the
24:59
Speaker 2: actual sat lights are controlled from no government staff British
25:02
Speaker 2: or American ascend that six inches. Only contractors are allowed
25:07
Speaker 2: to press those buttons, right, So I'm not saying contractors
25:10
Speaker 2: are Satanists. Don't run off with it there, But the
25:13
Speaker 2: two are in my head in the same mental brackets
25:16
Speaker 2: of the public services are there for show. And it's
25:20
Speaker 2: the question of what other allegiances do you have while
25:24
Speaker 2: you're there? There's probably a wooly answer, but the stuff's
25:28
Speaker 2: always there, and there are just common or garden nasty people,
25:31
Speaker 2: like the head of support to military operations in my
25:33
Speaker 2: day in that building over the road was Brian lord Go.
25:37
Speaker 2: And I was going to say, Google Bus, you'd say,
25:40
Speaker 2: use your preferred non discriminatory search engine to find out
25:44
Speaker 2: what Brian Laude did. He's a wife beater, quite a nasty,
25:47
Speaker 2: violent one, right, So he's put away for that. And
25:49
Speaker 2: there are a number of such people. And of course
25:51
Speaker 2: people say it's a large organization, you're always going to
25:54
Speaker 2: get that kind of thing. These guys always gravitate to
25:56
Speaker 2: the key posts, you know. At the radical solution to
26:00
Speaker 2: get rid of them is to remove those posts from existence,
26:04
Speaker 2: isn't it terrific?
26:07
Speaker 3: Alex thanks very much.
26:09
Speaker 1: No going on to well, I mean, I suppose related things,
26:14
Speaker 1: but I think this might be one for Ben. When
26:17
Speaker 1: you speak about the layers of the deep state and
26:19
Speaker 1: their organization, why does anyone speak about Masonic lodges and
26:23
Speaker 1: how secret societies influence these spheares. I think that there
26:28
Speaker 1: has been quite a lot of coverage of such things.
26:31
Speaker 1: But Ben, what's your take?
26:35
Speaker 3: That's a big question. We do talk about Masonic symbolism
26:40
Speaker 3: in a lot of our reporting. Actually, if I look
26:44
Speaker 3: at Tortoise Media for example, and a political foundation like
26:48
Speaker 3: some of these organizations that we've talked about over the
26:50
Speaker 3: past six months, we're often referencing Masonic symbolism and clandestine networks.
26:58
Speaker 3: And actually, I think that's what common purpose ultimately is.
27:00
Speaker 3: I think it's Mason control. That's my personal view on it.
27:04
Speaker 3: But some of the stuff that we're looking at at
27:06
Speaker 3: the moment, at a top level global level, in the stratosphere,
27:11
Speaker 3: like way way way above the Nation States, where the
27:15
Speaker 3: international rich convene and discuss their plans for humanity, what
27:21
Speaker 3: they're looking at is transformation, total transformation globally. Of the
27:28
Speaker 3: three pillars that I was talking about earlier, right, So
27:30
Speaker 3: I talked about the church, the market, and the state.
27:33
Speaker 3: So we're looking at people who are talking about a
27:35
Speaker 3: total transformation of the market, what they call capitalism. And
27:40
Speaker 3: there's a huge conversation, supposedly organic conversation happening out in
27:47
Speaker 3: the public at the moment about capitalism and the future
27:50
Speaker 3: capitalism and how it needs to change, and a lot
27:52
Speaker 3: of it, just like the occupy movement, is very much
27:54
Speaker 3: built on genuine concerns about the markets and what they've done. Yeah,
27:59
Speaker 3: and globalization in particular and the impact that that has
28:02
Speaker 3: had on the country, you know, but that desire that
28:08
Speaker 3: we're being driven towards essentially a fusing of the market
28:12
Speaker 3: in the state. So they're going to come together on
28:14
Speaker 3: the rights in the market, so they're going to become
28:19
Speaker 3: they're trying to socialize business. This is a lot of
28:21
Speaker 3: this language, and that's happening at the global level with
28:24
Speaker 3: things like ESG and the Sustainable Development Goals is going
28:27
Speaker 3: right the way down to small businesses so b corpse
28:30
Speaker 3: and social businesses and these new entities. Right, so they've
28:33
Speaker 3: got it right from the top all the way down
28:34
Speaker 3: to the bottom. On the market side, they're also looking
28:38
Speaker 3: to completely transform what they call democracy, which is government, right,
28:43
Speaker 3: the state. And when I think about democracy, I've used
28:45
Speaker 3: this term liberal democracy, which is we can do whatever
28:48
Speaker 3: we want if enough people go along with it. Right,
28:51
Speaker 3: that's what liberal democracy actually means. And that amounts to
28:55
Speaker 3: what alex has has described, where you've got supposedly publicly
28:59
Speaker 3: funded government entities, where the actual management layer, the power layer,
29:04
Speaker 3: is run by private corporations, which is kind of the
29:06
Speaker 3: inverse of what you're seeing on the other side. And
29:09
Speaker 3: it's all about coalescing power and profit into one place,
29:13
Speaker 3: this global platform. And then the final one, the transformation
29:17
Speaker 3: of the church. The way they talk about it is
29:19
Speaker 3: the transformation of humanity itself, right, and that's in two
29:23
Speaker 3: or three ways. Primarily, it's about fusing us with the technology,
29:30
Speaker 3: so actually we've become more than human in a way.
29:33
Speaker 3: It's the way they think about it, and ultimately that
29:35
Speaker 3: makes us easier to control because everything we're interfacing with
29:38
Speaker 3: reality through the technology. So that's a spiritual transformation of humanity.
29:44
Speaker 3: We no longer human were actually cyborgs, right, We've merged
29:46
Speaker 3: with the machinery. And then the other thing is this
29:50
Speaker 3: genetic engineering and this desire to take our genetic codes
29:55
Speaker 3: our DNA and to codify it and understand it an
30:00
Speaker 3: algorithmically trade on it. Ultimately, right, they building a marketplace
30:04
Speaker 3: and the control grid based on our genetic sequences, and
30:08
Speaker 3: that's the agenda of these secret societies. That's what they're doing. Ultimately.
30:14
Speaker 3: It's the way I see it. And part of the
30:16
Speaker 3: reason we don't maybe talk about it as much as
30:18
Speaker 3: some people would like is actually they are quite a
30:21
Speaker 3: pique and quite difficult to look at, and it's difficult
30:23
Speaker 3: to prove things, you know, so there's a lot of
30:26
Speaker 3: inference that has to be made. And when we talk
30:29
Speaker 3: on the news in particular, it's about things that we
30:31
Speaker 3: can very clearly demonstrate our true right. So venturing too
30:38
Speaker 3: much into that stuff. Certainly, in my short time with
30:41
Speaker 3: the column, I've only been doing this for about a
30:42
Speaker 3: year and a half has been less of a focus.
30:45
Speaker 3: But I think that will probably change.
30:53
Speaker 8: Yeah. Absolutely, Ben's Ben's kind of you know, put it
30:57
Speaker 8: all in a nutshell, and absolutely we we at the
31:00
Speaker 8: moment we the whole world is everything's being financialized. You know,
31:05
Speaker 8: we're finding the financialization of nature. With with the e
31:10
Speaker 8: s g s, every every small business and every every
31:15
Speaker 8: farmer are going to be you know, they're financializing, they're
31:18
Speaker 8: trying to capture the whole of nature and and that
31:23
Speaker 8: is a big, a big market. It's the greenwashing, you know,
31:26
Speaker 8: it's it's all the big banks really pushing into We've
31:30
Speaker 8: got all the you know which ultimately all the big
31:32
Speaker 8: big players here are owned by Vanguard, Black Rock and Stateside,
31:37
Speaker 8: and that's what we're looking at. We're looking at a
31:40
Speaker 8: massive corporatization of our entire world. So they want to
31:45
Speaker 8: own everything and and keep us poor, hungry and cold.
31:49
Speaker 8: And this is what what we really have to realize
31:51
Speaker 8: is that that they they they're they're aiming to do that,
31:55
Speaker 8: but they're falling back on everything they're doing. And I
31:59
Speaker 8: have to I have to say this to give us
32:00
Speaker 8: hope because it's because we have pushed back that they
32:04
Speaker 8: are behind in their agenda. I mean when I thank
32:07
Speaker 8: you when I look at the original original eight eight
32:13
Speaker 8: millennium goals in two thousand that they try to they
32:17
Speaker 8: from nineteen ninety two the Earth Summit, they tried to
32:20
Speaker 8: implement the eight millennium goals by two thousand. They wanted
32:23
Speaker 8: to be where we are now at the year two thousand,
32:26
Speaker 8: or the job done. It wasn't. They weren't able to
32:29
Speaker 8: do it. They had to accelerate it. They had to
32:31
Speaker 8: accelerate it with the seventeen goals. Now, if you look
32:35
Speaker 8: at the seventeen goals, I've just put up an interpretation
32:39
Speaker 8: of them on my website, Sandy Adams dot dot net.
32:43
Speaker 8: Do subscribe. But I just the whole thing is that
32:47
Speaker 8: we've got all these goals and they don't They're very sugarcoated.
32:51
Speaker 8: They look really good, but they are the trap that
32:55
Speaker 8: they want to really get us on board with, certainly
32:58
Speaker 8: with the AI. So the AI is is the problem,
33:01
Speaker 8: and the more we reject the AI, that's all we
33:04
Speaker 8: have to do is reject the AI.
33:06
Speaker 3: Yeah, we're venturing off tracks slightly from the question, but no,
33:14
Speaker 3: that's completely correct. Like the AI, where we were talking
33:16
Speaker 3: about the transformation of humanity, it's the artivist intelligence delivered
33:21
Speaker 3: through these devices that will facilitate that. So they are
33:25
Speaker 3: absolutely desperate to implement AI. They also are opining all
33:28
Speaker 3: their hopes on it. Because I said this quite a
33:33
Speaker 3: lot internally, right, But they actually they've tried to. They've
33:36
Speaker 3: embarked on a project that is impossible to deliver. They
33:39
Speaker 3: can't do what they're trying to do, it's not actually
33:42
Speaker 3: feasible to do it, and they are beginning to realize that.
33:46
Speaker 3: And you know, we often have to go on quite
33:49
Speaker 3: faint signals coming out of various different places in the system.
33:52
Speaker 3: But I've seen some communication coming down from top level
33:56
Speaker 3: in the past two days that tells me that they
33:59
Speaker 3: are absolutely scrabbling around, don't know what to do, terrified
34:04
Speaker 3: at the moment. And you know, it's great actually to see.
34:12
Speaker 8: I think they're realizing that we actually do have the power,
34:15
Speaker 8: if only we knew it. And it is a bit
34:17
Speaker 8: like the Wizard of Oz. It's like pulling back that
34:19
Speaker 8: curtain and seeing that there's some ridiculous person behind that
34:24
Speaker 8: curtain trying to seize our world, and we have the power.
34:29
Speaker 8: We just have to believe in, believe in ourselves, and
34:32
Speaker 8: go for it.
34:40
Speaker 9: I just want to is someone on I just wanted
34:42
Speaker 9: to say about freemasonry, because I think this is a
34:45
Speaker 9: really interesting question. Then I have to put the immediate
34:48
Speaker 9: caveats in. I'm not a Freemason. I have never been
34:51
Speaker 9: a free Mason to my knowledge, I'm not associated with
34:54
Speaker 9: free Masons. You've got to do this, because you know
34:57
Speaker 9: the backlash comes. But the do I personally believe that
35:02
Speaker 9: the Masonic movement has very considerable and dangerous power in
35:08
Speaker 9: this country, and we could say worldwide, Yes, I do.
35:12
Speaker 9: But the trouble with it is is that it's got
35:14
Speaker 9: a very glossy label on it, and it's dark and
35:17
Speaker 9: it's exciting, and the moment you start to point a finger,
35:21
Speaker 9: then people get taken into it, and it's that you know,
35:25
Speaker 9: it's the Freemasons. It's the Freemasons who's doing it. It's
35:28
Speaker 9: the Freemasons. And this takes you into mush. You can't
35:32
Speaker 9: actually get anywhere. And so for me, I'll try this analogy.
35:37
Speaker 9: It may fall flat, all right, but I've got an
35:40
Speaker 9: interest in radio appropriate with itc HQ. But if you
35:44
Speaker 9: look at a printed circuit board, it's got lots of
35:47
Speaker 9: these days, it's got lots of little minute components on it,
35:52
Speaker 9: and if there's a problem with that electronic circuit, it's
35:56
Speaker 9: very difficult to get into it in order to add
36:00
Speaker 9: lies what the fault is. Often where the fault is located,
36:04
Speaker 9: and the only way you can do it is by
36:07
Speaker 9: taking a section of the circuit and then you're testing
36:10
Speaker 9: what goes in and what comes out and if that works, well, okay,
36:15
Speaker 9: maybe the problems in that bit and you home in
36:17
Speaker 9: on it. So you solve a problem in a very
36:20
Speaker 9: complicated system by doing a series of little tests. And
36:25
Speaker 9: for me, you just cannot get into freemasonry and then say, well,
36:30
Speaker 9: this political decision has been made because of a Masonic
36:34
Speaker 9: meeting somewhere behind closed doors. We don't know where it is,
36:37
Speaker 9: and we i've got any minutes, but what we can
36:39
Speaker 9: see is where bad policy comes out, and that gives
36:45
Speaker 9: us a clue to the fact that something's wrong. But
36:47
Speaker 9: you can abandon the Masonic bit altogether, because we should
36:51
Speaker 9: be testing each individual and what they say and what
36:54
Speaker 9: they do. Are they honest, are they telling the truth?
36:57
Speaker 9: Are they coming out with policy which is better fitting society.
37:01
Speaker 9: If you test the individual, whatever else they're involved in,
37:06
Speaker 9: that that all drops to one side because if you
37:08
Speaker 9: discover the person's a liar, they're a liar and you
37:11
Speaker 9: can't trust them. So it doesn't matter whether they're a
37:13
Speaker 9: Freemason or not. They're a liar. So test the people
37:17
Speaker 9: don't get drawn into labels. Is one of the real
37:22
Speaker 9: weaknesses I think of our exciting fight back is that
37:27
Speaker 9: people get pulled into who the bad people are and
37:31
Speaker 9: they put a label on them. This is a mistake.
37:33
Speaker 9: Judge the person.
37:40
Speaker 1: Excellent, very good question. We've just got a couple of
37:43
Speaker 1: minutes left. We'll try and fit a couple more questions in,
37:46
Speaker 1: and I'm going to tweet one slightly in order to
37:47
Speaker 1: bring Diane in because she's been running several interviews specifically
37:52
Speaker 1: concentrating on education and the perversion of young minds via
37:57
Speaker 1: That means, so the question is about and we have
38:01
Speaker 1: obviously touched on it slightly, but about control through digitization,
38:06
Speaker 1: but particularly in the form of a mobile telephone dynamic.
38:08
Speaker 1: I just wonder, from what you've gleaned from those that
38:11
Speaker 1: you have spoken to, how is this sort of dreadful
38:17
Speaker 1: scourge kind of manifesting via specifically via these devices with
38:20
Speaker 1: children in an educational setting.
38:23
Speaker 4: Oh.
38:24
Speaker 7: I mean, I have inside experience of that from when
38:26
Speaker 7: I was at academic that there were and I have
38:29
Speaker 7: to admit that I was pulled into some research on
38:30
Speaker 7: this about how to make apps more addictive for young people.
38:36
Speaker 7: I participated in some of the research I was part
38:39
Speaker 7: of funding on. It was one of the things that
38:41
Speaker 7: I didn't feel comfortable about because I was like, why
38:43
Speaker 7: is this a good idea? You know, what do we
38:45
Speaker 7: know about young people and they're developing cognition of how
38:49
Speaker 7: this is going to impact how they see the world,
38:51
Speaker 7: what they do with their time, how they experience reality,
38:54
Speaker 7: and how many of us can be out nowadays in
38:57
Speaker 7: a restaurant and we see these children staring at devices.
39:00
Speaker 7: They're not talking to their siblings, they're not talking to
39:03
Speaker 7: their parents, They're looking at their phones, right, And so
39:05
Speaker 7: we don't really understand at this point, Well, we know
39:08
Speaker 7: that it's not good, but we also don't understand the
39:12
Speaker 7: overall impact. And also as well, the contents are difficult
39:16
Speaker 7: to manage. So back when I started as a librarian
39:19
Speaker 7: twenty five years ago, we had concerns about Internet searching
39:23
Speaker 7: and the filters never worked well. While they tried to
39:26
Speaker 7: implement that in public libraries wouldn't say, well, so if
39:30
Speaker 7: you type the word breast cancer into a search engine,
39:33
Speaker 7: but what comes up?
39:34
Speaker 4: You know?
39:35
Speaker 7: So they would they would legitimate searches would would be blocked,
39:38
Speaker 7: so they couldn't actually get to actual information that wasn't
39:41
Speaker 7: necessarily pornographic or whatever.
39:43
Speaker 4: But it was.
39:44
Speaker 7: It never worked, It has never worked, and it never
39:46
Speaker 7: will work, and again it goes back to what Brian
39:48
Speaker 7: was saying about we have to involve the parents. You
39:51
Speaker 7: can't just give children a phone and expect them to
39:54
Speaker 7: entertain themselves and expect that they're going to be able
39:57
Speaker 7: to integrate into the world. I already see it in students.
40:00
Speaker 7: You know, before I left universities over the lockdown period,
40:04
Speaker 7: These children, these young people, they were locked in their
40:06
Speaker 7: rooms watching zoom calls and YouTube videos. They weren't in class.
40:10
Speaker 7: They were now being young people getting in trouble going
40:13
Speaker 7: to pubs the way we did. They weren't doing any
40:16
Speaker 7: of that. They were locked and attached to screens. And
40:20
Speaker 7: the other thing as well, is that I think I
40:22
Speaker 7: might have said this before in the news, but COVID
40:24
Speaker 7: would not have happened the way it happened. If it
40:26
Speaker 7: had happened twenty years prior, we wouldn't have had the phones,
40:30
Speaker 7: we wouldn't have had all the Wi Fi, we wouldn't
40:33
Speaker 7: have had the ability to stay at home, order from Amazon,
40:36
Speaker 7: get all of our groceries delivered through our apps. Because
40:39
Speaker 7: the technology, well, if it was there, it wasn't rolled
40:42
Speaker 7: out to the public yet, right. But that's the reality
40:44
Speaker 7: that the children of today's world know now. And what
40:47
Speaker 7: scares me is if we ever beat this, when we
40:50
Speaker 7: go back into twenty years into the future, will they'd
40:53
Speaker 7: be able to function the way we do today? And
40:54
Speaker 7: I'm afraid that the answer is no, unless we continue
40:57
Speaker 7: to push back and take those things out of their
40:59
Speaker 7: hands until they're old.
41:05
Speaker 3: Accident Charles guys jump into that. I actually don't think
41:10
Speaker 3: that adults should be using phones either. You have to
41:16
Speaker 3: understand there's two things about that, right, So you asked
41:19
Speaker 3: to do some academic research. What why have you got
41:25
Speaker 3: two phones? Okay?
41:29
Speaker 7: Property, that's the property, do you see, HQ Alex.
41:35
Speaker 3: You asked to take part in some research about increasing
41:38
Speaker 3: usage of the fund. Yeah, well that's the entire business
41:41
Speaker 3: model of the whole big tech addiction. It's addiction exactly.
41:44
Speaker 3: So you're basically looking at I think of it like
41:47
Speaker 3: a drug cartel, right, So the Mexican cartels they want
41:50
Speaker 3: as many people taking as many of the most addictive
41:53
Speaker 3: drugs as possible. It's exactly the same thing with the
41:55
Speaker 3: tech companies. And actually there's there's been a big again
41:58
Speaker 3: very well shepherded movement recently in people my kind of generation,
42:04
Speaker 3: so sort of millennial parents who are looking at their
42:06
Speaker 3: children and going, hang the minute, this isn't good. And
42:09
Speaker 3: then the BBC and the government have swept in and gone, yes,
42:12
Speaker 3: we agree, it's really not good. So we're gonna we're
42:14
Speaker 3: gonna decide on we're going to try and ban phone
42:18
Speaker 3: usage until the sixteen. And it's like saying, well, you're
42:21
Speaker 3: not gonna be able to smoke crack until you're sixteen,
42:24
Speaker 3: so you shouldn't be smoking crack, right, Like, it's that's
42:28
Speaker 3: the line we should be taking with that, And actually
42:30
Speaker 3: the same history for all of us. I think my
42:32
Speaker 3: personal view is that we probably peaked in technological terms
42:36
Speaker 3: sometime in the nineties, right, And actually that's probably about
42:39
Speaker 3: right in terms of internet usage, computer capacity where the
42:43
Speaker 3: internet was, you know, because it was useful, but now
42:45
Speaker 3: it's just so all consuming that it's destructive to humanity,
42:51
Speaker 3: you know, and they're trying to use it to transform
42:54
Speaker 3: us and subjugate us. And why would you let them
42:58
Speaker 3: continue with that?
42:59
Speaker 2: Toto your podcast, At the risk of getting a severe
43:04
Speaker 2: look from a guardsman, I will give a one sentence edition.
43:09
Speaker 2: There are sometimes uses in having lots of different gadgets,
43:11
Speaker 2: like all the things in my pocket. I got detained
43:14
Speaker 2: and divn a schedule seven terrorism whatnot search at Glasgow
43:20
Speaker 2: Airport last to August, and I think I had three laptops,
43:24
Speaker 2: four mobiles, five E readers. Had to write down the
43:27
Speaker 2: passwords to all of them and Police Scotland took them
43:30
Speaker 2: all away. This gave me plenty of time to tell
43:33
Speaker 2: the specialist interviewing officers why I got into GHQ work
43:38
Speaker 2: and who in his chain of command was a Satanist
43:40
Speaker 2: ritual abuser and he had to write it all down.
43:46
Speaker 2: And I finished off by saying the former head of
43:50
Speaker 2: the Scottish legal world, actually Lord Hardy before SNP days.
43:55
Speaker 2: This was it was the first labor Guide under Devolution
43:58
Speaker 2: is named by Sheriff John Hallett. The book available for
44:01
Speaker 2: free on Kindle unlimited. As a child abuser and child
44:04
Speaker 2: pimp and you don't seem to know about it, mister
44:07
Speaker 2: so fifteen so cordially shook my hand and almost personally
44:11
Speaker 2: escorted me to the bus and said I was doing
44:13
Speaker 2: good work, terrific.
44:20
Speaker 1: An excellent note, if fraternalizing one to end that session
44:23
Speaker 1: on Alex, thank you very much, Thank you all to
44:26
Speaker 1: those of you who did provide the many many questions
44:29
Speaker 1: that we received and were able to go through, and
44:31
Speaker 1: the fantastic thing is you just never know where the
44:33
Speaker 1: answer is going to go. So I hope that was
44:35
Speaker 1: as enjoyable for all of you as it was for me.
44:37
Speaker 1: That's terrific. Thank you very much. Indeed, now we are
44:41
Speaker 1: stopping there for this session and then we've got fifteen
44:44
Speaker 1: minutes and then we welcome Patrick back to the stage,
44:47
Speaker 1: so back at half past please, thank you very much.
44:52
Speaker 1: The UK Column Panel