Latest / Reformed Thinking / Ears to Hear: Assonance and the Sound of Scripture in the English Bible

Transcript

Ears to Hear: Assonance and the Sound of Scripture in the English Bible · Reformed Thinking

• 0:00
  Reformed thinking. Welcome to this deep dive.
• 0:02
  Today we're going to do something a little different.
• 0:04
  We're stepping away for a moment from pure doctrine or church
• 0:07
  history. We're going to be looking at
• 0:09
  something more linguistic, more about the physical nature of the
• 0:12
  English Bible as it actually, you know, hit the ear.
• 0:15
  Our source material for this is all about a literary device.
• 0:18
  It's a subtle one called Athens. And it seems that this device
• 0:21
  has been quietly shaping how we hear and how we remember
• 0:24
  theological truth in English for a very long time.
• 0:27
  Think about it. So many of the Bible verses that
• 0:29
  are just lodged in your memory, the first verse of Genesis,
• 0:31
  Psalm 23, key lines from Romans, they don't just state a fact,
• 0:35
  they they resonate. They have a kind of grip on you,
• 0:37
  sometimes even before you fully parse the theology.
• 0:41
  So the question for us today is, well, how does the sound of our
• 0:44
  Bibles, the specific music of the vowels, how does that shape
• 0:47
  our reception of the word itself?
• 0:49
  Our mission is to try and understand how these sound
• 0:51
  patterns affect memory and emotional tone, and maybe even
• 0:54
  how we perceive theological ideas, especially within the
• 0:57
  great tradition of English translations.
• 0:58
  But. And this is key.
• 0:59
  We're doing this while holding absolutely firm to the primary
• 1:02
  value, which is fidelity to the inspired original texts.
• 1:06
  And the main concept we're going to be digging into is called
• 1:08
  assets. It's simply the repetition of
• 1:11
  similar vowel sounds in words that are close to each other.
• 1:14
  A classic example would be the A sound in By Grace.
• 1:17
  You have been saved through faith.
• 1:19
  And this is such an important conversation, especially for us
• 1:22
  from our confessional standpoint.
• 1:24
  Scripture isn't a textbook. It's not designed just for
• 1:27
  silent study in a library. It's a spoken word.
• 1:29
  It's meant to be heard. You just have to think of
• 1:31
  Nehemiah 8 with the public reading of the law, or even more
• 1:34
  clearly, Romans 10. Faith comes by hearing the Bible
• 1:37
  is an auditory book, you know, it's designed for our ears.
• 1:41
  So the core idea and the sources we're looking at is that
• 1:44
  assonance, particularly in that main historic stream of
• 1:47
  translations, Tyndale, the King James, all the way to the ESV,
• 1:51
  that this device has been maybe unconsciously helping English
• 1:54
  speakers remember Scripture, setting the emotional tone and
• 1:57
  even reinforcing theological connections.
• 2:00
  But we have to say this right at the top.
• 2:01
  This is the crucial caveat. All of this attention to sound,
• 2:04
  this linguistic beauty, it must always, always be secondary to
• 2:07
  the main man, which is fidelity. Our confession is clear.
• 2:10
  The authority is in the inspired Hebrew and Greek.
• 2:13
  The sound is a gift, but the original text is the standard.
• 2:16
  OK, so let's unpack that. This idea of hidden music, Yeah.
• 2:19
  How does Aspenence actually work and why is it so often, you
• 2:24
  know, hidden? Why don't we notice it all the
• 2:26
  time? That's the whole point of it,
• 2:27
  really. It's effective because it's
• 2:29
  subtle. So the definition is the
• 2:31
  repetition of similar vowel sounds in nearby syllables.
• 2:35
  But, and this is the key part, the consonants around them are
• 2:39
  different. So you're hearing an echo, but
• 2:41
  it's just the vowel, the core of the word.
• 2:44
  Right, so it's not like alliteration, which is super
• 2:46
  obvious, you know, Blessed be the God and Father.
• 2:48
  You can't miss the B sounds. Exactly.
• 2:50
  That's on the surface, and it's definitely not full rhyme where
• 2:54
  the vowel and the final consonant match.
• 2:57
  That can sound a bit sing songy and prose, which translators
• 3:01
  usually want to avoid. So Asinus is sort of in the
• 3:03
  middle. It's quieter.
• 3:04
  It is. It works just beneath your
• 3:06
  conscious attention. Your ear picks up on the
• 3:08
  pattern, but your brain isn't forced to stop and analyze it.
• 3:11
  It just creates a feeling of of flow.
• 3:14
  The sources get into the physics of this, which I found
• 3:16
  fascinating. It's not just an aesthetic
• 3:18
  choice, it's about how we literally form sounds with our
• 3:21
  mouths. Yes, exactly.
• 3:23
  The whole science of phonetics explains why it's so effective.
• 3:27
  The main difference between vowel sounds is just the shape
• 3:29
  of your mouth, where your tongue is, how round your lips are.
• 3:32
  Your mouth is a resonance chamber.
• 3:34
  So when you have a series of words with similar vowels,
• 3:36
  you're not having to change that mouth shape very much.
• 3:38
  It puts less strain on your vocal cords, your breathing is
• 3:41
  more consistent, and that vocal continuity is what we hear as
• 3:45
  smoothness as music. So because it's easier to say,
• 3:49
  it sounds better to hear, it feels less, I don't know,
• 3:53
  jagged? That's it, precisely.
• 3:55
  And that leads to the first big function of just creating
• 3:58
  musicality. Language with these recurring
• 4:01
  vowels is just easier to listen to.
• 4:02
  It's more harmonious. Even if the congregation isn't
• 4:05
  sitting there counting the vowel sounds, the overall effect is
• 4:08
  smoother, which is a huge help for public reading and
• 4:10
  recitation. And the second function, which
• 4:12
  is so critical for scripture, is about cohesion, about memory.
• 4:17
  How does repeating a vowel sound help tie words together in our
• 4:20
  minds? Well, our brains are pattern
• 4:22
  making machines and words that sound alike, they just seem to
• 4:25
  belong together. It's intuitive.
• 4:27
  So this auditory grouping creates these little clusters or
• 4:31
  chains in your memory. So for instance, if a sentence
• 4:34
  has three keywords that all share the same oh sound, your
• 4:38
  memory sort of lumps them together, even if the ideas are
• 4:41
  distinct. But in the Bible, the words are
• 4:43
  often theologically linked, so the sound just reinforces that
• 4:46
  link. So it's the phrase like grace,
• 4:49
  faith, and save. The shared a sound ties them
• 4:53
  together in your ear even before your mind has fully unpacked the
• 4:56
  doctrine. The ear gets there first.
• 4:57
  It's a powerful mnemonic device. And then there's the third
• 5:00
  function, which is maybe the most subtle of all coloring the
• 5:03
  mood or the emotional tone. How can a vowel sound feel heavy
• 5:07
  or light? It comes back to the physical
• 5:09
  act of making the sound. The type of vowel we use seems
• 5:13
  to be linked to certain emotional registers based on how
• 5:16
  open or closed our mouths are. So think about long open vowels,
• 5:20
  the O in woe or the ay in awe. To make those sounds, your mouth
• 5:25
  has to be wide and round. The resonance is often deeper.
• 5:29
  You know in your chest that physical production just
• 5:31
  naturally lends itself to conveying things like solemnity
• 5:35
  or gravity or something grand. It literally takes more breath,
• 5:38
  more effort to make that sound. It does, and on the flip side,
• 5:41
  you have short or sharp or what linguists call high front vowels
• 5:46
  like the I in quick or the long E in meek.
• 5:49
  For those your mouth is tighter, the sound is produced more at
• 5:52
  the front. They feel faster and more
• 5:53
  precise. Right, they can feel quick or
• 5:55
  tighter cutting. So there's a world of difference
• 5:58
  between the heavier sound of judgement and the ladies sound
• 6:00
  of comfort, and in good translations, that's often not
• 6:03
  an accident. So if Scripture is meant to be
• 6:06
  heard and recited, all of this becomes incredibly practical.
• 6:09
  It's what makes the text stick. It is.
• 6:11
  When a passage shares that vowel music, the listener's ear learns
• 6:15
  the pattern very quickly. It creates a kind of acoustic
• 6:17
  expectation. When you hear the first part of
• 6:20
  a phrase, you almost half expect the sound of the next part
• 6:23
  before it's even spoken. And that anticipation is a
• 6:26
  massive aid to communal memory. Let's shift gears a bit and talk
• 6:30
  about the history. How did this particular sound
• 6:32
  come to shape the English church?
• 6:34
  Because we're really focusing on one specific line of
• 6:36
  translations, the Tyndale KJV tradition.
• 6:40
  This KJV stream, as it's often called, running from Tyndale
• 6:43
  through the King James and onto modern versions like the ESV.
• 6:46
  It represents this very specific, very durable tradition
• 6:49
  in Bible translation. And you just have to start with
• 6:52
  William Tyndale in the early 1500s.
• 6:54
  I mean, we've really can't talk about the sound of the English
• 6:57
  Bible without him. Before Tyndale, a lot of English
• 7:00
  prose was frankly clumsy. It was very Latin.
• 7:03
  It very difficult to say out loud.
• 7:05
  Tyndale's genius was twofold. Of course.
• 7:08
  He was a brilliant scholar, working directly from the Hebrew
• 7:11
  and Greek. But his real gift, his
• 7:13
  revolutionary contribution, was his instinctive feel for English
• 7:17
  rhythm. He deliberately chose short,
• 7:19
  strong Anglo-Saxon words over the longer Latin ones.
• 7:23
  He wanted words that just fell off the tongue naturally.
• 7:26
  He was crafting a language for the common person's.
• 7:28
  Was he set the idiom, he set the cadence that in many ways we
• 7:32
  still use 500 years later. Can you give an example of that
• 7:35
  kind of choice he made? A classic one is his choice of
• 7:38
  words for repentance. He avoided the Latin based word
• 7:40
  penitence which had all these associations with the
• 7:43
  institutional, church and formal acts.
• 7:45
  He chose the simple, direct Anglo-Saxon word repent.
• 7:48
  It's not just a theological shift, it's a Sonic shift.
• 7:51
  It's crisp, It's personal. It's a sound that's fit for a
• 7:54
  sermon, not just a scholarly text.
• 7:56
  And the King James Version in 1611, they weren't starting from
• 7:59
  a blank slate. They were essentially polishing
• 8:02
  Tyndale's work. Oh, absolutely.
• 8:04
  The KJV was commissioned with public reading in mind for the
• 8:07
  pulpit. The translators openly said they
• 8:09
  were building on the work that came before them.
• 8:12
  They refined Tyndale's rhythm and created what we now call the
• 8:15
  Majestic style. It's characterized by those
• 8:18
  balanced clauses, the parallelism, and a very
• 8:21
  strategic use of sound assonance and alliteration to give the
• 8:25
  text a real sense of weight and make it easier to memorize.
• 8:28
  I mean, you can hear it right from the beginning.
• 8:30
  In the beginning, God created the heaven and the earth.
• 8:32
  The rhythm is just perfect. It's balanced.
• 8:35
  It's declarative. And that's almost pure Tyndale.
• 8:38
  The KJV translators knew not to mess with it.
• 8:40
  They mastered that kind of balanced phrasing, which creates
• 8:43
  a Sonic stability and makes it predictable and satisfying to
• 8:47
  the ear. So methodologically, this whole
• 8:49
  tradition is based on what's called formal equivalence.
• 8:52
  And for our listeners who are thinking confessionally, it's
• 8:55
  worth explaining why sticking to the originals form is so
• 8:58
  connected to preserving its music and meaning.
• 9:01
  Formal equivalence is the approach where the translator
• 9:04
  tries to follow the form of the original language, the Hebrew or
• 9:07
  Greek, as closely as possible. The vocabulary, the grammar, the
• 9:12
  sentence structure. You try to replicate it in
• 9:14
  English as long as it's still clear.
• 9:16
  And the reason for this in our tradition is theological.
• 9:20
  It comes from the conviction that the Holy Spirit inspired
• 9:23
  the very words and structures that the original authors used.
• 9:26
  So a sentence is in the passive voice in Greek.
• 9:29
  A formal equivalent translation will try to keep it passive in
• 9:32
  English, because that structure itself might be theologically
• 9:35
  significant. And in doing that, in trying to
• 9:38
  preserve the structure, they also end up preserving the
• 9:41
  traditional vocabulary where so much of this assonance lives.
• 9:44
  That's the key. The later translations in this
• 9:46
  line, the revised version, the ASV, the RSV, and more recently
• 9:50
  the ESV, they were all consciously tricked to stay in
• 9:53
  this tradition. They wanted to be more accurate,
• 9:56
  based on better manuscripts. But the deliberately kept much
• 9:58
  of the KJ VS vocabulary and, crucially, its cadence.
• 10:03
  The effect on the church? You really can't overstate it.
• 10:07
  The KJV became, as one source put it, the tuning fork for
• 10:10
  English religious language. It really did.
• 10:13
  For more than 300 years it was the sound of the Bible in
• 10:16
  English. It's rhythms made it possible
• 10:18
  for generations of children and adults to memorize huge portions
• 10:22
  of scripture. That shared acoustic world is a
• 10:25
  powerful thing. It ties the sound of the words
• 10:29
  themselves to a sense of reverence, which brings up this
• 10:32
  interesting trade off for modern translators in that same
• 10:35
  tradition. On one hand, accuracy is
• 10:38
  everything, but on the other, they're often very careful to
• 10:41
  keep the traditional music in famous passages because those
• 10:44
  sounds already live in the hearts and minds of believers.
• 10:48
  Preserving that familiar sound is seen as a pastoral good, as
• 10:51
  long as it doesn't twist the meaning.
• 10:53
  OK, this is where it gets really practical.
• 10:55
  Let's dig into some specific examples from the Bible and see
• 10:58
  how these vowel sounds are actually working to reinforce
• 11:00
  the meaning. Let's start with what we were
• 11:02
  talking about before coloring emotional tone.
• 11:04
  Let's go back to Isaiah chapter 5 with that series of woes.
• 11:08
  How does the sound there really drive home the feeling of
• 11:10
  judgement? OK, so you have the line.
• 11:13
  Woe unto them that call evil good and good evil.
• 11:16
  The sound that just dominates that phrase is the heavy O and
• 11:19
  oh you hear it and row unto and good.
• 11:22
  Phonetically. The long O is a back vowel.
• 11:26
  You round your lips, your tongue is far back in your mouth.
• 11:29
  It creates a very open space, so the sound resonates deep in your
• 11:33
  vocal tract. That's a low frequency guttural
• 11:36
  sound. So when you say whoa, it's
• 11:37
  naturally a long, heavy sound. Repeating it is like a verbal
• 11:41
  hammer blow. It slows you down.
• 11:43
  You can't just rush through that warning.
• 11:45
  You're forced to feel the weight of what's being said.
• 11:47
  Exactly. It creates this palpable sense
• 11:49
  of dread, of inevitability. The sound itself fits the
• 11:53
  message. Now if a modern translation
• 11:55
  changes that to say ah, those who you've kept meaning but the
• 11:59
  sound is completely changed, you've gone from a deep round O
• 12:01
  to a light quick. And the Sonic weed of the
• 12:04
  judgement is just gone. It's softened absolutely.
• 12:07
  The warning doesn't land with the same acoustic force.
• 12:10
  Now let's do a complete reversal.
• 12:11
  Let's go to Psalm 23. Rest and comfort.
• 12:15
  The whole atmosphere changes. The contrast is immediate.
• 12:18
  Look at the traditional rendering.
• 12:20
  He maketh me to lie down in green pastures.
• 12:23
  What do you hear there? It's dominated by high front
• 12:25
  vowels. The long E sound in he me green.
• 12:30
  Even the long A in maketh is a relatively high vowel.
• 12:33
  These are all sounds you make with your tongue high and
• 12:35
  forward in your mouth. They feel.
• 12:37
  Lighter, they take less effort to say.
• 12:38
  Right. And when you string them
• 12:40
  together like that, it creates the smooth, gentle gliding
• 12:43
  sound. It feels unhurried.
• 12:45
  The sound itself mirrors the theological idea of rest, of
• 12:48
  safety. Green pastures doesn't just
• 12:51
  describe a peaceful place. The phrase itself sounds
• 12:54
  peaceful. It's an acoustic icon of rest.
• 12:56
  So we have the heavy O for judgement and the light E for
• 12:58
  comfort. What about a command?
• 13:01
  Something quick and declarative. That's a great question.
• 13:03
  Look at first Peter 1.16. Be ye holy, for I am holy.
• 13:07
  The assonance there is really tight.
• 13:09
  It's all built around that long E sound and being ye.
• 13:12
  A command needs to be crisp, it needs to be precise.
• 13:14
  And these high front vowels are phonetically very efficient.
• 13:18
  They don't invite you to linger on them, they demand attention.
• 13:21
  The found is as sharp and direct as the command itself.
• 13:24
  OK, so let's move from tone to memory.
• 13:26
  How does assonance work as a tool for aiding memory and
• 13:29
  cohesion, especially in the really dense doctrinal parts of
• 13:34
  the Bible? This is where it's a huge help.
• 13:36
  Think about the opening of Ephesians one where Paul is just
• 13:39
  piling on all these spiritual blessings.
• 13:41
  Assonance helps the listener organize all that information.
• 13:45
  In that chapter you'll find words like praise, grace, and
• 13:48
  save often appearing near each other, all sharing that long a
• 13:53
  sound. In the same way, glory and God
• 13:55
  are a natural pair, not just in meaning, but in their sound, the
• 13:59
  open O and the hard G. So your ears starts to group
• 14:01
  them together. Grace, praise, glory, God.
• 14:05
  They sound like they belong in the same category.
• 14:07
  The sound becomes a kind of auditory footnote, reminding you
• 14:10
  that these concepts are all connected.
• 14:12
  For anyone trying to memorize that chapter, those sound links
• 14:14
  are incredible help. And that leads right into this
• 14:17
  idea of communal and lifelong anchors.
• 14:19
  There are just some short verses that everyone knows that seem to
• 14:21
  get stuck in our heads so easily.
• 14:23
  And it's often because of their oral shade.
• 14:25
  They are easy to say. The vowels just roll off the
• 14:28
  tongue. Those short, very assonant lines
• 14:30
  are the ones that lodge themselves in our memory for
• 14:33
  life. Let's go back to the Lord is my
• 14:35
  shepherd. I shall not want.
• 14:37
  The vowel sequence there is just incredibly smooth, the long E
• 14:40
  and shepherd, the open O and Lord.
• 14:42
  It's almost effortless to say that line.
• 14:44
  And because it's so easy to produce, it becomes easy to
• 14:47
  repeat and easy to remember. It becomes an anchor because it
• 14:50
  feels so natural in our mouths. And what about in corporate
• 14:53
  worship, the use of chant like refrains like in Psalm 136?
• 14:56
  Psalm 136 is designed for call and response.
• 14:59
  The congregation repeats the same refrain 26 times.
• 15:03
  In the KJV tradition, that refrain is for his mercy
• 15:06
  endureth forever. Now the repetition is obviously
• 15:09
  the main point, but the sound of the phrase is what makes it work
• 15:12
  so well in church. The rhythm is steady and you
• 15:14
  have those opener vowels and mercy, endureth and ever that
• 15:18
  creates this consistent, almost humming sound.
• 15:21
  So the congregation can lock into it.
• 15:23
  They can lock in. They don't even have to think
• 15:24
  about the words after the first few times.
• 15:26
  They anticipate the vowel pattern and that makes it so
• 15:29
  easy for everyone to join in, and it burns that phrase into
• 15:32
  the collective memory of the Church.
• 15:34
  But that's the perfect transition to the next and maybe
• 15:36
  most important part of this conversation.
• 15:39
  What happens when that beloved, memorable sound runs up against
• 15:43
  the need for greater accuracy? We've established how powerful
• 15:47
  the sound is, how useful it is for memory and worship, but now
• 15:50
  we have to face the issue of authority for the translator.
• 15:54
  What is the supreme ultimate authority?
• 15:57
  Well, the answer for us in the Reformed tradition is clear and
• 15:59
  it's non negotiable. The authority lies with the
• 16:02
  original Scriptures, as they were immediately inspired by the
• 16:04
  Holy Spirit. In the original languages.
• 16:07
  That means Hebrew and Aramaic for the Old Testament and Greek
• 16:09
  for the new. Those original documents, the
• 16:11
  autographs, are the standard. Our confession says that's where
• 16:15
  we go to settle all controversies.
• 16:17
  The English translation is a witness to that standard, but
• 16:19
  it's not the standard itself. So that sets up the supreme
• 16:22
  demand for the translator, any stylistic choice in English.
• 16:26
  The rhythm, the assonance, all of it is secondary.
• 16:29
  It has to be subordinate to fidelity to the meeting of the
• 16:32
  original Hebrew and Greek. Right, and it's important we
• 16:35
  understand why. First, the authority of our
• 16:37
  English Bible comes from how accurately it reflects what God
• 16:39
  actually said through the original writers, not from how
• 16:42
  beautiful the English sounds. Second, assonance is a feature
• 16:45
  of form, not doctrine. It can carry meaning, but it
• 16:49
  can't create it. If a beautiful sounding phrase
• 16:52
  actually misrepresents the original text, it has to go.
• 16:56
  And 3rd, just on a practical level, translators have a moral
• 16:59
  duty to be as clear as possible for the average reader.
• 17:02
  You can't let a love for literary style obscure the
• 17:04
  meaning. This is where the tension is so
• 17:06
  clear. Let's go back to that Psalm 136
• 17:08
  refrain to see this conflict in action.
• 17:10
  The traditional KJV phrase for His mercy endureth forever is
• 17:15
  beautiful. It's musical, it's memorable.
• 17:17
  But modern scholarship tells us the Hebrew word there is
• 17:19
  cheesed. And cheesed is such a rich word.
• 17:22
  It doesn't just mean mercy in a general sense, it means a
• 17:25
  specific covenantal loyalty. It's God's faithful, loving
• 17:28
  kindness to his people even when they don't deserve it.
• 17:31
  It's active and reliable. So because of that, most modern
• 17:35
  formal translations like the ESV have moved to for his steadfast
• 17:40
  love endures forever. The phrase steadfast love just
• 17:44
  captures that specific covenantal meaning of cheesed
• 17:46
  much more accurately. So there's the choice for the
• 17:49
  translator. Do you keep the familiar,
• 17:50
  musical, easily chanted mercy endureth forever?
• 17:54
  Or do you switch to the more theologically precise, lexically
• 17:57
  accurate, steadfast Love Endures forever?
• 18:00
  And in this tradition, they almost always choose fidelity.
• 18:03
  And while Steadfast love is a wonderful and rich phrase, it
• 18:05
  completely changes the rhythm. It breaks the old cadence.
• 18:08
  You lose that automatic chant like quality from the KJV's open
• 18:12
  air vowels. The communal anchor gets moved,
• 18:14
  all for the sake of being more precise about God's covenant
• 18:17
  loyalty. So the guardrail is pretty
• 18:19
  clear. A translator should never hold
• 18:21
  on to a beloved musical phrase if it's genuinely misleading
• 18:25
  people about what the original text meant.
• 18:27
  You can't chase a nice sound at the expense of the truth.
• 18:31
  And that's the resolution. Assonance is a servant of the
• 18:34
  truth. It is never the master.
• 18:36
  It's a wonderful gift that helps communicate the truth, but it's
• 18:39
  not the source of the truth itself.
• 18:41
  What this does though, is it elevates assonance to a
• 18:44
  legitimate secondary criterion. And this is really important.
• 18:48
  When a translator is choosing between 2 English phrases that
• 18:51
  are equally faithful and equally clear, they both capture the
• 18:55
  meaning of the original, then it is totally appropriate, I would
• 18:58
  say even wise, to choose the one that sounds better, the one that
• 19:02
  lends itself to public reading and memorization because of its
• 19:05
  rhythm and its sound. That makes a lot of sense.
• 19:07
  It's pastoral choice, but it's made within the strict
• 19:09
  boundaries of fidelity. Exactly.
• 19:12
  I think this attention to sound reminds us that God in His
• 19:15
  Providence has given us the English Bible in a form that
• 19:18
  doesn't just inform our minds, it also shapes our ears for
• 19:21
  reverence and for recall. The truth is primary, but it
• 19:24
  often comes wrapped in a fitting music.
• 19:26
  This has really opened up a new way of listening to Scripture
• 19:28
  for me. The subtle mechanics of how the
• 19:31
  language works are just so much more powerful than I think we
• 19:33
  realize. So to sort of wrap this all up,
• 19:36
  what we've seen is that Asinus, this subtle repetition of vowel
• 19:39
  sounds, has played this quiet but really significant role in
• 19:43
  the great tradition of the English Bible.
• 19:45
  It gives comfort to Psalms. It gives weight to judgement, it
• 19:47
  gives cohesion to doctrine, and it does all this while staying
• 19:50
  strictly within the guardrails of fidelity to the original
• 19:54
  languages. I think the practical take away
• 19:56
  for you as you listen is just this.
• 19:58
  Remember that Scripture is a spoken word.
• 20:00
  It's meant to be heard. So as you read or listen this
• 20:02
  week, try to be a more attentive listener.
• 20:05
  Notice the flow. Recognize that the vowel music
• 20:07
  you're hearing is part of the way God's truth gets into your
• 20:10
  heart and stays there. And if you're a parent or a
• 20:12
  teacher, think about the oral shape of the verses you ask
• 20:15
  people to memorize. Those short assonant lines we
• 20:17
  talked about those great anchors.
• 20:19
  They're the ones that tend to stick for a lifetime.
• 20:21
  We've talked a lot about the historical sound world of the
• 20:24
  KJZ tradition, and that acoustic landscape really did provide a
• 20:28
  shared cadence for the church for a very long time.
• 20:31
  So I guess I'd like to leave you with a final thought to Mull
• 20:33
  over. Think about your own current
• 20:36
  Bible translation, whether it's more formal or more dynamic.
• 20:39
  How is it shaping your ear and your memory right now?
• 20:41
  What sound patterns, if any, are acting as those lifelong anchors
• 20:45
  for your faith? And maybe most importantly, how
• 20:48
  does your gratitude for God's Providence grow when you realize
• 20:51
  His truth hasn't just been given to us accurately, but that it's
• 20:54
  often been given with a fitting and a memorable music?
• 20:57
  It's a reminder that God speaks to us as whole people, mind,
• 21:00
  heart and ear.