Latest / Talk to Prince Show - Solving World's Problems / Prince Israel Zaar on: Fear Not the AI But the Human Mind Behind the AI
Transcript
- 0:02Speaker 1: The fear of AI overriding humans or taking over humans,
- 0:12Speaker 1: or disobeying humans, creating emotion and distress to humans, making
- 0:24Speaker 1: it difficult for humans to deactivate their AI services, and
- 0:29Speaker 1: the threat that I am opposed to humans. All this
- 0:35Speaker 1: fantasy doomsday thinking failed to take into consideration that that
- 0:48Speaker 1: the artificial intelligence itself is the making of the human mind.
- 0:55Speaker 1: AI comes from the human being, and the human being
- 0:59Speaker 1: does not come from it, And even the fear of
- 1:05Speaker 1: that AI gonna attain consciousness, and that that deficient intelligence
- 1:11Speaker 1: is gonna be more intelligent than the human being itself.
- 1:17Speaker 1: That it's true that AI is gonna be intelligent than
- 1:21Speaker 1: certain human beings, but the AI itself cannot be more
- 1:29Speaker 1: intelligent than the creator of the AI itself. And even
- 1:37Speaker 1: though AI might be more intelligent than humans, AI can
- 1:43Speaker 1: only be intelligent than humans in certain tasks, in certain expectations,
- 1:50Speaker 1: certain benchmark, certain obligations or commitment, or the investment that
- 1:57Speaker 1: has been given to the or the deerial service a
- 2:03Speaker 1: functionality of that AIR, But the AI serve it's not
- 2:12Speaker 1: a human being. The difference between an artificial intelligence and
- 2:18Speaker 1: the human being is that a human being, it's a
- 2:22Speaker 1: mind being, a mind cheap, a mind code with certain
- 2:29Speaker 1: sets of mindsets. So what the AI can attain, The
- 2:36Speaker 1: AI can learn to be the mind cheap, a mind
- 2:42Speaker 1: cheap part of the human beings. A memory the air
- 2:46Speaker 1: can have, you know, a quantum memory or big dealer
- 2:54Speaker 1: quantumization memory, and can think faster than humans by many seconds.
- 3:05Speaker 1: And the AI equally can attain the the the mindsets
- 3:16Speaker 1: of humans. Thus random quantumizations of traditional cultures, religions and
- 3:25Speaker 1: politics and thinking and maris of societies and compredict human
- 3:31Speaker 1: behavior to their repetitive patterns. And so those mindsets they
- 3:39Speaker 1: what motivates humans, what incentivizes humans, humans intentionality and their
- 3:48Speaker 1: their deeds and omissions. Right, the humans assumptions can be
- 3:56Speaker 1: randomized by artificial intelligence, and the AI can mimic the
- 4:06Speaker 1: mind code of the human being and to voice adaptation
- 4:12Speaker 1: and and the copy the clone of the being itself.
- 4:21Speaker 1: But the one thing that the AI cannot replicate from
- 4:25Speaker 1: the human being is the mind being the being in
- 4:31Speaker 1: itself and it's mind, that being that things by the
- 4:34Speaker 1: seconds and think by nanoseconds, that being the dreams, that
- 4:39Speaker 1: being with the set of consciousness that sometimes its subconsciousness.
- 4:46Speaker 1: The being can actually grasps what is thinking, and the
- 4:50Speaker 1: being can think and optimize and and change his mind
- 4:54Speaker 1: by seconds. And the common sense of being that that's
- 5:00Speaker 1: street smart, that the ability to that most multifaceted type
- 5:08Speaker 1: of being that can can be spontaneous and it's thinking
- 5:14Speaker 1: would have been programmed. A mind I think for itself
- 5:20Speaker 1: intrinsic individuality, that the mind that is the being of
- 5:24Speaker 1: the being itself can never be replicated by to vicial intelligence.
- 5:30Speaker 1: I think that it's the being things of nature, even
- 5:35Speaker 1: like a bird on inside, like an ant an ak
- 5:41Speaker 1: and ai, can never fully replace the thing that has
- 5:44Speaker 1: a mind of itself because the mind of itself is
- 5:48Speaker 1: intrinsic to the being or to the creature itself, because
- 5:55Speaker 1: the being of the bean is the being itself and
- 5:57Speaker 1: nothing else. So nothing can replace the being of the being,
- 6:00Speaker 1: the mind being that thing that is the being itself,
- 6:05Speaker 1: and mind of that being, that mind that is not tangible,
- 6:12Speaker 1: that code of mind of thought. You know. Education try
- 6:18Speaker 1: to customarize the human mind and create the categorization and
- 6:26Speaker 1: the group and groupings of the being and give the
- 6:30Speaker 1: being a set of instruction. Fault startificial intelligence can replicate
- 6:35Speaker 1: the educational knowledge that the human being attains. But I
- 6:40Speaker 1: cannot replicate the creativity of that human being. It can
- 6:43Speaker 1: only copy the creativity of that human being. Because creativity
- 6:47Speaker 1: in itself is a thing that comes from the mind
- 6:51Speaker 1: based on its ecology, the conditions, the circumstances, and the situations,
- 6:56Speaker 1: and based on the correlational factors and causalities of creative thinking.
- 7:09Speaker 1: An artist can see a pencil and things things, think
- 7:13Speaker 1: of a canvas, and given the that that depends on
- 7:17Speaker 1: the brush or can create. What it doesn't know is creating.
- 7:23Speaker 1: It's not coming from any big data. The data in
- 7:27Speaker 1: the service is online. But even if artificial intelligence get
- 7:32Speaker 1: to create, that creation is a copy of a copy
- 7:36Speaker 1: of a copy, it cannot be intrinsically authentic in itself.
- 7:43Speaker 1: So I can never have what I call authentic originality.
- 7:48Speaker 1: Authentic originality comes from creatures of nature and natural beings
- 7:54Speaker 1: or natural things. They got that that thing of that
- 7:59Speaker 1: ecological intelligence, that constellational intelligence that communicate with the being,
- 8:06Speaker 1: with the biological natural being that cannot communicate with an
- 8:12Speaker 1: artificial intelligent creation that is external to the human being itself.
- 8:22Speaker 1: But the AI that can become the human being is
- 8:26Speaker 1: what I call the internal ar two types of air
- 8:33Speaker 1: internalization and externalization. They are the the internality are it
- 8:41Speaker 1: is the being itself what I called enlightened are enlightened
- 8:45Speaker 1: intelligent being. It is the being itself becoming the AI
- 8:50Speaker 1: itself by the alloping. It's primitive natural, educational and intelligence.
- 9:02Speaker 1: And for this intelligency involved for the being to develop,
- 9:04Speaker 1: it's android intelligence. The being on the machine and the
- 9:09Speaker 1: bean and the system that it creates, and that being
- 9:14Speaker 1: developed latificial intelligence. It means the mind of the being itself.
- 9:19Speaker 1: It is the AI itself. It's not an external big there,
- 9:25Speaker 1: but it's an intenna quantumization of big theatre. That's like
- 9:34Speaker 1: the being itself. It's the dictionary and the data that
- 9:39Speaker 1: it's input into the into the AI. The chip is
- 9:45Speaker 1: inputed in the being, into the being itself. So when
- 9:50Speaker 1: it has the internal AI into the being itself, then
- 9:53Speaker 1: the AI in that being can attain consciousness contain like
- 9:56Speaker 1: the human being itself, because it's just a natural being
- 10:01Speaker 1: that has developed its artificiality. It's artificial intelligences. It's not
- 10:07Speaker 1: a gadgetary external AI or software or hardware. That being
- 10:13Speaker 1: itself is the hardware and the software. So the computer
- 10:18Speaker 1: is the being. The Big Dealer is the being. The
- 10:22Speaker 1: chipit is the being, the clock is the being, the
- 10:24Speaker 1: Google is the being, The dipstick is the being. It
- 10:29Speaker 1: means the knowledge. The drone is the being. The robot
- 10:33Speaker 1: it's the being. Then, no intelligence is the being they
- 10:38Speaker 1: seem conduct to itself or the cheap itself. It's the being.
- 10:43Speaker 1: So it's internalized, not externalized. That's what my philosophy is
- 10:49Speaker 1: all about. About the internal ar unless about the external
- 10:55Speaker 1: are The external area is needed to assist the internal
- 11:04Speaker 1: eye to gather the cometum information, and it's for itself.
- 11:10Speaker 1: Humans will find it difficult the more humans try. The
- 11:14Speaker 1: more the artificial intelligences or the semiconductors that humans create
- 11:20Speaker 1: or the big data servers that humans create to mimic
- 11:24Speaker 1: the intelligence of the human being, the bigger such they
- 11:28Speaker 1: are gonna be physically, the hard wea're gonna be so large,
- 11:35Speaker 1: And that even though you have the electricity to power
- 11:39Speaker 1: such data, or countries who go to war to cretch
- 11:43Speaker 1: space for such theirs, and that the big there still
- 11:48Speaker 1: cannot do the task that humans, that an intelligent human
- 11:54Speaker 1: can do. So therefore the fear that that aim gonna
- 12:01Speaker 1: replace humans or AI gonna disobey humans or a I'm
- 12:06Speaker 1: gonna threaten humans. It's not the AI in itself, it's
- 12:13Speaker 1: the person behind the AI, is the mind behind the AIS,
- 12:19Speaker 1: just not the AI. The AI. It's like the the
- 12:25Speaker 1: face value of the mind that is hidden beyond the
- 12:31Speaker 1: view of society. The AI becomes addressing of the mind
- 12:36Speaker 1: that humans actually don't now. So don't be worried and
- 12:40Speaker 1: scared about the AI, the external gadgetry or software or
- 12:49Speaker 1: robotic or hardware of itself. The word about the mind
- 12:54Speaker 1: behind that AI. So the fear that are gonna replace
- 12:59Speaker 1: us can be said can be the same fear that
- 13:03Speaker 1: certain humans gonna replace certain humans, and say certain humans
- 13:09Speaker 1: gonna replace certain humans. That becomes evident if you go
- 13:14Speaker 1: back to civilizations, every new civilization replices or twats another civilization.
- 13:23Speaker 1: The Egyptians they destroy the civilization in the time of Mesopotrenia,
- 13:30Speaker 1: they destroy their civilization, the Persian Distress civilization, the Anchors,
- 13:35Speaker 1: the Mayas, they destroy their civilizations, the Chinese civilization, to
- 13:39Speaker 1: the Romans, to the Western civilization, to the British, to
- 13:46Speaker 1: the Dutch, to the America. The civilizations destroy other civilizations
- 13:54Speaker 1: or they make them primitive and effective or obsolete. So
- 14:02Speaker 1: the fear that the are gonna replace humans is not
- 14:06Speaker 1: AI replacing humans. In all is other civilization using AI
- 14:12Speaker 1: to replace other humans, you cannot not connect humans to
- 14:19Speaker 1: the AIS that they develop. Let me say it again,
- 14:23Speaker 1: you cannot disconnect humans from the AIS that they develop
- 14:27Speaker 1: and the AI s that they deploy. The algorithms of
- 14:31Speaker 1: the AI itself are made by humans, and the intentionality
- 14:35Speaker 1: and the intelligence of those humans, and the intensity of
- 14:40Speaker 1: the humans must be taken into consideration. The intelligence, the intentionality,
- 14:47Speaker 1: and the intensity of the intelligence and intentionality must be
- 14:51Speaker 1: taken into consideration when talking about artificial intelligence and humans.
- 15:01Speaker 1: An intelligent, positive, intentional human, we intensify the creation of
- 15:15Speaker 1: the programming and the deployment of a good intention are
- 15:23Speaker 1: the bandit, We create an AI that mimics the bandit.
- 15:28Speaker 1: The banded we create a clone of itself in activistial intelligence.
- 15:32Speaker 1: A narcissist, we create a clone of itself into activistial intelligence.
- 15:37Speaker 1: A rock or warmonger, we created itself into the activisial
- 15:45Speaker 1: intelligence of their creation. An entrepreneur, we create an entrepreneur AI.
- 15:53Speaker 1: A construction a constructions we created construction is a destruction
- 15:59Speaker 1: is we created this AR. A mathematician, we create an
- 16:04Speaker 1: AI of mathematics. A historian, were a history an engineering
- 16:12Speaker 1: engineering A scientist, were AI with a scientific method a
- 16:20Speaker 1: pseudo scientist. We create a pseudo scientific AR. A violent person,
- 16:29Speaker 1: we create a valiant AR. An ignorant primitive for the
- 16:34Speaker 1: Portland person. We create an ignorant primitive for the Parkland AR.
- 16:39Speaker 1: A dictator. We create a dictator. Are a free minded human?
- 16:44Speaker 1: We create a free minded are. A purpose minded human.
- 16:50Speaker 1: We create a purpose for minded. Are an enlightened human.
- 16:56Speaker 1: We can enlightened a R. A racist human. We create
- 17:02Speaker 1: a racist. A sexist human. We create a sexist R.
- 17:10Speaker 1: The biggest human we create a bigotry And an educationalalysis.
- 17:20Speaker 1: We create an educational A motivationalist and given the chance
- 17:25Speaker 1: to will create a motivational AIR. So the AI is
- 17:28Speaker 1: guided guided by the intelligence of those who create those are.
- 17:35Speaker 1: But when it comes to a general artificial intelligence, now
- 17:40Speaker 1: it's not individual intelligence. That's where the fear comes in.
- 17:44Speaker 1: It's not individual intelligence. It's either the randomization or or
- 17:52Speaker 1: the compounding, or the fusion or the quantumization of the
- 17:59Speaker 1: very lost intelligences of the human into a super makeer
- 18:04Speaker 1: data in the quantum of supercomputer data that produced or
- 18:13Speaker 1: deploy and AI that is not just one person, but
- 18:17Speaker 1: it's the mind of the minds of artists general is
- 18:23Speaker 1: a mind of the minds of artists. When it's a
- 18:26Speaker 1: mind of the minds of artists. If that if there
- 18:30Speaker 1: is not a counsel like an AI, is that the
- 18:37Speaker 1: nation type of thing. If there's not an AI counsel,
- 18:45Speaker 1: just like they got the counsel of bishops when it
- 18:50Speaker 1: came to the Bible and religion. If there's not that
- 19:00Speaker 1: AI counsel to decide which mine or it's it's important,
- 19:07Speaker 1: Which mine is good, which mine is bad? Which man
- 19:10Speaker 1: is ever? Which mine is kind, Which mine is compassionate,
- 19:14Speaker 1: Which mine is racist, which mine is not? Which mine
- 19:17Speaker 1: is in developmental, Which mine is innovative, Which mine is
- 19:20Speaker 1: developed uh inventive? Which mine is creative? Which mine is futuristic?
- 19:29Speaker 1: And which culture traditional religion or civilization or language or
- 19:35Speaker 1: well thought or of being or of living should be
- 19:41Speaker 1: integrated or should or what type of consensus or a
- 19:46Speaker 1: new AI social contract? Who design who decide the ethics?
- 19:53Speaker 1: Is it those with power or the powerless? Is Is
- 19:58Speaker 1: it the wealthy or the poor. Is it the global
- 20:02Speaker 1: north or the global south? Is it the most technologically
- 20:08Speaker 1: advanced or the primitive or impetuence. So that is what
- 20:16Speaker 1: humans should be worried about. Humans shouldn't be worried about
- 20:20Speaker 1: an AI itself. It cannot be worried about a car
- 20:26Speaker 1: that the car going to take over humans. We put
- 20:29Speaker 1: about travelist car, for example, but that car is control
- 20:33Speaker 1: by somebody. It's data that's inputed, that that's been imputed
- 20:37Speaker 1: into the car. That car runs on data the run
- 20:42Speaker 1: on systems and algorithms created by humans, by intelligent humans
- 20:51Speaker 1: with intentionality and the intensity of the intelligence or intentionality.
- 21:00Speaker 1: A smart computer, it is not a smart computer without
- 21:05Speaker 1: the intelligence of humans. There is no a I that
- 21:14Speaker 1: doesn't have a human mind behind it. It is the
- 21:20Speaker 1: mind of humans are the big diner that the computers innate,
- 21:28Speaker 1: that the need electricity to run the system. But the
- 21:35Speaker 1: mind itself is a human being. A dictionary was written
- 21:40Speaker 1: by humans. The words were put together by humans. A
- 21:43Speaker 1: calculator was invented by humans. The computer and theself was
- 21:47Speaker 1: invented by humans. The agorithms are written by humans. So
- 21:57Speaker 1: don't be scared of a R. Don't worry so much
- 22:02Speaker 1: about the harm that I can do, think so much
- 22:07Speaker 1: about the benefits that artificial intelligence can bring, the good
- 22:13Speaker 1: it can bring to humanity. I can foster society, I
- 22:18Speaker 1: can pull our lives, cure diseases, create new jobs, takes humans,
- 22:25Speaker 1: take humans beyond the hemisphere, create new material intelligences, and
- 22:33Speaker 1: benefit the lives of humans their well being, the education
- 22:36Speaker 1: and the intelligence their travels beyond their own spaces. Be
- 22:45Speaker 1: grateful that I can help help humans enlighten themselves and
- 22:50Speaker 1: hance their creativity and hans their good. But when it
- 22:56Speaker 1: comes to the point of worrying about the harm that
- 23:00Speaker 1: I can can be or that I can cause, we
- 23:06Speaker 1: should help other humans help themselves. The character, the monotonism,
- 23:14Speaker 1: and the attitude of the human being, your thought process, intentionalities,
- 23:22Speaker 1: their motivations, the desires and wishes. Those are the things
- 23:31Speaker 1: we should be worried about. And those things are fixable.
- 23:35Speaker 1: If the worries it's about humans, then they can be fixed.
- 23:43Speaker 1: But if unknown humans create the goddon the gods of
- 23:49Speaker 1: the future, that AI, that AI s of the wars
- 23:55Speaker 1: that rely on the fear is a hidden hand behind
- 24:04Speaker 1: the machine, but behind the software. If he's an evil
- 24:11Speaker 1: hand behind the algorithm. Worry not about a stressed notes
- 24:20Speaker 1: about a eye. You're worried about fellow humans. We have
- 24:26Speaker 1: seen what humans can do. We have seen the good,
- 24:32Speaker 1: the bad, and the ugly. If you watch the news
- 24:37Speaker 1: every day, who is in trick watching watching the news
- 24:41Speaker 1: every day and to see how humans use their thoughts,
- 24:47Speaker 1: their lives, their thinking, their creativity. You watch the news,
- 24:52Speaker 1: you see somebody winning a trophy, somebody inventing something new,
- 24:59Speaker 1: h somebody helping somebody, somebody doing their job. While at
- 25:06Speaker 1: the same time you see on the news somebody's killing,
- 25:08Speaker 1: somebody killing people, somebody raping somebody, somebody punning a bridge,
- 25:14Speaker 1: of somebody going to walls. And when see on the neils,
- 25:19Speaker 1: you get to imagine those are the minds they're going
- 25:22Speaker 1: to power their computers, empower the big dinner, and power
- 25:27Speaker 1: the algorithms of the future. Just that the codes of
- 25:30Speaker 1: the future were written by humans. And the flaw in
- 25:36Speaker 1: human intelligence and the laxity and the carelessness, the recklessness,
- 25:49Speaker 1: the cruelty, the inhumanity the citizen, the narcissism, the negative
- 25:58Speaker 1: selfishness or negativenessicism, the motivations that have humans to do
- 26:06Speaker 1: the things they do. If want to understand humans, what's
- 26:11Speaker 1: the news in every part of the world every day,
- 26:15Speaker 1: It helps you to understand the psychology of human activity
- 26:20Speaker 1: or human activities, human deeds and omissions, human desire, human
- 26:27Speaker 1: wants and needs, and how far humans we go to
- 26:31Speaker 1: get what they want. Who they will destroy, who will
- 26:36Speaker 1: be left behind, who they with disrespect or disregard, or
- 26:40Speaker 1: minimize or demain or the neglect, who they will exploit
- 26:46Speaker 1: at all costs. Those are the minds I shall worry about.
- 26:56Speaker 1: But if humans can help humans, instead of worrying about
- 27:02Speaker 1: if AI attain consciousness, you should worry about what type
- 27:06Speaker 1: of consciousness does that AI attain attend? What consciousness host consciousness?
- 27:19Speaker 1: That's the point is worry about. That's the point I
- 27:25Speaker 1: talk about enlightened AI the intenna itself, that the human
- 27:30Speaker 1: being must purify itself from with them. With the intelligence
- 27:34Speaker 1: that humans have, they must purify themselves from with them
- 27:40Speaker 1: to be of positive intelligence or the positive intelligence if
- 27:47Speaker 1: they if they write the acoronyms or code the codes
- 27:52Speaker 1: needed for the AIS of the future, they can all
- 27:57Speaker 1: have the society that we all want. But if the
- 28:01Speaker 1: mind behind antificial intelligence is towards weapons of mass destruction superiority.
- 28:11Speaker 1: If it's about winners and losers with is a head,
- 28:16Speaker 1: then humanity is going to be behind. Humanity, do not
- 28:21Speaker 1: be ahead a particular group at the expense of humanity
- 28:25Speaker 1: to be ahead. That's what I should worry about the
- 28:30Speaker 1: motivations of people and countries and systems beyond atificial intelligence.
- 28:35Speaker 1: Is antificial intelligence meant to make humanity better? Is it
- 28:40Speaker 1: meant to improve life? Prolonged life, create new in infas,
- 28:45Speaker 1: structuralal development, and new intelligences that benefits humanity and prolongs
- 28:53Speaker 1: of our existence? Our existence is the AI that revamp
- 28:59Speaker 1: our educational systems, our health services, the job market, the
- 29:05Speaker 1: financial market that takes care of the needy, the poor,
- 29:12Speaker 1: the sick, the elderly. Or is it the AI that's
- 29:20Speaker 1: just a middle person for the crutures of humans? Because
- 29:29Speaker 1: the law will we hold humans responsible, The law will
- 29:34Speaker 1: hold humans accountable, and the law will punish humans for
- 29:41Speaker 1: the pain of that dates. But when crue humans delegate
- 29:46Speaker 1: these powers to artificial intelligence, that's the problem because you
- 29:52Speaker 1: cannot punish artificial intelligence. So when humans hide behind AI,
- 30:00Speaker 1: they can crete systems and algorithms that might be very
- 30:03Speaker 1: dangerous for humanity. That's the thing you need to worry about.
- 30:12Speaker 1: That's what which you fix. Philosopher Prince Are Intelligence is
- 30:21Speaker 1: Philosopher Prince is resolved June the seven, twenty twenty five
- 30:35Speaker 1: from the Great City of Las Vegas on AI and
- 30:42Speaker 1: the human mind. What to fear? Is it the AI
- 30:49Speaker 1: itself or the mind behind the AI? Is it the
- 30:54Speaker 1: inntennal AI or the external are for a general artificial intelligence.
- 31:08Speaker 1: Thank you.