Latest / Safe As Podcast / EP32: Navigating fatigue risk with the defences in depth approach
Transcript
- 0:06Fatigue is bad. I'm OK.
- 0:08Well, not really, but let's jump into a paper from Dorset and
- 0:12Mcculloch's Fatigue, Defences and Death Framework, published
- 0:15in their 2005 paper called Managing Fatigue.
- 0:18It's about Sleep in Sleep Medicine reviews.
- 0:23As the title may have given away, fatigue really is about
- 0:26sleep. Today we're talking about
- 0:28cognitive or mental fatigue, which isn't just about being
- 0:32tired, but it generally is intimately connected with sleep
- 0:35and circadian factors. These are the structured means
- 0:38to address occupational fatigue risk quickly.
- 0:42They conceptualise A fatigue related incident as the final
- 0:45outcome of a causal error trajectory.
- 0:48It would make more sense if you actually saw a picture they have
- 0:51in their paper. An effective fatigue risk
- 0:53management system establishes multiple layers of defences
- 0:56across 5 levels to manage risk proactively.
- 1:00Level 1 is the level of sleep opportunity or the average sleep
- 1:04obtained of employees. This ensures rosters and
- 1:07schedules provide adequate opportunity for employees to
- 1:10obtain sufficient sleep. Not necessarily to get
- 1:13sufficient sleep, but they're afforded the opportunity.
- 1:17So interventions would be implementing prescriptive hours
- 1:20of service rules like maximum shift and minimum break
- 1:23durations, using fatigue modelling to assess if the work
- 1:27patterns adequately limit waking time and provide enough sleep
- 1:32opportunity Level 2. This is the actual sleep
- 1:36obtained. So this determines if an
- 1:38individual actually obtains sufficient sleep despite the
- 1:41opportunity. This addresses factors like
- 1:44personal choices or sleep disorders.
- 1:47For interventions, you can use things like the prior sleep and
- 1:50wake models or other sorts of sleep and fatigue estimation
- 1:53tools. This could be where employees
- 1:56track their own sleep levels and organisational interventions to
- 2:01assess fitness for work. For instance, if workers have
- 2:06had less than five hours sleep in the prior 24 hours and less
- 2:11than 12 hours sleep in the prior 48 hours, or have been awake for
- 2:15longer than the amount of sleep obtained in the prior 48 hours,
- 2:18they're almost certainly at a higher risk of fatigue.
- 2:22Level 3 behavioural symptoms. So the focus here is identifying
- 2:27individuals exhibiting fatigue related symptoms or behaviours
- 2:31when the other proceeding controls fail.
- 2:34So interventions could be using symptom checklists or subjective
- 2:37fatigue scales, having people put up their hand and report
- 2:40that they feel tired. These are typically over
- 2:44utilising organisations, these types of behavioural symptom
- 2:47interventions, even though they're really nowhere near the
- 2:50most effective level 4 fatigue related errors.
- 2:54Now this leverages this idea of fatigue proofing, which I'll go
- 2:57into more detail shortly. The focus here is identifying
- 3:01near misses, so performance variability and errors and
- 3:05whatnot which haven't actually led to an incident yet.
- 3:08Things that could be done at this level include error or task
- 3:10analysis, learning from normal daily work, things like that to
- 3:14actually help ensure that these errors in this performance
- 3:17variability don't actually progress through to full
- 3:20incidents without actually fully lose control of the process.
- 3:23Level 5. The actual incidents, fatigue
- 3:25related incidents. This is the final outcome.
- 3:28A fatigue related incidents actually occurred or at least an
- 3:30incident that's been substantially influenced by
- 3:32effects of fatigue interventions.
- 3:35Probably not too surprising. A robust incident analysis and
- 3:39investigation procedure really to understand why all the prior
- 3:42defences failed. How did it actually get to this
- 3:45stage? In a later paper they discussed
- 3:48this idea of fatigue briefing. Fatigue proofing refers to
- 3:52informal adaptive behaviours workers spontaneously employ to
- 3:56reduce fatigue related risk while working.
- 3:58Fatigue. This is just fatigue.
- 4:00It's been found in other areas like firefighters and whatnot
- 4:04will employ these types of self protective behaviours.
- 4:07In any case, it aligns really nicely with some of the adaptive
- 4:10philosophies like safety tool and resilience engineering where
- 4:14we try to build resilience skills into our workforce and
- 4:17the environments we work in and the capacities to fail safely.
- 4:21These are typically not part of formal safety management systems
- 4:25and approaches. They tend to hide in the shadows
- 4:28for Some of the suggestions around fatigue proofing could be
- 4:31task related strategies like slowing the task down, reducing
- 4:36the pace of the workflow, task buffering, building an extra
- 4:40time or space for error correction, double checking or
- 4:43cross checking, checking one's own work or seeking cheques from
- 4:46colleagues. Supervisors providing extra
- 4:48supervision when it's needed. Behaviour based strategies like
- 4:53task verbalization, talking out loud to to yourself or to others
- 4:57to detect issues and errors and increases in social interaction,
- 5:02engaging in non task dialogue or teasing and joking behaviour to
- 5:05improve alertness. They actually found this in some
- 5:07studies where people when they're under fatigue states
- 5:11will close off to banter, dialogue or jokes or just give
- 5:14weird responses to questions. So they use jokes and they tease
- 5:18each other to actually check in to see how people are tracking.
- 5:22Anyway, that's it. In this quick aside, check out
- 5:24the paper and let me know how you go about managing fatigue.
- 5:28Thanks everyone.