Latest / Honey Badger Radio / FEMA Supervisor Under Fire, Dad "Saves" His Family From Project 2025 | HBR News 478

Transcript

FEMA Supervisor Under Fire, Dad "Saves" His Family From Project 2025 | HBR News 478 · Honey Badger Radio

• 1:05
  Speaker 1: This is HBr News number four seventy eight, FEMA supervisor
• 1:10
  Speaker 1: under Fire Dad saves his family from Project twenty twenty five,
• 1:14
  Speaker 1: where we discuss the news of the week and give
• 1:17
  Speaker 1: it the Badger treatment. Hello everybody, and welcome to Honey
• 1:24
  Speaker 1: Badger Radio. I hope you guys are doing well this
• 1:26
  Speaker 1: week and that you're laughing at all of the insanity
• 1:29
  Speaker 1: not coming from us because we're winning, so that you're
• 1:33
  Speaker 1: not consumed by it. I am your host, Brian. I'm
• 1:36
  Speaker 1: joined by Hannah and doctor Ranmerkam. This week, we're gonna
• 1:40
  Speaker 1: be talking about some well interesting news that have come out,
• 1:45
  Speaker 1: like the rise of the four B movement in the US.
• 1:49
  Speaker 1: A Minnesota father erases his entire family for their own
• 1:54
  Speaker 1: to protect them rather, the Orange Man makes a vow
• 1:57
  Speaker 1: to protect free speech and more so, stick around. It's
• 2:01
  Speaker 1: gonna be a good time and be sure to join
• 2:04
  Speaker 1: us afterwards for the patron only show.
• 2:06
  Speaker 2: So I thought we were gonna look.
• 2:07
  Speaker 1: At more like weepy cringe, but we could also look
• 2:10
  Speaker 1: at this article if like Alison and I don't end
• 2:13
  Speaker 1: up responding to it on a video, but it doesn't
• 2:15
  Speaker 1: matter either way. We could look at this so Wired
• 2:17
  Speaker 1: magazine has thrown in the towel the Manisphere one. Did
• 2:21
  Speaker 1: you guys know that we won? We did it, guys,
• 2:24
  Speaker 1: we brought back patriarchy.
• 2:25
  Speaker 3: Or this this, this is bullshit.
• 2:28
  Speaker 4: I haven't heard Trump mention anything about the manuscript or
• 2:30
  Speaker 4: men's issues. I haven't heard Elon say anything about this
• 2:33
  Speaker 4: RKA all right, or Jenny Vonce or anything that.
• 2:36
  Speaker 3: They're talking about.
• 2:37
  Speaker 4: All the ship on the periphery right, none of this
• 2:41
  Speaker 4: is to do with the with with the Manisphere.
• 2:43
  Speaker 1: Don't take this from me, Mike. The Manisphere one, they said,
• 2:46
  Speaker 1: so we did this.
• 2:48
  Speaker 2: It's very simple.
• 2:49
  Speaker 4: The feminist the feminists there likes to blame everything on
• 2:52
  Speaker 4: men and what they that's all this.
• 2:55
  Speaker 5: Is is approximate for not actively being harmed by something.
• 3:00
  Speaker 5: Feminist deem it patriarchy because in their eyes, if it's
• 3:03
  Speaker 5: not harming men that harms women, that they're that malicious.
• 3:09
  Speaker 5: They've always been that malicious. That's the code you just
• 3:13
  Speaker 5: watch for. If men are not harmed by it, feminists
• 3:16
  Speaker 5: will start calling it patriarchy guaranteed.
• 3:19
  Speaker 1: Yeah, well we're gonna talk about it or and or
• 3:23
  Speaker 1: we'll look at more. You know, women and men losing
• 3:28
  Speaker 1: it online over the recent results of the election because
• 3:33
  Speaker 1: they did not see it coming and they have no
• 3:36
  Speaker 1: idea what life or reality.
• 3:38
  Speaker 2: Even is now.
• 3:39
  Speaker 1: So if you want to join us for that in
• 3:41
  Speaker 1: the Patron show, please consider becoming a Badger yourself by
• 3:45
  Speaker 1: going to feed the Badger dot com and setting up
• 3:48
  Speaker 1: a monthly subscription. It's feed the Badger dot com slash subscribe,
• 3:52
  Speaker 1: and that will give you access to all of the
• 3:54
  Speaker 1: additional content like our patron shows and our various community
• 3:58
  Speaker 1: activities like Allison's Writer's Room and so on, which is
• 4:02
  Speaker 1: you know, often praised by the people who are in there.
• 4:05
  Speaker 1: They like the community quite a bit. So hopefully we'll
• 4:07
  Speaker 1: see you guys there. And if you don't want to
• 4:09
  Speaker 1: wake up one morning to find yourself unable to find
• 4:11
  Speaker 1: our content because we've been possibly heeded from the Internet,
• 4:15
  Speaker 1: which may not happen now, I don't know, but just
• 4:18
  Speaker 1: in case, you should probably go check out badgerfeed dot
• 4:21
  Speaker 1: com or Honey Badger Radio dot com, which is where
• 4:23
  Speaker 1: our archived content lives. All right, So without all that,
• 4:28
  Speaker 1: With all that said, let us get into today's stories.
• 4:32
  Speaker 1: So a FEMA supervisor in Florida identified as Marnie Washington
• 4:39
  Speaker 1: instructed hurricane relief workers to avoid homes displaying Trump campaign
• 4:44
  Speaker 1: signs in Lake Placid following Hurricane Milton's devastation. This directive,
• 4:51
  Speaker 1: which was part of a broader best practices memo, led
• 4:54
  Speaker 1: to at least twenty homes being skipped for potential federal aid,
• 5:00
  Speaker 1: despite FEMA's mission to provide assistance regardless of political affiliation.
• 5:05
  Speaker 1: The incident has sparked criticism from Florida Governor Ron De Santis,
• 5:08
  Speaker 1: who ordered an investigation into what he described as quote
• 5:12
  Speaker 1: the federal government's targeted discrimination of Floridians who supported Donald Trump.
• 5:17
  Speaker 4: Well, it sort of goes to show you that election
• 5:21
  Speaker 4: interference takes many forms, across across many different Joe Biden
• 5:29
  Speaker 4: recently repeated the line, as he does before pausing, you
• 5:35
  Speaker 4: can't only respect our electoral process when you win.
• 5:41
  Speaker 3: Or whatever.
• 5:41
  Speaker 2: It was.
• 5:42
  Speaker 4: Well, good point, And just because Donald Trump won doesn't
• 5:46
  Speaker 4: mean we're going to assume that there was no election interference.
• 5:50
  Speaker 4: And I mean on the part of the Democrats, I'm
• 5:53
  Speaker 4: sure they couldn't find the extra fifteen million voters that
• 5:57
  Speaker 4: they mysteriously and uniquely found in twenty twelve. What's a
• 6:01
  Speaker 4: daizing Nothing to see here, but they still pulled the
• 6:04
  Speaker 4: classic trick of directing the mass media to constantly lie
• 6:08
  Speaker 4: about Trump well painstakingly sucking Kamala's rancid taint like piglets
• 6:16
  Speaker 4: chewing on a dead rat.
• 6:18
  Speaker 3: And also.
• 6:20
  Speaker 4: Case in point, there's this additional tactic of chext notes
• 6:26
  Speaker 4: killing Trump supporters. Sorry, am I being hyperbolic? Letting Trump supporters.
• 6:32
  Speaker 2: Wait, wait, I'm sure it happens on the other side.
• 6:34
  Speaker 2: I'm sure.
• 6:35
  Speaker 1: I'm sure it happens on the other side too. Let's
• 6:38
  Speaker 1: let's just let's just point that out. I don't have
• 6:41
  Speaker 1: any evidence of it. I don't have any stories because.
• 6:44
  Speaker 5: When you get to the other side, you're already dead.
• 6:49
  Speaker 5: You were talking about.
• 6:50
  Speaker 4: Every glitch, every glitch in this life and the next
• 6:53
  Speaker 4: seems to favor the blue side. But that, and yeah,
• 6:58
  Speaker 4: I know, letting Trump supporters die is not quite the
• 7:01
  Speaker 4: same thing as killing Trump Trump supporters. Legally speaking, negligent
• 7:07
  Speaker 4: homicide is indeed a kind of homicide, but rhetorically speaking,
• 7:11
  Speaker 4: is not the same as as first degree murder. I
• 7:14
  Speaker 4: guess it's it's a variation of the trolley problem. If
• 7:18
  Speaker 4: you pull the lever, then the disaster relief vehicle will
• 7:24
  Speaker 4: miss five people who are stranded on the tracks.
• 7:27
  Speaker 3: They'll just keep trundling along the.
• 7:28
  Speaker 4: Side streets until it finds a communist who looks like
• 7:32
  Speaker 4: they could use a nice latte. I could have sworn
• 7:36
  Speaker 4: there's such a crime as felony murder. That's when if
• 7:40
  Speaker 4: during the commission of a felony, another person is killed
• 7:43
  Speaker 4: or dies.
• 7:45
  Speaker 3: I would assume, or at least I.
• 7:46
  Speaker 4: Would hope, that discrimination by political partisanship is incapacity of
• 7:53
  Speaker 4: a of a federal office is by definition a felony
• 7:59
  Speaker 4: that by itself is surely a serious crime. And if
• 8:01
  Speaker 4: anyone died as a result, that right there is murder.
• 8:06
  Speaker 4: I guess we just I haven't heard about anyone dying
• 8:10
  Speaker 4: as a direct result of this discrimination, just like we
• 8:14
  Speaker 4: didn't hear about this scandal at all. It's until conveniently
• 8:20
  Speaker 4: just after the election, so I it would be naive
• 8:24
  Speaker 4: to assume nothing's being hidden from us. It seems pretty
• 8:29
  Speaker 4: likely that this woman is legally speaking a murderer. At
• 8:34
  Speaker 4: the very least, she's guilty of felony attempted murder. I
• 8:38
  Speaker 4: know that's not a thing, but it should be. And
• 8:41
  Speaker 4: and and she hasn't even been punished for this like
• 8:45
  Speaker 4: not even at a professional level. She's just been shifted
• 8:50
  Speaker 4: onto a different county like a pedophile bishop.
• 8:54
  Speaker 3: She is ready to do.
• 8:57
  Speaker 4: Isn't ready to start all over again? Fuck someone else
• 9:00
  Speaker 4: in the ass. This is insane, and Ronda Sentis is
• 9:05
  Speaker 4: out here going. I'm launching an investigation. New leadership is
• 9:10
  Speaker 4: on the way in DC, and I'm optimistic that these
• 9:13
  Speaker 4: partisan bureaucrats.
• 9:14
  Speaker 3: Will be fired.
• 9:17
  Speaker 4: Fired bro jail, jail, straight to jail, right away, jail.
• 9:24
  Speaker 4: She should be put in a prison cell with several
• 9:27
  Speaker 4: six foot trans women, and then her unidentifiable, sodomized remains
• 9:32
  Speaker 4: should be buried under the jail where it gets slowly
• 9:36
  Speaker 4: eaten by trans rats.
• 9:39
  Speaker 3: I don't know. It's still better than she deserves.
• 9:42
  Speaker 4: She should be eaten alive by maga squirrels right away.
• 9:49
  Speaker 3: There it is.
• 9:51
  Speaker 4: Yeah, the punishment should fit the crime. We're not doing
• 9:54
  Speaker 4: ship by halves this time. Trump, make a goddamn example. See,
• 9:59
  Speaker 4: these people aren't psychopaths. They're just children, weak, weak, spoiled children.
• 10:06
  Speaker 4: The only level of morality they respond to is punishment avoidance.
• 10:12
  Speaker 4: They commit whatever atrocities they think they can get away with,
• 10:15
  Speaker 4: and they keep doing it because they can get away
• 10:17
  Speaker 4: with it. So you've got to send a message, let
• 10:21
  Speaker 4: them know they won't get away with it.
• 10:23
  Speaker 3: And like any other child or any other.
• 10:27
  Speaker 5: Path that is that is what a psychopath is. By
• 10:30
  Speaker 5: the way, they don't have a conscience, they don't have
• 10:34
  Speaker 5: a sense of guilt, and it's it's all about risk
• 10:39
  Speaker 5: and reward.
• 10:40
  Speaker 4: But we're talking, we're talking about people who do have
• 10:43
  Speaker 4: that sense. But it's it's it's it's it's never been
• 10:47
  Speaker 4: accessed because they've they've just been pampered for their whole lives.
• 10:50
  Speaker 5: It's never been developed.
• 10:51
  Speaker 4: In other words, so if you do punish them, they
• 10:55
  Speaker 4: will fall in line. Yes, we should treat them like children.
• 10:59
  Speaker 5: And adult paths. If if they are convinced that that's
• 11:04
  Speaker 5: the only way they can get what they want, they
• 11:06
  Speaker 5: will fall in line. This is something that a lot
• 11:08
  Speaker 5: of people don't realize. And when it comes to this situation,
• 11:11
  Speaker 5: I'm looking at this and so whenever somebody in an organization,
• 11:19
  Speaker 5: in a management position in an organization does something they
• 11:23
  Speaker 5: are not supposed to do, they point the finger at
• 11:26
  Speaker 5: one of two places. Either they say these people did
• 11:30
  Speaker 5: this without my permission, which this woman didn't do because
• 11:34
  Speaker 5: you probably got caught telling people to do that, or
• 11:38
  Speaker 5: they point the finger at upper management and say this,
• 11:41
  Speaker 5: there was a memo, it was policy.
• 11:44
  Speaker 2: Right, those are the two things.
• 11:48
  Speaker 5: So there was a given there was a leak document.
• 11:51
  Speaker 5: I'm I'm guessing because the document would have been her,
• 11:57
  Speaker 5: her document to the people that she supervised. She is
• 12:01
  Speaker 5: going to have to be able to show that memo
• 12:04
  Speaker 5: that she is claiming this best practices memo exists. But
• 12:12
  Speaker 5: the thing that is really vital here is to understand
• 12:17
  Speaker 5: what she actually did. She claimed she was only following orders.
• 12:23
  Speaker 5: She claimed she was only following orders to do what
• 12:27
  Speaker 5: let people remain in life threatening circumstances during a flood.
• 12:36
  Speaker 2: Hurricane.
• 12:36
  Speaker 5: So only follow Yeah, well, hurricanes cause the biggest threat
• 12:41
  Speaker 5: that a hurricane causes is flooding, right, And what happens
• 12:45
  Speaker 5: during flooding is that your whole house can get swept
• 12:49
  Speaker 5: away with you in it. The structure can collapse on
• 12:53
  Speaker 5: top of you in the water, and you can drown
• 12:56
  Speaker 5: inside your house. It's why, even if you're us isn't
• 13:00
  Speaker 5: covered with water, even if you're in the upstairs of
• 13:04
  Speaker 5: a house that is being hit a home that is
• 13:06
  Speaker 5: being hit with water, if it's not constructed to withstand
• 13:12
  Speaker 5: that level of flooding and that category of hurricane. You
• 13:16
  Speaker 5: have to get out or your life is at very
• 13:19
  Speaker 5: serious risk. Right. But I'm going to make a connection
• 13:21
  Speaker 5: here because people have been castigating others for making that
• 13:25
  Speaker 5: connection for four years and it's been through the whole time,
• 13:33
  Speaker 5: all right. That is what was happening in Germany prior
• 13:38
  Speaker 5: to World War Two. That is what was happening in Germany,
• 13:42
  Speaker 5: prior to any stories about Nazis taking over and beginning
• 13:49
  Speaker 5: a systematic execution of people. That's what was happening during
• 13:55
  Speaker 5: that time. Those are the stories that were coming out.
• 13:58
  Speaker 5: People being denied important medical services, life saving medical services,
• 14:04
  Speaker 5: people being denied products that they needed, people being denied
• 14:10
  Speaker 5: access to programs that they needed. This is a government funded,
• 14:16
  Speaker 5: government run program that we are told we have to
• 14:22
  Speaker 5: pay for because no private program can exist to do
• 14:28
  Speaker 5: what they do, because citizens can't do what they do
• 14:31
  Speaker 5: without government supervision. But you have the Cajun Navy that did,
• 14:38
  Speaker 5: you have several other organizations that did the cage and
• 14:41
  Speaker 5: Navy is kind of pretty famous for it, right. But
• 14:47
  Speaker 5: I want to also connect this with the recent flooding
• 14:54
  Speaker 5: in North Carolina because what happened during that flooding. Private
• 15:00
  Speaker 5: citizens did start helping people. Private citizens did start going
• 15:06
  Speaker 5: into life risking situations, very dangerous situations, to get people
• 15:13
  Speaker 5: out because those people couldn't get themselves out. And we
• 15:19
  Speaker 5: started hearing stories coming out of North Carolina of government
• 15:23
  Speaker 5: officials and government agencies telling them to stop or go
• 15:26
  Speaker 5: to jail. Stop saving people's lives, or go to jail.
• 15:30
  Speaker 5: And now it's coming out that possibly, and my thinking
• 15:37
  Speaker 5: on this is it's more likely than not that she's
• 15:40
  Speaker 5: telling the truth that there was a memo that went
• 15:44
  Speaker 5: around FEMA claiming that best practices would be to avoid
• 15:49
  Speaker 5: homes with Trump flags, right, And they probably made it
• 15:57
  Speaker 5: out like, oh, those people are dangerous, don't go save
• 15:59
  Speaker 5: them because they're going to shoot you, or some stupid
• 16:01
  Speaker 5: shit like that. There should be an investigation, because it
• 16:04
  Speaker 5: should be brought out. It should come out what kind
• 16:07
  Speaker 5: of mentality was behind that mimo, What kind of mentality
• 16:11
  Speaker 5: was expressed in that memo and what was used to
• 16:14
  Speaker 5: convince people to allow their fellow human beings to possibly
• 16:17
  Speaker 5: die in agony and pain and fear people who made
• 16:25
  Speaker 5: their lives missions rescuing people in those circumstances, right, we're
• 16:33
  Speaker 5: told not to do it. Be like if somebody put
• 16:37
  Speaker 5: out a memo for my company and said, well, don't
• 16:40
  Speaker 5: go to any homes to take care of people with
• 16:42
  Speaker 5: disabilities if they have a Trump flag, right, let them
• 16:47
  Speaker 5: fall down the stairs and die, let them this or that, Like,
• 16:50
  Speaker 5: are you kidding me? There's no way I would follow
• 16:54
  Speaker 5: an order like that. I don't care if they had
• 16:57
  Speaker 5: a Hitler flag, if they got a disability and they
• 16:59
  Speaker 5: need help, They're still human. If I didn't like Trump
• 17:06
  Speaker 5: that much, it wouldn't change what I did at my job. Right,
• 17:13
  Speaker 5: this is the exploitation. And I will tell you this too.
• 17:17
  Speaker 5: The people that go out and actually enter those homes
• 17:20
  Speaker 5: and risk their lives and help people are not usually women.
• 17:25
  Speaker 5: So men were being given these directives. Men were being
• 17:29
  Speaker 5: exploited and potentially corrupted by these assholes who might later
• 17:35
  Speaker 5: come back if they didn't figure out right away and
• 17:38
  Speaker 5: actually follow the orders. They didn't figure out right away,
• 17:41
  Speaker 5: heck no, I'm not following that order. They're quite likely
• 17:46
  Speaker 5: going to have fallout from that psychologically later in their lives. Sure,
• 17:54
  Speaker 5: so you have, in addition to the potential for murder
• 17:57
  Speaker 5: for killing these people, the potential exploitation of your resources,
• 18:05
  Speaker 5: my resources to all taxpayers, everybody that pays federal income
• 18:09
  Speaker 5: taxes got exploited here against politically, against a group of
• 18:16
  Speaker 5: people on the basis of political disagreement, in the same
• 18:21
  Speaker 5: manner that we were taught the Nazis did to the
• 18:25
  Speaker 5: Jews prior to them taking enough power to be able
• 18:30
  Speaker 5: to start building camps and shit.
• 18:33
  Speaker 6: Right.
• 18:34
  Speaker 5: And then you also, on top of that, have people
• 18:37
  Speaker 5: in positions of authority and mentorship telling the people under
• 18:42
  Speaker 5: them things intended to corrupt and discombobulate them and persuade
• 18:48
  Speaker 5: them to do bad things that they would regret later on. Look,
• 18:54
  Speaker 5: there is everything about this that that that makes the
• 18:59
  Speaker 5: end cap point. When you ask should the government, if
• 19:02
  Speaker 5: the answer isn't vanish, disappear, go away, stop doing things right,
• 19:08
  Speaker 5: then the answer is no. Should the government fund no right?
• 19:14
  Speaker 5: Should the should Should this or that be limited to government?
• 19:17
  Speaker 5: Should only the government be allowed it? No? No, because
• 19:23
  Speaker 5: when they have a monopoly on anything, they exploit it
• 19:28
  Speaker 5: against their political enemies. And it doesn't have to be
• 19:30
  Speaker 5: a Banana republic. It happened here, yep, yeah.
• 19:38
  Speaker 4: Yeah, And I guess in an emergency situation, I suppose
• 19:44
  Speaker 4: I would grip my teeth and treat government leftists like
• 19:47
  Speaker 4: the humans in need that I suppose they are. But
• 19:50
  Speaker 4: when it comes to legal justice, you know, an I
• 19:53
  Speaker 4: for an eye, a tooth for a tooth, et cetera.
• 19:56
  Speaker 4: They want us to treat people like Nazis, so I'm
• 19:59
  Speaker 4: going to treat them like the obvious Nazi analogy that
• 20:03
  Speaker 4: they are.
• 20:04
  Speaker 3: So fuck it.
• 20:05
  Speaker 4: They are morally stunted freaks, and I'm sick of pretending
• 20:09
  Speaker 4: they're not. We must sever the wicked ladies and gentlemen.
• 20:14
  Speaker 4: They will repent and hell followed, and so let us
• 20:18
  Speaker 4: make America great again.
• 20:20
  Speaker 3: Friends, you know what I'm not.
• 20:24
  Speaker 5: I'm not I would even fight for their due process rights.
• 20:28
  Speaker 5: I have before right. I have stood up for people
• 20:31
  Speaker 5: who are on I've stood up for people who are
• 20:33
  Speaker 5: on the right. I have stood up for the biggest
• 20:36
  Speaker 5: fucking assholes I've ever met and the nicest people I've
• 20:39
  Speaker 5: ever met, for for due process rights for one reason,
• 20:47
  Speaker 5: one solid reason. If they're important. They're important for everybody,
• 20:51
  Speaker 5: and there's more than one reason why they're important. We
• 20:56
  Speaker 5: need to know, when this is all sorted out, why
• 21:03
  Speaker 5: it happened, the real full deal of why it happened,
• 21:09
  Speaker 5: how it happened exactly, name wise, individual wise, who is
• 21:17
  Speaker 5: responsible and who participated right? And also how do we
• 21:22
  Speaker 5: keep this from happening again? And you can't get to
• 21:25
  Speaker 5: the last one without the other ones and due processes
• 21:29
  Speaker 5: essential to that.
• 21:32
  Speaker 1: I have a video clip here of the woman in question,
• 21:37
  Speaker 1: what's her name again, Marnie Washington. She was interviewed on
• 21:41
  Speaker 1: a leftist rag about what happened. So let's take a
• 21:45
  Speaker 1: look at this really quick. This is really recently.
• 21:47
  Speaker 2: So first of all, when were you notified?
• 21:50
  Speaker 1: Because the Daily Wire said that was a whistleblower who
• 21:54
  Speaker 1: made this point go ahead.
• 21:56
  Speaker 7: I was notified after I demoved. Next morning, they told
• 22:01
  Speaker 7: me verbally I was fired, but they never provided me
• 22:04
  Speaker 7: anything in writing stating that I was fired. They all
• 22:08
  Speaker 7: alleged that these actions were made on my own recognians
• 22:13
  Speaker 7: and that it was for my own political advances. However,
• 22:18
  Speaker 7: if you look at the record, there is what we
• 22:21
  Speaker 7: call a community trend, and unfortunately, it just so happened
• 22:25
  Speaker 7: that the political hostility that was encountered by my team,
• 22:29
  Speaker 7: and I was on two different teams during this employment,
• 22:32
  Speaker 7: they just so happened to have the Trump campaign signage
• 22:36
  Speaker 7: FIMA always preaches avoidance first and then de escalation. So
• 22:42
  Speaker 7: this is not isolated. This is a colossal event of avoidance,
• 22:46
  Speaker 7: not just in the state of Florida, but you will
• 22:48
  Speaker 7: find avoidance in the Carolinas. Senior leadership will lie to
• 22:53
  Speaker 7: you and tell you that they do not know, but
• 22:55
  Speaker 7: if you ask the DSA crew leads and specialists what
• 22:59
  Speaker 7: they are experiencing in the field, they will tell you.
• 23:02
  Speaker 7: Demand for FEMA to give you those incident reports are really.
• 23:07
  Speaker 2: So they it was the Carolinas as well.
• 23:11
  Speaker 5: Yep. And it sounds like she is claiming that the
• 23:14
  Speaker 5: memo that she is claiming supports her wasn't specific to
• 23:20
  Speaker 5: Trump flags, so it was her. Yeah, that people are
• 23:26
  Speaker 5: dangerous and combative because they have a Trump flag, which
• 23:32
  Speaker 5: that didn't come from people's behavior, that came from the
• 23:36
  Speaker 5: establishment press. Yes, and that's something. See, this needs to
• 23:42
  Speaker 5: be fully investigated. Somebody in not necessarily in uh the organization,
• 23:50
  Speaker 5: because the organization is suspect, but somebody in a position
• 23:55
  Speaker 5: UH that that has specifically like judicial authority or specifically
• 24:01
  Speaker 5: authority over the budgeting in regard to this, like the
• 24:06
  Speaker 5: committees that are in charge of this organization. Personally, I
• 24:09
  Speaker 5: would rather see this privatized, and this would be an
• 24:14
  Speaker 5: excellent plan for people who get out of the military
• 24:19
  Speaker 5: that want to get jobs doing things and the rest
• 24:22
  Speaker 5: of that, you know, and they aren't injured or haven't
• 24:25
  Speaker 5: got some kind of disability that's going to keep them
• 24:27
  Speaker 5: from doing it from their military service. But there's a
• 24:30
  Speaker 5: lot of people who do you know, like four years
• 24:33
  Speaker 5: in the military because they are going to get money
• 24:36
  Speaker 5: for college or something else. And then then when they
• 24:39
  Speaker 5: get out of the military and they go back into
• 24:40
  Speaker 5: the civilian world, they're looking for jobs. And some of
• 24:43
  Speaker 5: them have had a lot of great training for other
• 24:47
  Speaker 5: types of jobs, and some of them haven't. But an
• 24:50
  Speaker 5: organization that isn't that, that's a non government organization, it's
• 24:54
  Speaker 5: not funded by government, it's not beholden the government. That
• 24:57
  Speaker 5: just goes in and does stuff like this. It can
• 25:00
  Speaker 5: take donations from the public. That kind of an organization.
• 25:05
  Speaker 5: People would support that, first of all, because they supported
• 25:08
  Speaker 5: the Cajun Navy, and the Cajun Navy kind of just
• 25:11
  Speaker 5: formed spontaneously. So if an organization like that existed that
• 25:20
  Speaker 5: could replace FEMA, people would support it.
• 25:24
  Speaker 6: Uh.
• 25:24
  Speaker 5: And yeah, I know we already have the Red Cross,
• 25:27
  Speaker 5: but the Red Cross isn't the shouldn't be the only
• 25:30
  Speaker 5: organization that does assistance, and they don't do everything that
• 25:34
  Speaker 5: FEMA does either, So it would be very valuable for
• 25:40
  Speaker 5: the public to ban together and support an organization like
• 25:44
  Speaker 5: that and not have the government be doing it, because clearly,
• 25:48
  Speaker 5: when the government is doing it, you get the bureaucracy
• 25:53
  Speaker 5: tolerating stuff like this and they only care about it.
• 25:57
  Speaker 5: The only reason they give a ratsass about this at
• 26:02
  Speaker 5: all is because you found out.
• 26:05
  Speaker 1: Yeah, exactly, Well, we got to move on to the
• 26:08
  Speaker 1: next story. So let us know what you guys think
• 26:10
  Speaker 1: about this one in the comments and let's get into
• 26:14
  Speaker 1: the next one.
• 26:14
  Speaker 2: This one is kind of dark, but I think it's important.
• 26:17
  Speaker 1: So last week, a man in Duluth, Minnesota killed himself,
• 26:23
  Speaker 1: his ex wife I'm sorry, his wife, ex partner, and
• 26:27
  Speaker 1: two sons in a horrific murder suicide after a police
• 26:31
  Speaker 1: wellness check. Anthony Nephew, aged forty six, was found dead
• 26:35
  Speaker 1: on a self inflicted gunshot wound, along with his wife,
• 26:38
  Speaker 1: Katherine Ramsland, and his seven year old son, Oliver Nephew
• 26:45
  Speaker 1: a mile away. The bodies of Nephew's ex wife, Aaron
• 26:48
  Speaker 1: Abramson and her fifteen year old son, Jacob nephew were
• 26:51
  Speaker 1: also discovered. While on the surface, the five had a disjointed,
• 26:55
  Speaker 1: albeit close family, Anthony had been growing increasingly distant into
• 27:00
  Speaker 1: the world of online conspiracy theories and the occult. He
• 27:04
  Speaker 1: began posting cryptic messages online, such as quote life is
• 27:08
  Speaker 1: just a fantasy of your own construction, drawn from the
• 27:11
  Speaker 1: lattice of your own experimental reality end quote. He eventually
• 27:14
  Speaker 1: grew paranoid and afraid of a possible second term for
• 27:17
  Speaker 1: President Donald Trump. Taking to social media, he detailed his fears,
• 27:21
  Speaker 1: stating quote, my mental health and the world can no
• 27:24
  Speaker 1: longer peacefully coexist, and a lot of the reason is religion.
• 27:29
  Speaker 1: I am terrified of religious zelots inflicting their misguided beliefs
• 27:33
  Speaker 1: on me and my family. I have intrusive thoughts of
• 27:36
  Speaker 1: being burned at the stake as a witch or crucified
• 27:38
  Speaker 1: on a burning cross, having people actually believe that I
• 27:42
  Speaker 1: or my child are Satan or the Antichrist, or whatever
• 27:45
  Speaker 1: their favorite color of boogeyman they are afraid of this
• 27:48
  Speaker 1: week end quote. He also stated his belief that Republicans
• 27:52
  Speaker 1: have made leaving domestic violence relationships harder and made allusions
• 27:57
  Speaker 1: to the Handmaid's Tale, stating Gilead here, I wonder where
• 28:01
  Speaker 1: he got that idea. Anthony previously had underlying mental issues
• 28:05
  Speaker 1: and claimed to be a suicide attempt survivor. He also
• 28:08
  Speaker 1: wrote a piece in the Duluth News you know the
• 28:11
  Speaker 1: place the Duluthe model is named after, tribune about mental
• 28:15
  Speaker 1: health and excerpt of this article reads as follows.
• 28:18
  Speaker 6: Quote.
• 28:19
  Speaker 1: Mental health in this country is stigmatized, ignored, or treated
• 28:23
  Speaker 1: as a burden for the individual to bear alone with
• 28:26
  Speaker 1: little help and less understanding. Americans deny they have mental
• 28:29
  Speaker 1: health struggles because they have to, because they're told to,
• 28:33
  Speaker 1: or because they don't realize their mind is broken. Finally,
• 28:36
  Speaker 1: the synapse is overload and they suffer a breakdown. For
• 28:39
  Speaker 1: most of us, that's the best and results. For millions
• 28:42
  Speaker 1: of Americans, a breakdown leads to suicide or homicide before suicide.
• 28:46
  Speaker 2: End quote. And I'd like to add a couple of things.
• 28:49
  Speaker 1: Number One, dude the help the mental health company has problems,
• 28:53
  Speaker 1: or that institution has problems, but most of it has
• 28:55
  Speaker 1: to do with the fact that you're a dude. And
• 28:57
  Speaker 1: the mental health industry has nothing to offer men because
• 29:01
  Speaker 1: it just isn't built with them in mind. And the
• 29:03
  Speaker 1: other thing is is that he was very concerned about
• 29:06
  Speaker 1: Project twenty twenty five, a thing that is never going
• 29:09
  Speaker 1: to happen and has always existed in some form. So anyway,
• 29:12
  Speaker 1: I give the floor to whoever wants to talk.
• 29:15
  Speaker 5: Now, well, let's start with the fact that it isn't
• 29:18
  Speaker 5: just it isn't just a gender issue here. His particular
• 29:24
  Speaker 5: delusions are fueled by the establishment media. They're fueled by
• 29:30
  Speaker 5: all of the people around him in his community. They're
• 29:34
  Speaker 5: fueled by all of the people that he would contact
• 29:38
  Speaker 5: for help in the mental health industry. I shouldn't say all,
• 29:41
  Speaker 5: because there are some people in mental health industry who
• 29:43
  Speaker 5: aren't actually mentally healthy, but there's a lot of people
• 29:48
  Speaker 5: in the mental health industry who are not, and they
• 29:50
  Speaker 5: buy into all of this shit. And this guy. Can
• 29:53
  Speaker 5: you imagine for a minute, all right, if you had
• 29:58
  Speaker 5: delusions of being a psychic who could see demons and
• 30:03
  Speaker 5: monsters and all kinds of like any kind of cryptid
• 30:07
  Speaker 5: that ever has been written about, whether it was made
• 30:10
  Speaker 5: up after the Internet or started, or has existed for
• 30:14
  Speaker 5: hundreds of years, and you see them everywhere because you
• 30:17
  Speaker 5: are schizophrenic and your particular type of schizophrenia cause of hallucinations,
• 30:22
  Speaker 5: and you've had all that information come in, and your
• 30:25
  Speaker 5: hallucinations take the form of things that you know about
• 30:28
  Speaker 5: and are scared of, and those are the things. Right.
• 30:30
  Speaker 5: So you go to a psychiatrist and you tell the
• 30:33
  Speaker 5: psychiatrist that you are having this problem, and the psychiatrist
• 30:36
  Speaker 5: turns to you and says, you just understand things too much.
• 30:41
  Speaker 5: We're not going to disabuse you of these notions. We're
• 30:44
  Speaker 5: not going to pretend that what you're seeing isn't real.
• 30:47
  Speaker 5: You're going to learn to live with it. And here's
• 30:50
  Speaker 5: how we're going to learn to live with it. Right.
• 30:52
  Speaker 5: That would be valuable if all of those things were
• 30:55
  Speaker 5: real and you were really seeing them, and they we're
• 31:00
  Speaker 5: really going to get you if you didn't learn to
• 31:02
  Speaker 5: deal with them. But in his circumstance, and in the
• 31:06
  Speaker 5: circumstance I just described, that's not the case. Even if
• 31:10
  Speaker 5: some of those things actually exist somewhere, nobody's ever found
• 31:14
  Speaker 5: proof of them, right, which means they're not going to
• 31:17
  Speaker 5: get you, at least not in your normal, everyday life.
• 31:21
  Speaker 5: And the same thing with this project, the same thing
• 31:23
  Speaker 5: that with this situation, that this man is afraid of
• 31:26
  Speaker 5: He's afraid of things that will never happen to him.
• 31:30
  Speaker 5: He's afraid of things that there is no evidence to
• 31:33
  Speaker 5: back the argument that they are going to happen to him.
• 31:38
  Speaker 5: And if he had gone from beause he if he
• 31:42
  Speaker 5: was getting help with this, the quote unquote help would
• 31:46
  Speaker 5: be all right, Yeah, all your fears are real. Well,
• 31:51
  Speaker 5: here's how we're going to talk about how to deal
• 31:53
  Speaker 5: with them. When he could have been really helped by
• 32:01
  Speaker 5: somebody willing to walk him back a little bit from
• 32:04
  Speaker 5: that and say, hey, wait a minute, you can disagree
• 32:07
  Speaker 5: with these things politically without panicking, okay, and at that
• 32:14
  Speaker 5: point that might have deviated him from this path. It's
• 32:20
  Speaker 5: very much the same as the Texas mom in the
• 32:24
  Speaker 5: nineties who drowned all four of her kids because that
• 32:28
  Speaker 5: would keep them from getting old enough to be culpable
• 32:30
  Speaker 5: in the eyes of God for sin, and therefore they
• 32:35
  Speaker 5: couldn't go to hell when they died, and that was
• 32:38
  Speaker 5: her real logic. A doctor could have helped her, her
• 32:47
  Speaker 5: husband begged for help for her, She begged for help,
• 32:52
  Speaker 5: and there was this mentality that she can't be crazy
• 32:55
  Speaker 5: because she's a mom. She can't be too crazy. She
• 32:59
  Speaker 5: can't need help that much, she can't need to be institutionalized.
• 33:05
  Speaker 5: And so they didn't help her, and her kids are dead,
• 33:08
  Speaker 5: and they didn't help this man and his whole family
• 33:10
  Speaker 5: is dead.
• 33:16
  Speaker 2: Yeah, Mike, did you want to say something?
• 33:20
  Speaker 4: I'm already regretting my rather biblical rhetorical conclusions to the
• 33:26
  Speaker 4: last story to repeat, Please don't kill people or even
• 33:33
  Speaker 4: use the violence. Just enact serious punishments on those who
• 33:39
  Speaker 4: do killing or violence. Mental health or no mental health.
• 33:46
  Speaker 4: And again, well, what we're dealing with here is someone
• 33:50
  Speaker 4: with some rather familiar talking points that stuff about the
• 33:54
  Speaker 4: Handmaid's Tale. And it's not just Margaret Atwood who's to
• 33:58
  Speaker 4: blame here? That that book would have been lost and
• 34:01
  Speaker 4: buried in the sounds of time were it not for
• 34:04
  Speaker 4: the male strem of bigotry into which it dropped should
• 34:10
  Speaker 4: I say female strom of bigotry? Is this really a
• 34:17
  Speaker 4: matter of mental illness? I know the obvious answer is yes,
• 34:21
  Speaker 4: but it begs the question just how many lies? How
• 34:26
  Speaker 4: much dare I say misinformation? Can a person be subjected
• 34:31
  Speaker 4: to before their actions can be attributed to that misinformation?
• 34:37
  Speaker 4: Can a mentally healthy person be driven to these kinds
• 34:41
  Speaker 4: of atrocities just by being lied to. The answer to
• 34:46
  Speaker 4: that is also yes, rather unequivocally. In fact, it's how
• 34:51
  Speaker 4: they get soldiers to fight wars. Well, principally, the draft
• 34:56
  Speaker 4: is how they get soldiers to fight wars, but more
• 34:59
  Speaker 4: often they're not.
• 35:00
  Speaker 3: That's not enough.
• 35:02
  Speaker 4: If you want to instill a killer instinct in an
• 35:05
  Speaker 4: otherwise ordinary person, you need lies or propaganda that people
• 35:12
  Speaker 4: believe and understand. As was discovered in the First World War,
• 35:18
  Speaker 4: men are actually rather reluctant to fire at people if
• 35:24
  Speaker 4: their life is not in danger and they have no
• 35:26
  Speaker 4: idea what they're even supposed to be fighting for. If
• 35:30
  Speaker 4: you throw two ordinary men together and tell them to
• 35:33
  Speaker 4: kill each other, they'll just go no, I can't do it.
• 35:39
  Speaker 4: I don't even know this man. And even if I did,
• 35:42
  Speaker 4: I can't just take a human life. It's extraordinarily difficult psychologically.
• 35:51
  Speaker 4: I mean, I still cringe about embarrassing things I said
• 35:55
  Speaker 4: twenty years ago. If I take someone else's life, I can't.
• 36:02
  Speaker 3: I'll never get over it.
• 36:05
  Speaker 4: But this all changes if you've been conditioned to believe
• 36:11
  Speaker 4: that the man you're fighting is in some way not human.
• 36:15
  Speaker 4: And it's rather harrowing how easily people are convinced of
• 36:19
  Speaker 4: such things. In the age of mass media one hundred
• 36:23
  Speaker 4: years ago, they had a hard time convincing men to
• 36:27
  Speaker 4: kill a Nazi if that Nazi was unarmed and not
• 36:32
  Speaker 4: a threat.
• 36:34
  Speaker 3: But I dread to think of.
• 36:36
  Speaker 4: How many of these Democrat voting zombies would readily pull
• 36:41
  Speaker 4: the trigger without hesitation if they were told the man
• 36:45
  Speaker 4: in question was a Trump support. It's worth pointing out
• 36:50
  Speaker 4: that if so much as one person gets killed by
• 36:55
  Speaker 4: a Democrat voter in a psychotic reaction to this Trump victory.
• 36:58
  Speaker 3: That is one more person than has ever been.
• 37:01
  Speaker 4: Killed by Trump supporters in their own retribution, even if
• 37:05
  Speaker 4: that includes January the sixth, in which Trump supporters killed nobody.
• 37:09
  Speaker 4: I suppose I should tone down my rhetoric. As I
• 37:14
  Speaker 4: said before, these people are not necessarily psychopaths. More often
• 37:19
  Speaker 4: than not, they've just been brainwashed or they're just suffering
• 37:22
  Speaker 4: from a sort of arrested development. Don't get me wrong,
• 37:26
  Speaker 4: they are extremely dangerous. They will probably kill you if
• 37:30
  Speaker 4: they can get away with it. But you know, no
• 37:35
  Speaker 4: good ever came from accelerationism. There are two kinds of
• 37:42
  Speaker 4: penal justice. At least I can think of that retributive
• 37:47
  Speaker 4: retributivism and consequentialism. Retributive justice means so making someone pay
• 37:55
  Speaker 4: for what they've done based primarily on a sense of revenge.
• 38:02
  Speaker 4: To me, it seems at best petty and at worst
• 38:05
  Speaker 4: apocalyptic spiral of you know, tribal warfare. Consequentialism is where
• 38:11
  Speaker 4: you it's is where you just in act consequences based
• 38:17
  Speaker 4: on someone's actually and you simply remove a criminal from
• 38:21
  Speaker 4: society until you're confident that they won't do it again.
• 38:25
  Speaker 3: And if they.
• 38:25
  Speaker 4: Never reform you, you just keep them away from society forever,
• 38:30
  Speaker 4: even if that involves capital punishment. That's you know, that's
• 38:34
  Speaker 4: it's perfectly applicable within a consequentialists system. Interesting philosophical question.
• 38:43
  Speaker 4: It's possible that sometime in the future people will figure
• 38:48
  Speaker 4: out how to manipulate gabber pathways in the brain to
• 38:52
  Speaker 4: distort a person's sense of time and make them experience
• 38:58
  Speaker 4: a thousand years in the space of eight months, and
• 39:02
  Speaker 4: and that would works as a centence. Would that be
• 39:06
  Speaker 4: an appropriate sentence for a criminal, even like even the
• 39:10
  Speaker 4: very worst of criminals. It's it's a horrifying thought, but
• 39:16
  Speaker 4: it's it's an interesting philosophical exercise, and it's drawn across
• 39:21
  Speaker 4: the lines of retributive, if retributive and consequentialist justice. To
• 39:27
  Speaker 4: what degree is it okay to torture people like that,
• 39:31
  Speaker 4: even if it may indeed mean saving money on prison habitation.
• 39:37
  Speaker 3: Personally, I think it's a bit much.
• 39:40
  Speaker 4: If you're that worried about the cost of the prison system,
• 39:42
  Speaker 4: then just execute people. Like I said, there's definitely permissible
• 39:47
  Speaker 4: consequentialistically speaking, But again I'm colliding with myself morally again again.
• 39:54
  Speaker 4: I again I did not condone violence, certainly not violence
• 39:57
  Speaker 4: inflicted by the state, and certainly not by the army
• 40:01
  Speaker 4: of sleep of cells brainwashed by the state. That this
• 40:04
  Speaker 4: is terribly complicated. I'm gonna leave it to you guys
• 40:09
  Speaker 4: to argue about it in the comments section.
• 40:11
  Speaker 5: Good luck, I got one. I've got one thing to
• 40:13
  Speaker 5: say human beings in general, human beings start out equally valuable,
• 40:23
  Speaker 5: and we end up equally valuable because we all end
• 40:26
  Speaker 5: up with varying degrees of disability when we get old,
• 40:29
  Speaker 5: and in between, there a lot of change takes place
• 40:33
  Speaker 5: based on what happens when we're growing up and what
• 40:35
  Speaker 5: lessons we learned. And I think that a justice system
• 40:42
  Speaker 5: that genuinely served the community, one that would do its
• 40:49
  Speaker 5: best to restore the greatest human value to the community,
• 40:54
  Speaker 5: that is the ability of the most people to be
• 40:58
  Speaker 5: contributing members of society so that the community would benefit
• 41:02
  Speaker 5: from their existence. Its most important function would be to
• 41:09
  Speaker 5: bring people back to a mentality of service to the
• 41:13
  Speaker 5: community and being a functional part of the community where
• 41:19
  Speaker 5: they're able to live without being at odds with the community.
• 41:25
  Speaker 5: And then once you get through all of the people
• 41:29
  Speaker 5: that you can do that for and restore them to
• 41:33
  Speaker 5: being valuable members of the community, then you address the
• 41:37
  Speaker 5: people that you have a harder time doing that for,
• 41:40
  Speaker 5: and you go through the layers and layers of people
• 41:42
  Speaker 5: whose mentality creates difficulty in restoring them to being at
• 41:47
  Speaker 5: any point valued members of the community. And you get
• 41:52
  Speaker 5: at the end of that to a small group of
• 41:55
  Speaker 5: people that are beyond human capability of helping them. And
• 42:03
  Speaker 5: that's the only group of people that we should be
• 42:06
  Speaker 5: focusing on with the question of long term containment. And
• 42:10
  Speaker 5: I've had people tell me, you know, the philosophy bullets
• 42:13
  Speaker 5: are cheaper than barracks. But I think when you get
• 42:15
  Speaker 5: to that point you're dealing with somebody who is mentally ill,
• 42:21
  Speaker 5: there's No, there's no mental health in being completely at
• 42:28
  Speaker 5: odds with being able to contribute to your community, being
• 42:33
  Speaker 5: a member of your community that other people want to
• 42:36
  Speaker 5: be around, that wants to be around other people, that
• 42:40
  Speaker 5: wants to live within the culture of your community, and
• 42:45
  Speaker 5: not find the aspects of the culture to buck that
• 42:48
  Speaker 5: would cause danger to other people. And so if you're
• 42:51
  Speaker 5: in that situation, if a person's in that situation it
• 42:56
  Speaker 5: is it becomes cruel and unusual to try to punish them.
• 43:01
  Speaker 5: And that's where you know prisons should represent, if not
• 43:08
  Speaker 5: mental health facilities, then containment facilities for people who cannot
• 43:13
  Speaker 5: be helped, and it should be humane that I do
• 43:18
  Speaker 5: recognize that the philosophy bullets are cheaper than barracks is
• 43:22
  Speaker 5: out there, and I also understand that if someone like
• 43:27
  Speaker 5: that escapes, they become a threat to the entire community.
• 43:33
  Speaker 5: I just never am going to trust any government authority
• 43:37
  Speaker 5: with anything like a death penalty, because historically they've always
• 43:42
  Speaker 5: used it wrong, they've always fucked it up, they've always
• 43:44
  Speaker 5: executed people who were not in that group, and they've
• 43:49
  Speaker 5: always executed people who didn't do the thing they're being
• 43:51
  Speaker 5: executed for. And those two things make it wrong. I
• 43:56
  Speaker 5: think if somebody breaks into your house and tries to
• 43:58
  Speaker 5: kill you, you should be able to defend yourself with
• 44:00
  Speaker 5: deadly force. I'm not against the death penalty in that way.
• 44:06
  Speaker 5: I'm just against the government having the power to apply it.
• 44:10
  Speaker 5: And I don't think that we should deliberately retaliate against
• 44:15
  Speaker 5: people who have done horrible things to us. I think
• 44:19
  Speaker 5: that we should do our best to In my opinion,
• 44:24
  Speaker 5: the greatest victory is turning someone around from the pathway
• 44:31
  Speaker 5: where they're going to do the most harm to the
• 44:33
  Speaker 5: pathway where they're going to reach their greatest potential to
• 44:36
  Speaker 5: be a valuable member of their community. Even if it
• 44:41
  Speaker 5: just means that they're going to be a janitor that
• 44:43
  Speaker 5: never breaks the law. Again, that's still a thousand times
• 44:47
  Speaker 5: better than a petty thief or a burglar, or a
• 44:52
  Speaker 5: killer or a rapist, a folder, a spindle or mutilat
• 44:57
  Speaker 5: or whatever. I don't think the government is the best
• 45:01
  Speaker 5: entity to do any of that. I think that if
• 45:04
  Speaker 5: the community we're able to form and support agencies that
• 45:08
  Speaker 5: could do that with no government authority, we would have
• 45:13
  Speaker 5: achieved it by now that these standards would have been achieved,
• 45:18
  Speaker 5: not the agencies would have been achieved, but these standards
• 45:21
  Speaker 5: would have been achieved by now. I think the only
• 45:22
  Speaker 5: reason they haven't is because government funded prisons run for
• 45:27
  Speaker 5: profit and they make money on slave labor, because that's
• 45:33
  Speaker 5: what's happening right now, and therefore, helping the people that
• 45:40
  Speaker 5: they incarcerate to become valuable members of their community is
• 45:46
  Speaker 5: not in their best interest and they'll never do it,
• 45:51
  Speaker 5: so I blame government for this too.
• 45:55
  Speaker 1: The irony of this as well is that the Project
• 45:58
  Speaker 1: twenty twenty five mongering campaign that we've had to put
• 46:02
  Speaker 1: up with for the past four years was spread mostly
• 46:06
  Speaker 1: by women and feminists, and a man under this I mean,
• 46:12
  Speaker 1: who was obviously not mentally like super healthy, but nonetheless
• 46:16
  Speaker 1: a man acted on this propaganda and brainwashing killed his
• 46:20
  Speaker 1: family and then himself, and feminists will blame the men.
• 46:25
  Speaker 2: For that because that's how it operates.
• 46:27
  Speaker 1: They create the conditions that they then will be used
• 46:31
  Speaker 1: to their advantage to continue to essentially legitimize themselves.
• 46:35
  Speaker 2: And so it's going to not be a.
• 46:37
  Speaker 1: Conversation about whether or not the Project twenty twenty five
• 46:41
  Speaker 1: fear mongering campaign, which I have been pushing against for
• 46:45
  Speaker 1: years since it started, even against people who supposedly.
• 46:49
  Speaker 2: Are on our side or were once.
• 46:52
  Speaker 3: That.
• 46:53
  Speaker 2: This is where it leads. This is the product of
• 46:55
  Speaker 2: your fear mongering.
• 46:57
  Speaker 5: So yeah, but to be more blunt than that, if
• 47:01
  Speaker 5: you have been panicmongering over twenty twenty five and this
• 47:05
  Speaker 5: man has heard the types of things that you have said,
• 47:09
  Speaker 5: because everything goes out in waves, you killed this man
• 47:14
  Speaker 5: and his family, just the same as if you panic
• 47:18
  Speaker 5: mongered over COVID, you killed my parents.
• 47:23
  Speaker 1: And if you don't believe that feminists were the primary
• 47:26
  Speaker 1: drivers of this fear mongering campaign and this psyop, I
• 47:30
  Speaker 1: just put Project twenty twenty five into a just your
• 47:33
  Speaker 1: Google or YouTube search engine and look at how many
• 47:36
  Speaker 1: feminist YouTube channels come up absolutely panicked about it when
• 47:41
  Speaker 1: if they have like they there's only two possible explanations, okay,
• 47:47
  Speaker 1: either one they're stupid or two they're dishonest. And I
• 47:52
  Speaker 1: think that they're dishonest because it's not hard. I went
• 47:56
  Speaker 1: through on my channel the entire document and look through it,
• 48:00
  Speaker 1: comb through it. Didn't find anything. I mean, I don't
• 48:03
  Speaker 1: even think it was that radical, you know, probably not
• 48:06
  Speaker 1: implementable considering it is essentially a document put up by
• 48:11
  Speaker 1: a think tank and guess what.
• 48:12
  Speaker 2: There are think tanks all over.
• 48:14
  Speaker 1: They always put stuff out and they have all kinds
• 48:17
  Speaker 1: of opinions, and almost none of them ever get fully realized.
• 48:21
  Speaker 1: Most of them don't even get picked up. So it's
• 48:23
  Speaker 1: kind of like one of these things that you can
• 48:25
  Speaker 1: pick up and say, oh, look, this is what Trump's
• 48:27
  Speaker 1: gonna do. And by the way, it wouldn't matter if
• 48:30
  Speaker 1: it was like some other like it could have been Disantis,
• 48:31
  Speaker 1: they would have done the same thing. It wouldn't matter
• 48:33
  Speaker 1: who it was. It's all about sticking this brand on
• 48:37
  Speaker 1: their enemies and then using that and then just creating
• 48:40
  Speaker 1: a bunch of fear and hype. And yeah, it was
• 48:42
  Speaker 1: everywhere everywhere. My mother called me about it. Oh did
• 48:44
  Speaker 1: you hear about Project? I didn't want What can I say?
• 48:48
  Speaker 1: Like if I told her mom it's nothing, she would
• 48:50
  Speaker 1: get angry with me for not taking it seriously enough,
• 48:52
  Speaker 1: even though I knew it was a nothing burger. And
• 48:55
  Speaker 1: yet I mean, I guess this Minnesota family thought it
• 48:57
  Speaker 1: was a something burger because they're all on so anyway,
• 49:02
  Speaker 1: just wanted to say that, like, this is ironically a
• 49:05
  Speaker 1: feminist problem that they created with their lies and it
• 49:09
  Speaker 1: led to somebody's death. Well, actually several people's death. But
• 49:12
  Speaker 1: speaking of feminists, we're gonna move on to the next story.
• 49:15
  Speaker 1: Let us know what you guys think about this. In
• 49:16
  Speaker 1: the comments. Following Donald Trump's victory in the US presidential election,
• 49:21
  Speaker 1: there has been a notable surge of interest in the
• 49:24
  Speaker 1: US and in women in the US for South Korea's
• 49:28
  Speaker 1: four B movement, where women pledge to abstain from dating, sex, marriage,
• 49:33
  Speaker 1: and childbirth. Is what four B standsports of the four
• 49:36
  Speaker 1: knows in Korea, which is no more dating, no more sex,
• 49:41
  Speaker 1: no more marriage, and no more childbirth with men as
• 49:44
  Speaker 1: a form of protest against misogyny and inequality. This movement,
• 49:48
  Speaker 1: initially a response to gender issues in South Korea, has
• 49:51
  Speaker 1: captured the attention of young American women on social media
• 49:53
  Speaker 1: platforms like TikTok and Instagram, with many expressing frustration over
• 49:57
  Speaker 1: the political landscape and perceive rollback of women rights, leading
• 50:00
  Speaker 1: to discussions and some American women adopting or even supporting
• 50:04
  Speaker 1: the movement's principles, which we have seen in you know,
• 50:08
  Speaker 1: like on TikTok and and and Instagram videos. We deserved
• 50:13
  Speaker 1: to be but we got four B. But I wanted
• 50:15
  Speaker 1: to add one thing to that to be is a
• 50:18
  Speaker 1: character from Near Automata, and I think that that's what
• 50:22
  Speaker 1: we're gonna get.
• 50:22
  Speaker 2: I believe that Elon Musk promised us this.
• 50:24
  Speaker 1: But one other thing I want to add to this is
• 50:26
  Speaker 1: to show you just how absolutely insane and entitled these
• 50:29
  Speaker 1: women are. So one of the things that drove them
• 50:32
  Speaker 1: to do this four B thing was this very viral
• 50:36
  Speaker 1: like audio clip of Nick Fuentez, notorious troll online who
• 50:41
  Speaker 1: I don't really have a problem with. Well yeah, probably
• 50:45
  Speaker 1: a gay fed but point is he he retrolls people online,
• 50:49
  Speaker 1: and he basically said, your body, my choice. He was
• 50:51
  Speaker 1: basically talking about how, you know, the Trump victory means
• 50:53
  Speaker 1: that women are not going to get their abortions, and
• 50:57
  Speaker 1: of course women because they cannot tolerate the notion of
• 51:00
  Speaker 1: anybody criticizing them in any way or trolling them for
• 51:04
  Speaker 1: that matter, they got so angry that that's part of
• 51:07
  Speaker 1: what caused this four B movement thing to sort of
• 51:10
  Speaker 1: get picked up in the United States. But they also
• 51:14
  Speaker 1: within hours of this, and this is something that I
• 51:16
  Speaker 1: was gonna make into a story, but I decided to
• 51:18
  Speaker 1: just tag it onto this one. They doxed his address
• 51:21
  Speaker 1: and they posted it online and then they a woman.
• 51:24
  Speaker 2: Went to his house who is address.
• 51:28
  Speaker 1: We don't know why, because she got pepper sprayed when
• 51:31
  Speaker 1: she got there and like kicked down the stairs by him.
• 51:35
  Speaker 1: And now they're calling for like legal action. And the
• 51:38
  Speaker 1: reason why I'm bringing this up so, I mean, we
• 51:40
  Speaker 1: can talk about the four B thing. It's obviously like
• 51:42
  Speaker 1: it's not great because it will Uh it's these people
• 51:47
  Speaker 1: are just gonna become more miserable, more disdainful, more vengeful,
• 51:51
  Speaker 1: and more resentful and they're gonna cause more problems and
• 51:54
  Speaker 1: that's not what they should be doing. But they are
• 51:57
  Speaker 1: also like openly doxing people. Remember when doc was like
• 52:00
  Speaker 1: the worst thing you could do on the internet. They
• 52:02
  Speaker 1: just did it and I brought it up. I brought
• 52:05
  Speaker 1: it up yesterday. I brought it up yesterday on the show.
• 52:07
  Speaker 1: And there are people like, well, you know, address is
• 52:09
  Speaker 1: our public information?
• 52:10
  Speaker 2: What like?
• 52:11
  Speaker 1: When like it's because it's a man. I mean, it
• 52:14
  Speaker 1: doesn't even matter that it's Nick Fuentz's I don't care
• 52:16
  Speaker 1: what you think about that guy. It doesn't matter. Guys,
• 52:19
  Speaker 1: get some fucking principles. Okay, it's either not okay to
• 52:22
  Speaker 1: dox people, or it's okay.
• 52:24
  Speaker 2: To dox people.
• 52:24
  Speaker 1: If it's not okay, it's not okay, and I'm on
• 52:26
  Speaker 1: the camp if it's not okay. And a woman showed
• 52:28
  Speaker 1: up at his door and people are acting like she
• 52:30
  Speaker 1: wasn't really a threat, you don't know what was gonna happen,
• 52:33
  Speaker 1: Like she claimed that she was just gonna like confront
• 52:36
  Speaker 1: him or whatever, and he pepper sprayed her when she
• 52:38
  Speaker 1: opened the door.
• 52:39
  Speaker 2: Rightfully fucking so, because.
• 52:42
  Speaker 5: You don't be on the trail to be a threat
• 52:44
  Speaker 5: to anybody, to be culpable for breaking the law and
• 52:49
  Speaker 5: to be removed from the property. If your lawbreaking involves
• 52:55
  Speaker 5: trespassing on personal property against the will of the homeowner,
• 52:59
  Speaker 5: that is not how the law and it's not how
• 53:01
  Speaker 5: ethical behavior works. It doesn't matter whether somebody is going
• 53:07
  Speaker 5: to get hurt. It matters whether you are taking away
• 53:10
  Speaker 5: from somebody something that is rightfully theirs, and that includes
• 53:13
  Speaker 5: control over their property.
• 53:16
  Speaker 1: Just saying, oh, for sure, But that's all I wanted
• 53:20
  Speaker 1: to say about that. I'm just saying that the four
• 53:22
  Speaker 1: B thing and this like docsing like this is like
• 53:26
  Speaker 1: the kind of social climate these cunts want.
• 53:31
  Speaker 5: So all right, Well, there's a couple of things that
• 53:33
  Speaker 5: need to be considered in handling this all right, The
• 53:36
  Speaker 5: first thing is the Shakers. People are going to be like,
• 53:39
  Speaker 5: what the fuck, how is this very very conservative Christian
• 53:45
  Speaker 5: movement of old in any way related. So the Shakers,
• 53:49
  Speaker 5: for people who don't know, the Shakers, were a Protestant
• 53:51
  Speaker 5: Christian sect that they started out in England, they came
• 53:55
  Speaker 5: to the United States. They had a whole bunch of
• 53:59
  Speaker 5: different beliefs that made them a little bit of odd
• 54:02
  Speaker 5: balls in the Christian community and everything. But the one
• 54:05
  Speaker 5: thing that I think most people who know about them
• 54:09
  Speaker 5: remember about them, aside from their contributions to our culture
• 54:12
  Speaker 5: like Shaker furniture and architecture and stuff, was how the
• 54:17
  Speaker 5: sect died out. And the reason the sect died out
• 54:22
  Speaker 5: was because they had a very vehement practice, vehement belief
• 54:26
  Speaker 5: in celibacy. The only types of love that humans were
• 54:30
  Speaker 5: supposed to have with each other was brotherly and sisterly love.
• 54:34
  Speaker 5: So no sex and no reproduction, no marriage, none of that,
• 54:41
  Speaker 5: so no replacement of members through childbirth. So as they
• 54:47
  Speaker 5: aged and died, if they didn't recruit other people to
• 54:51
  Speaker 5: be Shakers who were already born, then they couldn't they
• 54:57
  Speaker 5: couldn't continue to grow their church. So in their heyday,
• 55:02
  Speaker 5: and like the mid nineteenth century, sometimes they were like
• 55:06
  Speaker 5: less there were still less than ten thousand. They're you know,
• 55:08
  Speaker 5: like five or six thousand of them. There's two left,
• 55:12
  Speaker 5: if they're still alive. The last I read about them,
• 55:14
  Speaker 5: there's two people, not two churches, not two communities, two
• 55:19
  Speaker 5: individuals left who were shakers. And that's it, right, And yeah,
• 55:28
  Speaker 5: they were called shakers because there's something they did during
• 55:31
  Speaker 5: their during their religious services, But that's not important. What's
• 55:35
  Speaker 5: important is the four B movement. One of their major
• 55:40
  Speaker 5: tenets is celibacy, or at least non reproduction. Right they're
• 55:47
  Speaker 5: abstaining now. If they make that a lifetime thing, their
• 55:51
  Speaker 5: movement will die out eventually. If they cannot recruit now,
• 55:56
  Speaker 5: if nothing changes in government, if nothing changes in the establishment,
• 56:02
  Speaker 5: if nothing changes in the public school system. It's possible
• 56:06
  Speaker 5: that within the public school system, within the post secondary
• 56:09
  Speaker 5: education system, and so on, they may be able to recruit.
• 56:13
  Speaker 5: But the current incoming president has promised to do some
• 56:21
  Speaker 5: things in regard to the funding and overseeing by the
• 56:25
  Speaker 5: federal government of these agencies, not agencies, but institutions of
• 56:30
  Speaker 5: learning that would make that very difficult. Parents can take
• 56:35
  Speaker 5: their kids out of those environments for one thing. For
• 56:38
  Speaker 5: another thing, if the United States government stops supporting feminism
• 56:44
  Speaker 5: in post secondary education, it might also die out, especially
• 56:50
  Speaker 5: if it starts if the government starts tearing down all
• 56:55
  Speaker 5: support for post secondary education, because then universities would have
• 56:59
  Speaker 5: to limit what they do to types of areas of studies.
• 57:05
  Speaker 5: That would result in people earning a lot of money
• 57:08
  Speaker 5: when they get out of college and then coming back
• 57:09
  Speaker 5: and donating to the university because they think their education
• 57:13
  Speaker 5: was highly valuable.
• 57:15
  Speaker 6: Right.
• 57:15
  Speaker 5: That might also help to kill the four B movement
• 57:20
  Speaker 5: without doing anything to the people involved in it. So
• 57:23
  Speaker 5: that's how you handle the celibacy end of it, no problem,
• 57:27
  Speaker 5: Go ahead, don't don't fuck anybody. That's fine, unfuck you too,
• 57:30
  Speaker 5: like we're happy with that. Don't have children, don't raise
• 57:34
  Speaker 5: children to believe what you believe. Don't inflict any more
• 57:37
  Speaker 5: of your beliefs on the rest of the world than
• 57:39
  Speaker 5: you have to. Right, that's good. Right the other end
• 57:44
  Speaker 5: of it, Okay, somebody docs as you when I got
• 57:48
  Speaker 5: docksed on Twitter, and I want to say it was
• 57:51
  Speaker 5: like twenty thirteen, twenty fourteen, somewhere in there was really
• 57:53
  Speaker 5: back in the early parts of when Honey Badger Radio
• 57:59
  Speaker 5: was starting to get a little bit of notoriety in
• 58:02
  Speaker 5: conjunction with our involvement with gamer Gate. But the person
• 58:08
  Speaker 5: who docked us docked us at least me and a
• 58:13
  Speaker 5: few other people. We were docked because we were in
• 58:15
  Speaker 5: association with Voice for Men, and that was part of
• 58:18
  Speaker 5: a older, longer running feud. I guess you could say
• 58:25
  Speaker 5: between a Voice for Men and I can't believe that
• 58:32
  Speaker 5: I'm gonna I gotta talk about man boobs again. But
• 58:36
  Speaker 5: this asset, this asset of the establishment that runs a
• 58:42
  Speaker 5: stupid blog that has a pretty decent sized readership and
• 58:47
  Speaker 5: gets cited as if it has any credibility at all
• 58:51
  Speaker 5: by establishment media. He used to call it man Boobs.
• 58:54
  Speaker 5: Now he calls it. We Hunted the Mammoths. And the
• 58:56
  Speaker 5: guy's name is David Foutrell. He's like among dipshits, He's
• 59:01
  Speaker 5: like king dipshit from the planet dip Hole. Like the guy.
• 59:06
  Speaker 5: This is the kind of guy that even people who
• 59:09
  Speaker 5: were anti bullying would end up making fun of him.
• 59:12
  Speaker 5: It's really hard not to because he really is just
• 59:17
  Speaker 5: an absolute dipshit. So it's easy for them to exploit
• 59:20
  Speaker 5: him because the guy is never going to be popular
• 59:23
  Speaker 5: in his entire life, and if he seeks popularity, the
• 59:26
  Speaker 5: only way for him to get it is to do
• 59:27
  Speaker 5: shit like this. So I was sure it came from him, right,
• 59:34
  Speaker 5: And I'm I'm still to this day sure that whoever
• 59:36
  Speaker 5: did it was influenced by his blog, even though he
• 59:41
  Speaker 5: claimed no involvement whatsoever. But in any case, I followed,
• 59:46
  Speaker 5: filed the police report, and the police came back later
• 59:50
  Speaker 5: and said they could Oh my god. The sad thing
• 59:56
  Speaker 5: is that he doesn't actually look better than that, so
• 1:00:02
  Speaker 5: it's it's really this is the.
• 1:00:04
  Speaker 2: Four B movement personify.
• 1:00:09
  Speaker 5: In any case, I filed the police report, and like
• 1:00:11
  Speaker 5: I said, they came back, they say, couldn't do anything.
• 1:00:14
  Speaker 5: But interestingly, after a few of us did that, I
• 1:00:18
  Speaker 5: did that, and Jack Barnes did that because when he
• 1:00:21
  Speaker 5: was stoped, they published the location of the kindergarten his
• 1:00:25
  Speaker 5: daughter attended. They threatened a five year old a five
• 1:00:30
  Speaker 5: year old child because her dad said that fathers are
• 1:00:35
  Speaker 5: important in their families, and so her dad went to
• 1:00:39
  Speaker 5: the cops and was like, hey, they're threatening my five
• 1:00:41
  Speaker 5: year old child.
• 1:00:43
  Speaker 6: Uh.
• 1:00:43
  Speaker 5: And my understanding is that he got more done than
• 1:00:47
  Speaker 5: I did, but they also sent beheading videos to a
• 1:00:53
  Speaker 5: couple of the guys from a voice for men from back,
• 1:00:56
  Speaker 5: you know, back when videos from from al Qaeda beheading
• 1:01:04
  Speaker 5: people were coming out and said things like this should
• 1:01:09
  Speaker 5: happen to you. You know, the kind of threat tooids
• 1:01:11
  Speaker 5: that Anita Sarkisian could could make a million dollars on
• 1:01:16
  Speaker 5: if that somebody sent them to her. But nobody ever
• 1:01:19
  Speaker 5: sent her anything nearly that bad, so she only made
• 1:01:24
  Speaker 5: half a million dollars, not even that on her threat tooids.
• 1:01:29
  Speaker 5: But we didn't capitalize on it. We all went to
• 1:01:31
  Speaker 5: the cops right and everything that could be done was done.
• 1:01:35
  Speaker 5: Anytime a person could be identified as having sent an
• 1:01:38
  Speaker 5: actual threat or anything doing anything that they aren't supposed
• 1:01:43
  Speaker 5: to do under the law, anything that was actionable, action
• 1:01:47
  Speaker 5: was taken. And that's the best way to handle the situation.
• 1:01:51
  Speaker 5: You prepare to defend your home if you have to,
• 1:01:56
  Speaker 5: and hope that you don't have to, because it really
• 1:01:58
  Speaker 5: sucks to have to remember doing something violent to another person.
• 1:02:03
  Speaker 5: You never forget that, by the way, You never forget
• 1:02:05
  Speaker 5: the look on their face. You never forget how it
• 1:02:09
  Speaker 5: feels to be the person who is hurting another person.
• 1:02:12
  Speaker 5: It doesn't go away. You will have nightmares about it.
• 1:02:17
  Speaker 5: But hopefully you won't have to do that, because hopefully
• 1:02:21
  Speaker 5: when you take your information to the police, it'll stop,
• 1:02:25
  Speaker 5: the problem will go away, and you won't have to
• 1:02:28
  Speaker 5: defend yourself against another person attacking you. But in any case,
• 1:02:33
  Speaker 5: that's my two cents on it. And by the way,
• 1:02:38
  Speaker 5: as long as it's still law, it's a law I
• 1:02:41
  Speaker 5: don't approve of. I don't like the way that it's written.
• 1:02:43
  Speaker 5: I don't like the way that it targets men and
• 1:02:46
  Speaker 5: exempts women from accountability, the way that it fails men
• 1:02:52
  Speaker 5: by exempting women from accountability. But the Violence Against Women
• 1:02:56
  Speaker 5: Act addresses doxing. It always has ever since that it started,
• 1:03:02
  Speaker 5: including electronic practices. It just doesn't mention it by name.
• 1:03:08
  Speaker 5: It just says that if somebody in the United States
• 1:03:13
  Speaker 5: engages in a course of conduct that could be reasonably
• 1:03:19
  Speaker 5: expected to cause substantial emotional distress. So, in other words,
• 1:03:25
  Speaker 5: if you have been terrorized by something that somebody is doing,
• 1:03:28
  Speaker 5: and it's reasonable to expect you to be terrorized, that's
• 1:03:33
  Speaker 5: a federal law. That's a felony violation. They're guilty of
• 1:03:37
  Speaker 5: felony stalking and harassment, and there are punishments for that.
• 1:03:43
  Speaker 5: They're not all that severe, but there are punishments for that.
• 1:03:48
  Speaker 5: So if you are dealing with that kind of thing,
• 1:03:52
  Speaker 5: you find those sections in the Violence Against Women Act
• 1:03:56
  Speaker 5: that address cyberstalking and cyber harassment. You take a copy
• 1:04:02
  Speaker 5: of that with you to the police station, you file
• 1:04:05
  Speaker 5: a complaint. You give all of the information that you
• 1:04:09
  Speaker 5: have that is truthful and honest. So the name of
• 1:04:14
  Speaker 5: the account, even if you you know, don't know who
• 1:04:17
  Speaker 5: the owner of the account is. Anything that's happened that
• 1:04:20
  Speaker 5: leads you to suspect a person in particular, and you
• 1:04:25
  Speaker 5: leave it in their hands. And like I said, you
• 1:04:28
  Speaker 5: make ready to defend your home and your family if
• 1:04:31
  Speaker 5: you have to, but you do everything in your power
• 1:04:35
  Speaker 5: to ensure that it's not up to you and you
• 1:04:37
  Speaker 5: don't have to that you don't have to be responsible
• 1:04:39
  Speaker 5: for that, because that that level of risk on their
• 1:04:49
  Speaker 5: part will convince a lot of people who are being
• 1:04:53
  Speaker 5: targeted for getting sucked up. I guess into this four
• 1:04:59
  Speaker 5: B thing. In this kind of behavior, a lot of
• 1:05:02
  Speaker 5: people will think twice about behaving that way if they
• 1:05:05
  Speaker 5: think that there might be that kind of consequences. The
• 1:05:07
  Speaker 5: cops might come and knock on their door. So there
• 1:05:13
  Speaker 5: you go. Let it make it self obsolete and make
• 1:05:19
  Speaker 5: sure that you have the least amount of risk in
• 1:05:23
  Speaker 5: the situation if they decide to actually insist on a
• 1:05:26
  Speaker 5: conflict you didn't want a part of.
• 1:05:29
  Speaker 1: In other news, North Korea or South Korea, it's real quick, Mike,
• 1:05:33
  Speaker 1: I'm sorry. In other news, South Korea's reaction to the
• 1:05:36
  Speaker 1: four B movement there, which was tanking is tanking birth
• 1:05:40
  Speaker 1: rates and essentially it could potentially make the entire like
• 1:05:45
  Speaker 1: South Korean population extinct. The men of that society just
• 1:05:51
  Speaker 1: voted in their own anti feminist presidents, and so they're
• 1:05:56
  Speaker 1: basically reacting in the same way. I guess that we
• 1:05:59
  Speaker 1: are over here because they went too fucking far.
• 1:06:03
  Speaker 2: Okay, Mike Sawyers. Yeah.
• 1:06:07
  Speaker 4: To summarize the difference between Shakers and feminists is Shakers
• 1:06:13
  Speaker 4: were serious people. They put their money where their mouth is,
• 1:06:17
  Speaker 4: so to speak. Feminists are the epitome of not serious people.
• 1:06:24
  Speaker 4: They only put their money where their cunt is. Money speaks.
• 1:06:30
  Speaker 4: As you may know, wheresoever it might manifest. How long
• 1:06:34
  Speaker 4: ago was it when Roe v.
• 1:06:36
  Speaker 3: Wade was.
• 1:06:39
  Speaker 4: Overturned, not overturned, whatever, it was when the first baby
• 1:06:43
  Speaker 4: step was made towards bringing such legislation back to the States.
• 1:06:47
  Speaker 4: It was some time ago, wasn't. It was a couple
• 1:06:49
  Speaker 4: of years ago, during Biden's presidency, of course, But it
• 1:06:55
  Speaker 4: wasn't a presidential mandate mandate it was it was the
• 1:06:58
  Speaker 4: Supreme Court. Surely then was the time to enact this
• 1:07:03
  Speaker 4: here sex strike?
• 1:07:06
  Speaker 2: Was it not?
• 1:07:07
  Speaker 4: But there was no hide or hair of it when
• 1:07:09
  Speaker 4: Joe Biden was still the president. I mean asterisk Joe
• 1:07:13
  Speaker 4: Biden was never really the president.
• 1:07:15
  Speaker 3: You know, there it goes.
• 1:07:17
  Speaker 4: But yeah, they waited until Trump was reelected before they
• 1:07:20
  Speaker 4: started protesting by abstinence or should I say threatening to
• 1:07:27
  Speaker 4: protest by abstinence. They're not actually doing it. That would
• 1:07:32
  Speaker 4: insinuate that they can help themselves.
• 1:07:35
  Speaker 3: They can't.
• 1:07:36
  Speaker 4: They're constantly fucking everything that moves because they're horny bitches
• 1:07:41
  Speaker 4: with no impulse control, and they can effortlessly reel in
• 1:07:46
  Speaker 4: a man at a moment's notice, not just a man,
• 1:07:49
  Speaker 4: perhaps just a teenager whenever the urge takes them. Because
• 1:07:54
  Speaker 4: they're surrounded by horny simps who also have no impulse control.
• 1:07:59
  Speaker 4: That's not going to change anytime soon. This is this
• 1:08:03
  Speaker 4: is a show, This is a performance. They're yelling into
• 1:08:07
  Speaker 4: the void for once in their pampered, privileged lives, they
• 1:08:12
  Speaker 4: didn't get exactly what they wanted. Goes to show you
• 1:08:16
  Speaker 4: how accustomed women are to getting exactly what they want
• 1:08:20
  Speaker 4: all the time, because this is the kind of unhinged
• 1:08:24
  Speaker 4: wobbler they throw when they don't get it.
• 1:08:28
  Speaker 3: You have to do what I want.
• 1:08:30
  Speaker 4: You have to put a calculating communist retard in charge
• 1:08:33
  Speaker 4: of the free world. She's got a brown vagina. We're
• 1:08:37
  Speaker 4: supposed to give brown vaginas everything they want.
• 1:08:40
  Speaker 3: The TV said.
• 1:08:41
  Speaker 4: So it's it's babies throwing their toys out of the pram.
• 1:08:46
  Speaker 3: That's all it is. Nothing's going to change.
• 1:08:49
  Speaker 4: They say they're not going to fuck men anymore, but
• 1:08:52
  Speaker 4: of course they are. They're spiritually, spiritually vacuous degenerates who
• 1:08:59
  Speaker 4: have no play measures in life other than temporary sexual tingles.
• 1:09:04
  Speaker 4: It would be nice if they could turn their attention
• 1:09:07
  Speaker 4: to higher pursuits like art or science, or hey, actually
• 1:09:12
  Speaker 4: raising families, but it's not gonna happen. For the most part,
• 1:09:17
  Speaker 4: they can still have abortions, and even if they can't,
• 1:09:21
  Speaker 4: they'll just learn the fine martial art of the coat hanger,
• 1:09:27
  Speaker 4: and they'll.
• 1:09:27
  Speaker 3: Still get away with it because they still.
• 1:09:29
  Speaker 4: Can or they can just use the multitude of contraceptive
• 1:09:34
  Speaker 4: options they've always had. Boo fucking who men still don't
• 1:09:39
  Speaker 4: have those options, by the way, does anyone care?
• 1:09:42
  Speaker 5: No?
• 1:09:42
  Speaker 3: Weird?
• 1:09:43
  Speaker 2: Weird?
• 1:09:44
  Speaker 5: Well, we're like a year a little more than a
• 1:09:48
  Speaker 5: year away from one. Hopefully, according to the company that's
• 1:09:51
  Speaker 5: working on it, it'll be called Lane, and it'll make
• 1:09:55
  Speaker 5: women's birth control a non issue for you because it's
• 1:09:59
  Speaker 5: vassal gel.
• 1:10:00
  Speaker 3: Hopefully.
• 1:10:01
  Speaker 4: But in the meantime, we just have to find a
• 1:10:04
  Speaker 4: woman who has the wherewithal to use prevention on account
• 1:10:09
  Speaker 4: of it being far better than the cure. Oh and
• 1:10:12
  Speaker 4: people who are not dribbling communist retards will just carry
• 1:10:17
  Speaker 4: on as normal, like having babies and why not. Well,
• 1:10:21
  Speaker 4: while you baby murdering control freak dickheads will eject yourselves
• 1:10:27
  Speaker 4: from the gene pool and of nothing of value will
• 1:10:31
  Speaker 4: be lost. I mean, it's sad that this might contribute
• 1:10:35
  Speaker 4: to a continuing lower lowering of native birth rates, but
• 1:10:41
  Speaker 4: fuck it. As long as we're also culling the influence
• 1:10:44
  Speaker 4: the influx of immigrants, it just means we can bring
• 1:10:47
  Speaker 4: the population to a sustained decline and we can finally
• 1:10:53
  Speaker 4: enjoy a subsequent subsequent lowering of house prices and all
• 1:10:57
  Speaker 4: other prices. Sorry, folks, but that's how it works. If
• 1:11:01
  Speaker 4: you want to reverse the effects of inflation, it's remarkably difficult,
• 1:11:07
  Speaker 4: and this is the only way. Lower the supply and
• 1:11:10
  Speaker 4: you lower the demand. I, for one, welcome our new overlords,
• 1:11:15
  Speaker 4: namely us, the men, the men who actually contribute to
• 1:11:22
  Speaker 4: the system, rather than constantly demanding more and more from
• 1:11:26
  Speaker 4: it while supplying nothing, not even children. So yeah, sorry, ladies,
• 1:11:32
  Speaker 4: go ahead and eat my balls, or rather, don't eat
• 1:11:35
  Speaker 4: my balls. Enjoy eating an ultra processed vegan substitute for
• 1:11:39
  Speaker 4: my balls. Enjoy not enjoying yourself. Be offended, get mad,
• 1:11:45
  Speaker 4: stay mad, die alone. Let us enjoy our one and
• 1:11:50
  Speaker 4: only life on this earth without the constant hen pecking
• 1:11:53
  Speaker 4: for you fucked up, insatiable.
• 1:11:55
  Speaker 3: Hordes of Babylon might.
• 1:11:58
  Speaker 2: Drop, yes, but don't drop yourself mind.
• 1:12:01
  Speaker 8: Okay, So I'm about to I got a rubble rant
• 1:12:07
  Speaker 8: and I got some super child For some reason, it
• 1:12:08
  Speaker 8: didn't show up in the fee, but I'll read them.
• 1:12:11
  Speaker 1: So I'll start with the super childs, then the rubble rant,
• 1:12:14
  Speaker 1: and then we'll move on. So Richard Bierre gives us
• 1:12:16
  Speaker 1: five dollars. Thank you, Richard, sorry for not seeing it
• 1:12:19
  Speaker 1: until now, and says the closest comparison would be the
• 1:12:22
  Speaker 1: debacle with Katrina in two thousand and five, where the
• 1:12:24
  Speaker 1: local government was refusing all kinds of material aid because
• 1:12:27
  Speaker 1: it didn't tick all of the various boxes as being
• 1:12:31
  Speaker 1: suitable for the area, and demanding cash that government officials
• 1:12:34
  Speaker 1: could skim their particular cuts off of. One notable story
• 1:12:37
  Speaker 1: was about some politician who had rescue personnel waiting for
• 1:12:40
  Speaker 1: him so he could retrieve an amount of cash that
• 1:12:43
  Speaker 1: he had stashed in his freezer. The delay led to
• 1:12:45
  Speaker 1: that vehicle getting stuck during the evacuation process. We had
• 1:12:49
  Speaker 1: good reasons to pass by those homes or houses, it
• 1:12:52
  Speaker 1: was because we felt uncomfortably unsafe approaching them. Then he
• 1:12:56
  Speaker 1: gets another five dollars and says, too much of this
• 1:12:59
  Speaker 1: is due to the fact that there is no community,
• 1:13:02
  Speaker 1: but rather a huge collection of my communities or my people,
• 1:13:05
  Speaker 1: instead of all the people. Mindset, Yes, that is correct.
• 1:13:09
  Speaker 1: Albatross gave us five dollars and said nothing. If you
• 1:13:11
  Speaker 1: meant to say something, put it in the normal live
• 1:13:15
  Speaker 1: chat and I'll see if I can find a can
• 1:13:16
  Speaker 1: tag at badgery livestream, so we see it, and then
• 1:13:19
  Speaker 1: Mereth g gives us five dollars and says HBI News
• 1:13:22
  Speaker 1: four to seventy eight. The kind of women who would
• 1:13:24
  Speaker 1: adopt for be really shouldn't be breeding anyway, and they're
• 1:13:27
  Speaker 1: not gonna have a problem getting laid if they want to.
• 1:13:29
  Speaker 1: I know some people are like, oh, they're like fem cells. No,
• 1:13:32
  Speaker 1: they if they want to, they're gonna get laid because
• 1:13:34
  Speaker 1: there's some simp everywhere. There's a simp born every minute
• 1:13:36
  Speaker 1: that's willing to do it.
• 1:13:38
  Speaker 5: But you're right, they shouldn't be breeding because they shouldn't
• 1:13:41
  Speaker 5: be raising kids. Well children to those women is child abuse.
• 1:13:46
  Speaker 1: Yeah yeah, I mean, if they're gonna say that they
• 1:13:48
  Speaker 1: don't want to have kids, I'm not gonna stand in
• 1:13:50
  Speaker 1: the way. And then Nova Fans twenty one gives us
• 1:13:52
  Speaker 1: a dollar and says, just a reminder that the feminist
• 1:13:55
  Speaker 1: hashtag kill all men is just a prank, bro. But
• 1:13:59
  Speaker 1: one guy saying you're my choice means all men have
• 1:14:01
  Speaker 1: to take accountability, and they wonder why we think they're crazy. Yes,
• 1:14:05
  Speaker 1: that's exactly what it is. So anyway, thank you for
• 1:14:10
  Speaker 1: the superchats and Superchild. Sorry for missing them from before,
• 1:14:14
  Speaker 1: but I did get to it. So we're gonna move
• 1:14:16
  Speaker 1: on to the next story. Let us know what you
• 1:14:17
  Speaker 1: guys thinking about this one in the comments. All right,
• 1:14:20
  Speaker 1: so are we back? Donald Trump, during his twenty twenty
• 1:14:23
  Speaker 1: four presidential campaign, announced plans to reform what he perceives
• 1:14:28
  Speaker 1: as censorship in the US, targeting government agencies, universities, and
• 1:14:33
  Speaker 1: tech companies. By the way, before people say anything, only
• 1:14:37
  Speaker 1: specifically those with which he has authority over, which is
• 1:14:41
  Speaker 1: namely federal like the federal initiatives and the federal funding.
• 1:14:45
  Speaker 1: So don't get it mixed up. He's not calling for
• 1:14:47
  Speaker 1: censorship that that is outside of like essentially just not
• 1:14:52
  Speaker 1: you know, is actually doing the opposite of that. His
• 1:14:55
  Speaker 1: proposals include banning federal money for labeling domestic speech as misinformation,
• 1:14:59
  Speaker 1: fire federal employees involved in domestic censorship, and cutting federal
• 1:15:03
  Speaker 1: funds the universities that engage in censorship activities, emphasizing a
• 1:15:07
  Speaker 1: strong stance against what he terms the censorship cartel. And
• 1:15:11
  Speaker 1: I have here a six minute video. I'm gonna play
• 1:15:14
  Speaker 1: the whole thing. Let's not talk over it. Just let
• 1:15:16
  Speaker 1: it play. And then this was shared by Robert F.
• 1:15:19
  Speaker 2: Kennedy Junior.
• 1:15:20
  Speaker 1: Some lefties were coping and saying that it's not real
• 1:15:23
  Speaker 1: and that it's a fake video, but it's not.
• 1:15:25
  Speaker 2: It is real. Robert F. Kennedy Junior shared it.
• 1:15:28
  Speaker 1: You'll find it on Facebook and Twitter, and I'm gonna
• 1:15:30
  Speaker 1: go ahead and play it. It's just some his plan
• 1:15:32
  Speaker 1: for this, and I thought it was. It's promising for
• 1:15:34
  Speaker 1: a number of reasons. But let's listen to it.
• 1:15:36
  Speaker 3: Okay.
• 1:15:38
  Speaker 6: If we don't have free speech, then we just don't
• 1:15:41
  Speaker 6: have a free country. It's as simple as that. If
• 1:15:45
  Speaker 6: this most fundamental right is allowed to perish, then the
• 1:15:48
  Speaker 6: rest of our rights and liberties will topple, just like dominoes.
• 1:15:52
  Speaker 6: One by one, they'll go down. That's why today I'm
• 1:15:56
  Speaker 6: announcing my plan to shatter the left wing sense ship
• 1:16:00
  Speaker 6: resumed and to reclaim the right to free speech for
• 1:16:04
  Speaker 6: all Americans. And reclaim is a very important word in
• 1:16:08
  Speaker 6: this case, because they've taken it away. In recent weeks,
• 1:16:11
  Speaker 6: bombshell reports have confirmed that a sinister group of deep
• 1:16:16
  Speaker 6: state bureaucrats, Silicon Valley tyrants, left wing activists, and depraved
• 1:16:21
  Speaker 6: corporate news media have been conspiring to manipulate and silence
• 1:16:27
  Speaker 6: the American people. They have collaborated to suppress vital information
• 1:16:32
  Speaker 6: on everything from elections to public health. The censorship cartel
• 1:16:38
  Speaker 6: must be dismantled and destroyed, and it must happen immediately.
• 1:16:43
  Speaker 6: And here's my plan. First, within hours of my inauguration,
• 1:16:48
  Speaker 6: I will sign an executive order banning any federal department
• 1:16:53
  Speaker 6: or agency from colluding with any organization, business, or person
• 1:16:57
  Speaker 6: to censor, limit, categorize, or impede the lawful speech of
• 1:17:03
  Speaker 6: American citizens. I will then ban federal money from being
• 1:17:07
  Speaker 6: used to label domestic speech as miss or disinformation. And
• 1:17:13
  Speaker 6: I will begin the process of identifying and firing every
• 1:17:16
  Speaker 6: federal bureaucrat who has engaged in domestic censorship directly or indirectly,
• 1:17:23
  Speaker 6: whether they are the Department of Homeland Security, the Department
• 1:17:27
  Speaker 6: of Health Human Services, the FBI, the DOJ, no matter
• 1:17:32
  Speaker 6: who they are. Second, I will order the Department of
• 1:17:35
  Speaker 6: Justice to investigate all parties involved in the new unlined
• 1:17:41
  Speaker 6: censorship regime, which is absolutely destructive and terrible, and to
• 1:17:46
  Speaker 6: aggressively prosecute any and all crimes identified. These include possible
• 1:17:52
  Speaker 6: violations of federal civil rights law, campaign finance laws, federal
• 1:17:57
  Speaker 6: election law, securities law and anti trust laws, the Hatch Act,
• 1:18:02
  Speaker 6: and a host of other potential criminal, civil, regulatory, and
• 1:18:06
  Speaker 6: constitutional offenses. To assist in these efforts, I am urging
• 1:18:12
  Speaker 6: House Republicans to immediately send preservation letters and we have
• 1:18:17
  Speaker 6: to do this right now, to the Biden Administration, the
• 1:18:21
  Speaker 6: Biden campaign, and every Silicon Valley tech giant, ordering them
• 1:18:25
  Speaker 6: not to destroy evidence of censorship. Third, upon my inauguration
• 1:18:30
  Speaker 6: as president, I will ask Congress to send a bill
• 1:18:33
  Speaker 6: to my desk revising Section two thirty to get big
• 1:18:38
  Speaker 6: online platforms out of censorship business. From now on, digital
• 1:18:43
  Speaker 6: platforms should only qualify for immunity protection under section two
• 1:18:48
  Speaker 6: thirty if they meet high standards of neutrality, transparency, fairness,
• 1:18:53
  Speaker 6: and non discrimination. We should require these platforms to increase
• 1:18:58
  Speaker 6: their efforts to take down and lawful content such as
• 1:19:02
  Speaker 6: child exploitation and promoting terrorism, while dramatically curtailing their power
• 1:19:09
  Speaker 6: to arbitrarily restrict lawful speech. Fourth, we need to break
• 1:19:14
  Speaker 6: up the entire toxic censorship industry that has arisen under
• 1:19:18
  Speaker 6: the false guise of tackling so called to myths and disinformation.
• 1:19:23
  Speaker 6: The federal government should immediately stop funding all nonprofits and
• 1:19:27
  Speaker 6: academic programs that support this authoritarian project. If any US
• 1:19:33
  Speaker 6: university is discovered to have engaged in censorship activities or
• 1:19:37
  Speaker 6: election interferences in the past, such as flagging social media
• 1:19:43
  Speaker 6: content for removal of blacklisting, those universities should lose federal
• 1:19:48
  Speaker 6: research dollars and federal student loan support for a period
• 1:19:52
  Speaker 6: of five years and maybe more. We should also enact
• 1:19:56
  Speaker 6: new laws laying out clear criminal penalties for federal bureau
• 1:20:00
  Speaker 6: who partner with private entities to do an end run
• 1:20:04
  Speaker 6: around the Constitution and deprive Americans of their first, fourth
• 1:20:08
  Speaker 6: and fifth Amendment rights. In other words, deprive them of
• 1:20:13
  Speaker 6: their vote. And once you lose those elections, and once
• 1:20:16
  Speaker 6: you lose your borders like we have, you no longer
• 1:20:19
  Speaker 6: have a country. Furthermore, to confront the problems of major
• 1:20:23
  Speaker 6: platforms being infiltrated by legions of former deep staters and
• 1:20:28
  Speaker 6: intelligence officials, there should be a seven year calling off
• 1:20:32
  Speaker 6: period before any employee of the FBI, CIA, NSA, DNI, DHS,
• 1:20:40
  Speaker 6: or DoD is allowed to take a job at a
• 1:20:43
  Speaker 6: company possessing vast quantities of US user data. Fifth the
• 1:20:50
  Speaker 6: time has finally come for Congress to pass a digital
• 1:20:53
  Speaker 6: Bill of rights. This should include a right to digital
• 1:20:57
  Speaker 6: do process. In other words, government officials should need a
• 1:21:02
  Speaker 6: court order to take down online content, not send information requests,
• 1:21:07
  Speaker 6: such as the FBI was sending to Twitter. Furthermore, when
• 1:21:11
  Speaker 6: users of big online platforms have their content or accounts removed, throttled,
• 1:21:18
  Speaker 6: shadow band, or otherwise restricted, no matter what name they use,
• 1:21:23
  Speaker 6: they should have the right to be informed that it's happening,
• 1:21:27
  Speaker 6: the right to a specific explanation of the reason why,
• 1:21:31
  Speaker 6: and the right to a timely appeal. In addition, all
• 1:21:35
  Speaker 6: users over the age of eighteen should have the right
• 1:21:37
  Speaker 6: to opt out of content moderation and curation entirely and
• 1:21:41
  Speaker 6: receive an unmanipulated stream of information if they so choose.
• 1:21:47
  Speaker 6: The fight for free speech is a matter of victory
• 1:21:50
  Speaker 6: or death for America and for the survival of Western
• 1:21:54
  Speaker 6: civilization itself. When I am president, this whole rotten system
• 1:21:58
  Speaker 6: of censorship and information you should control will be ripped
• 1:22:02
  Speaker 6: out of the system at large. There won't be anything left.
• 1:22:07
  Speaker 6: By restoring free speech, we'll begin to reclaim our democracy
• 1:22:11
  Speaker 6: and save our nation. Thank you and God bless them. Eric.
• 1:22:15
  Speaker 3: I mean that's the end of the show. I don't know.
• 1:22:17
  Speaker 4: I don't know what we can even add to that.
• 1:22:19
  Speaker 4: I don't I didn't even write anything down. I didn't
• 1:22:22
  Speaker 4: even write any notes because because I knew what was
• 1:22:25
  Speaker 4: going to come up. And I'm like this, that's that's
• 1:22:27
  Speaker 4: just Trump being a contributor to the show, and that's
• 1:22:32
  Speaker 4: that's it.
• 1:22:34
  Speaker 3: I don't know.
• 1:22:34
  Speaker 4: Fuck Mount Rushmore. You should fucking demolish Mount Rushmore and
• 1:22:40
  Speaker 4: just build a statue to Trump.
• 1:22:41
  Speaker 2: Fuck it.
• 1:22:42
  Speaker 3: That's that's it.
• 1:22:43
  Speaker 2: That's what his face on the moon like. Put it
• 1:22:49
  Speaker 2: on mars.
• 1:22:50
  Speaker 5: I will point out a few things because there's there
• 1:22:52
  Speaker 5: are people who make arguments citing the First Amendment that
• 1:22:57
  Speaker 5: don't know what they're talking about. The First Amendment protects
• 1:23:01
  Speaker 5: political speech. Its primary purpose was to protect political speech.
• 1:23:08
  Speaker 5: Its primary purpose was not to protect your ability to
• 1:23:13
  Speaker 5: shove pourn down somebody's throat or anything like that. Bad
• 1:23:18
  Speaker 5: choice of words. I know that was on purpose. But
• 1:23:22
  Speaker 5: it does protect political speech. Your right to complain about
• 1:23:26
  Speaker 5: the government, your right to complain about the people who
• 1:23:30
  Speaker 5: run the government, your right to say the government should
• 1:23:32
  Speaker 5: not do things or should do things. All that exists
• 1:23:35
  Speaker 5: as political speech. It doesn't protect a right to receive
• 1:23:40
  Speaker 5: federal money for the purpose of curating a forum to
• 1:23:43
  Speaker 5: limit or direct the conversation. In regard to political speech right,
• 1:23:49
  Speaker 5: it doesn't protect a right to make people hear you,
• 1:23:55
  Speaker 5: or stop people from hearing something that you don't want
• 1:23:58
  Speaker 5: them to hear. None of those things are protected under
• 1:24:01
  Speaker 5: the First Amendment. Only the right to engage in political
• 1:24:06
  Speaker 5: debate and to protest. It doesn't give people a right
• 1:24:12
  Speaker 5: to get into political office and manipulate or control public
• 1:24:16
  Speaker 5: speech and use that office to facilitate that. It doesn't
• 1:24:20
  Speaker 5: protect sex crimes against children either, So people who try
• 1:24:27
  Speaker 5: to cite CP as an extreme example, no, fuck you.
• 1:24:31
  Speaker 5: It doesn't protect that because you have committed a crime
• 1:24:37
  Speaker 5: in order to create that, and when you engage in
• 1:24:42
  Speaker 5: the sharing of that, you are simply making yourself an
• 1:24:45
  Speaker 5: accessory to that crime. And it doesn't protect a right
• 1:24:50
  Speaker 5: to be heard. So those platforms existing, all these platforms
• 1:24:55
  Speaker 5: that exist that the public is allowed to use for
• 1:24:59
  Speaker 5: the ext change of their personal information, because we know
• 1:25:02
  Speaker 5: nothing is free. We know they're collecting our personal information
• 1:25:05
  Speaker 5: when they run these platforms, and we know they're using
• 1:25:07
  Speaker 5: them to advertise to us. And it's a lot like
• 1:25:11
  Speaker 5: using a grocery store card that tracks your shopping habits
• 1:25:17
  Speaker 5: and decides to stock more things that you want to
• 1:25:20
  Speaker 5: buy in order to get discounts on things you like
• 1:25:23
  Speaker 5: to buy at the store. You're taking a survey and
• 1:25:26
  Speaker 5: instead of getting paid, you're getting a free service for it.
• 1:25:28
  Speaker 5: All right, But all those platforms, Yeah, if they want
• 1:25:34
  Speaker 5: to censor, well, that's their business. But it's not something
• 1:25:40
  Speaker 5: the government should be involved in. It's not something the
• 1:25:42
  Speaker 5: government should be supporting. And they do not deserve government
• 1:25:45
  Speaker 5: money or government protection if they're going to do that.
• 1:25:48
  Speaker 5: So what he's doing here isn't manipulation, and it's not
• 1:25:54
  Speaker 5: in at odds with the First Amendment. He is enforcing
• 1:26:00
  Speaker 5: and protecting the First Amendment. And if you don't understand
• 1:26:04
  Speaker 5: that you need to go back to school, just don't
• 1:26:07
  Speaker 5: do it. In the United States, our school system here
• 1:26:09
  Speaker 5: is shit.
• 1:26:12
  Speaker 2: All right. Yeah.
• 1:26:13
  Speaker 1: I don't have much else to add to it either,
• 1:26:14
  Speaker 1: except as an aside. I thought it was funny that,
• 1:26:19
  Speaker 1: you know, Kamala Harris's campaign raised a billion dollars and
• 1:26:22
  Speaker 1: Trump's campaign raised like four hundred and something million dollars,
• 1:26:27
  Speaker 1: So Kamala raised more than twice what Trump raised, and
• 1:26:30
  Speaker 1: at the end of the campaign, Trump had money left over,
• 1:26:32
  Speaker 1: and Kamala Harris was twenty million dollars in debt. And
• 1:26:36
  Speaker 1: it's because of how much well, we don't.
• 1:26:38
  Speaker 5: Know for sure, because women are bad with money.
• 1:26:40
  Speaker 1: She was bad with money. She had a lot of
• 1:26:42
  Speaker 1: celebrity endorsements. She threw a lot of concerts and this
• 1:26:46
  Speaker 1: kind of thing. You know, she had all kinds of
• 1:26:48
  Speaker 1: people that normally that were actually critical of her in
• 1:26:51
  Speaker 1: the past, like Cardi b coming out in support of
• 1:26:54
  Speaker 1: her and giving like a totally phoned in literally you know, endorsement.
• 1:26:59
  Speaker 2: And you know, brought out Eminem and all these other people.
• 1:27:02
  Speaker 1: But what was really funny is that Trump saw how
• 1:27:05
  Speaker 1: much more she spent, how she was in debt, and
• 1:27:09
  Speaker 1: he basically urged the GOP to do whatever we can
• 1:27:14
  Speaker 1: to help them pay that bet off. He says, I
• 1:27:16
  Speaker 1: am very surprised that the Democrats, who fought a hard
• 1:27:18
  Speaker 1: and valiant fight in the twenty twenty presidential election, raising
• 1:27:22
  Speaker 1: a record amount of money, didn't have lots of money
• 1:27:24
  Speaker 1: left over. Now they're being squeezed by vendors and others.
• 1:27:27
  Speaker 1: Whatever we can do to help them during this difficult period,
• 1:27:29
  Speaker 1: I would strongly recommend we as the party as a party,
• 1:27:32
  Speaker 1: and for the sake of desperately needed unity, do he continued,
• 1:27:35
  Speaker 1: we have a lot of money left over in that
• 1:27:37
  Speaker 1: our biggest asset in the campaign was earned media and
• 1:27:41
  Speaker 1: that doesn't cost.
• 1:27:42
  Speaker 2: Very much make America great again. So he's actually offering
• 1:27:45
  Speaker 2: to help her pay bills.
• 1:27:47
  Speaker 5: Sounds like the male candidate spent money on practical things
• 1:27:52
  Speaker 5: and was conservative in his spending habits, and the female
• 1:27:56
  Speaker 5: candidate partied, well, did you know one thing?
• 1:28:00
  Speaker 1: Do you know what one of the things that that
• 1:28:02
  Speaker 1: one of the things that the Harris campaign spent money on?
• 1:28:05
  Speaker 1: And I'm not joking. I confirmed this, Okay. So do
• 1:28:08
  Speaker 1: you remember we covered her appearance on the Call Her
• 1:28:12
  Speaker 1: Daddy podcast, which is the number one podcast on Spotify
• 1:28:16
  Speaker 1: for women.
• 1:28:17
  Speaker 5: Mm hmm.
• 1:28:18
  Speaker 1: But Kamala Harris, they they would not let her fly
• 1:28:23
  Speaker 1: out to Alice Cooper Alex Cooper's set for the show.
• 1:28:29
  Speaker 1: So what they did was they spent over six figures
• 1:28:33
  Speaker 1: building an exact replica of the set in Washington and
• 1:28:38
  Speaker 1: threw her out there to sit there and do the show.
• 1:28:42
  Speaker 5: There is no way needed to cost that much money
• 1:28:46
  Speaker 5: to build a replica of they spent I.
• 1:28:48
  Speaker 1: Have seen yes, I know, but yeah, they built it. Oh,
• 1:28:52
  Speaker 1: I'm sure that the money was this.
• 1:28:53
  Speaker 5: Was this is you know what this reminds me of.
• 1:28:56
  Speaker 5: This reminds me of military spending and the six screwdriver.
• 1:29:03
  Speaker 1: And this is the reason. Yeah, and this is the reason,
• 1:29:06
  Speaker 1: by the way, that she did not end up going
• 1:29:08
  Speaker 1: on Joe Rogan because Joe he didn't say this, but
• 1:29:13
  Speaker 1: it was confirmed by another source because Joe wouldn't come
• 1:29:16
  Speaker 1: out and say it because he's a moral coward. What
• 1:29:19
  Speaker 1: was come out in the other source is that they
• 1:29:20
  Speaker 1: were basically saying, you'll will have you do the thing
• 1:29:23
  Speaker 1: with Kamala, but you have to fly out to Washington
• 1:29:27
  Speaker 1: and we're gonna build a replica of the Joe Rogan.
• 1:29:29
  Speaker 2: Podcast set and you're gonna sit there and do the thing.
• 1:29:32
  Speaker 5: So yeah, no, like I wouldn't.
• 1:29:34
  Speaker 2: I think it's hilarious. I think it's hilarious.
• 1:29:37
  Speaker 5: But when it comes down to it, though, it really
• 1:29:41
  Speaker 5: is like Kamala Harris spent money on frivolous things and
• 1:29:44
  Speaker 5: Trump spent money on practical things, and Trump ended up
• 1:29:48
  Speaker 5: with money left over, and Kamala Harris ended up maxing
• 1:29:53
  Speaker 5: out her her credit cards. Right, Yeah, Well, everybody else's
• 1:29:56
  Speaker 5: political credit cards. But here's here's something else to consider. Okay,
• 1:30:01
  Speaker 5: how many six thousand dollars screwdrivers did she buy? Was
• 1:30:05
  Speaker 5: it just in that one instance or are there a
• 1:30:07
  Speaker 5: whole bunch of other instances where there are there are
• 1:30:12
  Speaker 5: people who got paid way more than that service normally
• 1:30:16
  Speaker 5: would cost? And uh what what was the bribe for?
• 1:30:20
  Speaker 2: Oh yeah, no, they totally they totally overpaid for shit.
• 1:30:23
  Speaker 2: Who knows.
• 1:30:24
  Speaker 1: I mean, Oprah got a bunch of money, got a
• 1:30:29
  Speaker 1: bunch of money, Beyonce got money.
• 1:30:31
  Speaker 5: I see a lot of this going out to uh
• 1:30:34
  Speaker 5: celebrities that are kind of on the public suspect list
• 1:30:40
  Speaker 5: for hinky things going on in uh establishment media in
• 1:30:46
  Speaker 5: Hollywood and television and music and in these industries. And
• 1:30:49
  Speaker 5: I'm not just talking about the the communist networks within
• 1:30:55
  Speaker 5: those and I'm not just talking about like the progressive
• 1:30:58
  Speaker 5: Democrat networks within the like. There's a lot of people
• 1:31:01
  Speaker 5: within those industries that are suspected to be involved in
• 1:31:07
  Speaker 5: child trafficking and some other very serious crimes. So I
• 1:31:13
  Speaker 5: think there should be an investigation into how the Harris
• 1:31:18
  Speaker 5: campaign spent every penny. Every penny should be accounted for,
• 1:31:23
  Speaker 5: and every service should be accounted for, and in addition
• 1:31:29
  Speaker 5: to the pennies and the services being accounted for, what
• 1:31:33
  Speaker 5: is normal to pay for those services, and any difference
• 1:31:36
  Speaker 5: between the norm and what was actually paid should be
• 1:31:39
  Speaker 5: accounted for. Why the difference? Why did you charge this
• 1:31:43
  Speaker 5: much more? Because this I'm concerned that it wasn't just
• 1:31:50
  Speaker 5: money laundering, but paying people off, specific sets of people off,
• 1:31:57
  Speaker 5: with the favor of I'll hire you to do this thing,
• 1:32:02
  Speaker 5: and you'll keep your mouth shut about commalis involvement in
• 1:32:07
  Speaker 5: whatever criminal dealings may be, covering up for any other
• 1:32:11
  Speaker 5: money laundering, maybe covering up for other crimes. Trump's being
• 1:32:16
  Speaker 5: a nice guy here and everything, but the Democrat Party
• 1:32:20
  Speaker 5: is historically corrupt and historically associated with how do I
• 1:32:29
  Speaker 5: put this, I guess professional criminal networks, organized crime and so.
• 1:32:37
  Speaker 5: And it's not just one like I could say, you
• 1:32:40
  Speaker 5: know the KKK, and that's true, or I could say
• 1:32:43
  Speaker 5: to mafia and that's true. Or I could say any
• 1:32:45
  Speaker 5: number of gangs by name that people are familiar with,
• 1:32:50
  Speaker 5: and that would also be true. But organized crime in general,
• 1:32:54
  Speaker 5: so it's really dangerous to just be like, oh, those
• 1:32:57
  Speaker 5: poor guys, they spent too much money. Let's open up,
• 1:33:01
  Speaker 5: How did they spend too much money? Where did it go,
• 1:33:04
  Speaker 5: who was getting paid off? What were the crimes that
• 1:33:06
  Speaker 5: were being covered up? Because that needs to be handled.
• 1:33:10
  Speaker 5: If the Democrat Party is ever going to be trustworthy again,
• 1:33:13
  Speaker 5: that needs to be handled.
• 1:33:14
  Speaker 1: Yeah all right, well anyway, go ahead.
• 1:33:19
  Speaker 4: Okay, yeah, Well my first theory, those twenty million dollars
• 1:33:25
  Speaker 4: went to Ukraine and you can't see the air quotes
• 1:33:29
  Speaker 4: that I'm doing with my fingers, but you know what
• 1:33:32
  Speaker 4: I'm doing with the air quotes. At this point, everyone
• 1:33:35
  Speaker 4: knows went to Ukraine means went directly into Kamala Harris's pocket.
• 1:33:42
  Speaker 4: And twenty million is a low ball, to be perfectly honest.
• 1:33:46
  Speaker 4: I think it's it's more like two hundred million dollars
• 1:33:49
  Speaker 4: and for what it's worth. My second theory is that
• 1:33:54
  Speaker 4: wasn't Hunter Biden's cocaine.
• 1:33:59
  Speaker 3: I will leave you with that bombshell.
• 1:34:02
  Speaker 5: Oh my god, Havoc says in the chat.
• 1:34:04
  Speaker 2: My high school.
• 1:34:05
  Speaker 5: Teacher worked for the Defense Logistics Agency in his youth.
• 1:34:09
  Speaker 5: They ordered a three inch paper clip, but it was
• 1:34:11
  Speaker 5: misread and they were sent a three foot long paper clip.
• 1:34:15
  Speaker 5: It costs the taxpayers thousands, Like can you imagine how
• 1:34:20
  Speaker 5: much had to be done. It wouldn't just be that
• 1:34:23
  Speaker 5: that much metal had to be acquired and molded into
• 1:34:27
  Speaker 5: They had to have created the machinery and everything to
• 1:34:33
  Speaker 5: do that. Because that there's nothing that that would get
• 1:34:37
  Speaker 5: used for, and so there's nothing that would have been
• 1:34:40
  Speaker 5: in place in terms of infrastructure to create something like that.
• 1:34:47
  Speaker 5: It all would have had to have been made from scratch.
• 1:34:52
  Speaker 5: That's that's insane. That's that's one of the reasons why
• 1:34:57
  Speaker 5: it's like government. Oh my god, Yeah, what a stupid mistake.
• 1:35:01
  Speaker 1: I got a couple of super chats and rumble rants.
• 1:35:04
  Speaker 1: I'm gonna read out and then we're gonna end the show.
• 1:35:06
  Speaker 1: So zaraankskis is two dollars and says I can't wait
• 1:35:09
  Speaker 1: to vote for Trump.
• 1:35:11
  Speaker 5: Uh.
• 1:35:11
  Speaker 1: Then I got a rumble rant from Nova fan twenty one,
• 1:35:14
  Speaker 1: who gives us a dollar and says Trump should offer
• 1:35:16
  Speaker 1: Kamala Harris and her campaign jobs at McDonald's to pay
• 1:35:20
  Speaker 1: off her debt. Damn Albertnata Retro gives us five dollars
• 1:35:24
  Speaker 1: Canadian and says Trump is the DM that runs fair.
• 1:35:27
  Speaker 2: Games but gets screwed when he plays.
• 1:35:29
  Speaker 1: All right, so we're gonna go. We're gonna go ahead
• 1:35:32
  Speaker 1: and head into the Patron show. Now talk about meltdowns.
• 1:35:36
  Speaker 1: Maybe look at this article the Manisphere one, you know,
• 1:35:39
  Speaker 1: if there's If there's time, I think it's funny, or
• 1:35:43
  Speaker 1: or we'll just look at more videos of women screaming
• 1:35:45
  Speaker 1: and crying and showing their like I said, their they're
• 1:35:48
  Speaker 1: mental breakdowns online. So if you want to join us
• 1:35:51
  Speaker 1: for that, please go to feed the Badger dot com
• 1:35:53
  Speaker 1: and set up a monthly subscriptions Feed the dot Badger
• 1:35:55
  Speaker 1: dot com forward slast subscribe and hopefully we will see
• 1:35:59
  Speaker 1: you there. So thanks so much for coming on the show.
• 1:36:02
  Speaker 1: If you guys like this video, please hit like, subscribe.
• 1:36:04
  Speaker 1: If you're not already subscribed, hit the bellf notification, leave
• 1:36:06
  Speaker 1: with the comment Listen what you guys think about what
• 1:36:08
  Speaker 1: we discussed on the video today, and please please please
• 1:36:10
  Speaker 1: share this video because sharing is caring. Thank you so
• 1:36:13
  Speaker 1: much for coming on today's episode of HPR News and
• 1:36:15
  Speaker 1: we will see you next Tuesday.
• 1:36:17
  Speaker 9: Men's right activists are machines, dude. Okay, they are literal machines.
• 1:36:23
  Speaker 9: They are talking point machines. They are impossible to fucking
• 1:36:27
  Speaker 9: deal with, especially if you have like especially if you
• 1:36:29
  Speaker 9: have like a couple of dudes who have good memory
• 1:36:31
  Speaker 9: on top of that too. Holy shit, you're fucked