Latest / The SME Stream / John Clarke: Transpower CEO on their $1 million contribution to a regional energy package for Northland
Transcript
- 0:00Speaker 1: A bit of movement over the the the the power Pylon,
- 0:03Speaker 1: par Labor, Transparer and Mixim have donated a million bucks
- 0:07Speaker 1: to a fund that will support northern projects and the economy.
- 0:10Speaker 1: It's a good will jest, do you Transparer CEO John
- 0:12Speaker 1: Clark with us on this morning. I've already heard this
- 0:15Speaker 1: morning people including local MPs saying this is not enough,
- 0:18Speaker 1: it's a joke, all of that sort of thing. Were
- 0:19Speaker 1: you expecting that level of pushbacker or you're disappointed.
- 0:24Speaker 2: We've believe we've done our best to offer Northland something
- 0:29Speaker 2: back that will help improve the energy resilience and also
- 0:35Speaker 2: help plan for the future and make sure we've got
- 0:39Speaker 2: between ourselves and our two distribution partners up there, we've
- 0:44Speaker 2: got for Purpose network.
- 0:46Speaker 1: And when you say, when you say increase resilience, what
- 0:50Speaker 1: what's the money actually for and can't they do with
- 0:52Speaker 1: it whatever they want.
- 0:55Speaker 2: Certainly we've left with the community, Northland Community and Aukland
- 1:00Speaker 2: think we've indicated along with Northland Inc. That you know,
- 1:06Speaker 2: if it's used the community resilience projects, there are things
- 1:09Speaker 2: that help communities cope with storms and the other challenges
- 1:12Speaker 2: that Northland have. More things that help economic development in
- 1:16Speaker 2: Awakland other sort of things that we've been seen. But
- 1:20Speaker 2: we are leaving it your right to Northland and the
- 1:22Speaker 2: Northland community.
- 1:23Speaker 1: How do you come up with a million? Apart from
- 1:25Speaker 1: the fact that it's around number.
- 1:30Speaker 2: And max. Some both talk between ourselves and in our
- 1:35Speaker 2: case we identify what things we could put acide so
- 1:38Speaker 2: that we could free up some money to do this
- 1:42Speaker 2: community initiative.
- 1:43Speaker 1: Has insurance played a part at all or not?
- 1:47Speaker 2: Insurance has nothing to do with us. This is not
- 1:50Speaker 2: about compensations. As reiterated, compensation is not something that happens
- 1:57Speaker 2: with utility services. The scale of any economic loss is
- 2:02Speaker 2: often far more significant than the cost of utility service.
- 2:06Speaker 2: For instance, the costs will we recover from Northland for
- 2:11Speaker 2: the transmission grid, which does need a lot of a
- 2:13Speaker 2: maintenance up there, works out on average to about one
- 2:16Speaker 2: dollar per day for each of the electricity consumers in.
- 2:20Speaker 1: Northland, So you do accept that the damage done was
- 2:23Speaker 1: somewhere between thirty and eighty and so one million is
- 2:25Speaker 1: just a gesture.
- 2:28Speaker 2: The economic loss of not having a service like electricity
- 2:33Speaker 2: or water or gas is always way higher than what
- 2:37Speaker 2: has charged there, so we do acknowledge their economic costs
- 2:41Speaker 2: if you work that out, is in what we've ranged
- 2:44Speaker 2: different people have come to calculate that and.
- 2:47Speaker 1: Is compensation still on the table or as a millionaire
- 2:50Speaker 1: thanks for coming by by and go away.
- 2:54Speaker 2: Well, we've reiterated that domestic reidential consumers can talk to
- 2:58Speaker 2: their retailer if they stuff us. Obviously, larger industries approaching
- 3:05Speaker 2: us with their insurance claims, we'll deal with those. That's
- 3:10Speaker 2: you know, those seven years are open. But this is
- 3:14Speaker 2: something back to the Northland community to allow it to
- 3:17Speaker 2: move forward and for us to help them with not
- 3:22Speaker 2: only their electricity supply but some of the other challenges
- 3:24Speaker 2: they have.
- 3:25Speaker 1: Well, I can't understand John. I mean, ultimately you are
- 3:28Speaker 1: responsible because you employer mixim I get that part, But
- 3:31Speaker 1: essentially they're idiots that didn't do their job. Why aren't
- 3:34Speaker 1: they paying nine hundred ninety nine thou nine hundred and
- 3:36Speaker 1: ninety nine and U toss in the scent.
- 3:40Speaker 2: Well, we are responsible, and while we could argue who
- 3:46Speaker 2: how much should be shared, we're comfortable that it's a
- 3:49Speaker 2: fifty fifty arrangement that seems appropriate. And we're doing a
- 3:53Speaker 2: lot of work and you've seen the various reports and
- 3:55Speaker 2: recommendations which we're all on to make sure we support
- 3:59Speaker 2: our provide. I didn't like to make them so that
- 4:01Speaker 2: they get things right and something like this never happens again.
- 4:04Speaker 1: Well the type not John go Well John Clark, who's
- 4:07Speaker 1: the transparer CEO