Latest / Honey Badger Radio / Epstein Client List Exposed??? Zelensky Wants Military Age Raised | HBR News 436

Transcript

Epstein Client List Exposed??? Zelensky Wants Military Age Raised | HBR News 436 · Honey Badger Radio

0:04
This is HBr News number four thirty six, Epstein client list exposed. Zelenski
0:10
wants military age rays where we discussed the news of the week and give it
0:14
the Badger treatment. Hello everybody, and welcome to Honey Badger Radio. My
0:21
name is Brian. I'm joined by, as always, my lovely co hosts
0:25
Mike and Hannah. Mike Jay is going to be away probably until next year,
0:31
so you know, wish him a happy season and a happy new year
0:36
in the comments if you wish. But even without his light, he's able
0:42
to help us with write ups and stuff like that too, so you know,
0:45
he's sort of still here in spirit. Anyway. I hope you guys
0:51
are ready for some news this week. We're going to be talking about the
0:54
possibility that more and older men might need to die for their country of Ukraine.
1:00
Staffing in the hearing room staffing is I don't want to put that in
1:04
quotes. Boston Mayor holds a special holiday party for non whites and more so
1:10
stick around is going to be a good time, and be sure to join
1:12
us afterwards for the patron only show. So I want to plug a website
1:18
that I'm very much like to see grow called fandom Pulse, and fandom Pulse
1:27
was created by and started by John Dela Rose, who has been a guest
1:32
on this channel before. He is a writer and he was involved with I
1:37
believe he was involved with the Sad Puppies like a long time ago. And
1:41
he, you know, used to write for a website you might have heard
1:44
of called Bounding in the comics. He also writes for PJ Media. Anyway,
1:48
he's starting his own thing and he's got some good articles there and we're
1:51
going to go through one of them in the Patron Show. You might remembered
1:55
a story of Activision Blizzard that was they were accused of a sexual misconduct culture
2:05
of toxic male behavior years ago, and it looks like there their lawsuit has
2:10
been settled. So we're gonna be going through the article in the Patron Show.
2:15
I've already given my thoughts on these allegations. I know that people have
2:19
said that there might actually be stuff going down, and that might be true,
2:23
but I think that you what you have is a case of you know,
2:28
male feminists interacting with female feminists, and these are the kinds of things
2:31
you're just gonna get from that, You're right, So, but we'll see
2:35
what they say in the in the Patron Show. So if you want to
2:38
join us in the Patron Show, you have to become a Badger by going
2:40
to feed the Badger dot com and setting up a monthly subscription. Five bucks
2:44
a month will get you into our discord where you will be able to participate
2:49
in all of the additional sort of UH activities and and the in the community
2:53
that we have here, which I think is is very special. It's not
2:59
you know, it's not necessarily like a it's a very open minded group of
3:04
people and very intellectual kind of spurry actually, So if you like that kind
3:07
of thing, go to feed the Badger dot com and start a monthly subscription.
3:12
And if you want to send us a comment or anything, you can
3:15
also go to badger feed dot com slash just the tip and give a badger
3:23
chan a snack and then you'll be able to say whatever you want and we
3:28
will get more of whatever is sent out and we will read it on the
3:31
air for you guys. So and lastly, if you don't want to wake
3:36
up one morning to find that we've been yeeded from the internet, then you
3:39
have to follow us and by going to Badger. I'm sorry, it's Honeybadger
3:46
radio dot com or Badger feed dot com, which is where we archive everything.
3:51
So shout out also to the Rumble gang. What's up, guys,
3:54
and give us some emojis let us know that you're there. All right.
3:59
So with all that out of the way, it's a lot let's get into
4:02
the story. So I gotta start with one bit of breaking news that I
4:06
got during the day, so I had to change what we have based on
4:13
that. So breaking, Okay, Over one hundred and seventy of Jeffrey Epstein's
4:18
high profile associates will be named in court documents set to be unsealed in the
4:25
first days of twenty twenty four. So let me go ahead and give a
4:30
brief overview of this. So, court documents revealing the names of over one
4:33
hundred and seventy high profile associates of financier Jeffrey Epstein or I guess the late
4:41
financier Jeffrey Epstein, are set to be unsealed in the first days of twenty
4:46
twenty four, ordered by a judge. The vast unsealing scheduled in fourteen days,
4:51
which is I believe it's like new Year's Day, but there probably isn't
4:56
going to be anything out on New Year's Day, so we'll say probably like
4:59
the second or sometime that week. Anyway, in there was I saying yeah.
5:09
Fourteen days is expected to expose Epstein's powerful friends, shedding light on his
5:14
sex trafficking operation and network of influence. The release is likely to occur on
5:18
January second, following the New Year's holiday. The documents will You Know supposedly
5:25
identify one hundred and seventy seven individuals across hundreds of files. Four documents are
5:31
to be unsealed are related to a defamation case brought by Virginia Roberts, an
5:35
accuser of Prince Andrew, against Gelain Maxwell. Lots of names, It's a
5:41
little convoluted. The ruling by Judge Presca, who gave fourteen days to four
5:46
objections, involves does or doze does like John Doe and Jane Doe, who
5:53
are identified through media interviews, and includes housekeepers from Epstein's private island, one
5:59
of Prince Andrew accusers, and material on Harley Robson named in the two thousand
6:03
and six Epstein investigation. Some documents may relate to Jean Luke Brunel, a
6:09
model scout close to Epstein, who died in a Paris prison in twenty twenty
6:14
two. There's also other bodies that have turned up in the wake of this,
6:17
you know, probably COVID. I mean, let's be real, they
6:20
probably weren't masking. The documents have been released periodically since twenty nineteen. Court
6:28
documents really related to a defamation case by Virginia Roberts against Glade Maxwell, are
6:31
set to reveal the names of over one hundred and seventy individuals the unsealing Wait,
6:38
I don't think I actually did that twice. Sorry, but yeah,
6:43
so again we are supposedly going to learn something about this now. I guess
6:51
there's a couple of ways to look at this. This could be a you
6:56
know, a really exciting thing. I think that it's interesting. At least
7:00
one hundred and seventy seven names is not a small number, But then we
7:03
don't know how many have been to the island, and you know, and
7:09
whether or not like the ones that we're hoping to see are going to be
7:13
among the names. But it is some light that is being shed, hopefully,
7:17
and we'll see because they gave them fourteen days for objections. So I'm
7:23
sure there are people that are gonna be throwing everything they can at this so
7:27
that none of this stuff gets released. But I thought it was really important.
7:30
So what do you guys think? Yeah, I don't buy it.
7:32
I'll believe it when I see it, but I'm not confident that I'm going
7:36
to see it. A similar story We've covered a similar story earlier this year,
7:41
like a handful of complete unknowns well like it was said to be part
7:46
of his clientist and we were like, who the fuck are these people?
7:48
We don't care. We want we want the what called high profile associates,
7:54
and that's apparently what we're being given now. But I get I get the
7:59
feeling one hundred and seventy seven more unknowns are going to get thrown under the
8:03
bus, some of them possibly innocent, to save the next of Bill Clinton
8:09
and Bill Gates and what have you. They're not going to there's no cat
8:13
in the world that can withstand the pure evil of of of of people like
8:20
that. They're going to get off scot free. And it's it's just like
8:26
the FBI framing people for certain things. Yeah, like I said, they're
8:31
just they're just gonna throw a bunch of who I is under the bus and
8:35
justice will never be served, but I hope to be proved wrong. I
8:39
always blackpilled by default, and then if I'm right, I'm right, and
8:43
if I'm wrong, good things happen. That's what I'm doing. It's kind
8:48
of the way to look at it. And the other thing I want to
8:50
point out is it's interesting how it got released because this is maybe a tool
8:58
of the ultra feminist left getting used possibly against some of the representatives if if
9:07
they actually released those names, and and that is the use of the use
9:13
of defamation lawsuits to shut down uh a defendant's ability to assert their innocence.
9:22
And you know, I, like I, I have no doubt about Galaine
9:28
Maxwell. There's been too much evidence that's come out. But I've noticed that
9:33
in a lot of high file, high profile cases, that's been a tool.
9:37
You you know, you see the media attacks the individual, the individual
9:41
says no, I'm innocent, and for them saying I am innocent, that
9:46
this that the allegation never happened, then the accuser comes along and sues them
9:52
for for definite defamation. And honestly, they shouldn't be able to do that.
9:58
You should have the right to proclaim your innocent even if you're guilty.
10:01
It's that's part of due process, and it's not defaming the person who accused
10:07
you. Their accusation is defamation until it's proven to be true. And and
10:16
that's we have to look at it that way because oh when uh oh we
10:28
lost Hannah. I mean, it's gosh, it just it just muted me
10:33
for Pete's sake. Well, hopefully it's not going to do that all night.
10:39
What I'm saying, Yeah, that's really weird. I didn't even Ah,
10:48
okay, well that's that's that. That's kind of anyway. Now,
10:52
so you guys heard what I said about the defamation stuff and everything. If
10:56
we can't, we can't have that become a weapon that false accusers can use
11:01
to silence the public defense of the falsely accused, just because you know,
11:11
there are going to be some accusations that are not false where the individuals also
11:16
going to publicly defend themselves. In the end, if the accusation is true
11:20
and the individual says a bunch of bullshit about it being a lie in public,
11:24
and then the truth comes out and it's proved in court that it's true,
11:30
they're just going to look like an idiot. So there's no reason,
11:33
you know, to allow that. But unfortunately that's the case. And in
11:37
this case, it may give us one hundred and seventy seven names of people
11:41
who may or may not have gone to the island, and we won't know
11:48
unless those one hundred and seventy seven individuals then get investigated or the results of
11:54
investigations that are already being done into those people come out. Hopefully it won't
12:01
cause a wave of suicides or interfere with any ongoing investigations. Yeah, My
12:07
hope is that if most likely the people that are going to be released are
12:15
not going to be like the biggest names, but if this is followed up
12:20
on, and if justice works out the way it should, then maybe they
12:26
will. This will lead to plea deals, which will lead to bigger you
12:28
know fish Basically, I mean, I don't want to be too optimistic,
12:35
but I do think that the fact that you know this hasn't disappeared into the
12:39
memory hole is still like a you know, a big thing for us.
12:43
I guess because I think that like the average citizen is really really interested in
12:48
the outcome. I think it's the powerful people that wanted to disappear, So
12:54
yeah, i'd be I'd be interested to see how this unfolds. But we'll
12:58
see on Uh. You know, it's funny. I had a guest on
13:01
years ago named Jonathan Pagot, and I remember talking to him and him saying,
13:07
we were talking about how crazy things have gotten, and he said twenty
13:11
twenty four like like he was, he's like observing patterns and he said,
13:15
twenty twenty four is going to be really crazy. So I mean, if
13:18
this is going to happen on New Year's Day, I guess like it could.
13:22
It could be that things will get really really crazy. We'll see.
13:28
So I don't know, Uh, you guys have any other thoughts on this
13:31
before I move on to the next thing. So for a while, rumble
13:35
was on. But I think it's working now and that's just some restream shit.
13:39
But I don't know what. Go ahead, Mike, I said,
13:41
hang them ole new kimol and I'm trying to think of a more violent verb.
13:46
But I count ship on their ashes. Yeah, not too Yeah,
13:50
there you go. Somebody, somebody get the Wood Chipper Company on the phone.
13:58
All right, let's move on to the next to let us know what
14:00
you guys think about this one in the comments. Again, it's just a
14:01
little update. There isn't a lot of information. We don't know if this
14:05
is confirmed, but let's cross our fingers, I guess, and pray to
14:11
whoever God's you happen to worship odin whatever. All right, let's know what
14:15
you guys think in the comments. We're gonna move on to the actual stories
14:18
that I had picked out first this one. So, after his third trip
14:26
to Washington, d C. This year, Ukrainian President Voladimir Zelensky has expressed
14:31
the possibility that the age of military conscription could be raised to over forty years
14:37
old for all men. This statement arrives on the heels of Zelenski once again
14:43
asking Congress for another multi billion dollar military aid package, but with Congress not
14:50
being quick to agree to such a deal, citing the lack on manpower on
14:54
the part of the Ukrainian military. As it stands, all men between eighteen
14:58
and sixty are prohibited from leaving the Ukraine, and men with no prior military
15:03
experience can be drafted up to the age of twenty five. So they're doing
15:09
that. That SpongeBob meme, you know, the one. We did it,
15:15
Patrick, We did Patrick, except as not the city that's collaterally burning
15:20
down in the background. It's surprise, surprise the men. So it's the
15:24
same thing happened in World War One. Literally nothing was achieved in that war
15:28
other than the needless, pointless deaths of millions of men, and that seems
15:33
to be happening in Ukraine. You're not saving your nation, you're saving shit.
15:39
If you had just done a little bit of peace negotiation right from the
15:41
start, you might have lost, like Crimea in the dumbass region and whatnot,
15:46
but you wouldn't have matched your male population to their deaths in the process.
15:52
And why are you doing this? What's the justification. You don't want
15:56
to surrender, You don't even want to surrender a fraction of land that's largely
16:02
populated by ethnic Russians anyway, but you're ready, willing and enthusiastic about surrendering
16:07
your men, apparently all of them. You've burned through all the young men,
16:11
and now you're burning through the middle aged ones. And when they're all
16:15
dead, I don't know. I suppose you'll take the men over sixty,
16:19
load them into the treboschet and fling them across the Russian border in the hope
16:25
that one of them will land on a cow and perhaps injure it, and
16:29
before you know it, your population is reduced to mostly women. Much like
16:33
after World War One. Those women go on to vote in their own interests,
16:37
like they always do. They vote for a government that, through taxes
16:41
and skewed laws, steals whatever the few remaining have left and gives it to
16:47
ungrateful communist skanks who keep demanding more and more, and you get yourselves one
16:52
hundred years of darkness and counting. This is not patriotism by any stretch.
16:57
Your nation is not defined by your and it's defined by your people, specifically
17:03
your men. Let's be honest, your women won't. Your women won't fight
17:07
for it physically or metaphorically, not even if you let them, not even
17:11
if you force them, which you never would anyway. Evidently, they'll vote
17:15
for socialism, they'll demand more and more gibbs, they'll destroy the nation from
17:19
the inside out. And when they lose a war and all the men die,
17:23
the women opportunistically and enthusiastically defect to whoever won the fight, and they'll
17:30
get away with it, and they'll live to not fight another day, they'll
17:34
move on to the next nation and they'll fuck that up as well. This
17:38
is what we're funding, by the way, albeit against our will. This
17:41
is what our taxes are being spent on the destruction of the Ukrainian people and
17:48
lining the pockets of the Biden family and anyone else taking advantage of one of
17:53
the world's most corrupt governments. Do not give me any of this shit about
17:57
don't you care about the Ukrainian people? Why, yes, yes, I
18:00
do a little bit. I wish you would stop sending them to die,
18:04
and I get the distinct feeling they don't want to die either. If you
18:10
negotiated with Russia, they would have taken a few southeastern provinces and that would
18:14
be it. As it stands, Russia's gonna go ahead and take those provinces
18:18
anyway, and then they'll cast their eyes northwest and notice that there's no one
18:22
left to defend the rest of the country, No one left, except of
18:26
course, American men and British men and men from all over the western world.
18:32
They too will be sent to die against their will, and those nations
18:36
will also be reduced to mostly women, just like they were one hundred years
18:38
ago. The cycle repeats, and the whole situation gets a shit load worse.
18:42
This is why we talk about men's issues, because war is one of
18:47
the many symptoms of what happens when no one gives a shit about men or
18:52
their issues. Mysonry is even more destructive than xenophobia, even more destructive than
18:57
eucophobia. It's the excuse use people use to start wars. It's the excuse
19:03
people use to exact totalitarianism. They care more about the spoils of war than
19:10
they care about the men who fight for those spoils. Those who sacrifice men
19:17
for land deserve neither, and they will get neither. I'm paraphrasing a possibly
19:22
apocryphal quote there, and I think it's more apt than the original. But
19:27
I suppose I would say that I'm some kind of filthy mra But yeah,
19:33
bring the boys back home and words to that effect. We didn't invent that
19:38
sentiment, with a sentiment dispoused by many a conscientious objector over the years.
19:47
We're just among the very few people who are still espousing it. For whatever
19:52
it's worth. Wish us luck, and we'll wish it right back. That
19:56
give us more than luck, and we'll give you more than wishes, thoughts
20:02
I pressed and all that jazz. I just want to repeat, Like I
20:11
think I've said this in other ways about a million times. Every minute that
20:15
the United States is involved in this stuff creates more risk of what I've come
20:25
to think of as the Yank effect. It's a lot like the Batman effect.
20:29
Right, we see shit happening in other countries where we're not under attack,
20:37
and we're not under threat of attack, and we're not obligated to get
20:45
involved, and we finagle away to make it look like we're obligated to get
20:51
involved, and then we get involved, and we stir the shit, and
20:56
then it gets worse and the next thing you know, there is a larger
21:00
conflict, or there are a series of conflicts that that echo off of it
21:07
later on, or both. And the World War one World War two effect
21:15
was a really prime example of that, where I don't think things would have
21:23
gone throughout history and and honestly, the golf Wurs and everything came out of
21:29
that if the United States had not meddled in World War One. And we're
21:36
just we're just doing it again and again and again, and every single time
21:41
we have had you know, we come out looking like we're saviors for a
21:47
short time, and then history looks back and says, you know, if
21:51
we hadn't gone in there trying to be superheroes, this would have had a
21:56
an outcome that would have created a more lasting piece, or not created more
22:02
war. And now there's more war. So I just it's not just the
22:10
current situation that we're putting at risk. It's men today and men tomorrow,
22:19
and men twenty years from now, men fifty years from now, men one
22:26
hundred years from now, Like we're still seeing the echoes of the interference that
22:33
we engaged in in World War One and the resulting conflict that we got involved
22:40
in World War Two. So I just this is terrible. And if our
22:45
people don't figure out that every time our government does this it results in deaths
22:53
of their grandchildren and their great grandchildren, we're going to continue this pattern indefinitely.
23:00
Then it just needs to stop. We need to put the brakes on.
23:03
I need to start telling them, no, we're not going to vote
23:07
for people who will fund this shit. If you vote for this, you
23:11
lose our support, regardless of party, regardless of any other Like you maybe
23:18
your pro abortion and you got a pro abortion candidate, but they voted for
23:22
this shit. Vote them out anyway. There's a thousand other people willing to
23:26
run that are that are pro abortion. You know, if you're pro life
23:30
and the same thing they voted for this, it's not pro life to vote
23:33
for this, So vote them out. You know, there's there's a thousand
23:40
other people that you can vote in that are pro life. You know,
23:44
that's one issue. Every other issue, the drug issue, the budgeting issues,
23:48
welfare, all of that, whatever your other issues are, it's a
23:52
guarantee you can find somebody else to vote for your your pet issues. Find
23:57
somebody who won't say, and our guys to war, and it is our
24:03
guys. It's it's not for the most part, they don't send women,
24:07
right, Women might be on medical ships, women might be behind computers,
24:12
but they don't send women to fight, not very much. And and so
24:19
yeah, well for somebody who's not gonna send our guys, and then that's
24:25
that's it. Somebody in the chat saying that they are drafting women, even
24:29
pregnant women, I'd like to see a source for that, because that's crazy.
24:34
Well, there's two ways you get drafted in war. One is when
24:37
the government does it. And one is when the fight comes to your doorstep
24:41
and the war drafts you. I doubt the government doing it. I doubt
24:45
the government's doing it. They might be seeing some people where some instances where
24:51
women decided to stay in a neighborhood where they shouldn't have and then regretted it,
24:56
But I sincerely doubt that they're drafting women. But uh, but there
25:06
is like our I can I cannot tell you very much, but I can
25:11
tell you that our government is lying to the public about what they are doing
25:15
with the men in the United States. Absolutely. I I live where I
25:22
am seeing things happen, and our government is claiming things are not being done,
25:29
and things are not happening that are being done and that are happening,
25:33
just like before Vietnam. That's all I'm gonna tell you. Do not believe
25:42
what you see in the news about our non reaction. And that's that's to
25:51
everything that's going on right now and now. And one thing I will also
25:56
just put out there that I think matters a lot is where so when they
26:00
locked down Ukraine, they only prevented the men from leaving, and women left
26:07
that country and droves and from what I've what I understand, they've all gone
26:11
to other countries and they've essentially started new lives, or they've become male order
26:17
brides or something. Now I'm not saying all of them. There's probably a
26:21
significant number that are loyal to their you know, husbands and either stayed in
26:26
the country or they just got to a safe you know, the safe haven
26:32
wherever and stayed in contact. But all I'm saying is that the price that
26:37
the citizenry is paying for this, which I don't think is a just war.
26:44
And I've always been suspicious of it, especially the timing and then with
26:49
all of the stuff with like the Biden family and others. I've always been
26:55
suspicious of that, and I think it, Yeah, it's it's really messed
26:57
up because it's men's lives that are paying the price. And now you know,
27:02
Zelensky's willing to throw like guys over forty at this like how much is
27:08
enough? How much is it you like to take before people say, you
27:11
know, we need to start valuing men. So I don't know. Anyway,
27:18
I will say one more thing, Yeah, yeah, when you hear
27:19
the phrase boots on the ground, do not let them do that. You
27:25
see boots on the ground phrasing on Twitter say you know, asterisk men,
27:33
there are no boots on the ground. There are men. Yes, absolutely,
27:41
anyway those on you guys think about this in the comments, I have
27:44
a super chow from Meredith the top g and she says, for five dollars,
27:52
thank you, Meredith, HBr News number four thirty six, honey for
27:55
the Badgers. Are we surprised that effeckless fool wants to send more of his
27:57
citizens to the meek rind? I'm not no, I mean all he does
28:03
is like ask for money, I swear. I think it's just a giant
28:07
money laundering scheme and they're just killing people. They don't give a shit.
28:11
You know. That's pretty much the last two centuries of war. Yeah,
28:15
yeah, and probably going back throughout the whole history of war. Yep.
28:22
All right, well anyway, and let us know what you guys think about
28:25
this one in the comments. I think it's I think again, another thing
28:29
that's worth thinking about. And the reason why I brought this up is that
28:32
people will tell you the draft is not like you know, like there hasn't
28:36
been a draft. We're not going to be drafting anybody that all it takes
28:40
is one motion, one motion through like whatever your Congress or your parliament,
28:45
and even if they've never done it before, they'll do it. So it's
28:51
a conversation that's worth having, despite the fact that so many people will tell
28:56
you that it's a non issue. So, yeah, wh who's going to
29:00
stop them from changing the law so that so that men get drafted into a
29:04
war. They don't give a ship aback. You've seen what governments did over
29:07
the last three years and people just went along with it. Mm hmm,
29:11
Like it involves killing people quite a lot of people. I'm not going to
29:18
say how or why a going to over the last three years because we still
29:22
can't or can we I don't know, But yeah, the world governments have
29:26
displayed how ready and willing they are to sacrifice their own people. I say,
29:32
their own people. And that's how governments view people. They own them.
29:37
And yeah, there's they'll they'll throw everyone into the meat grinder, even
29:41
women by injecting Eventually, eventually when they they will kill women by poisoning them
29:52
and denying that they did it. But they'll kill men by throwing them into
29:56
an explosion, and they'll just say, yeah, we did it the They
30:00
won't even wait twenty years to declassify a document admitting that they did it.
30:03
They'll just do it and they go, what, Yeah, we threw a
30:07
bunch of men to the deaths. Well that's what we do with the government.
30:08
Fuck you, what are you gonna do? Nothing? Mm hmm.
30:17
Well let us know what you guys think about this one in the comments.
30:21
I looked forward to your thoughts. Thank you, Meredith for the kind comments
30:26
and support for the channel. All Right, so next up something a little
30:32
I don't know, is it light? There is a different picture, but
30:34
I don't think I'm gonna show it because I don't know how YouTube's gonna feel
30:37
about this. But Aiden mazy Zirpolski Zorrovsky, I'm sorry, a Senate staffer
30:44
who was fired after a video of him engaging in explicit acts in a Senate
30:48
hearing room surfaced. I don't know if you guys heard about that. I
30:52
guess it's been doing the rounds. After he was fired, he claimed homophobia
30:56
as the reason behind the fallout. You might as well just go for it.
31:03
You might as well. The leaked footage showed him involved in explicit activities
31:10
on a table in the Senate hearing room, mays Zarobski, identified as part
31:15
of Senator Ben Cardin's office. That's the person pictured here was subsequently terminated from
31:22
his position. Which position are we talking about? Like doggie or what?
31:27
In response, he posted a statement on LinkedIn attributing the incident's consequences to homophobia.
31:34
While acknowledging past poor judgment, he defended his love for his job and
31:38
vowed to explore how beet he loved it, and vowed to explore legal options
31:44
against what he called fabricated characterizations of his actions. Suggestions for improvement may include
31:48
clarifying the sequence of events and providing a more concise summary. See that's the
31:53
cleanest version of this story that I could, Like you said, is homophobia?
32:02
A common rebuttal to this story is if someone had heterosexual intercourse in a
32:07
Senate hearing room, you'd be perfectly fine with that. No, No,
32:13
I would not. That the story would be just as huge and just as
32:15
scandalous. And what's more, the perpetrators would be sacked even faster, and
32:20
the lanstream press would not be defending them like they are. It wouldn't surprise
32:24
me if they arrested the man in question for fucking a woman in the Senate.
32:30
Only the man, of course, the woman we would be considered a
32:32
rape victim unless it was Lauren Bober, of course. But when two Republicans
32:37
have sex, or even one touches the other's boob, they're both rapists and
32:43
neither of them is a rape victim. Don't ask me how that works.
32:45
I don't even know, all of which based the question that has it ever
32:50
happened? Has a straight couple ever had sex in the Senate? As far
32:54
as we know, no, maybe it has happened in GfK's time. You
33:00
know what, if we don't know that, Here's why we don't know that.
33:05
Here's why we don't know that. All right, I want you guys
33:07
to remember something. It came out I believe in twenty sixteen, twenty seventeen,
33:12
somewhere in there that our United States Congress, both the House and the
33:19
Senate, I believe, had a slush fund to pay people who work in
33:25
the building for making allegations against senators. So any kind of sexual misconduct allegation
33:35
could be swept under the rug using a handful of money that existed that was
33:40
reported on. That's been a thing for a long time. So I'm I'm,
33:49
you know, skeptical here of the idea that we would we would have
33:54
this reaction if there wasn't something else going on. And I'm not saying we
34:00
the public. I'm saying that we. I'm skeptical that we would be seeing
34:05
this reaction from the media and Congress. I wonder maybe there is maybe they
34:09
are just like fucking like rabbits out there, and every so often somebody they
34:15
want to get rid of somebody, and they're like, oh, you did
34:19
the thing that we do all the time, and we can use it against
34:22
you in this instance. I don't necessarily think it's an issue of hobo homophobia.
34:28
But I don't necessarily believe that this never happens and that it's it's not
34:36
normal behavior there, because everything I've seen come out about the Senate and Congress
34:45
and sexual misconduct indicates that it's just one big party there, that they don't
34:52
give a rat's ass about the sanctity of their buildings and the sanctity of their
34:57
environment, and that they're not shot to win stuff like this happens. I
35:00
don't believe they're shocked when stuff like this happens. I think maybe he did
35:05
it in front of cameras and a security guard saw it and went, oh,
35:09
you know, or something along those lines. Or he's pissed somebody off
35:15
in some other part of his job, some other avenue of reason why they
35:22
might be pissed off at him, and they're like, well, we've got
35:24
this dirt, let's use it. But I don't I don't believe for a
35:28
minute that these guys are scandalized in the least by this. I don't think
35:31
anybody in Washington is scandalized by sex. I think it's a constant, ever
35:37
present. Yeah, and even so, even if they do, even if
35:45
they have heterosexual orgies in Senate heroins, no one has ever been so wanton,
35:51
so blatant. So she bristic as to film the sexual acts and post
35:57
it online for all the world to see without any Yeah, pretty consequences.
36:02
How the fuck did that happen? The first confirmed case of sex in the
36:07
Senate, and it's gay sex, and people are defending it, They're calling
36:10
it an act of love. We looked away for a second, and suddenly
36:15
gay sex is less stigmatized than straight sex. So I'm I'm starting to wonder
36:20
if it was indeed done with thought for the consequences. One guy getting fired
36:28
is a low, low price to pay for the chance to undermine the nation
36:32
and make a mockery of the American people whose taxes are paying the wages of
36:37
these degenerate AIDS pigs. They're doing it on purpose. They've turned the US
36:44
Senate into their playground and their orgy, while they also turned playgrounds into orgies
36:51
and vice versa. But that's another Sorry, that's the next step though.
36:53
By the way, they're gonna get Joe Biden to fuck a child in the
36:57
ass and the front steps of the White House and they're gonna stream that shit
37:00
to twitch. Yeah, and CNN will just go what love is? Love?
37:07
Stay out our bedroom? Wait what? And when I say that,
37:12
As far as I know, I'm joking, But nothing would surprise me anymore.
37:15
You can't start progress after all, because progress is a euphemism that means
37:21
the death and destruction of everything anyone has ever held it, which technically is
37:27
inevitable on a cosmic scale. Soon enough, the universe is going to eat
37:30
death itself. I guess we were just hoping for a few more years of
37:35
stability before this death by a thousand cucks is thrust upon us, and indeed
37:42
into us by these unapologetic misanthropic traitors. Fuck you, not not literally fuck
37:52
you. I mean I don't I don't mean, I don't even know what
37:54
I mean. Anyway. You fucked up our nations and you've fucked up our
37:59
language, so we can't even say what we're talking about. There's nothing left
38:02
to fuck up except our literal asses. I for one, I'm keeping sandpaper
38:10
up my ass from now on, just in case it's a sensation that leaves
38:15
something to be desired. But I think it's far better than the alternative,
38:19
if the reason it it even is an alternative to this phenomenon, people are
38:23
still calling alternative no matter how normalized. It becomes. Bollocks to you.
38:30
And I don't mean you can have my bollocks. I mean, god,
38:34
never mind, I can't eat, I can't even anymore. Go away.
38:39
The chat is roasting the ship out of this story. Guys, you have
38:44
a lot of opinions, and I love them all. They're hilarious. Bain
38:46
says, the politicians fucked the public in the Senate all the time. That's
38:52
true, and then shadow Wolf eighty seven on rumble. What's up? Shadow
38:58
Wolf says my favorite take? How is that different from then what happens there
39:02
already? Just to the American people. Oh, you guys got jokes.
39:08
You guys got jokes. All right, Well, anyway, let us know
39:14
what you guys think about this crazy story in the comments. It's uh,
39:16
yeah, it's pretty wild, and we're gonna move on to the next one.
39:22
Last. I think that's really all we have left is one more thing.
39:24
Laughter. I want the list of names of people on whose behalf payments
39:32
have been made out of that slush fund I mentioned earlier. You think the
39:37
Epstein list is bad, I would like to compare the Epstein list to that
39:42
list and see if there are any names on both. Yep. It's saying
39:50
love is love, okay, And apparently apparently it doesn't matter if both people
40:00
are of age or consenting, or if it's done in an area that is
40:05
owned by the American people. The American people didn't consent to it. Yeah,
40:12
it's wild. All right, Well, let us know what you guys
40:14
think about this one in the comments, and we're gonna move on to the
40:16
next story. All right, let's talk about Mayor Michelle Wu So every year
40:24
since twenty fourteen, one of the Boston Council members hosts an electorate Elected of
40:30
Colors holiday party, in which Boston City Council members that aren't white get together
40:37
for a party. Michelle Wu, Boston's mayor, hosted the party this year.
40:40
She shared a photo on Instagram saying that quote, last night was my
40:44
turn to host the annual holiday dinner for Boston's elected officials of color. A
40:49
special moment to appreciate that our affinity group now includes leadership across city, state,
40:53
country, and federal offices. I think county is what, Yeah,
40:57
it's county. Wu was under five earlier this week when her director of City
41:01
Council Relations accidentally emailed the invitation to all city council members, not just those
41:07
that are people of color. Denis Dos Santos, the director, promptly rescinded
41:12
the invitation to those who received it by mistake, saying that quote, I
41:15
wanted to apologize for my previous email regarding a holiday party for tomorrow. I
41:21
did send that to everyone by accident, and I apologize if my email may
41:23
have offended or came across as so sorry for any confusion this may have caused
41:29
and quote, yeah, totally not offensive at all, because I said I
41:32
didn't mean it. Wu said of the annual party that quote. Not too
41:38
long ago in Boston, we didn't need such a big table to fit electeds
41:43
of color. But over my time as city councilor and now mayor, following
41:47
so many leaders who have paved the way, I've proudly watched this group grow
41:52
and create space for mentorship and fellowship amongst many who are breaking down barriers while
41:57
holding the weight of being the first or the only end quote. WU defended
42:01
her position outside of the home, saying that quote or outside of her home
42:07
saying, quote, I've been a part of the group that gathers representing elected
42:10
officials of color across all different levels of government in Massachusetts end quote. Who
42:15
said, according to WCVB, quote she continues a group that has been in
42:22
place for more than a decade and the opportunity to create a space for people
42:25
to celebrate and rotate who hosts end quote. She also added that quote,
42:30
I think we've all been in a position at one point where an email went
42:34
out and there was a mistake in the recipient end quote. She stressed that
42:37
there are other holiday parties where city officials of all races gather together. You'll
42:44
notice she didn't apologize for her racism. She only apologized for accidentally allowing her
42:52
secret racism to be revealed to the public. The question is why was she
43:00
keeping it secret. I know she's a politician. That's what politicians do by
43:05
trade. They lie to everyone and they keep the truth secret. That's that's
43:08
part of the cost. But when the truth is revealed, you're supposed to
43:13
actually show some remorse. When some when some devout Christian congressman is caught smoking
43:21
myth and fucking rent boys, what they do is apologize properly, even though
43:25
they're not actually hurting anyone, unless you unless you count the medical complications that
43:30
come from smoking myth and the acute pain that can come from buggery. But
43:35
at least it's it's all consensual. What they don't do is say I'm sorry
43:38
you found out. I'm sorry if I confused anyone into thinking that I'm some
43:45
kind of myth smoking twink fucker, but by smoking myth and fucking twinks.
43:50
But I can I can assure you this is fine, even though again,
43:54
what you do in your private life is not necessarily an abuse of government power
43:59
or betrayal of the people you're supposed to be serving. This bitch, on
44:04
quite the other hand, deliberately segregated elected officials or what she calls electeds.
44:10
I don't know when elected became a noun or whatever. She segregated them into
44:15
a two tier caste system for ten fucking years and she got away with this.
44:21
Ye when people are like, what, it's fine, it's been happening
44:23
for ages, you know, that makes it worse? Right? A thousand
44:29
years of darkness is not better than one hundred years of darkness. There's literally
44:32
an order of magnitude worse. That would be why you kept at secret.
44:38
And what's really crazy is, in the ten years this has been going on,
44:40
why did nobody blow the whistle on it? How Come no elected of
44:45
color ever mentioned this to anyone, not even the Asians, even while Asians
44:51
have been discriminated against in universities and god knows where else and getting banged up
44:55
in the streets by thugs whose race shall remain un identified. How come none
45:00
of the Asians invited to this banquet ever thought, hang on, this bullshit
45:07
is exactly what's keeping my people down. I'm gonna call it out, and
45:12
yet, probably because if they did so, they would have to name and
45:16
shame themselves as the whistleblower, forever being outed as the wrong direction racist who
45:22
refuses to be racist in the right direction. Evidently, anti white racism is
45:30
still even less stigmatized than open buggery in the Senate building. But we'll get
45:35
there as well. Give it a couple of years, and the next guy
45:38
who does it will issue a statement along the lines of I'm very sorry I
45:43
got railed in the Senate by a white man. It was inconsiderate and racist
45:47
of me. Next time, I will endeavor to get Shane fucked by six
45:52
black guys right there in the Oval office, and I'll film it in four
45:54
K and release on IMAX and force school children to watch it as part of
46:00
the curriculum, and arrest any parents who are at all perturbed by the situation.
46:05
Again, I am joking, but take heed for many a true word
46:10
is spoken in jest. All of this is just after all the fucking gestures
46:15
clowns. They don't even know what they're doing. All they know is that
46:19
whatever they're doing must be the right thing to do. They will fuck the
46:23
whole world in the ass and give it AIDS, and they will beraate anyone
46:27
for not respecting the civil rights of the AIDS virus. And then they'll force
46:31
you to take a vaccine that they claim cures the AIDS virus but actually gives
46:36
you the Black Death, and then they'll berate you for calling it the black
46:39
death because that's racist. Nothing is off the table, nothing on the contrary,
46:45
everything, everything, and everyone is on the table fucking each other to
46:50
death. I do excuse me, I have a lot to drink right now.
46:55
I just want to know it. At what point do we get to
47:00
say, well, you're not oppressed anymore, Like it's obviously we've We've had
47:07
decades and decades of advancement in various areas of of work and social advancements,
47:16
with various areas of legal power and social power and political power. Uh,
47:22
there is not an area of government that is still racially segregated to the disadvantage
47:30
of any people of color. There's not an area of even government bureaucracy that
47:38
is racially segregated to the disadvantage of people of color, regardless of what color
47:46
we're talking about other than white. Right, there's there's no area where there
47:54
is still systematic institutionalized discript a nation against people who are black, Hispanic,
48:06
Asian, doesn't matter, Native American, indigenous of any to any nation other
48:14
than white European nations. There's no law that says you can't be in any
48:21
particular position of government. There's no law that says you can't hold any particular
48:27
office. There's no law that says you can't be part of any particular bureaucracy,
48:31
the police force, the justice system, criminal justice system, none of
48:36
it. Right now, we find out that even sunshine laws don't apply to
48:44
elected officials of color. They can gather in secret, call it a party,
48:52
and you know, not not tell the public, not invite other officials,
49:00
in fact, openly disinvite other officials. And well it's supposed to be
49:07
okay because it's for people of color. Got their own separate little shadow government
49:13
there now, right, That's that's it. Ye. When do we get
49:19
to stop, you know, stop hearing about how oppressed you are? Do
49:22
we do we have to wait until there is a an open and blatant domination
49:32
of government. Do we have to wait until you know where we're we got
49:39
jack booted thugs coming to our doors and hauling us out of our apartments for
49:45
for being the wrong color and that kind of thing. Does that have to
49:47
happen first, or can we say that given access to every aspect of society
49:57
plus special access over and above the normal access to every aspect of society,
50:06
where you get your own special you got regular access plus your own special segregated
50:12
access. On top of that, you have exemption from standards for accountability within
50:19
society and in particular within government. At some point we should be able to
50:25
say, okay, that that constitutes not being oppressed anymore. Oppression is over
50:31
right, That's it done. We want we do of color oppressed, It's
50:37
over I will not accept any further statements of oppression from anyone, because it
50:45
is now okay for people of color to have their own separate government meetings out
50:54
of the press, outside of the media, and outside of the eye of
50:59
the public, and outside of the eye of their their colleagues in office,
51:04
and and make decisions and have discussions about government matters as long as they just
51:09
label it a party. Yep, you know, I'm I'm I'm actually in
51:16
support of the right of people to associate with whoever they want. I'm a
51:24
big supporter of freedom of association. If you if you are a private citizen.
51:31
This is not a private citizen situation though these are government officials, government
51:37
people, uh, the city council members, et cetera, that are discriminating.
51:44
So I think that that in the private space. You know, we've
51:47
talked about this before. If you own if you are a Muslim and you
51:52
own a uh, you know, a restaurant or a bakery or something you
52:00
going to, your your values are gonna impact like your preferences in terms of
52:04
your customers, and you have a right even if it even if people will
52:07
see it, could see it as discriminator or hateful. I think that,
52:10
you know, everybody has a right to associate with whom they want. That's
52:14
why I don't have a problem with the existence of skinheads or black nationalists or
52:20
whatever. I mean. I think it's stupid. I don't think it's productive,
52:22
but I don't think it should be illegal. But when you work for
52:28
the state, you are the you are working for us, and the people
52:34
are the ones that sign your checks. And this is something that most people
52:37
don't seem to like get through their heads, is that you know, the
52:39
government serves the people, not the other way around, and when they do
52:45
stuff like this, you have to ask yourself, like, is this where
52:47
my tax dollars are going? Like, even if it's something as petty as
52:52
a Christmas party, this is just what we learned about. I'm just saying,
52:55
like, what else is going on? What other kinds of description a
53:00
nation like this? How? How else has critical theory informed these kinds of
53:07
policies in ways that are more impactful than a party. And that's what I
53:12
think about when these when these things come, you know, come to to
53:15
uh to surface. Uh. Also, one other thing I'll say about this
53:20
too, is that why do people like this think that all people of or
53:24
or you know, slightly negative neutral, uh you know, attitudes. It's
53:30
not like Chinese people, Korean people and Japanese people and Filipinos all get along
53:37
like it's like the same, you know, even in that context. But
53:40
it's funny because it's this again, this is one of these things where it's
53:44
like all the people of color, if we lived in a world together,
53:46
we'd all get along when we know that they'd be at each other's throats.
53:50
I mean, did you see the the ship that the Japanese did to the
53:52
Chinese before World War Two. I think it was pretty horrible. So and
54:00
and the grudge that existed for it probably still does between Japan and South Korea.
54:06
Maybe Japan just gets in a lot of trouble. I don't know,
54:08
the same thing here in the US before Europeans came here, the tribes were
54:15
oh, yeah, the native tribes were killing each other. Yeah, they
54:17
were all at war with each other, and the wars were very brutal,
54:21
very very brutal. Yeah, child sacrifice, cannibalism in some cases. So
54:27
there's some stuff I'm looking at just a couple of comments, and I'm thinking,
54:31
maybe people don't know what sunshine laws are a This is is something that's
54:37
present in multiple levels of government, so you might have there's there There are
54:44
some sunshine laws at the federal level, there are some sunshine laws at the
54:46
state level, and there are some sunshine laws at the local level, depending
54:52
on your community standards. But sunshine laws basically exist to give residents access to
54:59
government activity, government meetings, and records. And the idea is that your
55:05
government can't just make a bunch of laws in secret and then start applying to
55:08
you things that you had no way of knowing what was going on. So
55:14
the more local and direct the action is toward you, the more likely it's
55:20
covered by a law like that. So your federal government might do military things
55:24
without telling you, but your local government, like your city government and your
55:29
county government, shouldn't be deciding a highway is going to go through your front
55:34
yard without letting you know. And they get around it by putting the information
55:39
in places that are hard to access, like another thing that's highlighted in the
55:44
Hitticker's Guide to the Galaxy. But there are not supposed to be secret meetings
55:51
of your local government. And Massachusetts does have such a law any meeting,
56:00
any any gathering of a certain number of people or more. Basically, and
56:07
I know in my area it's usually just a two or three people or more,
56:13
like you get three people in the hometown that I grew up with at.
56:15
If there are three people meeting to discuss a public matter, they have
56:20
to alert the media, the local newspaper, They have to make the meeting
56:25
public, they have to open it to the public, and if the public
56:29
doesn't show up, that's their problem. But there are there are laws like
56:35
that in Massachusetts. As well. So this could be If it looks like
56:42
they have these parties to discuss any kind of you know, public public policy
56:50
or public policy gets discussed at these meetings, then they are in violation of
56:58
I believe it's Section eighteen. Yeah here it looks like for Massachusetts. Yeah,
57:07
not that there will be any repercussions, not that there will be any
57:10
accountability, but it is. It is a violation, absolutely, absolutely,
57:17
So let us know what you guys think about this one in the comments.
57:20
I do have a bit of breaking, breaking, breaking news, like breaking
57:25
breaking, like right now. Apparently Mike Jay put this through the live show
57:30
chat and tagged me, but I'm going to share it with you guys.
57:35
I think I don't think there's any super chats or super childs, but feel
57:38
free to send those through. Apparently a big story just broke. Colorado Supreme
57:45
Court has said that as per the Civil War Insurrection Clause, they will not
57:50
put Trump on the ballot and even write ends for him will not be counted.
57:55
This is according to Disclose dot tv, but they're sharing a a wider
58:00
link. You can look at it in the uh Denver Post dot com,
58:06
which I'm putting up right now. Colorado Supreme Court bars Donald Trump from hearing
58:09
at on the state's ballot in twenty twenty four. Legal challenge alleged January sixth,
58:15
Capital Riot dis qualified Trump under insurrection clause, which, by the way,
58:20
more and more people are realizing was not in fact the thing that they
58:23
claimed it was. But I even if it was, Let's let's consider something
58:29
really quick here before we get into anything. What crime has he been found
58:35
guilty of in a court of law? Well, nothing yet, as far
58:42
as I know. There's just a lot of conspiracy. This is like the
58:45
kind of stuff I don't know. I've been Okay, let me be let
58:46
me be clear. I've been following the case because it's garbage, and I
58:51
figured I just probably gonna be a lot of like, you know, rhetorical
58:54
bullshit and like legal ease, and I thought I would just wait until things
59:00
done and settled before I looked. But this is just a decision that the
59:05
Denver Supreme or the Colorado Supreme Court came to. So a state Supreme court
59:12
is basically saying you can't vote for him even if you write him in,
59:15
and they're going by it's it's very I guess like it's sketch right from what
59:22
I can it's a it's a four to three opinion, so three of the
59:24
judges said this is wrong. And this is an old Democrat by the way,
59:30
but you look at this, it's the The Amendment prohibits people who engaged
59:38
in insurrection from running for office. So he has not been found guilty of
59:45
a single crime. He has not been found guilty of engaging in insurrection or
59:51
even encouraging insurrection. Nothing has been set, nothing has been attributed to him
1:00:00
officially by the government. So this is a Supreme Court of the State of
1:00:07
Denver stating that due process is not a right. If you are running for
1:00:15
office, you can be deemed guilty of a crime that you are not on
1:00:22
trial for in the state of Denver and excluded from the ballot in Denver for
1:00:31
being accused. Yeah, yeah, yeah, that's it, just for being
1:00:39
accused. I just wanted to make that clear. Everything else about the story,
1:00:45
nothing they have to say about Trump matters. The underlying story that we
1:00:52
just got is Denver court system. The Supreme Court of Denver just told the
1:01:00
American public that Denver's court system can act on allegations as if they are a
1:01:08
guilty verdict. Mm hmm. Unless it is Sony, it didn't happen.
1:01:19
Unless they're allegations against Democrats, well we'll find out. I don't think they
1:01:25
have anything. Honestly, they'd have to prove that Trump organized January sixth,
1:01:30
and we already know it was mostly the Fads that did that. Someone's in
1:01:34
fucking trouble. Someone many people in Colorado are gonna get fired. And even
1:01:37
if they don't, even if they get away with the old cloth or whatever,
1:01:43
Trump doesn't need Colorado. The next election is going to be like the
1:01:50
Reagan thing in nineteen eighty. It's gonna be an absolutely well, he's gonna
1:01:52
take it all the way to the top though, and his boys, his
1:01:55
boys in the Supreme Court. Guy's ass covered. I think I hope it's
1:02:00
it's gonna be i'd say whitewash, but red wash. It's I know,
1:02:05
Colorado's Yeah. Colorado is a swing state anyway, so it's one of those
1:02:08
states that could go either way. So they just found it another way of
1:02:13
stealing it like that, like they allegedly sometimes do in so many swing states.
1:02:16
But even if they do get away with this, even if they completely
1:02:22
break the fucking law. Trum's still going to win and unless many other states
1:02:28
follow suit and also get away with it, which again wouldn't surprise me.
1:02:32
So yeah, I mean this weird dead space between the black pillow and the
1:02:36
white pill on this. I don't, I don't. I don't know how
1:02:38
bad it's going to get, but I I I hope these cunts get arrested.
1:02:44
And I don't know, give color Give Colorado to Wyoming. They need,
1:02:51
they need more people. Anyway, they won't get arrested because it's it's
1:02:53
it's the Supreme Court of Colorado. The only thing that will happen is that
1:03:00
the Federal Supreme Court might overturn the state Supreme Court on this and say,
1:03:07
no, you have to list them, but it might be too late.
1:03:12
They timed this it looks like specifically, but yeah, it's it's it's it's
1:03:22
a near certainty the case will head the U. S. Supreme Court.
1:03:24
Colorado Supreme Court state its ruling until January fourth, the day before the deadline
1:03:30
for the Secretary of State to certify its presidential primary ballants ballots in case an
1:03:36
appeal is filed, in which case the state will be required to include Trump's
1:03:39
Nate name on the March fifth primary ballot unless federal justices say otherwise. So
1:03:45
they barely have time to get this in. But you know, it's the
1:03:52
thing that's that's of vital importance here for you to understand is we just had
1:04:00
the highest court in a state rule that you can be punished for being accused
1:04:09
of a crime without being found guilty. That if that doesn't get overturned,
1:04:15
that it doesn't matter who gets elected president. Yep, it's over. That
1:04:23
is a huge step. It's it's Trump. Notwithstanding, I don't care if
1:04:30
Satan himself came up and was accused of crimes in the United States and everybody's
1:04:34
like, it's the devil. Of course he's guilty. Doesn't matter, right,
1:04:39
you still have due process rights. And the reason this is important is
1:04:45
because you, each individual person out there can be accused of anything from insurrection
1:04:56
to treason to any other type of crime. I'm against the government for as
1:05:02
much as a tweet criticizing the actions of your elected officials. And it doesn't
1:05:11
matter if you have the right to freedom of speech. It doesn't matter if
1:05:17
you have the right to do process before you get criminally penalized. If the
1:05:24
highest court in your state can say you get trampled right. Your rights don't
1:05:30
matter. You have been accused of something too serious to give you due process
1:05:34
rights. Your name can't be on the ballot, you can't get this job,
1:05:38
you can't travel outside the state. You go to jail. Directly to
1:05:43
jail. Do not pass go, do not get a hearing. It's over.
1:05:48
There is no more. Yeah, there's no more civil rights, there's
1:05:54
no more human rights. There's nothing. You are subjects. Yep. When
1:06:01
the last law was down and the devil turned round on you, where would
1:06:05
you hide the laws? All being flat? The country is planted thick with
1:06:10
laws from coast to coast. Man's laws, not God's. And if you
1:06:13
cut them down, and you're just the man to do it, do you
1:06:15
really think you could stand upright in the winds that would blow? Then yes,
1:06:19
I'd give the devil benefit of law for my own safety's sake. You'll
1:06:26
know the quote, but it's worth repeating, and it is. Every bit
1:06:31
is important today, it is it is forever important. There is. You
1:06:38
have no rights if you do not have due process rights. All right,
1:06:44
So I got a super chow from Richard Beierre, who gives US five dollars,
1:06:48
thank you, Richard, and says, once the universal enemy is disposed
1:06:53
of, watch how fast they all turn on each other. There was a
1:06:58
minority meeting event at one of the California universities that, because the agenda hadn't
1:07:02
been decided on beforehand, degenerated into the oppression Olympics of who should be allowed
1:07:08
to speak first and on what issues? And then he followed up with another
1:07:13
five dollars and just said see above, Well, thank you for that,
1:07:18
Richard. And yes, this is a this is a pickle. That's what
1:07:25
I will say to that. But I think Trump's gonna fight this, and
1:07:30
I don't know. I don't think that it's going to be solidified. But
1:07:33
if it does end up going, then they're gonna do this everywhere. This
1:07:41
is like getting their foot in the door. If Colorado can do it and
1:07:44
then and no one stops them, then then all the states that want to
1:07:49
are going to follow up and they're just gonna do the same thing. So
1:07:53
this has to this has to be nipped in the bud. If they can
1:07:56
do this, elections won't be real matter even less than they already do.
1:08:02
And here's the thing, like, even if they were real, they still
1:08:05
wouldn't matter. M You wouldn't there is There's no government you can elect that
1:08:15
can replace your right of due process. Out of all of the battles that
1:08:19
Trump has fought, this one is the single most important one. Mm hm
1:08:29
all right, well let us know what you guys think about this one of
1:08:30
the comments. Thanks Mike Jay for the last minute a bit of breaking,
1:08:34
breaking, breaking news after the Epstein clientless thing. Yeah, twenty twenty four
1:08:40
is going to be a crazy ass year. I think Pageau was right.
1:08:44
Let us know you guys about this in the comments that we're gonna move on
1:08:45
to our last story. This is just a little follow up. So Jonathan
1:08:49
Majors, you guys might know as an actor that Hollywood was in love with
1:08:55
for a couple of years. He was in Creed three and a lot of
1:08:59
other films and television shows just kind of like skyrocketed to stardom, and he
1:09:04
was originally well, he played Kang the Conqueror in the Marvel Cinematic Universe.
1:09:10
He has been found guilty of reckless assault and harassment, though not guilty of
1:09:15
intentional assault and aggravated harassment. So just to you just remember, we covered
1:09:20
the there were these allegations against Jonathan Major's and at the time we didn't like
1:09:27
have like a you know, like any it was still an ongoing thing.
1:09:30
Well, these are the findings, according to the courts. So Disney owned
1:09:34
Marvel Studios swiftly severed ties with Majors following the verdict. He liked they did
1:09:41
with Johnny Depp, impacting his role in upcoming projects like Avengers Kan Dynasty.
1:09:46
Majors expressed gratitude for support and may may appeal the verdict. The fallout extends
1:09:53
beyond the MCU, impacting Mayor's career with cancelations and distancing from PR teams and
1:09:58
Disney owned entities. The case raises broader questions about the challenges faced by successful
1:10:03
men in the hashtag me too era. The m c U now grapples with
1:10:09
decisions on recasting or altering the storyline affecting the highly anticipated Avengers King. Yeah
1:10:15
not not not anticipated that that last part, that last part is it didn't
1:10:23
happen. So here's the question, what's the difference between reckless assault and harassment
1:10:29
and intentional assault and aggravated harassment? Because like, I'm sorry, but if
1:10:34
you can assault someone by accident. Uh. That that raises a whole bunch
1:10:41
of other questions since you don't actually have to lay a finger on a person
1:10:47
to assault them, You only have to threaten them mm hmm. And if
1:10:51
you don't like to threaten someone, that that that takes intention. Right.
1:10:58
If I if I say I'm going to punch you in the face, that's
1:11:00
a threat. Right. If I were to tell you that that's an overt
1:11:04
threat and there's intent behind it, the the intent to uh communicate to you
1:11:10
that I am considering an act of violence against you, right, that that's
1:11:14
that's a threat. Right, That's definitely an intentional assault, especially if I
1:11:19
do it with my fist raised up in the air and I'm approaching you,
1:11:23
that's an intentional assault. Mm hmm. So what the heck is a reckless
1:11:28
assault? You know? Is that flinging your arms around in you? I
1:11:30
think it's like, yeah, I think it's I think they're actually calling it
1:11:33
an accident. So that's that's not an assault. That's ridiculous. Let me
1:11:40
look it up. Reckless, reckless assault. I'm going to look it up.
1:11:44
Go ahead. And the same thing with harassment. You can't accidentally harass
1:11:46
somebody. You shouldn't be able to accidentally harass somebody, right, Either your
1:11:54
behavior was inappropriate and you knew it, or it wasn't or you had no
1:12:00
way of knowing it it was never communicated to you. Right. And so
1:12:05
these this idea that we're getting these smaller and smaller categories, in these vaguer
1:12:12
and vaguer ways of describing unintentional acts as if they have the same criminal culpability
1:12:20
attached to them as intentional acts. It strikes me that the only reason we
1:12:27
have this is because women are willing to exploit the legal system as a tool
1:12:31
of vengeance and as a means of using it as a stair steps to get
1:12:40
better jobs and more money and things like that. And I just don't buy
1:12:45
this that that sounds ridiculous to me. I can see reckless negligence, you
1:12:54
know, and things like that where you cause injury because you were less,
1:13:00
but that's not an assault. Yeah, they call it recklessly recklessly causing injury.
1:13:10
This is the lawyer the legal term that keeps coming up when I search
1:13:15
for it. So let me see a person who without lawful excuse, intentionally
1:13:21
or unintentionally. Let me see where is it uh yeah, without Okay,
1:13:34
the legal legislation, a person who without lawful excuse, intentionally or recklessly causes
1:13:41
injury to another person who is guilty of an indictable offense. The penalty is
1:13:46
level five imprisonment ten years maximum if the injury was caused recklessly, level six
1:13:53
imprisonment. So if it's intentional, it's ten years. If it's reckless,
1:13:57
which is I guess not intentional but still like dangerous, is five years.
1:14:02
I yeah, my searching, I keep seeing this coming up as a DV
1:14:10
thing specifically don't matter to violence thing, it doesn't happen. Yeah, those
1:14:14
were the accusations against him, is that domestic abuser and of course because of
1:14:17
the me too thing, even though this guy, in my opinion, he
1:14:21
was astro turf to start him because they just wanted like him to make it
1:14:26
and that's why they were able to toss him aside so quickly because he basically
1:14:30
like lost all his work after this. And again like this, he lost
1:14:33
work before he got like before they found a verdict, So it didn't matter
1:14:38
like to you know, to his employers, because they were like, well,
1:14:40
we're not going to associate with this guy, just like they did.
1:14:43
Johnny Depp's the same thing. Basically, if you get into an argument with
1:14:45
your wife or girlfriend and she gets injured, and even she can't she can't
1:14:51
prove that you did anything to cause the injury, that's enough for you to
1:14:56
get criminalized. Now, So the guy that the cops told him if if
1:15:03
his wife so much as broken nail assaulting him, they'd have to arrest him,
1:15:09
that's that's this mm hmmm. Basically, if she breaks her fist punching
1:15:14
you, you're you're guilty of reckless, reckless harm or reckless assault. And
1:15:21
then there's there was at least one case that I found when I was doing
1:15:26
my video on the history of social and legal response the domestic violence, where
1:15:34
I believe it was California law caused a guy to be arrested because his his
1:15:43
wife broke her wrist trying to stab him through his his defense where you know,
1:15:48
he has his arms up to block her, and she tried to get
1:15:54
past his arms and she broke her wrist because of how hard she was hitting
1:15:58
to try to get that knife into him, and he was the bad guy
1:16:03
for causing her injury when she was trying to stab him to death. And
1:16:11
that's that's basically what we're seeing here. That's what that is. As far
1:16:15
as harassment. Women accuse harassment over things that you should have learned to deal
1:16:25
with easier as kids, if you had siblings, you know, like you've
1:16:30
you've seen siblings have arguments in the back of the car on the way to
1:16:32
vacation. He's got his foot on my side of the floor, you know,
1:16:39
and and Dad's like, you know, deal with it. You know,
1:16:44
mom might Mom might say move your foot, get your food out of
1:16:46
there. Dad might say, deal with it. Yeah, and uh,
1:16:49
you know. And and when I was grown up, I learned to deal
1:16:53
with it. My brother and me, we would pick on each other.
1:16:56
You know, God forbid anybody else pick on one of us like that.
1:16:59
There was hell to pay for that. Between between the two of us.
1:17:00
We made them regret that they were ever born. But you know, we
1:17:06
picked on each other all the time. And we taught each other a lot
1:17:10
about what you can tolerate and how to creatively deal with intolerable behaviors and how
1:17:16
to negotiate a more tolerable set of behaviors toward each other, and also how
1:17:23
to bond with somebody who is picking on you and the and it worked out
1:17:27
really well. I mean, we're good buddies now, you know. But
1:17:34
this, this is bullshit, and this kind of legaliese just covers for women
1:17:43
being able to to use the court system as a means of getting one over
1:17:47
on men. It's not I'll bet that this is not a one way thing.
1:17:54
I'll bet that this is not a situation where there was a female victim
1:17:59
and a male purpose trader. Because if there, if there was, if
1:18:02
this was a situation where there was just a female victim and just a male
1:18:08
perpetrator, then the guilty verdict would have been intentional everything and aggravated everything.
1:18:15
But in this type of situation, when you see a verdict like this,
1:18:20
this was probably two way aggravation, two way agitation, and one way allegation.
1:18:30
And that's it. Oh yeah, for sure, for sure. I
1:18:34
think I think she was the woman involved from what I remember was reporting this
1:18:40
before the major's produced evidence that showed that she was as abusive as as he
1:18:47
was, at least because that was like video evidence. But of course she
1:18:53
wasn't found guilty of anything. I don't know if he like made a you
1:18:58
know, sort of like a counter suit suit or something like that. But
1:19:03
it doesn't really matter. His his life, his purpose, his career is
1:19:08
basically over. He's gonna be like doing something else unless somebody picks him up
1:19:12
or he goes to some like independent studio that's willing to overlook this or whatever.
1:19:16
But yeah, I think that's it. And this is this is not
1:19:19
like like, it's not he's gonna be able to go to the Daily Wire
1:19:23
because they're they're they're gonna see him as just as guilty. You know.
1:19:26
This isn't like a partisan thing, no way across the board. It doesn't
1:19:31
matter, right if they get accused of something, they're just gonna believe it.
1:19:36
So yep, this is what you do, guys. If if you
1:19:41
are in a situation where you have to work with women, or you're in
1:19:45
a relationship and you've picked a woman with volatile temper, which you shouldn't do,
1:19:54
and she starts acting like that, she starts being aggressive, she starts
1:19:59
being a beauty and that kind of thing. Don't don't try to defend yourself,
1:20:06
you know, unless you're facing deadly violence. Get your phone out and
1:20:11
start recording and back away and demonstrate that you are are trying to extract yourself
1:20:19
from the situation. Don't don't move forward, don't move toward the person,
1:20:26
don't lean in, don't yell back, don't talk back, don't do any
1:20:30
of that. Just get video of her aggression and retain that, and no
1:20:38
matter what else happens, don't give that up. Even if you have to
1:20:43
set your phone up to store that video outside of your phone, like online
1:20:49
somewhere, don't give that up because it'll disappear if if it's it happens to
1:20:58
be the only copy in the cop Just get a hold of it, and
1:21:01
that's how you handle it. Always be recording because you can't. You don't
1:21:09
have any other defense. You don't have any other recourse, you don't have
1:21:12
any other way of preventing yourself from being made culpable for her behavior, and
1:21:21
any reaction you have to her behavior is going to be criminalized. So that's
1:21:28
it. Just record it, and if you know, if you're you're being
1:21:33
railroad, make the evidence public. Yep. All right, Well, I
1:21:43
think that's all the stories, and we got through like six of them and
1:21:46
we still have a couple of minutes. So I got a super chow from
1:21:50
I think it's Richard again, Richard Bierer, who gives us five dollars,
1:21:56
Thank you, Richard, and says, you know, some of what our
1:21:59
mainstream had today would have only been something in the National Inquirer or Weekly World
1:22:03
News. So when do we see the public reveal of bat Boy? Oh,
1:22:08
I'm waiting for that. I think that's the the VP pick. If
1:22:11
I remember correctly, it's gonna be bad Boy. What what's bat Boy?
1:22:16
I don't know that. You don't know about, Mike. You don't know
1:22:18
about that photoshop photoshop actually before photoshop. Yeah, so do you know what
1:22:26
the Weekly World News was, Mike. It was like the lowest quality tabloid,
1:22:33
like way below Inquirer. But it was a fun read, which is
1:22:38
weird, Like it had all these ridiculous claims. You know, they would
1:22:43
go like regularly they would be like Nostra Damis predicted, this, this and
1:22:46
this, you know, and they talk about aliens and UFO sightings and the
1:22:50
face on Mars. Anyway, bad Boy was like a recurring show. Yeah,
1:22:56
bad Boy was like a recurring theme. What was that hold on wrong
1:23:02
thing posting your genome? Why no, that wasn't what I was trying to
1:23:06
post. I'm trying to get it photo they had an arrow or they had
1:23:12
an error. It wouldn't go through. So I think I can't pay for
1:23:15
it with my medical Oh, I'm trying to get that information for I'm still
1:23:24
going through the medical things of trying to get that information for uh, finding
1:23:31
out my getting my medical diagnosis for ailor s dan loos to to where the
1:23:38
insurance company will accept it. But this is what I was, This is
1:23:42
what I was trying to push. There was an image that I clicked on
1:23:45
and it didn't copy. That in West Virginia thirty years ago Americans pushed to
1:23:49
make June twenty. Yeah, yeah, there's there's the image that I was
1:23:57
a model. It just goes to this stupid news story. But the image
1:24:00
isloading. You can search bat boy pictures there he is. So that that
1:24:08
was basically done in a dark room or with makeup or both. There's there's
1:24:15
a little bit of dark room magic, but I think the ears are probably
1:24:19
latex, and you can kind of see the line where the bald cap was
1:24:26
placed on the person and then you can kind of see where they This is
1:24:34
a multiple exposure basically of like there's so there was this stuff was getting done
1:24:46
before photoshop ever existed, Before there were computer programs to do this, This
1:24:50
stuff was getting done in the dark room, and it's kind of neat how
1:24:53
they used to do it. So I always used to like this picture because
1:24:57
of that, because I knew it predated photoshop, you know. But yeah,
1:25:03
and and for those who are weird olfans, if you remember the song
1:25:09
Midnight Star, he couldn't he didn't say bat Boy, but the lie the
1:25:14
Incredible frog Boy is on the loose again is a reference to this story.
1:25:18
It's it's kind of depressing that if a real bat Boy existed now and someone
1:25:23
took a photo of it, everyone wud be like, hey, I generated
1:25:26
fuck you. If actual aliens landed at the White House lawn tomorrow, I
1:25:32
generated it. No one can believe anything anymore. I missed the days when
1:25:39
photographs actually meant meant evidence. You know, this is the thing that people
1:25:46
don't understand. You could you could fake this stuff before photoshop. It's just
1:25:56
that you had to have some talent, uh, you know, I back
1:26:00
in the day in the in the dark room. If if you were,
1:26:05
if you've created the correct circumstances, like you'll notice this is on a black
1:26:10
background. There's no trees and flowers and chirping birds. There's not a lot
1:26:14
of things that you would be interfering with if you it was dark right right.
1:26:24
And then the face itself, you notice that it's over exposed, so
1:26:30
there's a lot of a lot of white space to work with because the light
1:26:35
was so bright from the flash. It scared him. That's the face.
1:26:39
Yeah, But that's like so there. If you have a sky, you
1:26:43
could put things in the sky, you can put things in water, you
1:26:45
could put you could actually add a person to an image as long as you
1:26:51
had a solid color background that you wouldn't be obviously interfering with. All you
1:27:00
had to do was was a little bit of creating a shape to shine through
1:27:10
in the in the dark room any in larger so that you you know,
1:27:15
you block the that part of the image when you put when you print the
1:27:19
first part of it, and then you take the piece that you cut that
1:27:26
out of and and you know you shine through just that part when you when
1:27:32
you do the next part, and you maybe move it around a little bit
1:27:35
too, to create a little bit of double exposure around the edges, just
1:27:40
to just to hide it a little bit and that's why you end up with
1:27:45
like you can see along the eyebrow, that's what that is where they've double
1:27:51
exposed then and a lot of old pictures like you you can't be sure.
1:27:57
That's why it is easy to uh, or not necesscessarily easy. It's more
1:28:00
work. But the stuff that that we say well today, it's you know,
1:28:04
it's photoshops photoshop. It's not like pictures from history are a hundred one
1:28:12
hundred percent say well, there's a picture this happened, because there are ways
1:28:17
to have done that from the first photographs that came into existence. Right when
1:28:25
it became difficult is when photos were more sharp and less grainy. So and
1:28:31
it's a lot easier when you're doing it in newsprint because you're you're dealing with
1:28:36
images that aren't going to look good anyway. Yeah, m well, I
1:28:44
feel like you know that boy is like a throw Like the weekly World News
1:28:46
was like a fun paper, but you you had kind of looney if you
1:28:49
really believed it. One of the things that I did that I do kind
1:28:54
of miss about these days is that we wanted to believe things because it added
1:29:00
to like a kind of mystique about the world, Like it's why people are,
1:29:05
you know, talking, They talk about Aliens and Bigfoot and the moth
1:29:10
Man and the Jersey Devil and the chupacabra, And I think bat Boy was
1:29:14
kind of like trying to join that pantheon of cryptids, and it was you
1:29:18
know, I mean, it was one of these things that you you knew
1:29:21
like it probably wasn't real, but it was still fun to play along,
1:29:27
like Santa Claus, you know. But yeah, bat Boy unfortunately has gone
1:29:32
to the archives of cryptid history. So but it's good that you guys got
1:29:38
to see him if you've never seen him before. Anyway, probably still more
1:29:41
real news than the actual news we're getting. Yeah, yeah, so yeah,
1:29:45
this is the fun part today. You know, when you see when
1:29:49
you see video and stuff that the press is releasing and everything, you can
1:29:55
never be sure that you're not being tricked. It's right now, people that
1:30:00
really have access to the ability to create totally fake video are the ones in
1:30:06
power. It's still possible to verify video and stuff for court purposes, but
1:30:16
when you see it, when you see it on television, you can't even
1:30:20
be sure that it actually ever really happened. Mm hmmm. We're rapidly approaching
1:30:27
a future where real pictures will be called fake and fake pictures will be called
1:30:31
real, and no one will know the difference. It's all going to be
1:30:35
about a consensus. Yeah, well, yeah, that's that's that's what people
1:30:42
have call being been being, have called it post truth world even since before
1:30:48
this thing has happened. But that's that's what we're actually approaching. Well,
1:30:54
where no one knows the difference between a real photo and a faked photo,
1:30:57
and no one can even stuck the photo for for the telltale signs of what's
1:31:01
different. We're not there now because AI is still a bit ship, but
1:31:08
we geting to that point when no one's going to know the truth, especially
1:31:12
not if all of this is is controlled by by a centralized government, yeah,
1:31:19
a centralized corporation. If it if there's no competition between reporters of anything,
1:31:29
and it's all and everything is under the rubric of one globalist government,
1:31:34
then they're going to fake images and tell and tell you it's true, and
1:31:40
and they're going to suppress true images by telling you they're fake, and they're
1:31:44
going to be able to control everything. The only way to defeat the menace
1:31:49
of AI generated images is to decentralize the forces that control the media, namely
1:31:59
the government, but even in the absence of the government, that could still
1:32:02
be forces controlling the media in in in this in this all pervading way.
1:32:09
It's if if we want a future where anyone knows what the fuck the truth
1:32:13
is, we we need to decentralize these powers so that there is competition.
1:32:19
Yep, well, it has it has to be more than just competition.
1:32:24
There has to be a situation where you know, when when it was imagery,
1:32:33
like on film and print back in the day, the way to tell,
1:32:39
the way to prove that an image was real was to show the negative
1:32:44
or to produce a polaroid. Polaroid is really hard to fake because it has
1:32:49
to be uh shot from like two to four feet away to be in really
1:32:54
good focus, and so it's hard to create a fake negative. You don't
1:33:00
there's no negative, right, It's hard to create a fake polaroid because you'd
1:33:04
have to have a very large print that you were photographing with the polaroid,
1:33:11
you'd have to have it not have any glare on it. There'd be all
1:33:14
kinds of issues with that. So polaroid is one of those where you know,
1:33:20
you could use that as evidence, and a lot of people do take
1:33:25
evidence pictures with Polaroid Because of that, it's it's very hard to declare it
1:33:28
fake with imagery that's created uh and and not video, but imagery that's created
1:33:38
using say Nikon camera or a an Olympus camera or something like that U Cannon
1:33:46
rebel, you know, one of those. You basically have EXIF data that
1:33:53
is attached to the original image that that gives the time of them being shot,
1:34:00
tells what created it, what what device created it, uh and and
1:34:05
uh and so on, and that data proves that that's that's the original image.
1:34:12
When you start messing with the image, you get new incarnations. The
1:34:16
EXIF data will show that the image has been run through a program. But
1:34:24
the thing that will cause that to be a problem in the future, to
1:34:29
be able to determine you know, this was shot with an icon camera versus
1:34:32
this was this was edited in photoshop. Is if you get AI that messes
1:34:39
with the EXIF data when it when it does its editing or when it creates
1:34:44
its images, so that it lies and says this was this was taken with
1:34:48
Anikon camera, or this was taken with a with a canon or an Olympus
1:34:54
or produced by somebody's phone. Uh. And so if if we didn't,
1:35:02
if we didn't decentralize it, there's you know, if there's government involved,
1:35:06
there would have to be some sort of policy that made that illegal, that
1:35:12
would label it fraud to say this AI produced image that was entirely made on
1:35:19
a computer and has absolutely nothing to do with Nikon was actually filmed or photographed
1:35:26
with a Nicon camera. And and you're not. Your government's not going to
1:35:31
do that. Your your officials are going to want to be able to do
1:35:40
that. So our only recourse is basically, you know, totally totally taking
1:35:47
it out of their hands. All right, Well, I'm going to wrap
1:35:55
the show up there, guys, and we are going to head into the
1:35:58
Patent Show to talk about the latest with Actiblision. But I have to call
1:36:01
them. I think that like ever since Activision bought Blizzard, that's what we've
1:36:06
been saying. So Actiblision is settling their civil rights lawsuit over sexual misconduct in
1:36:13
the California office, and we will be looking at that in the Patron Shows.
1:36:16
If you want to join us there, you have to become a Badger
1:36:18
yourself. But by going to feed the Badger dot com and setting up a
1:36:21
monthly subscription five bucks a month will get you into our discord where you'll be
1:36:25
able to consume all the additional content and also hang out in our very positive
1:36:33
community. I don't know what to call it. I'm gonna say community chat.
1:36:38
Yeah, and uh oh, I got in the super chat. Look
1:36:42
at that. Thank you, Arctic Master one one nine zero. I'll give
1:36:46
you a giggle for that. I don't normally give Badger chands out for super
1:36:49
chats, but I will make an exception for you because it's the holiday.
1:36:54
Uh and he says, Merry Christmas, Happy holidays to you all for ninety
1:36:58
nine ninety nine and what that is amazing. I'm gonna give you an Alex
1:37:02
Jones for that. Honest, I'll eat and yeah, that's great man,
1:37:11
so thoughtful. Thank you so much. Okay, you are the top g
1:37:15
in this. In this uh this, we will eat your ass if you
1:37:19
request it. All right, Well, anyway, thanks guys so much for
1:37:29
coming. If you like this video, please hit like subscribe. If you're
1:37:30
not already subscribe, hit the bell notifications common let me know what you think
1:37:34
about what we discussed on the show today and please please please share this video
1:37:40
because sharing is caring. Thank you guys so much for coming on today's episode
1:37:43
of HPR News and we will talk to you all in the next video.