Latest / Illinois Valley - Shaw Local / Appeals court reverses detention order for man accused of filming minors
Transcript
- 0:05Speaker 1: Appeals court reverses detention order for man accused of filming miners.
- 0:10Written by Tom Collins, This article is being read by
- 0:14an automated voice brought to you by Everlett. A Quad
- 0:19City's man has been jailed on charges of secretly filming
- 0:22miners in Marseilles. Jackson Yeager successfully appealed, however, and may
- 0:26get pre trial release. Yager, thirty five, of Colonna, faces
- 0:31up to one hundred and fifty years if convicted of
- 0:33some of his ten felonies, led by possession of child
- 0:36sex abuse materials. A judge ruled in February that he
- 0:40presented a danger to others and ordered him detained. Thursday, however,
- 0:44an appeals court reversed that decision into two to one ruling.
- 0:48Yeager remains in LaSalle County jail and he remains charged,
- 0:52but the ruling will force a due overhearing on detention.
- 0:55A court date is pending in LaSalle County Circuit Court,
- 0:59Lasal County. The state's attorney, Joe Navarro, said he and
- 1:02his staff are reviewing Thursday's ruling and will consider whether
- 1:06to appeal to the Illinois Supreme Court. Jaeger was charged
- 1:10in February after evidence emerged that teens in the Marseille
- 1:13area were filmed in a bathroom equipped with a hidden camera.
- 1:18At a detention hearing, public defender Ryan Hamer argued Yaeger
- 1:22was a good candidate for pre trial release. Yeger has
- 1:25no criminal history and scored low on a risk assessment.
- 1:28A simple no contact order, Hamer said, would protect the miners.
- 1:32LaSalle County Circuit Judge Michelle A. Vescagni disagreed placing Yeager
- 1:38on GPS monitoring and telling him to stay away is
- 1:40not enough, the judge ruled. Thursday, the Third District Appellate
- 1:44Court reversed her detention ruling. Justice Matthew Bertani wrote that
- 1:49conditions of pre trial release were available to protect others.
- 1:53In our view, the states proffer disproportionately relied on the
- 1:57severity of the sex offense charged and circumstances in requesting
- 2:01defendant's detention. Britani wrote the appeals court did not simply
- 2:06order Yeager to be freed. LaSalle County prosecutors could prevail
- 2:09at the do overhearing and might argue Thursday's appelle at
- 2:12ruling wasn't unanimous. Justice John C. Anderson wrote in a
- 2:16dissenting opinion that prosecutors made a good case for holding Yeager.
- 2:21There appears to be no dispute that the video evidence
- 2:24depicts Yeager setting up the camera to covertly record the miners.
- 2:28Anderson said Yeager also attempted to contact the victim's family
- 2:32while he was in jail, which reflects on his inability
- 2:35to abide by court orders and conditions.