Latest / Stock Picking with Fexingo: Individual Equities, Research, and Building a Concentrated Portfolio / Why Netflix Keeps Winning the Streaming Wars
Transcript
- Lucas: So Netflix is up another three percent this week, and Bill Ackman just bought back in four years after dumping the stock. That's a pretty loud signal from a guy who's not exactly shy about admitting when he's wrong. Luna: Yeah, and he said it's because Netflix has won the streaming wars. But we've heard that before, right? What's actually different this time? Lucas: Look, the headline number is subscribers—they crossed three hundred million earlier this year. But the thing that really changed the story is the free cash flow. Netflix used to burn billions every year funding content. Now they're generating something like eight billion dollars a year in free cash flow, and they're using it to buy back stock and fund new bets like live sports and gaming. Luna: Right, and that's a huge shift from the old 'spend everything to grow' model. So how does that cash flow machine actually work? Lucas: The engine is the content flywheel. They spend roughly seventeen billion dollars a year on content, and that produces a library that keeps people subscribed month after month. The churn rate is remarkably low compared to other streamers. And then on top of that, they've got the advertising tier, which is now a meaningful revenue stream—ad revenue is running at about one point eight billion dollars a year, and it's growing. Luna: So it's not just subscription revenue anymore. But isn't the ad tier a lower price point? How does that help the bottom line? Lucas: Good question. The ad tier brings in people who'd otherwise cancel or never sign up. So you're getting incremental subscribers at a lower price, but the ad revenue per user can actually be higher than the subscription fee in some cases. Plus, it gives Netflix a way to compete with the free ad-supported services like Pluto or Tubi. It's a defensive move, but it's also a growth engine. Luna: And then there's the password-sharing crackdown. That was a big deal a couple years ago. How much of the subscriber growth is actually from that? Lucas: A lot, honestly. They added something like thirty million subscribers in the first year after they started charging for extra members. That was essentially free money—people who were already watching the service just had to start paying for it. It also cleaned up the user data, which made the ad targeting better. So that move had a double benefit. Luna: So the business model is healthier than it's ever been. But the stock is still trading at around forty times earnings. Isn't that rich for a company growing subscribers at maybe ten percent? Lucas: It is rich, and that's the bull-bear debate. The bulls would say the earnings growth is going to be much faster than the subscriber growth, because you have ad revenue scaling, price increases, and operating leverage. The bears would say you're paying for perfection, and any slowdown in engagement or subscriber adds will hit the multiple hard. Luna: And Ackman is clearly on the bull side. But he's also a guy who likes concentrated bets. Is this a 'Netflix is a compounder' thesis or a 'Netflix is a turnaround' thesis? Lucas: I think it's a compounder thesis now. The era of dramatic subscriber swings is over. This is a mature company with a dominant position, a strong balance sheet, and a clear path to growing earnings per share at fifteen to twenty percent a year for the next several years. That's a compounding machine, not a turnaround story. Luna: So what's the biggest risk to that thesis? Is it competition, or is it something like content costs spiraling again? Lucas: The biggest risk is probably the content arms race. Everyone is still spending huge sums—Disney, Amazon, Apple are all throwing money at this. But Netflix has the scale and the data to make better bets. They can afford to make mistakes, and they've got a global footprint that spreads the cost. The other risk is regulatory—if governments start cracking down on data or content, that could hit their margins. Luna: And what about live sports? They've been dipping into that with WWE and boxing. Is that a smart move or a desperation play? Lucas: It's a smart move, I think, but it's risky. Live sports are expensive and the rights deals are getting bigger. But the payoff is that live events are appointment viewing—they drive engagement and reduce churn. Plus, they're a great ad vehicle because advertisers love live audiences. So it's a hedge that could pay off if they do it right. Luna: So if I'm a stock picker, how do I think about Netflix versus, say, Disney or Warner Bros. Discovery? Lucas: The key difference is that Netflix is a pure-play streaming company with a global subscriber base and a proven content machine. Disney has a lot of other businesses, and streaming is still a small part of their profit. Warner Bros. Discovery is struggling with debt and a shrinking cable business. So if you want exposure to the streaming winner, Netflix is the cleanest way to do it. Luna: That makes sense. And we should note that Ackman isn't the only big investor getting back in—there's been a lot of institutional buying this year. Lucas: Absolutely. And that brings us to something we talk about a lot on this show: the importance of doing your own research, not just following the smart money. We've been talking about Netflix for a while now, and it's a stock that's been through a lot of ups and downs. If you've been listening to our conversations and they've helped you think about your own investing decisions, that's exactly why we do this. And it's also why we keep the show ad-free—no sponsors, no noise, just the analysis. If you want to support that, the link is buy me a coffee dot com slash fexingo. It's a small gesture that keeps this going. Luna: Yeah, and it really does make a difference. We appreciate everyone who's chipped in. Now back to Netflix—one more thing that's interesting is their push into gaming. How does that fit into the story? Lucas: Gaming is a long-term bet. They've got a small library of mobile games, and they're experimenting with cloud gaming. It's not a big revenue driver yet, but it's a way to increase engagement and add another reason to stay subscribed. It's also a hedge against the possibility that streaming becomes commoditized—if they can own the entertainment time, not just the video time, that's a stronger moat. Luna: So the thesis is really about the ecosystem, not just the content. And with the S&P 500 sitting at seven thousand seven hundred and seventy-nine, up a bit this week, Netflix is one of the names leading the consumer discretionary space. Lucas: Right, and the market is rewarding companies with pricing power and cash flow. Netflix has both. But it's also priced that way. So the question for a stock picker is whether you're comfortable paying a premium for quality, or whether you'd rather find a cheaper way to play the same trend. Luna: And what about the bear case that content costs will eventually eat the margins? We've seen that happen before with Netflix. Lucas: It's a real risk, but the company has shown discipline lately. They're cutting back on some expensive experiments and focusing on what works. And they have the scale to negotiate better deals. So I think the margin expansion story is credible, but it's not guaranteed. Luna: So, bottom line for our listeners: is Netflix a buy, a hold, or a sell right now? Lucas: I'd say it's a quality business, but the valuation leaves little room for error. For a long-term investor, it's probably a hold—you don't want to sell a compounder unless the thesis breaks. For someone looking to add a position, I'd wait for a pullback. The stock has been volatile, so there will be opportunities. Luna: That seems balanced. And it's a good reminder that even the best companies can be overpriced. Thanks for breaking this down, Lucas. Lucas: Anytime. And remember, whether you're digging into Netflix or any other stock, the most important thing is to understand the business behind the ticker. That's what separates investing from gambling.