Latest / Radio Baloney - The Richie Baloney Show! / Canada's Nightmare Online Harms Bill

Transcript

Canada's Nightmare Online Harms Bill · Radio Baloney - The Richie Baloney Show!

• 0:03
  You know, we're just gonna go over this quickly. I've made a bunch
• 0:06
  of videos. Again, if you're not subscribed, subscribe to the channel.
• 0:08
  You can see I've made a bunch of videos on the online online HARMSAC Bill
• 0:12
  C sixty three. But this is so dystopian and so dangerous and evil that
• 0:18
  I'm just gonna keep popping off about it, even just a little bits.
• 0:22
  I'm just gonna keep talking about it because it's so awful. It's important to
• 0:27
  Canadians know about this. I think what percentage of Canadians even know about this
• 0:30
  bill, probably in the single digits. They should be concerned if this bill
• 0:36
  goes through. I made everybody with any sense would just erase their entire social
• 0:41
  media presence immediately because of how dangerous it is. But anyway, I think
• 0:46
  very few Canadians actually even know that this is happening, which is really,
• 0:51
  really sad. So I'm just gonna keep talking about it. Here's from the
• 0:55
  Justice Center for Constitutional Freedoms in Canada. Yea, And again this is a
• 1:00
  warning. There's also a cautionary tale for those of you who are not watching
• 1:03
  in Canada right now. So this is important for everybody to know because your
• 1:08
  own government, I'm sure would love to do this same shit. The Online
• 1:12
  Harms Act Bill C. Sixty three is the most aggressive assault against free speech
• 1:19
  in modern Canadian history. If passed into law, the Act will expose you,
• 1:25
  along with every other Canadian, to being prosecuted by the Canadian Human Rights
• 1:32
  Commission over anything you say that someone else might view as hateful. Start to
• 1:37
  believe, let me reread that. If passed into law, the Act will
• 1:40
  expose you, along with every other Canadian, to being prosecuted by the Canadian
• 1:45
  Human Rights Commission over anything you say that someone else might view as hateful.
• 1:52
  And the question is, of course always what is hateful? Well, there's
• 1:56
  a definition. Watch my other videos. I show you the definition. It's
• 2:00
  completely vague and subjective, and it is essentially it's whatever the person in judgment
• 2:08
  decides it is. And the person in judgment is going to be a left
• 2:13
  wing activist. So the Canadian Human Rights Commission is going to hand it over
• 2:16
  to a human rights tribunal. These are kangaroo courts. In candidate, it's
• 2:21
  a parallel legal system, so it's like a civil court, not a criminal
• 2:24
  court. There is no presumption of innocence. There is no you know,
• 2:28
  guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. It's just like a kind of preponderance of evidence.
• 2:34
  And it gets worse. Let me read this to you. Unelected and
• 2:37
  unaccountable bureaucrats, most of them woke and progressive activists, will decide if your
• 2:42
  comment is hateful in their subjective view. The Online Harms Act will give the
• 2:47
  Canadian Human Rights Commission teeth Again. You could be ordered to pay the federal
• 2:53
  government fifty thousand dollars plus up to twenty thousand dollars to a victim who felt
• 3:00
  defended by what you said. This seventy thousand dollars maximum does not include any
• 3:05
  legal costs you may incur to defend yourself. That Keep mind, this can
• 3:09
  happen again and again and again. This will become an industry, right,
• 3:15
  There will be an industry of activists trying to cash in on this. Immediately
• 3:21
  the complaint the complainant, however, what experience no such risk. It costs
• 3:25
  nothing to make a complaint. If the complaint is dismissed, then the person
• 3:30
  who filed it is not on the hook for anything. Also, they're anonymous,
• 3:37
  so you'll never know who it is. You'll never have any idea of
• 3:39
  the person who costs you thousands of dollars, Even if you're not found guilty,
• 3:44
  which you will be in a kangaroo court human rights tribunal, you still
• 3:47
  haven't just spent thousands of dollars to defend yourself and just the insane hassle and
• 3:52
  stress. I've been dragged into it in the first place. Person who made
• 3:55
  the complaint, Oh, nothing happens if they don't get the twenty grand Hell
• 4:00
  us know what did take him ten minutes? Probably take him five minutes to
• 4:03
  make the complaint. Then they just wait see if they cash in. How
• 4:08
  many times are they going to do it? Ten times a day, one
• 4:10
  hundred times a day? Who knows? This is insane? This is Trudeau
• 4:15
  attempting to get the public to do his censorship work for him to punish his
• 4:23
  his political enemies. Before Section thirteen of the Canadian Human Rights Act was repealed,
• 4:29
  Canada's quasi judicial human rights commissions were notorious for trampling on canadians free speech
• 4:36
  rights. Their kangaroo courts were exempt from the rules of evidence and other legal
• 4:42
  guard rails that govern real courts in Canada. The conviction rate for those accused
• 4:46
  of hateful speech was close to one hundred percent, So, I mean,
• 4:51
  what a surprise a bunch of left wing activists in a kangaroo court found everybody
• 4:57
  hateful. Surprise. If the Online HARMSAC becomes law, the Canadian Human Rights
• 5:03
  Commission will not even need to identify a victim of your supposedly hateful speech,
• 5:10
  which again is totally subjective, and it will be judged by people who tend
• 5:15
  to find anything they disagree with as hate. The Commission will be able to
• 5:18
  prosecute you on the basis of an anonymous complaint, so you cannot face your
• 5:24
  accuser, ask questions of your accuser, or even know the name or identity
• 5:29
  of your accuser. In an advanced democracy, under the rule of law,
• 5:32
  a citizen has the right to know who their accuser is, to face the
• 5:36
  accuser and to question their accuser, or to have their lawyer question their accuser.
• 5:44
  The Online HARMSAC would take away these basic rights from Canadians and expose every
• 5:48
  citizen to the risk of a Canadian Human Rights Commission prosecution based on anonymous complaints.
• 5:57
  This is just crazy. I mean, is this our well? Is
• 6:00
  it kafka esque? And does it matter? At this point, it's fucking
• 6:02
  bananas. This is the Canada that Justin Trudeau wants. This is the Canada
• 6:09
  that far leftists want. This is the Canada that far left authoritarians want.
• 6:13
  This will be used one way, will be used political. It will be
• 6:16
  a political weapon, used on enemies of Justin Trudeau or whoever is leading the
• 6:23
  Liberal Party, or just whoever disagrees with the people in the Canadian Human Rights
• 6:28
  Commission and in the human rights tribunals. This will be a political weapon.
• 6:34
  This will turn into an industry for activists. In a Canadian Human Rights Commission
• 6:41
  prosecution, the person accusing you does not need to prove that they suffered any
• 6:45
  loss or damage as a result of your speech. They merely need to assert
• 6:49
  that you communicated hate speech. Unelected, unaccountable, woke bureaucrats will rely on
• 6:57
  their own subjective opinions to determine your guilt or innocence. You know, journalists
• 7:04
  are gonna have to like, journalists are gonna have to leave Canada, like
• 7:08
  a lot of people are gonna have to. I even I'm thinking, I
• 7:11
  mean, like, do I want to stay here? Is there a way
• 7:14
  that I can? You know, do I want to be do I do
• 7:16
  I want to live in a country with these kinds of insane laws. I
• 7:21
  mean, maybe there's ways are out, maybe you know, just blocking Canada,
• 7:25
  maybe that's a solution. But this really is crazy. This is just
• 7:30
  an attack. This is an attack on any rational, reasonable person in Canada.
• 7:38
  That's what this is. This is shut the fuck up, we're running
• 7:42
  the show. You don't have rights, you don't have freedoms. No,
• 7:46
  it's it's evil. This will also be in effect a new legal form of
• 7:51
  swatting a person with no repercussions. Swatting a person with no repercussions. Yeah,
• 7:57
  it is like that. You know, it's insane. It's insane.
• 8:00
  Again, this is totally political as well. This will be used one way
• 8:05
  against anybody not sharing the correct, the fashionable, the politically correct ideology.
• 8:11
  Saying things that aren't politically correct is going to get you into these human rights
• 8:16
  tribunals from this Human Rights Commission, which, frankly is it seems like it's
• 8:22
  euphemistically named not at this point, doesn't it human rights? I thought freedom
• 8:28
  of speech was a human right. I thought being able to speak your mind
• 8:31
  was a human right. Apparently not in Canada. Anymore. And now the
• 8:35
  bill hasn't passed yet and it's not certain that it will. It certainly seems
• 8:39
  to be totally unconstitutional, but we shall see. The Online Harms Act would
• 8:43
  allow, or would enable, thousands of activists to file human rights clients against
• 8:50
  the speech of people they disagree with. Even if many of these complaints are
• 8:54
  dismissed, good Canadians will still be forced to spend time and money defending themselves.
• 9:00
  Meanwhile, activists making the complaints will pay nothing. Your an ex salt
• 9:05
  to YouTube comment or ex post could get you hauled before the Canadian Human Rights
• 9:09
  Commission in order to pay tens of thousands of dollars. This is the candidate
• 9:15
  the Trudeau once. The Online Harms Act would also create a Digital Safety Commission
• 9:20
  with powers to police dozens of new regulations created by the Federal Cabinet without any
• 9:26
  input from Parliament, so not democratic. The Federal Cabinet will create new rules
• 9:31
  to censor social media services. These politicians will also determine the penalties for breaking
• 9:37
  those rules. The Digital Safety Commission will investigate, prosecute, and punish the
• 9:41
  providers of social media services who failed to comply with new censorship measures. This
• 9:48
  is another aspect they don't get into here though, but they're saying in this
• 9:50
  that their plan is fines for the social media companies of let's see twenty five
• 9:56
  million dollars or eight percent global net revenue. Oh no, global gross global
• 10:05
  gross revenue, so like eight percent for one one infraction eight percent of Facebook,
• 10:13
  say, of their gross global revenue. Now you're thinking they can't be
• 10:20
  serious, right, Twitter is going to pay eight percent of there, because
• 10:24
  it's twenty five million or whatever is larger, you know, so they can't
• 10:28
  actually believe that Google is going to pay eight percent of their gross global revenue
• 10:37
  or Twitter. To me, it looks like on one hand that they just
• 10:41
  simply are trying to drive social media out of Canada. Already, Facebook,
• 10:45
  because of the Online News Act, Facebook is not allowing Canadian news on its
• 10:48
  platform in Canada, right, so there's one down. Right, Is it
• 10:54
  possible that they're actually just trying to drive out all social media from Canada because
• 11:01
  clearly that's not going to be acceptable, right? Those are totally ridiculous.
• 11:05
  Me, it's bizarre, it's ludicrous, it's beyond Monty Python. It's just
• 11:13
  it's pure and total lunacy Trudeau was just talking a few weeks ago, about
• 11:18
  a couple of weeks ago, about how much he was pining for the days
• 11:20
  when there was only like CBC and CTV news. It was so much easier
• 11:26
  back then without all those pesky like independent journalists and stuff, and independent news,
• 11:31
  you know, two companies that oh, you just happen to be throwing
• 11:33
  money at You just happened to be the paymaster for. Is it possible that
• 11:37
  that's the that's the end goal, just to get social media out of Canada.
• 11:43
  He just feels it'll be just that much easier to manipulate and control and
• 11:48
  lie to the public. Here. This is my worry. I'm amazed at
• 11:50
  the lack of talk about it, given how terrible it is. Yeah,
• 11:54
  well again, I think the number of Canadians, the amount of you know,
• 11:58
  the percentage of Canadians that even know about this is again the single digits,
• 12:03
  which is terrifying because those people are all going to be vulnerable. Go
• 12:07
  forget again. This is kangaroo court run by you know, progressive activists who
• 12:13
  do not are not going to tolerate anything they don't like. You could have
• 12:18
  posted something ten years ago which was perfectly fine back then. In fact,
• 12:20
  it was perfectly fine in liberal circles back then. Right, Well, that
• 12:24
  can change in the second. I mean, I guarantee you something. If
• 12:26
  you're a liberal writing things on social media ten years ago, they're a shit
• 12:31
  that's going to be called hate by the Human Rights Commission, guaranteed, guaranteed.
• 12:37
  It changes so fast, and every time they take a step further to
• 12:41
  the left, whatever that last, wherever they were a step ago, that's
• 12:45
  now the far right. Because don't forget, anything that doesn't align exactly with
• 12:50
  them at any given moment is far right. It's fascism, it's not all
• 12:54
  of that right. That is literally the way they behave. So you could
• 12:58
  have posted something a year ago that's now we're boted absolutely now your new hitler.
• 13:03
  If you said, you know, five years ago, I'm not sure
• 13:07
  about this whole sex change for kids thing. That doesn't make any sense.
• 13:13
  That is going to be hate speech. Is that is going to be hate
• 13:18
  speech from now on. I think there were probably a lot of liberals you
• 13:20
  have ten years ago for sure that would have been like, you know,
• 13:22
  oh no, I heard this thing about sex changes for kids. I'm not
• 13:26
  sure about that. That's going to get you at the Human Rights Tributal for
• 13:31
  sure, and you'll be guilty. So if any of this concerns you and
• 13:35
  the scentist, you should be going to the Justice Center for Constitutional Freedoms JCCF
• 13:41
  dot ca A, go to their website and sign the petition. Anyway,
• 13:46
  that's all I'm going to say with that, Please subscribe, like and share.
• 13:48
  Sharing really helps me out. I thank you for that. I'll see
• 13:50
  you next time.