Latest / The Chuck ToddCast / Chuck’s Commentary - Trump’s “To The Victor Goes The Spoils” Diplomacy + Republicans Know How Bad The Midterms Will Be

Transcript

Chuck’s Commentary - Trump’s “To The Victor Goes The Spoils” Diplomacy + Republicans Know How Bad The Midterms Will Be · The Chuck ToddCast

• 0:00
  Speaker 1: This episode of the Chuck Todd cast is brought to
• 0:02
  Speaker 1: you by Chapter. Now, almost everything you hear about Medicare
• 0:06
  Speaker 1: is somebody quietly trying to steer you somewhere. And you're
• 0:11
  Speaker 1: skeptical of that, as you should be. I get it.
• 0:14
  Speaker 1: I mean, there's a federal lawsuit going on right now
• 0:17
  Speaker 1: over exactly this. Companies that branded themselves as unbiased while
• 0:21
  Speaker 1: allegedly pointing people toward whatever would pay them the most
• 0:25
  Speaker 1: as some sort of broker. So if your default is
• 0:28
  Speaker 1: to distrust everyone in this space, honestly, I get it.
• 0:31
  Speaker 1: I'm a bit distrustful these days myself. That's the whole
• 0:34
  Speaker 1: reason I want to tell you about Chapter. They're independent
• 0:37
  Speaker 1: Medicare advisors whose entire model is that their advisors are
• 0:41
  Speaker 1: not paid to push any one plan. They're just trying
• 0:45
  Speaker 1: to help. Yes, there's compensation that goes with it. but
• 0:47
  Speaker 1: it's across the board is what they're trying to do.
• 0:51
  Speaker 1: At the end of the day, they're advocating for you.
• 0:52
  Speaker 1: They're not the insurance companies themselves. They're an actual person
• 0:56
  Speaker 1: who actually goes through your doctors, your prescriptions, your needs,
• 1:01
  Speaker 1: and then compares them to every single plan available to
• 1:04
  Speaker 1: find the best one that will work for you and
• 1:06
  Speaker 1: hopefully save you a couple dollars too. And here's the
• 1:09
  Speaker 1: part that sets chapter apart. They don't disappear once you've
• 1:14
  Speaker 1: been in They will keep advocating for you. They're kind
• 1:17
  Speaker 1: of like almost like a concierge service. You're just there.
• 1:19
  Speaker 1: I need help. You're like customer service. You know, the plan,
• 1:22
  Speaker 1: you know, help me navigate this again. So you ever
• 1:24
  Speaker 1: get hit with a wrongful medical bill, they'll help you
• 1:28
  Speaker 1: fight it. They want to stay an advocate for you
• 1:31
  Speaker 1: even after you've done this. So look, I get it.
• 1:35
  Speaker 1: I think there's all sorts of space. You see a
• 1:38
  Speaker 1: lot of people are throwing themselves in this healthcare space.
• 1:41
  Speaker 1: What I like about these chapter folks, I've spent time
• 1:44
  Speaker 1: with them. This is a very transparent organization. It is
• 1:48
  Speaker 1: Medicare and all of its affiliated stuff can be very confusing.
• 1:53
  Speaker 1: The whole point of this is to make this easier
• 1:56
  Speaker 1: and less confusing. OK, so look, take the skepticism you
• 2:00
  Speaker 1: already have in all of this, point it at your
• 2:02
  Speaker 1: own plan for 20 minutes. It's free. There's no pressure.
• 2:06
  Speaker 1: And then call chapter today at 980-734-4200. three, nine, eight, five.
• 2:17
  Speaker 1: Hello there. And welcome to the Thursday episode of the
• 2:20
  Speaker 1: Chuck Todd cast. We've got the long weekend episode coming up.
• 2:23
  Speaker 1: So you know what that means? It means it ends
• 2:25
  Speaker 1: with a great college football preview. And trust me, I
• 2:29
  Speaker 1: don't have the most uplifting. One of my segments, is
• 2:32
  Speaker 1: it going to be the most uplifting? It's sort of
• 2:33
  Speaker 1: the disaster that is America's role in the world. Um,
• 2:38
  Speaker 1: So it's good to end the podcast on what is
• 2:40
  Speaker 1: going to be an incredible slate of college football games.
• 2:44
  Speaker 1: When I went through it to prepare my preview for
• 2:48
  Speaker 1: this weekend, I was like, whoa, there are a couple
• 2:54
  Speaker 1: of playoff elimination games already. I'll get to that. We've
• 2:57
  Speaker 1: got some just key matchups. I think every conference features
• 3:02
  Speaker 1: something that could be quite consequential. And then, of course,
• 3:06
  Speaker 1: it's the stuff we don't expect. college football usually delivers
• 3:09
  Speaker 1: as well. So that's the uplifting note. Let me give
• 3:11
  Speaker 1: you a full rundown of what to expect. I do,
• 3:14
  Speaker 1: before I get into a couple of the, a couple
• 3:18
  Speaker 1: of things I want to get sort of set the table,
• 3:22
  Speaker 1: if you will. One is sort of a little update
• 3:25
  Speaker 1: on the midterms. The other is sort of the future
• 3:27
  Speaker 1: of American foreign policy. I am coming to you after
• 3:31
  Speaker 1: just landing from a day trip to Ann Arbor, Michigan,
• 3:35
  Speaker 1: where I sat down with the Democratic nominee for U.S.
• 3:38
  Speaker 1: Senate in Michigan, Abdul El-Sayed. It's an interview that will
• 3:42
  Speaker 1: air on my Newsphere show this weekend. Sign up for
• 3:46
  Speaker 1: Newsphere if you haven't. Get your free trial so you
• 3:48
  Speaker 1: can catch this interview. And I focused my interview on
• 3:51
  Speaker 1: a topic that most people haven't asked him about, right?
• 3:53
  Speaker 1: He's done a ton of interviews and he gets a
• 3:57
  Speaker 1: lot of the same questions over and over. And I
• 3:58
  Speaker 1: wanted to, instead of finding, I think we all know
• 4:02
  Speaker 1: what he believes, right? The question is, what kind of
• 4:05
  Speaker 1: senator is he going to be? And so I spent
• 4:07
  Speaker 1: a lot of time with him on that. How can
• 4:11
  Speaker 1: he translate his activism into the United States Senate? Because
• 4:16
  Speaker 1: he's not the first outsider candidate who has promised to
• 4:20
  Speaker 1: really shake up that institution only to see the institution
• 4:25
  Speaker 1: essentially unshake it, if you will, right? Um, and you know,
• 4:32
  Speaker 1: he's not the first one that thought, Oh, you know,
• 4:35
  Speaker 1: we're going to bring some youthful energy to this place.
• 4:38
  Speaker 1: And the institution has a way of, of, of reigning
• 4:43
  Speaker 1: that in. Um, and I've, you know, I've watched left
• 4:47
  Speaker 1: and right. Try it. Mike Lee, Ted Cruz on the right,
• 4:50
  Speaker 1: Cory Booker, Michael Bennett on the left. And it's, it is,
• 4:54
  Speaker 1: I understand the desire. The institution makes it hard. But
• 5:00
  Speaker 1: I really think it focusing on that aspect of things.
• 5:05
  Speaker 1: I mean, look, we got into a lot of stuff,
• 5:06
  Speaker 1: some of it predictable, some of it unpredictable, but really
• 5:09
  Speaker 1: focusing on what's realistic. How how is he going to
• 5:13
  Speaker 1: use the platform of a United States senator? How much
• 5:17
  Speaker 1: of it is he going to be a big legislator?
• 5:19
  Speaker 1: Is he going to be a deliberator? And let's just
• 5:23
  Speaker 1: say if you've spent some time listening to him, watching
• 5:28
  Speaker 1: him on the trail, And the first thing he said
• 5:31
  Speaker 1: to me, I'll give you my one little sneak preview.
• 5:32
  Speaker 1: He says, look, I want it to be the world's
• 5:35
  Speaker 1: most deliberative body. He's ready to debate. And it'll be
• 5:40
  Speaker 1: interesting to see how many folks are really up for
• 5:44
  Speaker 1: having a senator that comes in and wants to sort
• 5:50
  Speaker 1: of reinvigorate that process. Look, this century, that's kind of died, right?
• 5:57
  Speaker 1: Great Senate debates. feel like they belong in an era
• 6:02
  Speaker 1: before even I started covering American politics. So, but I
• 6:08
  Speaker 1: found the conversation fascinating, informative, and I think you will too.
• 6:13
  Speaker 1: All right. So let's talk a little bit about where
• 6:18
  Speaker 1: we are less than five weeks before, what are we
• 6:22
  Speaker 1: at now? Less than, yeah, we're now at that five week,
• 6:25
  Speaker 1: basically getting closer to the five week mark. before Election Day.
• 6:29
  Speaker 1: And we're close enough to Election Day that I don't
• 6:30
  Speaker 1: think I need to tell you about another poll to
• 6:34
  Speaker 1: tell you how the midterms are going. And these days,
• 6:37
  Speaker 1: you don't need a poll. I always say there's a
• 6:40
  Speaker 1: lot of nervousness. Are the polls accurate? Could they be,
• 6:44
  Speaker 1: you know, is this one of those, you know, is
• 6:46
  Speaker 1: this just Democratic momentum? Are the polls off? Is there
• 6:50
  Speaker 1: going to be significant polling error that is underestimating the
• 6:53
  Speaker 1: Republican vote? And a lot of times what I've been
• 6:56
  Speaker 1: telling you and how often I think you've heard me
• 6:58
  Speaker 1: say it recently is you don't have to just look
• 7:00
  Speaker 1: at the polls. Listen to what the candidates themselves are
• 7:04
  Speaker 1: saying and watch some of the behavior of some of
• 7:06
  Speaker 1: the candidates. Right. And we've been chronicling right here on
• 7:09
  Speaker 1: the podcast over the last few weeks how you could
• 7:12
  Speaker 1: see the beginning of Republicans looking for a way to
• 7:16
  Speaker 1: escape Trump in one way or the other, whether it's
• 7:19
  Speaker 1: pushing back on him formally. And now you've gotten a
• 7:22
  Speaker 1: parade of Senate candidates in vulnerable Senate seats, suddenly saying
• 7:26
  Speaker 1: they want to end the Iran war, right? We heard
• 7:27
  Speaker 1: it from Mike Rogers. We heard it from Ashley Hinson.
• 7:30
  Speaker 1: We heard it from John Huston. It is, so sometimes
• 7:36
  Speaker 1: the actions let you know whether the polls we've been
• 7:41
  Speaker 1: seeing are correct. But there's three leaders recently, J.D. Vance,
• 7:46
  Speaker 1: the vice president, John Thune, the Senate Republican leader, and
• 7:50
  Speaker 1: Tim Scott, who is running the NRSC, the campaign arm
• 7:54
  Speaker 1: for Senate Republicans. And they all made comments this week
• 7:58
  Speaker 1: that were some form of, just give us more time.
• 8:03
  Speaker 1: It's not over yet. Nobody was talking about the polls
• 8:08
  Speaker 1: are wrong. There's nothing to see here. Things are going swimmingly.
• 8:14
  Speaker 1: And it's, in some ways, the talk, The chatter you're
• 8:19
  Speaker 1: getting out of Scott, Vance, and Thune actually is a
• 8:24
  Speaker 1: form of desperation. Let me get into the details a
• 8:26
  Speaker 1: little bit. So J.D. Vance earlier this week is out
• 8:29
  Speaker 1: there telling voters that, look, there's more work to do.
• 8:33
  Speaker 1: It's going to take more time to recover. I've heard
• 8:36
  Speaker 1: this messaging before. And that Republicans need the support of
• 8:40
  Speaker 1: the American people to, quote, finish the job. So think about,
• 8:45
  Speaker 1: and his words here were more work to do. Take
• 8:49
  Speaker 1: more time. Finish the job. Now, on one hand, it's
• 8:54
  Speaker 1: a form of humility, right? It's admitting this isn't Trump, right?
• 8:58
  Speaker 1: Trump could not accept the premise that things aren't working
• 9:01
  Speaker 1: at the moment. Vance, in his own way, is accepting
• 9:04
  Speaker 1: the premise. He gets it. Hey, people aren't feeling good.
• 9:06
  Speaker 1: They don't like this economy. He's trying to say, hey,
• 9:09
  Speaker 1: we're trying to fix it. And this was a couple
• 9:15
  Speaker 1: of weeks ago, he was directly trying to say, this
• 9:17
  Speaker 1: is still Biden's economy. Nobody's buying that anymore. Now everybody understands, no,
• 9:21
  Speaker 1: the Iran war is what has really accelerated what is
• 9:25
  Speaker 1: this inflationary environment. But it's the closest form of humility
• 9:31
  Speaker 1: you're going to get out of the Trump West Wing,
• 9:34
  Speaker 1: is what Vance is doing. But it is also an admission.
• 9:37
  Speaker 1: If voters were already feeling the benefits of the Trump agenda,
• 9:40
  Speaker 1: you wouldn't have to tell Voters to give it more time.
• 9:44
  Speaker 1: You'd be saying, look around, look at what we did.
• 9:47
  Speaker 1: You're better off. Instead, Vance's argument is essentially, we know
• 9:52
  Speaker 1: you're not feeling it yet. Just give us another chance.
• 9:55
  Speaker 1: And he's not alone, right? John Thune talked about the
• 9:58
  Speaker 1: Trump agenda and the big, beautiful bill. as, you know,
• 10:01
  Speaker 1: Republicans have set us up for success. That's future tense.
• 10:07
  Speaker 1: Doesn't mean we're feeling the success yet. And this was
• 10:14
  Speaker 1: with Sean Hannity. He's talking to the base and he
• 10:18
  Speaker 1: cannot bring himself to essentially pretend things are better than
• 10:22
  Speaker 1: they actually are. Tim Scott was earlier this week telling
• 10:27
  Speaker 1: Republican senators before they left, before they, you know, apparently
• 10:31
  Speaker 1: the only thing they seem to try to care about
• 10:32
  Speaker 1: to get done is to protect college sports bill. I mean,
• 10:36
  Speaker 1: of all things, if that's the last thing, you came
• 10:39
  Speaker 1: back to Washington, not to lower the price of groceries,
• 10:42
  Speaker 1: not to lower the price of gas, but to somehow
• 10:47
  Speaker 1: take money away from college athletes. I know that's my
• 10:51
  Speaker 1: spin to it, but you get my point, right? You're
• 10:53
  Speaker 1: more worried about appeasing Nick Saban than you are about
• 10:56
  Speaker 1: lowering the price of groceries. You're more worried about helping
• 10:59
  Speaker 1: out the SEC and the Big Ten than you are
• 11:02
  Speaker 1: about lowering the cost of diesel. Not the best look
• 11:06
  Speaker 1: right now for a Republican Party tried to justify their
• 11:09
  Speaker 1: congressional majorities less than five weeks before going into the election.
• 11:14
  Speaker 1: But let me get into a few more details of
• 11:16
  Speaker 1: what Scott told his colleagues, according to Semaphore. Tim Scott said,
• 11:20
  Speaker 1: we're in the fight for our lives with a record
• 11:22
  Speaker 1: number of toss-up races. So this is Tim Scott being
• 11:26
  Speaker 1: truthful about the environment. And his message was essentially, hey,
• 11:29
  Speaker 1: remember 2022? Joe Biden was unpopular. Everybody thought Democrats were
• 11:34
  Speaker 1: headed for disaster. The country didn't like that economy. And
• 11:38
  Speaker 1: Democrats actually gained a Senate seat. So this was Scott's way,
• 11:43
  Speaker 1: you know, it reminded me there was a time, and
• 11:46
  Speaker 1: Democrats have Stop doing this. But it wasn't just Democrats.
• 11:49
  Speaker 1: There was a time when a candidate was down in
• 11:52
  Speaker 1: the polls in the last week. They would invoke Harry Truman. Oh,
• 11:56
  Speaker 1: you know, Harry Truman, 1948. You know, everybody wrote him off,
• 12:00
  Speaker 1: said he couldn't win reelection. And lo and behold, he
• 12:02
  Speaker 1: made a comeback and he won. So you never know, right?
• 12:06
  Speaker 1: This was Tim Scott's attempt at the Harry Truman, the
• 12:11
  Speaker 1: Harry Truman motivated speech. Hey, look what Democrats pulled off
• 12:14
  Speaker 1: in 2022. They turned the red wave into a red mirage.
• 12:20
  Speaker 1: It's possible. Maybe the blue wave gets turned into a
• 12:22
  Speaker 1: blue mirage. But let's talk about 2022 for a minute
• 12:26
  Speaker 1: because Democrats had something in 2022 that Republicans don't appear
• 12:29
  Speaker 1: to have right now, the Dobbs decision. Dobbs is what
• 12:34
  Speaker 1: changed that election. Dobbs gave Democrats who didn't like their
• 12:39
  Speaker 1: own president, didn't love what was happening in the country,
• 12:42
  Speaker 1: a reason to show up to the polls, right? And
• 12:45
  Speaker 1: there was a sense of urgency. Oh my God, abortion
• 12:48
  Speaker 1: rights is now, this is, there is something bigger than
• 12:55
  Speaker 1: ignoring a bad presidency, right? It gave swing voters a
• 12:59
  Speaker 1: reason to vote against Republicans, even if they weren't particularly
• 13:02
  Speaker 1: happy with the Democratic Party's governance. What is the Republican
• 13:07
  Speaker 1: equivalent right now of that? What's sitting out there that
• 13:12
  Speaker 1: changes the trajectory of this election in the final few weeks?
• 13:17
  Speaker 1: There's really nothing equivalent, right? They're trying some culture war issues.
• 13:20
  Speaker 1: They're trying trans athletes in sports and their gender reassignment
• 13:26
  Speaker 1: surgery stuff, right? You see they're trying so hard to
• 13:30
  Speaker 1: bubble this up into the zeitgeist and throw it out there.
• 13:34
  Speaker 1: You see it in the ads. Elon Musk is creating
• 13:36
  Speaker 1: all sorts of just BS ads about it, but he's
• 13:41
  Speaker 1: trying so hard, right? He's got his own sort of
• 13:45
  Speaker 1: personal reason that he's obsessed with the trans issue. He's
• 13:49
  Speaker 1: still upset that he has a trans kid and he
• 13:51
  Speaker 1: doesn't want to look in the mirror and he just
• 13:54
  Speaker 1: sort of wants to blame society for this issue. But
• 14:00
  Speaker 1: I'm not sure that creates a Dobbs level of enthusiasm
• 14:07
  Speaker 1: to show up to the polls to vote for the
• 14:10
  Speaker 1: MAGA base. In some way. So it doesn't exist. But
• 14:17
  Speaker 1: what's interesting about all three together, right? Take what Vance, Thune,
• 14:21
  Speaker 1: and Scott are all saying. All these comments have been
• 14:23
  Speaker 1: said in the last 36 hours. This is essentially what
• 14:28
  Speaker 1: a football coach says at halftime when his team is
• 14:30
  Speaker 1: down four scores. Basically, hey, guys, just don't quit. Don't
• 14:35
  Speaker 1: walk away. Don't lay down arms. You know, let's give
• 14:38
  Speaker 1: it the good fight. You never know what could happen.
• 14:40
  Speaker 1: Maybe there's a turnover. Maybe there's this. And sure, about
• 14:43
  Speaker 1: one out of 50 times, a team down four scores
• 14:47
  Speaker 1: comes back and win. Doesn't happen very often, but it
• 14:51
  Speaker 1: can happen. So sure. And obviously, if you quit now,
• 14:56
  Speaker 1: bad can get worse in a hurry, right? And to me,
• 15:02
  Speaker 1: what Scott, Vance, and Thune were trying to do is
• 15:04
  Speaker 1: prevent a tsunami. They're basically saying, hey, don't give up yet.
• 15:08
  Speaker 1: Please continue to give money. Please continue to show up.
• 15:14
  Speaker 1: because if you just walk away now, if you sort
• 15:16
  Speaker 1: of throw in the towel, well, then it's not just
• 15:19
  Speaker 1: five Senate seats that you could lose. It's seven or eight, right?
• 15:22
  Speaker 1: You know, don't let the bottom, right? The bottom falling
• 15:25
  Speaker 1: out would mean South Carolina, Mississippi, maybe even South Dakota, right? Unlikely,
• 15:31
  Speaker 1: completely unlikely, but that's what a tsunami does. It creates
• 15:35
  Speaker 1: political damage you had no idea was coming. But really what,
• 15:41
  Speaker 1: what this Republican messaging is all about is, hey, there's
• 15:43
  Speaker 1: still a little bit of time left. They have more money.
• 15:49
  Speaker 1: If they can spend that money, talk to their voters,
• 15:53
  Speaker 1: bring out their base, maybe they can mitigate the damage, right?
• 16:00
  Speaker 1: Who knows? Maybe you have some success. Maybe you get
• 16:04
  Speaker 1: lucky in New Hampshire and you flip a seat and
• 16:06
  Speaker 1: you change the math. Maybe you get lucky in Minnesota.
• 16:09
  Speaker 1: Maybe you get lucky in Michigan. Those seem to be
• 16:12
  Speaker 1: the three Democratic-held seats that Republicans have a realistic shot
• 16:16
  Speaker 1: at making competitive. North Carolina and Georgia, by the way,
• 16:20
  Speaker 1: looks like they've been completely written off. But the thing is,
• 16:24
  Speaker 1: is when you hear comments like this, just like when
• 16:27
  Speaker 1: you're hearing a football coach trying to tell a team
• 16:30
  Speaker 1: losing by four scores that all hope is not lost,
• 16:35
  Speaker 1: what it does say is When a coach is having
• 16:38
  Speaker 1: to do that, a coach knows his players are starting
• 16:39
  Speaker 1: to wonder whether actually all hope is lost. And that's
• 16:43
  Speaker 1: what these Republican messages sound like to me. It's getting
• 16:46
  Speaker 1: late early. Early voting has already begun in a handful
• 16:49
  Speaker 1: of states. And there's, you know, just start changing the
• 16:54
  Speaker 1: trajectory of a race. You need a couple weeks. Well,
• 16:58
  Speaker 1: if we're down to five weeks, right, if we're down
• 17:01
  Speaker 1: to less than six weeks here, right, and we're sitting
• 17:04
  Speaker 1: in there, how much time do you really have? I've
• 17:08
  Speaker 1: said that basically the end of this month, we're kind
• 17:11
  Speaker 1: of going to know where everything is. We'll have an
• 17:13
  Speaker 1: idea by the 1st of October whether any of this
• 17:20
  Speaker 1: late TV advertising that has certainly saturated your Ohio's, your Iowa's,
• 17:26
  Speaker 1: and your Texas's, whether it has had any meaningful impact. Now,
• 17:34
  Speaker 1: I do think we may see more people voting later,
• 17:37
  Speaker 1: by the way. I know one I know I said
• 17:39
  Speaker 1: it's getting late early, you know, using a Yogi Berra ism.
• 17:43
  Speaker 1: But these days, because of the early vote, it is.
• 17:46
  Speaker 1: But I do think because of the shenanigans Trump has
• 17:50
  Speaker 1: attempted to do with mail in voting, we're seeing some
• 17:54
  Speaker 1: evidence in polling that a lot of Democrats may wait
• 17:57
  Speaker 1: later to vote, may decide to vote in person or
• 18:00
  Speaker 1: early in person rather than just through the mail. So
• 18:05
  Speaker 1: I guess perhaps you could say there might be a
• 18:08
  Speaker 1: little more runway for Republicans and that Democrats might not
• 18:11
  Speaker 1: bank as many votes early here. But I do promise
• 18:14
  Speaker 1: you this, any votes that get banked early are likely
• 18:16
  Speaker 1: going to be Democratic votes. Hey, you know those pieces
• 18:20
  Speaker 1: in your closet that you find yourself wearing on repeat? Boy,
• 18:24
  Speaker 1: is that me. I wear the same three or four things, right?
• 18:26
  Speaker 1: The sweater that goes with everything, that perfect pair of pants.
• 18:30
  Speaker 1: The t-shirt you somehow always reach for first. Those are
• 18:34
  Speaker 1: the pieces that make getting dressed easy, right? And that's
• 18:38
  Speaker 1: what Quince does best. Quince focuses on high-quality wardrobe staples
• 18:44
  Speaker 1: made with premium materials. The styles are timeless, versatile, designed
• 18:48
  Speaker 1: to become those dependable pieces you reach for day after day. 100%
• 18:53
  Speaker 1: Mongolian cashmere sweaters that start at just $ 60. And it
• 18:57
  Speaker 1: doesn't feel like you bought some discounted stuff here. It's
• 19:01
  Speaker 1: like good stuff. Gives you the softness and quality you'd
• 19:04
  Speaker 1: expect from a luxury brand without that luxury price tag.
• 19:08
  Speaker 1: Quince also makes premium pants, fitted tees and polos, breathable
• 19:12
  Speaker 1: active wear. The quality basics designed to work across your
• 19:15
  Speaker 1: wardrobe and hold up to everyday wear. Everything at Quince
• 19:19
  Speaker 1: is priced 50 to 80% less than similar brands that
• 19:23
  Speaker 1: make similar products. They work directly with ethical factories, and
• 19:27
  Speaker 1: cut out the middlemen. So you're paying for high quality.
• 19:29
  Speaker 1: You're not paying for brand markup. And look, you've heard
• 19:32
  Speaker 1: me sing the praises of Quince before because I enjoy
• 19:36
  Speaker 1: wearing Quince even before they paid to sponsor my podcast.
• 19:41
  Speaker 1: But I appreciate that they're a sponsor as well. You
• 19:43
  Speaker 1: want sponsors you believe in. I believe in Quince. I
• 19:46
  Speaker 1: wear Quince. Look, and it's not just clothing, by the way,
• 19:49
  Speaker 1: Quince Spring. that same approach to everything they make. They
• 19:51
  Speaker 1: got hotel quality bedding, bath to kitchen essentials, and thoughtfully
• 19:55
  Speaker 1: designed furniture. They make well-designed pieces for everyday living, sort
• 19:59
  Speaker 1: of the same philosophy, right? So find your next fall
• 20:02
  Speaker 1: favorite to Quince. Download the Quince app for app-exclusive offers
• 20:06
  Speaker 1: or go to quince.com slash chucked. Get free shipping on
• 20:10
  Speaker 1: your order, 365-day returns. It's now available in Canada and
• 20:14
  Speaker 1: the UK as well. That's q-u-i-n-c-e.com slash chucked. It brings
• 20:24
  Speaker 1: me to Donald Trump. If Trump is going to try
• 20:29
  Speaker 1: to change the political environment over the next few weeks,
• 20:32
  Speaker 1: there is one place where he clearly understands he has
• 20:34
  Speaker 1: to do it, and it's prices, which brings us to diesel.
• 20:39
  Speaker 1: The White House is now preparing to respond to all
• 20:42
  Speaker 1: of the Republicans in swing states, particularly in the Midwest,
• 20:45
  Speaker 1: who are panicked about the price of diesel. They are
• 20:47
  Speaker 1: preparing a proposal for what is a 90-day ban on
• 20:51
  Speaker 1: diesel exports. But apparently there's a fight inside the administration
• 20:56
  Speaker 1: over whether to actually do it, because not everybody thinks
• 21:00
  Speaker 1: this is a good idea. And in fact, it may
• 21:02
  Speaker 1: be like pretty much most of Trump's financial ideas, right?
• 21:06
  Speaker 1: He's borrowing from the future to try to get something now.
• 21:10
  Speaker 1: And instead, when he mortgages the future, he's making it
• 21:14
  Speaker 1: more costly down the road. I get why Trump's desperate
• 21:18
  Speaker 1: to do it, right? Diesel is north of six bucks
• 21:21
  Speaker 1: a gallon and probably more likely to get to seven
• 21:25
  Speaker 1: than it is to get below six. And we know
• 21:29
  Speaker 1: diesel just doesn't affect somebody driving a diesel truck. It's farmers.
• 21:33
  Speaker 1: It is the fuel for our ag economy. Hard stop, right?
• 21:38
  Speaker 1: It's how the food gets to your grocery store. Diesel
• 21:41
  Speaker 1: is what powers food to get to your grocery store.
• 21:43
  Speaker 1: It's how the stuff you order gets to your house. Eventually,
• 21:47
  Speaker 1: the price of diesel shows up in the price of
• 21:49
  Speaker 1: almost everything. So here comes the idea that sounds great
• 21:53
  Speaker 1: on a bumper sticker. Stop exporting American diesel. Let's keep
• 21:56
  Speaker 1: as much supply as we can here to keep costs down. OK,
• 22:01
  Speaker 1: sounds reasonable, except there's a reason even Trump's own energy
• 22:04
  Speaker 1: secretary reportedly is fighting the idea. And here's why. Refineries
• 22:09
  Speaker 1: don't make gasoline over here and diesel over there. It
• 22:14
  Speaker 1: isn't two separate products in two separate refineries. These products
• 22:18
  Speaker 1: are actually produced together, gas for your car and the
• 22:20
  Speaker 1: diesel for the products that need diesel fuel, like tractors,
• 22:27
  Speaker 1: et cetera. If refiners suddenly can't sell all that excess
• 22:31
  Speaker 1: diesel overseas, they'll start to cut refinery production. Well, what
• 22:37
  Speaker 1: does that do? Well, then you end up producing less gasoline.
• 22:42
  Speaker 1: So you may lower diesel's price temporarily and simultaneously raise
• 22:48
  Speaker 1: the cost of a gallon of gas. Literally robbing Peter
• 22:53
  Speaker 1: to pay Paul. And this gets the predicament Trump is in, right?
• 22:57
  Speaker 1: He needs something voters can feel in a matter of weeks, right?
• 23:01
  Speaker 1: He's desperate for something, anything. He doesn't have time to
• 23:05
  Speaker 1: announce some grand economic policy that might produce benefits in
• 23:08
  Speaker 1: 18 months. Although he tried that, I'll send you a
• 23:12
  Speaker 1: $ 5, 000 check if you keep Republicans in power. He's desperate
• 23:16
  Speaker 1: to bring down prices or to get put money in
• 23:19
  Speaker 1: or be perceived to be trying to put money in
• 23:22
  Speaker 1: the pocket of his voters. And I expect we're going
• 23:26
  Speaker 1: to actually have a lot of attempts at Iranian diplomacy
• 23:30
  Speaker 1: over the next few weeks. Because I have a feeling
• 23:32
  Speaker 1: he's going to use Iran. opportunities for diplomacy simply to
• 23:37
  Speaker 1: try to jawbone down prices. One day it will be
• 23:40
  Speaker 1: Iran better watch out. The next day, hey, we had
• 23:43
  Speaker 1: a great conversation. And then he hopes somehow the price
• 23:45
  Speaker 1: of gas goes down. We're close to a deal, he
• 23:48
  Speaker 1: may tell us. Although regret it if they don't make
• 23:51
  Speaker 1: a deal because he realizes the Iranians are not blind
• 23:55
  Speaker 1: to our political calendar, folks. And they know they have
• 23:59
  Speaker 1: a lot more leverage over Trump after the election than
• 24:03
  Speaker 1: they do at the moment. How do we know this?
• 24:06
  Speaker 1: Trump himself said it during his speech to the U.N.
• 24:09
  Speaker 1: He goes, they think they're going to have more leverage
• 24:11
  Speaker 1: over me. Well, they won't. The narrator, this is the
• 24:15
  Speaker 1: part where the narrator jumps in, in the voice of
• 24:18
  Speaker 1: Ron Howard and says, oh, yes, they do. And so
• 24:24
  Speaker 1: I suspect over the next couple of weeks, you're going
• 24:26
  Speaker 1: to be hearing about how close we are to a deal.
• 24:29
  Speaker 1: We've had some great conversations. We just heard it over
• 24:32
  Speaker 1: during this U.N. week, right? the objective is obvious. Anything
• 24:36
  Speaker 1: to convince the markets to bring energy prices down, right?
• 24:40
  Speaker 1: He will say, we've got oil moving through the strait.
• 24:44
  Speaker 1: All the independent reporting has indicated, no, you don't. But again,
• 24:48
  Speaker 1: it's about job owning, buying time, et cetera. I don't
• 24:51
  Speaker 1: know if markets are going to listen, right? The more
• 24:55
  Speaker 1: he does this, and he's kind of done this crying
• 24:58
  Speaker 1: wolf with a deal with Iran now for pretty much
• 25:01
  Speaker 1: the entire time that he started this war. And so
• 25:05
  Speaker 1: your credibility with everybody wears over time. And more and more,
• 25:11
  Speaker 1: fewer will believe it. So markets may not believe it.
• 25:15
  Speaker 1: And at this point, are voters going to believe it?
• 25:17
  Speaker 1: And that's the most important question. Ultimately, you can't job
• 25:21
  Speaker 1: own somebody's grocery bill then. And that's the problem Republicans
• 25:24
  Speaker 1: are trying to solve with very little time left to
• 25:27
  Speaker 1: solve it. Now let's go to the Democratic side of
• 25:30
  Speaker 1: the aisle, because there's another fascinating problem developing on that side.
• 25:34
  Speaker 1: It's money. And specifically, it's the inability of the party
• 25:38
  Speaker 1: at the moment to suddenly invest in races that many
• 25:41
  Speaker 1: people thought would not be that competitive six months ago,
• 25:45
  Speaker 1: but suddenly are now. But this is where the finance
• 25:50
  Speaker 1: problem that Democrats have been facing all cycle long, going
• 25:53
  Speaker 1: back to going into deep debt for the 2024 campaign,
• 26:00
  Speaker 1: is this money problem was gonna show up somewhere. And
• 26:04
  Speaker 1: the question was, was it gonna cost them a shot
• 26:06
  Speaker 1: at control of Congress or was it gonna cost them
• 26:09
  Speaker 1: an opportunity to turn a blue wave into a blue tsunami?
• 26:12
  Speaker 1: At this point, it looks like at a minimum, it's
• 26:15
  Speaker 1: gonna cost them an opportunity to turn a blue wave
• 26:18
  Speaker 1: into a blue tsunami. There are three races in particular
• 26:22
  Speaker 1: where the Democratic Party's money problems are, preventing them from
• 26:27
  Speaker 1: having a real opportunity at flipping these long-shot races. Mississippi Senate,
• 26:32
  Speaker 1: South Carolina Senate, and Florida governor. And Mississippi and South
• 26:37
  Speaker 1: Carolina are particularly interesting to me because these aren't very
• 26:40
  Speaker 1: expensive states in the grand scheme of things. Scott Cullum
• 26:46
  Speaker 1: in Mississippi has Democratic officials in the state publicly pleading
• 26:49
  Speaker 1: with the national party to invest. Annie Andrews, the Democratic
• 26:53
  Speaker 1: nominee in South Carolina, You would think now that South
• 26:57
  Speaker 1: Carolina is first in line for the Democratic presidential race,
• 27:01
  Speaker 1: that there'd be a lot of presidential candidates that would
• 27:03
  Speaker 1: be motivated to help her. And I've been, I have
• 27:07
  Speaker 1: to say, I think that there's so many Democrats running
• 27:10
  Speaker 1: around who would like to be considered presidential candidates in 2028.
• 27:15
  Speaker 1: I think they've missed two incredible opportunities here. to essentially
• 27:21
  Speaker 1: prove that they know how to be a party leader
• 27:23
  Speaker 1: and prove that they can marshal resources on behalf of
• 27:26
  Speaker 1: a candidate in one state. You want to demonstrate leadership
• 27:29
  Speaker 1: in the Democratic Party? Pick one. Pick Mississippi. Pick South Carolina.
• 27:33
  Speaker 1: Bring your own fundraising network to the state. Bring your
• 27:36
  Speaker 1: own donors. Bring attention. Raise money for your own super
• 27:39
  Speaker 1: PAC on their behalf. Show that you want to be
• 27:43
  Speaker 1: leader of the party as well as leader of the
• 27:45
  Speaker 1: free world.
• 27:48
  Speaker 2: I am.
• 27:49
  Speaker 1: It is this opportunity has been sitting there, whether you're
• 27:52
  Speaker 1: Andy Beshear, whether you're Rahm Emanuel, whether you're J.B. Pritzker,
• 27:56
  Speaker 1: whether you're Wes Moore. Now, I know some folks have
• 27:58
  Speaker 1: their own races to worry about. OK, there's plenty that don't.
• 28:04
  Speaker 3: Right.
• 28:04
  Speaker 1: Gavin Newsom could have done. There's a lot of folks
• 28:07
  Speaker 1: that could have done this. And they've, you know, they've
• 28:10
  Speaker 1: shown up in Mississippi to do, you know, a few
• 28:13
  Speaker 1: people have shown up to Mississippi to to do an
• 28:15
  Speaker 1: event or two with with with the candidates. Ditto in
• 28:20
  Speaker 1: South Carolina. But none of them have said, you know what,
• 28:24
  Speaker 1: instead of just trying to hopscotch around the country, I'm
• 28:29
  Speaker 1: going to do everything I can to turn a red
• 28:33
  Speaker 1: state blue. Anyway, it's a it's with all these ambitious
• 28:39
  Speaker 1: people wanting to be president. It's amazing to me that
• 28:42
  Speaker 1: none of them saw this opportunity to demonstrate some leadership
• 28:47
  Speaker 1: that would have been unique. And something we hadn't, it
• 28:50
  Speaker 1: would have allowed them to stand out, particularly with the
• 28:53
  Speaker 1: single most important constituency in a Democratic presidential primary, African-American voters.
• 29:00
  Speaker 1: But look, the other issue is, it's just, this is
• 29:03
  Speaker 1: welcome to the Democratic Party's money problem. Now, the big
• 29:06
  Speaker 1: one is Florida. And Florida's different. Florida is entering the
• 29:10
  Speaker 1: category Texas had occupied for Democrats for a couple of cycles.
• 29:14
  Speaker 1: By the time everybody looks up now in Florida and says,
• 29:17
  Speaker 1: wait a minute, This race might be competitive. It's too
• 29:20
  Speaker 1: late to invest because it's such an expensive state. Florida
• 29:26
  Speaker 1: is enormous. It's not as enormous as Texas, but it's
• 29:29
  Speaker 1: a lot closer than you think. The media markets are expensive.
• 29:33
  Speaker 1: And it is just like in Texas. You can't decide
• 29:36
  Speaker 1: in late September that you're going to dump an extra
• 29:38
  Speaker 1: 20 to 30 million dollars. into a state if you
• 29:41
  Speaker 1: didn't budget for it. And frankly, to just suddenly show
• 29:44
  Speaker 1: up and do this from scratch. So, look, I don't
• 29:49
  Speaker 1: think the Democratic Party's money problems are going to cost
• 29:53
  Speaker 1: them an opportunity to win the House or the Senate.
• 29:55
  Speaker 1: Money is not going to be the reason why if
• 29:57
  Speaker 1: they come up short in the House or come up
• 29:59
  Speaker 1: short in the Senate, That is not going to be
• 30:01
  Speaker 1: the reason. But if this doesn't turn, if they have
• 30:05
  Speaker 1: a blue wave that could have been turned into a
• 30:07
  Speaker 1: blue tsunami and they come less than three points short
• 30:10
  Speaker 1: in Florida, Mississippi, South Carolina, those three are as good
• 30:14
  Speaker 1: of a test as any. That's where you can point
• 30:18
  Speaker 1: the finger at the Democratic Party's money woes as being
• 30:22
  Speaker 1: the explanation of why they came up, why they couldn't
• 30:25
  Speaker 1: take advantage of an opportunity that is just sitting there.
• 30:29
  Speaker 1: Mississippi is just sitting there. South Carolina is just sitting there.
• 30:33
  Speaker 1: Florida governor is a lot more expensive, but it's also possible.
• 30:40
  Speaker 1: But like I said, like what used to happen to Texas, right?
• 30:44
  Speaker 1: This is the first cycle where Democrats actually planned to
• 30:49
  Speaker 1: put Texas in play more than a year out. They
• 30:53
  Speaker 1: were not thinking that at all in the state of Florida.
• 30:56
  Speaker 1: And now that the opportunity stares them in the face,
• 31:00
  Speaker 1: it's probably too late. Maybe it's not, you never know,
• 31:03
  Speaker 1: bottom could fall out, but it might be too late.
• 31:07
  Speaker 1: All right, now I wanna shift gears because I wanna
• 31:08
  Speaker 1: talk about something that I know isn't gonna decide very
• 31:12
  Speaker 1: many votes in November, which is why I'm not leading
• 31:14
  Speaker 1: with this. But it may matter a hell of a
• 31:18
  Speaker 1: lot longer than whatever happens this November or frankly in
• 31:20
  Speaker 1: November of 2028. Donald Trump went to the United Nations
• 31:24
  Speaker 1: earlier this week and gave another one of those speeches
• 31:27
  Speaker 1: That I think Americans hear one way and the rest
• 31:29
  Speaker 1: of the world hears very differently. We kind of shrug
• 31:33
  Speaker 1: our shoulders to his gobbledygook and move on. But there
• 31:37
  Speaker 1: was one line that stopped me. And I gave you
• 31:40
  Speaker 1: a preview with it in the previous episode. Trump was
• 31:43
  Speaker 1: bragging about Venezuela. The oil agreement administration, it struck with
• 31:48
  Speaker 1: the government now running the country. Although, again, it's an
• 31:52
  Speaker 1: illegitimate government. At least we used to claim it was
• 31:54
  Speaker 1: an illegitimate government, right? It's the Maduro crime family, essentially,
• 31:57
  Speaker 1: still running Venezuela. Except they now, instead of reporting to Maduro,
• 32:04
  Speaker 1: Delcy Rodriguez reports to Trump. But he said the line,
• 32:08
  Speaker 1: to the victor belong the spoils. At the United Nations,
• 32:15
  Speaker 1: the president of the United States of America, the country
• 32:18
  Speaker 1: that was one time a beacon for freedom and democracy.
• 32:24
  Speaker 1: Think about the message that sends because everybody else gets
• 32:28
  Speaker 1: to hear it too. And this gets at what I
• 32:32
  Speaker 1: think has become a fundamental problem with Trump's foreign policy.
• 32:37
  Speaker 1: People sometimes say it's incoherent. I don't think it's fully incoherent.
• 32:41
  Speaker 1: There's some consistencies to it, right? There is a coherency.
• 32:45
  Speaker 1: The coherency is Donald Trump, right? It revolves around him,
• 32:49
  Speaker 1: his instincts, his relationships, his grievances and whims. You know,
• 32:54
  Speaker 1: he doesn't like multilateralism, right? That's a consistent policy. He
• 32:58
  Speaker 1: wants to deal with everybody one-on-one. I've always said the
• 33:00
  Speaker 1: real reason he loves tariffs is control. You know, he
• 33:04
  Speaker 1: doesn't really care up or down. He just wants control.
• 33:07
  Speaker 1: And tariffs give him a perception of control in a relationship.
• 33:13
  Speaker 1: He loves the bilateral relationships, right? Because he somehow thinks
• 33:17
  Speaker 1: it gives him more leverage. All right. But you know what?
• 33:21
  Speaker 1: United States is a Does it unilaterally decide how the
• 33:24
  Speaker 1: world works? We used to be pretty influential to help
• 33:29
  Speaker 1: decide how the world works because we had credibility. Now,
• 33:34
  Speaker 1: we may very well suddenly start being not quite a
• 33:40
  Speaker 1: shining city on a hill, but a shiny metal object
• 33:46
  Speaker 1: that people start to emulate in all the wrong ways.
• 33:52
  Speaker 1: And that's the concern. And that's the damage that Donald
• 33:55
  Speaker 1: Trump has done. And we're now seeing the consequences of
• 33:58
  Speaker 1: what happens when you create this sort of America first
• 34:03
  Speaker 1: foreign policy. If everything is America first and you don't
• 34:09
  Speaker 1: give a damn about what happens to the rest of
• 34:11
  Speaker 1: the world, guess what? Everybody else is going to follow suit.
• 34:16
  Speaker 1: Let's start. I think one of the great consequences of
• 34:19
  Speaker 1: of lost trust and lost credibility is actually with Saudi Arabia,
• 34:23
  Speaker 1: who I'm sure Donald Trump thinks is an incredible ally.
• 34:27
  Speaker 1: He's certainly an incredible business partner to some members of
• 34:30
  Speaker 1: his family. So the United States and Israel went to
• 34:33
  Speaker 1: war with Iran. Seven months later, that war is still going.
• 34:38
  Speaker 1: Iran's proxies have expanded the conflict. The Houthis are attacking
• 34:42
  Speaker 1: Saudi Arabia again. The Saudis are asking the United States
• 34:45
  Speaker 1: for help since, well, It was the United States' decision
• 34:50
  Speaker 1: to go to war with Iran that has caused Saudi
• 34:52
  Speaker 1: Arabia to suddenly be fighting with the Houthis again. And
• 34:56
  Speaker 1: the United States is hesitating.
• 35:00
  Speaker 3: Now, why?
• 35:01
  Speaker 1: Well, one obvious reason is we're pretty stretched. We're not
• 35:05
  Speaker 1: ready to, frankly, we were uncomfortable opening a one-front war,
• 35:09
  Speaker 1: let alone having a two-front war. We've spent enormous amounts
• 35:13
  Speaker 1: of money and munitions on this war with Iran. And
• 35:16
  Speaker 1: we clearly were not, we never had planned for it,
• 35:20
  Speaker 1: which is why we're scrambling constantly all over the place.
• 35:24
  Speaker 1: The Pentagon's own audit of the cost of this war
• 35:27
  Speaker 1: is somewhere in 40 to 50 billion. It's likely more
• 35:31
  Speaker 1: than that. And we have had repeated reports and leaks
• 35:36
  Speaker 1: out of the Pentagon that we have a massive munition problem.
• 35:39
  Speaker 1: And part of it is we've been essentially giving Israel
• 35:43
  Speaker 1: and Ukraine our munitions for self-defense. And the idea, when
• 35:51
  Speaker 1: we sell arms, a lot of times, essentially, we buy
• 35:55
  Speaker 1: the new stuff from our manufacturers and our defense contractors.
• 36:00
  Speaker 1: And what's in our stockpiles, we give, we sell, or
• 36:05
  Speaker 1: we give, depending on what we decide to do, to
• 36:08
  Speaker 1: our key allies. Right. Well, we've been doing this a while,
• 36:12
  Speaker 1: particularly with Ukraine and Israel, and it is really drawn
• 36:16
  Speaker 1: down our inventories. Then we start a war, which we
• 36:19
  Speaker 1: did not plan for. And it's clear the Pentagon had
• 36:22
  Speaker 1: no preparation for this war. Because look at how we've
• 36:27
  Speaker 1: had to move carrier groups and, you know, we've had
• 36:29
  Speaker 1: to weaken ourselves in one area while we strengthen ourselves
• 36:32
  Speaker 1: in another.
• 36:36
  Speaker 2: And so.
• 36:37
  Speaker 1: But imagine you're Saudi Arabia. And I'm not endorsing whether, look,
• 36:41
  Speaker 1: we started this war. We have an important ally and
• 36:44
  Speaker 1: Saudi Arabia is suddenly asking for our help and we're
• 36:46
  Speaker 1: choking in the moment, right? And this has real consequences.
• 36:51
  Speaker 1: Trump apparently has gone back and forth about whether to
• 36:53
  Speaker 1: open another front and help the Saudis out with the Houthis.
• 36:57
  Speaker 1: Put yourself in the shoes of the Saudis for a
• 36:59
  Speaker 1: second and forget whether you like the Saudis. You may
• 37:06
  Speaker 1: not want to have them as an ally, but they are.
• 37:08
  Speaker 1: We've made security agreements with them, okay? If you're running
• 37:12
  Speaker 1: Saudi Arabia at the moment, you have to answer a
• 37:14
  Speaker 1: very simple question. Can I count on the United States
• 37:17
  Speaker 1: as my security partner and my security umbrella? What's your
• 37:22
  Speaker 1: answer today? Now, that's the same question in Europe. Can
• 37:27
  Speaker 1: Europe assume that the United States will always be there?
• 37:31
  Speaker 1: It's a question Ukraine's asking. It's a question Taiwan's asking.
• 37:35
  Speaker 1: How about Japan? How about Canada? Canada is particularly important
• 37:38
  Speaker 1: here because Mark Carney isn't just complaining about Donald Trump.
• 37:41
  Speaker 1: He's trying to do something about it. Canada is actively
• 37:44
  Speaker 1: trying to build a much deeper relationship with Europe unilaterally
• 37:48
  Speaker 1: because he can't trust the United States. Carney is talking
• 37:52
  Speaker 1: about an alliance of what he calls middle powers, basically
• 37:54
  Speaker 1: anybody but China, the United States and Russia. Canada is
• 37:58
  Speaker 1: pursuing closer economic defense and strategic ties with the European
• 38:02
  Speaker 1: Union precisely because He has concluded he can no longer
• 38:06
  Speaker 1: count on the United States. Think about that. Canada, our
• 38:11
  Speaker 1: next door neighbor. If you had asked me 10 years
• 38:15
  Speaker 1: ago to name the country that had the least reason
• 38:17
  Speaker 1: on earth to hedge against the United States, Canada would
• 38:20
  Speaker 1: probably have been number one on the list. But Canada
• 38:25
  Speaker 1: feels like it has to hedge. Our allies still want
• 38:28
  Speaker 1: us as an ally. What they increasingly don't want to
• 38:32
  Speaker 1: do is build a system that requires America to always
• 38:36
  Speaker 1: be in charge because of how poorly this president has
• 38:40
  Speaker 1: led the world. Look at what happened when this guy
• 38:44
  Speaker 1: got put in charge. And this is the part that
• 38:48
  Speaker 1: I think people underestimate. Again, I know foreign policy isn't
• 38:52
  Speaker 1: a voting issue unless it's impacting cost of living at home,
• 38:57
  Speaker 1: a la Iran war. The next president can't simply walk
• 39:02
  Speaker 1: into the Oval Office and say, okay, everybody, America's back.
• 39:05
  Speaker 1: Forget the last eight of the last 12 years. We
• 39:09
  Speaker 1: tried that once already with our allies, and then Trump
• 39:12
  Speaker 1: came back. And that is what's changed the calculation for everybody,
• 39:17
  Speaker 1: whether you're Saudi Arabia or Canada. The first Trump presidency
• 39:22
  Speaker 1: could be viewed overseas as an aberration. The second Trump
• 39:26
  Speaker 1: presidency tells every government on earth that this is something
• 39:30
  Speaker 1: the American political system can produce again. So now if
• 39:35
  Speaker 1: you're an ally, you have to hedge. What choice do
• 39:37
  Speaker 1: you have at the moment? You have to build another
• 39:39
  Speaker 1: supply chain. You got to build other military relationships, maybe
• 39:43
  Speaker 1: other security relationships. You might need another, find another source
• 39:48
  Speaker 1: of energy. You have to ask whether American intelligence cooperation
• 39:53
  Speaker 1: will still exist four years from now. Whether you can
• 39:56
  Speaker 1: trust the American intelligence operation. You have to ask whether
• 40:00
  Speaker 1: the treaty will mean the same thing under another president.
• 40:05
  Speaker 1: This is the enormous damage Donald Trump has done to
• 40:08
  Speaker 1: all of us. He's made us all less safe, folks.
• 40:11
  Speaker 1: This doesn't get repaired with one election. It's going to
• 40:14
  Speaker 1: take multiple presidents from multiple parties. to win back the
• 40:21
  Speaker 1: trust and credibility of some of our closest allies, never
• 40:24
  Speaker 1: mind skeptics we already had around the world. It's going
• 40:29
  Speaker 1: to take administrations honoring agreements made by previous administrations of
• 40:32
  Speaker 1: other political ideologies for us to get some credibility back.
• 40:40
  Speaker 1: Because that's how you rebuild trust. It takes time. You
• 40:45
  Speaker 1: can destroy trust in a single presidential term. It takes
• 40:50
  Speaker 1: you multiple terms to get it back. And then look
• 40:54
  Speaker 1: at the weird signals we're sending now as leader, supposedly
• 40:58
  Speaker 1: leader of the free world. We're rolling out the red
• 41:00
  Speaker 1: carpet for Xi Jinping. I thought this guy was one of,
• 41:05
  Speaker 1: was America's chief rival. Now look, I want to be
• 41:09
  Speaker 1: clear about something. I have no problem with the president
• 41:11
  Speaker 1: of the United States having summits and sitting down with
• 41:15
  Speaker 1: the leader of China and the leader of Russia, talking
• 41:18
  Speaker 1: on the phone, We should always be talking with our adversaries.
• 41:22
  Speaker 1: We should always be open to talk. Talk to Kim Jong-un.
• 41:25
  Speaker 1: Talk to Putin. Talk to Xi. It's one of the
• 41:28
  Speaker 1: few things that I think Trump, I'm glad he's gotten
• 41:31
  Speaker 1: rid of that sort of ridiculous protocol. You should always
• 41:35
  Speaker 1: be opening, open to talking, including with crazy-ass ideologues you
• 41:40
  Speaker 1: don't agree with. The question's not whether you sit down
• 41:46
  Speaker 1: with them. The question is, what you stand for when
• 41:49
  Speaker 1: you sit down with them. Do you defend democracy? Do
• 41:52
  Speaker 1: you defend your allies? Do you defend Western values? Do
• 42:00
  Speaker 1: you talk about human rights? Do you have the credibility
• 42:04
  Speaker 1: to talk about human rights? Do you actually advocate for democracy?
• 42:09
  Speaker 1: I mean, The Chinese government censors the press vigorously. And
• 42:21
  Speaker 1: what is this president trying to do in the week
• 42:24
  Speaker 1: he hosts Xi at the White House? Censor the press.
• 42:29
  Speaker 1: He's jealous of the power Xi has. Every other American
• 42:34
  Speaker 1: president looked at the Chinese system and said, that's terrible.
• 42:38
  Speaker 1: This president looks at the Chinese system and wishes it
• 42:43
  Speaker 1: was the one he could run. Sit with that a minute.
• 42:49
  Speaker 1: He weirdly respects and loves the fact that what she
• 42:53
  Speaker 1: says goes. It's interesting to me that Trump's alone here
• 43:02
  Speaker 1: in celebrating. I mean, you want to talk about a
• 43:04
  Speaker 1: politically terrible timing to vet the leading communist in the
• 43:10
  Speaker 1: world at the White House. It's less than six weeks
• 43:13
  Speaker 1: before a midterm election. Roger Wicker, the Republican chairman of
• 43:17
  Speaker 1: the Senate Armed Services Committee, was so uncomfortable with this
• 43:21
  Speaker 1: lavish welcome. Trump is dragging his ass out to Andrews
• 43:25
  Speaker 1: to welcome she. Roger Wicker took to the Senate floor
• 43:29
  Speaker 1: to say how uncomfortable he was. Meanwhile, what is Marco
• 43:34
  Speaker 1: Rubio report out this week that Donald Trump, he's confirmed
• 43:38
  Speaker 1: that Vladimir Putin has officially been invited to to the
• 43:41
  Speaker 1: G20 meeting in Miami in December at his Doral Country Club.
• 43:48
  Speaker 1: By the way, nobody in the G20 wants Putin there.
• 43:50
  Speaker 1: Putin is a menace to the world. Putin is trying
• 43:54
  Speaker 1: to destroy a country. And he's killed hundreds of thousands
• 43:58
  Speaker 1: of people, kidnapped children. And Donald Trump wants his sidekick
• 44:05
  Speaker 1: hanging out with him at Doral? Look, talking to Putin, though,
• 44:10
  Speaker 1: isn't the problem. But what are you telling the world
• 44:15
  Speaker 1: that America stands for that you want him there when
• 44:18
  Speaker 1: other members of the G20 don't? It brings me back
• 44:24
  Speaker 1: to the Victor go the spoils bullshit that Trump said
• 44:27
  Speaker 1: at the UN. If that's America's principle, well, guess what?
• 44:34
  Speaker 1: It only reinforces Putin's worldview. It only reinforces when Putin thinks, hey,
• 44:40
  Speaker 1: Ukraine belongs to us, to the victor go the spoils,
• 44:43
  Speaker 1: although he can't win that war. Or China looks at Taiwan,
• 44:48
  Speaker 1: to the victor go the spoils, going to take all
• 44:50
  Speaker 1: the chips. Meanwhile, you're going to have middle powers. Why
• 44:55
  Speaker 1: shouldn't India think this way? Why shouldn't Brazil think this way? Nigeria,
• 45:00
  Speaker 1: South Africa. Why wouldn't every aspiring regional power look around
• 45:06
  Speaker 1: at a weaker neighbor and say, you know what? To
• 45:08
  Speaker 1: the victor belong the spoils. That's the permission slip Donald
• 45:13
  Speaker 1: Trump just handed out at the United Nations this week.
• 45:17
  Speaker 1: If the United States announces that its foreign policy is
• 45:20
  Speaker 1: simply going to be in the pursuit of American self-interest,
• 45:25
  Speaker 1: not shared interests, not shared alliances or values, but simply
• 45:30
  Speaker 1: our interests, then everybody else is going to do exactly
• 45:34
  Speaker 1: the same thing. And you may think you're going to
• 45:38
  Speaker 1: like that world in theory, but I promise you all
• 45:43
  Speaker 1: that does is create the conditions for a lot more war.
• 45:48
  Speaker 1: The more unilateral things are, the more trade wars that exist,
• 45:52
  Speaker 1: the higher tariff walls are, the more fight we have
• 45:56
  Speaker 1: over whose resources belong to who, it only increases the
• 46:01
  Speaker 1: likelihood of war. America built this post-war system for a reason.
• 46:10
  Speaker 1: It wasn't charity. It was security for us. And it
• 46:13
  Speaker 1: was security for free people. We didn't build NATO because
• 46:17
  Speaker 1: we felt sorry for Europe. We didn't create these economic
• 46:20
  Speaker 1: alliances because we're nice people. We did it because an
• 46:24
  Speaker 1: interconnected system in which America had dependable allies actually made
• 46:29
  Speaker 1: America richer and safer. And now we're dismantling these pieces
• 46:35
  Speaker 1: with astonishing quickness. And that's the thing about Hurricane Trump.
• 46:41
  Speaker 1: The storm eventually passes, but the damage sits. Sometimes it
• 46:46
  Speaker 1: takes years to recover from a storm. And Hurricane Trump,
• 46:49
  Speaker 1: when it comes to our foreign policy, this is going
• 46:51
  Speaker 1: to take decades. And I think we're only beginning to
• 46:54
  Speaker 1: understand the damage that's accumulated here. Trump didn't blow all
• 46:58
  Speaker 1: this up in his first term the way some people
• 47:00
  Speaker 1: feared he might. But the second coming of Trump has
• 47:03
  Speaker 1: changed things. Our allies now know this wasn't a one-time accident.
• 47:08
  Speaker 1: This can happen again and again. So they're now preparing
• 47:11
  Speaker 1: for a world in which America is less reliable, a
• 47:15
  Speaker 1: world in which America has less influence, a world in
• 47:19
  Speaker 1: which America is less safe because we have less influence,
• 47:25
  Speaker 1: because we've become less reliable. And this doesn't show up
• 47:29
  Speaker 1: neatly in a midterm poll. Diesel prices does, right? The
• 47:34
  Speaker 1: grocery bill does. But foreign alliances and our personal security don't.
• 47:39
  Speaker 1: until suddenly you need one. And you discover that the
• 47:42
  Speaker 1: country you've spent decades telling to trust you decided it
• 47:45
  Speaker 1: needed a backup plan. So this isn't going to be
• 47:49
  Speaker 1: repaired on January 20th, 2029 by somebody different sitting behind
• 47:53
  Speaker 1: the resolute desk. It took decades to build up this credibility,
• 47:58
  Speaker 1: and it's going to take years to rebuild it. Multiple
• 48:02
  Speaker 1: presidents and multiple parties. And every time an American president
• 48:08
  Speaker 1: goes before the United Nations and tells the world to
• 48:12
  Speaker 1: the victor go along the spoils, the clock starts over again.
• 48:20
  Speaker 1: I know we shrug away what he's done to our
• 48:23
  Speaker 1: relationships around the world. But all of them, what he's
• 48:28
  Speaker 1: done is made us poorer and made us less secure.
• 48:33
  Speaker 1: We've never been more vulnerable than to the outside world
• 48:37
  Speaker 1: attacking us than we have during this last two years.
• 48:40
  Speaker 1: And there's only one person's foreign policy you have to
• 48:42
  Speaker 1: thank for that. Hey, this episode of the Chuck Toddcast
• 48:49
  Speaker 1: is brought to you by Ethos. Look, let me tell
• 48:52
  Speaker 1: you about life insurance. As you know, Ethos is an
• 48:56
  Speaker 1: incredible portal for helping you find the right life insurance policy.
• 48:59
  Speaker 1: I'm a huge believer in life insurance. I wouldn't have
• 49:02
  Speaker 1: gotten to college in Washington, D.C. without life insurance. My father...
• 49:06
  Speaker 1: Had a policy buried somewhere that we discovered, and it
• 49:08
  Speaker 1: wasn't a lot of money, but it was an important
• 49:12
  Speaker 1: bucket of money at a time that my mother, newly widowed,
• 49:16
  Speaker 1: single mom, me, I'm 16. It was... of enormous, enormous
• 49:22
  Speaker 1: help at that time. And this is why I believe
• 49:25
  Speaker 1: in life insurance. You don't know what could happen to
• 49:27
  Speaker 1: you on any given day. This is literally an insurance
• 49:31
  Speaker 1: policy for that. So let me tell you a little
• 49:33
  Speaker 1: bit about Ethos. Ethos makes getting life insurance fast and easy.
• 49:36
  Speaker 1: It's 100% online. You get a quote in seconds. You
• 49:39
  Speaker 1: apply in minutes and you can get coverage the same
• 49:41
  Speaker 1: day you begin this process. There's no medical exam. You
• 49:43
  Speaker 1: just answer a few simple health questions. You can get
• 49:46
  Speaker 1: up to $ 3 million in coverage. Some policies are as
• 49:49
  Speaker 1: low as $ 30 a month. And you'll get your lowest
• 49:51
  Speaker 1: rate from their network of trusted carriers. Ethos has gotten
• 49:56
  Speaker 1: 4.9 out of 5 stars on Trustpilot with over 5,500 reviews.
• 50:01
  Speaker 1: So take 10 minutes to get covered today. Life insurance
• 50:04
  Speaker 1: through Ethos. Get your free quote at ethos.com slash Chuck.
• 50:08
  Speaker 1: That is E-T-H-O-S dot com slash Chuck. Application times may vary.
• 50:14
  Speaker 1: The rates may vary. That Trustpilot rating was as of
• 50:17
  Speaker 1: August of 2026. Dear Chuck, first, hello to Mrs. Todd.
• 50:25
  Speaker 1: I hope she's having a beautiful September. Well, she's glad
• 50:29
  Speaker 1: to hear that. This comes from Douglas, a Ravens fan
• 50:31
  Speaker 1: living in PG County, Maryland's 4th District. During your Super
• 50:35
  Speaker 1: Tuesday discussion about Kamala Harris's 2028 chances, you mentioned the
• 50:39
  Speaker 1: limited examples of candidates successfully running for president multiple times,
• 50:42
  Speaker 1: including Trump and Grover Cleveland. What about Richard Nixon? Are
• 50:45
  Speaker 1: there any parallels or lessons from Nixon's political career that
• 50:48
  Speaker 1: Harris could take if she decides to run again in
• 50:50
  Speaker 1: 28 or 2032? You know, it does, right? I mean,
• 50:55
  Speaker 1: you want to talk about your parallels, right? She was
• 50:57
  Speaker 1: There was a whole bunch of people trying to get
• 50:58
  Speaker 1: her to run for governor, right? Because the field and she... Look,
• 51:02
  Speaker 1: had she chosen to run for governor, she'd have walked
• 51:04
  Speaker 1: into the governor's mansion. I think Richard Nixon thought he
• 51:08
  Speaker 1: was going to rock into the governor's mansion after he
• 51:09
  Speaker 1: lost the presidency in 60. And he ran into a
• 51:12
  Speaker 1: juggernaut that was Pat Brown. And that doesn't happen. Instead,
• 51:16
  Speaker 1: it was a guy named Ronald Reagan that was able
• 51:17
  Speaker 1: to defeat a guy named Pat Brown, something Richard Nixon
• 51:21
  Speaker 1: could not do. But yes, I think... So this is where,
• 51:29
  Speaker 1: you know, what did Nixon, why was Nixon able to
• 51:32
  Speaker 1: come back in 68? Because of what happened in 64, right?
• 51:37
  Speaker 1: And so in that sense, yes, this is why Harris
• 51:41
  Speaker 1: shouldn't run in 28. Now, the question is, what makes
• 51:44
  Speaker 1: her viable in 2032? A the Democratic nominee, I'm making
• 51:52
  Speaker 1: the assumption it'll come further to the left than where
• 51:55
  Speaker 1: Harris is, farther to the progressive side. But what it
• 51:59
  Speaker 1: would take is what happened to the Republicans, right? Barry
• 52:01
  Speaker 1: Goldwater took the Republicans to one of its worst performances
• 52:06
  Speaker 1: in the 20th century. And suddenly it made, it was
• 52:11
  Speaker 1: sort of like, oh, whoa, well, Nixon almost won in 60s.
• 52:15
  Speaker 1: Goldwater got trounced in 60. Maybe we ought to take
• 52:18
  Speaker 1: a second look at Nixon come 68, right? And there
• 52:21
  Speaker 1: was a little bit of the Rockefeller wing and all
• 52:23
  Speaker 1: this stuff. And then Nixon presented himself. He was the
• 52:26
  Speaker 1: candidate that conservatives didn't hate, but that the Rockefeller Republicans
• 52:32
  Speaker 1: thought they could tolerate. In fact, one of the most
• 52:34
  Speaker 1: important Rockefeller Republicans to join the Nixon movement was Henry Kissinger,
• 52:40
  Speaker 1: who had begun that campaign. He was a Rockefeller guy.
• 52:44
  Speaker 1: And then he ended up And a big critic of Nixon's.
• 52:48
  Speaker 1: Then he ended up in the Nixon camp. So if
• 52:51
  Speaker 1: you were looking for that parallel, it sits there, right?
• 52:54
  Speaker 1: So what are the ingredients? A shellacking in.
• 52:58
  Speaker 3: 28 that suddenly makes Kamala Harris's performance in 24 look.
• 53:10
  Speaker 1: A lot better come 2032, which is essentially now. Can
• 53:14
  Speaker 1: she position herself as this person that can bridge the
• 53:17
  Speaker 1: divide between the progressives and the sort of the business left,
• 53:22
  Speaker 1: if you will? That would be the open question I
• 53:26
  Speaker 1: would have. But I think that if you're asking for
• 53:28
  Speaker 1: the Nixon parallel, Nixon doesn't come back in 68 if
• 53:34
  Speaker 1: Republicans are more competitive in 64, even if they lose, right?
• 53:38
  Speaker 1: What gave Nixon an entree in 68 was the shellacking
• 53:42
  Speaker 1: in 64. That's one theory of the case. That's at
• 53:45
  Speaker 1: least my theory of the case. All right. Next question
• 53:48
  Speaker 1: comes from Nan from Sacramento's California's 6th District, where she
• 53:55
  Speaker 1: says we're going to send Kevin Kiley packing. All right.
• 53:58
  Speaker 1: Dream big. Assume Democrats take both the House and Senate
• 54:01
  Speaker 1: and you're suddenly majority leader and speaker. What are the
• 54:04
  Speaker 1: five most important issues you'd want Congress to tackle when
• 54:07
  Speaker 1: the new majority takes over in January? And what legislation
• 54:09
  Speaker 1: would you want to send to Trump's desk first? Love
• 54:11
  Speaker 1: the show. Well, you know, this was a conversation I
• 54:14
  Speaker 1: actually had with Abdul El-Sayed. So I hope you will
• 54:16
  Speaker 1: take a listen. He had an idea. I think if
• 54:18
  Speaker 1: Democrats win the House and the Senate, they need to,
• 54:22
  Speaker 1: you said your five things. I think you have to
• 54:25
  Speaker 1: decide what's the mandate, right? Why did voters send you there, right?
• 54:28
  Speaker 1: Number one, to put you a check on Trump. So
• 54:30
  Speaker 1: there's an accountability piece. Can't be the only thing. but
• 54:33
  Speaker 1: there's an accountability piece. So I think you have aggressive oversight.
• 54:37
  Speaker 1: Maybe you start with the pardons. Maybe you start with
• 54:41
  Speaker 1: the donors to the East Wing building or something like that.
• 54:47
  Speaker 1: So there's an accountability piece. I think the most egregious
• 54:53
  Speaker 1: stuff is the pay-for-play pardons, but that's where I come down.
• 54:57
  Speaker 1: Other people may think it's other stuff, but either way,
• 54:59
  Speaker 1: there's an accountability piece. Then there is... You know, can
• 55:03
  Speaker 1: you put together, can you get legislation passed in the
• 55:09
  Speaker 1: House and the Senate that you send it to Trump
• 55:10
  Speaker 1: for a signature? And maybe he vetoes it. In some ways,
• 55:16
  Speaker 1: you might be happier if he vetoes it. I don't
• 55:19
  Speaker 1: think Trump's going to, is going to quickly veto stuff.
• 55:25
  Speaker 1: And this is what's an interesting game of chicken that
• 55:29
  Speaker 1: these congressional Democratic majorities have. Do they send them legislation
• 55:34
  Speaker 1: that they want them to sign or do they send
• 55:36
  Speaker 1: them legislation that they hope he vetoes in order to
• 55:40
  Speaker 1: rile up the country, build their movement and things like this?
• 55:47
  Speaker 1: So that's a political decision. That's a tactical decision. What
• 55:51
  Speaker 1: I would say is I think you got to sort
• 55:54
  Speaker 1: of do both. I think you got to be– I
• 55:58
  Speaker 1: think the first thing I would do is get rid
• 55:59
  Speaker 1: of all the Canadian tariffs. And send that to him.
• 56:03
  Speaker 2: Right.
• 56:03
  Speaker 1: Restore the relationship with Canada. That's like a near term thing.
• 56:08
  Speaker 1: There's sort of universal agreement on that. If you look
• 56:11
  Speaker 1: at if Democrats do as well as you're outlining here,
• 56:15
  Speaker 1: you know, in large part, it is because of our
• 56:18
  Speaker 1: trade war with Canada that will have helped Democrats in Maine,
• 56:22
  Speaker 1: helped Democrats in Michigan, probably, you know, kept probably helped
• 56:26
  Speaker 1: Democrats in Minnesota and in a place like Kansas or Iowa.
• 56:30
  Speaker 1: which also has important trade relationship there. And you, because
• 56:35
  Speaker 1: I think you want to send a symbolic message to
• 56:38
  Speaker 1: the world that, hey, America's open for business again. This
• 56:41
  Speaker 1: is not a one-sided argument. And you see what Trump
• 56:43
  Speaker 1: does with it. He might veto it. But it's like,
• 56:51
  Speaker 1: we all know the way Trump, I mean, look at
• 56:52
  Speaker 1: the way Trump sidles up to Mamdani, right? In fact,
• 56:56
  Speaker 1: I promise you, he's going to have a meeting with
• 56:59
  Speaker 1: Abdul El-Sayed. You just know he will if he wins
• 57:02
  Speaker 1: a Senate seat. Anybody who's considered a new rising star,
• 57:08
  Speaker 1: Trump always wants to be close to. He's like the
• 57:11
  Speaker 1: influencer that wants to hang with another influencer and if
• 57:14
  Speaker 1: they don't agree, so they could somehow collaborate together and
• 57:18
  Speaker 1: dominate the algorithms, if you will. So I'd probably, like
• 57:26
  Speaker 1: I said, I'd probably focus on, I think that actual
• 57:30
  Speaker 1: Because you're trying to lower costs. You're trying to increase,
• 57:33
  Speaker 1: you know, you have a tourism problem because Canadians won't
• 57:35
  Speaker 1: come over. Repair the Canadian relationship first. And it is
• 57:40
  Speaker 1: focused on costs and all of those things. I think
• 57:43
  Speaker 1: you do an immediate war powers resolution on Iran. My
• 57:47
  Speaker 1: guess is you'll get a whole bunch of Republicans to
• 57:49
  Speaker 1: sign on to that as well. So that's the, but
• 57:54
  Speaker 1: I do think you got to do meaningful, you know,
• 57:57
  Speaker 1: start the meaningful oversight process. But you got to, you know,
• 58:01
  Speaker 1: the one thing that I think Democrats ought to be
• 58:03
  Speaker 1: careful of on the oversight stuff is that you're going
• 58:06
  Speaker 1: to have quite a few people like, I want to
• 58:07
  Speaker 1: do oversight and I want to do this one and
• 58:09
  Speaker 1: I want to go after this. Have a plan. Have
• 58:13
  Speaker 1: some sort of agreement what you're going to go one, two, three, four.
• 58:17
  Speaker 2: Right.
• 58:18
  Speaker 1: And be careful chasing a shiny metal object story. Do
• 58:22
  Speaker 1: try to get at substantive graft first. And the pay
• 58:27
  Speaker 1: to play pardon system is to me the most egregious
• 58:30
  Speaker 1: thing he does because it undermines the rule of law.
• 58:33
  Speaker 1: And once the rule of law goes, man, Katie, bar
• 58:36
  Speaker 1: the door. I start worrying about whether the republic itself
• 58:40
  Speaker 1: can stand under those circumstances. But those would be the
• 58:43
  Speaker 1: places I would begin first. All right. Eric R. in
• 58:46
  Speaker 1: Minnesota 4 writes in. He says, hey, I'm responding to
• 58:49
  Speaker 1: the Chris Sims rant and your support of it. While
• 58:55
  Speaker 1: college football has a lot going for it in its favor.
• 58:58
  Speaker 1: I struggle to see how the current model is sustainable.
• 59:00
  Speaker 1: I'm not saying it's not. When programs within the same
• 59:03
  Speaker 1: conference operate on vastly different financial levels and players are
• 59:06
  Speaker 1: effectively free agents every year as a Minnesota alum whose
• 59:10
  Speaker 1: realistic hope is an occasional playoff in appearance, what I
• 59:14
  Speaker 1: am missing, what am I missing? Why should fans outside
• 59:17
  Speaker 1: the handful of powerhouse programs believe this version of college
• 59:20
  Speaker 1: football is sustainable long term? Look, it's not. The point, though,
• 59:24
  Speaker 1: is this bill is the wrong way to go about
• 59:27
  Speaker 1: it because, again, it seems to be that the response is, well,
• 59:31
  Speaker 1: the players are making too much money and we've got
• 59:33
  Speaker 1: to stop that. Look, there's no doubt you need to
• 59:36
  Speaker 1: have some sanity on the player side of things. And
• 59:39
  Speaker 1: what is the– and I think we don't have an agreement.
• 59:43
  Speaker 1: I was having this conversation with a college basketball coach
• 59:47
  Speaker 1: about this issue, which is what constitutes employment? Um, and
• 59:54
  Speaker 1: you know, is a student athlete and employee, and if
• 59:57
  Speaker 1: they're not employees, can they collectively bargain? And I brought
• 1:00:01
  Speaker 1: up the screen actors guild, right? Like not every actor
• 1:00:04
  Speaker 1: is an employee at the moment, but, but they're a
• 1:00:07
  Speaker 1: member of the guild. And then when they get hired, right.
• 1:00:11
  Speaker 1: And I think that, I think there's, this could be
• 1:00:15
  Speaker 1: sort of a blueprint, but If you're going to keep
• 1:00:21
  Speaker 1: the cost side down, you're going to have to collectively bargain.
• 1:00:25
  Speaker 1: And in order to have some sort of, I mean,
• 1:00:28
  Speaker 1: it's what the NFL did to try to rein in
• 1:00:31
  Speaker 1: costs for how much quarterbacks are being paid in the
• 1:00:34
  Speaker 1: first two years. And they put in a system to
• 1:00:36
  Speaker 1: try to essentially give teams more control over their QB
• 1:00:43
  Speaker 1: costs over time. It doesn't mean over time they weren't
• 1:00:46
  Speaker 1: going to spend an enormous amount of money on a quarterback.
• 1:00:49
  Speaker 1: but it allowed them to sort of budget for it, right?
• 1:00:56
  Speaker 1: If you will. So I think that that's, the point
• 1:00:58
  Speaker 1: is this bill doesn't solve this problem. And, you know,
• 1:01:04
  Speaker 1: now look, with Sims going on, you know, he was
• 1:01:07
  Speaker 1: basically saying, you know, this idea that college football is dying. Look,
• 1:01:12
  Speaker 1: my issue is with, there's all sorts of way this
• 1:01:15
  Speaker 1: is screwed up, right? Minnesota doesn't, is lucky to be
• 1:01:22
  Speaker 1: in the Big Ten on one hand. On the other hand,
• 1:01:25
  Speaker 1: you're kind of at the whims of what Michigan and
• 1:01:29
  Speaker 1: Ohio State decide, right? And I guess USC and Michigan
• 1:01:34
  Speaker 1: have played outsized roles in how private equity works and
• 1:01:37
  Speaker 1: all of that. I think the conference structure doesn't work
• 1:01:46
  Speaker 1: and it creates an unfairness. And then if you're going
• 1:01:48
  Speaker 1: to This is where I think you've got to treat
• 1:01:53
  Speaker 1: all of the teams equally. That's how the NFL has
• 1:01:58
  Speaker 1: become this powerhouse, right? Why does Green Bay have as
• 1:02:01
  Speaker 1: much power as Dallas, as much power as the Giants?
• 1:02:07
  Speaker 1: Because of the way the TV revenue is shared and
• 1:02:12
  Speaker 1: how it's distributed. And so I think that ultimately to get, to,
• 1:02:19
  Speaker 1: to make, an alum at Minnesota feel as if they,
• 1:02:24
  Speaker 1: that the playing field is leveled, not level, but it's level,
• 1:02:29
  Speaker 1: it's closer to being level. I think that it's the
• 1:02:36
  Speaker 1: structure of how TV rights are negotiated, right? And that's
• 1:02:40
  Speaker 1: what's so frustrating about this bill, right? The Big Ten
• 1:02:43
  Speaker 1: and the SEC are both trying to create, keep their
• 1:02:45
  Speaker 1: velvet rope. And with the support of ESPN and Fox,
• 1:02:50
  Speaker 1: actually keep the costs, keep the rights deals down. If
• 1:02:55
  Speaker 1: these were on the open market and in order to
• 1:02:58
  Speaker 1: get an Ohio State game, you also had to negotiate
• 1:03:04
  Speaker 1: with Washington State and Oregon State. Again, if the NFL
• 1:03:10
  Speaker 1: negotiated its TV rights the way college sports does, the
• 1:03:17
  Speaker 1: Jacksonville Jaguars would always be in the seat of you.
• 1:03:22
  Speaker 1: And yet the NFL is enormously successful and enormously popular
• 1:03:29
  Speaker 1: because everybody thinks they have a fair shot. And I
• 1:03:32
  Speaker 1: guess that's where I'm hoping. I want college sports to
• 1:03:35
  Speaker 1: feel fair again. And I say this as somebody who
• 1:03:39
  Speaker 1: I know, I'm a fan of a program who has
• 1:03:41
  Speaker 1: bought their way into the being in the powerhouse. I
• 1:03:46
  Speaker 1: get it, but they're just playing by the rules that
• 1:03:49
  Speaker 1: that have been established by Georgia, Alabama, the SEC, and
• 1:03:52
  Speaker 1: the Big Ten. This bill doesn't solve the problem. This
• 1:03:57
  Speaker 1: bill entrenches what's left of those powers at the expense
• 1:04:05
  Speaker 1: of the players. I get it. We need rules. You
• 1:04:10
  Speaker 1: need to have this stuff. They ought to abide by contracts.
• 1:04:13
  Speaker 1: You agree to all those things. And you're going to
• 1:04:16
  Speaker 1: need You're probably going to need Congress to give them
• 1:04:21
  Speaker 1: antitrust exemptions in some cases. But you need to create
• 1:04:26
  Speaker 1: a system that allows for Oregon State and Ohio State,
• 1:04:33
  Speaker 1: Minnesota and Central Florida to feel as if this system
• 1:04:40
  Speaker 1: is accessible to them. And this bill doesn't do that.
• 1:04:47
  Speaker 3: All right.
• 1:04:47
  Speaker 1: This comes from Jay. Greetings from California's 24th district. With
• 1:04:51
  Speaker 1: recent high-profile AI security incidents and conflicts over data centers,
• 1:04:55
  Speaker 1: public concerns about AI seem to be growing. Do you
• 1:04:57
  Speaker 1: think Congress could turn those concerns into meaningful legislation, either
• 1:05:00
  Speaker 1: now or in the next Congress? And could an AI
• 1:05:02
  Speaker 1: Bill of Rights addressing personal data, copyright protections, and practices
• 1:05:05
  Speaker 1: like personalized pricing become a larger political issue heading into 2028? Look,
• 1:05:11
  Speaker 1: I hope so. I've been waiting for my Privacy Bill
• 1:05:15
  Speaker 1: of Rights. For 20 years now. John Tester talked about
• 1:05:21
  Speaker 1: this in his 2006 Montana Senate race. And, you know,
• 1:05:27
  Speaker 1: when we were talking about a privacy bill of rights,
• 1:05:29
  Speaker 1: it was more than just about the internet. It was also,
• 1:05:32
  Speaker 1: you know, there were plenty of people on the right
• 1:05:34
  Speaker 1: that were concerned about it when it came to, you know,
• 1:05:37
  Speaker 1: if they wanted to purchase a gun and who could
• 1:05:39
  Speaker 1: find out that information. But I've been waiting for this
• 1:05:43
  Speaker 1: privacy bill of rights for 20 years now, if not longer.
• 1:05:48
  Speaker 1: especially right after the 9-11 legislation that sort of took
• 1:05:52
  Speaker 1: away a bunch of our rights. And I went off
• 1:05:54
  Speaker 1: on a rant about this a couple of weeks ago
• 1:05:55
  Speaker 1: where I said, I really do think that we got
• 1:05:59
  Speaker 1: way too comfortable right after 9-11 giving up privacy in
• 1:06:02
  Speaker 1: exchange for security. And then we morphed right into handing
• 1:06:06
  Speaker 1: it all over to big tech, right? Europe never did
• 1:06:09
  Speaker 1: it as much as we did. And what's the difference? 9-11.
• 1:06:13
  Speaker 1: So I do think, and I think things like surveillance pricing,
• 1:06:20
  Speaker 1: The whole idea that I have, you want to use
• 1:06:26
  Speaker 1: my app, you've got to update it, you've got to
• 1:06:27
  Speaker 1: hand over your data, and you get to use the app.
• 1:06:31
  Speaker 1: It's like, remember, for those of you old enough, you
• 1:06:37
  Speaker 1: went to RadioShack, you had to somehow fill out a
• 1:06:39
  Speaker 1: form in order to buy batteries, and you're like, why
• 1:06:40
  Speaker 1: am I handing you my data just to buy a
• 1:06:42
  Speaker 1: goddamn pack of batteries? Why, if I want to use
• 1:06:46
  Speaker 1: your app, I got to hand you all this data?
• 1:06:48
  Speaker 1: And oh, by the way, maybe even hand you money
• 1:06:50
  Speaker 1: for the app too. So I do think this is
• 1:06:54
  Speaker 1: a really popular thing to do. And I would focus
• 1:06:58
  Speaker 1: it on privacy. And I would focus it on protecting people's...
• 1:07:02
  Speaker 1: This is consumer protection. And I think that this stuff
• 1:07:06
  Speaker 1: sells better when it's consumer protection. And I would be
• 1:07:10
  Speaker 1: putting it under consumer protection. It's about protecting consumers from
• 1:07:15
  Speaker 1: being exploited by... large language models, from being exploited by
• 1:07:19
  Speaker 1: the big tech companies. But that's where, and if you, look,
• 1:07:24
  Speaker 1: it's not about being anti-tech. We can be pro-tech and pro-technology,
• 1:07:29
  Speaker 1: but it's about being pro-consumer. And so I would be
• 1:07:32
  Speaker 1: framing it as that. But I absolutely, if this moment
• 1:07:36
  Speaker 1: doesn't trigger this focus of the next Congress to worry
• 1:07:42
  Speaker 1: about privacy, to worry about who owns our data, And
• 1:07:46
  Speaker 1: what kind of control can we have over our own data?
• 1:07:48
  Speaker 1: If that does not have salience now, then, man, we
• 1:07:57
  Speaker 1: are all in trouble. So I anticipate that we're going
• 1:08:00
  Speaker 1: to finally see some movement on this. And I do
• 1:08:03
  Speaker 1: think the best way in and the broadest coalition you
• 1:08:06
  Speaker 1: can build on this is through consumer protection and privacy rights.
• 1:08:14
  Speaker 1: All right, last question comes from Ray, and he says, hey, Chuck,
• 1:08:16
  Speaker 1: it's Ray again from Florida's 21st District. If Democrats take
• 1:08:19
  Speaker 1: control of Congress this fall, what could they realistically do
• 1:08:22
  Speaker 1: to change the direction of the administration at home and
• 1:08:26
  Speaker 1: restore America's relationships abroad? Could we see efforts involving officials
• 1:08:30
  Speaker 1: like Patel or Hegseth, a change in the approach to Iran,
• 1:08:33
  Speaker 1: or a reset with allies like Canada, or would major
• 1:08:36
  Speaker 1: changes largely have to wait until 2028? Love your insight, balance,
• 1:08:39
  Speaker 1: and honesty. Well, as you kind of ask a similar
• 1:08:42
  Speaker 1: question that we got earlier, sort of, you know, imagine
• 1:08:46
  Speaker 1: these big majorities, what, what could be done and where
• 1:08:48
  Speaker 1: would you focus your priorities? And so in some ways,
• 1:08:51
  Speaker 1: I think, like I said, I think, I think there's
• 1:08:53
  Speaker 1: some meaningful, if the majorities are big enough, because I
• 1:08:56
  Speaker 1: think Republicans will be there on some of this trade
• 1:08:59
  Speaker 1: war situation. with Canada and all this stuff. So I
• 1:09:01
  Speaker 1: think there's real opportunity to start the reset with Canada
• 1:09:06
  Speaker 1: before the next president comes into office in 2029. And
• 1:09:10
  Speaker 1: I think that's an important reset. I mean, I hope
• 1:09:15
  Speaker 1: all of us are better informed of how important our
• 1:09:17
  Speaker 1: relationship with this Canada economically is. I know my friends
• 1:09:20
  Speaker 1: in the state of Florida realize this. I know my
• 1:09:22
  Speaker 1: friends in Las Vegas realize this. And there's a whole
• 1:09:26
  Speaker 1: bunch of people in the Midwest who realize this, right?
• 1:09:29
  Speaker 1: Canada is an incredibly important customer to the United States
• 1:09:32
  Speaker 1: and maybe America's most important customer. So I think, and
• 1:09:36
  Speaker 1: I do think some reset on that can be done.
• 1:09:39
  Speaker 1: As for personnel, look, I, you know, remember after 2006, Trump, Trump,
• 1:09:48
  Speaker 1: After 2006 and Democrats winning both the House and the Senate,
• 1:09:52
  Speaker 1: Bush fired Rumsfeld. He made a dramatic decision to change it.
• 1:09:56
  Speaker 1: And he basically sort of accepted the premise that the
• 1:09:59
  Speaker 1: management of the war was a disaster. He had to
• 1:10:01
  Speaker 1: change directions, hires a new defense secretary. It's Bob Gates
• 1:10:06
  Speaker 1: who ends up being the same Obama's first defense secretary.
• 1:10:11
  Speaker 1: So I do think that, like I said in the
• 1:10:14
  Speaker 1: previous episode, I think that The fact that articles of
• 1:10:18
  Speaker 1: impeachment are sitting there for a lame duck Congress and
• 1:10:20
  Speaker 1: egg Seth, egg Seth days, somebody has got to take
• 1:10:23
  Speaker 1: the fall for the mistake of Iran. And Trump's never
• 1:10:25
  Speaker 1: going to be the one to do it. Right. It's
• 1:10:27
  Speaker 1: not going to be his fault. Rubio has done a
• 1:10:29
  Speaker 1: pretty good Homer Simpson into the bushes on this one.
• 1:10:34
  Speaker 1: I think America is going to blame BB. And I
• 1:10:38
  Speaker 1: certainly think Trump's going to start blaming BB, but you've
• 1:10:42
  Speaker 1: got like the Pentagon wasn't ready for this war. Now
• 1:10:44
  Speaker 1: is that, Is that a Trump problem or is that
• 1:10:47
  Speaker 1: a Hegseth problem? Well, you probably make an argument for both.
• 1:10:51
  Speaker 1: So I do think Hegseth could, that that's something. And Patel,
• 1:10:56
  Speaker 1: I mean, you know, you're, you know, let's see. This
• 1:10:59
  Speaker 1: is where I think oversight has to be strategic and
• 1:11:03
  Speaker 1: has to be sort of, look, I think you say
• 1:11:05
  Speaker 1: to yourself, like, whose lives are being hurt right now
• 1:11:09
  Speaker 1: by this bad leadership? Well, look, Kennedy is literally Right.
• 1:11:14
  Speaker 1: This measles outbreak. Right. There are deaths directly connected to
• 1:11:18
  Speaker 1: Kennedy's irresponsible leadership. So I think you would I think,
• 1:11:23
  Speaker 1: you know, that I think that issue, although I think
• 1:11:26
  Speaker 1: there's a lot of Democrats afraid of going after him.
• 1:11:29
  Speaker 1: But I certainly would be prioritizing that there are literally
• 1:11:32
  Speaker 1: people dying in Pennsylvania due to due to Bobby Kennedy Jr.
• 1:11:36
  Speaker 1: 's irresponsible rhetoric and leadership on on being a vax,
• 1:11:40
  Speaker 1: an anti-vaxxer. I think Patel and an FBI that isn't
• 1:11:46
  Speaker 1: trusted at the moment, that's a very dangerous thing. That's
• 1:11:49
  Speaker 1: not good for the country. But you better have the goods, right?
• 1:11:54
  Speaker 1: And I certainly think exit. So, but I wouldn't underestimate,
• 1:11:57
  Speaker 1: you know, Trump is, Trump doesn't like to be dealt
• 1:12:01
  Speaker 1: out and Trump wants to let other people take the
• 1:12:04
  Speaker 1: fall for his problems. And this is where, look, some
• 1:12:11
  Speaker 1: of it will depend on whether Democrats get both the
• 1:12:14
  Speaker 1: house and the Senate and whether they are governing majorities
• 1:12:17
  Speaker 1: or if they're narrow majorities, but if they're governing majorities, um,
• 1:12:24
  Speaker 1: there might be things Trump goes ahead and let's happen.
• 1:12:29
  Speaker 1: And in that sense, I think that, you know, Democrats
• 1:12:33
  Speaker 1: have to be prepared for that. I know that's it.
• 1:12:36
  Speaker 1: And I, I don't know if they are, um, And
• 1:12:40
  Speaker 1: that's why I'm curious. Will they create legislation that they
• 1:12:42
  Speaker 1: hope he signs? Or are they going to send over
• 1:12:45
  Speaker 1: legislation that he hope he vetoes? All right, let me do,
• 1:12:58
  Speaker 1: when I went through the schedule this week in college football,
• 1:13:02
  Speaker 1: I was like, whoa, this is a, you know, okay.
• 1:13:07
  Speaker 1: Ohio State, Texas, LSU, Ole Miss, right? We've in some
• 1:13:10
  Speaker 1: ways they had been hyped up even before the season began.
• 1:13:14
  Speaker 1: But now that we're in the middle of this season, right?
• 1:13:18
  Speaker 1: You know, we are at the end of the beginning.
• 1:13:22
  Speaker 1: We are now the beginning. We are now, I think
• 1:13:24
  Speaker 1: this is the first week of the heart of the
• 1:13:29
  Speaker 1: schedule and the heart of the season. So look, the two,
• 1:13:36
  Speaker 1: probably the most consequential game for playoff purposes, uh, is Texas,
• 1:13:43
  Speaker 1: Tennessee with, uh, and it's Texas at Tennessee. I think
• 1:13:48
  Speaker 1: this is a real test, by the way, Arch Manning
• 1:13:51
  Speaker 1: versus Peyton Manning's alma mater. I'm sure. Right. We've got
• 1:13:56
  Speaker 1: to see a bunch of Manning show up for that game. Um,
• 1:14:02
  Speaker 1: Do you believe Texas is one of the top teams,
• 1:14:05
  Speaker 1: or do you believe Texas just sort of took advantage
• 1:14:09
  Speaker 1: of Ohio State kind of playing with their food in
• 1:14:13
  Speaker 1: the last quarter and a half of that game? Well,
• 1:14:17
  Speaker 1: we're going to find out. So I think this is
• 1:14:19
  Speaker 1: a huge— for me, it's a huge test for Texas. I
• 1:14:23
  Speaker 1: think you talk to some of my friends who are
• 1:14:26
  Speaker 1: Tennessee fans. They're hopeful about this year. But they're kind
• 1:14:29
  Speaker 1: of realistic. They know they have a brand new quarterback.
• 1:14:31
  Speaker 1: And the assumption was, hey, they'll be competitive. But really,
• 1:14:35
  Speaker 1: it's next year that they hope to make a run
• 1:14:37
  Speaker 1: at the playoff. So everything here for Tennessee might be gravy.
• 1:14:42
  Speaker 1: But one thing Josh Heupel is, is a really good
• 1:14:44
  Speaker 1: game planner. I think this is going to be a
• 1:14:47
  Speaker 1: terrific game. And like I said, I think we're going
• 1:14:49
  Speaker 1: to learn a lot more about Texas than we are Tennessee. Florida, Mississippi.
• 1:14:56
  Speaker 1: Ole Miss... Its reward for knocking off LSU at home
• 1:15:00
  Speaker 1: is to travel to the swamp. Florida just beat Auburn
• 1:15:05
  Speaker 1: on the road, quite handily, mind you. What's amazing here
• 1:15:09
  Speaker 1: is Ole Miss, who has defeated two ranked teams, Louisville,
• 1:15:13
  Speaker 1: who's ranked, and LSU. In fact, they may be the
• 1:15:16
  Speaker 1: only undefeated team who's got victories over two ranked teams already.
• 1:15:22
  Speaker 1: They've had three games. Two of their wins are ranked teams.
• 1:15:25
  Speaker 1: And they're the underdog to Florida in the swamp. And
• 1:15:28
  Speaker 1: I understand why they're the underdog. There's a little bit
• 1:15:31
  Speaker 1: of assumption that there's a, you know, there might've been
• 1:15:34
  Speaker 1: a little bit of a hangover, you know, a celebration
• 1:15:37
  Speaker 1: hangover from defeating LSU. You know, were they, how, you know,
• 1:15:43
  Speaker 1: how much did they focus their time and energy in
• 1:15:45
  Speaker 1: preparing for the LSU game? And now all of a
• 1:15:47
  Speaker 1: sudden they got to prepare for Florida. Florida's got a
• 1:15:50
  Speaker 1: ton of skilled position players. This guy, Jaden Bowe. First
• 1:15:55
  Speaker 1: of all, I'm very happy. I sold a $ 350, PSA
• 1:16:01
  Speaker 1: 10 of a Jaden Baugh auto out of 50. So
• 1:16:04
  Speaker 1: I was happy about that. I actually listed it. I
• 1:16:07
  Speaker 1: didn't think it would go for that, but then suddenly
• 1:16:09
  Speaker 1: he's just been on fire and got to love my
• 1:16:13
  Speaker 1: Florida fan. If only that guy found out I was
• 1:16:15
  Speaker 1: a Hurricane fan telling him a Florida Gator thing, right?
• 1:16:18
  Speaker 1: But I'm just telling you about my side hustle. A
• 1:16:21
  Speaker 1: little bit probably told you too much, but that's all right.
• 1:16:27
  Speaker 1: In many ways, I think Ole Miss can lose this
• 1:16:29
  Speaker 1: game and they're still fine for the playoff. But what
• 1:16:33
  Speaker 1: this game is going to tell us is how seriously
• 1:16:34
  Speaker 1: should we be taking Florida as a contender? I'm skeptical
• 1:16:38
  Speaker 1: that John Summerall somehow turned this around that quickly. Um,
• 1:16:43
  Speaker 1: so I'm, I'm a little bit of a skeptic here
• 1:16:45
  Speaker 1: and I kind of think that the, uh, I, I,
• 1:16:48
  Speaker 1: I understand all the love for Florida and all the
• 1:16:50
  Speaker 1: assumption that, that Ole Miss could be, this could be
• 1:16:52
  Speaker 1: a sleepy spot for them. Um, But if Florida wins
• 1:16:58
  Speaker 1: this game, are we suddenly asking? And remember, we're asking ourselves,
• 1:17:04
  Speaker 1: are they a playoff contender? The biggest game in the
• 1:17:08
  Speaker 1: Big Ten is Oregon at USA. This is a playoff
• 1:17:14
  Speaker 1: game for Oregon. Losing to Oklahoma State means they can't
• 1:17:18
  Speaker 1: lose another game. A two-loss Oregon team where one of
• 1:17:22
  Speaker 1: the losses is Oklahoma State. I don't know if they're
• 1:17:27
  Speaker 1: on the edge, right? So they can't afford a second
• 1:17:32
  Speaker 1: loss as much as maybe other teams could. Now, look,
• 1:17:37
  Speaker 1: Miami made it by losing at Louisville and SMU, but
• 1:17:40
  Speaker 1: both Louisville and SMU were better than what Oklahoma State. Now,
• 1:17:43
  Speaker 1: maybe Oklahoma State ends up being better than we think.
• 1:17:46
  Speaker 1: And if you're Oregon, you better hope Oklahoma State goes
• 1:17:49
  Speaker 1: into West Virginia this weekend and beats West Virginia in Morgantown,
• 1:17:53
  Speaker 1: making your loss to them look a little better. But boy,
• 1:17:56
  Speaker 1: is there a lot to learn about Oregon. As for USC,
• 1:17:59
  Speaker 1: this is an important game for them. This is a
• 1:18:01
  Speaker 1: prove-it game for Lincoln Riley. He's been on the outside
• 1:18:04
  Speaker 1: looking in with this playoff business. This is at the Coliseum.
• 1:18:11
  Speaker 1: If not now, when, right? USC clearly has the skill
• 1:18:17
  Speaker 1: position players to be a top contender. The question I
• 1:18:20
  Speaker 1: have is whether they have the depth. It's been interesting
• 1:18:22
  Speaker 1: as they build a big lead when they bring in
• 1:18:23
  Speaker 1: their second and third team. Their second and third hadn't
• 1:18:26
  Speaker 1: been so great. I think they're a little thin. And
• 1:18:28
  Speaker 1: I think one of the things we're all learning in
• 1:18:30
  Speaker 1: this college, you know, you got to survive 16 games
• 1:18:34
  Speaker 1: now to win the national title. Right? That's what Indiana
• 1:18:37
  Speaker 1: went 16-0 and even had a bye. Right? Because you're
• 1:18:41
  Speaker 1: either playing an extra game in the conference championship or
• 1:18:44
  Speaker 1: you're playing three games in the playoff like Miami did.
• 1:18:47
  Speaker 1: But if you play two games in the playoff, it
• 1:18:49
  Speaker 1: probably means you had– played your conference championship game. So
• 1:18:51
  Speaker 1: either way, it's a minimum 15 games and to win
• 1:18:54
  Speaker 1: the title, it's 16. That's a long season. You got
• 1:19:00
  Speaker 1: to have depth to handle that. Miami's depth is being
• 1:19:04
  Speaker 1: tested right now. We're already on a, you know, we
• 1:19:07
  Speaker 1: were on our fourth string running back. in that wake
• 1:19:10
  Speaker 1: forest game. And I think the, I think there's a
• 1:19:13
  Speaker 1: reason the play calling got as conservative as it did
• 1:19:16
  Speaker 1: because of that. And that's, that's the open question I
• 1:19:19
  Speaker 1: have about USA, but it's a huge game and Texas
• 1:19:23
  Speaker 1: A & M at LSU. This is a playoff elimination game, period.
• 1:19:28
  Speaker 1: Loser leaves town. Losers season is over, right? A &
• 1:19:33
  Speaker 1: M losing back to back to Kentucky and LSU. Yeah,
• 1:19:37
  Speaker 1: I guess you could say they could run the table
• 1:19:39
  Speaker 1: and 10-2 A & M could get in. I believe it.
• 1:19:41
  Speaker 1: But it's hard to imagine if you've lost to Kentucky
• 1:19:46
  Speaker 1: by double digits and then you go in to Baton
• 1:19:49
  Speaker 1: Rouge and let's say you lose, it's hard to see
• 1:19:52
  Speaker 1: how you become a contender again. And there's going to
• 1:19:55
  Speaker 1: be all sorts of hand-wringing about that if that's the case.
• 1:19:57
  Speaker 1: Then if you're LSU and you blow this game, the
• 1:20:01
  Speaker 1: assumption is, oh, you let Ole Miss beat you twice, right?
• 1:20:05
  Speaker 1: Your head wasn't in the game. It's a home game.
• 1:20:06
  Speaker 1: So It's a big game for both teams. And like
• 1:20:09
  Speaker 1: I said, I think the loser might be out of it.
• 1:20:12
  Speaker 1: And by the way, I told you to watch out
• 1:20:14
  Speaker 1: for A & M in that Kentucky game. So with
• 1:20:18
  Speaker 1: that said, let me tell you who I think is
• 1:20:19
  Speaker 1: on upset watch this week. This is what I mean
• 1:20:21
  Speaker 1: when this cards. You have these three marquee games that
• 1:20:23
  Speaker 1: are going to have playoff implications and a fourth if
• 1:20:26
  Speaker 1: you throw in A & M and LSU. Then there's
• 1:20:28
  Speaker 1: a bunch of sort of secondary games that I think
• 1:20:32
  Speaker 1: one of them is going to be more meaningful than
• 1:20:35
  Speaker 1: we expect. UCLA travels to Maryland. UCLA feels like they're
• 1:20:40
  Speaker 1: riding high. Then they're going to go across three time zones.
• 1:20:44
  Speaker 1: Look what USC almost blew it against Rutgers. Maryland's licking
• 1:20:48
  Speaker 1: their wounds after losing to Virginia Tech. You know, on paper,
• 1:20:52
  Speaker 1: UCLA should come into Maryland and have no problems. I'm
• 1:20:57
  Speaker 1: a little suspicious of that one. How about Notre Dame
• 1:21:00
  Speaker 1: traveling to West Lafayette and playing Purdue? Purdue's had some
• 1:21:06
  Speaker 1: competitive games. They were competitive with UCLA. They lost an
• 1:21:09
  Speaker 1: overtime game to Wake Forest. They may be sitting at
• 1:21:15
  Speaker 1: the bottom of the standings in the Big Ten, but
• 1:21:18
  Speaker 1: they're not a cellar dweller this year. They're pretty competitive.
• 1:21:23
  Speaker 1: They've got some pretty good running backs.
• 1:21:25
  Speaker 2: This is one of those, if Michigan State gave Notre
• 1:21:30
  Speaker 2: Dame trouble at home, I wouldn't be surprised if this
• 1:21:35
  Speaker 2: is a one-score game at.
• 1:21:36
  Speaker 1: Halftime, just like the Michigan State Notre Dame game was.
• 1:21:39
  Speaker 1: Oklahoma at Georgia. Oklahoma, their season's on the line here.
• 1:21:44
  Speaker 1: They lay another egg. Maybe losing close at Georgia keeps
• 1:21:49
  Speaker 1: them in the conversation. Losing by double digits at Georgia
• 1:21:52
  Speaker 1: eliminates them. Utah at Iowa State. Utah's running this crazy offense.
• 1:21:58
  Speaker 1: You've got to take a look at it. It's like
• 1:22:00
  Speaker 1: two quarterbacks that go back and forth. It's a lot
• 1:22:02
  Speaker 1: of fun to watch. If you've got 10 minutes and
• 1:22:05
  Speaker 1: you see this on your YouTube TV or ESPN or whatever,
• 1:22:09
  Speaker 1: spend a few minutes watching Utah play football this year.
• 1:22:12
  Speaker 1: It's a fun offense, man. It is crazy. It's a
• 1:22:14
  Speaker 1: little bit different. It's a lot of fun. Iowa State's
• 1:22:18
  Speaker 1: been a little stronger than I expected, and Ames is
• 1:22:21
  Speaker 1: always a tough place to play. Iowa at Michigan, will
• 1:22:27
  Speaker 1: either team score 21 points? I think that's a fair question.
• 1:22:31
  Speaker 1: Wisconsin's at Penn State. How good is Penn State? I
• 1:22:34
  Speaker 1: think Wisconsin's not going to be a walkover. South Carolina's
• 1:22:37
  Speaker 1: at Alabama. You see where I'm going here. It's sort
• 1:22:40
  Speaker 1: of like, okay, there's not these super marquee games, but
• 1:22:44
  Speaker 1: there's a lot of really good games. And I promise you,
• 1:22:48
  Speaker 1: we're going to... I mean, I left out Missouri at
• 1:22:50
  Speaker 1: Mississippi State. They're both undefeated. Mississippi State might have the
• 1:22:54
  Speaker 1: most exciting quarterback in the country, not named Trinidad Chambliss
• 1:22:56
  Speaker 1: or Darian Mensah. So it's an.
• 1:23:01
  Speaker 1: I will just tell you this. I think it's an
• 1:23:03
  Speaker 1: incredible week. I didn't even talk about my hurricanes. We're
• 1:23:06
  Speaker 1: playing central Michigan. I think they have their triple option team.
• 1:23:09
  Speaker 1: All I care about the good news from my, my
• 1:23:12
  Speaker 1: Miami hurricanes. They're playing on a Saturday for the very
• 1:23:15
  Speaker 1: first time. They actually get to play a football game
• 1:23:17
  Speaker 1: on a Saturday. Well, the Todd family will be well
• 1:23:21
  Speaker 1: represented there. I'm not making it to that game. Um,
• 1:23:25
  Speaker 1: but I have offspring that will be there. And, uh,
• 1:23:29
  Speaker 1: All I care about is no injuries and a little
• 1:23:32
  Speaker 1: more offensive line competency. That's how I'll be watching the game.
• 1:23:39
  Speaker 1: Like I said, I think they're triple option. I got
• 1:23:41
  Speaker 1: a lot of confidence in the coaching on the defensive
• 1:23:44
  Speaker 1: side of the ball. I get a little nervous about
• 1:23:46
  Speaker 1: the micromanaging of the offense at times. Sometimes the play
• 1:23:51
  Speaker 1: calling is fantastic and they're in a rhythm, but it's
• 1:23:54
  Speaker 1: pretty clear that Dawson is a rhythm play caller. And
• 1:23:57
  Speaker 1: sometimes it's, You know, it's like somebody at a craps
• 1:24:02
  Speaker 1: table that can't roll the wrong number. And sometimes it
• 1:24:07
  Speaker 1: doesn't matter what he calls, nothing works. And that was
• 1:24:10
  Speaker 1: sort of his excuse. He claims he didn't change his
• 1:24:13
  Speaker 1: play calling in the second half of the Wake Forest game.
• 1:24:16
  Speaker 1: Certainly seemed to us that they didn't go down the
• 1:24:19
  Speaker 1: field as much as they should have or could have
• 1:24:23
  Speaker 1: on that front. I hope some lessons were learned by
• 1:24:26
  Speaker 1: the coaching. I know the coaching staff was upset with
• 1:24:29
  Speaker 1: some of the players. But a massive– I mean, I'm
• 1:24:32
  Speaker 1: still upset at my Miami Hurricane beat writers who have
• 1:24:36
  Speaker 1: not brought up what could have been the catastrophic coaching
• 1:24:41
  Speaker 1: decision going for that meaningless field goal when they should
• 1:24:45
  Speaker 1: have gone for it and not handed the ball back
• 1:24:46
  Speaker 1: to Wake Forest on that. I kind of wish there
• 1:24:50
  Speaker 1: had been more public coverage of that. I really, really, really,
• 1:24:53
  Speaker 1: really hope the coaching staff accepts the criticism on this
• 1:24:59
  Speaker 1: one that they blew that one. And that they don't
• 1:25:01
  Speaker 1: make that same mistake again.
• 1:25:03
  Speaker 3: All right.
• 1:25:04
  Speaker 1: So with that, like I said, do check out Newsphere
• 1:25:08
  Speaker 1: this week. Abdul El-Sayed's my exclusive guest. It's a terrific interview.
• 1:25:12
  Speaker 1: And we spend a lot more time on what is
• 1:25:14
  Speaker 1: he going to do as a senator if he gets
• 1:25:16
  Speaker 1: the chance to be a senator? Like I said, it's
• 1:25:19
  Speaker 1: a conversation. He's had a lot of conversations out there,
• 1:25:22
  Speaker 1: but I don't think he's had an extensive conversation about this.
• 1:25:26
  Speaker 1: If you could check into the interview, you'll find out.
• 1:25:28
  Speaker 1: Is he going to move his entire family to Washington
• 1:25:30
  Speaker 1: or not? I'll let you check in with Newsphere to
• 1:25:32
  Speaker 1: find out. With that, enjoy the weekend. And I want
• 1:25:37
  Speaker 1: to give a special shout out to my cousin who's
• 1:25:39
  Speaker 1: going to be getting married this weekend. I'm looking forward
• 1:25:43
  Speaker 1: to it. Congrats, guys. And we'll see you at the wedding.
• 1:25:47
  Speaker 1: And with that, I'll see all of you on Monday.