Latest / Uphoff on Media Podcast / Be Careful What You Wish For
Transcript
- 0:02SPEAKER_00: Over a 35-year career in five CEO roles,
- 0:05SPEAKER_00: there is one question I've been asked more than any other.
- 0:09SPEAKER_00: Do I have what it takes to get into management?
- 0:13SPEAKER_00: Sales reps thinking about becoming sales managers,
- 0:16SPEAKER_00: marketing specialists looking to become marketing directors,
- 0:19SPEAKER_00: and many more times than I can count,
- 0:22SPEAKER_00: senior leaders wondering if they had the potential to take on C-level roles.
- 0:27SPEAKER_00: In most every case, my response was the same.
- 0:30SPEAKER_00: Be careful what you wish for.
- 0:32SPEAKER_00: Leadership roles may not be what you think they are.
- 0:35SPEAKER_00: They come at a cost and not everyone is suited for them.
- 0:39SPEAKER_00: After a recent career advice discussion with mid-level manager trying
- 0:44SPEAKER_00: to figure out their next step,
- 0:45SPEAKER_00: I decided to share my business leadership journey,
- 0:48SPEAKER_00: the lessons learned,
- 0:49SPEAKER_00: and a framework that may help you determine which seat you're most suited for.
- 0:54SPEAKER_00: Interestingly enough,
- 0:55SPEAKER_00: it all started with a book about a presidential race that I read
- 0:58SPEAKER_00: while holding our one-year-old daughter on my chest.
- 1:02SPEAKER_00: Okay, let's get to work.
- 1:05SPEAKER_00: This episode is titled, Be Careful What You Wish For.
- 1:09SPEAKER_00: Early in my career, I read a 1,047 page book about six men who wanted to be president.
- 1:16SPEAKER_00: It told me I was built for leadership, but what it warned me about took longer to learn.
- 1:22SPEAKER_00: I was a newly minted VP at Ziff Davis in a job that felt way over my head and likely was.
- 1:29SPEAKER_00: With my one-year-old daughter asleep on my chest, I started reading What It Takes.
- 1:33SPEAKER_00: I thought I was reading a book about a presidential primary.
- 1:37SPEAKER_00: I didn't realize I was reading a book that would help me identify
- 1:39SPEAKER_00: a massive challenge I was facing.
- 1:42SPEAKER_00: It told me I was built for business leadership.
- 1:45SPEAKER_00: It also warned me something would break if I didn't get smarter about managing it.
- 1:52SPEAKER_00: Richard Ben Kramer's What It Takes,
- 1:54SPEAKER_00: The Way to the White House is about six men who wanted to be president.
- 1:57SPEAKER_00: My daughter Olivia was one year old and somewhere in the middle of that brick of
- 2:02SPEAKER_00: a book,
- 2:02SPEAKER_00: I stopped reading it as political history and started reading it as a mirror.
- 2:07SPEAKER_00: Kramer didn't write about policy, he wrote about appetite.
- 2:10SPEAKER_00: What makes six people volunteer for the worst job interview in the world?
- 2:15SPEAKER_00: 18 months of having their entire life picked apart in public on the chance they get
- 2:19SPEAKER_00: to do something enormous.
- 2:22SPEAKER_00: 34 years later, that's still the only question in the book worth remembering.
- 2:28SPEAKER_00: Crazy enough was the easy takeaway.
- 2:30SPEAKER_00: The harder one took longer to learn.
- 2:33SPEAKER_00: Some part of me already suspected I had the temperament for what I was stepping into.
- 2:38SPEAKER_00: I didn't shrink from decisions made without enough information,
- 2:41SPEAKER_00: and I wasn't especially afraid of being wrong in front of people
- 2:44SPEAKER_00: who could make my life difficult about it.
- 2:46SPEAKER_00: Kramer's book confirmed that part quickly.
- 2:50SPEAKER_00: Six people,
- 2:50SPEAKER_00: three Republicans,
- 2:51SPEAKER_00: effectively down to two,
- 2:53SPEAKER_00: four Democrats,
- 2:54SPEAKER_00: all of them certifiably a little crazy in the same specific way,
- 2:57SPEAKER_00: willing to trade a normal life for a shot and an impossible one.
- 3:02SPEAKER_00: The second lesson took longer and it was the one that actually mattered.
- 3:06SPEAKER_00: Wanting a job badly enough to survive it and knowing how to carry it
- 3:09SPEAKER_00: without dropping everything else are not the same skill.
- 3:12SPEAKER_00: I had the first one,
- 3:14SPEAKER_00: I was still working on the second and the evidence was standing right in front
- 3:18SPEAKER_00: of me every night.
- 3:19SPEAKER_00: A business demanding more of me than I knew how to give it efficiently,
- 3:23SPEAKER_00: a marriage that needed attention I wasn't always paying,
- 3:26SPEAKER_00: a daughter who wouldn't be a one-year-old twice.
- 3:29SPEAKER_00: Something was going to break if I kept running leadership on instinct instead of a system.
- 3:35SPEAKER_00: I still get some version of the same question every few months,
- 3:38SPEAKER_00: usually from someone weighing a move into management who wants me to tell them
- 3:42SPEAKER_00: whether they should take it.
- 3:43SPEAKER_00: My answer hasn't changed since I first heard myself say it out loud.
- 3:47SPEAKER_00: Be careful what you wish for.
- 3:52SPEAKER_00: That question deserves a real answer, not just a warning.
- 3:55SPEAKER_00: That line was never meant to talk anyone out of leadership.
- 3:59SPEAKER_00: It was meant to make them actually answer the question instead of just wanting the title.
- 4:03SPEAKER_00: Most people who ask are conflating two different things,
- 4:07SPEAKER_00: wanting the exposure and status that comes with the title and being built for
- 4:11SPEAKER_00: the actual mechanics of doing the job,
- 4:13SPEAKER_00: deciding without complete information and getting judged in public for
- 4:17SPEAKER_00: the decision either way.
- 4:18SPEAKER_00: Those are separable and running one against the other tells you more than either one alone.
- 4:26SPEAKER_00: Plot tolerance for ambiguity,
- 4:28SPEAKER_00: how you decide before the picture is complete,
- 4:30SPEAKER_00: against appetite for exposure,
- 4:32SPEAKER_00: how you hold up being watched,
- 4:34SPEAKER_00: wrong, and reassessed in public, and four seats show up, not one.
- 4:40SPEAKER_00: High on both is the candidate quadrant.
- 4:43SPEAKER_00: Kramer's six all live there,
- 4:45SPEAKER_00: not because they were the smartest people in the race,
- 4:48SPEAKER_00: but because they could stay on the roof.
- 4:50SPEAKER_00: Low ambiguity tolerance paired with high appetite for exposure is the performer,
- 4:55SPEAKER_00: commanding once the plan is set, exposed the moment it isn't.
- 4:59SPEAKER_00: High ambiguity tolerance paired with low appetite for exposure is the strategist,
- 5:04SPEAKER_00: seeing three moves ahead and genuinely fine not knowing how it resolves as long
- 5:08SPEAKER_00: as their name isn't the one attached to the outcome in public.
- 5:12SPEAKER_00: Low on both is the specialist doing the org's best work against a clear brief,
- 5:17SPEAKER_00: someone for whom both ambiguity and scrutiny drain rather than sharpen.
- 5:25SPEAKER_00: I landed in the candidate quadrant early in my career,
- 5:28SPEAKER_00: and that told me almost nothing useful by itself.
- 5:31SPEAKER_00: It told me I could survive the job.
- 5:33SPEAKER_00: It didn't tell me I knew how to run it without a system underneath me,
- 5:36SPEAKER_00: and that gap nearly caught up with me.
- 5:40SPEAKER_00: The scrutiny used to have an off switch, now it doesn't.
- 5:44SPEAKER_00: Every one of Kramer's candidates got a concession speech.
- 5:47SPEAKER_00: Win or lose,
- 5:48SPEAKER_00: a day arrived when the campaign ended,
- 5:50SPEAKER_00: the coverage moved on, and the verdict closed.
- 5:53SPEAKER_00: Business leadership used to run on its own quieter version of that system.
- 5:58SPEAKER_00: A bad quarter got explained away by the next earnings call.
- 6:01SPEAKER_00: A rough town hall got buried under Monday's news cycle.
- 6:05SPEAKER_00: A 360 review happened once a year on a schedule a leader could see coming and prepare for.
- 6:10SPEAKER_00: The evaluation had a rhythm, and the rhythm had recovery time built into it.
- 6:15SPEAKER_00: That rhythm is gone, and it didn't fade out gradually.
- 6:19SPEAKER_00: I've argued that this same cycle used to exist on the sales side of B2B,
- 6:23SPEAKER_00: a human somewhere in the loop who could feel when something was off
- 6:27SPEAKER_00: and course correct before it became a lost deal nobody could explain.
- 6:32SPEAKER_00: Agentic AI is doing the identical thing to how leaders themselves get evaluated.
- 6:38SPEAKER_00: An agent summarizing a week of all hands transcripts doesn't wait for
- 6:42SPEAKER_00: the quarterly engagement survey to catch the gap between what a leader said and what
- 6:46SPEAKER_00: the room actually heard.
- 6:48SPEAKER_00: A sentiment tool reading internal slack doesn't need a listening tour scheduled
- 6:52SPEAKER_00: before it clocks that morale moved.
- 6:54SPEAKER_00: A board member watching a live dashboard doesn't need the deck to ask why
- 6:58SPEAKER_00: a number shifted in the last 48 hours.
- 7:01SPEAKER_00: Ground Truth doesn't wait for the annual review anymore.
- 7:04SPEAKER_00: It updates continuously and it doesn't ask permission first.
- 7:10SPEAKER_00: The key takeaway here isn't more monitoring.
- 7:13SPEAKER_00: It's the disappearance of the recovery window.
- 7:16SPEAKER_00: Episodic scrutiny gave a leader a window to have a bad week and fix it before
- 7:20SPEAKER_00: the bad week became the story.
- 7:22SPEAKER_00: Continuous scrutiny shrinks that window to almost nothing.
- 7:26SPEAKER_00: Every live signal is a small ongoing referendum and
- 7:29SPEAKER_00: the referendum never adjourns long enough for anyone to catch their breath.
- 7:33SPEAKER_00: That changes what crazy enough has to mean now.
- 7:38SPEAKER_00: Kramer's candidates needed the temperament to survive one campaign with
- 7:41SPEAKER_00: a clear end date and a known finish line.
- 7:44SPEAKER_00: The same temperament today has to run several overlapping evaluations at once on
- 7:49SPEAKER_00: a clock that never calls a recess.
- 7:53SPEAKER_00: The same six traits, every one of them wearing a different shape.
- 7:57SPEAKER_00: Everyone who's asked me some version of should I take this job over
- 8:01SPEAKER_00: the last three decades was really asking about six things.
- 8:05SPEAKER_00: Resilience,
- 8:07SPEAKER_00: tolerance for ambiguity,
- 8:08SPEAKER_00: the discipline to let some fires burn so you can fight the ones that matter,
- 8:12SPEAKER_00: the ability to take and carry real risk,
- 8:15SPEAKER_00: optimism,
- 8:16SPEAKER_00: and whether they had anyone around them
- 8:18SPEAKER_00: who could catch what they couldn't see themselves.
- 8:22SPEAKER_00: None of the six are new.
- 8:23SPEAKER_00: Here's what continuous scrutiny did to each.
- 8:28SPEAKER_00: Number one, resilience.
- 8:30SPEAKER_00: Used to be measured in quarters, a bad stretch absorbed by a good one three months later.
- 8:34SPEAKER_00: Continuous sentiment and performance signal collapses that runway to almost nothing.
- 8:39SPEAKER_00: A leader's response to one difficult week is now legible and near real time instead
- 8:44SPEAKER_00: of filed away until the next board deck.
- 8:46SPEAKER_00: And the recovery has to happen on the same compressed clock the scrutiny runs on.
- 8:52SPEAKER_00: Number two,
- 8:53SPEAKER_00: tolerance for ambiguity used to mean that data wasn't in yet,
- 8:56SPEAKER_00: and the skill was patience, knowing how long to wait before you moved.
- 9:00SPEAKER_00: More often now,
- 9:01SPEAKER_00: the data is in constantly,
- 9:03SPEAKER_00: streaming from a dozen live sources at once,
- 9:06SPEAKER_00: and the harder skill is deciding while
- 9:08SPEAKER_00: the picture keeps moving underneath you instead of holding still long enough
- 9:11SPEAKER_00: to read it.
- 9:13SPEAKER_00: Number three, letting fires burn.
- 9:15SPEAKER_00: It's harder before it gets easier.
- 9:17SPEAKER_00: Agents surface more signal,
- 9:18SPEAKER_00: not less,
- 9:19SPEAKER_00: more anomalies flag, more decisions that technically require a human sign off.
- 9:24SPEAKER_00: The skill shifts from knowing which fires to walk past to building
- 9:27SPEAKER_00: a real triage system for the fires a machine hands you before you've noticed
- 9:32SPEAKER_00: the smoke yourself.
- 9:34SPEAKER_00: Number four, managing risk now includes a category framers candidates never had to deal with.
- 9:40SPEAKER_00: The exposure created by handing judgment to a system nobody in
- 9:44SPEAKER_00: the room can fully audit in real time and answering for its calls as
- 9:48SPEAKER_00: if they were your own because to the board and the market, they are.
- 9:52SPEAKER_00: Number five,
- 9:53SPEAKER_00: optimism has to stay grounded instead of promotional because
- 9:56SPEAKER_00: the promotional version doesn't survive contact with a dashboard
- 9:59SPEAKER_00: that updates hourly.
- 10:01SPEAKER_00: The clearest recent example wasn't a founder's keynote.
- 10:05SPEAKER_00: It was three departing CEOs telling their board As I wrote when Doug McMillan
- 10:12SPEAKER_00: of Walmart,
- 10:12SPEAKER_00: James Quincy of Coca-Cola,
- 10:15SPEAKER_00: and Shantanu Narayan of Adobe all made a version of the same call within months
- 10:20SPEAKER_00: of each other.
- 10:21SPEAKER_00: The real optimism in that moment wasn't, I can do this.
- 10:24SPEAKER_00: It was, this is worth doing whether or not I'm the one who finishes it.
- 10:30SPEAKER_00: And number six,
- 10:30SPEAKER_00: support systems is the trait I have the least patience for people skipping,
- 10:35SPEAKER_00: mostly because it's the one I skip longest myself.
- 10:38SPEAKER_00: And it's the trait continuous scrutiny punishes fastest.
- 10:42SPEAKER_00: It covers more than having someone to call when things get hard.
- 10:46SPEAKER_00: It means a leadership team strong enough to catch what you can't see about yourself,
- 10:51SPEAKER_00: a management structure that keeps running when you're not the one holding it up,
- 10:55SPEAKER_00: and enough deliberate structure at home to keep a marriage and a family
- 10:58SPEAKER_00: from surviving on whatever attention is left over at the end of the day.
- 11:04SPEAKER_00: A leader with nowhere to process a hard week at the office or at the kitchen table
- 11:08SPEAKER_00: before the next signal lands starts making decisions from fatigue instead
- 11:13SPEAKER_00: of judgment.
- 11:15SPEAKER_00: The trade I nearly failed.
- 11:17SPEAKER_00: Here's what actually would have broken early in my career
- 11:20SPEAKER_00: if I hadn't taken Kramer's second verdict seriously.
- 11:23SPEAKER_00: Not the business.
- 11:24SPEAKER_00: I was resilient enough,
- 11:25SPEAKER_00: ambitious enough, comfortable enough with ambiguity to keep the job moving.
- 11:29SPEAKER_00: What was at risk was the husband and the father fully showing up in addition to
- 11:34SPEAKER_00: the business leader.
- 11:35SPEAKER_00: And I didn't fix that by trying harder.
- 11:37SPEAKER_00: I fixed it by building actual structure around how I ran my time
- 11:42SPEAKER_00: and my attention instead of assuming strength of will alone would cover the gap.
- 11:46SPEAKER_00: The data on this hasn't gotten friendlier.
- 11:50SPEAKER_00: Somewhere between 55 and 60 percent of CEOs report feeling isolated at
- 11:54SPEAKER_00: the job they fought so hard to get.
- 11:56SPEAKER_00: Nearly all of them say they'd welcome coaching or outside counsel.
- 12:00SPEAKER_00: Roughly two-thirds get none.
- 12:03SPEAKER_00: New leaders have it even worse.
- 12:05SPEAKER_00: More than seven in ten say they felt lonelier in the early stretch of a new role
- 12:09SPEAKER_00: than they did before they stepped into it.
- 12:11SPEAKER_00: The instinct that gets rewarded on the way up,
- 12:14SPEAKER_00: carry it yourself,
- 12:16SPEAKER_00: is precisely the instinct that has to be unlearned once you're actually in the seat.
- 12:21SPEAKER_00: I didn't build a peer group or hire a coach early in my career.
- 12:24SPEAKER_00: I didn't have the language for what I needed yet.
- 12:27SPEAKER_00: What I did have was a book that scared me into taking the second lesson as seriously
- 12:31SPEAKER_00: as the first and enough sense to start building something more deliberate
- 12:35SPEAKER_00: than instinct before home life was significantly impacted.
- 12:41SPEAKER_00: Three of the four quadrants are leadership too.
- 12:44SPEAKER_00: Not everyone belongs in the candidate quadrant and
- 12:46SPEAKER_00: the other three quadrants were never the lesser answer.
- 12:50SPEAKER_00: The performer runs the room once the plan is set and deserves
- 12:53SPEAKER_00: a real system around them instead of a lecture about toughening up.
- 12:57SPEAKER_00: The strategist is often the best chief of staff or strategy chief
- 13:01SPEAKER_00: a candidate will ever have, not a leader who fell short.
- 13:05SPEAKER_00: The specialist does work most organizations can't survive without,
- 13:08SPEAKER_00: and the next move from there should be toward mastery,
- 13:11SPEAKER_00: not toward a title that was never the right fit to begin with.
- 13:16SPEAKER_00: Be careful what you wish for was never a warning to stay small.
- 13:20SPEAKER_00: It was an instruction to find out which
- 13:22SPEAKER_00: of these four quadrants you're actually built for before you take the promotion,
- 13:26SPEAKER_00: not after you're already in the job and something at home is starting to give.
- 13:31SPEAKER_00: Olivia's all grown up now with children of her own and the book is still on my shelf.
- 13:36SPEAKER_00: Prioritizing my family didn't cost the business anything.
- 13:39SPEAKER_00: It made me a better leader and it made those years worth living, not just surviving.
- 13:44SPEAKER_00: What I remember about the book Isn't the six candidates.
- 13:47SPEAKER_00: It's the young business leader holding his daughter,
- 13:50SPEAKER_00: finding out the hard way that wanting the job and knowing how
- 13:53SPEAKER_00: to carry it are two different tests and that you better pass both.
- 13:59SPEAKER_00: Well, that's it for this episode.
- 14:01SPEAKER_00: If you found this useful, please do one thing.
- 14:04SPEAKER_00: Follow the Uphoff on Media podcast on Apple or Spotify and leave a rating.
- 14:08SPEAKER_00: It's the single best way to help another operator find this.
- 14:12SPEAKER_00: I'm Tony Uphoff, back at it next week.