Latest / UK Column Radio / UK Column News Podcast 5th August 2024

Transcript

UK Column News Podcast 5th August 2024 · UK Column Radio

0:08
Speaker 1: Good afternoon. Today is Monday, the fifth of August twenty
0:12
twenty four, just after one o'clock. Welcome to UK column News.
0:15
I'm your host today, Brian Garish, delighted to be joined
0:19
by Diane Rasmus and mccaddy from Scotland, and also Ben
0:24
Rubin who's in London. So let's get kicked off straight away.
0:29
We've had terrible events over the weekend and I'm going
0:32
to look our audience in the eye today and say
0:35
that if you were involved in any of the violence
0:39
over the weekend, then I'm afraid to say that you
0:42
are effectively a useful idiot playing into the hands of
0:47
the state. Let's just have a look at some of
0:49
the things that went on, and this is from a
0:54
mainstream source, but it's all over the internet. And of
0:57
course what's actually happening is violence, which is escalated in
1:02
all sorts of ways, but particularly for people to be
1:05
throwing rocks and bricks at the police totally unacceptable. We
1:11
had damage to a Muslim stall here. Later on there's
1:16
a clip where somebody's actually on the ground being beaten
1:19
with sticks. Cars set on fire. The violence, of course
1:24
flaring up at many places across the country. People were
1:29
out protesting peacefully, but overall, of course, all of the
1:34
protests were branded by the violence. And I'm going to
1:38
make a very strong statement to say that that violence
1:42
is going to allow Keir Starmer to introduce draconian closed
1:47
down on the country. Willy nilly, he's got a free
1:50
hand to do it because people went out there, broke
1:54
the law, damage property, injured other people and it was
1:59
all on the cry that we don't want the amount
2:03
of migration or immigration that we've got. We want our
2:05
country back. But this is very simplistic, and if people
2:10
really want their country back, then they've actually got to
2:14
understand what is going on in the country and why
2:17
the man on screen at the moment has got part
2:20
of it. He's talking about millionaires pursuing their vanity projects,
2:25
but in reality, something much darker and deeper is actually happening,
2:30
not only in UK but worldwide. So let's stick at
2:34
why the violent protest fails. And I've just brought in
2:38
a number of points here, but the weekend violence allows
2:41
the government to focus on the violence and not the
2:44
underlying issues. Peaceful protests on this scale would have forced
2:50
the issue of migration to be addressed because the peaceful
2:53
protests could have been increased in scale and therefore the
2:57
pressure on the government increased two deal with the question
3:01
of migration and immigration. The weekend violence allows the government
3:06
to introduce yet more draconian controls, police controls, courts and
3:12
also the censorship of free speech. And if we just
3:16
bring in a few more here. The violence turns people
3:19
against each other, rather than acting together to challenge the
3:22
crimes of the state, which they're actually protesting about in
3:26
the first place. The violence turns the police against the
3:30
public and against any mention, any criticism of the issue
3:35
of immigration and migration.
3:37
Speaker 2: So this is.
3:40
Speaker 1: Self censorship as a result of the people who got
3:43
involved in violence. The violence doesn't hurt the state, clear
3:48
starmer well away from it, protected by the security of
3:52
the state. What the violence did is destroyed the lives
3:55
and property of innocent, hard working people. Message from the
4:00
UK column today is please pay attention to this news
4:04
because we're in very difficult and dangerous times in UK
4:08
and if you think the solution is violence, then you
4:11
need to think again. Ben welcome to the news. You've
4:15
got some good news I think from Ireland.
4:20
Speaker 3: Indeed, yes, hello everybody, and thank you for that, Brian.
4:24
That was an excellent opening statement. And I would also
4:27
like to thank Mike's opening statement on the News on
4:31
Friday Eggs. I think that he hit on some extraordinarily
4:34
important issues, many of which you've just gone over again,
4:37
So thank you both.
4:38
Speaker 2: There are some good and some bad.
4:40
Speaker 3: I'm not going to talk for too long about the
4:42
situation that's unfolded over the weekend. The things I wanted
4:45
to just draw your attention to were, first of all,
4:48
in Northern Ireland. We've seen quite a remarkable development as
4:53
a nation that has seen probably the most bloody and
4:57
deeply entrenched sectaria violence seen anywhere on Earth over the
5:03
past few centuries, has seen two previously warring factions reunite
5:09
on the streets. We've got the Republicans and the Unionists
5:13
coming out and standing together and saying we are united,
5:18
we are Irish, we are going to push back against
5:21
what the globalists are trying to do to our country.
5:23
And we've got a short piece of video we're going
5:25
to run now start up.
5:32
Speaker 4: Were well done together.
5:34
Speaker 5: There are children, we are heldern we.
5:42
Speaker 3: We are we are So that's an historical moment there.
5:57
I think that's just the start, but we'll see how
5:59
that develops. And actually that kind of unity and that
6:03
focus on the authorities needs to be the approach taken,
6:07
not just in Island but everywhere else. I think it's
6:09
incredibly important. There are a lot of people online and
6:12
elsewhere who are really trying to sow seeds of division.
6:15
Speaker 2: We've seen the likes of.
6:17
Speaker 3: Lawrence Fox coming out in an incredibly irresponsible fashion talking
6:21
about the need to remove Islam from the United Kingdom.
6:25
Speaker 2: I mean, these statements are just designed to provoke.
6:28
Speaker 3: It's completely uncalled for and potentially could be something that
6:34
the police should be looking into, I think with Fox,
6:37
but then also on the other side of the debate
6:40
as well, with this tweet from Nick Lowles that I
6:45
saw pop up, where he's basically saying falsely it turns
6:51
out reporting that acid has been thrown out of a
6:53
car window at a Muslim woman in Middlesbrough, which is
6:57
really just an incitement to violence to the Muslim community.
7:02
That turned out to be false. It hasn't taken it down.
7:04
We have to stop this from either side deliberately trying
7:09
to escalate this situation before it gets worse.
7:13
Speaker 1: Okay, thank you for that Ben Well, I'm going to
7:16
bring our audience into the meat of what's happening and
7:21
reasons for why. Let's just have a little look at
7:24
this cliff, more of the troubles, but then we have
7:28
Cooper speaking to the country.
7:32
Speaker 6: They are scenes that are now happening daily in towns
7:35
and cities across the country. In Liverpool, police officers coming
7:39
under attack from a far right moth, a number of
7:45
officers injured as they dealt with what was described as
7:48
serious disorder. Police in running battles with some of those
7:54
in the city streets. They knew protests were planned, but
7:58
images show the scale of the crowds, and this just
8:02
a few miles from Southport, where the attack on children
8:06
at a dance class seemingly lit the fuse. Similar scenes
8:10
in Nottingham, bottles thrown as fighting broke out, and in
8:16
Blackpool where more fighting broke out in the Crown their
8:19
loyalties very clear.
8:27
Speaker 5: Any person organizing or taking part.
8:30
Speaker 7: In the procession.
8:32
Speaker 6: In Belfast II, a hotel housing migrants was the target,
8:40
leading to clashes with police. More than two dozen protests
8:44
have taken place across the country. Last night it was
8:48
Sunderland that saw the worst of the violence its streets,
8:51
bearing the scars today and prompting this warning that those
8:55
responsible will face action.
8:57
Speaker 8: Will the police need to lead operations in communities across
9:01
the country where there has been both violent disorder and
9:06
thuggery on the streets which is completely unacceptable, completely damaging,
9:12
and where the police need to know they have our
9:14
full support taking the strongest possible action, making sure that
9:18
these criminals face the full force of the law.
9:24
Speaker 1: So there we are home, Secretary of that cooper full
9:27
force of the law to crack down on these people.
9:30
She's interested in the violence, she's not interested in the
9:33
immigration and the migration. And let's have a listen to
9:37
illustrious Prime Minister Keir Stormer.
9:41
Speaker 4: I utterly condemn the far right thuggery we've seen this weekend.
9:47
Be in no doubt those that have participated in this
9:51
violence will face the full force of the law. The
9:55
police will be making arrests, individuals will be held on
10:00
remand charges will follow, and convictions will follow. I guarantee
10:08
you will regret taking part in this disorder, whether directly
10:13
or those whipping up this action online and then running
10:16
away themselves. This is not protest, It is organized violent
10:24
thuggery and it has no place on our streets or online.
10:32
Speaker 1: So he's pretty good on thuggery on the streets, not
10:35
so good on Jimmy's Saville. But that's a debate for
10:38
another time. But of course, who was the close friend,
10:42
possibly puppet and string puller of Keir Starmer Well, it
10:46
was none other than Tony Blair, and that's where we
10:49
need to focus. Let's have a look at this clip
10:51
and remind ourselves.
10:55
Speaker 9: When Tony Blair in marriage from his North London home
10:58
into the morning sunshine to for the palace, he was
11:01
almost swamped by well wishers and among the many emotional
11:11
moments of the morning came one from older labor stalwarts.
11:15
Speaker 7: There's no question what sever in my own opinion, abba
11:18
having achieved this victory in ninety seven if it hadn't
11:22
been for Neil's courage and determination in leading up to
11:27
ninety two. And it gives me great pleasure publicly to
11:30
be able to say that I give.
11:31
Speaker 9: Again in a break with traditions, signaling a determination to
11:40
do things differently. The Blairs walked into Downing Street to
11:43
be cheered by hundreds of party workers.
11:52
Speaker 2: As I stand here.
11:54
Speaker 8: Four number ten Dollar Street.
11:56
Speaker 10: I know the.
12:01
Speaker 9: Huge responsibility.
12:04
Speaker 8: And the great Press and the British people.
12:06
Speaker 3: Have based in me.
12:21
Speaker 1: So why have we got Blair on screen? Well, have
12:25
a look at this because this is where we need
12:27
to get back into history to discover what was going on.
12:31
Is a report from the Migration Policy Institute, the Immigration
12:34
Legacy of Tony Blair, and it says throughout this period,
12:38
but particularly from two thousand and one, Labor put migration
12:42
at the center of its energetic legislative program. In the
12:46
ten year period under blair stewardship, Labor past four migration
12:51
related parliamentary acts and a fifth parliamentary Trey Bill. This
12:55
rate of lawmaking surpasses that of every other social pol
13:00
see area. So this is where the agenda for migration
13:03
and immigration and immigration in this case was generated, and
13:08
of course we are now suffering the effects. There was
13:10
this interesting graph included in the article and it was
13:14
taking it back to immigration, back to nineteen seventy one.
13:20
Initially there was a net outflow that we can then
13:23
see in nineteen ninety that it started to be a
13:28
positive movement towards more immigration into the country, but even so,
13:34
very low figures compared to the six hundred thousand today.
13:39
So let's have a look at Cooper, Home Secretary and
13:42
how she reacted when she was challenged back in twenty
13:46
thirteen on the subject of immigration.
13:51
Speaker 11: Do you believe that immigration is too high?
13:54
Speaker 8: Well, we said that the pace of immigration was too fast,
13:56
so it is right to bring the level down, and
13:59
that's why we've actually supported some of the measures that
14:02
the government has introduced. For example, are greater restrictions on
14:05
people who were coming here with high qualifications but actually
14:09
were coming to.
14:09
Speaker 9: Do lower skills jobs.
14:11
Speaker 8: So yes, there are things like that you should do
14:13
because I think, you know, we recognize there were things
14:16
that we did, for example around not having transitional controls
14:20
on Eastern European migration, which we should have done.
14:23
Speaker 11: But when you say the pace of immigration was too high,
14:26
does that mean you think immigration was too high under
14:30
labor and it's too high now?
14:32
Speaker 8: Well, as I said, we do think that the level
14:34
should come down. That's why we're supporting some of these
14:36
measures that the government's introduced. But I think you've also
14:39
got to look.
14:39
Speaker 7: At what immigration use the phrase Well, I actually I
14:42
just did.
14:43
Speaker 2: Actually I just did.
14:44
Speaker 8: I just did, and I talked about actually because you
14:47
had the problem, for example, of not having transitional controls
14:50
for Eastern Europe. But you've also got to look at
14:52
what kind of immigration that you have. So I think,
14:54
for example, illegal immigration has been a growing problem. There
14:58
should be much stronger action to deal with that, and
15:00
the government's not doing that. But at the same time,
15:02
what the government is doing is putting off a legitimate
15:05
university students who bring billions of pounds into this economy.
15:09
So you've got to look at the kind of immigration
15:11
as well as the level, as well as the pace.
15:13
Speaker 11: If you think immigration must come down by how much
15:16
should it come down?
15:17
Speaker 8: Well, I think there is a problem with the approach
15:19
the government's taking because they've said they've set this target
15:22
for net migration, which in practice includes a lot of
15:26
British citizens. So, for example, the way in which net
15:29
migration has fallen over the last few years.
15:34
Speaker 1: So she Labor will not answer the question. And the
15:37
reason she won't answer the question is because the problem
15:40
which we now face today has been created by the
15:43
political parties as part of a much deeper agenda, while
15:47
the Tories any better. Let's have a.
15:49
Speaker 12: Look migration figures now, and Rishisinak has been forced to
15:54
admit the number of people migrating legally to the UK
15:57
is too high. The figure for net migration has reached
16:01
a record high of just over six hundred thousand last year.
16:04
It's a big increase on the previous year and comes
16:07
despite repeated government pledges to bring migration down. But Missus
16:11
Sunak denies he's lost control of the issue. Our deputy
16:14
Political editor in Nushka Astana has more.
16:18
Speaker 13: It is a promise you will have heard in net
16:21
migration to this country will be in the order of
16:23
tens of thousands each year.
16:25
Speaker 2: Again.
16:25
Speaker 8: We do want to bring net migration down to sustainable
16:28
levels and.
16:29
Speaker 10: Again and we will have a system that is finally
16:31
subject to proper democratic control.
16:34
Speaker 13: Thirteen years and five Conservative prime ministers later, they're still
16:38
saying it, but with a bit less confidence.
16:41
Speaker 2: Numbers are too high. It's as simple as that, and
16:43
I want to bring them down.
16:45
Speaker 13: And no wonder when the Tories regained power. In twenty ten,
16:48
net migration was two hundred and fifty six thousand. After
16:51
a dip because of the pandemic, numbers hit an all
16:54
time high of almost half a million in twenty twenty one.
16:58
Today's six hundred and six thousand and breaks that record,
17:02
taking us some way from that tens of thousands made
17:05
up of one point two million people coming to the
17:08
UK and more than five hundred and fifty thousand leaving.
17:11
The rise has been driven by students, work visas and
17:15
humanitarian schemes, including for Ukraine. So what are they going
17:19
to do about it?
17:22
Speaker 1: Well, of course he wasn't going to do anything much
17:24
about it. But we're now seeing the route of the
17:26
problem which so many people who are out on the
17:28
streets simply do not understand that this is a created problem.
17:33
It's been created across the Labor Party and the Conservative parties.
17:38
This is a much deeper agenda. Where can we go
17:40
for a glimpse of that agenda? Well, of course we
17:43
have to go to the UN and we look at
17:46
migration which is encouraged by the UN. And the name
17:50
which came to my mind immediately was Peter Sutherland. Here's
17:54
Peter Sutherland at the Builderberg twenty thirteen meeting. And of
17:58
course said balls husband of Vet Cooper, also at that
18:02
same meeting, why are we interested in mister Sutherland? Because
18:06
he said, effectively, the EU should be doing its best
18:10
to encourage mass migration to undermine the homogeneity of European countries.
18:16
This is a planned agenda, and the agenda is to
18:20
destroy the United Kingdom as a nation state. Our target
18:24
should not be the immigrants who have come in through
18:27
the open door. We should be looking at the treasonous,
18:31
in my opinion, politicians who've opened the door to this
18:35
unsustainable mass migration. Diane, welcome to the News today. Very
18:42
serious news. There's lots of information to cover, but you've
18:47
also been looking at agenda, political agenda which is coming
18:52
into the UK.
18:56
Speaker 14: Brian, hello, and hello Ben, as well to just review
19:01
the sustainable Development goals as we know them. A Debbie
19:05
talked about them on Friday and Wie Evans talked about
19:08
how they are actually unsustainable. So what Debbie and I
19:12
talked about this over the weekend, and you can look
19:14
up the sustainable development goals yourself. They're all over the internet.
19:18
But we have created is seventeen unsustainable goals and I
19:22
wanted to show how this sort of translates into the
19:25
migration issue, because migration is throughout these goals. So the
19:30
seventeen goals, as we sort of translated them into ways
19:32
that normal people will understand I'll just read them quickly
19:35
because I think they're very important. You will be poor,
19:39
you will eat bugs, you will be modified, you will
19:42
be indoctrinated. You will have no gender. You will drink
19:45
recycled water. You will use smart meters, you will use CBDC,
19:50
you will use smartphones. You will have no borders. You
19:53
will not travel, you will be hungry, you will not breathe,
19:57
you will not fish, you will live online. You will
20:00
be censored, you will live in nineteen eighty four, and
20:04
ultimately you will not be sustained. It's not about them,
20:07
it's about you. It's about us. So from here I
20:11
wanted to show a video that is from the International
20:14
Organization for Migration, which is associated with you, and they're
20:17
based in Geneva, and just to show you a little
20:20
bit about what they are saying about the relationship between
20:22
these unsustainable goals, the twenty thirty Agenda and migration.
20:28
Speaker 15: By embracing the twenty thirty Agenda for Sustainable Development and
20:32
it's seventeen sustainable development goals, we have an unmissible opportunity
20:37
to harness the development potential of migration to support beneficial outcomes,
20:42
starting with reducing inequalities and putting the right policies in
20:46
place to ensure safer, more orderly, and regular migration. Migration
20:52
has been a longstanding coping strategy for people to pull
20:55
themselves out of poverty, to cope with lack of basic infrastructure,
21:00
or search for better opportunities. People's reasons to move can
21:04
also be influenced by conflict, natural hazards, or environmental conditions
21:09
linked to climate change, and in a global context of
21:12
rapid urbanization, movement of people is increasingly taking place to
21:17
cities and urban areas, enriching local communities and societies both
21:22
where migrants are and where they come from. The Knowledge
21:26
of skills and experience that migrants bring and gain in
21:29
new places contribute to the labour force in key sectors
21:32
such as health, and play a vital role in building
21:36
diverse and productive societies. Migration can empower women economically and socially,
21:42
and help people realize their personal aspirations and educational potential.
21:48
This encourages innovation, which benefits science, technology, and industry. With
21:54
increased earnings, migrants are able to send financial support to
21:58
family members back home. This is critical to help reduce
22:02
hunger and strengthen the resilience and sustainability of poorer communities.
22:08
But none of these benefits are guaranteed. We can only
22:11
achieve all of this by upholding human rights, fostering peace
22:16
and security, ensuring equal access to justice and protection from
22:20
exploitation for all. We also need to build strong partnerships
22:25
in our cities, within our countries and regions, and globally
22:29
through international cooperation. Migration is everyone's business. Together, we can
22:37
ensure that we leave no one behind.
22:43
Speaker 14: So we can see a couple of things in that video.
22:45
We see the Sustainable Development Goals, the little cartoony pictures,
22:50
not just the people, but the cartoony pictures that are
22:53
part of the original Sustainable Development Goals infographic, which I
22:56
have sort of taken the liberty of reworking, as I
22:59
said previous, So sustainable gold Development ten I have called
23:03
you will have no borders. They call it reduce inequality
23:06
within and among countries. And this basically consists of making
23:10
sure that people who are originally from poorer countries or
23:15
countries that are different from Western cultures essentially are the
23:19
same or have the same access to things, are essentially
23:23
the same. So we could go into communism here in
23:25
a way compared to those of us who are in
23:28
we're wealthy countries, as they call it. So they talk
23:30
a little bit about COVID, they talk a little about
23:32
other things, but it doesn't really apply as much as
23:37
certainly not COVID, but certainly the difference between people coming
23:40
from Africa, Asian countries and so on, and what this
23:44
means for the West. They don't really focus on that
23:47
as much as they focus on the fact that we're
23:49
supposed to be taking people in from other countries to
23:52
make things more equal for everyone. So the International Organization
23:57
from Migration has a graphic that is similar to the
24:00
original graphic from the UN, and it shows specifically how
24:03
migration relates to all sustainable goals, all seventeen of them,
24:07
and you can read those on your own if you
24:09
really want to. But they do have the same images
24:12
and the same pictures that are in the original version.
24:15
And there's a lot of documentation out here which I
24:17
will put into the show notes. I'll just give you
24:19
a taste of some of this, so I don't go
24:21
to too much detail. They talk specifically, and a lot
24:24
of their documentation about the Agenda twenty thirty for Sustainable Development.
24:28
They talk about the contribution of migrants for inclusive growth.
24:32
So there's that language again, the inclusion, the diversity, the
24:36
things that what we're all supposed to be concerned about,
24:38
apparently according to the UN and other organizations. We talk
24:42
a lot about safe, orderly, regular migration. There's a lot
24:46
about peace and security, which Debbie Evans talked about on
24:49
Friday again as well. So there's the piece and security throughout.
24:53
So we see again a lot of this language coming
24:55
up over and over again. If we look at the
24:58
specifics to to sustainable develop a goal ten reduced inequalities,
25:03
or as I've called it, you will have no borders,
25:05
you'll have no identity, you will have no culture ten
25:07
point seven with some details on how this is going
25:10
to be done is to facilitate orderly, save regular and
25:13
responsible migration and mobility of people, including through the implementation
25:18
of planned and well managed migration policies. And so this
25:21
goes into some more detail again is how we're going
25:24
to do this. By twenty thirty, we will reduce to
25:27
less than three percent the transaction costs of migrant remittances
25:30
and eliminate remittance corridors with costs higher than five percent.
25:34
So we're doing what we can to decrease the cost
25:37
and increase the number of people that are being moved around. Essentially,
25:42
this is about replacement migration. So this replacement Migration document
25:46
is from the Human It's something like three hundred and
25:49
fifty pages long, with an incredible amount of detail in
25:51
different languages, so you can look that up yourself, but
25:54
just basically a couple of points from the executive summary,
25:58
which is to say, this is what they're doing, is
26:00
moving people around to address the solution of aging populations.
26:05
And you can see also in that graphic as well
26:08
the details of how the UK will result in a
26:11
couple of different scenarios going up to twenty fifty. So
26:15
if we look at twenty fifty, if we have no migration,
26:18
if we have migration along with replacement and so on,
26:22
the descendants of people who migrated here and to show
26:25
how that influences the population of the UK. The World
26:29
Migration Report twenty twenty four is another three hundred page document.
26:33
We see the countries separated out by men and women,
26:37
the people who have left their native countries and where
26:40
they have gone to. Now you can see obviously the
26:43
United States of America, but has by far the most.
26:46
They are much bigger than the UK obviously physically, I
26:50
would say a lot of those do also well come
26:52
from Mexico due to the crisis that they have at
26:55
the southern border at the moment that Kambala Harris was
26:57
supposedly in charge of over the past four years but
26:59
never did anything about that. But we see the UK
27:03
does have quite a few coming in, especially in relation
27:06
to the size of the UK and the population, the
27:10
indigenous population that was already here in the first place.
27:13
The Strategic Plan for the International Organization of Migration from
27:17
the UN from twenty twenty four to twenty twenty eight
27:20
for the next four years, so this is just the
27:22
start of it, has all these different reasons for migration.
27:27
The Global Compact for Migration is something that the heads
27:31
of states from around the world who are you in
27:33
number states agreed to. There is a website where you
27:36
can read specifically what the UK has done in relation
27:39
to the Global Compact for Migration. They're very much bought
27:42
into it. Despite the Tories in recent years talking about
27:45
how they were going to control migration. We can see
27:48
what's actually truly happened. So there's a lot of detail
27:51
about that and how this all works together. So this
27:54
is coming in the next four years. Again, there's more information.
27:59
There's entire data bases that you can look at, geospatial
28:02
information about This is specifically for developing countries and their
28:06
data about what's going on in their countries. This is
28:09
more for countries like Haiti and other countries that have
28:12
people leaving more than the countries where they are coming into. Again,
28:17
a huge database there. We have some other things here
28:21
as well from this strategic plan, the idea of leaving
28:25
nobody behind the sustainable development goals. Where is this coming from. Well,
28:29
it's coming from a lot of sources. But the plan
28:31
of Sustainability, which as we know, means unsustainability, is really
28:36
what we're trying to do. But they use the excuses
28:38
for things like we're trying to decrease poverty, we're trying
28:42
to deal with climate change, We're doing all these things
28:45
basically using other sustainable development goals or unsustainable goals to
28:50
make it a difference, to show that migration is somehow
28:54
going to be a solution to some of these problems
28:56
that they feel that they have determined exist out there.
29:00
There's another three hundred page document here a guide for
29:03
practitioners on how to actually implement migration issues for states
29:09
and cities around the world, for practitioners who are actually
29:12
doing the work designed to serve government actors as it
29:16
says there, and how to integrate sustainable development goals into
29:19
their migration plans in individual countries. Next we have here
29:24
another more information the next slide please. So now we
29:28
are into the World Economic Forum, and of course if
29:31
you look at something at the UN, you can also
29:33
probably find it on the World Economic Forum. So I
29:35
just wanted to make this clear to show just how
29:37
broadness is. This was from Davos again making that connection
29:43
between migration and sustainable development and how migration can lead
29:46
to sustainable development and address issues like floods and all
29:50
of the weather issues. It talks about water issues like
29:53
we don't have water issues in the UK already. So
29:56
the Ward Economic Forum has as well client change information
30:01
adapt adaptation strategies to climate change as we can see
30:04
on the next slide please, And we also have King
30:09
Charles and his as we know, devotion to climate change.
30:13
So this was him visiting the UN Nairobi in relation
30:16
to climate action and climate protesting and what we need
30:19
to do so King Charles of course is at the
30:23
center of all this, the head of everything, and of
30:25
course we have to we have to look at this
30:28
role of the Great Reset as well, and what the
30:32
Great Reset books said specifically around migration that basically of
30:37
the wealthier countries have to work with the most fragile
30:41
countries which will consist in a new wave of mass
30:45
migration and its direction like those that occurred in Europe
30:47
in twenty sixteen. So this is what was published by
30:51
Klaus and with Charles himself of for us in the background.
30:55
So Charles said in September twenty twenty at the WEF
30:58
Sustainable Development Impacts something that we need a Marshall plan
31:01
to tackle the environment. And what does he mean by this, Well,
31:04
I think we have just a short clip from him
31:07
to hear what he said at that conference.
31:12
Speaker 11: I've been deeply encouraged by the positive response that we've
31:16
received from around the world inspired by the Great Reset.
31:20
Speaker 16: It's called to action, and this is.
31:22
Speaker 17: Why I called for a Marshal like plan for nature,
31:25
people and planet.
31:30
Speaker 14: So that's that's King Charles now. And just to just
31:33
to reiterate that final point, Brian, and to go back
31:35
to what you've said at the beginning, and what Benna said,
31:37
is that we need to refocus where our targets are.
31:40
They don't need to be on each other, they don't
31:42
need to be a member of the British public that
31:43
feel certain ways. We have to look at where this
31:45
is coming from and this is a much larger adenda
31:47
that we have to look at in a different way.
31:49
Speaker 1: I believe Dyane, thank you very much that excellent report
31:54
and well you've demonstrated absolutely that the idea that migration
32:00
as a subject with target figures that this is being
32:05
debated and produced in the Labour's manifesto for example, is
32:09
complete nonsense. This is globalist policy which is being enacted
32:14
in UK without any debate in Westminster and any debate
32:19
within the Labor Party itself. This is the betrayal of
32:23
the nation and we have to get this information across
32:26
to the people who think the way to deal with
32:29
globalist agenda is violence on the streets. It's education we need.
32:35
And on the subject of education, I want to take
32:37
people back to I think it's twenty sixteen where an
32:41
author called Christopher's Story was being interviewed. Let's have a listen.
32:47
Speaker 5: A major part of the strategy since nineteen sixty one
32:50
has consisted of building slowly and installing a very dictatorial
32:57
regional world government over all of Europe on top of
33:00
the existing socialist bureaucracies that are in the governments of
33:04
each of these countries over all of Europe and now
33:07
sadly also Britain in the form of the European Union.
33:11
And this constitutes an accomplishment of Leninist strategy as predicted
33:16
by Galitsen. And of course, while the KGB had infiltrated
33:22
all the European governments and the British government, as they
33:25
had infiltrated the American CIA and other parts of the
33:28
United States government. In addition to that, the current treaty
33:34
arrangements between the European Union based in Brussels, this and
33:39
the new Russia mean that there's even further tighter Soviet
33:44
and KGB control over the foreign policy of this new
33:49
globalist regional government that controls Russia, that controls Europe, and
33:53
controls Britain.
33:54
Speaker 16: I don't disagree with any of that.
33:57
Speaker 1: So Christopher's story. We'll have more from Christopher's story in
34:01
just a few seconds, But of course he is agreeing
34:03
with that that it's the globalist agenda that is driving
34:07
politics in the world. So let's hear what Christopher's story
34:10
had to say in response to the opening gambit by
34:14
the interviewer.
34:16
Speaker 16: That's what it is.
34:17
Speaker 17: Now, let me describe the European Union what it really is.
34:20
It is a political collective. So all these British politicians
34:24
who constantly talk about the need to be in the
34:27
center of Europe and the need to influence, you know,
34:29
for Britain's great experience to be used for the benefit
34:33
of the Europeans so that they, you know, so that
34:35
we can influence what they do, are completely wasting their breath.
34:40
They are insulting our intelligence. This is a political collective.
34:44
In a political collective, decisions are taken collectively. No individual
34:50
nation can take any decisions.
34:52
Speaker 5: Now we destroys the sovereignty we have.
34:56
Speaker 17: We have no sovereignty, We have no interests, and we
35:00
have politicians in Westminster who talk about British interests. We
35:04
have delegated and collectivized those interests. Now, there are a
35:08
few residual, peculiar exceptions. For example, there's a thing called
35:12
the Common Foreign and Security Policy, which is part of
35:15
the collectivisation process. Well, Britain flouted that policy by joining
35:23
the United States in respect of this Iraqi operation, but
35:28
we shouldn't have done that. The Europeans didn't know what
35:31
to do and threw up their hands in horror. But
35:34
this will probably be the last chance we'll have if
35:36
we don't get out of it.
35:40
Speaker 1: So pretty direct warning as to what we're dealing with.
35:43
We're dealing with collective politics, which is beyond national governments.
35:48
He was focusing on the European Union, but of course
35:50
the European Union itself is controlled by those globalist powers
35:55
above it. One more part of this clip and then
35:59
I'm going to take you into detail of why we
36:01
should pay attention to what Christopher's story was warning about.
36:07
Speaker 17: This business of controlling all the political parties and giving
36:12
them allowing them to adopt different names. You know, this
36:17
was a conscious policy which was laid down by Gorbachev
36:21
and Yeltsin at the twenty eighth Party Congress in July
36:26
nineteen ninety. Both Gorbachev and Yeltsin made speeches in which
36:30
they said to.
36:31
Speaker 16: The comrades, now is the time.
36:34
Speaker 17: To follow whatever path you feel would be most appropriate.
36:39
Speaker 16: In a nutshell, that's what they said.
36:41
Speaker 17: We have the two quotes in my book the European
36:45
Union Collective. So that's what I call democratism, which is
36:49
the creation and maintenance of the illusion of democracy. Now
36:52
that pattern is being implemented in the European Union because.
37:00
Speaker 16: By various means, almost all.
37:03
Speaker 17: The participants, even at national level, in the political process
37:09
are selected for the job, or are appointed, or are chosen.
37:15
Now it's quite difficult to explain this, but in Britain
37:20
there's an extremely lethal piece of legislation which requires all
37:25
political parties to register at a central registration point and
37:33
it basically dictates what the political parties can and cannot do.
37:37
But in the European at the European level, no political
37:41
party can participate in the European Parliament if it's not
37:45
one hundred percent signed up to the idea of the
37:48
European Project.
37:49
Speaker 5: And submission to the authority of regional world government based
37:53
in Brussels, which is now imposing dictatorial controls on a
37:58
daily basis down to the most minute level of business
38:02
and human activity on all residents of Europe and increasingly
38:06
in Britain. And if you read the Financial Times newspaper,
38:09
you see examples daily and in the Wall Street Journal
38:12
of how the European Union is trying to tell people
38:15
and businesses in the United States what they will do.
38:17
Speaker 16: That's quite true.
38:18
Speaker 17: When Gorbachev visited London briefly for a day on the
38:23
twenty third of March two thousand and during that visit
38:28
he made a statement which I repeated at every opportunity.
38:32
He acknowledged and stated that the European Union is the
38:36
new European Soviet, the.
38:40
Speaker 1: European Soviet, which, of course kir Stormer wants us to
38:44
be buried into deeper than we are at the moment
38:48
UK column warning about Brexit without the exit. And that's
38:52
the key situation now for the astute members of our
38:56
audience that have said, yes, but it's not the Russians
38:59
driving it. Absolutely correct. And of course Christopher's story went
39:03
on later after that period to talk about the higher powers.
39:08
But let's focus on the warnings he gave us as
39:12
to what was going to be done for society. And
39:14
I'm going to bring on screen. This is the title
39:18
of his book, The European Union Collective enemy of its
39:21
member States, and early in the book, shown on the
39:24
right of the screen as a table which I'm going
39:27
to take you into now, because this revealed by a
39:32
then KGB DEFACTA talked about a plan to destroy UK
39:37
and Western societies. It started out with demoralization. Religion was
39:43
going to be weakened and made into a spiritual desert,
39:47
emptiness and ignorance. Education was going to be zero historical
39:52
knowledge and complete ignorance. Media, political correctness, group think, luciferian fog, culture,
40:03
addictive fads, salacious and empty culture, mumbo jumbo ape speech.
40:09
All of these things, in my opinion, have come to pass.
40:12
And this is why we should pay attention to the
40:14
detail warning in this book. Law and order to be
40:18
made legislated, imposed, inconsistent with an unwarranted bias in favor
40:24
of the offender. Victimization of the victim absolutely correct, and
40:29
we've given that a big green tick. Social relations to
40:33
be reduced to rights, not obligations. To erode individual responsibility
40:38
that has happened. Security, the police, and the military to
40:43
be weakened to a point where that we are effectively
40:46
defenseless and we cannot act unless we're in cooperation with
40:51
other powers. Internal politics to be made aggressive, poisonous, party antagonisms,
40:57
a sense of drift, a failure to get to grips
41:00
with issues, constant lying and equivocation, careerism and egoism. That
41:07
is all correct, foreign relations entanglement in an ever expanding
41:11
net of multilateral treaties. All of this has been done
41:15
to the UK and it's reduced us to the state
41:18
that we see ourselves in. But it goes on family
41:22
and society fostering of breakdown, destroying marriage, health, the use
41:28
of junk food, state provided conditional healthcare, and the key
41:34
one here at race, the mixing of races, the elevation
41:38
of racism to hitlarian level, the promotion of diversity, degradation
41:44
of breeding genetics versus the environment debate. What was all
41:49
that designed to achieve hatred and divisions and evil compromises,
41:54
and that is now exploded onto the streets population to
41:58
be alienated from the cry side, to be urbanized, to
42:02
be forced onto drugs and to be made vulnerable to
42:06
mass epidemics. That's a very interesting one. Labor problems in
42:11
the labor force, trade unions versus society quote here, public
42:17
sector chaos unquote. So all of these absolutely achieved and
42:23
following demoralization, the warning was that we were to be destabilized.
42:29
I'm going to treat these as a block and here
42:31
it says reaction to all of these breakdown policies, mobocracy,
42:37
breakdown of law and order, rioting, street deaths, and that's
42:42
exactly what we've experienced. And what was the ultimate goal, Well,
42:47
the ultimate goal was described as normalization, but the average
42:52
person can consider this as the implementation of a new
42:56
form of communism, and that is a very accurate summary
43:02
of what's actually happening in this country. And we've now
43:05
been reduced through all of those individual attacks to where
43:09
we are now, which is breakdown in the country and
43:13
violence on the streets. So for people out there that
43:17
still don't understand what they're up against, the idea is
43:20
that you need to learn what you're up against because
43:23
it feeds off violence, and the more violence there is
43:27
in this country, the tighter the lockdown of that communist control.
43:31
And don't be fooled by the fact that Keir Starmer's
43:35
in its suit and tie, because as Eric Pickle said,
43:38
former Communities Minister for the Tories, Eric Pickles said, I
43:45
look like an un likely revolutionary. But the revolution starts
43:50
here and I'm going to suggest to our audience that
43:53
please join us for UK Extra today because we're going
43:57
to discuss in a lot more detail vicious attack by
44:02
the international political elite on the UK and other nation states.
44:08
Well serious news today. But if you like what the
44:11
UK Column is doing, then please join us. Please become
44:15
a paid subscriber because that small donation a month helps
44:19
us do what we do and we want to expand.
44:22
Please share the information and of course we are here
44:26
on these platforms with the exception of Facebook, which is
44:29
still effectively banning us for reasons best known to themselves.
44:34
Anybody can purchase from the UK Column shop, so if
44:38
you feel that you'd like to help us, you can
44:41
make a purchase with one of the items and that
44:44
would be very very well received with the UK Column team.
44:49
We still have copies of Agenda twenty one Your Life
44:52
in their hands. Many people have bought this book from
44:56
UK Column and we have huge amount of very positive
45:00
feedback saying it's an extremely good analysis of how the
45:04
global elite are putting their power base together. Now positive things.
45:10
The twenty third, twenty sixth of August, we've got Freedom
45:14
Music Festival. This is from Hope, Sussex. Details are here
45:20
a four day family event and you can look online
45:24
to actually see more details of the musicians and all
45:28
the good things lined up. Now, Diane, I think you
45:32
can help me with this one because we've got an
45:34
interview coming out tomorrow six of August at one pm,
45:38
which is Craig Houston.
45:42
Speaker 14: Yes, Brian thinks he actually says Craig Houston. I think
45:45
that's the Scottish or Glaswegian version of that name. He's
45:50
a really amazing podcast I really like his work. He
45:54
talks about Scottish politics and in relationship to the UK,
45:58
and I think it will just be a good way,
46:00
especially those of us in Scotland, but anyone else involved
46:03
in UK politics and understanding the relationship with the devolved
46:07
nations to Westminster. I think it will be hopefully an
46:10
enjoyable thing for everyone to participate and get some views on.
46:14
He plans to stand in the twenty twenty sixth Scottish
46:18
Parliament election with an undecided affiliation at this point because
46:23
nothing suits him any more. But I think it will
46:25
be a very interesting conversation for the members.
46:28
Speaker 16: Brilliant.
46:29
Speaker 1: Thank you very very much, Diane. We'll also give people
46:32
reminder of UK column on location that's going to be
46:35
in Bristol on the ninth of October twenty twenty four.
46:38
Tickets are now on sale for that. More details will
46:42
be released in due course, but we encourage people to
46:45
come along and give us support. Also had an email
46:49
saying that there's a peaceful rally coming up Wednesday, the
46:52
fourth of September twelve pm Parliament Square. We are sleepwalking
46:57
into a dictatorship, so let's peacefully and lawfully unite against
47:02
the selected, not elected, tyrannical warmongering government and the unelected
47:08
bureaucrats who control them. Can't disagree with that, and Fiona
47:12
there has requested that we promote this rally on the
47:18
fourth of September and encourage people to get out and
47:21
about and of course to talk peacefully to the policemen
47:24
who will, no doubt beyond scene to say why the
47:28
process is taking place and why it's necessary. Ben let's
47:34
bring you back on and I think the subject is
47:37
net zero.
47:40
Speaker 3: Absolutely it is net zero and actually the same went
47:46
you just delivered there, Brian. That was really sobering stuff,
47:49
but it's directly linked to what I'm going to talk about.
47:51
We've talked about social transformation and it's directly connected to
47:56
climate change, the climate agenda and the transition to a
47:59
new energy system. Let's here to start with from Sondrine
48:03
Dixon de clev, the President of the Club of Rome.
48:11
Speaker 18: So, I think the main challenge for global leadership in
48:15
this moment of the poly crisis is real fear. What
48:20
we're seeing is the fact that leaders are not ready
48:23
to confront challenges head on, and they're getting stuck in
48:28
short term knee jerk responses to big crises that are
48:32
hitting them, whether it be the pandemic or whether it
48:35
now be conflict, either in Gaza or Ukraine. And I
48:38
think we need brave leadership. We need leaders who are
48:41
ready to confront this fear and the fear mongering that
48:44
we're seeing from many different sizes, especially the growing right wing,
48:49
and really come forward with policies that embrace both a
48:54
shift and a just transition and decarbonization and also social
48:59
equity policies. We need to see a lot from the
49:08
upcoming European elections. First of all, we cannot slip into
49:11
the current predictions of moving towards the radical right. The
49:15
radical right is already now shaking things up against our
49:18
nature protection law, indicating that we need to become more
49:22
competitive like the United States, that this is not the
49:25
time to move towards the European Green Deal, and that
49:28
we need to simplify and even deregulate, and this is
49:33
not possible. We actually have to move faster. But we
49:37
can do it in a way which is smart and optimized.
49:40
We can do it in a way that actually takes
49:42
away the perversities in the market and shifts that capital
49:45
towards green projects, towards social projects. We can do it
49:49
in a way that actually taxes wealth rather than taxes people,
49:53
and shift that wealth into the pockets of more people.
49:56
Because what we're going to see is that if we
49:59
have growing social tepes, which is what we're seeing right
50:01
now with the farmers actually in the streets, that is
50:04
going to create such instability for our goals, whether they
50:08
be green objectives or social objectives, that we could potentially
50:11
see revolution.
50:16
Speaker 3: So green and social objectives are two sides of the
50:19
same coin. And the Labor government has come out very
50:23
strongly straight out the gate and implemented its new project,
50:29
the Great British Energy Company. This is one of their
50:32
manifesto commitments. They're going to turn Britain into a clean
50:36
energy superpower by setting up this organization, by embracing energy dependents,
50:42
getting away from the influence of the likes of putin
50:45
six hundred and fifty thousand new high quality jobs, most
50:48
of those funded by the taxpayer.
50:50
Speaker 2: Obviously, this being labor policy and this is roaring ahead, right.
50:55
Speaker 3: So this is a nationalized energy business and it's just
50:59
announced its new Chairman's is the first chairman, which is
51:03
Jurgen Meyer CBE who spent thirty three years at Siemens UK.
51:10
Siemens is a World Economic Forum partner. So that demonstrates
51:14
to you quite clearly what's behind this organization, what's behind
51:19
this agenda. That also explains why heir Meyer is so
51:23
keen on delivering what he calls a vibrant green fourth
51:27
Industrial technology Revolutions is from his LinkedIn Privaile. He's using
51:32
the World Economic Forum language to describe his background what
51:35
he wants to see happen out there in the world.
51:36
He's also been given the blessing of John O'Brien, who
51:40
we've spoken about a lot previously. He's the founder of Anthropy,
51:44
which is the WEF in the UK.
51:47
Speaker 2: Event happens once a.
51:48
Speaker 3: Year, and he describes Mayer as one of our most
51:51
committed early anthropists. So this is who is controlling the
51:56
new energy system that we're going to have to rely
51:58
on to run the country over the coming years. It's
52:02
worth referencing as well that he mentioned the Crown of State,
52:06
who are going to be partnering with Great British Energy.
52:08
That means most of the profit from this endeavor, which
52:12
is funded by taxpayers, is actually going to be going
52:14
first of all to the state, then also to the
52:17
royal family. So that's who's actually going to benefit from this.
52:20
This organization being run by someone with a world economic
52:24
foreign background, and the promised benefits for citizens have already
52:28
completely evaporated. So you may remember from the recent election
52:33
campaign a promise of three hundred pounds a year off bills,
52:37
which was actually something that Starmer came out and said himself.
52:41
So he said this on x that his labor government
52:44
is going to tackle the cost of living crisis through
52:47
this new endeavor.
52:48
Speaker 2: But that's actually been renegged on.
52:50
Speaker 3: They've already they've already stepped back from that commitment just
52:54
in the past few weeks since the election, So it
52:57
was essentially a lie but who is going to benefit
53:00
from this. Well, we know it's a public private partnership.
53:02
We've talked about the public side of it, the state
53:04
and the royal family. Let's have a little look at
53:06
the private market. So I'm going to talk about this organization,
53:10
Octopus Group, which is a private business focused on building
53:14
industries that will change the world, and their corporate website.
53:19
They're quite complicated, a big organization. They've got six component
53:24
parts in the core group. The first is investments, then energy,
53:28
which are going to come back to money, so they
53:30
offer investment advice to retail investors. They also have something
53:35
called Octopus Legacy, which is about estate planning for people
53:38
after they die.
53:39
Speaker 2: It's a really odd mixture of different businesses.
53:42
Speaker 3: Here energy Generation, which they then sold last year or
53:46
in twenty one, I think it was to one of
53:47
their own subsidiaries, and going to come back to that
53:49
in a moment. And then another organization called Seco, which
53:53
is about creating technology for financial advisors to run their
53:56
businesses on. Again, a very strange mix, but it's from
54:00
by this guy and he explains that although it is
54:02
a slightly strange mix, Octopus is full of people and
54:05
organizations who share a common purpose. In his own words,
54:09
that's the chief executive explaining what that organization is about,
54:13
what Octopus is about, which is quite interesting because, as
54:17
Brian has informed me he sent this meme over to
54:20
me earlier on today, common purpose has been compared to
54:23
an octopus in the past, right, so it operations and
54:26
interest infecting every different part of the system. I think
54:29
that we could probably agree that Octopus group is doing
54:33
a similar thing. And actually they have adopted the term
54:36
agents of change, which is very common purpose language to
54:41
describe themselves.
54:42
Speaker 2: This is a podcast series you can go and listen
54:45
to to hear about what they're up to.
54:47
Speaker 3: Now let's have a look at one particular agent of change.
54:50
This is Greg Jackson. Greg Jackson, sorry, who's the chief
54:54
executive of Occopus Octopus Energy. We'll be able to get
54:58
my words out properly today, promise. And he says that
55:02
their role is simple. They're about bringing around about a
55:05
sustainable global energy system, faster and cheaper through technology.
55:10
Speaker 2: That's what all of us are up to.
55:12
Speaker 3: Now, let's hear from him about what he's particularly excited about.
55:18
Speaker 4: The new government thinks the UK can double on your
55:21
wind power treble solar and quadruple off your wind by
55:24
the end of the decade.
55:26
Speaker 10: What matts for being growth is there's one hundred billion
55:28
pounds of capital more than that waiting to be deployed
55:31
in the UK that's been going abroad because we can't
55:34
build stuff here. That means that not only do not
55:37
get the jobs in construction and you know, actually creatingness infrastructure,
55:40
but we don't benefit from the cheap electricity to bring
55:43
as well.
55:44
Speaker 16: That's going to change.
55:48
Speaker 3: So it's a one hundred billion pound capital investment marketplace,
55:52
public private marketplace. That's really what's driving this right. It's
55:55
a huge amount of money to be made. Who are
55:57
they funded by Octopus Group? So what we talked about
56:00
the holding company which jones them Octopus itself, but also
56:04
a bunch of international Australian and Japanese energy companies. A
56:08
company called Generation which was founded by Al Gore, who's
56:11
one of the kind of high priests of this sustainability movement.
56:15
The Canadian Pension Plan Investment boarder also in there as well.
56:18
I've been around for about eight years now that the
56:21
growth has been absolutely staggering. So they started in twenty sixteen.
56:24
By twenty nineteen they had a million energy customers. By
56:27
twenty twenty they were valued at two billion dollars and
56:30
by twenty one that had increased to five billion dollars,
56:34
put on three billion dollars of value in a year apparently,
56:36
and by twenty three they had gone up to eight
56:38
billion dollars. And they've been hoovering up a huge number
56:42
of smaller independent energy companies. And actually just a few
56:46
months ago this back in May this year, they became
56:49
the largest energy provider in the UK, actually overtaking British
56:53
Gas in eight years. It's absolutely astonishing that they've managed
56:57
to achieve that. Maybe it's something to do with the
57:00
common purpose of all of the people who work there
57:02
in their professional and political connections, who can say they've
57:07
certainly got a big pr push behind them. All of
57:10
the mainstream media have lined up behind them saying how
57:13
fantastic they are. They're really inescapable. Their advertising spend means that,
57:17
you know, I can walk down the street in London
57:19
and see an octopus LCD billboard, or they're on the tube,
57:23
they're on the TV, They're absolutely all over the place.
57:26
They've got this thing called the fan club where local
57:28
communities can get in touch and say, hey, build a
57:31
fan for us in our area. So apparently thirty thousand
57:34
people around the UK have already applied for that, and
57:38
that's where the big transformation of banning legislation is going
57:43
to really kick in when they want to start building
57:45
these all around the country. Luckily though, they're very very
57:48
well politically connected, including into Tortoise Media. They actually sponsored
57:52
the Tortoise Media Election Night party back on July the
57:56
fourth general election. You can see Greg Jackson, James Harding,
58:00
the guy that we've spoken about a lot who hangs
58:02
around in Davos at Goals House and is former political
58:08
edits with the BBC and an extraordinarily well connected man.
58:11
I'm sure he's been helping usher this agenda along for them.
58:15
They're a big organization. So this is Oltopa's Energy. Octoper's
58:19
Group has six companies. October's Energy has nine within it. Right,
58:22
it's a huge ecosystem. I won't go into all of
58:25
them because I don't have time, but I'm just going
58:27
to focus on two today that I think are particularly important.
58:30
The first one is this crack and Tech. I should
58:33
just draw your attention to the logo By the way,
58:36
that little eye there to me does not look like
58:38
a friendly eye if you're thinking about how you might
58:41
want to represent your organization, that strikes me as a
58:44
very odd logo to choose. But anyway, essentially this is
58:47
the operating system or the AI enabled smart grid. This
58:53
is the technology that they're going to use to run
58:55
this new energy system. They're licensing it out to other
58:59
companies build it for themselves, but this is now being
59:02
used by other energy businesses in the UK and all
59:05
around the world to run their connected grid operations.
59:09
Speaker 2: Right, So essentially Octopus is.
59:11
Speaker 3: Becoming the facto standard operating system almost by stealth, for
59:16
how the energy system runs. What does that actually mean?
59:20
So here's a little article from them talking about what
59:22
that actually looks like. This is written by octopuses a
59:26
thought piece that they've written, and essentially what they're saying
59:29
is that we need to completely transform our approach to
59:33
risk management. Right, so we want to move decisions away
59:36
from the center and give them to people that are
59:40
closest to their respective processes. And apparently this might intuitively
59:44
sound risky, but in fact it's the opposite. According to
59:46
this company. Instead of developing extensive plans that span many months.
59:51
Utilities can massively improve their innovation by continuously taking smaller,
59:55
incremental steps, basically applying a digital mindset to infrastructure investments.
1:00:00
Speaker 2: If you really understand what this means, it's kind.
1:00:02
Speaker 3: Of terrifying that I don't think that this is a
1:00:04
good idea at all, but this is the agenda that
1:00:06
they're pushing out into the energy system. This article goes
1:00:11
on saying that true transformation comes when utilities are able
1:00:14
to move beyond the belief that speed makes people more
1:00:17
likely to miss something or make more mistakes.
1:00:20
Speaker 2: I think that's just true, isn't it.
1:00:21
Speaker 3: The benefit gain in interacting fast and frequently with customers
1:00:25
is higher than the risk mitigated through extensive upfront planning.
1:00:28
Speaker 2: That is a nightmare.
1:00:29
Speaker 3: Anyone who operates in the energy system, particularly in a risk.
1:00:33
Speaker 2: Or an operations role, will know that that is not correct.
1:00:37
Speaker 16: Right.
1:00:37
Speaker 3: But this is being pushed down into the system by
1:00:40
this organization, including by their new CEO. This guy, Emir
1:00:44
or Rad, who believes is an American Israeli, looks like
1:00:49
he studied in Tel Aviv. So this is a person
1:00:51
who's going to be running large sways of the UK
1:00:54
and the global energy system across this new technology platform.
1:00:57
And then the second of the organizations are going to
1:01:01
talk about is this one, which is the Center for
1:01:03
Net Zero, which is run by Lucy U I've spoken
1:01:07
about several times in the past. Amongst other things, she
1:01:10
is an advisor to the Tony Blair Institute for Global Change.
1:01:13
So this is absolutely Blair and a bunch of other
1:01:16
organizations that she's part of. This is about what they
1:01:20
call collecting and democratizing data from the smart grid, and
1:01:24
just issued this report and you should go and read this.
1:01:27
It's quite technical, but it's only about eight pages long.
1:01:30
And since what they're talking about is this idea of
1:01:32
synthetic smart me to data. So they say in the
1:01:36
opening statement access to granular demand data is essential for
1:01:40
the net zero transition, but you have to have data
1:01:42
to run your data enabled system. It allows for accurate
1:01:46
profiling and active demand management. As our reliance on variable
1:01:50
renewable generation increases. Because our generation capacity is variable, it's
1:01:56
not reliable. We need the technology to pick up the
1:01:59
slack and move energy where it's required around the system.
1:02:03
Because we don't know where it's required around the system.
1:02:05
We're going to create a bunch of synthetic data in
1:02:09
order to essentially make up what we think should be happening.
1:02:14
The potential for a disaster here is difficult to overstate.
1:02:17
To be honest with you, this organization is deeply, deeply,
1:02:21
deeply embedded into central government. They've been working with a
1:02:24
political foundation who I've spoken about previously and three ci
1:02:27
Who've spoken about previously to create training to reframe and
1:02:31
re educate politicians and civil servants.
1:02:34
Speaker 2: So this is just launch.
1:02:35
Speaker 3: It's the introduction to the Energy Transition course, and it's
1:02:38
about understanding the importance of the energy transition, understanding infrastructure,
1:02:43
technology investment, and the workforce stakeholder roles in collaboration, the
1:02:47
governance clean energy solutions.
1:02:49
Speaker 2: Basically training people.
1:02:51
Speaker 3: In how this captive public private marketplace runs. And then
1:02:56
when local authority people or people from central government to
1:03:00
make an investment in this marketplace, they can go to
1:03:03
this new organization which has popped up this week, which
1:03:06
is the Innovation Procurement Empowerment Center, which is going to
1:03:09
be helping local authorities spend the sixty billion pounds a
1:03:13
year that they have.
1:03:15
Speaker 2: On green investments.
1:03:18
Speaker 3: They talk about this as being a significant leaver the
1:03:21
public authorities can use to create and shape markets. Who
1:03:25
knew that that's what councils were supposed to be doing.
1:03:28
And that is also being run by connected places Caterpult
1:03:31
where Lucy U, who I've spoken about a second ago,
1:03:35
is an advisor, and also it's run by UK Research
1:03:39
and Investment, which sits under thees of Patrick Balance.
1:03:43
Speaker 2: Both of those people.
1:03:44
Speaker 3: Going straight back up to the Blair Institute and Tony Blair.
1:03:48
So that is just one example of what's going on
1:03:51
right now in the health system as chaos rains on
1:03:54
the streets, or in the energy system, as chaos brains
1:03:56
on the streets.
1:03:58
Speaker 1: Ben thank you very much for that report. Well, credibly
1:04:01
important report you've just given because it's showing how once
1:04:05
again the Nation state is getting the raw end of
1:04:09
the globalist agenda. They think they can control everything in
1:04:13
the world. King Charles thinks he can control space as well.
1:04:18
How do we deal with this. We've got to deal
1:04:20
with it in an educated way, and we will be
1:04:22
discussing that very thing in UK column Extra coming up
1:04:28
in just a few minutes. Diane, I'm going to say
1:04:31
I think we'll hold your report on the elections in
1:04:35
the State and we'll bring it into UK Column Extra
1:04:38
because we want to have a good discussion about the
1:04:42
facts that you've got for us today. So I'm going
1:04:45
to say to our audience, thank you very much for
1:04:47
joining us. We think that we are now into an
1:04:50
extremely dangerous phase, not only in UK but worldwide as
1:04:55
we see these vicious conflicts unfold, and it's very clear
1:04:59
that the globalist government system wants to destroy our livelihoods,
1:05:05
it wants to destroy the nation state, and it wants
1:05:08
to destroy communities as we've historically known them. So at
1:05:13
the end of the day, if you are out or
1:05:15
you have been out over the weekend involved in violence,
1:05:19
you're actually helping this agenda. We need to deal with
1:05:23
the problem in a completely different way. So please join
1:05:28
us if you can for UK Column Extra and we'll
1:05:31
talk through some of the things that people can and
1:05:34
should do. We'll see you then. Thanks for joining us.
1:05:38
Bye bye,