Latest / Logic Library / 17 - Humane Liberalism - part 3 - The Ego and His Own - Max Stirner

Transcript

17 - Humane Liberalism - part 3 - The Ego and His Own - Max Stirner · Logic Library

0:00
Section seventeen of The Ego and his Own Humane Liberalism, Part three. Do
0:06
I now reject what liberalism has won in its various exertions. Far be the
0:10
day that anything one should be lost only after man has become free through liberalism.
0:16
I turned my gaze upon myself and confessed to myself openly what man seems
0:20
to have gained, I alone have gained. Man is free when man is
0:25
to man the supreme being. So it belongs to the completion of liberalism that
0:29
every other supreme being be annulled. Theology overturned by anthropology, God and his
0:35
grace laugh down atheism universal the egoism of property has given up the last that
0:41
it had to give, when even that my God has become senseless. For
0:46
God exists only when he has his heart the individual's welfare, as the latter
0:51
seeks his welfare in him. Political liberalism abolish the inequality of masters and servants.
0:58
It made people masterless, and the master was now removed from the individual,
1:03
the egoist to become a ghost the law or the state. Social liberalism
1:08
abolishes the inequality of possession or the poor and rich, and makes people possessionless
1:14
or propertyless. Property is withdrawn from the individual and surrendered to ghostly society.
1:21
Humane liberalism makes people godless atheistic. Therefore the individual's god, my God,
1:26
must be put an end to. Now masterlessness is indeed at the same time
1:32
freedom from service possessionlessness, at the same time freedom from care and godlessness at
1:38
the same time freedom from prejudice. But with the master, the servant falls
1:42
away with possession, the care about it, with the firmly rooted God the
1:48
prejudice. But since the Master rises again in as state, the servants appears
1:53
again as subject. Since possession becomes the property of society, care to be
2:00
gotten anew as labor. And since God as man becomes a prejudice, there
2:06
arises a new faith, faith in humanity or liberty. For the individual's god,
2:10
the god of all vis a man, is now exalted, for it
2:16
is the highest thing in all of us to be man. But as nobody
2:21
can become entirely what the idea man imports, man remains to the individual a
2:27
lofty other world and unattained supreme being a God. But at the same time
2:32
this is the true God, because he is fully adequate to us to wit
2:37
our own self. We ourselves, but separated from us and lifted above us.
2:45
PostScript. The foregoing review of free human criticism was written by Bits immediately
2:52
after the appearance of the books in question, as was also that which elsewhere
2:57
refers to writings of this tendency. I did little more than bring together the
3:01
fragments. But criticism is restlessly pressing forward, and thereby makes it necessary for
3:07
me to come back to it once more, now that my book is finished,
3:10
and insert this concluding note. I have before me the latest eighth number
3:16
of the Algamina literator Zeitung of Bruno Bauer. There Again, the general interests
3:25
of society stand at the top. But criticism has reflected and given this society
3:31
a specification by which it is discriminated from a form which previously had still been
3:37
confused with it. That state in former passages, still celebrated as free state,
3:43
quite is given up, given up because it can in no wise fulfill
3:49
the task of human society. Criticism only saw itself compelled to identify for a
3:57
moment human and political affairs in eighteen forty two. But now it has found
4:01
that the state, even as free state, is not human society, or
4:06
as it could likewise say that the people is not man. We saw how
4:12
it got through with theology and showed clearly that God sinks into dust before man.
4:17
We see it now come to a clearance with politics in the same way,
4:21
and show that before man peoples and nationalities fall. So we see how
4:28
it has its explanation with church and state, declaring them both unhuman. And
4:32
we shall see, for it betrays this to us already, how it can
4:36
also give proof that before man the masses, which it even calls a spiritual
4:42
being, appear worthless. And how should the lesser spiritual beings be able to
4:47
maintain themselves before the supreme spirit Man casts down the false id does so what
4:55
the critic has in view the present in the scrutiny of the masses, which
5:00
he will place before man in order to combat them from the standpoint of man.
5:05
What is now the object of criticism the masses a spiritual being? These
5:11
the critic will learn to know and will find that they are in contradiction with
5:16
man. He will demonstrate that they are unhuman, and will succeed just as
5:21
well in this demonstration as in the former ones, that the divine and the
5:26
national, or the concerns of church and of state, were the unhuman.
5:30
The masses are defined as the most significant product of the revolution, as the
5:35
deceived multitude which the illusions of political illumination and in general, the entire illumination
5:44
movement of the eighteenth century have given over to boundless disgruntlement. The revolution satisfied
5:50
some by its result and left others unsatisfied. The satisfied part is the commonality,
5:58
bourgeoisie, etc. The unsatisfied is the masses. Does not the critic
6:03
so placed himself belong to their masses. But the unsatisfied are still in great
6:10
mistiness, and their discontent utters itself only in a boundless disgruntlement. This the
6:16
likewise unsatisfied critic now wants to master. He cannot want and attain more than
6:23
to bring that spiritual being, the masses, out of its disgruntlement, and
6:28
to uplift those who are only disgruntled, i e. To give them the
6:33
right attitude toward those results of the revolution which are to be overcome. He
6:40
can become the head of the masses, their decided spokesman. Therefore, he
6:45
wants also to abolish the deep chasm which parts him from the multitude from those
6:49
who want to uplift the lower classes of the people. He is distinguished by
6:54
wanting to deliver from disgruntlement, not merely these, but himself too. But
7:00
assuredly his consciousness does not deceive him either when he takes the masses to be
7:05
the natural opponents of theory, and foresees that the more this theory shall develop
7:12
itself so much, the more will it make the masses compact. For the
7:16
critic cannot enlighten or satisfy the masses with his presupposition man. If over against
7:24
the commonality, they are only the lower classes of the people, politically insignificant
7:31
masses over against man, they must still more be mere masses, humanly insignificant.
7:39
Yes, unhuman masses or a multitude of unmn The critic clears away everything
7:46
human, and, starting from the presupposition that the human is the true he
7:49
works against himself, denying it wherever it had been hitherto found. He proves
7:55
only that the human is to be found nowhere except in his head, but
7:59
the unhuman everywhere. The unhuman is the real, the extent on all hands.
8:05
And by the proof that it is not human, the critic only enunciates
8:09
plainly the tortological sentence, that is the unhuman. But what if the unhuman,
8:16
turning its back on itself with resolute heart, should at the same time
8:20
turn away from the disturbing critic and leave him standing untouched and unstung by his
8:26
remonstrance. You call me the unhuman, it might say to him, And
8:31
so I really am for you. But I am so only because you bring
8:37
me into opposition to the human. And I could despise myself only so long
8:41
as I let myself be hypnotized into this opposition. I was contemptible because I
8:46
sought my better self outside me. I was the unhuman because I dreamed of
8:52
the human. I resembled the pious who hunger for their true self and always
8:56
remain poor sinners. I thought of myself only in comparison to another. Enough,
9:03
I was not all in all, was not unique note original German for
9:11
unique einzig end of note. But now I cease to appear to myself as
9:18
the unhuman, Cease to measure myself and let myself be measured by man,
9:24
cease to recognize anything above me. Consequently, adu humane critic, I only
9:31
have been the unhuman. Am it now no longer? But am the unique?
9:35
Yes to your loathing the egoistic, yet not the egoistic, as it
9:41
lets itself be measured by the human, humane and unselfish by the egoistic,
9:48
as the unique. We have to pay attention to still another sentence of the
9:52
same number, criticism sets up no dogmas and wants to learn to know nothing
9:58
but things. The critic is afraid of becoming dogmatic or setting up dogmas.
10:03
Of course, why thereby he would become the opposite of the critic, the
10:09
dogmatist. He would now become bad as he is good as critic, or
10:13
would become from an unselfish man, an egoist, etc. Of all things
10:18
no dogma. This is his dogma. For the critic remains on one and
10:24
the same ground with the dogmatist, that of thoughts. Like the latter,
10:28
he always starts from a thought that varies. In this that he never ceases
10:33
to keep the principal thought in the process of thinking, and so does not
10:37
let it become stable. He only asserts the thought process against the thought,
10:41
faith, the progress of thinking against stationariness in it from criticism. No thought
10:50
is safe, since criticism is thought or the thinking mind itself. Therefore,
10:56
I repeat that the religious world and This is the world thought reaches its completion
11:01
in criticism, where thinking extends its encroachments over every thought, no one of
11:07
which may egoistically establish itself. Where would the purity of criticism, the purity
11:15
of thinking, be left, if even one thought escape the process of thinking.
11:20
This explains the fact that the critic has even begun already to gibe gently
11:26
here and there are the thoughts of man of humanity and humaneness, because he
11:31
suspects that here a thought is approaching dogmatic fixity. But yet he cannot decompose
11:37
this thought till he has found a higher in which it dissolves, for he
11:41
moves only in thoughts. This higher thought might be enunciated as that of the
11:48
movement or process of thinking itself, i e. As the thought of thinking
11:52
or of criticism. For example, freedom of thinking has in fact become complete.
11:58
Here freedom of mind celebrates its triumph for the individual. Egoistic thoughts have
12:05
lost their dogmatic truculence. There is nothing left but the dogma of freethinking or
12:13
of criticism, against everything that belongs to the world of thought. Criticism is
12:20
in the right i e. In might, it is the victor criticism and
12:24
criticism alone is up to date. From the standpoint of thought. There is
12:28
no power capable of being an overmatch for criticisms, and it is a pleasure
12:35
to see how easily and sportively this dragon swallows all other serpents of thought.
12:41
Each serpent twist to be sure, but criticism crushes it in all its turns.
12:48
I am no opponent of criticism. I am no dogmatist, and do
12:52
not feel myself touched by the critics tooth with which he tears the dogmatist to
12:56
pieces. If I were a dogmatist, I should place at the header dogma
13:01
i e. A thought, an idea, a principle, and should complete
13:05
this as a systematist, spinning it out to a system, a structure of
13:11
thought. Conversely, if I were a critic viz. A v an opponent
13:18
of the dogmatist, I should carry on the fight of free thinking against the
13:22
enthralling thought. I should defend thinking against what was thought. But I am
13:26
neither the champion of a thought nor the champion of thinking. For I from
13:31
whom I start am not a thought, nor do I consist in thinking against
13:37
me the unnameable. The realm of thoughts, thinking, and mind is shattered
13:43
criticism is the possessed man's fight against possession as such, against all possession,
13:50
a fight which is founded in the consciousness that everywhere possession, or as the
13:54
critic calls it, a religious and theological attitude, is extant. He knows
14:00
that people stand in a religious believing attitude not only toward God, but toward
14:07
other ideas as well, like right the state law. He recognizes possession in
14:13
all places. So he wants to break up thoughts by thinking. But I
14:16
say, only thoughtlessness really saves me from thoughts, which is not thinking,
14:22
but my thoughtlessness or I the unthinkable, incomprehensible that frees me from possession.
14:30
A jerk does me the service of the most anxious thinking. A stretching of
14:33
the limbs shakes off the torment of thoughts. A leap upward hills from my
14:39
breast the nightmare of the religious world. A jubilant hoopoler throws off year long
14:43
burdens. But the monstrous significance of unthinking jubilation could not be recognized in the
14:48
long night of thinking and believing. What clumsiness and frivolity to want to solve
14:56
the most difficult problems acquit yourself of the most comprehensive tasks by breaking off.
15:03
But have you tasks if you do not set them to yourself? So long
15:07
as you set them, you will not give them up. And I certainly
15:11
do not care if you think and thinking create a thousand thoughts. But you,
15:16
who have set the tasks, are you not to be able to upset
15:22
them again? Must you be bound to these tasks? And must they become
15:26
absolute tasks? To cite only one thing, the government has been disparaged on
15:33
account of its resorting to forcible means against thoughts, interfering against the press by
15:39
means of the police power of the censorship, and making a personal fight out
15:43
of a literary one, as if it were solely a matter of thoughts,
15:48
and as if one's attitude toward thoughts must be unselfish, self denying, and
15:54
self sacrificing. Do not these thoughts attack the governing parties and so call out
16:00
egoism? And do the thinkers not set before the attacked ones the religious demand
16:07
to reverence the power of thought of ideas, They are to succumb voluntarily and
16:12
resignedly, because the divine power of thought Minerva fights on their enemy's side.
16:18
Why that would be an act of possession, a religious sacrifice. To be
16:23
sure, the governing parties are themselves held fast in a religious bias, and
16:30
follow the leading power of an idea or a faith. But they are at
16:33
the same time unconfessed egoists, and right there against the enemy. They're pent
16:40
up egoism, breaks loose, possessed in their faith. They are at the
16:44
same time unpossessed by their opponent's faith, i e. They are egoists.
16:48
Towards this, if one wants to make them a reproach, it could only
16:52
be the converse to wit, that they are possessed by their ideas against thoughts,
16:59
no egoistic power is to appear, no police power, etc. So
17:04
the believers in thinking believe, But thinking and its thoughts are not sacred to
17:10
me, and I defend my skin against them, as against other things.
17:15
That may be an unreasonable defense. But if I am in duty bound to
17:21
reason, then I, like Abraham, must sacrifice my dearest to it.
17:26
In the kingdom of thought, which like that of faith, is the kingdom
17:30
of heaven, everyone is assuredly wrong who uses unthinking force, just as everyone
17:37
is wrong who in the kingdom of love behaves unlovingly, although he is a
17:41
Christian and therefore lives in the Kingdom of Love, yet acts unchristianly in these
17:47
kingdoms to which he supposes himself to belong, though he nevertheless throws off their
17:53
laws. He is a sinner or egoist. But it is only when he
17:59
becomes a criminal against these kingdoms that he can throw off their dominion. Here
18:03
too, the result is this that the fight of the thinkers against the government
18:08
is indeed in the right, namely in might, so far as it is
18:12
carried on against the government's thoughts. The government is dumb and does not succeed
18:18
in making any literary joinder to speak of, but is, on the other
18:22
hand, in the wrong to wit in impotence, so far as it does
18:26
not succeed in bringing to the field anything but thoughts. Against a personal power,
18:32
the egoistic power stops the mouth of the thinkers. The theoretical fight cannot
18:37
complete the victory, and the sacred power of thought succumbs to the might of
18:41
egoism. Only the egoistic fight. The fight of egoists on both sides,
18:48
clears up everything. This lasts now to make thinking an affair of egoistic option.
18:55
An affair of the single person note original German einsigen and note a mere
19:03
pastime or hobby, as it were, and to take from it the importance
19:07
of being the last decisive power, This degradation and desecration of thinking, this
19:14
equalization of the unthinking and thoughtful ego. At this clumsy but real equality,
19:21
criticism is not able to produce because it itself is only the priest of thinking
19:27
and sees nothing beyond thinking. But the deluge criticism does indeed affirm e g.
19:37
That free criticism may overcome the state. But at the same time it
19:41
defends itself against the approach which is laid upon it by the state government.
19:47
That it is self will and impudence. It thinks, then that self will
19:52
and impudence may not overcome it alone. May The truth is rather the reverse.
19:59
The state can be really overcome only by impudent self will. It may.
20:06
Now, to conclude with this, be clear that in the critics new
20:10
change of front, he has not transformed himself, but only made good and
20:15
oversight disentangled a subject, and is saying too much when he speaks of criticism
20:21
criticizing itself it or rather he has only criticized its oversight and cleared it of
20:27
its inconsistencies. If he wanted to criticize criticism, he would have to look
20:33
and see if there was anything in its presupposition. I own my part,
20:38
start from a presupposition, in presupposing myself. But my presupposition does not struggle
20:45
for its perfection, like man struggling for his perfection. It only serves me
20:52
to enjoy it and consume it. I consume my presupposition and nothing else,
20:59
and exist only in consuming it. But that presupposition is therefore not a pre
21:03
supposition at all. For as I am the unique, I know nothing of
21:07
the duality of a presupposing and a presupposed ego, an incomplete and a complete
21:15
ego or man. But this that I consume myself means only that I am.
21:22
I do not presuppose myself, because I am every moment just positing or
21:27
creating myself, And am I only by being not presupposed, but posited and
21:33
again posited only in the moment when I posit myself. I am creator and
21:40
creature in one. If the presuppositions that have hitherto been current are to melt
21:47
away in a full dissolution, they must not be dissolved into a higher presupposition.
21:53
Again I a thought or thinking self criticism for that dissolution is to be
22:00
from my good. Otherwise it would belong only in the series of the innumerable
22:06
dissolutions which, in favor of others e g. This very man, God,
22:10
the state, pure morality, etc. Declared old truths to be untruths
22:15
and did away with long fostered presuppositions. End of Section seventeen. Humane Liberalism, Part three