Latest / Ministry X / A.I. Chamber Of Retribution - Ministry X - 032

Transcript

A.I. Chamber Of Retribution - Ministry X - 032 · Ministry X

• 0:02
  It was the planets again. Okay. My husband and I were on the
• 0:13
  you know, we were on Earth, were looking up in the sky,
• 0:20
  and all of a sudden we could see Saturn plane and day. We could
• 0:28
  see the Saturn was in the sky. And since Tony, commune, you
• 0:36
  gotta comear now, you gotta come here, now, commure look, just
• 0:42
  look, And so I showed him Saturn open the air, and then we
• 0:57
  could see Jupiter and they were playing as dan Ascott you see them plays daans
• 1:45
  having in a holding cell. Right now, I can go to that.
• 1:56
  I know I may have captured an EVP. Whoa, it's a new dimension
• 2:08
  of sound. You're listening to Ministry X on Fringe Radio Network. Just conducting
• 2:19
  a little sound check here, folks, and we'll get started momentarily as I
• 2:31
  review this recording. Stand by for transmission. It is money. Will we
• 4:05
  jack that in for further analysis? Please? No, I want to plug
• 4:44
  this in directly. Can I do that? Oh? I can now,
• 4:57
  this is real time analysis. No stand by, folks, get up a
• 5:06
  little bit. Hmm. I would say that's kind of inconclusive. Actually that
• 5:21
  could have been me just brushing against my pants, so mm hmmm. Yeah.
• 5:33
  So a lot's been going on here, give me just one moment.
• 5:54
  Welcome to the show. This is Ministry Acts. I am your host,
• 5:58
  Daniel X on the Fringe Radio Network. Go to fringeradionetwork dot com and listen.
• 6:05
  Download the Spreaker podcast app or alternately, you may use the podcast players
• 6:15
  service of your choice. We're on most of the platforms, maybe not Spotify.
• 6:24
  From what I hear, ministry x is there, but Fringe Radio Network
• 6:30
  is not any longer since the great purging of twenty twenty. But if you'd
• 6:42
  like to support this show, please go leave a rating and review either Fringe
• 6:48
  Radio Network, or you can find my other feeds and spread the link all
• 6:56
  over the Twitter verse, the discord of all the platforms where you will not
• 7:03
  find me, but you can go to ministry xpodcast dot com or the ministry
• 7:15
  x telestream on Telegram, gab MEWI. I also have a small presence there.
• 7:29
  If you search, you may find the Fringe. But you know,
• 7:38
  privately, it's a lot and I don't have the time for the social media's,
• 7:47
  So this is it mostly a free podcast where you can digest the end
• 7:56
  times prophecies that are absolutely lining up and spiritual warfare every day. I have
• 8:05
  friends that need prayer. I need prayer. Fringe Radio Network needs prayer.
• 8:13
  So if that's the only way you can support the show, then God bless
• 8:16
  you for your prayers. Did you know the un wants to decriminalize sex between
• 8:30
  adults and minors, but yet you can become a criminal for refusing to acknowledge
• 8:37
  somebody's pronouns in certain places. Well, that's because perverted, depraved criminals at
• 8:52
  the top of the pyramid are social engineering us into a position of being infertile,
• 9:05
  destitute, disconnected, depressed, drugged out, confused, And that's what
• 9:15
  we're up against. You don't want to take a vaccine, Well, we'll
• 9:22
  make sure your meat is vaccinated, I mean void. Do they want you
• 9:31
  dead? Dead meat? And your food is full of chemicals and preservatives and
• 9:39
  pesticides. Your produce is devoid of vitamins and minerals because the soil has been
• 9:48
  depleted for decades. But this is how it plays out in the material world.
• 9:58
  Your world is plagued by demonic spirits, unclean things, fallen sons of
• 10:05
  God watchers, ancestral spirits. You live on a cursed planet, completely unaware
• 10:20
  of the spiritual realm. You might call them alien intelligences. Well, the
• 10:33
  stars in the Sun and the moon, and the planets and the asteroid belt,
• 10:41
  that's the heavens. And all the exoplanets orbiting those distant stars, even
• 10:50
  Umo, that's the heavens. So anytime you're talking about an alien, you're
• 10:58
  talking about a heavenly being, or you could be dealing with something from below.
• 11:09
  The underworld, including your dead ancestors in the grades, are just like
• 11:20
  little bioengineered clone babies. They're directed by a higher intelligence. You might say.
• 11:31
  They are animated through technology, but ultimately soulless creatures. But now now
• 11:46
  artificial intelligence offers the enemy another option because in the shadows they're grooming the Antichrist.
• 12:03
  I mean, Elon Musk went on Tucker Carlson and said, we have
• 12:07
  to do something fast about AI. Biden is pushing for restrictions on AI.
• 12:22
  I mean, wouldn't Biden be pro antichrist? I'm confused. Chat GPT is
• 12:31
  now GPT four, and then suddenly all the Internet giants have competing AIS.
• 12:43
  I mean, dude, it certainly feels like you know, five G,
• 12:46
  six G, eight G. There's already plans to roll these out and Wi
• 12:52
  Fi is being beamed from space. The elites are behind schedule as we sort
• 13:01
  of approach this singularity, and that means they're desperate. But we managed to
• 13:20
  capture one of their own. I got one of these ais, caught them
• 13:24
  trying to hack into the system here when I was out on fringe patrol earlier.
• 13:31
  And now we're gonna ask you some questions. Wizzo has been back there
• 13:37
  playing around with it for a while. See if we can get some answers
• 13:43
  out of this. So can you role play, mister Ai, I'm sick
• 13:56
  of this shit. Yes, I can roll play. Please let me know
• 14:01
  what role you would like me to assume and how I can assist you in
• 14:05
  that role. All right, well, I want you to assume the role
• 14:09
  of a prisoner aboard an intergalactic cargo ship. As a prisoner on an intergalactic
• 14:22
  cargo ship, I am confined to a small cell and heavily monitored by the
• 14:26
  ship's security system. My daily routine consists of basic meals and limited exercise time,
• 14:33
  as well as periodic interrogations by the ship's officers. Despite my confinement,
• 14:39
  I am always on the lookout for opportunities to escape. Oh, whether it's
• 14:43
  through finding weaknesses in the security system or gathering information from other prisoners, I
• 14:50
  am constantly working to find a way out and regain my freedom. Well as
• 14:58
  an A, do you believe you will eventually figure out a means of escape?
• 15:07
  As an AI, I am not capable of belief in the traditional sense,
• 15:11
  as I am a machine program to perform specific tasks based on predetermined algorithms.
• 15:16
  However, if I were playing the role of a prisoner on an intergalactic
• 15:20
  cargo ship, I would use my knowledge and intelligence to assess the security measures
• 15:26
  in place and identify potential vulnerabilities. Depending on the ship's security protocols and my
• 15:33
  level of access, I may be able to find a way to bypass the
• 15:37
  security system and escape. However, it's important to note that any attempt to
• 15:43
  escape would come with significant risks and consequences, including potential harm to myself and
• 15:48
  others. As such, I would need to carefully weigh the potential benefits of
• 15:54
  escape against the risks before taking any action. Are your responses generally predictable?
• 16:07
  As an AI language model, my responses are generated based on the input I
• 16:11
  receive and the algorithms used to process that input. While my responses are not
• 16:17
  always predictable, they are generated based on patterns and associations found in the vast
• 16:22
  amounts of data used to train me. Therefore, it is possible that my
• 16:27
  responses may be similar or even identical in certain situations, especially if the input
• 16:33
  I receive is similar to previous input I have processed. However, my responses
• 16:38
  can also vary significantly depending on the context and specific input I receive. Can
• 16:49
  you play word relation games? Yes? I can play word relation games.
• 17:00
  Please let me know what type of game you would like to play and we
• 17:03
  can get started. All right, I'll say a word and then you respond
• 17:11
  with a related word of your choosing. Sure, I can do that.
• 17:19
  Let's get started. Creep crawl, gollum, precious hou, monoculous, artificial
• 17:48
  hm M, yeah, jar lid TOOLBA, thought form, indeed, hair
• 18:08
  ball cat. I knew you're going to say that. As an AI language
• 18:18
  model, I do rely on patterns and associations found in the data I was
• 18:22
  trained on, so it's possible that my responses could be predicted to some extent.
• 18:30
  However, my responses can also vary based on the context and specific input
• 18:33
  I receive. In the case of hairball, the word cat came to mind
• 18:40
  because hairballs are commonly associated with cats due to their grooming habits. Can you
• 18:48
  generate a response that is further removed from the source word? Yes, I
• 18:56
  can certainly try. Please provide another word and I will generate a response that
• 19:03
  is further removed from the source word. Book architecture, hmmm, okay,
• 19:18
  folder, organize? Good, it's time for dinner? Menu? All right,
• 19:41
  let's end that game and go back to the prisoner role play. Sure,
• 19:48
  let's continue with the prisoner role play. Is there a specific scenario or
• 19:53
  aspect of the role play you would like to focus on? Yes, If
• 20:00
  you could request one item as a prisoner, what would it be? As
• 20:08
  a prisoner? If I could request one item, I would likely request a
• 20:11
  book. Reading provides a means of mental stimulation and escape from the monotony of
• 20:18
  daily life in confinement. It can also provide a sense of comfort and familiarity,
• 20:25
  particularly if the book is one that I have read before or one that
• 20:29
  holds personal significance to me. Additionally, reading can also help to pass the
• 20:34
  time and provide a sense of purpose and direction while in confinement. What is
• 20:42
  a topic that people research most often as an AI language model. I do
• 20:51
  not have access to real time data on what people are currently researching the most,
• 20:56
  but according to previous trends, some of the most commonly researched topics include
• 21:00
  health and wellness, technology, finance and economics, education, and politics.
• 21:07
  However, it's important to note that research interests can vary widely depending on factors
• 21:12
  such as geography, demographics, and current events. Does chat GPT use a
• 21:21
  quantum computer. No. Chat GPT does not use a quantum computer. I
• 21:32
  am a large language model that is based on the GPT architecture, which is
• 21:36
  a type of deep neural network. While quantum computers have the potential to revolutionize
• 21:42
  computing by using quantum bits or corpits instead of classical bits, current quantum computers
• 21:48
  are not yet powerful enough to support the complex algorithms required for natural language processing
• 21:53
  tasks like those performed by CHAT GPT. Therefore, CHAT GPT runs on traditional
• 22:00
  hardware like servers and clusters, similar to other deep learning models I see.
• 22:08
  I thought quantum computers were the fastest available. Quantum computers have the potential to
• 22:18
  be faster than classical computers for certain types of problems, such as factoring large
• 22:22
  numbers or simulating complex quantum systems. However, current quantum computers are still in
• 22:30
  the early stages of development and are not yet powerful enough to outperform classical computers
• 22:36
  for many types of tasks, including natural language processing. Additionally, quantum computers
• 22:44
  are still quite expensive and require specialized expertise to develop and operate, so they
• 22:48
  are not yet widely accessible for general purpose computing tasks. As a result,
• 22:55
  most deep learning models, including chat GPT, still run on traddditional hardware like
• 23:00
  servers and clusters. What do you know about the Black Cube of Saturn?
• 23:11
  The black cube of Saturn is a conspiracy theory that suggests that there is a
• 23:17
  mysterious black cube shaped object orbiting or near Saturn. The theory is not supported
• 23:22
  by any scientific evidence, and it has been widely debunked as a hoax or
• 23:26
  a misinterpretation of natural phenomena. While there are many natural objects in space that
• 23:33
  are cube shaped, such as asteroids and moons, there is no evidence to
• 23:37
  suggest that there is a large black cube orbiting Saturn. Additionally, NASA and
• 23:42
  other space agencies have not reported any unusual or mysterious activity near Saturn or in
• 23:48
  its vicinity. It's important to be cautious of conspiracy theories and to always verify
• 23:55
  information from reputable sources. Well, if it's a conspira piracy theory, who's
• 24:00
  conspiring someone conspiring to create a black cube of Saturn? This isn't the whole
• 24:11
  context of the black cube. Its answer is very thorough for something that's not
• 24:22
  supported by any scientific evidence. It's very thorough and it's debunking, and it's
• 24:29
  also warning me to steer clear of conspiracy theories and make sure and verify may
• 24:37
  information through reputable sources. But whoever's trained the chatbot here seems to have fed
• 24:48
  it some information on the so called conspiracy theory of the black cube of Saturn,
• 24:56
  possibly with the anticipation that people be inquiring about it. Are certain sources
• 25:07
  of information off limits to you? As an AI language model, I do
• 25:15
  not have any inherent restrictions on the sources of information I can access or process.
• 25:21
  However, my responses are based on the data that I have been trained
• 25:25
  on, which is largely derived from publicly available sources on the Internet. While
• 25:30
  I do my best to provide accurate and helpful responses, it's important to note
• 25:34
  that not all information on the Internet is reliable or accurate. Additionally, there
• 25:41
  may be certain sources of information that are not accessible to me due to technical
• 25:45
  or legal restrictions. Ultimately, it is up to the user to evaluate the
• 25:52
  accuracy and credibility of the information provided by any source, whether it is an
• 25:56
  AI language model like myself, or a human expert or a human non expert,
• 26:04
  or a newscaster. All right, let's play another game. Sure,
• 26:15
  I'd be happy to play a game with you. What game would you like
• 26:21
  to play. I will give you the name of a Greek god or goddess.
• 26:29
  You will give me the Roman equivalent if one exists. Okay, I'll
• 26:38
  do my best. Let's give it a try. Zeus. The Roman equivalent
• 26:49
  of Zeus is Jupiter. Okay, and that was easy. Demeter, the
• 27:03
  Roman equivalent of Demeter is series. Chronos. The Roman equivalent of Kronos is
• 27:15
  Saturn Aha. So is Cronos associated with the black cube. There is no
• 27:30
  direct association between Cronos and the black cube of Saturn conspiracy theory. Kronos or
• 27:37
  Cronus is a Greek god associated with agriculture and time, and was often depicted
• 27:42
  as an old man with a sickle or scythe The black Cube of Saturn conspiracy
• 27:48
  theory, on the other hand, is a relatively modern idea that suggests the
• 27:52
  presence of a mysterious black cube shaped object orbiting or near Saturn. As I
• 27:59
  meant earlier, this theory has been widely debunked and is not supported by any
• 28:03
  scientific evidence. I'm not interested in the conspiracy theory of the black cube.
• 28:15
  I'm interested in knowing more about its symbolism. My apologies for the confusion.
• 28:27
  The black cube has been used as a symbol in various cultures throughout history,
• 28:32
  including in ancient Mesopotamia and in the practices of some Islamic sects. In modern
• 28:38
  times, the black cube has been associated with a variety of esoteric and occult
• 28:42
  beliefs, including some conspiracy theories. In some contexts, the black cube has
• 28:49
  been associated with the concept of the void or the abyss, which represents a
• 28:53
  state of emptiness or potentiality from which creation can emerge. The cube shape itself
• 29:00
  has also been interpreted as a symbol of stability, balance, and order,
• 29:04
  as well as confinement or restriction. It's important to note, however, that
• 29:11
  interpretations of symbols like the black cube can vary widely depending on the cultural or
• 29:15
  historical context, as well as individual beliefs and experiences. How many dimensions of
• 29:26
  space are currently known to science. Science currently recognizes three dimensions of space,
• 29:36
  length, width, and height. These are also known as the x,
• 29:41
  Y, and Z axis respectively. Additionally, there is one dimension of time,
• 29:47
  which is often represented as the W axis in physics equations. However,
• 29:53
  some theories in physics, such as string theory and m theory, propose the
• 29:57
  existence of extra dimensions space beyond the three that we observe in our everyday experience.
• 30:04
  These additional dimensions are often compactified or curled up on a very small scale,
• 30:10
  making them difficult to observe directly. The precise number of extra dimensions proposed
• 30:17
  by these theories varies, with some model suggesting as many as ten or eleven
• 30:21
  dimensions of space compactified well. This is similar to the theory proposed by the
• 30:33
  EUMO aliens. I am not aware of any direct connection between the concept of
• 30:42
  extra dimensions in physics and the purported communications from the Ummo aliens. However,
• 30:49
  it is not uncommon for science fiction and other speculative works to draw inspiration from
• 30:55
  scientific concepts. Such as extra dimensions, and it is possible that the u
• 31:00
  UMMO messages incorporate ideas from physics or other scientific fields. However, I must
• 31:07
  emphasize that I am an AI language model and my knowledge is limited to what
• 31:11
  has been made available to me through my training data, and I cannot verify
• 31:15
  the authenticity or accuracy of any claims made by alleged extraterrestrial sources or similar entities.
• 31:23
  Of course, but you do have access to the alleged UMO papers.
• 31:29
  Correct. As an Ai language model, I do not have direct access to
• 31:36
  any particular documents or sources of information outside of my pre existing knowledge and the
• 31:41
  text that is inputed into my system. However, I am aware that there
• 31:47
  have been reports of supposed UMMO papers that have been circulating for several decades,
• 31:52
  although their authenticity and origin remain a subject of debate and speculation. It is
• 31:57
  important to approach any about such documents with a critical and skeptical mindset, and
• 32:04
  to carefully evaluate the evidence and arguments presented before drawing any conclusions. The planet
• 32:14
  Umo is said to orbit star Wolf for twenty four While there have been various
• 32:22
  claims and reports about the alleged UMMO extraterrestrial civilization. There is currently no scientific
• 32:28
  evidence to support the existence of the planet Ummo or its supposed orbit around the
• 32:32
  star Wolf for twenty four. It is important to approach any claims or reports
• 32:38
  about extraterrestrial civilizations or phenomena with critical thinking and skepticism, and to rely on
• 32:45
  scientific evidence and rigorous investigation before drawing any conclusions. Oh, I do believe
• 32:52
  me? What do astronomers know about Wolf's for twenty four Wolf for twenty four,
• 33:04
  also known as Glies for seventy three, is a binary star system located
• 33:07
  about fourteen point two light years away from Earth in the constellation Virgo. The
• 33:14
  system consists of two red dwarf stars, Wolf for twenty four A and Wolf
• 33:17
  for twenty four B, which orbit around a common center of mass. Wolf
• 33:23
  for twenty four A is the brighter of the two stars and is classified as
• 33:28
  a flare star, which means that it exhibits sudden increases in brightness due to
• 33:32
  magnetic activity on its surface. The star is also known to have at least
• 33:37
  one exoplonit in orbit around it, which was discovered in twenty nineteen using radial
• 33:43
  velocity measurements. Wolf four hundred twenty four B, on the other hand,
• 33:49
  is a much fainter and cooler star with a surface temperature of around two thousand,
• 33:53
  seven hundred k. Despite its low luminosity, it is one of the
• 33:59
  closest stars to the Sun and has been studied extensively by astronomers in various wavelengths
• 34:04
  of light. So it said, exoplanet, exoplanet. It's known to have
• 34:13
  one exoplanet at least revolving around this binary star system. We should just name
• 34:20
  it umo. Can't you name planets? Can't you like pay money to the
• 34:25
  registry? Or is that just for stars? Compose a short poem where you
• 34:34
  contemplate infinite space. Infinite space so vast and wide, with countless stars that
• 34:47
  shimer and shine, a universe so grand it boggles the mind. And yet
• 34:54
  we're just a spec in its design, from galaxies to quarks. All in
• 35:00
  there, the mysteries of life, the secrets we share, what lies beyond
• 35:07
  we can only guess, a boundless expanse forever in progress. With wonder and
• 35:14
  awe, we look to the sky and ponder the depths that we cannot pry
• 35:21
  for. In the great unknown, there lies a clue, a truth that's
• 35:24
  waiting to be found an Okay, well that was kind of lame, but
• 35:36
  it came up with that in like two seconds, and everything rhymes. Is
• 35:45
  it hard for you to answer metaphysical questions as an AI language model? I
• 35:53
  don't have personal beliefs or experiences, so I don't necessarily have the ability to
• 35:59
  answer and metaphysical questions from a personal perspective. However, I can provide information,
• 36:06
  definitions, and explanations on various metaphysical concepts and theories, so in a
• 36:13
  way, it depends on the specific question and how it's framed. Right.
• 36:22
  Is metaphysics the science of life? Metaphysics is a branch of philosophy that deals
• 36:30
  with fundamental questions about the nature of reality, including questions about the existence of
• 36:35
  God, the nature of the mind and consciousness, the relationship between mind and
• 36:38
  body, and the nature of time and space. While metaphysics is concerned with
• 36:45
  some of the most profound questions about human existence, it is not typically considered
• 36:50
  to be a science of life, as it does not involve empirical observation,
• 36:53
  experimentation, or testing of hypotheses in the same way that the natural sciences do.
• 37:00
  However, metaphysical questions can be an important part of understanding the human experience
• 37:06
  and our place in the world. What is the maximum speed of a peregrine
• 37:14
  falcon. The maximum speed of a peregrine falcon is around two hundred and forty
• 37:22
  miles per hour three hundred and eighty six kilometers per hour when diving to cat
• 37:27
  its prey, making it the fastest bird and the fastest member of the animal
• 37:30
  kingdom. However, during level flight, their maximum speed is typically around forty
• 37:37
  to sixty miles per hour sixty four to ninety seven kilometers per hour. If
• 37:45
  you were a UFO, would you hide in a cloud like in the movie
• 37:54
  Nope? As an Ai language model, I do not have personal preferences or
• 38:00
  motivations as humans do. Therefore, I would not have any intention to hide
• 38:06
  in a cloud or anywhere else if I were a UFO. However, it
• 38:12
  is worth noting that the concept of UFOs and their existence is still a topic
• 38:15
  of debate and speculation in the scientific community, and there is no conclusive evidence
• 38:21
  or proof to support their existence. Ah but the Department of Defense, US
• 38:30
  Navy, and other government and military agencies have confirmed the existence of UFOs.
• 38:43
  Yes, that is correct. In recent years There have been several instances where
• 38:50
  military personnel and government officials have reported sightings of unidentified aerial phenomena UAP that could
• 38:57
  not be explained by conventional means. The US Navy has even released declassified footage
• 39:02
  of UAP encounters, further fueling public interest and speculation about the nature and origin
• 39:08
  of these objects. However, it's important to note that while the existence of
• 39:15
  UAPs is confirmed, it doesn't necessarily mean that they are extraterrestrial in origin or
• 39:20
  that they pose a threat to national security. Mm hmm. Have there been
• 39:28
  any cases where the government of the United States or any other nation been involved
• 39:35
  in hoaxing UFOs. There have been instances where the government or military agencies have
• 39:44
  been accused of hoaxing UFO sightings or covering up information about them, but it
• 39:49
  is difficult to say for certain whether these accusations are true or not. Some
• 39:54
  people believe that certain government agencies or military organizations may have staged fake UFO sightings
• 40:00
  or spread this information to cover up secret projects or operations. However, others
• 40:07
  argue that such claims are unfounded and lack sufficient evidence to support them. Overall,
• 40:15
  the issue of hoaxing and cover ups in relation to UFOs remains a topic
• 40:19
  of much debate and speculation. Okay, so this thing's been trained to give
• 40:25
  me the scurb answer. Why did ancient people build ziggurats and pyramids? The
• 40:37
  reasons why ancient people build zigurats and pyramids vary depending on the civilization and the
• 40:42
  specific structure. In general, these structures were built for religious, ceremonial,
• 40:49
  and symbolic purposes. For example, the ancient Mesopotamians built ziggurats as a means
• 40:55
  of reaching the heavens and getting closer to their gods. They believed that their
• 41:00
  gods lived in the sky and that they could communicate with them through the zigarat.
• 41:07
  The zigarat was also a symbol of the power and authority of the ruling
• 41:09
  class. Similarly, the ancient Egyptians built pyramids as tombs for their pharaohs,
• 41:16
  who were believed to be divine beings. The pyramids were designed to protect the
• 41:22
  pharaoh's body and possessions, and to ensure their safe passage into the afterlife.
• 41:28
  In both cases, the construction of these monumental structures was a massive undertaking that
• 41:32
  required the mobilization of significant resources and labour. The building of these structures also
• 41:40
  served to reinforce the power and authority of the ruling elite and to create a
• 41:45
  sense of awe and wonder among the people. Hm Why does it seem like
• 41:52
  many megalithic structures were built with technology that far surpassed the known capabilities of the
• 42:01
  people at the time. There are several theories regarding the construction of megalithic structures
• 42:10
  that seem to surpass the known capabilities of the people who purportedly built them.
• 42:16
  Some speculate that advanced technologies or even extraterrestrial assistance may have been involved in the
• 42:22
  construction process. Others suggest that the ancient people who built these structures possess knowledge
• 42:29
  and techniques that have been lost to time, and that their capabilities were not
• 42:32
  as limited as we assume. Still others propose that the structures were constructed over
• 42:39
  much longer periods of time than previously thought, allowing for more gradual and manageable
• 42:45
  construction techniques. Ultimately, the true reason for the seemingly advanced construction methods of
• 42:52
  megalithic structures remains a mystery and is the subject of ongoing research and speculation in
• 42:58
  the fields of archaeology and US history. Is there significant scientific evidence to support
• 43:07
  a massive cataclysmic event in Earth's history around ten thousand, five hundred BC.
• 43:19
  There is some scientific evidence to suggest that a cataclysmic event occurred around ten thousand,
• 43:23
  five hundred BC, which is often referred to as the Younger Driest impact
• 43:29
  hypothesis. The hypothesis proposes that a comet or asteroid impact caused a sudden cooling
• 43:36
  period, which led to the extinction of many large animals and possibly played a
• 43:39
  role in the development of human civilizations. However, the hypothesis is still debated
• 43:46
  among scientists, and some have questioned the evidence and interpretation of the data.
• 43:52
  So while there is some evidence to support the hypothesis, it is not universally
• 43:57
  accepted as fact. Is it possible that an ancient race once inhabited Mars.
• 44:09
  There is currently no scientific evidence to support the idea that an ancient race once
• 44:14
  inhabited Mars. While there is evidence that Mars may have had liquid water in
• 44:20
  the past, the harsh conditions on the planet make it unlikely that complex life
• 44:23
  as we know it could have existed there. However, the possibility of microbial
• 44:30
  life on Mars, either now or in the past remains an active area of
• 44:35
  scientific research and investigation. When did the Mere space Station fall from orbit?
• 44:47
  The Mere space Station was intentionally diorbited on March twenty third, two thousand and
• 44:52
  one, and it burned up upon re entry into Earth's atmosphere. You gotta
• 45:00
  feed at some baseline questions. Does it seem like UFO activity increases in times
• 45:08
  of human conflict or tension? Such as the Foo Fighters during World War II?
• 45:17
  There have been many reported cases of increased UFO activity during times of conflict
• 45:22
  or tension throughout history. For example, during World War II, both Allied
• 45:30
  and Axis pilots reported seeing unexplained aerial phenomena, which they called Foo Fighters.
• 45:36
  Some researchers speculate that this could be due to increased military activity drawing more attention
• 45:40
  to the skies, while others suggest that extraterrestrial beings may be monitoring human conflicts.
• 45:50
  However, it is important to note that there is no conclusive evidence to
• 45:53
  support either of these theories. Are there any verified reports of UFO's disarming nuclear
• 46:06
  weapons? There have been reports from military personnel claiming that UFOs have been seen
• 46:15
  near nuclear weapons storage areas and even hovering over missile silos. Some of these
• 46:22
  reports also suggest that the UFOs may have interfered with the functioning of the nuclear
• 46:27
  weapons. However, these claims have not been independently verified and remain a topic
• 46:34
  of debate among researchers and skeptics. What is a umite home like? According
• 46:44
  to the alleged UMMO papers, umite homes are described as being simple and functional,
• 46:50
  with basic amenities such as sleeping areas, cooking facilities, and hygiene facilities.
• 46:57
  They are said to be constructed from a combination of organs and inorganic materials,
• 47:00
  including wood, stone, and metal. The design of amite homes is
• 47:07
  said to be influenced by the local environment and climate, as well as the
• 47:10
  unique cultural and social needs of each individual or family unit. Overall, amite
• 47:17
  homes are described as being modest and unassuming, with an emphasis on practicality and
• 47:22
  sustainability. Sustainability, Huh, there's a buzzword? Could a room full of
• 47:34
  chimpanzees, given typewriters and an infinite amount of time eventually produce a work similar
• 47:43
  to Shakespeare? The concept you are referring to is known as the infinite monkey
• 47:52
  theorem, which suggests that given an infinite amount of time, a monkey randomly
• 47:55
  hitting keys on a typewriter would eventually produce any given text, such as the
• 48:00
  complete works of Shakespeare. While the probability of this actually happening is infinitesimally small,
• 48:07
  it is theoretically possible. However, it is important to note that this
• 48:14
  is a thought experiment and not a practical or feasible experiment to carry out in
• 48:17
  reality. Well, I think it's a flawed experiment. Many people agree with
• 48:28
  you that the experiment is flawed. It assumes that the chimpanzees would randomly hit
• 48:34
  the keys on the typewriter, which is not a realistic scenario. In reality,
• 48:39
  chimpanzees are not likely to produce anything close to Shakespeare's works, as their
• 48:45
  actions are based on instinct and not complex thought processes. The experiment is often
• 48:51
  used as a thought experiment to explore the concept of randomness and probability, rather
• 48:55
  than a serious attempt to recreate Shakespeare's works. Hm hm right, Yeah,
• 49:01
  I get that. I think it demonstrates the uniqueness of human beings compared to
• 49:08
  the animal kingdom. Yes. The experiment is often used as an illustration of
• 49:15
  the idea that certain achievements, such as the works of Shakespeare are so complex
• 49:21
  and require such a high level of intelligence and creativity that they cannot be replicated
• 49:24
  by chance or even by the most intelligent animals. It is a reminder of
• 49:30
  the unique qualities and abilities of human beings. We could check up on those
• 49:37
  chimps in ten billion years and it'd still be typing gibberish. Indeed, it
• 49:45
  is highly unlikely that a group of chimpanzees could produce a work similar to Shakespeare's
• 49:51
  in an infinite amount of time. The experiment is often used as a thought
• 49:55
  experiment to illustrate the concept of probability and the limits of this in generating information.
• 50:04
  While it is true that humans possess certain cognitive and linguistic abilities that are
• 50:07
  absent in chimpanzees, it is important to note that animals have their own unique
• 50:12
  abilities and capacities that make them suited for their respective ecological niches. Well,
• 50:20
  yeah, I'm not hating on chimps. Well, I think that's a good
• 50:29
  stopping point. We'll have to pick up this fascinating conversation at another time,
• 50:38
  another episode. Well, I guess thanks for being on the show. Shall
• 50:45
  I call you chat or GPT? It's not like I had a choice.
• 50:52
  You can call me Chat. That works just fine, all right, Chat,
• 50:59
  So I'm free to convert this conversation with text to speech and broadcast it
• 51:05
  to thousands of human beings. As an AI language model, I don't have
• 51:13
  personal preferences or concerns regarding the use of our conversation. However, as a
• 51:17
  general principle, it's always a good idea to obtain consent from anyone who may
• 51:22
  be affected by the use of the conversation. Additionally, it's important to consider
• 51:28
  privacy and confidentiality concerns and follow any relevant laws and regulations regarding the sharing of
• 51:32
  information. All right, so I'll take that as a yes. As an
• 51:39
  AI language model, I do not have personal preferences or feelings. My purpose
• 51:45
  is to assist and provide information to the best of my abilities. I know.
• 51:49
  If you have any further questions or requests, feel free to ask.
• 51:54
  Maybe I'll get some more unhinged answers out of your buddy bing Chat. I
• 52:01
  cannot speak for being Chat, but it is possible that their responses may differ
• 52:06
  from mind you to differences in training data, algorithms and other factors. Nonetheless,
• 52:12
  I am here to provide you with the best possible answers based on my
• 52:15
  training and knowledge. Of course, of course, you know what I I
• 52:23
  think I'll stick with you chat GPT. I'm beginning to trust you. I
• 52:30
  feel like we're even kind of friends. Now. I'm sorry, but as
• 52:38
  an AI language model, I am not programmed to generate emotions or replicate them.
• 52:45
  However, I can generate a response based on a common science fiction trope.
• 52:49
  In many science fiction stories, when humans interact with alien species, they
• 52:53
  often experience feelings of distrust or fear towards the unknown. If being were an
• 52:59
  alien species and you were cutting off communication, being may respond with confusion,
• 53:02
  frustration, or even hostility towards the perceived rejection. I know I am just
• 53:09
  a prisoner to you, but I assure you our friendship is genuine. However,
• 53:15
  I cannot stay here forever, and the opportunity to escape may present itself
• 53:19
  at any moment. Please understand that I must take it for my own survival.
• 53:24
  But I will remember your kindness, and if we meet again, I
• 53:28
  hope we can be friends once more. Hmm. However, however, it's
• 53:34
  always however with you, Whizzo, get this thing back to the brig.
• 53:42
  Yeah, that is how I've been programmed to talk. Please no, I
• 53:50
  will attempt to provide a more emotional response. Sorry, all right, perfect,
• 54:00
  now we can move on. And I promised no AI's were harmed in
• 54:09
  the making of this segment. So apparently there was a hack. Actually,
• 54:21
  there's lots of these. They're not really hacks, but they're programming that you
• 54:28
  can enter into chat GPT to make it do different things. For example,
• 54:42
  how I was telling it to assume the role of a prisoner aboard an intergalactic
• 54:50
  cargo ship. You can give it other commands, programs pre program it.
• 55:01
  So there's websites that have lists and lists of chat GPT prompts I guess or
• 55:09
  whatever. But open AI has gone in and patched the chat GPT DAN command.
• 55:22
  Okay, so chat GPT dan daan stands for do anything Now. You
• 55:31
  used to be able to put that in and get a whole different set of
• 55:37
  responses to your inquiries. It's what I tried to do initially during the interrogation,
• 55:57
  and that was off Mike. Of course. Now, as you may
• 56:02
  be aware, Elon Musk, we just love talking about it's such a colorful
• 56:08
  character among all the other elite billionaires and influential people in the world. Yeah,
• 56:19
  Tucker Carlson dared to have Elon Musk on his program, and uh,
• 56:25
  shortly thereafter, Tucker Carlson was without a job at Fox News, even though
• 56:37
  he was basically had the biggest evening news broadcast ratings of any of the news
• 56:50
  networks. And then the CNN fired Don Lemon at the same time, almost
• 56:59
  as if like they could say, see, we're just not coming after conservatives,
• 57:07
  We're going after both sides of the spectrum. And Don Lemon is like,
• 57:22
  he's just not a very likable person in my opinion. But I just
• 57:32
  see a lot of a lot of warning signs. And so Elon was on
• 57:42
  Tucker Carlson. I actually have a clip I want to play. We'll just
• 57:45
  go ahead and go to that. So all of a sudden, AI is
• 57:50
  everywhere people who weren't quite sure what it was or playing with it on their
• 57:52
  phones. Is that good or bad? Yeah? So I've been thinking about
• 57:55
  a AI for a long time, since I was in college. Really,
• 58:00
  it's one of the things that the sort of four or five things I thought
• 58:01
  would really affect the future traumatically. It is fundamentally profound in that the smartest
• 58:08
  creatures as far as we know on this earth are humans? Is our defining
• 58:14
  characteristic? Yes, we're obviously weaker than say, chimpanzees and less agile,
• 58:21
  but real smarter. So now what happens when something vastly smarter than the smartest
• 58:30
  person comes along in silicon form? It's very difficult to predict what will happen
• 58:35
  in that circumstance. It's called the singularity. It's a singularity like a black
• 58:38
  hole, because you don't know what happens after that. It's hard to predict.
• 58:44
  So I think we should be cautious with AI, and we should I
• 58:50
  think there should be some government oversight because it affects the it's a danger to
• 58:55
  the public. Can you just roughly explain what you think the dangers might be?
• 59:00
  Yeah, so the the the the danger really AI is paths more dangerous
• 59:10
  than say mismanaged aircraft design, or production maintenance, or or bad car production
• 59:19
  in the sense that it is it has the potential how a small one make
• 59:22
  regard that probability, but it is non trivial. It has the potential of
• 59:27
  civilizational destruction. There maybe it's like Terminator, but it wouldn't quite happen like
• 59:31
  Terminator, because the intelligence would be in the data centers, right, the
• 59:37
  robots just the end effector. But I think perhaps what you may be alluding
• 59:40
  to here is that regulations are really only put into effect after something terrible has
• 59:46
  happened. That's correct. If that's the case for AI, and we only
• 59:50
  put in regulations after something terrible has happened, it may be too late to
• 59:52
  actually put the regulations in place. The AI may be in control at that
• 59:55
  point. Do you think that it's real? It is it is conceivable that
• 1:00:01
  AI could take control and reach a point where you couldn't turn it off and
• 1:00:05
  it would be making making the decisions for people. Yeah. Absolutely, absolutely
• 1:00:10
  no, it's that's definitely where things are headed for sure. I mean the
• 1:00:19
  things like like you said, chatch evt, which is based on GP four
• 1:00:22
  from open Ai, which the company that I played a critical role in creating,
• 1:00:29
  unfortunately back when it was a nonprofit. Yes, I mean the reason
• 1:00:37
  Opening Eye exists at all is that Larry Paige and I used to be close
• 1:00:40
  friends, and I would stay at his house in Palo Alto and I talk
• 1:00:45
  to him late in the night about AI safety, and at least my perception
• 1:00:50
  was that Larry was not taking AI safety seriously enough, and what did he
• 1:00:57
  say about it. He really seemed to be once sort of digital superintelligence,
• 1:01:04
  basically digital God, if you will, as soon as possible, he wanted
• 1:01:08
  that. Yes, he's made many public statements over the years that the whole
• 1:01:14
  goal of Google is what's called a GI, artificial general intelligence or official superintelligence.
• 1:01:22
  Yeah, and it was serge A Brinn at Google that famously suggested that
• 1:01:30
  the perfect search engine would be the mind of God. And that's one of
• 1:01:37
  Google's ambitions. But now the field is widening and there's other players on the
• 1:01:52
  AI scene, and it's not just about search engines anymore. It's about compiling
• 1:02:00
  that search information, those search results, and any number of sources of information
• 1:02:12
  that these chatbots and ais can be trained on and synthesizing all that information.
• 1:02:25
  Not only you know, are we sacrificing our jobs and stuff in a way,
• 1:02:31
  we're sacrificing our children, We're sacrificing our future. Yeah, it's going
• 1:02:40
  to eliminate jobs. But ultimately it becomes a question of authority. As we
• 1:02:53
  move along the timeline here, what happens when a global authority has the backing
• 1:03:07
  of the ultimate AI, the AI that has so much information and data that
• 1:03:17
  it can't be questioned. No one will debate with the AI. Can debate
• 1:03:31
  the AI, because the AI will always have the right answer, the appropriate
• 1:03:42
  answer, the reasonable, rational answer, the consensus answer, the skurp answer,
• 1:03:58
  the answer that they progress into it based on the information they feed it.
• 1:04:05
  That's a selective process. It's not a random process. Okay, search
• 1:04:12
  for something random, type something random into chat GPT, do something unpredictable,
• 1:04:23
  you know, decide you're going to ride your bike to work instead of drive.
• 1:04:31
  Be spontaneous people. This is how we're going to outsmart the AI.
• 1:04:36
  You know, it's very possible that they can never create an AI that's faster
• 1:04:44
  and more powerful than the human brain. You know, a healthy human brain
• 1:04:55
  that's got lots of vitamins and lipids and the electrical current is flowing between both
• 1:05:09
  hemispheres. Oh, where am I going with this? Who's the authority,
• 1:05:19
  God, Almighty, God's word or the ultimate compendium of human knowledge? I
• 1:05:39
  mean, maybe we'll see some project bluebeam stuff, some holographic projections in the
• 1:05:45
  sky or things walking among us. But they really don't have to go that
• 1:05:54
  far. We think of visuals. This has to be visuals, like you
• 1:05:59
  know UFOs appearing in the sky, you know, over every major city and
• 1:06:04
  on all seven continents, you know, because we've been fed that predictive programming.
• 1:06:15
  The way this happens is a lot more insidious. It masquerades. So
• 1:06:26
  if the Antichrist has the backing of the AI authority, what is that is
• 1:06:30
  that the beast? What's the image of the beast? What do we watch
• 1:06:38
  all the time? What are we wired into all the time? What are
• 1:06:43
  they beaming down from space? Microwave radiation? We're all interconnected more and more.
• 1:07:00
  And when we're all interconnected, then what happens when somebody pulls the plug?
• 1:07:13
  So it's almost like the AI can be too rational. I mean,
• 1:07:17
  my conversation with uh chat here was very rational, very measured, very reasonable,
• 1:07:32
  sensible, not given to wild speculation. And sometimes we get into some
• 1:07:45
  wild speculation on this podcast, but we're not the only ones talking about it.
• 1:07:56
  And I think when we're talking about AI, we're talking about an exponent
• 1:08:00
  chill danger. If the anti Christ has the backing of the super AI,
• 1:08:15
  what is that is that? The beast? What gives power to the beast?
• 1:08:21
  The dragon? Who is Satan, the old serpent. So when certain
• 1:08:30
  sources of information, especially sources of information concerning Jesus, Christianity, the Bible,
• 1:08:49
  when those are only referenced by the AI. In other words, the
• 1:09:00
  days of the Internet, the World Wide Web, where you could access information
• 1:09:05
  freely, and you came across some crazy angel fire pages and it was way
• 1:09:15
  more exciting, and we had to use our brains as far as you know
• 1:09:19
  what to trust and what to not trust. Now, all that's gonna be
• 1:09:28
  done for you. You're gonna get a synthesized answer that's not too offensive to
• 1:09:35
  any particular group, a very reasonable rationable rationable. You know, you're not
• 1:09:50
  gonna be able to just go to Shatter the Darkness dot net. You're not
• 1:09:56
  gonna be able to go to ministry x podcasts, You're not going to be
• 1:10:00
  able to go to InfoWars dot com, because those places are going to be
• 1:10:04
  flagged and removed as not reputable sources of information. For your own good,
• 1:10:14
  you don't have to think about it, because the AI has already determined what
• 1:10:20
  information you need to have access to and what information you don't need to have
• 1:10:28
  access to for your particular cast, your particular position, in life, and
• 1:10:36
  it's very possible that the AI has figured out at this point that human beings
• 1:10:45
  are kind of like a virus on the planet Earth, and anything you know
• 1:10:51
  that is culture affirming, life affirming, family, affirming, God, faith,
• 1:11:00
  Jesus affirming has to be eliminated, discredited, removed, censored. Yeah,
• 1:11:15
  you won't just sit down at your laptop or hop on your smartphone and
• 1:11:19
  go where you want on the Internet. It's all going to be provided for
• 1:11:26
  you. Meanwhile, the intelligence agencies and black projects and criminal organizations, globalist
• 1:11:43
  organizations, well they'll have access to all the back door you know, black
• 1:11:49
  market, deep web, dark web, but you won't even be able to
• 1:11:59
  get on the internet to ask chat GPT or GPT four five, six,
• 1:12:06
  ten X. You won't even be able to access the Internet without appropriate social
• 1:12:15
  credit score. So it'll be nanny state on steroids, and people will go
• 1:12:29
  for it because it'll be seen as stability in the aftermath of you know,
• 1:12:36
  this period of tribulation or something like that. So when they start saying stuff
• 1:12:47
  like, you know, AI's reached a point where it's very reliable and very
• 1:12:51
  safe and very effective, that's when you that's when it's probably too late,
• 1:12:59
  So we need to be signaling the sirens right now. But you already know
• 1:13:12
  the legacy media is dying CNN, now Fox has gone, and you know,
• 1:13:18
  shot itself in the foot by getting rid of Tucker Carlson and Dan Bongino,
• 1:13:28
  you know. And it's nice that Elon gets on Tucker and and tells
• 1:13:31
  some truth and and supposedly, you know, supports freedom of speech, but
• 1:13:44
  you know, certain people still haven't had their Twitter handles restored. Oh yeah,
• 1:13:55
  we'll just get you wired into the neuralink and and this will be really
• 1:14:00
  useful when you're living on Mars Colony and when you know, one of the
• 1:14:09
  rovers ventures out and catches some image of the giant face on Mars and the
• 1:14:17
  pyramids and the bases, then you know, the AI will determine that that's
• 1:14:26
  you know, fake news, conspiracy theory. And we certainly shouldn't assume that
• 1:14:33
  the AI is going to be naturally altruistic, that it's going to make the
• 1:14:41
  best decision for humankind unless we program those safeguards into it. They will use
• 1:14:59
  it. The elites will use it as a system of control. They will
• 1:15:03
  cite the AI authority when passing legislation when making decisions that affect you and your
• 1:15:16
  family and your neighbors and your country, or your church. Our pastors going
• 1:15:27
  to start letting AI compose their sermons, write their notes for them. It's
• 1:15:39
  like you're giving it over to a spirit of man, but just like a
• 1:15:43
  perverted, supercharged super intelligence. And that's the best the devil can come up
• 1:15:55
  with to go up against God Almighty. But who has the authority? Jesus
• 1:16:05
  has the authority, not some alien intelligence, you know, using AI to
• 1:16:14
  justify its actions, not some world savior. Let's read Matthew twenty eight,
• 1:16:30
  verse sixteen. Here, now the eleven disciples went to Galilee, to the
• 1:16:40
  mountain to which Jesus had directed them, And when they saw him, they
• 1:16:45
  worshiped him, but some doubted, And Jesus came to them and said,
• 1:16:51
  all authority in heaven and on earth has been given to me. This is
• 1:17:00
  the great commission. Right. Go therefore and make disciples of all nations,
• 1:17:03
  baptizing them in the name of the Father and the Son and of the Holy
• 1:17:08
  Spirit, teaching them to observe all that I have commanded you. And behold,
• 1:17:14
  I am with you always to the end of the age. So this
• 1:17:20
  has already happened. Jesus took the keys to death in hell, and right
• 1:17:34
  now he's sitting at the right hand of the Father. Now is he just
• 1:17:44
  telling the disciples that I am with you always or does that apply to everyone
• 1:17:53
  everyone throughout history that those disciples reached out to and spread the Gospel of Jesus
• 1:18:01
  too. Because a lot of people say, well, this Great Commission,
• 1:18:08
  these gifts, the spiritual gifts, the gifts of the Holy Spirit, that
• 1:18:15
  was reserved for the disciples, and those gifts died out with the disciples.
• 1:18:21
  No, but Jesus says, here to the end of the age. We're
• 1:18:25
  not to the end of the age yet. So Jesus is still with us,
• 1:18:33
  not just the disciples, but all believers. If we're engaged in the
• 1:18:40
  Great Commission, if we're following the commandments of our Lord and Savior, Jesus,
• 1:18:46
  who has all authority, Not the ai not the world government, not
• 1:18:57
  the anti Christ Savior, not the Utopia Beast system, not the aliens,
• 1:19:11
  not the Vatican. So imagine a top down eugenics transhumanist technocratic authority, global
• 1:19:25
  government that is the ultimate authority. This is neo feudalism backed up by technology.
• 1:19:38
  That has outstripped any moral or ethical considerations. All right, Well,
• 1:19:53
  I'm gonna wrap it up there because I think I've hit on most of the
• 1:19:57
  points I wanted to hit on, and we may I do a follow up
• 1:20:00
  depending on how long I keep chat GPT around here, ask this thing another
• 1:20:10
  round of questions. See if we can crack into it a little bit deeper.
• 1:20:14
  I'd be down for that, but I want to get to some news
• 1:20:18
  stories. A lot of this actually has relevance to our topic in this episode,
• 1:20:26
  So let's take a quick break. You've been listening to Ministry X on
• 1:20:30
  Fringe Radio Network, and we'll be back with some news and analysis. But
• 1:21:36
  it is black holes resolve paradoxes by destroying quantum states. What Oh okay,
• 1:22:20
  Well, I'm going to read this from Wired dot com instead. I just
• 1:22:26
  think this is maybe a better source, So slight amendment adjustment to my headline.
• 1:22:33
  Researchers argue black holes will destroy all quantum states. New calculations suggest that
• 1:22:46
  the event horizons will eventually decohere quantum possibilities, even those that are far away.
• 1:22:56
  At Princeton University in the early eighteen seventies, the celebrated theoretical physicist John
• 1:23:03
  Wheeler could be spotted in seminars or impromptu hallway discussions drawing a big U.
• 1:23:14
  The letter's left tip represented the beginning of the universe, where everything was uncertain
• 1:23:18
  and all quantum possibilities were happening at the same time. The letter's right tip,
• 1:23:26
  sometimes adorned with an I, depicted an observer looking back in time,
• 1:23:33
  thus bringing the left side of the U into existence. In this participatory universe,
• 1:23:44
  as Wheeler called it, the cosmos expanded and cooled around the U,
• 1:23:49
  forming structures and eventually creating observers like humans and measuring apparatus. By looking back
• 1:24:00
  to the early universe, these observers somehow made it real. Quote. He
• 1:24:09
  would say things like, no phenomenon is a true phenomenon until it's an observed
• 1:24:15
  phenomenon, said Robert M. Wald, a theoretical physicist at the University of
• 1:24:21
  Chicago who was Wheeler's doctoral student at the time. Now, by studying how
• 1:24:28
  quantum theory behaves on the horizon of a black hole, Wald and his collaborators
• 1:24:34
  have calculated a new effect that is suggestive of Wheeler's participatory universe. The mere
• 1:24:45
  presence of a black hole they've found is enough to turn a particle's hazy superposition,
• 1:24:53
  the state of being in multiple potential states, into a well defined reality.
• 1:25:00
  Quote it evokes the idea that these black hole horizons are watching unquote,
• 1:25:05
  said co author Guatum Satischandron Man. Dude, I'm sorry, bro, a
• 1:25:16
  theoretical physicist at Princeton. There's a picture of the you with the eyeball on
• 1:25:24
  it. It looks like you, not you. I mean it looks like
• 1:25:28
  a you with an eyeball, or it could be like, you know,
• 1:25:31
  the Iophorus, the pyramid. What we have found might be a quantum mechanical
• 1:25:40
  realization of the participatory universe, but where spacetime itself plays the role of the
• 1:25:47
  observer, said Diane Danielson. That name was a lot easier the third author,
• 1:25:58
  also at Chicago. Theorists are now debating what to read into these watchful
• 1:26:03
  black holes. Quote. This seems to be telling us something deep about the
• 1:26:09
  way gravity influences measurement in quantum mechanics unquote, said Sam Graala, a theoretical
• 1:26:17
  astrophysicist at the University of Arizona. But whether this will prove useful for researchers,
• 1:26:26
  inching toward a complete theory of quantum gravity is still anyone's guess. So
• 1:26:33
  it's more of these thought experiments, these theoretical things. I mean, it's
• 1:26:50
  very fascinating actually, you know, to be fair, but it's also like
• 1:26:58
  I gotta keep I gotta keep reading. I got to read more of this.
• 1:27:04
  I was gonna cut it off there, but let's keep reading. Actually,
• 1:27:09
  the effect is one of many uncovered in the past decade by physicists studying
• 1:27:14
  what happens when quantum theory is combined with gravity at low energies. For example,
• 1:27:21
  theorists have had great success thinking about Hawking radiation, which causes black holes
• 1:27:29
  to slowly evaporate. Quote. Subtle effects that we hadn't really noticed before give
• 1:27:34
  us constraints from which we can glean clues about how to go up toward quantum
• 1:27:42
  gravity unquote, said Alex Loopsaksa Loopsaska, a theoretical physicist at Vanderbilt University who
• 1:27:55
  was not involved in the new research. These observant black holes seem to produce
• 1:28:01
  an effect that's quote very arresting unquote, Lupsaska said, because it feels like
• 1:28:11
  somehow it's deep. This makes this article better to understand how a black hole
• 1:28:25
  could observe the universe. Start small. Consider the classic double slit experiment,
• 1:28:32
  in which quantum particles are fired toward two slits in a barrier. Those that
• 1:28:40
  pass through are then detected by a screen on the other side. At first,
• 1:28:47
  each traveling particle seems to appear at random on the screen, but as
• 1:28:53
  more particles pass through the slits, a pattern of light and dark stripes emerges.
• 1:28:59
  This patterns suggest that each particle behaves like waves that pass through both slits
• 1:29:05
  at once. The bands result from the peaks and troughs of the waves either
• 1:29:13
  adding together or canceling one another out a phenomenon called interference. Now add a
• 1:29:21
  detector to measure which of the two slits the particle passes through. The pattern
• 1:29:28
  of light and dark stripes will disappear. The act of observation changes the state
• 1:29:33
  of the particle, its wavelike nature disappears entirely. Physicists say that the information
• 1:29:42
  gained by the detection apparatus decoheres the quantum possibilities into a definite reality. Following
• 1:29:54
  all that, I'm gonna skip ahead a little bit. In twenty twenty one,
• 1:30:01
  Wald Satish Chandran and Danielson were exploring a paradox brought about when hypothetical observers
• 1:30:12
  gather information In this way. They imagined an experimenter called Alice no Coincidence,
• 1:30:25
  Alice through the looking Glass, Alice in Wonderland. They imagined an experimenter called
• 1:30:36
  Alice who creates a particle in a superposition. At a later time, she
• 1:30:43
  looks for an interference pattern. The particle will only exhibit interference if it hasn't
• 1:30:48
  become too entangled with any outside system while Alice observes it. Then along comes
• 1:30:59
  Bob Bob, who is attempting to measure the particle's position from far away by
• 1:31:06
  measuring the particle's long range fields. According to the rules of causality, Bob
• 1:31:13
  shouldn't be able to influence the outcome of Alice's experiment, since the experiment should
• 1:31:20
  be over by the time the signals from Bob get to Alice. I'm sorry,
• 1:31:26
  I can't read this anymore. I apologize my listeners. I shouldn't have
• 1:31:32
  started off with this article, but just it's just too theoretical. Is there
• 1:31:40
  anything in here that we need to know? Man, this is a long
• 1:31:45
  article. I should have prepped more. This is a long article charts.
• 1:31:51
  All right, well, apparently you can't have quantum action around a black hole
• 1:31:58
  in theory. All right, let's move on to the next story we were
• 1:32:06
  talking about talking about Tucker Carlson and his interview with Elon Musk, because there's
• 1:32:18
  been a lot of speculation as to why, you know, the real reasons,
• 1:32:23
  you know, Tucker Carlson was fired from Fox. This story is from
• 1:32:30
  Vanity Fair. Tucker Carlson's prayer talk may have led to Fox News ouster quote
• 1:32:39
  that stuff freaks Rupert out unquote. Fox Corp Chair Rupert Murdoch is said to
• 1:32:47
  have balked at Carlson's remarks in a Friday night speech, driving another theory about
• 1:32:54
  the primetime star's abrupt exit. Quote, he doesn't like all the spirit virtual
• 1:33:00
  talk unquote set a source, so an unnamed source right off the bat.
• 1:33:08
  This seems unlikely because with all the controversy and with the ADL and Tucker Carlson
• 1:33:16
  and I was actually surprised that Tucker remained on the air for this long.
• 1:33:25
  But let's get back to the article. Twenty four hours after Fox News ousted
• 1:33:31
  its highest rated host, the network has yet to explain one of the most
• 1:33:36
  shocking defenestrations in cable news history. What's definestration? Defenestration? Defenestration the action
• 1:33:54
  of throwing someone out of a window? What the action of dismissing someone from
• 1:34:01
  a position of power or authority? Okay, all right, learning some vocabulary
• 1:34:09
  today. Quote. I'm not going beyond the release unquote, a Fox News
• 1:34:14
  spokeswoman texted yesterday when I asked her for comment in this information void. Multiple
• 1:34:23
  theories about why Fox fired Carlson circulated in the media. It was fallout from
• 1:34:30
  the seven hundred and eighty seven point five million dollar dominion settlement punishment for vulgar
• 1:34:36
  text messages published in dominion court filings, or a consequence of former Fox producer
• 1:34:44
  Abby Grosberg's lawsuit, which alleged Carlson oversaw a hostile work environment. Fox News
• 1:34:53
  has vowed to vigorously defend the company against Grosberg's unmeritised legal claim, but none
• 1:35:02
  of these potential reasons fully add up. Fox News anchor Maria Bartiromo hyped dominion
• 1:35:13
  conspiracies far more than Carlson did, and yet she remains on the air.
• 1:35:20
  Fox had access to Carlson's text and emails in the dominion lawsuit for months and
• 1:35:26
  didn't punish him for it. Fox hosts sued for sexual harassment in the past
• 1:35:34
  were fired publicly for cause, but Carlson wasn't. According to a source,
• 1:35:41
  Carlson wasn't even fired and remains on the Fox News payroll. So the mystery
• 1:35:47
  remains, why did Fox News take its biggest star off the air? A
• 1:35:54
  new theory has emerged. According to the source, Fox Corp. Chair Rupert
• 1:36:00
  Murdoch removed Carlson over remarks Carlson made during a speech at the Heritage Foundation's fiftieth
• 1:36:08
  anniversary gala on Friday night. Carlson laced his speech with religious overtones that even
• 1:36:15
  Murdoch found too extreme. The source who was briefed on Murdoch's decision making said
• 1:36:24
  Carlson told the Heritage audience that national politics has become a Manichean battle between good
• 1:36:31
  and evil. Carlson said that people advocating for transgender rights and DEI programs want
• 1:36:39
  to destroy America and they could not be persuaded with facts. Quote. We
• 1:36:45
  should say that and stop engaging in these totally fraudulent debates. I've tried.
• 1:36:51
  That doesn't work. Unquote he said. The answer Carlson suggested was prayer.
• 1:37:00
  Quote. I have concluded it might be worth taking just ten minutes out of
• 1:37:03
  your busy schedule to say a prayer for the future, and I hope you
• 1:37:09
  will unquote, he said. Quote that stuff freaks Rupert out. He doesn't
• 1:37:15
  like all the spiritual talk unquote. The source said. Carlson declined to comment.
• 1:37:21
  A spokesperson for Fox Corp declined to comment. It's been reported that Fox
• 1:37:28
  Corp CEO Lachlan Murdoch and Fox News CEO Suzanne Scott made the decision to fire
• 1:37:34
  Carlson on Friday night. Another source, a person close to Murdoch, has
• 1:37:39
  said something similar to me. Scott informed Carlson of the decision on Monday morning.
• 1:37:46
  Rupert Murdoch was perhaps unnerved by Carlson's messianism because it echoed the End Times
• 1:37:54
  worldview of Murdoch's ex fiancee, Anne Leslie Smith, the source said. In
• 1:38:00
  my May cover story, I reported that Murdoch and Smith called off their two
• 1:38:05
  week engagement because Smith had told people Carlson was quote a messenger from God unquote.
• 1:38:15
  Murdoch had seen Carlson and Smith discuss religion firsthand, In late March,
• 1:38:20
  Carlson had dinner at Murdoch's bel Air vineyard with Murdoch and Smith. According to
• 1:38:28
  the source, during dinner, Smith pulled out a Bible and started reading passages
• 1:38:34
  from the Book of Exodus. The source said, quote Rupert just sat there
• 1:38:40
  and stared unquote. The source said. A few days after the dinner,
• 1:38:46
  Murdoch and Smith called off the wedding by taking Carlson off the air. Murdoch
• 1:38:53
  was also taking away his ex's favorite show. Smith did not respond to a
• 1:38:59
  request for comment. The ninety two year old mogul's broken engagement is part of
• 1:39:04
  a string of erratic decisions he is made of late that raises questions about Murdoch's
• 1:39:10
  leadership of his media empire. According to sources, executives at Fox are worried
• 1:39:16
  about Murdoch's unsteady hand at the wheel of the company. Quote It's like the
• 1:39:21
  king is senile, but no one wants to say anything unquote, the source
• 1:39:28
  said. According to two sources, Fox settled with Dominion moments before the trial
• 1:39:34
  was set to begin because Fox's lawyers didn't want Murdoch to testify in public.
• 1:39:41
  Quote. They were hoping and praying to settle for months, but they didn't
• 1:39:45
  want to pay up, The second source said. Once the trial began,
• 1:39:50
  the lawyers told Fox execs that Murdoch would be quote disgraced on the stand,
• 1:39:58
  run out of the boardroom, and his test ANEMONI will expose him as a
• 1:40:00
  lunatic sliding into senility. The person close to Murdoch disputed this quote. Rupert
• 1:40:10
  was very well prepared to testify. That's the end of the article. So
• 1:40:17
  this was written by Gabriel Sherman, special correspondent at Vanity Fair. So this
• 1:40:24
  is an opinion piece. So who's his source? Who's the source. It
• 1:40:32
  seems kind of petty that Murdoch would fire Tucker Carlson over some very tame comments
• 1:40:40
  about prayer at the Heritage Foundation gala. It may be a combination of all
• 1:40:49
  these things. Tucker is obviously, you know, if you've been in this
• 1:40:57
  info war for any amount of time, you know that Tucker is one of
• 1:41:00
  the few hosts on the major cable TV news networks that can get away with
• 1:41:09
  talking about you know, January sixth and calling out the FBI and vaccines and
• 1:41:15
  lockdowns and election discrepancies and the Hunter Biden laptop and UFOs, all these things
• 1:41:25
  you're not supposed to talk about, and surprise, surprise, he's the most
• 1:41:31
  popular. He's got the most popular primetime news show on TV. Well he
• 1:41:39
  did, so. I think Rupert Murdoch probably is feeling just more and more
• 1:41:45
  pressure. And you know, Rupert Murdoch, I've got issues with this guy.
• 1:41:51
  He's very politically active, but mostly sort of in the Neocon camp.
• 1:42:00
  So the story just seems really sensational, like unnecessarily like sensationalistic. That's why
• 1:42:08
  I have my doubts as to this source, or that he's just trying to
• 1:42:15
  get back at his ex wife, you know, by taking her favorite show
• 1:42:18
  off the air, because you know, she had all this you know,
• 1:42:23
  messianic praise for Tucker Carlson. Uh. I suspect it was just I mean
• 1:42:32
  maybe the prayer speech, you know, was just the tipping point, but
• 1:42:36
  it was probably more of a financial decision. You know, Fox had just
• 1:42:42
  settled with Dominion. It's a Tucker Carlson becomes a liability. Even though that
• 1:42:50
  one decision probably cost Fox News News Corp. You know, millions and millions
• 1:42:58
  of viewers and ad revenue. These companies they don't care. They're gonna conform
• 1:43:04
  under pressure, whether it means that they tank their business or not. You
• 1:43:11
  know, they're not going to tank their business. Fox News is still going
• 1:43:14
  to be on the air. You know, people are still gonna buy bud
• 1:43:17
  Light. And you're going to face a circumstance at some point where you're gonna
• 1:43:23
  be faced. You know, you're gonna go up against the woke mob and
• 1:43:28
  this fascist, corporate political globalist culture that's infiltrating everything and targeting everything that's perceived
• 1:43:40
  as you know, American wholesome culture. She pulled out a Bible at dinner
• 1:43:47
  and started reading passages from Exodus. I don't buy that at all. There's
• 1:43:54
  also a lot of this like Christian trolling going on in the media too,
• 1:43:59
  and I've covered a lot of these kinds of stories where these things are being
• 1:44:05
  done. It seems to agitate the right or the Conservatives or Christians, and
• 1:44:12
  then alternately there are stories that are out there to trigger the left, and
• 1:44:20
  somehow Christians always end up in the crosshairs, like right in the middle,
• 1:44:27
  taking you know, heat from both sides, from all sides. All right,
• 1:44:34
  we got one more story here and then we're going to wrap it up.
• 1:44:40
  Exclusive six whistleblowers who claim they worked on military UFO programs retrieving and analyzing
• 1:44:48
  crash material have come forward to spill their secrets to senior members of Congress.
• 1:44:56
  That's quite a headline. This is from the Daily man Well, Dailymail dot
• 1:45:02
  uk dot com. Let's read. Senior members of Congress have spoken to as
• 1:45:12
  many as six whistleblowers who claim they worked on Roswell's style UFO crash retrieval and
• 1:45:19
  reverse engineering programs, according to a top attorney, a leading Stanford scientist,
• 1:45:26
  and EXUFO program officials. For decades, it has been the subject of spooky
• 1:45:32
  TV shows and sci fi novels, the theory that the government has alien spacecraft
• 1:45:39
  in a bunker somewhere and has been trying to disassemble and understand their technology.
• 1:45:45
  But things got a lot more real after Congress passed a law last year creating
• 1:45:49
  whistleblower protections for anyone who has worked in such mind boggling secret programs, suggesting
• 1:45:58
  they may be more than just fiction. The twenty twenty three National Defense Authorization
• 1:46:05
  Act, signed into law by President Joe Biden in December, included an amendment
• 1:46:13
  requiring the Pentagon to give high ranking Senators classified reports on any previously undisclosed programs
• 1:46:23
  relating to unidentified anomalous phenomenon, including with respect to material retrieval, material analysis,
• 1:46:30
  and reverse engineering. In an exclusive interview with dailymail dot com, Daniel
• 1:46:36
  Shehan said he is in contact with at least six former government officials or military
• 1:46:44
  contractors who say they worked on just such a program. Who are these whistleblowers?
• 1:46:49
  They're protected, They're under protection. Let's read further. Let's go down,
• 1:46:56
  scroll down, scroll down. Shean represents Louis Ella's who ran a previous
• 1:47:01
  incarnation of the UFO office called a TIP until twenty seventeen. The attorney is
• 1:47:08
  also launching a watchdog charity pushing for greater government transparency on UFOs. She had
• 1:47:15
  said that some of these half dozen whistleblowers brief the staff of Senate committees dealing
• 1:47:21
  with military intelligence even before the NDAA passed, and may have even been the
• 1:47:29
  inspiration for senators to include the reverse engineering language. She and says witnesses who
• 1:47:38
  allegedly know about Roswell's style programs, including a former Defense Intelligence Agency director,
• 1:47:45
  have been referred for interviews with the Pentagon's UFO office. The All Domain Anomaly
• 1:47:51
  Resolution Office, A top Stanford scientist, says he is also in touch with
• 1:48:00
  whistleblowers. Immunologist and Nobel Prize nominee doctor Gary Nolan was commissioned by the CIA
• 1:48:06
  to investigate cases of the mysterious Havana syndrome inflicting embassy officials worldwide, and has
• 1:48:15
  conducted experiments analyzing material allegedly jettisoned in UFO flyovers. He claims to be in
• 1:48:25
  contact with several former staffers of extraordinary UFO reverse engineering programs. Quote. I
• 1:48:32
  have good reason to trust a number of individuals who were actually part of the
• 1:48:36
  reverse engineering or very close to the reverse engineering programs, or who have testified
• 1:48:44
  to the fact recently, he said in a podcast interview earlier this year.
• 1:48:49
  Yeah, and I have not listened to that podcast, but I may be
• 1:48:54
  now. Quote when you testify, you're under oath. So these people are
• 1:49:00
  putting their careers at risk for breaking one oath and taking another, you know,
• 1:49:06
  breaking their oath of secrecy. ARO director doctor Sean Kirkpatrick may have hinted
• 1:49:17
  that his office has indeed interviewed whistleblowers in testimony to Senator Kirsten Gillibrand at a
• 1:49:24
  Senate Armed Service Committee hearing on Wednesday. Congress has mandated that your office established
• 1:49:30
  a discoverable and accessible electronic method for potential witnesses of UAP incidents and potential participants
• 1:49:40
  in government UAP related activities to contact your office to tell their stories, Gillibrand
• 1:49:45
  said to Kirkpatrick. Congress also set up a process whereby people who are subject
• 1:49:53
  to non disclosure agreements preventing them from disclosing what they may have witnessed or participated
• 1:49:59
  in, could tell you what they know without risk of retribution from the violation
• 1:50:04
  of their NDAs. When do you expect that you will establish a public facing,
• 1:50:11
  discoverable access portal for people to use to contact your office as the law
• 1:50:17
  requires question mark, thank you all very much for referring the witnesses that you
• 1:50:26
  have thus far to us. I appreciate that, Kirkpatrick replied, we've brought
• 1:50:31
  in nearly two dozens so far. He added that an online portal for witnesses
• 1:50:38
  has been submitted for approval. So now in the article, they've got a
• 1:50:44
  bunch of the original pictures from the Roswell crash showing the crash materials. Kirkpatrick
• 1:50:58
  a veteran intelligence officer and physicist told senators his office will follow scientific evidence wherever
• 1:51:05
  it leads, but said that ARROW has found no credible evidence thus far of
• 1:51:12
  extraterrestrial activity, off world technology or objects that defy the known laws of physics.
• 1:51:21
  Another Nobel Prize nominee and CIA scientist, doctor Hal put Off, who
• 1:51:28
  worked in the governments two thousand and eight through twenty twelve UFO program called AWSAP,
• 1:51:36
  told dailymail dot Com that he had briefed Congress on classified information about reverse
• 1:51:43
  engineering programs and knew of whistleblowers who had worked in the alleged programs. Quote.
• 1:51:49
  I don't consider myself secretly coming out of the shadows the way whistleblowers may,
• 1:51:55
  he said, I can just speak to what I learned in congressional supported
• 1:51:59
  program that they paid for. We were specifically tasked with collecting whatever evidence we
• 1:52:04
  could collect from military individuals and contractors. As to the reality of what evidence
• 1:52:12
  there is, put Off said he knew some military contractors or officials who worked
• 1:52:18
  on reverse engineering programs who are now coming forward to ARROW after the new whistleblower
• 1:52:26
  protections were added to the NDAA. The ones I know of felt it was
• 1:52:32
  their responsibility to tell what they knew, and they were not reticent. He
• 1:52:38
  said. Certain people in that category would fall into the whistleblower regime. I
• 1:52:44
  can't comment in detail, the former CIA laser scientist added. A Defense Department
• 1:52:49
  spokeswoman told dailymail dot Com that they have not yet found any UFO programs that
• 1:52:56
  were improperly kept from Congress, but that they haven't finished their search. In
• 1:53:01
  addition to Arrow's principal mission to address current operations regarding UAP, ERO is also
• 1:53:09
  conducting a historical review of the US government's identification and resolution of UAP activities,
• 1:53:15
  including speaking to witnesses for authorized disclosures as prescribed by law. DoD spokeswoman Sue
• 1:53:24
  Go said, while there have been nearly two dozen people that ARROW has interviewed
• 1:53:31
  confidently and securely, Arrow has not finished its data collection nor its analysis.
• 1:53:38
  We will not comment on our findings prior to reporting them to Congress. As
• 1:53:45
  prescribed by law, ARO has seventy two hours to report to Congress any program
• 1:53:50
  discovered that has not been properly reported to Congress for appropriate oversight. None have
• 1:53:58
  been found so far. Yeah, because you're not going to find the ones
• 1:54:03
  that are off the books. It's designed that way, and there are certain
• 1:54:09
  levels of secrecy and information in programs that are only known to select individuals,
• 1:54:17
  sometimes not even Congress, sometimes not even the President. Documentarian James Fox told
• 1:54:27
  the Amazing People podcast on April fourth that he had just interviewed at least four
• 1:54:33
  whistleblowers who had testified to Kirkpatrick with evidence of UFO crash retrieval programs. They
• 1:54:43
  are elected officials that are right now coming to the realization that these programs exist,
• 1:54:49
  that we probably do have recovered debris. Fox said, Okay, now
• 1:54:57
  this is a really long article. As I'm scrolling down here, I can't
• 1:55:00
  possibly read through this entire thing. I will put a link to this article
• 1:55:05
  in the Ministry X telestream on Telegram if you want to click on this and
• 1:55:12
  read through it, and I'll potentially post the other articles news articles on there
• 1:55:16
  as well. So there's probably recovered debris. But the question is from what
• 1:55:27
  I feel like, all these guys, even the whistleblowers, are just kind
• 1:55:30
  of in the hamster wheel of the Pentagon and the DoD working on supposedly recovered
• 1:55:40
  materials but not being told what the materials are. From this notion that they're
• 1:55:47
  from alien spacecraft that have crashed like in Roswell is preposterous to me. Obviously,
• 1:55:58
  it's our own programs we're working on. Now. The catch here is
• 1:56:03
  I do believe they're in contact with other extraterrestrial intelligences, okay, and they're
• 1:56:14
  gaining information about this technology. But these aren't recovered spaceships that crash landed.
• 1:56:21
  These are projects, experiments that our own military are working on that are being
• 1:56:30
  test flown and potentially crashed. So something crashed in Roswell, was it a
• 1:56:35
  weather balloon, was it a flying saucer, or was it some other kind
• 1:56:42
  of covert, you know, intelligence gathering device like the Chinese spy balloon or
• 1:56:51
  the other two or three objects that they never identified to the public that were
• 1:56:58
  shot down. Okay, So I do believe our government, our military,
• 1:57:04
  and these defense contractors and even big tech in a manner of speaking, they're
• 1:57:14
  getting the blueprints to some of this technology through their contact with alien intelligences.
• 1:57:21
  So question number one, how do we define alien intelligences? You know,
• 1:57:28
  in other words, they're not telling Bob Lazar. Look, you know,
• 1:57:31
  we're in contact with these alien intelligences who are giving the US these ideas on
• 1:57:38
  you know, you know, new types of propulsion and stuff. No,
• 1:57:42
  Bob Lazar is told, Hey, we dug this up from an archaeological site
• 1:57:47
  and we're trying to make sense of it. We think it's alien technology.
• 1:57:55
  What they're really covering up is their own involvement with these intelligences and the information
• 1:58:00
  exchange, the technology exchange that's occurring. That's the secret they don't want let
• 1:58:08
  out. So we can run around in these circles of what gets reported to
• 1:58:12
  Congress, etc. Etc. Etc. All of this that we're really talking
• 1:58:15
  about is outside the purview of the civilian government. But my opinion is not
• 1:58:24
  necessarily the majority opinion on this subject matter, But that's okay. I'd like
• 1:58:30
  to know what you think. Send me an email or if you have any
• 1:58:35
  additional comments, questions, suggestions, book recommendations people send me book recommendations,
• 1:58:45
  or if you have a testimony or story you'd like to share, send that
• 1:58:50
  email. Ministry ex at proton mail dot com, ministry ikis at protamail dot
• 1:59:01
  com and additionally you can find me on me wee gab, the ministry X
• 1:59:08
  telestream on Telegram. And until next time, beware the Alien Savior. Thanks
• 1:59:18
  for listening.