Latest / Chief in Tech Deep Dive Shortcast / Chief in Tech S1E30 - Nilima Achwal : Pitch Like a Goddess – How Founders Can Magnetize Millions

Transcript

Chief in Tech S1E30 - Nilima Achwal : Pitch Like a Goddess – How Founders Can Magnetize Millions · Chief in Tech Deep Dive Shortcast

• 0:00
  What if the reason you're failing to get buy
• 0:04
  -in for your project isn't because you aren't
• 0:06
  pushing hard enough, but because you just haven't
• 0:08
  stopped pushing? Oh, that completely flips the
• 0:11
  script on how we think about work. Right. because
• 0:14
  we are constantly fed this, you know, this exhausting
• 0:17
  narrative of modern work. Like, you have to grind
• 0:20
  out 14 -hour days. You constantly hustle. You
• 0:23
  aggressively pitch. You essentially have to force
• 0:25
  the world to recognize the value of whatever
• 0:27
  you're building. Right. It's the absolute default
• 0:29
  setting for anyone leading a project. Yeah. The
• 0:32
  assumption is just that business is like Newtonian
• 0:35
  physics, right? Every ounce of success requires
• 0:39
  an equal and opposite application of sheer exhausting
• 0:42
  outward force. Exactly. It's like we've been
• 0:44
  told our whole lives that to win a tug of war,
• 0:46
  we have to pull the rope until our hands literally
• 0:49
  bleed. Yep. But today's source material suggests
• 0:51
  something incredibly counterintuitive. It argues
• 0:54
  that you can actually win the game just by letting
• 0:56
  go of the rope entirely and like walking over
• 0:59
  to a completely different field. Which sounds
• 1:01
  crazy, but it works. It does. OK, let's unpack
• 1:04
  this. For this deep dive, we're looking at a
• 1:06
  presentation called Pitch Like a Goddess, the
• 1:09
  Art of Magnetic Leadership. Written by Amelia.
• 1:12
  Yeah, Amelia, the founder of the Female Founders
• 1:15
  Lab. which is an accelerator specifically for
• 1:18
  systems changing ideas. And our mission today
• 1:21
  is to explore this radical paradigm shift, one
• 1:25
  that swaps out that exhausting quote unquote
• 1:28
  masculine strategy of outward pushing for a quote
• 1:31
  unquote feminine strategy of magnetic receiving.
• 1:35
  And to really understand the mechanics of this
• 1:37
  shift, we first have to look at the breaking
• 1:40
  point of the traditional model. Yeah. the breakdown.
• 1:43
  Because Amelia didn't just invent this philosophy
• 1:45
  in a vacuum, you know, it was forged out of complete
• 1:47
  systemic failure. Like when the traditional method
• 1:49
  of aggressively pushing outward proved to be
• 1:52
  fundamentally broken. Right. So we really need
• 1:54
  to start with her background to ground this.
• 1:56
  Definitely. So Amelia spent 15 years embedded
• 1:58
  in the global startup ecosystem, and she was
• 2:01
  heavily focused on the social impact space. In
• 2:03
  2011, she moved to India. And a year later, the
• 2:07
  tragic Highly publicized New Delhi rape case
• 2:10
  occurred, which sparked massive national protests.
• 2:13
  Yeah, a really pivotal moment. And while a lot
• 2:15
  of the tech ecosystem reacted by trying to build
• 2:19
  like quick fix safety apps, she took a much deeper
• 2:22
  systems thinking approach. She recognized that
• 2:24
  surface level technology just wouldn't solve
• 2:26
  a fundamentally behavioral issue. Exactly. She
• 2:28
  set out to address the root causes of gender
• 2:31
  dynamics and consent, you know, to prevent the
• 2:34
  problem from replicating in the next generation.
• 2:36
  Which led her to build a transformative sex and
• 2:39
  gender education company. And to prove the concept,
• 2:42
  she ran a pilot program with Teach for India
• 2:44
  in a low -income school. And the environment
• 2:46
  there was initially chaotic, right? Oh, completely.
• 2:49
  There was severe misbehavior, sexual harassment,
• 2:52
  to the point where teachers struggled to even
• 2:54
  conduct class. But after running her specific
• 2:57
  curriculum, the behavioral shift, it was just
• 3:00
  staggering. The source material highlights this
• 3:02
  profound moment where a young boy from the pilot
• 3:05
  approached her. Remember this quote? Yeah, he
• 3:07
  said, I used to think that we should try to get
• 3:10
  the girl at any cost. And after you taught us
• 3:12
  about consent, my mind changed completely. Now
• 3:15
  if a girl says no, I'll not force her. I'll accept
• 3:17
  it and move on. I mean, the measurable impact
• 3:20
  of that is just incredible. It's massive. Six
• 3:23
  months later, the teachers gave her program a
• 3:25
  standing ovation because those same unmanageable
• 3:29
  kids had become the most empathetic students
• 3:32
  in the entire school. Right. she had undeniable
• 3:35
  ground -level proof that her system worked. and
• 3:38
  was fundamentally altering behavioral trajectories.
• 3:41
  And see, that ground level proof makes what happens
• 3:44
  next so completely jarring. Yeah, the contract
• 3:47
  is wild. Fast forward to 2016. Amelia is standing
• 3:50
  on the stage of the Bombay Stock Exchange, and
• 3:53
  she's doing a high stakes dress rehearsal for
• 3:55
  an elite tech accelerators demo day. OK. And
• 3:58
  she is completely out of cash. If she doesn't
• 4:00
  secure funding, this life changing company folds.
• 4:03
  High pressure. So she pours her absolute soul
• 4:06
  into the pitch, detailing the exact societal
• 4:08
  transformation we just talked about. And when
• 4:10
  she finishes, the room is dead silent. Finally,
• 4:14
  a mentor raises his hand and says, what's that
• 4:16
  font you're using? There are no animations between
• 4:19
  the slides. Honestly, my 10 -year -old son could
• 4:21
  have done a better job. It's just, it's painful
• 4:24
  even here. No questions about the business model.
• 4:27
  No questions about the standing ovation from
• 4:29
  the teachers. Just a critique on the slide transitions.
• 4:33
  What's fascinating here is how it exposes a massive
• 4:35
  structural flaw in how traditional business environments
• 4:39
  evaluate potential. Right, like how do they miss
• 4:41
  it? Well, traditional startup ecosystems rely
• 4:44
  heavily on heuristic shortcuts. pattern matching.
• 4:48
  Investors and mentors are just drowning in pitches,
• 4:50
  so they index heavily on superficial external
• 4:53
  validation markers. Like the font. Exactly. To
• 4:56
  mitigate their own perceived risk. So the polished
• 5:00
  slide deck, the aggressive financial projections,
• 5:02
  the specific Silicon Valley dialect. Oh yeah,
• 5:05
  you have to sound the part. Right. These act
• 5:07
  as proxies for competence. If a founder doesn't
• 5:10
  speak that exact dialect or present information
• 5:13
  in that precise visual format, the system literally
• 5:16
  cannot process the intrinsic value of the vision,
• 5:19
  regardless of how profound the real -world results
• 5:21
  are. It's the equivalent of performing a miraculous,
• 5:26
  life -saving open -heart surgery. only for the
• 5:29
  chief of medicine to walk into the operating
• 5:31
  room and critique the color of your scrubs. That
• 5:33
  is exactly what it is. And the system's inability
• 5:36
  to see her value completely broke her. She felt
• 5:38
  entirely unseen. She eventually packed up, moved
• 5:41
  back to California, and retreated to her parents'
• 5:43
  house. She felt like she had left her identity
• 5:45
  as a founder completely behind. Yeah. But that
• 5:48
  retreat, interestingly enough, stripped away
• 5:51
  the noise of the traditional ecosystem, and it
• 5:54
  actually set the stage for her most significant
• 5:56
  breakthrough. It's the class - I say quiet before
• 5:58
  the storm, but in a good way. Exactly. So she's
• 6:01
  sitting quietly at her parents' kitchen table
• 6:03
  in Northern California, and she gets an email
• 6:05
  from Tata. Tata? Wow. Yeah, Tata is India's largest
• 6:09
  conglomerate. They're a massive multinational
• 6:12
  entity. And the email says her work is revolutionary,
• 6:15
  and they want to license her program to reach
• 6:18
  600 ,000 students across the country. 600 ,000.
• 6:21
  That's a huge leap. They want to physically go
• 6:24
  into the schools and train the facilitators themselves.
• 6:27
  and she achieved this monumental scale with a
• 6:30
  tiny team of three people, basic friends and
• 6:33
  family capital, and absolutely no high level
• 6:36
  initial connections to push this through. This
• 6:38
  is where we really need to analyze the mechanism
• 6:40
  of what actually happened because she wasn't
• 6:43
  aggressively pitching Tata in the war room. She
• 6:46
  wasn't tweaking her slide deck font to appease
• 6:49
  their executives. The realization she came to
• 6:52
  and really the core of this entire deep dive,
• 6:55
  is that she had been operating from a feminine
• 6:57
  leadership paradigm while trying to survive in
• 7:00
  a fiercely masculine ecosystem. Okay, let's translate
• 7:03
  those terms for the listener because we are talking
• 7:05
  about energy states and operational frameworks
• 7:07
  here, not, you know, gender. Right, exactly.
• 7:10
  The source breaks it down into two fundamental
• 7:12
  energies that everyone utilizes, the masculine
• 7:14
  or yang and the feminine or yin. Okay. The masculine
• 7:18
  energy is highly logical, practical, assertive,
• 7:21
  and competitive. Most importantly, it's externally
• 7:24
  driven. It relies on pushing out into the world
• 7:27
  to seek external data, status, and validation.
• 7:30
  The hustle. Exactly. The feminine energy, the
• 7:32
  yin, operates fundamentally differently. It's
• 7:36
  imaginative, collaborative, and deeply purpose
• 7:39
  -driven. Okay. Instead of pushing outward for
• 7:42
  validation, it is internally sourced. It operates
• 7:45
  from the inside out, focusing on quote unquote
• 7:47
  receiving. OK, I have to pause and like push
• 7:51
  back on this a bit. Sure. Because to anyone operating
• 7:54
  in a high stakes corporate or startup environment,
• 7:58
  this sounds a bit abstract. Wait, isn't business
• 8:01
  inherently a competitive quote unquote masculine
• 8:04
  space? It's definitely framed that way. Right.
• 8:06
  So if you stop pushing and just sit back to receive,
• 8:10
  don't you just get completely run over by your
• 8:12
  competitors? I mean, the word receiving sounds
• 8:14
  a lot like passive in action. I get that. And
• 8:16
  that is the biggest hurdle in grasping this concept.
• 8:19
  Receiving is not passive at all. It is highly
• 8:22
  active, but in a totally different direction.
• 8:24
  How so? Think about the actual physics of a magnet.
• 8:27
  You do not force a magnet to stick to a piece
• 8:29
  of metal by aggressively pushing it. No, you
• 8:32
  just get close to it. Right, you create a magnetic
• 8:34
  field that is so strong, the metal is inherently
• 8:37
  pulled toward it. In a business context, receiving
• 8:41
  means being so deeply and immovably anchored
• 8:44
  in your vision and your proof of concept that
• 8:47
  you stop frantically chasing external validation.
• 8:50
  Ah, okay. Tata wasn't pitched. They were pulled
• 8:54
  into the gravitational field of the undeniable
• 8:56
  value she had already created. The source basically
• 9:00
  argues that our current business culture suffers
• 9:02
  from a toxic over -reliance on the push mechanics,
• 9:06
  completely ignoring the physics of the pull.
• 9:08
  OK, that makes sense. But generating that kind
• 9:10
  of magnetic pull requires a completely different
• 9:12
  foundation than the typical startup playbook.
• 9:15
  Completely different. And Amelia outlines this
• 9:17
  in her presentation, noting that magnetic leadership
• 9:19
  starts when you realize the vision actually chose
• 9:22
  you. Yes, principle one. Here's where it gets
• 9:25
  really interesting. We can see this clearly when
• 9:27
  we contrast the traditional founder with the
• 9:29
  magnetic founder. Let's do it. The traditional
• 9:31
  founder operates entirely in that outward pushing
• 9:34
  energy. They might brainstorm 12 random highly
• 9:38
  tactical business ideas. Test all of them and
• 9:41
  simply pick the one with the highest profit margin.
• 9:44
  Very analytical, very yang. Right. But the magnetic
• 9:48
  founder is more of a steward. Their vision stems
• 9:50
  from a deep personal experience or a profound
• 9:53
  frustration with the systemic injustice. They're
• 9:56
  a channel for a massive industry shift. Oh, that's
• 9:59
  a great way to put it. For instance, if you are
• 10:01
  building an education marketplace, the magnetic
• 10:03
  founder doesn't pitch it as a neat software tool.
• 10:06
  They pitch it as an essential lever, creating
• 10:08
  deep structural value for teachers, parents and
• 10:11
  students. Exactly. They elevate the framing from
• 10:14
  a simple transactional product to a transformative
• 10:17
  movement. But doesn't that emotional attachment?
• 10:20
  violate the golden rule of startups? Which rule?
• 10:23
  Well, we're constantly told to be agile, you
• 10:25
  know, to follow the data and to pivot the second
• 10:29
  the market doesn't respond. If you believe your
• 10:31
  vision shows you, aren't you in danger of stubbornly
• 10:34
  sinking with the ship when the market shifts?
• 10:36
  It's a valid concern. Take Amelia's time in the
• 10:38
  accelerator. Her mentors aggressively pressured
• 10:42
  her to pivot into a simple B2C software app because
• 10:46
  that's what investors were funding at the time.
• 10:48
  Right. And if we connect this to the bigger picture,
• 10:51
  the distinction here is between stubbornly clinging
• 10:54
  to your tactics versus remaining uncompromisingly
• 10:58
  anchored in your ethos. Tactics versus ethos.
• 11:01
  Yes. A magnetic leader is highly flexible on
• 11:04
  the how. but completely immovable on the Y. Oh,
• 11:08
  I see. Amelia knew that the actual behavioral
• 11:11
  transformation she was creating required a group
• 11:13
  setting integrated directly into the schools.
• 11:15
  That was her core ethos. Yeah. If she had bowed
• 11:18
  to the pressure and pivoted to a simple individual
• 11:20
  consumer app just to secure a quick check from
• 11:23
  an investor, she would have destroyed the actual
• 11:25
  value of the company. She would have lost the
• 11:26
  magic. Exactly. Holding firm to that ethos is
• 11:30
  precisely what preserved the multi -layered value
• 11:32
  that eventually attracted a massive conglomerate
• 11:34
  like Dada. OK, so you actively picket the execution,
• 11:37
  but you fiercely protect the underlying purpose.
• 11:40
  You've got it. But if you're holding that purpose
• 11:42
  so tightly, how do you manage the very real dynamic
• 11:46
  of interacting with investors or executives who
• 11:49
  hold the budget? You know, people who actively
• 11:51
  want to mold your idea to fit their own agenda.
• 11:55
  Well, you have to build a wall around that ethos.
• 11:58
  Amelia refers to this as principle two, creating
• 12:02
  a container. Okay, so creating a container. This
• 12:04
  is where you properly... utilize that assertive
• 12:08
  masculine energy, not to push your idea onto
• 12:11
  others, but to aggressively protect the boundaries
• 12:13
  of your feminine vision. The source highlights
• 12:15
  a massive trap almost everyone falls into when
• 12:18
  asking for resources. Oh, the self -negotiation.
• 12:21
  Yes. Let's say you go out to raise $800 ,000.
• 12:24
  You pitch a few times, and you get consecutive
• 12:26
  rejections. The silence is deafening. Panic sets
• 12:30
  in, and you immediately start negotiating against
• 12:33
  yourself in your own head. We've all been there.
• 12:34
  You look at your financial model and think, you
• 12:36
  know what, I can probably scrape by on $150 ,000.
• 12:39
  You start slashing your own value before anyone
• 12:41
  has even asked you to. It reminds me of a bouncer
• 12:44
  at a highly exclusive VIP club. You've curated
• 12:47
  the guest list. You know exactly how valuable
• 12:49
  the experience inside is. But the minute the
• 12:53
  sidewalk out front is empty for five minutes,
• 12:55
  you panic, drop the velvet rope, and start waving
• 12:58
  random people in off the street for half the
• 13:01
  cover charge. I love that analogy. You instantly
• 13:03
  devalue the entire establishment. You've just
• 13:06
  explained the mechanism of a collapsing container.
• 13:09
  Oh, interesting. The container is the defined
• 13:11
  boundary of your project. It is you dictating
• 13:14
  the timeline, the required ca - the price point,
• 13:17
  and the non -negotiable values of the venture.
• 13:20
  Practically speaking though, when a venture capitalist
• 13:22
  is grilling you on your metrics and pushing back
• 13:24
  on your valuation, don't you have to play their
• 13:27
  game to get the check? See, understanding the
• 13:29
  psychology of that boardroom dynamic is crucial.
• 13:32
  When investors or stakeholders aggressively push
• 13:35
  back on your metrics or critique your framework,
• 13:38
  it's very often a stress test. A stress test?
• 13:40
  Yes. They are intentionally applying pressure
• 13:43
  to see if your container cracks. If you flinch,
• 13:47
  apologize, and immediately offer to rewrite your
• 13:50
  entire business plan because one person questioned
• 13:53
  a projection, you signal that your foundation
• 13:56
  is fundamentally unstable. That makes total sense.
• 14:00
  Why would they invest millions into a structure
• 14:03
  that collapses under the first sign of pressure?
• 14:05
  So the strategy isn't to appease them. The strategy
• 14:07
  is to gather their feedback objectively, integrate
• 14:11
  anything that actually serves your vision, and
• 14:13
  then just hold your boundary for dear life. Exactly.
• 14:15
  Like if they demand specific numbers you haven't
• 14:18
  tracked yet, you don't panic or fabricate data.
• 14:21
  You simply say, we don't have those yet, but
• 14:23
  here is the data we do have. You invite aligned
• 14:27
  people into your specific container. You do not
• 14:30
  warp the container to fit whoever happens to
• 14:31
  be sitting across the table. Right. But a strong
• 14:34
  container is, you know, it's useless if it exists
• 14:36
  in total obscurity. Setting a boundary around
• 14:39
  your vision doesn't magically deposit funds into
• 14:41
  your bank account. You have to bridge the gap
• 14:44
  between holding your ground and actually being
• 14:46
  found by the right people. Which brings us to
• 14:49
  principle three. Which means stepping completely
• 14:51
  out of the shadows. The presentation calls this
• 14:54
  letting yourself be seen and heard fully. It's
• 14:58
  the tactical shift from grinding away quietly
• 15:01
  in your office for 14 hours a day to embracing
• 15:04
  radical visibility to achieve what the source
• 15:07
  calls quantum results. We should probably define
• 15:10
  quantum results here, because it isn't just a
• 15:12
  buzzword for success. No, it's a specific type
• 15:15
  of growth. Right. It refers to non -linear growth.
• 15:18
  In a traditional push model, growth is linear.
• 15:21
  You make 10 cold calls, you get one meeting.
• 15:23
  But quantum results happen through network effects.
• 15:26
  Yes. When you broadcast a highly authentic, uncompromising
• 15:29
  vision, it acts as a beacon. It activates second
• 15:32
  and third degree connections in your network
• 15:33
  who are values aligned. And they bring resources
• 15:36
  to you at a speed and scale that linear pushing
• 15:38
  could never achieve. And Amelia modeled this
• 15:41
  perfectly when she pitched her venture live on
• 15:43
  an Indian reality TV show for social entrepreneurs
• 15:46
  to 10 million viewers. 10 million. That's radical
• 15:50
  visibility. Absolutely. But the source material
• 15:53
  provides another incredible case study of how
• 15:56
  this mechanism works in private fundraising with
• 15:59
  Morgan Hewitt. Oh, the health care platform.
• 16:01
  Yeah. Morgan was building a mental health medication
• 16:04
  platform designed to help people find prescriptions
• 16:06
  without adverse side effects. But she was trapped
• 16:09
  in a classic startup catch -22. What was the
• 16:12
  catch? She needed to buy massive, expensive data
• 16:15
  sets from the pharmaceutical industry to build
• 16:17
  her algorithm. But she couldn't raise the capital
• 16:20
  because she didn't have a working algorithm to
• 16:22
  show investors. She had no product, just a visual
• 16:26
  prototype. Man, that's tough. If she had operated
• 16:29
  in the traditional push mindset, she would have
• 16:31
  spent months apologizing for not having the product
• 16:34
  ready, constantly tweaking her pitch to hide
• 16:36
  the missing data. Exactly. Which is the complete
• 16:39
  opposite of what she did. She stopped defensively
• 16:42
  pitching a locked product and started offensively
• 16:45
  broadcasting the specific massive bottleneck
• 16:47
  she was trying to solve. She leaned into the
• 16:50
  visibility. She did. Fully exposing the systemic
• 16:54
  flaw in how pharmaceutical data is hoarded. By
• 16:58
  unapologetically telling that exact story, she
• 17:00
  wasn't just begging for cash. She was calling
• 17:03
  out to investors who were specifically aligned
• 17:05
  with fixing that injustice. And because she created
• 17:08
  that magnetic field, she raised a $400 ,000 pre
• 17:12
  -seed round in just four weeks. Four weeks. Yeah.
• 17:16
  And then, six months later... She raised a seed
• 17:18
  round of over a million dollars, becoming one
• 17:21
  of only 49 Black women globally to raise a million
• 17:25
  dollar seed round in 2021. That is the definition
• 17:28
  of quantum results. In Stacey Edgar, utilized
• 17:31
  the exact same mechanism in a highly regulated
• 17:34
  bureaucratic industry. Right, the insurance space.
• 17:36
  Yeah. She tried to reimagine health insurance
• 17:38
  for freelancers. In the beginning, she only had
• 17:41
  about 30 users in a bare -bones pilot program.
• 17:44
  30 users is... yeah, that's not a lot to pitch
• 17:47
  with. But rather than hiding behind her small
• 17:48
  numbers, she shifted her narrative to project
• 17:51
  the massive anchored vision of her container.
• 17:54
  Within two weeks of that shift, that clear signal...
• 17:57
  attracted brand -name partnerships with Covered
• 18:00
  California and Kaiser Permanente. And those partnerships
• 18:04
  then provided the leverage to raise a $550 ,000
• 18:08
  pre -seed round. The common denominator in all
• 18:11
  of these success stories is a profound identity
• 18:13
  shift. These founders had to fundamentally change
• 18:17
  how they viewed their own role. They had to transition
• 18:20
  from being the chef, sweating in the weeds of
• 18:23
  the kitchen, frantically chopping onions and
• 18:25
  hoping someone liked the soup, to being the owner
• 18:28
  of the restaurant. I really like that. They had
• 18:30
  to realize their primary job was no longer just
• 18:33
  building the product in the dark. Their job was
• 18:35
  stewarding the vision, protecting the container,
• 18:38
  and acting as the magnet for the necessary funds
• 18:40
  and partnerships. And this raises an important
• 18:42
  question really that forces us to examine our
• 18:45
  own behavior. It is. How often do we use seemingly
• 18:48
  logical excuses as armor to avoid the vulnerability
• 18:51
  of being truly seen? Oh, all the time. We tell
• 18:54
  ourselves, I don't have the right network. or
• 18:57
  my idea is just too complex to explain, or I
• 19:00
  need to build three more features before I show
• 19:02
  this to anyone. Right. Those aren't business
• 19:04
  strategies. They are shields protecting us from
• 19:07
  the radical visibility required to actually attract
• 19:11
  the right people. So what does this all mean?
• 19:14
  Synthesizing all of this for you listening right
• 19:16
  now, whether you are trying to raise millions
• 19:18
  of dollars for a tech startup, prepping to pitch
• 19:21
  a controversial new project at your Tuesday staff
• 19:24
  meeting, or just trying to lead a small team
• 19:27
  through a difficult transition, you have a fundamental
• 19:30
  choice in your operational physics. You can continue
• 19:33
  to rely entirely on the exhausting masculine
• 19:36
  strategy of pushing. You can keep trying to aggressively
• 19:39
  force people to see your value, warping your
• 19:42
  ideas to match whatever you think the room wants
• 19:44
  to hear, and bringing yourself out, pulling a
• 19:46
  rope that's tearing your hands apart. Or you
• 19:49
  can lean into the physics of receiving. You can
• 19:51
  identify the vision that shows you, anchor deeply
• 19:54
  into that ethos, and set an uncompromising container
• 19:57
  to protect it. You can focus your energy on broadcasting
• 20:00
  your most authentic self, trusting that absolute
• 20:03
  clarity will act as a magnet for the specific
• 20:05
  opportunities and allies who align with your
• 20:08
  values. And this isn't just about massive funding
• 20:10
  rounds, by the way. Right. The source reminds
• 20:12
  us to celebrate every single dollar or every
• 20:15
  tiny nod of agreement in a meeting, not for the
• 20:18
  immediate payout, but as mechanical validation
• 20:21
  that your magnetic field is working, that the
• 20:23
  right people are being pulled into your container
• 20:25
  at exactly the right time. It completely reframes
• 20:28
  the daily grind. So I want to leave you with
• 20:31
  a final thought to mull over today. Look at the
• 20:34
  absolute hardest project or pitch or goal you
• 20:38
  are working on right now. The one that is draining
• 20:40
  your energy and making you feel like you are
• 20:42
  constantly forcing an immovable object. We all
• 20:45
  have one. If you stopped trying to aggressively
• 20:47
  sell it, if you stopped desperately trying to
• 20:49
  convince people of its worth, and instead focused
• 20:52
  entirely on unapologetically letting your uncompromising
• 20:56
  vision be seen, who might unexpectedly walk through
• 20:59
  the door to join you?