Latest / Investor Exchange / Baker Technology: Half-Year 2025 Profit Guidance

Transcript

Baker Technology: Half-Year 2025 Profit Guidance · Investor Exchange

• 0:02
  Time for another Investor Exchange podcast. Here are your hosts, Matt and Sally.
• 0:08
  Welcome to The Deep Dive, the show where we distill complex information into
• 0:12
  surprising insights, making you genuinely well-informed. Glad to be here.
• 0:16
  Today, we're plunging into, well, a pretty stark financial story.
• 0:20
  We're looking at how a company went from making a decent profit to reporting
• 0:24
  a significant loss, all within just one year.
• 0:28
  It's a really striking example, isn't it, how fast things can change.
• 0:31
  The company is Baker Technology Limited. They're based in Singapore and they
• 0:35
  specialize in specialized marine offshore equipment and services,
• 0:40
  mainly for the oil and gas sector. Exactly.
• 0:42
  So our mission today is to really unpack their latest financial results,
• 0:46
  the unaudited interim statements for the first half of 2025.
• 0:50
  We'll compare them against the same period in 2024. Yeah, the goal is to understand
• 0:54
  what exactly happened, what drove this big shift in performance,
• 0:58
  and importantly, what does the company see looking ahead?
• 1:01
  And as we get into it, you'll see some surprising things, like how factors that
• 1:04
  seem kind of small or maybe external can have these massive financial ripples.
• 1:09
  Absolutely. Even a company with a strong core business isn't immune to unexpected
• 1:14
  headwinds. It's going to be quite illuminating, I think.
• 1:17
  Okay, let's dive right in then. The headline numbers really tell a story of a dramatic downturn.
• 1:22
  It's quite something. It really is. So first half of 2024, Baker Technology
• 1:26
  Group reports a net profit after tax.
• 1:29
  Pretty healthy, $13.0 million. Right. Comfortable position.
• 1:32
  Then fast forward one year, first six months of 2025, they swing completely the other way.
• 1:39
  A net loss after tax of $17.4 million.
• 1:43
  Wow. That's a swing of what, over $30 million? From profit to loss. Exactly.
• 1:47
  A huge swing. Right. And it's not just some abstract number on a page.
• 1:51
  No, definitely not. It hits shareholders directly. You look at the earnings
• 1:53
  per share, or in this case, loss per share. It went from a positive 5.9 cents
• 1:58
  in the first half of 2024 to a negative 9.2 cents per share in the first half of 2025.
• 2:03
  That's a very clear, very direct impact on shareholder value in a really short time.
• 2:08
  And it wasn't just the bottom line, was it? The revenue, the actual money coming
• 2:12
  in, that took a massive hit too.
• 2:14
  Oh, absolutely. A nosedive is probably the right word. Yeah.
• 2:17
  We're talking a 56% decrease in revenue.
• 2:20
  56%. It dropped from $52.4 million in 1H 2024 down to just $23.0 million in 1H 2025.
• 2:28
  That's huge. More than half their revenue just gone compared to the previous year.
• 2:34
  So where did that massive drop come from primarily?
• 2:37
  Well, digging into the details, the report points mainly to lower contributions
• 2:41
  from their core marine offshore segment. Okay.
• 2:44
  Specifically, they mentioned lower charter revenue, so less income from chartering
• 2:49
  out their vessels and also lower fabrication revenue, making less specialized equipment.
• 2:54
  So it wasn't just a small dip. It sounds like a pretty fundamental challenge
• 2:57
  in their main business area.
• 2:58
  It certainly suggests that. And you can see geographically, too.
• 3:01
  Ah, yeah, I saw that. Some regions were hit harder than others.
• 3:04
  Definitely. Like the Asia-Pacific region, but excluding China and Singapore,
• 3:09
  revenue there went from $38.2 million.
• 3:12
  This is a big chunk. Right. A major market for them. It dropped all the way down to $12.8 million.
• 3:17
  That's a huge contraction in a key area. Wow. OK, so revenue down dramatically.
• 3:22
  What did that do to their gross profit? Because, you know, even if revenue falls, if you cut costs enough.
• 3:28
  Well, that's where it gets even more stark. Their gross profit was almost wiped out.
• 3:32
  Wiped out. Pretty much. A staggering 99% reduction.
• 3:36
  99%. Good grief. What are the numbers? It went from $19.8 million in gross profit
• 3:41
  in the first half of 2024 down to just $0.3 million, $300,000 in the first half of 2025.
• 3:48
  So $19.8 million down to $0.3 million.
• 3:53
  Exactly. Now, they did reduce their cost of sales by about 30 percent,
• 3:57
  but it wasn't nearly enough to compensate for that huge revenue drop.
• 4:01
  So basically, after paying for the direct costs of what they sold or chartered,
• 4:05
  they were making almost nothing.
• 4:06
  Precisely. Margins became incredibly thin once that volume disappeared,
• 4:10
  which really tells you their core operations, despite some cost cutting,
• 4:13
  were generating almost no income compared to the year before.
• 4:16
  Okay, so the operational side was clearly tough, lower revenue, near zero gross profit.
• 4:20
  But that $17.4 million net loss feels like there must be more to the story than
• 4:25
  just the operational side.
• 4:27
  You're absolutely right. And this is where it gets, well, fascinating from a
• 4:30
  financial perspective.
• 4:32
  While the operational issues were significant, the real game changer here,
• 4:36
  the thing that really pushed them deep into their red...
• 4:39
  Was foreign exchange, Forex. Ah, okay.
• 4:43
  The report mentions that as a major reason for the net loss. A major reason.
• 4:47
  The group recorded a foreign exchange loss of $8.0 million in the first half of 2025.
• 4:54
  $8 million just lost on currency movements. And how is that compared to the year before?
• 4:59
  That's the kicker. It's a complete reversal. In the first half of 2024,
• 5:03
  they actually had a foreign exchange gain of $3.1 million.
• 5:07
  So let me get this straight. Right. They went from a $3.1 million gain from
• 5:10
  Forex and 1H24. Correct.
• 5:13
  To an $8.1 million loss from Forex and 1H25. Exactly.
• 5:16
  If you add those together, that's an $11.1 million negative swing,
• 5:20
  purely from currency fluctuations. $11 million.
• 5:23
  That alone explains a huge chunk
• 5:25
  of the difference between the profit last year and the loss this year.
• 5:28
  It absolutely does. It wasn't just a minor factor. It was a massive financial hit.
• 5:32
  So what actually happened with the currencies? Why such a big swing?
• 5:35
  It boils down to the U.S. dollar versus the Singapore dollar.
• 5:39
  In the first half of 2025, the U.S.
• 5:42
  Dollar depreciated against the Singapore dollar by about 6%. OK.
• 5:46
  USD got weaker. Right. But in the first half of 2024, the U.S.
• 5:51
  Dollar had actually appreciated against the Singapore dollar by about 3%.
• 5:54
  So completely the opposite move. Precisely.
• 5:57
  And for a company like Baker Technology operating internationally,
• 6:01
  likely holding assets or having contracts in USD while reporting an SGD,
• 6:06
  that shift has a direct multimillion dollar impact on their reported profits.
• 6:11
  It really shows how these big global economic shifts like currency rates can
• 6:16
  hammer a company's bottom line, doesn't it? Absolutely. It's a very vivid example.
• 6:20
  But, you know, we shouldn't forget the operational side either. Good point.
• 6:24
  The forex loss was huge, but the underlying business issues were still there. Exactly.
• 6:29
  That lower contribution from chartering and fabrication driven by the fall in
• 6:33
  revenue, that was a very real problem, too.
• 6:35
  The forex loss compounded it significantly.
• 6:38
  Okay. One thing that looks slightly positive, maybe.
• 6:41
  Administrative expenses, finance costs, they didn't balloon, did they?
• 6:46
  No, that's right. They remained relatively stable or even decreased slightly.
• 6:50
  So the massive loss wasn't because they suddenly started spending wildly on overhead or something.
• 6:55
  Correct. It suggests the financial pressure came primarily from those external
• 6:59
  factors, the market downturn hitting revenue and the currency swings rather
• 7:03
  than, say, poor internal cost control on the admin side.
• 7:07
  Okay, let's shift gears a bit and look at their overall financial health.
• 7:10
  The balance sheet. What happened to their shareholders' funds?
• 7:14
  They took a hit as well, which you'd expect, given the loss.
• 7:17
  Group shareholders' funds decreased from $235.3 million at the end of December
• 7:22
  2024 down to $210.3 million by the end of June 2025.
• 7:28
  And what drove that drop? Was it just the net loss? The net loss attributable
• 7:32
  to shareholders, which was $18.6 million, was the biggest factor,
• 7:35
  yes. But there were a couple of other things, too.
• 7:37
  There was a foreign currency translation loss of $2.7 million.
• 7:41
  That comes from consolidating the results of their overseas subsidiaries into
• 7:46
  Singapore dollars. Right. Another 4X impact. Yep.
• 7:48
  And importantly, they also paid out a dividend during this period, $4.1 million.
• 7:54
  Ah, OK. So the loss, the currency translation effect and the dividend payment
• 7:59
  all reduced the shareholders funds.
• 8:01
  Correct. And that directly impacts the net asset value per share.
• 8:05
  It dropped from 116.0 cents down to 103.6 cents.
• 8:09
  Less underlying value per share on the books. Got it. What about their cash
• 8:13
  position? Did that take a similar hit? It did decrease, yes.
• 8:16
  Cash and short-term deposits went from $112.0 million at the end of last year
• 8:21
  down to $99.8 million by June 30th, 2025.
• 8:26
  So a drop of about $12.2 million, where did that cash go? Well, several places.
• 8:30
  They had net outflows from operating activities of $6.0 million.
• 8:34
  Which makes sense if they were making a loss overall. Exactly.
• 8:37
  They also spent $4.1 million on capital expenditure buying property, plant, and equipment.
• 8:42
  Then there was that $4.1 million dividend payment we just mentioned. Right.
• 8:46
  That uses cash. And finally, a net purchase of investment securities for $2.5 million.
• 8:51
  So operations, investment in assets, paying shareholders, and buying securities all used cash.
• 8:58
  But wasn't there something that helped offset that outflow a bit?
• 9:02
  Then I saw something about a rights issue.
• 9:04
  Yes, good catch. That's an important detail.
• 9:07
  They did benefit from the successful completion of a rights issue by CH Offshore LTD, or CHO.
• 9:13
  Which is related to them. Yes, they hold a significant stake.
• 9:16
  This rights issue, where existing shareholders could buy more shares,
• 9:20
  brought in $6.1 million from minority shareholders of CHO. Ah,
• 9:25
  so that inflow of cash helped cushion the blow from the operational losses and
• 9:29
  other spending. Exactly.
• 9:31
  It was a strategic move that provided a partial but helpful offset to the overall cash reduction.
• 9:36
  It shows them actively managing their capital structure.
• 9:39
  And despite all these challenges, it looks like they didn't see any major new
• 9:43
  issues with the value of their assets, like their vessels, or with customers not paying.
• 9:48
  That seems to be the case, according to the report. They stated they didn't
• 9:52
  perform further impairment reviews on their vessels because there were no new
• 9:56
  indicators of impairment in the first half of 2025.
• 9:59
  So they still think the vessels are worth what's on the books for now. Yes.
• 10:04
  And they also deemed their provision for expected credit losses,
• 10:07
  basically. Money set aside for potential bad debts from customers as adequate.
• 10:12
  OK, so some stability there, which is good. Yeah. Now, looking forward,
• 10:15
  did the company see this coming?
• 10:17
  Was this loss a complete shock? Actually, no. And this speaks to their transparency.
• 10:22
  They had issued a profit guidance announcement back on June 16th, 2025.
• 10:27
  Oh, really? What did it say? It basically warned shareholders to expect a net loss for the first half.
• 10:32
  And they cited the main reasons, lower revenue and those foreign exchange losses.
• 10:37
  So they flagged it in advance. They did. And in their results announcement,
• 10:40
  they said the actual loss was broadly in line with that guidance.
• 10:44
  So management seemed to have a realistic grasp of the situation beforehand.
• 10:49
  That's generally seen as a positive, right? Managing expectations.
• 10:53
  Yes. It avoids nasty surprises for the market.
• 10:56
  So given they knew things were tough, what's their strategy now?
• 11:00
  How are they approaching the future?
• 11:02
  They're describing their approach as cautious and calibrated,
• 11:06
  which sounds about right given the circumstances.
• 11:09
  Cautious and calibrated. What does that mean in practice? Well,
• 11:13
  they point to ongoing geopolitical flux, general uncertainties,
• 11:17
  and specifically mention roiling tariff rates and exemption policies as things they're navigating.
• 11:23
  Sounds like the global trade environment is a big concern. Definitely.
• 11:26
  So they've set out two guiding principles. One is investment expenditure for
• 11:31
  growth. OK, so they're still looking for opportunities.
• 11:33
  Yes, but balanced against the second principle, capital preservation.
• 11:37
  Ah, protecting what they have. Exactly. So it's a balancing act.
• 11:41
  Be careful, protect the balance sheet, but don't completely stop investing in
• 11:45
  potential growth areas.
• 11:46
  It's a common strategy in uncertain times. And reflecting that caution and obviously the loss.
• 11:52
  Dividends. No dividend declared or recommended for the first half of 2025.
• 11:56
  Yes, very explicitly. They said it was in view of the group's operational and financial cash needs.
• 12:03
  So a direct link. Performance is down. Cash is needed internally.
• 12:07
  So no payout to shareholders for now. Precisely. It's a clear signal about prioritizing
• 12:12
  the company's stability and operational requirements right now.
• 12:15
  Okay, so let's just recap this deep dive into Baker Technologies' first half
• 12:20
  of 2025. It was an incredibly tough period. Definitely.
• 12:25
  The key takeaways are that massive revenue decline, mainly from their core marine offshore segment.
• 12:30
  Right, down 56%. Compounded by a really significant foreign exchange loss.
• 12:35
  That $8 million Forex loss compared to a gain the previous year was the critical
• 12:40
  factor turning a prior profit into a pretty substantial net loss this time around.
• 12:44
  Yeah, that $11 million swing from Forex alone is just huge.
• 12:47
  It really highlights something important, doesn't it? Which brings us to a final
• 12:51
  thought for you, our listener.
• 12:52
  For a company like Baker Technology, deeply involved in global trade.
• 12:57
  Operating across borders, dealing in different currencies, how much of its success
• 13:02
  or failure is actually tied to these big external forces?
• 13:06
  Things like global economics, geopolitical stability, currency markets.
• 13:10
  You mean potentially even more than just how well they run their core business day to day?
• 13:14
  Sometimes, yes. It raises the question.
• 13:17
  How can businesses, and maybe investors too, better prepare for these kinds of shocks?
• 13:22
  These sudden swings in currency or gifts in trade policy that seem to come out
• 13:26
  of nowhere but have huge impacts?
• 13:28
  It's a tough one. It really shows how interconnected everything is.
• 13:31
  Even a specialized sector like marine offshore equipment can be so exposed to
• 13:36
  global winds. It certainly does. Something to think about.
• 13:41
  Music.