Latest / The Epstein Chronicles / Howard Lutnick And The Transcript From His Epstein Related Congressional Hearing (Part 5) (5/15/26)

Transcript

Howard Lutnick And The Transcript From His Epstein Related Congressional Hearing (Part 5) (5/15/26) · The Epstein Chronicles

• 0:00
  Speaker 1: What's up, everyone, and welcome to another episode of the
• 0:02
  Epstein Chronicles. In this episode, we're getting right back to
• 0:06
  the Howard Lutnik transcript from his meeting with Congress redacted.
• 0:14
  All right, we can go back on the record. Good afternoon,
• 0:17
  Secretary Lutnik. My name is redacted. I'll be conducting most
• 0:21
  of the questioning for the Minority today. Before we begin questioning,
• 0:25
  I'd like to know for the record that this transcribed
• 0:27
  interview is not being videotaped. The Majority has decided that
• 0:31
  the American people don't deserve to watch the testimony that
• 0:34
  you will provide today. They've decided instead that the American
• 0:38
  people can find and read the transcript of your testimony
• 0:41
  if it's released at some date in the future. Today's
• 0:45
  transcribed interview, originally announced on March third, appears designed to
• 0:50
  preempt a motion to subpoenas Secretary Lutnick's testimony by Congresswoman
• 0:54
  Nancy Mace, but that does not justify keeping these proceedings
• 0:59
  off of camera. Committee Republicans have claimed that the investigations
• 1:03
  being conducted in the interest to transparency for the public
• 1:07
  and for the survivors of Jeffrey Epstein's crimes. To that end,
• 1:11
  the Committee has videotaped multiple prominent witnesses who have appeared
• 1:15
  for testimony in the Epstein investigation, and the majority has
• 1:19
  released those videos shortly after the testimony was complete. The
• 1:23
  Committee was videoed and released the testimony of Glenn Maxwell,
• 1:27
  Darren Endyke, Richard Kahn, and Les Wexner. Oversight Republicans videotape
• 1:32
  the testimony of President Bill Clinton and former Secretary Hillary Clinton,
• 1:37
  and those videos were released to the public three days
• 1:40
  after the conclusion of their depositions. The American people and
• 1:45
  the survivors of Epstein's crimes deserve the same of today's testimony.
• 1:49
  The fact that Secretary Lutnik is present for a transcribed
• 1:52
  interview rather than a deposition does not change our obligation
• 1:56
  to transparency. Earlier this Congress, overt Site Republicans investigated the
• 2:02
  now dupunk theory that the previous administration used an auto
• 2:06
  pen to take action without President Biden's knowledge. As part
• 2:10
  of that investigation, over Site Republicans interviewed fourteen former Democratic
• 2:15
  White House officials. The overwhelming majority, eleven of the fourteen
• 2:19
  were conducted as transcribed interviews. Yet every single interview, including
• 2:25
  the transcribed interviews was videotaped, and every single video was
• 2:29
  released to the public. Committee Republicans have set one standard
• 2:33
  for officials in a democratic administration and a separate and
• 2:37
  less transparent standard for officials in the Republican administration. That
• 2:42
  is a political distinction, not a principled one. To be clear,
• 2:46
  the Minority welcomes Secretary Lutni's appearance and testimony, but we
• 2:51
  believe the American people should be able to watch today's
• 2:54
  interview and reach their own conclusions about today's testimony. And
• 2:58
  with that, I will move on to substantative questions. Good afternoon,
• 3:02
  Secretary Lutnik. As I said, my name is redacted, and
• 3:06
  as you know, today's conversation is going to focus on
• 3:08
  your relationship with Jeffrey Epstein. I would like to start
• 3:12
  with the interview that you gave to The New York
• 3:14
  Post in October of last year. I know you discussed
• 3:18
  it a little bit in the previous round. Some of
• 3:20
  these questions might be repetitive to some degree. I'll try
• 3:23
  to minimize that to the extent possible, but there's going
• 3:26
  to be some overlap. In that interview last year, you
• 3:30
  describe your relationship with Jeffrey Epstein in detail. Substantial parts
• 3:34
  of that interview have since been called into question, so
• 3:38
  we will go over the interview one piece out of
• 3:40
  time and establish which parts are accurate. So I'll introduce,
• 3:44
  as minority exhibit a written transcript of the portion of
• 3:50
  the interview that related to mister Epstein. I'll give you
• 3:53
  a moment to look it over if you'd like to.
• 3:56
  Secretary Lutnik, can I have a copy of that for
• 3:58
  my lawyer redacted? Yeah? There were I think there were
• 4:02
  three in there redacted. Yeah, And they'll always hand you
• 4:07
  three or four of the council to look at. Mister
• 4:09
  Mayron who prepared the transcript redacted. It was prepared by us.
• 4:13
  We can confirm to you the accuracy of it. If
• 4:16
  you have some specific reason to believe that part of
• 4:19
  it's not accurate, of course, we're happy to discuss that. Mayron.
• 4:23
  The first line says, I would be remised, is that
• 4:26
  what was said? Redacted? Yeah? That was our best interpretation.
• 4:31
  I think you could reasonably interpret it as likely being
• 4:34
  remiss question. We're going to go over it one by
• 4:39
  one as well. Lutnick, that's all right, I'm just going
• 4:43
  to read it quickly. Question of course? Answer okay. Question.
• 4:48
  I'm going to break it up in pieces. The only
• 4:50
  thing I will do is skip the parts where the
• 4:52
  interviewer interrupted you with the words like right or interesting.
• 4:57
  Just starting at the outset, you were asked how well
• 4:59
  you Jeffrey Epstein, and you started by saying, quote, all right,
• 5:03
  so we are in number eleven and he lives at
• 5:05
  number nine. So is it correct that you did and
• 5:09
  maybe still do. I'm Machur live at eleven East seventy
• 5:12
  first Street in New York City. Answer yeah, I have
• 5:16
  a townhouse at eleven East seventy first Street. Question and
• 5:20
  is that what you were referring to here when you
• 5:22
  said number eleven? Answer yeah. Question and as far as
• 5:25
  you know, is it correct that mister Epstein lived at
• 5:28
  nine East seventy first Street. Answer yeah, that was his residence.
• 5:32
  Question and is that what you were referring to when
• 5:36
  you said number nine? Answer yeah. Question Is it correct
• 5:39
  that those two homes are adjacent to each other? Answer yes,
• 5:43
  question they share a wall. Answer yes. Question. And then
• 5:48
  you said, quote, so we renovate, we buy our house,
• 5:51
  and our house is pigeons and mice. Okay, that's it.
• 5:53
  It was derelict. Right, so we build, we rebuild our house,
• 5:58
  we move in two thousand and five, and I'll stop there.
• 6:01
  So I heard you say in a previous round you
• 6:03
  bought your home I think in nineteen ninety seven. Is
• 6:06
  that correct answer? That's correct? Question? And did you know
• 6:10
  at the time you purchased the home that you the
• 6:13
  home had been previously owned by both Jeffrey and Less
• 6:16
  Wexner answer, I don't know. I know I bought it
• 6:20
  from Charles de Gunzburg, so that I remember, I don't
• 6:22
  know if I knew anything else. Question is it that
• 6:26
  you were not sure whether that you knew at the
• 6:28
  time that the home had previously owned by Jeffrey Epstein
• 6:31
  unless Wexner answer, when I bought the house, I didn't know.
• 6:35
  I don't recall knowing. Question you don't recall whether or
• 6:38
  not you knew at the time. Is that right? Answer? Right? Question? Okay?
• 6:42
  Is it possible that you knew? Is it possible that
• 6:45
  you did not know? Am I interpreting that correctly? Answer? No,
• 6:49
  I don't recall knowing. I recall what I did know
• 6:52
  was I bought the house from Charles de Gunzburg. That
• 6:55
  I know, I don't know if I knew who owned
• 6:57
  it previously. I can't say, as I sit here today,
• 7:00
  from whatever, almost thirty years ago, what I knew or
• 7:03
  didn't know, But I certainly didn't know when I bought it. Question.
• 7:07
  I'm sorry, there is just a little contradiction between those
• 7:10
  two parts. You're not sure today whether or not you
• 7:12
  know at the time that the home was owned by
• 7:15
  Jeffrey Epstein. Is that fair answer? No, I bought my
• 7:18
  house from Charles de Gunsberg, and I do not recall
• 7:21
  knowing when I bought the house who owned it previously. Question. So,
• 7:25
  sitting here today, you cannot be certain as to whether
• 7:27
  you know or not or knew at the time who
• 7:31
  the previous owners were. Is that what I hear you saying? Answer, Well,
• 7:35
  I'm trying to be clear. I remember clearly I bought
• 7:39
  the house from Charles de Gunsberg. He was the owner
• 7:41
  of the house. I can't remember, as I sit here today,
• 7:44
  almost thirty years later, whether I ever knew subsequently that
• 7:48
  I learned who owned the house previously. I just don't
• 7:51
  remember as I sit here. Question. But the narrow question
• 7:55
  is just at the time you bought the home, did
• 7:57
  you know whether the home was previously owned by Jeffrey Epstein,
• 8:01
  and I think I think you're saying you're just not
• 8:04
  sure either way, it was a long time ago. Answer,
• 8:07
  I don't think so. Question. I'm sorry, No, I don't
• 8:10
  think so. Is unclear for us? For me, No, you
• 8:13
  don't think you knew or you're just not sure whether
• 8:16
  you knew or not. Answer, I know I bought the
• 8:20
  house from Charles de Gunsberg that I knew. Question. I'm
• 8:24
  crystal clear on that part, no doubt about it. The
• 8:26
  narrow question is just at the time of purchase, did
• 8:29
  you know that the home had previously been owned by
• 8:32
  Jeffrey Epstein. Answer, before Charles de Gunsberg owned it, I
• 8:37
  don't remember whether I ever learned that at the time,
• 8:40
  meaning at the time I purchased it, I didn't learn that.
• 8:42
  I don't know. I don't recall. I don't know. Question
• 8:46
  you don't recall whether or not you knew at the
• 8:48
  time you purchased it. Right answer, when I agreed to
• 8:51
  buy the house, I surely didn't know. How was that
• 8:54
  is that helpful? Question? Well, it is, but it's not
• 8:57
  quite the same thing as the earlier statement. I'm not
• 9:01
  suggesting that you did or did not know. It's just
• 9:04
  I think you heard you say it was thirty years ago.
• 9:07
  I don't recall whether or not I knew, but there
• 9:10
  have been a few statements that suggest no, I did
• 9:13
  not know that it was previously owned by Epstein. So
• 9:16
  I just want to pin that down and which one
• 9:18
  of those it is. Answer? I don't know, and I
• 9:21
  don't think I ever knew that Jeffrey Epstein owned the
• 9:23
  house that I bought. Is that helpful? Question? Yeah? Is
• 9:27
  that new information for you here today? Answer that? What
• 9:30
  question that Jeffrey Epstein previously owned your house? Answer? Yes,
• 9:34
  question okay, answer, I don't know that to be true.
• 9:38
  Question has it ever been suggested to you or have
• 9:41
  you ever heard that Epstein previously owned your home? Answer?
• 9:45
  I don't think that's true, So I guess, as I
• 9:47
  sit here today, I don't think that's true. Question I
• 9:50
  got that, but that's not quite the question I asked.
• 9:54
  Has it ever been suggested to you or have you
• 9:56
  ever heard somebody say that Epstein previously owned your home? Answer?
• 10:01
  I can't recall as I sit here today. Question is
• 10:04
  it correct that you did some kind of large scale
• 10:06
  renovation project on the home? Answer in my home. Yes,
• 10:10
  of course. Question and is it correct? I think I
• 10:13
  heard you say in the previous round that you moved
• 10:15
  in in two thousand and five. Answer yeah, question okay,
• 10:19
  So the next part is quote, Okay, Jeffrey Epstein's arrested
• 10:23
  and like, oh wait, I think or something like that.
• 10:26
  So knock on the door his assistant on like a
• 10:29
  Saturday says mister Epstein's your neighbor, and he'd like to
• 10:32
  invite you over for some coffee, so I can come over.
• 10:35
  The first part of that, which is that mister Epstein
• 10:37
  was arrested in six but he did not plead guilty
• 10:40
  to solicitation of a minor in two thousand and eight.
• 10:43
  A question for you is, and I think you described
• 10:46
  it in some detail previously. Is it correct that mister
• 10:49
  Epstein's assistant did knock on your door on a Saturday
• 10:51
  morning because mister Epstein wanted to invite you over for coffee.
• 10:56
  Answer say that again, question is it correct? That is,
• 11:00
  as far as you can recall, mister Epstein's assistant knocked
• 11:02
  on your door, to the best of your recollection on
• 11:05
  a Saturday morning because Epstein wanted to invite you over
• 11:08
  for coffee. Answer. I don't know if it was Saturday
• 11:12
  or not, but I do recall that someone who will
• 11:14
  worked for him knocked on our door and invited us
• 11:16
  for coffee. Question was it framed as mister Epstein would
• 11:20
  like to invite you over for coffee? Answer? I wasn't.
• 11:24
  The person didn't tell me. They told me someone who
• 11:27
  worked for me. It was an assistant. Someone who worked
• 11:30
  for Epstein knocked on the door and spoke to someone
• 11:32
  who worked for me and said, your neighbor would like
• 11:34
  to invite you over for coffee. But it's not a
• 11:37
  conversation I participated in. So I'm trying to just give
• 11:40
  you the context. Question I understand you are not directly
• 11:44
  a party to that conversation. Answer, I was not. Question
• 11:49
  The next part is quote, so my wife and I
• 11:51
  go next door. You know, we walk the seven steps
• 11:54
  right to the next door next house for coffee. We
• 11:57
  share a wall, right so it's New York City. So
• 12:00
  he invites us in. We have coffee in this and
• 12:02
  he says, do you want a tour? We said great,
• 12:04
  I'll stop there. So is it correct that you and
• 12:07
  your wife did go over to Epstein's house that day? Answer? Now,
• 12:11
  I don't know if it was that day. Question, it
• 12:13
  might have been a later date. Answer correct. Question. Is
• 12:17
  it correct that mister Epstein did offer you a tour?
• 12:19
  Answer yeah, question, and is it correct that you and
• 12:22
  your wife did agree to that tour? Answer yeah. Question.
• 12:26
  Prior to this interaction, did you have any knowledge of
• 12:29
  who Jeffrey Epstein was? Answer not that I can think
• 12:32
  of now, no question. I think in the interview you
• 12:38
  then said that he, meaning Epstein, has got a really
• 12:41
  big house. I think we all at this point understand
• 12:44
  that that is an accurate statement. And then you were
• 12:47
  asked whether you visited every room of Epstein's house, and
• 12:50
  you said, quote, he's got well, I'll tell you, so,
• 12:53
  his house is like super big, really wide, and so
• 12:55
  he gives me a tour of the living room, big
• 12:57
  living room, and then across from it double doors. I
• 13:00
  assume it's a dining room, and he opens the doors
• 13:03
  and there's a massage table in the middle of the
• 13:05
  room and candles all around and stuff, and I'll stop there.
• 13:09
  So is it correct that he did give you a
• 13:12
  tour and that you recall the tour as you described
• 13:14
  it here. Answer? Yes, we were in the living room
• 13:18
  for coffee, and my recollection is we went across the
• 13:21
  hall to the next room, which he opened the door.
• 13:24
  I assumed it was a dining room, and that's the
• 13:26
  massage table as I described there. Question is the part
• 13:30
  about the candles accurate to your recollection? Answer? Yes, question
• 13:34
  where the candles lit? Answer? I don't recall. All right, folks,
• 13:39
  we're gonna wrap up right here, and in the next
• 13:40
  episode dealing with the topic, we're gonna pick up where
• 13:43
  we left off. All the information that goes with this
• 13:46
  episode can be found in the description box.