Latest / Murder Files Unsealed / Yogurt Shop Murders Allegedly Solved 34 Years Later As Police Identify Suspect

Transcript

Yogurt Shop Murders Allegedly Solved 34 Years Later As Police Identify Suspect · Murder Files Unsealed

0:00
Speaker 1: Welcome to the deep dive. We take stories, often complex ones,
0:03
break them down and give you what you need to know. Today,
0:06
we're looking into a case that's haunted American true crime
0:09
for decades, the nineteen ninety one yogurt shop murders in Austin, Texas.
0:15
Speaker 2: It's a huge case, not just because of the tragedy itself,
0:18
which was immense, but because it's spun into this thirty
0:21
four year saga. It really affected everything legal process is,
0:24
forensic science even led to wrongful convictions. Yes, quite a story.
0:28
Speaker 1: Yeah, and that's our mission today, a real deep dive
0:31
into the sources we've got. We need to unpack the
0:33
whole thing, the crime scene, the investigation's failures back in
0:36
the nineties, and then you know this incredible breakthrough in
0:39
twenty twenty five driven by technology. We're digging into what happened,
0:43
why it took so long, and how science finally finally
0:46
gave an answer.
0:46
Speaker 2: And you really have to start with the setting. I
0:48
think Austin in the early nineties. The documents paint this
0:51
picture of a city that was well booming in its
0:54
own way, creative, that weird but welcoming vibe. You know,
0:57
music festivals, progressive ideas, not the kind of you'd imagine
1:00
this sort of calculated brutal violence happening.
1:04
Speaker 1: Right. That contrast is jarring, and maybe that's why it's
1:06
stuck with the city for so long. It sort of
1:08
sets the stage for this mystery that lasted decades, only
1:12
to be solved incredibly by identifying a serial killer who
1:15
was already dead. So let's go back December sixth, nineteen
1:20
ninety one. Tell us about that night.
1:21
Speaker 2: Okay, so it's a Friday night, wintry, the Sources Mansion
1:24
holiday lights up around North Cross Mall in North Austin
1:27
for normal end a week feel, and the location was popular.
1:32
I can't believe. It's yogurt on Guadalupe Street twenty nine
1:36
oh six guadalupek Just.
1:37
Speaker 1: A regular yogurt shop and a strip mall and nothing
1:39
special until about eleven PM that night, and inside before
1:43
everything went wrong, there were four young women girls. Really,
1:46
it's important we know who they were, isn't it. Their
1:48
memory really fueled the whole search for justice.
1:51
Speaker 2: Absolutely, you have to center the victims first. Jennifer Harvesince,
1:54
she was seventeen, the senior in high school. Yeah, described
1:56
as full of energy, a cheerleader, saving money from her
1:59
shift there. She wanted to go to beauty school become a.
2:01
Speaker 1: Hairstylist, and her friend Eliza Thomas worked there too, also seventeen.
2:06
Eliza was the artist, always sketching, apparently aiming to be
2:09
a graphic designer. Sources mention her infectious smile. Just a
2:13
talented young woman focused on her future.
2:15
Speaker 2: Then the two younger ones. They weren't working, just stopping
2:18
by to get a ride home later. Jennifer's sister, Sarah Harbison,
2:21
was fifteen, a bit quieter than Jennifer, of people said,
2:24
but loved poetry. She just tagged along with her friend
2:27
Amy to borrow Jennifer's.
2:28
Speaker 1: Car and Amy ayers, Sarah's best friend. Only thirteen years old,
2:33
seventh grade, straight, a student, love dancing. She'd been babysitting
2:37
that night, earning some Christmas money before meeting up with
2:40
Sarah and Jennifer. Just kids doing normal Friday.
2:42
Speaker 2: Night thing exactly, and that normality was just shattered. Around
2:46
eleven pm. Someone passing by sees flames coming from the shop,
2:49
calls it in. Firefighters get there. In the back room,
2:53
it's thick with smoke, intense heat, and the smell of
2:56
accelerant is overwhelming.
2:58
Speaker 1: Horrifying, and they realized pretty quickly this wasn't just a fire,
3:01
was it. It was a cover up, a clumsy one,
3:04
but deliberate. They found the girls all four bound with
3:08
duct tape, gagged, sexually assaulted, confirmed for at least amy
3:13
ayres later, and then shot execution style in the head.
3:18
The sources really stressed the calculated cruelty of it all.
3:21
Speaker 2: Yeah, the details suggest the perpetrators were maybe panicked, or
3:24
maybe they knew the place a bit. They used lighter fluid, sure,
3:26
but also cleaning supplies from the shop itself is accelerant
3:30
trying to burn everything. Autopsies confirmed two different guns were used,
3:34
a point two to two caliber and a point three
3:36
to eight zero caliber.
3:37
Speaker 1: And here's that detail, the crucial bit that somehow survived
3:40
despite the fire, despite the accelerant trying to destroy everything,
3:44
One single point three to a zero shell casing it fell,
3:48
got lodged in a floor drain, protected from the worst
3:50
of the fire, just this tiny piece of brass. It
3:53
would turned out to be the key, but my god,
3:55
not for another thirty four years.
3:56
Speaker 2: Once the news broke, the sheer horror of it it
3:59
just rocked. As the sources say, the city changed almost overnight.
4:02
It wasn't like other crimes. This felt different, more personal,
4:04
more violating.
4:05
Speaker 1: That phrase a wound on the collective psyche. That really
4:09
gets it, doesn't it. People's sense of safety just evaporated,
4:13
that friendly Austin vibe felt threatened, parents locking doors, tighter,
4:18
NonStop news coverage. It was more than a crime. It
4:21
felt like a trauma for the whole community.
4:23
Speaker 2: And all that grief and fear put immense pressure on
4:26
the Austin Police Department APD. They needed answers fast. But
4:31
the investigation, right from the start, it was hit with problems,
4:35
some unavoidable, maybe some less.
4:37
Speaker 1: So well, let's be fair about the immediate challenges. The fire,
4:40
as we said, destroyed a ton of potential evidence. It
4:43
was a strip mall, late at night, no security cameras
4:45
back then, not like today, very few witnesses. They were
4:49
really up against it.
4:49
Speaker 2: True, but the initial phase was also marked by leads
4:52
that just fizzled out, and that really started to fuel
4:56
public frustration. Pretty early on, like just days after the
4:59
murder's they to take fifteen year old kid nearby. He
5:01
had a point two two pistol on him that matches
5:04
one of the murder weapons. Right, huge potential lead.
5:06
Speaker 1: Wow, Okay, so what happened?
5:08
Speaker 2: Released they couldn't find anything else to connect him directly,
5:11
no blood, no prints of the scene, nothing linking him
5:14
to the girls. So despite the gun, not enough evidence.
5:18
Speaker 1: And then came the false confessions. This seems to be
5:20
where the pressure really started bending things. Kenneth McDuff, a
5:24
known serial killer on death row, he confessed he did.
5:28
Speaker 2: Likely for attention, maybe hoping for some kind of deal.
5:32
APD spent valuable time chasing that down, but years later,
5:36
after mcdeff was executed in ninety eight, DNA testing proved
5:39
definitively he wasn't involved. A posthumous exoneration from this crime anyway.
5:44
Speaker 1: And there were others too, Yeah.
5:45
Speaker 2: Two Mexican nationals claimed they did it in nineteen ninety two.
5:48
Their story seemed detailed at first, but it fell a
5:50
partner scrutiny, probably looking for reward money or something. The
5:53
FBI even weighed in with a profile. It suggested, you know,
5:56
opportunistic predators, young guys, knew the area, driven by sexual fantasy, rage,
6:02
standard stuff. But a profile isn't.
6:04
Speaker 1: Evidence, so without witnesses or solid leads. It really came
6:07
down to forensics, didn't it. And that's where they hit
6:09
the big wall exactly.
6:11
Speaker 2: The medical examiner confirmed the sexual assault on Amy Airs
6:15
using vaginal swabs that proved male involvement. But this is
6:18
nineteen ninety one. DNA tech was primitive compared to now.
6:22
The best they could get was a partial YSTR profile
6:25
Y chromosome short TANA repeat.
6:27
Speaker 1: Okay, break that down for us. Why was a YSTR
6:30
profile basically a dead end back then?
6:32
Speaker 2: Right? So, the y chromosome passes pretty much directly from
6:35
father to son. A YSTR profile confirms yes, there's male
6:39
DNA here, and it can trace a male family line,
6:42
but it can't tell you which mail in that line.
6:44
Think of like finding a common last name like Smith,
6:47
but having no phone book to look up which Smith.
6:49
And crucially, back then, there were no big databases for
6:52
YSTR profiles, no way to run it against anything meaningful
6:55
familial searching using public genealogy sites science fiction in nineteen
6:58
ninety one. So they knew male was involved, but that
7:01
profile couldn't lead them to an individual. It was basically
7:04
useless for finding a suspect in the wider world.
7:06
Speaker 1: So the case just Stalked went cold. By the mid nineties,
7:10
they looked at over fifty people. Apparently. You can imagine
7:13
the public reaction, frustration turning into anger, accusations of APD
7:17
being incompetent, the lack of answers must have been unbearable.
7:21
It was.
7:22
Speaker 2: But the story isn't just about police struggles. It's also
7:25
about the families, the victims' families. They refused to let
7:28
this be forgotten.
7:29
Speaker 1: Amy's father, Bob ayers, he became a real force, didn't he.
7:34
The sources describe him channeling his grief into advocacy, not
7:38
just for Amy, but for all cold case victims, pushing
7:41
for changes in the law, getting dedicated funding for cold
7:44
case units in Texas, fighting for victim rights.
7:47
Speaker 2: Tireless absolutely, and the Harbison and Thomas families too. They
7:50
were right there. They started support groups, organized this annual
7:53
candlelight vigil that became huge. Thousands people would come out
7:56
every year. They get Jennifer, Eliza, Sarah and Amy's stories
7:59
all way in the public consciousness, made sure the city
8:02
couldn't just move on.
8:03
Speaker 1: And then there's that timing with the media just before
8:06
the big break in twenty twenty five, that HBO docu
8:09
Suries the Yogurt Shot murders comes out huge national attention,
8:13
right when things were about to heat up again.
8:15
Speaker 2: Yeah, it's fascinating timing, whether it directly influenced the final
8:18
push or it just coincided with it. Yeah, definitely put
8:20
the case back under a massive spotlight. Maybe gave detective
8:23
Jackson that extra bit of impetus serendipity. Maybe. But before
8:29
we get to the breakthrough, we have to cover this
8:32
really dark chapter. All that frustration, the pressure for answers
8:35
we talked about it led somewhere truly awful, the wrongful
8:39
convictions for innocent men. It's like a textbook example of
8:42
how things can go wrong in the justice system.
8:44
Speaker 1: This was nineteen ninety nine, right eight years after the murders.
8:47
APD makes these arrests, and this is where that term
8:49
tunnel vision comes up a lot in the sources. They
8:52
seem to have locked onto these guys, Robert Springsteen, the Fifth,
8:55
Michael Scott, Maurice Pierce, and Force Welborn. They knew the
8:58
victims apparently.
8:59
Speaker 2: That were acquaintance. Yeah, and remember Maurice Pierce, he was
9:02
actually caught with a point two to two pistol shortly
9:04
after the murders back in ninety one. He was released
9:07
then lack of evidence, but when the police revisited the
9:10
case years later, that old detail probably made him and
9:13
by extension, his friends, looked suspicious again. The tunnel visions
9:16
started to set.
9:17
Speaker 1: In, but there was no physical evidence linking them still.
9:20
Speaker 2: Nothing zero, nothing at all, No prints, no hairs, no DNA.
9:24
The entire case against them was built on something else, confessions.
9:28
Scott and Springsteen specifically were interrogated, and the sources describe
9:32
these interrogations as intense, psychologically coercive hours and hours, maybe days,
9:39
until they broke.
9:40
Speaker 1: They confessed and implicated each other.
9:42
Speaker 2: They did in graphic detail, apparently, but almost immediately both
9:45
of them were canted. They said they were forced, manipulated,
9:48
that the police fed them details just to make the
9:50
interrogation stop. Well Born and Peers were then charged as
9:52
accomplices based mostly on what Scott and Springsteen had said
9:56
in those initial recanted statements.
9:58
Speaker 1: The trials in two thousand and one one in two
10:00
thousand and two sound like they were pretty intense. Prosecutors
10:03
really went after them. Springsteen convicted first, got the death penalty,
10:06
then Scot same thing, death penalty. And this was all
10:10
based on confessions they'd already taken back and junk science.
10:14
What does that mean here?
10:15
Speaker 2: It means that because they had no hard physical evidence,
10:19
the prosecution had to rely on other things, things like
10:22
questionable psychological theories, forensic methods that weren't really validated or
10:27
have since been discredited, testimony that didn't hold up later.
10:30
They basically built a story around the coerce confessions, using
10:35
whatever they could find, even if it wasn't scientifically sound,
10:37
to make it seem plausible.
10:39
Speaker 1: It's more than just bad police work. Then it sounds systemic,
10:41
like once they decided these were the guys, everything else
10:44
got filtered through that belief confirmation bias big time.
10:47
Speaker 2: Exactly. They had their narrative, and evidence that didn't fit
10:50
was ignored or downplayed. It's a dangerous path.
10:52
Speaker 1: But science eventually caught up that same DNA evidence that
10:55
was useless before.
10:57
Speaker 2: Right the turning point was two thousand and three, then
11:00
DNA tech had advanced significantly. They retested those same vaginal
11:04
swabs from Amy airs, the ones that gave the partial
11:06
ystr profile back in ninety one. This time they could
11:09
do much more sophisticated why STR analysis.
11:12
Speaker 1: And what did the advanced tests show?
11:14
Speaker 2: It showed their innocent definitive exclusion. Remember why STR traces
11:19
the male line. While it might not pinpoint one person
11:22
within that line, it can absolutely rule people out if
11:25
their YSTR doesn't match the profile from the crime scene.
11:28
The male DNA found on ang years did not match Springsteen's, Scott, Pierce,
11:32
or wellborn period. The killer was someone.
11:34
Speaker 1: Else entirely wow, So that forensic proof forced the system
11:38
to correct itself.
11:39
Speaker 2: Eventually, Yes, it took time for the legal process. The
11:41
Texas Court of Criminal Appeals overturned Springsteen's conviction in two
11:44
thousand and six, Scott's followed in two thousand and nine,
11:47
and finally in two thousand and nine, all charges against
11:50
all four men were dropped.
11:51
Speaker 1: Michael Scott spent ten years on death row, a decade
11:54
for something he didn't do.
11:56
Speaker 2: Unbelievable. The human cost is just staggering. The sources talk
12:00
about ruined lives, the PTSD Scott suffered. Springsteen became an
12:04
advocate against wrongful convictions after his release, trying to make
12:07
something positive out of that horror.
12:09
Speaker 1: And this whole chapter just cemented the yogurt shop case
12:12
as this warning sign for the justice system.
12:15
Speaker 2: Absolutely, the criticism of APD, the tunnel vision, the reliance
12:19
on coerce confessions. It became a national example of how
12:22
things can go wrong. People drew parallels to other big
12:25
cases like the Central Park five. It really damaged public
12:28
trust and highlighted these deem flaws. So while these four
12:31
men were fighting for their freedom and trying to rebuild
12:33
their lives, the real killer was still out there, a ghost.
12:37
And then in twenty twenty five, science finally puts a
12:39
name to that ghost. Robert Eugene Brasher's.
12:42
Speaker 1: Brashers not someone from Austin, right. The sources say he
12:45
was born in Arkansas in fifty eight.
12:47
Speaker 2: A drifter exactly, a man with no real roots, constantly moving,
12:51
and his criminal record was long, violent and spanned multiple states.
12:56
He was completely off Austin PD's radar for decades.
12:59
Speaker 1: His record for nineteen ninety one was already.
13:01
Speaker 2: Bad, terrifyingly so burglary impersonating an officer. But the big
13:06
one was in Florida nineteen eighty six, attempted murder. He
13:09
shot a woman in the face. He actually got paroled
13:12
for that in nineteen eighty nine, just two years before
13:14
the Yogurt shot murders. He got out and seems to
13:17
have immediately gone back to.
13:18
Speaker 1: Violence, and after ninety one he just kept going.
13:21
Speaker 2: Yes, authorities now connect him to at least three more
13:24
murders multiple sexual assaults between nineteen ninety and nineteen ninety eight.
13:28
Crimes happened in South Carolina, Missouri, Kentucky, Tennessee. He just
13:32
moved around, leaving victims in his wake.
13:35
Speaker 1: So what connects him definitively to the yogurt shop? Is
13:37
it just the timing.
13:38
Speaker 2: It's much more than timing. It's his modus operati, his
13:41
mo It's chillingly consistent, and it matches the yogurt shop
13:45
details almost perfectly. He targeted young women, he bound them,
13:48
he sexually assaulted them, and he executed them with small
13:51
caliber handguns. It was his signature.
13:53
Speaker 1: Let's run through those other crimes, the ones that show
13:55
the pattern.
13:56
Speaker 2: Okay, nineteen ninety Greenville, South Carolina. He's linked to the
13:59
rapists strangling of a twenty two year old woman named
14:01
Melody Rose, and crucially, DNA evidence was collected from that scene.
14:06
That profile became key later on. Then there was a
14:08
gap seems so, or at least known connections. Then nineteen
14:12
ninety seven, Memphis, Tennessee, he bound and raped a fourteen
14:16
year old girl. She survived, and she gave police a
14:20
description of him that helped build the picture investigators had
14:23
of this unknown offender.
14:25
Speaker 1: In the Kentucky case in ninety eight, that one.
14:27
Speaker 2: Was incredibly similar to Austin. A young woman shot, bound,
14:30
left in a remote area, same kind of savagery. And importantly,
14:34
as we'll see, ballistics evidence was recovered from that scene too,
14:37
linking it directly back later.
14:39
Speaker 1: But Brasher's himself never faced trial for these later crimes.
14:42
Speaker 2: No, he died in January nineteen ninety nine. He was forty.
14:46
It was during some unrelated police standoff in Missouri. He
14:48
was cornered and he turned a gun on himself, a
14:51
point three to eight zero caliber pistol.
14:53
Speaker 1: Incidentally, So how did he end up in Austin in
14:56
December ninety one any known reason, No.
14:58
Speaker 2: Obvious ties, no arrests, There, nothing connecting him specifically to
15:02
the city before the crime. But that's the thing with
15:04
drifters like him, Their movements are erratic, hard to track.
15:08
We know now his nomadic lifestyle put him in Texas
15:10
around that time. He could easily have passed through Austin.
15:12
Speaker 1: And the physical evidence links pile up overwhelmingly.
15:15
Speaker 2: Remember the two guns used in Austin point two to
15:18
two and the point three to eight zero well case
15:20
files from Memphis relating to his activities around ninety seven
15:24
and his death in ninety nine. Specifically, note that Brashers
15:27
was known to possess both point two to two and
15:29
point three eight zero caliber weapons. It's a direct match
15:32
to the murder weapons. Plus his pattern of hitting isolated
15:36
businesses late at night. It fits the yogurt shop scenario, perfectly,
15:40
vulnerable target. All these pieces scattered across years and states,
15:43
suddenly clicked into place around this one guy, Robert Eugene Brasher's.
15:48
Speaker 1: Okay, so we have the suspect identified decades later. The
15:51
final part of this is how they actually made that
15:53
connection in twenty twenty five. It really sounds like a
15:55
story of sheer police persistence meeting incredible technological events.
16:00
Speaker 2: Absolutely, and you have to credit detective Daniel Jackson. He
16:03
took over the cold case in twenty twenty two. Imagine
16:06
inheriting that file thirty years old, stained by wrongful convictions,
16:09
the family's still desperate for answers, and now this HBO
16:12
documentary bringing it all back did. Jackson didn't just shuffle papers.
16:16
He reportedly really immersed himself in It felt the wheat
16:19
of those four girls.
16:19
Speaker 1: Stories, and he decided to push for retesting right even
16:23
though previous attempts hadn't yielded much exactly.
16:25
Speaker 2: He believed modern science might see something missed before. He
16:29
focused on two key pieces of old evidence, the ballistics
16:33
that shellcasing and the DNA those degraded swabs, and.
16:37
Speaker 1: It paid off a double breakthrough in the summer of
16:39
twenty twenty five. Let's start with the ballistics. June twenty
16:43
twenty five, all.
16:43
Speaker 2: Right, Jackson resubmitted that point three to eight eu roh shellcasing,
16:47
the one from the floor drain, to NIBBEN, the National
16:51
Integrated Ballistic Information Network.
16:53
Speaker 1: Explain NIBBEN, how is it different from what they could
16:55
do in ninety one?
16:56
Speaker 2: NIBBIN is essentially a huge digital fingerprint data for guns,
17:01
but using showcasings. Every time a gun fires, it leaves
17:04
unique microscopic marks on the casing from the firing pin,
17:07
the extractor, et cetera. NIBBIN scans these marks and stores them.
17:10
Police departments nationwide upload casings from crime scenes. This system
17:14
automatically compares new entries against the entire database, looking for
17:18
matches across jurisdictions. It connects shootings that might otherwise seem unrelated.
17:22
Speaker 1: So Jackson puts the Austin casing into nibben in twenty
17:25
twenty five.
17:26
Speaker 2: And bang, an instant hit. It matched a casing recovered
17:29
from that nineteen ninety eight murder scene in Kentucky, the
17:32
one attributed to Brashers. This was it the first hard
17:36
physical link tying the gun used in the yogurt shop
17:39
murders directly to Robert Eugene Brasher's thirty four years later.
17:42
Speaker 1: Incredible, So that's the gun link. What about the DNA confirmation.
17:46
Speaker 2: That came just a couple of months later August twenty
17:48
twenty five. This involved the famous genetic genealogist C. C.
17:51
Moore and her team. They used investigative Genetic genealogy or IgG,
17:56
same method used to catch the Golden State Killer and others.
17:59
Speaker 1: So they took that old partial ystr profile, the one
18:03
that was useless back then.
18:05
Speaker 2: Exactly With IgG, they could take that limited genetic information
18:08
and upload it or rather a compatible version of it
18:11
to public genealogy databases like ged match or family tree DNA,
18:15
people upload their own DNA for ancestry research. IgG uses
18:19
those databases to find distant relatives of the unknown suspect,
18:22
building out a family tree until they can narrow down
18:24
the possibilities to a specific individual or family branch.
18:27
Speaker 1: And what did the DNA they used actually come from?
18:29
It wasn't just the swab.
18:30
Speaker 2: This part is heartbreaking but crucial. Yes, the profile came
18:34
partly from the vaginal swab taken from Amy Airs, but
18:38
sources confirm it also came from DNA found under her fingernails.
18:41
Speaker 1: Wow, she fought back.
18:43
Speaker 2: She fought back. Detective Jackson's quote on this is just
18:47
so powerful, he said, Amy's final moments on this earth
18:51
were to solve this case. It's because of her fighting
18:53
back that thirteen year old girl, in her final moments,
18:56
left the biological trace that, decades later, science could finally
19:00
used to identify her killer.
19:01
Speaker 1: So the IgG process points towards the Brasher's family line rapidly.
19:05
Speaker 2: Yes, Once IgG zeroed in on the Brasher's family, investigators
19:09
could make a direct comparison. They had Brasher's DNA profile
19:12
on record from that nineteen ninety Melody Rose case investigation
19:15
in South Carolina. They compared the profile from amyator samples
19:18
to Brasher's known profile. It was a perfect match.
19:21
Speaker 1: The confirmation after thirty four years.
19:23
Speaker 2: The confirmation ballistics and DNA both pointing directly at Robert
19:27
Eugene Brasher's The official announcement came in late September twenty
19:30
twenty five. The Austin Mayer called it a significant breakthrough
19:34
in a crime that truly had changed the city forever.
19:37
Speaker 1: And the families. How did they react after waiting so
19:40
so long?
19:41
Speaker 2: Relief, certainly, but incredibly bittersweet as you'd expect. They finally
19:46
had a name. They finally knew who was responsible after
19:48
thirty four years of uncertainty and false leads and dashed hopes.
19:53
Just knowing that the tiny shell casing saved by chance
19:56
led them to this killer who was already dead. It
20:00
provided a kind of finality, even if it wasn't courtroom justice.
20:03
Speaker 1: So the identification of Brashers, it's huge win for forensic science.
20:08
Isn't it proof that technology really can catch up?
20:11
Speaker 2: Absolutely? It's a landmark case for cold case investigation globally.
20:15
It really underscores why preserving evidence, even tiny fragments, is
20:19
so vital, and it showcases the power of tools like
20:22
IDG and nibbon. These technologies aren't just identifying killers here,
20:26
they were also crucial in definitively proving the innocence of Springsteen,
20:29
Scott Pierce, and wellborn. Science provided the exoneration they deserved.
20:33
Speaker 1: And the case did lead to some positive changes in Austin,
20:36
right beyond just solving this one crime.
20:39
Speaker 2: Yes, the failures, especially the wrongful convictions, force some institutional changes,
20:45
cold case units got better funding and resources, and the
20:48
family's relentless advocacy helped strengthen victim rights laws in Texas.
20:52
Some good came from the tragedy.
20:53
Speaker 1: Eventually, the case isn't officially closed, is it? The sources
20:57
say it remains open.
20:58
Speaker 2: Why Two main reasons. First, Brasher's is dead. He died
21:02
in nineteen ninety nine, so it can be no trial,
21:04
no prosecution, no punishment handed down by a court justice
21:07
in that sense is impossible.
21:09
Speaker 1: And the second reason.
21:10
Speaker 2: The two gun theory. This is still a major sticking
21:13
point for investigators. Remember the emmey you confirmed two different
21:16
guns were used. The point two two and the point
21:19
three a zero, while we know Brashers possess both calibers
21:22
at times, the way the crime has carried out four
21:24
victims execution style makes many investigators strongly believe he likely
21:28
had an accomplice.
21:29
Speaker 1: Using two guns simultaneously would be difficult for one person
21:32
in that scenario.
21:33
Speaker 2: Very difficult, though not strictly impossible, but it's much more
21:37
common in scenarios with multiple shooters. So the thinking is
21:41
Brashers pulled one trigger, someone else pulled the other, and
21:44
that someone else, if they exist, is still unidentified and
21:47
has never faced justice. That keeps the case file open.
21:52
Speaker 1: And there are other loose ends too, right, questions that
21:55
might never.
21:55
Speaker 2: Be answered definitely, like how did Brashers even choose that
21:59
yogurt shop? He wasn't local? Was it just random bad luck?
22:03
Did he see one of the girls earlier? Will likely
22:05
never know his exact motivation or selection process?
22:08
Speaker 1: And those fifty plus false confessions early on, including mcduff's.
22:12
Speaker 2: It's bizarre, isn't it? What makes so many people confess
22:15
to something so horrific? Was it the media attention? Mental
22:18
health issues, a desire to interfere. It's a strange psychological
22:23
footnote to the case.
22:24
Speaker 1: Finding Brasher is also brought a different kind of pain,
22:26
didn't it for his family?
22:28
Speaker 2: Yeah? The sources mentioned his daughter, Deborah Brasher's claunch. Imagine
22:32
finding out decades later that your deceased father was responsible
22:35
for something like this. Just devastating news to process.
22:37
Speaker 1: Publicly, and for the four men exonerated Scott, Springsteen, Pierce Wellborn.
22:44
It's vindication, yes, but the damage is done.
22:47
Speaker 2: Absolutely. Vindication doesn't erase the lost years, the trauma, the stigma.
22:52
Michael Scott spent a decade on death row. You don't
22:54
just bounce back from that. The system failed them profoundly
22:57
before science finally stepped in.
22:58
Speaker 1: So it feels like incomplete justice, the killer named, but
23:02
beyond reach, a potential partner still unknown.
23:06
Speaker 2: That's a good way to put it. Incomplete accountability is
23:09
scrash it here hashtag tag outro. So, wrapping up this
23:12
deep dive has been quite a journey. We've traced thirty
23:14
four years from that awful night in ninety one, the fire,
23:18
the flawed initial hunt, the trauma of the wrongful convictions
23:20
that derailed so many lives, and then finally twenty twenty five,
23:24
ballistics and genetics converging to point of Brashers, and.
23:27
Speaker 1: You really have to acknowledge the people who kept it going.
23:29
Detective Jackson's fresh look at the evidence, and the families,
23:32
bob Ayers, the Harvestins, the Thomases, their refusal to give
23:36
up hope. They're constant push for answers. They kept the
23:38
memory of Jennifer, Eliza, Sarah and Amy alive.
23:41
Speaker 2: But it leaves us with the final thought, doesn't it
23:43
for you the listener? The sources say technology caught up
23:46
to the truth. Brashers is identified, but that two gun
23:51
theory looms large, a possible second killer still free. So
23:56
can this case ever really be closed if justice demands
23:59
brought secution as technology keeps evolving, maybe revealing more. Yeah,
24:04
when do you say solved?
24:05
Speaker 1: Yeah? And what does this whole story teach us about
24:07
needing closure versus sticking to the hard evidence, and especially
24:11
about avoiding that tunnel vision trap that cost four men
24:13
years of their lives. That lesson feels bigger than just Austin.
24:17
You know, it's about the integrity of the whole system.
24:19
Speaker 2: A dark, complex story finally seeing some light through science
24:23
and persistence.
24:24
Speaker 1: Thanks for joining us for this deep dive We'll catch
24:26
you on the next one.