Latest / United We Scan / Fight Like Hell Rallies and Legislation

Transcript

Fight Like Hell Rallies and Legislation · United We Scan

• 0:14
  Welcome to the United We Scan Podcast, the podcast by rural
• 0:18
  carriers for rural carriers. The views expressed in this
• 0:22
  podcast are of the presenters and the presenters only and do
• 0:25
  not represent the views, opinions, or strategies of the
• 0:28
  United States Postal Service or the National Rural Letter
• 0:30
  Carriers Association. We ask that you please consult
• 0:33
  your assigned union representative for guidance in
• 0:35
  your local area. Please like this podcast, share
• 0:39
  with your fellow rural carriers, and subscribe to be notified
• 0:42
  each time a new episode is uploaded.
• 0:44
  Please leave a comment or question for us below.
• 0:47
  Thank you. Now here are the hosts of the
• 0:50
  United We Scan podcast. Welcome back everybody.
• 0:54
  Where are we at Episode 116? We are going to talk a little
• 0:58
  bit about the Fight Like Hell rallies that went on across the
• 1:01
  country today, some legislation that's come about and whatever
• 1:06
  else we feel like talking about. So on that note, how was your
• 1:10
  week, James? They're pretty normal at the
• 1:13
  post office, you know, it was very, very light for most of the
• 1:17
  week, but Monday missing pieces of chunks of my DPS thank you
• 1:24
  mail handlers and then Tuesday I got that mail in my mail and
• 1:31
  also had two box holders to go along with it.
• 1:35
  Then Wednesday I had the valve packs come along, you know,
• 1:39
  Thursday and Friday was actually nice to have a little bit later
• 1:42
  day, you know, But other than that, Saturday was a easy day.
• 1:48
  I'm going to end up having to file a grievance because they're
• 1:51
  splitting multiple routes in my office every week now because of
• 1:57
  the carrier and emergency placement and the retirement
• 2:00
  that we had. So now they're splitting the the
• 2:02
  routes every weekend and I'm getting sick of it.
• 2:06
  I want to be able to work on my relief day if needed, and so do
• 2:11
  the carriers on the relief day work list.
• 2:13
  But apparently District has told everybody that nobody gets
• 2:16
  overtime anymore. Probably trying to prevent Doge
• 2:19
  from finding all that overtime that they're paying out and
• 2:22
  screaming at them. But other than that, went to the
• 2:25
  rally today and we'll talk about that during the episodes.
• 2:30
  But that pretty much sums up my week.
• 2:32
  Ready to get another week underway here?
• 2:35
  How about you, Bill? How was your week?
• 2:36
  Oh, like I said, off air, you know, I'm getting some prompts
• 2:42
  and individuals who run for our state board and considering it
• 2:47
  and a lot of phone calls, you know, a lot of questions and
• 2:51
  everything in regards to a lot of topics, which sadly, you
• 2:57
  know, we, we have repeatedly, you know, addressed time and
• 3:00
  time again on this podcast, But you know, people missed it.
• 3:04
  Don't go back and listen to podcast with the headers and in
• 3:07
  regards to the topics they're covering.
• 3:09
  But it was a good week, decent weather.
• 3:13
  We've got some much needed rain comings in tonight.
• 3:16
  And you know, I, I, I didn't get a chance to get out to the
• 3:20
  rallies. We had some things we had to
• 3:22
  take care of today, but we had a very good showing up in
• 3:26
  Philadelphia at several locations, almost 1000 people at
• 3:31
  the main post office. So that that was nice to see
• 3:35
  that, you know, that all these people were out there and you
• 3:39
  know, everybody's now, you know, with the signs out there and
• 3:43
  T-shirts and everything. I mean, they, they really had,
• 3:45
  you know, a great response to this rallies.
• 3:49
  So I'm glad to see that they got out there, you know, you know,
• 3:52
  the get their voices heard and put faces to to it.
• 3:55
  Like the one man said, he says, you know, I'm one of the newer
• 3:58
  carriers. I have my daughter here.
• 3:59
  You know, I don't know if I'm going to have a job, if I'm
• 4:02
  going to pay, be able to pay for her, you know, daycare or food
• 4:06
  or anything because of this. And like I said to my wife, I
• 4:10
  said, you know, this is a, a bunch of fear mongering, you
• 4:12
  know that, you know, get people all worked up in the friends,
• 4:15
  you know, but the problem of it is if you don't respond like the
• 4:19
  carriers did today, then guess what?
• 4:22
  It might just slip through the cracks and become reality.
• 4:26
  So you have to get, you know, your craft and your community
• 4:29
  and your senators, representatives involved in this
• 4:33
  and let them know how you feel about this so they can prevent
• 4:36
  it. Other than that, living large,
• 4:39
  loving grandchildren. And how about you, Kristen?
• 4:43
  How'd your week go for you? Oh, it started off OK.
• 4:48
  And then Ruby, he'd left Tuesday afternoon to go to Academy,
• 4:54
  which was Wednesday through Saturday for her.
• 4:57
  So I was then full time Grandma. My week at work wasn't too bad,
• 5:05
  seemed pretty average. I was off Wednesday because
• 5:09
  little man had his six month doctor's appointment.
• 5:12
  Thursday and Friday we're fairly light.
• 5:14
  Friday he did not let me sleep one bit.
• 5:18
  I've worked my K day yesterday on very very very little sleep.
• 5:23
  Was hoping to have an easy day when I walked in and that
• 5:26
  quickly went bye bye and out the door when I saw that I had the
• 5:30
  two tubs of Advos sitting there and 119 parcels.
• 5:35
  But yeah, so other than that, you know, Ruby is finished with
• 5:40
  Academy. She got home about 8:00 last
• 5:43
  night and let's just say that was the happiest 7 month old
• 5:48
  baby I have seen in a long time when Mama walked through the
• 5:52
  door. And here I was happy too because
• 5:56
  I could actually get some sleep. Other than that wasn't too bad.
• 6:00
  I mean we're we're down to regulars right now.
• 6:03
  So we've got the one H route is being covered by either my sub
• 6:09
  or the one that I trained most recently when he's not running
• 6:14
  his route, and the other one is being covered by that brand new
• 6:20
  RCA assigned to that route. So it's been it's been kind of
• 6:25
  interesting, but Oh no, it wasn't all that bad this week
• 6:29
  for me anyways, other than the lack of sleep.
• 6:32
  But this is a new week and Ruby starts her on the job training
• 6:35
  Tuesday. So shall be interesting to see
• 6:39
  how that goes. That's all I'm going to say
• 6:42
  about that at the moment, but I'm pretty sure she'll do all I
• 6:45
  unfortunately, as much as Ruby and I both wanted to go to one
• 6:49
  of the rallies here in Michigan, unfortunately we weren't able to
• 6:53
  do it and a little man, I think he's gotten the daycare crud on
• 6:57
  top of it. So, you know, brand new daycare
• 7:00
  starting, It's like when kids go back to school, stuff goes
• 7:02
  around and Ruby not getting home until 8:00 because she was 404
• 7:08
  hundred, excuse me, 4 hours away at Academy.
• 7:11
  And although close or you know, all the rallies to me were 3 1/2
• 7:16
  to four hours away. So unfortunately it was not
• 7:19
  feasible for us to go as much as we both really wanted to go, we
• 7:22
  couldn't do it. But I was definitely there in
• 7:25
  spirit with everybody and I just love seeing all the photos that
• 7:29
  I've been seeing from the rallies across the country.
• 7:32
  The turn out just looks awesome. The news reports are starting to
• 7:36
  pick it up. I've so, you know, noticed from
• 7:38
  all the local news channels in those areas.
• 7:41
  And yeah, we're we're, our voices are starting to get
• 7:44
  heard. Get the message out.
• 7:48
  Absolutely. Yeah, I was.
• 7:50
  I was lucky to be able to attend the one in Ann Arbor.
• 7:53
  And that one, of course, was hosted by multiple branches in
• 8:00
  the Ann Arbor area. And we had about 130 people show
• 8:04
  up. And I'm, I saw that talk with
• 8:07
  five other four other rural carriers that were there, as
• 8:11
  well as 4 customers of the Postal Service that showed up
• 8:16
  for the rally. And other people have said
• 8:19
  they've had customers show up and things like that as well to
• 8:21
  their rallies. So that is awesome to see that
• 8:24
  not only are the postal employees showing up, but the
• 8:27
  very people that we serve, we're showing up and fighting
• 8:31
  alongside of us to make sure that Postal Service remains the
• 8:35
  vital service that it is. Yeah, I, I love the fact that,
• 8:40
  you know, Donald Trump, you know, sit there saying how much
• 8:43
  money we're losing. Yeah, we're we're losing money.
• 8:45
  He's got to remember we are a service just like the Police
• 8:48
  Department, just like the Armed Services, just like a fire
• 8:51
  department. We're we're not there as a
• 8:55
  profit making mechanism. We're there to service the
• 8:58
  country thing is simple. So, you know, if you want that
• 9:02
  service, you know, the yes, it it should be self-sustaining,
• 9:05
  but how much, how much return do we really get on what you pay
• 9:10
  your military? All you get the the security of
• 9:13
  of your mind saying we'll never be attacked or if we are
• 9:16
  attacked, we can respond. I mean, I've never had a a house
• 9:20
  fire, but you know, every year I give money to the fire
• 9:23
  department because of the fact that they they need millions to
• 9:27
  run one Firehouse, even with an all violent Volunteer Fire
• 9:32
  station. These are things that you need.
• 9:36
  And if you don't have those services, you'll be surprised
• 9:39
  how fast people will realize how important they are.
• 9:43
  I mean, look, look at look at the situations where local the
• 9:46
  police departments can't hire anybody and they have to rely
• 9:50
  upon regional or state police to help give them coverage on, you
• 9:53
  know, night times and weekends. Folks, we're not here to make
• 9:56
  money. We're here to provide a service.
• 9:59
  Is it required? Do we make money?
• 10:01
  Yes, we have expenses. We, you know, we have cost, We
• 10:04
  have retirement and medical and paid payroll and everything
• 10:07
  else. Back to the matter is we are a
• 10:10
  service first. It's right in the name.
• 10:14
  Exactly, exactly. We are there to serve the
• 10:19
  people. And if if management and the
• 10:23
  Senate, the House don't understand that and definitely
• 10:27
  President Trump and Elon Musk don't understand that, we do.
• 10:32
  We understand what our customers need from us.
• 10:35
  We understand where the service comes from and that is the
• 10:40
  letter carriers on the ground serving the customers, the
• 10:44
  clerks serving the customers over the counter, the mail
• 10:49
  handlers moving the mail around in the plants to get them to
• 10:52
  those offices, the VMF fixing vehicles to get them to the post
• 10:58
  offices and to serve the post offices with the big trucks,
• 11:04
  things like that. The people that actually do the
• 11:07
  work at the post office, upper management, no they don't.
• 11:11
  They don't do anything of super importance to the post office
• 11:17
  that isn't already being done by a computer.
• 11:20
  Most upper management is sending out emails, doing reports,
• 11:25
  things that are automated in most other organizations, but
• 11:29
  instead they're automating jobs at the bottom here while
• 11:33
  maintaining and holding on to theirs, not saving the post
• 11:36
  office money. Yet they're the ones that get
• 11:38
  the raises, and those of us that are getting our hands dirty
• 11:42
  doing the work don't see crap. Let's talk about.
• 11:45
  Legislation, come on, let's get it.
• 11:47
  Get it going. James, get the legislation
• 11:49
  going. All right, so I posted about all
• 11:53
  the resolutions and bills that have been put forth in Congress
• 11:59
  yesterday, and I kind of wanted to get you guys in on this
• 12:03
  conversation because everybody should be in on these
• 12:07
  conversations. We should know what our
• 12:09
  legislature is doing and what it's doing to affect us.
• 12:14
  Now, granted, this isn't an all-encompassing list.
• 12:16
  I spent three hours on congress.gov putting this
• 12:20
  together just to get this information, but it's out there.
• 12:24
  And this is the same as reading out the PO6O3 or your Elm.
• 12:30
  You got to know what's going on so you can stay informed.
• 12:34
  So the very first one that I want to talk about is House
• 12:38
  Resolution 70. Now, this is different from the
• 12:41
  bills that are usually put forth.
• 12:43
  This is basically a statement from the House expressing their
• 12:49
  opinion, and it states it is expressing the sense of the
• 12:52
  House of Representatives that Congress should take all
• 12:55
  appropriate measures to ensure that the United States Postal
• 12:58
  Service remains an independent establishment of the federal
• 13:01
  government and is not subject to privatization.
• 13:05
  Now as a standing, this has 168 Co sponsors to it, 160 Democrats
• 13:15
  and eight Republicans. So basically they just want to
• 13:20
  make a statement that the House does not believe the Postal
• 13:23
  Service should be privatized. Your guys in stock?
• 13:26
  Well, I agree. I mean, that was part of the
• 13:28
  reason for all the Israelis today.
• 13:30
  Well, yeah, from a business perspective, this would be a
• 13:37
  ginormous type of undertaking in regards to trying to privatize
• 13:42
  the post office. And the reason being is because
• 13:46
  of the fact that as a service, we go into areas where a private
• 13:50
  entrepreneur, it does not want to service, you know, the rural
• 13:54
  Americans, OK, it's too expensive.
• 13:57
  That's why we have all the last mile hand offs from UPS and
• 14:02
  FedEx and DHL and Amazon because we go those extra miles and it
• 14:08
  it's a money loser. But the fact of it is that we
• 14:12
  are the service of record and nobody else that wants to go out
• 14:16
  there. Now what are you going to do in
• 14:20
  regards to giving them equal service per SE that they're they
• 14:24
  are entitled to? Are you going to restrict it to
• 14:27
  six days? Are you going to get restricted
• 14:28
  to every other day? As we've heard the options being
• 14:31
  discussed, it it really it is such a big problem for you to
• 14:38
  turn around and kind of take this monster that the post
• 14:42
  office is and divvy it up. And then again, once you divvy
• 14:46
  it up, you now have to regulate the privatization of it because
• 14:50
  you're not going to get find anybody who's going to buy the
• 14:53
  post office in its full entity. It's going to be broken up in
• 14:57
  pieces. So therefore who's going to
• 15:00
  regulate out each piece is sold off and how it is regulated in
• 15:07
  regards to their responsibilities to the public
• 15:10
  in regards to service, in regards to accountability, in in
• 15:15
  regards to just privacy. Because now you have a public
• 15:19
  entity running the Postal Service and they're not going to
• 15:23
  be bound by the sanctity of the mail that's required by the
• 15:27
  United States Postal Service. So where, where are these rules,
• 15:31
  regulations, these guidelines all going to be coming together
• 15:35
  and formulated and, and it's not going to be done in a couple
• 15:38
  months there President Trump, it would be a year long type
• 15:42
  situation and you're not going to be sell, be able to sell
• 15:46
  every piece of the post office because every piece is not a
• 15:50
  money maker. We'll actually get into that
• 15:52
  later. I actually have a document that
• 15:54
  I found that talks about that now.
• 16:01
  This next one is currently not a threat, but it is out there. the
• 16:08
  IT only has a sponsor. It has zero Co sponsors since
• 16:13
  being introduced on January 3rd and that is HR 86, the NOSHA Act
• 16:21
  to abolish the Occupational Safety and Health
• 16:25
  Administration. He calls it the Nullify
• 16:28
  Occupational Safety and Health Administration Act, and the
• 16:32
  language is specifically just as the Occupational Safety and
• 16:36
  Health Act of 1970 is repealed, the Occupational Safety and
• 16:41
  Health Administration is abolished.
• 16:44
  And I seem to recall an e-mail from management going around
• 16:48
  saying stop the OSHA retaliation.
• 16:52
  So it sounds like Representative Andy Biggs from Arizona 5 agrees
• 16:59
  with management that they the retaliation from OSHA needs to
• 17:03
  stop, so we need to abolish it. But you know, and you realize
• 17:06
  OSHA does cover more than just the post office.
• 17:09
  I mean, that's. Yeah, everybody.
• 17:12
  That's everybody. I mean, you know, it's like
• 17:17
  privatizing the post office. All you know, OK, the
• 17:19
  government's going to get out of it.
• 17:21
  Well, it's not affecting just our mail customers.
• 17:25
  It's affecting every business in the country.
• 17:27
  It's affecting every government office in the country.
• 17:32
  It is not just, you know, the mail delivery to, you know, Joe
• 17:35
  Adams at 123 Main St. It's everybody in the damn
• 17:40
  country. How the hell are you going to
• 17:42
  get around that? Let's get rid of OSHA.
• 17:44
  But you know, in regards to the post office, well, if you get
• 17:46
  rid of OSHA, you're getting rid of it in regards to every entity
• 17:51
  in the country, every charity, every business, every, every
• 17:56
  service. Every manufacturer.
• 17:59
  Yeah, everybody. I mean, that's the one thing
• 18:02
  when I hear the term OSHA, you think more of your manufacturers
• 18:08
  and, and, and stuff like that as well.
• 18:11
  I mean, that's the one thing that comes to me when I hear the
• 18:14
  word OSHA. So yeah, that would affect the
• 18:17
  entire nation. I mean, how, how would you like,
• 18:21
  and James would know this from being, you know, in in the
• 18:24
  paramedic field there with firefighters and all.
• 18:27
  How about the fact that, you know, OSHA doesn't regulate you
• 18:30
  guys and you know, you go in there and and you know, you have
• 18:33
  a, a multi, you know, alarm fire going off.
• 18:37
  And since you're not required to be OSHA regulated, half your
• 18:40
  equipment doesn't work. You know, half your people
• 18:42
  aren't trained, but you know, this is what OSHA looked for in
• 18:46
  regards to, you know, that aspect because the people have
• 18:50
  to be responsible enough, trained enough equipment has to
• 18:53
  be available, available and functional, you know, to fight
• 18:58
  fires. If somebody sits there and says,
• 19:00
  well, we can't do it because we have a bunch of split hoses that
• 19:03
  froze last week in, you know, in a fire that we serviced and
• 19:09
  somebody, you know, pumped the lines out, that's what I'm I'm
• 19:13
  going. To have to correct you there,
• 19:15
  Bill, the fire service is covered under the National Fire
• 19:20
  Protection Association. OSHA would be involved with
• 19:25
  everything else, but the firefighting stuff is covered
• 19:28
  under the National Fire Protection Association.
• 19:30
  So you're saying that she has no viability over to fire
• 19:33
  companies? OSHA does have viability but
• 19:37
  when it comes to the firefighting stuffs, NFPA
• 19:40
  standards are usually what the fire departments go by OSHA
• 19:44
  would cover like the fire station, vehicles, safety,
• 19:49
  things like that. But firefighting you go to a
• 19:52
  higher standard with NFPA than OSHA.
• 19:55
  So a fire truck, which is part of their equipment would fall
• 19:57
  under their jurisdiction. Yes.
• 20:01
  And it would also cover that would also go under the dot too,
• 20:05
  the Department of Transportation, so many able to
• 20:08
  recover that. Yeah, yeah.
• 20:10
  So, but the equipment that we use on a fire scene is NFPA
• 20:15
  certified? So if your truck isn't probably
• 20:18
  service and you take your good equipment out there and the
• 20:22
  truck doesn't work and the door doesn't go up and you crash
• 20:25
  through the door that that'll fall under ocean.
• 20:30
  Hey, look, I, I, I, I remember Liz Lightfoot out there at Grand
• 20:35
  Rapids several years ago, driving into a parking lot
• 20:39
  garage with a car carrier on top, not realizing it said 7
• 20:43
  foot clearance. OK, I'm just.
• 20:47
  That's why we have warning. That's that's why we have
• 20:51
  warning labels on things now. Yeah, don't drink battery acid,
• 20:55
  No. All right.
• 20:59
  How did we live this long without those warnings, Jesus?
• 21:03
  So the next one, this was actually a good one.
• 21:06
  It doesn't have any Co sponsors right now, but it was introduced
• 21:11
  by Nick Laloda out of New York 1 And it is to require the Postal
• 21:17
  Service to use a mobile retail unit to provide retail postal
• 21:21
  services in an area when the post office for such area is
• 21:25
  temporarily unavailable to provide such services and for
• 21:28
  other purposes. So I know that we have mobile
• 21:32
  post offices where they put a clerk in a little van that
• 21:36
  offers limited postal services in a parking lot.
• 21:41
  This this bill would actually make it required that they do
• 21:45
  that. And not only that, but even for
• 21:50
  postal retail facilities that are contracted out that are
• 21:55
  temporarily unable to provide services.
• 21:58
  The only The only exception to that is if the contract with the
• 22:04
  contractor has expired, like they're not going to renew the
• 22:07
  contract with them is the only reason why they wouldn't have to
• 22:10
  do that with this bill. So think of Hurricane Helene and
• 22:14
  Milton and those areas. They would have had to bring a
• 22:17
  bunch of mobile retail units to those areas that have been
• 22:21
  affected by those hurricanes or even the areas with the
• 22:24
  Tornadoes at the post office was damaged.
• 22:28
  Or even those that have offices that burn down.
• 22:31
  Yep, thank you. I I wasn't just going by by by
• 22:35
  bills there, but also I know of an RMPO location in my old
• 22:40
  office that burned down. Now all those people that had PO
• 22:45
  boxes there have to drive 20 miles to go get their mail.
• 22:51
  Or my office when the person lit the lobby on fire.
• 22:54
  I have an alibi for that day. Well, they got them on camera,
• 22:58
  so it was all good. But they did provide, they did
• 23:02
  provide the mobile retail unit for a little while and they
• 23:06
  actually parked it next door at the library for people to go to.
• 23:10
  But then it just became difficult for them to handle it
• 23:13
  because all the mail was going to another post office where we
• 23:16
  were all at. And then the clerk would have to
• 23:19
  come in to that office, pick it up and then drive to the mobile
• 23:22
  truck to hand out the mail. And they kind of got annoyed
• 23:26
  with that. See, this is where the politics
• 23:30
  get involved. Westchester burned down and it
• 23:33
  it happened in August. What was coming up folks that
• 23:36
  that that would make them put a a temporary mobile office there.
• 23:41
  Well, you had the election. So to make sure that, you know,
• 23:44
  in this, you know, area that there is a availability of
• 23:50
  postal services, they put a step van that was in there that had a
• 23:54
  service window that you could get out and go up to just for
• 23:59
  the ballots. As soon as the election was
• 24:01
  over, that van up and disappeared.
• 24:03
  Why can't you put a temporary office in a tractor trailer and
• 24:08
  parked at the trailer on the lot with full services for the
• 24:11
  people in the area? I agree.
• 24:13
  I mean, they're still fighting about whether to rebuild that
• 24:17
  post office, and it just doesn't make any sense.
• 24:21
  Yeah. Yeah, you moved 87 routes 24
• 24:26
  miles away. That's 48 miles round trip that
• 24:29
  everybody's getting paid now, added on their routes.
• 24:32
  That's why every route became AK route.
• 24:35
  You know it, it didn't affect mine as much because I was
• 24:38
  already a overburden K route, but now you had 11 overburden K
• 24:43
  routes. You talk about wasting money.
• 24:47
  How about that, folks? How about putting this back into
• 24:50
  our office? And yet they turned around and
• 24:53
  we're discussing moving three other post offices into a
• 24:57
  rebuilt Westchester office, and now you would have three offices
• 25:02
  traveling extra mileage to get to their routes.
• 25:05
  This doesn't make any damn sense.
• 25:07
  No, Bart, nobody said they were intelligent and they are allowed
• 25:10
  to mismanage. Yep.
• 25:12
  All right. The next one I have is HR 491
• 25:19
  Equal COLA Act. Now before anybody jumps on
• 25:21
  this, this does not touch the Postal Service.
• 25:26
  It will not touch the Postal Service, but what it does affect
• 25:30
  is retirees on the Federal Employees Retirement System on
• 25:34
  hers or the Civil Service Retirement System.
• 25:38
  Because it's under Title 5, it's to amend it to change to achieve
• 25:43
  parity between the cost of living adjustment with respect
• 25:46
  to an annuity under the Federal Employees Retirement System and
• 25:50
  an annuity under the Civil Service Retirement System.
• 25:53
  That every once a year, effective December 1st of each
• 25:58
  year, each annuity will have an increase by the percentage
• 26:03
  change in the price index for the base quarter of such year
• 26:08
  and up to the adjusted in the nearest 110th of a percent under
• 26:12
  Section 88462 of Title 5 USC. So basically if you're a
• 26:19
  retiree, they want to make equal COLA adjustments for all
• 26:23
  retirees on furs and CSRS. For that.
• 26:27
  And I'm for that too. How about you, Kristen?
• 26:32
  You for it too. Yep, I am.
• 26:37
  All right, a little extra cheddar.
• 26:38
  Cheddar Roma sandwich. Yeah.
• 26:42
  You'll get to be able to buy one more slice of cheese with that
• 26:44
  increase. Yeah, you ain't kidding.
• 26:48
  All right, we'll go on to HR 758 Mail Traffic Deaths Reporting
• 26:55
  Act. This one is to direct the USPS
• 26:59
  to issue regulations requiring Postal Service employees and
• 27:02
  contractors to report to the Postal Service traffic crashes
• 27:06
  involving vehicles carrying mail that result in injury or death
• 27:10
  and for other purposes. This is basically they want to
• 27:14
  make sure that because Postmaster General Louis Dejoy
• 27:20
  did not know of traffic accidents and deaths in the
• 27:24
  Postal Service, they want to make it so that they're all
• 27:27
  reported and tracked. And this has passed the House
• 27:33
  with a vote of 402 to 16. It was pretty much almost
• 27:40
  unanimous in the House and it's on in the Senate now.
• 27:46
  But that's one that is important because tracking injuries and
• 27:51
  deaths with accidents in the Postal Service is something that
• 27:55
  really should be monitored and taken care of because it's been
• 27:58
  happening a lot more lately. Your thoughts?
• 28:01
  You're not. You're not referring to the time
• 28:04
  when Dejoy was up before the committee who asked him about
• 28:08
  how many deaths there were, and he didn't know the answer.
• 28:11
  It well, he they were asking him about Palmetto, but he doesn't
• 28:16
  even know about. Well, yeah.
• 28:20
  Well, the Palmetto was. Yeah, it was a specific question
• 28:24
  about Palmetto, but they also asked him about how many the US
• 28:28
  Postal Service suffer every year, and he didn't know that
• 28:31
  answer either. Exactly He.
• 28:34
  Just he, he, he was taken a guess like 9 or 10.
• 28:36
  I don't know. It's pretty.
• 28:38
  Yeah. When you sit there and you say,
• 28:40
  I don't know, yeah. But in the past 12 months, we've
• 28:43
  had well to 14 rural carrier deaths in the past 12 months.
• 28:48
  It's 12 too many, 13 too many. Yes, it.
• 28:52
  Is, Yeah. And they were all on the job,
• 28:55
  Yeah. And let's not, let's not, you
• 28:58
  know, also discount the how many attacks have been made on util
• 29:01
  carriers, mostly city, but you know, there are rule attacks on
• 29:05
  rules too by individuals. HR 765, the Males Act.
• 29:15
  There is also Senate 155 that Matt is congruent to this.
• 29:22
  It is to improve the communications between the USPS
• 29:26
  and local communities relating to the relocation and
• 29:29
  establishment of Postal Service, retail service facility and for
• 29:33
  other purposes. So basically they want them to
• 29:37
  talk to local communities before they move, relocate, or even
• 29:44
  create post offices in communities.
• 29:48
  And would that also include consolidation into SDCS?
• 29:55
  Yes, it does. And so the Postal Service, it
• 29:58
  says in the bill, it says the Postal Service may not implement
• 30:01
  a temporary relocation, including for a commemorative
• 30:05
  event for a period longer than two days without collecting and
• 30:09
  considering community input under paragraph C of that
• 30:11
  section. So they don't want the Postal
• 30:14
  Service to just Willy nilly close and move facilities or
• 30:19
  bring in new facilities all over the country.
• 30:22
  And just as a footnote, nobody from the Board of Governors has
• 30:25
  gotten back to me in regards to me volunteering to be the
• 30:29
  Postmaster General. Next one.
• 30:36
  Is James, it just sounds like, you know, they're going to come
• 30:40
  up with another committee to create more payroll for somebody
• 30:42
  that they're friends with, you know, to, to do a study on this
• 30:46
  or, you know, they handle the questioning.
• 30:48
  You know, it's real simple folks.
• 30:51
  You know, we serve the community at large.
• 30:54
  And if you can prove the viability of that service, then,
• 30:58
  you know, for God's sakes, why are you removing it?
• 31:02
  I mean, my Leo, OK, we, we've had an office in Phoenixville,
• 31:07
  PA get relocated to the FD and C now to get back out to
• 31:12
  Phoenixville. The mileage isn't so bad, but
• 31:15
  the traffic is OK now. The Phoenixville post office is
• 31:19
  still there, open and operating. What's the point of driving all
• 31:23
  these extra mileage? You know, at the extra mileage,
• 31:26
  the extra pay, the extra wear and tear, the extra liability of
• 31:30
  being on the road longer in the same piece of shit vehicles.
• 31:35
  To save 2 commercial trucks from going to and from that facility.
• 31:39
  Well, I did find out April first there are cutting all of our
• 31:43
  trucks down to one in the morning and that's it, but
• 31:49
  struck in the afternoon starting April 1st and.
• 31:52
  And you know that serves 2 purposes, OK, you're going to
• 31:54
  save some money, OK? And because the joy changed the
• 31:58
  the time frame in the specifics in regards to the delivery of
• 32:01
  mail, unless you have expresses OK that have to move to make
• 32:07
  their commitments, that one extra day is not going to make a
• 32:10
  big difference in this time standards already established
• 32:13
  under the joy. So I'm I'm not that upset about
• 32:17
  up in the afternoon, but the fact of the matter is you still
• 32:20
  have these facilities that you have to maintain.
• 32:23
  They're still there for the, you know, as a Center for the
• 32:26
  public. Why are you going through the
• 32:28
  sixer expense of moving the the carriers to an SD and C?
• 32:34
  And spending more money and people wear and tear on the
• 32:36
  vehicles. Right.
• 32:39
  And these vehicles, some of these vehicles are coming up on
• 32:41
  50 years old. James, the LLVS are coming up on
• 32:45
  being 50 years old. Now you're making.
• 32:48
  Now you're making me feel old. You know the shoe fits I'm.
• 32:52
  I'm just a little older than the LLVS, all right?
• 32:59
  You know, I'm I'm old enough to take my driving test in the LLV.
• 33:06
  The next one I have is HR 1249 to require the USPS to post
• 33:14
  notices of changes that will affect nationwide postal
• 33:17
  services. And the ACT may be cited as
• 33:20
  Instituting notification Formalities on Reorganizing Mail
• 33:23
  Act, also known as INFORM. And basically when a proposed
• 33:30
  change is dismitted to the PRC, the notice of the change with an
• 33:34
  effective storefront postal facilities to remain posted for
• 33:38
  no fewer than 30 days after the change has gone into effect.
• 33:41
  Basically inform the customers what what's changing and why.
• 33:46
  You know that that reminds me of informing, you know, builders
• 33:50
  when they're putting up new, you know, developments that you have
• 33:55
  to use the cluster box unit. You can't have curbside
• 33:58
  mailboxes. You know, this is what we're
• 34:00
  going to do. And there's nothing you can say
• 34:02
  about it. And personally, you know, I, I,
• 34:05
  I, I feel like, you know, if you're living in a development
• 34:09
  that has, you know, 6 to $700,000 homes, you're just
• 34:15
  ghettoizing ghetto. Ghetto as in the ghetto
• 34:19
  ghettoizing the development because it looks like crap?
• 34:23
  Looks like a trailer park. It it well, I wouldn't go that
• 34:27
  far, but you know, there's a newer development on off of
• 34:30
  Lenape Road and it has all these $800,000 carriage homes.
• 34:35
  Now all they are is townhomes that are modified in regards to
• 34:39
  their roof lines and everything like that.
• 34:41
  And their back decks are different based on the
• 34:44
  customers, you know, Willy Nilly's and what they wanted on
• 34:48
  the on the House. But the fact of the matter is
• 34:51
  they've got one giant, one cluster section there that is
• 34:56
  6/6 CBU's. OK, not, not a lot, OK, But all
• 35:02
  the trash that the people basically dump when they get
• 35:06
  their mailbox open up, their mailboxes, the stuff that's
• 35:09
  spewing around there. And then you go to the other end
• 35:11
  of the development and you have another six CBU's on the
• 35:15
  cul-de-sac. And this all sits on top of a
• 35:18
  hill. So it gets all the nice windage
• 35:20
  there and you go up there on a windy day and you just see all
• 35:23
  the Advo's blowing around in the cul-de-sac that people have, you
• 35:27
  know, taken out of the mailbox that got away from them and they
• 35:30
  just let it go. So it looks like a ghetto.
• 35:33
  It really does. Then yeah, the I love the first
• 35:37
  house on the left because he's got little 2 foot high shrubs
• 35:40
  all around his property and all the trash and plastic bags and
• 35:43
  everything just swirls around and ends up up against his
• 35:46
  house. I bet you he gets tired of that
• 35:48
  shit every day. Why?
• 35:51
  Why can't they have curbside savings?
• 35:54
  That's why. Pay the carriers less.
• 35:57
  That's all it's about is paying the carriers less because the
• 36:01
  post office doesn't pay for the CBU.
• 36:03
  The post office doesn't pay for curbside boxes.
• 36:07
  The cost is in the carrier going box to box.
• 36:10
  That's the cost. So next one is HR.
• 36:15
  Of course, James, you could always raise the postal rate
• 36:18
  again for first class letter. That makes sense.
• 36:20
  We'll get to that. We'll get to that.
• 36:26
  I will be talking about that on the next article.
• 36:28
  I have after I get done with all these resolutions, house HR 1310
• 36:35
  to limit the closure or consolidation of any United
• 36:39
  States Postal Service processing and distribution center.
• 36:42
  So that would be all your PND CS, just PND CS, not the SND CS.
• 36:48
  It doesn't include those, just the PNDC.
• 36:51
  It's and the the extra part of that is if such action would
• 36:55
  result in no such center being located in that state.
• 37:00
  So for instance, that one actually is this is not a good
• 37:05
  bill with that statement being in there because if you have
• 37:11
  like let's go with Nevada since she got into a great argument
• 37:15
  with the joy over this. In Nevada, you have a processing
• 37:18
  center in Reno, you have a processing center in Las Vegas.
• 37:22
  They could close the Reno facility and not violate this
• 37:25
  bill because they still have the processing center in Las Vegas.
• 37:28
  Inversely, if you have one on the Eastern Shore of Maryland,
• 37:34
  OK, and you have one on the Eastern Shore of Delaware, you
• 37:38
  have to maintain both of them even though they're only 14
• 37:42
  miles away from each other because they're not within the
• 37:45
  state. Yeah, but if there's one on the
• 37:48
  western side of Maryland way over by West Virginia, Yep, they
• 37:54
  can close that one and still keep the eastern one and this
• 37:57
  bill would would not be violated.
• 38:00
  Exactly. They'll make the 50 mile rule
• 38:03
  there. Or take Texas, you have one on
• 38:05
  the east side of Texas and when on the West side of Texas, it
• 38:09
  takes for a semi truck a day plus to drive across that state
• 38:15
  on I-10 because they only can drive for 11 hours before they
• 38:18
  have to shut down for a 10 hour break.
• 38:21
  So we take a day and a little bit for mail to go from the West
• 38:24
  side of the state to the east side of the state in Texas or
• 38:27
  the same for I-5 in California from the north side to the South
• 38:30
  side. For smarter than you.
• 38:36
  This one is actually a little bit better on that than that
• 38:40
  last one, and it was actually issued by Harriet Hagman out of
• 38:44
  Wyoming at large. And it is HR 1473, Postal
• 38:50
  Processing Protection Act, to require the United States Postal
• 38:54
  Service to apply certain requirements when closing a
• 38:57
  processing, shipping, delivery, or other facilities supporting a
• 39:00
  post office and for other purposes.
• 39:04
  And it's reasonable. It is, I'm going to say, not bad
• 39:08
  on that one. Yeah.
• 39:10
  Hold on, somebody actually put some thought into this.
• 39:13
  I guess so. Amazing.
• 39:16
  Must be a freshman lawmaker. Yeah.
• 39:19
  The next one I want to put out there, this one that we don't
• 39:22
  have to discuss because we've already rallied on it last year
• 39:26
  and it's been reintroduced. That is HR1065 and S463 that
• 39:35
  Protect our Letter Carriers Act. That is the big one.
• 39:41
  Here's the next really big one that a lot of RCA's and regular
• 39:47
  carriers will really appreciate and that is HR 1522.
• 39:53
  The Federal Retirement Fairness Act, also known as the buyback
• 39:58
  bill to a mid title 5 USC to provide that civilian service in
• 40:04
  a temporary position after December 31, 1988 may be
• 40:08
  credible service under the Federal Employee Retirement
• 40:11
  System and for other purposes. You can find back your.
• 40:16
  Non career time with the Postal Service.
• 40:19
  Unless you're on Table 2. No, this covers anybody at in a
• 40:24
  that in a civil service position after December 31st, 1988, which
• 40:30
  is when they cancelled that. So it applies to everybody.
• 40:35
  Yes, civil service. But if you're on, if you're on
• 40:37
  Table 2, you can't afford to do the buyback, so.
• 40:40
  That's why I'm, well, even some, even a lot of people on table
• 40:43
  one since Rex came into effect. Oh yeah.
• 40:48
  Now the next. Pros and cons?
• 40:51
  I'm going to weigh in on this a little bit because please do.
• 40:55
  I mean it. The previous one was subsidized.
• 41:00
  Subsidizing this would would be a financial nightmare.
• 41:05
  And honestly, and people don't understand how a buyback would
• 41:09
  work. They're all like, yes, I had
• 41:11
  nine years in as an RCA. I want those nine years to
• 41:15
  count. It's not going to include a full
• 41:19
  nine years. It's going to take the hours
• 41:22
  that you worked and calculate towards the amount of service,
• 41:28
  not your yearly amount. So if you were one of those Rcas
• 41:34
  that first started and you worked one day a week, maybe a
• 41:38
  few days here and there, so maybe you have a total of 6
• 41:41
  months that you worked for that year.
• 41:44
  It's going to calculate the amount of work hours you had and
• 41:49
  lump those together towards time served.
• 41:52
  Not you have nine years, here's your anniversary date to this
• 41:57
  date. Now it doesn't work that way and
• 41:58
  people don't understand that. Yeah.
• 42:00
  So you're looking at the way it would work, is the 2080 rule
• 42:05
  2080 hours because that's full time service.
• 42:07
  That is what the Retirement Act is based on for checks as well.
• 42:12
  So every 2080 hours you worked would equal one year of
• 42:18
  retirement or fraction thereof. Yep.
• 42:21
  So you got to remember that as well.
• 42:23
  And we all know, I mean, if not within the last five years in
• 42:27
  some areas, but there's still offices that are well staffed
• 42:30
  that the job as an RCA is feast or famine.
• 42:34
  And if you're feasting, great, that's awesome for you.
• 42:38
  But if you're one of those that is in the famines, you're not
• 42:42
  going to have as much time being able to accredit towards it.
• 42:45
  I'm just just saying, you know, that's something I mean, there's
• 42:50
  yes, it's a great idea having, you know, nearly nine years
• 42:55
  myself. And I know those last few years
• 42:58
  I was working six days a week. And so, yeah, I mean, I could
• 43:04
  see where that is. But if you're one of those that
• 43:06
  you know didn't work as much, it may not benefit you so.
• 43:12
  And then it's like. I said there's give or take,
• 43:14
  there's up pros and cons to everything and people just have
• 43:17
  to realize it's not going to be you're credited from your higher
• 43:21
  date to when you went career. It's going to be a calculation
• 43:27
  of the hours that you work. And it's also a question of
• 43:29
  whether they're doing it based on the hours you actually worked
• 43:34
  or the evaluations of the route that you got paid for and things
• 43:38
  like that as well. Because Subs that worked one day
• 43:41
  a week and worked the month heavy Monday and worked 1011
• 43:45
  hours on a nine hour route or an 8 hour route.
• 43:49
  That's another calculation that probably has to be figured out
• 43:52
  as well. It was.
• 43:53
  It's actual worked hours. It doesn't go by.
• 43:55
  Your evaluation. So I hope so because the post
• 43:59
  office would probably try to do it that way.
• 44:00
  All right. HR 1559, I do not have text on
• 44:09
  this, but it is called to extend the right of appeal to the Merit
• 44:15
  Systems Protection Board to certain employees in the United
• 44:18
  States Postal Service. This one actually effects
• 44:21
  veterans in the Postal Service and that is the appeals process
• 44:26
  involving the MPMSPB and that's in discipline, grievances,
• 44:32
  things like that. So that's something that we
• 44:35
  should keep an eye on when the text comes out.
• 44:37
  It was, it was introduced on February 25th and they still
• 44:41
  haven't uploaded the text onto the website.
• 44:43
  This next one is going to get some people riled up.
• 44:48
  Bill. Bill HR 1560, Postal Supervisors
• 44:59
  and Managers Fairness Act to modify procedures for
• 45:05
  negotiating pay and benefits of supervisory and other managerial
• 45:09
  personnel of the United States Postal Service.
• 45:12
  So Gerald Connolly of Virginia 11 put this forth.
• 45:17
  He does have a Co sponsor, Mr. Boast, who is from Illinois, 12.
• 45:25
  They want to try to basically bargain, represent for
• 45:31
  management pace, pace policy schedules and fringe benefit
• 45:36
  program. So basically it's, I think it's
• 45:38
  trying to unionize supervisors and managers through
• 45:43
  legislation. Making them bargaining unit
• 45:46
  employees. Making them bargaining
• 45:48
  collective bargaining agreements between the Postal Service and a
• 45:51
  bargaining representative organized under Section 12.
• 45:55
  O3 that affects any matter. So it would be a separate union
• 46:00
  for supervisors and postmasters. But they already have their
• 46:03
  associations. They're not bargaining, but they
• 46:06
  are associations. So they'll become bargaining
• 46:10
  unit employees of the managers and postmasters or whatever they
• 46:16
  decide to call the the association that wins this
• 46:21
  lucrative bill. I'd like to see management file
• 46:24
  agreements on upper management for something stupid.
• 46:27
  That'd be funny, that. 'D be entertaining.
• 46:29
  I'd actually love to sit in on that.
• 46:33
  You can't do that, right? Well, the our contract says
• 46:37
  yeah, yeah, that's why we hollered at you all the time
• 46:39
  because you can't do that because our contract says this.
• 46:43
  Yeah, yeah, I. And yet it, it, it, it's
• 46:50
  reminiscent of the fact that, you know, most of these
• 46:52
  supervisors and postmasters are in fear for their jobs.
• 46:57
  So just like the arts, you know, and, and just like the Rcas,
• 47:01
  they're under 90 days or, you know, you know, people that are
• 47:04
  getting harassed and all that, that the intimidation factor
• 47:07
  comes into play for them. We consider when they want to
• 47:11
  file, you know, a grievance per SE against their supervisors or
• 47:16
  upper management, their DMS, their pooms, whatever.
• 47:20
  Yeah. This, this, this, this, this
• 47:23
  could turn into a Jerry Springer show.
• 47:25
  I want it. That's exactly what I was.
• 47:31
  Could you imagine your postmaster file in a hostile
• 47:35
  work environment? Grievance against their POOM or
• 47:38
  district management. That would.
• 47:44
  Be. That that would be funny.
• 47:48
  Did it help? I mean, really?
• 47:51
  And yeah, they they come in the next day.
• 47:53
  Any other they're all pissed off.
• 47:55
  So why you know a grievance was denied?
• 47:58
  It's like didn't line didn't line you ass wife.
• 48:06
  I didn't find feel the paperwork in time.
• 48:13
  I filed it on day 15, now we had 14 days to file it.
• 48:19
  Oh God. Yeah, that would, that would be.
• 48:23
  Ironic. That's gonna be entertaining
• 48:24
  about. That one.
• 48:26
  Yeah, yeah. All right.
• 48:28
  The next one is HR 1760, USPS Act to require the Comptroller
• 48:36
  General of the United States to submit reports to Congress on
• 48:39
  theft of mail and United States Postal Service property and
• 48:43
  other similar criminal violations relating to the
• 48:46
  Postal Service and for other purposes.
• 48:49
  It may also be cited as upholding a Secure Postal System
• 48:52
  Act. Oh my God, But let's create
• 48:55
  another job, another committee and another subcommittee to do
• 48:59
  something that we should already be doing currently under the
• 49:03
  current, you know, regime. I mean, but you know, James,
• 49:08
  it's just like, you know, hiding mail when, you know, you have
• 49:11
  routes that are they vacated because people calling out or
• 49:16
  whatever and they turn around and they just work the parcels
• 49:19
  and they hide the mail. But yet, you know, you delay,
• 49:22
  you know, taking out mail or coming back and picking up a
• 49:24
  tray of DPS that they couldn't find.
• 49:26
  Oh, holy hell to pay. But management does it all the
• 49:30
  time. My post office was a big
• 49:33
  violator of that. So this one is they shall
• 49:36
  investigate nationwide patterns and instances of the theft of
• 49:40
  mail, delays of mail, United States Postal Service employee
• 49:44
  violations investigated by the Office of the Inspector General
• 49:48
  of the Postal Service. Any other criminal or civil
• 49:51
  violations under the jurisdiction of the Postal
• 49:53
  Inspection Service in the theft or vandalism of Postal Service
• 49:57
  property. And submit a report on each such
• 49:59
  investigation to the Committee on Oversight and Government
• 50:02
  Reform of the House of Representatives and the
• 50:04
  Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs of the
• 50:07
  Senate, the two bodies of the the Legislature that oversee the
• 50:11
  Postal Service. But what are they doing now?
• 50:14
  In general, they are themselves the the the Postal Service is
• 50:19
  delaying the mail themselves. Yes, but, but just just like
• 50:23
  other police agencies, we've investigated ourselves and found
• 50:27
  no wrongdoing. Yeah.
• 50:29
  All right, this is another one that does not have the text yet.
• 50:34
  It was induced on March 14th and it still has not been posted
• 50:39
  yet, but it is to amend Title 18, United States Code to modify
• 50:46
  the rules and duties of United States Postal Service police
• 50:49
  officers and for other purposes. It's HR 2095, so we do not know
• 50:55
  what they're modifying, but I'm hoping that what it is, is
• 50:59
  they're actually allowing the police officers to go back out
• 51:02
  and protect mail carriers on their route, especially with all
• 51:04
  the arrow key fast and robberies and and fatal assault mail
• 51:11
  carriers that have happened. I hope that that's what this,
• 51:14
  this resolution is for. I will keep an eye on this one
• 51:17
  for sure. And when I get the text, we'll
• 51:19
  come back to it. Another one that I that I do not
• 51:24
  have the text on, which was introduced the same day was
• 51:28
  HR2103 to modify the procedures used by the United States Postal
• 51:33
  Service for the closure or consolidation of any post office
• 51:37
  or any processing and distribution center and for
• 51:40
  other purposes. That's one we're looking at.
• 51:43
  It's got 4 Co sponsors already, but waiting on the text on that
• 51:47
  as well. HR 2174 Paycheck Protection Act
• 51:54
  this one is going to be controversial overall.
• 52:00
  HR 2174, Paycheck Protection Act to provide that agencies may not
• 52:06
  deduct labor organization dues from the pay of federal
• 52:09
  employees, including the United States Postal Service.
• 52:13
  And this one, you can argue both sides of it, OK.
• 52:19
  But the thing I see on this is basically they're trying to make
• 52:25
  the employees have to write a check for their union dues if
• 52:29
  they're a federal employee and, you know, or an employee of the
• 52:32
  Postal Service versus having it deducted from your paycheck.
• 52:37
  Now, I don't know about you guys, but when I signed my dues
• 52:41
  deduction paperwork, I knew what I was doing.
• 52:44
  I knew I was joining the union, I wanted to join the union, and
• 52:49
  this made it an easy way that I didn't have to remember that I
• 52:52
  had to send off my dues to the to the union.
• 52:55
  I didn't have to worry about the check getting lost in Palmetto
• 52:58
  or any other facility like Indianapolis or wherever on its
• 53:03
  way to the Union. It was taken care of for me.
• 53:06
  What do you guys think? It's going to be a hot potato
• 53:08
  either. Yeah.
• 53:09
  I mean, I could see both sides of it, you really could.
• 53:13
  But at the same time, I mean, like you said, you know, it's
• 53:17
  already coming out. That's one less thing I have to
• 53:20
  remember to send off a payment for well.
• 53:23
  And. Then worrying if a check is
• 53:26
  going to clear by the time it gets there and they get it in
• 53:29
  the bank or you know, I don't know.
• 53:34
  Well, here's the other problem, OK, because of the delay of the
• 53:37
  mail process, Yeah. How would our union, for
• 53:41
  example, handle all these payments coming in in a timely
• 53:45
  fashion without, you know, some type of grace period for it to
• 53:49
  arrive? The other problem of this is if
• 53:52
  they enact this, then you can withdraw the union anytime you
• 53:56
  want. I'm not sending your payment in.
• 54:01
  Imagine how many people would bail with that.
• 54:04
  You know, and there are a lot of people that hate the idea that
• 54:09
  they have to wait until their annual year is up, but that's
• 54:13
  the other side of it. You would have to send in the
• 54:15
  check annually as a carrier to the union versus bi weekly small
• 54:22
  amounts taken out of your check. You would have to save out those
• 54:25
  small amounts every paycheck in order to reach your annual dues.
• 54:29
  And I understand people are going to come at me for saying
• 54:32
  this, but paying your union dues helps protect carriers.
• 54:40
  There are stewards that protect carriers, there are Adrs and DRS
• 54:47
  that protect carriers. There are regional reps that
• 54:50
  protect carriers. There are national officers that
• 54:53
  protect carriers. The money you put into this
• 54:57
  union doesn't just pay for fun and games at conventions and
• 55:01
  conferences and things like that.
• 55:03
  It pays for the ability to represent the craft and things
• 55:07
  like arbitration. Arbitration can cost $100,000 in
• 55:13
  some instances easily to protect the carrier, like the carrier in
• 55:18
  my office on emergency placement that may end up going all the
• 55:23
  way up because of this, this pod stuff going on across the
• 55:27
  country that may go all the way up and may even end up in
• 55:30
  arbitration. Now that carrier is sitting at
• 55:32
  home, has been sitting at home for weeks already and probably
• 55:36
  will not be back to work for a long time until that's all
• 55:41
  settled. So I want you to think about
• 55:43
  those carriers that are getting hurt by these things when you
• 55:47
  talk about dues and protecting carriers, because these are your
• 55:51
  brothers and sisters of the craft that you're protecting
• 55:53
  with your union dues. OK, I don't want you to get mad
• 55:56
  at me, James, but I'm going to play devil's advocate too.
• 55:59
  We. Do we need that kind of stuff on
• 56:01
  here? No you you make a good point in
• 56:05
  regards to our representation and everything.
• 56:07
  And the good stewards, the good NROSADRS and DRS.
• 56:15
  Conversely, we're also paying for the bad stewards.
• 56:20
  ADRSDRSNROSA point in case. So we had ADR from my area who
• 56:28
  had failed to process Step 2 grievances for over 2 years.
• 56:33
  Where was the NRO overseeing him?
• 56:36
  OK, we had, you know the the ADR's who had pushed them up to
• 56:42
  the Dr. Where were they? We have local stewards who don't
• 56:47
  know enough about the contract and just give in to management
• 56:51
  or they have a personal agenda against that carrier, which
• 56:55
  you're not supposed to have. Thankfully we're not paying them
• 56:59
  the post office it, but the fact of the matter is that your
• 57:02
  representation is fail failing to duly represent you.
• 57:07
  What about the fact that these people who get into these full
• 57:10
  time paid positions aren't required or responsible enough
• 57:16
  to do the jobs that they were elected to or?
• 57:19
  In the case. Of like the you're appointed to.
• 57:22
  Exactly. And the thing of it is that, you
• 57:25
  know, you have a, a 5050 balance there.
• 57:28
  And, and just like some people have Unicorn post offices where
• 57:32
  the postmaster goes out and carries a route when it's vacant
• 57:36
  or, you know, we'll, we'll run out, you know, the mist thrown
• 57:39
  parcels and, and spurs because, you know, everybody's been been
• 57:43
  dismissed for today and one or two got left behind.
• 57:46
  You have just as many people. And, and you know, in my
• 57:49
  experience with the last SD and C, as well as the 26 years at
• 57:53
  Westchester, that, you know, for the most part, they don't give a
• 57:58
  shit about the carriers. They, they, they worry about
• 58:01
  getting their, their zoom meetings done.
• 58:04
  They worry about getting their reports done in a timely
• 58:06
  fashion. They worry about the, the
• 58:08
  latest, you know, tirade from Adm or a poom thing.
• 58:13
  OK, you're only allowed three hours in the office.
• 58:15
  OK, you, you have to do this. You have to this, this is the,
• 58:20
  the, the, the, the, the muddle that we're encompasses that you
• 58:27
  have good and bad on both sides. And and I'm saying all this
• 58:30
  because of the fact that if you don't get involved, it'll never
• 58:34
  get resolved. Nothing will get better unless
• 58:38
  you get involved. And you have to be in the union
• 58:41
  to get involved to the point of making significant changes to
• 58:46
  the entire structure of our national board, our national
• 58:50
  steward system and, and every steward NRO that that's on
• 58:56
  payroll because of the fact that, like I said earlier, I I'm
• 59:01
  being prodded to run for our state board, OK.
• 59:04
  Because people are tired of the politics and it's so hard to
• 59:08
  fight that. But if you don't fight it,
• 59:11
  you'll never win. You'll never gain an inch of
• 59:13
  ground and you'll never make an improvement in your work
• 59:16
  conditions, the environment that you go go into and spend a third
• 59:21
  of your day, every day of your life that you go in.
• 59:24
  You spend more time with these people than you do your own
• 59:27
  family. And if you don't fight for a
• 59:29
  better treatment, if you don't fight for the contract language,
• 59:33
  if you don't fight for each other, it's not going to get any
• 59:36
  better. Because we have both extremes.
• 59:38
  We have great carriers, great stewards, great DRS and some NR
• 59:44
  OS and then some people in the national board.
• 59:47
  But conversely, we run into, you know, the same amount of people
• 59:51
  who aren't doing their jobs. And I've had it for years, you
• 59:55
  know, in my position and you have bad management.
• 59:58
  And the, and the worst part is they're terrified of losing
• 1:00:02
  their jobs and they kowtow to their superiors.
• 1:00:06
  So you know, this, this is the problem.
• 1:00:08
  You know, you've got the good and the bad and there's a middle
• 1:00:11
  ground that yet you got to find. But once you do that middle
• 1:00:14
  ground, you have to keep pushing.
• 1:00:16
  Against the bad, because otherwise it'll just stay there
• 1:00:20
  and fester. So get involved.
• 1:00:22
  You want something done, stand up for change.
• 1:00:26
  Get involved. Quit crying about it.
• 1:00:28
  So to answer you on your devil's advocate pair, wouldn't the
• 1:00:33
  failure of those individuals, whether they be local steward,
• 1:00:36
  the local steward one that is a failure on the representative
• 1:00:41
  above them and the carriers in the office for standing up
• 1:00:46
  against that? Because the carriers in the
• 1:00:49
  office by a 2/3 vote can remove their steward if they believe
• 1:00:55
  the steward is not representing them.
• 1:00:57
  And the representative overseeing them, seeing things
• 1:01:03
  like that could also move to have them decertified as well.
• 1:01:08
  It's the same going up the chain.
• 1:01:10
  If it's an ADR, the Dr. has that responsibility.
• 1:01:13
  If it's ADR, the NRO has the responsibility.
• 1:01:17
  If it's an NRO or an area or the regional, then that's also on
• 1:01:23
  the responsibility. The regionals also on the
• 1:01:25
  responsibility of the NRO. If it's an NRO, it's the
• 1:01:29
  responsibility of the national board.
• 1:01:31
  And it all comes to head at the top with the president.
• 1:01:37
  He is responsible for everything that happens within this union,
• 1:01:40
  as he is the top dog of this union.
• 1:01:44
  He is to make sure that this union not only is properly
• 1:01:49
  protecting this craft and representing this craft to the
• 1:01:52
  best of its ability, but he's also responsible ensuring that
• 1:01:56
  everybody is treated with dignity, fairness and respect
• 1:01:59
  throughout the steward system. So I've got, so I've only got
• 1:02:06
  four more bills left. We'll go through them kind of
• 1:02:09
  quickly here. This one is one that we need to
• 1:02:13
  keep a big eye on for sponsors and stuff like that.
• 1:02:19
  Right now it doesn't have a lot, it only has one Co sponsor, but
• 1:02:23
  it is was introduced on March 18th.
• 1:02:26
  If HR 2193 the FEHB Protection Act.
• 1:02:32
  Now this act, the only thing this act does is it requires
• 1:02:38
  anybody with dependence on their health care, and this includes
• 1:02:43
  the the Postal Service health benefit plan to send in
• 1:02:47
  verification that their dependence actually have the
• 1:02:54
  familial relation to them, whether it's a birth certificate
• 1:02:58
  or marriage certificate, whatever it is.
• 1:03:01
  And if you do not do that within six months, they are required to
• 1:03:06
  remove that dependent from your healthcare coverage.
• 1:03:11
  I can see the point of this. I think it's one of those that
• 1:03:17
  has its pros and cons, but I mean, I could see why they would
• 1:03:22
  do that. I mean, it would be like in a
• 1:03:26
  situation like mine or, or you know, and I'm going to just we
• 1:03:32
  don't recognize common law in the state of Michigan.
• 1:03:35
  But if you think of those areas that have common law, you're
• 1:03:38
  technically you don't have a legal document between the two
• 1:03:42
  of you being married. You know, it's a slippery slope
• 1:03:47
  or those that, yeah, I'll just say that you're my spouse or my
• 1:03:53
  child and I'll put you on my insurance.
• 1:03:55
  I mean, I can get it. I see the point of it.
• 1:03:58
  But at the same time, it's like, yeah, that's just creating a
• 1:04:01
  whole another fiasco of yeah. And on top, on top of that, my
• 1:04:07
  question is it's, it's a government agency that's running
• 1:04:10
  the can't the government agency pull up the birth certificates,
• 1:04:13
  marriage licenses and whatever that's filed with the systems
• 1:04:16
  already? I mean you when you have a
• 1:04:19
  change of life event as it is, you have a baby or a a legal
• 1:04:24
  adoption or you get married, you have to Smith that documentation
• 1:04:29
  as it is to add them on to your insurance.
• 1:04:33
  So it's already there. Yeah.
• 1:04:36
  But if it's one of those instances I could see for like
• 1:04:39
  open enrollment, new employee, you know, newly career,
• 1:04:44
  something of that nature where you don't necessarily have to
• 1:04:47
  submit the supporting documentation.
• 1:04:50
  I think this is what would just say, hey you need to send this
• 1:04:53
  in as well. So the next one I have is
• 1:04:58
  HR2241. No text on this yet.
• 1:05:02
  Introduced on March 21st, it's to amend the National Labor
• 1:05:07
  Relations Act to ensure the right of employees to a secret
• 1:05:12
  ballot election conducted by the National Labor Relations Board.
• 1:05:16
  Still trying to figure out why this one's coming out.
• 1:05:18
  I mean, I thought secret ballots were the way we're supposed to
• 1:05:21
  to do the elections. I'll let you from the states
• 1:05:26
  where they tell you who to vote for.
• 1:05:28
  Did I say that out loud? You mean like the NBA's were
• 1:05:31
  telling people how to vote on the city carriers TA?
• 1:05:36
  I may have been looting alluding to that.
• 1:05:40
  I'm just, you know, just spitballing, that's all.
• 1:05:46
  And this is this is another one that I'm trying to figure out
• 1:05:51
  what it's pertaining to and what they're actually trying to
• 1:05:56
  remove. It came from Ashley Henson out
• 1:05:59
  of Iowa too. HR2262 to amend the Fair Labor
• 1:06:06
  Standards Act of 1938 to exclude certain activities from hours
• 1:06:11
  worked and for other purposes. Trying to figure out what
• 1:06:15
  activities they're trying to exclude and if they're actually
• 1:06:20
  work related activities that they're trying to exclude that
• 1:06:24
  are currently included, like bathroom breaks or something
• 1:06:28
  similar to that. You know, since management likes
• 1:06:30
  to think that bathroom breaks are a off the clock activity.
• 1:06:34
  I'm still hearing that from carriers to this day, even
• 1:06:39
  though our quick reference guide actually says right there does
• 1:06:43
  not include bathroom. Yeah, I, I, I get, I get such
• 1:06:47
  joy out of hearing that one because of the way I was
• 1:06:49
  questioned about a bathroom break.
• 1:06:52
  It didn't like the answer I gave them.
• 1:06:57
  I mean, yeah, I was honest about it, but I I was very detail
• 1:07:00
  oriented too. Anything else, James?
• 1:07:04
  So I won't, I won't, I won't say anything more, Kristen.
• 1:07:07
  So you don't have to edit it. Thank you.
• 1:07:10
  I appreciate that. Well, that was all the bills I
• 1:07:15
  had for now. There are.
• 1:07:16
  There were a couple more that I had included on my post, but I
• 1:07:20
  thought those were the most interesting ones to talk about.
• 1:07:25
  So I was actually given a document from Wells Fargo on the
• 1:07:31
  privatization of the Postal Service.
• 1:07:34
  And let's just say they aren't living in reality.
• 1:07:40
  Let's start with this, the fact that they're turning around and
• 1:07:45
  saying that mail and parcels can be split with the mail and
• 1:07:51
  parcel businesses with the intent of maintaining mail
• 1:07:54
  operations as a government enterprise, preserving rural
• 1:07:58
  community access and the universal service obligation.
• 1:08:02
  Parcel could be carved out or and sold or IPO.
• 1:08:06
  The combination of IPO proceeds and monetization of the real
• 1:08:09
  estate portfolio could be used to build out stand alone assets
• 1:08:14
  for parcel and monetize technology as well as the
• 1:08:18
  subsidized potential mail losses unlocking 85 billion of real
• 1:08:22
  estate. They own 8500 facilities of
• 1:08:26
  which they believe 7200 or smaller post office facilities
• 1:08:29
  and 1300 or larger store facilities and the Postal
• 1:08:33
  Service on 20,700 acres of land. So it could be $1.2 billion for
• 1:08:39
  property and three 34 billion for the land and federal federal
• 1:08:47
  parcel pricing, raising the prices 30 to 140% on parcels.
• 1:08:57
  Restructure $400 billion of pension and healthcare
• 1:09:00
  liabilities. Move to another entity likely to
• 1:09:05
  the US taxpayer. Where they could, they arguably
• 1:09:07
  are now since the buyers or investors will be reluctant to
• 1:09:12
  assume such a large legacy liability.
• 1:09:14
  No shit Sherlock, In order to drive efficiency and maximize
• 1:09:20
  value, it is likely that employees receive a the type of
• 1:09:25
  deferred buyout, offer to leave or layoffs could ensue.
• 1:09:31
  USPS parcel pricing was 25 to 60% below FedEx UPS depending on
• 1:09:36
  product type. So they'd have to raise it 30 to
• 1:09:39
  140%. The federal government would
• 1:09:41
  have raised proceeds from buyers or investors.
• 1:09:44
  But yeah, there's AI have a 13 page report from Wells Fargo on
• 1:09:52
  the privatization of the Postal Service.
• 1:09:54
  I will actually put that in our Discord server for people to
• 1:09:58
  look at. Something to read if I have
• 1:10:01
  insomnia. Yes, it'll definitely put you to
• 1:10:04
  sleep, but So what are you guys thoughts on on on that document
• 1:10:11
  I. Have no thoughts on it?
• 1:10:15
  I'm kind of going. To take a a a a page out of
• 1:10:18
  Corey Walton's book, and I'm not stressing over any of this right
• 1:10:22
  now. No, no, I think it's a lot of
• 1:10:24
  fear mongering, OK. Exactly what it is.
• 1:10:28
  But in regards to the Wells Fargo 1, James, I've always had
• 1:10:32
  the contention that the post office ought to split it's it's
• 1:10:37
  service between the mail and the parcels.
• 1:10:41
  And, and, and I truly believe that if you know, you have
• 1:10:45
  vehicles that you know, can handle the mail, OK,
• 1:10:48
  specifically just mail and, you know, then you have other
• 1:10:52
  vehicles that can handle the parcels.
• 1:10:55
  Yes, there's going to be some overlap, but the, you know, the
• 1:10:57
  parcel aspect of it is going to be, you know, skipping, jumping,
• 1:11:01
  you know, over 3 or 4 routes. Whereas you can now take a route
• 1:11:05
  and put anywhere from 1000 to 1500 addresses on there and just
• 1:11:09
  focus on the mail. And that would include, you
• 1:11:12
  know, anything that's certified or, you know, a registered
• 1:11:16
  express that, you know, requires a signature like that so that,
• 1:11:19
  you know, the parcel aspect of it could be more efficient.
• 1:11:22
  I I still think that's something feasible that they ought to look
• 1:11:26
  at. I, I, I can concur with that.
• 1:11:29
  But at the same time for cost efficiency overall and in
• 1:11:35
  general with, with the service in your rural communities, it's
• 1:11:39
  easier to keep the parcels and mail together than it is to send
• 1:11:44
  two vehicles out to the same areas to deliver.
• 1:11:47
  Like I know rural areas that every other house they're
• 1:11:51
  delivering a parcel to at the same time that they're
• 1:11:54
  delivering the mail. Whereas like in my in my area
• 1:11:58
  with the size of my area, half, half the trucks could probably
• 1:12:02
  deliver the routes mail and half the trucks could deliver all the
• 1:12:07
  parcels. But you're also talking about
• 1:12:10
  you're still using the same amount of vehicles to do the
• 1:12:14
  same amount of work. Right.
• 1:12:15
  But the, the efficiency let let let me, let, let me try to put
• 1:12:20
  this in perspective to you youngins, OK?
• 1:12:23
  Because back in the day when we used to get mail when used to
• 1:12:26
  come in, in the morning and there was 20 plus feet of
• 1:12:30
  bundled catalogs and then three and four tubs of loose flats.
• 1:12:36
  And we used to, you know, do that plus anywhere from 9:00 to
• 1:12:40
  12:00 trays of DPS. And we were consistently three
• 1:12:43
  to five hours under evaluation because all you did was you hit
• 1:12:48
  the mailboxes bang, bang, bang. You know, no, no stopping to
• 1:12:53
  find this parcel of that package.
• 1:12:54
  You know, and this is, you know, this is a formula that you can
• 1:12:57
  only use in areas that are concentrated enough in in, in
• 1:13:01
  housing density. You can't do it out in Iowa
• 1:13:04
  where there's where there's 120 mile route.
• 1:13:06
  Just wouldn't make any sense there to send a vehicle to the
• 1:13:09
  end of the route to deliver a parcel that the trucks already
• 1:13:12
  going to for mail. But in, you know, the, the
• 1:13:15
  suburban and semi rural areas, you know, such as Westchester,
• 1:13:19
  Pennsylvania, it would make great sense.
• 1:13:23
  You know, I, I swear to God, I, I sit there and I hear somebody
• 1:13:27
  get, oh, I got 2 box holders and I got 5 trays of DPS.
• 1:13:32
  I'm like, shut the hell up. I used, I used to go out with 15
• 1:13:38
  to 18 trays of flats and letters every day before we had, we had
• 1:13:42
  the parcel business and you know how pissed you would get when
• 1:13:46
  you got a parcel? Oh my God.
• 1:13:49
  Because we actually had that, you know, out of the vehicle,
• 1:13:51
  yeah. Oh, and you, you mean back in
• 1:13:56
  Paris? When, when, when you know,
• 1:13:58
  somebody said that they could still deliver box to box like
• 1:14:01
  they used to. Yeah, or, or like when they
• 1:14:04
  first came out with the barcodes on the scans there and one of
• 1:14:08
  the first barcodes was the EVEVS barcode and they were having a
• 1:14:15
  fit because, you know, first of all, we had a little flip phone
• 1:14:20
  that was our transponder for our 14 LB scanner, OK.
• 1:14:25
  And we and I would never scan these EVs packages and
• 1:14:30
  management was having to fit. And then I turned around and
• 1:14:32
  showed them the language that says those those packages don't
• 1:14:35
  require scans. Well, why are we putting the
• 1:14:38
  barcodes on there? I said, look, I'm not, I don't
• 1:14:41
  know who the idiot is came up with that.
• 1:14:43
  I'm just showing you the language that the post office
• 1:14:45
  agreed to. OK.
• 1:14:47
  But you know, like I said, we, we would get done by 1/30, 2:00
• 1:14:52
  in the afternoon and, and had, you know, 600 addresses, you
• 1:14:58
  know, a lot, a lot of them. And that was, that was a big
• 1:15:01
  route in our office. 600. Most of us were in the four
• 1:15:04
  hundreds with the volume of mail we had.
• 1:15:06
  And we'd still get back, you know, in time to pick up the kid
• 1:15:09
  from daycare or off the school bus drop and all.
• 1:15:13
  You know, there is a certain efficiency just delivering mail.
• 1:15:17
  Ask anybody that happens when they turn around and, you know,
• 1:15:21
  Amazon doesn't show up and and they've got, you know, 20
• 1:15:24
  parcels and the rest of it's mail.
• 1:15:26
  They're, you know, they're walking out of the office at
• 1:15:28
  120-1140 saying, oh great, well, you're going to pay for it the
• 1:15:32
  next day. I like those.
• 1:15:34
  Days I'm much more in the mailbox.
• 1:15:36
  Little packages and I'm just tossing mail.
• 1:15:39
  I miss those days. Meow puts now what?
• 1:15:41
  What happens when the mail volume goes down?
• 1:15:46
  It's it's been going down for the last 15 years dramatically.
• 1:15:50
  I mean, you know, you're just going to end up turning around,
• 1:15:52
  consolidating routes and, you know, yeah, right.
• 1:15:56
  As the parcels go up, the mail goes down.
• 1:15:59
  So, you know, one way or the other, you might have to convert
• 1:16:02
  a mail route to a parcel route. Same equipment, same driver, you
• 1:16:06
  know, just different function, that's all.
• 1:16:09
  Yeah, and I mean I, I actually got to know what it was like to
• 1:16:13
  just throw and go with the boxes.
• 1:16:16
  You know, I had a day where I, we were so overloaded that they
• 1:16:19
  sent me help and I just gave them all the parcels except for
• 1:16:23
  one down a, down a back Rd. that I had to go all the way down to
• 1:16:25
  their box because they got a hardship.
• 1:16:28
  But going along, I did the second-half of my route in an
• 1:16:32
  hour and a half, which normally takes me 3 hours.
• 1:16:36
  I remember back, you know when I was still a newer RCAI was like
• 1:16:41
  6 months in and the package volume was you know this was pre
• 1:16:46
  Amazon days and I remember it was a bad day.
• 1:16:49
  Anyways bad days start with me. I ended up being like 1/2 hour
• 1:16:53
  40 minutes late coming in and had a box holder that day but I
• 1:16:58
  had very little packages. I was on a well 4748 Ki was done
• 1:17:03
  at 1:30 that day with a box holder.
• 1:17:07
  Mm hmm. Yeah, yeah.
• 1:17:09
  I mean, when you just throw and go, it's nice.
• 1:17:12
  Back when carriers had it good. Yeah, we had it too good for
• 1:17:18
  too. We had it too good for too long,
• 1:17:19
  James. All right, guys, we ready to
• 1:17:24
  wind this down. Sounds like a plan to me.
• 1:17:28
  All righty. Your final words, James.
• 1:17:31
  You know, it's great to see all the people coming out for all
• 1:17:34
  these rallies across this nation.
• 1:17:36
  It can't stop. The legislation out there is
• 1:17:39
  proving that. It can't stop the stuff going on
• 1:17:42
  between the unions and the postmasters general and the
• 1:17:46
  contract negotiations, the president, everything that's
• 1:17:50
  going on. We need to keep fighting.
• 1:17:54
  We need to keep standing up. We need to keep educating
• 1:17:57
  ourselves because the most important thing is an educated
• 1:18:00
  carrier is the bane of management.
• 1:18:03
  You have to know more than management does to stay ahead of
• 1:18:07
  the game. You have to protect yourself.
• 1:18:10
  You have to protect your career and you have to protect your
• 1:18:13
  brothers and sister of this craft and the other craft
• 1:18:17
  because at the end of the day, we're all in this together,
• 1:18:21
  Bill. Well, you're right.
• 1:18:23
  You know, an educated carrier is, is a dangerous carrier.
• 1:18:29
  Westchester, specifically local carrier, brought up the fact
• 1:18:34
  that they're putting somebody who's in their third week onto
• 1:18:38
  another route to carry because they had three call outs that
• 1:18:41
  day and the carrier, not the steward, stood up to management
• 1:18:47
  and says no, you can't do that. Well, then the steward got
• 1:18:50
  involved. Well, the steward had to look up
• 1:18:52
  the information which was handily provided them by some
• 1:18:57
  asshole you all know, not mentioning my name in
• 1:19:00
  particular. But the fact of the matter was,
• 1:19:02
  you know, by the end of the day, they had it resolved and they
• 1:19:05
  had to redo their schedule because of the contractual
• 1:19:08
  grievance. And it it's, it's those people
• 1:19:13
  who are, you know, my heroes, the ones that stand up for
• 1:19:16
  another carrier. You know, they're getting
• 1:19:18
  involved. They're they're not letting the
• 1:19:21
  status quo go. And the fact that, you know,
• 1:19:24
  Stewart didn't know about it because he's only concerned with
• 1:19:28
  issues that are brought to his attention.
• 1:19:30
  He's not looking, you know, for any improprieties by management.
• 1:19:34
  Well, you have to be alert. You, you have to be that
• 1:19:37
  tactical office and look for those situations that are
• 1:19:40
  developing or could develop because management's trying to
• 1:19:44
  get over, you know, I don't care who you are.
• 1:19:49
  If you if you see something egregious, if you have a
• 1:19:53
  question, challenge it. Challenge management, challenge
• 1:19:56
  your local steward and get involved because of the fact
• 1:19:59
  that it takes all of us to protect the craft.
• 1:20:02
  It's not, you know, you're protecting an individual, but
• 1:20:05
  the craft in whole, because that goes a long way of showing
• 1:20:09
  people that you know you care. It's like being the steward who
• 1:20:12
  represents somebody they don't like or the person they don't
• 1:20:16
  like doesn't like them either. It's you have to do due
• 1:20:21
  diligence and protect that individual, protect the craft
• 1:20:26
  and watch out for everybody. Watch out for you, your fellow
• 1:20:29
  brothers and sisters. But you know, the thing of it is
• 1:20:32
  that you have to care. You have to put in the time and
• 1:20:35
  the effort. You have to put in the the the
• 1:20:38
  the due diligence in regards to knowing the contract, the, the
• 1:20:42
  M38, the PO6O3, the ALM, the F2021.
• 1:20:47
  I mean, you know, it's a lot. Arcam Rex yes, it is a lot and
• 1:20:52
  that's what we're here for we're to help we're here to help you
• 1:20:54
  with these situations and understandings, the rules and
• 1:20:58
  regulations that might affect your job or just the environment
• 1:21:01
  at your job. So, you know, all of us Texas
• 1:21:05
  IMS, you know, we're, we're here, I'm averaging about 3 new
• 1:21:09
  people a week right now. So, you know, I'm, I'm having a
• 1:21:12
  good time and, you know, responding to them.
• 1:21:15
  But the fact of the matter is it, you need to address it on
• 1:21:18
  the floor as it occurs, OK? Don't let it fester.
• 1:21:22
  Don't, don't let it slip by. Address the situation that needs
• 1:21:26
  correction. Stand up for yourself, stand up
• 1:21:28
  for each other. OK, go out there, have a good,
• 1:21:31
  good week. You know you've got the what
• 1:21:34
  you've your mini mail survey will is supposed to be what by
• 1:21:38
  the end of the week here? Do you have any results?
• 1:21:40
  Saturday. And then and then the following
• 1:21:43
  Saturday they go in effect. So make sure you've got your
• 1:21:46
  disputes ready and details. You need details, you need
• 1:21:51
  facts. Just can't say oh, I'm not
• 1:21:54
  getting the right dismounts distance much distance are you
• 1:21:57
  getting? How much distance are you
• 1:21:59
  supposed to get? How far is it to, you know, the
• 1:22:04
  parcel? You know, your hampers inside
• 1:22:06
  the office or your bullpen area? You know, you got a question,
• 1:22:10
  dispute it. Back it up with facts.
• 1:22:12
  Make sure each dispute is on a separate form.
• 1:22:15
  Yeah, guys, go out there. Be safe.
• 1:22:17
  You know, springs right around the corner for most of us.
• 1:22:20
  And you know, the kids are going to be out there.
• 1:22:23
  Be careful watching them around the cars and the cul de sacs.
• 1:22:27
  I love them little shits, you know, running out in front of
• 1:22:29
  you, but you know, I know you all do a good job and you try to
• 1:22:33
  be professional, safe and efficient.
• 1:22:35
  Just make sure you know, you get the get home to your loved ones
• 1:22:38
  because you are the most important delivery of the day.
• 1:22:40
  And that's how you say it, Don. You're the most important
• 1:22:43
  delivery of the day, Kristen. Thank you, guys.
• 1:22:47
  Yeah, that's, you know, that's like James says, we are all in
• 1:22:51
  this together, but you know, we're not going to have change
• 1:22:55
  if we don't all come together to be that change.
• 1:22:58
  That means being active. That means supporting those
• 1:23:03
  newer RC as and especially to be active.
• 1:23:07
  I I have an issue already off the bat.
• 1:23:09
  Ruby wants to be active. Let me tell you, she already has
• 1:23:13
  a taste of it is, you know going with me this past year and she's
• 1:23:18
  already put her name in for state convention delegate.
• 1:23:23
  She'll be on the ballot for National Convention delegate.
• 1:23:26
  She wants to and now I'm already getting pushed back by her
• 1:23:30
  regular that she'll to the route she's assigned at because he
• 1:23:33
  thinks she's going to run off and party at all these union
• 1:23:37
  conventions with me. No, that's not what it is, you
• 1:23:41
  know, and talking to other people, you know, we, we need
• 1:23:44
  the next generation to stand up, educate themselves, educate each
• 1:23:49
  other, get involved and be active.
• 1:23:53
  We really do. It's you know, and I hate to say
• 1:23:57
  this because you know, Ruby's had the experiences of going to
• 1:24:00
  those things with me. They did turn to her quite a bit
• 1:24:04
  at both. You know, the orientation
• 1:24:06
  presentation isn't as well a little bit at Academy that they
• 1:24:10
  could because she has experienced it.
• 1:24:13
  So she was able to tell them what goes on and, and what, what
• 1:24:19
  the union does and everything else, which I think was awesome.
• 1:24:23
  I mean, they had she had a brand new RCA in her Academy from
• 1:24:27
  another town that was going to go to one of the rallies today.
• 1:24:31
  You know, that's, you know, that's what we need out of this
• 1:24:36
  next generation coming up and that's what we need to do to
• 1:24:40
  mentor as we go into the future because you know, obviously we
• 1:24:45
  don't know what our future is going to hold for us at this
• 1:24:48
  present time. Nobody knows.
• 1:24:50
  We don't have that little crystal ball or that Magic 8
• 1:24:53
  ball to tell us what's going to happen.
• 1:24:54
  We don't. So until we know what's going to
• 1:24:57
  happen, let's do the best that we can do.
• 1:25:00
  Let's provide the service for our customers that they expect.
• 1:25:04
  Let's exceed their expectations if we can, and let's mentor our
• 1:25:09
  coworkers and our new Rcas and even our current Rcas who don't
• 1:25:14
  want to, don't think it's important.
• 1:25:17
  We needed to show them why it's important.
• 1:25:20
  So on that note, guys, I know it's going to be spring break
• 1:25:24
  coming up for several areas, I know in my area and whatnot.
• 1:25:27
  So please be vigilant. Like Bill said, the kids are
• 1:25:30
  going to be out and around you vigilant.
• 1:25:33
  Stay safe, stay hydrated. It's still March, weather is
• 1:25:37
  whatever it wants to be at this point, 50° one day, snowing the
• 1:25:42
  next, back and forth, you know, So stay safe out there guys, and
• 1:25:49
  we'll be back next week.