Latest / 360 with Katie Woolf / Bishop of the Catholic Church Charles Gauci says the NT Government's proposed changes to anti-discrimination laws would have concerning unintended consequences

Transcript

Bishop of the Catholic Church Charles Gauci says the NT Government's proposed changes to anti-discrimination laws would have concerning unintended consequences · 360 with Katie Woolf

• 0:00
  Speaker 1: Now, we have been talking quite a bit about the
• 0:02
  Speaker 1: Northern Territory government's anti discrimination bill this week, and one
• 0:06
  Speaker 1: of the major stakeholders set to be impacted by these
• 0:09
  Speaker 1: changes is schools of faith, and the Bishop of the
• 0:12
  Speaker 1: Catholic Church in the Northern Territory, Charles Gouchy, is concerned
• 0:16
  Speaker 1: that if passed, there could be a lot of unintended consequences. Now,
• 0:21
  Speaker 1: Bishop Charles Gouchi joins me on the line right now.
• 0:24
  Speaker 1: Good morning to you, Bishop.
• 0:27
  Speaker 2: Good morning to you. Okay, how are you not too bad?
• 0:29
  Speaker 1: Thank you so much for your time this morning. Now, Bishop, firstly,
• 0:34
  Speaker 1: do you support these proposed changes?
• 0:37
  Speaker 2: Look, I certainly am not in favor of any discrimination
• 0:42
  Speaker 2: against anyone, and so I think the intentions are good. However,
• 0:50
  Speaker 2: some aspects of the new proposed directives have got implications
• 0:56
  Speaker 2: that could cause a lot of angst and serious problems
• 1:00
  Speaker 2: for us and for other people.
• 1:02
  Speaker 1: So what are your concerns with the proposed changes.
• 1:08
  Speaker 2: People choose faith schools because they want their children to
• 1:13
  Speaker 2: benefit from the values and the beliefs of that community.
• 1:19
  Speaker 2: So in our Catholic schools, we are very clear in
• 1:22
  Speaker 2: our ethos and when we employ staff in our schools
• 1:27
  Speaker 2: they are required to uphold our ethos. Now, it doesn't
• 1:31
  Speaker 2: mean that every teacher is a Catholic or even a believer,
• 1:35
  Speaker 2: but we certainly have a firm policy that the principal,
• 1:40
  Speaker 2: the deputy, the director of religious education are practicing members
• 1:45
  Speaker 2: of our faith community. They are seen as religious leaders,
• 1:49
  Speaker 2: and that they would uphold the values of our church. Now,
• 1:53
  Speaker 2: many of our clientele, students, parents, are not Catholics, but
• 1:58
  Speaker 2: they still value what we offer. And with the new legislation,
• 2:04
  Speaker 2: I would not be able to require that these leaders
• 2:09
  Speaker 2: uphold our ethos and our members of our community. Also,
• 2:16
  Speaker 2: if a teacher was to start teaching something very different
• 2:20
  Speaker 2: from what we believe on values and morality, it would
• 2:23
  Speaker 2: be very difficult for us to say, excuse me, we
• 2:26
  Speaker 2: cannot quite teach that. We are not talking about a
• 2:29
  Speaker 2: person's personal beliefs, a teacher's personal beliefs, or even their
• 2:34
  Speaker 2: own private lives. We are talking what they do within
• 2:37
  Speaker 2: our school and what they teach that is very much
• 2:40
  Speaker 2: threatened by this new legislation.
• 2:43
  Speaker 1: Bishop, can you give us some examples of how you
• 2:46
  Speaker 1: think that you know or how they may be some
• 2:49
  Speaker 1: of those unintended consequences as a result of those changes.
• 2:54
  Speaker 2: For example, if a teacher decided to say that they
• 3:01
  Speaker 2: don't that they believe in poly amori for example, and
• 3:06
  Speaker 2: that it's a good thing, which excuse me. We have
• 3:10
  Speaker 2: certain beliefs about morality of how you live your life,
• 3:15
  Speaker 2: and that is really contrary to what we believe. So
• 3:18
  Speaker 2: please hold that to yourself, don't teach it in our school.
• 3:22
  Speaker 2: Or if a person was to say that they don't
• 3:26
  Speaker 2: believe in God, well that's their personal lives, but please
• 3:29
  Speaker 2: don't try to promote atheism in our school. Or if
• 3:33
  Speaker 2: they are a believer in another faith and they try
• 3:37
  Speaker 2: to encourage and foster that faith within our school contrary
• 3:40
  Speaker 2: to what we believe. Those are examples where we could
• 3:44
  Speaker 2: have problems.
• 3:45
  Speaker 1: No, Bishop, my understanding is that you have raised these
• 3:49
  Speaker 1: concerns with the government and with the Attorney General. What
• 3:52
  Speaker 1: has been their reaction.
• 3:55
  Speaker 2: Well, some months ago they put out a draft and
• 3:59
  Speaker 2: we spoke very strongly about some of these issues, as
• 4:02
  Speaker 2: did other churches and other bodies, but they have been
• 4:05
  Speaker 2: totally ignored now in this present form, when this President
• 4:09
  Speaker 2: four came out, it's obvious they ignored what we had said.
• 4:13
  Speaker 2: And I've written to every member of Parliament, sent them
• 4:17
  Speaker 2: a letter. One responded and said, no, we are not
• 4:25
  Speaker 2: threatening the milieure or the faith of the school. We
• 4:29
  Speaker 2: have just wanted to make sure that there is no
• 4:33
  Speaker 2: discrimination against who is employed. So and I said, We're
• 4:37
  Speaker 2: not about discriminating, but we are asking that those particular
• 4:41
  Speaker 2: leadership roles are of people of faith. I've not had
• 4:45
  Speaker 2: a second response. The others just acknowledged. I've asked to
• 4:49
  Speaker 2: meet with the Attorney General and I'm waiting for a
• 4:51
  Speaker 2: response on that. But certainly I've written strongly, and I've
• 4:56
  Speaker 2: made my letters public and people know about them. Got
• 5:00
  Speaker 2: many of the parents are involved that are very concerned.
• 5:03
  Speaker 1: And Bishop, what would you say to, you know, to
• 5:06
  Speaker 1: anybody listening this morning who is thinking, well, you know,
• 5:08
  Speaker 1: it is discriminatory, you know, to have somebody in those
• 5:12
  Speaker 1: roles and to tell them that they have to be
• 5:16
  Speaker 1: the same faith as you. What would you say to
• 5:18
  Speaker 1: those listening that feel that way.
• 5:21
  Speaker 2: The very reason why we have faith schools is that
• 5:23
  Speaker 2: we can promote the ethos and faith of that particular faith.
• 5:28
  Speaker 2: So it's it's contradictory not to hold the faith of
• 5:31
  Speaker 2: that of that particular belief system and have the schools
• 5:37
  Speaker 2: called faith schools. It doesn't make sense. So people can
• 5:41
  Speaker 2: look for employment wherever they wish, but if they come
• 5:45
  Speaker 2: to one of our faith schools, they know they are
• 5:47
  Speaker 2: coming to work within that particular faith Milliere. So it
• 5:52
  Speaker 2: makes sense to me to be able to respect that
• 5:56
  Speaker 2: particular miliere. Well, I would say it's about protecting the
• 6:00
  Speaker 2: right of those parents to have children got up in
• 6:04
  Speaker 2: the values that they want. So I believe it's a
• 6:07
  Speaker 2: form of discrimination against those families not to allow them
• 6:11
  Speaker 2: to do that by imposing upon them a belief system
• 6:14
  Speaker 2: that they don't want. So in effect, it is reverse discrimination.
• 6:18
  Speaker 1: And Bishop, I know that there are some concerns as
• 6:21
  Speaker 1: well with these amendments to the bill. This well, some
• 6:24
  Speaker 1: of it's a bit vague, particularly when you talk about
• 6:28
  Speaker 1: the offense being added or people being offended. What is
• 6:32
  Speaker 1: your understanding of that and how do you think that
• 6:35
  Speaker 1: it could impact the church?
• 6:38
  Speaker 2: Oh, I think it's not just the church, but everybody
• 6:41
  Speaker 2: else as well. It's very vague. What does offense mean.
• 6:45
  Speaker 2: Somebody could say there's a Christmas pageant and there is
• 6:48
  Speaker 2: actually an activity scene I find that offensive, or a
• 6:52
  Speaker 2: preacher could say in a funeral, for example, I really
• 6:57
  Speaker 2: believe these beliefs about what happens when you die in
• 7:01
  Speaker 2: a in a Catholic called Christian funeral, and somebody could
• 7:04
  Speaker 2: say I find that offenses. So that's so vague. It
• 7:08
  Speaker 2: hasn't been taught out true. It's a clumsy. It's a
• 7:11
  Speaker 2: clumsy proposal. Our lawyers have picked holes all over it
• 7:15
  Speaker 2: and said this is going to have unnecessarily litigation and
• 7:19
  Speaker 2: the waste of funds and resources and people's energies. It's
• 7:24
  Speaker 2: very vague. Bishop, Nobody, nobody wants. I would be the
• 7:27
  Speaker 2: first one to say, please be respectful. You disagree with someone,
• 7:31
  Speaker 2: do it respectfully and don't try to attack the person.
• 7:36
  Speaker 2: So I am against discrimination. We want to not discriminate
• 7:40
  Speaker 2: against anyone regarding faith, ethnicity, orientation, whatever. That's not what
• 7:47
  Speaker 2: we are about. I want to respect all people.
• 7:51
  Speaker 1: And so, Bishop, obviously you've already sought legal advice on
• 7:55
  Speaker 1: these changes, and and they're looking at how this may
• 7:58
  Speaker 1: impact the church schools.
• 8:00
  Speaker 2: Yes, yes, I have and and and I say and
• 8:05
  Speaker 2: I have stated that publicly. Yes I have, and and
• 8:09
  Speaker 2: but there are so many implications. It's going to cost
• 8:12
  Speaker 2: so much unnecessary more resources and energy and money to
• 8:16
  Speaker 2: sort all this out. Look if I if I cannot
• 8:19
  Speaker 2: have a say school to be a genuine Shay school
• 8:23
  Speaker 2: where it's respectful of everybody, where we give people an
• 8:26
  Speaker 2: idea of other people's beliefs as well in the society
• 8:30
  Speaker 2: we live in and really have great intellectual respect for
• 8:33
  Speaker 2: values and ideas. If I cannot have that in our schools,
• 8:37
  Speaker 2: what's the point of having them. We would have to
• 8:39
  Speaker 2: close them. I think serious to consider closing them, and
• 8:41
  Speaker 2: then all the kids would have to go to the
• 8:43
  Speaker 2: state schools.
• 8:44
  Speaker 1: Bishop, what do you think the government need to do
• 8:47
  Speaker 1: here with this legislation.
• 8:50
  Speaker 2: I think they need to take seriously our concerns and
• 8:53
  Speaker 2: talk with us properly and not Russia true, and look
• 8:55
  Speaker 2: at the implications and put amendments into what they have done.
• 9:00
  Speaker 1: Well. I'm sure I know that there's other people in
• 9:02
  Speaker 1: the community who have really serious concerns around these changes.
• 9:06
  Speaker 1: And I know the government's going to say that they
• 9:08
  Speaker 1: have gone through that consultation process. But Bishop Charles, do
• 9:11
  Speaker 1: you feel as that they've actually gone through a genuine
• 9:14
  Speaker 1: consultation here?
• 9:16
  Speaker 2: No, I don't believe that. I believe that they may
• 9:19
  Speaker 2: believe that, but I don't think they have done it objectively.
• 9:22
  Speaker 2: I said they think they've ignored a lot of the
• 9:24
  Speaker 2: concerns expressed to them by people. And you know, people
• 9:28
  Speaker 2: of faith are beginning to believe they are being discriminated
• 9:30
  Speaker 2: against them. Honestly, people of faith are wondering whether there's
• 9:34
  Speaker 2: a hidden agenda. It's not. I hope not. I hope not.
• 9:38
  Speaker 2: I hope not.
• 9:39
  Speaker 1: Well, and you know, with this then you also think, well,
• 9:42
  Speaker 1: with this legislation, are people of faith they're able to
• 9:45
  Speaker 1: take legal action that you know, like you've said that
• 9:47
  Speaker 1: they're feeling discriminated against. And this is where it is
• 9:50
  Speaker 1: also up in the air. At this point, it feels, well.
• 9:54
  Speaker 2: I certainly want to look at all options here. I'm
• 9:56
  Speaker 2: taking this very very seriously. It's really questioning whether we
• 10:00
  Speaker 2: are going to be viable in all of our schools
• 10:03
  Speaker 2: and we have plenty of them giving a great contribution
• 10:06
  Speaker 2: to people or trust the and p I repeat, more
• 10:08
  Speaker 2: than have the students to come to our schools. I'm
• 10:12
  Speaker 2: not Catholic, but they value what we present and what
• 10:16
  Speaker 2: we hold. So it's a very major concern. And it's
• 10:20
  Speaker 2: not just about schools. As you say, this whole idea
• 10:23
  Speaker 2: of what is offensive, how do you determine that it
• 10:27
  Speaker 2: needs a lot.
• 10:27
  Speaker 1: More thought, so, Bishop Charles Gatchi, is the church considering
• 10:32
  Speaker 1: taking legal action against the Northern Territory government At this point.
• 10:37
  Speaker 2: We haven't said that we're going to do that, and
• 10:40
  Speaker 2: I certainly it's all happening so quickly, but I want
• 10:43
  Speaker 2: to us to be able to consider all my options
• 10:46
  Speaker 2: if this comes true. We have to we have to
• 10:48
  Speaker 2: consider all our options and we want to walk under.
• 10:51
  Speaker 2: We want to sit down and talk properly and anicably
• 10:54
  Speaker 2: and point out these concerns properly. And I'm prepared to
• 10:58
  Speaker 2: sit down and meet with it whoever and talk about them.
• 11:00
  Speaker 2: Not just I, other leaders and other people are prepared
• 11:04
  Speaker 2: to do the shame as well well.
• 11:06
  Speaker 1: Bishop Charles Gouci, I very much appreciate your time this morning.
• 11:10
  Speaker 1: Thank you for coming on the show and speaking to
• 11:13
  Speaker 1: us about those concerns.
• 11:15
  Speaker 2: Thank you very much.
• 11:16
  Speaker 1: Thank you,