Latest / Logic Library / 01 - The Law - Frederic Bastiat

Transcript

01 - The Law - Frederic Bastiat · Logic Library

• 0:00
  Section one. The law perverted, the law, and in its wake all
• 0:07
  the collective forces of the nation. The law, I say, not only
• 0:12
  diverted from its proper direction, but made to pursue one entirely contrary. The
• 0:18
  law become the tool of every kind of avarice. Instead of being its check,
• 0:24
  the law guilty of that very iniquity which it was its mission to punish.
• 0:30
  Truly, this is a serious fact, if it exists, and one
• 0:34
  to which I feel bound to call the attention of my fellow citizens. We
• 0:40
  hold from God the gift that, as far as we are concerned, contains
• 0:44
  all others life, physical, intellectual and moral life. But life cannot support
• 0:52
  itself. He who has bestowed it has entrusted us with the care of supporting
• 0:57
  it, of developing it, and of perfecting it. To that end,
• 1:00
  he has provided us with a collection of wonderful faculties. He has plunged us
• 1:07
  into the midst of a variety of elements. It is by the application of
• 1:11
  our faculties to these elements that the phenomena of assimilation and of appropriation by which
• 1:19
  life pursues the circle that has been assigned to it are realized. Existence.
• 1:26
  Faculties assimilation. In other words, personality, liberty, property, This is
• 1:34
  man. It is of these three things that it may be said, apart
• 1:38
  from all demagogic subtlety, that they are anterior and superior to all human legislation.
• 1:48
  It is not because men have made laws that personality, liberty, and
• 1:53
  a property exist. On the contrary, it is because personality, liberty,
• 1:57
  and property exist before and that men make laws. What then is law?
• 2:05
  As I have said elsewhere, it is the collective organization of the individual right
• 2:09
  to lawful defense. Nature, or rather, God, has bestowed upon every
• 2:16
  one of us, the right to defend his person, his liberty, and
• 2:20
  his property, since these are the three constituent or preserving elements of life,
• 2:25
  elements each of which is rendered complete by the others, and that cannot be
• 2:30
  understood without them. For what are our faculties but the extension of our personality?
• 2:38
  And what is property but an extension of our faculties. If every man
• 2:44
  has the right of defending, even by force, his person, his liberty,
• 2:49
  and his property, a number of men have the right to combine together
• 2:53
  to extend, to organize a common force to provide regularly for this defense.
• 3:00
  Collective right then has its principle, its reason for existing, its lawfulness in
• 3:07
  individual right. And the common force cannot rationally have any other end or any
• 3:13
  other mission, than that of the isolated forces for which it is substituted.
• 3:17
  Thus, as the force of an individual cannot lawfully touch the person, the
• 3:23
  liberty, or the property of another individual, for the same reason, the
• 3:27
  common force cannot lawfully be used to destroy the person, the liberty, or
• 3:31
  the property of individuals or of classes. For this perversion of force would be,
• 3:39
  in one case, as in the other, in contradiction to our premises.
• 3:45
  For who will dare to say that force has been given to us not
• 3:47
  to defend our rights, but to annihilate the equal rights of our brethren.
• 3:53
  And if this be not true of every individual force acting independently, how can
• 3:59
  it be true of the collective force, which is only the organized union of
• 4:02
  isolated forces. Nothing therefore, can be more evident than this. The law
• 4:10
  is the organization of the natural right of lawful defense. It is the substitution
• 4:15
  of collective for individual forces for the purpose of acting in the sphere in which
• 4:20
  they have a right to act, of doing what they have a right to
• 4:24
  do to secure persons liberties and properties, and to maintain each in its right,
• 4:30
  so as to cause justice to reign over all. And if a people
• 4:36
  established on this basis were to exist, it seems to me that order would
• 4:41
  prevail among them in their acts as well as in their ideas. It seems
• 4:46
  to me that such a people would have the most simple, the most economical,
• 4:50
  the least oppressive, the least to be felt, the most restrained,
• 4:56
  the most just, and consequently the most stable government that could be imagined,
• 5:00
  whatever its political form might be. For under such an administration, every one
• 5:08
  would feel that he possessed all the fullness, as well as all the responsibility
• 5:13
  of his existence. So long as personal safety was insured, so long as
• 5:18
  labor was free, and the fruits of labor secured against all unjust attacks,
• 5:25
  no one would have any difficulties to contend within the state. When prosperous,
• 5:30
  we should not, it is true, have to thank the state for our
• 5:32
  success. But when unfortunate, we should no more think of taxing it with
• 5:38
  our disasters than our peasants think of attributing to it the arrival of hail or
• 5:43
  of frost. We should know it only by the inestimable blessing of safety.
• 5:49
  It may further be affirmed that, thanks to the non intervention of the state
• 5:55
  in private affairs, our wants and their satisfactions would develop themselves in their natural
• 6:00
  order. We should not see poor families seeking for literary instruction before they were
• 6:05
  supplied with bread. We should not see towns peopled at the expense of rural
• 6:11
  districts, nor rural districts at the expense of towns. We should not see
• 6:16
  those great displacements of capital, of labor, and of population that legislative measures
• 6:23
  occasion, displacements that render so uncertain and precarious the various sources of existence,
• 6:30
  and thus enlarged to such an extent the responsibility of governments. Unhappily, law
• 6:36
  is by no means confined to its own sphere. Nor is it merely,
• 6:42
  in some ambiguous and debatable views, that it has left its proper sphere.
• 6:46
  It has done more than this. It has acted in direct opposition to its
• 6:50
  proper end. It has destroyed its own object. It has been employed in
• 6:57
  annihilating that justice which it ought to have establish, in effacing amongst rights that
• 7:02
  limit which it was its true mission to respect. It has placed the collective
• 7:08
  force in the service of those who wished to traffic without risk and without scruple
• 7:13
  in the persons, the liberty and the property of others. It has converted
• 7:17
  plunder into a right that it may protect it, and lawful defense into a
• 7:23
  crime that it may punish it. How has this perversion of law been accomplished,
• 7:30
  and what has resulted from it? The law has been perverted through the
• 7:33
  influence of two very different causes, naked greed and misconceived philanthropy. Let us
• 7:42
  speak of the farmer self. Preservation and development is the common aspiration of all
• 7:48
  men, in such a way that if everyone enjoyed the free exercise of his
• 7:53
  faculties and the free disposition of their fruits, social progress would be incessant,
• 7:59
  interrupted, inevitable. But there is also another disposition which is common to them.
• 8:07
  This is to live and to develop when they can, at the expense
• 8:11
  of one another. This is no rash imputation emanating from a gloomy, uncharitable
• 8:16
  spirit. History bears witness to the truth of it by the incessant wars,
• 8:22
  the migrations of races, sectarian oppressions, the universality of slavery, the frauds
• 8:28
  in trade, and the monopolies with which the annals abound. This fatal disposition
• 8:35
  has its origin in the very constitution of man, in that primitive and universal
• 8:41
  and invincible sentiment that urges it towards its well being and makes it seek to
• 8:46
  escape pain. Man can only derive life and enjoyment from a perpetual search and
• 8:54
  appropriation, that is, from a perpetual application of his faculties to objects,
• 8:58
  or from labor. This is the origin of property. But also he may
• 9:05
  live and enjoy by seizing and appropriating the productions of the faculties of his fellow
• 9:09
  men. This is the origin of plunder. Now, labor being in itself
• 9:16
  a pain, and man being naturally inclined to avoid pain. It follows,
• 9:22
  and history proves it that wherever plunder is less burdensome than labor, it prevails,
• 9:28
  and neither religion nor morality can in this case prevent it from prevailing.
• 9:35
  When does plunder cease, then when it becomes more burdensome and more dangerous than
• 9:41
  labor. It is very evident that the proper aim of law is to oppose
• 9:46
  the fatal tendency to plunder with the powerful obstacle of collective force, that all
• 9:52
  its measures should be in favor of property and against plunder. But the law
• 9:58
  is made generally by one man or by one class of men, And as
• 10:03
  law cannot exist without the sanction and the support of a preponderant force, it
• 10:09
  must finally place this force in the hands of those who legislate. This inevitable
• 10:16
  phenomenon, combined with the fatal tendency that we have said exists in the heart
• 10:20
  of man, explains the almost universal perversion of law. It is easy to
• 10:26
  conceive that, instead of being a check upon injustice, it becomes its most
• 10:31
  invincible instrument. It is easy to conceive that, according to the power of
• 10:37
  the legislator, it destroys for its own profit, and in different degrees,
• 10:41
  amongst the rest of the community, personal independence by slavery, liberty by oppression,
• 10:48
  and property by plunder. It is in the nature of man to rise
• 10:54
  against the injustice of which they are the victims. When therefore plunder is organized
• 11:00
  by law for the profit of those who perpetrate it. All the plundered classes
• 11:05
  tend, either by peaceful or revolutionary means, to enter in some way into
• 11:09
  the manufacturing of laws. These classes, according to the degree of enlightenment at
• 11:16
  which they have arrived may propose to themselves to very different ends when they thus
• 11:22
  attempt the attainment of their political rights. Either they may wish to put an
• 11:26
  end to lawful plunder, or they may desire to take part in it.
• 11:31
  Woe to the nation where this latter thought prevails among the masses at the moment
• 11:35
  when they, in their turn, seize upon the legislative power. Up to
• 11:41
  that time, lawful plunder has been exercised by the few upon the many,
• 11:46
  as in the case in countries where the right of legislating is confined to a
• 11:50
  few hands. But now it has become universal, and the equilibrium is sought
• 11:56
  in universal plunder the ject justice that society contains, instead of being rooted out
• 12:03
  of it, is generalized. As soon as the injured classes have recovered their
• 12:07
  political rights, their first thought is not to abolish plunder. This would suppose
• 12:13
  them to possess enlightenment, which they cannot have, but to organize against the
• 12:18
  other classes and to their own detriment, a system of reprisals, as if
• 12:24
  it were necessary before the reign of justice arrives, that all should undergo a
• 12:28
  cruel retribution, some for their iniquity and some for their ignorance. It would
• 12:33
  be impossible, therefore, to introduce into society a greater change and a greater
• 12:39
  evil than this, the conversion of the law into an instrument of plunder.
• 12:46
  What would be the consequences of such a perversion. It would require volumes to
• 12:52
  describe them all. We must content ourselves with pointing out the most striking.
• 12:58
  In the first place, it would efface from everybody's conscience the distinction between justice
• 13:03
  and injustice. No society can exist unless the laws are respected to a certain
• 13:09
  degree. But the safest way to make them respected is to make them respectable.
• 13:15
  When law and morality are in contradiction to each other, the citizen finds
• 13:20
  himself in the cruel alternative of either losing his moral sense or of losing his
• 13:26
  respect for the law, two evils of equal magnitude between which it would be
• 13:31
  difficult to choose. It is so much in the nature of law to support
• 13:35
  justice that in the minds of the masses they are one and the same.
• 13:41
  There is in all of us a strong disposition to regard what is lawful as
• 13:45
  legitimate, so much so that many falsely derive all justice from law. It
• 13:52
  is sufficient, then for the law to order and sanction plunder, that it
• 13:56
  may appear to many consciences just and sacred. Slavery, protection and monopoly find
• 14:01
  defenders not only in those who profit by them, but in those who suffer
• 14:07
  by them. If you suggest a doubt as to the morality of these institutions,
• 14:11
  it is said directly you are a dangerous experimenter, a utopian, a
• 14:18
  theorist, a despiser of the laws. You would shake the basis upon which
• 14:22
  society rests if you lecture upon morality or political economy. Official bodies will be
• 14:31
  found to make this request to the government, that henceforth science be taught not
• 14:35
  only with sole reference to free exchange, to liberty, property and justice,
• 14:41
  as has been the case up to the present time, but also, and
• 14:45
  especially with reference to the facts and legislation contrary to liberty, property and justice
• 14:50
  that regulate French industry, that in public lecturns salaried by the Treasury. The
• 14:58
  professor abstained rigorously from endangering, in the slightest degree the respect due to the
• 15:03
  laws now in force, so that if a law exists that sanctioned slavery or
• 15:09
  monopoly, oppression or plunder, in any form whatever, it must not be
• 15:13
  mentioned for how can it be mentioned without damaging the respect that it inspires.
• 15:20
  Still, further, morality and political economy must be taught in connection with this
• 15:24
  law, that is, under the supposition that it must be just only because
• 15:30
  it is law. End of Section one