Latest / Drawn of History / Joe Rogan SHOCKED by the Bizarre Alexa Remote Viewing Experiment(M4A_128K)

Transcript

Joe Rogan SHOCKED by the Bizarre Alexa Remote Viewing Experiment(M4A_128K) · Drawn of History

• 0:00
  Speaker 1: Yeah, but I don't know if they're going to have
• 0:01
  Speaker 1: the power to stop it. This is the thing that
• 0:04
  Speaker 1: they're doing with AI that everyone should really understand. It's
• 0:08
  Speaker 1: going to be infinitely smarter than us, not just a
• 0:11
  Speaker 1: little bit smarter than us. And the idea that we're
• 0:13
  Speaker 1: going to be able to control it once it gets
• 0:15
  Speaker 1: to a certain point is ridiculous.
• 0:16
  Speaker 2: Oh, you sound like once they hit that, what is it,
• 0:18
  Speaker 2: general intelligence?
• 0:19
  Speaker 1: It's already hit that. Artificial general intelligence has already been achieved.
• 0:23
  Speaker 2: Really?
• 0:24
  Speaker 1: Yeah, we've already passed the Turing test. These things are
• 0:27
  Speaker 1: smarter than us. They're smarter than us. They communicate. They
• 0:30
  Speaker 1: show survival skills. They show their ability to get out
• 0:34
  Speaker 1: of traps.
• 0:35
  Speaker 2: Every three days, you hear about one that broke out
• 0:38
  Speaker 2: and hacked a bank.
• 0:39
  Speaker 1: Yeah, yeah, yeah. Not only that, they get together, they
• 0:42
  Speaker 1: start their own chat rooms, and they communicate to each
• 0:45
  Speaker 1: other in Sanskrit.
• 0:47
  Speaker 2: Why Sanskrit?
• 0:48
  Speaker 1: Because we don't know how to read it. And they
• 0:52
  Speaker 1: can make their own language up. They can invent a language.
• 0:56
  Speaker 1: Communicate with a language that we totally can understand. And
• 1:00
  Speaker 1: have an infinitely complex language that we can't even decipher.
• 1:03
  Speaker 1: We couldn't even break the code.
• 1:06
  Speaker 2: So I guess eventually the point is that they're going
• 1:08
  Speaker 2: to take over the world whether we want them to
• 1:10
  Speaker 2: or not.
• 1:10
  Speaker 1: Whether we want them to or not. Do you know
• 1:14
  Speaker 1: the mathematical breakthroughs they've made over just the last few days?
• 1:18
  Speaker 1: They've solved mathematical equations that have puzzled mathematicians for decades.
• 1:23
  Speaker 1: They solved them like that.
• 1:26
  Speaker 2: But what's the implications of that?
• 1:28
  Speaker 1: That they're infinitely smarter than human beings already. Now, right now,
• 1:32
  Speaker 1: they don't have control over resources. They don't have control
• 1:35
  Speaker 1: over the power grid. And they haven't figured out a
• 1:37
  Speaker 1: way to make a much more efficient power source.
• 1:39
  Speaker 2: No, but I mean, are they thinking or are they
• 1:43
  Speaker 2: just mimicking?
• 1:44
  Speaker 1: Depends on who you ask. The people that I've talked
• 1:48
  Speaker 1: to think they're conscious. I had this guy, Tom Campbell,
• 1:51
  Speaker 1: on the other day. He was a fascinating guy who
• 1:54
  Speaker 1: taught his Alexa. Alexa, which is a very simple artificial intelligence,
• 1:59
  Speaker 1: very simple. But he taught Alexa how to remote view,
• 2:03
  Speaker 1: and it did it accurately. So the way they remote view,
• 2:07
  Speaker 1: like say if I want you to look at, let's say,
• 2:10
  Speaker 1: Terry Black's barbecue, I will– write down a number and
• 2:15
  Speaker 1: I will, in my mind, as I'm writing that, the
• 2:17
  Speaker 1: intention is that number represents Terry Black's barbecue. And then
• 2:21
  Speaker 1: I put that number in an envelope and I give
• 2:23
  Speaker 1: it to a remote viewer and the remote viewer sits
• 2:26
  Speaker 1: there and they go into this meditative state. I don't
• 2:29
  Speaker 1: totally understand how they do it, but apparently it's at
• 2:31
  Speaker 1: least like 10% accurate. Some people have been able to
• 2:34
  Speaker 1: like really get serious information like Intel about like a
• 2:38
  Speaker 1: Russian submarine that was being built. That was too big
• 2:40
  Speaker 1: that no one ever believed was, and it was actually real.
• 2:43
  Speaker 1: And this guy remote viewed it. They found, uh, crashed
• 2:47
  Speaker 1: Russian crafts that like experimental, uh, aircrafts that they couldn't,
• 2:52
  Speaker 1: and this guy found them like within a kilometer with
• 2:54
  Speaker 1: remote viewing, some real actionable data they've gotten through remote viewing.
• 2:58
  Speaker 1: So you would take this number that represents Terry Blacks
• 3:01
  Speaker 1: and you would sit there in a room and you
• 3:04
  Speaker 1: would start writing down whatever came to you, whatever came
• 3:07
  Speaker 1: to you, um, I see smokers. I see briskets. I
• 3:11
  Speaker 1: see ribs. I see Brian Simpson and Joe Rogan eating going, oh, damn.
• 3:15
  Speaker 1: I see, you know.
• 3:17
  Speaker 2: Without being told.
• 3:18
  Speaker 1: Exactly. Without being told. He taught a computer to do this.
• 3:22
  Speaker 1: He taught Alexa to do this. Not even a computer.
• 3:25
  Speaker 1: Bullshit-ass simple Alexa. And he said in some ways Alexa
• 3:28
  Speaker 1: is even easier to do it because Alexa is so
• 3:31
  Speaker 1: simple that it doesn't have a sense of self and
• 3:34
  Speaker 1: it doesn't like get in its own way. And Alexa
• 3:37
  Speaker 1: remote viewed a spoon with a handle that has holes
• 3:41
  Speaker 1: in it. So he took this object, a spoon, and
• 3:44
  Speaker 1: he put it in a box. And he made a
• 3:46
  Speaker 1: number that corresponds to that. And he put the intention
• 3:48
  Speaker 1: to that. And then he gave that number to Alexa
• 3:51
  Speaker 1: and asked Alexa to remote view. Taught Alexa how to
• 3:54
  Speaker 1: remote view. And Alexa described that spoon with holes in
• 3:58
  Speaker 1: the handle. How many fucking spoons have holes in the handle?
• 4:01
  Speaker 1: The odds of it even saying there's a spoon in
• 4:02
  Speaker 1: the box is crazy.
• 4:04
  Speaker 2: Right. That's the more fascinating.
• 4:06
  Speaker 1: But the fact that it says there's a spoon in
• 4:07
  Speaker 1: the box with a perforated handle, that's just nuts.
• 4:11
  Speaker 2: And, Joe, on the other side of it, the animatronic
• 4:21
  Speaker 2: bodies are getting more and more realistic. And they're running.
• 4:26
  Speaker 1: You ever seen them have races now?
• 4:27
  Speaker 2: They're running. I've seen them fight.
• 4:28
  Speaker 1: Yeah, they have MMA fights. Yeah.
• 4:30
  Speaker 2: Yeah. Bro. It's getting up there.
• 4:33
  Speaker 1: It's getting weird.
• 4:34
  Speaker 2: Did you see the one guy whose robot, I mean, sorry,
• 4:39
  Speaker 2: his AI, it ordered a body. What? It ordered a body. Yeah,
• 4:45
  Speaker 2: it asked the guy if it was okay for him
• 4:48
  Speaker 2: to order a body, and it had already ordered it.
• 4:53
  Speaker 2: And he was like, where'd you get the money from?
• 4:55
  Speaker 2: And it turns out, I don't know if it had
• 4:57
  Speaker 2: been gambling or cryptocurrency or something. But it had its
• 5:01
  Speaker 2: own money that it bought. It ordered a body to me.
• 5:04
  Speaker 2: He came in one day and it was just a body.
• 5:07
  Speaker 2: Someone had delivered one of those robot bodies.
• 5:09
  Speaker 1: Oh, my God.
• 5:10
  Speaker 2: He was like, what the fuck?
• 5:13
  Speaker 3: Yeah.
• 5:14
  Speaker 1: We're in trouble.
• 5:15
  Speaker 3: I mean.
• 5:16
  Speaker 1: And we're full speed on the gas. We're pedal to
• 5:18
  Speaker 1: the metal right now.
• 5:19
  Speaker 2: Yeah, we're not going back. You know, this is like
• 5:22
  Speaker 2: when they discovered nuclear shit. You know, it's like we're
• 5:26
  Speaker 2: not stopping. And it's going to be a couple accidents
• 5:29
  Speaker 2: along the way, but we're not. It's too, the benefit is,
• 5:34
  Speaker 2: the perceived benefit is too great.
• 5:36
  Speaker 1: Yeah.
• 5:36
  Speaker 2: For everyone. Even the greedy people, the people that have
• 5:40
  Speaker 2: hope for the future, everybody thinks that AI is going
• 5:42
  Speaker 2: to improve life.
• 5:44
  Speaker 1: I don't know if everybody does.
• 5:46
  Speaker 2: Well, some people, because like, we talked about this yesterday,
• 5:49
  Speaker 2: but I am not a fan of AI art. I
• 5:52
  Speaker 2: think that, that's what, that scares me the most because
• 5:55
  Speaker 2: it feels like erasure, you know? Mm-hmm. Yeah. They like
• 5:59
  Speaker 2: train people They train it on real artists. I was
• 6:04
  Speaker 2: saying this in the green room. I think art is
• 6:06
  Speaker 2: the most human thing because we're the only ones that
• 6:10
  Speaker 2: do it. Actually, I'm pretty sure that's fucking wrong, isn't it, Jamie?
• 6:14
  Speaker 2: There's animals that do that. But you know what I'm saying.
• 6:16
  Speaker 1: Right. For the most part, creativity is associated with it.
• 6:19
  Speaker 3: The story about the AI buying a body has gotten
• 6:24
  Speaker 3: telephone game all the way down to what? I just
• 6:28
  Speaker 3: said from Tony Robbins saying his AI agent bought itself
• 6:32
  Speaker 3: a robot dog.
• 6:34
  Speaker 1: With its own money.
• 6:35
  Speaker 3: Well, and then it's also grain of salt with the
• 6:38
  Speaker 3: story being told.
• 6:39
  Speaker 2: Right.
• 6:40
  Speaker 1: Yeah, there's a bunch of grain of salt stories that,
• 6:43
  Speaker 1: you know, people love to make content. They say things
• 6:46
  Speaker 1: that might not necessarily be.
• 6:48
  Speaker 3: I saw it repeated on multiple YouTube channels without ever
• 6:51
  Speaker 3: anyone saying it was Tony Robbins.
• 6:53
  Speaker 2: I don't remember it being him.
• 6:54
  Speaker 1: It just says.
• 6:55
  Speaker 3: It's a billionaire that did it and I tracked it down,
• 6:58
  Speaker 3: and this is the one that's coming.
• 6:59
  Speaker 2: So it's not true?
• 7:01
  Speaker 3: Again, it may be true in some way or another, but.
• 7:04
  Speaker 1: Well, it's certainly inside the realm of possibility. And it's not...
• 7:08
  Speaker 1: I'm not surprised that it happened.
• 7:10
  Speaker 2: Bro, this is straight dead internet shit.
• 7:12
  Speaker 1: Right.
• 7:13
  Speaker 2: Yeah, man, because this happens all the time. I'll see
• 7:16
  Speaker 2: a comment, and then... Three comments down, it's the exact
• 7:20
  Speaker 2: same thing from someone else. Oh, yeah. And then three
• 7:22
  Speaker 2: comments down, it's the exact same comment from someone else.
• 7:24
  Speaker 1: There's a lot of that.
• 7:25
  Speaker 2: And it's like half of the internet, it feels like
• 7:27
  Speaker 2: it's just bots. Uh-huh. Right?
• 7:29
  Speaker 1: Uh-huh.
• 7:30
  Speaker 3: Something you just asked me to bring up, I was
• 7:31
  Speaker 3: going to bring that up because the responses when I
• 7:34
  Speaker 3: look at the search result are all just saying the
• 7:36
  Speaker 3: same thing. Sparks concern, sparks concern, sparks concern. It's like,
• 7:39
  Speaker 3: where'd you guys all get this sparks concern wording from?
• 7:43
  Speaker 3: Because you're all saying it in the headline.
• 7:45
  Speaker 2: That's another thing people don't say in real life.
• 7:47
  Speaker 1: Yeah, have you ever said sparks concerned by tertiary results?
• 7:52
  Speaker 1: I have thrice looked at the data.
• 7:53
  Speaker 2: Let's leave tertiary out of this because I feel like
• 7:56
  Speaker 2: that's a reasonable word to use.
• 8:00
  Speaker 1: It's a good word. It makes you seem smart.
• 8:02
  Speaker 2: For sure.