Latest / UK Column Radio / UK Column News Podcast 13th December 2024

Transcript

UK Column News Podcast 13th December 2024 · UK Column Radio

0:08
Speaker 1: Good afternoon, It's Friday, the thirteenth of December twenty twenty four.
0:12
Speaker 1: I'm lucky for some Welcome to the UK column News.
0:14
Speaker 2: I'm your host.
0:15
Speaker 1: Mike Grumson joined me today in the studio Brian Gerrish,
0:18
Speaker 1: and by videolink we have Debbie Evans and Mark Anderson
0:22
Speaker 1: and a special guest later on in the program. Now
0:25
Speaker 1: we're going to get straight on here with the fantastic
0:28
Speaker 1: news that, of course we have this massive backlog in
0:31
Speaker 1: the justice system at the moment, so seventy three thousand
0:35
Speaker 1: cases in the backlog, all in the Q willing to
0:39
Speaker 1: be dealt with, and that's double the levels pre pandemic
0:43
Speaker 1: in inverted commas. Now, of course, the so called pandemic
0:47
Speaker 1: is the excuse for this, but it's not the only one.
0:50
Speaker 1: That's not the only reason, because in twenty nineteen the
0:54
Speaker 1: British regime of the day decided to cut court setting days,
0:58
Speaker 1: and of course that made matters already bad, and then
1:02
Speaker 1: the so called pandemic made matters even worse, so that
1:04
Speaker 1: by twenty twenty one and twenty twenty two they had
1:07
Speaker 1: uncapped a number of days that judges were allowed to
1:10
Speaker 1: sit to try to deal with the situation, but of
1:12
Speaker 1: course that the damage was already done by that stage.
1:15
Speaker 1: And then following the plandemic, there was the barrister strike.
1:21
Speaker 1: This was involving criminal barristers who wanted better pay through
1:24
Speaker 1: the legal aid scheme, and of course government of the
1:27
Speaker 1: day wouldn't give them what they wanted, so that made
1:30
Speaker 1: matters even worse. And of course in the meantime there
1:34
Speaker 1: are even more cases because of course there are more
1:37
Speaker 1: people in the country because the British regime has increased,
1:41
Speaker 1: but also the British regime has increased the number of
1:44
Speaker 1: police on the streets. That's resulted in more arrests. But
1:47
Speaker 1: they haven't increased the number of barristers. They haven't increased
1:50
Speaker 1: the number of judges, and they haven't increased the amount
1:52
Speaker 1: of court time. So we shouldn't be making any mistake
1:55
Speaker 1: about this. This is another engineered crisis and skin of
2:00
Speaker 1: it is pretty astronomical. This is driving public demands for
2:04
Speaker 1: a fix, and we're doing that by abusing victims even further,
2:09
Speaker 1: and victims of serious crime even further, by for example,
2:13
Speaker 1: rip cases, for example, taking.
2:15
Speaker 2: Four years to even come to court.
2:17
Speaker 3: I mean, that's just obscene, that's obscene, Mike, and then
2:20
Speaker 3: we have the family court hearings where there is no
2:24
Speaker 3: justice for many families whatsoever.
2:27
Speaker 1: Indeed, so of course they're going to fix this problem,
2:30
Speaker 1: aren't they. And who are they're going to bring to
2:33
Speaker 1: fix the problem? Well, it is of course Lord Brian
2:36
Speaker 1: Levison well known in the country because of the Levison
2:40
Speaker 1: Inquiry into the British Press. But of course, a couple
2:46
Speaker 1: of years ago, in fact it was twenty fifteen, was
2:48
Speaker 1: immediately after the Leveson Inquiry. He was looking at efficiencies
2:53
Speaker 1: in the court system even then, So this is something
2:55
Speaker 1: that's been going on for ten years at the very least,
2:59
Speaker 1: and some that he was aware of, something that successive
3:02
Speaker 1: governments have been aware of and so on. But he
3:05
Speaker 1: was looking at digital court reform at that time. But
3:08
Speaker 1: what's the target this time, Well, the target is the
3:11
Speaker 1: jury and this is what they want to see in courts,
3:15
Speaker 1: empty jury chairs. We don't need juries in the UK,
3:18
Speaker 1: We don't ever want juries in the UK, and so
3:23
Speaker 1: that's one of the proposals. And the way that they're
3:25
Speaker 1: going to implement this is that at the moment, of course,
3:27
Speaker 1: we have magistrates courts which are there to deal with
3:31
Speaker 1: supposedly the most insignificant criminal activity, and magistrates having just
3:37
Speaker 1: been allowed to increase their sentences up to a year.
3:41
Speaker 1: So that's any criminal activity that might be subject to
3:45
Speaker 1: a sanction of a year in prison. And we've got
3:48
Speaker 1: the Crime court which sees more serious crimes and those
3:52
Speaker 1: would be generally heard in front of a jury. So
3:55
Speaker 1: one of the things that Levison is talking about, or
3:57
Speaker 1: they're trying to encourage Levison to look at, is the
3:59
Speaker 1: potential of putting a third tier in between those two,
4:02
Speaker 1: which would be heard in front of a judge and
4:04
Speaker 1: two magistrates, and those of course would not have juries.
4:09
Speaker 1: So more and more jury trials having the juries removed
4:12
Speaker 1: and just judges.
4:14
Speaker 3: And again a mike. And of course this is the
4:16
Speaker 3: family court system, where you effectively have the star Chamber
4:20
Speaker 3: with just a judge, no jury, usually no press. So
4:25
Speaker 3: the precedent where they want to go is the family court,
4:29
Speaker 3: is the family courts, and that's where the children are
4:32
Speaker 3: taken away from their families, and nobody can do anything
4:35
Speaker 3: about it because of judge rules, right.
4:38
Speaker 1: And the other thing that Levis will be looking at
4:40
Speaker 1: is increasing magistrates powers even further to give them the
4:44
Speaker 1: ability to sentence for longer than a year, and maybe
4:46
Speaker 1: do away with this mid tier court system altogether and
4:49
Speaker 1: just put that all into the magistrates court. Now, the
4:52
Speaker 1: fact is that, of course this is nothing whatever to
4:55
Speaker 1: do with speeding up justice. This is only this is
4:59
Speaker 1: only about attacking the idea of juries. And well this
5:02
Speaker 1: is why, because you know, there are no prison spaces
5:06
Speaker 1: for the backlog, and no intention of creating sufficient prison
5:10
Speaker 1: spaces for the backlogs. Although they're talking about building more
5:13
Speaker 1: prisons and willnot they're not building them fast enough. They're
5:16
Speaker 1: not building enough of them in order to meet the
5:18
Speaker 1: needs of this so called backlog. So if they speed
5:22
Speaker 1: up the justices, puce even more pressure on the prison system,
5:25
Speaker 1: so they're not going to be able to put them
5:26
Speaker 1: in prison anyway.
5:27
Speaker 2: So this is not.
5:28
Speaker 1: About, you know, getting rid of a backlog, is about
5:32
Speaker 1: creating a problem in order to provide.
5:33
Speaker 2: A solution, and the solution is getting rid of juries.
5:37
Speaker 1: And why are they attacking juries, Well, because juries, this
5:41
Speaker 1: is a fundamental constitutional protection in this country. Juries have
5:45
Speaker 1: the power to overrule bad law through the process called
5:48
Speaker 1: jury nullification. And of course, if you create a middle
5:51
Speaker 1: tier of courts which don't have juries, and only have judges.
5:56
Speaker 1: Judges will not consider overruling parliamentary sovereignty and inverted commas.
6:03
Speaker 1: They will simply rule based on the law. And the
6:06
Speaker 1: problem there is what we also make the point that
6:09
Speaker 1: judges never tell juries about jury nullification. So what is
6:14
Speaker 1: happening here is that more and more protections of and
6:18
Speaker 1: out of control dictatorial government are being removed from the
6:23
Speaker 1: people by the removal of juries. And this is really important.
6:26
Speaker 1: And the other thing to note here in the whole
6:28
Speaker 1: dig dig sorry digitization of the court system process that
6:33
Speaker 1: Levison started in twenty fifteen, i'll just highlight this from
6:36
Speaker 1: the Law Society algorithm use in the Criminal Justice System report,
6:41
Speaker 1: because this is always in the background, the use of
6:43
Speaker 1: using AI and algorithms to help make judicial decisions, and
6:47
Speaker 1: this takes it even to a worse state. And this
6:50
Speaker 1: was what the Law Society was saying in twenty nineteen,
6:52
Speaker 1: but it's something we've got to consider when we're talking
6:54
Speaker 1: about this. They can make law enforcement in the administration
6:58
Speaker 1: of justice more efficient and consist and that's the use
7:00
Speaker 1: of algorithms. But using algorithms without questioning them or explaining
7:04
Speaker 1: them to the public could lead the decisions that threaten
7:06
Speaker 1: human rights and undermine public trust and the justice system.
7:10
Speaker 1: The direction of travel here, Brian is really horrendous.
7:14
Speaker 3: Well, absolutely, because the one thing that an algorithm isn't
7:17
Speaker 3: going to have, there's any a form of empathy or compassion.
7:20
Speaker 3: So if you want to know what AI is going
7:23
Speaker 3: to bring, it's going to be ruthless, draconian justice, that's
7:28
Speaker 3: what it's going to bring.
7:30
Speaker 2: And no juries.
7:31
Speaker 1: So juries, yeah, Debbie, let's come to you then. And
7:35
Speaker 1: the question of m RNA.
7:39
Speaker 4: Yes, indeed, good afternoon everyone, lovely to be here, and
7:42
Speaker 4: it's a very cold afternoon here in Cornwall. But I
7:45
Speaker 4: want to warm you up with June Raine's words as
7:48
Speaker 4: if I could. On the last MHRA board meeting that
7:51
Speaker 4: has not yet been published on YouTube. She said, and
7:54
Speaker 4: I quote there's more work on mRNA platform technology, not
7:59
Speaker 4: just for cancer vaccines, but for personalized medicines and guidance,
8:04
Speaker 4: which will be out there for public consultation quite soon.
8:09
Speaker 4: The efforts to drive forward innovation are moving ahead quite strongly. Also,
8:15
Speaker 4: Ed Dowd, in a recent interview, estimated that globally there
8:18
Speaker 4: had been between seven point three and fifteen million deaths
8:23
Speaker 4: from the COVID nineteen injection and twenty nine to sixty
8:26
Speaker 4: million disabled, with another five hundred to nine hundred million
8:31
Speaker 4: vaccine injured, and still they're.
8:33
Speaker 5: Ramping up mRNA.
8:35
Speaker 4: So I want to take you back to a report
8:38
Speaker 4: that we did on the UK column News thirty first
8:41
Speaker 4: of May twenty twenty four, where we talked about Kathleene Carrico,
8:45
Speaker 4: who was the joint winner of the Nobel Prize with
8:47
Speaker 4: Professor Drew Weissman. So please go and have a look
8:51
Speaker 4: at that, because I want to take a look at
8:53
Speaker 4: Professor Drew Weisman. Here's the press release that was released
8:57
Speaker 4: from the Nobel Prize announcing the award to both of
9:00
Speaker 4: them for their work in enabling development of effective mRNA
9:05
Speaker 4: vaccines for COVID nineteen. So let's look at Professor Drew Weisman.
9:10
Speaker 4: Let's look at the Pearlman School of Medicine, because he's
9:13
Speaker 4: there pictured.
9:14
Speaker 5: In the middle.
9:15
Speaker 4: I've just arrowed him there, not a very big picture,
9:17
Speaker 4: so we'll blow his picture up. Here's a larger frame
9:20
Speaker 4: of him and you can see that he is the
9:23
Speaker 4: Professor of Vaccine Research and Infections Diseased Division. He's got
9:28
Speaker 4: so many awards I would have to scroll down for
9:31
Speaker 4: at least probably a minute for you to see all
9:34
Speaker 4: of the awards that he's received. And purely by chance,
9:38
Speaker 4: a few days ago, I happened to catch a live
9:41
Speaker 4: the Future of Health the Nobel Week Dialogue twenty twenty
9:45
Speaker 4: four lecture. This was held in Stockholm, and who was
9:49
Speaker 4: attending well none other than Professor Drew Weissman, and I
9:52
Speaker 4: was very interested to hear what he was having to say.
9:56
Speaker 4: How long did it actually take from the release of
9:59
Speaker 4: the sequet once to making the vaccine because there was
10:03
Speaker 4: a race on Let's listen.
10:07
Speaker 6: So you developed with Katie Kerrico the mRNA vaccine for
10:11
Speaker 6: COVID nineteen, and that's built on decades of research on mRNA.
10:17
Speaker 6: But how long did it take you to create the
10:20
Speaker 6: actual vaccine for COVID nineteen.
10:25
Speaker 7: So honestly, it took about fifteen minutes to design the
10:29
Speaker 7: vaccine once the sequence was released. But we made a
10:35
Speaker 7: bunch of different variants because we weren't sure which one
10:38
Speaker 7: would work best. But the advantage of RNA is you
10:42
Speaker 7: just need the sequence, and once you've got the sequence,
10:45
Speaker 7: you can make a vaccine.
10:49
Speaker 4: You just need the sequence. We made a bunch of variants,
10:53
Speaker 4: so Let's look at the Professor Weisman's laboratory and here
10:57
Speaker 4: it is welcome to Professor Weisman's laboratory. And you can
10:59
Speaker 4: see the sign on the front Drew Weisman's lab rocks.
11:04
Speaker 4: But what does it do? What does it actually do?
11:06
Speaker 4: So the next line will tell you, really very briefly
11:09
Speaker 4: that that studies nuclear side modified mr NA and lipid
11:14
Speaker 4: nanoparticles l NP therapeutics. But how big is this lab?
11:18
Speaker 4: How big has it got? Let's listening on that.
11:22
Speaker 6: You know your lab, it's astonishing, astonishing how many diseases
11:32
Speaker 6: you're working on right now? I think in the last
11:35
Speaker 6: year your lab tripled in size. Could you give us
11:38
Speaker 6: a few examples of the of what you're working on
11:43
Speaker 6: the diseases you're.
11:45
Speaker 8: Yes, So.
11:46
Speaker 7: We think of virus vaccines as there are easy ones
11:51
Speaker 7: and there are difficult ones. So HCV, influenza, HIV, malaria,
11:57
Speaker 7: TB are difficult. But we've on beyond just standard infetious
12:02
Speaker 7: disease vaccines. We're working on vaccines for autoimmune diseases, vaccines
12:09
Speaker 7: that turn off specific immune responses. We're working on in
12:14
Speaker 7: vivo gene therapies. So what that means is instead of
12:18
Speaker 7: taking cells out of a person's body, which is difficult
12:23
Speaker 7: and expensive. We do the gene therapy in the body.
12:27
Speaker 7: We direct the lipin nanoparticles to the bone, marrow stem cells,
12:32
Speaker 7: or the liver or the heart or whatever organ you're treating,
12:36
Speaker 7: and you deliver cast nine gene editing that can fix
12:40
Speaker 7: the genetic defects. So my dream five years from now,
12:46
Speaker 7: hopefully is to go somewhere, probably in Africa, but anywhere
12:51
Speaker 7: in the world with an igloo cooler full of RNA
12:56
Speaker 7: LNPs that will cure sickle cell anemia with the single injection.
13:01
Speaker 8: And I think that's possible.
13:04
Speaker 7: Gene therapy therapeutics using RNA is in the body. You
13:09
Speaker 7: just give the RNA LNPs and they do the work
13:13
Speaker 7: in the body, and that's critical.
13:20
Speaker 4: So I don't know. Gentlemen, I'm sure you're going to
13:22
Speaker 4: want to comment on this because this video was only
13:25
Speaker 4: literally it was broadcast a couple of days ago, so
13:28
Speaker 4: this is right up to date. But before I let
13:31
Speaker 4: you comment, there's more. There's one more video clip, and
13:34
Speaker 4: I want you to take pay special attention to Pan vaccines.
13:38
Speaker 4: And also he didn't really answer the question of what
13:41
Speaker 4: was coming through his laboratory that had tripled in size,
13:44
Speaker 4: and I want you to take notice of AVM flu.
13:47
Speaker 4: Perhaps you're gonna you're gonna hear You're going to hear
13:50
Speaker 4: cattle milk mentioned perhaps as well. So for this final
13:54
Speaker 4: clip from Professor Drew Weissman, have a listen and take note.
14:00
Speaker 6: Things from your website on the on some of the
14:02
Speaker 6: other things you're working on HIV, herpes, limes disease, avian flu, neurovirus, ebola,
14:10
Speaker 6: and you're also working then on on AI tools as
14:14
Speaker 6: well to help with discovery. It's un and and the
14:20
Speaker 6: idea of pan vaccines too. Do you want to say
14:23
Speaker 6: something about the idea the idea there vaccines for multiple diseases.
14:29
Speaker 7: Yes, So if we look at pandemics, most viral pandemics
14:37
Speaker 7: have been caused by influenza and coronaviruses.
14:41
Speaker 8: The issues with both of those is they have animal reservoirs.
14:45
Speaker 7: And we never know what the next transfer crossover is
14:50
Speaker 7: gonna be. So for influenza, we see bird flu is
14:55
Speaker 7: now infecting cattle and cattle milk. We see corona viruses
15:00
Speaker 7: are constantly crossing over. So instead of making a new
15:05
Speaker 7: vaccine every time a virus crosses over, our idea is
15:09
Speaker 7: that we make a pan rus vaccine, one that treats
15:14
Speaker 7: all influenza viruses, so no matter what crosses over from
15:20
Speaker 7: a bird, from a pig, from a chicken, from whatever,
15:25
Speaker 7: people will be protected.
15:27
Speaker 8: And the same with coronaviruses.
15:29
Speaker 7: We make a vaccine that protects against all coronaviruses capable
15:35
Speaker 7: of crossing over from bats. Then one vaccine either treats
15:40
Speaker 7: the next infection or prevents it from ever happening.
15:47
Speaker 4: So there you have it. Are you feeling confident I'm
15:50
Speaker 4: not over to you, gentlemen?
15:52
Speaker 1: Well, Debbi, my first question is how did the humanity
15:55
Speaker 1: survive over the last fifty sixty thousand years with all
15:59
Speaker 1: these coronaviruses constantly crossing over from every possible animal species.
16:04
Speaker 1: The entire human species should have been wiped out darkies
16:07
Speaker 1: ago with mr and a vaccination.
16:11
Speaker 4: One hundred percent, Mike, And that's how ridiculous and how
16:15
Speaker 4: dangerous this is becoming. But there's going to be more
16:18
Speaker 4: about mRNA coming up later in the program.
16:22
Speaker 2: Thank you, Debbie.
16:25
Speaker 3: Okay, Recovering from that segment, I actually said I thought
16:28
Speaker 3: the man was mad while the video was going on.
16:31
Speaker 3: Of course, the audience couldn't hear that, but I thought
16:33
Speaker 3: he was utterly mad. Academically he's probably extremely bright, but
16:37
Speaker 3: is he mad in my opinion, yes, well more madness
16:40
Speaker 3: in the world because Syria has fallen. But everybody now
16:45
Speaker 3: is shifted onto the next target, and of course the
16:48
Speaker 3: next target is around that's where we need the bloodshed.
16:51
Speaker 3: So the BBC is leading the charge. Here's the headline,
16:55
Speaker 3: where next for it round now that its axis of
16:58
Speaker 3: resistance is shattered. This is a very long interactive article
17:03
Speaker 3: which I'm not going to go into, but it's very glossy.
17:05
Speaker 3: But I'm going to put on the top that you
17:07
Speaker 3: can just read the glee as the BBC is ramping
17:11
Speaker 3: up the anti Iran propaganda. This is the journalist Caroline Hawley.
17:17
Speaker 3: Now she is a very very experienced Middle East correspondent.
17:22
Speaker 3: She's written lots of articles. But look at how she
17:26
Speaker 3: begins here amid the shattered glass and trampled flags, posters
17:30
Speaker 3: of Iran Supreme Leader live ripped on the floor of
17:34
Speaker 3: the Uranian embassy and Damascus, there are torn pictures to
17:38
Speaker 3: the former leader of Lebanon's has Bottom movement, Hassan Hasrala,
17:43
Speaker 3: who was killed in an Israeli air striking beir Route
17:46
Speaker 3: in September. She is lapping it up, and of course,
17:49
Speaker 3: the whole purpose of this article is to ramp up
17:53
Speaker 3: the idea of war and bloodshed with Iran. But I'm
17:57
Speaker 3: saying to the public today, when I read this article,
18:00
Speaker 3: some think called my eye and it just acted as
18:04
Speaker 3: a focal point for saying this lady was deceiving the public.
18:08
Speaker 3: So let's just have a look at the key quote.
18:11
Speaker 3: We'll just bring that on screen. All the dominoes have
18:14
Speaker 3: been falling, says James Jeffrey, a former US diplomat and
18:18
Speaker 3: deputy National Security Advisor who now works at the non
18:22
Speaker 3: partisan Wilson's Center think tank. Now, is this a lie,
18:27
Speaker 3: I don't know, or are we actually being led to
18:30
Speaker 3: believe that this experienced BBC journalist does not know what
18:35
Speaker 3: non partisan means. Let's listen to the Wilson Center talking
18:40
Speaker 3: about themselves and we'll see how non partisan't they are.
18:46
Speaker 9: What's important to us and the way that we approach
18:48
Speaker 9: our work is that people can come here from around
18:52
Speaker 9: the world from both sides of the political aisle. There's
18:55
Speaker 9: a lot of talk about developing consensus. I'm actually that
18:58
Speaker 9: interested in consensus. I'm interested in constructive disagreement. You have
19:03
Speaker 9: to mobilize ideas and debates so that people can sort
19:07
Speaker 9: of do them and figure out what the radi answers
19:09
Speaker 9: are and figure out the best policy that serves America's
19:13
Speaker 9: interests around there.
19:17
Speaker 3: So to the viewers and listeners, did you get it?
19:20
Speaker 3: What they are about is what is best for America's interests.
19:24
Speaker 3: There's nothing nonpart isan about it. This is absolutely for
19:29
Speaker 3: America's interests and anything that gets in the way of
19:32
Speaker 3: American's interest is going to be invaded or trampled into
19:37
Speaker 3: the ground. So for the BBC to be telling us
19:40
Speaker 3: that their article is formed around non partisan opinion is
19:44
Speaker 3: just outrageous. But it goes on. Let's popa back on screen.
19:48
Speaker 3: This was another little one that caught my eye. We
19:50
Speaker 3: know that a Rond spent thirty to fifty billion dollars
19:55
Speaker 3: in Syria, says Dr Sanam Vaquil, director of the Middle
19:59
Speaker 3: East and North af Program at the think tank Chatham House.
20:03
Speaker 3: So here she is up to the same tricks. Because
20:06
Speaker 3: to suggest that Chatham House is independent, to me at least,
20:10
Speaker 3: is just utterly incredible because if you go to their website,
20:13
Speaker 3: it talks about their policies, their three cent sorry, their
20:18
Speaker 3: three second century goals to enable and build peaceful, sustainable,
20:23
Speaker 3: inclusive societies. But if we get into the real meet
20:27
Speaker 3: of the BBC, going back to twenty twelve, we see
20:31
Speaker 3: this lady. She has done a lot of work for
20:34
Speaker 3: the BBC. Here she's just described as an Iran analyst.
20:39
Speaker 3: But is she just an independent analyst in forming BBC readers. Well, actually,
20:45
Speaker 3: when you get to the bottom, you discover that she's
20:47
Speaker 3: an I run analyst with the Brookings Institution at Washington
20:51
Speaker 3: and a former US State Department policy advisor. So BBC
20:56
Speaker 3: not independent. We're talking about women like this lady. And
21:00
Speaker 3: I'm going to say, what is she Victorian Newland too, Mike, Possibly,
21:06
Speaker 3: But she's a woman on a lifetime mission to crush
21:09
Speaker 3: Iran for under the boot of US interests. And if
21:14
Speaker 3: you have a look at some of the policy documents,
21:16
Speaker 3: we get an instant look into what they're really doing.
21:19
Speaker 3: US policy towards Iran missed opportunities and Path Forward won't
21:24
Speaker 3: give you the detail. Let's just pull out the key
21:27
Speaker 3: bits because it's talking about together with new American efforts
21:31
Speaker 3: to ramp up pressure on Iran, pressure breakdown regime change.
21:37
Speaker 3: And if I come in in another one here the
21:40
Speaker 3: aim she doesn't say us, but it is US diplomacy.
21:43
Speaker 3: The aim of US diplomacy is to advance US interests,
21:48
Speaker 3: not to make friends or endorse enemies. So we don't
21:51
Speaker 3: want to make friends in the world. We're just going
21:53
Speaker 3: to follow the interests. And if we get onto this
21:56
Speaker 3: paper by the Brookings Institute, which he's been involve with,
22:00
Speaker 3: let's look at the title here, which path to Persia
22:05
Speaker 3: Options for a new American strategy towards Iran. Well, what
22:08
Speaker 3: are they talking about? We only need to look in
22:11
Speaker 3: the contents because if we get into this, we've got
22:16
Speaker 3: the diplomatic options. We know what those are Americans' best
22:20
Speaker 3: interest because we've just covered that persuasion and engagement. But
22:25
Speaker 3: if we go down here, going all the way the
22:29
Speaker 3: military options, this is invasion, air strikes, or perhaps we
22:33
Speaker 3: just leave it to bb and the Israelis to do
22:36
Speaker 3: the slaughter for the Americans in order to get their
22:40
Speaker 3: best interest in here's the second part of the contents.
22:45
Speaker 3: And if we bring this in, we've got the velvet revolution.
22:49
Speaker 3: This is the iron fist in the velvet glove getting
22:53
Speaker 3: in and encouraging and uprising inside the country. This is subversion.
22:58
Speaker 3: This is what BBC media action has been involved in
23:02
Speaker 3: over many years. And if we go through it goes
23:05
Speaker 3: on to containment except the unacceptable, just containing Iran. But
23:12
Speaker 3: ultimately they're talking about crafting. Let's just bring that down,
23:16
Speaker 3: crafting and integrated Iran policy, connecting all those options. So
23:23
Speaker 3: think about that and what the BBC is really peddling
23:27
Speaker 3: to you, which is regime change to benefit the Americans.
23:30
Speaker 3: Their words, not mine. Let's just have a look at
23:34
Speaker 3: what a formerhead of MI six had to say about
23:38
Speaker 3: those nice friendly rebels in Syria.
23:42
Speaker 10: We are always optimistic about these things, but sometimes it
23:46
Speaker 10: turns out we've exchanged bad for worse. What's your estimate,
23:51
Speaker 10: I mean, from what we know of HTS, do you
23:55
Speaker 10: believe the sort of transition from being an al Qaeda
23:59
Speaker 10: affiliate in to being what some people are calling a
24:02
Speaker 10: genuine liberation movement?
24:04
Speaker 11: Well, I think Phil is right to be cautious about this.
24:09
Speaker 11: But when I was chief of mi I six ten
24:12
Speaker 11: twelve years ago, we looked at all these Syrian opposition
24:15
Speaker 11: groups and classified them into those that we could support
24:18
Speaker 11: and those who will be on the pale and too
24:20
Speaker 11: close to Al Qayada and Tararira Sham was definitely in
24:23
Speaker 11: the latter category. But I think Amumhammad al Jolani, the leader,
24:28
Speaker 11: has made great efforts over the last ten years to
24:30
Speaker 11: distance himself from those terrorist groups. And certainly the actions
24:35
Speaker 11: we've seen of Tartaria ra Sham over the last last
24:39
Speaker 11: two weeks has been those of a liberation movement, not
24:42
Speaker 11: of a terrorist organization.
24:45
Speaker 3: So there's the man really declaring it as it is
24:48
Speaker 3: the British working in the background to use terrorists to
24:51
Speaker 3: break down Syria, and now the target is Iran with
24:55
Speaker 3: exactly the same tactics.
24:57
Speaker 1: And if anybody thinks that there's a word of true
25:00
Speaker 1: coming out of that man's mouth, just watch Wednesday's news
25:02
Speaker 1: program if you didn't see it, because we'll show you
25:05
Speaker 1: just what those lovely people at the terral Sham have
25:09
Speaker 1: been doing over the last couple of weeks.
25:11
Speaker 2: And it's not worn. You know, it's not pleasant.
25:15
Speaker 1: Mark, Let's welcome you to the program and US policy
25:20
Speaker 1: now with respect to deportation, what's going on?
25:25
Speaker 5: Good day everyone. You might recall last week Mike I
25:28
Speaker 5: reported that the State of Texas Land Office is donating
25:32
Speaker 5: or offering just over fourteen hundred acres of land right
25:35
Speaker 5: along the Texas Mexican border in the four county area
25:40
Speaker 5: in which I live, the Rio Grande Valley, Star County
25:42
Speaker 5: to be exact. Now, we're following up this week with
25:46
Speaker 5: rumblings that there's kind of battle lines being drawn between
25:51
Speaker 5: so called blue sanctuary cities and the incoming Trump administration.
25:57
Speaker 5: I got a hold of the Northwest Side GOP Club.
26:00
Speaker 5: I talked to one of its leaders last night, doctor
26:03
Speaker 5: Dave Naik, So I've got some firsthand information mixed in here.
26:07
Speaker 5: This slide here shows that they welcomed the incoming orders.
26:13
Speaker 5: Our Tom Homan to a program December ninth. Of course,
26:16
Speaker 5: mister Holman spoke to that group. He's been nominated by
26:19
Speaker 5: Trump to head Immigration and Customs Enforcement within the DHS.
26:24
Speaker 8: And we'll go on.
26:25
Speaker 5: This is a little bit about the Northwest Side group. We,
26:28
Speaker 5: the People of the Northwest Side, are an organization of
26:31
Speaker 5: politically active individuals individuals excuse me, primarily from of course,
26:35
Speaker 5: the northwest Side of Chicago and neighboring suburbs. We provide
26:39
Speaker 5: a united and powerful voice and force for change that
26:42
Speaker 5: believes life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness are superior
26:46
Speaker 5: to increased regulation, waste, and corruption, And it says at
26:49
Speaker 5: the bottom an important part this club inspires both thought
26:53
Speaker 5: and action to get things right politically, fiscally, socially, and culturally.
26:57
Speaker 5: So they're a very goal oriented group. Here's some quotes
27:00
Speaker 5: from mister Homan from that presentation. One of them, We're
27:04
Speaker 5: going to start right here in Chicago. If you're Chicago mayor,
27:09
Speaker 5: which is Brandon Johnson doesn't want to help, he can
27:12
Speaker 5: step aside. So mister Homan has some powerful words. But
27:16
Speaker 5: if he impedes us, if he knowingly harbors or conceals
27:19
Speaker 5: an illegal alien, I will prosecute him. Mister Holman seems
27:23
Speaker 5: to be promising. He went on to say in this
27:26
Speaker 5: next slide January twenty. First, you're going to look for
27:30
Speaker 5: a lot of ICE agents in your city, that being Chicago,
27:34
Speaker 5: looking for criminals and gang members. Count on it. It
27:37
Speaker 5: will happen. Now, we got to keep in mind mister
27:41
Speaker 5: Homan is subject to being having his nomination for that
27:44
Speaker 5: position confirmed. But now we have a short video from
27:49
Speaker 5: the program. This is an exclusive. I got it from
27:51
Speaker 5: doctor Dave Naek just last night. So this will give
27:54
Speaker 5: you more flavor.
27:57
Speaker 12: As US citizens, we are tasked to defend our constitution
28:02
Speaker 12: and to protect the rule of law. You know, there's
28:07
Speaker 12: this saying a goal without a plan is just a wish.
28:12
Speaker 12: And I've been wishing that our communities would be safer,
28:15
Speaker 12: especially here in Chicago and Illinois.
28:18
Speaker 2: Folks.
28:18
Speaker 12: Let me tell you borders, our Tom Homan is the
28:22
Speaker 12: man with that plan to make America safe again.
28:27
Speaker 13: Chicago's in trouble because your mayor sucks and your governor sucks,
28:39
Speaker 13: and we're going to start right here in Chicago, Illinois. Now,
28:42
Speaker 13: if you're Chicago mayor doesn't want to help, he can
28:48
Speaker 13: step aside. Well if he impedes us, If you know
28:52
Speaker 13: any harbors and conceals on illegal alien, I will prosecute him.
29:00
Speaker 5: So, as you can see, there's some tough words going down,
29:03
Speaker 5: and there's a lot of a lot of activity and
29:06
Speaker 5: a lot of contemplation of what's being said by mister
29:10
Speaker 5: Homan from these mayors in Chicago and elsewhere. Now, this
29:15
Speaker 5: next slide is from the Chicago Republican Party, of with
29:20
Speaker 5: which the Northwest Side Group is affiliated. This is back
29:23
Speaker 5: from November two. It gives some interesting background and developments
29:27
Speaker 5: that are leading up to what just happened. For mister
29:29
Speaker 5: Homan's speech, Chicago Republicans the City Council was strong armed
29:35
Speaker 5: in a certain respect today's special meeting of the City Council.
29:39
Speaker 5: This was around November first or so to consider placing
29:42
Speaker 5: Sanctuary City's sanctuary city status on a Chicago exclusive referendum
29:47
Speaker 5: ballot in the twenty twenty fourth primary election. Was nothing
29:50
Speaker 5: short of a disgrace to the Johnson administration and his
29:53
Speaker 5: Democratic allies, first Democrats in Springfield, the state Capitol, but
29:58
Speaker 5: every possible piece of pressure on Chicago Alderman to stop
30:01
Speaker 5: the meeting. Once that failed and a quorum was present,
30:05
Speaker 5: local socialists used every tactic possible on site, right down
30:08
Speaker 5: to shutting off the lights in the City Council chamber.
30:11
Speaker 5: We'll move on. It kind of gives you an idea
30:13
Speaker 5: of just how cantankers things are getting. Quorum calls a
30:17
Speaker 5: delay tactic that forces a row call of the aldermen
30:20
Speaker 5: in parliamentary arguments by Mayor Johnson's floor leader, thirty fifth
30:25
Speaker 5: ward Alderman, Carlos Ramirez Rosa, stalled the initial proceedings for hours,
30:30
Speaker 5: but the desire of attending aldermen to let the people
30:32
Speaker 5: decide the sanctuary city issue by reprimendum. Referendum appeared to
30:36
Speaker 5: be unstoppable, but then the lights went out, and after
30:39
Speaker 5: someone threw a switch, only the emergency lighting was available,
30:44
Speaker 5: preventing this council meeting from continuing. So it was adjourn
30:48
Speaker 5: and we'll go on from there. Jeff Fielder with the
30:53
Speaker 5: Chicago Republicans, the executive director, was quoted as saying it
30:56
Speaker 5: felt like a South America and junta was interveering, intervening
31:00
Speaker 5: to stop democracy, he went on, and then the policy
31:04
Speaker 5: director for the Chicago GOP, Chris Myers, went on to say,
31:07
Speaker 5: it's ironic that so many illegal aliens crossing our border
31:11
Speaker 5: come from Nicaragua and Venezuela, fleeing from authoritary and socialist regimes,
31:16
Speaker 5: only to come to Chicago, where American leftists are trying
31:19
Speaker 5: to establish the same kind of thing, a rather ironic
31:23
Speaker 5: thing in mister myers estimation. And Chicago Mayor Brandon Johnson
31:27
Speaker 5: meanwhile has been defying Trump's borders are and his threat
31:32
Speaker 5: to these sanctuary cities. We will not bend. Mister Johnson
31:37
Speaker 5: has been quoted as saying by CBS Austin, but putting
31:41
Speaker 5: the slides aside for just a moment, I'm looking to
31:44
Speaker 5: some notes. I just spoke to doctor Dave Naeck of
31:47
Speaker 5: the Northwest Side GOP last night. He shared some interesting
31:51
Speaker 5: things that I don't have slides for this just in
31:53
Speaker 5: You might say, there are fifty thousand illegals in Chicago
31:58
Speaker 5: over the last four years. In Chico cargo alone five
32:02
Speaker 5: and that's costing the city of Chicago five hundred million
32:06
Speaker 5: dollars in recent expenses, and the costs statewide in Illinois
32:12
Speaker 5: three is three billion dollars. And the issues have to
32:18
Speaker 5: do with safety, public safety, sex trafficking, and the flow
32:22
Speaker 5: of the dangerous drug fentanel. And get this one, four
32:26
Speaker 5: hundred thousand children. In terms of the overall flow over
32:30
Speaker 5: the southern border, some four hundred thousand children are unaccounted for.
32:35
Speaker 5: We do not know their whereabouts and some other interesting
32:39
Speaker 5: facts from my conversation with doctor Dave Naik. The main
32:42
Speaker 5: three goals, he says, are sealed the border, stop catch
32:47
Speaker 5: and release, and find all these unaccounted for children, which
32:52
Speaker 5: it is believed are victims of the sex trade. Among
32:56
Speaker 5: other things, there seems to be no digital record, there's
33:00
Speaker 5: no way of ascertaining the whereabouts of these hundreds of
33:04
Speaker 5: thousands of children. And one of the things that doctor
33:08
Speaker 5: Dave Naek shared though, guys, is that the announcements by
33:14
Speaker 5: mister Holman at the December nine program of the Northwest
33:17
Speaker 5: GOP and the announcements of President elect Trump in the
33:22
Speaker 5: estimation of the local Republicans in Chicago, these things are
33:26
Speaker 5: softening the views somewhat of the Chicago Mayor, of the
33:33
Speaker 5: Governor of Illinois JB. Pritzker, for whom the JB. Prisker
33:37
Speaker 5: the Prisker Forum for Global Cities in Chicago by the
33:41
Speaker 5: Chicago Council and Global Affairs that's named after the Prisker family.
33:44
Speaker 5: But evidently Prinsker's views and the Chicago Mayor's views are
33:48
Speaker 5: softening somewhat. They're looking at being a little bit more
33:52
Speaker 5: cooperative with the Trump administration. Of course that remains to
33:55
Speaker 5: be seen, but we're still seeing a lot of Bellius
34:00
Speaker 5: kind of rhetoric like that. And of the slides I
34:04
Speaker 5: have left, I won't say too much this next one
34:08
Speaker 5: about New York. Meanwhile, in the state of New York,
34:12
Speaker 5: the New Yorkers for Immigrant Justice have been protesting the
34:17
Speaker 5: moves by New York officials to take the hotels that
34:21
Speaker 5: have been completely occupied by illegal aliens and evict them,
34:26
Speaker 5: because it's beginning to cost the state of New York
34:29
Speaker 5: and New York City. It's costing them not just millions,
34:32
Speaker 5: but billions of dollars, getting into the B word in
34:36
Speaker 5: terms of statewide costs of harboring and housings. Such an unusual,
34:41
Speaker 5: unusually high number of illegal aliens, because we have to
34:44
Speaker 5: keep in mind, that's the bottom line, the number of
34:47
Speaker 5: them is so high. But anyway, that's kind of what's
34:51
Speaker 5: happening in New York. We have a couple lists here.
34:54
Speaker 5: I don't need to read a lot of the donors,
34:56
Speaker 5: but we have the Rockefeller Brothers Fund that's behind the
35:00
Speaker 5: that New York organizations that's protesting the people getting kicked
35:04
Speaker 5: out of the hotels. We have the Ford Foundation, we
35:08
Speaker 5: have a bunch of a bunch of others.
35:09
Speaker 2: We have.
35:12
Speaker 5: The Pinkerton Foundation, JP, Morgan Chase, and many other elitist
35:18
Speaker 5: and elitist connected organizations that are fighting the Trump administration
35:24
Speaker 5: along many lines.
35:25
Speaker 2: And we can.
35:26
Speaker 5: Skip over that Fox News slide. There's one last slide
35:29
Speaker 5: from New York State Alderman Matt Slater, I'll just read
35:32
Speaker 5: that it's a real concern, real concern for my constituents.
35:36
Speaker 5: If people are protesting the fact that we're finally getting
35:39
Speaker 5: real about illegal immigration, they should open their doors and
35:42
Speaker 5: welcome these people in he means, into their own homes
35:45
Speaker 5: if they're so concerned. But taxpayers should not be fronting
35:49
Speaker 5: billions of dollars. Again, that's statewide in New York to
35:52
Speaker 5: incentivize those who are breaking our laws. So that that
35:56
Speaker 5: pretty much winds it up. But the battle lines are
35:59
Speaker 5: being drawn. But we'll see if their positions will soften
36:02
Speaker 5: over the next few weeks. So back to you guys.
36:05
Speaker 1: Thanks Mark, Okay, let's move on. If you like what
36:07
Speaker 1: the UK column does, you'd like to support us, then
36:10
Speaker 1: support dot UK Columnist place to go.
36:12
Speaker 2: There are options to help us there.
36:13
Speaker 1: You make a donation, join as a member, and of
36:16
Speaker 1: course if you do join as a member, that gives
36:18
Speaker 1: you access to extra the forums and so on. You
36:21
Speaker 1: can pick something up at the UK column Shop, or
36:25
Speaker 1: you could pick.
36:26
Speaker 2: Something up from Clive Tocarl dot com.
36:27
Speaker 1: We get a small percentage of every purchase, but it
36:31
Speaker 1: doesn't cost you any more to do that. A couple
36:33
Speaker 1: of things from the shop if you'd like to get
36:35
Speaker 1: those for Christmas. But please share everything that you see
36:40
Speaker 1: on our website that's of interest to you if you
36:42
Speaker 1: possibly can, because that helps us a great deal as well.
36:47
Speaker 1: Now on Sunday, another reminder, final reminder in fact of
36:51
Speaker 1: the second annual David Ray Griffin Lecture, Doctor Malavasseti speaking
36:55
Speaker 1: as the main keynote speaker on that. He is a
36:58
Speaker 1: fantastic speaker and I find them hugely engaging in previous events,
37:03
Speaker 1: So please join us at six pm until the eight
37:07
Speaker 1: pm on Sunday evening for that in the usual places.
37:10
Speaker 1: And well, we're delighted to say that the petition to
37:14
Speaker 1: Ensure Diagnosis and Treatment for People Suffering from Adverse COVID
37:17
Speaker 1: nineteen vaccine side effects rached its ten.
37:20
Speaker 2: Thousand signature target.
37:22
Speaker 1: So we will wait to see what the Welsh government
37:25
Speaker 1: says about holding a debate on that, and no doubt
37:29
Speaker 1: Debbie will have more to say on that and extra Brian.
37:32
Speaker 1: Let's move on then to BBC Media Action.
37:36
Speaker 3: I'm afraid we have to mention the BBC the UK
37:38
Speaker 3: call them absolutely unique in warning over a great many
37:42
Speaker 3: years about this pernicious so called charity it's a political charity.
37:47
Speaker 3: However that works. But if you take a look at
37:49
Speaker 3: what BBC Media Action is up to today, well we've
37:53
Speaker 3: got something really incredible that's come in because basically we
37:58
Speaker 3: are working with a dred million people in need around
38:02
Speaker 3: the world.
38:02
Speaker 2: Just to clarify, that's BBC Media Action.
38:05
Speaker 3: BBC Media Action, and what they're saying is that, of
38:09
Speaker 3: course they're impartial, impactful and trustworthy. So what is this
38:15
Speaker 3: organization actually doing. Let's have a look at this little
38:18
Speaker 3: video clip.
38:22
Speaker 14: We live in the age of information. Humanity is more
38:26
Speaker 14: connected and interconnected than ever before. Soon most people will
38:33
Speaker 14: have access to the Internet via mobile phone, with the
38:36
Speaker 14: whole world at their fingertips. But this is also the
38:41
Speaker 14: age of disinformation. It threatens human rights and democracy, acts
38:46
Speaker 14: as a catalyst for conflict, poses risks to our health.
38:51
Speaker 14: It leads people to lose faith in science, in democratic
38:54
Speaker 14: institutions and in the media. So how can people know
39:00
Speaker 14: what information they can trust?
39:03
Speaker 15: So on called like these vaccines. They are talking about
39:07
Speaker 15: the vaccine it's a sign of the beast or something.
39:11
Speaker 15: Initially I was thinking the same lineage the same.
39:13
Speaker 16: Guy we targeted one hundred and thirty three practicing journalists
39:18
Speaker 16: to be trained. These are people to create content for
39:22
Speaker 16: the generality of the propulace.
39:24
Speaker 15: Before the BBC Media Action training, I would say I
39:29
Speaker 15: had no real major information about discovery. But after the
39:33
Speaker 15: training another I feel like I have a duty to
39:36
Speaker 15: know what to say.
39:37
Speaker 16: The importance of correct information and access to correct information
39:42
Speaker 16: as understandable to the target audience cannot be over.
39:48
Speaker 3: So we have it there. This is on fast in
39:50
Speaker 3: the Veldway Club. This is the BBC getting in training,
39:54
Speaker 3: telling young people what to think, telling them the truth
39:59
Speaker 3: is what the ABC says, and then they go and
40:02
Speaker 3: grab colleagues and so this subversion spreadts throughout their countries.
40:07
Speaker 3: BBC Media Action couldn't have put it simpler there. But
40:10
Speaker 3: of course they can only do what they're doing with
40:13
Speaker 3: huge amounts of money.
40:15
Speaker 1: And you know, they're busy pushing COVID narratives into Africa,
40:19
Speaker 1: into a continent that was barely touched by COVID, didn't
40:23
Speaker 1: have any vaccines, didn't have any excess mortality, you know,
40:27
Speaker 1: absolutely nothing compared to First World countries that were subject
40:32
Speaker 1: to lockdowns and vaccination and all this kind of stuff.
40:35
Speaker 2: So so quite incredible.
40:37
Speaker 1: But if you want to know how much money BBC
40:39
Speaker 1: Media Action is getting from the Foreign Comnwealth Office, for example,
40:43
Speaker 1: have a look at fcdospending dot UK, colum dot org
40:47
Speaker 1: and all the informations there, along with all the information
40:50
Speaker 1: of how much money the Foreign Office is sending to
40:53
Speaker 1: a bunch of other organizations and institutions, and well that
41:00
Speaker 1: this information is up to date final following the intervention
41:04
Speaker 1: the Information Commissioner, we can probably say, well a rough calculation.
41:09
Speaker 1: If you're looking for a twenty billion pound black hole
41:12
Speaker 1: since twenty twenty two, you might find it on the
41:15
Speaker 1: front page of that website if you go and.
41:17
Speaker 2: Have a look.
41:18
Speaker 3: So ultimately, millions billions of pounds disappearing into these overseas
41:23
Speaker 3: projects undeclared. Of course it's undeclared because this money is
41:28
Speaker 3: being used to subvert nation states.
41:32
Speaker 1: Now let's move on to the tragic story of Sarah Sharif.
41:36
Speaker 1: Now it is a tragic story and the tragedy can't
41:39
Speaker 1: be overestimated. Murdered by her father despite his violent behavior
41:44
Speaker 1: of being well understood by the authorities. Now the Children
41:48
Speaker 1: Children's Commissioner, Rachel Desuza, well, she has had something to
41:53
Speaker 1: say about the death of Sarah and what should be
41:59
Speaker 1: done to make sure that this can never happen again.
42:03
Speaker 17: I mean, look, there are three or four things that
42:05
Speaker 17: I think could be done now that could make a
42:07
Speaker 17: real difference.
42:09
Speaker 5: One.
42:09
Speaker 17: I think one of the chilling things about this case
42:12
Speaker 17: was when hearing the Sorrowtory's father leave that message saying
42:18
Speaker 17: I legally punish Sarah and she's dead. We need, now,
42:24
Speaker 17: you know, in the twenty first century, to remove the
42:27
Speaker 17: reasonable chastisement clause towards children in assault law. Children need
42:32
Speaker 17: to have the same rights as adults to not be beaten. Secondly,
42:38
Speaker 17: Sarah was known to services to be at risk from
42:41
Speaker 17: before her birth, and yet she found herself living with
42:45
Speaker 17: a father who was who had known a history bit
42:48
Speaker 17: of violence, and her case was closed after being reported.
42:52
Speaker 17: And it seems that a week data sharing is part
42:56
Speaker 17: of the reason for that. And we need now to
42:59
Speaker 17: bring in and the Children and Wellbeing Bill is coming
43:02
Speaker 17: in a unique identifier for every child and proper data sharing.
43:05
Speaker 17: It's not good enough not to be sharing data. I
43:08
Speaker 17: think there's another thing that we can do here that
43:11
Speaker 17: needs to happen straight away, which is we need an
43:14
Speaker 17: elective home education register.
43:19
Speaker 1: So the regions is calling for an elective home education
43:22
Speaker 1: registers because Sarah was apparently taken out of school and
43:26
Speaker 1: that was what ultimately resulted in her tragic death. But
43:31
Speaker 1: Rachel went on to say that if there's any suggestion
43:36
Speaker 1: of domestic abuse for any children that have been taken
43:39
Speaker 1: out of school and are being homeschooled, if there's any
43:41
Speaker 1: suggestion of domestic abuse, that parents should lose the right
43:45
Speaker 1: to homeschool at that point. But the question of a
43:48
Speaker 1: unique identifier for every child, what are we going to do?
43:50
Speaker 1: Are we going to micro chip them next? Well, of
43:53
Speaker 1: course children actually do have records going through schools at
43:58
Speaker 1: the moment. This is just one example of a system
44:00
Speaker 1: that many, many, if not most, schools are using around
44:03
Speaker 1: the country, and that's seapoms. This is all about promoting
44:07
Speaker 1: the comprehensive safety of every student, so they help schools
44:11
Speaker 1: uphold and enhance their student well being initiatives. It's completely customizable.
44:15
Speaker 1: The software also helps lessen burden on staff managing can
44:19
Speaker 1: been strad of tasks, allowing schools to gain efficiency. So
44:22
Speaker 1: if a child does anything that a teacher doesn't agree with,
44:26
Speaker 1: and it might be expressing a view that the teacher
44:28
Speaker 1: doesn't agree with, that goes on as a sea palm record,
44:32
Speaker 1: but it might include child on child abuse interventions, attendance,
44:36
Speaker 1: persistent absence, more things. And of course they are already
44:41
Speaker 1: working with social services and the councils to make sure
44:44
Speaker 1: that those organizations have access to this data. And this
44:47
Speaker 1: data follows the school right through there or follows the
44:50
Speaker 1: child right through their school career right up to adulthood.
44:54
Speaker 1: So but on the issue of micro chipping, well, of
44:56
Speaker 1: course we have seen this at least us being softened
45:01
Speaker 1: up for this idea for quite a number of years.
45:03
Speaker 1: So this is from the Metro. Should you microchip your child?
45:06
Speaker 1: We asked an expert. Here is a BCC research human microchipping,
45:12
Speaker 1: the benefits and disadvantages. Here is substack posts. While microchipping
45:16
Speaker 1: your child is I must. Here's the daily meal, the
45:20
Speaker 1: stomach churning, the terrifying incident that means add microchip my
45:23
Speaker 1: children in a heartbeat, writes Claire Foge. So this is
45:27
Speaker 1: something which is absolutely being promoted as hard as it can.
45:31
Speaker 2: Be at the moment.
45:32
Speaker 1: And again another failure to protect the child, because of
45:37
Speaker 1: course what we see constantly, Brian is children that need
45:40
Speaker 1: protection not getting the protection. Children that don't need protection,
45:44
Speaker 1: being taken from the parents and sold on the open
45:46
Speaker 1: market of adoption and.
45:48
Speaker 3: Being abused in the system which the state says it's
45:51
Speaker 3: to care for the children. This is utterly obscene and
45:55
Speaker 3: Rachel needs taking to book over a belief system because
45:59
Speaker 3: it's hopefully inadequate to the realities of the abuse of
46:03
Speaker 3: children in UK.
46:04
Speaker 1: More not of course, Yes, Mark back to you, and
46:08
Speaker 1: what's Pfizer been up to.
46:12
Speaker 5: Like usual very questionable activities. Of course, we have to
46:16
Speaker 5: keep in mind what DeBie reported today from that mRNA scientist,
46:20
Speaker 5: and we have to keep in mind that they're going
46:22
Speaker 5: to try probably to push another plandemic type scenario before
46:28
Speaker 5: too long. The bird flu still hangs in the background.
46:30
Speaker 5: But here just a little over a month ago, Pfizer
46:34
Speaker 5: is accused of hiding a contraceptive's brain tumor link. According
46:38
Speaker 5: to Bloomberg law Pfizer Incorporated failed to warran patients. It's
46:43
Speaker 5: alleged that its injectable contraceptive drug depo Privera can increase
46:48
Speaker 5: the risk of developing brain tumors. This new lawsuit is alleging, quote,
46:53
Speaker 5: for several decades, the manufacturers and sellers of deeper Privera
46:56
Speaker 5: and its authorized generic and generic analogs, and it was
47:00
Speaker 5: responsibility to investigate whether the medication could contribute to the
47:04
Speaker 5: growth of brain tumors. And that's according to the complaint
47:07
Speaker 5: filed in the US District Court for the Central District
47:10
Speaker 5: of California. That's Devoric versus Pfizer Incorporated. For the record,
47:15
Speaker 5: there's a link there that shows you how to look
47:17
Speaker 5: at the lawsuit. Plaintiff Taylor Devoric alleged that researchers have
47:22
Speaker 5: found depo Pervera and similar progesterone medications have been linked
47:27
Speaker 5: to a greater incidence of brain tumors called intracranio meningioma.
47:31
Speaker 5: She's seeking damages on her failure to warn, defective design,
47:35
Speaker 5: negligist misrepresentation, and breach of warranty claims against the pharmaceutical giant.
47:41
Speaker 5: And this is interesting that complaint comes in the wake
47:45
Speaker 5: of a handful of substantially similar lawsuits filed in other
47:49
Speaker 5: federal courts in California and Indiana in recent weeks. And
47:53
Speaker 5: this is the company shooting back. Depo Pervera has been
47:56
Speaker 5: an FDA approved medication for more than thirty years and
48:00
Speaker 5: has been a safe and effective treatment option for millions
48:02
Speaker 5: of patients during that time. Pfizer the company will vigorously
48:07
Speaker 5: defend these losses, a spokesman said a little bit more
48:11
Speaker 5: of the American label for depo Pervera still makes no
48:14
Speaker 5: mention of the increased risk to patients of developing intracranio
48:17
Speaker 5: mening geomas, even though the EU and UK now list
48:22
Speaker 5: mening gioma under the medication's warning section. And that's according
48:26
Speaker 5: to Devork's complaint. Devork the plaintiff and Devork issued a
48:30
Speaker 5: twenty twenty four study published in the British Medical Journal
48:33
Speaker 5: that said the prolonged use of medications like deepot pervera
48:39
Speaker 5: were found to significantly increase the risk of developing that
48:42
Speaker 5: mening geoma cancer. So there's some British outlets involved. This
48:47
Speaker 5: is from the British Medical Journal, just a posting people
48:50
Speaker 5: can look at the use of progestogens and the risk
48:55
Speaker 5: of intracranial mening zoma the National case control study from
48:59
Speaker 5: the BMJ. And from there we have just a screenshot
49:05
Speaker 5: of the actual lawsuit, the actual document in court. People
49:08
Speaker 5: can get the case number from there. There's contacts and
49:12
Speaker 5: the US National Institutes of Health citing the British the
49:17
Speaker 5: British Medical Journal. Excuse me, and this is twenty years ago.
49:21
Speaker 5: Now we've got a little history to think about. Twenty
49:23
Speaker 5: years ago May two thousand and four, Pfizer, the world's
49:27
Speaker 5: largest drug maker. It still pretty much is pled guilty
49:31
Speaker 5: on the thirteenth of May of that year to numerous
49:33
Speaker 5: civil and criminal charges for illegally promoting the off label
49:37
Speaker 5: use of GABA penton, which is for like Parkinson's and
49:40
Speaker 5: other things. It has agreed to pay two hundred and
49:43
Speaker 5: forty million dollars a criminal fine and one hundred and
49:46
Speaker 5: fifty two million to state and federal health care programs.
49:49
Speaker 5: That fine was the second largest given in the industry. Meanwhile,
49:54
Speaker 5: off label sales of GABA penton continued to soar at
49:58
Speaker 5: that time, despite evidence that the drug is not effective
50:02
Speaker 5: for some of the problems it's used to treat. And
50:04
Speaker 5: now we have fifteen years ago on the next slide.
50:07
Speaker 5: We have to remember this. All this trust has been
50:09
Speaker 5: put into Peiser. It was during the development of the
50:13
Speaker 5: mRNA vaccines. They were the leading company during the covidocracy,
50:18
Speaker 5: during the so called pandemic, and fifteen years ago, need
50:22
Speaker 5: we be reminded Peiser had to pay two point three
50:25
Speaker 5: billion for fraudulent marketing. The American pharmaceutical giant and its
50:30
Speaker 5: subsidiary upjohn had agreed to pay two point three billion.
50:34
Speaker 5: They did so the largest healthcare fraud settlement in the
50:38
Speaker 5: history of the US Department of Justice to resolve criminal
50:41
Speaker 5: and civil liability arising from the illegal promotion of certain
50:46
Speaker 5: pharmaceutical products and that was the anti inflammatory drug Bextra
50:52
Speaker 5: at that time. So this is twenty years ago and
50:55
Speaker 5: fifteen years ago. Peiser lost both cases, some of the
50:59
Speaker 5: large settlements in US history in both cases, and now
51:03
Speaker 5: they're in court again for this possible cancer link, and
51:07
Speaker 5: yet they're on deck to possibly produce more mRNA vaccines
51:12
Speaker 5: should another plandemic arise. It just shows you how carefully
51:17
Speaker 5: we have to look at the cvs of these companies
51:19
Speaker 5: and it's amazing Pfizer has garnered so much trust when
51:23
Speaker 5: you look at the history and now the current situation.
51:26
Speaker 5: So that's it for now, guys, back to you.
51:29
Speaker 1: Thank you, Thank you, Mark, and well w I need
51:33
Speaker 1: to welcome CHERL. Gringer to the program as well. But
51:36
Speaker 1: w what have you got on the littist.
51:41
Speaker 10: Right?
51:41
Speaker 4: Well, thank you and yes I'm absolutely delighted that we're
51:44
Speaker 4: joined by Cheryl today because we told you a little
51:47
Speaker 4: while ago, a couple of weeks ago, that there was
51:49
Speaker 4: going to be a first level tribunal against the MHR
51:53
Speaker 4: that Cheryl has trailblazed herself. It's literally been a one
51:57
Speaker 4: woman mission, so she's got to come and give us
52:00
Speaker 4: an update on that. She's also going to give us
52:02
Speaker 4: some stats because there's all sorts of things that's breaking
52:05
Speaker 4: around social media with regards to releases of freedom of information,
52:10
Speaker 4: so she's going to be updating us on that. And
52:13
Speaker 4: also she had a little adventure and went to Parliament yesterday,
52:16
Speaker 4: so we're going to be hearing about that. Cheryld, thank
52:19
Speaker 4: you so much for coming. Thank you for joining us
52:22
Speaker 4: give us an update on the first level tribunal that
52:24
Speaker 4: you and I both went to last week.
52:31
Speaker 18: Hi everybody, thanks very much for having me back to
52:34
Speaker 18: report that we didn't get anywhere. Basically it's been postponed,
52:42
Speaker 18: but it was quite an interesting exercise. So this is
52:47
Speaker 18: my yellow card vaccine monitor where they were monitoring two
52:52
Speaker 18: five hundred pregnant ladies and I wanted the information on
52:56
Speaker 18: the results of that monitor. So the appeal was held
53:00
Speaker 18: on the third of December, and the judge was cross
53:04
Speaker 18: because we hadn't or she got all the information in
53:08
Speaker 18: the bundle that she was supposed to have not down
53:10
Speaker 18: to me. I did everything I was supposed to do
53:12
Speaker 18: in the time I was supposed to do it, and eventually,
53:16
Speaker 18: having talked to us, she went away to consider everything,
53:19
Speaker 18: and she came back and she said the tribunal recognizes
53:22
Speaker 18: the very important issues to be determined and that they
53:25
Speaker 18: need to be dealt with justly, which is why she's
53:28
Speaker 18: actually moved to the twentieth of February twenty twenty five
53:32
Speaker 18: so we can have a whole day to discuss this.
53:35
Speaker 18: She also said the tribunal acknowledges the very significant public
53:39
Speaker 18: interest in the public having information about the safety vaccinations,
53:43
Speaker 18: and the whole thing is now going to revolve around
53:46
Speaker 18: what's called a Scott schedule, which means they nine questions
53:50
Speaker 18: that I wrote it, I get listed, and they the
53:54
Speaker 18: MHRA tell me their answers, and then I go back
53:58
Speaker 18: and tell me what I think for those, and that
54:01
Speaker 18: forms the basis of the day's hearing that we're in February.
54:05
Speaker 18: So I think I'm able to use my same witnesses
54:11
Speaker 18: because I asked for them to come along as well,
54:14
Speaker 18: so I have people backing me and I have people
54:17
Speaker 18: who can attend like Debbie, so that is hopefully something
54:22
Speaker 18: that will be prepared for come February. So that really
54:25
Speaker 18: is an update on the Tribune. Yesterday, keeping going with
54:30
Speaker 18: me MHRA comments, I went to support test Matt Bay
54:36
Speaker 18: who was going to have a backbench debate on the
54:39
Speaker 18: performance of the MHRA, And to start off with, I
54:43
Speaker 18: was told it was going to start about one o'clock,
54:45
Speaker 18: and then when I was on my way, I thought
54:48
Speaker 18: it was probably going to start about three o'clock, so
54:51
Speaker 18: I put off going in a bit later and I'd
54:54
Speaker 18: only been on the train about ten minutes when I
54:56
Speaker 18: found out that it was actually going to be owned.
55:01
Speaker 18: So again another discussion on the MHRA is about to
55:05
Speaker 18: be postponed. And the interesting thing was they squashed in
55:12
Speaker 18: three ministeriums, so that was one on building homes, one
55:17
Speaker 18: on qualifications reform, and one ten year prison capacity. So
55:22
Speaker 18: they were squashed in. And then there was a general
55:25
Speaker 18: debate that was on an independent review into the treatment
55:31
Speaker 18: of LGBT veterans and there were twenty two MPs that
55:36
Speaker 18: were involved in that. And when I spoke to estmat
55:40
Speaker 18: Bay's team. There were only seven MPs that were going
55:43
Speaker 18: to speak up at hers, So perhaps it's something that
55:46
Speaker 18: I can ask, Perhaps people can approach an MP and
55:50
Speaker 18: see if they would be interested in attending the new
55:55
Speaker 18: debate once it becomes available the date that that's going
55:58
Speaker 18: to be held on.
56:02
Speaker 3: I just wanted to come back and stress for the
56:04
Speaker 3: audience what utterly fantastic work that you have done, because
56:08
Speaker 3: of course, before you got going, there was nothing happening.
56:12
Speaker 3: There was no real leverage to get the MHR to
56:17
Speaker 3: answer for what it had and had not done, and
56:21
Speaker 3: you have kickstarted that. I wondered whether the tribunal would
56:25
Speaker 3: get to the point where simply the judge worked against
56:29
Speaker 3: you and closed it down within that tribunal. So I
56:34
Speaker 3: know you may feel a little bit down, but it
56:36
Speaker 3: seems to me that the questions that the judge aren't
56:39
Speaker 3: asked were actually pretty pertinent. It was reasonable to say
56:43
Speaker 3: you can get all that detailed information and analysis through
56:48
Speaker 3: in a three hour hearing. That's subtly ridiculous. So your
56:52
Speaker 3: hard work has now leveraged it, leveraged it into a
56:58
Speaker 3: much longer period. This thing is beginning to break surface.
57:03
Speaker 3: And if we say it was going to happen as
57:07
Speaker 3: a debate in Parliament, they've had to close that down
57:10
Speaker 3: as well because they're so frightened at the subject. You know,
57:14
Speaker 3: don't underestimate what you've done. You've taken the lid off
57:18
Speaker 3: this thing. What needs to happen now, I think is
57:21
Speaker 3: that we need to get public support and I'm looking
57:24
Speaker 3: at very much at our audience in behind you, to
57:27
Speaker 3: demand that this thing gets the hearing which it's deserved.
57:31
Speaker 3: You've got the wedge into the crack in the wall,
57:35
Speaker 3: and the thing is now to hammer that wedge in.
57:38
Speaker 3: So I'm going to say to you, well done.
57:43
Speaker 18: Well, thanks very much. I mean, at the end of
57:45
Speaker 18: the day, they'll both probably happen now about the same time,
57:49
Speaker 18: so one will help the other.
57:51
Speaker 8: I would have thought.
57:52
Speaker 18: But as I say, if people can actually approach there
57:55
Speaker 18: and get more than seven MPs to back this look
57:59
Speaker 18: at the performance of the MHRA, I think that would
58:02
Speaker 18: be very valuable to show that there is interest in
58:05
Speaker 18: this particular subject. So I'll leave that with people. So
58:12
Speaker 18: I mean, just finally we got information that the CHM,
58:17
Speaker 18: the Committee on Human Medicines which advises the MHRA, and
58:23
Speaker 18: medical officers and is shared by Debbie's favorite professor, Manir
58:28
Speaker 18: Permuhammad and the committee have been very quiet on their minutes,
58:35
Speaker 18: but now they're actually published the minutes and we can
58:37
Speaker 18: get to see the minutes of their discussions before the
58:40
Speaker 18: vaccines were released, which is quite interesting. So to start
58:46
Speaker 18: off with, the first one I went to was the
58:48
Speaker 18: end of twenty seventh of November, and I looked at
58:51
Speaker 18: six minutes to start off with, and it ranged from
58:55
Speaker 18: about eighty people taking part in this week to about
58:59
Speaker 18: fifty the fifty odd fifty four people. How the heck
59:03
Speaker 18: you run a committee has got that number of people
59:06
Speaker 18: on it? I have no idea. Can I just have
59:09
Speaker 18: the slide up? Might please?
59:11
Speaker 2: There you go?
59:13
Speaker 18: Thank you. So So basically this just sums up some
59:16
Speaker 18: of the things that I picked up on. They argued
59:19
Speaker 18: about the lack of benefit in the under fifties. There
59:23
Speaker 18: was one person who said that there's no point in
59:25
Speaker 18: using them under fifty, but it went through past infection
59:29
Speaker 18: was not considered to be a risk because they looked
59:31
Speaker 18: to what other vac scenes did, so that was fine.
59:34
Speaker 18: They mentioned the process one process too, so that was
59:36
Speaker 18: actually discussed. They were very much aware that it was
59:39
Speaker 18: a different process for making for clinical trials and for
59:42
Speaker 18: actually putting out for commission.
59:43
Speaker 5: Of the public.
59:44
Speaker 18: They went on and on about the particulate effects, So
59:47
Speaker 18: the particle size that was seen in the files discussed.
59:53
Speaker 18: They discussed this is called EJO five five three, which
59:57
Speaker 18: is the infamous batch that to a lot of side
1:00:00
Speaker 18: of it, and there were thirty times the amount of
1:00:03
Speaker 18: limnopathy compared with clinical trials, and that again was because
1:00:09
Speaker 18: of particulate debris and also the integrity of the mRNA,
1:00:15
Speaker 18: so the stability wasn't right. They knew about beations that
1:00:19
Speaker 18: all of this would bring to immunogenicity. They basically had
1:00:24
Speaker 18: talked about hypersensitivity and anaphylaxis and perhaps reaction to PEG.
1:00:31
Speaker 18: And then they also knew, which was incredible to see
1:00:34
Speaker 18: it in black Wine, that the distributing site was extensive
1:00:39
Speaker 18: and this is before it was launched, and there was
1:00:42
Speaker 18: lack of data on severe cases of COVID elderly, and
1:00:46
Speaker 18: they were also discussing asymptomatic cases and whether that was
1:00:49
Speaker 18: a thing then, and the MADERNA information that was looking
1:00:53
Speaker 18: at animal reproductive tox ecology as a basis for looking
1:00:57
Speaker 18: at use in pregnancy and breastfeeding. There's many more things
1:01:01
Speaker 18: that can be picked up, I'm sure, but I have
1:01:03
Speaker 18: to look at more of these. It's there now that
1:01:05
Speaker 18: information and people can go and look at this Vaccine
1:01:07
Speaker 18: Benefit Risk Expert Working Group what a name which is
1:01:11
Speaker 18: a quality of the ad top group the internet and
1:01:14
Speaker 18: look for themselves.
1:01:16
Speaker 1: Yeah, I mean, I think just to finish this, we'll
1:01:19
Speaker 1: talk a bit more about this in extra. But the
1:01:21
Speaker 1: admission of distribution from the injection site being extensive, that
1:01:25
Speaker 1: that is huge actually, and we will talk more about
1:01:29
Speaker 1: that an extra. I think we're at a time we're.
1:01:33
Speaker 3: Out of time, but I'll just say once again Cheryld,
1:01:36
Speaker 3: what you've done is fantastic. And of course Debbie got
1:01:40
Speaker 3: stuck in although well years ago now with those MHR
1:01:45
Speaker 3: board meetings which started to get the information to the surface.
1:01:50
Speaker 3: So the thing is just now to keep going. And
1:01:53
Speaker 3: no they're not going to roll over and give in easily.
1:01:55
Speaker 3: It's going to be a battle. But the key bit
1:01:57
Speaker 3: is to get the truth.
1:01:58
Speaker 1: That absolutely well, look, we've got to leave it there
1:02:01
Speaker 1: for today. Thank you very much to Mark, to Debbie,
1:02:04
Speaker 1: to Cheryl and to Brian. Of course we will see
1:02:07
Speaker 1: in a few minutes if your UK call a member
1:02:09
Speaker 1: for some extra otherwise, have a great weekend and we'll
1:02:13
Speaker 1: see you again on Monday.
1:02:14
Speaker 2: Bye bye, bye bye