Latest / The Chuck ToddCast / Interview Only w/ Cobi Blumenfeld-Gantz - How To Navigate The Medicare Maze
Transcript
- 0:00Speaker 1: This episode of the Chuck Todd cast is brought to
- 0:02Speaker 1: you by Chapter. Now, almost everything you hear about Medicare
- 0:06Speaker 1: is somebody quietly trying to steer you somewhere. And you're
- 0:11Speaker 1: skeptical of that, as you should be. I get it.
- 0:14Speaker 1: I mean, there's a federal lawsuit going on right now
- 0:17Speaker 1: over exactly this. Companies that branded themselves as unbiased while
- 0:21Speaker 1: allegedly pointing people toward whatever would pay them the most
- 0:25Speaker 1: as some sort of broker. So if your default is
- 0:28Speaker 1: to distrust everyone in this space, honestly, I get it.
- 0:31Speaker 1: I'm a bit distrustful these days myself. That's the whole
- 0:34Speaker 1: reason I want to tell you about Chapter. They're independent
- 0:37Speaker 1: Medicare advisors whose entire model is that their advisors are
- 0:41Speaker 1: not paid to push any one plan. They're just trying
- 0:45Speaker 1: to help. Yes, there's compensation that goes with it. but
- 0:47Speaker 1: it's across the board is what they're trying to do.
- 0:51Speaker 1: At the end of the day, they're advocating for you.
- 0:52Speaker 1: They're not the insurance companies themselves. They're an actual person
- 0:56Speaker 1: who actually goes through your doctors, your prescriptions, your needs,
- 1:01Speaker 1: and then compares them to every single plan available to
- 1:04Speaker 1: find the best one that will work for you and
- 1:06Speaker 1: hopefully save you a couple dollars too. And here's the
- 1:09Speaker 1: part that sets chapter apart. They don't disappear once you've
- 1:14Speaker 1: been in They will keep advocating for you. They're kind
- 1:17Speaker 1: of like almost like a concierge service. You're just there.
- 1:19Speaker 1: I need help. You're like customer service. You know, the plan,
- 1:22Speaker 1: you know, help me navigate this again. So you ever
- 1:24Speaker 1: get hit with a wrongful medical bill, they'll help you
- 1:28Speaker 1: fight it. They want to stay an advocate for you
- 1:31Speaker 1: even after you've done this. So look, I get it.
- 1:34Speaker 1: I think there's all sorts of space. You see a
- 1:38Speaker 1: lot of people are throwing themselves in this healthcare space.
- 1:41Speaker 1: What I like about these chapter folks, I've spent time
- 1:44Speaker 1: with them. This is a very transparent organization. It is
- 1:48Speaker 1: Medicare and all of its affiliated stuff can be very confusing.
- 1:53Speaker 1: The whole point of this is to make this easier
- 1:56Speaker 1: and less confusing. OK, so look, take the skepticism you
- 2:00Speaker 1: already have in all of this, point it at your
- 2:02Speaker 1: own plan for 20 minutes. It's free. There's no pressure.
- 2:06Speaker 1: And then call chapter today at 980-734-4200. So my guest
- 2:17Speaker 1: today is a co-founder of one of my sponsors, Chapter.
- 2:21Speaker 1: You have probably heard at least some of my content
- 2:26Speaker 1: being sponsored by Chapter. And Chapter is a company that
- 2:31Speaker 1: really is designed to help people navigate the Medicare system.
- 2:35Speaker 1: And if any of you are of a certain age
- 2:38Speaker 1: or have parents of a certain age, you have come
- 2:40Speaker 1: to learn that it ain't easy. And if you get
- 2:43Speaker 1: the right policy, it's fantastic. You end up in the
- 2:47Speaker 1: wrong one, not so good. And one of the things
- 2:49Speaker 1: that I do want to make a priority here is
- 2:53Speaker 1: I have worked really hard. I don't want any of
- 2:55Speaker 1: my content behind a paywall, but I just don't want
- 2:59Speaker 1: any kind of sponsor. And we do get to know
- 3:02Speaker 1: sponsors here. And I think it's important for you to
- 3:05Speaker 1: know who these folks are and spend a little time
- 3:09Speaker 1: with them. So joining me now is Kobe Blumenfeld-Gantz, a
- 3:12Speaker 1: co-founder of Chapter. And believe it or not, Chapter is
- 3:16Speaker 1: not that old of a company. And in many ways,
- 3:18Speaker 1: it's a company that is here because of technology in
- 3:24Speaker 1: some ways. Kobe, let's start there. Fill in some of
- 3:29Speaker 1: the blanks. You heard my introduction. Tell me what I
- 3:34Speaker 1: left out that you wish I hadn't.
- 3:36Speaker 2: Yeah, thank you so much for having me. We started
- 3:39Speaker 2: the company a few years ago after seeing my parents
- 3:42Speaker 2: go through the Medicare process and just have a really
- 3:44Speaker 2: tough time. It took them many months, a lot of faxes,
- 3:50Speaker 2: a lot of going in person to the social security office,
- 3:52Speaker 2: which from my perspective was just like, what is going
- 3:54Speaker 2: on here? And ultimately they ended up on a plan
- 3:58Speaker 2: that charged them a lot more than it needed to.
- 4:00Speaker 2: And my mom is now subject to late Part D
- 4:03Speaker 2: enrollment penalties. which is just unfortunate because she got bad
- 4:07Speaker 2: guidance and that could have been prevented. So I used
- 4:11Speaker 2: to work at a big technology company. I used to
- 4:13Speaker 2: do a lot of work with the US government supporting
- 4:16Speaker 2: lots of different missions that the government has from military
- 4:19Speaker 2: intelligence to federal healthcare. And just coming from a data
- 4:24Speaker 2: and technology background, thought that the way that people have
- 4:27Speaker 2: to go through Medicare today just makes no sense. The
- 4:30Speaker 2: technology is bad. The data is bad. The incentives are misaligned.
- 4:34Speaker 2: And I didn't see a company or a way for people,
- 4:38Speaker 2: a company that was really supporting seniors in navigating this process.
- 4:41Speaker 2: And so I wanted to try to start that.
- 4:44Speaker 1: You know, it's funny you say that. So my mother,
- 4:45Speaker 1: of course, she's, I'm not going to say her age
- 4:49Speaker 1: because she's a listener, right? I'm not going to do
- 4:52Speaker 1: that to her, but she's on Medicare and she got...
- 4:55Speaker 1: she got lucky. She got some good advice early and got,
- 4:58Speaker 1: I think it's the schedule F, right? That's the one.
- 5:02Speaker 2: Yeah.
- 5:02Speaker 1: That that's this magic plan. And I'm like, how did
- 5:05Speaker 1: she goes? I don't know. Somebody told me F is the,
- 5:08Speaker 1: what I needed to be focused on. And she, you know,
- 5:11Speaker 1: sort of did. And I'm thankful for it now. She's
- 5:13Speaker 1: very happy. It's always been a pretty good, pretty good policy,
- 5:17Speaker 1: but she didn't have a lot of knowledge. And so,
- 5:21Speaker 1: you know, I was thinking about what's the best way to,
- 5:24Speaker 1: for us to have a conversation that is productive for
- 5:28Speaker 1: the listener. And it is sort of like, let's start with,
- 5:32Speaker 1: you're 61 years old. Let's assume someone on here is 61.
- 5:36Speaker 1: You know that at 62, that I believe, right? Correct
- 5:39Speaker 1: me if I'm wrong. 62, you can start to buy
- 5:41Speaker 1: into Medicare. 65. You still have to wait till 65.
- 5:45Speaker 1: I thought you could do some early. You can't do
- 5:47Speaker 1: it early at 62.
- 5:48Speaker 2: That's social security. Yeah.
- 5:49Speaker 1: That is, okay. So let's, somebody's in their early 60s.
- 5:55Speaker 1: Let's say it's their last year of private insurance. They
- 5:58Speaker 1: know Medicare is coming. Let's start the preparatory process. Give
- 6:04Speaker 1: me how you would advise people how to prepare for
- 6:07Speaker 1: that transition from private health insurance to Medicare.
- 6:12Speaker 2: Yeah, to your point, people should start getting educated a
- 6:15Speaker 2: few years before. So if they are 61, 62, it's
- 6:18Speaker 2: a good time to start learning the basics just to
- 6:22Speaker 2: familiarize yourself. You don't need to do anything until you're
- 6:25Speaker 2: about 64 and a half, a few months before your
- 6:28Speaker 2: 65th birthday. But really the key things to think about
- 6:32Speaker 2: are what are the healthcare needs you might have, not
- 6:35Speaker 2: just next year, but over the next few years. So
- 6:39Speaker 2: are there specific doctors you care about being able to see?
- 6:42Speaker 2: Are there particular procedures or health systems you want to
- 6:45Speaker 2: go to? Are there certain prescriptions you're going to need
- 6:48Speaker 2: to take? And what type of flexibility do you care about?
- 6:53Speaker 2: Are you willing to have a little bit less flexibility
- 6:55Speaker 2: and pay less? Or do you want to pay a
- 6:57Speaker 2: little bit more to have Maximum flexibility.
- 6:59Speaker 1: You mean by flexibility, just a wider variety of doctor networks?
- 7:04Speaker 2: Wider variety of doctor networks, not requiring a referral to
- 7:08Speaker 2: see a specialist, having more covered when you do go
- 7:14Speaker 2: get healthcare, as opposed to paying as you go. These
- 7:18Speaker 2: are just some of the different things to think about. Really,
- 7:22Speaker 2: Medicare advisors like Chapter and others exist. to help people
- 7:26Speaker 2: with this. It's funny you mentioned your mother was not
- 7:29Speaker 2: particularly knowledgeable. I really don't think anyone in this country,
- 7:32Speaker 2: unless it is your profession, really understands how the system goes.
- 7:35Speaker 2: And frankly, most Medicare advisors don't understand how this works either.
- 7:38Speaker 2: But I was listening to a podcast a while ago,
- 7:44Speaker 2: over a year ago, but a Stanford professor of health
- 7:47Speaker 2: economics was doing a podcast on just a health insurance
- 7:50Speaker 2: system and the healthcare system, not Medicare specifically. And he
- 7:53Speaker 2: made a side comment that even he, as a professor
- 7:57Speaker 2: of health economics at Stanford, does not understand how to
- 8:00Speaker 2: sign up for Medicare. So it is very challenging for
- 8:03Speaker 2: most people.
- 8:05Speaker 1: So I think most people think, well, Medicare, everything's covered.
- 8:11Speaker 1: And then you get Medicare and you find out, and
- 8:14Speaker 1: a lot of people go, oh, no. A lot, you know,
- 8:18Speaker 1: you know, yes, a lot of stuff is covered maybe
- 8:21Speaker 1: in the basic policy that compared to other basic policies
- 8:26Speaker 1: if you're younger, but less is covered than you think,
- 8:31Speaker 1: which I guess some people might say is a Congress problem.
- 8:35Speaker 1: But what is the basic, you know, what is the
- 8:38Speaker 1: shock that you find that most new Medicare applicants find
- 8:43Speaker 1: out about when it comes to Medicare?
- 8:45Speaker 2: Most people assume, as you said, that Medicare is just
- 8:48Speaker 2: kind of this thing that happens, you get it, and
- 8:50Speaker 2: it's done. I wish that's how it worked. It's unfortunately
- 8:54Speaker 2: not how it works. There's a lot of different parts
- 8:58Speaker 2: of Medicare, but the simplest way to think about it
- 9:00Speaker 2: is original Medicare, which is known as Parts A and B,
- 9:03Speaker 2: covers up to 80% of medical expenses. But because 20%
- 9:08Speaker 2: of medical expenses can be a lot, if you go
- 9:11Speaker 2: to the hospital and it's 10, 20, $ 30, 000, 20% of
- 9:13Speaker 2: that is bought. Most people get some type of supplemental coverage.
- 9:19Speaker 2: And that supplemental coverage can take the form of Medicare Advantage,
- 9:22Speaker 2: which you see a lot of ads for, or Medicare Supplement,
- 9:25Speaker 2: or also known as Medigap. And that's what your mom has,
- 9:27Speaker 2: a Medigap Plan.
- 9:29Speaker 1: F.
- 9:30Speaker 2: So those are the two different paths people can go
- 9:32Speaker 2: down to really get the coverage that they should have. Yeah.
- 9:38Speaker 1: No, no, no, go ahead, finish your thought.
- 9:40Speaker 2: Those two plan types operate quite differently. A Medicare Advantage
- 9:44Speaker 2: plan in many ways operates like the commercial health insurance
- 9:47Speaker 2: plan most people have had when they've been employed through
- 9:51Speaker 2: most of their lives. It usually has a provider network.
- 9:54Speaker 2: So there are some doctors you can go to, some
- 9:56Speaker 2: doctors are in network. There's sometimes some out of network coverage,
- 9:59Speaker 2: sometimes less. There are specific prescriptions on formulary and different
- 10:02Speaker 2: costs of those prescriptions. There are different hospitals that are
- 10:05Speaker 2: in and out of network. You get some hearing, some dental,
- 10:08Speaker 2: some vision, some other benefits that are partially subsidized. So
- 10:12Speaker 2: if you want to get a hearing aid, they'll say,
- 10:15Speaker 2: instead of paying cash pay price might be two, three,
- 10:18Speaker 2: $ 4, 000 for a hearing aid, you can get it for
- 10:20Speaker 2: one or $ 2, 000 through us. But again, you have to
- 10:22Speaker 2: get a specific type of hearing aid from an audiologist
- 10:25Speaker 2: that we recommend.
- 10:26Speaker 1: I wanna ask about Medicare Advantage because there's cynic in
- 10:31Speaker 1: me and it's always been my, a lot of people
- 10:34Speaker 1: assume Medicare Advantage is run by the government and Medicare
- 10:38Speaker 1: Advantage is a brand name that private insurance companies use
- 10:43Speaker 1: And I'll be honest, I wish it weren't called Medicare
- 10:46Speaker 1: Advantage because I do think it creates an expectation from
- 10:51Speaker 1: the end user that, hey, this is a government policy
- 10:56Speaker 1: when it is not, correct?
- 10:58Speaker 2: That's right. I actually, I find, I take issue with
- 11:01Speaker 2: the name Medicare Advantage less on the Medicare side and
- 11:03Speaker 2: more on the Advantage side, in that it's not necessarily better.
- 11:08Speaker 2: So that's my issue with it. But to your point,
- 11:11Speaker 2: the way the Medicare Advantage programs are run by private
- 11:15Speaker 2: insurance carriers, so all the insurance carriers we know, United, Atna, Anthem,
- 11:19Speaker 2: They have their own Medicare Advantage plans. The government pays them,
- 11:23Speaker 2: and it's known as value-based care or at-risk care. What
- 11:26Speaker 2: happens is the government pays a given Medicare Advantage insurance
- 11:31Speaker 2: carrier a fixed amount per person that they're covering, and
- 11:35Speaker 2: it is up to the insurance carrier to manage that
- 11:39Speaker 2: person's risk and that person's health below that cost. And
- 11:42Speaker 2: any amount that they can do below that cost, they
- 11:46Speaker 2: can take as margin, as profit. So that's what value-based
- 11:49Speaker 2: care at risk care means. Medicare Advantage is a form
- 11:51Speaker 2: of value-based care.
- 11:52Speaker 1: Yeah. So that's one of those though, where you wish,
- 11:56Speaker 1: I mean, and this gets it to a philosophical, you know,
- 12:00Speaker 1: which is who should be monitoring the value-based care, the
- 12:04Speaker 1: patient or or the insurance company. And then when the
- 12:07Speaker 1: insurance company's doing it, you don't feel as if there's
- 12:10Speaker 1: concern that the patient isn't coming first.
- 12:12Speaker 2: Certainly, and those are very valid concerns. And we've seen
- 12:16Speaker 2: a lot of news stories over the past few years
- 12:18Speaker 2: about prior auth denials. There was one news story a
- 12:22Speaker 2: few months ago. There was an investigation into a couple
- 12:25Speaker 2: insurance carriers, and what they found was most prior auth
- 12:30Speaker 2: requests are denied. Of those denials, when they are appealed,
- 12:36Speaker 2: they're almost all approved. All it is saying is the
- 12:40Speaker 2: insurance carrier is default denying you and just making it
- 12:44Speaker 2: harder for you to get the procedure that you need.
- 12:47Speaker 1: We wonder why health insurance companies are so unpopular. Right, exactly.
- 12:54Speaker 2: It's hard for a lot of reasons. It's not just
- 12:56Speaker 2: the insurance carrier's fault, to be clear. It is a
- 12:58Speaker 2: really Frankenstein system that's very complicated and they control a
- 13:02Speaker 2: lot of it, but they are operating within a system
- 13:04Speaker 2: and regime that they don't control entirely themselves, but there's
- 13:08Speaker 2: a lot they can do better, certainly.
- 13:11Speaker 1: With these Medicare Advantage policies, Who's regulating them? Does the
- 13:16Speaker 1: federal government regulate it or is it back being regulated
- 13:18Speaker 1: by state insurance industry?
- 13:20Speaker 2: Great question. So Medicare Advantage is regulated by CMS, by
- 13:23Speaker 2: the federal government. It is regulated by CMS. Under HHS, yes.
- 13:28Speaker 2: So they regulate Medicare Advantage. Medicare Supplement, to your point,
- 13:33Speaker 2: is regulated at the state level. State departments of insurance
- 13:36Speaker 2: or departments of finance, depending on how the state has
- 13:38Speaker 2: set it up, regulate Medicare Supplement carriers. So it is
- 13:41Speaker 2: a totally different regime.
- 13:46Speaker 1: There's a part of what you guys do that some
- 13:49Speaker 1: people will say, how come the federal government doesn't do this?
- 13:52Speaker 1: Why isn't this just, and as a tech guy, I'm
- 13:56Speaker 1: sure that's a question you've probably asked yourself.
- 13:59Speaker 2: Exactly. If the federal government did it, we would be
- 14:01Speaker 2: in a different business, which would be great. There's a
- 14:03Speaker 2: lot of things we can help seniors with. The federal
- 14:07Speaker 2: government does a couple of things. They do have a
- 14:09Speaker 2: Medicare.gov website. They do have a 1-800-Medicare call center. The
- 14:13Speaker 2: challenge is with any government-provided service, it's usually not going
- 14:18Speaker 2: to be very good. And so they're not going to
- 14:21Speaker 2: have the best people. They're not going to have the
- 14:22Speaker 2: best technology. They're not going to have the best support.
- 14:27Speaker 1: I'll be honest. I'm sure certain people are going, why
- 14:29Speaker 1: don't they have the best technology? That's a much broader question. Right,
- 14:33Speaker 1: I know, I know. We're not solving that here, yeah.
- 14:36Speaker 2: Yeah, I mean, so I worked at Palantir for a
- 14:38Speaker 2: long time and I built technology for the government. So
- 14:40Speaker 2: happy to talk about that if you're curious. I think
- 14:43Speaker 2: there are a couple of reasons why the government is
- 14:45Speaker 2: quite bad at using technology. I think one is that
- 14:49Speaker 2: the procurement, it's very boring, but the procurement process to
- 14:53Speaker 2: buy technology is very antiquated.
- 14:56Speaker 1: Oh, it's agency to agency. I mean, what's interesting about
- 15:00Speaker 1: it is, And this gets a nut, we're gonna go
- 15:04Speaker 1: down rabbit holes here and I wanna try to avoid it,
- 15:06Speaker 1: but let me, I'll just quickly do cybersecurity. I went
- 15:09Speaker 1: deep into this when I was covering cybersecurity for a
- 15:12Speaker 1: bit of time, which is, it's both a feature and
- 15:19Speaker 1: a bug. The fact that the technology is not uniform,
- 15:24Speaker 1: the fact that the procurement procedure is not uniform is
- 15:28Speaker 1: actually good for security. but it's bad for consumers. The trade-off,
- 15:35Speaker 1: the efficiency that you might get would also potentially supercharge fraud,
- 15:42Speaker 1: which is something that they're also going to Is that
- 15:45Speaker 1: what you ran into when you worked as a contractor
- 15:49Speaker 1: on the other end?
- 15:50Speaker 2: Yeah, in some cases, definitely. I think the Different parts
- 15:56Speaker 2: of the federal government have gotten a lot better. DOD,
- 15:58Speaker 2: Department of Defense or Department of War, has actually gotten
- 16:01Speaker 2: a lot better at working with newer technology companies and
- 16:04Speaker 2: getting good technology into the hands of the warfighter, as
- 16:07Speaker 2: it were. It's certainly not perfect, but it is a
- 16:10Speaker 2: lot better. I think it's better because we've had this
- 16:14Speaker 2: existential risk from China to force us to be better.
- 16:17Speaker 2: I think throughout the rest of the government, we haven't
- 16:19Speaker 2: actually had that revolution to make it much better for
- 16:23Speaker 2: the government to buy and work with other technology companies.
- 16:27Speaker 2: I think it's been a lot slower throughout the rest
- 16:29Speaker 2: of the government. When I was working on the other side,
- 16:34Speaker 2: directly with the government, It's not just the procurement process.
- 16:38Speaker 2: It's also, you know, the government is a very large,
- 16:41Speaker 2: slow-moving organization, and there's bureaucracy by design. So it's going
- 16:44Speaker 2: to take a lot of time. There's going to be
- 16:46Speaker 2: a lot of checks and balances, and there's a reason
- 16:49Speaker 2: that the government doesn't run like a company.
- 16:52Speaker 1: Well, as I always say, they have to be a service.
- 16:54Speaker 1: You know, I joke, you know, when people complain about
- 16:57Speaker 1: the postal service, oh, it should be run like a business. Well,
- 17:01Speaker 1: it's not a business. It's a service, and you've got
- 17:03Speaker 1: to deliver mail to rural Alaska. And if you were
- 17:06Speaker 1: doing a business, you'd say, hmm, that isn't cost effective
- 17:09Speaker 1: to deliver mail to rural Alaska. We're going to just
- 17:12Speaker 1: give you mail once a week and we're going to
- 17:14Speaker 1: ship it. And it's easy to do to a private customer.
- 17:17Speaker 1: But when you at the federal government, everybody has to
- 17:21Speaker 1: be treated the same.
- 17:23Speaker 2: Right.
- 17:23Speaker 1: The government can't do that. They can't pick and choose
- 17:26Speaker 1: which customers they don't want, which is both good for
- 17:30Speaker 1: the average person. but it does make creating efficiencies very difficult, correct?
- 17:36Speaker 2: That's exactly right. And this is, again, quite philosophical, but
- 17:42Speaker 2: our bureaucracy was set up to be slow moving. That
- 17:45Speaker 2: is a feature, not a.
- 17:47Speaker 1: Oh, I say this all the time. Our constitutional republic,
- 17:52Speaker 1: we are set up to not do things whipsaw, because
- 17:57Speaker 1: stability is always what our founders prioritized. And with stability
- 18:04Speaker 1: comes impatience sometimes.
- 18:06Speaker 2: Yes, slowness and there are trade-offs. In most cases, I
- 18:10Speaker 2: think it is correct that this is how it works.
- 18:15Speaker 2: Of course, I wish the government were more efficient in
- 18:17Speaker 2: a lot of ways. I wish they had better technology,
- 18:19Speaker 2: trying to help them get better technology in a lot
- 18:21Speaker 2: of ways, but I don't think the government will magically
- 18:25Speaker 2: in Medicare or any regime just wake up and have
- 18:28Speaker 2: 10x better technology tomorrow. It's just unfortunately not going to happen.
- 18:30Speaker 1: So walk me through what you what you what is
- 18:33Speaker 1: what is supposed to be the idealized experience for somebody
- 18:36Speaker 1: on chapter? Yeah.
- 18:37Speaker 2: So when people have Medicare questions, when they're figuring out
- 18:40Speaker 2: if they need to sign up, when to sign up,
- 18:42Speaker 2: how to sign up, they give us a call. They
- 18:45Speaker 2: can schedule a time via our website and get an
- 18:49Speaker 2: appointment or they can just.
- 18:50Speaker 1: Is it always a human being or is how automated
- 18:53Speaker 1: are you?
- 18:54Speaker 2: It is always a human being interacting with the customer directly.
- 19:00Speaker 2: On occasion, we will use different AI to help scheduling
- 19:03Speaker 2: or to help with admin tasks or to help get
- 19:07Speaker 2: an answer faster. But for the core, I have questions
- 19:11Speaker 2: at Medicare and I need to sign up for a plan,
- 19:12Speaker 2: that is always a human being. There are actually times
- 19:17Speaker 2: when we could be automating that away, but we've decided
- 19:19Speaker 2: not to. We build a lot of AI and we
- 19:21Speaker 2: use a lot of technology that's facing our team internally
- 19:25Speaker 2: so that our licensed Medicare advisors have the best information
- 19:28Speaker 2: at their fingertips and know what's going on. But we
- 19:31Speaker 2: think it's really important to have a relationship with the
- 19:34Speaker 2: end user. And the reality is most people want to
- 19:36Speaker 2: talk to a human, especially seniors. I think most Americans do,
- 19:40Speaker 2: but particularly seniors.
- 19:42Speaker 1: Oh, I have this theory that the next... wave of
- 19:47Speaker 1: incremental revenue streams. for tech companies are going to be
- 19:52Speaker 1: to charge more for human connectivity.
- 19:55Speaker 2: Yep. Totally agree.
- 19:56Speaker 1: That human customer service, you can get free customer service
- 19:59Speaker 1: from an AI or you can get human customer service.
- 20:04Speaker 1: You may have to pay for it, which is, some
- 20:07Speaker 1: people aren't going to like that I said that. I'm
- 20:09Speaker 1: just saying I'm not saying it should be that way.
- 20:11Speaker 1: I think we both know.
- 20:13Speaker 2: Right.
- 20:14Speaker 1: We both know that this could get there. You just
- 20:25Speaker 1: used a phrase, licensed Medicare advisor. How does one become
- 20:29Speaker 1: a licensed Medicare advisor?
- 20:32Speaker 2: There are a number of different regulatory steps you have
- 20:36Speaker 2: to go through. So you have to be licensed at
- 20:37Speaker 2: the federal level. There is a third party organization that
- 20:40Speaker 2: runs it to get the accreditation. It's an accident health
- 20:45Speaker 2: insurance license.
- 20:47Speaker 1: So do you have literally every employee goes to our
- 20:49Speaker 1: class or what is is, you know, I'm just curious.
- 20:54Speaker 2: There's how do you get licensed, which frankly is not
- 20:56Speaker 2: a particularly high bar. How do you be a Medicare advisor?
- 20:59Speaker 2: A chapter is a much higher bar that we control.
- 21:01Speaker 2: The licensure is done by a third party. Every Medicare
- 21:04Speaker 2: advisor in the country has to go through the same test.
- 21:07Speaker 2: It's a standardized test to get, think of it as
- 21:09Speaker 2: like a real estate license. It's a credential you have
- 21:13Speaker 2: to get. Again, it's not a particularly high bar. For chapter,
- 21:17Speaker 2: we set up our own training program, which covers not
- 21:20Speaker 2: only the basics, but all the edge cases to make
- 21:22Speaker 2: sure people are getting the best guidance. Our philosophy around Medicare,
- 21:28Speaker 2: which is unique, most Medicare advisors really prioritize Medicare Advantage,
- 21:32Speaker 2: largely because that pays a higher commission. We don't do that.
- 21:37Speaker 2: We do what's right for the individual, and on net,
- 21:39Speaker 2: we tend to support more people into Medicare Supplement because
- 21:42Speaker 2: we think it's the correct move for people. even if
- 21:45Speaker 2: it's not the best for our revenue, but we don't care.
- 21:48Speaker 2: And then we set up a lot of training on
- 21:52Speaker 2: our technology because the way that our Medicare advisors get
- 21:55Speaker 2: the most up-to-date data is via our technology platform that
- 21:58Speaker 2: we've built. So the way I like to think about
- 22:01Speaker 2: it and talk about it is if... let's say if
- 22:05Speaker 2: you were looking for directions in a town you just entered,
- 22:09Speaker 2: you could ask a gas station attendant, that's what you
- 22:12Speaker 2: might've done 20 years ago, like what's the fastest way
- 22:14Speaker 2: to get to this place? Or today you could ask
- 22:17Speaker 2: Google Maps, which not only will have all the roads,
- 22:20Speaker 2: it'll have any detours, it'll have live traffic, which the
- 22:22Speaker 2: gas station attendant probably won't have. And so we've built
- 22:25Speaker 2: kind of that Google Maps analog. So we know everything
- 22:27Speaker 2: that's going on on every plan with every doctor, with
- 22:30Speaker 2: every prescription, with every health system. in someone's local area
- 22:34Speaker 2: because that's what they care about. And it doesn't really
- 22:36Speaker 2: matter that we're not the gas station attendant who lives
- 22:39Speaker 2: there because we have all the data.
- 22:44Speaker 1: So the average person uses you the first time they
- 22:49Speaker 1: sign up, and is that the last time they interact
- 22:52Speaker 1: with Chapter?
- 22:53Speaker 2: No. So when people first connect with us, if it's appropriate,
- 22:57Speaker 2: we'll help them sign up for a plan. If they're
- 22:58Speaker 2: already on the right plan, we'll tell them that. Once
- 23:00Speaker 2: they enroll in a plan, we are there 24-7, 365
- 23:03Speaker 2: days a year. We have a full, what we call
- 23:05Speaker 2: our member advocate team, which helps people find doctors who
- 23:09Speaker 2: are in network, get lower price prescriptions, appeal bills and claims,
- 23:14Speaker 2: understand their Medicare benefits, and really just answer any question
- 23:18Speaker 2: they have. Our job is really to be the layer
- 23:20Speaker 2: between them and the insurance carrier, because frankly, insurance carriers
- 23:23Speaker 2: aren't that much fun to deal with. So we offer
- 23:27Speaker 2: that sort of layer of support in between.
- 23:29Speaker 1: Is the individual paying that or is that part of
- 23:32Speaker 1: your process? B structure, the commission you're getting or.
- 23:36Speaker 2: A lot of it, yeah. So we never charge the
- 23:38Speaker 2: individual for our services. The way we earn revenue and
- 23:40Speaker 2: build a business is we do earn revenue from the
- 23:42Speaker 2: insurance carrier, like other Medicare advisors. But one of the
- 23:46Speaker 2: many things that's unique about our model is we blind
- 23:49Speaker 2: all of that information from our team and our team's
- 23:51Speaker 2: compensation doesn't vary. So what that means is we will
- 23:54Speaker 2: still enroll you in a Medicare plan, even if we
- 23:57Speaker 2: are nothing on that plan. And the amount we pay
- 24:01Speaker 2: our Medicare advisors does not vary.
- 24:03Speaker 1: On average, how many Medicare plans are you guys, are
- 24:08Speaker 1: they paying to be part of chapter and how many
- 24:10Speaker 1: Medicare plans that you might guide people in where you're
- 24:14Speaker 1: not getting compensated? Is this? 50% of the market, 20%
- 24:17Speaker 1: of the market, 75%, you sure I'm asking?
- 24:19Speaker 2: Yeah, it's very, it actually, it actually varies a lot
- 24:22Speaker 2: based on month because different plans are commissionable or non-commissionable.
- 24:25Speaker 2: We get more contracts with more plans, but between 60
- 24:28Speaker 2: and 90% of people we support, we earn revenue on
- 24:33Speaker 2: depending on the month. So sometimes as low as 60%,
- 24:35Speaker 2: sometimes as much as 90%.
- 24:37Speaker 1: You know, there's plenty of, a cynic is going to
- 24:39Speaker 1: hear that like, I'm sure they're always guiding into wherever
- 24:41Speaker 1: they get a commission. Yeah. And that's just, it's, it's, but,
- 24:46Speaker 1: If when you say, it's interesting, you said the Medicare
- 24:52Speaker 1: Advantage plans, that sounds like they're the most aggressive at
- 24:57Speaker 1: trying to get people into their plans. That's right. Why
- 25:00Speaker 1: is that? Why do you think they don't, you know,
- 25:03Speaker 1: because Medigap is something you do with the government, right?
- 25:06Speaker 2: Medigap is also administered by these private insurance carriers. So
- 25:10Speaker 2: there are- Why.
- 25:11Speaker 1: Do they not like it? They just get more profit
- 25:13Speaker 1: off of Medicare Advantage?
- 25:14Speaker 2: Yeah, it's not that they don't like it. It's that
- 25:16Speaker 2: a Medicare Advantage plan tends to be more profitable than
- 25:19Speaker 2: a Medicare supplement plan to the insurance carrier, which, if
- 25:23Speaker 2: you think about insurance, means that it should be the
- 25:26Speaker 2: inverse to the customer, that a Medicare supplement plan should
- 25:29Speaker 2: be more profitable to the customer because it's a zero-sum game.
- 25:32Speaker 2: There's a fixed number of dollars. And so if the
- 25:35Speaker 2: plan is making more, the customer is making less. So
- 25:38Speaker 2: that's one. It's not strictly correct, but that's one directional
- 25:40Speaker 2: way to think about it. But yeah, broadly, Medicare Advantage
- 25:45Speaker 2: carrier is making more money on a plan than a
- 25:48Speaker 2: Medigap carrier is making on a plan. And so Medicare
- 25:51Speaker 2: Advantage plans pay more to the distribute what they would
- 25:55Speaker 2: consider to user acquisition or marketing of which Medicare advisors
- 26:01Speaker 2: are part to get that to work.
- 26:05Speaker 1: You know, in your, and I know in these days,
- 26:09Speaker 1: Being bipartisan, I don't know if that's a good thing
- 26:11Speaker 1: or a bad thing. It depends on the person, right?
- 26:13Speaker 1: Like the way people feel about politicians in general. But
- 26:16Speaker 1: you've got, whether it's Donna Shalala Al Gore on the left, J.D. Vance,
- 26:23Speaker 1: I think Peter Thiel was a founder. Is that bipartisanship,
- 26:30Speaker 1: I mean, you guys believe it's a feature. Is that
- 26:33Speaker 1: helpful to you? Or do you wish you had less
- 26:35Speaker 1: politicians involved?
- 26:37Speaker 2: We actually never had any intention of having politicians involved.
- 26:42Speaker 2: It was pure happenstance. So the backstory is Vivek Ramaswamy,
- 26:47Speaker 2: who's now a prominent Republican.
- 26:48Speaker 1: I forgot about Ramaswamy.
- 26:49Speaker 2: Yes. Yes.
- 26:51Speaker 1: A co-founder as well, right? Was he a full co-founder?
- 26:53Speaker 2: Yeah. He was a full co-founder. Peter was not. I
- 26:56Speaker 2: became very good friends with Vivek well before he ever
- 26:59Speaker 2: entered politics. He was just a successful entrepreneur. He founded
- 27:01Speaker 2: a very successful public biopharma company called Roivant, which is
- 27:05Speaker 2: a very good company. We had just gotten connected via
- 27:09Speaker 2: mutual friend because that person knew we were both interested
- 27:11Speaker 2: in helping older Americans. And so we just started getting
- 27:14Speaker 2: to know each other, became very good friends, started working
- 27:18Speaker 2: on the idea of chapter together. And then a few
- 27:21Speaker 2: years later, a couple of years later, he decided to
- 27:24Speaker 2: run for office, but that was never the context under
- 27:28Speaker 2: which we started working together, got to know each other. Similarly,
- 27:31Speaker 2: for JD, JD was a professional investor for a decade
- 27:35Speaker 2: before he entered politics as a senator in Ohio. He
- 27:39Speaker 2: was really interested in chapter actually because he grew up
- 27:41Speaker 2: largely reliant on his community on Medicaid. He cared a
- 27:45Speaker 2: lot about Medicare and Medicaid. When he was a senator,
- 27:47Speaker 2: he actually was very supportive of both programs. And so, again,
- 27:53Speaker 2: I met him under the context of him being a
- 27:55Speaker 2: professional investor. He was never a politician. Both of them
- 27:58Speaker 2: happened to be prominent politicians. One, the vice president, of course, today.
- 28:03Speaker 2: But that just sort of happened. It was never intentional.
- 28:06Speaker 2: And then similarly, We met Al Gore under the context
- 28:11Speaker 2: of him being a professional investor. He hasn't been in
- 28:13Speaker 2: politics in a very long time. Donna, of course, it's
- 28:17Speaker 2: political because she was the Secretary of Health, but again,
- 28:19Speaker 2: it was under the context of her being one of
- 28:21Speaker 2: the foremost experts of Medicare because she actually ran the
- 28:25Speaker 2: Medicare program for a very long time, for eight years
- 28:27Speaker 2: under Clinton. It was more just we got to know
- 28:31Speaker 2: people who were excited by our mission and excited by
- 28:33Speaker 2: what we're doing. and less about the politics, I think
- 28:37Speaker 2: it has actually been quite helpful to have people on
- 28:40Speaker 2: both sides of the aisle because Medicare is inherently a
- 28:45Speaker 2: government program, which even though it's, I'd say, nonpartisan, bipartisan,
- 28:49Speaker 2: everyone supports it, there are political components to it. And
- 28:55Speaker 2: in order to get anything passed, if we want to
- 28:57Speaker 2: pass any regulations, it does have to go through Congress.
- 28:59Speaker 2: So that's been helpful.
- 29:01Speaker 1: Do you guys have lobbyists or do you use a
- 29:03Speaker 1: trade association?
- 29:06Speaker 2: Sort of neither. So for the first four years, all
- 29:11Speaker 2: government engagement, I did just myself. I reached out to
- 29:16Speaker 2: Congress members. I cold emailed people.
- 29:18Speaker 1: I got- You had sort of been working on government
- 29:21Speaker 1: contracts in the past. You felt pretty familiar with the process.
- 29:24Speaker 2: Yes. Yes. When I was at Palantir, again, I've never
- 29:27Speaker 2: been a lobbyist as a technical legal term. I've never
- 29:30Speaker 2: been a lobbyist. I've never technically lobbied, I don't think.
- 29:35Speaker 2: I've spent a lot of time with legislators, with federal government.
- 29:39Speaker 2: I felt pretty good about how to engage with them
- 29:41Speaker 2: and how to educate them. I was very fortunate to
- 29:44Speaker 2: be invited to testify at the Senate in 2023. At
- 29:47Speaker 2: the Senate Finance Committee, they were doing a hearing on
- 29:50Speaker 2: how to improve Medicare marketing for seniors. And so that
- 29:53Speaker 2: was a really cool life experience to be able to
- 29:55Speaker 2: testify in front of the Senate. But the past year,
- 30:00Speaker 2: I've been leaning on some more additional support as we've
- 30:03Speaker 2: been trying to expand the messaging and get more pro-consumer
- 30:08Speaker 2: regulations in front of Congress members.
- 30:11Speaker 1: Are you only focused on Medicare or are you... Do
- 30:16Speaker 1: you plan to expand into the regular health insurance system,
- 30:21Speaker 1: the portals, healthcare.gov, even Medicaid and any of that?
- 30:26Speaker 2: Our vision as a company has always been from day
- 30:29Speaker 2: one to help older Americans live the best chapter of
- 30:33Speaker 2: their lives of retirement. And so we want to redefine
- 30:36Speaker 2: what it means to be older, what it means to
- 30:37Speaker 2: be retired in this country. And I think healthcare and
- 30:42Speaker 2: health insurance is a really important part of that, but
- 30:44Speaker 2: it's not the only part.
- 30:45Speaker 1: So if you expand, you're not expanding in healthcare. You're expanding,
- 30:50Speaker 1: sticking with the same demographic group, not to sort of,
- 30:53Speaker 1: you know, it's like there are two directions your business
- 30:56Speaker 1: plan could have gone, right? One would have been the
- 30:59Speaker 1: entire healthcare system, insurance system, and you could have gone
- 31:02Speaker 1: in different directions. You've decided to stick to, we're going
- 31:07Speaker 1: to be an organization for seniors. And so maybe you
- 31:10Speaker 1: end up getting into life insurance or fiduciary or things
- 31:13Speaker 1: like that. Is that what you're thinking?
- 31:16Speaker 2: The first part, yes. Our goal is to help seniors,
- 31:18Speaker 2: and we think about how do we earn the right
- 31:20Speaker 2: to help people with more and more aspects of their lives.
- 31:24Speaker 2: I don't particularly want to sell insurance. We only sell
- 31:28Speaker 2: Medicare because it's so important. I think, frankly, most people
- 31:32Speaker 2: who are buying life insurance should probably buy it before
- 31:34Speaker 2: their 60s. Otherwise, it's not necessarily... a good product to buy.
- 31:38Speaker 2: I don't know that we want to go selling life insurance,
- 31:40Speaker 2: but more specifically, we do want to help people with
- 31:43Speaker 2: their finances. We will be rolling out a product later
- 31:46Speaker 2: this year actually to monitor people's health expenses and tell
- 31:49Speaker 2: them when they're being overpaid. Because we know everything about
- 31:52Speaker 2: your health insurance, about your Medicare, we can tell you,
- 31:54Speaker 2: are you being charged the in-network copay as opposed to
- 31:58Speaker 2: the out-of-network copay? Are you being charged the right amount
- 32:01Speaker 2: from your doctor and from your health insurance carrier? Starting
- 32:03Speaker 2: to monitor people's expenses to save them money. That type
- 32:06Speaker 2: of thing I'm very excited about.
- 32:09Speaker 1: I think about, you know, being with the entrepreneurial myself
- 32:15Speaker 1: in different areas, you always think, okay, who could disrupt
- 32:19Speaker 1: my business? And it feels to me your only challenge
- 32:23Speaker 1: is the federal government, right? I guess medicare.gov, in theory,
- 32:28Speaker 1: could offer the services you offer. It just sounds like
- 32:34Speaker 1: you think, well, Maybe they'll eventually figure this out. But
- 32:38Speaker 1: for a good 10 to 15, maybe 20 years, this
- 32:40Speaker 1: is going to be a good business.
- 32:42Speaker 2: Frankly, if the government is my main competition, I feel great.
- 32:48Speaker 1: And is that how you view it? Or do you
- 32:50Speaker 1: right now as you're- It's not. I don't think you
- 32:54Speaker 1: can be a successful, run a good business if you
- 32:56Speaker 1: don't measure yourself against. So I always love to ask
- 32:59Speaker 1: this question. Who do you measure yourself against?
- 33:02Speaker 2: I appreciate that question. So to answer the first part,
- 33:04Speaker 2: I don't view myself in competition with the government at all.
- 33:10Speaker 2: Even if the government had better technology, there will be
- 33:12Speaker 2: at least 50% of Americans who don't trust, unfortunately, who
- 33:15Speaker 2: don't trust the government.
- 33:16Speaker 1: You're right. No matter what, they want some third-party verifier.
- 33:19Speaker 1: You're 100% correct.
- 33:21Speaker 2: I don't view it as competition. I view it as, hopefully, complementary.
- 33:27Speaker 2: We don't view ourselves, alluding to it as really a
- 33:29Speaker 2: Medicare company, we view ourselves as a technology company that
- 33:32Speaker 2: builds great products to help redefine retirement. When we think
- 33:35Speaker 2: about that, we're thinking about how do we build the
- 33:38Speaker 2: best technology? I think about the best technology companies. How
- 33:44Speaker 2: do we build great products that people love, like Apple?
- 33:47Speaker 2: How do we build great AI products, like some of
- 33:50Speaker 2: the AI labs? How do we build great applications of AI,
- 33:53Speaker 2: like some of the verticalized application companies that are building
- 34:00Speaker 2: really good products? That's more how we think of ourselves.
- 34:03Speaker 2: To your point, though, it's a very strange moment we're in.
- 34:07Speaker 2: When I started the company, as happens in any investor-backed category,
- 34:12Speaker 2: there were a lot of other companies that from the
- 34:14Speaker 2: outside looked pretty similar to us. There were seven or
- 34:16Speaker 2: eight other venture-backed companies trying to revamp Medicare. or the
- 34:20Speaker 2: Medicare process. We're kind of the only one that exists
- 34:23Speaker 2: today of those 78. They've all gone out of business.
- 34:26Speaker 2: And so in a lot of ways, we don't really
- 34:30Speaker 2: have competition today, at least in our core sort of
- 34:33Speaker 2: what we do, which is strange.
- 34:35Speaker 1: What do you think the failure was of those other businesses?
- 34:37Speaker 1: They were just technologically behind.
- 34:40Speaker 2: There's a number of different aspects and obviously I wasn't there,
- 34:44Speaker 2: so it's- Oh, of course. But my hypothesis is there
- 34:47Speaker 2: are two things. One is it's a very hard business
- 34:49Speaker 2: to execute well. It's just very hard from a data perspective,
- 34:54Speaker 2: from an insurance carrier relation perspective, from a user acquisition perspective,
- 34:57Speaker 2: it's very hard to execute. And so execution is one component.
- 34:59Speaker 2: And then the other component is Because my background in
- 35:03Speaker 2: data and technology, I think I understand the value of
- 35:05Speaker 2: having accurate data and how much that affects people's interaction
- 35:10Speaker 2: with the company. Most of these other companies really just
- 35:13Speaker 2: tried to make the user interface a little bit better
- 35:15Speaker 2: without fixing the underlying data challenges and the underlying incentive challenges.
- 35:19Speaker 2: So I think we solved a lot of the actual
- 35:22Speaker 2: foundational issues that other people either weren't aware of or
- 35:25Speaker 2: couldn't solve.
- 35:26Speaker 1: All right. So you have a unique perspective. And you
- 35:30Speaker 1: have a unique insight on this sort of, you know,
- 35:34Speaker 1: we have this quasi public private health care relationship, health
- 35:38Speaker 1: insurance relationship in this country. Right. It's always ours is different.
- 35:43Speaker 1: Wave a magic wand. If you were starting this from scratch,
- 35:47Speaker 1: what would it look like? Is there anything out there
- 35:50Speaker 1: that's familiar today that you'd be like, you know, this
- 35:53Speaker 1: model would if we had only started it this way,
- 35:56Speaker 1: we'd be in a better place.
- 35:59Speaker 2: It's really hard to come up with a perfect healthcare
- 36:02Speaker 2: system for the US. Other countries have in many ways
- 36:06Speaker 2: more effective healthcare systems, but it's largely because they're much
- 36:09Speaker 2: more homogenous. They're much smaller. And homogeneity matters when you're
- 36:15Speaker 2: dealing with healthcare because there are genetic correlations that affect
- 36:20Speaker 2: the type of care people need.
- 36:22Speaker 1: We're not an ethnic-based nation. We're an idea. So it
- 36:25Speaker 1: means we've got the whole world's DNA in our country.
- 36:29Speaker 1: in a way that no other country has this much
- 36:31Speaker 1: different DNA in it than ours.
- 36:33Speaker 2: Which is a beautiful thing for our country, but a
- 36:35Speaker 2: very hard thing for our health system to deal with.
- 36:38Speaker 2: I do think there are a couple of core principles
- 36:40Speaker 2: that if we implemented would make our system 100X better.
- 36:45Speaker 2: One is today there's no longitudinal incentive for an insurance
- 36:49Speaker 2: carrier to proactively keep us healthy. What I mean by
- 36:53Speaker 2: that is If you're.
- 36:54Speaker 1: On- They make more money when we use the system.
- 36:57Speaker 1: They don't make more money when we don't.
- 36:59Speaker 2: Exactly. And so how do we flip that incentive? And
- 37:01Speaker 2: not only that, but- I am going to be, you know,
- 37:04Speaker 2: I'm employed by chapter. I get my health insurance through chapter.
- 37:09Speaker 2: Chapter may switch its health insurance carrier next year. So
- 37:13Speaker 2: all of chapter's employees may go from insurance carrier A
- 37:16Speaker 2: to insurance carrier B. So why should insurance carrier A
- 37:19Speaker 2: think about how healthy I'm going to be in 10 years?
- 37:21Speaker 2: They only care about how healthy I'm going to be
- 37:23Speaker 2: when I'm covered by them, when I can make money
- 37:24Speaker 2: by them, right? Similar for Medicare. Again, it depends on
- 37:29Speaker 2: the type of Medicare and the specifics, but many people
- 37:31Speaker 2: switch their plan every year. And so if you are
- 37:34Speaker 2: switching your plan every year, why should an insurance care
- 37:37Speaker 2: care about your health in 15 or 20 years? And
- 37:40Speaker 2: that's a rational response. I'm not blaming the insurance carriers,
- 37:43Speaker 2: it's actually rational.
- 37:44Speaker 1: No, I was just gonna say, right, this is logic, right?
- 37:47Speaker 1: It's human.
- 37:48Speaker 2: And so what I would love to see is some
- 37:51Speaker 2: type of longitudinal incentive. And I think there's a lot
- 37:55Speaker 2: of ways that could be implemented, but one way is
- 37:58Speaker 2: you basically have a reinsurance carrier, who is basically, it
- 38:04Speaker 2: would have to be government facilitated in some way because
- 38:07Speaker 2: they'd have to be with you for at least 30 years.
- 38:09Speaker 2: I'd say you get assigned a reinsurance carrier who's with
- 38:13Speaker 2: you from, I don't know, 18 to until you pass
- 38:18Speaker 2: away or something like that, where they actually are compensated
- 38:22Speaker 2: and are incentivized to improve your health over the long term.
- 38:28Speaker 1: It's almost like they get paid more the longer we live. Exactly, exactly.
- 38:32Speaker 2: Or they get paid for preventative care or, you know,
- 38:36Speaker 2: there's a lot of ways to, and the details matter
- 38:38Speaker 2: a lot and are hard to pontificate on in abstract,
- 38:41Speaker 2: but I think that concept would dramatically improve.
- 38:45Speaker 1: I mean, we sort of dabbled in it with the smoking, right?
- 38:51Speaker 1: If you're a smoker, you get charged more. And I
- 38:55Speaker 1: guess in the law, we decided that was okay to
- 38:57Speaker 1: do that, right? There was always some, You know, it is,
- 39:01Speaker 1: you know, the obviously the big fight during Obamacare was, OK,
- 39:04Speaker 1: if you're going to cover preexisting conditions and make it
- 39:07Speaker 1: sort of a neutral deal, a healthier person doesn't get
- 39:12Speaker 1: to pay less.
- 39:13Speaker 2: Right.
- 39:13Speaker 1: You're in this larger pool. And, you know, if you don't,
- 39:19Speaker 1: as we've all learned, if you don't do it that way,
- 39:21Speaker 1: you know, you basically disincentivize insurance companies from helping unhealthy people.
- 39:26Speaker 2: Right.
- 39:26Speaker 1: Yes.
- 39:27Speaker 2: Yes, the second element, which actually is in health related,
- 39:31Speaker 2: so much of our health is determined by our food
- 39:34Speaker 2: and our food quality is so much worse than most
- 39:38Speaker 2: other developed countries. And so I just think if we
- 39:41Speaker 2: had better food and it were more cost-effective to buy
- 39:45Speaker 2: good food, to me, it's always been crazy that if
- 39:47Speaker 2: I want to buy just... Lettuce, like good quality lettuce
- 39:52Speaker 2: or good quality apples that is more expensive than buying
- 39:56Speaker 2: a hamburger.
- 39:57Speaker 1: Right. In theory, had more people had to do work
- 40:03Speaker 1: to create that hamburger, there was more, you know, whether
- 40:06Speaker 1: it's the right processes to create the hamburger than there
- 40:10Speaker 1: is to create the apple. And yet the apple, you know,
- 40:14Speaker 1: fresh apples can be as expensive as a McDonald's hamburger.
- 40:18Speaker 2: Exactly. And so I think we need better quality food
- 40:21Speaker 2: that's more affordable. And again, it's rational that especially people
- 40:26Speaker 2: who have less income are relying on cheaper food, and
- 40:30Speaker 2: that cheaper food is predominantly not healthy. And so I
- 40:33Speaker 2: think if we could fix a lot of our food
- 40:36Speaker 2: supply and food economics, it would also dramatically improve the
- 40:38Speaker 2: health of this country.
- 40:40Speaker 1: So 10 years ago, when you were learning, when you
- 40:44Speaker 1: got to Silicon Valley, you started Did you think you
- 40:47Speaker 1: were going to be in the healthcare space?
- 40:49Speaker 2: I did not, I still often don't think of ourselves
- 40:53Speaker 2: in the healthcare space. Obviously we interact with health insurance carriers,
- 40:55Speaker 2: but so much of what we do is we think
- 40:58Speaker 2: about the world so differently than anyone who has grown up,
- 41:01Speaker 2: so to speak, in healthcare. But no, I didn't expect
- 41:05Speaker 2: us to, I didn't expect myself to be here. As
- 41:08Speaker 2: you alluded to, it's always kind of funny to think
- 41:10Speaker 2: about the current vice president as someone that was involved
- 41:15Speaker 2: with the company, a former vice president, someone who was
- 41:17Speaker 2: involved with the company. Sure. Yeah. Yeah.
- 41:20Speaker 1: These were a lot of vice presidents. Yeah.
- 41:22Speaker 2: Yeah. We'll see if we can get some more.
- 41:25Speaker 1: We'll find out what Kamala Harris is up to.
- 41:28Speaker 2: Right.
- 41:29Speaker 1: Exactly. And all that stuff. Well, look, I am full disclosure.
- 41:36Speaker 1: You guys are a sponsor. Your sponsor. Also, my partner
- 41:39Speaker 1: on Super Tuesdays, Chris Eliza. And so, look, I think
- 41:44Speaker 1: these conversations are. are useful, they're helpful, and I want
- 41:48Speaker 1: to make them sort of where people learn something. I
- 41:51Speaker 1: appreciate that. I appreciate that you were comfortable and forthcoming
- 41:55Speaker 1: talking about all this.
- 41:57Speaker 2: Of course. Thanks so much for having me.