Latest / The Morning Edition / One Nation’s newest donors, and why they want to remain secret
Transcript
- 0:00S1: Virginia Giuffre helped vanquish a prince and a millionaire.
- 0:04S2: And I won't stop fighting. I will never be silenced.
- 0:07S1: But one of her toughest battles was a very private one.
- 0:11S3: It was the worst thing that could have happened to her.
- 0:13S3: Her children were her life.
- 0:18S1: Virginia, a podcast from the newsrooms of the age, The
- 0:21S1: Sydney Morning Herald and WA today, out now.
- 0:29S4: Can you all sound like bulldozers, please? Girl.
- 0:37S5: Some of you may have seen a memorable video of
- 0:40S5: Australia's richest person, Gina Rinehart, celebrating Pauline Hanson at a
- 0:45S5: Bush summit last month.
- 0:47S4: Pauline, may I invite you to the stage quickly, please, Ben,
- 0:50S4: come and help me with the.
- 0:52S5: Rinehart had gifted the leader of One Nation an orange
- 0:55S5: toy bulldozer to symbolise. It seemed a hope that Hanson
- 0:59S5: will cut through bureaucracy.
- 1:01S4: We actually need a beautiful big, fat. Where is it?
- 1:06S4: It's coming. We need an orange bulldozer. Let's hear the noise, girl.
- 1:16S5: But Gina Rinehart is just one of several mega-rich donors
- 1:20S5: who are flocking to the far right political party. I'm
- 1:24S5: Samantha Zellinger Maurice, and you're listening to The Morning Edition
- 1:27S5: from The Age and the Sydney Morning Herald. Today, senior
- 1:30S5: reporter Sarah Danckert on the donations that are flooding to
- 1:34S5: One Nation ahead of the state election in Victoria and
- 1:38S5: what donors are expecting in return. Welcome, Sarah, back to
- 1:46S5: the podcast.
- 1:47S6: Thanks, Sam.
- 1:49S5: Now, you've written that ahead of the Victorian state election
- 1:52S5: in November, One Nation has been absolutely scooping up donations
- 1:56S5: from people who previously only donated to the Liberal Party.
- 2:00S5: So can you just give the listeners an idea of
- 2:03S5: who these people are and also what's driving this shift?
- 2:07S6: Yeah, it's it's, it's a really interesting shift. And it's
- 2:09S6: certainly a situation that's got, um, the state Liberal Party
- 2:13S6: in a bit of a flat panic. This was not a,
- 2:15S6: you know, a small aside, this is a very much
- 2:18S6: a trend and it's a trend you're seeing in the,
- 2:20S6: in the polling where you can see the increase of
- 2:23S6: support or proposed support that they've got. In this case,
- 2:27S6: Melbourne's private property developers are leading the charge. Now, Victoria
- 2:31S6: is unlike other states, Victoria doesn't ban or limit donations
- 2:36S6: by property developers, whereas they do in New South Wales.
- 2:39S6: So if you're listening in New South Wales, you might
- 2:41S6: find that a really unusual thing to hear. But in
- 2:45S6: the great state of Victoria, things are done a little
- 2:47S6: bit differently. So it's Melbourne's private property developers. And of course,
- 2:50S6: the city is synonymous with some big private property developers.
- 2:54S6: These are you're ultra wealthy types. Um, and they're promising
- 2:59S6: huge sums in return for advocacy. And on the other side,
- 3:02S6: there's also entrepreneurs and they're looking for changes to red tape, which,
- 3:07S6: you know, that's sort of what conservative politics often is
- 3:10S6: about removal of red tape, removal of green tape.
- 3:13S5: And specifically, these are people who in previous times would
- 3:16S5: have ordinarily donated to the Liberal Party. Is that right?
- 3:19S6: Yeah, absolutely. So these are rusted on liberal donors. These
- 3:22S6: are people who, in the past, the Liberal Party could
- 3:25S6: rely on for significant donations. These were sort of their
- 3:29S6: true blue bloods as they as they like to be known. Interestingly,
- 3:34S6: not all are giving up their memberships to the Liberal Party,
- 3:37S6: and some are also splitting their donations. So some are saying, well,
- 3:41S6: you know, if I used to give X amount, I
- 3:43S6: will split that and I'll give a little bit to
- 3:45S6: the Liberals and I'll give some to one nation because
- 3:49S6: I want two irons in the fire. I want double
- 3:52S6: the advocacy, double the fun.
- 3:54S5: Ah, you're right, double the fun. Okay. You might call
- 3:56S5: it that. And so I guess give. Give us some
- 3:59S5: names here. Like, who are we talking about and what
- 4:01S5: is driving their move from being, you know, rusted on
- 4:04S5: liberal supporters. And again, like you say, they may still
- 4:07S5: be supporting Liberal Party, but they're you know, they used
- 4:09S5: to support the Liberal Party with their donations, and now
- 4:12S5: they're sort of splitting some or all to one nation.
- 4:15S5: So who are they and why are they doing it?
- 4:17S6: Yeah. So on a state level, we haven't really outed
- 4:21S6: these donors yet. And we can get to sort of,
- 4:23S6: I guess, why. One of the reasons why is that
- 4:26S6: there's still a level of shame of One Nation donating shame.
- 4:31S6: There's also people don't want to be questioned about their donation.
- 4:35S6: So a long time ago, 2016, it's probably not that
- 4:39S6: long for many people. Um, but 2016, in the federal election,
- 4:43S6: a Melbourne property developer called Bill McNee made a made
- 4:46S6: a donation. He actually donated a plane long before Jeana
- 4:48S6: donated a plane to the party. It's not a new idea, Jeana.
- 4:51S6: So Bill McNee donated a plane and some other cash,
- 4:54S6: and there were scores of articles written about Bill McNair's donation,
- 4:58S6: and he was asked everywhere he went about his donation.
- 5:02S6: And Bill McNair, of course, is one of our most
- 5:04S6: reclusive property developers. You know, he lives in a $50
- 5:07S6: million mansion in Toorak, and I'm sure a lot of
- 5:10S6: people around the country would go, bill who? Um, and
- 5:13S6: until he'd made his One Nation donation, he was largely unknown,
- 5:17S6: despite being incredibly wealthy and successful. So some of the
- 5:20S6: names aren't coming out. We do know that federally. Of course,
- 5:24S6: we've seen Gina Rinehart of Hancock Prospecting and of course,
- 5:28S6: stockbroker Angus Aitken. He's a sydneysider. Um, and he is
- 5:33S6: previously donated to the Liberals as well, but he's also
- 5:36S6: donated to Advance Australia. And he has a view on,
- 5:40S6: I guess, very much a business view in donating. It
- 5:44S6: is about red tape. It is about work from home, um,
- 5:48S6: for people he knows and other people in that group federally,
- 5:52S6: some of the changes to youth wages have really upset
- 5:55S6: some business owners. So that's where previously you could pay
- 5:58S6: 16 year old a lot less than than a 22
- 6:00S6: year old. Um, and, and some people are quite upset
- 6:04S6: about those changes there. So it seems like it's small beer,
- 6:07S6: but you can actually see this bleeding into some of
- 6:10S6: the national policy positions already. You can see it shaping
- 6:13S6: up as to what one nation will be in Victoria.
- 6:16S6: And it's going to be not just a party based
- 6:19S6: on migration and migration policy, but a party based on
- 6:23S6: very what would be, quote unquote, traditional liberal values or
- 6:28S6: conservative liberal values, which is, you know, lowering the amount
- 6:32S6: of regulation. Uh, you know, and that's what they say,
- 6:35S6: the red tape, green tape, that's the, that's the sort
- 6:38S6: of main push.
- 6:40S5: And I've got to ask you something that you mentioned earlier,
- 6:43S5: which is so interesting because you mentioned shame there in
- 6:46S5: terms of people perhaps not wanting to disclose that they've
- 6:49S5: donated to One Nation out of shame. Now, presumably you've
- 6:52S5: spoken to some of these state based property developers or
- 6:55S5: the people around them. So why did they say they donated?
- 6:58S6: Because they want so specifically they want the taxes changed.
- 7:02S6: So their main interest is a lot of these property taxes.
- 7:05S6: The Victorian government's been pretty cash strapped, been looking to
- 7:08S6: raise money and it sort of found a tax for everything.
- 7:11S6: Um and particularly vacant property taxes. And they want more advocacy,
- 7:18S6: a greater amount of advocacy on these on these what
- 7:20S6: we would see as a niche topic. But for these people,
- 7:23S6: if they spend their business buying up vacant property sites
- 7:27S6: to do developments in the two years they're holding that site,
- 7:30S6: they're now getting charged taxes. And they feel as though
- 7:33S6: and this has got to do with as much as
- 7:36S6: it's got to do with with opposing the incumbent state government,
- 7:39S6: the Labor Party's policy on taxes, it's actually to do
- 7:43S6: with the fissure within the Liberal Party, because you've got
- 7:45S6: to remember, these are liberal donors and they're moving to
- 7:47S6: one nation. So in Victoria, We've got a more moderate
- 7:51S6: leadership for the Liberal Party. Jess Wilson is much more
- 7:54S6: progressive on a lot of issues and sort of much
- 7:57S6: more if it doesn't need fixing. I'm not really going
- 8:00S6: to focus on approach. And a great example is the
- 8:04S6: work from home policy.
- 8:05S5: And so can you just break it down just briefly
- 8:08S5: for those who've forgotten, you know, specifically what the working
- 8:10S5: from home policy is that that some are so concerned about.
- 8:14S6: Yeah. So in the state of Victoria, they plan to
- 8:16S6: mandate working from home two days a week. This will shift, um,
- 8:21S6: all sorts of companies into a situation where staff will
- 8:25S6: be able to say, well, as a minimum, I can
- 8:27S6: work from two days a week from home. And there's
- 8:31S6: a whole lot of business owners in Victoria that are really,
- 8:34S6: really upset about the work from home policy. And then
- 8:38S6: you've got a Liberal Party that has got that much
- 8:40S6: lower on their to do list because they're worried about
- 8:45S6: losing votes if they say they oppose the work from
- 8:48S6: home policy because it's really, really popular in some areas
- 8:52S6: and it's particularly popular with working women. And that's a
- 8:55S6: great example of where the shame comes from. Some of
- 8:57S6: the shame is not necessarily associated with one nation's larger policies,
- 9:01S6: of course, which they're synonymous for are i.e. monoculture or migration.
- 9:07S6: Some of it is the bosses don't want their workers
- 9:10S6: to know yet unless they're successful, that they've had any
- 9:15S6: role in funding the the dismantling of this work from
- 9:19S6: home policy. So my shame it's to do with not
- 9:23S6: wanting to be associated with as much as the what
- 9:27S6: they're advocating for, because it is pretty contentious issues. But also,
- 9:31S6: I think the Bill McNee example is a great example.
- 9:35S6: You know, Bill did donate. And, you know, in the end,
- 9:38S6: he said that he would never donate to the party
- 9:40S6: again simply because of the media attention he received. But,
- 9:43S6: you know, people don't want lists written about everybody who's
- 9:46S6: donated to One nation. Just like, you know, people cringe
- 9:49S6: when we do up lists of who donates to the
- 9:51S6: mayor and stuff like that.
- 9:54S5: But this brings me to the next question, because all
- 9:56S5: this influx of cash, though, that One Nation is getting,
- 9:58S5: is raising questions about how and where One Nation is
- 10:02S5: receiving its donations for the state campaign. So tell us
- 10:05S5: a bit about that.
- 10:06S6: So so far, they've only received two donations, at least
- 10:10S6: according to the live database. So they've received two donations
- 10:15S6: in the last 6 to 12 months. It's $6,239. It's
- 10:20S6: not a huge amount of money. But the thing is,
- 10:23S6: is that it's a very complex, dangerously complex situation. And
- 10:29S6: that's because there's been a bit of an issue with
- 10:31S6: Victoria's donation laws. So we had a situation where the
- 10:38S6: state government tried to bring in um caps, and those
- 10:43S6: caps were challenged, and that went all the way to
- 10:45S6: the High Court, and that placed the State of Victoria
- 10:48S6: into a basically a state of abeyance in terms of
- 10:51S6: donation disclosures.
- 10:53S7: Dodgy rigged laws. They would rather have no rules at all.
- 10:58S7: They couldn't organise a chook raffle in a pub. The
- 11:00S7: major parties trading blows over the rush on new rules
- 11:04S7: around political donations required after the High Court threw out
- 11:09S7: Labor's last version because it wasn't fair. Would it be
- 11:13S7: concerned for for One Nation if donations are capped?
- 11:16S8: No, not at all.
- 11:17S6: There'll be a queue of donations waiting to be declared,
- 11:20S6: because one minute they were saying the cap was this amount,
- 11:23S6: the next minute the cap was going to be that amount.
- 11:25S6: So people have been holding off on actually making the
- 11:29S6: donations until there was clarity around this figure. There is
- 11:35S6: now clarity, so to speak. Ah, you know, the government's
- 11:39S6: managed to reach a deal where they'll be able to
- 11:42S6: cap donations at something incredibly low, like $5,030. But there's
- 11:47S6: still a huge amount of problems with how, as you
- 11:51S6: pointed out, how it's going to be disclosed. There's been
- 11:53S6: a lot of ambiguity. And then there's also been strange conduct.
- 11:57S6: So we saw Chip Le Grand reported for the age, um,
- 12:01S6: that the PM by election candidate Darren Hercus in a
- 12:04S6: by election down in one of our key seats. Chip
- 12:07S6: reported that Darren was instructed to use his personal bank
- 12:11S6: account to receive donations. Now, the party strongly denied that
- 12:15S6: those allegations because that's illegal. And so we don't have
- 12:19S6: a huge amount of clarity as to whether they have
- 12:21S6: a state campaign account. And that would be where the
- 12:23S6: money would be received through there. Um, we've got candidates
- 12:27S6: saying that they would also be able to bring in
- 12:30S6: their own donations. And so there's a lot of ambiguity
- 12:36S6: over this. And without being unkind to One Nation, it's
- 12:39S6: a party that has had a history and issues with
- 12:43S6: keeping up with its disclosures. I think, you know, we've
- 12:47S6: seen more recently that it's been trying to ensure that
- 12:50S6: all of its paperwork is very much up to date.
- 12:52S6: It seems to be sensitive to that allegation. Um, but,
- 12:56S6: you know, we've been speaking to people throughout the week, um,
- 13:01S6: who know a lot about campaign financing and even they
- 13:05S6: concede that it's a really, uh, it's a, it's a
- 13:08S6: tough area to navigate at the moment with this high
- 13:11S6: court challenge and changes to the caps.
- 13:16S5: After the break.
- 13:17S6: They plan to announce all of their 100 candidates on
- 13:20S6: the same day as an idea that will bamboozle the media.
- 13:23S6: I also would say that I and many other journalists
- 13:26S6: accept the challenge.
- 13:32S1: Virginia Giuffre helped vanquish a prince and a millionaire.
- 13:36S2: And I won't stop fighting. I will never be silenced.
- 13:39S1: But one of her toughest battles was a very private one.
- 13:43S3: It was the worst thing that could have happened to her.
- 13:45S3: Her children were her life.
- 13:49S1: Virginia, a podcast from the newsrooms of the age, The
- 13:53S1: Sydney Morning Herald and WA today, out now.
- 14:00S5: And you've said that the donation situation in Victoria is
- 14:03S5: dangerously complex. So how is this dangerous?
- 14:06S6: Well, it's dangerously complex because if you don't declare your
- 14:10S6: your your donations properly. No, I don't mean necessarily the donors.
- 14:15S6: It's the onus is on the party, though I'm sure
- 14:18S6: that there's a certain amount of onus on the donors
- 14:20S6: as well. But, you know, the party has to declare
- 14:24S6: the reason it becomes dangerous is that not declaring some
- 14:28S6: of these donations can end up being an actual criminal offence.
- 14:31S6: And so that's why it's dangerous, you know, and certainly
- 14:36S6: we've seen this issue with the party before, and it's
- 14:38S6: an issue all parties face. It's an issue that the
- 14:41S6: from from the smallest independent to, you know, to the
- 14:45S6: the mighty ALP, with its union backing and gifts of
- 14:50S6: services from all sorts of law firms, that it's it's
- 14:53S6: dangerous because you've got to ensure that it's correct because
- 14:56S6: if you don't, it's a criminal offence. And then, of course,
- 14:58S6: there's the reputation hit that comes from that. And that
- 15:03S6: would be dangerous for one nation, because I think One
- 15:05S6: Nation is trying to put its best foot forward for
- 15:08S6: for this upcoming state election.
- 15:10S5: Yeah. And presumably if you can't manage your own party's finances,
- 15:14S5: how can you be expected to manage the country's.
- 15:16S6: Exactly. And if you're lying, and if you're caught lying
- 15:18S6: about that, or call it caught making a mistake about that,
- 15:21S6: what else are you going to make mistakes on? So it's,
- 15:23S6: it's a, it's a reputation issue as well as it being,
- 15:27S6: you know, a technical breach of the law that is
- 15:29S6: very serious.
- 15:30S5: Okay. But you have spoken to one nation's only current
- 15:33S5: Victorian representative. So what did she tell you about how
- 15:37S5: the party is handling donations.
- 15:39S6: So she was really upbeat actually, despite not being endorsed.
- 15:42S6: I've never spoken to somebody who was so positive despite being, uh,
- 15:47S6: what was it, 4 or 5 months out from election
- 15:49S6: and not being endorsed? Um, so she's told me she
- 15:52S6: was receiving a lot of support. She's got donors lining
- 15:54S6: up to give to her campaign. The other thing she's
- 15:57S6: said is that those donations are in abeyance until she's
- 16:00S6: actually elected. She said that in the past that the
- 16:04S6: party had always used a model where candidates were self-funded.
- 16:08S6: So in the past they've used that model. And Ricky
- 16:10S6: Lee was saying that they'll be moving to a model
- 16:12S6: where it's sort of a mix, where it's donations and
- 16:17S6: some self-funding or just donations. And that is an interesting
- 16:21S6: situation as well, because if that model is applied throughout
- 16:25S6: the rest of the country, it starts to become an
- 16:28S6: arms race for who can bring in the largest donors
- 16:31S6: rather than it being necessarily, um, the best man wins
- 16:35S6: or the best person wins. Now, in America, that's really common.
- 16:39S6: Of course, we all know that. You know, Donald Trump
- 16:42S6: is fabulous at raising money. So it's not that uncommon.
- 16:46S6: But it does create a situation where you've got people
- 16:50S6: lining up for safer seats, safer positions. This is a
- 16:53S6: party in the state of Victoria where no one's been endorsed,
- 16:56S6: and they want to run 100 candidates in November. So
- 17:00S6: there's going to be the upper house seats are going
- 17:02S6: to be seen to be much safer. Ricky Lee is
- 17:05S6: in one of those. But the question is, are there
- 17:07S6: other people in Bendigo? Are there other people from that
- 17:11S6: region who can bring in more donors might be more popular,
- 17:15S6: and therefore Ricky Lee's overlooked. Now, I haven't seen any
- 17:18S6: evidence that that's going to happen, but certainly it's striking
- 17:22S6: to sit to talk to a sitting member of Parliament
- 17:25S6: in July when the elections in November, and they're saying, well,
- 17:28S6: I'm not endorsed. I hope to be, but I'm not yet.
- 17:31S5: So now, is that is that an unusual situation? Because
- 17:35S5: that's that's strikes me as possibly unusual only four months
- 17:38S5: out before an election.
- 17:39S6: It is unusual for it to be this quantum. So
- 17:41S6: I think the Liberals have got some people that they've
- 17:43S6: still got to endorse for different seats. But there's also
- 17:47S6: with One Nation, it's 100 people who haven't been endorsed.
- 17:49S6: They want to run 100 candidates. I understand that they
- 17:53S6: plan to. This is what my sources have told me,
- 17:56S6: that they plan to announce all of their 100 candidates
- 17:59S6: on the same day as an idea that will bamboozle
- 18:02S6: the media. Um.
- 18:04S5: Bamboozle us? How?
- 18:06S6: Oh, there'll be so many names to go through. We
- 18:08S6: won't be able to find all the bad things about
- 18:10S6: them quickly enough.
- 18:11S5: Right. Okay.
- 18:12S6: Not that. Not that there's going to be bad things
- 18:14S6: to find about them because they've been thoroughly vetted. Um,
- 18:17S6: but yeah, that was the sort of the vibe. I
- 18:20S6: also would say that, um, I and many other journalists
- 18:24S6: accept the challenge. Yeah. Um.
- 18:27S5: You're built for this. Sarah. This is.
- 18:28S6: Yeah. And I can feel the spreadsheet getting set up already. Yeah.
- 18:32S5: That's right. And Sarah, just to wrap up, I mean,
- 18:34S5: if there is, of course, as you've written, this influx
- 18:37S5: of donations to One Nation, is there any way for
- 18:39S5: the public to find out where these donations have come
- 18:43S5: from before they cast their vote? Or is this something
- 18:45S5: that's only made public after an election?
- 18:48S6: Yeah. So this is the live. There's this live dashboard
- 18:51S6: in Victoria where ostensibly, you should be able to see
- 18:54S6: your donations so that people can get the, the transparency
- 18:58S6: that you rightly point out is, is what people want.
- 19:02S6: And also like, I guess a true democratic value, right?
- 19:05S6: You know, transparency is key to democracy. Um, but as
- 19:10S6: I said, the Victoria donation laws have been a bit wonky, um,
- 19:14S6: up to the high Court back again. So there's a
- 19:18S6: lot of doubt about whether and when those things will
- 19:20S6: get done and how much of it will get shown
- 19:23S6: before the election. You don't have to declare the donation
- 19:27S6: in the instant it's made. I think there's up to
- 19:30S6: three weeks. So if people make their donations in November.
- 19:33S6: You're not going to find out about it afterwards. And
- 19:37S6: beyond that, there's also huge ways where donations can be structured.
- 19:42S6: They can be funneled through different ways. It's not what
- 19:46S6: the law intends or not what the law wants. So
- 19:50S6: will you get the transparency you need? It'll be a
- 19:53S6: better transparency. It will be clearer, but it's not going
- 19:56S6: to be what what we expect. And so I think
- 19:59S6: we're not really going to know until after the election
- 20:02S6: who's been funding this.
- 20:06S5: Wow. Well, thank you so much, Sarah, for your time.
- 20:09S6: Thank you.
- 20:13S5: Today's episode was produced by Tammy Mills, and our podcasts
- 20:17S5: are overseen by Lisa Muxworthy and Tom McKendrick. If you
- 20:21S5: like our show, follow the Morning Edition and leave a
- 20:23S5: review for us on Apple or Spotify. Thanks for listening.