Latest / Honey Badger Radio / Honey Badger Radio targeted by Homeland Security Part 2 | Rantzerker 196

Transcript

Honey Badger Radio targeted by Homeland Security Part 2 | Rantzerker 196 · Honey Badger Radio

• 0:00
  Coming to you live from deep within a surprisingly warm, radioactive wasteland. Actually,
• 0:06
  we are the survivors of the alt right keck Apocalypse, the few,
• 0:09
  the brave, the bitchy, once more waiting into battle against the froggy lobster
• 0:15
  Homelandy securetti gloey glowey hoards. There we go. That's it, That's what
• 0:20
  I was groping for with ran Zerker number one nine six honey Badger Radio targeted
• 0:27
  by homeland Security, Part two, question Mark. I am Alison, and
• 0:32
  I am with Karen and Brian, and we are asking which one of us
• 0:40
  is the infiltrator, which it's like that video game among us? Well,
• 0:47
  it's one of us, one of us is uh it sucks, Yeah,
• 0:54
  one of us is informing Yeah, and which one did you expect to who?
• 1:00
  Well? I guess is it a who done it? Or who done
• 1:03
  it? What? Who? Well? I don't think. If we have
• 1:11
  like a setup where there's three of us and one of us is the informer
• 1:14
  and we have to figure out who it is, that's not a who done
• 1:17
  it? But it's a type of mystery, isn't it. I don't know.
• 1:19
  Well, there's like a video game that my kids there's a trader in
• 1:23
  our midst. There's a trader in the midst. It's like, yeah,
• 1:26
  the video game is among us. I know, that's what you're doing among
• 1:30
  us, that's it. Yeah. Yeah, So it's like, uh but
• 1:38
  yeah, no, apparently we're just that interesting. So but not so interesting
• 1:47
  that they have someone among us. I don't think so. Mmmm, well,
• 1:55
  because I can't imagine Allison being a trader or Brian or me or or
• 2:02
  you know, like Mike Stevenson or Lauren b or you know what, like
• 2:10
  Lauren b is like the Mada Haari of the freaking Department of Homeless Security infiltrating
• 2:16
  the men's rights movement. Like I mean, she's got the cleavage for it,
• 2:21
  but I just don't see it. M all right, Okay, so
• 2:28
  we better get in we better get into it. Last we've probably been infiltrated,
• 2:31
  though at a low level. Lot. Yeah, no, in the
• 2:36
  in the greetings and salutations room there, there's there's not much actual levels to
• 2:43
  our well in in the greetings and salutations room, there's probably somebody installed in
• 2:49
  there. Yeah, but you're like low versus high? Does that really apply
• 2:53
  to us? Like, well, no, but I mean like in terms
• 2:55
  of you know, to observe, right, you know, observe and report
• 3:00
  back on our on our nefarious activities. Yeah. Yeah, well you know,
• 3:07
  I am almost thinking thinking of taking things into my own hands here and
• 3:15
  stealing a dirt truck, okay, a sand truck and spreading it all over
• 3:21
  my streets because we got like, we got three centimeters of snow okay,
• 3:28
  heavy wet snow that got packed down, and they haven't done shit with it,
• 3:36
  okay, and so now all of our residential streets are just a skating
• 3:39
  rink, like they're just I was watching a woman skate her kid to the
• 3:49
  bus stop this morning with skates. Yeah. Actually, we it's been a
• 4:00
  very frustrating time because it's quite difficult to walk. Yeah. And it's it's
• 4:05
  like it's it's beautiful out. It's like right now in Edmonton it's seven degrees
• 4:11
  wow. Yeah, so I think it's five degrees here, so a little
• 4:15
  cooler freak out celsius. Yeah, so not infinite cold for for all of
• 4:20
  you who Yeah, no, this is like shirt sleeve weather. I went
• 4:24
  and I took my garbage out and stuff without even putting a sweater over my
• 4:28
  tank top. Mmm. Well I still wore a sweater, but that's because
• 4:31
  I live on the bald Prairies, not a city. But uh, yeah,
• 4:36
  it's it's been unusual. And the problem is that it warm it snows,
• 4:41
  then it warms up, turns to ice, and then turns all the
• 4:44
  sidewalks into skating rinks, which are actually exhausting to navigate when you're trying to
• 4:48
  walk your dog. Yeah. And if you didn't get the snow when it
• 4:50
  first fell, right, then you're boned, right because it just freezes.
• 4:57
  It all freezes overnight, like it ha melts than it freezes. And then
• 5:01
  it's like now you're chipping, chipping the whole thing, right, it's not
• 5:06
  shoveling anymore. It's like pick and shovel stuff. Mm hmm. It's like
• 5:14
  you're an ice miner on trick and Andorria. M hmm. Yeah, startar
• 5:20
  Star trek Star trek reference. I'm a little distracted because I'm having an argument
• 5:25
  over uh like Japanese versus I don't know what to call it, a post
• 5:30
  Renaissance storytelling and uh, and it's it's a little bit distracting because I'm just
• 5:36
  far more interested in storytelling than being targeted by the FBI, the Department of
• 5:45
  Whole Lands Security. Yeah, it's even why. I mean I feel embarrassed
• 5:49
  for them, I know, like why would you? And also I feel
• 5:58
  like this ship be something the American taxpayers are like, why are you wasting
• 6:03
  your money? Why are you wasting not your money? Why are you wasting
• 6:08
  our money on this? That this this should be a travesty honestly, that
• 6:14
  they are actually taking funds away from protecting Americans to observing a bunch of spurgs
• 6:21
  talk about anime and the Lord of the Rings, Like what a frick are
• 6:29
  you fucking kidding me? Like, really, they're gonna do what the tells
• 6:35
  us about masculine What do you think that we're gonna do? Are we gonna
• 6:39
  put on like a D and D game that that that somehow morphs into I
• 6:45
  don't know, throwing over the government or something like what it would be based
• 6:58
  it's just too much work. Like also, I don't really have that much
• 7:01
  of an interest. I mean, how is it possible do they think that
• 7:04
  any of us are a manifest threat to the American public? Well, most
• 7:10
  of us can't even stop arguing on Twitter like well, and it's as well,
• 7:15
  it's like we're not highly politically active, right, I mean, this
• 7:21
  is really the thing. It's like, how many people have told me I
• 7:25
  should run for office? Like? How many people? A lot of people
• 7:29
  have told me I should run for office? And I'm like, fuck no,
• 7:34
  Like who has the energy for that? Right? And I'd have to
• 7:41
  clean up my language? Right, there's no smoking in government buildings to ask
• 7:49
  like, give me a break. No, I'm never gonna do that.
• 7:53
  Besides, oh no, I've wrong my thing. Oh no, that's I
• 8:00
  didn't mean to press that. Okay, Okah, let's get on with it.
• 8:05
  I guess, yeah, okay, pointing out the stupidity of all of
• 8:09
  this. What are we looking at right now? What do you guys want
• 8:11
  to look at? Oh? The same share my should the share the twitters
• 8:16
  with you? Do you remember the document? What one? That? That
• 8:22
  that the official document, the official document of of why we're being well the
• 8:28
  diverting hate thing or diverting. Yeah, it got taken down? Did you
• 8:31
  know that? No? Did you get a copy? Uh? It got
• 8:37
  taking down? Huh uh yeah I think they did maybe maybe? Yeah?
• 8:46
  Second, just a second, I got the application for the to like for
• 8:52
  to make the report, but the actual thing we were looking at the other
• 8:54
  day. Last time we did one of these, the dhs or whatever.
• 9:01
  They took it down, but it's still I'm sure it's still a thing we
• 9:09
  have, like you know, like I said, like the screen shots and
• 9:11
  stuff I have that BX shared. Actually, yeah, here, let me
• 9:20
  see, like wow, I didn't realize that this was gonna happen. Sorry,
• 9:22
  folks. Yeah, they took it down down the memory hole. The
• 9:26
  document went yep, that's right. Okay, wait a second, let me
• 9:31
  give this a try, because but it was. It was definitely there.
• 9:35
  And b X, the person who shared it. I'm gonna have her.
• 9:39
  She is a woman. I'm gonna have her on for a fire stared chat
• 9:43
  on Monday. Oh look at what I got. I still have it?
• 9:46
  Do you have it? Yes? I do. Can you give me a
• 9:50
  link or something and then I can just up on the screen. No,
• 9:54
  no, no, no, I can't because it's gone so you should be
• 10:01
  able to. I can't download it because I only have this. This is
• 10:07
  ephemeral, guys. It's in your cash. It's in my cash. Unless
• 10:11
  somebody can tell me how to access it. I'm gonna no, no,
• 10:16
  it's okay, here's what I'm gonna do. I'm gonna you can copy and
• 10:18
  paste, copy, copy all and paste all into a document. I'll try.
• 10:24
  But I'm on a PC, not a Mac. All right, control
• 10:31
  a control at not giving me that option control. I could also share your
• 10:43
  screen, all right, let me do that. Let me do that instead.
• 10:48
  Hold on, I'm gonna share. I'm gonna share your the screen that
• 10:52
  you're sharing. Give me a second, guy, Sorry, I got I
• 10:56
  gotta go to your screen again. Yeah, mine, you gotta go to
• 11:01
  mine? Yeah no, I mean from there, I'm on yours. But
• 11:07
  but Brian's gonna share your screen on his stream. Yes, and then and
• 11:11
  then we will be able to show the last accessible one of these. And
• 11:16
  I think that it maybe maybe what happened is b X changed the sharing permissions
• 11:24
  on it. But here we go, do you see it? Okay,
• 11:30
  trying to change Why would if b X changed the sharing like she why would
• 11:37
  she change the sharing permissions? How could she change the sharing permissions? Because
• 11:41
  it's her document, So it might be a situation where she's no, no,
• 11:46
  no, no, no, no no no no. This is the
• 11:48
  DHS. This is the report to the DHS from the DHS website. Okay,
• 11:52
  all right, this is the DHSS document that b X wrote a report
• 11:58
  on. Mm hmm, okay, all right, gotcha. Yeah, so
• 12:01
  it is it is a situation where they've they've made this and I apologize for
• 12:05
  the difference. And you see the difference in my volume. This is when
• 12:09
  I'm actually looking at my screens and this is when I'm eating my mic.
• 12:13
  So just so that you guys know, I'm sharing your Twitter exchange to Alison
• 12:18
  because you're sharing your ship now. So maybe s which back to the I
• 12:26
  mean, I can you know, I can look at here, you go,
• 12:31
  I got it, It's right here, all right, Everything's good,
• 12:33
  everything is solid. Everything has been salvage in some some I mean the deep
• 12:39
  the whole situation hasn't been salvage. But at least we could look at it.
• 12:43
  I think. Is it diverting hate and misogynous extremism? Yes? Okay,
• 12:48
  actually I can access your the thing she sent you through your Twitter on
• 12:54
  my end. I can just share that. Are you sure? Are you
• 12:58
  sharing my my my Strea? I'm sharing your window right now. Yeah.
• 13:03
  Yeah, let's just keep it at that, because otherwise we might be introducing
• 13:05
  more problems. All right, So I'm sharing on the screen, Karen's driving.
• 13:11
  Okay, yeah, I know I'm the one driving, and I shall
• 13:15
  attempt to drive. Oh before you get into that, I did get a
• 13:22
  super chow and you probably should think the things anyways. Oh yeah, yeah,
• 13:26
  I put that up on the screen real quick and read it. So.
• 13:31
  Richard Pierre gives us five dollars and says, imagine if the government put
• 13:35
  as much scrutiny into the telemarketing scammers that are doing actual economic damage to people
• 13:43
  and possibly the reputation of the companies that they impersonate, all right, for
• 13:48
  that not just not just telemarket like you see Elon Musk, you see uh
• 13:54
  justin Trudeau. You see like all of these people like Tom Cook from a
• 14:00
  Tim Cook, Tom Cook from Apple, right, you know, and they're
• 14:05
  they're they're doing deep fakes of their voices, like a whole bunch of journalists
• 14:09
  at like MSNBC and CNN and stuff talking about you know, how the Canadian
• 14:16
  government has partnered with X and Toronto Dominion Bank right to give you a passive
• 14:24
  income stream, right and and I'm just like what the what like what Yeah,
• 14:35
  every Canadian can make four thousand dollars a month through this passive income stream,
• 14:41
  you know, and I'm just like, okay, so they're not going
• 14:46
  after that, but they're going after anti feminists. Yes, oh yeah,
• 14:52
  a bigger threat. It's not because we're about men's issues. It's not to
• 14:56
  talk about guys. It's the underdog. It just happens to have all of
• 15:01
  the state's weapons at its disposal. Yeah, no, it's it's not because
• 15:05
  it's not because we we advocate for men's you know, men to get help
• 15:11
  in certain areas or you know, to say that men are being left behind
• 15:16
  or they're being ignored or disregarded. It's because we're like and feminism is what's
• 15:20
  doing it. That's why or that's why, because if you're anti feminist,
• 15:26
  you're anti woman by definition. Is interesting. I was thinking about that,
• 15:31
  how feminism has become synonymous with a gender, So if you're anti feminist,
• 15:37
  you're anti woman. But at the same time, as masculinity are, men
• 15:45
  have been become synonymous with ideology. So in other words, you're not if
• 15:50
  you are if you are anti men, you're anti the masculine ideology. So
• 15:54
  men are associated with an ideology just by fact, and an ideology, isn't
• 16:00
  it gender? Do you get what I'm saying. So a gender is an
• 16:03
  ideology, and an ideology is a gender. And everybody's wondering where all this
• 16:07
  crap came from. Yeah, no, it's and people you know, like
• 16:12
  I see people talking about it and they're like, well, this started like
• 16:15
  ten fifteen years ago, right. No, no, no, like this
• 16:21
  started in the eighteen hundreds, right, and then it they decided, Okay,
• 16:27
  they decided they were going to install it into the universities. Because from
• 16:32
  the universities, right, goes everything right from there, that's all of about
• 16:40
  reality. Where we learn about reality. Every aspect of society is populated and
• 16:47
  controlled and run by people who were educated in universities. Right, So journalism
• 16:52
  and the law, and politics and anthropology and utilities, theology and like everything
• 17:02
  HR departments, right, and all of these courses. This is what's insidious
• 17:07
  about it. All of these courses. You know, you could just basically
• 17:10
  generally call them the courses that end with the word studies. Right, So,
• 17:17
  gender studies, Women's studies, queer studies, African American studies, indigenous
• 17:23
  studies, all of these different studies. And then the grand puba of all
• 17:30
  of these programs, which would be interdisciplinary studies where you learn just a little
• 17:34
  bit, you know, you get to take a little bit off the buffet
• 17:37
  from each of these programs. Right, they all have an activism component.
• 17:44
  Right. You earn credit by organizing protests or participating in protests. Right.
• 17:51
  The women who attended that, the people in women's studies courses. That one
• 17:56
  who said at the Warren Ferrell protests that she was there as part of her
• 18:00
  Women's Studies course program, she was earning credit for that for participating in that
• 18:06
  protest. Right. So the whole point is to activate these students and convert
• 18:12
  them into an almost well occult like or religious fervor, right, from which
• 18:21
  they want to proselitize. They want to proselytize their way of thinking everywhere.
• 18:26
  So where do they go. They go to all they move on into all
• 18:30
  the jobs that allow them to do that, to convert willing or otherwise as
• 18:37
  many people as possible. Right, And that is where we are right now.
• 18:41
  That was a forty year freaking plan, right, that started with the
• 18:47
  first Women's studies course in nineteen seventy. All Right, so I want to
• 18:53
  remind everyone that I have started. It's a little bit early, but I
• 18:56
  started the monthly fundraiser at Feedbadger dot Com Support. I'm thinking of seeing if
• 19:02
  we can get it done a little early so we're not necessarily doing it through
• 19:06
  the holidays, but that will depend on you guys. So if you would
• 19:08
  like to support the show, go to feed the Badger dot com slash support
• 19:11
  and if you would like to send us a message, that is that feed
• 19:15
  the Badger dot com slash just the tip. You get the full benefit,
• 19:18
  We get the full benefit of whatever funds you send, and you get the
• 19:21
  benefit of avoiding YouTube's minefield of comment enhancement. So once again, feed Thebadger
• 19:27
  dot Com slash support to make sure we can continue to do these shows,
• 19:30
  and feed the Badger dot Com slash just the tip to send us, you
• 19:34
  know, a little gratuity plus some no plus your whatever message you want,
• 19:41
  whatever comment you have, if you want to scream at us, you want
• 19:44
  to correct us, you want to add et cetera, then do so it
• 19:48
  Feedbadger dot Com slash just the tip. All right, let's uh, let's
• 19:52
  get into it. See, so we have Karen's lovely mug next to Sasha
• 19:56
  day Game, who's apparently a ding to Homeland Security the face of misogyny,
• 20:03
  well, a face of the face misogyny. Well, they're basically just lumping
• 20:07
  him in with all the pick up artists, right, yeah, no,
• 20:11
  And it's like he's he's the least extreme of all of the pick up artists,
• 20:18
  Like he's the most pro feminist of all of the pick up artists,
• 20:25
  and like they just don't know, right, And and I'm I'm looking at
• 20:30
  it, and I'm like, why didn't they like grab a screen grab of
• 20:33
  meat talking with Chris Cantwell literally the day, the night before he turned himself
• 20:40
  in, I had him on for an interview. He wanted to have his
• 20:44
  say, and he trusted me to be honest and to be willing to do
• 20:51
  it. And because I've always been like I'll talk to anybody. Right,
• 20:57
  looks like this document is missing a bit. Let me see if I can
• 21:00
  get it through, or do you want to see if you can get it
• 21:03
  through? The Twitter account there asking me, Yeah, go see if you
• 21:11
  can get it, because I'm missing the last half on vx's account. Yes,
• 21:15
  on bx's account. So hold on. Here we have Karen and the
• 21:19
  dread misogynist Sasha Dake. It's kind of like a ways down right, because
• 21:23
  she's been posting like, yeah, it's it's a ways up, eh,
• 21:27
  I can I can do it myself. Let me see no, no,
• 21:30
  I I found the post, but I, like I said, I had
• 21:34
  her original tweet up already and it didn't open a link. I think like
• 21:40
  when you click on it, yeah something, I mean, there are some
• 21:44
  blurbs like that she's she's taken some screenshots. But if you try to open
• 21:48
  up the diverting hate, there's also a video could look at the video.
• 21:55
  Here's of the YouTube video where the team explains our programmed to a panel of
• 21:57
  judges. Let me open that. It's kind of long. It's like,
• 22:04
  but she's got a time code here, hold on a second, and thought,
• 22:08
  yeah, sorry, this is good. This is like guys, there's
• 22:11
  a lot of documents to go through and they get a little confusing. Yeah,
• 22:15
  and like it's like, as we said, this is probably the the
• 22:21
  tip of the iceberg in terms of how because this is there's an actual grant
• 22:26
  process and this was just one that applied for the grant and their specific strategy
• 22:32
  was to work I believe, with Twitter in the back rooms of Twitter and
• 22:37
  get it. So you know how they have those community context things like if
• 22:41
  somebody does a tweet and then people community notes. Yeah, I mean,
• 22:48
  and that seems to be more democratic than what they were proposing. I don't
• 22:51
  know, because anybody can participate and they're you're gonna get less community thought,
• 22:56
  you should find people twisting it. It's kind of like what Wikipedia started off
• 22:59
  as. Yeah, so, but what they wanted to do, what these
• 23:03
  individuals wanted to do is target Twitter accounts like Karen's and honeybadger Bite and have
• 23:08
  something like that, pointing people or pointing men to resources that they approve of.
• 23:15
  Essentially, so it would be I don't know, it's not an organic
• 23:21
  community thing. It's like a targeted effort mm hmmmmm hmm. And I don't
• 23:25
  know if they were just going to do like you have people do that manually,
• 23:30
  or if they were gonna work with Twitter to make that or the scenes,
• 23:34
  or if it is actually something that did happen. You don't know,
• 23:38
  because we're just looking at the paperwork, the paper trail of this. I
• 23:44
  mean, it may just be that seventy seven hundred thousand US tax dollars use
• 23:48
  the US taxpayer dollars went to this university and they did, what would it
• 23:56
  be called fuck and all with it? Yeah, so it's just it's just
• 24:00
  pork. Maybe they put it into like, I don't know, buying new
• 24:04
  rhododendros for their atrium or something. Who knows rhododendrons, Yeah, no,
• 24:12
  or whatever plant you like. What's an atrium plant? I don't know.
• 24:18
  I'm not really big on my atrium plants. It's fernst Okay, so they
• 24:23
  bought like seven hundred thousand dollars worth of ferns for their atrium instead of actually
• 24:30
  implementing this, which ferns are really good at cleaning the air and and also
• 24:37
  producing oxygen. Mm hmm. Excellent volunteer plants in your yard? Did you
• 24:44
  find anything, Brian? I got the video up. I'm asking if you
• 24:45
  guys want to watch the video. Okay, yeah, let's do that.
• 24:49
  All right, Well, then join my thing and I'm gonna start. When
• 24:52
  you're ready, I'm gonna hit play. Here's a video where they discuss their
• 24:59
  project or whatever. Are you in there, I'm in all right, I'm
• 25:03
  hitting play. Then I don't know what this is going to have. I've
• 25:06
  never seen this is like that, So that's kind of the focus. We'd
• 25:10
  love to talk to executives as well. And with that comment, Thomas had
• 25:14
  the final word. I would like to thank the entire Peace Coalition team for
• 25:19
  your important peace building campaign, very contemporary and well thought out answers to the
• 25:25
  judges questions. So as we now transition from our first presentation to the second,
• 25:30
  I'd like to ask the Howard University team and all our judges to please
• 25:34
  turn off your videos and microphones as we queue up the video from our next
• 25:40
  team from the Middlebury Institute of International Studies. I think this is a misogyny
• 25:51
  to violent extremism. Pythoneo, in combination with dangerous algorithms, have led to
• 25:56
  an alarming increase in targeted violence and self harm in cell ideology, which stands
• 26:03
  for involuntary celibate, is a mentality focused on sexist beliefs, self deprecation and
• 26:11
  at its worst, encourages violence. Today, social media platforms have two choices
• 26:17
  when it comes to dealing with malicious content, remove or keep. We are
• 26:22
  proposing a third choice that addresses the threat while safeguarding free speech. Uh not
• 26:30
  really? Yeah, yeah, what I think it does it if they leave
• 26:38
  it up, If they leave it up and provide a counter argument or a
• 26:44
  counter message, like it's hard to it's it's hard to be mad at that,
• 26:49
  like that, that is actually how things should work. But that's not
• 26:56
  what they're doing. They're asking social media companies to redirect content away from our
• 27:03
  Yeah, it should not. It should not be something that is like done.
• 27:08
  Yeah, they're tutional level. Yeah yeah. And then and the reason
• 27:14
  because if they like put their ideas out there and then that our ideas were
• 27:18
  out there and they just let them stand on their own merit, they will
• 27:21
  probably lose. So they have to make sure that they can't make it look
• 27:26
  obvious by censoring us, because they that's been proven not to work. Hi,
• 27:30
  Alex, Welcome back to Twitter. So instead they gotta redirect, They
• 27:36
  gotta, they gotta, they gotta massage people in the right direction. Well,
• 27:41
  how many how many people have I blocked on Twitter? I don't block
• 27:45
  anybody. I don't know, like none. Yeah, blocked a couple of
• 27:51
  people. I'll mute some people who are just like really ridiculous. But even
• 27:56
  during the whole medicre freaking fiasco, I didn't block any one. Well I
• 28:02
  might maybe I blocked a couple of those guys. But it was like,
• 28:07
  you know, like you just you have an argument, they don't, so
• 28:15
  you just keep reiterating your argument and you keep watching them throw themselves at the
• 28:19
  impenetrable wall of your argument. But in some cases, like one of the
• 28:23
  people I blocked actually attempted to uh okay, so they attempted to do what
• 28:30
  happened to me and the Calgary Expo, except to a convention that I had
• 28:36
  actually organized. So I was like, you know what, I don't want
• 28:40
  to give you credibility by being able to retweet my tweets off. What you're
• 28:44
  gonna do is target my business. Yeah, you know, that's like,
• 28:48
  I'm done. If you're going to engage in something that's functionally illegal, then
• 28:53
  I don't want to have you have access to my timeline. Sure, and
• 28:57
  then there's this other vidual who's a freaking stalker to the point where there have
• 29:03
  been other Twitter users that have reported her to the police, and she is
• 29:11
  insane and obsessed to a scary degree. So I've also blocked her. But
• 29:15
  yeah, no, I mean I get it, I totally get it.
• 29:18
  But in terms of messaging and stuff, it's it's like, in terms of
• 29:25
  just general opinions being posted by people I don't, I don't, or people
• 29:32
  disagreeing with me on on the opinion right, I don't. I don't block
• 29:37
  them. They often block me, right, usually after I've proved them wrong
• 29:45
  or shown them up in some way. Right. Like there was that world
• 29:52
  famous immunologist who you know, got into it with me for almost a week
• 29:59
  on Twitter, and then I finally and he would never come back with anything
• 30:06
  other than you're not even a doctor, let alone an immunologist. You have
• 30:11
  no right to talk about this. You don't even know the difference between a
• 30:15
  class one and a class to answer, Jim, Right, So you have
• 30:19
  no right to even speak on the topic. Right. So I finally just
• 30:25
  asked him three very simple questions. Right, He's like, your blog post
• 30:29
  is garbage. I don't even need to look at it to know that.
• 30:33
  So I said, okay, well just answer me these three questions, very
• 30:36
  simple, yes, basic questions that could be answered in one or two words
• 30:41
  each. And he did, and I was right, and he blocked me.
• 30:48
  He answered them, and then he blocked me. Well play some more,
• 30:56
  yeah, because he didn't want to have you respond to him. He
• 31:00
  didn't want to Well, he waited until after I thanked him for proving me
• 31:04
  right at least the first portion of my blog post. Thank you for confirming
• 31:10
  that the first portion of my blog post was absolutely correct and accurate. Then
• 31:17
  he blocked me. Okay, but we should probably get back to this.
• 31:21
  Yes, I know we need to. Uh, I mean, it's it's
• 31:22
  it could be worse. They could just be removing stuff. Yeah. However,
• 31:26
  I also think it's a complete and utter irresponsible waste to use taxpayer money
• 31:33
  to be doing this, Oh yeah, to be policing any kind of speech,
• 31:37
  and they're distorting people they're targeting. They're distorting the message of the people
• 31:44
  they're targeting. Like, honestly, if we applied the logic that they're using
• 31:48
  to in cells to women or feminists, then we could use Valerie Selenis to
• 31:56
  call feminism terrorism. Yep, we could use I don't know, Lucy let
• 32:02
  Be. I think it was Lucy let Be to call all women a danger
• 32:07
  to children. Like, this is not logic, This is not saying logic
• 32:12
  that they're using, and not just that they are applying that kind of logic
• 32:16
  to insults, well, they apply it to men. Let's not even let's
• 32:19
  not even talk about insults, let's talk about men. They apply that logic
• 32:22
  to men. Yep. They will attribute the power of the top one percent
• 32:28
  to all men, and the motives of the bottom one percent of criminal men
• 32:31
  to all men. This is what feminism does. It attributes the power of
• 32:36
  the top one percent of men to all men, not even the top one
• 32:38
  percent of men, like the top one one percent of of one percent of
• 32:43
  men to all men. Their power is what all men have, and the
• 32:45
  motives of the most criminal men to all men. You say, so,
• 32:52
  it's like, not what ninety nine point nine percent of men are, Like,
• 32:58
  Okay, they tay the power of that top one percent of one percent
• 33:02
  and then they take the most depraved serial killers and rapists and say that's what
• 33:07
  men want to do with their power. It's sick. Yeah, no,
• 33:12
  it's kind of like it's you can't even call it the apex fallacy anymore,
• 33:15
  because it's like an apex slash nedar fallacy or eat or apex versus enoch.
• 33:29
  Well, explain where you're going with that. I'm curious, Like, no,
• 33:31
  it's it's not just the apex fallacy where you look at the top right
• 33:37
  and say that is all men you're looking at the very top and the very
• 33:42
  bottom. So the apogee and the nid that the very top of power,
• 33:46
  the very bottom of morality, and then you're just men by that. So
• 33:51
  you're saying, all men have this level of power and this is what they
• 33:53
  do with it, even though the men that you're saying, well, this
• 33:57
  is the the this is the this is the majority morality of men is based
• 34:02
  on serial killers and rapists and who all happen to be in Congress? Yeah,
• 34:10
  serial killers and rapists, you know, And that's the morality. That's
• 34:15
  how men define their morality. Okay, that's how feminism defines men's morality at
• 34:20
  the same time as they all have the power of the top. Yeah,
• 34:24
  so it would need a different It's more than the apex fallacy. It's it's
• 34:30
  the it's like you said, it's the apex plus most criminal elements of the
• 34:37
  group. And this is actually war propaganda, like literally, feminism is war
• 34:43
  propaganda directed against men. Right. This is every single ID identity based conspiracy
• 34:51
  theory that's the same map, and feminism does that against men. There's no
• 34:53
  excuse for this. There's absolutely no excuse for this. It's absolutely foul.
• 35:01
  All right, Okay, so I got another superchow, So I gotta like
• 35:07
  read out the super chow from Richard Beierre, who gave us some support,
• 35:13
  I think, so I will give him a John Cena for that. He
• 35:22
  says for five dollars. Option three is report offensive posters to the government and
• 35:27
  have them placed on a watch list or the no fly list. Well that's
• 35:31
  if the other things are not doable. But yeah, I think that they're
• 35:37
  learning that when you just censor people, it actually draws more attention to them
• 35:42
  now, especially now that there are more people willing to stand up for the
• 35:46
  people who have been censored. So they're like, okay, wait, if
• 35:50
  we just try to throw our enemies in jail or hurl accusations, there are
• 35:57
  people who will come forward and defend them. But how about instead we just
• 36:01
  try to you know, like redirect the cattle to where we want them to
• 36:08
  be, to our you know, little enclosure, instead of where they currently
• 36:15
  are. So that's kind of what I think is happening. Yeah, they're
• 36:22
  trying to herd people, especially men in particular. They're trying to rent the
• 36:30
  only problem with all this is that they're wrong. They got the causality mixed
• 36:35
  up. Of course, men don't become red pilled. I'm just gonna use
• 36:39
  that. I use it semi ironically at this point. But they don't become
• 36:44
  red pilled because of red pilled contents. They become red pilled because of feminist
• 36:49
  content experience. Well, yes, honestly, honestly, you have no like
• 36:59
  feminine have absolutely nowhere to stand on this. You have for the past couple
• 37:05
  generations you have inflicted propaganda campaign, a wartime propaganda campaign against men, and
• 37:13
  now we are reaping the results. Okay, and then go ahead, did
• 37:17
  you guys hear the latest about Destiny? Oh? Yeah, good lord,
• 37:22
  what happened? I mean, I'm not laughing. It's tragic, it is
• 37:24
  seriously, but yes, I do think about it. Okay, live stream
• 37:29
  about Destiny and Hunter avalone on my personal channel. Oh there you go.
• 37:35
  Destiny had had an open relationship with his wife Melina. Okay, and uh,
• 37:40
  and you know he's worth a lot of money, right, like he
• 37:45
  has he has a good income from his streams and stuff. Right, so,
• 37:52
  but he, uh, he had an open relationship with her, and
• 37:55
  he spent what a year two three years defending it everywhere? Right? Oh
• 38:01
  yeah, no, you can say the same thing. You know, you
• 38:06
  say she's going to leave me, You say it's gonna ruin the relationship.
• 38:09
  Right, Well, you could say the same thing about men and cheating,
• 38:14
  right, You could say the same thing about men and and and them stepping
• 38:17
  out on their wives and stuff. Right, they don't. He didn't realize
• 38:22
  and most people don't who aren't red pilled don't realize that men and women step
• 38:25
  out for totally different reasons, right, sexually, and that's why women get
• 38:35
  more upset if a man emotionally cheats, and men get more upset when a
• 38:39
  woman sexually cheats. So a man can say to his wife it didn't mean
• 38:45
  anything, right, and she's more likely to forgive him. But if a
• 38:50
  woman says to her husband it didn't mean anything, he's going to be even
• 38:55
  more mad because you stepped out on me for something that didn't even mean anything,
• 39:01
  right, Okay, And these are instinctive things based on reproductive potentials,
• 39:08
  evolutionary psychology, sex differences right in psychology, And so men and women go
• 39:17
  into open relationships for totally different reasons. Right if the woman suggests, if
• 39:24
  she's the one who proposes that the relationship be open, right, you can
• 39:30
  pretty much bank that she's shopping for better offers, she's living comfortably while she's
• 39:37
  with you. Then she's going to take half and go with the guy who
• 39:43
  tickles her cunt flaps better. Yep. So, and he's getting a divorce.
• 39:53
  Isn't that surprising. He's getting a divorce and she's going to take half
• 39:59
  his shit. Mm hmmm. And she she's gonna get that, she's gonna
• 40:04
  get the green card because she was, like, you know, immigrated here
• 40:08
  to be with him. So she's basically set now and now she can just
• 40:13
  you know, like whoever. Right, So, but look, well maybe
• 40:16
  not the green cars. I think she's in Sweden again, but I don't
• 40:19
  know. She didn't marry him. She's in Sweden with the new man.
• 40:24
  Yeah, yeah, I know. Like apparently is abusive too, according to
• 40:36
  according to Destiny, he's abusive, not necessarily according to her right. Yeah.
• 40:42
  Also, he did say you got to make a choice, and so,
• 40:47
  interestingly enough, the woman went with the guy who made her make a
• 40:52
  choice, who treated himself with some value regardless of the specific circumstances. But
• 40:58
  so is there anything new in regards to destiny? We figured all this,
• 41:02
  well, all this is just the first today, this morning was the first
• 41:07
  I'd heard of it, and I was just like, well, yeah,
• 41:10
  I've seen this happen over and over again. I've seen it happen over and
• 41:15
  over again. When a woman wants the relationship to be open, the man,
• 41:21
  okay, the not wise man, right, the naive man will say,
• 41:28
  well, that's great because then I can step out and it's not going
• 41:34
  to hurt the relationship. It's not going to end the relationship. I'm not
• 41:37
  going to lose her if I cheat, right, okay, and he will
• 41:44
  stay and he often will stay with that one woman forever. Right. The
• 41:51
  woman is just looking at it as an opportunity to trade up. Yeah,
• 41:59
  so if she suggests it, that's like a huge red flag. And even
• 42:06
  if he suggests it, if she takes the opportunity, also a huge red
• 42:10
  flag. Right. She's looking she's looking to do the monkey branch thing.
• 42:17
  You know, the monkey never lets go of the one branch until it has
• 42:22
  the next branch in its hand. That's what that's all she's trying to do.
• 42:25
  It looks like that's what she did. It is it's exactly the new
• 42:30
  guy isn't quite as rich self value that's what might not be as rich,
• 42:39
  probably better looking, and probably has more self respect. Yes, well enough
• 42:46
  self respect to say you have to make a choice because well, I don't
• 42:50
  know he was he was wearing a dress, he was pretty feminine. But
• 42:52
  look, we should play more than I don't know the story of that guy.
• 42:55
  All I know is if you're a male fan feminists and you enter a
• 43:00
  relationship thinking that you can just be this like I guess, unconcerned with your
• 43:08
  own boundaries and limitations, you should think twice before you put yourself in that
• 43:14
  situation. As a man. You should have some more self respect and basically
• 43:19
  like, look, everyone's gonna tell me that open relationships are modern and progressive
• 43:22
  and that if I don't do it, then I'm somehow a retrograde, you
• 43:27
  know, toxically masculine, easily triggered, sensitive male with with you know,
• 43:35
  fragile masculinity. No, just say you know what, I'm not comfortable with
• 43:38
  that and then move on. Just establish your boundaries. Not just establish your
• 43:44
  boundaries, like make a declaration. Yeah right, I don't want to share
• 43:51
  you. I love you, I want you, I want all of you.
• 43:55
  I don't want to share you. Not in that way. Right,
• 44:00
  I'll share you with your parents, I'll share you with your siblings, I'll
• 44:04
  share you with your nieces and nephews, i'll share you with our kids.
• 44:08
  Right. But I don't want to share you in that way, right.
• 44:12
  I want I love you so much right that I want you all to myself
• 44:20
  in that way. Right. That is the most flattering thing you could ever
• 44:24
  tell a woman, if she deserves it. But let me play. Let's
• 44:30
  play more of the video because we're just getting started here. So even if
• 44:35
  you don't alternative paths to hateful rabbit holes. Rather than simply deleting the content
• 44:43
  and fueling the fury of bad actors, we choose to present the option to
• 44:47
  view the content or to explore healthier options. We do this through thoughtful user
• 44:52
  design. Beyond this excelebate, Wait, I want to read something in her
• 44:59
  example? Really? I thought it was kind of funny encourages Wait wait,
• 45:02
  wait we look it through today. Yeah, that's what I'm trying to do.
• 45:09
  Social media platforms choices when it comes to dealing with malicious content, remove
• 45:15
  or keep. We are proposing a third choice that addresses the threat while safeguarding
• 45:22
  free speech with diverting hate we provide alternative paths to hateful rabbit holes rather than
• 45:30
  simply deleting the content. So here, Okay, so this phone, it
• 45:34
  says ux r u X. You can only bring one item to a remote
• 45:38
  island to assist your research of native use of tools and usability. What do
• 45:43
  you bring? And then there's certified toxic boy at Shaday and night It says,
• 45:52
  some are all So this tweet has been I guess, uh wait,
• 45:57
  that was censored. Well no, but they're gonna showing behind a click like
• 46:06
  this is this is a way of censoring. You're not getting rid of it,
• 46:10
  but it's still censored. Yeah, but let's it's still censored based on
• 46:15
  a moral system in which they feel free to level a wartime propaganda at men.
• 46:22
  This is what's infuriating. Yeah, but what she's I think what she's
• 46:25
  doing is she's taking this and she's saying, instead of doing this, this
• 46:31
  is an example of what not to do. She's going to demonstrate something else
• 46:37
  and feeling the fury of bad actors, we choose to present the option to
• 46:43
  view the content or to explore help. So she's saying, Okay, that's
• 46:49
  that's the thing. That's the difference. They're allowing you to view the content,
• 46:52
  but it's still hidden, right, so that the tweet says certify talks
• 46:58
  a boy. The sheep think the red Pale is about women. It is
• 47:00
  much more than that women are a mere fraction. It's about unlearning everything,
• 47:06
  politics, religion, economic science, entertainment. True red pillars see the world
• 47:09
  for what it really is. Oh, guys, want to know what it's
• 47:13
  said that she thought was so offensive? Yeah, no, this institution,
• 47:17
  Like, what's really interesting is that this is the way that this this tweet
• 47:22
  is and what they think is toxic is basically people questioning the status quo.
• 47:30
  Yep, and the and it really does speak to this whole And then and
• 47:36
  then the institution comes in. Then the institution comes in and says, oh,
• 47:43
  well you can't see that without expanding extra effort. Yes, yeah,
• 47:50
  And this this is our compromise. Yeah right, this is this is how
• 47:55
  we this is how we don't violate speech. Yeah. Yeah, we just
• 48:01
  make it harder to listen to people. Yeah, who say things that the
• 48:07
  institutions don't like, right when they're complaining about the institutions. Yeah, Jim
• 48:14
  Bottle, if you're not listening the people who are proposing this is this college,
• 48:19
  but they are being funded by the Department of only Security, so they're
• 48:23
  not small. And the colleges are informed and educated and staffed by these same
• 48:32
  people. So it's not like, oh my god, here's this this fringe
• 48:37
  group way over here that wants to control like this government is. No.
• 48:40
  No, they're totally in bed with each other. They're totally doing this.
• 48:44
  They're absolutely aware of what they're doing. They know what it is, and
• 48:46
  they're terrified of people having free speech that are saying something that they find dangerous.
• 48:52
  This is why they're doing this and are informed. They are essentially armed
• 48:58
  with information that they can use. They are a danger to these people because
• 49:01
  they won't be their slaves. They what they are finding threatening is simply questioning.
• 49:09
  Yeah, the establishment and what the establishment says is true. That's it.
• 49:16
  Yeah, this is this is just an establishment defending itself. There's no
• 49:22
  mystery to it. And feminists while we're perving itself. Yeah, feminists are
• 49:28
  a big part of how the establishment defends itself and justifies itself. Okay,
• 49:34
  well you know what what better human shields than women? Right? Yeah?
• 49:37
  Or women's benefit or supposed benefit. Oh I should probably do a shout out
• 49:43
  because Richard Bierre did give us one hundred bucks. Thank you Richard. Yeah,
• 49:49
  very and again if you would like to join Richard and helping us out
• 49:54
  this month, it's Feedbadger dot com slash support. He did that because a
• 49:58
  while that, like last month, I was like, oh, let's crack
• 50:00
  this thing, let's put something in there please, and he did so I
• 50:04
  think he just replicated what he did last month. So thank big thanks to
• 50:06
  you Richard. And again feed the Badger dot com slash support and feed the
• 50:10
  Badger dot colm slash. Just a tip if you want to send us a
• 50:13
  message, send those messages through like us so we can have a conversation.
• 50:20
  All right, sorts, all right, I'll play a little bit more.
• 50:22
  I got another super child, but I'm gonna look at it later. Options.
• 50:25
  We do this through thoughtful user design. Beyond this experience within a social
• 50:30
  platform like Twitter, we have also built a resource hub diverting hate dot Org.
• 50:37
  We utilize effective digital marketing to intersect hateful narratives and provide outlets and tools
• 50:44
  to build resiliency. Our original database and network analysis allow us to effectively meet
• 50:51
  our audience where they are by using identified key terms, profiles, locations,
• 50:57
  and languages. All together, we've created a one of its kind approach to
• 51:02
  diverting at risk men away from hate. They they are going all fucking out
• 51:14
  to do something. Isn't that crazy? Isn't it interesting? I'm pretty sure
• 51:19
  I missed a bit of it, but I'm pretty sure I saw the last
• 51:21
  bit With the at risk men, they mean at risk. They don't mean
• 51:23
  at risk as suicide. They don't give a fuck about that. They mean
• 51:25
  at risk for being questioning. Questioning you aren't just questioning the status quo.
• 51:36
  That's what really concerns them. They have no interest in helping men. They
• 51:40
  have no care for men. They just want to make sure that men do
• 51:45
  and think the way they want them to. That's it. Yeah, they're
• 51:46
  maintaining the maintaining the status quo. We're the ones that are going against it.
• 51:52
  Well. The the the issue is is that when you look at men
• 51:57
  who actually kill or lash out violently for ideological reasons or because they're in pain,
• 52:12
  a lot of that pain is number one, it's deeply personal. And
• 52:15
  they aren't actually red pilled, they're blue pilled. They don't understand why all
• 52:20
  of this horrible stuff is happening to them. Yeah, right, when you
• 52:25
  explain why, often they calm down. Okay, Like here's why they calm
• 52:34
  down. They don't lash out blindly at just anybody because they realize that it's
• 52:40
  not everybody's fault. It's not the whole world out to get them. It's
• 52:45
  these people and those people and those people over there, right, And like
• 52:53
  the number of messages I got when I started out, and for probably the
• 52:59
  first five six years, right that said, I was on my way to
• 53:04
  hating women until I saw your videos and then I realized why this was happening.
• 53:12
  Yeah, so I talked them out of hating women. Yeah, I've
• 53:17
  had that too. And so I mean, like just different than yours as
• 53:22
  well. Yeah, well, I mean like I generally I go by the
• 53:27
  evolutionary psychology approach and the legal approach. Right, So it's like, it's
• 53:30
  the law and it's our instincts, and this is just how it is,
• 53:35
  and this is why, and it's nobody's fault. Okay, It's it's really
• 53:40
  nobody's fault. It's just the confluence of everything that brought us to this point.
• 53:50
  Like from the first cyanobacteria that divided in the prim primordial ooze in what
• 53:58
  is now Australia. Right from that moment, we were kind of destined to
• 54:02
  be this retarded, okay, and that's just how it is. We are
• 54:08
  just this retarded about gender, right, And it's not about you. It's
• 54:15
  nothing personal. Okay, it's not that everybody hates you personally. It's just
• 54:22
  it's just an is. Okay, it's just an is. And you have
• 54:30
  to figure out a way to navigate through that. And they're like, Okay,
• 54:36
  you've actually you haven't given me a solution to the problem. You haven't
• 54:40
  fixed the problem for me, but you've actually let me know what the landmines
• 54:45
  are in that minefield, so I can try and like navigate my way around
• 54:52
  them instead of stepping on one. Right, And now I feel like I
• 54:57
  feel better, I feel lesson and like this is what they're trying to prevent.
• 55:07
  They're trying to prevent men from being able to say, okay, okay,
• 55:14
  now it all makes sense. Yeah, and and okay I can.
• 55:19
  It's not great. I'm not super pumped about it, but I can at
• 55:23
  least deal with it. I can at least figure out a way to go
• 55:29
  about my life right, find some happiness. Yep, all right, I
• 55:37
  want to rise some Well, go ahead, they they want they want these
• 55:42
  men to just keep lashing out and keep killing themselves. Yeah right, and
• 55:45
  and unfortunately for them, Unfortunately for them, the number of men who lash
• 55:51
  inward rather than out is like what one hundred to one or more? What
• 56:00
  would be the goal of demonizing men and more than that, demonizing masculinity itself
• 56:07
  to the point where more and more men are driven to suicide there or they're
• 56:13
  driven to self destruction, or they're driven to identify and try to live as
• 56:20
  women because they would do anything to escape their masculine curse. And at the
• 56:24
  same time, you would also try to convince women that they deserve a man
• 56:30
  that is beyond their reach, no matter what they look like, no matter
• 56:34
  what they've accomplished, no matter like, you know, how shitty a person
• 56:39
  they act. They're allowed to do it because they are women and they should
• 56:44
  become They should wait until they're thirty forty to have children, even and if
• 56:49
  they don't, it's okay. What is the goal of that If it is
• 56:52
  not eugenics, it is eugenics. They are practicing eugenics. They have conditioned
• 56:58
  but our entire civilization, our whole species to essentially destroy itself. And they
• 57:05
  have pandered to women to the point where they don't feel like like that their
• 57:09
  their life as a woman, their biology is as important as their desires in
• 57:15
  the moment, and that men are just demons, like this is what it's
• 57:20
  doing. And of course the people who are doing this, But wait,
• 57:22
  and the people who are doing this, they are having kids, they have
• 57:27
  families, they are married, they are in relationships, they have their resources,
• 57:31
  they are literally and and these are the same people, by the way,
• 57:36
  that will claim that they're that we're overpopulated, that the earth is being
• 57:39
  destroyed by too many people. They are practicing eugenics. They are doing this
• 57:46
  with propaganda. This is literally happening. Change my mind. That is literally
• 57:52
  what they're doing. I'm just saying this isn't eugenics, because eugenics is actually
• 57:57
  a form of selective breeding where you're making and they're making men not good enough.
• 58:04
  Yeah, well but yeah, they're also making men infernal, and they're
• 58:07
  using birth control, and they're using SSR eyes and all this other ship.
• 58:12
  It's but what what this, what this trend is right now is that it's
• 58:21
  all of the people who are And this is this is why I never bought
• 58:25
  the argument that, you know, the whole vaccine thing, right with COVID,
• 58:32
  was about, uh, you know it some kind of scheme to reduce
• 58:39
  the population, because the only people who would be if that was what it
• 58:44
  was, the only people who would be left, right are the requel citron,
• 58:50
  the ones who refuse to comply, the ones who say fuck no,
• 58:54
  and you don't get to tell me what to do, right, And that
• 58:59
  is is kind of what's happening here with this, Like I don't think that
• 59:04
  this. I if they want to breed a whole bunch of Genghis Khans who
• 59:09
  are gonna overthrow them in their freaking Builderberg hotel at their next conference, right,
• 59:17
  and then that's what they're doing. But I don't think that's actually what
• 59:22
  they want. They would actually love for everybody who is non compliant, everybody
• 59:30
  who refuses to comply, to stop reproducing. But we won't because we're non
• 59:37
  compliant. We won't stop doing what we're doing. Can't stop, won't stop.
• 59:44
  Yeah, you can go fuck yourself, okay, be ungovernable. Right,
• 59:49
  So they're basically eliminating the sheep and leaving only the wolves if this is
• 59:58
  what their goal is. Yeah, you got a point there, But let's
• 1:00:01
  watch a little bit more. Oh we have no Let's let's watch a little
• 1:00:05
  bit more. Let's get back all right, let's get back to the video.
• 1:00:07
  When presented with potentially malicious narratives, are tool initiatives drive our audience towards
• 1:00:14
  brighter paths. God damn, Like, I can't get over the fact that
• 1:00:21
  this is within a context that literally applies the worst malicious thinking when it comes
• 1:00:29
  to men, ascribing to men the power of the top like one percent percent
• 1:00:34
  and the motives of the bottom most criminal and the worst not even just like
• 1:00:38
  the basic you know, robbery or our per snatcher or any of that.
• 1:00:45
  No, feminists go to the worst of the worst, the kind of criminals
• 1:00:47
  even other criminals don't like, like the ted bundies. Yeah, the worst,
• 1:00:52
  the kind of criminals that other criminals will go out of their way to
• 1:00:58
  kill, yeah, and shive them in fucking prison. And the feminists go
• 1:01:02
  to those men. They go, they walk past all of the tradesmen,
• 1:01:07
  they walk past all of them mentally, you know, the management that are
• 1:01:10
  just doing their job, All these men, they'd walk past all the firefighters,
• 1:01:15
  all the good policemen. They walk past all of the men who rescue
• 1:01:20
  em you know, uh, the first responders, the first responders. They
• 1:01:24
  walk past all the soldiers that protect them, and they walk into the prison.
• 1:01:29
  They walk past all the more normal, not normal, but you know,
• 1:01:32
  less insane prisoners. The guys. Yeah. No, the guys who
• 1:01:37
  were like, you know, they shoplifted, or they were using drugs,
• 1:01:42
  or or they were maybe they were cheated on their taxes, you know,
• 1:01:45
  or they robbed, uh, but they didn't even rob there was like a
• 1:01:50
  burglary or whatever. All of the criminals who aren't considered by our society to
• 1:01:54
  be so extreme. The feminists walk past all those men. They walk past
• 1:01:59
  they go into protective custody. And these are the criminals who are in protective
• 1:02:04
  custody because everybody wants to kill them, because they're the most morally marginal of
• 1:02:08
  all men in society, even the morally marginal men consider them morally marginal.
• 1:02:13
  March right into there and says, these men right here, this one percent
• 1:02:19
  of one percent of the most criminal, disturbingly criminal men in the world.
• 1:02:23
  This is what motivates all men, and this attitude is this is the attitude
• 1:02:30
  that like, these people are the ones who are saying, oh, look
• 1:02:34
  at these narratives of hate, like they would say what I am saying is
• 1:02:37
  a narrative of hate, which is simply saying, hey, don't do that.
• 1:02:40
  That's not there, that's not their Oh who was it? Was it
• 1:02:46
  Catherine McKinnon or Sheila Jeffries who said that that, uh? Men, basically
• 1:02:57
  they rape their they rape their women, they rape their children, right,
• 1:03:02
  they abuse their women, they abuse their children. Not all men need to
• 1:03:07
  do this right in order to keep all women suppressed, Okay, but enough
• 1:03:15
  of them do that, it keeps all women suppressed, right, And it's
• 1:03:22
  like, okay, enough of them do that, you know, like okay,
• 1:03:31
  percentages, Like can you can you give me a percentage because like I'm
• 1:03:39
  just thinking that feminists have like a really skewed vision of what the average man
• 1:03:45
  does, you know, Like that that whole giant center of the bell curve,
• 1:03:52
  right, very big, big group of people there who don't do those
• 1:03:59
  things. They don't they don't rape, they don't rape. It's just below
• 1:04:03
  the center to the very top. Because if you think about it's a moral
• 1:04:05
  bell curve, then the men at the very top are like, you know,
• 1:04:10
  Jesus and Gandhi. Well, no, but they aren't well, I
• 1:04:15
  mean moral though the Buddha, yeah, you know, like the well,
• 1:04:20
  the Buddha did leave his wife and son. He did, he didn't take
• 1:04:25
  care of them well, but he did. He did return and give like
• 1:04:32
  a he apparently gave his son a position within what the work he was doing.
• 1:04:42
  So and and the other thing is that, you know, it's it's
• 1:04:45
  a period. It's a time period where if you were part of the aristocratic
• 1:04:49
  class as a man, you'd probably be quite commonly abandoned your kids to go
• 1:04:54
  do war, you know. So it's more like it was probably it's difficul
• 1:05:00
  call to judge him by our morals, true, you know. And but
• 1:05:04
  regardless, My overall point is that if you're if you're looking at like a
• 1:05:09
  moral uh distribution, it's all you would just be the very the tale one
• 1:05:15
  tale. Feminists look at one tiny tale and they say that this this represents
• 1:05:21
  all men. And then they say, well, and it represents all men
• 1:05:25
  because other men benefit from women living in fear of Ted Bundy. Well,
• 1:05:29
  I don't see how men benefit from that, considering that whole framework is how
• 1:05:33
  women justify a lot of abuse against the men in their lives. Have you
• 1:05:38
  noticed, like, well, and it also justifies me. I think women
• 1:05:42
  women like just basic social and avoiding men and also legal power over men.
• 1:05:48
  So all of this, all of this framing men as the worst of them
• 1:05:54
  justifies all kinds of over over overreach when it comes to women's power over men.
• 1:06:00
  Well, I you know, like, I don't see how that really
• 1:06:03
  has benefited men. But and this is this is the other thing I was
• 1:06:09
  thinking about because I was watching all of these conservative tweets and uh, I'm
• 1:06:15
  probably going to offend some people, but they're talking about this essentially somehow they've
• 1:06:21
  started to blame transgenderism on gay men, and I'm like looking at this and
• 1:06:28
  I'm thinking, well, all right, if you're a conservative, if no,
• 1:06:33
  yeah, it doesn't work it they believe me, The leaps are ridiculous.
• 1:06:38
  And they're also blaming surrogacy on gay me in dehumanizing women, Like I'm
• 1:06:44
  pretty sure there are also straight couples that use surrogates, but let's set that
• 1:06:46
  aside. How is surrogacy paying a woman for the use of her womb any
• 1:06:55
  different than than welfare, except that at the end, the child goes to
• 1:07:00
  parents, you know, instead of single mom. So like, but regardless,
• 1:07:06
  I mean, it's like you're you're gonna call out surrogacy and then just
• 1:07:11
  be completely silent on the issue of female driven single motherhood. Yeah. Not,
• 1:07:17
  I'm not gonna Let's not blame men here. The majority of single single
• 1:07:21
  motherhood is driven by women. They may blame the men in their lives,
• 1:07:28
  but it was their choices that led to it, and conservatives won't touch that.
• 1:07:31
  No, Instead, they'll blame gay men on in surrogacy, dehumanizing women.
• 1:07:36
  This is what I'm seeing. This is what I'm seeing, and I'm
• 1:07:40
  like looking at this, and I'm looking at the conservative women, and this
• 1:07:43
  is a question that I have. I'm gonna pose it here for conservative women.
• 1:07:46
  How do you how do you I don't want to submit. How do
• 1:07:54
  you trust your male partner, your husband's morality? How do you trust to
• 1:08:00
  him to lead you morally if you regard him as your moral inferior? Yeah,
• 1:08:08
  Okay, that's the challenge I'm gonna put out there for conservative women.
• 1:08:11
  You talk about how your man is the head, is the moral head,
• 1:08:15
  your moral head, and yet you embrace all of this trash about men and
• 1:08:21
  their morality. Okay, I'm just putting it out there. Their morality when
• 1:08:27
  it comes to sexuality, their morality when it comes to abuse, their morality
• 1:08:30
  when it becomes to parenthood. Their morality is somehow men are somehow responsible for
• 1:08:38
  female surrogacy, right, and also single motherhood. You know, is there
• 1:08:43
  anything that men that any corruption, moral corruption that you don't blame on men?
• 1:08:47
  And then you turn around and say, yes, a man is my
• 1:08:49
  moral head. Really well, it sounds like a bunch of bullshit to me
• 1:08:56
  anyway. But that was just one thing I wanted to say. I'm a
• 1:09:00
  little bit off off topic. I think, all right, I got a
• 1:09:03
  bunch of super chows. I really should read through because they're going to disappear.
• 1:09:08
  Okay, so great Indoors gives us ten dollars on superchow and says,
• 1:09:15
  and I'm not going to respond to this cause it'll take too long, but
• 1:09:17
  I may talk about it later. Regarding Hunter avalone, have you seen the
• 1:09:21
  response by Salty Cracker and the Quartering. I don't really watch them. They
• 1:09:26
  claim Hunter hid behind his girlfriend and use her as a shield. I have
• 1:09:29
  no idea where they got their evidence from. As I haven't seen footage that
• 1:09:32
  would prove this. It's also been claimed Hunter supports defunding the police, which
• 1:09:38
  I think is true. Let me see while Cracker was showing a tweet in
• 1:09:45
  his video in which Hunter explicitly says he does not support defunding the police.
• 1:09:47
  I guess your girlfriend decides by her own free will to protect her significant other
• 1:09:53
  people will deny a woman split second decision making and automatically make the guy out
• 1:09:58
  to be a coward. All right, I'm not going to respond to that.
• 1:10:00
  It'll take too long, but thank you for the super challenge them the
• 1:10:03
  less. And I don't know. I don't watch Salty Cracker. I've seen
• 1:10:06
  a couple of times, but he's I don't know, he's just really certain
• 1:10:11
  about how hilarious it is and it doesn't really make me laugh, and I'm
• 1:10:15
  just tired of the coffee peddler. No, I don't really watch the Briefly,
• 1:10:19
  you're absolutely right, Well, I want to respond briefly to that.
• 1:10:23
  Yes, it is actually taking away the courage of his girlfriend. If that's
• 1:10:28
  what happened, like if his girlfriend was just like split second put herself in
• 1:10:31
  front of him, how is he supposed to stop that, first of all,
• 1:10:35
  And second of all, when you're talking, when you reframe it is
• 1:10:39
  something that he did or didn't do, you're actually removing the courage of her
• 1:10:44
  convictions and her as an individual, and her choices to be brave in the
• 1:10:49
  face of potential harm to someone that she loves. Why would you do that?
• 1:10:54
  It's so we're not going to go forward into a world worth having if
• 1:11:00
  you continue to do shit like this. That's to everybody. Don't do it.
• 1:11:06
  Yeah, you know it's It's what I was saying about conservatives, but
• 1:11:10
  they're doing it the other way. No. No, women women don't make
• 1:11:15
  don't women don't make moral choices because they can only be good. Well,
• 1:11:18
  you know, women can't be courageous because it can only be about as the
• 1:11:23
  result of a man's cowardice. It's all the same thing. It's all the
• 1:11:26
  same. I would call it misogyny from where I'm standing. Everybody else is
• 1:11:30
  the misogynist. I'm just putting that out there, all of y'all, you're
• 1:11:33
  all misogynists. Okay, I'll be quiet now. I got a super chow
• 1:11:40
  from Richard bare for five dollars, and he says, with all the data
• 1:11:44
  points being collected. The diversion might include a visit at one's residence by at
• 1:11:47
  least two people in dark suits who are wearing a certain type of earpiece.
• 1:11:53
  I mean, I think that could be an inevitability. But thank you,
• 1:11:55
  Richard, And then he gives another five dollars and says, the box wine
• 1:12:00
  industry depends on feminism. Also, should Karen be deployed to talk to the
• 1:12:02
  manager of the Department of Homeland Security? Additional, what is the possibility of
• 1:12:06
  HBr streaming in the style of the new Twitch meta that could possibly gain more
• 1:12:11
  viewers and subscribers. Please don't be gross. The new Twitch meta is women
• 1:12:15
  that are basically naked on Twitch, but not naked about as naked as they
• 1:12:19
  can get because women are totally innocent and never push the boundaries of the rules
• 1:12:25
  of any sort of website to get attention. That never happens. No,
• 1:12:29
  that's not going to happen, Richard. No, okay, let's get back
• 1:12:32
  to the video. Get to see you won't get to see Brian's booty at
• 1:12:38
  any time. I don't know. I am not a toy to be viewed
• 1:12:42
  in that way. I'm sorry. Okay, let's continue. Thank you for
• 1:12:46
  joining our presentation on Diverting hate. Our team comprised of thirteen graduate students.
• 1:12:53
  We are a global, multi lingual group of future policymakers at the Middlebury Institute
• 1:12:59
  of the National Sounds like Ubisoft Future. Yeah, well that's exactly this isn't
• 1:13:08
  I know, this is made by like a college group, but like the
• 1:13:13
  government is using them. I mean, the government basically educated them. What
• 1:13:16
  do you think the colleges are You think that because they say that they're they're
• 1:13:20
  like private institutions on paper, that they're not in any way tied to the
• 1:13:25
  state or to big tech corporations. I mean, as humanitarians, we are
• 1:13:31
  passionate about building a safer world. Experiences, we landed on a project that
• 1:13:36
  would build resiliency for an at risk population of young men in online spaces who
• 1:13:43
  are vulnerable to take with us. What is it at risk for disagreeing with
• 1:13:49
  us? Yeah, that's what that's what a risk is. Streamous rabbit holes.
• 1:13:59
  Diverting heat targets vulnerable young men aged eighteen to thirty four who are engaging
• 1:14:02
  with in cell content. Online ins ideology has no ques of organizational structure.
• 1:14:08
  As such, our target audience is highly varied across different locations, ethnicities,
• 1:14:12
  religions, cultures, socioeconomic backgrounds, and occupations, but they do share similar
• 1:14:15
  set of beliefs and behaviors online. All right, I just want to point
• 1:14:19
  out that when they say in cell content, but they mean just like men
• 1:14:26
  who question it don't mean in cells. I mean, I'm just making sure,
• 1:14:30
  you know, because some people are gonna feel, you know, like
• 1:14:34
  a desire to be like, wait a minute, an in cell is actually
• 1:14:38
  this? These people don't care. They're targeting men, any men who are
• 1:14:43
  basically like, you know, you know, I have questions, something's wrong,
• 1:14:48
  I'm confused. You know that multi that multi million dollar millionaire guy who
• 1:14:54
  was getting sued by his ex fiance because she wanted half of his shit,
• 1:15:00
  and and you know, he was basically like like, she threw some false
• 1:15:04
  allegations after Yeah, that guy who's like, wonder, well, how did
• 1:15:08
  this happen? He's an in cell according to this. So stop if you
• 1:15:13
  feel the need to come out and say, actually, in cells are different.
• 1:15:16
  No, that's not what they mean. Stop it. You're just talking
• 1:15:19
  about any man, any man. Johnny Depp is an in cell. According
• 1:15:25
  to these people. This is what I'm talking about any man who has who
• 1:15:29
  has questions about this, who has been in this part of the internet that's
• 1:15:33
  curious about these issues. That's what they're talking about. They use the word
• 1:15:38
  in cell. It doesn't mean anything. Well, I mean the thing is
• 1:15:40
  that that's in cell and in cell adjacent, which like, yeah, an
• 1:15:48
  feminition basically all men. Yeah, it's all men. Any man who's not
• 1:15:54
  the guy in this video, any man who isn't towing the line. And
• 1:15:58
  this guy who is right here in this video talking about this, he could
• 1:16:00
  easily join those in cels easily if he just has one bad relationship and he's
• 1:16:06
  like, yeah, oh you know what, I think I'm going to stop
• 1:16:09
  dating agreement for a while, or one disagreement or yeah, or one disagreement
• 1:16:14
  exactly. No, the word in cell is meaningless, That's what I'm saying.
• 1:16:18
  They're using it. It's their categorization. Thomas Soul wrote about this in
• 1:16:25
  nineteen ninety five. I'll talk about it on a show on my channel like
• 1:16:30
  sometime this week. Anyway, let's keep going. In particular, diverting hate
• 1:16:35
  six young men with one or more risk factors including social isolation, low self
• 1:16:40
  esteem, and aggrieved entitlement as our target audience engages with this misogynist. What's
• 1:16:46
  aggrieved entitlement? That means like that means like you think that you're owed something
• 1:16:55
  and you're pissed off because you don't. You didn't get it. Here's the
• 1:17:00
  thing. What did feminists say generations ago when they were said, we're gonna
• 1:17:04
  take over or we're gonna give us access to your jobs? Man, what
• 1:17:09
  did they say? They said, and then we can love you like companions.
• 1:17:14
  We no longer have to love you for your money. We're gonna love
• 1:17:16
  you for as your as our companions. Yeah. No, is like they
• 1:17:24
  promised us a bunch of ship and they promised us a bunch of shit.
• 1:17:28
  We fulfilled our part of the bargain and uh and now they're renegging. Yes,
• 1:17:33
  it's aggrieved entitlement and it's not even most in Most in cels absolutely pedestalize
• 1:17:39
  women. So we're talking about a fringe of a fringe once again. But
• 1:17:42
  you know that fringe has put two and two together. Wait, feminists said
• 1:17:48
  that, you know, women would would have access to men's jobs, the
• 1:17:51
  things that made men attractive to women. They're gonna get access to the peacock
• 1:17:57
  feathers. But that means that they're gonna love us for more than our peacock
• 1:18:00
  feathers. They're gonna love us for the bird inside the feathers, and then
• 1:18:04
  they get inside. Then then they find out Nope, nope, you still
• 1:18:10
  have to make more money. It's just that, yeah, you have maked
• 1:18:13
  have to make more money than the average man because the average man doesn't make
• 1:18:16
  enough. So women's women's desires and men did not change. And this is
• 1:18:21
  one of the things that in Twitter I get a lot of fights about because
• 1:18:26
  they they that women do not want to acknowledge this about themselves. So they
• 1:18:29
  want to do it in their in their profiles, and they want to make
• 1:18:31
  sure that men embody it before they're interested in them. But they won't come
• 1:18:36
  out and say, yes, money is critically important. I don't understand.
• 1:18:45
  I don't understand why that's such a taboo thing, like in terms of like,
• 1:18:50
  okay, so for someone like me, you know, I'm in my
• 1:18:55
  fifties, I'm done having kids, My kids are all independent, they're all
• 1:18:59
  moved out and every thing, right, like what do I need money for?
• 1:19:02
  Right? But for for a woman who's like looking to start a family
• 1:19:11
  of course you're gonna want you really want to have children, and the thing
• 1:19:17
  is that you're gonna want a man who can support you while you're stuck at
• 1:19:25
  home when your kids are small. Okay, that be it as it may.
• 1:19:30
  Most of these women don't aren't even going to be having children. But
• 1:19:33
  regardless they said, oh no, we will no longer want you for your
• 1:19:41
  money. Well that never changed. That never changed. If it had,
• 1:19:45
  there would be no population crisis, there would be no reduction in marriage.
• 1:19:51
  We would be you know, like if if feminists have been one correct and
• 1:19:57
  they'd be like, oh yeah, women just want companions. Nothing would like
• 1:20:00
  we would be fine. Yeah, but we would be fine. And I
• 1:20:05
  don't go in for this whole but you know, like the average man is
• 1:20:10
  a terrible companion. Really, no compared to the average compared to the average
• 1:20:15
  woman. No, there's it's it's like I told Tommy sodomy Ower the first
• 1:20:19
  time I was on his show, you know, because he was like,
• 1:20:21
  oh, you say you're bisexual, but you're with a man, And I
• 1:20:25
  said, yeah, I like things straight forward, mine, I I like
• 1:20:30
  things straightforward. You know, being with a man is never having to hear
• 1:20:34
  if you don't know what you did wrong. I'm certainly not going to tell
• 1:20:36
  you. It's also doesn't require maintenance as much for men. It's like,
• 1:20:45
  okay, well, but I mean if you minus minus high maintenance only because
• 1:20:50
  he has a health issue. But but yeah, you know, he provides
• 1:20:56
  quite a bit too, right. Oh yeah, no, it's I mean
• 1:20:59
  it's we've got we've got a fair trade going here. Yeah, and that's
• 1:21:05
  what I'm getting at. Whereas with so with men, you know, it's
• 1:21:10
  more cuprocal. You know, appreciation goes a long way. Oh yeah,
• 1:21:16
  like just expressing appreciation goes a long way with men. Yeah, with women
• 1:21:23
  it goes you can say, oh, I appreciate you. But if it
• 1:21:27
  doesn't come with something material, generally it's not considered to be honest. Oh
• 1:21:31
  yeah, no. I I keep seeing these ads in front of YouTube videos.
• 1:21:35
  Surprise your daughter, delight your wife this year this Christmas with this unique
• 1:21:44
  gift. Right, and it's a necklace in a box that has a prefab
• 1:21:50
  like little letter to my dearest daughter, to my dearest wife. Right,
• 1:21:56
  you are a princess. You are blah blah blah, you are my queen
• 1:22:00
  blah blah blah blah blah and it's like, well, how is that unique
• 1:22:04
  if you're mass producing them? But it's it's like an expression of love and
• 1:22:11
  devotion shouldn't have to come with a material gift, Like we're not even planning
• 1:22:19
  on putting anything on a tree this year, Like there's there's no Christmas presents
• 1:22:27
  this year, and and it's it's not because we aren't in the spirit of
• 1:22:31
  giving or in the spirit of family and celebrating and all of that, because
• 1:22:38
  we are. We're having Christmas Dinner at my son, my older son and
• 1:22:43
  daughter's house where they will they'll cook the turkey, I'll cook the stuffing,
• 1:22:49
  my mom will prep the vegetables right, and we will all bring something and
• 1:22:54
  we will all spend time together and have a great time, and it will
• 1:22:59
  be wonderful and it will be delicious because my older son is an excellent cook.
• 1:23:05
  My younger son is actually a pretty good cook too. But but you
• 1:23:12
  look at it and it's like, nobody really needs those material things to feel
• 1:23:21
  valued, to feel loved, to feel accepted, to feel to feel celebrated.
• 1:23:31
  You don't like this is this is one thing that I just never had
• 1:23:34
  in common with with women in general. Was this idea that somebody needs to
• 1:23:45
  give me things to make me feel valued, like material things. I don't
• 1:23:51
  need that, you know. I like the fact that my husband can provide
• 1:23:58
  for a comfortable life for both of us. That's great, But like he
• 1:24:03
  doesn't need to. When he tells me he loves me, I believe him.
• 1:24:11
  I don't need it to come with a freaking check. Yeah. But
• 1:24:15
  anyway, I think we ultimately what they talk about aggrieved entitlement is actually and
• 1:24:21
  the other thing is that there's this presentation that women are in in media,
• 1:24:27
  that women somehow that romantic relationships are women selecting a man because apparently he's so
• 1:24:34
  awkward that it's cute and making him a better person or something, you know,
• 1:24:42
  And I don't think that in cells are necessarily entitled there. First of
• 1:24:47
  all, again we're talking about a fringe of a fringe because apparently most in
• 1:24:49
  cels put women on pedestals, and it's actually men who have sex with a
• 1:24:54
  lot of women who are more misogynist according to the feminist deeminist definition of misogyny,
• 1:25:00
  which you know, I don't think that should be surprising, honestly,
• 1:25:04
  but uh, but regardless, So, the the fringe of the fringe of
• 1:25:10
  in cells might feel gypped because there was a lot of conversation about how,
• 1:25:17
  oh, women won't have to mate with men based on their need for material
• 1:25:26
  provision, although it'll all be about companionship, and that didn't materialize at all,
• 1:25:30
  and that was entirely on women. Oh, there's nowhere else to put
• 1:25:36
  it. You promised men, You promised that men would get women who wanted
• 1:25:44
  companions and that is not what happened. All right, should we play more
• 1:25:53
  of the video? Sure, a little bit? Yeah, all right,
• 1:25:56
  radicalize digital spaces. Our aim is to offer more positive of outlets these men
• 1:26:00
  before they are at a stage of actively seeking violence. People will now describe
• 1:26:03
  our research tactics and how we well because speaking yeah, because because there was
• 1:26:12
  two remember to two, okay, for like some Elliott Roger and Alec Manassi,
• 1:26:21
  and there was you don't even go with actively seeking self destruction. No,
• 1:26:27
  it's just violence towards others women. And but there was two that we
• 1:26:35
  know of, right, like, you're you're much you're much more likely to
• 1:26:42
  actually lose disaffected young men. Two. Uh, other forms of radicalization than
• 1:26:50
  the red pill. Mm hmmm mm hmmm. Uh. How how many how
• 1:26:57
  many young men ran away ah and joined ISIS from the UK and the US
• 1:27:06
  and Canada. Right, how many how many young men were radicalized by by
• 1:27:15
  ISIS to do that and young women? To be sure? You know,
• 1:27:20
  like you're you're not seeing that the radicalization of young men into the uh in
• 1:27:30
  cell ideology that leads to anything remotely like that, right, And we're we're
• 1:27:41
  like number four after ISIS. Ye, according to the Department of Homeland Security.
• 1:27:48
  Right, you got white supremacists, and then you got what, uh,
• 1:27:55
  school board parents, I don't know. And then then you've got oh
• 1:28:00
  no, anti government people, and then you've got ISIS, and then you've
• 1:28:03
  got men's issues people, the manosphere, and then they're taking this tiny sliver
• 1:28:15
  of the manosphere, right, it's a growing sliver, right, But it's
• 1:28:18
  it's not it's by far, it's not like the entirety of the manosphere,
• 1:28:23
  the in cells. Right. And there's been like two one in Canada,
• 1:28:30
  one in the US two in the last what six years? Yeah? Yeah,
• 1:28:45
  Like and consider how many suicides. But the thing is that it's the
• 1:28:48
  violence but not the suicides. Go ahead, yeah, well, and it's
• 1:28:51
  not just like consider the suicides, it's consider the other acts of other groups,
• 1:29:00
  other radicalized groups, right, Consider the activities of ISIS, Consider the
• 1:29:08
  activities of anti government like Antifa and other anti governmental organizations or I guess you
• 1:29:20
  can't call them organizations because they're not very organized, but you know groups,
• 1:29:27
  you look at those and you're seeing these are like highly promoted on social media.
• 1:29:40
  You know, they're looked at as perfectly fine. They're a terror threat,
• 1:29:45
  but they have every right to organize and to disseminate their stuff and all
• 1:29:50
  of this, right, Like, why aren't they They have every right to
• 1:29:56
  march in the streets with the communist flag, right and scream burn the whole
• 1:30:01
  system down, okay, and then set things on fire and that's a fiery
• 1:30:08
  but mostly peaceful protest b l M. Right, Like all of these groups
• 1:30:14
  right that are clearly huger terror threats than Elliott Roger and Alec Manassian. Sure,
• 1:30:28
  Like I'm just I'm blown away. How do you The thing is though,
• 1:30:31
  it only it only doesn't track if the goal of these people was to
• 1:30:39
  actually stop harm. It's not the goal of these people is to stop men
• 1:30:45
  from questioning or if they're going to like pursue go down a road a rabbit
• 1:30:50
  hole. It has to be there, carefully curated rabbit hole. It's nothing
• 1:30:57
  to do with reducing harm. Thing to do with that. That's why they're
• 1:31:01
  all down with Black Lives Matter and ANTIFA and these other radical like feminist organizations.
• 1:31:08
  You know what, I don't want to say it radical. They're just
• 1:31:10
  they're just feminist organizations. Like there was a Kamie Antifa guy that like he
• 1:31:16
  was threatening to assassinate Vivik Ramaswami very recently. He was doing a talk somewhere
• 1:31:24
  and they had to cancel it because some guy was gonna kill him and people
• 1:31:28
  who were in attendance. Yeah, So, I mean, like this stuff,
• 1:31:31
  it's that they don't care about that. They're not gonna I mean,
• 1:31:35
  they haven't figured out how to blame men for that just yet. But like,
• 1:31:40
  if anything, they'll just leave it like line, and if it becomes
• 1:31:43
  too big, they'll say, oh, well, this is a male violence
• 1:31:45
  problem, and then they're just gonna shift. They're just gonna shift the gears
• 1:31:48
  and that's gonna become the new thing when you know, I'm pretty sure he
• 1:31:51
  was just some crazy dude that wanted to kill the fascists. Because Van Jones
• 1:31:59
  made comments about fucking vvik on on CNN, and of course he never takes
• 1:32:03
  accountabiliey for his words. But us over here is Ryan and like say,
• 1:32:08
  hey, you know what's going on with relationships and men and women. Yeah,
• 1:32:13
  here, here's some here's some information, here's a little history, here's
• 1:32:15
  a little some some wisdom. And he's like, oh, well, that
• 1:32:19
  can't happen. That guy might go off to hurt women someplace. Well,
• 1:32:24
  it's okay, this is all about preserving the ideology. Yes, let's face
• 1:32:29
  it. And the thing is that here's the big problem, right. The
• 1:32:33
  ideology is that men in power equals women oppressed. That's the ideology. And
• 1:32:41
  I've discussed this over and over and over again. It's not scientific because it's
• 1:32:45
  not even a conjecture, because it's never there's there has never been an explanation
• 1:32:49
  of how you falsify it. Feminists have never said, Okay, this is
• 1:32:53
  how you would falsify this conjecture about reality. And incidentally, the way you
• 1:32:57
  would falsify it is by simply proving that men in power does not equal women
• 1:33:01
  oppressed. And what you mean by oppressed and what we generally mean by oppressed,
• 1:33:04
  the definition of oppressed is harm. Ye, a exercise of power that
• 1:33:10
  causes unjust harm. Right, So in order to prove that men in power
• 1:33:15
  equals women are pressed, you would have to look at the harms done to
• 1:33:18
  women. Not just the harms done to women. You would have to compare
• 1:33:23
  them to the harms done to men. Men in powered is irrelevant. You
• 1:33:27
  just have to look straight up at the situation of men and the situation of
• 1:33:30
  women. Right, Which is caused, which is experiencing greater harm, which
• 1:33:35
  is experiencing greater levels of sacrifice, which is experiencing greater levels expectation and responsibility,
• 1:33:43
  which has better outcomes, which one lee lives longer lives. No,
• 1:33:46
  no, you don't don't look at anything all the statistics about who's in power.
• 1:33:50
  You have to look at the statistics about the outcome. Yeah, that
• 1:33:57
  is these these statistics that they're showing right here, this is counter evidence to
• 1:34:01
  their ideology. So they have to treat these stats and the resultant problems that
• 1:34:08
  they represent like plutonium. Right, they have to have caveat caveat, caveat
• 1:34:15
  caveat. They have to control the entire process of recognizing any of this stuff,
• 1:34:20
  and at a whim they'll just stop because it's against their ideology. They
• 1:34:25
  put their ideology ahead of helping men, or they'll blame or they'll blame okay,
• 1:34:31
  they'll blame us for driving men to suicide. Yeah, well because what
• 1:34:36
  because we recognize the issues that their men face. But they will take these
• 1:34:44
  issues and they will minimize them, and they will try to remove them.
• 1:34:47
  And they only reason, the only reason why they even address them is because
• 1:34:54
  they are so manifest and the fact that because we talk about them, they
• 1:34:59
  can't stop ignoring them, where they can't continue to ignore them because we talk
• 1:35:03
  about them, and the very act of talking about them is attracting people who
• 1:35:09
  experience them, men who experience them. Duh, Well, why wouldn't it
• 1:35:13
  right We talk about the issues at men face and attracts men to our work
• 1:35:17
  because they're facing those issues. Well, so they can't ignore them anymore.
• 1:35:25
  So what they're trying to do is they're trying to control them and contain them
• 1:35:30
  and direct them away from anyone who will say, well, wait a second,
• 1:35:34
  the ideology says, appren women are oppressed, but look at all of
• 1:35:40
  these issues that men face, So is it fair to subject men to the
• 1:35:45
  verbal and psychological abuse of feminist allegation. It's not even conjecture because it can't
• 1:35:54
  it hasn't even been it's not even a scientific conjecture because it's never been stated
• 1:35:59
  how you fall by it? So is it a fair to subject men to
• 1:36:03
  feminist allegation with all of this evidence that it is wrong? Yeah? Right,
• 1:36:12
  you know. And then we're saying, well, this, this evidence
• 1:36:15
  counteract counterveans feminist allegation, like but on its face, right, it's it's
• 1:36:21
  this is this is this the one in six men, the three times four
• 1:36:27
  times more suicide. This contravenes feminist allegation against men. So men should not
• 1:36:33
  be subjected to this condemnation of their masculinity by feminists. And then we take
• 1:36:42
  it a step further and furthermore, this condemnation itself is a men's issue,
• 1:36:49
  and then they that's what gets us labeled. You see what I'm saying,
• 1:36:55
  that's it. Yeah, the fact that we say that, no, actually,
• 1:36:59
  these men's issues exist. That means we need to reconsider the ideology about
• 1:37:03
  reality that that that that women are oppressed. That means we need to reconsider
• 1:37:10
  that. And furthermore, since we need to reconsider it, in fact,
• 1:37:14
  we should have done this in the first place before they I mean, it
• 1:37:16
  should have died in the crib. Basically, feminist is so anti science,
• 1:37:20
  it should have died in the crib. But regardless, we need to reconsider
• 1:37:24
  this. And then in reconsidering this, we need to ask ourselves, why
• 1:37:30
  are we inflicting harm on men based on something that has never been proven true,
• 1:37:41
  in fact, has never even occupied the space of any kind of scientific
• 1:37:45
  conjecture whatsoever. Something that has multiply been proven even though it's been never proven
• 1:37:49
  true, multiply has tons of evidence that couldn't possibly be true. And we
• 1:37:55
  are subfirming's disconfirming. We are subjecting men. We are inflicting harm on men
• 1:38:03
  based on a fundamental lie, right, and they that's what they don't want
• 1:38:11
  men to hear. But where at what point in all of this am I
• 1:38:17
  wrong? Well, you're not wrong, Alison, And that's why they have
• 1:38:23
  to divert people away from you, exactly. But that's shit, you guys
• 1:38:29
  are If any of these people who are doing this crap are listening to this,
• 1:38:31
  now, you are wrong and you are harming people. And you know
• 1:38:36
  what, I understand that nobody gives a crap about harming men. That's just
• 1:38:43
  standard operating procedure for every freaking civilization I've ever studied. To be honest,
• 1:38:47
  some civilizations are a lot better of respecting the average man than others. But
• 1:38:53
  for the most part, men just are expected to sacrifice, to make the
• 1:38:57
  big sacrifices for the existence of the civilizations they're part of. That's just the
• 1:39:00
  way it is, just the way it go, all right. But this
• 1:39:05
  is, this is beyond that. This is this level of sacrifice and harm
• 1:39:16
  is just and it's wrong. And the fact is that you are just like
• 1:39:24
  this, if you're listening and you're part of this, you're just a continuation
• 1:39:30
  of the same old, same old, a continuation of a society justifying to
• 1:39:34
  itself the sacrifice of its sons. And believe me, that ain't new anyway.
• 1:39:45
  Let's continue, I guess all right, let's play some moretics. We're
• 1:39:47
  directed towards defining the problem. We saw repeatedly that early access to healthy,
• 1:39:54
  stable communities is essential to preventing people from seeking out and developing identity within violent
• 1:39:59
  extreme We also found the men, you are a violent extremist view, I'm
• 1:40:06
  it's so fucking insane. How can you say this? Like? Right,
• 1:40:12
  from the start. You take the most powerful men and you say all men
• 1:40:18
  have that power. And you take the most depraved men and you say,
• 1:40:21
  this is this defines all men's motives and intent. Do you know what that
• 1:40:28
  sounds like? Well, it sounds like a prelude to a genocide. It's
• 1:40:34
  not gonna happen. Like, we're never gonna genocide our own husband's father's sons.
• 1:40:41
  So we're just gonna allow them to live in misery and kill themselves,
• 1:40:44
  right, that's right. Yeah. So but it's like I, I don't
• 1:40:48
  I don't worry about I don't worry about men as as like a totality,
• 1:40:57
  right as a sex being shoved in to ovens. I don't worry about that.
• 1:41:00
  I don't worry about valrii Illana's you know, pipe dreams, or Sally
• 1:41:06
  Miller Gerhart or Mary Daily's you know agenda to bring the male population down to
• 1:41:15
  about ten percent of the earth's population. I don't. I don't think that's
• 1:41:20
  ever gonna happen. Women just aren't going to cooperate when it comes to their
• 1:41:28
  particular men, right, their protectors and providers, their paychecks, their ATMs,
• 1:41:35
  their freaking you know, significant others, whether those are their fathers or
• 1:41:46
  their brothers, or their husbands or their sons. Right, they're not going
• 1:41:51
  to do it. They're not gonna Gender side is not something that's ever going
• 1:41:57
  to happen. Feminists want it to happen, but it's not going to at
• 1:42:03
  least not on any kind of industrial scale. But but I do worry about
• 1:42:10
  I do worry about this kind of rhetoric being targeted specifically at certain types of
• 1:42:21
  men, the white Christian man, uh, the white Jewish man, you
• 1:42:32
  know, the the swarthy Muslim man. You know. I worry about that,
• 1:42:41
  right because every single genocide overwhelmingly targets men and boys first. It eventually
• 1:42:48
  will graduate often often to to targeting the women as well, and the children,
• 1:42:58
  like the girls, men and boys. Men and boys are the first,
• 1:43:03
  the first wave, always, always, always, And that worries me.
• 1:43:10
  That worries me because the oppression narrative, the oppression coalition, right,
• 1:43:15
  and they act like it's a coalition. It's falling apart right now, right
• 1:43:20
  with Israel and Palestine and trans versus Turfs, right, all of these things.
• 1:43:28
  The oppression coalition is falling apart, it's splintering, it's balkanizing, and
• 1:43:33
  you are actually going to see some issues because that's tribalism. That's not sexism,
• 1:43:45
  that's tribalism. You're going to see some tribalistic violence. And sexist violence
• 1:43:50
  pales in comparison to tribalistic violence. I'm sorry, it just does violence against
• 1:43:58
  the other, right, violence against the other is a scary fucking thing.
• 1:44:05
  And ye, violence against women. Violence against women has never been violence against
• 1:44:13
  the other because women have never been the other. Okay, our women are
• 1:44:18
  our women. The it's only after you killed off all the men and boys
• 1:44:25
  that you start on the women and girls of that other group. Tribalistic violence
• 1:44:31
  is only enabled by the habits that we have around men, Like if I
• 1:44:40
  demonizing the other men, Yeah, demonizing those men over there are not We're
• 1:44:46
  good, be willing to sacrifice our men, Yeah, to destroy the other
• 1:44:53
  men. That's that's. Those are emotional habits both ways, and I mean
• 1:44:57
  they're probably also built whole Holy Jesus, Okay, But what I was going
• 1:45:02
  to say is that these people also don't care about women, like if it
• 1:45:08
  if it's between women and ideology, they'll choose their ideology over women, which
• 1:45:14
  is why, which in itself is why tribalist violence is so disturbing, because
• 1:45:23
  when you put that ideology ahead of anyone, you can murder anyone, and
• 1:45:27
  that includes women. So all right, yeah no, and uh, Boratt
• 1:45:32
  also says, and stay out to the to the maleman. Okay, let's
• 1:45:41
  see if we can get the mailman would never have left if Borat hadn't been.
• 1:45:45
  This is basically sort of a rehash. I think, really, you
• 1:45:47
  know, yeah, they're doing it. We could have just gone through this
• 1:45:50
  originally. Actually it's just a presentation, but I think it's a bit a
• 1:45:57
  bit better because you get I guess you get the creepy you get the creepy
• 1:46:02
  toad. Okay. I mean my ultimate point is this, they direct war
• 1:46:09
  propaganda against men, right, and then they turn around and say that people
• 1:46:13
  who are saying, well, we shouldn't do that are the ones who are
• 1:46:15
  creating hate. Yep. Isn't that like crazy? Yeah? No, I
• 1:46:23
  mean it's it's par for the course. Yeah, it's predictable. All right.
• 1:46:29
  I got another super chow, thank you. Uh. And it's from
• 1:46:34
  Richard Bierre and he says, for five dollars, why do I get the
• 1:46:39
  feeling that the supportive community will be located at the end of a long train
• 1:46:44
  ride, which will be a one way trip. And this is probably me
• 1:46:46
  with my tinfoil hat on. But I suspect that in cell is code speak
• 1:46:50
  or straight white male. Look up that s JW d UI stop where the
• 1:46:56
  NB actually calls out the officer for being a white male. I mean,
• 1:47:00
  you ain't wrong. I mean I think it's all it's it is. In
• 1:47:04
  CEL doesn't mean inceel. It's just man who disagrees, that's all. And
• 1:47:10
  a woman who disagrees to pick me. And if they could like somehow create
• 1:47:15
  a fear mongering narrative around pigmies, like if there's like a woman who does
• 1:47:20
  something that they could use, they would do it, but it just doesn't
• 1:47:24
  happen that way. So for now, it's just in cell. And yeah,
• 1:47:28
  straight it just means man on the outside. Straight white male is is
• 1:47:34
  basically code for has penis. Yeah, honestly, because yeah, straight white
• 1:47:41
  male is just man with with more steps. Yeah it's because honestly, it's
• 1:47:46
  every single male of any any particular group, regardless how allegedly marginalized or realistically
• 1:47:54
  marginalized, is the straight white male of their group. Yep, Yeah,
• 1:48:00
  No, gay men are the straight white men of the gay community. When
• 1:48:03
  it comes to when it comes to recognizing his paternity rights, George Floyd was
• 1:48:11
  the straight white male of black people. When it comes to recognizing his right
• 1:48:16
  to have some kind of role in his community, respected role in his community
• 1:48:20
  as a black man, he would be a straight white man of the black
• 1:48:24
  community. So when it comes to taking care of men like George Floyd in
• 1:48:29
  any way, he becomes the straight white male and considering their issues, considering
• 1:48:34
  their concerns, the very people who used his death to make millions would have
• 1:48:39
  called him the straight white male. The moment that he needed something while he
• 1:48:43
  was alive, he would have been considered the straight white male of the black
• 1:48:45
  community. Well, you literally have people saying, well, you know,
• 1:48:51
  black men are the straight white men of the black community, and you have
• 1:48:57
  you know, Black Lives Matter saying they want to redefine the family. They
• 1:49:03
  want to dismantle the white supremacist nuclear family structure and redefine the family for mothers,
• 1:49:16
  parents, and children. Yeah, the literally Black Lives Matter on their
• 1:49:24
  original website basically called the existence of black men to be white supremacy and then
• 1:49:30
  mothers, parents, and children, mothers, parents and children in their family
• 1:49:40
  is fathers. Fathers were not mentioned. No, And by parents they mean
• 1:49:45
  like other women who help. Yeah, No, it's it's like grandma who
• 1:49:50
  looks after the kids during the day or whatever. Having men in your community,
• 1:49:56
  having men fulfill any role, recognizing maybe that men have have a special
• 1:50:00
  role to fulfill. That's all white supremacy. So the very people who said
• 1:50:04
  that they advocated for George Floyd are the very people who were removing him from
• 1:50:11
  anything resembling a life worth having. Yep, and it was it was from
• 1:50:15
  it was from before he was born too. He was born into a system
• 1:50:20
  that they created put him on that road. But it's hatred for us to
• 1:50:28
  point that out. Should I play some more or a little bit more?
• 1:50:35
  Okay, times more likely to attempt to suicide and significantly less likely to seek
• 1:50:44
  out mental health support than we So we asked ourselves, what can we do
• 1:50:48
  to assist people in getting connected to healthy online? Can Here's what's happening with
• 1:50:54
  the mental health thing? What what I First, of all, men are
• 1:50:58
  seeking help before they commit suicide. The problem is they're not getting it right.
• 1:51:03
  So what's likely happening is they're seeking health, not getting it, not
• 1:51:06
  following up. So women will go to a therapist and be like, oh,
• 1:51:11
  this is exactly what I needed. I needed to talk to someone who
• 1:51:15
  won't judge me right, and they're like, Okay, I'm gonna keep going
• 1:51:18
  right. Men see that and they bounce right. They try, but they
• 1:51:24
  don't find what they need. Actually, actually, you you shared a report
• 1:51:30
  or a study to show that if men have a negative view of their mauline,
• 1:51:35
  of their own masculinity, they have worse mental health outcomes. And guess
• 1:51:40
  what the American Psychological Association does for men? It makes them feel like shit.
• 1:51:45
  And these people either don't know that and they're ignorant and they shouldn't be
• 1:51:49
  speaking on it, or they do know that and they're lying. So it's
• 1:51:53
  one of the other. Yeah, you're absolutely, that's exactly right, Brian.
• 1:51:58
  Great point to bring up, Like literally, the APA is constructing mental
• 1:52:02
  illness and men, and they're exacerbating mental illness and men. So men are
• 1:52:09
  going to mental health professionals, but they are not finding a solution. So
• 1:52:15
  this putting it on men's feet like this like, oh, the real reason
• 1:52:18
  why you're killing yourself or you me have mental health issues is because it is
• 1:52:23
  because of your inability to take care of yourself. Why do women have to
• 1:52:26
  do so much emotional labor? Blah blah blah blah blah. That's all bullshit.
• 1:52:31
  That's one goddamn bullshit, all right, listen, it's and honestly,
• 1:52:38
  telling men to go to therapy is basically telling me now, yeah, no,
• 1:52:43
  no, I would never telling men to go to therapy is these people's
• 1:52:47
  way of telling them to pull themselves up by their bootstraps. No, it's
• 1:52:53
  not. It's it's like telling men to have another dose of poison, right
• 1:52:59
  this It like I would never. I would never send any one of my
• 1:53:02
  children. I mean, I guess if any of them want to go to
• 1:53:06
  trade school, right, Sam's thinking about maybe, you know, becoming an
• 1:53:11
  electrician or something like that, right, totally fine, Right, But I
• 1:53:17
  saw what was coming ten years ago, right, more than ten years ago,
• 1:53:24
  when my older two were about to graduate, and I told them,
• 1:53:30
  I said, I'm not paying for you to go to university, like I'm
• 1:53:32
  not fucking putting one thin dime into it. You can live here for free
• 1:53:40
  if you pay for it yourself. Right, if you work, you have
• 1:53:44
  to pay rent not a whole lot of rent, but you have to pay
• 1:53:48
  rent. You can still live here until you get like enough savings, enough
• 1:53:53
  of a cushion to move out and have a good life. Right, But
• 1:53:59
  I am not, yeah, paying for you to go to that place and
• 1:54:03
  be poisoned. Right. And my husband, he and his mother recommended a
• 1:54:14
  psychologist. And the psychologist he's seventy seven years old. He's old school,
• 1:54:23
  right, So he goes and he sees him every now and then and talks
• 1:54:28
  about things, and the guy's really good, gives him some concrete advice and
• 1:54:33
  mostly about work problems and stuff like that. But it's like, you have
• 1:54:40
  this issue with any kind of psychologist you go to nowadays. Right, if
• 1:54:46
  they are less than sixty five years old, they're going to be they're gonna
• 1:54:54
  be apa stamped, rubber stamped. Right. But he hate men? Are
• 1:54:59
  you going to blame them? Man? Okay, Well, are you going
• 1:55:01
  to tell the man how he's wrong, how he's wrong on the inside and
• 1:55:09
  he has to change? Like this is not how they approach women. They
• 1:55:16
  don't say, hey, women, you're bad and you should feel bad unless
• 1:55:23
  you change completely change yourself and don't feminine, Yeah, don't identify as feminine,
• 1:55:30
  right, and and then all your problems will be solved. Right.
• 1:55:34
  They don't know problems which are your fault, by the way, or because
• 1:55:38
  you identify as feminine, because you value your femininity. You see. That's
• 1:55:42
  yeah, yeah, no, it's it's it's infuriating. And I see,
• 1:55:45
  I've seen it. I've watched it happen at the APA, the toxic Masculinity
• 1:55:50
  guidelines and stuff that they introduced your a few years ago, you know,
• 1:55:58
  like all of these things and them getting completely away from evolutionary psychology, any
• 1:56:04
  kind of consideration of that of sex differences between men's and women's psychology. They've
• 1:56:13
  just been like no, no, no, no, no no, and
• 1:56:17
  masculinity is bad and wrong. And I'm just like if I went to a
• 1:56:25
  psychologist and they told me I was bad and wrong and that was that,
• 1:56:33
  and I just had to completely change how I think and how I feel and
• 1:56:38
  how I do things like no, no, not if I have a real
• 1:56:48
  problem, not if I have genuine problems in my life. It's also freaking
• 1:56:54
  arrogant because the thing is that most people are experts of existing in their existence,
• 1:57:00
  you know, whereas the psychologist is like, no, I erase your
• 1:57:03
  existence and substitute my own ideology. No, Like, if you're not gonna
• 1:57:09
  come at it from recognizing, well, this person who has lived his life
• 1:57:14
  has managed to live it up to this point and keep himself alive. You
• 1:57:18
  know, he's the expert on that. And then maybe work with well,
• 1:57:24
  you could try this, you could try that. Maybe this is something that
• 1:57:27
  you you're you're you're working against yourself with, you know. But but to
• 1:57:33
  come at it from Nope, you got to erase all of the shit that's
• 1:57:36
  got you to this point. Like, honestly, that that would turn me
• 1:57:42
  off. Can you imagine, like you're a guy who's actually successfully staved off
• 1:57:45
  depression and suicide and you go to a one of these quackers quacks and they're
• 1:57:50
  like, well, you gotta change everything because it's your fault you have these
• 1:57:57
  problems in the first place, and you're just doing human wrong. But good
• 1:58:01
  lord, I wouldn't I would actually think that that might be uh, that
• 1:58:06
  might be a contributing factor to suicide. All right, shall we Okay,
• 1:58:15
  we want to do some more a little bit. Yeah, all right,
• 1:58:17
  let' see how they get connected to malicious ones To comprehensively answer this question.
• 1:58:23
  We intentionally utilized a mixed methods approach of quantitative, qualitative, and primary research
• 1:58:28
  methods. Our quantitative research included our network analysis, which gave us an idea
• 1:58:34
  of where the community exists and how it reinforces itself online. Well, this
• 1:58:39
  is actually qualitative research included interviewing experts from YouTube, Twitter, Moonshot, the
• 1:58:44
  Department of Home and Security, and others. We incorporated all the useful information
• 1:58:48
  and suggestions we received from these experts into our project. Next up is more
• 1:58:54
  on our primary research and overall strategy. We do another one. Actually interesting.
• 1:59:00
  Yeah, let's do a little bit more like this is actually interesting,
• 1:59:03
  all right. Unsatisfied with the availability of hard data, we created a comprehensive
• 1:59:13
  database of INSO terminology commonly utilized in online spaces in order to create an accurate
• 1:59:18
  network analysis of INSOL related behavior on platforms like Twitter. The database mildly Dangerous,
• 1:59:27
  very Dangerous, an intel gathering place called inso Wikipedia, is alphabetically organized
• 1:59:32
  and for now stands at eighty one. I'm talking it hilarious because this guy
• 1:59:36
  as common as I don't mean to be rude, but this guy looks like
• 1:59:42
  he's he's very close to the subject matter, shall we say okay and others
• 1:59:53
  are as nuanced as black pill. Furthermore, to improve the effectiveness and usefulness
• 1:59:58
  of the database, we created a violation skill which denotes each terms commonality and
• 2:00:03
  judge hatefulness based on extensive research and our collective subject matter expertise. Important to
• 2:00:12
  know, however, is that while Diverting Hates database has many terms, it
• 2:00:15
  will continue to evolve, expand, and adapt as we learn more about our
• 2:00:20
  target audience. To this end, in the coming months, our aim is
• 2:00:26
  to refine our methodology for compelling and ranking terms so that readers and you get
• 2:00:31
  better. Let's get Can we get to the actual terms or do they not
• 2:00:36
  cover those I don't know? I haven't seen this? Okay, because this
• 2:00:45
  and trace our sources. This is a little bit like okay, we're going
• 2:00:48
  through all the legal ease here. We want to get to the spicy stuff.
• 2:00:53
  But keep but for now, we are proud to house a robust and
• 2:00:58
  original database that we can use to effectively target our audience through the use of
• 2:01:03
  network analysis. In addition, the database serves as a unique tool for social
• 2:01:10
  media companies to utilize when implementing our tool. We don't get so we didn't
• 2:01:19
  get the actual terminology. Huh no, but it's you have to you have
• 2:01:25
  to realize it's going to be like red pill or Pearl Davis or Fresh and
• 2:01:31
  Fit or you know, uh cap go to dehumanizing language right there, recent
• 2:01:45
  posts first one. There you go. Okay, oh here we go.
• 2:01:51
  There we go right there. Thank you. You want me to go through
• 2:01:55
  this? Okay, So dehumanizing language. This is their list A women is
• 2:02:02
  there's a violation scale. Okay, that's that's violation is a five. It's
• 2:02:09
  super violating. We're already chat emphasize in women w a h women misspelling of
• 2:02:17
  the word women, derogatory term primarily used by in cells that implies women are
• 2:02:24
  unintelligent and lacking common sense. This is a direction. For example, women
• 2:02:30
  is like the mambulance. It's like, it's not it's not that the women
• 2:02:35
  are lacking common sense. It's it's that there are a bunch of fucking cry
• 2:02:40
  babies. Yeah that's women. Yeah, yeah, because they need to call
• 2:02:45
  a wambulance. Yeah, exactly, Jesus all right, And yet somehow the
• 2:02:54
  next one is less is less violating. It's called fmoids or foids. This
• 2:02:59
  is something I've only heard in cells use a derogatory portmanteau of female and android
• 2:03:05
  used by in cells to describe women. It seeks to emphasize the purpose the
• 2:03:10
  purportedly cold nature of women and dehumanizes them purportedly, like like, women can't
• 2:03:15
  be cold, especially to men they aren't attracted to That's impossible. Oh okay,
• 2:03:20
  you know, you know here's the thing too, right, Like,
• 2:03:23
  okay, so I could be described as an in cell adjacent person, right,
• 2:03:30
  okay, because I talk about men's instincts, women's instincts, I talk
• 2:03:35
  about our evolved psychology. I talk about all of that stuff. Like we
• 2:03:39
  literally are programmed. We have wetwear, then we have layers of operating systems
• 2:03:45
  on top of that, and then we have like hardware operating systems than software
• 2:03:50
  installed. And that's that's the order right in which things happen. Starts off
• 2:03:59
  in the hardware, then it goes to the operating system, then it goes
• 2:04:01
  to the software. Right, Okay, So we it's literally oldest, first,
• 2:04:09
  newest, last in the order of operations. So we are all operating,
• 2:04:15
  all of us, men, women, and lizards. We are all
• 2:04:20
  operating primarily first and foremost with our lizard brains, with our reptilian brains,
• 2:04:30
  and then everything else is kind of being processed and filtered, and sometimes we
• 2:04:36
  make the decision before we're even aware that we've made a decision, and then
• 2:04:41
  we back rationalize why we did it, you know, Oh, well I
• 2:04:45
  did it because this, or I did it because that. No, you
• 2:04:47
  did it because you did it right, And a part of your brain you're
• 2:04:51
  not even aware of made the decision ninety percent of the time, right,
• 2:04:57
  So like this femoids and man boughts, absolutely absolutely, Yeah, but I'm
• 2:05:09
  hardware. That's not even on the violation scale for me. Like, I
• 2:05:13
  don't get I guess I don't have a violation scale, all right. Next
• 2:05:17
  is feminazi, which is a three. So these are like in descending order
• 2:05:21
  of offensiveness. Feminazi. I don't even think people really use that anymore.
• 2:05:26
  Sometimes people use it when they're saying, oh, I'm not talking about feminists,
• 2:05:29
  I'm talking about feminazis, and I'm like, what's the difference, But
• 2:05:32
  feminazi is no difference. Yeah, there's no difference. I know. It's
• 2:05:35
  a stupid like distinction people try to make. It's like, oh, I'm
• 2:05:40
  not extreme. It's like the whole thing is extreme, dude. It's it's
• 2:05:44
  it's it all started with third wave feminism. That yeah, yeah, yesterday
• 2:05:50
  with the newest feminism on TikTok. Right. Okay, so feminazi has a
• 2:05:56
  is a three and it says a blend between feminist and not. I don't
• 2:06:00
  know if you guys figured that out, but really I did not see that.
• 2:06:05
  No, I didn't. I couldn't see that either. Derogatory term for
• 2:06:10
  feminists refers to extreme feminists who are I'm said to believe in a holocaust on
• 2:06:15
  men. You mean the actual women who do No, No, it's something
• 2:06:31
  Mary Daily, Sally Miller Gerhardt, ten year professors right, who got their
• 2:06:40
  jobs as professors of women's studies based on their belief that the male population needed
• 2:06:48
  to be brought down to ten percent of the total human population. Yeah,
• 2:06:56
  good grief again, like this entire ideology is hateful. It is. These
• 2:07:01
  people are starting from a premise, and you know, you know, they
• 2:07:05
  spend a lot of time and money defending this ship too. They spend more
• 2:07:11
  time and money building these giant like these papers and these podcasts and videos and
• 2:07:16
  propaganda they do. They spend so much time and money on an effort.
• 2:07:20
  You see, like they're defining these terms. They probably had like other professors
• 2:07:25
  looking over the material and spending like work hours of their tenure jobs to like
• 2:07:30
  make sure that they got famoid correct and in cell correct and all this shit.
• 2:07:36
  And it's all just to protect their ideology. It's all to protect their
• 2:07:40
  bottom line, their jobs, their livelihood. It's that none of this is
• 2:07:44
  actually addressing any of the any of the concerns that men have, not one
• 2:07:48
  cent. It's all like, but we have to find top g you know,
• 2:07:54
  like that's so insll itself. Offense gets a big paragraph because it's a
• 2:08:01
  it's a we gotta get We got a deep delve deep in cell two on
• 2:08:05
  the scale shortened version of involuntary celibate, which defines a person who has involuntarily
• 2:08:13
  abstained from relationships, whether sexual or not. I don't think you can involuntarily
• 2:08:18
  or stain. I think that you're kind of pushed into it. But yeah,
• 2:08:22
  really abstained. That abstain doesn't work. There, No, it doesn't
• 2:08:26
  work there No. No, No, they're academics. They're worse, they're
• 2:08:33
  intellectuals. Jesus. Typically, when this term is used, it represents a
• 2:08:39
  male who is sexually frustrated and takes to the Internet to discuss their frustrations with
• 2:08:45
  women and lack of relationships. These discussions range from accepting various realities pill jargon
• 2:08:50
  to classifying themselves and their lack of characteristics or traits cell terms. While some
• 2:08:56
  in cells can be considered fringe and expect hateful, misogynistic beliefs, that is
• 2:09:01
  not the case for all inside Well, thanks thanks for that. Bone.
• 2:09:05
  Mine is just the name rate A two on your Yeah, just the word
• 2:09:11
  you use it to attack basically men who disagree with you. Do you have
• 2:09:15
  to like offer trigger warnings to the people around you so they don't get upset
• 2:09:18
  by the fact that you have to use the term to describe the man.
• 2:09:22
  Eight. Let's see what the next page is. Okay, the last one.
• 2:09:26
  I gotta read the last one, so it is super important. Top
• 2:09:28
  G. This has a one and it says nickname for Andrew Tait, a
• 2:09:31
  media personality that has espoused extreme misogynist ideas to a significant following. Okay,
• 2:09:37
  first of all, First of all, Andrew Tait is not the top G.
• 2:09:41
  That's Meredith G. Meredith G is the top G. Get that right?
• 2:09:45
  Yeah, that's number one. Number two, Andrew tait Is is pretty
• 2:09:50
  fucking blue pilled. I'm sorry to me. I've seen his videos. I'm
• 2:09:56
  not impressed. Just saying I'll defend his rights. I don't think that.
• 2:10:01
  I think he's treated unfairly by the media and ship, but he's not.
• 2:10:03
  He's not like, he's not really red pilling anybody as far as I I
• 2:10:09
  wonder one thing that he said that has blown my mind. So I really
• 2:10:13
  wonder if they took the time to actually analyze our content, if if the
• 2:10:18
  sheer level of massogy noir would just like blow out the lizard center of their
• 2:10:24
  brain. Well, I just I just yeah, no, because okay,
• 2:10:28
  so I I uh I used tickling her cunt flaps earlier on and some serious
• 2:10:39
  violence there, Karen, Yeah, no, it's uh well, tickling is
• 2:10:45
  actually a form of torture. You know, it is so well for people
• 2:10:50
  who are really ticklish. So my husband knows not to tickle ever, okay,
• 2:10:58
  and my dog knows to only lick my feet in a certain way.
• 2:11:05
  Quantity of posts containing key terms, Oh yeah, so the quantity of posts.
• 2:11:11
  Okay, So seventy I don't know what seventy one is like seventy one
• 2:11:16
  period or seventy one thousand or whatever. But at the bottom of femoid what
• 2:11:20
  they don't have a they don't have the their Yeah, just this quantity seventy
• 2:11:26
  one out of three hundred. No, there's no vertical scale. It's just
• 2:11:30
  like, what what are what is this out of? Yeah? This is
• 2:11:33
  this is Oh, this is you know what this is? This is out
• 2:11:35
  of three hundred misogyn war points. Oh maybe I don't know. But at
• 2:11:41
  the bottom of a femoid seventy one, then feminazi at eighty one. It's
• 2:11:46
  kind of a boomer word for feminists to be honest. Uh, then in
• 2:11:50
  cells at two hundred ninety seven. Now, I just got a question.
• 2:11:52
  Does this include when feminists use the term, because I feel like that's when
• 2:11:56
  when feminists use yeah, that's what that is because they love that word.
• 2:12:01
  They love it. I mean, if this was like twenty and fourteen,
• 2:12:05
  that would be MR instead. You know, this is like, this is
• 2:12:09
  this is somebody paid for this? Yeah, yeah, seven security. I
• 2:12:18
  could use seven hundred thousand dollars and I could tell you exactly why this is
• 2:12:24
  bullshit. You got to pump those numbers up. Those are rookie numbers.
• 2:12:31
  This is a year top G one hundred and sixty one and ninety five.
• 2:12:37
  I think Whamen should be number one. It's the most triggering, it's the
• 2:12:39
  most fun to use. I think we can win. We have to.
• 2:12:45
  We have to get the top score. Yeah no, if if if you,
• 2:12:48
  if you call a woman a whaman, then uh then yeah, no,
• 2:12:54
  you're hittner like wrightner strong, independent soul right right, the baby maker,
• 2:13:01
  straight shots, punt you and the ovary in cells. You're slacking off.
• 2:13:03
  You need to get those women that women. Get those women numbers up.
• 2:13:09
  Yeah, get those women numbers up. Should be at least six hundred
• 2:13:13
  out of three three hundred poorly explained points. Okay, it says here,
• 2:13:18
  Oh, they scraped nine hundred and five posts post with keywords in cell or
• 2:13:24
  in cells were five. They went through nine hundred and five posts. So
• 2:13:33
  it's that and how many posts get made on Twitter every day? How many?
• 2:13:39
  Well, okay, but they're describing a community, So it was nine
• 2:13:43
  hundred and five posts from how do they identify the community people that they'd already
• 2:13:48
  apparently identified as part of the community. All right, So of the nine
• 2:13:54
  hundred and five streat posts, post with keywords in cell or in cells were
• 2:13:58
  two ninety seven. So it basically is just reading it what we looked at
• 2:14:01
  in terms of the chart, and we have this other thing. I'm not
• 2:14:05
  really sure what this is. Looks like a kind of graph, and it
• 2:14:11
  has it broken up into different sections sexual scarcity, defense in cells, degenerate
• 2:14:16
  modern women, red pill, sexual abuse, boycott, feminist orges. So
• 2:14:20
  the biggest are like abortion, transphobia has twelve oh interesting messengers society nine,
• 2:14:31
  wokeness general eleven, societal destruction ten, single hood two, women in politics
• 2:14:35
  five, trauma healing one, progressive women for traditional gender roles five in cell
• 2:14:41
  news one, p u A three, stupid dumb thirteen eight, deep state
• 2:14:48
  eleven, mainstream media five. Okay, I don't even know what this is
• 2:14:52
  supposed to mean, but you know it's got a lot of things. Well,
• 2:14:56
  we're going to read it. I think there's a thing here says through
• 2:14:58
  inductive coding. Different themes were established in the Getter post sample. The most
• 2:15:03
  recurring themes were women being referred to as stupid, dumb, or naive,
• 2:15:07
  as well as critiques of modern women as degenerates and promiscuous. General transphobic posts
• 2:15:13
  were also captured through these key terms. I don't know, like they're just
• 2:15:16
  sort of lumping that in, so who knows what qualifies. I wouldn't look
• 2:15:20
  into that too close. I don't think it's going to reveal much. General
• 2:15:24
  criticisms of wokeness, of which feminism or gender equality is considered part absolutely were
• 2:15:30
  frequently coded as well. Of no. Posts alleging a connection between feminism and
• 2:15:35
  or gender equality and the deep State were also frequently recurring. Well, yes,
• 2:15:39
  that's also true, guys. In this document for the Homeland Security the
• 2:15:43
  insults are alleging it. Yes, so the deep State, in an effort
• 2:15:48
  to prove that the deep state doesn't exist, is going to use its deep
• 2:15:52
  state powers to call out the people that are suspicious of the deep State.
• 2:15:56
  Good job, guys, No will notice. Nobody's gonna see that you make
• 2:16:03
  the connections here. It's not like gloryer Steynum wasn't like a known CIA asset,
• 2:16:09
  guys. It's not like that. No, it's not like that at
• 2:16:15
  all. Yeah, okay, so go back down. Let's see the rest
• 2:16:18
  of that. The paragraph you mean all right, says coded where highly offensive
• 2:16:26
  slurs were used to refer to women in politics, feminin, Nazi or femoid.
• 2:16:31
  Two very explicit INSEEL related themes were coded sexual scarcity referring to the lack
• 2:16:35
  of sexual partners of some men, which is a very small percentage, by
• 2:16:39
  the way, and defense in cells recurring referring to posts and direct support of
• 2:16:43
  the in cell community, which there probably should be a lot more of by
• 2:16:46
  the way. Of the one hundred and thirty six tech segments coded, one
• 2:16:50
  segment was coded under the sexual abuse theme. The post lamented that women complain
• 2:16:56
  about sexual harassment. Okay, let me let me put this out, like
• 2:17:03
  if you compared this to the average feminist forum. No, just like the
• 2:17:09
  average like socially supported feminist academic uh community? Yeah, like women are degenerate.
• 2:17:18
  Well, men are considered to be defined by rapists and serial killers.
• 2:17:22
  Mental yeah right, Uh? Women have power? Will men ared seem to
• 2:17:28
  be defined by the top one of men who have power like women? Women?
• 2:17:35
  Women complain a lot they're women. Oh well, let me sip from
• 2:17:41
  my male tears mug like this is unbelievable. But except one one philosophy or
• 2:17:50
  allegation towards the other gender is being funded by homeland security, it is you
• 2:17:58
  can see it all both sides everywhere, But both sides. Yeah, there's
• 2:18:03
  no SI, there's no both sides until we have the same clout as feminists.
• 2:18:09
  Yeah, and men don't want that. I don't think men want to
• 2:18:11
  run the fucking government to make to make things fair and they just want the
• 2:18:16
  government to get the fuck out of their lives. Well, men, men
• 2:18:22
  who do want to run the government, they are not just running the government
• 2:18:24
  for men. No, they're running it for women primarily. But yeah,
• 2:18:28
  but I'm saying, like men like we yeah, no, to use the
• 2:18:35
  state power to like make life fair for men, because like the problem is
• 2:18:39
  the state. Yeah, at least, I mean at least in part you
• 2:18:46
  know, Oh my god, this guy is just going door to door.
• 2:18:56
  So let's just look at the headings. Let's look at the headings the what
• 2:19:01
  the headings headings of the graph? What are you talking about? What headings?
• 2:19:07
  Well, let's go down, just go down a bit, just go
• 2:19:09
  down, all right, I want to read this the narrative, go back
• 2:19:13
  up, go back up. This is this is confusing as all the narrative
• 2:19:16
  for these two themes. Although Sanki visualization of these themes were further explored and
• 2:19:20
  broken down into narratives. Firstly, against in cells category coded eight times overlapped
• 2:19:24
  seven times with the transphobia theme. The narrative for these two themes goes as
• 2:19:28
  follows. In cells unable to get a partner and desperate to find one gender
• 2:19:33
  transition to prey on women. These posts tended to be used to discredit gender
• 2:19:37
  transitioning as a legitimate medical treatment for gender dysphoria. This is an in cell
• 2:19:41
  forum, and I'm guessing that they are against transmaxing by you, yes,
• 2:19:50
  Like they're saying that this in cell forum is saying that in cells transition to
• 2:19:56
  women in order to pray on try transition to them and to pray on them.
• 2:20:01
  So well, that depends. Are the in cells saying that men who
• 2:20:07
  transition are preying on women or are they saying that they would rather live as
• 2:20:11
  women because transmaxing has nothing to do with dating women. Although I think that
• 2:20:18
  this is this is an absolute like, this doesn't seem consistent unless there is
• 2:20:24
  a contingent of in cells in the forum that are basically calling out transmaxers.
• 2:20:30
  Possibly again, I don't know. I think it's no. They're literally they're
• 2:20:33
  literally saying that in cells are transitioning in order to pray on women, or
• 2:20:41
  at least that the narrative says that. Okay, so that that is actually
• 2:20:48
  kind of the urf feminist narrative. Yeah, but why is that popping up
• 2:20:54
  in an in cell forum directed in other in cells we're transmaxing? This sounds
• 2:21:03
  like gobbledegook. I don't I don't trust I don't trust them to like present
• 2:21:09
  this fairly. I think that when in cells are getting to the point where
• 2:21:13
  they want to live as women, they have reached the end of their rope.
• 2:21:16
  They're limited, they have basically run out of other options, and they're
• 2:21:18
  taking the most extreme measures. And I and I think that in many cases,
• 2:21:22
  because this isn't real generousphoria. If they're making a conscious decision to live
• 2:21:28
  as a woman, this is not going to go well for them. So
• 2:21:31
  this is not something that I would I would want to consider at all normal.
• 2:21:37
  It probably is very very very rare and fringe. Although people are being
• 2:21:43
  groomed to be trans by their parents, there is also the tools. But
• 2:21:50
  but no, but what this what this seems to be saying, okay,
• 2:21:56
  is that there are people accusing in CeX here in the chat by the way,
• 2:22:09
  IBX, Yeah, well I probably should finish this off. I think
• 2:22:15
  that this is just gonna have to be a big question maybe in the comments
• 2:22:18
  people know, but there there are people who are accusing in cells of transitioning
• 2:22:24
  so they can pray on women. Well that's not men's rights activists. I
• 2:22:28
  don't even think that's in cells. I think that, but they're attributing it
• 2:22:31
  to an inter Yeah, okay, guys, did you just wander into a
• 2:22:37
  turf for them by accident? Yeah? I mean they are in cells,
• 2:22:41
  found cells, But I can what is this? This doesn't even make sense
• 2:22:46
  coming from insults is what we're getting at. But maybe somebody in the comments
• 2:22:50
  can clarify this big question mark that we have. Yeah, okay, what
• 2:22:56
  do you want to do? What? Yeah, no, we need to
• 2:23:01
  stop. We need to stop because I have responsibilities to have two dogs that
• 2:23:09
  need fed. We don't have much left. I just want to see the
• 2:23:13
  end. That's it. Roll all the way to the end, scroll that
• 2:23:18
  ass. Okay, I don't even know what that there you go right there,
• 2:23:20
  the conclusion. I don't even know what that freaking spaghetti mess is.
• 2:23:26
  This is just look where b X, I see you in the chat we'll
• 2:23:31
  talk about it. We'll go do a deep dive when you come on.
• 2:23:33
  Okay, I can't. I've been doing this for like two and a half
• 2:23:37
  hours and I have to do an after show. It's crazy. I'm just
• 2:23:41
  not that's just too much. So we're going to finish it here. Stay
• 2:23:46
  in touch with me on Twitter and Badger Arcade. I've been messaging you.
• 2:23:50
  We'll figure it out. I want to get to the bottom of it,
• 2:23:54
  truthfully. Okay. What conclusion? This preliminary study sought to understand the theme
• 2:24:00
  foci of Manisphere related content on Getter. The general frequency of criticism of purported
• 2:24:07
  wokeness and degeneracy indicates that Getter's ideological folk I reply primarily on a far right
• 2:24:13
  vernacular and simultaneously draws on some Manisphere concepts. However, most of its discourse
• 2:24:18
  relies on deep state conspiracies interwoven with anti feminist ideals, says the Feminist being
• 2:24:26
  funded by Homeland Consecurity. A small number of codes for the sexual scarcity and
• 2:24:31
  pickup artists PUA themes indicate there are some sub movements of the Menisphere present on
• 2:24:35
  Getter. Overall, this study suggests Getter is a useful platform for analysis of
• 2:24:39
  evolving discussions of the manisphere and their overlap with ideological communities. All right,
• 2:24:46
  this is based on a bit more than nine hundred posts that they got on
• 2:24:50
  getter. Good lord, somebody's getting a that's real. Okay, somebody's getting
• 2:24:56
  a paycheck for this, and that is the real tragedy here. Oh yeah,
• 2:25:01
  no, like I'm oh, they're getting more than this too. They're
• 2:25:03
  probably because this is what the government gave them. If they probably I don't
• 2:25:07
  know if BX nos, but they probably got donations from other foundations, you
• 2:25:13
  know, and they probably got paid like big time to do shit like this.
• 2:25:18
  What the hell does this do? Like, you know, you could
• 2:25:22
  just address men's issues, No, Alison, No, No, that's too
• 2:25:30
  much work. Why would you do that when you can just pay like random
• 2:25:35
  college students, like you know, nearly a million dollars to just infuse the
• 2:25:43
  Internet with propaganda so that men get driven away to places where they won't get
• 2:25:46
  any help and are more likely to commit suicide. Why why would you make
• 2:25:50
  it so easy when you can make it way harder then spend more money?
• 2:26:00
  Oh, good lord, Like, why don't you just okay, okay,
• 2:26:07
  don't ask don't ask why the why just opens up and everyone gets swallowed in.
• 2:26:15
  Okay, yeah, no, we're done. Thank you guys for listening.
• 2:26:20
  Feed the Badger dot com slash support to support the show. Feed Thebadger
• 2:26:22
  dot com slash just the tip if you want to send us a message,
• 2:26:24
  if you enjoyed this content, you want to tell us we aren't screaming into
• 2:26:28
  the void, and we will take those comments and read them at the next
• 2:26:31
  relevant show, which will be shortly according to Brian, since he's gonna have
• 2:26:37
  the individual who brought up all this research and so yeah, let's uh back
• 2:26:41
  to you, Brian. Yeah video, please hit like subscribe you not already
• 2:26:48
  subscribe, hit the bellf notification. We know what you guys think about what
• 2:26:50
  we discussed on the show today. There's links to the original Twitter thread and
• 2:26:54
  the description I am gonna be. I think b X, who's in the
• 2:26:58
  live chat right now, will be where the plan is for her to come
• 2:27:03
  on a Monday at like in theive o'clock or something, so hopefully she can
• 2:27:09
  make that and shout out to the rumble gang. I forgot to shout out
• 2:27:13
  to you guys before, but you know, throw some emojis or gifts in
• 2:27:16
  the chat for the Rumble Gang and because I want to make the last platform
• 2:27:22
  what there's a last super child that got in and yeah, I know I'm
• 2:27:26
  going to read it out. I did get one more super child from Richard
• 2:27:31
  Pierre. He gives us five bucks and says, and these people doing this
• 2:27:33
  investigation are also complaining that men are preferring video games to casual sex. Uh
• 2:27:39
  yeah, well you know again they want to take everything away from them and
• 2:27:43
  then complain when they find some of the places to escape into. Yeah.
• 2:27:46
  Men exist, I mean that's the general complaint men. Yeah, men exist.
• 2:27:56
  Yeah. Anyway, so we're gonna we're gonna go into the Patron Show
• 2:28:05
  now, so join me there. I think I'll be in the probably just
• 2:28:09
  the nerd cast out of a show, So that's kind of a low level
• 2:28:11
  thing if you want to join us. And yeah, with all that said,
• 2:28:16
  share the video because Sharry is caring. Thanks guys for coming on today's
• 2:28:20
  episode of The rant Zerker. We'll maybe go through more of it later and
• 2:28:24
  we'll talk to you guys in the next one.