Latest / truthunedited / THE MYSTERY OF THE LOST YEARS OF THE JEWISH CALENDAR

Transcript

THE MYSTERY OF THE LOST YEARS OF THE JEWISH CALENDAR · truthunedited

• 0:00
  Speaker 1: Did you know that the Jewish calendar, frequently discussed, studied,
• 0:03
  Speaker 1: and admired by many, including Jews themselves, contain surprising curiosities
• 0:09
  Speaker 1: that rarely reach the general public. At first glance, it
• 0:12
  Speaker 1: appears to be a solid, ancient system, carefully preserved over
• 0:16
  Speaker 1: the centuries. However, when examined more closely, intriguing details emerge
• 0:22
  Speaker 1: that challenge widely accepted historical certainties. Among them, one of
• 0:27
  Speaker 1: the most fascinating involves what scholars refer to as chronological inconsistencies,
• 0:33
  Speaker 1: known as the lost years or missing years of the
• 0:36
  Speaker 1: Jewish calendar. In today's documentary, we will delve into this
• 0:40
  Speaker 1: little discussed enigma and shed light on one of the
• 0:43
  Speaker 1: greatest controversies in biblical and historical chronology. After all, what
• 0:49
  Speaker 1: year are we really in? When we examine the Jewish
• 0:51
  Speaker 1: calendar through a critical and comparative lens, does the system
• 0:56
  Speaker 1: that organizes time from Adam onward accurately reflect known historical events?
• 1:02
  Speaker 1: Stay with us and discover the background of this mystery
• 1:05
  Speaker 1: that spans centuries. The intriguing case of the lost years
• 1:09
  Speaker 1: of the Jewish calendar. The so called missing years of
• 1:13
  Speaker 1: the Hebrew calendar refer to a significant chronological discrepancy between
• 1:18
  Speaker 1: traditional rabbinic dating and modern academic dating, especially when we
• 1:23
  Speaker 1: examine fundamental historical events such as the destruction of the
• 1:27
  Speaker 1: First Temple of Jerusalem. According to rabbinic tradition, this event
• 1:31
  Speaker 1: occurred in four hundred twenty two b C, corresponding to
• 1:35
  Speaker 1: the year three thousand, three hundred thirty eight of the
• 1:38
  Speaker 1: Hebrew Anno Mundi calendar. Most historians, however, based on Babylonian records,
• 1:44
  Speaker 1: archaeological evidence, and astronomical data, place the destruction of the
• 1:48
  Speaker 1: First Temple in five hundred eighty seven b C, revealing
• 1:52
  Speaker 1: a substantial difference between the two systems of time keeping.
• 1:56
  Speaker 1: More broadly, this divergence exposes a deep conflict between conventional
• 2:01
  Speaker 1: historical chronology widely accepted in academic circles, and the chronology
• 2:06
  Speaker 1: presented by this Seder Olam Rabbah, a rabbinic text compiled
• 2:10
  Speaker 1: around the second century AD that offers an alternative narrative
• 2:14
  Speaker 1: of Jewish history. One of the most striking examples of
• 2:17
  Speaker 1: this discrepancy appears during the Persian period, when the Achaemenid
• 2:22
  Speaker 1: Empire ruled the region of Israel. While conventional chronology indicates
• 2:26
  Speaker 1: that Persian dominance lasted approximately two hundred and seven years.
• 2:30
  Speaker 1: The Seder Olam dramatically reduces this period to just thirty
• 2:34
  Speaker 1: four years. This compression of time creates a difference of
• 2:38
  Speaker 1: more than one hundred seventy years, triggering a cascading effect
• 2:42
  Speaker 1: on numerous other historical milestones. One of the most significant
• 2:46
  Speaker 1: impacts concerns the duration of the Second Temple of Jerusalem.
• 2:51
  Speaker 1: According to later Rabbinic tradition, the Second Temple stood for
• 2:55
  Speaker 1: four hundred twenty years. Conventional historical chronology, by contrasts, estimates
• 3:01
  Speaker 1: its existence at approximately five hundred eighty nine years. This
• 3:06
  Speaker 1: difference influences not only academic debates, but also directly shapes
• 3:10
  Speaker 1: how Biblical events are understood, taught, and interpreted within religious, cultural,
• 3:15
  Speaker 1: and theological contexts. Academic chronology is broadly supported by a
• 3:20
  Speaker 1: robust body of historical, archaeological, and scientific sources that complement
• 3:26
  Speaker 1: one another. These include Persian, Babylonian, and Greek records, as
• 3:31
  Speaker 1: well as administrative documents, royal inscriptions, and chronological tables preserved
• 3:36
  Speaker 1: on clay tablets. One of the strongest pillars of this
• 3:39
  Speaker 1: approach is the use of detailed astronomical observations such as
• 3:44
  Speaker 1: precise records of lunar and solar eclipses, which allow researchers
• 3:48
  Speaker 1: to anchor historical events to absolute dates. These celestial phenomena
• 3:54
  Speaker 1: function as true time markers, providing objective and verifiable testimony
• 3:58
  Speaker 1: of ancient history, independent of religious traditions or later interpretations.
• 4:04
  Speaker 1: In contrast, the Seder Olam Rabba presents a different proposal.
• 4:08
  Speaker 1: By condensing certain historical periods, especially those involving foreign rule
• 4:13
  Speaker 1: over Israel, The text appears to aim not merely at
• 4:16
  Speaker 1: recording facts, but at organizing the past within a specific
• 4:20
  Speaker 1: theological framework. Many scholars understand this choice as a deliberate
• 4:25
  Speaker 1: attempt to align history with the Jewish religious narrative, reinforcing
• 4:29
  Speaker 1: the spiritual and cultural identity of the Jewish people. This
• 4:33
  Speaker 1: effort becomes even more meaningful when considered within the context
• 4:37
  Speaker 1: in which the Caeda Olam was compiled, a period marked
• 4:40
  Speaker 1: by dispersion, persecution, and the need to preserve national and
• 4:45
  Speaker 1: religious cohesion in the face of lost political sovereignty. Despite
• 4:49
  Speaker 1: these methodological differences, it is important to note that even
• 4:53
  Speaker 1: within academic chronology, there are minor variations among scholars. In general,
• 4:59
  Speaker 1: these differences are limited to one or two years for
• 5:02
  Speaker 1: certain specific dates. Even so, there are historical milestones that
• 5:07
  Speaker 1: are widely accepted, such as the siege of Jerusalem in
• 5:10
  Speaker 1: five hundred ninety seven BC. Both the Babylonian Chronicles and
• 5:15
  Speaker 1: the Biblical texts agree that nebucid Neza the Second captured
• 5:19
  Speaker 1: Jerusalem during this period. The Babylonian Chronicles, published by Donald
• 5:23
  Speaker 1: Wiseman in nineteen fifty six, provide particularly precise data, stating
• 5:28
  Speaker 1: that the first capture occurred on the second day of
• 5:31
  Speaker 1: the month of Ada, corresponding to March sixteenth, five hundred
• 5:35
  Speaker 1: ninety seven BC. Interestingly, even before the publication of these chronicles,
• 5:41
  Speaker 1: the scholar Edwin R. Tyler had already reached a similar
• 5:44
  Speaker 1: conclusion by carefully analyzing the Biblical texts, placing the initial
• 5:49
  Speaker 1: capture of Jerusalem in the spring of five hundred ninety
• 5:52
  Speaker 1: seven b C. Other academics, such as William F. Albright,
• 5:57
  Speaker 1: proposed slightly different dates, often pointing to five hundred ninety
• 6:01
  Speaker 1: eight b C. Nevertheless, despite these minor variations, the general
• 6:07
  Speaker 1: consensus remains the siege and capture of Jerusalem by nebucad
• 6:11
  Speaker 1: Neza marked a decisive turning point in Jewish history. After
• 6:15
  Speaker 1: this first siege, nebucad Nezza installed Zedekiah as a vassal
• 6:19
  Speaker 1: king in Jerusalem in an effort to maintain indirect control
• 6:23
  Speaker 1: over the region. According to the biblical accounts, Zedekiah reigned
• 6:27
  Speaker 1: for eleven years until his rebellion provoked a second and
• 6:31
  Speaker 1: devastating siege. This renewed attack culminated in the destruction of
• 6:36
  Speaker 1: the First Temple and the definitive collapse of his reign.
• 6:40
  Speaker 1: Although it is widely accepted that Jerusalem fell again during
• 6:43
  Speaker 1: the summer month of Tammuz, the exact dates of this
• 6:46
  Speaker 1: event continue to be debated among scholars. William F. Albright
• 6:51
  Speaker 1: places the final fall of Jerusalem and the end of
• 6:54
  Speaker 1: Zedekiah's reign in five hundred eighty seven b C, while
• 6:58
  Speaker 1: Edwin R. Thieler proposes the following year, five hundred eighty
• 7:03
  Speaker 1: six b C. This difference, subtle at first glance, reveals
• 7:08
  Speaker 1: the complexity of the chronological methods used to reconstruct ancient history.
• 7:13
  Speaker 1: Thela's proposal is based on the so called accession year method,
• 7:18
  Speaker 1: a system widely employed for most of the kings of Judah.
• 7:21
  Speaker 1: In this model, the year in which a king ascends
• 7:24
  Speaker 1: the throne is not counted as his first full regnal year,
• 7:28
  Speaker 1: but rather as a partial period known as the accession year.
• 7:32
  Speaker 1: Applying this method to Zedekiah, his first full year of
• 7:36
  Speaker 1: reign would have occurred between five hundred ninety seven and
• 7:39
  Speaker 1: five hundred ninety six b C, following his enthronement by
• 7:43
  Speaker 1: the Babylonians. From that point, the count proceeds systematically until
• 7:48
  Speaker 1: the eleventh year of his rule, the year marked by
• 7:50
  Speaker 1: the final siege and the fall of Jerusalem. Thus, the
• 7:55
  Speaker 1: end of his reign is placed between five hundred eighty
• 7:58
  Speaker 1: seven and five hundred eighty Considering that in Judah, regnal
• 8:04
  Speaker 1: years were traditionally reckoned from the month of Tischree in
• 8:07
  Speaker 1: the autumn, this calculation positions the destruction of the city
• 8:11
  Speaker 1: and the First Temple in the summer of five hundred
• 8:14
  Speaker 1: eighty six b C. The strength of this chronological reconstruction
• 8:20
  Speaker 1: is reinforced by Babylonian historical records, which provide a detailed
• 8:24
  Speaker 1: sequence of military campaigns and reigns, as well as precise
• 8:28
  Speaker 1: astronomical data such as eclipses recorded on cune form tablets.
• 8:33
  Speaker 1: These elements function as fixed points in time, enabling historians
• 8:38
  Speaker 1: to align biblical narratives with historically verifiable events. All of
• 8:43
  Speaker 1: this highlights not only the reliability of modern analyzes, but
• 8:47
  Speaker 1: also the immense complexity involved in reconstructing events that took
• 8:51
  Speaker 1: place more than two millennia ago. When we turn our
• 8:54
  Speaker 1: attention to traditional Jewish sources, we encounter a different approach.
• 9:00
  Speaker 1: Rural rabbinic texts state that the Second Temple stood for
• 9:03
  Speaker 1: four hundred twenty years, a calculation based primarily on the
• 9:07
  Speaker 1: Seder Olam Rabbah, a central work of classical Jewish chronology.
• 9:12
  Speaker 1: According to this tradition, the destruction of the Second Temple
• 9:15
  Speaker 1: occurred in the year sixty eight CE, which would imply
• 9:19
  Speaker 1: that its construction began around three hundred fifty two b C.
• 9:24
  Speaker 1: To sustain this dating, a fixed interval of seventy years
• 9:27
  Speaker 1: is assumed between the destruction of the First Temple and
• 9:30
  Speaker 1: the beginning of the construction of the second, leading to
• 9:33
  Speaker 1: the conclusion that the First Temple was destroyed around four
• 9:36
  Speaker 1: hundred twenty two b C. Although this chronology exerted enormous
• 9:41
  Speaker 1: influence and was widely accepted among ancient rabbis, it was
• 9:45
  Speaker 1: never entirely unanimous. Texts such as Piquet de Rabi, Elieza,
• 9:51
  Speaker 1: Midrash leitch Tov, and the writings of various Rishanim medieval
• 9:55
  Speaker 1: rabbinic authorities present significant divergences from the dates establish by
• 10:00
  Speaker 1: the Seder olam rabba. These internal disagreements reveal that even
• 10:05
  Speaker 1: within the Jewish tradition, chronology has always been a debated,
• 10:09
  Speaker 1: complex subject far from absolute consensus. One of the central
• 10:15
  Speaker 1: issues surrounding the Jewish calendar concerns the so called lost years,
• 10:20
  Speaker 1: a discrepancy of approximately one hundred sixty five years in
• 10:23
  Speaker 1: relation to academic chronology. According to traditional rabbinic calculations, the
• 10:29
  Speaker 1: destruction of the First Temple would have occurred one hundred
• 10:32
  Speaker 1: sixty five years later than the date accepted by most historians,
• 10:36
  Speaker 1: who place the event between five hundred eighty seven and
• 10:39
  Speaker 1: five hundred eighty six b c. This difference is not
• 10:43
  Speaker 1: merely a matter of numbers, but reflects a fundamental tension
• 10:46
  Speaker 1: between academic rigor grounded in historical and archaeological sources, and
• 10:52
  Speaker 1: the theological and narrative interpretation found in rabbinic traditions. The chronology
• 10:57
  Speaker 1: of the Seder olam Rabbah foundational text in Jewish tradition
• 11:02
  Speaker 1: seeks to align historical events with a religious narrative, often
• 11:06
  Speaker 1: simplifying or compressing long periods of time in order to
• 11:10
  Speaker 1: emphasize spiritual and theological lessons. While this is understandable within
• 11:15
  Speaker 1: a religious context, such adaptations may not align with the
• 11:18
  Speaker 1: more broadly accepted historical data derived from external sources. At
• 11:24
  Speaker 1: the same time, works such as per Que de Rabbi
• 11:26
  Speaker 1: Eliezer and Midrash leech Tov reveal a more flexible and
• 11:30
  Speaker 1: dynamic rabbinic tradition in which historical details were frequently adapted
• 11:36
  Speaker 1: to serve theological purposes or specific contexts. This dynamism suggests
• 11:42
  Speaker 1: that Jewish tradition did not view historical dates as rigid
• 11:46
  Speaker 1: and immutable, but as part of a broader symbolic narrative.
• 11:50
  Speaker 1: In terms of rabbinic chronology, based on texts such as
• 11:54
  Speaker 1: the Talmud and the Seder olam Rabba, the Second Temple
• 11:58
  Speaker 1: of Jerusalem is described as having stood for four hundred
• 12:01
  Speaker 1: twenty years. This calculation is of great importance within the
• 12:05
  Speaker 1: Jewish narrative, as it directly links the history of the
• 12:08
  Speaker 1: temple to the identity of the Jewish people and their
• 12:11
  Speaker 1: relationship with God. The four hundred twenty year period is
• 12:16
  Speaker 1: divided into several dynastic phases and periods of foreign domination,
• 12:21
  Speaker 1: each with its own implications for the political and religious
• 12:24
  Speaker 1: history of Israel. Let us examine these divisions in greater detail.
• 12:28
  Speaker 1: Herodian Dynasty one hundred three years from thirty five BC
• 12:33
  Speaker 1: to AD sixty eight. This period corresponds to the peak
• 12:38
  Speaker 1: and decline of the Second Temple, coinciding with the administration
• 12:42
  Speaker 1: of Herod the Great, who expanded the Temple and promoted
• 12:45
  Speaker 1: the height of Jewish life under Roman control. However, this
• 12:50
  Speaker 1: era also marked the beginning of decline and ultimately the
• 12:53
  Speaker 1: siege and destruction of the Temple by the Romans. In
• 12:56
  Speaker 1: a d seventy Hasmani and Dynasty one hundred three years
• 13:02
  Speaker 1: from one hundred thirty eight to thirty five BC. The
• 13:06
  Speaker 1: Hasmanian dynasty was established after the Macabean revolt against Hellenistic rule.
• 13:11
  Speaker 1: During this period, the Jews achieved a degree of independence,
• 13:15
  Speaker 1: but as the dynasty aged, Israel gradually lost its autonomy
• 13:19
  Speaker 1: due to the growing power of Rome. Seleucid Empire one
• 13:23
  Speaker 1: hundred eighty years from three hundred eighteen to one hundred
• 13:26
  Speaker 1: thirty eight b C, the territory of Israel came under
• 13:30
  Speaker 1: the control of the Seleucid Empire, one of the successor
• 13:33
  Speaker 1: states that emerged after the division of Alexander the Great's Empire.
• 13:37
  Speaker 1: This period was marked by intense cultural and religious conflicts,
• 13:41
  Speaker 1: such as the Macabean Revolt, which had a profound impact
• 13:44
  Speaker 1: on Jewish identity and led to the rededication of the
• 13:47
  Speaker 1: Temple and the relative independence of the Hasmanians, a Chemenid
• 13:52
  Speaker 1: empire thirty four years from three hundred fifty two to
• 13:56
  Speaker 1: three hundred eighteen BC. This was the final period of
• 14:00
  Speaker 1: Persian rule over Israel, during which the Second Temple was
• 14:03
  Speaker 1: already functioning, although brief Persian influence on the administrative and
• 14:08
  Speaker 1: religious organisation of Judah was significant, and the rebuilding of
• 14:13
  Speaker 1: the Temple was encouraged and supported by the Persians. These
• 14:17
  Speaker 1: divisions offer a detailed view of the various historical periods
• 14:21
  Speaker 1: associated with the Second Temple, providing not only a timeline
• 14:26
  Speaker 1: but also insight into how dynastic changes and foreign powers
• 14:30
  Speaker 1: shaped Israel's identity over time. Although rabbinic traditions tend to
• 14:35
  Speaker 1: simplify certain aspects, the complexity and nuance of ancient Jewish
• 14:40
  Speaker 1: history remain a fertile field for debate and investigation, especially
• 14:44
  Speaker 1: when attempting to reconcile theological narratives with historical and archaeological findings.
• 14:50
  Speaker 1: By disregarding the years prior to the effective beginning of
• 14:53
  Speaker 1: the construction of the Second Temple, Rabbinic chronology establishes three
• 14:58
  Speaker 1: hundred eighteen BC as the date of the Persian conquest
• 15:02
  Speaker 1: by the Greeks, indicating that Hellenistic rule began six years
• 15:06
  Speaker 1: before the so called Seleucid era officially inaugurated in three
• 15:11
  Speaker 1: hundred twelve slash three hundred eleven b C. This chronological choice, however,
• 15:17
  Speaker 1: stands in direct contrast to the widely accepted academic chronology,
• 15:21
  Speaker 1: which places Alexander the Great's military campaigns in the region
• 15:25
  Speaker 1: between three hundred thirty four and three hundred thirty b C,
• 15:29
  Speaker 1: based on Greek and Babylonian historical records and consistent archaeological evidence.
• 15:35
  Speaker 1: This initial discrepancy already reveals how the two systems operate
• 15:39
  Speaker 1: from fundamentally different assumptions when organizing history. The construction of
• 15:44
  Speaker 1: the Second Temple is also framed in Rabbinic tradition within
• 15:48
  Speaker 1: a symbolic and theological interval of seventy years following the
• 15:52
  Speaker 1: destruction of the First Temple. Based on Second Chronicles thirty
• 15:56
  Speaker 1: six twenty one, it is understood that the second the
• 16:00
  Speaker 1: Temple was built in the seventy first year after the
• 16:03
  Speaker 1: Babylonian exile, placing its construction in three hundred fifty two BC.
• 16:09
  Speaker 1: This calculation implies that the destruction of the First Temple
• 16:12
  Speaker 1: occurred in four hundred twenty three b C, a date
• 16:15
  Speaker 1: supported by later Jewish texts such as Megelat Antiacus. Once again,
• 16:22
  Speaker 1: rabbinic logic prioritizes the internal coherence of scripture and interpretive tradition,
• 16:28
  Speaker 1: even when this creates tension with conventional historical chronology. The
• 16:33
  Speaker 1: four hundred twenty year duration attributed to the Second Temple
• 16:37
  Speaker 1: is closely tied to the rabbinic interpretation of the prophecy
• 16:42
  Speaker 1: of the seventy Weeks described in Daniel nine twenty four
• 16:46
  Speaker 1: to twenty seven. Within this framework, the total interval between
• 16:50
  Speaker 1: the destruction of the First and Second Temples corresponds to
• 16:53
  Speaker 1: four hundred ninety years seventy years of exile in Babylon,
• 16:58
  Speaker 1: followed by four hundred twenty years during which the Second
• 17:01
  Speaker 1: Temple stood. This chronological structure imbues history with strong theological meaning,
• 17:07
  Speaker 1: linking historical events to a broader prophetic plan. From an
• 17:11
  Speaker 1: academic perspective, however, this Biblical passage is interpreted in various ways,
• 17:17
  Speaker 1: many of which are not tied to a literal or
• 17:19
  Speaker 1: linear chronology. In summary, Rabbinic chronology presents a rich, coherent,
• 17:25
  Speaker 1: and deeply meaningful historical framework within Jewish tradition, while also
• 17:30
  Speaker 1: revealing clear differences when compared to modern academic reconstructions. These
• 17:35
  Speaker 1: divergences do not invalidate either approach, but rather highlight the
• 17:39
  Speaker 1: complexity of the historical legacy of the Second Temple period.
• 17:44
  Speaker 1: And when we carefully consider everything presented so far, taking
• 17:48
  Speaker 1: into account both traditional Jewish explanations and academic perspectives, it
• 17:53
  Speaker 1: becomes evident that there is indeed a significant discrepancy in
• 17:57
  Speaker 1: the current Jewish calendar, which states that the world is
• 18:00
  Speaker 1: approximately five thousand, seven hundred eighty six years old. When
• 18:04
  Speaker 1: we examine this issue more closely, certain problems become evident.
• 18:08
  Speaker 1: There are, in fact years that are not fully accounted
• 18:11
  Speaker 1: for within the traditional Jewish chronological system. Many people, including
• 18:16
  Speaker 1: those who regard the Jewish calendar as perfect, precise and
• 18:19
  Speaker 1: free of error, are completely unaware of the existence of
• 18:23
  Speaker 1: these so called lost years. This represents a cumulative gap
• 18:27
  Speaker 1: of approximately one hundred sixty five years, a detail that
• 18:31
  Speaker 1: often goes unnoticed by those who do not delve deeply
• 18:34
  Speaker 1: into chronological, historical, and comparative studies. Among scholars who construct
• 18:39
  Speaker 1: a chronology from Adam to the present day based on
• 18:42
  Speaker 1: the scriptures and Jewish traditions, it is common to assert
• 18:46
  Speaker 1: that the world is around six thousand years old since creation.
• 18:50
  Speaker 1: This calculation stems from a literal reading of the Biblical
• 18:53
  Speaker 1: genealogies and the Anno Mundi calendar. However, when we reflect
• 18:58
  Speaker 1: on the days of creation in life of Jewish tradition itself,
• 19:01
  Speaker 1: an alternative interpretation emerges, the possibility that the world may
• 19:06
  Speaker 1: be around twelve thousand years old. This view considers not
• 19:10
  Speaker 1: only the six days of creation, but also six subsequent
• 19:14
  Speaker 1: days extending to the present, understanding each day as an
• 19:18
  Speaker 1: expanded period of time. In this context, the interpretation that
• 19:23
  Speaker 1: for God, one day is like a thousand years becomes
• 19:26
  Speaker 1: especially relevant for many interpreters. This language should not be
• 19:31
  Speaker 1: read in a strictly literal sense, but symbolically serving as
• 19:35
  Speaker 1: a key to understanding the vastness of divine time in
• 19:38
  Speaker 1: contrast to human perception. This reading seeks to reconcile faith, theology,
• 19:44
  Speaker 1: and philosophical reflection on the origin of the world. On
• 19:48
  Speaker 1: the other hand, there are those who completely reject these
• 19:51
  Speaker 1: approaches and argue that the universe is millions or even
• 19:55
  Speaker 1: billions of years old, based on modern scientific models such
• 19:59
  Speaker 1: as cosm homology, geology, and the theory of evolution. This further
• 20:04
  Speaker 1: expands the debate, shifting the discussion into a complex arena
• 20:07
  Speaker 1: where science, religion, and interpretation intersect, a subject that certainly
• 20:12
  Speaker 1: deserves deeper analysis on another occasion. For now, however, the
• 20:16
  Speaker 1: reflection remains. Had you ever heard about the Lost years
• 20:20
  Speaker 1: in the Jewish calendar? Feel free to leave your comments, opinions,
• 20:24
  Speaker 1: and questions on this fascinating topic. May God bless you
• 20:28
  Speaker 1: all and see you soon.